US8818346B2 - Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming - Google Patents

Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8818346B2
US8818346B2 US11/888,265 US88826507A US8818346B2 US 8818346 B2 US8818346 B2 US 8818346B2 US 88826507 A US88826507 A US 88826507A US 8818346 B2 US8818346 B2 US 8818346B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
controller
function blocks
command
function
function block
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US11/888,265
Other versions
US20090037938A1 (en
Inventor
Brian S. Frank
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tridium Inc
Original Assignee
Tridium Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tridium Inc filed Critical Tridium Inc
Priority to US11/888,265 priority Critical patent/US8818346B2/en
Assigned to TRIDIUM INC. reassignment TRIDIUM INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FRANK, BRIAN S.
Publication of US20090037938A1 publication Critical patent/US20090037938A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8818346B2 publication Critical patent/US8818346B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/60Software deployment
    • G06F8/65Updates
    • G06F8/656Updates while running

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the inventive subject matter relate generally to control engines in automation systems and more particularly to a programmable control engine on a wireless device.
  • Automation systems such as building automation, industrial automation and home automation systems typically are distributed systems in which many different intelligent components contribute to the operation of the system.
  • an automation system is unique to a job site or building, and the controllers that receive data from temperature sensors, operate switches, or manage other devices in an automation system must be programmed for a specific environment or building site.
  • the job of programming a controller has required skilled software engineers having knowledge of the programming languages and operating environments supported by the controllers being programmed.
  • the job of determining what the controllers are to be programmed to do has typically been performed by a domain expert, that is, a person with knowledge of the requirements and goals of a particular automation system.
  • the domain expert typically knows the requirements of the system and communicates these requirements to the software engineers who program the controllers of a building automation system to meet the requirements.
  • conventional automation development environments require the skills and expertise of both a software engineer and a domain expert.
  • conventional systems may require the skills of both a software engineer and a domain expert when changes may be desired in the operation of an existing automation system.
  • the domain expert determines what changes may be needed and communicates the required changes in behavior of the system to the software engineers, who may then change existing controller software to meet the changed requirements.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an operating environment in which example embodiments of the invention may be practiced.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of a controller according to embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating software components of a controller according to embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example arrangement of function blocks.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for programming a controller according to embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an operating environment 100 in which example embodiments of the invention may be practiced.
  • Environment 100 may include controllers 102 , function block programming tool 108 and application server 110 . These components may be communicably coupled using one or more networks 112 and 114 .
  • Controllers 102 include hardware and software that operate to control devices 104 and that may also report data on operating conditions, alarms, or other data regarding devices 104 .
  • Devices 104 may be any of a variety of devices used in an automation system, including sensors, switches, actuators and other such devices. Further details on the hardware and software for controllers 102 are provided below with reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 .
  • Function block programming tool 108 provides an interface for specifying function blocks that may be used to program a controller 102 . Further details on function blocks and function block programming tool 108 are provided below with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4 .
  • application server 110 provides one or more applications and/or stores data for an automation system.
  • Application server may provide for the provisioning of controllers on a system and may provide a database to store data related to the controllers for an automation system. Further, application server 110 may serve as an archive or repository for log and alarm data.
  • a controller may be a high level controller 106 .
  • a high level controller 106 may have more processor and/or memory resources to enable the controller to run an automation system framework or to run applications that are not desirable to run in a standard controller 102 .
  • the automation system framework may provide some or all of the functionality available on an application server 110 , and/or may provide a function block programming tool 108 .
  • Networks 112 and 114 may be used to couple the function block programming tool 108 , application server 110 and controllers 102 and 106 .
  • network 112 is a wireless network, and the controllers and other nodes on the network may be organized as a mesh network.
  • a mesh network is desirable, because mesh networks are typically self-healing in that the network can still operate even when a node breaks down or a connection goes bad. As a result, a very reliable network is formed.
  • other network topologies such as star or cluster tree topologies are possible and within the scope of the inventive subject matter.
  • network 114 may be a local area network such as an Ethernet based network, a Modbus network, or an oBIX (Open Building Information Exchange) based network.
  • Ethernet based network such as an Ethernet based network, a Modbus network, or an oBIX (Open Building Information Exchange) based network.
  • oBIX Open Building Information Exchange
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram providing further details and illustrating components of a controller 102 according to embodiments of the invention.
  • a controller 102 includes one or more processors 202 , a memory 208 a device interface 216 , and a network interface 206 .
  • Processor 202 may be any type of computational circuit such as, but not limited to, a microprocessor, a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, a digital signal processor (DSP), or any other type of processor, processing circuit, execution unit, or computational machine, the invention are not limited to any particular type of processor.
  • CISC complex instruction set computing
  • RISC reduced instruction set computing
  • VLIW very long instruction word
  • DSP digital signal processor
  • Device interface 216 provides an interface to one or more devices 104 .
  • device interface 104 may be a LonMark® fieldbus interface to LonMark devices.
  • device interface 104 may be a BACnet interface to a BACnet device.
  • Other interfaces to other types of devices are possible and within the scope of the inventive subject matter.
  • Network interface 206 provides an interface to network 104 .
  • Network interface 206 may be a wireless transceiver.
  • network interface 206 is a low power wireless network interface 206 and supports the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.15.4 network standard.
  • IEEE 802.15.4 standard is designed to provide a low data rate communications with multi-month to multi-year battery life and very low complexity.
  • the IEEE 802.15.4 implementation is intended to operate in an unlicensed, international frequency band.
  • Implementation of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard in a controller 102 provides for data rates sufficient for communication of automation system data while providing relatively long battery life.
  • the standard provides a CSMA-CA (carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance) communication protocol, and additionally provides a guaranteed time slot mechanism for high priority communications.
  • CSMA-CA carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance
  • Memory 208 stores data and programs executed by processor 202 . Although shown as one unit in FIG. 2 , memory 208 may include several types of memory including various combinations of RAM, ROM or Flash memory. In some embodiments, memory 208 is used to store a control engine 214 , a control application 212 and a network stack 210 .
  • Control engine 214 provides software that determines which control applications resident on a controller are executed and provides an interface for customizing the control applications 212 that run on the controller.
  • the control engine software 214 may be created by a software engineer or programmer, and remains relatively static over the life of a controller and may also remain fairly static from one controller to another in the same family.
  • a controller 102 does not require an operating system and control engine 214 may be designed to include those functions normally provided by an operating system that may be required on a controller 102 .
  • Control application 212 runs on a controller 102 and provides the customized software required for a particular automation system. Further details on a control engine 214 and control application 212 are provided below with reference to FIG. 3 .
  • Network stack 210 provides software layers that provide an interface between the software of the control engine 214 and control application 212 , and network interface 206 .
  • the network stack includes a physical layer that conforms to the IEEE 802.15.4 standard.
  • the network layer may conform to the Internet Protocol (IP) V4 or V6 standards. Use of the IPV6 standard may be desirable if support for a large number of nodes in an automation system is necessary.
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • network stack 206 includes layers that conform to the ZigBee® network stack as defined by the ZigBee Alliance.
  • the ZigBee network stack uses the MAC (Media Access and Control) and Physical layers of the 802.15.4 protocol, and provides network, security, and application framework layers that may be used to send and receive network data.
  • ZigBee compliant network stacks may be used to handle multiple traffic types, including periodic data such as data from a sensor, intermittent data such as data from a switch, and repetitive low latency data such as alarm or security related data. Further details on the ZigBee stack may be found in “ZigBee Specification” (document 053474r13), published December, 2006 by the ZigBee Alliance, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram providing further details of software components for a controller and automation system according to embodiments of the invention.
  • control engine 214 maintains a library of function blocks 304 .
  • a function block 304 is a unit of execution for a control application 212 .
  • Function blocks may be instantiated and linked in a manner such that the output of one function block provides input to another function block.
  • Individual function blocks may perform activities such as provide sensor data to another function block, provide a set point for a device, provide execution control structures such as loops, or cause a device such as an actuator or switch to operate.
  • Function blocks may be defined in any of a number of programming languages.
  • function blocks may be defined using the Java programming language, the C, C++ or C# programming language.
  • function blocks and other control engine software are written in the Sedona programming language available from Tridium, Inc. of Richmond, Va. However, the embodiments are not limited to any particular programming language.
  • Function blocks are one component of the control engine software.
  • a function block component includes:
  • Slots are the members of a component class which specify how the function block is exposed to a domain expert during the assembly process. There are two types of slots: properties define configuration properties or runtime variables for the function block and actions that define a command which can be invoked for the function block.
  • kits for deployment to controllers.
  • a kit is a unit of deployment, versioning, and naming in some embodiments.
  • a kit is similar to a Java JAR file or a .NET DLL.
  • kits may be stored as a single file which ends with the “.kit” extension.
  • the file itself is a compressed file (for example, a PKZIP formatted file).
  • the kit file may include an XML manifest file which specifies meta-data about the kit such as its name, version, vendor, and description.
  • the manifest also may enumerate a kit's component types, including function blocks that are available for application assembly.
  • Kits may compiled using a compiler. During the compilation all the classes forming function blocks and components in the kit are checked for validity, and may be compiled into a special format called IR for “intermediate representation”.
  • the IR format is a text based “assembly language”. IR code is portable which means one kit file can be deployed for multiple platforms and architectures.
  • the IR code of one or more kits may be further compiled into a single file referred to as a binary image file.
  • the code in a binary image file is a compact, binary representation of the code which is designed to be loaded and executed on the control engine for a controller.
  • the control engine includes a virtual machine (VM) to interpret and execute the code in a binary image file.
  • VM virtual machine
  • a function block After a function block has been designed and deployed, it is available for use developing automation and control systems. For example, a function block may be used by a domain expert to build applications for a controller as described below.
  • Function blocks may be coded such that they are intended for use with a particular device, such as function blocks that operate an actuator or read a particular type of sensor. Further, function blocks may be related to a particular domain, such as function blocks that perform calculations related to energy management. Thus in some embodiments, the function blocks are “pluggable”, that is, the function blocks required for a particular automation domain or a particular set of devices may be provided in a particular function block library, and the desired function block libraries may be loaded for a control engine 214 . When a function block is needed, it may be “plugged” into an existing application comprising function blocks, or a new application may be formed by “plugging” function blocks together such that the outputs of function blocks are “plugged” into the inputs of other function blocks.
  • function blocks are maintained in library 302 until control engine 214 receives a command to instantiate a function block or function blocks.
  • control engine 214 receives a command to instantiate a function block or function blocks.
  • three function blocks have been instantiated from library 302 to form a control application 212 .
  • a control application 212 may include fewer or more function blocks.
  • a function block programming tool 106 may be used to specify commands and actions related to function blocks that reside on a particular controller 102 .
  • function block programming tool 106 may be a standalone tool that includes the ability to specify actions related to function blocks, it may be included as part of a workbench of tools, or it may be included on a high level controller in an automation system.
  • Function block programming tool 106 provides an interface to select function blocks and identify actions related to function blocks on a controller 102 .
  • the interface may be a graphical user interface, however other interfaces may be provided, including text based interfaces.
  • the actions that may be specified for function blocks include, but are not limited to:
  • function block programming tool 106 communicates over a network with a control engine using an application protocol 306 .
  • Application protocol 306 includes request and response messages that provide the data necessary to implement the actions listed above.
  • the application protocol is referred to as the SOX protocol.
  • An example of the data structures included in data packets for the SOX protocol is provided in Appendix A of this specification.
  • the SOX protocol may be implemented above the network layers of a low power wireless network such as an IEEE 802.15.4 network.
  • the SOX protocol may be implemented as an application layer protocol in a ZigBee network stack.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example arrangement 400 of function blocks.
  • four function blocks 402 - 408 are connected via links 410 to define an example application for a control engine.
  • Function block 402 is a temperature sensor function block.
  • Function block 402 receives data from a temperature sensor (for example, through device interface 216 ) and passes the data to loop function block 406 .
  • Function block 404 is a “Set Point” function block.
  • Function block 404 provides data regarding a set point for the system.
  • the set point in this example may define a temperature value threshold for use by other function blocks such as loop function block 406 .
  • the set point value for a set point function block may be static, that is constant, or it may be dynamically modifiable by a user interface associated with the set point function block.
  • Loop function block 406 may be defined a loop that repeatedly reads input values received from temperature sensor function block 402 and set point function block 404 and determines if the temperature value received from temperature sensor function block 402 crosses the threshold value defined by the set point function block 404 . If the temperature value does cross the set point value, then loop function block 406 may provide an output value to action function block 408 . Otherwise, loop function block 406 may return to the “top” of the loop to reread the set point and temperature values from function blocks 402 and 404 .
  • Action function block 408 upon receipt of the appropriate data from loop function block 406 may send a command to a switch device or actuator device to cause the device to perform an action.
  • action block 408 may cause a heating or cooling system to activate.
  • the data structures illustrated in Appendix A may be used to define an application for execution on a controller.
  • the “app” data structure includes fields that specify a number of components (e.g. function blocks) and an array of components that form an application, and an array of links that may be used to link the components of an application.
  • an “appComp” data structure has fields that define certain properties for a function block component of an application.
  • the “appComp” data structure includes a numeric identifier for a function block component, however the function block component may also include a name field.
  • a “link” data structure may be used to define the links 410 between function block components.
  • the “link” data structure includes fields that identify a “from” component identifier and a “to” component identifier that defines the direction of data flow.
  • the “link” data structure also includes fields that identify slots within the “from” and “to” components that respectively provide data and receive data.
  • the data structures described above and others may be used in application layer messages (e.g. SOX messages) that are transmitted from a function block programming tool to a controller.
  • application layer messages e.g. SOX messages
  • FIG. 4 is but one possible arrangement of function blocks, and that many different types of function blocks may exist and may be configured into many possible combinations to form applications that are executed on a controller.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method 500 for programming a controller according to embodiments of the invention. The execution of various aspects of the methods described below may be distributed through some or all of the elements of the automation system described above.
  • Machine-readable media includes any mechanism that provides (e.g., stores and/or transmits) information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a wagering game machine, computer, etc.).
  • tangible machine-readable media includes read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, flash memory machines, etc.
  • Machine-readable media also includes any media suitable for transmitting software over a network.
  • method 500 begins at block 502 by presenting an interface to select one or more function blocks.
  • the interface may be presented, for example, by a function block programming tool 106 .
  • the interface may be a graphical user interface allowing a user to view and manipulate graphical objects (icons, menus etc.) that represent the function blocks of an application for a controller.
  • the interface may be a text based interface.
  • a system executing the method receives a selection of one or more function blocks and determines a command to be performed in relation to the one or more function blocks.
  • the command may be to add a function block to an application, remove a function block, link one function block to another, or unlink a function block from another function block.
  • the command may be explicitly provided through the interface or the command may be inferred from the user's actions. For example, dragging a function block from a library of available function blocks to a window representing the current application may be used to infer an “add” command.
  • identifiers associated with the one or more function blocks selected at block 504 are transmitted through a network from a system executing the function block editor to a controller, along with one or more commands to be applied to the function blocks by the controller.
  • the identifiers may be used to identify function blocks in a function block library maintained on the controller.
  • the function block identifiers and commands may be transmitted through a wired or wireless network.
  • the ZigBee wireless protocol stack is used as part of a wireless transmission.
  • the controller receives the function block identifier(s) and command(s) through the wired or wireless network.
  • the controller interprets the command(s) received over the network and at block 510 performs or applies the command(s) to the one or more function blocks associated with the function block identifiers received over the network.
  • the controller continues the execution of the application as potentially modified by the command(s) and/or function block(s) received at block 508 . It should be noted that in some embodiments, in continuing the execution of the application, neither the controller nor the application need be restarted, and execution of the application continues. This may be accomplished by having the control engine coordinate the modification of an application's function blocks with the interpretation of the function blocks of the application.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Systems and methods provide for programming a wireless device for an automation system. The system and methods include specifying commands that are to be preformed regarding function blocks that may be organized into an application on a wireless device. The function blocks may be maintained in a library by a control engine on the wireless device. The control engine receives commands related to function blocks, such as instantiating function blocks from the library or linking existing function blocks. The control application formed by the function blocks may be executed on the controller to provide an automation application.

Description

FIELD
Embodiments of the inventive subject matter relate generally to control engines in automation systems and more particularly to a programmable control engine on a wireless device.
BACKGROUND
Automation systems such as building automation, industrial automation and home automation systems typically are distributed systems in which many different intelligent components contribute to the operation of the system. In most cases, an automation system is unique to a job site or building, and the controllers that receive data from temperature sensors, operate switches, or manage other devices in an automation system must be programmed for a specific environment or building site.
In conventional systems, the job of programming a controller has required skilled software engineers having knowledge of the programming languages and operating environments supported by the controllers being programmed. The job of determining what the controllers are to be programmed to do has typically been performed by a domain expert, that is, a person with knowledge of the requirements and goals of a particular automation system. The domain expert typically knows the requirements of the system and communicates these requirements to the software engineers who program the controllers of a building automation system to meet the requirements. Thus in order to build a new automation system, conventional automation development environments require the skills and expertise of both a software engineer and a domain expert.
Further, conventional systems may require the skills of both a software engineer and a domain expert when changes may be desired in the operation of an existing automation system. The domain expert determines what changes may be needed and communicates the required changes in behavior of the system to the software engineers, who may then change existing controller software to meet the changed requirements.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the Figures of the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an operating environment in which example embodiments of the invention may be practiced.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of a controller according to embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating software components of a controller according to embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 4 shows an example arrangement of function blocks.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for programming a controller according to embodiments of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS Example Operating Environment
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an operating environment 100 in which example embodiments of the invention may be practiced. Environment 100 may include controllers 102, function block programming tool 108 and application server 110. These components may be communicably coupled using one or more networks 112 and 114.
Controllers 102 include hardware and software that operate to control devices 104 and that may also report data on operating conditions, alarms, or other data regarding devices 104. Devices 104 may be any of a variety of devices used in an automation system, including sensors, switches, actuators and other such devices. Further details on the hardware and software for controllers 102 are provided below with reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3.
Function block programming tool 108 provides an interface for specifying function blocks that may be used to program a controller 102. Further details on function blocks and function block programming tool 108 are provided below with reference to FIGS. 3 and 4.
In some embodiments, application server 110 provides one or more applications and/or stores data for an automation system. Application server may provide for the provisioning of controllers on a system and may provide a database to store data related to the controllers for an automation system. Further, application server 110 may serve as an archive or repository for log and alarm data.
In some embodiments, a controller may be a high level controller 106. In general, a high level controller 106 may have more processor and/or memory resources to enable the controller to run an automation system framework or to run applications that are not desirable to run in a standard controller 102. In some embodiments, the automation system framework may provide some or all of the functionality available on an application server 110, and/or may provide a function block programming tool 108.
Networks 112 and 114 may be used to couple the function block programming tool 108, application server 110 and controllers 102 and 106. In some embodiments, network 112 is a wireless network, and the controllers and other nodes on the network may be organized as a mesh network. A mesh network is desirable, because mesh networks are typically self-healing in that the network can still operate even when a node breaks down or a connection goes bad. As a result, a very reliable network is formed. However, other network topologies such as star or cluster tree topologies are possible and within the scope of the inventive subject matter.
In some embodiments, network 114 may be a local area network such as an Ethernet based network, a Modbus network, or an oBIX (Open Building Information Exchange) based network.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram providing further details and illustrating components of a controller 102 according to embodiments of the invention. In some embodiments, a controller 102 includes one or more processors 202, a memory 208 a device interface 216, and a network interface 206. Processor 202 may be any type of computational circuit such as, but not limited to, a microprocessor, a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, a digital signal processor (DSP), or any other type of processor, processing circuit, execution unit, or computational machine, the invention are not limited to any particular type of processor. Although only one processor 202 is shown, multiple processors may be present in a controller 102.
Device interface 216 provides an interface to one or more devices 104. In some embodiments, device interface 104 may be a LonMark® fieldbus interface to LonMark devices. Alternatively, device interface 104 may be a BACnet interface to a BACnet device. Other interfaces to other types of devices are possible and within the scope of the inventive subject matter.
Network interface 206 provides an interface to network 104. Network interface 206 may be a wireless transceiver. In some embodiments, network interface 206 is a low power wireless network interface 206 and supports the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.15.4 network standard. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard is designed to provide a low data rate communications with multi-month to multi-year battery life and very low complexity. The IEEE 802.15.4 implementation is intended to operate in an unlicensed, international frequency band. Implementation of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard in a controller 102 provides for data rates sufficient for communication of automation system data while providing relatively long battery life. In general, the standard provides a CSMA-CA (carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance) communication protocol, and additionally provides a guaranteed time slot mechanism for high priority communications.
Memory 208 stores data and programs executed by processor 202. Although shown as one unit in FIG. 2, memory 208 may include several types of memory including various combinations of RAM, ROM or Flash memory. In some embodiments, memory 208 is used to store a control engine 214, a control application 212 and a network stack 210. Control engine 214 provides software that determines which control applications resident on a controller are executed and provides an interface for customizing the control applications 212 that run on the controller. In general, the control engine software 214 may be created by a software engineer or programmer, and remains relatively static over the life of a controller and may also remain fairly static from one controller to another in the same family. In some embodiments, a controller 102 does not require an operating system and control engine 214 may be designed to include those functions normally provided by an operating system that may be required on a controller 102.
Control application 212 runs on a controller 102 and provides the customized software required for a particular automation system. Further details on a control engine 214 and control application 212 are provided below with reference to FIG. 3.
Network stack 210 provides software layers that provide an interface between the software of the control engine 214 and control application 212, and network interface 206. In some embodiments the network stack includes a physical layer that conforms to the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. The network layer may conform to the Internet Protocol (IP) V4 or V6 standards. Use of the IPV6 standard may be desirable if support for a large number of nodes in an automation system is necessary.
In some embodiments network stack 206 includes layers that conform to the ZigBee® network stack as defined by the ZigBee Alliance. The ZigBee network stack uses the MAC (Media Access and Control) and Physical layers of the 802.15.4 protocol, and provides network, security, and application framework layers that may be used to send and receive network data. ZigBee compliant network stacks may be used to handle multiple traffic types, including periodic data such as data from a sensor, intermittent data such as data from a switch, and repetitive low latency data such as alarm or security related data. Further details on the ZigBee stack may be found in “ZigBee Specification” (document 053474r13), published December, 2006 by the ZigBee Alliance, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram providing further details of software components for a controller and automation system according to embodiments of the invention. In some embodiments, control engine 214 maintains a library of function blocks 304. A function block 304 is a unit of execution for a control application 212. Function blocks may be instantiated and linked in a manner such that the output of one function block provides input to another function block. Individual function blocks may perform activities such as provide sensor data to another function block, provide a set point for a device, provide execution control structures such as loops, or cause a device such as an actuator or switch to operate.
Function blocks may be defined in any of a number of programming languages. For example, function blocks may be defined using the Java programming language, the C, C++ or C# programming language. In particular embodiments, function blocks and other control engine software are written in the Sedona programming language available from Tridium, Inc. of Richmond, Va. However, the embodiments are not limited to any particular programming language.
Function blocks are one component of the control engine software. In some embodiments, a function block component includes:
    • An identifier for identification and naming inside an application
    • A short ASCII character name as a human label
    • Reflective type
    • Named set of reflective slots
Slots are the members of a component class which specify how the function block is exposed to a domain expert during the assembly process. There are two types of slots: properties define configuration properties or runtime variables for the function block and actions that define a command which can be invoked for the function block.
The function blocks and other components of a control engine may be assembled into kits for deployment to controllers. A kit is a unit of deployment, versioning, and naming in some embodiments. A kit is similar to a Java JAR file or a .NET DLL.
A kit may be stored as a single file which ends with the “.kit” extension. In some embodiments, the file itself is a compressed file (for example, a PKZIP formatted file). The kit file may include an XML manifest file which specifies meta-data about the kit such as its name, version, vendor, and description. The manifest also may enumerate a kit's component types, including function blocks that are available for application assembly.
Kits may compiled using a compiler. During the compilation all the classes forming function blocks and components in the kit are checked for validity, and may be compiled into a special format called IR for “intermediate representation”. The IR format is a text based “assembly language”. IR code is portable which means one kit file can be deployed for multiple platforms and architectures.
The IR code of one or more kits may be further compiled into a single file referred to as a binary image file. The code in a binary image file is a compact, binary representation of the code which is designed to be loaded and executed on the control engine for a controller. In some embodiments, the control engine includes a virtual machine (VM) to interpret and execute the code in a binary image file.
After a function block has been designed and deployed, it is available for use developing automation and control systems. For example, a function block may be used by a domain expert to build applications for a controller as described below.
Function blocks may be coded such that they are intended for use with a particular device, such as function blocks that operate an actuator or read a particular type of sensor. Further, function blocks may be related to a particular domain, such as function blocks that perform calculations related to energy management. Thus in some embodiments, the function blocks are “pluggable”, that is, the function blocks required for a particular automation domain or a particular set of devices may be provided in a particular function block library, and the desired function block libraries may be loaded for a control engine 214. When a function block is needed, it may be “plugged” into an existing application comprising function blocks, or a new application may be formed by “plugging” function blocks together such that the outputs of function blocks are “plugged” into the inputs of other function blocks.
In some embodiments, function blocks are maintained in library 302 until control engine 214 receives a command to instantiate a function block or function blocks. In the example illustrated in FIG. 3, three function blocks have been instantiated from library 302 to form a control application 212. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that a control application 212 may include fewer or more function blocks.
In some embodiments, a function block programming tool 106 may be used to specify commands and actions related to function blocks that reside on a particular controller 102. As noted above, function block programming tool 106 may be a standalone tool that includes the ability to specify actions related to function blocks, it may be included as part of a workbench of tools, or it may be included on a high level controller in an automation system. Function block programming tool 106 provides an interface to select function blocks and identify actions related to function blocks on a controller 102. In some embodiments, the interface may be a graphical user interface, however other interfaces may be provided, including text based interfaces. In some embodiments, the actions that may be specified for function blocks include, but are not limited to:
    • Add a function block to an application (e.g. instantiate a function block from a library)
    • Delete (remove) a function block from an application
    • Rename a function block
    • Add a link from one function block to another function block
    • Remove an existing link between two function blocks
    • Events—Specify function blocks to handle one or more event types that may be generated within a system or a device
In some embodiments, function block programming tool 106 communicates over a network with a control engine using an application protocol 306. Application protocol 306 includes request and response messages that provide the data necessary to implement the actions listed above. In particular embodiments, the application protocol is referred to as the SOX protocol. An example of the data structures included in data packets for the SOX protocol is provided in Appendix A of this specification. In some embodiments, the SOX protocol may be implemented above the network layers of a low power wireless network such as an IEEE 802.15.4 network. In alternative embodiments, the SOX protocol may be implemented as an application layer protocol in a ZigBee network stack.
FIG. 4 shows an example arrangement 400 of function blocks. In the example illustrated, four function blocks 402-408 are connected via links 410 to define an example application for a control engine. Function block 402 is a temperature sensor function block. Function block 402 receives data from a temperature sensor (for example, through device interface 216) and passes the data to loop function block 406.
Function block 404 is a “Set Point” function block. Function block 404 provides data regarding a set point for the system. The set point in this example may define a temperature value threshold for use by other function blocks such as loop function block 406. The set point value for a set point function block may be static, that is constant, or it may be dynamically modifiable by a user interface associated with the set point function block.
Loop function block 406 may be defined a loop that repeatedly reads input values received from temperature sensor function block 402 and set point function block 404 and determines if the temperature value received from temperature sensor function block 402 crosses the threshold value defined by the set point function block 404. If the temperature value does cross the set point value, then loop function block 406 may provide an output value to action function block 408. Otherwise, loop function block 406 may return to the “top” of the loop to reread the set point and temperature values from function blocks 402 and 404.
Action function block 408, upon receipt of the appropriate data from loop function block 406 may send a command to a switch device or actuator device to cause the device to perform an action. For example, action block 408 may cause a heating or cooling system to activate.
In some embodiments, the data structures illustrated in Appendix A may be used to define an application for execution on a controller. For example, the “app” data structure includes fields that specify a number of components (e.g. function blocks) and an array of components that form an application, and an array of links that may be used to link the components of an application. In these embodiments, an “appComp” data structure has fields that define certain properties for a function block component of an application. The “appComp” data structure includes a numeric identifier for a function block component, however the function block component may also include a name field.
A “link” data structure may be used to define the links 410 between function block components. The “link” data structure includes fields that identify a “from” component identifier and a “to” component identifier that defines the direction of data flow. The “link” data structure also includes fields that identify slots within the “from” and “to” components that respectively provide data and receive data.
The data structures described above and others may be used in application layer messages (e.g. SOX messages) that are transmitted from a function block programming tool to a controller.
It should be noted that the example provided in FIG. 4 is but one possible arrangement of function blocks, and that many different types of function blocks may exist and may be configured into many possible combinations to form applications that are executed on a controller.
Example Operation
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method 500 for programming a controller according to embodiments of the invention. The execution of various aspects of the methods described below may be distributed through some or all of the elements of the automation system described above.
Some or all of the methods described below may be executed from a machine-readable medium. Machine-readable media includes any mechanism that provides (e.g., stores and/or transmits) information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a wagering game machine, computer, etc.). For example, tangible machine-readable media includes read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, flash memory machines, etc. Machine-readable media also includes any media suitable for transmitting software over a network.
In some embodiments, method 500 begins at block 502 by presenting an interface to select one or more function blocks. The interface may be presented, for example, by a function block programming tool 106. In some embodiments, the interface may be a graphical user interface allowing a user to view and manipulate graphical objects (icons, menus etc.) that represent the function blocks of an application for a controller. Alternatively, the interface may be a text based interface.
At block 504, a system executing the method receives a selection of one or more function blocks and determines a command to be performed in relation to the one or more function blocks. As noted above, the command may be to add a function block to an application, remove a function block, link one function block to another, or unlink a function block from another function block. The command may be explicitly provided through the interface or the command may be inferred from the user's actions. For example, dragging a function block from a library of available function blocks to a window representing the current application may be used to infer an “add” command.
At block 506, identifiers associated with the one or more function blocks selected at block 504 are transmitted through a network from a system executing the function block editor to a controller, along with one or more commands to be applied to the function blocks by the controller. The identifiers may be used to identify function blocks in a function block library maintained on the controller. The function block identifiers and commands may be transmitted through a wired or wireless network. In some embodiments, the ZigBee wireless protocol stack is used as part of a wireless transmission.
At block 508, the controller receives the function block identifier(s) and command(s) through the wired or wireless network. The controller interprets the command(s) received over the network and at block 510 performs or applies the command(s) to the one or more function blocks associated with the function block identifiers received over the network.
At block 512, after performing or applying the commands, the controller continues the execution of the application as potentially modified by the command(s) and/or function block(s) received at block 508. It should be noted that in some embodiments, in continuing the execution of the application, neither the controller nor the application need be restarted, and execution of the application continues. This may be accomplished by having the control engine coordinate the modification of an application's function blocks with the interpretation of the function blocks of the application.
General
In this detailed description, reference is made to specific examples by way of drawings and illustrations. These examples are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the inventive subject matter, and serve to illustrate how the inventive subject matter can be applied to various purposes or embodiments. Other embodiments are included within the inventive subject matter, as logical, mechanical, electrical, and other changes can be made to the example embodiments described herein. Features or limitations of various embodiments described herein, however essential to the example embodiments in which they are incorporated, do not limit the inventive subject matter as a whole, and any reference to the invention, its elements, operation, and application are not limiting as a whole, but serve only to define these example embodiments. This detailed description does not, therefore, limit embodiments of the invention, which are defined only by the appended claims.
Each of the embodiments described herein are contemplated as falling within the inventive subject matter, which is set forth in the following claims.
The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. Section 1.72(b) requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to limit or interpret the scope of the claims. The claims provided below are hereby incorporated into the detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
APPENDIX A
meta
{
  str name
  u2 parentId
  u1 numChildren
  u2[ ] children
}
slot
{
  u1  flags
  str  name
  u1  type
}
link
{
  u2 fromCompId
  u1 fromSlotId
  u2 toCompId
  u1 toSlotId
}
links
{
  link[ ] links
  u2 0xffff end marker
}
val
{
  bool | u1 | u2 | s4 | s8 | f4 | f8
}
***********************************************************
* App
***********************************************************
app
{
  u4 magic 0x73617070 “sapp”
  u4 version 0x0001 0.1
  u2 numComponents
  appComp[ ] comps
  u2 numLinks
  link[ ] links
}
appComp
{
  u2 id
  u2 type
  meta meta
  val[ ] configProps
  u1 ‘;’ end marker
}
***********************************************************
* Read
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘r’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 compId
  u1 propId
}
res
{
  u1  ‘R’
  u2  replyNum
  u2  compId
  u1  propId
  u1  any code (‘X’ for error)
  var  propValue
}
***********************************************************
* Hello
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘h’
  str  username
  str  password
}
res - rejection
{
  u1 ‘H’
  u1  ‘R’
  str  reason // “auth”, “busy”
}
res - welcome
{
  u1  ‘H’
  u1  ‘W’
  u1  sessionId
  str  appName
}
***********************************************************
* Bye-Bye
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘b’
  u1 sessionId
}
res
{
  u1 ‘B’
}
***********************************************************
* Read Type
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘t’
  u1  sessionId
  u2  replyNum
  u2  typeId
}
res
{
  u1 ‘T’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 baseTypeId
  str name
  u1 slotCount
  slot[ ] slots
}
***********************************************************
* Read Component Meta-data
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1  ‘m’
  u1  sessionId
  u2  replyNum
  u2  componentId
}
res
{
  u1 ‘M’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
  u2 type
  meta meta
}
***********************************************************
* Subscribe
***********************************************************
req
{
 u1 ‘s’
 u1 sessionId
 u2 replyNum
 u2 componentId
}
res
{
  u1 ‘S’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
  meta meta
  val[ ] allProps
  links links
}
***********************************************************
* Unsubscribe
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘u’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
}
res
{
  u1 ‘U’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
}
***********************************************************
* Post
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘p’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
  u1 slotId
  val argument
}
res
{
  u1 ‘P’
  u2 replyNum
}
***********************************************************
* Add
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘a’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
  u2 parentId
  u2 typeId
  str name
  val[ ] configProps
}
res
{
  u1 ‘A’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 compId
}
***********************************************************
* Rename
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1 ‘n’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
  u2 compId
  str newName
}
res
{
  u1 ‘N’
  u2 replyNum
  u2 compId
}
***********************************************************
* Delete
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1  ‘d’
  u1  sessionId
  u2  replyNum
  u2  compId
}
res
{
  u1  ‘D’
  u2  replyNum
  u2  compId
}
***********************************************************
* Link/Unlink
***********************************************************
req
{
  u1  ‘l’
  u1  sessionId
  u2  replyNum
  u1  ‘a’ | ‘d’ (add/delete)
  link  link
}
res
{
  u1 ‘L’
  u2 replyNum
}
***********************************************************
* Event
***********************************************************
req - runtime event
{
  u1 ‘e’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
  u1 ‘r’ (runtime)
  val[ ] runtimeProps
}
req - config event
{
  u1 ‘e’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
  u2 componentId
  u1 ‘c’ (config)
  meta meta
  val[ ] configProps
  links links
}
res
{
  u1 ‘E’
  u1 sessionId
  u2 replyNum
}

Claims (30)

What is claimed is:
1. A controller apparatus comprising:
at least one processor and a memory;
a low power wireless network interface coupled to the at least one processor; and
a control engine executable by the at least one processor from the memory and operable to:
receive a command and one or more identifiers specifying one or more function blocks associated with the one or more identifiers, each of the one or more function blocks comprising a unit of execution of an application executing on the controller apparatus,
perform one or more operations on the one or more function blocks in accordance with the command and the one or more identifiers, and
coordinate the operations on the one or more function blocks and interpretation of the function blocks of the application such that execution of the control engine and the application continue without restarting the control engine and the application.
2. The controller apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a network stack for the wireless interface.
3. The controller apparatus of claim 2, wherein a physical layer of the network stack conforms to an IEEE 802.15.4 interface standard.
4. The controller apparatus of claim 2, wherein a network layer of the network stack conforms to an Internet Protocol Version 6 interface standard.
5. The controller apparatus of claim 2, wherein the network stack substantially conforming to a ZigBee interface standard.
6. The controller apparatus of claim 1, wherein the command is an add command and wherein the control engine instantiates one or more function blocks in the memory.
7. The controller apparatus of claim 6, wherein the control engine is operable to maintain a function block library and wherein the one or more function blocks are instantiated from the function block library.
8. The controller apparatus of claim 1, wherein the command is a link command and wherein the control engine causes an output of a first function block to be sent to an input of a second function block.
9. A method comprising:
presenting an interface allowing selection from a plurality of function block identifiers for a control system;
receiving through the interface a selection of one or more of the plurality of function block identifiers and a command;
transmitting the selection and the command through a low power wireless interface to a controller for the control system;
determining in accordance with the selection and the command an operation to perform on one or more function blocks on the controller, the one or more function blocks comprising a unit of execution;
specifying how the one or more function blocks are exposed to a domain expert during an assembly process via a slot, wherein the slot is a member of a component class, and wherein the slot comprises a configuration property, a runtime variable, or an action that defines a command that can be invoked for the one or more function blocks; and
coordinating the operation on the one or more function blocks and interpretation of function blocks of an application such that execution of the application formed by the one or more function blocks continues without restarting the application.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the command is an add command and wherein the command causes at least one function block to be instantiated on the controller.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the function block is instantiated from a function block library on the controller.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the command is a link command and wherein the command causes an output of a first function block on the controller to be sent to an input of a second function block on the controller.
13. A method comprising:
receiving by a controller a command and one or more identifiers specifying one or more function blocks associated with the one or more identifiers, each of the one or more function blocks comprising a unit of execution;
compiling the one or more function blocks into a kit comprising a single binary image file; and
performing one or more operations on one or more function blocks on the controller in accordance with the command and the one or more identifiers;
wherein the one or more function blocks are included in an application executing on the controller, wherein the controller coordinates the operations on the one or more function blocks and interpretation of function blocks of the application such that the application is not restarted after performing the one or more operations on the one or more function blocks.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the command is an add command and wherein performing one or more operations includes instantiating one or more function blocks on the controller, the one or more function blocks included in at least part of an application executing on the controller.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the one or more function blocks are instantiated from a function block library on the controller.
16. The method of claim 13, wherein the command is a link command and wherein performing one or more operations causes an output of a first function block on the controller to be sent to an input of a second function block on the controller.
17. A system comprising:
a control engine for a controller, the control engine operable to maintain a plurality of function blocks, each of the function blocks comprising a unit of execution of an application executing on the controller;
a function block programming tool operable to:
provide an interface to select one or more identifiers associated with one or more function blocks and for selecting a command, and
transmit the command and the one or more identifiers to the control engine over a low power wireless network interface;
wherein the control engine, upon receiving the command and the one or more identifiers performs an operation related to one or more function blocks identified by the one or more identifiers in accordance with the command and coordinates the operation related to the one or more function blocks and interpretation of the function blocks of the application such that the control engine and the application are not restarted after performance of the operation related to the one or more function blocks.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the control engine includes a network stack for the low power wireless network interface.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein a physical layer of the network stack conforms to an IEEE 802.15.4 interface standard.
20. The system of claim 18, wherein a network layer of the network stack conforms to an Internet Protocol Version 6 interface standard.
21. The system of claim 17, wherein the command is an add command and wherein the control engine instantiates one or more function blocks in the memory.
22. The system of claim 21, wherein the control engine is operable to maintain a function block library and wherein the one or more function blocks are instantiated from the function block library.
23. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having stored thereon machine-executable instructions for causing one or more processors to perform operations comprising:
presenting an interface allowing selection from a plurality of function block identifiers for a control system;
receiving through the interface a selection of one or more of the plurality of function block identifiers and a command;
transmitting the selection and the command through a low power wireless network interface to a controller for the control system;
determining in accordance with the selection and the command an operation to perform on one or more function blocks on the controller, each of the one or more function block comprising a unit of execution of an application executing on the controller; and
coordinating the operation on the one or more function blocks and interpretation of function blocks of an application such that execution of the controller and the application formed by the one or more function blocks continues without restarting the controller and the application.
24. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 23, wherein the command is an add command and wherein the command causes at least one function block to be instantiated on the controller, the one or more function blocks included in at least part of an application executing on the controller.
25. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 24, wherein the function block is instantiated from a function block library on the controller.
26. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 23, wherein the command is a delete command and wherein the command causes a function block to be removed from a set of function blocks forming an application executing on the controller.
27. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having stored thereon machine-executable instructions for causing one or more processors to perform operations comprising:
receiving by a controller a command and one or more identifiers specifying one or more function blocks associated with the one or more identifiers; and
performing one or more operations on one or more function blocks on the controller in accordance with the command and the one or more identifiers;
wherein the one or more function blocks are included in an application executing on the controller, wherein the controller is configured to coordinate the operations on the one or more function blocks and to interpret the function blocks of the application such that the controller and the application are not restarted after performing the one or more operations on the one or more function blocks.
28. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 27, wherein the command is an add command and wherein performing one or more operations includes instantiating one or more function blocks on the controller, the one or more function blocks included in at least part of an application executing on the controller.
29. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 28, wherein the one or more function blocks are instantiated from a function block library on the controller.
30. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 27, wherein the command is a link command and wherein performing one or more operations causes an output of a first function block on the controller to be sent to an input of a second function block on the controller.
US11/888,265 2007-07-31 2007-07-31 Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming Active 2030-11-30 US8818346B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/888,265 US8818346B2 (en) 2007-07-31 2007-07-31 Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/888,265 US8818346B2 (en) 2007-07-31 2007-07-31 Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090037938A1 US20090037938A1 (en) 2009-02-05
US8818346B2 true US8818346B2 (en) 2014-08-26

Family

ID=40339385

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/888,265 Active 2030-11-30 US8818346B2 (en) 2007-07-31 2007-07-31 Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8818346B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090204370A1 (en) * 2008-02-11 2009-08-13 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated System and method for enabling extensibility in sensing systems
US9497038B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2016-11-15 Schneider Electric Buildings, Llc Self-healing communications network
US11579578B2 (en) 2020-03-26 2023-02-14 Honeywell International Inc. Hierarchal controller logic with incremental updates

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8102867B2 (en) * 2009-05-07 2012-01-24 Ours Technology Inc. Bridges and computing devices with bridges
CH701294A1 (en) * 2009-06-18 2010-12-31 Archimede Solutions Sarl multi-protocol system monitoring and management of heterogeneous smart objects.
US8626344B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2014-01-07 Allure Energy, Inc. Energy management system and method
US8498749B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2013-07-30 Allure Energy, Inc. Method for zone based energy management system with scalable map interface
US9209652B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2015-12-08 Allure Energy, Inc. Mobile device with scalable map interface for zone based energy management
US9838255B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2017-12-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Mobile demand response energy management system with proximity control
US8560095B2 (en) * 2009-12-30 2013-10-15 Honeywell International Inc. Changeable BACnet interface
US20130054863A1 (en) 2011-08-30 2013-02-28 Allure Energy, Inc. Resource Manager, System And Method For Communicating Resource Management Information For Smart Energy And Media Resources
US9716530B2 (en) 2013-01-07 2017-07-25 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Home automation using near field communication
US10063499B2 (en) 2013-03-07 2018-08-28 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Non-cloud based communication platform for an environment control system
US10135628B2 (en) 2014-01-06 2018-11-20 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System, device, and apparatus for coordinating environments using network devices and remote sensory information
CN106464551A (en) 2014-01-06 2017-02-22 魅力能源公司 System, device, and apparatus for coordinating environments using network devices and remote sensory information
CN108459853A (en) * 2018-02-05 2018-08-28 中用科技有限公司 The method and system that controller in automatic control system is programmed

Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4809346A (en) * 1986-07-18 1989-02-28 Hughes Aircraft Company Computer vision architecture for iconic to symbolic transformation
US5249270A (en) 1991-03-29 1993-09-28 Echelon Corporation Development system protocol
US5297257A (en) 1991-04-15 1994-03-22 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Distributing a real-time control program to a plurality of input/output nodes
US5398336A (en) 1990-10-16 1995-03-14 Consilium, Inc. Object-oriented architecture for factory floor management
US5550980A (en) 1990-01-30 1996-08-27 Johnson Service Company Networked facilities management system with optical coupling of local network devices
US5718767A (en) 1994-10-05 1998-02-17 Nordson Corporation Distributed control system for powder coating system
US5805442A (en) 1996-05-30 1998-09-08 Control Technology Corporation Distributed interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems
US5862052A (en) 1996-04-12 1999-01-19 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system using a control strategy implemented in a layered hierarchy of control modules
US6047222A (en) 1996-10-04 2000-04-04 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Process control network with redundant field devices and buses
US6067477A (en) 1998-01-15 2000-05-23 Eutech Cybernetics Pte Ltd. Method and apparatus for the creation of personalized supervisory and control data acquisition systems for the management and integration of real-time enterprise-wide applications and systems
US6119125A (en) 1998-04-03 2000-09-12 Johnson Controls Technology Company Software components for a building automation system based on a standard object superclass
US6157943A (en) 1998-11-12 2000-12-05 Johnson Controls Technology Company Internet access to a facility management system
US6189109B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-02-13 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of remote access and control of environmental conditions
US6370448B1 (en) 1997-10-13 2002-04-09 Rosemount Inc. Communication technique for field devices in industrial processes
US20030167320A1 (en) * 2002-02-26 2003-09-04 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Registration service for registering plug-in applications with a management console
US20060004895A1 (en) * 2004-06-07 2006-01-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for creating a binary file for function-based data storage and a computer-readable storage medium for storing the method
US7539488B2 (en) * 2005-11-09 2009-05-26 Texas Instruments Norway As Over-the-air download (OAD) methods and apparatus for use in facilitating application programming in wireless network devices of ad hoc wireless communication networks
US7620015B2 (en) * 2004-02-10 2009-11-17 Forward Information Technologies Sa Method and system for seamless handover of mobile devices in heterogeneous networks
US7669197B1 (en) * 2002-09-12 2010-02-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Embedded system employing component architecture platform

Patent Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4809346A (en) * 1986-07-18 1989-02-28 Hughes Aircraft Company Computer vision architecture for iconic to symbolic transformation
US5550980A (en) 1990-01-30 1996-08-27 Johnson Service Company Networked facilities management system with optical coupling of local network devices
US5598566A (en) 1990-01-30 1997-01-28 Johnson Service Company Networked facilities management system having a node configured with distributed load management software to manipulate loads controlled by other nodes
US5398336A (en) 1990-10-16 1995-03-14 Consilium, Inc. Object-oriented architecture for factory floor management
US5249270A (en) 1991-03-29 1993-09-28 Echelon Corporation Development system protocol
US5297257A (en) 1991-04-15 1994-03-22 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Distributing a real-time control program to a plurality of input/output nodes
US5718767A (en) 1994-10-05 1998-02-17 Nordson Corporation Distributed control system for powder coating system
US5862052A (en) 1996-04-12 1999-01-19 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system using a control strategy implemented in a layered hierarchy of control modules
US5805442A (en) 1996-05-30 1998-09-08 Control Technology Corporation Distributed interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems
US6047222A (en) 1996-10-04 2000-04-04 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Process control network with redundant field devices and buses
US6189109B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-02-13 Micron Electronics, Inc. Method of remote access and control of environmental conditions
US6370448B1 (en) 1997-10-13 2002-04-09 Rosemount Inc. Communication technique for field devices in industrial processes
US6067477A (en) 1998-01-15 2000-05-23 Eutech Cybernetics Pte Ltd. Method and apparatus for the creation of personalized supervisory and control data acquisition systems for the management and integration of real-time enterprise-wide applications and systems
US6119125A (en) 1998-04-03 2000-09-12 Johnson Controls Technology Company Software components for a building automation system based on a standard object superclass
US6157943A (en) 1998-11-12 2000-12-05 Johnson Controls Technology Company Internet access to a facility management system
US20030167320A1 (en) * 2002-02-26 2003-09-04 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Registration service for registering plug-in applications with a management console
US7669197B1 (en) * 2002-09-12 2010-02-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Embedded system employing component architecture platform
US7620015B2 (en) * 2004-02-10 2009-11-17 Forward Information Technologies Sa Method and system for seamless handover of mobile devices in heterogeneous networks
US20060004895A1 (en) * 2004-06-07 2006-01-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for creating a binary file for function-based data storage and a computer-readable storage medium for storing the method
US7539488B2 (en) * 2005-11-09 2009-05-26 Texas Instruments Norway As Over-the-air download (OAD) methods and apparatus for use in facilitating application programming in wireless network devices of ad hoc wireless communication networks

Non-Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Coactive: Bringing the Other Network into Focus", VAR Business, No. 1413, (1998), 2 pgs.
"Coupling of LonWorks and JAVA Applications", http://www.longworks.echelon.com/News/Nixdorf.html, (Nov. 5, 1998), 10 pgs.
"Echelon Joins Java Alliance to Develop Open AOU Specifications for Industrial Automation", Business Wire, (Oct. 7, 1996), 1-2.
"Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems", IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communications Systems (WFCS '97), (Oct. 1, 1997), 13 pgs.
"The Open LonWorks(r) Client/Server Solution", http://www.metra.com/MNSSpecs.html, Metra Network Services, (Nov. 5, 1998), 9 pgs.
Arnold, M., "Remote Monitoring via Integration of LonWorks and World Area Network Technology", DialogWeb, (1997), 1 pg.
Byron, D., "A Technical Roadmap for Enterprise Connectivity to Control Networks", http://web.archive.org/web/19980519113419/www.coactive.com/media/wp9605lu.pdf, Coactive White Papers, Nov. 5, 1998 , 1-13.
Chen, P.-W., "A Smart WWW Page Model and its Application to On-Line Information Retrieval in Hyperspace", Proceedings of the 1996 Pacific Workshop on Distributed Multimedia Systems (DMS '96), (1996), 10 pgs.
Child, J., "Embedded Systems Conference Focuses on Getting The Job Done", Electronic Design, 55(1), (Oct. 22, 1998), 9 pgs.
Diaz-Gonzalez, J. P., et al., "Language Aspects of Envisager: An Object Oriented Environment for the Specification of Real-Time Systems", Proceedings, International Conference on Computer Languages, (1998), 214-225.
Gaw, D., "Scalable, Integrated, Real-Time Energy Management-Requirements and System Architecture", http://www.coative.com/pages/wp98energyman.html, White Paper, Coactive Networks Inc., (Nov. 5, 1998), 9 pgs.
Kramer, J., "CONIC: An Integrated Approach to Distributed Computer Control Systems", IEE Proceedings, vol. 130(Part E, No. 1), (Jan. 1983), 1-10.
Nakanishi, Y., "Development of a Seamless Connection Technology Between Information Networks and Control Networks Using Java Language", Shikoku Research Institute, Inc., 11 pgs.
Orihara, A., "An Autonomous Decentralized System Platform Under Multi-Vendor Enviornments in Building Automation", Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS '97), (Apr. 1997), 409-415.
Paya, S., et al., "Remote Access to an Industrial Network Map 3.0 Through Internet", http://web.archive.org/web/20021204160951/http://casal.upc.es/~ieee/looking/sempere/Remote.html, Communications Department Polytechnic University of Valencia, (Nov. 5, 1998), 7 pgs.
Paya, S., et al., "Remote Access to an Industrial Network Map 3.0 Through Internet", http://web.archive.org/web/20021204160951/http://casal.upc.es/˜ieee/looking/sempere/Remote.html, Communications Department Polytechnic University of Valencia, (Nov. 5, 1998), 7 pgs.
Randazzo, M., "Controls companies see opportunities on the internet", Energy Users News, (Mar. 1997), 2 pgs.

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090204370A1 (en) * 2008-02-11 2009-08-13 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated System and method for enabling extensibility in sensing systems
US9104430B2 (en) * 2008-02-11 2015-08-11 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated System and method for enabling extensibility in sensing systems
US9497038B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2016-11-15 Schneider Electric Buildings, Llc Self-healing communications network
US11579578B2 (en) 2020-03-26 2023-02-14 Honeywell International Inc. Hierarchal controller logic with incremental updates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090037938A1 (en) 2009-02-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8818346B2 (en) Wireless device with a control engine using functional block programming
US10536295B2 (en) Control infrastructure
Morin et al. Models@ run. time to support dynamic adaptation
US6028998A (en) Application framework for constructing building automation systems
US9124444B2 (en) Method of facilitating servicing an appliance
US8005780B2 (en) Taxonomy engine and dataset for operating an appliance
US8155120B2 (en) Software architecture system and method for discovering components within an appliance using fuctionality identifiers
Hussein et al. Model-driven development of adaptive IoT systems.
Graham et al. Abstractions, architecture, mechanisms, and a middleware for networked control
US7921429B2 (en) Data acquisition method with event notification for an appliance
Belsare et al. Micro-ros
Koziolek et al. Self-commissioning industrial IoT-systems in process automation: a reference architecture
Cengic et al. On formal analysis of IEC 61499 applications, Part A: Modeling
CN111651352B (en) Warehouse code merging method and device
Atmojo et al. Dynamic reconfiguration and adaptation of manufacturing systems using SOSJ framework
WO2017079002A1 (en) Non-monotonic eventual convergence for desired state configuration
Muldoon et al. Towards pervasive intelligence: Reflections on the evolution of the agent factory framework
Gaglio et al. A fast and interactive approach to application development on wireless sensor and actuator networks
Theorin A sequential control language for industrial automation
Zhao et al. A Cross-Platform Communication Mechanism for ROS-Based Cyber-Physical System.
Lu et al. A UML profile to model safety-critical embedded real-time control systems
Kučera et al. Modeling and Control of Discrete Event and Hybrid Systems Using Petri Nets and OPC Unified Architecture
Gharbi et al. Functional and operational solutions for safety reconfigurable embedded control systems
JP4366576B2 (en) Programmable controller equipment
Mikhailov et al. M3-driven smart space creation using a DD-WRT-based device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TRIDIUM INC., MINNESOTA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FRANK, BRIAN S.;REEL/FRAME:019700/0244

Effective date: 20070726

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551)

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8