US8640069B2 - Noise analysis model and noise analysis method including disposing resistors and setting points in a semiconductor - Google Patents
Noise analysis model and noise analysis method including disposing resistors and setting points in a semiconductor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8640069B2 US8640069B2 US13/546,985 US201213546985A US8640069B2 US 8640069 B2 US8640069 B2 US 8640069B2 US 201213546985 A US201213546985 A US 201213546985A US 8640069 B2 US8640069 B2 US 8640069B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- noise
- point
- noise analysis
- substrate
- resistor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/36—Circuit design at the analogue level
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/10—Noise analysis or noise optimisation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a noise analysis model and a noise analysis method and, particularly, to a noise analysis model and a noise analysis method for noise that propagates through a substrate.
- a semiconductor device that is incorporated into electronic equipment or the like is subject to noise due to the environment or the effect of another element on a circuit substrate of the semiconductor device.
- the noise propagates through the substrate of the semiconductor device and causes elements such as transistors formed on the substrate to malfunction.
- the semiconductor device in order for the semiconductor device to operate normally, it is required to eliminate the effect of noise in the semiconductor device.
- a substrate coupling network and a ground line network of a silicon chip are represented by a resistor mesh equivalent circuit.
- a typical silicon chip is a rectangle with about several millimeters on one side, having a thickness of about 0.5 millimeters.
- the mesh resolution is about 10 micrometers, for example, the number of resistor elements included in the resistor mesh equivalent circuit reaches tens of thousands.
- CMOS Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor
- transistors that form the circuit having noise sensitivity have a size of about 1 micron.
- the transistors that form the circuit having noise sensitivity are sufficiently smaller than the mesh resolution of about 10 micrometers. Therefore, to make noise analysis on such minute transistors, the number of resistor elements included in the resistor mesh equivalent circuit further increases. Accordingly, the scale of analysis becomes too broad, which requires an enormous amount of calculation resources. As a result, it is difficult to complete the analysis within a practical allowable time.
- a first aspect of the present invention is a noise analysis model including a first resistor that serves as a substrate resistor in a semiconductor substrate between a first point set in the semiconductor substrate between a noise source and a transistor to which substrate noise from the noise source propagates through the semiconductor substrate and a second point set in the semiconductor substrate just below a back gate of the transistor, a second resistor that serves as a substrate resistor in the semiconductor substrate between the second point and a fixed potential region near the transistor, and a third resistor that serves as a line resistor of a line connecting the fixed potential region and a power pad that supplies a ground potential.
- a second aspect of the present invention is a noise analysis method including creating a noise analysis model by specifying a position of a transistor in a circuit to be analyzed of a semiconductor device, setting a first point in the semiconductor substrate on a path where substrate noise propagates from a noise source to the transistor through a semiconductor substrate on which the semiconductor device is formed, setting a second point in the semiconductor substrate just below a back gate of the transistor, disposing a first resistor that serves as a substrate resistor in the semiconductor substrate between the first point and the second point at a position between the first point and the second point, disposing a second resistor that serves as a substrate resistor in the semiconductor substrate between the second point and a fixed potential region near the transistor at a position between the second point and the fixed potential region, and disposing a third resistor that serves as a line resistor of a line connecting the fixed potential region and a power pad that supplies a ground potential at a position between the fixed potential region and the power pad; creating a netlist of the circuit to be analyzed containing the noise
- FIG. 1 is a top view schematically showing a structure example of a semiconductor device 101 on which noise analysis is to be made;
- FIG. 2 is a top view schematically showing chip-level noise analysis in a semiconductor device
- FIG. 3A is a view schematically showing chip-level noise analysis between a noise source on a semiconductor substrate and a connection point;
- FIG. 3B is a view schematically showing chip-level noise analysis between a noise source on a semiconductor substrate and a connection point;
- FIG. 3C is a view schematically showing chip-level noise analysis between a noise source on a semiconductor substrate and a connection point;
- FIG. 3D is a view schematically showing chip-level noise analysis between a noise source on a semiconductor substrate and a connection point;
- FIG. 4 is a top view schematically showing a model structure of a noise analysis model 100 used in an element-level noise analysis method according to the first embodiment
- FIG. 5A is an equivalent circuit diagram of the noise analysis model 100 according to the first embodiment
- FIG. 5B is a circuit diagram showing an equivalent circuit of a transistor main body composed of a diffusion layer 2 and gate fingers f 1 , f 2 , f 3 and f 4 shown in FIG. 4 ;
- FIG. 5C is a circuit diagram showing an equivalent circuit of a noise analysis circuit 100 and a transistor main body in the case of using NMOS transistors;
- FIG. 5D is a circuit diagram showing an equivalent circuit of a noise analysis circuit 100 and a transistor main body in the case of using PMOS transistors;
- FIG. 6 is a top view of a noise analysis model showing a method of determining resistance values of resistors R S1 to R S4 ;
- FIG. 7 is a top view of a substantial part schematically showing a positional relationship between a transistor and a connection point 1 represented by the noise analysis model 100 ;
- FIG. 8 is a circuit diagram showing a circuit configuration in the case of using a plurality of noise analysis models
- FIG. 9 is a top view of a noise analysis model showing a method of determining resistance values of resistors R GB1 to R GB4 ;
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the flow of a noise analysis method according to the first embodiment
- FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing details of Step S 22 of the flow of creating the noise analysis model 100 according to the first embodiment
- FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing the flow of a noise analysis method according to a second embodiment
- FIG. 13A is a top view schematically showing the layout of a semiconductor device used in noise analysis according to an example 1;
- FIG. 13B is a top view schematically showing the layout of a semiconductor device used in noise analysis according to the example 1;
- FIG. 14A is a graph showing the dependence of a substrate propagation coefficient G on the number of gate fingers in the layout shown in FIG. 13A ;
- FIG. 14B is a graph showing the dependence of a substrate propagation coefficient G on the number of gate fingers in the layout shown in FIG. 13B .
- FIG. 1 is a top view schematically showing a structure example of a semiconductor device 101 on which noise analysis is to be made.
- a digital circuit 1012 and an analog circuit 1013 are formed on a semiconductor substrate 1011 .
- the digital circuit 1012 includes a noise generation block 1014 , which is a circuit block being a noise source.
- Noise 1015 is emitted from the noise generation block 1014 to peripheral circuits.
- the noise 1015 propagates through the semiconductor substrate 1011 and reaches another block of the digital circuit 1012 or the analog circuit 1013 . Particularly, the noise 1015 that reaches the analog circuit 1013 causes elements in the analog circuit 1013 to malfunction.
- FIG. 2 is a top view schematically showing chip-level noise analysis in a semiconductor device.
- a resistor mesh equivalent circuit is created by segmenting the semiconductor substrate 1011 into resistor mesh.
- the propagation of noise 1025 from a noise source 1024 to an analog circuit 1023 is analyzed.
- this embodiment relates to a method of making high-accuracy noise analysis by performing element-level noise analysis with use of a result of chip-level noise analysis.
- This method is to make noise analysis in consideration of the effect of element-level noise within a feasible processing time by using a noise analysis model for analyzing the effect of element-level noise.
- the element-level noise analysis method according to this embodiment analyzes noise propagation before and after a connection point at which noise is conducted into an analog circuit.
- the method performs analysis of noise at the chip level between the noise source on the semiconductor substrate and the connection point and analysis of noise that propagates through the connection point into an element of the analog circuit.
- FIGS. 3A to 3D are views schematically showing chip-level noise analysis between a noise source on a semiconductor substrate and a connection point. As shown in FIG.
- a noise source 1024 in the digital circuit on the semiconductor substrate 1011 , a noise source 1024 in the digital circuit, a transistor 103 in the analog circuit, a guard band 4 to shield the analog circuit from noise, a metal line 6 to supply a ground potential to the guard band 4 , and a pad 7 to supply a ground potential from the outside are disposed.
- Noise propagates from the noise source 1024 to the transistor 103 through the semiconductor substrate 1011 .
- the pad 7 is connected to the ground potential outside the chip by a wire bonding 8 in the semiconductor package, for example, as shown in FIG. 3A , so that the ground potential is supplied to the pad 7 .
- the method of supplying the ground potential shown in FIG. 3A is one example, and a method other than wire bonding, such as FCBGA (Flip Chip Ball Grid Array) package, may be employed.
- the semiconductor substrate 1011 is segmented into mesh all over the chip as shown in FIG. 3B , for example. Then, a substrate coupling network and a ground line network can be represented and analyzed by a resistor mesh equivalent circuit (resistor mesh) 1030 as shown in FIG. 3C . It is assumed that the propagation of noise from the noise source to the transistor is through a connection point 1 (first point), which is one of intersections of the resistor mesh. It is also assumed that a point at which noise is generated from the noise source 1024 is a point 0 .
- connection point 1 (first point), which is one of intersections of the resistor mesh 1030 , can be regarded as a propagation noise output terminal to the transistor 103 .
- the connection point 1 (first point) can be regarded as a noise input terminal to the transistor 103 .
- the symbol A 1 corresponds to the chip-level noise analysis
- the symbol A 2 corresponds to the element-level noise analysis.
- connection point 1 (first point) as a common node to pass propagation noise
- the chip-level noise analysis and the element-level noise analysis can be performed independently of each other. This enables each of the analyses to be made optimally and independently.
- the connection point 1 (first point) is used in common to thereby focus on the element-level noise analysis, so that it is possible to analyze the effect of noise on elements in the analog circuit in more detail.
- the element-level noise analysis is implemented by using a noise analysis model described hereinbelow.
- FIG. 4 is a top view schematically showing a model structure of a noise analysis model 100 that is used in the element-level noise analysis method according to the first embodiment.
- the noise analysis model 100 is a model for a MOS transistor having a plurality of gate fingers.
- a diffusion layer 2 to form a source/drain region is formed on the semiconductor substrate (not shown).
- gate fingers f 1 to f 4 are formed on the semiconductor substrate (not shown).
- a guard band 4 that is grounded through a ground resistor R GND is formed.
- the ground resistor R GND represents a line resistance component of the metal line 6 that connects from the guard band 4 to the pad 7 shown in FIG. 3A , for example.
- the number of gate fingers is not limited to four as a matter of course.
- the noise analysis model 100 is constructed by disposing a resistance model in the above-described transistor structure.
- resistors R S1 to R S4 are respectively disposed between the connection point 1 (first point) and center points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points), for example, in the semiconductor substrate just below back gates located under the gate fingers f 1 to f 4 .
- the resistors R S1 to R S4 represent resistance components acting on noise that propagates through the semiconductor substrate from the connection point 1 (first point) to each of the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates. Note that, to clearly indicate that the resistors R S1 to R S4 are connected to the back gates in the semiconductor substrate, the positions of the gate fingers f 1 to f 4 are shown by dotted lines.
- resistors R GB1 to R GB4 are respectively disposed between the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates located under the gate fingers f 1 to f 4 and the guard band 4 .
- the resistors R GB1 to R GB4 represent resistance components acting on noise that propagates through the semiconductor substrate from the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates to the guard band 4 .
- FIG. 5A is an equivalent circuit diagram of the noise analysis model 100 according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 5A , the propagation path of noise acting on the back gates located under the gate fingers f 1 to f 4 is represented by two resistors connected in series between the connection point 1 (first point) and the guard band 4 , and a ground resistor of the guard band 4 .
- FIG. 5B is a circuit diagram showing an equivalent circuit of a transistor main body that is composed of the diffusion layer 2 and the gate fingers f 1 , f 2 , f 3 and f 4 shown in FIG. 4 .
- the noise analysis model ( FIG. 5A ) that contributes to noise propagation and the equivalent circuit of the transistor main body ( FIG. 5B ) are combined at the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates, thereby enabling the element-level noise analysis.
- the transistor equivalent circuit upon which the transistor layout is reflected FIG. 5B
- the noise analysis model upon which the actual gate finger layout is reflected FIG. 5A
- FIG. 5C is a circuit diagram showing an equivalent circuit of the noise analysis circuit 100 and the transistor main body in the case of using NMOS transistors.
- FIG. 5D is a circuit diagram showing an equivalent circuit of the noise analysis circuit 100 and the transistor main body in the case of using PMOS transistors.
- parasitic capacitance components are shown in addition.
- the same noise analysis model that contributes to noise propagation ( FIG. 5A ) is used in both cases of NMOS transistors and PMOS transistors as in the case of NMOS transistors, elements are different in FIG. 5D in that PMOS transistors are used in the equivalent circuit of the transistor main body.
- N-well parasitic capacitance components exist respectively between the back gates of the transistors and the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates.
- the parasitic capacitance components are represented by the parasitic capacitors C 1 to C 4 .
- FIG. 6 is a top view of the noise analysis model showing a method of determining the resistance values of the resistors R S1 to R S4 .
- the resistance values of the resistors R S1 to R S4 are determined in proportion to the distance between the connection point 1 (first point) and the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate.
- the resistance values of the resistors R S1 to R S4 are represented by the following equation (1) where c is an arbitrary coefficient and i is an integer satisfying 1 ⁇ i ⁇ 4.
- R Si c ⁇ Li Equation (1)
- FIG. 7 is a top view of a substantial part of the resistor mesh 1030 (resistor elements are not shown) schematically showing a positional relationship between a transistor and the connection point 1 (first point) represented by the noise analysis model 100 .
- the transistor 103 represented by the noise analysis model 100 is placed on the semiconductor substrate in which the resistor mesh (the resistor mesh structure shown in FIG. 3A ) is configured. The position of the transistor 103 on the semiconductor substrate can be easily calculated from the netlist.
- the resistor mesh segmented with boundaries 1031 has points of intersection of the boundaries 1031 . In this embodiment, the intersection of the boundaries 1031 which is located closest to the transistor 103 that is sufficiently smaller than the resistor mesh is set as the connection point 1 (first point).
- the resistance values of the resistors R S1 to R S4 are proportional to the distance between the connection point 1 (first point) and the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates.
- the resistance values of the resistors R S1 to R S4 are the lowest when the distance between the connection point 1 (first point) and the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates is the shortest. Therefore, by setting the intersection of the boundaries 1031 which is the closest to the transistor 103 as the connection point 1 (first point), it is possible to analyze the noise that has the highest voltage level and has the most dominant effect on the operation of the transistor among noise which propagates to the hack gates. In the case of making more detailed analysis, noise analysis using a plurality of noise analysis models may be performed by creating noise analysis models in which intersections 1032 to 1035 other than the connection point 1 (first point) are set as the connection point.
- FIG. 8 is a circuit diagram showing a circuit configuration in the case of using a plurality of noise analysis models.
- FIG. 8 shows the state in consideration of the case where noise propagates and enters through the connection point 1034 shown in FIG. 7 in addition to the case where noise is input from the connection point 1 (first point). Therefore, compared with FIG. 5C , a noise analysis model 101 is constructed in addition to the noise analysis model 100 .
- the noise analysis model 101 has the same configuration as the noise analysis model 100 . However, because the noise analysis model 101 is connected to the connection point 1034 , resistance components from the connection point to each of the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates are different from those of the noise analysis model 100 . Accordingly, resistors corresponding to the resistors R S1 to R S4 of the noise analysis circuit 100 are indicated as R S11 to R S14 .
- FIG. 9 is a top view of a noise analysis model showing a method of determining resistance values of resistors R GB1 to R GB4 .
- the resistance values of the resistors R GB1 to R GB4 are determined in proportion to the distance between the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate and the guard band. For example, if the distances between the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the respective back gates and the guard band are L G1 to L G4 , respectively, the resistance values of resistors R GB1 to R GB4 are represented by the following equation (2) where d is an arbitrary coefficient.
- R GBi d ⁇ L Gi Equation (2)
- Guard bands are formed in several places on the semiconductor substrate.
- the guard band that is the closest to the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below each back gate is selected.
- guard bands in the left, right, up and down directions with respect to the point BG 1 in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate are searched, for example.
- guard bands 41 and 42 are formed in addition to the guard band 4 , and, in this embodiment, the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates are connected to the closest guard band 4 .
- the points BG 1 in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate may be used as a reference, the points BG 2 to BG 4 in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates may be used instead.
- the guard bands may be searched with respect to the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates, and the guard band at the shortest average distance from the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates may be used.
- the resistance values of resistors R GB1 to R GB4 are proportional to the distance between the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate and the guard band.
- the resistance values of resistors R GB1 to R GB4 are the lowest when the distance between the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate and the guard band is the shortest.
- noise analysis using a plurality of noise analysis models may be performed by creating noise analysis models in consideration of the connection with guard bands other than the guard band 4 located at the shortest distance. In this case, analysis in which another noise analysis model in which at least the values of R GB1 to R GB4 and R GND are different is added and connected is performed (not shown) in the same way as in FIG. 8 .
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the flow of a noise analysis method according to the first embodiment.
- noise analysis is performed on the basis of GDS data 10 and circuit diagram data 12 indicating circuit layout information of the semiconductor device and external input information 13 such as bias setting and input and control signals.
- GDS data is used as the information indicating the circuit layout of the semiconductor device in FIG. 10
- layout data in another format may be used.
- Step S 1 chip-level substrate noise analysis from the noise source to the connection point 1 (first point) is performed (Step S 1 ).
- the chip-level substrate noise analysis is performed using the GDS data 10 and the circuit diagram data 12 and the external input information 13 such as bias setting and input and control signals by SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis, denoted by the reference symbol 11 in FIG. 10 ), for example (Step S 11 ).
- SPICE Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis, denoted by the reference symbol 11 in FIG. 10
- Step S 11 analysis on noise propagation through the substrate is performed by the SPICE 11 , and voltage waveforms of noise at candidates for the connection point is acquired from a plurality of (for example, n where n is an integer of one or larger) intersections of the resistor mesh.
- Step S 2 The voltage level of noise at each candidate for the connection point is thereby acquired. Then, according to information INF at the connection point 1 (first point) determined in Step S 2 , which is described later, one corresponding to the connection point 1 (first point) is selected among the noise voltage waveforms at the candidates for the connection point (Step S 12 ), the selected one is combined with an element-level analysis model (Step S 2 ), which is described later (Step S 3 ), and then final analysis is executed (Step S 4 ). Note that, by using a frequency as a parameter when performing the analysis on noise propagation through the substrate, the voltage-level frequency characteristics of noise at each candidate for the connection point can be acquired.
- Step S 2 the flow (Step S 2 ) to perform element-level noise analysis in a circuit to be analyzed such as the analog circuit that is connected to the connection point 1 (first point) is described.
- position information of the circuit to be analyzed such as the analog circuit is extracted from the GDS data 10 by a typical LPE (Layout Parameter Extractor) tool, for example.
- element information containing the extracted position information of elements such as transistors to receive substrate noise within the circuit to be analyzed and parasitic elements in the layout is extracted (Step S 21 ).
- FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing details of Step S 22 of the flow of creating the noise analysis model 100 according to the first embodiment.
- Step S 22 the connection point 1 (first point) for the transistor to be analyzed is determined using the element information 21 extracted in Step S 21 and the connection point candidate position information 22 extracted in Step S 1 (Step 220 ). Then, the distance L i between the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below each back gate of the transistor to be analyzed and the connection point 1 (first point) is detected (Step S 221 ).
- the distance L i is substituted into the equation (1), and the resistance of the resistors values R S1 to R S4 that are respectively connected to the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates, for example, are calculated (Step S 222 ).
- the guard bands in the vicinity of the transistor to be analyzed are detected using the element information 21 extracted in Step S 21 (Step S 223 ). Generally, it is preferred to detect the guard band located at the shortest distance first. Then, the distance L Gi between the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below each back gate of the transistor to be analyzed and the guard band is detected (Step S 224 ). After that, the distance L Gi is substituted into the equation (2), and the resistance values of the resistors R GB1 to R GB4 that are respectively connected to the points (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates, for example, are calculated (Step S 225 ).
- the ground resistance R GNDj of each guard band is detected using the guard band detected in Step S 223 and ground resistance information 23 such as a resistance component of the line layer from the detected guard band to the pad (Step S 226 ). Then, the ground resistance R GND acting on the guard band 4 is detected (Step S 227 ).
- the noise analysis model 100 shown in FIG. 4 is then created on the basis of the resistance R S1 to R S4 , R GB1 to R GB4 and the ground resistance R GND , for example (Step S 228 ). Note that, a plurality of transistors are included in the analog circuit to be analyzed, and the noise analysis model 100 may be created for each of the transistors in the above manner.
- Step S 23 a netlist of the circuit to be analyzed into which the noise analysis model 100 created in Step S 22 is incorporated is created.
- Step S 1 the chip-level substrate noise analysis result obtained in Step S 1 is integrated into the netlist of the circuit to be analyzed created in Step S 2 (Step S 21 to S 23 ) (Step S 3 ).
- a netlist for analysis that allows noise analysis on elements of the circuit to be analyzed can be thereby created (Step S 4 ).
- the chip-level substrate noise analysis in Step S 1 and the element-level substrate noise analysis in Step S 2 are integrated at the connection point 1 (first point), and the connection point 1 (first point) serves as the output terminal of noise in the chip-level substrate noise analysis and serves as the input terminal of noise in the element-level substrate noise analysis, thus acting as a point at which noise information is passed.
- the noise analysis method can create the netlist for analysis into which the noise analysis model 100 to evaluate the effect on elements in the circuit to be analyzed is incorporated.
- SPICE simulation for example, with use of the netlist for analysis, it is possible to perform output waveform analysis of the semiconductor device in consideration of the effect of substrate noise at the element level.
- the analyses at the respective levels can be made independently of each other.
- higher resolution can be made only for the element-level noise analysis in the circuit to be analyzed for which high-resolution noise analysis is required, without increasing the mesh resolution of the chip-level noise analysis. Accordingly, the noise analysis method and the noise analysis model allow an analysis result to be obtained within a practical analysis time.
- the resistance values of the resistors R GB1 to R GB4 depend on the distance between the point (second point) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gate and the guard band in the creation of the noise analysis model 100 . It is thereby possible to change the resistance values of the resistors R GB1 to R GB4 by changing the position of the guard band.
- the noise analysis method it is possible to easily decide the design policy to reduce the effect of substrate noise on elements in the circuit to be analyzed at the time of making circuit layout design of the semiconductor device.
- FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing the flow of the noise analysis method according to the second embodiment.
- noise analysis is performed on the basis of the GDS data 10 and the circuit diagram data 12 indicating circuit layout information of the semiconductor device and the external input information 13 such as bias setting and input and control signals just like in the first embodiment.
- the GDS data is used as the information indicating the circuit layout of the semiconductor device in FIG. 12
- layout data in another format may be used as in the first embodiment.
- Step S 5 chip-level substrate noise analysis from the noise source to the connection point 1 (first point) is performed (Step S 5 ).
- Step S 51 in Step S 5 is the same as Step S 11 in FIG. 10 and thus not redundantly described.
- Step S 51 the voltage waveform of the noise source and the voltage waveform at each candidate for the connection point are acquired from the analysis on noise propagation through the substrate in Step S 51 . Then, a chip-level substrate propagation coefficient ⁇ is calculated from the amplitude ratio of the voltage waveform of the noise source and the voltage waveform at each candidate for the connection point (Step S 52 ). After that, according to information INF at the connection point 1 (first point) determined in Step S 6 , which is described later, one corresponding to the connection point 1 (first point) is selected among the noise voltage waveforms at the candidates for the connection point as described later, in the same manner as in FIG. 10 (Step S 53 ).
- Step S 6 element-level noise analysis in a circuit to be analyzed such as the analog circuit that is connected to the connection point 1 (first point) is performed (Step S 6 ).
- Steps S 61 to S 63 in Step S 6 are the same as Steps S 21 to S 23 in Step S 2 in FIG. 10 and thus not redundantly described.
- Step S 63 analysis on noise propagation through the substrate at the element level with use of the noise analysis model 100 is performed by a typical LPE tool, for example. Specifically, the analysis on noise propagation through the substrate is performed by a typical LPE tool, and the voltage waveform of noise that is output from the connection point 1 (first point) through the noise analysis model 100 is acquired. Further, the voltage waveform of the noise source is acquired. Then, an element-level substrate propagation coefficient ⁇ is calculated from the amplitude ratio of the voltage waveform at the connection point and the voltage waveform of noise output through the noise analysis model 100 (Step S 64 ).
- the noise analysis method allows calculation of the substrate propagation coefficient G of noise in consideration of elements in the circuit to be analyzed by using the noise analysis model 100 . It is thereby possible to quantitatively evaluate the effect of substrate noise on elements in the circuit to be analyzed. Therefore, the effect of noise on elements in the circuit to be analyzed such as the analog circuit can be evaluated in more detail than the case of performing the chip-level substrate noise analysis only.
- FIGS. 13A and 13B are top views schematically showing the layout of the semiconductor device that is used in the noise analysis according to the example 1.
- transistors Q 1 and Q 2 that form a differential pair DP are arranged in line symmetry with respect to a center line CL. Further, a noise source NS is placed on the center line CL outside the differential pair DP.
- a connection point CP 1 is placed at the midpoint between the transistors Q 1 and Q 2 .
- a connection point CP 2 is placed at the position closer to the noise source NS by about 10 ⁇ m compared to the connection point CP 1 .
- CP 1 is located closer to the differential pair than CP 2 is.
- the dependence of the substrate propagation coefficient G on the transistors Q 1 and Q 2 was observed by changing the number of gate fingers of the transistors Q 1 and Q 2 , which is the substantial channel width.
- the gate finger width in the transistors B 01 to B 05 was 0.1 ⁇ m
- the gate finger length in the area where the gate finger and the source-drain diffusion layer are in contact was 11.45 ⁇ m.
- the number gate fingers of the transistors B 01 to B 05 was 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16, respectively.
- FIG. 14A is a graph showing the dependence of the substrate propagation coefficient G on the number of gate fingers in the layout shown in FIG. 13A .
- the graph shows that, in the transistor with a large number of gate fingers, which is the transistor with a large substantial channel width, the sensitivity for the amount of substrate noise in each gate finger position is large. Therefore, the tendency is reproduced that a difference occurs in substrate noise sensitivity represented by the substrate propagation coefficient G depending on the size of the transistor that forms the analog circuit. Further, it shows that the model of this example that takes the shape of fingers into consideration is important in the element-level noise analysis as well to enhance the analysis accuracy.
- FIG. 14B is a graph showing the dependence of the substrate propagation coefficient G on the number of gate fingers in the layout shown in FIG. 13B .
- the connection point CP 2 is set at the position away from the transistor that forms the analog circuit in the direction toward the noise source.
- CP 1 is set closer than CP 2 is.
- the tendency is reproduced that the noise sensitivity relatively increases in the result of FIG. 14A where the connection point is closer to the differential pair.
- This result attests to the fact that “the resistance values of the resistors R S1 to R S4 are the lowest when the distance between the connection point 1 (first point) and the points BG 1 to BG 4 (second points) in the semiconductor substrate just below the back gates is the shortest.
- connection point 1 (first point)
- this example ensures that substrate noise response characteristics can be analyzed for each transistor.
- the example further ensures that the substrate noise response characteristics of transistors vary depending on the position of the connection point with respect to the analog circuit to be analyzed, for example.
- the present invention is not restricted to the above-described embodiment, and various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
- example 1 is an example for the noise analysis method according to the second embodiment
- the same result is obtained for the noise analysis method according to the first embodiment.
- it can be concluded that it is preferred to set the connection point on the layout symmetry axis of the analog circuit to be analyzed in the noise analysis method according to the first embodiment as well. Further, it can be concluded that it is preferred to set the connection point as close as possible to the transistor that forms the analog circuit.
- resistors R GB1 to R GB4 and the ground resistor R GND are connected to the guard band 4 is described in the above embodiment, this is just by way of illustration. Specifically, the resistors R GB1 to R GB4 and the ground resistor R GND are not necessarily connected to the guard band as long as they are connected to a fixed potential region to which a fixed potential is supplied.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Design And Manufacture Of Integrated Circuits (AREA)
- Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
Description
R Si =c·Li Equation (1)
R GBi =d·L Gi Equation (2)
Claims (20)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2011-251475 | 2011-11-17 | ||
JP2011251475A JP5832252B2 (en) | 2011-11-17 | 2011-11-17 | Noise analysis model and noise analysis method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130132920A1 US20130132920A1 (en) | 2013-05-23 |
US8640069B2 true US8640069B2 (en) | 2014-01-28 |
Family
ID=48428207
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/546,985 Active US8640069B2 (en) | 2011-11-17 | 2012-07-11 | Noise analysis model and noise analysis method including disposing resistors and setting points in a semiconductor |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8640069B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5832252B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR102400557B1 (en) * | 2015-10-13 | 2022-05-20 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Circuit Design Method and Simulation Method considering random telegraph signal noise |
CN116258111B (en) * | 2023-05-15 | 2023-08-04 | 贝叶斯电子科技(绍兴)有限公司 | Static analog integrated circuit layout analysis method |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2006100718A (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Operation analyzing method for semiconductor integrated circuit device, analyzing apparatus used therefor, and optimization designing method using the apparatus |
US7480879B2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2009-01-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Substrate noise tool |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3670553B2 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2005-07-13 | 株式会社東芝 | Semiconductor integrated circuit analyzing apparatus, semiconductor integrated circuit analyzing method, and recording medium recording program for executing semiconductor integrated circuit analyzing method |
JP4183377B2 (en) * | 2000-10-25 | 2008-11-19 | Necエレクトロニクス株式会社 | Layout method of analog / digital mixed semiconductor integrated circuit |
JP2002158284A (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2002-05-31 | Nec Corp | Method for analyzing substrate noise of semiconductor integrated circuit and analyzing device therefor |
FR2889332B1 (en) * | 2005-07-28 | 2007-12-28 | Coupling Wave Solutions Cws Sa | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASSISTING THE DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS |
JP4994651B2 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2012-08-08 | 株式会社エイアールテック | Method for generating board-coupled equivalent circuit |
JP2008118098A (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2008-05-22 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Operation analysis method of semiconductor integrated circuit |
JP2010061547A (en) * | 2008-09-05 | 2010-03-18 | Nec Electronics Corp | Semiconductor device design support apparatus and substrate netlist generation method |
-
2011
- 2011-11-17 JP JP2011251475A patent/JP5832252B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-07-11 US US13/546,985 patent/US8640069B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2006100718A (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Operation analyzing method for semiconductor integrated circuit device, analyzing apparatus used therefor, and optimization designing method using the apparatus |
US20060091550A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-05-04 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method of analyzing operation of semiconductor integrated circuit device, analyzing apparatus used in the same, and optimization designing method using the same |
US7480879B2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2009-01-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Substrate noise tool |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Joardar, A Simple Approach to Modeling Crosstalk in Integrated Circuit, Oct. 1994, IEEE, vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 1212-1219. * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP5832252B2 (en) | 2015-12-16 |
US20130132920A1 (en) | 2013-05-23 |
JP2013110147A (en) | 2013-06-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10140407B2 (en) | Method, device and computer program product for integrated circuit layout generation | |
JP4312784B2 (en) | ESD analysis apparatus, ESD analysis program, semiconductor device design method, and semiconductor device manufacturing method | |
US7120551B2 (en) | Method for estimating EMI in a semiconductor device | |
CN103294842B (en) | Semiconductor device design method, system and computer-readable medium | |
US9305134B2 (en) | Semiconductor device design method, system and computer program product | |
US10318686B2 (en) | Methods for reducing delay on integrated circuits by identifying candidate placement locations in a leveled graph | |
US10396063B2 (en) | Circuit with combined cells and method for manufacturing the same | |
JP4501728B2 (en) | Crosstalk error control device, crosstalk error control method, and crosstalk error control program | |
US7698670B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for designing semiconductor integrated device using noise current and impedance characteristics of input/output buffers between power supply lines | |
US6772404B2 (en) | Parasitic element extraction apparatus | |
JP2006100718A (en) | Operation analyzing method for semiconductor integrated circuit device, analyzing apparatus used therefor, and optimization designing method using the apparatus | |
JP4065229B2 (en) | Power supply noise analysis method for semiconductor integrated circuit | |
JP2011065377A (en) | System and method for extracting parasitic element | |
US9659133B2 (en) | Method, system and computer program product for generating layout for semiconductor device | |
US9653393B2 (en) | Method and layout of an integrated circuit | |
US10002224B2 (en) | Interactive routing of connections in circuit using auto welding and auto cloning | |
US8640069B2 (en) | Noise analysis model and noise analysis method including disposing resistors and setting points in a semiconductor | |
JP4997710B2 (en) | LSI cell library data generation method | |
US20160210386A1 (en) | Circuit simulation device, circuit simulation method, and circuit simulation program | |
US10223483B1 (en) | Methods for determining resistive-capacitive component design targets for radio-frequency circuitry | |
US20110113395A1 (en) | Method, Electronic Design Automation Tool, Computer Program Product, and Data Processing Program for Creating a Layout for Design Representation of an Electronic Circuit and Corresponding Port for an Electronic Circuit | |
Eissa et al. | Parametric dfm solution for analog circuits: electrical-driven hotspot detection, analysis, and correction flow | |
JP2010140279A (en) | Method for designing electronic system | |
US20110078649A1 (en) | Wafer layout assisting method and system | |
KR100567069B1 (en) | Method for design of semiconductor device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SODA, MASAAKI;REEL/FRAME:028607/0968 Effective date: 20120625 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, JAPAN Free format text: CHANGE OF ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:044928/0001 Effective date: 20150806 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |