US7545504B2 - Imaging systems using unpolarized light and related methods and controllers - Google Patents
Imaging systems using unpolarized light and related methods and controllers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7545504B2 US7545504B2 US11/539,275 US53927506A US7545504B2 US 7545504 B2 US7545504 B2 US 7545504B2 US 53927506 A US53927506 A US 53927506A US 7545504 B2 US7545504 B2 US 7545504B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- light
- optical
- polarization
- source
- path
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/41—Refractivity; Phase-affecting properties, e.g. optical path length
- G01N21/45—Refractivity; Phase-affecting properties, e.g. optical path length using interferometric methods; using Schlieren methods
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/102—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for optical coherence tomography [OCT]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B9/02—Interferometers
- G01B9/02001—Interferometers characterised by controlling or generating intrinsic radiation properties
- G01B9/02002—Interferometers characterised by controlling or generating intrinsic radiation properties using two or more frequencies
- G01B9/02004—Interferometers characterised by controlling or generating intrinsic radiation properties using two or more frequencies using frequency scans
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B9/02—Interferometers
- G01B9/02015—Interferometers characterised by the beam path configuration
- G01B9/02027—Two or more interferometric channels or interferometers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B9/02—Interferometers
- G01B9/02041—Interferometers characterised by particular imaging or detection techniques
- G01B9/02044—Imaging in the frequency domain, e.g. by using a spectrometer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B9/02—Interferometers
- G01B9/0209—Low-coherence interferometers
- G01B9/02091—Tomographic interferometers, e.g. based on optical coherence
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
- A61B3/12—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for looking at the eye fundus, e.g. ophthalmoscopes
- A61B3/1225—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for looking at the eye fundus, e.g. ophthalmoscopes using coherent radiation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0059—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
- A61B5/0062—Arrangements for scanning
- A61B5/0066—Optical coherence imaging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B2290/00—Aspects of interferometers not specifically covered by any group under G01B9/02
- G01B2290/45—Multiple detectors for detecting interferometer signals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B2290/00—Aspects of interferometers not specifically covered by any group under G01B9/02
- G01B2290/70—Using polarization in the interferometer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N2021/178—Methods for obtaining spatial resolution of the property being measured
- G01N2021/1785—Three dimensional
- G01N2021/1787—Tomographic, i.e. computerised reconstruction from projective measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/21—Polarisation-affecting properties
- G01N21/23—Bi-refringence
Definitions
- the present invention relates to imaging and, more particularly, to imaging systems and related methods and controllers.
- OCT optical coherence tomography
- OCT systems include Fourier domain OCT (FD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT).
- FD-OCT generally includes swept source (SS) and spectral domain (SD), where SD systems generally use spectrometers rather than a swept source.
- SD systems generally rely on movement of a mirror or reference source over time to control imaging depth.
- the imaging depth may be determined by Fourier transform relationships between the acquired spectrum, rather than by the range of a physically scanned mirror.
- the number of samples of the spectrum may be used to control the imaging depth, with a greater number of samples of spectrum providing a deeper imaging capability.
- TD-OCT and FD-OCT are implementations of Low-Coherence Interferometry (LCI), a signal processing technique that relies on the mixing of two correlated broadband, or low coherence, optical signals that travel differential paths.
- Non-imaging implementations include Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry (OLCR), optical coherence-domain reflectometry (OCDR), and optical frequency domain reflectometry (OFDR).
- OLCR Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry
- OCDR optical coherence-domain reflectometry
- OFDR optical frequency domain reflectometry
- Low coherence interferometry is a specific class of the more general concept of optical interferometry.
- optical interferometers including, for example, Michelson interferometers, Mach-Zehnder interferometers, and Fabry-Perot cavity interferometers. Michelson and Mach-Zehnder interferometers are commonly used for sensing, metrology, and imaging applications.
- Low coherence implementations rely on the concept of coherence gating.
- An interferometric signal whose modulation amplitude is proportional to the product of the two mixed signals is generated when the difference between optical path lengths is within the coherence length of the signal. The coherence length is inversely proportional to the source bandwidth.
- Optical signals may be described by their state and degree of polarization.
- any optical signal may be decomposed into two orthogonal polarizations.
- the state of polarization (SOP) describes the relative amplitudes and phases of the two orthogonal components of polarization.
- the degree of polarization (DOP) describes the ratio of polarized light to the total irradiance.
- Unpolarized light is described by light that has energy distributed uniformly among the orthogonal polarization states, regardless of the basis set used to decompose the light field. Incandescent light tends to be highly unpolarized. In contrast, a laser tends to produce highly polarized light fields. A field may be described by the sum of its polarized component and its unpolarized component.
- a DOP of 1.0 describes a fully polarized field, and a DOP of zero describes an unpolarized field.
- Superluminescent light emitting diodes (SLED) used in OCT tend to have a DOP from about 50% to about
- Light fields may be polarized by passing through a polarizer. Furthermore, light fields may be depolarized by a number of methods known to those having skill in the art.
- Interferometric efficiency follows a cosine-squared law for the mixing of polarized signals.
- the signal strength of interfering polarized signals falls as the cosine-squared of the angle between the two polarizations.
- Orthogonal signals do not typically interfere.
- the reduction of interferometric efficiency caused by unmatched SOP can be referred to as polarization fading. Under certain conditions, unpolarized light interferes with a static reduction in polarization efficiency of about 50%.
- the interferometer includes an optical source 150 , a beam splitter/combiner 101 , first and second birefringent optical paths A 106 and B 107 and corresponding reflectors A 103 and B 104 , and a detector 105 .
- the optical source 150 may have an arbitrary coherence length and arbitrary DOP is incident on the beam splitter/combiner 101 .
- a fraction of the signal travels the birefringent optical path A 106 towards the Reflector A 103 .
- the remaining signal ignoring some unavoidable losses, travels the second birefringent path B 107 to the second reflector B 104 .
- the reflected signals from the Reflector A 103 and the Reflector B 104 reverse paths and recombine at the beam splitter/combiner 105 , where the subsequent mixed signals interfere, and the interference signal is captured on the detector 105 .
- no means for minimizing or controlling polarization fading is provided.
- the interferometer includes a polarized optical source 160 , a beam splitter/combiner 101 , first and second birefringent optical paths A 106 and B 107 and corresponding first and second reflectors A 103 and B 104 , SOP control 102 , and a detector 105 .
- SOP control 102 may be used in one or both of the birefringent optical paths A 106 and path B 107 . The use of SOP control 102 in this configuration may increase the likelihood that the polarization in one path may be aligned to the polarization in the other path, so that polarization fading may be reduced or possibly eliminated.
- the interferometer includes an optical source 250 , a beam splitter 208 , first and second birefringent optical paths A 206 and 207 , a beam combiner 209 and a detector 205 .
- the optical source 250 may have arbitrary coherence length and arbitrary DOP is incident on the beam splitter 208 .
- a fraction of the signal travels the birefringent path A 206 towards the beam combiner 209 .
- the remaining signal travels the second birefringent path B 207 to the same beam combiner 209 .
- the signals from path A 206 and path B 207 mix at the beam combiner 209 and the interference signal is captured on the detector 205 . In this configuration, no means for minimizing or controlling polarization fading is provided.
- the interferometer includes an polarized optical source 260 , a beam splitter 208 , first and second birefringent optical paths A 206 and 207 , SOP control 202 , a beam combiner 209 and a detector 205 .
- SOP control 202 may be used in one or both of the path A 206 and path B 207 . The use of SOP control 202 in this configuration may increase the likelihood that the polarization in one path may be aligned to the polarization in the other path, so that polarization fading may be reduced or possibly eliminated.
- the OCT includes a low-coherence or broadband source 300 , polarization controllers 302 , an isolator 305 , a splitter/combiner 301 and a spectrometer.
- the low-coherence or broadband light source 300 is coupled to a splitter/coupler 301 by a source arm 308 , a spectrometer 304 is coupled to the splitter/coupler 301 by a detector arm 303 , a reference arm 306 extends from the splitter/coupler 301 to a reference, such as a mirror, and a sample arm 307 extends from the splitter/coupler 301 to a sample, schematically illustrated as a human eye in FIG. 3 .
- These polarization controllers 302 may be used to increase the likelihood that the light returning from the reference arm 306 and the sample arm 307 are aligned relative to each other and potentially aligned with a dispersive element in the spectrometer 304 .
- the polarization controller 302 between the source 300 and an isolator 305 can be used to align the source polarization with the isolator 305 , which may be polarization sensitive. Polarization insensitive isolators may also be used, in which case that polarization controller 302 between the source 300 and the isolator 305 may not be present. These polarization controllers 302 are typically “tweaked” or adjusted on an hourly or daily time scale in order to maintain optimal system performance. Such systems are typically sensitive to disturbances of any connections, but particularly those of reference/sample arms 306 and 307 , the optical connections to the reference and the sample. System performance may also be sensitive to the performance of the broadband (Low-coherence) light source 300 , the coupler 301 and the spectrometer 304 .
- the broadband (Low-coherence) light source 300 the coupler 301 and the spectrometer 304 .
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide optical imaging systems including a light source and a depolarizer.
- the light source is provided in a source arm of the optical imaging system.
- a depolarizer is coupled to the light source in the source arm of the optical imaging system and is configured to substantially depolarize the light from the light source.
- a birefringence controller may be provided in a first path or a second path of the system and may be configured to modify a polarization-dependent optical path length in the at least one of the first and second paths.
- control settings of the birefringence controller may be set during manufacture and configured to be adjusted infrequently.
- control settings of the birefringence controller may be dynamic and may be configured to be set based on a metric of a measured or imaged signal and/or a rate of active control associated with demands of an application.
- the system may further include a power coupler coupled to the depolarizer and the first and second paths.
- the power coupler may be configured to provide light to and combine light from the first and second paths.
- the system further includes an isolator coupled between the light source and the depolarizer.
- the isolator may be configured to inhibit light from reentering the light source.
- the system further includes a spectrometer in a detector arm of the optical imaging system.
- the spectrometer may be configured to receive light from the light source and disperse the received light onto at least one detector.
- the detector may include a detector array including a plurality of detectors. Ones of the plurality of detectors may be configured to measure a power in a frequency band that is a subset of a total spectrum of the light source.
- the depolarizer may be further configured to substantially depolarize over the frequency band viewed by a single detector.
- the system may further include a photodiode in a detector arm of the optical imaging system.
- the photodiode may be configured to measure incident power over a time interval.
- the depolarizer may include a Lyot depolarizer, a multi-path depolarizer or a polarization scrambler.
- the optical imaging system may be a spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system and the light source may be a broadband light source.
- OCT optical coherence tomography
- the optical imaging system may be a frequency domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system and the light source may be a narrowband light source having an optical frequency that varies with time.
- OCT optical coherence tomography
- the optical imaging system may be a time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system and the light source may be a broadband light source.
- OCT optical coherence tomography
- optical imaging systems including a substantially unpolarized light source in a source arm of the optical imaging system.
- the unpolarized light source is configured to provide substantially unpolarized light to first and second paths of the system.
- Still further embodiments of the present invention provide optical imaging systems including a light source and a depolarizer.
- the light source is provided in a source arm of the optical imaging system.
- the depolarizer is provided in a reference arm of the optical imaging system and is configured to substantially depolarize light returning from the reference arm.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide optical interferometry systems including a light source and a birefringence controller.
- the light source is configured to provide substantially unpolarized light to first and second paths.
- the birefringence controller is provided in at least one of the first and second paths and is configured to modify a polarization-dependent optical path length in the at least one of the first and second paths.
- the system may further include a depolarizer in the at least one of the first and second paths including the birefringence controller.
- the depolarizer may be configured to compensate for polarizing elements present in the at least one of the first and second paths.
- the system may further include a power coupler coupled to the unpolarized light source and the first and second paths.
- the power coupler may be configured to provide a portion of light produced by the unpolarized light source to the first path and a remaining portion of the light produced by the unpolarized source to the second path.
- the system may further include first and second reflectors.
- the first reflector may be provided in the first path that reflects at least a portion of the light provided to the first path.
- the second reflector may be provided in the second path that reflects at least a portion of the light provided to the second path.
- the power coupler may be further configured to combine the reflected light from the first and second paths.
- the system may further include a detector configured to receive the combined reflected light.
- the system may further include a power splitter coupled to the unpolarized light source and the first and second paths.
- the power splitter may be configured to provide a portion of light produced by the unpolarized source to the first path and a remaining portion of the light produced by the unpolarized source to the second path.
- the system may further include a power coupler coupled to the first and second paths.
- the power coupler may be configured to combine at least a portion of the light provided to the first path and at least some portion of the light provided to the second path.
- the system may further include a detector configured to receive the combined light from the first and second paths.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide optical imaging systems including at least two light sources and a polarization beam combiner.
- the at least two light sources are provided in a source arm of the system.
- the polarization beam combiner is coupled to the at least two light sources and configured to output a substantially unpolarized signal having a power in each orthogonal polarization.
- the system may further include at least one variable optical attenuator between at least one of the at least two light sources and the polarization beam combiner.
- the at least one variable optical attenuator may be configured to control a power level from the at least one of the at least two light sources.
- the system may further include at least one filter between at least one of the at least two light sources and the polarization beam combiner.
- the at least one filter may be configured to provide equalized power across a spectrum.
- the system may be an optical coherence tomography imaging system.
- variable optical path length birefringence controllers including a polarization beam splitter.
- the polarization beam splitter is configured to receive light and split the light into first and second polarized components.
- the first and second polarized components travel respective first and second paths and at least one of the first and second paths includes a path length adjustment mechanism.
- the path length adjustment mechanism may include a path delay.
- the path length adjustment mechanism may include a nonlinear optical fiber that is configured to control an optical phase delay of the at least one of the first and second paths.
- the path length adjustment mechanism may include an electro optic phase modulator configured to control an optical phase delay of the at least one of the first and second paths.
- the path length adjustment mechanism may include a polarization-maintaining optical fiber configured to control an optical phase delay of the at least one of the first and second paths.
- Still further embodiments of the present invention provide a birefringence controller including an electro optic modulator configured to control a relative phase delay between first and second polarization states.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide birefringence controllers including a birefringent optical fiber configured to control a relative phase delay between first and second polarization states.
- birefringence controllers including a birefringent optical crystal configured to control a relative phase delay between first and second polarization states.
- Still further embodiments of the present invention provide birefringence controllers in at least one of a first path and a second path of an optical imaging system.
- the birefringence controller is configured to modify a polarization-dependent optical path length in the at least one of the first and second paths.
- the optical imaging system operates using substantially unpolarized light.
- the birefringence controller may be further configured to have a single degree of freedom and wherein the single degree of freedom modifies a differential birefringence between the first path and the second path.
- Still further embodiments of the present invention provide methods of imaging. Substantially unpolarized light is provided to first and second optical paths of an optical imaging system.
- a polarization-dependent optical path length is modified in at least one of the first and second paths of the optical imaging system.
- an optical power in a frequency band that is a subset of a total spectrum of the light source may be measured.
- incident power may be measured over a time interval.
- substantially unpolarized light may be received from a substantially unpolarized light source to provide the substantially unpolarized light.
- polarized light may be received from a polarized light source.
- the received polarized light may be substantially depolarized to provide the substantially unpolarized light.
- the light may be depolarized by substantially depolarizing the light for all wavelengths and times, depolarizing the light using a wavelength-average and/or depolarizing the light using a time-average.
- FIG. 1A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a conventional Michelson interferometer having birefringent optical paths.
- FIG. 1B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a conventional Michelson interferometer having birefringent optical paths and polarization control.
- FIG. 2A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a conventional Mach-Zehnder interferometer having birefringent optical paths.
- FIG. 2B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a conventional Mach-Zehnder interferometer having birefringent optical paths and polarization control.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a conventional optical engine (system).
- FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of signal strength versus relative angle for different polarizations according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a plurality of graphs illustrating spectral density vs. optical path length difference for various differential birefringence and polarization angles according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a Lyot-type optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of a multipath optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization control, variable optical attenuators, and fixed coupler.
- FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a multipath optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization control, variable optical attenuator, and polarization beam combiner.
- FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of a multipath optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization beam splitter, variable optical attenuator, and polarization beam combiner.
- FIG. 10 is a schematic block diagram of a multipath optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization controller, polarization beam splitter, and a fixed coupler.
- FIG. 11 is a schematic block diagram of a multipath optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization control, and a variable coupler.
- FIG. 12 is a schematic block diagram of an optical depolarizer according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization scrambler.
- FIG. 13A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Michelson interferometer having birefringent optical paths, using a depolarized source and birefringence control according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 13B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Mach-Zehnder interferometer having birefringent optical paths, using a depolarized source and birefringence control according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 14A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a low coherence source with a depolarizer.
- FIG. 14B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a low coherence source with a depolarizer and birefringence control.
- FIG. 14C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a depolarized low coherence source and birefringence control.
- FIG. 15A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a swept source with a depolarizer.
- FIG. 15B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a swept source with a depolarizer and birefringence control.
- FIG. 15C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a depolarized swept source and birefringence control.
- FIG. 16A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a low coherence source with a depolarizer.
- FIG. 16B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a low coherence source with a depolarizer and birefringence control.
- FIG. 16C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a depolarized low coherence source and birefringence control.
- FIG. 17A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a depolarized source and periodic filters.
- FIG. 17B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a depolarized source, birefringence control and periodic filters.
- FIG. 18A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a low coherence source with a depolarizer in the reference arm.
- FIG. 18B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a swept source with a depolarizer in the reference arm.
- FIG. 18C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a low coherence source with a depolarizer in the reference arm.
- FIG. 19A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization-multiplexed low coherence sources with power balancing using variable optical attenuators.
- FIG. 19B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization-multiplexed low coherence sources with power balancing using variable optical attenuators and using birefringence control.
- FIG. 19C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization-multiplexed low coherence sources with spectral equalization and using birefringence control.
- FIG. 20A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization-multiplexed swept sources with power balancing using variable optical attenuators.
- FIG. 20B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization-multiplexed swept sources with power balancing using variable optical attenuators and using birefringence control.
- FIG. 20C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization-multiplexed swept sources with spectral equalization and using birefringence control.
- FIG. 21A is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using a polarization-multiplexed low coherence sources with power balancing using variable optical attenuators.
- FIG. 21B is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization-multiplexed low coherence sources with power balancing using variable optical attenuators and using birefringence control.
- FIG. 21C is a schematic block diagram illustrating a time-domain optical coherence tomography system according to some embodiments of the present invention using polarization-multiplexed low coherence sources with spectral equalization and using birefringence control.
- FIG. 22 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a two-path birefringence controller using polarization beam splitter and combiner with a variable delay line according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 23 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a two-path birefringence controller using polarization beam splitter and combiner with nonlinear optical phase delay according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 24 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a birefringence controller using polarization beam splitter and combiner with an electro optic phase modulator according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 25 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a birefringence controller using polarization beam splitter and combiner with an polarization-maintaining fiber phase modulator according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 26 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a birefringence controller using a birefringent crystal according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- some embodiments of the present invention provide optical interferometry systems that include birefringence in one or both of two interfering paths, as illustrated in FIG. 1 A for a Michelson configuration and in FIG. 2A for a Mach-Zehnder configuration.
- These birefringent optical interferometry configurations are among common configurations for waveguide-based, including optical fiber waveguide-based, interferometers.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide birefringent optical interferometry systems that include unpolarized light sources to reduce or eliminate the polarization fading effects due to differential polarization evolution in the interfering paths, or to polarization dependent reflection of a sample being measured/imaged.
- the use of a depolarizer may replace all of the polarization controllers illustrated in FIGS. 1B and 2B with an unpolarized source, or a partially polarized or polarized source that may be followed with one or more depolarizer(s), which may be adjusted once (or not at all) at time of manufacture and may result in a system that is much less sensitive to thermal variations or mechanical disturbances of the optical system, or polarization dependences of references or samples.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide for birefringence controllers to further reduce static or time-dependent polarization fading.
- Birefringence controllers have fewer degrees of freedom than state-of-polarization (SOP) controllers, and therefore may provide for simpler optimization of interferometric sensitivity in birefringent interferometers than in possible with polarization controllers as will be discussed further below.
- SOP state-of-polarization
- Some embodiments of the present inventions provide for nominally single-frequency birefringent optical interferometers that utilize nominally unpolarized light sources. Such interferometers are typically applied to the measurement of path length differences or changes at a fraction of a wavelength of the light source.
- Some embodiments of the present inventions provide for broadband, low-coherence, or white-light birefringent optical interferometers that utilize nominally unpolarized light sources. Such interferometers are typically applied to the measurement of path length differences or changes at a fraction of the coherence-length of the light source.
- Some embodiments of the present inventions provide for broadband, low-coherence, or white-light birefringent optical interferometers that utilize nominally unpolarized light sources for the purposes of measurements or for imaging or for combinations of measurement and imaging.
- OCT Optical Coherence Tomography
- OCT embodiments may include, for example, time-domain or Fourier-domain, swept-source, spectral-domain or spectral radar.
- OCT embodiments of the present invention may be applied to monochomatic or broadband interferometers in Michelson or Mach-Zehnder configurations, among others, for imaging or measurements.
- Some embodiments of the present invention provide optical systems (engines) for OCT that include unpolarized light sources and/or depolarizers to reduce or even eliminate the polarization effects of optical components in the system or the polarization dependent reflection of a sample being measured/imaged.
- a depolarizer may replace all of the polarization controllers illustrated in, for example, FIG. 3 , with a depolarizer(s), which may be adjusted once (or not at all) at time of manufacture and may result in a system that is much less sensitive to thermal variations or mechanical disturbances of the optical system.
- the OCT engine may include a light source, an interferometer with a source arm, a detector arm, a reference arm and a sample arm, and a detector apparatus.
- the depolarizer may be placed in the source arm between the source and the interferometric coupler.
- the OCT engine systems may include light sources, such as superluminescent light-emitting diodes (SLED's) that typically produce light that is partially polarized, and/or tunable lasers, which produce light that is typically highly polarized.
- SLED's superluminescent light-emitting diodes
- tunable lasers which produce light that is typically highly polarized.
- the performance of a depolarizer can be measured by the degree of polarization (DOP) where 100% indicates light with a single state of polarization (SOP) and 0% indicates perfectly unpolarized light, i.e., where all polarizations are present in equal amounts.
- DOP is defined as the ratio of the power of the polarized light to the total power. For example, passing light through an ideal polarizer would typically produce light with 100% DOP. Conversely, an ideal depolarizer would typically produce light with 0% DOP. However, for some embodiments of the present invention, perfect depolarization is not required.
- OSNR optical-signal-to-noise ratio
- SOP state of polarization
- the interferometric signal power will generally be proportional to the electric field strength from the reference arm, the electric field strength from the signal arm and the square of the cosine of the angle between the two SOPs as seen in the following equation:
- Signal_strength E sample *E* reference *cos 2 ⁇ (1) This generally can vary from 1, for perfectly aligned SOPs, to 0, for SOPs that are at right angles. Thus, when the two SOPs are most nearly aligned the maximum signal strength may be provided.
- the light from the source can be largely depolarized before it is sent down the reference and sample arms.
- polarization effects in the two arms may be less important as any polarization effects in the two arms will be averaged over all of the available polarization states.
- Signal_strength E sample *E* reference *[1+DOP 2 *(cos 2 ⁇ 1)] (2) Equation 2 assumes the same DOP for the sample power and the reference power.
- Illustrative curves for these equations are illustrate in FIG. 4 .
- highly polarized light (100% Polarized)
- the signal strength falls off rapidly with the angle between the polarization of the reference and signal light.
- highly unpolarized light 0% Polarized
- the angle has no effect on the signal strength as expected.
- the worst-case signal loss is only 4% and, even for light that is 50% polarized, the signal loss is 25%.
- Equation 2 is an approximate form that is informative, but may have limited validity in real world systems where differential birefringence between two interfering paths may lead to polarization fading even with unpolarized light.
- a complete theory of interference has been derived for two optical signals of arbitrary coherence and polarization state, each traveling a distinctly different path with arbitrary birefringence, polarization dependent loss and optical path length.
- the correlation functions are calculated for a complete set of polarization states in terms of the coherence of the source fields.
- the model is validated against simple and known cases.
- the impact of differential birefringence is analyzed. Fading of fringe visibility is readily visible from the resultant equations. Regardless of input polarization state, visibility fading can be controlled and eliminated using an active control system to manage the differential birefringence between the two paths.
- ⁇ right arrow over (E) ⁇ j ⁇ right arrow over (L) ⁇ ( L j ) ⁇ right arrow over (B) ⁇ b ( ⁇ bj ) ⁇ right arrow over (P) ⁇ ( ⁇ j , ⁇ j ) ⁇ right arrow over (B) ⁇ a ( ⁇ aj ) ⁇ right arrow over (E) ⁇ sj (3) where the vectors ⁇ right arrow over (E) ⁇ sj and ⁇ right arrow over (E) ⁇ j are the input (source) and output fields of path j as
- Equation (3) Evaluating Equation (3) with the help of Equations (4A)-(7) yields the field at the output path references to the input fields as:
- E ⁇ j e i ⁇ ⁇ kLj ⁇ e i ⁇ ( ⁇ aj + ⁇ bj ) / 2 ⁇ [ ⁇ cos ⁇ 2 ( ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ + ⁇ ⁇ e - ⁇ i ⁇ aj ( 1 ⁇ - ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ 2 ( ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ ⁇ cos ( ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ ⁇ sin ( ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ e - ⁇ i ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ bj ( 1 ⁇ - ⁇ ⁇ e - i ⁇ ( ⁇ ⁇ aj ⁇ + ⁇ ⁇ bj ) ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ cos ⁇ 2 ⁇ ( ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ + ⁇ ⁇ j ) ⁇ ⁇ cos ( ⁇ ⁇
- Incident fields and correlations will now be discussed. Incident fields of various polarization states and their respective self-correlations are given in Table 1 set out below.
- the x correlation is defined as
- the y correlation has a similar definition, and the cross correlation is defined as ( ⁇ circumflex over (x) ⁇ right arrow over (E) ⁇ )( ⁇ right arrow over (E) ⁇ *) .
- These electrical fields relate to the fields given in Equation (4A,B) by simple dot product with the appropriate unit vector.
- ⁇ P is the angle of linear polarization or major axis of elliptical polarization.
- the coherence terms are given by the following equation:
- Table 1 relates the W ij kl terms directly to the coherence terms for a given polarization state.
- Cross correlation terms can be simply derived by using two distinct polarization terms in Table 1.
- Mixed states of polarization can be obtained by a normalized superposition of the elements in Table 1, for example, partially-polarized can be a combination of linear polarized light and unpolarized light.
- the orthogonal components do not interfere, and no fringes are formed.
- Equation (26) also applies to the case of coherent but unpolarized light, provided ⁇ L is much shorter than the coherence length of the light. This result differs from that discussed in W. K. Burns (JLT 10, 992, 1992), which predicted and measured a visibility of 0.5 in a fiber gyroscope geometry. This discrepancy can be accounted for in that they assumed polarization mixing in the fiber, which is not present in our model. Adding this component may reduce the visibility by half, since the polarization mixing splits an equal amount of light from each uncorrelated polarization component of the source into each of the output polarizations of each path.
- the second interference term in Equation (28) would vanish, as is evidenced in the upper left plot of FIG. 5 .
- the polarization or birefringent axis
- the spectral density in this case reduces to unity (i.e. the fringes vanish) for a differential birefringence of ⁇ /4.
- the two degrees of freedom are the angle that polarized light makes with respect to a birefringence axis, and the differential birefringence between the two paths.
- the number of degrees of freedom required to minimize polarization fading reduces to one: the differential birefringence between the two paths as will be discussed further herein.
- Depolarization can be achieved in at least three different ways according to some embodiments of the present.
- the light may be fully depolarized for all wavelengths and times.
- the light may be effectively depolarized in a wavelength-averaged sense, taking advantage of the fact that any photodiode typically integrates over a bandwidth of light and not just a single wavelength. Thus, if a distribution of polarization states exists within the optical bandwidth of a detector, the light may appear effectively depolarized to that detector.
- Wavelength-averaged depolarization can be accomplished by, for example, using a Lyot depolarizer, where wavelength-dependent birefringence in an optical path is used to create a well-distributed wavelength-dependence of polarization.
- the light may be effectively depolarized in a time-averaged sense taking advantage of the fact that any photodiode integrates over a finite period of time.
- the light may appear effectively depolarized to that detector.
- Time-averaged depolarization can be accomplished by, for example, using a polarization scrambler where the time to cycle through the various polarization states is on the same order or less than the integration time of the photodiode.
- Depolarizers can be built in a variety of ways and various such depolarizer designs may be utilized in embodiments of the present invention.
- a depolarizer design is used that provides a high enough level of depolarization of the light seen by any single detector in the system.
- unpolarized light is characterized by a light field that may be decomposed into two orthogonal polarizations, where the fields of the orthogonal polarizations are phase un-correlated, and where the intensities of the two orthogonal polarizations are equal, and where these conditions hold independent of basis set chosen for the polarization decomposition.
- a device for depolarizing a substantially polarized light source may include: a) a device for splitting an incident light source into two paths, b) a path length difference greater than the coherence length of the light source with respect to the detection bandwidth (optical or electrical), c) a polarization controller to orient the polarizations at the output of the two paths such that the two resultant light fields are substantially orthogonal to each other and d) a variable optical attenuator (VOA) to match the power levels of the two resultant light fields.
- VOA variable optical attenuator
- a Lyot depolarizer is a fiber Lyot depolarizer, which consists of two sections of birefringent fiber spliced together.
- a Lyot depolarizer generally does not depolarize the light at a single wavelength, but rather produces different polarizations at different wavelengths. As long as the detector integrates over a sufficient optical bandwidth, the light will on average behave as depolarized.
- a characteristic of a Lyot depolarizer is the size of the bandwidth required for the light to appear depolarized. In general the longer the fiber in the Lyot depolarizer, the narrower the bandwidth required for the light to appear depolarized. In some embodiments of the present invention, the relevant bandwidth is the range of wavelengths detected by a single photodiode.
- a Lyot depolarizer is illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 7 A second general architecture/design for a depolarizer is illustrated in FIG. 7 .
- the optical power is split by a 50%/50% power coupler.
- One leg of a first 50%/50% power coupler 760 is connected to a polarization controller 761 , then to a length of fiber 762 and finally to a second 50%/50% power coupler 760 .
- the other leg is connected to a second polarization controller 761 , then to a variable optical attenuator (VOA) 763 and finally to the other leg of the second 50%/50% power coupler 760 .
- the polarization controllers are set so that the light passing through each leg is rotated 90 degrees with respect to the light in the other leg.
- the fiber coil in the first leg should be longer than the coherence length observed by any individual detector in the system and may ensure that the light coming from each of the two legs is incoherent with respect to the other leg.
- the VOA on the second leg may be used to ensure that the power out of each leg is equal. Note that, in some embodiments, this configuration is provided with just one polarization controller and also may be provided with a VOA in each path (two VOAs instead of one) to accurately match the power levels on each leg. This configuration in some embodiments may produce highly unpolarized light (low DOP).
- FIG. 8 As a modification of the depolarizer architecture shown in FIG. 7 , another architecture/design is illustrated in FIG. 8 .
- a polarization beam combiner (PBC) 870 is used instead of a 50%/50% power coupler.
- the PBC 870 may ensure that the polarizations on the two legs are orthogonal and the PBC typically has lower insertion loss that a power coupler.
- Two polarization controllers are used in this architecture because the polarization in each leg is matched with the transmitted polarization state for the respective inputs to the PBS.
- the polarization controllers can be used as VOAs in this configuration, eliminating the additional VOAs in each leg. It is still desirable that the paths through each leg vary in length by a distance longer than the coherence length of the light viewed by any single detector.
- FIG. 9 Another modification of the depolarizer architecture shown in FIG. 7 is illustrated in FIG. 9 .
- both power couplers have been replaced, the first by a polarization beam splitter (PBS) 971 and the second by a polarization beam combiner (PBC) 970 .
- a single polarization controller 961 is placed between the input and the PBS 971 .
- This polarization controller 961 rotates the predominately linear polarization of the input source so that the power is split nearly 50%/50% by the PBS 971 .
- the fiber loop 962 in the top leg provides a path length difference that may be selected to reduce or even destroy the coherence between the two paths.
- the VOA 963 in the bottom leg provides fine power control.
- the PBC 970 recombines the two orthogonal polarizations back onto one output fiber.
- the VOA 963 may not be included in some embodiments depending on the degree of depolarization desired and the performance of the other optical components in the depolarizer. This architecture should have even further reduced insertion loss, as both the PBS 971 and the PBC 970 should have lower insertion loss than the power couplers 760 ( FIG. 7 ).
- FIG. 10 A potentially lower cost version of a depolarizer is illustrated in FIG. 10 .
- This architecture uses a single polarization controller 1061 and a PBS 1071 .
- the polarization controller 1061 is used to rotate the linear polarization so that it is split nearly 50%/50% by the PBS 1071 .
- the fiber loop 1062 provides a path length difference that may reduce or even destroy the coherence between the two paths.
- the light is recombined using a 50%/50% coupler 1060 .
- the architecture of the embodiments of FIG. 10 may use fewer and cheaper parts than that of FIG. 9 , but may not have the same degree of depolarization as the depolarizers described with reference to FIGS. 6 through 9 .
- FIG. 11 A depolarizer design according to further embodiments of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 11 .
- the optical input power is split by a 50%/50% power coupler 1160 .
- One leg is connected to a polarization controller 1161 , then to a length of fiber/coil 1162 and finally to a variable coupler 1180 .
- the other leg is connected to a second polarization controller 1161 and then to the other leg of the variable coupler 1180 .
- the polarization controllers 1161 may be set so that the light passing through each leg is rotated 90 degrees with respect to the light in the other leg.
- the fiber coil 1162 in the first leg may be longer than the coherence length observed by any individual detector in the system and may ensure that the light coming from each of the two legs is incoherent with respect to the other leg.
- the variable coupler 1180 may be used to match the amount of power coming from each leg. Note that it is possible to build this configuration in some embodiments of the present invention with just one polarization controller. The configuration of the embodiments of FIG. 11 may produce highly unpolarized light (low DOP).
- FIG. 12 Another type of depolarizer is shown in FIG. 12 , the depolarization is accomplished by using a polarization scrambler 1200 to vary the polarization over time. Provided that the time to cycle through the various polarization states is on the order of or less than the integration time of an photodiode in the system, then the light may appear depolarized to the photodiode.
- polarization scramblers including, for example, ones with motorized moving waveplates, ones that squeeze the fiber to change the polarization properties, and ones that have integrated electro-optic devices that change the polarization properties of the device.
- depolarizers are not limited to the embodiments discussed herein.
- the depolarizer is designed to provide unpolarized light to each detector.
- the term “depolarized light” refers generally to substantially unpolarized (depolarized) light.
- the use of the word substantially indicates that the light may not be completely depolarized, i.e. some portion/percentage of the light may still be polarized without departing from the scope of the present invention. In other words, the degree of depolarization may vary from one embodiment to another.
- the term “depolarizer” refers to a device that creates substantially unpolarized light from substantially polarized light.
- the term “unpolarized light source” refers to a light source that provides substantially unpolarized light, i.e. the unpolarized light may vary in degree. In some embodiments of the present invention, the light may be from zero to about 30 percent polarized and still be considered “unpolarized” light in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
- birefringence refers to an optical path length difference between polarization states.
- a birefringence controller may be configured to modify a polarization-dependent optical path length as will be discussed in detail below.
- the interferometer consists of an unpolarized or depolarized source 1370 , a beam splitter/combiner 1301 , and birefringent paths A 1306 and B 1307 . Because the light is depolarized, SOP control discussed with respect to conventional embodiments is neither required nor useful. Instead, birefringence control 1311 is used in one or both of paths A 1306 and B 1307 . Birefringence control may be preferable to SOP control, because only one degree of freedom is required as discussed above.
- a depolarizer 1320 may be deployed in one or both the birefringent paths A 1306 and B 1307 .
- the depolarizer 1320 in this circumstance may serve to compensate for an increased polarization that may have been induced by polarization dependent loss (or gain) in the system.
- the interferometer consists of an unpolarized or depolarized source 1370 , a beam splitter/combiner 1301 , and birefringent paths A 1306 and B 1307 . Because the light is depolarized, SOP control is neither required nor useful. Instead, birefringence control 1311 is used in one or both of paths A 1306 and B 1307 as discussed with respect to FIG. 13A .
- Embodiments of the present invention illustrated in FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate a Michelson configuration and a Mach-Zehnder configuration, respectively, including elements according to some embodiments of the present invention.
- Each configuration uses an unpolarized or depolarized source 1370 , contains a birefringent optical path A 1306 that may be termed a reference path and a birefringent path B 1307 that may be termed a sample path.
- Birefringence control 1311 may be used in one or both birefringent paths to compensate for differential birefringence between the paths.
- Supplemental depolarization 1320 may be used in one or more paths to at least partially compensate for polarizing elements in the respective path.
- the detector 1305 may include a single or multiple elements, and may include a wavelength-dispersed spectrometer.
- the detector 1305 may include a single or multiple elements, and may include a wavelength-dispersed spectrometer.
- a depolarizer is used in a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography SD-OCT architecture.
- the depolarizer 1420 in the source arm 1408 depolarizes the light from the low-coherence or broadband source 1400 after it has passed through an isolator 1405 .
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1401 and sent to the reference arm 1406 and the sample arm 1407 . Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1401 and sent down both the source arm 1408 and the detector arm 1403 .
- the isolator 1405 may limit or possibly prevent light from reentering the source 1400 .
- a source that is insensitive to reflected light may be used and the isolator may be omitted.
- the depolarizer may be configured to depolarize over the bandwidth viewed by any single detector not just on average over the entire spectrum of the source.
- a depolarizer is used in a birefringent spectral-domain optical coherence tomography SD-OCT architecture.
- the depolarizer 1420 in the source arm 1408 depolarizes the light from the low-coherence or broadband source 1400 after it has passed through an isolator 1405 .
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1401 and sent to the reference arm 1406 and the sample arm 1407 .
- Birefringence control 1411 may be applied to either the reference path 1406 or the sample path 1407 or both without departing from the scope of the present invention.
- Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1401 and sent down both the source arm 1408 and the detector arm 1403 .
- the isolator 1405 may limit or possibly prevent light from reentering the source 1400 .
- a source that is insensitive to reflected light may be used and the isolator may be omitted.
- an unpolarized or depolarized source may be used in a birefringent spectral-domain optical coherence tomography SD-OCT architecture.
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1401 and sent to the reference arm 1406 and the sample arm 1407 .
- Birefringence control 1411 is applied to either path in order balance the birefringence in each path. Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1401 and sent down both the source arm 108 and the detector arm 1403 .
- the birefringence control may be set during assembly of the instrument and may need only be adjusted occasionally or not at all during operation.
- the birefringence control may be dynamically set based on a metric of the measured or image signal, the rate of active control being set by the demands of the individual application, but in general the rate of active control is substantially slower than the detector integration bandwidth.
- a depolarizer is used in a swept-source optical coherence tomography SS-OCT architecture.
- the depolarizer 1520 in the source arm 1508 depolarizes the light from the swept-source laser 1530 after it has passed through an isolator 1505 .
- Light from the source arm 1508 is split by a power coupler 1501 and sent to the reference arm 1506 and the sample arm 1507 . Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1501 and sent down both the source arm 1508 and the detector arm 103 .
- the isolator 1505 may limit or even prevent light from reentering the source 130 .
- a source that is insensitive to reflected light may be used and the isolator may be omitted.
- a depolarizer may be used in a birefringent swept-source optical coherence tomography SS-OCT architecture.
- the depolarizer 1520 in the source arm 1508 depolarizes the light from the swept source laser 1500 after it has passed through an isolator 1505 .
- a swept source laser can be generally referred to as a narrowband light source having an optical frequency that may vary with time. Thus, other equivalent light sources may also be used.
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1501 and sent to the reference arm 1506 and the sample arm 1507 .
- Birefringence control 1511 may be applied to either path in order balance the birefringence in each path. Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1501 and sent down both the source arm 1508 and the detector arm 1503 .
- the isolator 1505 may limit or possibly prevent light from reentering the source 1500 . In some embodiments of the present invention, a source that is insensitive to reflected light may be used and the isolator may be omitted.
- an unpolarized or depolarized source may be used in a birefringent swept-source optical coherence tomography SS-OCT architecture.
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1501 and sent to the reference arm 1506 and the sample arm 1507 .
- Birefringence control 1511 may be applied to either path in order balance the birefringence in each path. Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1501 and sent down both the source arm 1508 and the detector arm 1503 .
- the photodiode 1531 acts as a detector that measures the total incident power over a given time interval.
- the depolarizer depolarizes over the instantaneous line width of the swept laser source 1530 , rather than just depolarizing the light on average over the entire spectrum of the swept source.
- the birefringence control may be set during assembly of the instrument as discussed above. In further embodiments of the present invention, the birefringence control may be dynamic as discussed above.
- the depolarizer 1620 in the source arm 1608 depolarizes the light from the low-coherence or broadband source 1600 after it has passed through an isolator 1605 .
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1601 and sent to the reference arm 1606 and the sample arm 1607 .
- the length of the reference arm may be changed over time, here illustrated by a moving mirror 1632 .
- Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1601 and sent down both the source arm 1608 and the detector arm 1603 .
- the isolator 1605 may limit or possibly prevent light from reentering the source 1600 .
- the source 1600 is insensitive to reflected light and the isolator 1605 may be omitted.
- a depolarizer may be used in a birefringent time-domain optical coherence tomography TD-OCT architecture.
- the depolarizer 1620 in the source arm 1608 depolarizes the light from the low coherence source 1600 after it has passed through an isolator 1605 .
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1601 and sent to the reference arm 1606 and the sample arm 1607 .
- Birefringence control 1611 is to applied to either path in order balance the birefringence in each path.
- Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1601 and sent down both the source arm 1608 and the detector arm 1603 .
- the isolator 1605 may limit or possibly prevent light from reentering the source 1600 .
- a source that is insensitive to reflected light may be used and the isolator may be omitted.
- the detector 1631 measures the total power over a given time interval.
- the depolarizer 1620 depolarizes over the total bandwidth of the low-coherence or broadband source 1600 .
- an unpolarized or depolarized source may be used in a birefringent time-domain optical coherence tomography TD-OCT architecture.
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1601 and sent to the reference arm 1606 and the sample arm 1607 .
- Birefringence control 1611 is to applied to either path in order balance the birefringence in each path. Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1601 and sent down both the source arm 1608 and the detector arm 1603 .
- the detector 1631 measures the total power over a given time interval.
- a periodic optical filter (POF) 1740 added to the configuration illustrated in FIG. 14A will be discussed.
- the addition of the POF 1740 may provide additional benefits as discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/495,226, filed Jul. 28, 2006, entitled “OPTICAL COHERENCE IMAGING SYSTEMS HAVING A REDUCED EFFECTIVE LINEWIDTH AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety.
- the POF 1740 could be an interleaver and/or a Fabry Perot cavity and/or other POF and may be tunable by various means including mechanical, electrical, and/or optical.
- the added depolarizer in each of the described embodiments may be beneficially a depolarizer that works within the bandwidth viewed by any single detector in the system, including individual detectors inside one or more spectrometers.
- the depolarizer 1720 in the source arm 1708 depolarizes the light from the low-coherence or broadband source 1700 after it has passed through an isolator 1705 .
- Light from the source arm is split by a power coupler 1701 and sent to the reference arm 1706 and the sample arm 1707 . Reflected light from the reference and sample arms are combined by the power coupler 1701 and sent down both the source arm 1708 and the detector arm 1703 .
- the isolator 1705 may limit or possibly prevent light from reentering the source.
- the source 1700 may be insensitive to reflected light and the isolator may be omitted.
- the depolarizer depolarizes over the bandwidth viewed by any single detector rather than simply depolarizing on average over the entire spectrum of the source.
- Birefringence control 1711 is added in order to modify birefringence in the reference and sample paths.
- the birefringence control may, as for other embodiments, be set once or only infrequently, or may be part of an active control system without departing from the scope of the present invention.
- optical engines may include an optical source, a plurality of optical spectrometers, a plurality of interferometers and one or more optical depolarizers.
- One or more of the depolarizers may be a Lyot depolarizer and/or a multi-path depolarizer.
- optical engines may include a tunable optical source, a plurality of optical detectors, a plurality of interferometers and one or more optical depolarizers.
- One or more of the depolarizers may be a Lyot depolarizer and/or a multi-path depolarizer.
- optical engines may include an optical source, a reference arm that changes effective optical path length, a plurality of optical detectors, a plurality of interferometers and one or more optical depolarizers.
- One or more of the depolarizers may be a Lyot depolarizer and/or a multi-path depolarizer and/or a polarization scrambler.
- optical engines include an optical source, a plurality of optical detectors, a plurality of interferometers, a plurality of periodic optical filters, and one or more optical depolarizers.
- One or more of the depolarizers may be a Lyot depolarizer and/or a multi-path depolarizer and/or a polarization scrambler.
- a depolarizer 1820 is placed in the reference arm 1806 of the OCT engine. In this configuration only the light returning from the reference arm may be depolarized. When interfered with the light from the sample arm 1807 , which is polarized or partially polarized, there will typically be an interference signal regardless of the specific polarization properties of the sample. Typically this architecture will result in a 3.0 dB decrease in OSNR relative to the maximum possible OSNR, but there will generally be minimal change in the signal strength regardless of the polarization properties of the sample or changes in the polarization properties of the system.
- the path length through the depolarizer 1820 will need to be essentially constant as a function of wavelength. This is the case for depolarizers, such as the Lyot depolarizer illustrated in FIG. 6 and the depolarizer based on a polarization scrambler in FIG. 12 .
- a depolarizer 1820 is placed in the reference arm of an OCT engine based on a swept laser source 1830 .
- the light returning from the reference arm may be depolarized.
- the sample arm 1807 which is polarized or partially polarized, there will typically be an interference signal regardless of the specific polarization properties of the sample.
- this architecture will result in a 3.0 dB decrease in OSNR relative to the maximum possible OSNR, but there generally will be minimal change in the signal strength regardless of the polarization properties of the sample or changes in the polarization properties of the system.
- a depolarizer 1820 is placed in the reference arm of a time domain OCT engine that uses a broad band source 1800 and a scanning reference arm 1832 .
- the light returning from the reference arm is typically depolarized.
- the sample arm 1807 which is polarized or partially polarized, there will typically be an interference signal regardless of the specific polarization properties of the sample.
- this architecture will result in a 3.0 dB decrease in OSNR relative to the maximum possible OSNR, but there will generally be minimal change in the signal strength regardless of the polarization properties of the sample or changes in the polarization properties of the system.
- FIG. 19A an optical engine according to further embodiments of the present invention will be discussed.
- a polarization beam combiner PBC
- the fiber 1901 between the sources and the PBC may be polarization maintaining.
- a source 1900 is coupled into each input of a polarization beam combiner so that the output of the PBC 1903 has power in each of the orthogonal polarizations and is depolarized.
- the rest of the engine is similar in design to FIG. 14A .
- Embodiments of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 19A may have the advantage that more optical power may be available to the engine and may not require polarization controllers to align polarization with various components.
- birefringence control 1911 is applied as discussed above with respect to other embodiments of the present invention.
- one or more active or passive filters 1910 is added to increase the likelihood that power is equalized across the applicable spectrum for both multiplexed polarizations.
- FIG. 20A there are two or more swept laser sources 2030 that are connected to a polarization beam combiner 2000 . Between the sources 2030 and the PBC are optional variable optical attenuators 2063 which can be used to control the power level from each source.
- the fiber 2001 between the sources and the PBC may be polarization maintaining.
- a source 2030 is coupled into each input of a polarization beam combiner so that the output of the PBC 2000 has power in each of the orthogonal polarizations and is depolarized.
- Embodiments of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 20A may have an advantage that more optical power may be available to the engine and may not require polarization controllers to align polarization with various components.
- birefringence control 2011 is applied as discussed in these embodiments as discussed in detail above.
- one or more active or passive filters 2010 may be added to increase the likelihood that power is equalized across the applicable spectrum for both multiplexed polarizations.
- FIG. 21A there are two or more low coherence sources 2100 that are connected to a polarization beam combiner 2110 . Between the sources 2100 and the PBC are optional variable optical attenuators 2163 which can be used to control the power level from each source.
- the fiber 2101 between the sources and the PBC may be polarization maintaining.
- a source 2130 is coupled into each input of a polarization beam combiner so that the output of the PBC 2110 has power in each of the orthogonal polarizations and is depolarized.
- Embodiments of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 21A may have an advantage that more optical power may be available to the engine and may not require polarization controllers to align polarization with various components
- birefringence control 2111 is applied as discussed for previous embodiments.
- one or more active or passive filters 2101 is added to increase the likelihood that power is equalized across the applicable spectrum for both multiplexed polarizations.
- birefringence control is specified to modify birefringence in each of two interferometric paths.
- polarization fading is modulated cosinusoidally according to a sum of the birefringence in each of the two interferometric paths.
- Birefringence as described herein may be the polarization-dependence of optical path length.
- Various methods of controlling the path birefringence are known to those having skill in the art.
- birefringence control may be of high order, whereby the total change in birefringence may be over a distance equal to many wavelengths, or even greater than the coherence length of the light source.
- the birefringence control may be over a fraction of a wavelength for monochromatic interferometers, and over a fraction of a coherence length, for broadband, or low-coherence, interferometers.
- input signal 2250 impinges on a polarization beam splitter 2271 .
- the nominally unpolarized source is separated into two polarized components that travel a polarization path p 2253 along one direction and a polarization path s 2252 along a second direction.
- One or both paths include an independent path delay 2251 that has control of the optical path on the order of a small fraction, for example, about 10% or less, of the wavelength of light, with enough range to cover a path length change equal to at least one to at least a few optical wavelengths.
- Such control can be provided, for example, by a piezo-electric controller.
- the light is recombined into the polarization beam combiner 2200 and reintroduced into the optical path of the interferometer 2250 .
- nonlinear optical phase modulation in a nonlinear optical fiber 2380 may be used to finely control the effective optical path length on one or both of paths 2353 and/or 2352 .
- pump light 2381 in a wavelength band disjoint from the interferometer source wavelength band is introduced into the nonlinear fiber 2380 .
- the induced phase delay is in direct proportion to the intensity of the pump light 2381 and the nonlinear refractive index of the optical fiber 2380 .
- Residual pump 2382 is removed from the path at the output to reduce the likelihood that it will contribute to the detected interferometric signal.
- Embodiments of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 23 may also include a single optical fiber path with s ⁇ and p ⁇ input polarizations 2353 and 2352 , and a pump 2381 with polarization control to modify the relative phase delay imparted on the two orthogonal signal polarizations.
- electro optic phase modulation 2460 is used to finely control the effective optical path length differential between orthogonal polarizations.
- voltage control 2471 is used to control the effective birefringence of an electro optic crystal 2460 .
- phase modulation between orthogonal polarization components is created in polarization-maintaining optical fiber (PMF) 2570 .
- PMF polarization-maintaining optical fiber
- the magnitude of accumulated birefringence is controlled by rotating a birefringent crystal 2680 , such as a multi-order optical waveplate.
- Rotating 2673 a crystal with a fixed refractive index difference for orthogonal polarizations in order to increase the total path length through the crystal is sufficient to provide the level or birefringence control required in the present invention.
- birefringence control is achieved with the use of active feedback, by maximizing a metric of the interferometric signal.
- the metric may include, for example, peak interferometric signal power, average signal power, or a ratio that involves the maximum signal power, minimum signal power, and/or average signal powers, derived over some operating range.
Abstract
Description
S=2[1+cos(Δa+Δb)cos(kΔL)]
where S is the spectral intensity, cos(kΔL) is an interference term and cos(Δa+Δb) is a signal fading term.
Signal_strength=E sample *E* reference*cos2 θ (1)
This generally can vary from 1, for perfectly aligned SOPs, to 0, for SOPs that are at right angles. Thus, when the two SOPs are most nearly aligned the maximum signal strength may be provided.
Signal_strength=E sample *E* reference*[1+DOP2*(cos2 θ−1)] (2)
{right arrow over (E)} j ={right arrow over (L)}(L j){right arrow over (B)} b(δbj){right arrow over (P)}(θj,εj){right arrow over (B)} a(δaj){right arrow over (E)} sj (3)
where the vectors {right arrow over (E)}sj and {right arrow over (E)}j are the input (source) and output fields of path j as
The unitary matrix {right arrow over (L)} describes average phase accumulation along the path of length Lj as illustrated by the following equation:
Two matrices {right arrow over (B)} describe the total birefringence δaj+δbj of the path as:
In order to account for polarization dependent loss (PDL, a polarizing effect), a polarizer of arbitrary strength lies in between these two sections of birefringence at angle θj and extinction δj, given by the following equation:
Note that the case of no polarizer is obtained by setting ε=1, in which case {right arrow over (P)} becomes a simple unitary matrix.
The power contained in this field can be derived as:
The first and second terms are the intensity of the x- and y-polarized components, respectively, while the third term represents the interference between the polarizations due to polarization mixing in the path via polarizer. Note that in the absence of any polarizer (ε=1), the intensity simplifies to the sum of the intensities of each polarization component. For a perfect polarizer (ε=0), the resultant intensity reduces to Malus' law (cosine-squared dependence on the polarizer angle).
S= {right arrow over (E)}*{right arrow over (E)} (10)
where the vector {right arrow over (E)} is the sum of the two fields that propagate through
S=(S 11 xx +S 11 yy +S 11 xy)+(S 22 xx +S 22 yy +S 22 xy)+(S 12 xx +S 12 yy +S 12 xy +S 12 yx) (11)
The first two bracketed terms in Equation (11) are the background terms involving the coherence of each source with itself, including coherence across orthogonal polarizations, and are given by the following equations:
S jj xx=(P j x
S jj xx=2(P j x +P j y)P j c Re{e iδ
The final bracketed terms in Equation (11) give rise to interference between the two arms of the interferometer and are given by the following equations:
S 12 xx=2Re{e ikΔL e i(Δ
S 12 yy=2Re{e ikΔL e −i(Δ
S 12 xy=2Re{e ikΔL e −iΣ
S 12 yx=2Re{e ikΔL e iΣ
P j x=cos2(θj)+εj sin2(θj)P j y=εj cos2(θj)+sin2(θj) (18A,B)
P j c=(1−εj)cos(θj)sin(θj) (19)
while the birefringence terms are defined by the following equations:
Δa=(δa2−δa1)/2 Δb=(δb2−δb1)/2 (20A,B)
Σa=(δa2+δa1)/2 ΔL=(L 2 −L 1) (21A,B)
The field correlations are the ensemble averages of the source fields, given by the following equation:
W ij kl= E si k* E sj l (22)
TABLE 1 |
Electric field representations for various cases of polarized light. |
Type | Electric field | x-correlation | y-correlation | cross correlation |
Unpolarized |
|
|
|
0 |
Linear x |
|
|
0 | 0 |
Linear y |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Linear 45° |
|
|
|
|
Arbitrary Linear |
|
|
|
|
Circular |
|
|
|
|
Elliptical |
|
|
|
|
and represent the self or mutual coherence of the relative field components. Therefore, Table 1 relates the Wij kl terms directly to the coherence terms for a given polarization state. Cross correlation terms can be simply derived by using two distinct polarization terms in Table 1.
TABLE 2 |
Polarizer terms for simple cases. |
Polarizer | x-polarization | y-polarization | no polarizer | ||
term | (εj = 0) | (εj = 0) | (εj = 1) | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | ||
|
0 | 1 | 1 | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | ||
S=W 11 xx +W 22 yy (24)
the value of which is dependent on the polarization of the incident field. The orthogonal components do not interfere, and no fringes are formed.
S=(W 11 xx +E 11 yy +W 22 xx +W 22 yy)+2(W 12 xx +W 12 yy)cos(kΔL) (25)
Now under the assumption that the light in both paths originates from the same source of coherent (Γ=1) linearly-polarized light, then the spectral density reduces to the familiar form given by the following equation:
S=2[1+cos(kΔL)] (26)
where the peak intensity is four times the intensity of a single beam and the fringes have unity visibility. Equation (26) also applies to the case of coherent but unpolarized light, provided ΔL is much shorter than the coherence length of the light. This result differs from that discussed in W. K. Burns (JLT 10, 992, 1992), which predicted and measured a visibility of 0.5 in a fiber gyroscope geometry. This discrepancy can be accounted for in that they assumed polarization mixing in the fiber, which is not present in our model. Adding this component may reduce the visibility by half, since the polarization mixing splits an equal amount of light from each uncorrelated polarization component of the source into each of the output polarizations of each path.
S=2[1+cos(Δa+Δb)cos(kΔL)] (27)
Equation (27) shows that differential birefringence in the paths will lead to fading of the interference fringes via the term cos(Δa+Δb). For a differential birefringence of π/2 between the two paths, the fringes vanish. Assuming that the birefringence varies on a time scale much shorter than the acquisition time of the system measuring the fringes, then the time-averaged spectral intensity is simply S=2 (the sum of the intensities of the individual paths), and all fringes have vanished.
S=2[1+cos(kΔL+Δa+Δb)]+4 sin2(θp)sin(Δa+Δb)sin(kΔL) (28)
In the first term, the differential birefringence adds an offset to the fringes, but does not contribute to fading. There is a second interference term that has fading associated with it whose strength is dependent on the relative angle between the source polarization angle and the birefringent axis. Although as written it looks like a separate term that might be sifted away from the signal, it is in fact deterministically coupled via the same arguments. This term in fact serves to reduce the fringe visibility as illustrated in
Claims (30)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/539,275 US7545504B2 (en) | 2005-10-07 | 2006-10-06 | Imaging systems using unpolarized light and related methods and controllers |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US72508705P | 2005-10-07 | 2005-10-07 | |
US11/539,275 US7545504B2 (en) | 2005-10-07 | 2006-10-06 | Imaging systems using unpolarized light and related methods and controllers |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070086017A1 US20070086017A1 (en) | 2007-04-19 |
US7545504B2 true US7545504B2 (en) | 2009-06-09 |
Family
ID=37621932
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/539,275 Active 2027-02-10 US7545504B2 (en) | 2005-10-07 | 2006-10-06 | Imaging systems using unpolarized light and related methods and controllers |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7545504B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007044612A2 (en) |
Cited By (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080117427A1 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2008-05-22 | Fujifilm Corporation | Optical tomograph |
US20100149519A1 (en) * | 2008-06-12 | 2010-06-17 | Mehrdad Toofan | Polarization contrast imager (pci) |
US20100274270A1 (en) * | 2009-04-28 | 2010-10-28 | Patel Himanshu N | Guidewire support catheter |
US20110080591A1 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2011-04-07 | Axsun Technologies, Inc. | Integrated Dual Swept Source for OCT Medical Imaging |
US8361097B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 | 2013-01-29 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter system and method for boring through blocked vascular passages |
US8548571B2 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2013-10-01 | Avinger, Inc. | Devices and methods for predicting and preventing restenosis |
US8644913B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2014-02-04 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, imaging, and atherectomy devices |
US9125562B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2015-09-08 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter-based off-axis optical coherence tomography imaging system |
US9345510B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2016-05-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters with longitudinally displaceable drive shafts |
US9345406B2 (en) | 2011-11-11 | 2016-05-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, atherectomy devices, and imaging |
US9345398B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2016-05-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter drive assemblies |
US9498600B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2016-11-22 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with laterally-displaceable tip |
US9498247B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2016-11-22 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and occlusion crossing devices |
US9557156B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2017-01-31 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography with graded index fiber for biological imaging |
US9592075B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2017-03-14 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters devices having multi-channel bushings |
US9593934B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2017-03-14 | Axsun Technologies Llc | Integrated dual swept source for OCT medical imaging |
US9677869B2 (en) | 2012-12-05 | 2017-06-13 | Perimeter Medical Imaging, Inc. | System and method for generating a wide-field OCT image of a portion of a sample |
US9788790B2 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2017-10-17 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography for biological imaging |
US9854979B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-01-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Chronic total occlusion crossing devices with imaging |
US9949754B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2018-04-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices |
US10130386B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2018-11-20 | Avinger, Inc. | Identification of elastic lamina to guide interventional therapy |
US10335173B2 (en) | 2012-09-06 | 2019-07-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Re-entry stylet for catheter |
US10357277B2 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2019-07-23 | Avinger, Inc. | High speed chronic total occlusion crossing devices |
US10363062B2 (en) | 2011-10-17 | 2019-07-30 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and non-contact actuation mechanism for catheters |
US10548478B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2020-02-04 | Avinger, Inc. | Balloon atherectomy catheters with imaging |
US10568520B2 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2020-02-25 | Avinger, Inc. | Micro-molded anamorphic reflector lens for image guided therapeutic/diagnostic catheters |
US10577573B2 (en) | 2017-07-18 | 2020-03-03 | Perimeter Medical Imaging, Inc. | Sample container for stabilizing and aligning excised biological tissue samples for ex vivo analysis |
US10890429B2 (en) | 2018-12-27 | 2021-01-12 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Automatic calibration optical interferometer and automatic calibration method of optical interferometer |
US10932670B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-03-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical pressure sensor assembly |
RU2747380C1 (en) * | 2018-01-16 | 2021-05-04 | Иллюмина, Инк. | Multi-shoulder image system based on structured lighting |
US11096717B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-08-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Tissue collection device for catheter |
US11224459B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2022-01-18 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with shapeable distal tip |
US11278248B2 (en) | 2016-01-25 | 2022-03-22 | Avinger, Inc. | OCT imaging catheter with lag correction |
US11284916B2 (en) | 2012-09-06 | 2022-03-29 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and occlusion crossing devices |
US11344327B2 (en) | 2016-06-03 | 2022-05-31 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter device with detachable distal end |
US11382653B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2022-07-12 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter |
US11399863B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2022-08-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with serrated cutter |
US11406412B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2022-08-09 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters with imaging |
US11793400B2 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2023-10-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices |
US11957376B2 (en) | 2022-08-01 | 2024-04-16 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with serrated cutter |
Families Citing this family (88)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1434522B1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2010-01-13 | The General Hospital Corporation | Optical systems for tissue analysis |
US9295391B1 (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2016-03-29 | The General Hospital Corporation | Spectrally encoded miniature endoscopic imaging probe |
GB2408797B (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2006-09-20 | Gen Hospital Corp | Method and apparatus for determination of atherosclerotic plaque type by measurement of tissue optical properties |
US7355716B2 (en) | 2002-01-24 | 2008-04-08 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for ranging and noise reduction of low coherence interferometry LCI and optical coherence tomography OCT signals by parallel detection of spectral bands |
US8054468B2 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2011-11-08 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for ranging and noise reduction of low coherence interferometry LCI and optical coherence tomography OCT signals by parallel detection of spectral bands |
CA2519937C (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2012-11-20 | Guillermo J. Tearney | Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography by path length encoded angular compounding |
EP3002547B1 (en) | 2003-06-06 | 2019-04-03 | The General Hospital Corporation | Process and apparatus for a wavelength tuning source |
CN103284691B (en) | 2003-10-27 | 2017-04-26 | 通用医疗公司 | Method and apparatus for performing optical imaging using frequency-domain interferometry |
AU2004320269B2 (en) * | 2004-05-29 | 2011-07-21 | The General Hospital Corporation | Process, system and software arrangement for a chromatic dispersion compensation using reflective layers in optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging |
JP4995720B2 (en) | 2004-07-02 | 2012-08-08 | ザ ジェネラル ホスピタル コーポレイション | Endoscopic imaging probe with double clad fiber |
EP1782020B1 (en) | 2004-08-06 | 2012-10-03 | The General Hospital Corporation | Process, system and software arrangement for determining at least one location in a sample using an optical coherence tomography |
KR20070058523A (en) | 2004-08-24 | 2007-06-08 | 더 제너럴 하스피탈 코포레이션 | Method and apparatus for imaging of vessel segments |
US8965487B2 (en) | 2004-08-24 | 2015-02-24 | The General Hospital Corporation | Process, system and software arrangement for measuring a mechanical strain and elastic properties of a sample |
WO2006039091A2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2006-04-13 | The General Hospital Corporation | System and method for optical coherence imaging |
KR101257100B1 (en) | 2004-09-29 | 2013-04-22 | 더 제너럴 하스피탈 코포레이션 | System and Method for Optical Coherence Imaging |
US8922781B2 (en) | 2004-11-29 | 2014-12-30 | The General Hospital Corporation | Arrangements, devices, endoscopes, catheters and methods for performing optical imaging by simultaneously illuminating and detecting multiple points on a sample |
JP5684452B2 (en) | 2005-04-28 | 2015-03-11 | ザ ジェネラル ホスピタル コーポレイション | System, method and software apparatus for evaluating information related to anatomical structures by optical interferometry |
EP1887926B1 (en) | 2005-05-31 | 2014-07-30 | The General Hospital Corporation | System and method which use spectral encoding heterodyne interferometry techniques for imaging |
US9060689B2 (en) | 2005-06-01 | 2015-06-23 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus, method and system for performing phase-resolved optical frequency domain imaging |
EP2207008A1 (en) | 2005-08-09 | 2010-07-14 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing polarization-based quadrature demodulation in optical coherence tomography |
PL1937137T3 (en) | 2005-09-29 | 2022-11-21 | General Hospital Corporation | Method and apparatus for optical imaging via spectral encoding |
US7889348B2 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2011-02-15 | The General Hospital Corporation | Arrangements and methods for facilitating photoluminescence imaging |
WO2007084849A1 (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-26 | The General Hospital Corporation | System and methods for generating data using one or more endoscopic microscopy techniques |
DK1973466T3 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2021-02-01 | Massachusetts Gen Hospital | BALLOON IMAGING CATHETER |
US8145018B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2012-03-27 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus for obtaining information for a structure using spectrally-encoded endoscopy techniques and methods for producing one or more optical arrangements |
JP5524487B2 (en) | 2006-02-01 | 2014-06-18 | ザ ジェネラル ホスピタル コーポレイション | A method and system for emitting electromagnetic radiation to at least a portion of a sample using a conformal laser treatment procedure. |
EP2659852A3 (en) | 2006-02-01 | 2014-01-15 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus for applying a plurality of electro-magnetic radiations to a sample |
EP3143926B1 (en) * | 2006-02-08 | 2020-07-01 | The General Hospital Corporation | Methods, arrangements and systems for obtaining information associated with an anatomical sample using optical microscopy |
JP2009527770A (en) | 2006-02-24 | 2009-07-30 | ザ ジェネラル ホスピタル コーポレイション | Method and system for performing angle-resolved Fourier domain optical coherence tomography |
JP2007252475A (en) * | 2006-03-22 | 2007-10-04 | Fujifilm Corp | Optical tomographic imaging system, and image-quality adjusting method for optical tomographic image |
EP2517616A3 (en) | 2006-05-10 | 2013-03-06 | The General Hospital Corporation | Processes, arrangements and systems for providing frequency domain imaging of a sample |
WO2008049118A2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2008-04-24 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for obtaining and providing imaging information associated with at least one portion of a sample and effecting such portion(s) |
JP2008128926A (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2008-06-05 | Fujifilm Corp | Optical tomographic imaging device |
WO2008089406A2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2008-07-24 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for simultaneous inspection at different depths based on the principle of frequency domain optical coherence tomography |
US9176319B2 (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2015-11-03 | The General Hospital Corporation | Methods, arrangements and apparatus for utilizing a wavelength-swept laser using angular scanning and dispersion procedures |
US7574082B2 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2009-08-11 | Verizon Services Organization Inc. | Optical power monitoring with robotically moved macro-bending |
WO2008121844A1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-09 | The General Hospital Corporation | System and method providing intracoronary laser speckle imaging for the detection of vulnerable plaque |
US8045177B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2011-10-25 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and methods for measuring vibrations using spectrally-encoded endoscopy |
WO2009002452A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2008-12-31 | Josh Hogan | Orthogonal reference analysis system with enhanced snr |
WO2009023635A1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2009-02-19 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Forward-imaging optical coherence tomography (oct) systems and probe |
US7898656B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2011-03-01 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for cross axis parallel spectroscopy |
US8593619B2 (en) | 2008-05-07 | 2013-11-26 | The General Hospital Corporation | System, method and computer-accessible medium for tracking vessel motion during three-dimensional coronary artery microscopy |
WO2009155536A2 (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2009-12-23 | The General Hospital Corporation | Fused fiber optic coupler arrangement and method for use thereof |
EP2309923B1 (en) | 2008-07-14 | 2020-11-25 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and methods for color endoscopy |
WO2010054097A2 (en) * | 2008-11-05 | 2010-05-14 | The General Hospital Corporation | System and method for providing full jones matrix-based analysis to determine non-depolarizing polarization parameters using optical frequency domain imaging |
WO2010068764A2 (en) * | 2008-12-10 | 2010-06-17 | The General Hospital Corporation | Systems, apparatus and methods for extending imaging depth range of optical coherence tomography through optical sub-sampling |
WO2010090837A2 (en) | 2009-01-20 | 2010-08-12 | The General Hospital Corporation | Endoscopic biopsy apparatus, system and method |
JP2012515930A (en) | 2009-01-26 | 2012-07-12 | ザ ジェネラル ホスピタル コーポレーション | System, method and computer-accessible medium for providing a wide-field super-resolution microscope |
EP2394336B1 (en) * | 2009-02-04 | 2023-05-24 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for utilization of a high-speed optical wavelength tuning source |
US20100284054A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Modulation of unpolarized light |
WO2011008822A2 (en) | 2009-07-14 | 2011-01-20 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus, systems and methods for measuring flow and pressure within a vessel |
EP3753480A1 (en) | 2010-03-05 | 2020-12-23 | The General Hospital Corporation | Systems, methods and computer-accessible medium which provide microscopic images of at least one anatomical structure at a particular resolution |
US9069130B2 (en) | 2010-05-03 | 2015-06-30 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus, method and system for generating optical radiation from biological gain media |
JP5778762B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2015-09-16 | ザ ジェネラル ホスピタル コーポレイション | Apparatus and method for spectral analysis of optical coherence tomography images |
US9557154B2 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2017-01-31 | The General Hospital Corporation | Systems, devices, methods, apparatus and computer-accessible media for providing optical imaging of structures and compositions |
EP2575591A4 (en) | 2010-06-03 | 2017-09-13 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for devices for imaging structures in or at one or more luminal organs |
JP5709040B2 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2015-04-30 | 株式会社リコー | Spectral imaging device |
US9510758B2 (en) | 2010-10-27 | 2016-12-06 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus, systems and methods for measuring blood pressure within at least one vessel |
US8982355B2 (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2015-03-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Smart optical material characterization system and method |
ES2396391B2 (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2014-12-04 | Medlumics, S.L. | VARIABLE OPTICAL DELAY DEVICE FOR LOW COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY. |
WO2013013049A1 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-24 | The General Hospital Corporation | Systems, methods, apparatus and computer-accessible-medium for providing polarization-mode dispersion compensation in optical coherence tomography |
EP2748587B1 (en) | 2011-08-25 | 2021-01-13 | The General Hospital Corporation | Methods and arrangements for providing micro-optical coherence tomography procedures |
WO2013066631A1 (en) | 2011-10-18 | 2013-05-10 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and methods for producing and/or providing recirculating optical delay(s) |
WO2013148306A1 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-03 | The General Hospital Corporation | Imaging system, method and distal attachment for multidirectional field of view endoscopy |
US11490797B2 (en) | 2012-05-21 | 2022-11-08 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus, device and method for capsule microscopy |
CN104487891B (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2018-09-28 | 富士通光器件株式会社 | Light-receiving circuit |
US9415550B2 (en) | 2012-08-22 | 2016-08-16 | The General Hospital Corporation | System, method, and computer-accessible medium for fabrication miniature endoscope using soft lithography |
EP2720388A1 (en) | 2012-10-15 | 2014-04-16 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | An optical frequency domain reflectometry (OFDR) system |
US9968261B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2018-05-15 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for providing diffuse spectroscopy co-registered with optical frequency domain imaging |
WO2014120791A1 (en) | 2013-01-29 | 2014-08-07 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus, systems and methods for providing information regarding the aortic valve |
US11179028B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2021-11-23 | The General Hospital Corporation | Objective lens arrangement for confocal endomicroscopy |
WO2014144709A2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | The General Hospital Corporation | Methods and systems for characterizing an object |
US9279660B2 (en) * | 2013-05-01 | 2016-03-08 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method and apparatus for processing polarization data of polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography |
EP2997354A4 (en) | 2013-05-13 | 2017-01-18 | The General Hospital Corporation | Detecting self-interefering fluorescence phase and amplitude |
JP6346410B2 (en) * | 2013-05-24 | 2018-06-20 | 国立大学法人 筑波大学 | Jones Matrix OCT System and Program for Image Processing of Measurement Data Obtained by OCT |
WO2015010133A1 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2015-01-22 | The General Hospital Corporation | Determining eye motion by imaging retina. with feedback |
WO2015009932A1 (en) | 2013-07-19 | 2015-01-22 | The General Hospital Corporation | Imaging apparatus and method which utilizes multidirectional field of view endoscopy |
ES2893237T3 (en) | 2013-07-26 | 2022-02-08 | Massachusetts Gen Hospital | Apparatus with a laser arrangement using optical scattering for applications in optical coherence tomography in the Fourier domain |
WO2015105870A1 (en) | 2014-01-08 | 2015-07-16 | The General Hospital Corporation | Method and apparatus for microscopic imaging |
US10736494B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2020-08-11 | The General Hospital Corporation | System and method for facilitating manual and/or automatic volumetric imaging with real-time tension or force feedback using a tethered imaging device |
WO2015153982A1 (en) | 2014-04-04 | 2015-10-08 | The General Hospital Corporation | Apparatus and method for controlling propagation and/or transmission of electromagnetic radiation in flexible waveguide(s) |
KR102513779B1 (en) | 2014-07-25 | 2023-03-24 | 더 제너럴 하스피탈 코포레이션 | Apparatus, devices and methods for in vivo imaging and diagnosis |
US20160248519A1 (en) * | 2015-02-19 | 2016-08-25 | Coriant Advanced Technology, LLC | Variable power splitter for equalizing output power |
WO2017196823A1 (en) * | 2016-05-09 | 2017-11-16 | Trustees Of Boston University | Method and system for enhanced single particle reflectance imaging |
GB2566314B (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2020-07-29 | Exalos Ag | Depolarisers |
CN112970210B (en) * | 2018-11-24 | 2022-07-22 | 华为技术有限公司 | Polarization processing device, optical transceiver and optical polarization processing method |
US10802120B1 (en) * | 2019-08-20 | 2020-10-13 | Luminar Technologies, Inc. | Coherent pulsed lidar system |
US20220390322A1 (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2022-12-08 | Viavi Solutions Inc. | Techniques for providing a swept wavelength (sw) measurement for acquiring polarization dependent loss (pdl) in a single scan |
Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4905169A (en) | 1988-06-02 | 1990-02-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method and apparatus for simultaneously measuring a plurality of spectral wavelengths present in electromagnetic radiation |
US5104222A (en) | 1990-09-18 | 1992-04-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | System and method for minimizing input polarization-induced phase noise in an interferometric fiber-optic sensor depolarized input light |
GB2267752A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1993-12-15 | Hewlett Packard Co | Improved sensitivity optical low-coherence reflectometer using optical attenuation |
WO1999019693A1 (en) | 1997-10-09 | 1999-04-22 | Geosensor Corporation | Interferometric sensing apparatus |
US6421131B1 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 2002-07-16 | Cambridge Research & Instrumentation Inc. | Birefringent interferometer |
US20030020920A1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2003-01-30 | Dave Digant P. | Method and apparatus for differential phase optical coherence tomography |
US6801319B2 (en) | 2002-01-03 | 2004-10-05 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Symmetrical depolarized fiber optic gyroscope |
US6847744B2 (en) | 2002-07-12 | 2005-01-25 | Itf Technologies Optiques Inc. | All-fiber linear design depolarizer |
US20050018201A1 (en) | 2002-01-24 | 2005-01-27 | De Boer Johannes F | Apparatus and method for ranging and noise reduction of low coherence interferometry lci and optical coherence tomography oct signals by parallel detection of spectral bands |
US6870973B2 (en) | 2002-07-08 | 2005-03-22 | Jds Uniphase Corporation | Fiber depolarizer for fabry-perot laser diodes |
US6891998B2 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2005-05-10 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus for passive depolarization |
US6946990B2 (en) | 2003-07-23 | 2005-09-20 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and methods for radome depolarization compensation |
US6992777B2 (en) | 2001-11-13 | 2006-01-31 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | Birefringent Mach-Zehnder interferometer |
US7039262B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2006-05-02 | Oplink Communications, Inc. | Depolarizer |
US7050222B2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Covega, Inc. | Methods and devices for high power, depolarized superluminescent diodes |
US7072369B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2006-07-04 | The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | Depolarized laser diode module and depolarized laser diode light source |
US7075644B2 (en) | 2002-08-05 | 2006-07-11 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Depolarizer and spectroscope and polychromater |
US7085441B1 (en) | 2005-03-04 | 2006-08-01 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Fiber-optic gyroscope with depolarizer using integrated optic waveguide |
US7088878B2 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2006-08-08 | Optoplan As | Method and apparatus for producing depolarized light |
US7099081B2 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2006-08-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Small-spot spectrometry instrument with reduced polarization and multiple-element depolarizer therefor |
US20070002327A1 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-04 | Yan Zhou | Fourier domain optical coherence tomography employing a swept multi-wavelength laser and a multi-channel receiver |
US7301644B2 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2007-11-27 | University Of Miami | Enhanced optical coherence tomography for anatomical mapping |
US20070291277A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | Everett Matthew J | Spectral domain optical coherence tomography system |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4050222A (en) * | 1975-08-29 | 1977-09-27 | Stephens Industries, Inc. | Envelope opening apparatus |
-
2006
- 2006-10-06 WO PCT/US2006/039301 patent/WO2007044612A2/en active Application Filing
- 2006-10-06 US US11/539,275 patent/US7545504B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4905169A (en) | 1988-06-02 | 1990-02-27 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method and apparatus for simultaneously measuring a plurality of spectral wavelengths present in electromagnetic radiation |
US5104222A (en) | 1990-09-18 | 1992-04-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | System and method for minimizing input polarization-induced phase noise in an interferometric fiber-optic sensor depolarized input light |
GB2267752A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1993-12-15 | Hewlett Packard Co | Improved sensitivity optical low-coherence reflectometer using optical attenuation |
US6195162B1 (en) | 1997-10-09 | 2001-02-27 | Geosensor Corporation | Seismic sensor with interferometric sensing apparatus |
WO1999019693A1 (en) | 1997-10-09 | 1999-04-22 | Geosensor Corporation | Interferometric sensing apparatus |
US6421131B1 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 2002-07-16 | Cambridge Research & Instrumentation Inc. | Birefringent interferometer |
US7099081B2 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2006-08-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Small-spot spectrometry instrument with reduced polarization and multiple-element depolarizer therefor |
US20030020920A1 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2003-01-30 | Dave Digant P. | Method and apparatus for differential phase optical coherence tomography |
US7072369B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2006-07-04 | The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | Depolarized laser diode module and depolarized laser diode light source |
US6992777B2 (en) | 2001-11-13 | 2006-01-31 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | Birefringent Mach-Zehnder interferometer |
US6801319B2 (en) | 2002-01-03 | 2004-10-05 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Symmetrical depolarized fiber optic gyroscope |
US20050018201A1 (en) | 2002-01-24 | 2005-01-27 | De Boer Johannes F | Apparatus and method for ranging and noise reduction of low coherence interferometry lci and optical coherence tomography oct signals by parallel detection of spectral bands |
US7039262B2 (en) | 2002-04-09 | 2006-05-02 | Oplink Communications, Inc. | Depolarizer |
US6870973B2 (en) | 2002-07-08 | 2005-03-22 | Jds Uniphase Corporation | Fiber depolarizer for fabry-perot laser diodes |
US6847744B2 (en) | 2002-07-12 | 2005-01-25 | Itf Technologies Optiques Inc. | All-fiber linear design depolarizer |
US7075644B2 (en) | 2002-08-05 | 2006-07-11 | Yokogawa Electric Corporation | Depolarizer and spectroscope and polychromater |
US6891998B2 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2005-05-10 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus for passive depolarization |
US7050222B2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Covega, Inc. | Methods and devices for high power, depolarized superluminescent diodes |
US6946990B2 (en) | 2003-07-23 | 2005-09-20 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and methods for radome depolarization compensation |
US7088878B2 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2006-08-08 | Optoplan As | Method and apparatus for producing depolarized light |
US7301644B2 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2007-11-27 | University Of Miami | Enhanced optical coherence tomography for anatomical mapping |
US7085441B1 (en) | 2005-03-04 | 2006-08-01 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Fiber-optic gyroscope with depolarizer using integrated optic waveguide |
US20070002327A1 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-04 | Yan Zhou | Fourier domain optical coherence tomography employing a swept multi-wavelength laser and a multi-channel receiver |
US20070291277A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | Everett Matthew J | Spectral domain optical coherence tomography system |
Non-Patent Citations (8)
Title |
---|
Burns et al. "Depolarized source for fiber-optic applications" Optics Letters 16(6):381-383 (1991). |
Burns et al., "Fiber-Optic Gyroscopes with Broad-Band Sources," Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. LT-1, No. 1, Mar. 1983, 98-105. |
Burns et al., "Fiber-Optic Gyroscopes with Depolarized Light," Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 10, No. 7, Jul. 1992, 992-999. |
International Search Report an Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/039301; date of mailing May 25, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2006/039301; date of mailing Feb. 15, 2007. |
Senthilkumaran, Paramasivam, "Berry's phase fiber loop mirror characteristics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 22, No. 2, Feb. 2005, pp. 505-511. |
Szafraniec et al., "Theory of Polarization Evolution in Interferometric Fiber-Optic Depolarized Gyros," Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 17, No. 4, Apr. 1999, 579-590. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/495,226, filed Jul. 28, 2006, Izatt et al. |
Cited By (77)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7830524B2 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2010-11-09 | Fujifilm Corporation | Optical tomograph using a plurality of wavelength-swept light beams |
US20080117427A1 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2008-05-22 | Fujifilm Corporation | Optical tomograph |
US10869685B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 | 2020-12-22 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter system and method for boring through blocked vascular passages |
US9918734B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 | 2018-03-20 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter system and method for boring through blocked vascular passages |
US8361097B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 | 2013-01-29 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter system and method for boring through blocked vascular passages |
US9572492B2 (en) | 2008-04-23 | 2017-02-21 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, imaging, and atherectomy devices |
US20100149519A1 (en) * | 2008-06-12 | 2010-06-17 | Mehrdad Toofan | Polarization contrast imager (pci) |
US8696695B2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2014-04-15 | Avinger, Inc. | Guidewire positioning catheter |
US20100274270A1 (en) * | 2009-04-28 | 2010-10-28 | Patel Himanshu N | Guidewire support catheter |
US11076773B2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2021-08-03 | Avinger, Inc. | Guidewire positioning catheter |
US9642646B2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2017-05-09 | Avinger, Inc. | Guidewire positioning catheter |
US11839493B2 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2023-12-12 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography for biological imaging |
US10342491B2 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2019-07-09 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography for biological imaging |
US9788790B2 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2017-10-17 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography for biological imaging |
US11284839B2 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2022-03-29 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography for biological imaging |
US10052125B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2018-08-21 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with laterally-displaceable tip |
US9125562B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2015-09-08 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter-based off-axis optical coherence tomography imaging system |
US11717314B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2023-08-08 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with laterally-displaceable tip |
US10729326B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2020-08-04 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter-based off-axis optical coherence tomography imaging system |
US9498600B2 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2016-11-22 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with laterally-displaceable tip |
US20110080591A1 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2011-04-07 | Axsun Technologies, Inc. | Integrated Dual Swept Source for OCT Medical Imaging |
US9574869B2 (en) | 2009-10-02 | 2017-02-21 | Axsun Technologies Llc | Integrated dual swept source alternating same scan band for OCT medical imaging |
US8665450B2 (en) * | 2009-10-02 | 2014-03-04 | Axsun Technologies, Inc. | Integrated dual swept source for OCT medical imaging |
US8548571B2 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2013-10-01 | Avinger, Inc. | Devices and methods for predicting and preventing restenosis |
US11382653B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2022-07-12 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter |
US9345510B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2016-05-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters with longitudinally displaceable drive shafts |
US10349974B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2019-07-16 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters with longitudinally displaceable drive shafts |
US10548478B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2020-02-04 | Avinger, Inc. | Balloon atherectomy catheters with imaging |
US9593934B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2017-03-14 | Axsun Technologies Llc | Integrated dual swept source for OCT medical imaging |
US9949754B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2018-04-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices |
US8644913B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2014-02-04 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, imaging, and atherectomy devices |
US11903677B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2024-02-20 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, imaging, and atherectomy devices |
US11134849B2 (en) | 2011-03-28 | 2021-10-05 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, imaging, and atherectomy devices |
US10363062B2 (en) | 2011-10-17 | 2019-07-30 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and non-contact actuation mechanism for catheters |
US9345406B2 (en) | 2011-11-11 | 2016-05-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, atherectomy devices, and imaging |
US11135019B2 (en) | 2011-11-11 | 2021-10-05 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices, atherectomy devices, and imaging |
US10244934B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2019-04-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter drive assemblies |
US10952615B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2021-03-23 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography with graded index fiber for biological imaging |
US9345398B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2016-05-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter drive assemblies |
US9557156B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2017-01-31 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography with graded index fiber for biological imaging |
US11206975B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2021-12-28 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter drive assemblies |
US11647905B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2023-05-16 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical coherence tomography with graded index fiber for biological imaging |
US11406412B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2022-08-09 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters with imaging |
US10335173B2 (en) | 2012-09-06 | 2019-07-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Re-entry stylet for catheter |
US11284916B2 (en) | 2012-09-06 | 2022-03-29 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and occlusion crossing devices |
US10359271B2 (en) | 2012-12-05 | 2019-07-23 | Perimeter Medical Imaging, Inc. | System and method for tissue differentiation in imaging |
US9677869B2 (en) | 2012-12-05 | 2017-06-13 | Perimeter Medical Imaging, Inc. | System and method for generating a wide-field OCT image of a portion of a sample |
US10722121B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-07-28 | Avinger, Inc. | Chronic total occlusion crossing devices with imaging |
US10932670B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-03-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical pressure sensor assembly |
US9854979B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-01-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Chronic total occlusion crossing devices with imaging |
US11096717B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-08-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Tissue collection device for catheter |
US11723538B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2023-08-15 | Avinger, Inc. | Optical pressure sensor assembly |
US11890076B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2024-02-06 | Avinger, Inc. | Chronic total occlusion crossing devices with imaging |
US10130386B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2018-11-20 | Avinger, Inc. | Identification of elastic lamina to guide interventional therapy |
US10806484B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2020-10-20 | Avinger, Inc. | Identification of elastic lamina to guide interventional therapy |
US11944342B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2024-04-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Identification of elastic lamina to guide interventional therapy |
US10568655B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2020-02-25 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters devices having multi-channel bushings |
US9498247B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2016-11-22 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and occlusion crossing devices |
US10470795B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2019-11-12 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters and occlusion crossing devices |
US9592075B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2017-03-14 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheters devices having multi-channel bushings |
US11147583B2 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2021-10-19 | Avinger, Inc. | High speed chronic total occlusion crossing devices |
US10357277B2 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2019-07-23 | Avinger, Inc. | High speed chronic total occlusion crossing devices |
US11931061B2 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2024-03-19 | Avinger, Inc. | High speed chronic total occlusion crossing devices |
US11033190B2 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2021-06-15 | Avinger, Inc. | Micro-molded anamorphic reflector lens for image guided therapeutic/diagnostic catheters |
US11627881B2 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2023-04-18 | Avinger, Inc. | Micro-molded anamorphic reflector lens for image guided therapeutic/diagnostic catheters |
US10568520B2 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2020-02-25 | Avinger, Inc. | Micro-molded anamorphic reflector lens for image guided therapeutic/diagnostic catheters |
US11278248B2 (en) | 2016-01-25 | 2022-03-22 | Avinger, Inc. | OCT imaging catheter with lag correction |
US11399863B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2022-08-02 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with serrated cutter |
US11344327B2 (en) | 2016-06-03 | 2022-05-31 | Avinger, Inc. | Catheter device with detachable distal end |
US11224459B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2022-01-18 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with shapeable distal tip |
US10894939B2 (en) | 2017-07-18 | 2021-01-19 | Perimeter Medical Imaging, Inc. | Sample container for stabilizing and aligning excised biological tissue samples for ex vivo analysis |
US10577573B2 (en) | 2017-07-18 | 2020-03-03 | Perimeter Medical Imaging, Inc. | Sample container for stabilizing and aligning excised biological tissue samples for ex vivo analysis |
RU2747380C1 (en) * | 2018-01-16 | 2021-05-04 | Иллюмина, Инк. | Multi-shoulder image system based on structured lighting |
US11675175B2 (en) | 2018-01-16 | 2023-06-13 | Illumina, Inc. | Multi-arm structured illumination imaging |
US10890429B2 (en) | 2018-12-27 | 2021-01-12 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Automatic calibration optical interferometer and automatic calibration method of optical interferometer |
US11793400B2 (en) | 2019-10-18 | 2023-10-24 | Avinger, Inc. | Occlusion-crossing devices |
US11957376B2 (en) | 2022-08-01 | 2024-04-16 | Avinger, Inc. | Atherectomy catheter with serrated cutter |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20070086017A1 (en) | 2007-04-19 |
WO2007044612A2 (en) | 2007-04-19 |
WO2007044612A3 (en) | 2007-07-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7545504B2 (en) | Imaging systems using unpolarized light and related methods and controllers | |
US7280221B2 (en) | High efficiency low coherence interferometry | |
US6519378B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for implementation of an unpolarized monochromatic light source | |
US7388672B2 (en) | High efficiency balanced detection interferometer | |
JP5571558B2 (en) | Short coherence interferometer | |
US7728985B2 (en) | Polarization-sensitive common path optical coherence reflectometry/tomography device | |
Takada | Noise in optical low-coherence reflectometry | |
US6204924B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring polarization mode dispersion of optical devices | |
EP1913332A2 (en) | Apparatus, methods and storage medium for performing polarization-based quadrature demodulation in optical coherence tomography | |
JP2004004085A (en) | System and method for eliminating uncertainty of relative phase in property solution of device carried out by polarization meter | |
US7088878B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for producing depolarized light | |
US7602499B2 (en) | Measuring polarization mode dispersion | |
JP2009300363A (en) | Instrument for measuring ratio of light signal to noise | |
JP2004340926A (en) | Apparatus and method for determining chromatic dispersion of optical component | |
Cyr et al. | Random-scrambling tunable POTDR for distributed measurement of cumulative PMD | |
US20030043467A1 (en) | Polarization delay unit | |
CA2479245C (en) | Method and apparatus for producing depolarized light | |
US6941032B2 (en) | Passive polarization stabilizer | |
Simova et al. | Biased π-shifted low-coherence Interferometry for measuring polarization mode dispersion (PMD) | |
CA2229219A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring polarization mode dispersion of optical devices | |
Xu et al. | Polarization properties of Rayleigh backscattering with a high degree of coherence in single-mode fibers | |
Takada | Analysis of polarization dependence of optical low coherence reflectometry using an active faraday rotator | |
Rivera et al. | Experimental arrangement to measure dispersion in optical fiber devices | |
US9013694B2 (en) | System and method for measuring a wavelength-resolved state of polarization of an optical signal | |
Cyr et al. | PMD measurements in multipath components: the single-waveplate example |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BIOPTIGEN, INC., NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BUCKLAND, ERIC L.;MARCIANTE, JOHN R.;IZATT, JOSEPH A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018788/0390;SIGNING DATES FROM 20061005 TO 20061106 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |