US6229998B1 - Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station - Google Patents

Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6229998B1
US6229998B1 US09292775 US29277599A US6229998B1 US 6229998 B1 US6229998 B1 US 6229998B1 US 09292775 US09292775 US 09292775 US 29277599 A US29277599 A US 29277599A US 6229998 B1 US6229998 B1 US 6229998B1
Authority
US
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
power
band
signal
base
spectrum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US09292775
Inventor
Walid Hamdy
Lennart Mathe
Todd Sutton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Qualcomm Inc
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/69Spread spectrum techniques
    • H04B1/707Spread spectrum techniques using direct sequence modulation
    • H04B1/7097Interference-related aspects
    • H04B1/71Interference-related aspects the interference being narrowband interference
    • H04B1/7102Interference-related aspects the interference being narrowband interference with transform to frequency domain
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K3/00Jamming of communication; Counter-measures
    • H04K3/20Countermeasures against jamming
    • H04K3/22Countermeasures against jamming including jamming detection and monitoring
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04KSECRET COMMUNICATION; JAMMING OF COMMUNICATION
    • H04K2203/00Jamming of communication; Countermeasures
    • H04K2203/10Jamming or countermeasure used for a particular application
    • H04K2203/16Jamming or countermeasure used for a particular application for telephony

Abstract

A method and apparatus for use in a wireless communication base station which provides real-time, continuous detection of in-band jammers with negligible impact on base station cost. In addition to providing jammer detection, the use of the invention to provide improved hardware and system diagnostic capabilities is presented. The jammer detection apparatus utilizes automatic gain control techniques, digital sampling, and digital signal processing to identify anomalous frequency components in the received power spectral density curve. Also described are the use of complex sampling, the complex fast Fourier transform (FFT), and Hanning windows to improve jammer detection capabilities. A method of estimating the location of in-band jammers is described using the computed received power spectral density curves of multiple base stations.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

I. Field of the Invention

The current invention relates to wireless telecommunications. More particularly, the present invention relates to a novel method and apparatus for real-time detection and location identification of in-band jammers in a wireless base station.

II. Description of the Related Art

Since the introduction of cellular phones to the marketplace, there has been an explosive increase in the usage of portable phones. The frequency spectrum available for wireless phone use, however, did not increase as quickly as the subscriber base. Eventually, the number of subscribers to wireless phone service began to outstrip the capacity of wireless infrastructure using the Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS) technology. In response to this imbalance, pioneering companies like Qualcomm developed ways of providing greater call capacity than possible with AMPS without requiring additional frequency spectrum.

In some cases, such as with Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), this increase in efficiency was accompanied by an increase in complexity of the wireless equipment. By building powerful ASIC and microprocessor technology into both handset and base station equipment, such advanced wireless systems can utilize more powerful digital signal processing and communication system techniques to achieve better signal quality and capacity. Code division multiple access communications systems have been standardized in the United States in Telecommunications Industry Association TIA/EIA/IS95-A, entitled “MOBILE STATION-BASE STATION COMPATIBILITY STANDARD FOR DUAL-MODE WIDEBAND SPREAD SPECTRUM CELLULAR SYSTEM”, hereafter referred to as IS-95 and incorporated by reference herein.

Some problems occur in any wireless communication system which can reduce the call-carrying capacity of the spectrum. One such problem is interfering, or jamming, transmissions introduced into the spectrum reserved for use by the wireless system. Transmitters not associated with the wireless system may cause such jamming transmissions by either purposely or inadvertently transmitting an unauthorized signal into the spectrum reserved for the wireless system. While the interference caused by the thermal noise inherent in any wireless system cannot be avoided, jamming signals may be removed, and the resultant lost capacity reclaimed, by turning off the jamming transmitter. Of course, urging the owner of a jamming transmitter to cease transmissions can only occur after the jamming signal is detected. Sometimes documented evidence of jamming is also required.

In a large, complex wireless system, however, it is not always easy to detect jammers. The jamming may occur sporadically, and be difficult to track. Currently, wireless base stations do not typically have the built-in ability to perform spectrum analysis of their received signals. The currently prevalent method of detecting jammers requires that the presence of a jammer first be suspected, by analyzing call capacity and dropped call logs of the system. When a base station is experiencing poor call quality or inexplicably high dropped call rates, a field technician may bring external spectrum analysis equipment to the suspect base station and connect it to the receive antenna system. Such spectrum analyzers are not built into every base station largely due to the amount of increased cost that such a design would require of base stations in an already cost-competitive market. The external spectrum analyzers used for jammer detection generally do not have connections to processors within the wireless system network, so the spectrum analysis data must be collected and analyzed off-line and manually by the field technician. Jamming signals that occur only sporadically may be difficult to detect using such methods, because they must be present when spectrum measurements are being taken to be detected. In addition, even if such a jamming signal is detected using such methods, the field technician gets little information about the location of the jammer from data collected at a single base station.

Most wireless receivers decode signals which occupy a predetermined frequency band. For this reason, the received signal is typically passed through a bandpass filter, which removes signals outside the spectrum reserved for the wireless system. Many receivers in such a wireless system are also equipped with automatic gain control (AGC) modules, which attenuate the incoming signal to better fit within the dynamic range of subsequent receiver circuitry. Such AGC modules attenuate the received signal so that it does not exceed the dynamic range of the subsequent sampling circuits, causing signal distortion commonly referred to as “clipping”. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, an AGC formula is used which holds the root-mean-squared (RMS) value of the processed signal to a predetermined constant value. Jamming signals that reside within the wireless system's allocated spectrum, cannot be removed by bandpass filtering. Such in-band jammers will cause AGC circuits to attenuate the received signal more than would occur in the absence of jammers. The result is often a signal whose power spectral density has a shape that may be distinguished from that of a signal which is devoid of in-band jammer components.

In a system using spread-spectrum signals such as CDMA, all subscriber units transmit signals to the base station using the same frequency band and cause mutual interference to each other. In a CDMA system, call capacity is maximized by constraining all subscriber stations to transmitting the lowest power necessary to sustain a predetermined received SNR at the base station. An in-band jammer increases the noise level which every subscriber station must overcome to achieve this SNR, thus forcing every subscriber station to transmit at higher power levels.

An increase in subscriber transmit power causes several problems, including increased drain on batteries, which results in decreased standby and talk time of the subscriber stations. It also causes additional interference to subscribers operating in adjacent base station coverage areas. Subscribers operating in those adjacent base stations respond by increasing their transmit power m an escalating power race.

In addition, subscriber stations near the coverage boundary of a wireless base station may already be transmitting at their maximum level. If such subscriber stations cannot transmit enough power to maintain an acceptable SNR at the base station receiver, the link to that base station will drop. Thus, by increasing the level of transmit power needed to maintain an SNR level near the edge of coverage, a jammer may, in effect, cause shrinkage of a wireless base station's effective reverse-link coverage area.

In many CDMA systems, the forward link radius of the base station is deliberately decreased to match the shrinkage in the reverse link radius which occurs as the result of reverse link loading. Thus, a jamming signal could also result in shrinkage of the wireless base station's effective forward-link coverage area. The balancing of forward and reverse link cell radius is further disclosed U.S. Pat. No. 5,548,812, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BALANCING THE FORWARD LINK HANDOFF BOUNDARY TO THE REVERSE LINK HANDOFF BOUNDARY IN A CELLULAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM”, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated by reference herein.

As the number of transmitting subscriber stations increases, jammer detection becomes more difficult. This increased difficulty arises because the jammer represents a smaller percentage of the total received power, making it easier to hide. For this reason, a built-in spectrum analyzer, which can analyze the received spectrum during spontaneous lulls in call activity, is highly desirable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention encompasses a method and apparatus for providing real-time, constant detection of in-band jammers with negligible impact on base station cost. Such real-time spectrum analysis is particularly advantageous for use in wideband wireless systems such as CDMA, in which all subscribers use the same transmit frequency band. In addition to providing jammer detection, the present invention enables added hardware and system diagnostic capabilities.

With the advent of advanced technologies like CDMA, increasing amounts of processing power are being designed into modern wireless base stations. While older AMPS base stations could be designed with perhaps a single microprocessor and racks of analog equipment, modern CDMA base stations are being designed with thirty or more microprocessors, including powerful processors with clock speeds in excess of 60 MHz. The present invention capitalizes on the realization that a modern wireless base station may have a surplus of processing power sufficient for performing complicated signal analysis. The base station is designed so that a digital sample stream used in demodulating subscriber station signals is also made available to an existing processor for digital signal processing.

Possible options for producing the necessary digital samples include using just the real-input-data FFT using only data in the I or in the Q branch and performing a complex-input-data FFT using both data in the I and Q branches.

A real-input-data FFT has the benefit that it requires less data and processing per FFT, since if having real data, one can perform “two FFT's almost for the cost of one” with some tricks. The other option has the benefit that it allows inspection of the “whole spectrum”, from F0-Fs/2 to F0+Fs/2, where F0 is the CDMA center frequency and Fs is the (baseband) sample rate.

The important question is now: In terms of jammer detection sensitivity, is option A or B better?

Call the jammer power Pj, and thermal+user power for P. The jammer power will distribute equally between the I and Q branches. Thermal noise by its nature, will also distribute equally between I and Q. The user power (=signal from transmitting phones) will also be divided equally between I and Q because the nature of the OQPSK PN spreading.

For a real-input-data FFT, the thermal+user power P/2 is spread over a bandwidth 0 to C/2, whereas in a complex-input-data FFT the thermal+user power P is spread over a bandwidth −C/2 to C/2. (C is the CDMA signal bandwidth of approximately 1.25 MHz). That means that the (in-band) power spectral density will be the same for either technique, with the power spectral density equaling P/C. The jammer detection threshold will be set relative to this “noise floor”, and it can be concluded that the jammer detection threshold will be the same for the two cases. But because the jammer power divided equally between the I and the Q branch, the jammer power will be 3 dB less for the real-input-data FFT than in the case of the complex-input-data FFT.

The resulting spectral analysis data is used to identify jamming signals having power spectral density characteristics which are distinguishable from those of legitimate subscriber transmissions in the wireless system's frequency band. By using several base stations located near the jamming transmitter, and by comparing the power spectral densities received at those base stations, the location of the jamming transmitter is estimated.

Additionally, such spectral analysis data is used to detect aberrant receive spectrum characteristics which may indicate a hardware malfunction or failure.

Upon detecting a jamming signal or hardware malfunction, the base station could send an appropriate alarm through the backhaul to a network manager located in the base station controller (BSC). The network manager could correlate alarms received from multiple base stations to estimate the location of a jamming transmitter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features, objects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the levels of received power in a wireless base station for various user and in-band jammer scenarios.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of a process which is a preferred embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is an example FFT output of received spectrum containing a bin-aligned narrow-band jammer component, utilizing a rectangular window on the sample stream.

FIG. 4 is an example FFT output of received spectrum containing a non-bin-aligned narrow-band jammer component, utilizing a rectangular window on the sample stream.

FIG. 5 is an example FFT output of received spectrum containing a bin-aligned narrow-band jammer component, utilizing a Hanning window on the sample stream.

FIG. 6 is an example FFT output of received spectrum containing a non-bin-aligned narrow-band jammer component, utilizing a Hanning window on the sample stream.

FIG. 7 is a graphical example of the unaveraged FFT as may occur in a wideband wireless base station.

FIG. 8 is a graphical example of the results obtained by averaging twenty sets of FFT output.

FIG. 9 is an idealized example of the nominal received spectrum processed by a wideband wireless base station in the absence of a jammer.

FIG. 10 is an idealized example of the received spectrum, processed by a wideband wireless base station, including power contributed by an in-band jammer.

FIG. 11 is an idealized example of the received spectrum processed by a wideband wireless base station having a hardware failure in the base station's AGC module.

FIG. 12 is an idealized example of the received spectrum containing a jammer.

FIG. 13 is an idealized example of the received spectrum containing a wideband jammer.

FIG. 14 depicts several base stations of a wireless network and idealized displays of each base station's received spectrum in the presence of an in-band jammer.

FIG. 15 is an architecture diagram for a preferred embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 16 is a diagram showing sub-modules of the signal processing module of FIG. 15.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

A wireless system typically has many base stations, which communicate with the subscriber stations using the wireless system's allocated spectrum. Each base station receives analog signals that contain thermal noise and any signals transmitted from nearby subscriber stations. In a wireless system using spread spectrum techniques such as CDMA, all subscribers transmit signals within the same wide reverse-link frequency band. Also residing within this reverse-link frequency band may be undesired interfering, or jamming, signals. If such interfering signals emanate from transmitters not belonging to the wireless system, they may have frequency characteristics which allow them to be distinguished from signals belonging to the wireless system.

FIG. 1 illustrates the effect an in-band jammer can have on a CDMA wireless system. In the scenarios portrayed, the received SNR of each subscriber is held to 5% (or approximately −13 dB), and the jammer power 118 is half that of the thermal noise power 112. The SNR and jammer power shown in these graphs have been chosen for illustration only, and can vary widely in actual wireless systems. In fact, jammer power seen in actual wireless systems can be much greater than the thermal noise power. SNR = P U ( P j + P n ) + ( N U - 1 ) P U ( 1 ) P U = SNR ( P j + P n ) 1 - SNR ( N U - 1 ) ( 2 )

Figure US06229998-20010508-M00001

SNR—Signal-to-noise ratio at the base station receiver

Pu—Received power from each transmitting subscriber station

Pj—Received power from an in-band jammer

Pn—Received power from thermal noise

Nu—Number of transmitting subscriber stations

The relationship between SNR, Pu, Pn, Pj, and Nu, is shown in equations (1) and (2). The bar graphs in FIG. 1 show the in-band power occupied by thermal noise, jammers, and subscriber units in the following scenarios:

no transmitting subscriber units, no jammers 102

one transmitting subscriber unit, no jammers 104

fifteen transmitting subscriber units, no jammers 106

one transmitting subscriber unit, with jammers 108

fifteen transmitting subscriber units, with jammers 110

As illustrated in FIG. 1, thermal noise is white noise, whose power is generally constant 112 over frequency. In the scenario depicting one transmitting subscriber unit and no jammers 104, the subscriber station 114 need only transmit enough power to compete with the thermal noise 112. Thus, the SNR is equal to the ratio of subscriber station power 114 to the thermal noise power 112. As other subscriber units begin transmitting to the same base station, each subscriber unit adds to the noise level with which every other subscriber unit must compete. In the scenario having fifteen transmitting subscriber units and no jammers 106, the strength of the interference for any received subscriber signal 114 is computed by adding the thermal noise 112 to the sum of received power of all fourteen other subscribers 122.

In a system where a jammer is present and only a single subscriber station is transmitting 108, that single subscriber unit will be power-controlled to increase its transmit power 120 enough to maintain the desired SNR. When this occurs in a system having a jammer and 15 users 110, all subscriber units must increase their transmit power to compensate for the additional interference. Thus, any subscriber unit 120 must maintain a transmit power level which is proportional to the combined power of the thermal noise 112, the jammer 118, and all other users in the system 124. If some subscriber stations are unable to transmit enough power to sustain the required SNR, this condition may result in dropped calls. Even if the increased power requirements cause no calls to drop, the increase in power 126 causes increased interference to subscriber stations within neighboring coverage areas.

FIG. 2 depicts a preferred embodiment of a process for detecting in-band jammers using existing hardware in the base station. The analog signals are received by the base station's antenna system, and are bandpass-filtered and downconverted to baseband (steps not shown). Multiple techniques for performing this bandpass-filtering and downconverting are well known in the art. In the preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the signals are passed through an automatic gain control (AGC) module 204, which attenuates the incoming signal so that it resides more optimally within the dynamic range of the sampling circuitry.

The attenuated signal is then sent to a sampler 208, preferably implemented as an analog-to-digital converter, to produce a stream of digital samples. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the sampler includes cosine and sine digital mixers. The output of the are analog-to-digital converter is sent to the cosine and sine digital mixers, which produce complex samples. This technique, known as complex baseband sampling is well known in the art, and improves subsequent signal analysis by 3 dB.

After sampling, the resultant I and Q sample streams are each multiplied by a windowing function 210 prior to performing a complex fast Fourier transform (FFT) on the I and Q data streams 212. An FFT divides the spectrum into many rectangular sub-bands or bins, each centered at discrete, equally-spaced frequency values. The magnitude of a sinusoidal signal component will be accurately represented in the output of an FFT only if it occurs at the center frequency of one of the bins (also referred to as bin-aligned). If such a signal occurs instead between two adjacent bins (non-bin-aligned), the signal will be detected in both of the adjacent bins, but at lower magnitude in each.

FIG. 3 shows the output of an FFT in which the input samples have not been windowed, and in which the samples contain a sinusoidal signal 302 having a frequency equal to the center frequency of an FFT bin. FIG. 4 shows the output of an FFT in which the input samples have not been windowed, and in which the input signal contains a sinusoidal signal 402 having a frequency equidistant to the center frequencies of two adjacent FFT bins. As evident in the figures, a non-bin-aligned sinusoidal signal causes the FFT to detect frequency components to the adjacent frequency bins in either direction. The result is a frequency spike which is flat at its peak, and has a smaller peak magnitude. In addition, the non-bin-aligned signal causes widening of the base of the detected power spike 404, as well as artifacts in bins which are not adjacent to the signal's center frequency, such as at the edge of the passband 406.

By applying a contouring function, also known as windowing, to the sample stream prior to performing an FFT, the FFT can be made less susceptible to the placement of signal frequencies relative to FFT bins. Several windowing functions, including Hanning windows, are well known in the art. FIG. 5 shows the output of an FFT in which the input samples have been modified using a Hanning window, and in which the samples contain a sinusoidal signal 502 having a frequency equal to the center frequency of an FFT bin. FIG. 6 shows the output of an FFT in which the input samples have been modified using a Hanning window, and in which the samples contains a sinusoidal signal 602 having a frequency equidistant to the center frequencies of two adjacent FFT bins. The magnitudes of the sinusoidal signal components displayed in all four scenarios (FIG. 3-FIG. 6) are equal. Though the use of a Hanning window widens the base of the detected bin-aligned signal 504 compared to that of the rectangular window 304, the shape of the curve stays more consistent when the same signal occurs between two bin frequencies 604. In addition, windowing decreases the difference between peak values of bin-aligned 502 and non-bin-aligned 602 components and greatly decreases the other frequency artifacts seen at the edge of the passband 506 and 606.

Continuing with the description of the preferred embodiment in FIG. 2, the FFT step 212 produces a set of sub-band power measurements, with each measurement representing the power received in an FFT bin. By performing FFT's on multiple sets of digital samples, several sets of sub-band power measurements may be collected and averaged together as shown 212. Averaging the results of multiple FFT's produces a smoother curve and makes subsequent frequency analysis less susceptible to signal noise. Averaging is appropriate in a jammer detection and system diagnostic application, because the input spectrum is assumed to be changing much more slowly than the detected signal noise. FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of an exemplary FFT output. FIG. 8 is a graphical representation of a similar set of 20 exemplary FFT sample sets averaged together.

After averaging multiple sets of FFT output 214, the resulting sub-band power measurements are analyzed 216 to identify any power spectrum anomalies. Since a CDMA wireless base station receives a combination of thermal noise and signals which approximate additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), the nominal frequency spectrum of the received signal approximates that of bandlimited white noise, as shown in idealized form in FIG. 9. As shown, the nominal spectrum should have little or no energy outside the reverse-link frequency band 902. The power spectral density measured within the reverse-link frequency band is nominally held to a characteristically flat, or constant signal energy floor 904. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the received signal is attenuated using an AGC module, which causes the signal energy floor to be held to a predictable level for a nominal input signal.

FIG. 10 shows an idealized graph of the frequency spectrum of a signal containing a narrow-band jammer 1002, which is within the reverse-link frequency band 1004. A narrow-band jammer component 1006 is unlikely to contain enough power to measurably affect the signal floor set by the AGC 1006, so may be detected by looking for any peak which rises above a jammer detection threshold 1008.

The claimed invention could also be used to detect certain hardware problems which alter the shape of the received spectrum. FIG. 11 is an idealized received frequency spectrum graph of a base station which has a failure in its AGC mechanism. As shown, the frequency spectrum might be properly rectangular in shape and contained within the reverse-link frequency passband 1104. But, if the average power level within the passband 1102 is less than the nominal level 1106, an AGC module failure may be indicated. In a scenario not depicted, an AGC failure may also be detected if the average power level within the passband is greater than the nominal value. Insufficient attenuation of the received signal by the AGC module could result in clipping by the sampler, which could cause significant frequency components being detected outside the reverse-link frequency band 1104.

In the event that a jammer transmits in a relatively wide frequency band, it may contribute significant interference power to the received signal without having a single frequency bin peak which exceeds a nominal narrow-band jammer detection threshold. In such a case, runs of consecutive sub-band power measurements are evaluated as a group and compared against different thresholds which varies according to run length. FIG. 12 depicts an idealized graph of spectrum for a signal having a jammer component 1202 which is spread out over a run of multiple sub-bands 1204. Though no single bin in the graph has power greater than the single-bin threshold 1206, the jammer will still be detectable when the multiple sub-band measurements are evaluated to exceed a multiple-bin threshold 1208.

FIG. 13 depicts another idealized graph of spectrum for a signal having a jammer component 1302 which occupies an even wider frequency band 1304. Again, though such a jammer would not be detected using a single-bin jammer detection threshold 1306, it would still be detectable using a wide-band threshold 1308. In such an approach, groups of adjacent frequency bin values may be averaged together and compared to multiple-bin jammer detection thresholds, according to the number of bins in the group.

In a wireless communication system having multiple base stations with this jamming detection capability, the analysis of reverse-link spectrum from multiple base stations could also allow the estimation of a jamming transmitter's location. FIG. 14 depicts several wireless base stations 1404 and 1406 located at varying distances from a jamming transmitter 1402. Each base station is drawn with an idealized representation of its received spectrum 1408. The jammer is detected at the greatest power levels by the base stations 1404 closest to the jammer 1402. The jammer may be detected at very low levels, or not at all, by base stations 1406 farther away from the jammer 1402. These measurements, along with the knowledge of each base station's location, are analyzed to provide an estimate of the jamming transmitter's location.

FIG. 15 illustrates, in block diagram form, a preferred embodiment of the base station jammer detection apparatus. The analog signals received by the base station's antenna system (not shown) are processed using bandpass filters (not shown) and downconverter circuitry (not shown). The resulting bandpass-filtered and downconverted signal are then attenuated by an automatic gain control (AGC) module 1502, which adjusts the signal to be within the dynamic range of sampling circuitry. The output of the AGC module 1502 is sent to the sampling module 1504, which sends its input the signal processing module 1506. As mentioned previously, the sampling module 1504 may utilize complex sampling, in which case a complex sample stream would be sent to the signal processing module 1506. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the signal processing module could be implemented in any number of ways, including in software running on a microprocessor, or within an ASIC or programmable logic device.

FIG. 16 shows an exemplary embodiment of the sub-modules contained within the signal processing module. The complex samples, represented by I and Q, are processed using a Hanning window in the windowing modules 1604. The resultant windowed signal is then processed by the FFT module 1606, which performs a complex FFT and outputs complex sub-band power components. The magnitude of the complex sub-band power components is obtained by summing the squares of the two components in an absolute power module 1608. Several of the resultant sets of sub-band power measurements are collected and averaged in the averaging module 1610 before being analyzed in the spectrum analysis module 1612.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. In a wireless communication base station, a method for detecting in-band interfering signals comprising the steps of:
(a) performing downconversion and bandpass-filtering of a received analog signal to produce a downconverted bandpass-filtered analog signal which resides approximately within a predetermined reverse-link frequency band;
(b) performing automatic gain control of said downconverted bandpass-filtered analog signal to produce a first gain-controlled signal whose RMS amplitude is approximately equal to a predetermined value;
(c) performing analog-to-digital conversion of said first gain-controlled signal to create a stream of digital samples;
(d) performing analysis of said stream of digital samples to create a first set of sub-band power measurements corresponding to the received power associated with adjacent frequency sub-bands, each sub-band representing a fraction of a predetermined spectrum analysis band, said spectrum analysis band representing a superset of said reverse-link frequency band; and
(e) performing spectrum evaluation which identifies a group of one or more adjacent sub-band power measurements which exceed a predetermined threshold.
2. The method of claim 1 in which said analysis is performed utilizing a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising performing windowing on said stream of digital samples prior to performing said analysis.
4. The method of claim 3 in which said windowing utilizes a Hanning window.
5. The method of claim 1 in which said predetermined threshold varies according to the number of said sub-band power measurements in said group.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of repeating said analysis multiple times over different portions of said stream to produce multiple sets of sub-band power measurements and averaging said multiple sets to produce a second set of sub-band power measurements for use in performing said identification and evaluation.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein said predetermined threshold varies according to the number of said multiple sets averaged.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said evaluation further comprises the step of identifying any group of one or more sub-band power measurements which are inside said reverse-link frequency band, and are less than a predetermined minimum floor threshold.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein said evaluation further comprises the step of identifying any group of one or more sub-band power measurements which are outside said reverse-link frequency band, and are greater than a predetermined out-of-band threshold.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein said analog-to-digital conversion further comprises performing complex sampling to produce said stream of digital samples.
11. A wireless communication system base station comprising:
an automatic gain control module for attenuating a downconverted bandpass-filtered signal and producing a gain-controlled signal having an RMS magnitude which is approximately equal to a predetermined value;
an analog-to-digital converter, operably connected to said automatic gain control module, or processing the output of said gain-controlled signal to produce a stream of digital samples;
a signal processing module for processing said stream of digital samples, operably connected to said analog to digital converter, said signal processing module comprising:
a time to frequency converter module for analyzing a portion of said stream to produce received sub-band power measurements corresponding to adjacent, frequency sub-bands, each sub-band representing a fraction the transmit frequency band;
a spectrum evaluation module for identifying any group of one or more adjacent sub-band power measurements which exceed a predetermined threshold.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said time to frequency converter module utilizes a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).
13. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said spectrum analyzer further comprises a windowing module for performing non-rectangular windowing of said stream of digital samples.
14. The apparatus of claim 13 in which said windowing module utilizes a Hanning window.
15. The apparatus of claim 11 in which said predetermined threshold varies according to the number of said sub-band power measurements in said group.
16. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said spectrum analyzer further comprises a sub-band power averaging module for averaging multiple sets of sub-band power measurements to produce a second set of sub-band power measurements for use by said spectrum evaluation module.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein said predetermined threshold varies according to the number of said multiple sets averaged.
18. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein said analog-to-digital converter further comprises means for performing complex sampling, and wherein said stream of digital samples are complex digital samples, and wherein said time to frequency converter module utilizes Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and wherein said signal processing module further comprises an absolute power module, operably connected between said time to frequency converter module and said averaging module, said received sub-band power measurements being produced by said absolute power module.
19. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said spectrum evaluation module also identifies any group of one or more sub-band power measurements which are inside said reverse-link frequency band, and are less than a predetermined minimum floor threshold.
20. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said spectrum evaluation module also identifies any group of one or more sub-band power measurements which are outside said reverse-link frequency band, and are greater than a predetermined out-of-band threshold.
US09292775 1999-04-12 1999-04-12 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station Active US6229998B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09292775 US6229998B1 (en) 1999-04-12 1999-04-12 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station

Applications Claiming Priority (11)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09292775 US6229998B1 (en) 1999-04-12 1999-04-12 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station
CN 00806142 CN100361409C (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station
EP20000928150 EP1166458B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station
EP20030009461 EP1337050B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station
PCT/US2000/009675 WO2000062437A1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station
DE2000613108 DE60013108D1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 A method and apparatus for detecting base-station of in-band jammers in a wireless spread spectrum
DE2000631895 DE60031895D1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 A method and system for detecting Inbandstörern in a spread spectrum base station
KR20017012875A KR100824492B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station
DE2000613108 DE60013108T2 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 A method and apparatus for detecting base-station of in-band jammers in a wireless spread spectrum
DE2000631895 DE60031895T2 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 A method and system for detecting Inbandstörern in a spread spectrum base station
JP2000611395A JP4485695B2 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-04-11 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6229998B1 true US6229998B1 (en) 2001-05-08

Family

ID=23126143

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09292775 Active US6229998B1 (en) 1999-04-12 1999-04-12 Method and system for detecting in-band jammers in a spread spectrum wireless base station

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US6229998B1 (en)
EP (2) EP1337050B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4485695B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100824492B1 (en)
CN (1) CN100361409C (en)
DE (4) DE60031895T2 (en)
WO (1) WO2000062437A1 (en)

Cited By (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6591110B1 (en) * 2000-06-27 2003-07-08 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of detecting and calculating external jammer signal power in communication systems
US20030198200A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2003-10-23 Cognio, Inc. System and Method for Spectrum Management of a Shared Frequency Band
US20040028003A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2004-02-12 Diener Neil R. System and method for management of a shared frequency band
US20040028123A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2004-02-12 Sugar Gary L. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a radio device
US20040047324A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 Diener Neil R. System and method for management of a shared frequency band using client--specific management techniques
US6714605B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2004-03-30 Cognio, Inc. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a communication device
US20040137915A1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2004-07-15 Diener Neil R. Server and multiple sensor system for monitoring activity in a shared radio frequency band
WO2004034077A3 (en) * 2002-10-04 2004-12-16 Sigtec Navigation Pty Ltd Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20050002473A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2005-01-06 Kloper David S. Signal pulse detection scheme for use in real-time spectrum analysis
US20050073983A1 (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-07 Diener Neil R. Automated real-time site survey in a shared frequency band environment
US6898235B1 (en) * 1999-12-10 2005-05-24 Argon St Incorporated Wideband communication intercept and direction finding device using hyperchannelization
US20050227625A1 (en) * 2004-03-25 2005-10-13 Diener Neil R User interface and time-shifted presentation of data in a system that monitors activity in a shared radio frequency band
US20050285781A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2005-12-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. GPS receiver and method for detecting a jammer signal using fast fourier transform
US7012968B2 (en) * 2000-11-30 2006-03-14 Lg Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for detecting and adjusting transmission power of CDMA system
US20060270371A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-11-30 Sugar Gary L Tracking short-term maximum power spectrum density for improved visibility of low duty cycle signals
US20070008215A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 Sige Semiconductor (Europe) Limited GPS receiver with improved immunity to collocated transmissions and method therefor
US20070224963A1 (en) * 2004-05-17 2007-09-27 Yossi Moscovitz Method and User Equipment for Jamming Detection and Signalling in a Mobile Telecommunications Network
US20070264939A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-15 Cognio, Inc. System and Method for Identifying Wireless Devices Using Pulse Fingerprinting and Sequence Analysis
EP1862816A1 (en) * 2006-06-04 2007-12-05 Fondazione Torino Wireless Time-frequency interfering detector
WO2007056673A3 (en) * 2005-11-04 2007-12-13 Tektronix Inc Wide-bandwidth spectrum analysis of transient signals using a real-time spectrum analyzer
US20070297524A1 (en) * 2006-06-13 2007-12-27 Ben Jones Approach for spectrum analysis in a receiver
US20070297540A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Navini Networks, Inc. Method and system for detecting preambles in a multi-cell system
US20070298775A1 (en) * 2002-05-28 2007-12-27 Motorola, Inc. Dynamic mobile station configuration in wireless communications systems and methods therefor
US20080144856A1 (en) * 2006-09-19 2008-06-19 Tektronix International Sales, Gmbh Signal analyzers and frequency domain data production methods
US7430254B1 (en) 2003-08-06 2008-09-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Matched detector/channelizer with adaptive threshold
US20090245686A1 (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-01 Tektronix, Inc. Video bandwidth resoluation in dft-based spectrum analysis
US20100026547A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for providing jammer detection in a receiver
US20100302087A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Lockheed Martin Corporation Smart Signal Jammer
CN102026256A (en) * 2010-12-28 2011-04-20 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Method and device for monitoring abnormal jamming signal
US20110176639A1 (en) * 2008-07-30 2011-07-21 Kyocera Corporation Radio base station
US8301075B2 (en) 2009-05-14 2012-10-30 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Tactical radio and radio network with electronic countermeasures
WO2013090568A1 (en) 2011-12-15 2013-06-20 Northrop Grumman Guidance And Electronics Company, Inc. System and method for detection of rf signal spoofing
US20130217358A1 (en) * 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus to determine if a cellular jamming signal is malicious or non-malicious based on received signal strength
US20130215786A1 (en) * 2010-11-16 2013-08-22 Cinterion Wireless Modules Gmbh Method of detecting and jamming transmitter effecting a communication user equipment, user equipment and evaluation unit with interfaces to the user equipment
US9288007B2 (en) 2013-11-15 2016-03-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Endpoint device antenna beam forming based jamming detection and mitigation
US9295028B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2016-03-22 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp Detection and mitigation of denial-of-service attacks in wireless communication networks
US9614640B2 (en) 2012-11-19 2017-04-04 Gemalto M2M Gmbh Method, device and system for detecting a jamming transmitter
US9844016B2 (en) 2011-11-18 2017-12-12 Gemalto M2M Gmbh Method of detecting a jamming transmitter affecting a communication user equipment, device and user equipment and system with the user equipment
US9905120B1 (en) 2016-08-29 2018-02-27 At&T Digital Life, Inc. Alarm initiation when sensor is intentionally jammed

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100502261C (en) 2003-10-10 2009-06-17 华为技术有限公司 Method for testing analog channel suppressing degree of receiver
CN100578975C (en) 2004-07-28 2010-01-06 华为技术有限公司 Method for testing performance of signal receiver
WO2006102811A1 (en) * 2005-03-29 2006-10-05 Zte Corporation A method and an apparatus for eliminating the narrow-band interference in the spread spectrum system
EP1959581A4 (en) * 2005-12-07 2010-03-31 Zte Corp Method and device for removing narrow band interference in spreading frequency system
CN101146307B (en) 2006-12-14 2010-12-08 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A frequency spectrum scanning device and its method
EP2181512A4 (en) 2007-08-20 2014-12-24 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Supervision of faults in a receiver chain based on noise floor monitoring
RU2447584C2 (en) * 2007-08-20 2012-04-10 Телефонактиеболагет Лм Эрикссон (Пабл) Faults supervision in receiver circuit based on minimum noise level monitoring
CN101179283B (en) 2007-09-28 2011-01-12 杭州国芯科技股份有限公司 Method of detecting and suppressing pulse noise
CN101471725B (en) 2007-12-29 2012-11-21 鼎桥通信技术有限公司 Method for frame synchronization of distributed base station
US8014436B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2011-09-06 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Multi-dimensional signal of reduced peak-to-RMS ratio
KR101145097B1 (en) * 2009-01-30 2012-05-14 한국전자통신연구원 Multi-channel down-converter and multi-channel down-converting method for generating narrowband channel using fast fourier transform
EP2665215A1 (en) 2012-05-14 2013-11-20 Gemalto M2M GmbH Method of detecting a jamming transmitter affecting a communication user equipment, device and user equipment and system with the user equipment
EP2665214A1 (en) 2012-05-14 2013-11-20 Gemalto M2M GmbH Method of detecting a jamming transmitter affecting a communication user equipment,device and user equipment and system with the user equipment
KR101421987B1 (en) 2013-04-05 2014-07-23 주식회사 이노와이어리스 Spectrum analyzer and method for processing a measured signal

Citations (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4817198A (en) 1984-12-24 1989-03-28 Telefunken Electronic Gmbh Radio receiver
WO1991007037A1 (en) 1989-11-07 1991-05-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in a cdma cellular mobile telephone system
US5036527A (en) 1990-02-05 1991-07-30 Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc. Iterative automatic gain control for an analog front end of a modem
US5093840A (en) 1990-11-16 1992-03-03 Scs Mobilecom, Inc. Adaptive power control for a spread spectrum transmitter
US5119508A (en) 1988-11-18 1992-06-02 Motorola, Inc. Predictive AGC in TDM systems
US5134707A (en) 1989-10-26 1992-07-28 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Satellite receiver
WO1992016063A1 (en) 1991-02-28 1992-09-17 N.V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken System for broadcasting and receiving digital data, receiver and transmitter for use in such system
US5179353A (en) 1991-01-10 1993-01-12 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Power control circuit used for both analog/digital dual mode
US5184349A (en) 1991-01-16 1993-02-02 Motorola, Inc. Amplitude control of a burst signal in a receiver
US5276685A (en) 1988-11-30 1994-01-04 Motorola, Inc. Digital automatic gain control
US5321847A (en) 1991-07-26 1994-06-14 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for detecting intermodulation distortion in a radio frequency receiver
US5321851A (en) 1989-11-15 1994-06-14 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Radio receiver comprising automatic gain controlling function
US5331638A (en) 1991-01-15 1994-07-19 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Gain control in a TDMA radio-telephone system
US5339453A (en) 1990-06-29 1994-08-16 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. AGC circuit for radio receiver having AGC sensitivity compensated by if output signal
US5369792A (en) 1990-07-03 1994-11-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba AGC circuit of FM front-end portion for controlling bandwidth detection sensitivity
US5408698A (en) 1991-03-26 1995-04-18 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Radio tele-communication device having function of variably controlling received signal level
US5448774A (en) 1991-10-09 1995-09-05 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Intermittent operation receiver
US5493713A (en) 1993-09-29 1996-02-20 Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics Limited Demodulation of FM audio carrier
US5509030A (en) 1992-03-04 1996-04-16 Alcatel Network Systems, Inc. RF receiver AGC incorporating time domain equalizer circuity
US5548812A (en) 1994-07-21 1996-08-20 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for balancing the forward link handoff boundary to the reverse link handoff boundary in a cellular communication system
US5555277A (en) 1993-12-01 1996-09-10 Datapoint Corporation Technique for cancelling common mode switching noise to achieve reduced error rates in a local area network
US5564092A (en) 1994-11-04 1996-10-08 Motorola, Inc. Differential feed-forward amplifier power control for a radio receiver system
US5564094A (en) 1992-09-02 1996-10-08 Motorola, Inc. Radio receiver providing reduced intermodulation distortion
US5722063A (en) 1994-12-16 1998-02-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for increasing receiver immunity to interference
US5722061A (en) 1994-12-16 1998-02-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for increasing receiver immunity to interference
GB2326783A (en) 1997-06-23 1998-12-30 Nec Corp Spread spectrum radio receiver in which the gain is controlled in dependence on data error produced by interfering signals

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6009129A (en) * 1997-02-28 1999-12-28 Nokia Mobile Phones Device and method for detection and reduction of intermodulation distortion

Patent Citations (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4817198A (en) 1984-12-24 1989-03-28 Telefunken Electronic Gmbh Radio receiver
US5119508A (en) 1988-11-18 1992-06-02 Motorola, Inc. Predictive AGC in TDM systems
US5276685A (en) 1988-11-30 1994-01-04 Motorola, Inc. Digital automatic gain control
US5134707A (en) 1989-10-26 1992-07-28 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Satellite receiver
WO1991007037A1 (en) 1989-11-07 1991-05-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in a cdma cellular mobile telephone system
US5321851A (en) 1989-11-15 1994-06-14 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Radio receiver comprising automatic gain controlling function
US5036527A (en) 1990-02-05 1991-07-30 Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc. Iterative automatic gain control for an analog front end of a modem
US5339453A (en) 1990-06-29 1994-08-16 Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. AGC circuit for radio receiver having AGC sensitivity compensated by if output signal
US5369792A (en) 1990-07-03 1994-11-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba AGC circuit of FM front-end portion for controlling bandwidth detection sensitivity
US5093840A (en) 1990-11-16 1992-03-03 Scs Mobilecom, Inc. Adaptive power control for a spread spectrum transmitter
US5179353A (en) 1991-01-10 1993-01-12 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Power control circuit used for both analog/digital dual mode
US5331638A (en) 1991-01-15 1994-07-19 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Gain control in a TDMA radio-telephone system
US5184349A (en) 1991-01-16 1993-02-02 Motorola, Inc. Amplitude control of a burst signal in a receiver
WO1992016063A1 (en) 1991-02-28 1992-09-17 N.V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken System for broadcasting and receiving digital data, receiver and transmitter for use in such system
US5408698A (en) 1991-03-26 1995-04-18 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Radio tele-communication device having function of variably controlling received signal level
US5321847A (en) 1991-07-26 1994-06-14 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for detecting intermodulation distortion in a radio frequency receiver
US5448774A (en) 1991-10-09 1995-09-05 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Intermittent operation receiver
US5509030A (en) 1992-03-04 1996-04-16 Alcatel Network Systems, Inc. RF receiver AGC incorporating time domain equalizer circuity
US5564094A (en) 1992-09-02 1996-10-08 Motorola, Inc. Radio receiver providing reduced intermodulation distortion
US5493713A (en) 1993-09-29 1996-02-20 Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics Limited Demodulation of FM audio carrier
US5555277A (en) 1993-12-01 1996-09-10 Datapoint Corporation Technique for cancelling common mode switching noise to achieve reduced error rates in a local area network
US5548812A (en) 1994-07-21 1996-08-20 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for balancing the forward link handoff boundary to the reverse link handoff boundary in a cellular communication system
US5564092A (en) 1994-11-04 1996-10-08 Motorola, Inc. Differential feed-forward amplifier power control for a radio receiver system
US5722063A (en) 1994-12-16 1998-02-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for increasing receiver immunity to interference
US5722061A (en) 1994-12-16 1998-02-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for increasing receiver immunity to interference
US5732341A (en) 1994-12-16 1998-03-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for increasing receiver immunity to interference
GB2326783A (en) 1997-06-23 1998-12-30 Nec Corp Spread spectrum radio receiver in which the gain is controlled in dependence on data error produced by interfering signals

Cited By (84)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6898235B1 (en) * 1999-12-10 2005-05-24 Argon St Incorporated Wideband communication intercept and direction finding device using hyperchannelization
US6591110B1 (en) * 2000-06-27 2003-07-08 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of detecting and calculating external jammer signal power in communication systems
US7012968B2 (en) * 2000-11-30 2006-03-14 Lg Electronics, Inc. Apparatus for detecting and adjusting transmission power of CDMA system
US20110090939A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2011-04-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and Method for Management of a Shared Frequency Band
US7424268B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2008-09-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for management of a shared frequency band
US6714605B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2004-03-30 Cognio, Inc. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a communication device
US20090046625A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2009-02-19 Diener Neil R System and Method for Management of a Shared Frequency Band
US20040156440A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2004-08-12 Sugar Gary L. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a communication device
US7292656B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2007-11-06 Cognio, Inc. Signal pulse detection scheme for use in real-time spectrum analysis
US20050002473A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2005-01-06 Kloper David S. Signal pulse detection scheme for use in real-time spectrum analysis
US20040028123A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2004-02-12 Sugar Gary L. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a radio device
US20040028003A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2004-02-12 Diener Neil R. System and method for management of a shared frequency band
US7254191B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2007-08-07 Cognio, Inc. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a radio device
US7224752B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2007-05-29 Cognio, Inc. System and method for real-time spectrum analysis in a communication device
US20030198200A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2003-10-23 Cognio, Inc. System and Method for Spectrum Management of a Shared Frequency Band
US7606335B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2009-10-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. Signal pulse detection scheme for use in real-time spectrum analysis
US8175539B2 (en) 2002-04-22 2012-05-08 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for management of a shared frequency band
US20080019464A1 (en) * 2002-04-22 2008-01-24 Cognio, Inc. Signal Pulse Detection Scheme for Use in Real-Time Spectrum Analysis
US7742760B2 (en) * 2002-05-28 2010-06-22 Motorola, Inc. Dynamic mobile station configuration in wireless communications systems and methods therefor
US20070298775A1 (en) * 2002-05-28 2007-12-27 Motorola, Inc. Dynamic mobile station configuration in wireless communications systems and methods therefor
US7408907B2 (en) 2002-09-11 2008-08-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for management of a shared frequency band using client-specific management techniques
US20040047324A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 Diener Neil R. System and method for management of a shared frequency band using client--specific management techniques
WO2004034077A3 (en) * 2002-10-04 2004-12-16 Sigtec Navigation Pty Ltd Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US8125381B2 (en) 2002-10-04 2012-02-28 U-Blox Ag Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20090102709A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2009-04-23 Bryant Roderick C Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20090109088A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2009-04-30 Bryant Roderick C Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US8816905B2 (en) 2002-10-04 2014-08-26 U-Blox Ag Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US7463189B2 (en) * 2002-10-04 2008-12-09 Signav Pty Ltd. Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20090128403A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2009-05-21 Bryant Roderick C Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20060055596A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2006-03-16 Bryant Roderick C Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20080174481A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2008-07-24 Bryant Roderick C Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20080174483A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2008-07-24 Bryant Roderick C Satellite-based positioning system improvement
US20040137915A1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2004-07-15 Diener Neil R. Server and multiple sensor system for monitoring activity in a shared radio frequency band
US7184777B2 (en) 2002-11-27 2007-02-27 Cognio, Inc. Server and multiple sensor system for monitoring activity in a shared radio frequency band
US8045654B1 (en) 2003-08-06 2011-10-25 Lockheed Martin Corporation Matched detector/channelizer with adaptive threshold
US7430254B1 (en) 2003-08-06 2008-09-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Matched detector/channelizer with adaptive threshold
US7444145B2 (en) 2003-10-03 2008-10-28 Cisco Technology, Inc. Automated real-time site survey in a shared frequency band environment
US20050073983A1 (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-07 Diener Neil R. Automated real-time site survey in a shared frequency band environment
US20060274684A1 (en) * 2003-10-03 2006-12-07 Diener Neil R Automated real-time site survey in a shared frequency band environment
US7110756B2 (en) 2003-10-03 2006-09-19 Cognio, Inc. Automated real-time site survey in a shared frequency band environment
US7460837B2 (en) 2004-03-25 2008-12-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. User interface and time-shifted presentation of data in a system that monitors activity in a shared radio frequency band
US20050227625A1 (en) * 2004-03-25 2005-10-13 Diener Neil R User interface and time-shifted presentation of data in a system that monitors activity in a shared radio frequency band
US20070224963A1 (en) * 2004-05-17 2007-09-27 Yossi Moscovitz Method and User Equipment for Jamming Detection and Signalling in a Mobile Telecommunications Network
US7680450B2 (en) * 2004-05-17 2010-03-16 Telit Communications S.P.A. Method and user equipment for jamming detection and signalling in a mobile telecommunications network
US20050285781A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2005-12-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. GPS receiver and method for detecting a jammer signal using fast fourier transform
US20060270371A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-11-30 Sugar Gary L Tracking short-term maximum power spectrum density for improved visibility of low duty cycle signals
US20070008215A1 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-01-11 Sige Semiconductor (Europe) Limited GPS receiver with improved immunity to collocated transmissions and method therefor
US7250899B2 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-07-31 Sige Semiconductor (Europe) Limited GPS receiver with improved immunity to collocated transmissions and method therefor
CN101300498B (en) 2005-11-04 2011-04-20 特克特朗尼克公司 Wide-bandwidth spectrum analysis of transient signals using a real-time spectrum analyzer
US8179118B2 (en) 2005-11-04 2012-05-15 Tektronix, Inc. Wide-bandwidth spectrum analysis of transient signals using a real-time spectrum analyzer
WO2007056673A3 (en) * 2005-11-04 2007-12-13 Tektronix Inc Wide-bandwidth spectrum analysis of transient signals using a real-time spectrum analyzer
US20080258706A1 (en) * 2005-11-04 2008-10-23 Tektronix, Inc. Wide-Bandwidth Spectrum Analysis of Transient Signals Using a Real-Time Spectrum Analyzer
US7835319B2 (en) 2006-05-09 2010-11-16 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for identifying wireless devices using pulse fingerprinting and sequence analysis
US20070264939A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-15 Cognio, Inc. System and Method for Identifying Wireless Devices Using Pulse Fingerprinting and Sequence Analysis
EP1862816A1 (en) * 2006-06-04 2007-12-05 Fondazione Torino Wireless Time-frequency interfering detector
US8023575B2 (en) 2006-06-13 2011-09-20 Bandspeed, Inc. Approach for spectrum analysis in a receiver
US20070297524A1 (en) * 2006-06-13 2007-12-27 Ben Jones Approach for spectrum analysis in a receiver
US20070297540A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Navini Networks, Inc. Method and system for detecting preambles in a multi-cell system
US7991083B2 (en) * 2006-06-22 2011-08-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for detecting preambles in a multi-cell system
US7945407B2 (en) 2006-09-19 2011-05-17 Tektronix, Inc Signal analyzers and frequency domain data production methods
US20080144856A1 (en) * 2006-09-19 2008-06-19 Tektronix International Sales, Gmbh Signal analyzers and frequency domain data production methods
US8249386B2 (en) * 2008-03-28 2012-08-21 Tektronix, Inc. Video bandwidth resolution in DFT-based spectrum analysis
US20090245686A1 (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-01 Tektronix, Inc. Video bandwidth resoluation in dft-based spectrum analysis
US20110176639A1 (en) * 2008-07-30 2011-07-21 Kyocera Corporation Radio base station
US8559865B2 (en) * 2008-07-31 2013-10-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for providing jammer detection in a receiver
US20100026547A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for providing jammer detection in a receiver
US8301075B2 (en) 2009-05-14 2012-10-30 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Tactical radio and radio network with electronic countermeasures
US20100302087A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Lockheed Martin Corporation Smart Signal Jammer
US7982654B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2011-07-19 Lockheed Martin Corporation Smart signal jammer
US20130215786A1 (en) * 2010-11-16 2013-08-22 Cinterion Wireless Modules Gmbh Method of detecting and jamming transmitter effecting a communication user equipment, user equipment and evaluation unit with interfaces to the user equipment
US9198063B2 (en) * 2010-11-16 2015-11-24 Gemalto M2M Gmbh Method of detecting a jamming transmitter affecting a communication user equipment, user equipment and evaluation unit with interfaces to the user equipment
CN102026256A (en) * 2010-12-28 2011-04-20 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Method and device for monitoring abnormal jamming signal
CN102026256B (en) 2010-12-28 2014-09-10 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Method and device for monitoring abnormal jamming signal
US9844016B2 (en) 2011-11-18 2017-12-12 Gemalto M2M Gmbh Method of detecting a jamming transmitter affecting a communication user equipment, device and user equipment and system with the user equipment
WO2013090568A1 (en) 2011-12-15 2013-06-20 Northrop Grumman Guidance And Electronics Company, Inc. System and method for detection of rf signal spoofing
EP2792021A4 (en) * 2011-12-15 2015-10-21 Northrop Grumman Guidance & Electronics Co Inc System and method for detection of rf signal spoofing
US20130217358A1 (en) * 2012-02-16 2013-08-22 Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus to determine if a cellular jamming signal is malicious or non-malicious based on received signal strength
US9031538B2 (en) * 2012-02-16 2015-05-12 Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus to determine if a cellular jamming signal is malicious or non-malicious based on received signal strength
US9614640B2 (en) 2012-11-19 2017-04-04 Gemalto M2M Gmbh Method, device and system for detecting a jamming transmitter
US9295028B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2016-03-22 At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp Detection and mitigation of denial-of-service attacks in wireless communication networks
US9781156B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2017-10-03 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Detection and mitigation of denial-of-service attacks in wireless communication networks
US9699664B2 (en) 2013-11-15 2017-07-04 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Endpoint device antenna beam forming based jamming detection and mitigation
US9288007B2 (en) 2013-11-15 2016-03-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Endpoint device antenna beam forming based jamming detection and mitigation
US9905120B1 (en) 2016-08-29 2018-02-27 At&T Digital Life, Inc. Alarm initiation when sensor is intentionally jammed

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
JP4485695B2 (en) 2010-06-23 grant
EP1337050A3 (en) 2005-08-24 application
JP2002542651A (en) 2002-12-10 application
EP1166458B1 (en) 2004-08-18 grant
DE60031895T2 (en) 2007-08-30 grant
KR20010108483A (en) 2001-12-07 application
CN1346545A (en) 2002-04-24 application
KR100824492B1 (en) 2008-04-22 grant
DE60013108D1 (en) 2004-09-23 grant
EP1337050B1 (en) 2006-11-15 grant
DE60013108T2 (en) 2005-08-18 grant
CN100361409C (en) 2008-01-09 grant
EP1337050A2 (en) 2003-08-20 application
DE60031895D1 (en) 2006-12-28 grant
EP1166458A1 (en) 2002-01-02 application
WO2000062437A1 (en) 2000-10-19 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5799005A (en) System and method for determining received pilot power and path loss in a CDMA communication system
US5440582A (en) Method and apparatus for determining signal usability
US5544155A (en) Method of synchronization for code division multiple access radiotelephone communications
US6341224B1 (en) Power controller for mobile communication system wherein a signal to interference threshold is dynamically moved based on an error rate measurement
US7295813B2 (en) Current reduction by dynamic receiver adjustment in a communication device
US6546252B1 (en) System and method for estimating interfrequency measurements used for radio network function
US20070076783A1 (en) Frequency selective automatic gain control with dual non-symmetric attack and release times and interference detection feature
US6072998A (en) Radio receiver for receiving a modulated digital signal
US7103316B1 (en) Method and apparatus determining the presence of interference in a wireless communication channel
US5898740A (en) Power control method in a cellular communication system, and a receiver
US4853686A (en) Method and apparatus for establishing a connection in shortwave radio networks
US6526031B1 (en) Forward power control determination in spread spectrum communications systems
US20040042568A1 (en) Procedure for jammer detection
US7512419B2 (en) Method and apparatus for intelligent noise reduction in a distributed communication system
US6618365B1 (en) Method and apparatus to reduce uplink compressed mode monitoring in a communication device
US5812600A (en) Method and apparatus for mitigating distortion effects in the determination of signal usability
US6304594B1 (en) Interference detection and avoidance technique
US20040235439A1 (en) Method and apparatus for selective disregard of co-channel transmissions on a medium
US6215812B1 (en) Interference canceller for the protection of direct-sequence spread-spectrum communications from high-power narrowband interference
US7616554B2 (en) Controller and transmission and reception method for radio communications in a transceiver for radio communications
US5396657A (en) Selectable filter for reducing Gaussian noise, co-channel and adjacent channel interference in a radio-telephone receiver
US20020137485A1 (en) Method and apparatus for classifying interference
US20130310023A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Detection of Intermodulation Products
US20050100119A1 (en) Adaptive interference immunity control
US6130907A (en) Interference detection for spread spectrum systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HAMDY, WALID;MATHE, LENNART;SUTTON, TODD;REEL/FRAME:009914/0656;SIGNING DATES FROM 19990410 TO 19990412

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12