US5186416A - System for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight - Google Patents

System for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5186416A
US5186416A US07/634,695 US63469590A US5186416A US 5186416 A US5186416 A US 5186416A US 63469590 A US63469590 A US 63469590A US 5186416 A US5186416 A US 5186416A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
control signal
aircraft
wings
acceleration
aerodynamic surfaces
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US07/634,695
Inventor
Pierre Fabre
Xavier Le Tron
Philippe Lacoste
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations SAS
Airbus Group SAS
Original Assignee
Airbus Group SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Group SAS filed Critical Airbus Group SAS
Assigned to AEROSPATIALE SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE reassignment AEROSPATIALE SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: FABRE, PIERRE, LACOSTE, PHILIPPE, LE TRON, XAVIER
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5186416A publication Critical patent/US5186416A/en
Assigned to AIRBUS FRANCE reassignment AIRBUS FRANCE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE AND SPACE COMPANY EADS FRANCE
Assigned to EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE AND SPACE COMPANY EADS FRANCE reassignment EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE AND SPACE COMPANY EADS FRANCE CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AEROSPATIALE SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C13/00—Control systems or transmitting systems for actuating flying-control surfaces, lift-increasing flaps, air brakes, or spoilers
    • B64C13/02—Initiating means
    • B64C13/16—Initiating means actuated automatically, e.g. responsive to gust detectors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/0055—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots with safety arrangements
    • G05D1/0066—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots with safety arrangements for limitation of acceleration or stress

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight.
  • Such a system is activated whatever the vertical acceleration to which the aircraft is subjected, and that proportionally to said acceleration.
  • the smallest accelerations are therefore reflected in the deflection angle of the ailerons, which may cause disturbances of the flight conditions and causes repeated and often superfluous operation of the actuating jacks of the ailerons.
  • the purpose of the present invention is to overcome these drawbacks.
  • the system for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight comprising means for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft, and means for supplying signals for controlling the aerodynamic surfaces connected to the wings of the aircraft, said control means controlling the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces as a function of the acceleration signals which they receive, is remarkable according to the invention in that said control means are only activated when said vertical acceleration ⁇ exceeds a predetermined threshold ⁇ s.
  • a non zero control signal for deflection of said aerodynamic surfaces is effectively applied to said surfaces only when the vertical acceleration ⁇ exceeds a predetermined threshold.
  • the system of the invention is effectively only brought into service when the forces on the wings and particularly on the root of the wings of the aircraft are likely to reach a critical value, placing the integrity of the structure of the wings in danger, whether the aircraft is effecting a maneuver or whether it is being subjected to a gust of wind, low accelerations without danger for the same structure not being taken into account.
  • said signals for controlling the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces are proportional to ⁇ - ⁇ s.
  • said acceleration threshold ⁇ s is substantially equal to 2 g.
  • control signal varies linearly between 0 and 1 when the acceleration ⁇ varies between said threshold ⁇ s and the maximum admissible acceleration ⁇ max.
  • maximum admissible acceleration ⁇ max is substantially equal to 2.5 g.
  • said control signals are used also for controlling the pitch control surfaces of the aircraft to counter the pitching moment created by deflection of said aerodynamic surfaces.
  • the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces and, if required, of the pitch control surfaces is obtained by multiplying the control signal by a constant factor which depends on the nature of said surfaces.
  • the present control signal is immediately applied to the aerodynamic surfaces when, above said threshold ⁇ s, the vertical acceleration ⁇ increases.
  • the present control signal is effectively applied to the aerodynamic surfaces only when the difference between the signal previously in force applied to the aerodynamic surfaces and the present signal reaches a predetermined threshold.
  • said difference threshold is substantially equal to 0.2.
  • control signal is immediately applied to the aerodynamic surfaces when said control signal is, in absolute value, less than a predetermined value. More particularly, with the control signal varying between 0 and 1, said value is substantially equal to 0.1.
  • said control means comprise means for computing the control signal properly speaking and means for translating this signal into a deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces.
  • said means for computing the control signal comprise a linear interpolation table connected to said means for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft.
  • said computing means comprise a first AND logic gate, to the three inputs of which the following information is delivered:
  • the aircraft is in flight or not
  • the aircraft is in a smooth configuration or not
  • control stick is deflected above a predetermined angular threshold or not
  • said computing means comprise a first comparator for comparing the present control signal and the control signal previously in force applied to the aerodynamic surfaces.
  • said computing means comprise a second comparator for comparing the present control signal to which a given value has been added and the control signal in force.
  • said computing means comprise a third comparator for comparing the present control signal with a predetermined reference value.
  • the output of the first AND logic gate and the outputs of the first, second and third comparators are connected to the respective inputs of a second AND logic gate whose output is connected to a memory, the latter being also connected to the output of the first switch.
  • the output of the first comparator controls a second switch to the two inputs of which are connected respective reference generators and whose output is connected to a device for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal, connected to the output of said memory.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates schematically the system of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the control means of the system of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a logic diagram of one embodiment of the means for computing the control signal when the aircraft is effecting a maneuver.
  • the system of the invention makes it possible to reduce the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root 1 of the wings 2 of an aircraft in flight, particularly a heavy transport civil aircraft 3 as shown.
  • the system of the invention comprises means 4 for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft, and means 5 for delivering signals for controlling the aerodynamic surfaces, such as ailerons 6, connected to the wings 2 of aircraft 3 in the vicinity of the free ends thereof, these control means 5 controlling the deflection angle of the aerodynamic surfaces 6 as a function of the acceleration signals which they receive from the detection and measurement means 4 by connection 7.
  • the control means 5 are connected by connections 8 to respective means (not shown) for actuating the ailerons 6.
  • the detection and measurement means 4 comprise one or more accelerometers which, in actual fact, are advantageously implanted at the front of the aircraft, i.e. at the level of the piloting cabin 9.
  • control means 5 are only activated when the vertical acceleration ⁇ of the aircraft exceeds a predetermined threshold ⁇ s, as will be seen in detail with reference to FIG. 3.
  • control means 5 comprise means 10 for computing the control signal properly speaking connected, on the one hand, by connection 11 to means 12 for translating this signal into a deflection angle of the ailerons 6 and, on the other hand, by connection 13 to means 14 for translating this signal into a deflection angle of the pitch control surfaces 15, connected to the control means by connection 16, so as to counter the pitching moment created by deflection of ailerons 6.
  • the deflection angle of the ailerons 6 and of the pitch control surfaces 15 will be obtained by multiplying the control signal by a constant factor which depends on the nature of the aerodynamic surfaces (ailerons, pitch control surfaces or others) in question.
  • the spoilers in addition to ailerons 6, may also be adjusted for reinforcing the effect of lightening the forces on the root of the wings of the aircraft.
  • the principle of the invention i.e. activation of the control means 5 of the aerodynamic surfaces 6 from a predetermined acceleration threshold is applicable not only when the aircraft is subjected to a gust of wind but also when it is effecting a maneuver such as a pull-up.
  • the means 10 for computing the control signal properly speaking will be described below with reference to FIG. 3, when the aircraft is effecting a maneuver.
  • the acceleration signal conveyed by connection 7, is delivered to the input of a linear interpolation table 20.
  • the latter is designed so that it delivers a control signal which remains 0 as long as the load factor (vertical acceleration) is less than or equal to the predetermined threshold, for example equal to 2 g, and which is interpolated linearly between 0 and 1 for any other value of the load factor between 2 and 2.5 g, the latter value corresponding to the maximum load factor permitted by piloting laws for heavy transport civil aircraft.
  • the control signal from the linear interpolation table 20 is fed by connection 21 to a first input of a switch 22 which switches from the position shown with a continuous line in the drawings, in which the output of switch 22 is connected to a zero value reference generator 23 which is connected to the second input of switch 22 by connection 19, to the position shown with a broken line, in which the control signal may be transmitted through said switch if the three following conditions are fulfilled:
  • control stick or the lateral stick is deflected above a predetermined angular threshold for confirming the maneuver (for example 8° in the nose-up direction); this information is delivered to the third input of the AND logic gate 24 by connection 27.
  • the output of the AND logic gate 24 is then at logic level 1 causing switch 22 to switch from the position shown with a continuous line to the position shown with a broken line.
  • the output of the AND logic gate 24 is connected to switch 22 which it controls by connection 28.
  • switch 22 is connected by connection 29 to memory 30 whose function will be explained further on, itself connected to a device 32 for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal, whose output is connected by connections 11 and 13 to means 12 and 14 for translating this control signal into a deflection angle of the ailerons 6 or of the pitch control surfaces 15 (FIGS. 1 and 2).
  • the signals controlling the deflection angle of the aerodynamic surfaces 6 will be proportional to ⁇ - ⁇ s (with ⁇ max equal to 2.5 g). However, if the load factor decreases, while still remaining greater than threshold ⁇ s, the control signal effectively applied to the aerodynamic surfaces will only decrease after confirmation of this tendency, so as not to adversely affect the stability of the aircraft. For that, a hysteresis effect is created as will be described hereafter.
  • the control signal from the linear interpolation table 20 is fed by connection 33 to an input of a first comparator 34 whose other input receives by connection 35 the signal previously in force applied to ailerons 6, with a certain delay defined by device 36.
  • Comparator 34 is such that, when the load factor decreases, i.e. when the signal in force is greater than the present control signal, its output is at logic level 1.
  • present control signal is meant the signal which has just been received by the computing means 10 and computed in the linear interpolation table 20.
  • the signal from device 36 is also applied to an input of a second comparator 38 by connection 37 whose other input receives, by connection 39, the signal from the linear interpolation table 20 by connection 40, to which a given value has been added, for example equal to 0.2, in the summator 41.
  • the second input of summator 41 is connected by connection 42 to a generator 43 generating this reference, for example 0.2.
  • the output of comparator 38 is at logic level 1 if the signal delivered by connection 39 is greater than that delivered by connection 37, i.e. if the difference between the signal in force and the present signal is less than said given value, for example 0.2; which represents the wait for confirmation of the previously indicated tendency.
  • a third comparator 44 the signal from the linear interpolation table 20 by connection 45 is compared with a given value, for example 0.1, delivered to the second input of comparator 44 by a reference generator 46 connected thereto by connection 47.
  • the output of comparator 44 is at logic level 1 if said signal is greater than said reference value.
  • comparators 34, 38 and 44 are fed, by the respective connections 48, 49 and 50, to three inputs of a second AND logic gate 51, whose fourth input is connected by connection 52 to the output of the first AND logic gate 24 and whose output is connected by connection 53 to the memory 30.
  • the tendency is to an increase of the load factor
  • the difference between the signal in force and the present control signal is greater than or equal to for example 0.2, or
  • control signal is, in absolute value, less than for example 0.1.
  • the output of comparator 34 is also connected by connection 54 to a second switch 55 which may switch from the position shown with a continuous line in FIG. 3, when said output is at logic level 0, to the position shown with a broken line when the output of comparator 34 passes to the logic level 1.
  • the first position corresponds to a rate of variation of the control signal, when the load factor increases, which is greater than that corresponding to the second position when the load factor decreases.
  • the rate of variation may be 0.5/s and, in the second case, 0.1/s.
  • switch 55 is connected to the device 32 for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal by connection 60.
  • the system according to the present invention reduces the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft when they risk reaching a critical value, i.e. when the vertical acceleration of the aircraft exceeds a predetermined threshold, but not taking into account "small" accelerations having no danger for the integrity of the structure of the wings and, on the other hand, creates a hysteresis effect by which, when the vertical acceleration decreases while remaining greater than said threshold, the deflection angle of the aerodynamic surfaces will develop in this direction only after confirmation of such tendency, so as not to adversely affect the stability of the aircraft.
  • the principle of the present invention can be applied not only when the aircraft is effecting a maneuver, but also when it is subjected to a gust of wind.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Control Devices (AREA)

Abstract

A system for reducing the forces applied to the wings of an aircraft in flight includes an accelerometer for measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft and generators for generating signals to control the aerodynamic surfaces in the wings of the aircraft as a function of the acceleration measured by the accelerometer. The control signal generator is not activated except when the vertical acceleration exceeds a predetermined value.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight.
When an aircraft makes a maneuver, such as a pull-up, or when it is subjected to a gust of wind, that maneuver causes an increase of the lift and so of the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings. A maneuver such as a pull-up or a gust of wind results in a vertical acceleration of the aircraft which can be measured by means of accelerometers. The measurement of such acceleration is called "vertical load factor". For a given load factor, the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings can only be reduced by bringing the point of application of the lift close to the root of the wings through an upward deflection of the ailerons provided in the vicinity of the free end of each wing.
2. Description of the Prior Art
From the document U.S. Pat. No. 3,347,498 a system is already known for reducing the forces applied to the root of the wings of an aircraft, not only when this latter is effecting maneuvers but also when it is subjected to gusts of wind, comprising accelerometers disposed on the fuselage and at the ends of the wings of the aircraft, and control means for controlling the deflection angle of the ailerons, provided in the vicinity of the free ends of the wings, proportionally to the vertical acceleration of the aircraft measured by said accelerometers.
Such a system is activated whatever the vertical acceleration to which the aircraft is subjected, and that proportionally to said acceleration. The smallest accelerations are therefore reflected in the deflection angle of the ailerons, which may cause disturbances of the flight conditions and causes repeated and often superfluous operation of the actuating jacks of the ailerons.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The purpose of the present invention is to overcome these drawbacks.
For this, the system for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight, of the type comprising means for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft, and means for supplying signals for controlling the aerodynamic surfaces connected to the wings of the aircraft, said control means controlling the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces as a function of the acceleration signals which they receive, is remarkable according to the invention in that said control means are only activated when said vertical acceleration γ exceeds a predetermined threshold γs.
Thus, a non zero control signal for deflection of said aerodynamic surfaces is effectively applied to said surfaces only when the vertical acceleration γ exceeds a predetermined threshold. In other words, the system of the invention is effectively only brought into service when the forces on the wings and particularly on the root of the wings of the aircraft are likely to reach a critical value, placing the integrity of the structure of the wings in danger, whether the aircraft is effecting a maneuver or whether it is being subjected to a gust of wind, low accelerations without danger for the same structure not being taken into account.
Preferably, above said threshold γs, said signals for controlling the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces are proportional to γ-γs.
In the case where the system of the invention is more particularly adapted for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of the aircraft when the latter is effecting a maneuver such as a pull-up and when said aircraft is a heavy transport civil aircraft, said acceleration threshold γs is substantially equal to 2 g.
Advantageously, the control signal varies linearly between 0 and 1 when the acceleration γ varies between said threshold γs and the maximum admissible acceleration γmax. In particular, the maximum admissible acceleration γmax is substantially equal to 2.5 g.
According to another characteristic of the present invention, said control signals are used also for controlling the pitch control surfaces of the aircraft to counter the pitching moment created by deflection of said aerodynamic surfaces.
According to yet another characteristic of the present invention, the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces and, if required, of the pitch control surfaces is obtained by multiplying the control signal by a constant factor which depends on the nature of said surfaces.
According to another characteristic of the present invention, the present control signal is immediately applied to the aerodynamic surfaces when, above said threshold γs, the vertical acceleration γ increases.
Preferably, when the vertical acceleration γ decreases while remaining above said threshold γs, the present control signal is effectively applied to the aerodynamic surfaces only when the difference between the signal previously in force applied to the aerodynamic surfaces and the present signal reaches a predetermined threshold. In particular, with the control signal varying between 0 and 1, said difference threshold is substantially equal to 0.2.
Furthermore, the present control signal is immediately applied to the aerodynamic surfaces when said control signal is, in absolute value, less than a predetermined value. More particularly, with the control signal varying between 0 and 1, said value is substantially equal to 0.1.
According to another characteristic of the present invention, said control means comprise means for computing the control signal properly speaking and means for translating this signal into a deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces.
Advantageously, said means for computing the control signal comprise a linear interpolation table connected to said means for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft.
Furthermore, said computing means comprise a first AND logic gate, to the three inputs of which the following information is delivered:
the aircraft is in flight or not,
the aircraft is in a smooth configuration or not, and
the control stick is deflected above a predetermined angular threshold or not,
and whose output controls a first switch, whose two inputs are connected respectively to a zero value reference generator and to the output of said linear interpolation table.
According to another characteristic of the present invention, said computing means comprise a first comparator for comparing the present control signal and the control signal previously in force applied to the aerodynamic surfaces.
Preferably, said computing means comprise a second comparator for comparing the present control signal to which a given value has been added and the control signal in force.
Advantageously, said computing means comprise a third comparator for comparing the present control signal with a predetermined reference value.
In particular, the output of the first AND logic gate and the outputs of the first, second and third comparators are connected to the respective inputs of a second AND logic gate whose output is connected to a memory, the latter being also connected to the output of the first switch.
Furthermore, the output of the first comparator controls a second switch to the two inputs of which are connected respective reference generators and whose output is connected to a device for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal, connected to the output of said memory.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The figures of the accompanying drawings will better show how the invention may be put into practice.
FIG. 1 illustrates schematically the system of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the control means of the system of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a logic diagram of one embodiment of the means for computing the control signal when the aircraft is effecting a maneuver.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The system according to the present invention makes it possible to reduce the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root 1 of the wings 2 of an aircraft in flight, particularly a heavy transport civil aircraft 3 as shown. Referring to FIG. 1, the system of the invention comprises means 4 for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft, and means 5 for delivering signals for controlling the aerodynamic surfaces, such as ailerons 6, connected to the wings 2 of aircraft 3 in the vicinity of the free ends thereof, these control means 5 controlling the deflection angle of the aerodynamic surfaces 6 as a function of the acceleration signals which they receive from the detection and measurement means 4 by connection 7. For this, the control means 5 are connected by connections 8 to respective means (not shown) for actuating the ailerons 6. It will be noted that the detection and measurement means 4 comprise one or more accelerometers which, in actual fact, are advantageously implanted at the front of the aircraft, i.e. at the level of the piloting cabin 9.
More particularly, the control means 5 are only activated when the vertical acceleration γ of the aircraft exceeds a predetermined threshold γs, as will be seen in detail with reference to FIG. 3.
Referring to FIG. 2, the control means 5 comprise means 10 for computing the control signal properly speaking connected, on the one hand, by connection 11 to means 12 for translating this signal into a deflection angle of the ailerons 6 and, on the other hand, by connection 13 to means 14 for translating this signal into a deflection angle of the pitch control surfaces 15, connected to the control means by connection 16, so as to counter the pitching moment created by deflection of ailerons 6.
The deflection angle of the ailerons 6 and of the pitch control surfaces 15 will be obtained by multiplying the control signal by a constant factor which depends on the nature of the aerodynamic surfaces (ailerons, pitch control surfaces or others) in question. In this connection, in addition to ailerons 6, the spoilers, not shown in FIG. 1, may also be adjusted for reinforcing the effect of lightening the forces on the root of the wings of the aircraft.
The principle of the invention, i.e. activation of the control means 5 of the aerodynamic surfaces 6 from a predetermined acceleration threshold is applicable not only when the aircraft is subjected to a gust of wind but also when it is effecting a maneuver such as a pull-up. By way of illustration, the means 10 for computing the control signal properly speaking will be described below with reference to FIG. 3, when the aircraft is effecting a maneuver.
The acceleration signal, conveyed by connection 7, is delivered to the input of a linear interpolation table 20. The latter is designed so that it delivers a control signal which remains 0 as long as the load factor (vertical acceleration) is less than or equal to the predetermined threshold, for example equal to 2 g, and which is interpolated linearly between 0 and 1 for any other value of the load factor between 2 and 2.5 g, the latter value corresponding to the maximum load factor permitted by piloting laws for heavy transport civil aircraft.
The control signal from the linear interpolation table 20 is fed by connection 21 to a first input of a switch 22 which switches from the position shown with a continuous line in the drawings, in which the output of switch 22 is connected to a zero value reference generator 23 which is connected to the second input of switch 22 by connection 19, to the position shown with a broken line, in which the control signal may be transmitted through said switch if the three following conditions are fulfilled:
1) The aircraft must be in flight; this information is delivered to a first input of a first AND logic gate 24 by connection 25; and
20 The aircraft must be in a smooth configuration (leading edge slats and wing flaps retracted); this information is delivered to a second input of the AND logic gate 24 by connection 26; and
3) The control stick or the lateral stick is deflected above a predetermined angular threshold for confirming the maneuver (for example 8° in the nose-up direction); this information is delivered to the third input of the AND logic gate 24 by connection 27. The output of the AND logic gate 24 is then at logic level 1 causing switch 22 to switch from the position shown with a continuous line to the position shown with a broken line.
The output of the AND logic gate 24 is connected to switch 22 which it controls by connection 28. In its turn, switch 22 is connected by connection 29 to memory 30 whose function will be explained further on, itself connected to a device 32 for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal, whose output is connected by connections 11 and 13 to means 12 and 14 for translating this control signal into a deflection angle of the ailerons 6 or of the pitch control surfaces 15 (FIGS. 1 and 2).
If the load factor γ increases, while still being greater than said threshold γs, the signals controlling the deflection angle of the aerodynamic surfaces 6 will be proportional to γ-γs (with γmax equal to 2.5 g). However, if the load factor decreases, while still remaining greater than threshold γs, the control signal effectively applied to the aerodynamic surfaces will only decrease after confirmation of this tendency, so as not to adversely affect the stability of the aircraft. For that, a hysteresis effect is created as will be described hereafter.
The control signal from the linear interpolation table 20 is fed by connection 33 to an input of a first comparator 34 whose other input receives by connection 35 the signal previously in force applied to ailerons 6, with a certain delay defined by device 36. Comparator 34 is such that, when the load factor decreases, i.e. when the signal in force is greater than the present control signal, its output is at logic level 1. By present control signal is meant the signal which has just been received by the computing means 10 and computed in the linear interpolation table 20.
The signal from device 36 is also applied to an input of a second comparator 38 by connection 37 whose other input receives, by connection 39, the signal from the linear interpolation table 20 by connection 40, to which a given value has been added, for example equal to 0.2, in the summator 41. For that, the second input of summator 41 is connected by connection 42 to a generator 43 generating this reference, for example 0.2. The output of comparator 38 is at logic level 1 if the signal delivered by connection 39 is greater than that delivered by connection 37, i.e. if the difference between the signal in force and the present signal is less than said given value, for example 0.2; which represents the wait for confirmation of the previously indicated tendency.
In addition, in a third comparator 44, the signal from the linear interpolation table 20 by connection 45 is compared with a given value, for example 0.1, delivered to the second input of comparator 44 by a reference generator 46 connected thereto by connection 47. The output of comparator 44 is at logic level 1 if said signal is greater than said reference value.
The output signals from comparators 34, 38 and 44 are fed, by the respective connections 48, 49 and 50, to three inputs of a second AND logic gate 51, whose fourth input is connected by connection 52 to the output of the first AND logic gate 24 and whose output is connected by connection 53 to the memory 30.
In the case where the output of the AND logic gate 51 is at logic level 1, i.e. the four inputs of said gate are at level 1, memory 30 is "frozen", which means that the previously defined value of the control signal ("control signal in force") is kept. More precisely, that occurs if and only if the following conditions are respected:
1) The load factor decreases (comparator 34),
2) This decrease is less than a certain threshold (comparator 38),
3) The signal is greater than a given value (comparator 44) and of course
4) The aircraft is in flight, in a smooth configuration and the control stick (or lateral stick) is deflected beyond a certain angular threshold (the output of AND logic gate 24 is at logic level 1).
On the other hand, if one of these four conditions (or group of conditions in so far as item 4 is concerned) is not respected, the output of the AND logic gate 51 then passes to logic level 0 and memory 30 becomes "transparent", i.e. it lets the present control signal transmitted by connection 29 pass. That occurs when:
the tendency is to an increase of the load factor, or
with the load factor decreasing, the difference between the signal in force and the present control signal is greater than or equal to for example 0.2, or
the control signal is, in absolute value, less than for example 0.1.
It will be noted that in the case where the output of the AND logic gate 24 is at logic level 0, the "transparent" memory lets the zero reference value (generator 23) pass as "control signal".
Moreover, the output of comparator 34 is also connected by connection 54 to a second switch 55 which may switch from the position shown with a continuous line in FIG. 3, when said output is at logic level 0, to the position shown with a broken line when the output of comparator 34 passes to the logic level 1. The first position corresponds to a rate of variation of the control signal, when the load factor increases, which is greater than that corresponding to the second position when the load factor decreases. In the first case, the rate of variation may be 0.5/s and, in the second case, 0.1/s. This information is transmitted respectively from the reference generators 56 and 57 connected to switch 55 by connections 58 and 59. Furthermore, switch 55 is connected to the device 32 for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal by connection 60.
That allows the rate of variation of the control signal to be adjusted in the direction of variation thereof: a low rate when this signal tends to decrease reduces the disturbances to the movement of the aircraft while keeping a sufficient level of lightening of the forces.
Thus, the system according to the present invention, on the one hand reduces the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft when they risk reaching a critical value, i.e. when the vertical acceleration of the aircraft exceeds a predetermined threshold, but not taking into account "small" accelerations having no danger for the integrity of the structure of the wings and, on the other hand, creates a hysteresis effect by which, when the vertical acceleration decreases while remaining greater than said threshold, the deflection angle of the aerodynamic surfaces will develop in this direction only after confirmation of such tendency, so as not to adversely affect the stability of the aircraft. Of course, the principle of the present invention can be applied not only when the aircraft is effecting a maneuver, but also when it is subjected to a gust of wind.

Claims (19)

What is claimed is:
1. A system for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight, comprising:
means for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft, and providing corresponding acceleration signals,
control means supplying signals for controlling the aerodynamic surfaces connected to the wings of the aircraft, said control means controlling the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces as a function of said acceleration signals received by said control means, the latter being only activated when said vertical acceleration γ exceeds a first predetermined threshold γs, such that, when the vertical acceleration γ decreases while remaining above said threshold γs, a new control signal is effectively applied to the aerodynamic surfaces only when the difference between the signal in force previously applied to the aerodynamic surfaces and the new signal reaches a second predetermined threshold.
2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein, above said threshold γs, said signals for controlling the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces are proportional to γ-γs.
3. The system as claimed in claim 1, adapted for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of the aircraft when the latter is effecting a maneuver such as a pull-up and when said aircraft is a heavy transport civil aircraft, wherein said acceleration threshold γs is substantially equal to 2 g.
4. The system as claimed in claim 3, for an aircraft having a maximum admissible acceleration γmax, wherein said control signal varies linearly between 0 and 1, when the acceleration γ varies between said threshold γs and the maximum admissible acceleration γmax.
5. The system as claimed in claim 4, wherein the maximum admissible acceleration γmax is substantially equal to 2.5 g.
6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said control signals are used also for controlling the pitch control surfaces of the aircraft to counter the pitching moment created by deflection of said aerodynamic surfaces.
7. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces and, if required, of the pitch control surfaces is obtained by multiplying the control signal by a constant factor which depends on the nature of said surfaces.
8. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein a new signal is immediately applied to the aerodynamic surfaces when, above said threshold γs, the vertical acceleration γ increases.
9. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein, with the control signal able to vary between 0 and 1, said second threshold is substantially equal to 0.2.
10. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein a new control signal is immediately applied to the aerodynamic surfaces when said control signal is, in absolute value, less than a predetermined value.
11. The system as claimed in claim 10, wherein, with the control signal able to vary between 0 and 1, said value is substantially equal to 0.1.
12. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said control means comprise means for computing the control signal and means for translating this signal into a deflection angle of said aerodynamic surfaces.
13. The system as claimed in claim 12, wherein said means for computing the control signal comprise a linear interpolation table connected to said means for detecting and measuring the vertical acceleration of the aircraft.
14. The system as claimed in claim 13, wherein said computing means comprise a first AND logic gate, to the three inputs of which the following information is delivered:
the aircraft is in flight or not,
the aircraft is in a smooth configuration or not, and
the control stick is deflected above a predetermined angular threshold or not,
and the output of which controls a first switch, whose two inputs are connected respectively to a zero value reference generator and to the output of said linear interpolation table.
15. The system as claimed in claim 14, wherein said computing means comprise a first comparator for comparing the present control signal and the control signal in force previously applied to the aerodynamic surfaces.
16. The system as claimed in claim 15, wherein said computing means comprise a second comparator for comparing the new control signal to which a given value has been added and the control signal in force.
17. The system as claimed in claim 16, wherein said computing means comprise a third comparator for comparing the present control signal with a predetermined reference value.
18. The system as claimed in claim 17, wherein the output of the first AND logic gate and the outputs of the first, second and third comparators are connected to the respective inputs of a second AND logic gate whose output is connected to a memory, the latter being also connected to the output of the first switch.
19. The system as claimed in claim 18, wherein the output of the first comparator controls a second switch to the two inputs of which are connected respective reference generators and whose output is connected to a device for limiting the rate of variation of the control signal, connected to the output of said memory.
US07/634,695 1989-12-28 1990-12-27 System for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight Expired - Lifetime US5186416A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR8917341 1989-12-28
FR8917341A FR2656585B1 (en) 1989-12-28 1989-12-28 SYSTEM FOR REDUCING THE EFFORTS APPLIED TO THE AIRCRAFT AND IN PARTICULAR TO THE LOCATION OF THE WINGS OF AN AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT.

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5186416A true US5186416A (en) 1993-02-16

Family

ID=9389080

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/634,695 Expired - Lifetime US5186416A (en) 1989-12-28 1990-12-27 System for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US5186416A (en)
EP (1) EP0435764B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69016986T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2071065T3 (en)
FR (1) FR2656585B1 (en)

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5375793A (en) * 1992-08-14 1994-12-27 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Process for the control of the control surfaces of an aircraft for the low speed compensation of a lateral path deviation
US5669582A (en) * 1995-05-12 1997-09-23 The Boeing Company Method and apparatus for reducing unwanted sideways motion in the aft cabin and roll-yaw upsets of an airplane due to atmospheric turbulence and wind gusts
EP0953504A1 (en) 1998-04-29 1999-11-03 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Aircraft with reduced wing loads
DE19819341A1 (en) * 1998-04-30 1999-11-11 Daimler Chrysler Aerospace Method for reducing gust loads on an aircraft below the cruising altitude
WO2000015498A1 (en) 1998-09-11 2000-03-23 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method for compensating structural variations in an airplane that are due to external disturbances
US20030141418A1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-07-31 Darbyshire Ian Thomas Aircraft control system
US6729579B1 (en) * 1998-08-04 2004-05-04 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Flight control device for improving the longitudinal stability of an automatically controlled airplane and method of operating same
US20040104302A1 (en) * 2002-08-10 2004-06-03 Detlef Schierenbeck Method and system for reducing engine induced vibration amplitudes in an aircraft fuselage
US6772979B2 (en) * 2002-06-21 2004-08-10 Airbus France Method and device for reducing the vibratory motions of the fuselage of an aircraft
US20040195441A1 (en) * 2003-04-07 2004-10-07 Honeywell International Inc. Flight control actuation system
US20040245387A1 (en) * 2003-01-21 2004-12-09 Kreeke Marc Van De Method and system for controlling an aircraft control surface
US20040245388A1 (en) * 2003-03-26 2004-12-09 Airbus France Process for countering the vibrations induced in an aircraft by the windmilling of a fan and system of electric flight controls implementing this process
US6915989B2 (en) 2002-05-01 2005-07-12 The Boeing Company Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system
US20060284022A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2006-12-21 Harrigan Jeffery S Aerospace vehicle yaw generating systems and associated methods
US20070114327A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 The Boeing Company Wing load alleviation apparatus and method
US20070246605A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2007-10-25 Airbus France Electric Flight Control System for Aircraft Elevators
US20080203237A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2008-08-28 Airbus France Method and Device for Lightening Loads on the Wing System of an Aircraft in Roll Motion
US20080265104A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-10-30 Airbus France Method and device for dynamically alleviating loads generated on an airplane
US20090157363A1 (en) * 2007-12-13 2009-06-18 The Boeing Company System, method, and computer program product for predicting cruise orientation of an as-built airplane
US20090157239A1 (en) * 2007-12-17 2009-06-18 The Boeing Company Vertical Gust Suppression System for Transport Aircraft
US20090261201A1 (en) * 2008-04-17 2009-10-22 The Boening Company Line transfer system for airplane
US20090292405A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2009-11-26 Kioumars Najmabadi Wing-body load alleviation for aircraft
EP2146263A2 (en) 2003-11-03 2010-01-20 The Boeing Company Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system
US20100078518A1 (en) * 2008-09-26 2010-04-01 Tran Chuong B Horizontal tail load alleviation system
US20110202207A1 (en) * 2010-02-16 2011-08-18 Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) Method And Device For Automatically Protecting An Aircraft Against An Excessive Descent Rate
CN102306027A (en) * 2010-05-03 2012-01-04 空中客车运营简化股份公司 Method and device for reducing the real loads generated on an airplane by an aerodynamic disturbance
US20130134258A1 (en) * 2011-11-30 2013-05-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Aerodynamic wing load distribution control
US8606388B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2013-12-10 The Boeing Company System for assembling aircraft
US20150021443A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-01-22 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and Apparatus for Minimizing Dynamic Structural Loads of an Aircraft
US20150028162A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2015-01-29 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
WO2018224565A3 (en) * 2017-06-07 2019-02-07 Turbulence Solutions Gmbh Method and controller for controlling an aircraft by improved direct lift control

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102004045732A1 (en) * 2004-09-21 2006-03-30 Airbus Deutschland Gmbh Airplane e.g. passenger airplane has control device which acts on trailing-edge flaps and stallstrips to reduce maximum possible lift of wings when actual wing load reaches predetermined value
FR2992287B1 (en) * 2012-06-20 2015-05-08 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE REDUCTION, DURING INFLIGHT MANEUVER, OF REAL LOADS EXERCISED ON AN AIRCRAFT.
US9639089B2 (en) * 2015-06-04 2017-05-02 The Boeing Company Gust compensation system and method for aircraft

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2985409A (en) * 1955-09-26 1961-05-23 North American Aviation Inc Gust alleviation system
US3347498A (en) * 1964-09-16 1967-10-17 Elliott Brothers London Ltd Aircraft structural stress alleviators
US4479620A (en) * 1978-07-13 1984-10-30 The Boeing Company Wing load alleviation system using tabbed allerons
FR2559123A1 (en) * 1984-02-03 1985-08-09 Hirsch Rene Method and device for compensating for gusts experienced by an aircraft in flight
US4562546A (en) * 1983-01-13 1985-12-31 Rockwell International Corporation Stability augmentation system for a forward swept wing aircraft
EP0213760A2 (en) * 1985-08-15 1987-03-11 Honeywell Inc. Asymmetric torque switching for aircraft autopilot
US4651955A (en) * 1984-05-07 1987-03-24 Deutsche Airbus Gmbh Device for automatically controllable unloading of aircraft wings
WO1987002964A1 (en) * 1985-11-12 1987-05-21 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Flight control system employing complementary filter
US4725020A (en) * 1980-12-09 1988-02-16 The Boeing Company Control system incorporating structural feedback
US4787042A (en) * 1985-11-18 1988-11-22 Rockwell International Corporation Limiting aircraft vertical acceleration response
US4796192A (en) * 1985-11-04 1989-01-03 The Boeing Company Maneuver load alleviation system
US4821982A (en) * 1987-04-07 1989-04-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Brain O2 reserve limiter for high performance aircraft
US4821981A (en) * 1985-10-08 1989-04-18 The Boeing Company Maneuver enchancement and gust alleviation system
US4855738A (en) * 1987-07-31 1989-08-08 Safe Flight Instrument Corporation Variable threshold wind shear warning system
US4905934A (en) * 1988-07-05 1990-03-06 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Universal-type gust alleviation system for aircraft

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2985409A (en) * 1955-09-26 1961-05-23 North American Aviation Inc Gust alleviation system
US3347498A (en) * 1964-09-16 1967-10-17 Elliott Brothers London Ltd Aircraft structural stress alleviators
US4479620A (en) * 1978-07-13 1984-10-30 The Boeing Company Wing load alleviation system using tabbed allerons
US4725020A (en) * 1980-12-09 1988-02-16 The Boeing Company Control system incorporating structural feedback
US4562546A (en) * 1983-01-13 1985-12-31 Rockwell International Corporation Stability augmentation system for a forward swept wing aircraft
FR2559123A1 (en) * 1984-02-03 1985-08-09 Hirsch Rene Method and device for compensating for gusts experienced by an aircraft in flight
US4651955A (en) * 1984-05-07 1987-03-24 Deutsche Airbus Gmbh Device for automatically controllable unloading of aircraft wings
EP0213760A2 (en) * 1985-08-15 1987-03-11 Honeywell Inc. Asymmetric torque switching for aircraft autopilot
US4821981A (en) * 1985-10-08 1989-04-18 The Boeing Company Maneuver enchancement and gust alleviation system
US4796192A (en) * 1985-11-04 1989-01-03 The Boeing Company Maneuver load alleviation system
WO1987002964A1 (en) * 1985-11-12 1987-05-21 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Flight control system employing complementary filter
US4787042A (en) * 1985-11-18 1988-11-22 Rockwell International Corporation Limiting aircraft vertical acceleration response
US4821982A (en) * 1987-04-07 1989-04-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Brain O2 reserve limiter for high performance aircraft
US4855738A (en) * 1987-07-31 1989-08-08 Safe Flight Instrument Corporation Variable threshold wind shear warning system
US4905934A (en) * 1988-07-05 1990-03-06 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Universal-type gust alleviation system for aircraft

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Journal of Aircraft, vol. 26, No. 4, Apr. 26, 1989, New York, pp. 322 327. *
Journal of Aircraft, vol. 26, No. 4, Apr. 26, 1989, New York, pp. 322-327.

Cited By (65)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5375793A (en) * 1992-08-14 1994-12-27 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Process for the control of the control surfaces of an aircraft for the low speed compensation of a lateral path deviation
US5669582A (en) * 1995-05-12 1997-09-23 The Boeing Company Method and apparatus for reducing unwanted sideways motion in the aft cabin and roll-yaw upsets of an airplane due to atmospheric turbulence and wind gusts
EP0953504A1 (en) 1998-04-29 1999-11-03 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Aircraft with reduced wing loads
FR2778163A1 (en) 1998-04-29 1999-11-05 Aerospatiale AIRCRAFT WITH LOWER SAIL EFFORTS
US6064923A (en) * 1998-04-29 2000-05-16 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Aircraft with reduced wing structure loading
US6161801A (en) * 1998-04-30 2000-12-19 Daimlerchrysler Aerospace Airbus Gmbh Method of reducing wind gust loads acting on an aircraft
DE19819341A1 (en) * 1998-04-30 1999-11-11 Daimler Chrysler Aerospace Method for reducing gust loads on an aircraft below the cruising altitude
DE19819341C2 (en) * 1998-04-30 2000-06-15 Daimler Chrysler Aerospace Method for reducing gust loads on an aircraft below the cruising altitude
US6729579B1 (en) * 1998-08-04 2004-05-04 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Flight control device for improving the longitudinal stability of an automatically controlled airplane and method of operating same
DE19841632C2 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-06-07 Daimler Chrysler Ag Method for compensating structural vibrations of an aircraft due to external disturbances
US6416017B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2002-07-09 Daimlerchrysler Ag System and method for compensating structural vibrations of an aircraft caused by outside disturbances
DE19841632A1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2000-03-23 Daimler Chrysler Ag Attenuating the effect of gusts and buffeting on a flying aircraft involves measuring resulting disturbances with inertial sensing, producing counteracting control surface movements
WO2000015498A1 (en) 1998-09-11 2000-03-23 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method for compensating structural variations in an airplane that are due to external disturbances
US20030141418A1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-07-31 Darbyshire Ian Thomas Aircraft control system
US6986486B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2006-01-17 Bae Systems Plc Aircraft control system
US6915989B2 (en) 2002-05-01 2005-07-12 The Boeing Company Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system
US7191985B2 (en) 2002-05-01 2007-03-20 The Boeing Company Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system
US20060237594A1 (en) * 2002-05-01 2006-10-26 Kioumars Najmabadi Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system
US6772979B2 (en) * 2002-06-21 2004-08-10 Airbus France Method and device for reducing the vibratory motions of the fuselage of an aircraft
US20040104302A1 (en) * 2002-08-10 2004-06-03 Detlef Schierenbeck Method and system for reducing engine induced vibration amplitudes in an aircraft fuselage
US6863242B2 (en) * 2003-01-21 2005-03-08 Airbus France Method and system for controlling an aircraft control surface
US20040245387A1 (en) * 2003-01-21 2004-12-09 Kreeke Marc Van De Method and system for controlling an aircraft control surface
US20040245388A1 (en) * 2003-03-26 2004-12-09 Airbus France Process for countering the vibrations induced in an aircraft by the windmilling of a fan and system of electric flight controls implementing this process
US7090172B2 (en) * 2003-03-26 2006-08-15 Airbus France Process for countering the vibrations induced in an aircraft by the windmilling of a fan and system of electric flight controls implementing this process
US20040195441A1 (en) * 2003-04-07 2004-10-07 Honeywell International Inc. Flight control actuation system
US6827311B2 (en) * 2003-04-07 2004-12-07 Honeywell International, Inc. Flight control actuation system
EP2267569A1 (en) 2003-11-03 2010-12-29 The Boeing Company Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system for reducing torsional vibration in the aircraft structure
EP2146263A2 (en) 2003-11-03 2010-01-20 The Boeing Company Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system
US7702429B2 (en) 2004-08-13 2010-04-20 Airbus France Electric flight control system for aircraft elevators
US20070246605A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2007-10-25 Airbus France Electric Flight Control System for Aircraft Elevators
US20060284022A1 (en) * 2005-06-21 2006-12-21 Harrigan Jeffery S Aerospace vehicle yaw generating systems and associated methods
US20080203237A1 (en) * 2005-07-08 2008-08-28 Airbus France Method and Device for Lightening Loads on the Wing System of an Aircraft in Roll Motion
US8010243B2 (en) * 2005-07-08 2011-08-30 Airbus Operations Sas Method and device for lightening loads on the wing system of an aircraft in roll motion
US20070114327A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 The Boeing Company Wing load alleviation apparatus and method
US20080265104A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-10-30 Airbus France Method and device for dynamically alleviating loads generated on an airplane
US8000845B2 (en) 2007-02-28 2011-08-16 Airbus France Method and device for dynamically alleviating loads generated on an airplane
US8620470B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2013-12-31 The Boeing Company System for assembling aircraft
US8606388B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2013-12-10 The Boeing Company System for assembling aircraft
US20090157363A1 (en) * 2007-12-13 2009-06-18 The Boeing Company System, method, and computer program product for predicting cruise orientation of an as-built airplane
US8326587B2 (en) * 2007-12-13 2012-12-04 The Boeing Company System, method, and computer program product for predicting cruise orientation of an as-built airplane
US20090157239A1 (en) * 2007-12-17 2009-06-18 The Boeing Company Vertical Gust Suppression System for Transport Aircraft
US8774987B2 (en) * 2007-12-17 2014-07-08 The Boeing Company Vertical gust suppression system for transport aircraft
US9651935B2 (en) 2008-04-17 2017-05-16 The Boeing Company Line transfer system for airplane
US8733707B2 (en) 2008-04-17 2014-05-27 The Boeing Company Line transfer system for airplane
US20090261201A1 (en) * 2008-04-17 2009-10-22 The Boening Company Line transfer system for airplane
US20090292405A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2009-11-26 Kioumars Najmabadi Wing-body load alleviation for aircraft
US8024079B2 (en) 2008-05-20 2011-09-20 The Boeing Company Wing-body load alleviation for aircraft
WO2010011388A2 (en) * 2008-05-20 2010-01-28 The Boeing Company Wing-body load alleviation for aircraft
WO2010011388A3 (en) * 2008-05-20 2010-07-29 The Boeing Company Wing-body load alleviation for aircraft
US8342445B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2013-01-01 The Boeing Company Horizontal tail load alleviation system
US8752789B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2014-06-17 The Boeing Company Horizontal tail load alleviation system
US20100078518A1 (en) * 2008-09-26 2010-04-01 Tran Chuong B Horizontal tail load alleviation system
US8818577B2 (en) * 2010-02-16 2014-08-26 Airbus Operations (Sas) Method and device for automatically protecting an aircraft against an excessive descent rate
US20110202207A1 (en) * 2010-02-16 2011-08-18 Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) Method And Device For Automatically Protecting An Aircraft Against An Excessive Descent Rate
CN102306027B (en) * 2010-05-03 2016-08-24 空中客车运营简化股份公司 For the method and apparatus reducing the real load that aerodynamic disturbance produces aboard
CN102306027A (en) * 2010-05-03 2012-01-04 空中客车运营简化股份公司 Method and device for reducing the real loads generated on an airplane by an aerodynamic disturbance
US20150028162A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2015-01-29 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US9242723B2 (en) * 2011-06-10 2016-01-26 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US20150021443A1 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-01-22 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and Apparatus for Minimizing Dynamic Structural Loads of an Aircraft
US9446837B2 (en) * 2011-07-28 2016-09-20 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Method and apparatus for minimizing dynamic structural loads of an aircraft
US8998132B2 (en) * 2011-11-30 2015-04-07 Lockheed Martin Corporation Aerodynamic wing load distribution control
US20130134258A1 (en) * 2011-11-30 2013-05-30 Lockheed Martin Corporation Aerodynamic wing load distribution control
EP2599712A3 (en) * 2011-11-30 2017-06-21 Lockheed Martin Corporation (Maryland Corp.) Aerodynamic wing load distribution control
WO2018224565A3 (en) * 2017-06-07 2019-02-07 Turbulence Solutions Gmbh Method and controller for controlling an aircraft by improved direct lift control
US11334093B2 (en) 2017-06-07 2022-05-17 Turbulence Solutions Gmbh Method and controller for controlling an aircraft by improved direct lift control

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0435764A1 (en) 1991-07-03
DE69016986T2 (en) 1995-07-06
FR2656585A1 (en) 1991-07-05
DE69016986D1 (en) 1995-03-23
EP0435764B1 (en) 1995-02-15
FR2656585B1 (en) 1995-01-13
ES2071065T3 (en) 1995-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5186416A (en) System for reducing the forces applied to the wings and particularly to the root of the wings of an aircraft in flight
US5913492A (en) System for controlling an aircraft control surface tab
US4825375A (en) Apparatus and methods for apportioning commands between aircraft flight control surfaces
US4723214A (en) Automatic camber control
RU2460670C2 (en) Method and device to control shift of movable stabiliser on aircraft
CN107870629B (en) Enhanced takeoff system
EP3159767B1 (en) Zoom climb prevention system for enhanced performance
RU2731194C2 (en) Method and device for protection of maximum lift of an aircraft
EP0235964B1 (en) Method and apparatus for flight guidance for an aircraft in windshear
EP0743245A1 (en) System for providing an air/ground signal to aircraft flight control systems
EP2998819B1 (en) Variable maximum commandable roll rate for directional control during engine-out rolling maneuver
US5112009A (en) Pitch control system for aircraft
US5527002A (en) Electrical flight control system for an airplane, with attitude protection on takeoff
EP0183282B1 (en) Longitudinal stability augmentation system
US6575410B2 (en) Glide slope tracking system
US8190306B2 (en) Method and device for reducing on an aircraft the effects of a vertical turbulence
US4932611A (en) Leading-edge flap system
US20100090068A1 (en) Aircraft with wings whose maximum lift can be altered by controllable wing components
US5995880A (en) Method and device for detecting vertical gusts of wind and application thereof to the pitch-attitude control of an aircraft
GB2136746A (en) Mechanism for increasing the flutter speeds of transonic aircraft wings
US4563743A (en) Maneuver-force gradient system
US7422176B2 (en) Method for ensuring the safety of an aircraft flying horizontally at low speed
CN108828941B (en) Separation control method based on parameter identification
US4530060A (en) Aircraft speed control system modified for decreased headwind at touchdown
CN108829121B (en) Separation controller based on parameter identification

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AEROSPATIALE SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE, FRANC

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:FABRE, PIERRE;LE TRON, XAVIER;LACOSTE, PHILIPPE;REEL/FRAME:006269/0538

Effective date: 19911230

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE AND SPACE COMPANY EADS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AEROSPATIALE SOCIETE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE;REEL/FRAME:017575/0062

Effective date: 20051221

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE AND SPACE COMPANY EADS FRANCE;REEL/FRAME:017575/0111

Effective date: 20051221