US4334244A - Adaptive image enhancement system - Google Patents

Adaptive image enhancement system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4334244A
US4334244A US06173005 US17300580A US4334244A US 4334244 A US4334244 A US 4334244A US 06173005 US06173005 US 06173005 US 17300580 A US17300580 A US 17300580A US 4334244 A US4334244 A US 4334244A
Authority
US
Grant status
Grant
Patent type
Prior art keywords
sample
means
samples
video signal
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US06173005
Inventor
James K. Chan
Curtis L. May
Allan Spooner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HE HOLDINGS Inc dba HUGHES ELECTRONICS
Magnavox Electronic Systems Co
MESC Electronic Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Magnavox Government and Industrial Electronics Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Grant date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N5/00Details of television systems
    • H04N5/14Picture signal circuitry for video frequency region
    • H04N5/20Circuitry for controlling amplitude response
    • H04N5/205Circuitry for controlling amplitude response for correcting amplitude versus frequency characteristic
    • H04N5/208Circuitry for controlling amplitude response for correcting amplitude versus frequency characteristic for compensating for attenuation of high frequency components, e.g. crispening, aperture distortion correction
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N5/00Details of television systems
    • H04N5/14Picture signal circuitry for video frequency region
    • H04N5/21Circuitry for suppressing or minimising disturbance, e.g. moiré, halo, even if the automatic gain control is involved

Abstract

An image enhancement system in which a running average of a group of digitized samples of a video signal and a median of a group of digitized samples are processed to form a gradient sample. The gradient sample is scaled in response to the noise level of the video signal. The gradient samples, average samples, and medium samples are combined by a processor which generates a corresponding sequence of output samples that are converted into an enhanced video signal from which an image is produced. The processor provides image edge enhancement for high gradients while providing increased noise filtering for low gradients.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to real-time image processing systems, and more particularly, to a video signal processing system for enhancing a video image by combined noise filtering and edge sharpening.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Altering the image signal to present the viewer additional information or insight into factors concerning the pre-enhanced image are known. For example, two useful image enhancement operations are noise reduction and edge sharpening. Various filtering techniques for reducing noise have been proposed. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,009,016--Graham there is described a noise reduction system in which a running average of picture samples (pixels) is compared with each new sample of the video signal, and if the picture sample does not exceed a predetermined theshold, the average of the samples is substituted. In copending application Ser. No. 133,606 filed Mar. 24, 1980, entitled "Adaptive Enhancement of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Television Imagery," assigned to the same assignee as the present application, there is described a refined noise reduction system which generates an average from samples over an area extending both vertically above, and horizontally back from the current sample of the video signal. While both of these arrangements improve picture quality by reducing noise in areas of the picture which have relatively low detail and uniform intensity, they provide no enhancement by sharpening the edge between regions of contrasting intensity. Noise filtering and image sharpening involve conflicting requirements since filtering to reduce noise can blur the image while circuits for enhancing image sharpness will also enhance the noise.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a video image enhancement system which adapts itself to noise filtering of the video signal in image regions of nearly uniform intensity while providing edge sharpening in a region of sharp contrast and high detail. The system adapts globally to the input signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio so that if if the noise level is very low, there is enhancement by edge sharpening of all detail, but if the noise level is high, noise filtering but no edge enhancement is provided. This global adaption to the signal-to-noise ratio is independent of picture detail. In addition, the system adapts locally to the gradient magnitude to provide either noise filtering or edge enhancement with a smooth transition between these two conditions.

The video enhancement system of the present invention is based on the concepts that human observers detect the presence of noise much easier in a nearly uniform region than near an edge, while responding more to an edge brightness difference than to the same brightness difference in regions not adjacent to each other. This suggests that by dividing the images into regions of nearly uniform brightness and regions of higher contrast, it is possible to limit noise filtering to the low contrast regions and edge sharpening to the higher contrast regions. Because such segmentation requires some kind of thresholding to define the two regions, resulting in loss in spatial resolution and introduction of artifacts, the present invention provides a system which is adaptive to image content as measured by the magnitude of the picture gradient. The degree of noise filtering is decreased gradually while the degree of edge sharpening is increased gradually as the magnitude of the gradient increases. At the same time, the rate of transition is made adaptive to the input signal-to-noise ratio of the image so that more adaptive noise filtering is performed if the image is noisier and more adaptive edge enhancement is performed if the image is cleaner.

This is accomplished by providing apparatus in which a succession of digitized samples of the video signal are generated and stored. With each new sample, a group of samples are averaged to generate an average sample while another group of samples are compared to generate the median sample of the group. Processing means generate a gradient sample corresponding to the absolute difference between the median and average samples. The gradient sample is scaled according to the noise level of the video signal independently of picture content. The scaled sample gradient is multiplied by the difference between the median and average samples and added to the average sample to generate an output sample. Successive output samples are converted to an output video signal for processing into an image.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of the invention reference should be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the idealized characteristics of the enhancement system;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of the characteristics of the system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the characteristics of the embodiment of FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a median filter;

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of the processor P2 of FIG. 2;

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of the processor P4 of FIG. 2;

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of the processor P6 of FIG. 4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown the overall characteristics of a video adaptive image enhancement system having the required properties. As the picture gradient increases, the degree of average filtering to reduce noise is decreased and the degree of edge filtering increases. A family of curves for different levels of SNR, as indicated by σ, show the characteristic shifts to provide more or less average filtering while providing less or greater edge filtering as the noise level increases or decreases. It will be noted that the degree of noise filtering decreases gradually while the degree of edge sharpening increases gradually as the magnitude of the gradient increases. There is a smooth transition from the performance of the adaptive noise filter to the performance of the adaptive enhancer as the image content changes at different regions of the image. As shown by the family of curves, the rate of transition is made adaptive to the input signal-to-noise ratio of the image. Thus the curve σ1 represents an image generated from a video signal of relatively low SNR while the curve σ2 corresponds to a video signal of higher SNR. Thus a system having the characteristics of FIG. 1 adapts locally to the image content as measured by the gradient magnitude and globally to the input SNR of the image.

Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a simplified block diagram of a video enhancement circuit according to the present invention which approximates the characteristics shown in FIG. 1. The performance characteristics of the circuit of FIG. 2 are shown in FIG. 3. A television video signal is applied to the input of the enhancement circuit. An analog-to-digital converter 10 quantizes the signal into a plurality of successive digitized samples or pixels. The signal amplitude represented by each pixel is defined as x(i,j), where i is the number of the row or line during one complete frame of the video image and j is the number of successive samples in one line. At least two complete rows are temporarily stored in a two-line store 12, which may be a shift register. As each new sample is transferred into the register 12, a sample from at least two rows above in the image is shifted out of the register.

For each sample x(i,j), a median sample m(i,j) is generated by a median filter 14. The median filter looks at a group of samples in the store 12 and selects the sample point of the group which has the middle magnitude. Preferably the median filter 14 looks at five image points or pixels arranged in a cross pattern, that is, three successive points in the same row or line, and three vertical points with the center point being common to both the horizontal and vertical lines. A suitable circuit for the median filter 14 is described below in detail in connection with FIG. 6.

At the same time and operating in parallel with the median filter is an average filter 16 which generates an output sample that is the average of a group or block of the samples stored in the store 12. Various averaging patterns can be used, such as a running line average, an area average, or a more complex averaging arrangement, such as described in the above-identified patent application. The samples stored may correspond to a 3×3 pattern of image pixels. To simplify division in obtaining the average value, only eight samples are used instead of nine. This allows a division by eight, which in a binary system only requires a three digit left shift operation. The resulting output sample from the average filter 16 is designated f(i,j).

The magnitude of the gradient at any point on the picture can be determined by the difference in the median sample value m(i,j) and the average f(i,j). The magnitude of the gradient at any point on the image is given by G(i,j)=m(i,j)-f(i,j). Thus the sample gradient is obtained by a subtracting circuit 18 which subtracts the digitized output from the average filter 16 from the digitized output of the median filter 14.

The gradient magnitude provided by the output of the subtracter is used to activate one of five processing units P1, P2, P3, P4 or P5 by comparing the gradient magnitude with a set of threshold values T1, T2, T3 and T4 derived from a table of threshold values stored in a threshold memory 20. Any one of a plurality of sets of four threshold values are selected, depending on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the video signal as determined by a noise monitor circuit 22. The noise monitor circuit 22, as hereinafter described in detail, generates a digitized value which is proportional to the SNR of the video input signal. In its preferred form, the noise monitor circuit utilizes the equalizing pulses of a received television signal as a reference, since the waveshape of the pulses are standardized. Any noise in the received signal can be detected as distortion of the equalizing pulse waveform. Such a noise monitoring system is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,044,381. The output of the noise monitor circuit 22 is used to address the memory 20 to select a corresponding set of four threshold values from the table of thresholds stored in the memory 20.

The absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient magnitude is compared with the first threshold value T1 by a comparator circuit 24. If the comparator indicates that the gradient value |G(i,j)| is less than the first threshold value T1, it activates the processor P1. The processor P1 is a simple gate circuit which is activated by the output C1 from the comparator circuit 24 to gate the average sample from the average filter 16 to a common terminal 26 connected to the input of a digital-to-analog converter 28. Thus the average value sample f(i,j) is substituted for the input sample x(i,j) in generating an enhanced TV video signal.

The absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient is also compared by a comparator 30 with a threshold value T2 which is larger than the value T1. If the gradient value is equal to or greater than the threshold value T2, the output of the comparator C2 activates the processor P2. The processor P2, in response to the output m(i,j) of the median filter 14, the output f(i,j) of the average filter 16, the absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient and the noise level as indicated by the output of the noise monitor 22, generates an output sample Pf (i,j) according to the following relation: ##EQU1## α(σ) is a noise factor which is a function of the SNR value σ. T(σ) is the threshold value T2 which is also a function of the SNR value σ.

The processor P2 for carrying out the function of the equation 1 is shown in FIG. 7. The absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient is scaled by the noise factor α(σ) by a multiplier 32. The output is then multiplied by the median value m(i,j) by a multiplier 34. The output of the multiplier 34 is added to the average sample value f(i,j) by an adder 36 and applied to one input of a divider circuit 38. The output of the multiplier 32 is increased by one by an "add-one" circuit 40 and used as the divisor for the divider circuit 38. The output of the divider circuit 38 corresponds to the value Pf (i,j) and is gated to the common terminal 26 by a gate 42 in response to the control signal C2 from the comparator 30 when the gradient magnitude is greater than T1 but less than T2.

If the absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient is greater than the threshold T2 but less than the threshold T3, a comparator 44 turns on a control signal C3, activating the processor P3. The processor P3 is merely a gate for gating the median value m(i,j) to the common terminal 26.

If the absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient is greater than the threshold value T3 but less than a threshold value T4, a comparator 46 turns on a control signal C4 which in turn activates the processor P4 having the following characteristic:

P.sub.e (i,j)=m(i,j)+β(σ)G(i,j);|G(i,j)|>T(σ)

The processor P3 is shown in FIG. 8. The processor P4 again multiplies the absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient with the noise factor β(σ) by a multiplier 47. The output of the multiplier 47 is added to the median value m(i,j) by an adder 48 to produce the desired edge enhanced value Pe (i,j). This modified sample value is gated to the common terminal 26 through a gate 50 in response to the control signal C4.

Finally, if the absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient is greater than T4, a maximum limit is set to prevent any excessive enhancement. The processor P5 modifies the median value mi,j by adding or subtracting a constant value C and applying the output to the common terminal 26 in response to a control signal C5 from the comparator 46.

The characteristics of the circuit of FIG. 2 are shown in FIG. 3. It will be seen that the characteristic of FIG. 3 is a close approximation to the desired characteristic of FIG. 1. From FIG. 3 it will be seen that if the magnitude of the gradient is below T1, the output sample corresponding to the average value f(i,j). Between T1 and T2, the adaptive noise filter sample value Pf is used, which reduces the degree of noise filtering as the magnitude of the gradient increases. Once the magnitude of the gradient exceeds the threshold T2, the output sample of the median filter is used as the output sample, resulting in less noise filtering but improved edge detail. With the magnitude of the gradient between the range of T3 and T4, the edge enhanced sample Pe, which varies with the change in the magnitude of the gradient, is used as the output sample. Finally, a maximum degree of edge enhancement is provided by using the m(i,j)±C as the sample output. FIG. 3 shows two different sets of thresholds, T and T' , corresponding to two different levels of noise, σ1 and σ2.

A preferred embodiment is shown in FIG. 4 in which a single processor P6 provides a modified sample value that provides both noise filtering and edge enhancement of the resulting image. The circuit is otherwise the same as the arrangement in FIG. 2 except that the threshold memory provides only two threshold values, T1 and T4. Processor P6 is activated between the full gradient range from T1 to T4. The processor P6 provides a combined noise filtering and edge enhancement according to the following relation: ##EQU2## For a fixed SNR, the absolute value |G(i,j)| of the gradient acts as a non-linear adaptive gain factor which changes P(i,j) from Pf (i,j) to Pe (i,j) smoothly as the gradient increases. Since T(σ) increases as σ increases, this gain factor is de-emphasized as the input picture gets noisier. FIG. 9 shows a block diagram of processor P6.

The performance of the circuit depends largely on the size of the averaging and the median filters. For example, averaging a block of n×n pixels gives an improvement in SNR of 20 log10 (n). The larger that n is, the better is the noise filtering. With n=3, that is, averaging a 3×3 matrix of pixels, the noise filtering is improved by about 9.5 db. Performance of the median filter depends on both the size and the shape of the block of pixels used. Increasing the number increases the noise filtering but produces a greater loss of spatial resolution. Five pixels arranged in a cross has been found to produce satisfactory results.

One embodiment of a median filter is shown in the block diagram of FIG. 6. The five samples from the cross-shaped block, designated x0, x1, x2, x3 and x4, are applied to a group of comparator circuits 50 from the store 12. Ten comparison circuits are required to compare each of the five samples with each of the other samples. Each comparator provides a binary coded output in which 0 represents less than and 1 represents greater than or equal. The ten binary bits from the ten comparators are applied to a decision logic circuit 52 which determines which of the five input samples is in the middle of the five samples. The decision logic sets a switch to connect the median value of the input samples to an output register 56. The concept of a median filter has been described in the literature. See, for example, "Nonlinear (Nonsuperposable) Methods for Smoothing Data" by J. W. Tukey, Comp. Rec., 1974 EASCON, p. 673.

The averaging filter, in its simplest form, sums a group of the stored points, preferably arranged in a block, and divides by the number of points to generate an average value. An alternative averaging circuit is described in copending application Ser. No. 133,606 filed Mar. 24, 1980, entitled "Adaptive Enhancement of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Television Imagery" by Curtis May and assigned to the same assignee as the present application.

From the above description it will be seen that a circuit is provided which provides both noise filtering and edge enhancement in the same image. The degree of noise filtering and edge enhancement adapts locally to image content and globally to the SNR of the image. As a result, degradation in spatial resolution or the introduction of artifacts such as "contouring" and "salt-and-pepper" effects are minimized. The averaging filter and the median filter can be tailored depending on application areas, giving the system considerable flexibility. Minimum storage is required and real-time operation for a TV system is no problem.

Claims (9)

What is claimed is:
1. Apparatus for enhancing the image produced from a received video signal, comprising: means sampling the video signal at a predetermined rate to provide a succession of coded samples indicating the instantaneous amplitude of the video signal with each sampling, memory means storing a plurality of said coded samples, means inserting the coded samples into the memory means with each successive sampling of the video signal, means generating an average sample corresponding to the average of a predetermined group of samples stored in the memory means in response to each sampling of the video signal, means generating a median sample corresponding to the median of a predetermined group of samples stored in the memory means in response to each sampling of the video signal, subtraction means for generating a gradient sample with each sampling of the video signal corresponding to the median sample minus the average sample, processing means responsive to the average sample and the gradient sample for generating an output sample proportional to the sum of the average sample and the product of the gradient sample and the absolute value of the gradient sample, and means converting successive output samples to an output video signal.
2. Apparatus of claim 1 further including means responsive to the received video signal for generating a noise signal indicative of the signal-to-noise ratio of the received video signal, and means scaling the product of the gradient sample and the absolute value of the gradient sample by an amount inversely related to the level of said noise signal.
3. Apparatus of claim 2 further including means generating a gradient threshold signal, means comparing the absolute value of the gradient sample with said threshold signal, the processing means including means for generating an output sample equal to the average sample when the absolute value of the gradient sample is less than said threshold signal.
4. Apparatus for enhancing the quality of an image produced from an input video signal, comprising:
analog-to-digital converter receiving the video signal and converting the signal to a succession of digital samples of the video signal, means storing a plurality of said digital samples, means selecting a first predetermined group of stored digital samples for generating a median sample corresponding in magnitude to the median value of said first group of stored digital samples in response to each new digital sample of the video signal, means selecting a second predetermined group of stored digital samples for generating an average sample corresponding in magnitude to the average value of said second group of stored samples in response to each new digital sample of the video signal, digital processing means for selecting one of a plurality of possible output samples in response to each average sample and each median sample, each of the possible output samples being dependent on the changes in the magnitude of the difference between the median sample and the average sample, and a digital-to-analog converter for converting the output samples of said digital processing means back to an output video signal.
5. Apparatus of claim 4 further including noise monitoring means responsive to the input video signal for generating a noise signal corresponding to and varying with the level of noise in the video signal, the processing means including means for scaling the output samples of said digital processing means in response to the noise signal.
6. Apparatus of claim 4 further including means for generating a threshold signal, and means comparing the threshold signal with the difference between the median signal and the average signal for gating the average sample directly to the digital-to-analog converter in place of the output sample from the processing means when said difference is below the level of said threshold signal.
7. Apparatus of claim 6 further including means responsive to the noise signal for varying the level of the threshold signal with changes in the noise level.
8. Apparatus of claim 4 wherein the processing means includes means multiplying said difference between the median sample and the average sample with the absolute value of said difference, and means adding the output of the multiplying means to the average sample to generate the output sample from the processing means.
9. Apparatus of claim 7 wherein the processing means includes means multiplying said difference between the median sample and the average sample with the absolute value of said difference, means scaling the output of the multiplying means in response to the noise signal, and means adding the output of the multiplying means to the average sample to generate the output sample.
US06173005 1980-07-28 1980-07-28 Adaptive image enhancement system Expired - Lifetime US4334244A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06173005 US4334244A (en) 1980-07-28 1980-07-28 Adaptive image enhancement system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06173005 US4334244A (en) 1980-07-28 1980-07-28 Adaptive image enhancement system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4334244A true US4334244A (en) 1982-06-08

Family

ID=22630107

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06173005 Expired - Lifetime US4334244A (en) 1980-07-28 1980-07-28 Adaptive image enhancement system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US4334244A (en)

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4388646A (en) * 1981-06-04 1983-06-14 Rca Corporation Low-distortion detection of pulses superimposed on an unknown and variable background signal
US4395732A (en) * 1981-08-19 1983-07-26 Motorola Inc. Statistically adaptive analog to digital converter
EP0105619A2 (en) * 1982-09-07 1984-04-18 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Multiple-measurement noise-reducing system
EP0113433A2 (en) * 1982-12-06 1984-07-18 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba X-ray image data processing apparatus
US4472733A (en) * 1982-09-01 1984-09-18 Rca Corporation Color channel signal-to-noise improvement in digital television
DE3427669A1 (en) * 1983-07-27 1985-02-07 Rca Corp Circuit arrangement for the improvement of signaluebergaengen
US4513440A (en) * 1982-06-29 1985-04-23 Harris Corporation Hardware median filter
US4553042A (en) * 1983-07-27 1985-11-12 Rca Corporation Signal transition enhancement circuit
US4561022A (en) * 1983-08-11 1985-12-24 Eastman Kodak Company Image processing method based on processing of interrelated image gradients
US4571635A (en) * 1984-02-17 1986-02-18 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method of image enhancement by raster scanning
US4587448A (en) * 1983-07-27 1986-05-06 Rca Corporation Signal transition detection circuit
US4595958A (en) * 1984-08-24 1986-06-17 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Multiformat image recordation
US4642689A (en) * 1983-12-23 1987-02-10 U. S. Philips Corporation Increasing the resolution of a digitized, time-dependent signal
US4736439A (en) * 1985-05-24 1988-04-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Image preprocessing by modified median filter
US4782389A (en) * 1987-04-30 1988-11-01 Rca Licensing Corporation Adaptive M-tile sample producer
US4785347A (en) * 1983-06-20 1988-11-15 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Method for emphasizing sharpness of a picture image by forming and processing sharp and unsharp signals from a picture image signal
US4829381A (en) * 1988-04-18 1989-05-09 Polaroid Corporation System and method for electronic image enhancement by dynamic pixel transformation
US4933766A (en) * 1988-06-02 1990-06-12 U.S. Philips Corporation Interpolation filter and receiver provided with such an interpolation filter
US4941190A (en) * 1988-07-15 1990-07-10 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method and system for enhancement of a digitized image
US5038388A (en) * 1989-05-15 1991-08-06 Polaroid Corporation Method for adaptively sharpening electronic images
EP0529903A2 (en) * 1991-08-23 1993-03-03 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system
EP0588181A1 (en) * 1992-09-14 1994-03-23 THOMSON multimedia Method and apparatus for noise reduction
US5379074A (en) * 1992-07-18 1995-01-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Multilevel nonlinear filter for edge detection and noise suppression
EP0661549A1 (en) * 1993-12-30 1995-07-05 Corning Incorporated Noise reduction of electrical signals
EP0683605A2 (en) * 1994-05-18 1995-11-22 NOKIA TECHNOLOGY GmbH Method and device for enhancing the transients of a video signal in component form
US5490094A (en) * 1992-09-14 1996-02-06 Thomson Consumer Electronics, S.A. Method and apparatus for noise reduction
EP0762746A2 (en) * 1995-09-06 1997-03-12 HE HOLDINGS, INC. dba HUGHES ELECTRONICS Thermal imaging device
US6028957A (en) * 1996-03-07 2000-02-22 Minolta Co., Ltd. Image forming apparatus having a noise removing unit
US6175659B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2001-01-16 Silicon Intergrated Systems Corp. Method and apparatus for image scaling using adaptive edge enhancement
WO2001072032A1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2001-09-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. N-dimensional filter and method for n-dimensionally filtering an original image pixel
US20020186890A1 (en) * 2001-05-03 2002-12-12 Ming-Chieh Lee Dynamic filtering for lossy compression
US20030007699A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-01-09 Jasc Software, Inc. Fine moire correction in images
US6633683B1 (en) * 2000-06-26 2003-10-14 Miranda Technologies Inc. Apparatus and method for adaptively reducing noise in a noisy input image signal
US6781625B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2004-08-24 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Noise reducing apparatus
US6813393B2 (en) * 1998-01-30 2004-11-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image storing method and image output system
EP1480449A2 (en) * 2003-05-21 2004-11-24 STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. Adaptive coring for video peaking
US6850651B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2005-02-01 Corel Corporation Moiré correction in images
US20050147293A1 (en) * 2004-01-02 2005-07-07 Lg Electronics Inc. Image processing and method
US20050220354A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2005-10-06 Markus Simon Temporal noise reduction and local contrast amplification
US20060285010A1 (en) * 2005-06-17 2006-12-21 Lsi Logic Corporation Systems and methods for deinterlacing video signals
US20070126935A1 (en) * 2005-10-13 2007-06-07 Chia-Hao Hsiung Signal separation apparatus applied in image transmittion system and related method
US20070189631A1 (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-16 Yen-Hsing Wu Methods and apparatuses for enhancing image quality
US20070189632A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-16 Yen-Hsing Wu Image processing device and method
US20080080663A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Wolfgang Haerer Scatter radiation correction in radiography and computed tomography employing flat panel detector
US20090180555A1 (en) * 2008-01-10 2009-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Filtering and dithering as pre-processing before encoding
US8072539B1 (en) 1993-07-26 2011-12-06 Cooper J Carl Apparatus and method for digital processing of analog television signals
US8160132B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2012-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Reducing key picture popping effects in video
US8238424B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2012-08-07 Microsoft Corporation Complexity-based adaptive preprocessing for multiple-pass video compression
US9571856B2 (en) 2008-08-25 2017-02-14 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Conversion operations in scalable video encoding and decoding

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3462547A (en) * 1966-09-06 1969-08-19 Stanford Research Inst Data processing system for signals obtained from a video scanner
US3621129A (en) * 1968-05-01 1971-11-16 Metals Research Ltd Detection devices for image analysis systems
US4121248A (en) * 1977-03-07 1978-10-17 Texas Instruments Incorporated Streak reduction system for FLIR display

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3462547A (en) * 1966-09-06 1969-08-19 Stanford Research Inst Data processing system for signals obtained from a video scanner
US3621129A (en) * 1968-05-01 1971-11-16 Metals Research Ltd Detection devices for image analysis systems
US4121248A (en) * 1977-03-07 1978-10-17 Texas Instruments Incorporated Streak reduction system for FLIR display

Cited By (74)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4388646A (en) * 1981-06-04 1983-06-14 Rca Corporation Low-distortion detection of pulses superimposed on an unknown and variable background signal
US4395732A (en) * 1981-08-19 1983-07-26 Motorola Inc. Statistically adaptive analog to digital converter
US4513440A (en) * 1982-06-29 1985-04-23 Harris Corporation Hardware median filter
US4472733A (en) * 1982-09-01 1984-09-18 Rca Corporation Color channel signal-to-noise improvement in digital television
EP0105619A2 (en) * 1982-09-07 1984-04-18 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Multiple-measurement noise-reducing system
EP0105619A3 (en) * 1982-09-07 1987-08-26 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Multiple-measurement noise-reducing system
US4618928A (en) * 1982-12-06 1986-10-21 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Data processing apparatus for producing X-ray images with improved signal to noise ratio
EP0113433A3 (en) * 1982-12-06 1984-09-12 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba X-ray image data processing apparatus
EP0113433A2 (en) * 1982-12-06 1984-07-18 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba X-ray image data processing apparatus
US4785347A (en) * 1983-06-20 1988-11-15 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Method for emphasizing sharpness of a picture image by forming and processing sharp and unsharp signals from a picture image signal
DE3427669A1 (en) * 1983-07-27 1985-02-07 Rca Corp Circuit arrangement for the improvement of signaluebergaengen
FR2557410A1 (en) * 1983-07-27 1985-06-28 Rca Corp signal processing circuit
US4587448A (en) * 1983-07-27 1986-05-06 Rca Corporation Signal transition detection circuit
US4553042A (en) * 1983-07-27 1985-11-12 Rca Corporation Signal transition enhancement circuit
US4561022A (en) * 1983-08-11 1985-12-24 Eastman Kodak Company Image processing method based on processing of interrelated image gradients
US4642689A (en) * 1983-12-23 1987-02-10 U. S. Philips Corporation Increasing the resolution of a digitized, time-dependent signal
US4571635A (en) * 1984-02-17 1986-02-18 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method of image enhancement by raster scanning
US4595958A (en) * 1984-08-24 1986-06-17 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Multiformat image recordation
US4736439A (en) * 1985-05-24 1988-04-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Image preprocessing by modified median filter
US4782389A (en) * 1987-04-30 1988-11-01 Rca Licensing Corporation Adaptive M-tile sample producer
US4829381A (en) * 1988-04-18 1989-05-09 Polaroid Corporation System and method for electronic image enhancement by dynamic pixel transformation
US4933766A (en) * 1988-06-02 1990-06-12 U.S. Philips Corporation Interpolation filter and receiver provided with such an interpolation filter
US4941190A (en) * 1988-07-15 1990-07-10 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method and system for enhancement of a digitized image
US5038388A (en) * 1989-05-15 1991-08-06 Polaroid Corporation Method for adaptively sharpening electronic images
US5550936A (en) * 1991-08-23 1996-08-27 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system
US5920654A (en) * 1991-08-23 1999-07-06 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system that includes discrimination of an interpolation direction
EP0529903A2 (en) * 1991-08-23 1993-03-03 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system
EP0529903A3 (en) * 1991-08-23 1995-03-22 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Image processing system
GB2269071B (en) * 1992-07-18 1996-02-28 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Noise suppression in image signals
US5379074A (en) * 1992-07-18 1995-01-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Multilevel nonlinear filter for edge detection and noise suppression
US5490094A (en) * 1992-09-14 1996-02-06 Thomson Consumer Electronics, S.A. Method and apparatus for noise reduction
EP0588181A1 (en) * 1992-09-14 1994-03-23 THOMSON multimedia Method and apparatus for noise reduction
US8072539B1 (en) 1993-07-26 2011-12-06 Cooper J Carl Apparatus and method for digital processing of analog television signals
EP0661549A1 (en) * 1993-12-30 1995-07-05 Corning Incorporated Noise reduction of electrical signals
EP0683605A3 (en) * 1994-05-18 1996-11-06 Nokia Technology Gmbh Method and device for enhancing the transients of a video signal in component form.
EP0683605A2 (en) * 1994-05-18 1995-11-22 NOKIA TECHNOLOGY GmbH Method and device for enhancing the transients of a video signal in component form
EP0762746A2 (en) * 1995-09-06 1997-03-12 HE HOLDINGS, INC. dba HUGHES ELECTRONICS Thermal imaging device
EP0762746A3 (en) * 1995-09-06 1999-06-09 Raytheon Company Thermal imaging device
US6028957A (en) * 1996-03-07 2000-02-22 Minolta Co., Ltd. Image forming apparatus having a noise removing unit
US6813393B2 (en) * 1998-01-30 2004-11-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image storing method and image output system
US6175659B1 (en) * 1998-10-06 2001-01-16 Silicon Intergrated Systems Corp. Method and apparatus for image scaling using adaptive edge enhancement
WO2001072032A1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2001-09-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. N-dimensional filter and method for n-dimensionally filtering an original image pixel
US6633683B1 (en) * 2000-06-26 2003-10-14 Miranda Technologies Inc. Apparatus and method for adaptively reducing noise in a noisy input image signal
US7206453B2 (en) * 2001-05-03 2007-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Dynamic filtering for lossy compression
US20020186890A1 (en) * 2001-05-03 2002-12-12 Ming-Chieh Lee Dynamic filtering for lossy compression
US6850651B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2005-02-01 Corel Corporation Moiré correction in images
US20050220360A1 (en) * 2001-07-02 2005-10-06 Zaklika Krzysztof A Moire correction in images
US7050651B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2006-05-23 Corel Corporation Moiré correction in images
US20030007699A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-01-09 Jasc Software, Inc. Fine moire correction in images
US6950211B2 (en) 2001-07-05 2005-09-27 Corel Corporation Fine moire correction in images
US20050270584A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2005-12-08 Trifonov Mikhail I Fine moire correction in images
US7277206B2 (en) 2001-07-05 2007-10-02 Corel Corporation Fine moire correction in images
US20050220354A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2005-10-06 Markus Simon Temporal noise reduction and local contrast amplification
US6781625B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2004-08-24 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Noise reducing apparatus
EP1480449A3 (en) * 2003-05-21 2004-12-08 STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. Adaptive coring for video peaking
EP1480449A2 (en) * 2003-05-21 2004-11-24 STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd. Adaptive coring for video peaking
US20050147293A1 (en) * 2004-01-02 2005-07-07 Lg Electronics Inc. Image processing and method
US20060285010A1 (en) * 2005-06-17 2006-12-21 Lsi Logic Corporation Systems and methods for deinterlacing video signals
US7477319B2 (en) * 2005-06-17 2009-01-13 Lsi Corporation Systems and methods for deinterlacing video signals
US8094237B2 (en) 2005-10-13 2012-01-10 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Signal separation apparatus applied in image transmission system and related method
US20070126935A1 (en) * 2005-10-13 2007-06-07 Chia-Hao Hsiung Signal separation apparatus applied in image transmittion system and related method
US8090213B2 (en) 2006-02-14 2012-01-03 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Image processing device and method
US20070189632A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-16 Yen-Hsing Wu Image processing device and method
US7945110B2 (en) 2006-02-15 2011-05-17 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Methods and apparatuses for enhancing image quality
US20070189631A1 (en) * 2006-02-15 2007-08-16 Yen-Hsing Wu Methods and apparatuses for enhancing image quality
US20080080663A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Wolfgang Haerer Scatter radiation correction in radiography and computed tomography employing flat panel detector
DE102006046191B4 (en) * 2006-09-29 2017-02-02 Siemens Healthcare Gmbh Scatter correction in radiography and computed tomography with area detectors
DE102006046191A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Siemens Ag Method for correction of scattered radiation errors in radiography and computed tomography with flat panel detectors, involves estimating scattered radiation distribution
US7860208B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2010-12-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Scatter radiation correction in radiography and computed tomography employing flat panel detector
US8238424B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2012-08-07 Microsoft Corporation Complexity-based adaptive preprocessing for multiple-pass video compression
US8750390B2 (en) 2008-01-10 2014-06-10 Microsoft Corporation Filtering and dithering as pre-processing before encoding
US20090180555A1 (en) * 2008-01-10 2009-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Filtering and dithering as pre-processing before encoding
US8160132B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2012-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Reducing key picture popping effects in video
US9571856B2 (en) 2008-08-25 2017-02-14 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Conversion operations in scalable video encoding and decoding

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6459455B1 (en) Motion adaptive deinterlacing
US5109282A (en) Halftone imaging method and apparatus utilizing pyramidol error convergence
US5014333A (en) Image processor with smooth transitioning between dither and diffusion processes
US4695884A (en) Correction of shading effects in video images
US6078686A (en) Image quality enhancement circuit and method therefor
US6671068B1 (en) Adaptive error diffusion with improved edge and sharpness perception
US5818975A (en) Method and apparatus for area selective exposure adjustment
US4800432A (en) Video Difference key generator
US6965416B2 (en) Image processing circuit and method for processing image
US6463173B1 (en) System and method for histogram-based image contrast enhancement
US5010504A (en) Digital image noise suppression method using SVD block transform
US4240109A (en) Video movement detection
US6075902A (en) Area recognizing device for image signals
US5394195A (en) Method and apparatus for performing dynamic gamma contrast control
US5557339A (en) Screen filtering boundary detection for noise filtering prior to image compositing
US5072291A (en) Image information signal processing apparatus for improving reproduced image quality by discriminating the type of input image and selecting a particular processing in accordance therewith
US7145607B1 (en) Spatio-temporal video noise reduction system
US6914628B1 (en) Image processing apparatus and method, and medium containing image processing control program
US4242705A (en) Noise reduction system for video signals
US6507372B1 (en) Image enhancement circuit and method using mean matching/quantized mean matching histogram equalization and color compensation
US5454052A (en) Method and apparatus for converting halftone images
US5870503A (en) Image processing apparatus using error diffusion technique
US5343309A (en) Image processing system and method employing adaptive filtering to provide improved reconstruction of continuous tone images from halftone images including those without a screen structure
US5798846A (en) Apparatus and method for selectively processing a scanned image
US4794531A (en) Unsharp masking for image enhancement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MAGNAVOX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS COMPANY

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MAGNAVOX GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS COMPANY A CORP. OF DELAWARE;REEL/FRAME:005900/0278

Effective date: 19910916

AS Assignment

Owner name: MESC ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC., DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAGONOVOX ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:006817/0071

Effective date: 19931022

AS Assignment

Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MESC ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:006818/0404

Effective date: 19931022

AS Assignment

Owner name: MAGNAVOX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INDIANA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:007927/0147

Effective date: 19941219

Owner name: MAGNAVOX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS COMPANY, INDIANA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:007927/0104

Effective date: 19951214

Owner name: MESC ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC., INDIANA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CITICORP USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:008098/0523

Effective date: 19940831

AS Assignment

Owner name: HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HE HOLDINGS INC.;HUGHES ELECTRONICS, FORMERLY KNOWN AS HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:009342/0796

Effective date: 19971217

AS Assignment

Owner name: HE HOLDINGS INC., DBA HUGHES ELECTRONICS, CALIFORN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:009375/0528

Effective date: 19971217