US3982925A - Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys - Google Patents

Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3982925A
US3982925A US05/566,314 US56631475A US3982925A US 3982925 A US3982925 A US 3982925A US 56631475 A US56631475 A US 56631475A US 3982925 A US3982925 A US 3982925A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
slag
carbon
nio
esr
mold
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US05/566,314
Inventor
Wilfredo V. Venal
H. Joseph Klein
Richard R. Daniel
Rodney T. Gross
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Haynes International Inc
Original Assignee
Cabot Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cabot Corp filed Critical Cabot Corp
Priority to US05/566,314 priority Critical patent/US3982925A/en
Priority to AR262724A priority patent/AR209641A1/en
Priority to DE19762614866 priority patent/DE2614866A1/en
Priority to SU762346600A priority patent/SU795503A3/en
Priority to JP51039778A priority patent/JPS51123709A/en
Priority to BR7602129A priority patent/BR7602129A/en
Priority to SE7604144A priority patent/SE427474B/en
Priority to GB14218/76A priority patent/GB1526132A/en
Priority to FR7610326A priority patent/FR2307045A1/en
Priority to CA249,815A priority patent/CA1075009A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3982925A publication Critical patent/US3982925A/en
Assigned to HAYNES INTERNATINAL, INC. reassignment HAYNES INTERNATINAL, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: CABOT CORPORATION
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION reassignment BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HAYNES ACQUISITION CORPORATION
Assigned to SOCIETY NATIONAL BANK, INDIANA reassignment SOCIETY NATIONAL BANK, INDIANA SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION reassignment BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. reassignment HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, RELEASE AND TERMINATION AGREEMENT Assignors: SOCIETY BANK, INDIANA, N.A.
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B9/00—General processes of refining or remelting of metals; Apparatus for electroslag or arc remelting of metals
    • C22B9/16—Remelting metals
    • C22B9/18—Electroslag remelting

Definitions

  • This invention relates to methods of decarburization or ESR slags and reduction of carbon pick up in superalloys and particularly to the decarburization of ESR slag with NiO.
  • the control of carbon to very low levels is critical especially in corrosion resistant alloys, particularly nickel and cobalt base alloys, such as "Hastelloy”* alloy B, "Hastelloy” alloy C, “Hastelloy” alloy C-276 and "Hastelloy” alloy C-4, to prevent weld heat-affected zone corrosion. It has been recognized for some time that the precipitation of grain boundary carbides in the weld heat-affected zone of such alloys is the principal source of preferential, in-situ corrosion attack in as-welded material of this type.
  • molten slag used in conventional ESR (electro-slag remelting) practices.
  • ESR electro-slag remelting
  • These slags which are generally calcium-fluride based, are conventionally melted in a carbon crucible prior to addition to the ESR mold for molten slag start of remelting.
  • a significant amount of carbon appears in the slag as melted and at the time of addition to the mold. This carbon is at least in part transferred to the ingot which is remelted throughout, particularly the butt or bottom portion.
  • Typical of the calcium fluoride slags used for this type of practice are 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 (CaF 2 /CaO/MgO/Al 2 O 3 ratio) slags. All compositions are given in percent by weight unless otherwise stated.
  • NiO NiO to the slag prior to remelting the superalloy.
  • the NiO may be added to the stream of molten slag as it is poured into the mold or it may be added to the starting chips in the bottom of the mold prior to adding the molten slag or any combination of these methods may be used, e.g. part in the chips and part in the slag.
  • This causes oxidation of the carbon and its evolution as volatile oxides of carbon (CO and CO 2 ).
  • the addition of Al to the mold bottom prior to adding the treated molten slag will protect such materials.
  • deoxidants for example, silicon, titanium, Ni-Mg, Ca-Si, one or more elements in the Rare Earths Series, misch-metal and the like.
  • silicon, titanium, Ni-Mg, Ca-Si, one or more elements in the Rare Earths Series, misch-metal and the like may be used together with or in place of aluminum.
  • the choice of deoxidant is not critical in practice of this invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph of carbon content versus time of fluidity in 70F/15/0/15 slag
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of carbon content versus time of fluidity in 100F/0/0/0 slag
  • FIG. 3 is a graph of carbon content versus time of fluidity in 70F/15/0/15 slag in a dual arc furnace.
  • FIG. 4 is a phase diagram of the system CaF 2 -CaC 2 .
  • a slag of composition 70F/15/0/15 was melted in a graphite crucible induction furnace. The total amount of slag was seven pounds. Samples were taken from the slag at five minute intervals for a total of 30 minutes and the carbon pick up determined. NiO sinter was added to the slag to react with the carbon dissolved in the slag. The results are tabulated in Table I.
  • Example III A 70/15/0/15 slag was melted as in Example III. Two heats of 7 lbs. each were melted without any decarburization treatment and a third 7 lb. heat decarburized using NiO sinter as in Example III. A 41/2 inch diameter electrode of "Hastelloy" alloy C-276 having the analysis set out in Table II was remelted into a 6 inch ingot using each of these slags. Analysis of the slag and resulting ingot are tabulated in Table III.
  • Example III A 100/0/0/0 slag was melted as in Example III. Again a 7 lb. heat was melted without decarburizing and a second 7 lb. heat was decarburized using NiO sinter as in Example III. A series of 41/2 inch diameter electrodes of "Hastelloy" alloy C-276 having the analysis set out in Table II were remelted into a 6 inch ingot using electroslag remelting (ESR) techniques using each of these slags. Analysis of the slags and the resulting ingots are tabulated in Table IV.
  • ESR electroslag remelting
  • FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 the experimental points are connected together for illustrative purposes and does not necessarily represent any functional relationship between %C and time. Temperatures were measured by an optical pyrometer which in some cases was cross-checked with immersion thermocouples.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 graphically show the change in carbon content of molten 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0, respectively, in the graphite crucible induction furnace (Examples I and II).
  • the source of carbon for Examples I and II is the graphite crucible plus whatever amount of graphite and in some cases CaC 2 that is intentionally added for a desired initial carbon level prior to decarburization.
  • FIG. 4 The tentative phase diagram for the system CaC 2 in CaF 2 is shown in FIG. 4. This diagram shows a potential maximum carbon solubility of 10.5% at 1600°F. Thus, it would appear that at the carbon levels here encountered all of the carbon is in solution even though the slag actually used is a ternary CaF 2 -CaO-Al 2 O 3 system.
  • FIG. 2 shows no appreciable difference in carbon pick-up for molten 100F/0/0/0 at 2800°F and 3000°F as would be expected from the tentative phase diagram CaF 2 -CaC 2 (FIG. 4).
  • results of tests using 70F/15/0/15 indicate higher levels of carbon pick-up at 3000°F compared to those at 2800°F.
  • test IV which was run according to a standard practice for slag showed a dramatic increase in slag carbon content from 0.03%C at 2750°F to 0.26% at >3200°F. (Note: Slag temperature is raised prior to top pouring into the ESR mold for molten slag start).
  • Tests 2R and 4R (FIG. 1) run at 3000°F exhibited approximately the same carbon levels as those in Test 3R at 2800°F. However, Test 4R also at 3000°F had carbon levels well above those of the rest.
  • Test 1AR which was run to simulate a standard practice, i.e., slag temperature not controlled and raised to >3000°F prior to pouring, showed a similar increase in carbon content as in Test IV.
  • NiO decarburized slag was used in ESRemelting a 41/2-1/2-inch diameter ( ⁇ 108 mm diameter) alloy C-276 electrode into a 6-inch diameter ( ⁇ 152 mm diameter) ingot.
  • the composition of the starting alloy C-276 electrode is shown in Table 2.
  • the results for 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
  • Table 3 shows once again the effectiveness of using an NiO sinter decarburized slag in ESRemelting "HASTELLOY" alloy C-276 without causing carbon pickup in the ingot.
  • a carbon balance for Tests 10R and 12R (Table 3) indicate a net loss of ⁇ 0.51 gm and ⁇ 0.87 gm carbon, respectively, during ESRemelting without causing an increase in slag carbon content.
  • a possible explanation for this is that residual NiO might have caused further oxidation of carbon in both the electrode and the slag during ESR.
  • a carbon balance for Tests 11R and 13R indicates a net loss of ⁇ 0.44 gm and ⁇ 0.47 gm which could all be accounted for in the increase of the slag carbon content after remelting. This would indicate the apparent capability of 100F/0/0/0 to keep a greater amount of carbon in solution compared to 70F/15/0/15 an implication of a possibly greater carbon solubility in pure CaF 2 than in the ternary system CaF 2 -CaO-Al 2 O 3 .
  • Tests 2R and 4R (FIG. 1) run at 3000°F exhibited approximately the same carbon levels as those in Test 3R at 2800°F. However, Test 4R also at 3000°F had carbon levels well above those of the rest.
  • Test 1AR which was run to simulate a standard practice, i.e., slag temperature not controlled and raised to >3000°F prior to pouring, showed a similar increase in carbon content as in Test IV.
  • 70F/15/0/15 we are dealing with the quaternary system CaF 2 -CaO-Al 2 O 3 -CaC 2 where the solubility of carbon might be different compared to the simple CaF 2 -CaC 2 binary.
  • the kinetics of carbon pick-up in CaF 2 based slag systems is temperature dependent.
  • NiO decarburized slag was used in ESRemelting a 41/2-1/2-inch diameter ( ⁇ 108 mm diameter) alloy C-276 electrode into a 6-inch diameter ( ⁇ 152 mm diameter) ingot.
  • the composition of the starting alloy C-276 electrode is shown in Table 2.
  • the results for 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
  • Table 3 shows once again the effectiveness of using an NiO sinter decarburized slag in ESRemelting "HASTELLOY" alloy C-276 without causing carbon pickup in the ingot.
  • a carbon balance for Tests 10R and 12R (Table 3) indicate a net loss of ⁇ 0.51 gm and ⁇ 0.87 gm carbon, respectively, during ESRemelting without causing an increase in slag carbon content.
  • a possible explanation for this is that residual NiO might have caused further oxidation of carbon in both the electrode and the slag during ESR.
  • a carbon balance for Tests 11R and 13R indicates a net loss of ⁇ 0.44 gm and ⁇ 0.47 gm which could all be accounted for in the increase of the slag carbon content after remelting. This would indicate the apparent capability of 100F/0/0/0 to keep a greater amount of carbon in solution compared to 70F/15/0/15 an implication of a possibly greater carbon solubility in pure CaF 2 than in the ternary system CaF 2 -CaO-Al 2 O 3 .

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

A method of decarburizing ESR slags to reduce carbon pick up in superalloys is provided in which NiO is added to the slag prior to remelting the metallic electrode in amounts sufficient to reduce carbon in the slag to a desired level.

Description

This invention relates to methods of decarburization or ESR slags and reduction of carbon pick up in superalloys and particularly to the decarburization of ESR slag with NiO.
The control of carbon to very low levels is critical especially in corrosion resistant alloys, particularly nickel and cobalt base alloys, such as "Hastelloy"* alloy B, "Hastelloy" alloy C, "Hastelloy" alloy C-276 and "Hastelloy" alloy C-4, to prevent weld heat-affected zone corrosion. It has been recognized for some time that the precipitation of grain boundary carbides in the weld heat-affected zone of such alloys is the principal source of preferential, in-situ corrosion attack in as-welded material of this type.
We have found that one of the principal sources of carbon pick up in these alloys is the molten slag used in conventional ESR (electro-slag remelting) practices. These slags, which are generally calcium-fluride based, are conventionally melted in a carbon crucible prior to addition to the ESR mold for molten slag start of remelting. A significant amount of carbon appears in the slag as melted and at the time of addition to the mold. This carbon is at least in part transferred to the ingot which is remelted throughout, particularly the butt or bottom portion. Typical of the calcium fluoride slags used for this type of practice are 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 (CaF2 /CaO/MgO/Al2 O3 ratio) slags. All compositions are given in percent by weight unless otherwise stated.
We have found that this problem of carbon pick up can be eliminated by the addition of NiO to the slag prior to remelting the superalloy. Preferably we add the NiO to the molten slag just prior to adding it to the ESR mold and then pouring the mixture into the mold. However, the NiO may be added to the stream of molten slag as it is poured into the mold or it may be added to the starting chips in the bottom of the mold prior to adding the molten slag or any combination of these methods may be used, e.g. part in the chips and part in the slag. This causes oxidation of the carbon and its evolution as volatile oxides of carbon (CO and CO2). Where it is desired to prevent oxidation of highly oxidizable materials such as Ti from the metal, the addition of Al to the mold bottom prior to adding the treated molten slag will protect such materials.
It is well known in the art that many other additions may be used as deoxidants, for example, silicon, titanium, Ni-Mg, Ca-Si, one or more elements in the Rare Earths Series, misch-metal and the like. One or more of these deoxidant additions may be used together with or in place of aluminum. The choice of deoxidant is not critical in practice of this invention.
This invention can perhaps best be understood by reference to actual application of our method to remelt practice and to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a graph of carbon content versus time of fluidity in 70F/15/0/15 slag;
FIG. 2 is a graph of carbon content versus time of fluidity in 100F/0/0/0 slag;
FIG. 3 is a graph of carbon content versus time of fluidity in 70F/15/0/15 slag in a dual arc furnace; and
FIG. 4 is a phase diagram of the system CaF2 -CaC2.
EXAMPLE I
A slag of composition 70F/15/0/15 was melted in a graphite crucible induction furnace. The total amount of slag was seven pounds. Samples were taken from the slag at five minute intervals for a total of 30 minutes and the carbon pick up determined. NiO sinter was added to the slag to react with the carbon dissolved in the slag. The results are tabulated in Table I.
EXAMPLE II
A seven pound slag of composition 100F/0/0/0 was treated precisely as in Example I. The results are tabulated in Table I.
EXAMPLE III
One hundred sixty (160) pounds of a slag of composition 70F/15/0/15 was prepared in a dual electrode arc furnace. Again the profile of carbon pick up was determined by chemical analysis after which NiO sinter was added stepwise and the decarburization effect determined. The results are tabulated in Table I.
              TABLE I                                                     
______________________________________                                    
RESULTS OF SLAG DECARBURIZATION EXPERIMENTS                               
USING NiO SINTER                                                          
______________________________________                                    
Slag Type                                                                 
70F/15/0/15                                                               
Dual Electrode Arc Furnace (Example III)                                  
       %C Before  %C After  Lbs. NiO/                                     
                                     %                                    
Test No.                                                                  
       Decarb.    Decarb.   Lbs. Slag                                     
                                     Reduction                            
______________________________________                                    
2V     .05        .03       .018     40                                   
3V     .26        .02       .020     92                                   
4V     .33        .02       .020     94                                   
Graphite Crucible Induction Furnace (Example I)                           
3R     .026       .013      .011     50                                   
4R     .064       .015      .008     77                                   
5R     .034       .010      .008     70                                   
  10R  .042       .020      .008     52                                   
Slag Type                                                                 
 100F/0/00                                                                
Graphite Crucible Induction Furnace (Example II)                          
       %C Before  %C After  Lbs. NiO/                                     
                                     %                                    
Test No.                                                                  
       Decarb.    Decarb.   Lbs. Slag                                     
                                     Reduction                            
______________________________________                                    
6R     .045       .029      .011     36                                   
7R     .042       .026      .008     38                                   
  11R  .063       .032      .008     49                                   
______________________________________
EXAMPLE IV
A 70/15/0/15 slag was melted as in Example III. Two heats of 7 lbs. each were melted without any decarburization treatment and a third 7 lb. heat decarburized using NiO sinter as in Example III. A 41/2 inch diameter electrode of "Hastelloy" alloy C-276 having the analysis set out in Table II was remelted into a 6 inch ingot using each of these slags. Analysis of the slag and resulting ingot are tabulated in Table III.
              TABLE II                                                    
______________________________________                                    
COMPOSITION OF STARTING "HASTELLOY" ALLOY                                 
C-276 ELECTRODE                                                           
______________________________________                                    
Element           Percent by Weight                                       
______________________________________                                    
Al                0.23                                                    
B                 < 0.001                                                 
C                 0.006                                                   
Ca                < 0.005                                                 
Co                1.09                                                    
Cr                16.15                                                   
Cu                < 0.01                                                  
Fe                5.29                                                    
Mg                0.018                                                   
Mn                0.55                                                    
Mo                15.97                                                   
N                 .007                                                    
Ni plus incidental                                                        
                  Balance about 55.0                                      
 impurities                                                               
P                 0.013                                                   
S                 0.002                                                   
Si                0.03                                                    
Ti                < 0.01                                                  
V                 0.22                                                    
W                 3.78                                                    
Zr                < 0.01                                                  
______________________________________                                    

                                  TABLE III                               
__________________________________________________________________________
 RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS USING DECARBURIZED 70F/15/0/15 SLAG               
Voltage 30 - Amperage 2000                                                
                      %C Slag                                             
                      Before                                              
                            After After                                   
                                       %C    %C Ingot*                    
       Test No.       Decar.                                              
                            Decar.                                        
                                  ESR  Electrode                          
                                             B1    B2    HT               
__________________________________________________________________________
8R control electrode, slag not decarb.,                                   
                      .042±.02                                         
                            --    0.32±.02                             
                                       .006±.003                       
                                             .009±.003                 
                                                   .005±.002           
                                                         .004±.002     
42.4 lb. (˜19.3 kg) ESR ingot                                       
14R control electrode, slag not decarb.,                                  
                      .076±.03                                         
                            --    .021±.02                             
                                       .006±.003                       
                                             .035±.005                 
                                                   .023±.005           
                                                         .017±.005     
36 lb. (˜16.3 kg) ESR ingot                                         
10R slag decarburized with .06 lb.                                        
                      .042±.02                                         
                            .020±.02                                   
                                  .016±.02                             
                                       .006±.003                       
                                             .003±.002                 
                                                   .004±.002           
                                                         .004±.002     
NiO, 48.5 lb. (˜22 kg) ESR ingot                                    
__________________________________________________________________________
 *B1 samples are the very butt end of the ingot except for some material  
 that is ground off to make the surface of the X-ray slug flat. B2 samples
 are the opposite face of the slag sample which is about 7/8 inch (19 to 2
 mm) thick. HT are hot top samples.
EXAMPLE V
A 100/0/0/0 slag was melted as in Example III. Again a 7 lb. heat was melted without decarburizing and a second 7 lb. heat was decarburized using NiO sinter as in Example III. A series of 41/2 inch diameter electrodes of "Hastelloy" alloy C-276 having the analysis set out in Table II were remelted into a 6 inch ingot using electroslag remelting (ESR) techniques using each of these slags. Analysis of the slags and the resulting ingots are tabulated in Table IV.
                                  TABLE IV                                
__________________________________________________________________________
 RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS USING DECARBURIZED 100F/0/0/0 SLAG                
Voltage 30 - Amperage 2400                                                
                      %C Slag                                             
                      Before                                              
                            After After                                   
                                       %C    %C Ingot*                    
       Test No.       Decar.                                              
                            Decar.                                        
                                  ESR  Electrode                          
                                             B1    B2    HT               
__________________________________________________________________________
9R control electrode, not decarb.,                                        
                      0.42±.02                                         
                            --    .035±.02                             
                                       .006±.003                       
                                             .005±.002                 
                                                   .002±.002           
                                                         .008±.003     
48 lbs. (˜21.8 kg) ESR ingot                                        
11R slag decarburized with .06 lb.                                        
                      .063±.03                                         
                            .032±.02                                   
                                  .040±.02                             
                                       .006±.003                       
                                             .005±.002                 
                                                   .005±.002           
                                                         .002±.002     
NiO 48.5 lb. (˜22 kg) ESR ingot                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
 *Same comments as in Table III.
In FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, the experimental points are connected together for illustrative purposes and does not necessarily represent any functional relationship between %C and time. Temperatures were measured by an optical pyrometer which in some cases was cross-checked with immersion thermocouples. FIGS. 1 and 2 graphically show the change in carbon content of molten 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0, respectively, in the graphite crucible induction furnace (Examples I and II). The source of carbon for Examples I and II is the graphite crucible plus whatever amount of graphite and in some cases CaC2 that is intentionally added for a desired initial carbon level prior to decarburization. On the other hand, for runs made at the arc furnace (Table III), carbon could be picked up by the slag from the two electrodes and the graphite furnace shell as well as from the approximately 0.25 pound (˜0.114 kg) graphite powder added between the two electrodes to start the furnace. The graphite powder alone could result in 0.15% C pick-up by the slag -- thus, the difference in absolute carbon levels between Examples I and II and those of Example IV. In all probability, carbon in a halide based slag such as 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 is present as CaC2. This assumption is based primarily on the peculiar odor of CaC2 which can be easily detected in all of the slag samples.
The tentative phase diagram for the system CaC2 in CaF2 is shown in FIG. 4. This diagram shows a potential maximum carbon solubility of 10.5% at 1600°F. Thus, it would appear that at the carbon levels here encountered all of the carbon is in solution even though the slag actually used is a ternary CaF2 -CaO-Al2 O3 system.
FIG. 2 shows no appreciable difference in carbon pick-up for molten 100F/0/0/0 at 2800°F and 3000°F as would be expected from the tentative phase diagram CaF2 -CaC2 (FIG. 4). However, results of tests using 70F/15/0/15 (FIG. 3) indicate higher levels of carbon pick-up at 3000°F compared to those at 2800°F. In fact, test IV which was run according to a standard practice for slag showed a dramatic increase in slag carbon content from 0.03%C at 2750°F to 0.26% at >3200°F. (Note: Slag temperature is raised prior to top pouring into the ESR mold for molten slag start). Although not as compellingly evident, the same phenomenon was observed in the experiments using 70F/15/0/15 run in the graphite crucible induction furnace. Tests 2R and 4R (FIG. 1) run at 3000°F exhibited approximately the same carbon levels as those in Test 3R at 2800°F. However, Test 4R also at 3000°F had carbon levels well above those of the rest. In addition, Test 1AR which was run to simulate a standard practice, i.e., slag temperature not controlled and raised to >3000°F prior to pouring, showed a similar increase in carbon content as in Test IV. Of course, in these runs using 70F/15/0/15, we are dealing with the quaternary system CaF2 -CaO-Al2 O3 -CaC2 where the solubility of carbon might be different compared to the simple CaF2 -CaC2 binary. Moreover, there is an indication from these experimental results that the kinetics of carbon pick-up in CaF2 based slag systems is temperature dependent.
The most significant results that could be gathered from FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 are the favorable extent to which slag decarburization could be carried out using NiO sinter addition. Table I summarizes the results of the slag decarburization experiments using NiO sinter.
In the series of tests described in Examples IV and V above NiO decarburized slag was used in ESRemelting a 41/2-1/2-inch diameter (˜108 mm diameter) alloy C-276 electrode into a 6-inch diameter (˜152 mm diameter) ingot. The composition of the starting alloy C-276 electrode is shown in Table 2. The results for 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 3 shows once again the effectiveness of using an NiO sinter decarburized slag in ESRemelting "HASTELLOY" alloy C-276 without causing carbon pickup in the ingot. A carbon balance for Tests 10R and 12R (Table 3) indicate a net loss of ˜0.51 gm and ˜0.87 gm carbon, respectively, during ESRemelting without causing an increase in slag carbon content. A possible explanation for this is that residual NiO might have caused further oxidation of carbon in both the electrode and the slag during ESR.
A carbon balance for Tests 11R and 13R (Table 4) indicates a net loss of ˜0.44 gm and ˜0.47 gm which could all be accounted for in the increase of the slag carbon content after remelting. This would indicate the apparent capability of 100F/0/0/0 to keep a greater amount of carbon in solution compared to 70F/15/0/15 an implication of a possibly greater carbon solubility in pure CaF2 than in the ternary system CaF2 -CaO-Al2 O3.
In the foregoing specification we have set out certain presently preferred practices and embodiments of our invention; however, it will be understood that this invention may be otherwise practiced within the scope of the following claims.
3000°F as would be expected from the tentative phase diagram CaF2 -CaC2 (FIG. 4). However, results of tests using 70F/15/0/15 (FIG. 3) indicate higher levels of carbon pick-up at 3000°F compared to those at 2800°F. In fact, test IV which was run according to a standard practice for slag showed a dramatic increase in slag carbon content from 0.03%C at 2750°F to 0.26% at >3200°F. (Note: Slag temperature is raised prior to top pouring into the ESR mold for molten slag start). Although not as compellingly evident, the same phenomenon was observed in the experiments using 70F/15/0/15 run in the graphite crucible induction furnace. Tests 2R and 4R (FIG. 1) run at 3000°F exhibited approximately the same carbon levels as those in Test 3R at 2800°F. However, Test 4R also at 3000°F had carbon levels well above those of the rest. In addition, Test 1AR which was run to simulate a standard practice, i.e., slag temperature not controlled and raised to >3000°F prior to pouring, showed a similar increase in carbon content as in Test IV. Of course, in these runs using 70F/15/0/15, we are dealing with the quaternary system CaF2 -CaO-Al2 O3 -CaC2 where the solubility of carbon might be different compared to the simple CaF2 -CaC2 binary. Moreover, there is an indication from these experimental results that the kinetics of carbon pick-up in CaF2 based slag systems is temperature dependent.
The most significant results that could be gathered from FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 are the favorable extent to which slag decarburization could be carried out using NiO sinter addition. Table I summarizes the results of the slag decarburization experiments using NiO sinter.
In the series of tests described in Examples IV and V above NiO decarburized slag was used in ESRemelting a 41/2-1/2-inch diameter (˜108 mm diameter) alloy C-276 electrode into a 6-inch diameter (˜152 mm diameter) ingot. The composition of the starting alloy C-276 electrode is shown in Table 2. The results for 70F/15/0/15 and 100F/0/0/0 are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 3 shows once again the effectiveness of using an NiO sinter decarburized slag in ESRemelting "HASTELLOY" alloy C-276 without causing carbon pickup in the ingot. A carbon balance for Tests 10R and 12R (Table 3) indicate a net loss of ˜0.51 gm and ˜0.87 gm carbon, respectively, during ESRemelting without causing an increase in slag carbon content. A possible explanation for this is that residual NiO might have caused further oxidation of carbon in both the electrode and the slag during ESR.
A carbon balance for Tests 11R and 13R (Table 4) indicates a net loss of ˜0.44 gm and ˜0.47 gm which could all be accounted for in the increase of the slag carbon content after remelting. This would indicate the apparent capability of 100F/0/0/0 to keep a greater amount of carbon in solution compared to 70F/15/0/15 an implication of a possibly greater carbon solubility in pure CaF2 than in the ternary system CaF2 -CaO-Al2 O3.
In the foregoing specification we have set out certain presently preferred practices and embodiments of our invention; however, it will be understood that this invention may be otherwise practiced within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (10)

We claim:
1. The method of electroslag remelting of nickel and cobalt base alloy materials to prevent weld heat affected zone corrosion resulting from precipitation of grain boundry carbides in such alloys comprising the step of decarburizing the ESR starting slag by adding a sufficient amount of NiO to the molten slag to react with sufficient carbon to evolve volatile oxides of carbon and reduce the carbon in the slag to the desired level prior to starting the remelting of the alloy material.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the NiO is in the form of a sinter product.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the NiO is added to the slag in the vessel in which said slag is melted.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the NiO is added to the slag as it is poured into an ESR mold.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least a part of the NiO is placed in an ESR mold prior to introducing the molten slag into said mold.
6. The method of electroslag remelting of alloys comprising the steps of:
a. melting a slag in a melting vessel;
b. transferring said slag to an ESR mold;
c. treating the slag in at least one of steps (a) and (b) with sufficient amount of NiO to react with carbon to evolve volatile oxides of carbon and reduce the carbon in the slag to a desired level prior to starting the remelting of the metallic electrode; and
d. remelting a metallic electrode in said ESR mold through said molten slag.
7. The method as claimed in claim 6 where at least one of the group consisting of aluminum, silicon, titanium, Ni-Mg, Ca-Si, one or more elements in the rare earth series and misch-metal is added to the ESR mold prior to transferring the slag into the mold.
8. The method as claimed in claim 6 where Al is added to the ESR mold prior to transferring the slag into the mold.
9. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the NiO is in the form of NiO sinter.
10. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the molten slag is a CaF2 based slag from the group consisting of 70/15/0/15 and 100/0/0/0 slags.
US05/566,314 1975-04-09 1975-04-09 Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys Expired - Lifetime US3982925A (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US05/566,314 US3982925A (en) 1975-04-09 1975-04-09 Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys
AR262724A AR209641A1 (en) 1975-04-09 1976-03-30 METHOD OF DECARBURING SLAG
DE19762614866 DE2614866A1 (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-06 PROCESS FOR DECARBING SUPER ALLOYS USING THE ELECTRO-SLAG REMELTING PROCESS
CA249,815A CA1075009A (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 Methods of decarburization in esr processing of superalloys
BR7602129A BR7602129A (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 PROCESS FOR DISCHARGING OF ESR BASED SLOPES, AND PROCESS FOR REFUSING ALLOY ELECTRIC SCORING
SE7604144A SE427474B (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 VIEW IN THE RELEASE OF NICKEL AND COBULATE-BASED ALLOY MATERIALS THROUGH ELECTRIC LAYOUT GRAINING
GB14218/76A GB1526132A (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 Methods of decarburibation in esr processing of superalloys
FR7610326A FR2307045A1 (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 PROCESS FOR DECARBURATION OF ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVE MILKS FOR MELTING SUPERALALLIES
SU762346600A SU795503A3 (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 Method of making leather or fur hide
JP51039778A JPS51123709A (en) 1975-04-09 1976-04-08 Decarbonizing process

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US05/566,314 US3982925A (en) 1975-04-09 1975-04-09 Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3982925A true US3982925A (en) 1976-09-28

Family

ID=24262379

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US05/566,314 Expired - Lifetime US3982925A (en) 1975-04-09 1975-04-09 Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US3982925A (en)
JP (1) JPS51123709A (en)
AR (1) AR209641A1 (en)
BR (1) BR7602129A (en)
CA (1) CA1075009A (en)
DE (1) DE2614866A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2307045A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1526132A (en)
SE (1) SE427474B (en)
SU (1) SU795503A3 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116716518A (en) * 2023-06-30 2023-09-08 江西宝顺昌特种合金制造有限公司 Hastelloy C-4 tube plate and preparation method thereof

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS61143476U (en) * 1985-02-25 1986-09-04
JPH042305A (en) * 1990-04-20 1992-01-07 Daiwa Riken Kogyo:Kk Tooth-pick holder

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2374396A (en) * 1941-05-09 1945-04-24 Stephen F Urban Method of making chromium-nickel austenitic stainless steel
US2913337A (en) * 1955-07-25 1959-11-17 Cooper Alloy Corp Shell molding
US3234608A (en) * 1959-11-19 1966-02-15 Renault Continuous-casting method of melting metals in a slag medium by using consumable electrodes
US3905804A (en) * 1973-06-07 1975-09-16 Lukens Steel Co Method of decarburization of slag in the electroslag remelting process

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
LU61904A1 (en) * 1970-10-21 1971-08-10

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2374396A (en) * 1941-05-09 1945-04-24 Stephen F Urban Method of making chromium-nickel austenitic stainless steel
US2913337A (en) * 1955-07-25 1959-11-17 Cooper Alloy Corp Shell molding
US3234608A (en) * 1959-11-19 1966-02-15 Renault Continuous-casting method of melting metals in a slag medium by using consumable electrodes
US3905804A (en) * 1973-06-07 1975-09-16 Lukens Steel Co Method of decarburization of slag in the electroslag remelting process

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116716518A (en) * 2023-06-30 2023-09-08 江西宝顺昌特种合金制造有限公司 Hastelloy C-4 tube plate and preparation method thereof
CN116716518B (en) * 2023-06-30 2024-02-09 江西宝顺昌特种合金制造有限公司 Hastelloy C-4 tube plate and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS55448B2 (en) 1980-01-08
AR209641A1 (en) 1977-05-13
DE2614866A1 (en) 1976-10-21
FR2307045B1 (en) 1980-04-30
BR7602129A (en) 1976-10-05
JPS51123709A (en) 1976-10-28
FR2307045A1 (en) 1976-11-05
CA1075009A (en) 1980-04-08
SE427474B (en) 1983-04-11
GB1526132A (en) 1978-09-27
SE7604144L (en) 1976-10-10
SU795503A3 (en) 1981-01-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3620716A (en) Magnesium removal from aluminum alloy scrap
US4140555A (en) Nickel-base casting superalloys
US4035892A (en) Composite calcium clad material for treating molten metals
US2283299A (en) Manufacture of steel
US3853540A (en) Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys
JPS63100150A (en) Master alloy for producing titanium alloy and its production
US3982925A (en) Method of decarburization in ESR-processing of superalloys
US3212881A (en) Purification of alloys
US2481599A (en) Alloy addition agent
US3988147A (en) Methods of decarburization of molten ESR slags and reduction of carbon pick up in corrosion resistant alloys
US3723094A (en) Electroflux slags and methods of electroflux remelting
JP4287594B2 (en) Treatment of aluminum alloy melt
US4049470A (en) Refining nickel base superalloys
US3997332A (en) Steelmaking by the electroslag process using prereduced iron or pellets
US4008104A (en) Method for dephosphorization and denitrification of an alloy containing easily oxidizable components
US4375371A (en) Method for induction melting
US4184869A (en) Method for using flux and slag deoxidizer in ESR process
US2693414A (en) Methods of casting titanium stabilized steel
RU2070228C1 (en) Method of smelting highly chromium nickel alloy
JPH0148342B2 (en)
SU1735410A1 (en) Method of smelting copper and its alloys
SU910826A1 (en) Master alloy
SU692886A1 (en) Niobium based alloy
JPS58141361A (en) Method for dephosphorizing silicon alloy
SU885321A1 (en) Alloy for steel killing and alloying

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED FILE - (OLD CASE ADDED FOR FILE TRACKING PURPOSES)

AS Assignment

Owner name: HAYNES INTERNATINAL, INC., 1020 WEST PARK AVENUE,

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:CABOT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004770/0271

Effective date: 19870731

Owner name: HAYNES INTERNATINAL, INC.,INDIANA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CABOT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:004770/0271

Effective date: 19870731

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HAYNES ACQUISITION CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:005159/0270

Effective date: 19890831

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIA

Free format text: RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:006668/0772

Effective date: 19930706

Owner name: SOCIETY NATIONAL BANK, INDIANA, INDIANA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:006676/0253

Effective date: 19930701

AS Assignment

Owner name: HAYNES INTERNATIONAL, INC., INDIANA

Free format text: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, RELEASE AND TERMINATION AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SOCIETY BANK, INDIANA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:014468/0279

Effective date: 19960923