US3918100A - Sputtering of bone on prostheses - Google Patents
Sputtering of bone on prostheses Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3918100A US3918100A US469182A US46918274A US3918100A US 3918100 A US3918100 A US 3918100A US 469182 A US469182 A US 469182A US 46918274 A US46918274 A US 46918274A US 3918100 A US3918100 A US 3918100A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- bone
- sputtering
- prosthesis
- coating
- particles
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/3641—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix characterised by the site of application in the body
- A61L27/3645—Connective tissue
- A61L27/365—Bones
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/30767—Special external or bone-contacting surface, e.g. coating for improving bone ingrowth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L27/00—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
- A61L27/36—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix
- A61L27/3604—Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses containing ingredients of undetermined constitution or reaction products thereof, e.g. transplant tissue, natural bone, extracellular matrix characterised by the human or animal origin of the biological material, e.g. hair, fascia, fish scales, silk, shellac, pericardium, pleura, renal tissue, amniotic membrane, parenchymal tissue, fetal tissue, muscle tissue, fat tissue, enamel
- A61L27/3608—Bone, e.g. demineralised bone matrix [DBM], bone powder
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2310/00—Prostheses classified in A61F2/28 or A61F2/30 - A61F2/44 being constructed from or coated with a particular material
- A61F2310/00005—The prosthesis being constructed from a particular material
- A61F2310/00011—Metals or alloys
- A61F2310/00017—Iron- or Fe-based alloys, e.g. stainless steel
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2310/00—Prostheses classified in A61F2/28 or A61F2/30 - A61F2/44 being constructed from or coated with a particular material
- A61F2310/00005—The prosthesis being constructed from a particular material
- A61F2310/00011—Metals or alloys
- A61F2310/00023—Titanium or titanium-based alloys, e.g. Ti-Ni alloys
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2310/00—Prostheses classified in A61F2/28 or A61F2/30 - A61F2/44 being constructed from or coated with a particular material
- A61F2310/00005—The prosthesis being constructed from a particular material
- A61F2310/00011—Metals or alloys
- A61F2310/00029—Cobalt-based alloys, e.g. Co-Cr alloys or Vitallium
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2310/00—Prostheses classified in A61F2/28 or A61F2/30 - A61F2/44 being constructed from or coated with a particular material
- A61F2310/00389—The prosthesis being coated or covered with a particular material
- A61F2310/00958—Coating or prosthesis-covering structure made of bone or of bony tissue
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S623/00—Prosthesis, i.e. artificial body members, parts thereof, or aids and accessories therefor
- Y10S623/92—Method or apparatus for preparing or treating prosthetic
- Y10S623/923—Bone
Definitions
- ABSTRACT A system of coating prostheses with ground bone particles is presented. Prostheses made of various metals and other substances are coated using if sputtering techniques to form a film which adheres to thedevice. stimulates living bone attachment thereto and which is ultimately replaced by new bone. Beet cattle bone material. some ground to 125 mesh and the remainder in chunks. has been successfully used in one embodiment as the coating applied by the if sputtering process.
- Another object of this invention is to provide a sysis necessary, as in hip prostheses, present methods and tem for forming hip joint prostheses wherein a metallic devices are not adequate.
- the stresses in this area can form provides the necessary structural strength and a be very large as indicated by estimated forces of up to film of adhered bone particles provides a base for joinfour times the weight of the body and, consequently, ing the form to the living bone.
- the prosthesis to be inserted has to be very strong as
- a further object of this invention is to provide a proswell as resistant to corrosion, stress corrosion, and fathesisfor use in areas of large stresses and to which is tigue.
- Sputtering was ments for forming a highly satisfactory metallic, prosconducted at low power densities to the target, 0.19 thesis exist.
- the overall problem is not comwatts/cm to 0.81 watts/cm to prevent thermal depletely solved since it is believed that both 316 stainless composition of the bone.
- Spark source mass spectrosteel and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum implants may metric analysis and X-ray analysis verify that the sputbe carcinogenic in rats.
- tered films have the same atomic composition as pure In addition to the suspected deficiencies in stainless bone target material. Scanning electron micrographs steel and the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, the indicate that the films are amorphous in character. Debone and pin inserts occasionally lose intimate contact tails of the procedures are now presented. due to the large forces acting on the femur around the intramedullary pin of the hip bone prosthesis.
- the present invention provides a The substrates used for bone deposition were either method whereby bone may be deposited on any prosactual implant materials such as 316 L stainless steel, thesis and, by virtue of the presence of the deposited impervious A1 0 porous A1 0 and a composite porbone, living bone is encouraged to grow around the ous-impervious A1 0 or glass microscope slides for prosthetic implant and to reunite about the implant. rate determination runs, procedure limitation experi- According to the present invention, prostheses may ments and thickness measurements. All substrates were be formed by coating metallic substrates'with bone parcleaned with methyl alcohol and air dried in an enviticles by means of rf sputtering in a vacuum. One rf ronmental hood prior to insertion into the vacuum sputtering process may be that of ionized inert gas chamber. bombardment of an electrode to emit atoms of the Sputtering parameters were as follows:
- the upper power level was determined by the temperature limitation of the rubber hoot gaskets and O-ring used as vacuum seals on the sputtering chamber. [f the target material is sufficiently outgassed. the bone target may be run at power densities exceeding 3.85 watts/cm provided the vacuum system has metal seals.
- the color of the sputtered films obtained from the experiments ranged from a transparent light brown on glass and stainless steel, and beige, to almost black on A1
- the films on A1 0 tended to be darker in color as thickness increased.
- Sputtering rates and corresponding. substrate temperatures were determined for rf power input to the target ranging from 1.08 watts/cm to 3.26 watts/cm
- Deposition rates were determined on masked glass substrates in a four hour sputtering run. Film thickness was measured on a Rank, Taylor, Hobson Tallystep 1 machine and deposition temperatures were monitored usinga PT/PT RH thermocouple located in good thermal.
- Deposition rates ranged from 375A/hr at 1.08 watts/cm to 2370A/hr at 3.26 watts/cm?
- Substrate temperatures ranged from 210C at 1.08 watts/cm to 375C at 3.26 watts/cm? Specular reflectance analysis and transmission spectrums were performed on coated glass, stainless steel, and A1 0 substrates. Although no definite identification of the coatings on the glass substrates could be made at power densities up to 3.85 watts/cm the films sputtered onto A1 0 and stainless steel at power densi ties up to 1.63 watts/cm were shown by spectrographic analysis to have the same molecular composition as the original bone material. In addition, it was shown that material taken from the target was identical to the original bone.
- Impervious A1 0 2. Porous A1 0 3. A1 0 composite having an impervious inner core and a porous skin.
- the substrates were cleaned in methyl alcohol and air dried in an environmental hood. They were then mounted, i.e. wire held, on a substrate holder along 1.0 X 10" mm Hg to 6,5 X10 mm Hg (as measured on a Bayard-Alpert Type 3.4 X 10" mm Hg (as measured with a with a sample for analysis, a masked glass slidefor thickness measurements, and a PT/PT 10% RH thermocouple. The specimens were coated on two side, re-- quiring two runs. The sputtering power density was 2.17 watts/cm and deposition temperatures were 374C and 362C. Resulting film thickness were 8500A and 9000A, i.e.
- spark source mass spectrometric analysis has been subjected to spark source mass spectrometric analysis and scanning electron microscope analysis with X-ray analysis. Results of the spark source mass.
- spectrometric analysis indicate that not only are the major components of the film the same as original bone, but also some characteristic lines of the structure are reproduced in the spectra of the deposit.
- Prosthetic devices made according to the present invention are structurally capable of withstanding even the very large forces which act on the femur in hip bone replacement.
- prostheses may now be coated with a bone substance which has been found to adhere to structural forms by impingement through the rf sputtering process.
- Such a coating formed in such a manner assures that virtually any shape of the strut tural form will receive a uniform coating over its entire surface.
- the structural form or prosthesis may be rotated during the sputtering process to assure uniform distribution of bone particles over the entire exterior surface of the prosthesis.
- the present invention demonstrates that bone particles as well as phosphosilicate glass, dielectric material,
- the prostheses particularly adapted to the present system are ones which require substantial strength such as those for use in hip joint repair.
- the bone material may be made to adhere on forms having less strength, i.e. those made of sub stances such as metallic ceramics, glass and similar materials.
- a coating thickness of substantially 1 micron is preferable to induce new bone growth and enhance the healing of a simple fracture or other bone damage.
- Such a thickness is also compatible with the present procedure for impinging bone particles on a metallic prosthesis in that appreciably thicker coatings tend to crack and break off when the prosthesis cools down. That is, the metallic prosthesis is raised to temperatures on the order of 350C to 400C by the impinging particles. In cooling down thereafter, a metallic substrate contracts more than the bone coating and partial separation can occur if the coating is too thick.
- Sputtered-bone-coated prostheses made according to the present invention first induce living bone to grow on the implant and then to absorb and replace the implant coating over an extended period of time. This bone replacement process occurs on a non-toxic substrate or structural material which is implicitly in contact with the bone part of the body.
- the new bone growth promoted by the sputtered bone coating also results in the elimination of secondary grafting operations wherein bone is removed from the host and reintroduced in the area where bone is missing, e.g. in gunshot wounds.
- Two important areas for strengthening by prostheses coated according to the present invention thus are along the intramedullary pin of a hip-prostheses and in and around prostheses used for bone replacement in gunshot wounds where necrosis is particularly prevalent.
- a prosthesis for use as a bone implant comprising:
- said bone material will induce living bone growth around the implant and. additionally, will eliminate the necessity for bone grafting.
- the prosthesis as defined in claim 2 wherein the bone implant is presputtered for substantially 40 minutes at a power density on the order of 1.63 watts per cm 4.
- the prosthesis as defined in claim 3 wherein sputtering is conducted at power densities to the target in the range of from 0.19 watts per cm to 0.81 watts per cm to avoid thermal decomposition of the bone particles.
- said bone material baked at substantially 125C for substantially 18 hours prior to presputtering to evaporate moisture from the bone
- said coating having a thickness of substantially 1 micron.
- a method of forming a bone replacement or bone repair prosthesis comprising adhering bone particles to a prosthetic form by rf sputtering.
- prosthetic form is presputtered for substantially 40 minutes at a power density of substantially 1.63 watts per cm 10.
- sputtering is performed at an operating pressure of substantially 3.5 X 10 mm Hg and said bone particles are applied to a coating thickness of substantially 1 micron.
- bone particles are derived from ground animal bone having a consistency in part of substantially 125 mesh and in part of substantially larger pieces
- said bone particles baked at substantially 125C for substantially 18 hours to evaporate moisture therefrom.
- bone particles are obtained by machining bone chips to a powder form and heating the powder to substantially C for substantially 60 hours to remove moisture and gases therefrom.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Dermatology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
Abstract
A system of coating prostheses with ground bone particles is presented. Prostheses made of various metals and other substances are coated using rf sputtering techniques to form a film which adheres to the device, stimulates living bone attachment thereto and which is ultimately replaced by new bone. Beef cattle bone material, some ground to 125 mesh and the remainder in chunks, has been successfully used in one embodiment as the coating applied by the rf sputtering process.
Description
' iJnited States Patent [1 1 Shaw et :11.
[4 1 Nov. 11, 1975 1 1 SPUTTERING OF BONE ON PROSTHESES [75] Inventors: Bevil .1. Shaw, Murrysville; Richard P. Miller, Pittsburgh. both of Pa.
221 Filed: May 13, 1974 [21] Appl. No.: 469.182
[52] U.S.Cl. v.3/1.9; 3/1.91:3/1.911; 3/1912; 3/1913; 32/10 A; 128/92 C; 128/92 G; 204/192 [51] Int. Cl. A61F 1/00; C23C 15/00 [58] Field of Search 204/192. 298: 3/19. 1.911. 3/1912. 1.913; 32/10 A; 128/92 C. 92 G [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2.239.642 4/194] Burkhardt ct a1 204/192 2.537.070 1/1951 Longfellow 128/92 BA 3.593.342 7/1971 Niebauer et a1. 3/1
3.605.123 9/1971 Hahn 3/1 3.609.367 10/1971 Hodosh.... 32/10 A 3.635.811 1/1972 Lane 204/192 3.789.029 1/1974 Hodosh... 260/25 R 3.790.507 2/1974 Hodosh 260/25 R Primary lirami)wr.1ohn H. Mack Ass/Mun! liraiinerAaron Weisstuch Allurney. Agent. or" FirmR. S. Sciascia; C. E. Vautrain. Jr.
[57] ABSTRACT A system of coating prostheses with ground bone particles is presented. Prostheses made of various metals and other substances are coated using if sputtering techniques to form a film which adheres to thedevice. stimulates living bone attachment thereto and which is ultimately replaced by new bone. Beet cattle bone material. some ground to 125 mesh and the remainder in chunks. has been successfully used in one embodiment as the coating applied by the if sputtering process.
12 Claims. N0 Drawings 1 SPUTTERING OF BONE ON PROSTHESES The present invention concerns improvements in bone replacement prostheses and, more particularly,
electrode at high energy levels for deposit on a prosthesis. Bone material from beef cattle has been successfully adhered by this method to prostheses of polished stainless steel and aluminum, and to Pyrex test tubes the sputtering of bone onto such prostheses to form a 5 and microscope slides. covering which stimulates bone growth and attachment Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to natural bone. to provide a system for forming prostheses having a Despite recent advances in the field of prosthetic refilm which adheres to the prosthesis base and to which placement of bone, effective prosthetic replacement living bone may adhere. has not been achieved. Where total bone replacement Another object of this invention is to provide a sysis necessary, as in hip prostheses, present methods and tem for forming hip joint prostheses wherein a metallic devices are not adequate. The stresses in this area can form provides the necessary structural strength and a be very large as indicated by estimated forces of up to film of adhered bone particles provides a base for joinfour times the weight of the body and, consequently, ing the form to the living bone. the prosthesis to be inserted has to be very strong as A further object of this invention is to provide a proswell as resistant to corrosion, stress corrosion, and fathesisfor use in areas of large stresses and to which is tigue. Some advances in bone replacement in this area adhered a coating of bone particles to promote bone include the use of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum algrowth and attachment to living bone. loy, Vitallium, which has proved to be generally satis- Other objects, advantages and novel features of the factory and has an apparent advantage of case-hardeninvention will become apparent from the following deing with use. This alloy provides a structurally sound tailed description thereof. answer to the mechanical wearing problem between Bone material has been successfully deposited on mithe acetabulum, or hip-cup, and the femoral head proscroscope slides and pieces of aluminum and stainless thesis. in addition, high density polyethylene has been steel by rfsputtering. The rf sputtering process used infound to be suitable as a lubricant between these workvolved the ionized gas bombardment of an electrode to ing parts since it has a low wearing rate, is resistant to emit atoms or molecules of that electrode at high encreep, and has no toxic effects. Thus, some of the eleergy levels for deposit on a substrate. Sputtering was ments for forming a highly satisfactory metallic, prosconducted at low power densities to the target, 0.19 thesis exist. However, the overall problem is not comwatts/cm to 0.81 watts/cm to prevent thermal depletely solved since it is believed that both 316 stainless composition of the bone. Spark source mass spectrosteel and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum implants may metric analysis and X-ray analysis verify that the sputbe carcinogenic in rats. tered films have the same atomic composition as pure In addition to the suspected deficiencies in stainless bone target material. Scanning electron micrographs steel and the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, the indicate that the films are amorphous in character. Debone and pin inserts occasionally lose intimate contact tails of the procedures are now presented. due to the large forces acting on the femur around the intramedullary pin of the hip bone prosthesis. This loss EXPERIMENTS of contact leads tofailure of the prosthetic device and Bone chips obtained from steer bone were used as presents a need for a method and/or means for encourthe target, or cathode, in the sputtering system. The aging bone attachment to the implant. 4O bone was first boiled in lye to remove muscle and fatty The deficiencies associated with hip bone replacetissues and then cleaned in boiling water. Next, small ment also exist in relation to replacement of bone in rebone chips were machined for use as a powder-type tarpairing the damage sustained in such instances as gunget and then heated at 120C for 60 hours to remove shot wounds and vehicle accidents. Here there has moisture and .to outgas the target material. The dried been less success since the bone does not appear to albone chips were placed on an aluminum backing plate ways grow along the-prosthesis fillingthe gap-This efand held by an aluminum oxide retaining ring, the tarfect may be due to the prosthesis itself, but could also get size being 12.2 cm dia X 0.4 cm height. Further outbe due to thetraumatized tissue in the injured area. gassing was accomplished by pumping under high vac- This kind of woundis of particular concern to the uum for approximately 15 hours, and the target was armed services. Necrosis, i.e. failure of bone to grow presputtered for a minimum of 40 minutes at 1.63 and unite around the break therein, is'not uncommon watts/cm? in these accidents. The present invention provides a The substrates used for bone deposition were either method whereby bone may be deposited on any prosactual implant materials such as 316 L stainless steel, thesis and, by virtue of the presence of the deposited impervious A1 0 porous A1 0 and a composite porbone, living bone is encouraged to grow around the ous-impervious A1 0 or glass microscope slides for prosthetic implant and to reunite about the implant. rate determination runs, procedure limitation experi- According to the present invention, prostheses may ments and thickness measurements. All substrates were be formed by coating metallic substrates'with bone parcleaned with methyl alcohol and air dried in an enviticles by means of rf sputtering in a vacuum. One rf ronmental hood prior to insertion into the vacuum sputtering process may be that of ionized inert gas chamber. bombardment of an electrode to emit atoms of the Sputtering parameters were as follows:
Most of the runs were left under a Pump Down:
high vacuum overnight (-15 hours) to remove moisture and outgas the target. Some low power level runs could be sufficiently outgassed in as little as three hours.
-continued Blank Off Pressure:
ionization gauge).
Operating Pressure:
Pirani-typc gauge).
Argon Flow Rate: 45 cc/min of gettered argon Cathode-Anode Distance: -2 inches Presputter: 40 minutes at 1.63 watts/cm Substrate Temperatures: 210C at 1.08 watts/cm 375C at 3.26 watts/cm Sputtering Run Times: l-ll hours Procedure Limitations:
The upper power level was determined by the temperature limitation of the rubber hoot gaskets and O-ring used as vacuum seals on the sputtering chamber. [f the target material is sufficiently outgassed. the bone target may be run at power densities exceeding 3.85 watts/cm provided the vacuum system has metal seals.
water-cooled chamber. and end plates.
The color of the sputtered films obtained from the experiments ranged from a transparent light brown on glass and stainless steel, and beige, to almost black on A1 The films on A1 0 tended to be darker in color as thickness increased.
All of the sputtered coatings exhibited excellent adherence to each of the substrate materials. All samples passed the Scotch tape adherence test performed by ripping a piece of pressed-on Scotch tape from the coated substrate. The films could hardly be removed by scraping with a knife.
Sputtering rates and corresponding. substrate temperatures were determined for rf power input to the target ranging from 1.08 watts/cm to 3.26 watts/cm Deposition rates were determined on masked glass substrates in a four hour sputtering run. Film thickness was measured on a Rank, Taylor, Hobson Tallystep 1 machine and deposition temperatures were monitored usinga PT/PT RH thermocouple located in good thermal.
contact on the substrate holder. Deposition rates ranged from 375A/hr at 1.08 watts/cm to 2370A/hr at 3.26 watts/cm? Substrate temperatures ranged from 210C at 1.08 watts/cm to 375C at 3.26 watts/cm? Specular reflectance analysis and transmission spectrums were performed on coated glass, stainless steel, and A1 0 substrates. Although no definite identification of the coatings on the glass substrates could be made at power densities up to 3.85 watts/cm the films sputtered onto A1 0 and stainless steel at power densi ties up to 1.63 watts/cm were shown by spectrographic analysis to have the same molecular composition as the original bone material. In addition, it was shown that material taken from the target was identical to the original bone.
The following materials were covered with bone for in vivo evaluation.
1. Impervious A1 0 2. Porous A1 0 3. A1 0 composite having an impervious inner core and a porous skin.
The substrates were cleaned in methyl alcohol and air dried in an environmental hood. They were then mounted, i.e. wire held, on a substrate holder along 1.0 X 10" mm Hg to 6,5 X10 mm Hg (as measured on a Bayard-Alpert Type 3.4 X 10" mm Hg (as measured with a with a sample for analysis, a masked glass slidefor thickness measurements, and a PT/PT 10% RH thermocouple. The specimens were coated on two side, re-- quiring two runs. The sputtering power density was 2.17 watts/cm and deposition temperatures were 374C and 362C. Resulting film thickness were 8500A and 9000A, i.e. an average deposition rate of l250A/hr- Although the results do not conclusively show that the material transferred on sputtering is identical to actual bone, spectrographic analysis shows that the chemical composition is virtually identical to the original bone, and other analysis shows that the same molecular bondingis present. The primary difference between the two is that the sputtered material is amorphous as opposed to the original crystalline structure.
Films applied by the system of the present invention.
have been subjected to spark source mass spectrometric analysis and scanning electron microscope analysis with X-ray analysis. Results of the spark source mass.
spectrometric analysis indicate that not only are the major components of the film the same as original bone, but also some characteristic lines of the structure are reproduced in the spectra of the deposit.
There isthus provided a system for coating prosthetic devices with material which will enhance healing at a 1 bone implant as well as promote bone growth and attachment to the implant. Prosthetic devices made according to the present invention are structurally capable of withstanding even the very large forces which act on the femur in hip bone replacement. In constrast with prior methods and devices, prostheses may now be coated with a bone substance which has been found to adhere to structural forms by impingement through the rf sputtering process. Such a coating formed in such a manner assures that virtually any shape of the strut tural form will receive a uniform coating over its entire surface. Where necessary, the structural form or prosthesis may be rotated during the sputtering process to assure uniform distribution of bone particles over the entire exterior surface of the prosthesis.
The present invention demonstrates that bone particles as well as phosphosilicate glass, dielectric material,
etc. may be if sputtered on a target. Not only may such a natural substance be deposited on a target, but under proper conditions of temperature and voltage the bone particles may be made to impinge upon and adhere to the target. The prostheses particularly adapted to the present system are ones which require substantial strength such as those for use in hip joint repair. However, the bone material may be made to adhere on forms having less strength, i.e. those made of sub stances such as metallic ceramics, glass and similar materials.
This adaptability of bone particles to adhere to metal surfaces leads to the formation of prosthetic devices in which the coating performs two important functions, one being that of covering the metallic base with a medium that is both non-toxic and will also induce bone growth, and the other being to provide a coating of a natural bone material. Even though this bone material coating is a foreign substance, it should not be rejected by the body in which the device is implanted since ivory which is also a foreign body is not rejected and, in fact, has been used successfully as an implant. Sputtered bone, therefore, when implanted in a human should behave the same as ivory implants have, i.e. be adaptable to being built upon by bone formed by body processes.
It has been determined that a coating thickness of substantially 1 micron is preferable to induce new bone growth and enhance the healing of a simple fracture or other bone damage. Such a thickness is also compatible with the present procedure for impinging bone particles on a metallic prosthesis in that appreciably thicker coatings tend to crack and break off when the prosthesis cools down. That is, the metallic prosthesis is raised to temperatures on the order of 350C to 400C by the impinging particles. In cooling down thereafter, a metallic substrate contracts more than the bone coating and partial separation can occur if the coating is too thick.
Sputtered-bone-coated prostheses made according to the present invention first induce living bone to grow on the implant and then to absorb and replace the implant coating over an extended period of time. This bone replacement process occurs on a non-toxic substrate or structural material which is implicitly in contact with the bone part of the body. The new bone growth promoted by the sputtered bone coating also results in the elimination of secondary grafting operations wherein bone is removed from the host and reintroduced in the area where bone is missing, e.g. in gunshot wounds. Two important areas for strengthening by prostheses coated according to the present invention thus are along the intramedullary pin of a hip-prostheses and in and around prostheses used for bone replacement in gunshot wounds where necrosis is particularly prevalent.
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in the light of the above teachings.
What is claimed is:
l. A prosthesis for use as a bone implant comprising:
to be replaced; and a coating of bone material impinged upon and adhered to said prosthesis by rf sputtering,
whereby said bone material will induce living bone growth around the implant and. additionally, will eliminate the necessity for bone grafting.
2. The prosthesis as defined in claim 1 wherein the material of said metallic base is selected from the nontoxic group consisting of stainless steel, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, titanium and titanium alloys and said coating is formed by an rf sputtering process.
3. The prosthesis as defined in claim 2 wherein the bone implant is presputtered for substantially 40 minutes at a power density on the order of 1.63 watts per cm 4. The prosthesis as defined in claim 3 wherein sputtering is conducted at power densities to the target in the range of from 0.19 watts per cm to 0.81 watts per cm to avoid thermal decomposition of the bone particles.
5. The prosthesis as defined in claim 4 wherein said bone material forming said coating is animal bone ground in part to a 125 mesh and in part in pieces of substantially greater size,
said bone material baked at substantially 125C for substantially 18 hours prior to presputtering to evaporate moisture from the bone,
said coating having a thickness of substantially 1 micron.
6. A method of forming a bone replacement or bone repair prosthesis comprising adhering bone particles to a prosthetic form by rf sputtering.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the prosthetic form is positioned at the cathode of the rf sputtering means at a distance of substantially 2 inches from the anode thereof.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the sputtering is conducted at power densities to the target in the range of from 0.19 watts per cm to 0.81 watts per cm to avoid thermal decomposition of the bone particles.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the prosthetic form is presputtered for substantially 40 minutes at a power density of substantially 1.63 watts per cm 10. The method of claim 9 wherein sputtering is performed at an operating pressure of substantially 3.5 X 10 mm Hg and said bone particles are applied to a coating thickness of substantially 1 micron.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the bone particles are derived from ground animal bone having a consistency in part of substantially 125 mesh and in part of substantially larger pieces,
said bone particles baked at substantially 125C for substantially 18 hours to evaporate moisture therefrom.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein the bone particles are obtained by machining bone chips to a powder form and heating the powder to substantially C for substantially 60 hours to remove moisture and gases therefrom.
Claims (12)
1. A prosthesis for use as a bone implant comprising: a metallic base conforming to the shape of the bone to be replaced; and a coating of bone material impinged upon and adhered to said prosthesis by rf sputtering, whereby said bone material will induce living bone growth around the implant and, additionally, will eliminate the necessity for bone grafting.
2. The prosthesis as defined in claim 1 wherein the material of said metallic base is selected from the non-toxic group consisting of stainless steel, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, titanium and titanium alloys and said coating is formed by an rf sputtering process.
3. The prosthesis as defined in claim 2 wherein the bone implant is presputtered for substantially 40 minutes at a power density on the order of 1.63 watts per cm2.
4. The prosthesis as defined in claim 3 wherein sputtering is conducted at power densities to the target in the range of from 0.19 watts per cm2 to 0.81 watts per cm2 to avoid thermal decomposition of the bone particles.
5. The prosthesis as defined in claim 4 wherein said bone material forming said coating is animal bone ground in part to a 125 mesh and in part in pieces of substantially greater size, said bone material baked at substantially 125*C for substantially 18 hours prior to presputtering to evaporate moisture from the bone, said coating having a thickness of substantially 1 micron.
6. A method of forming a bone replacement or bone repair prosthesis comprising adhering bone particles to a prosthetic form by rf sputtering.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the prosthetic form is positioned at the cathode of the rf sputtering means at a distance of substantially 2 inches from the anode thereof.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the sputtering is conducted at power densities to the target in the range of from 0.19 watts per cm2 to 0.81 watts per cm2 to avoid thermal decomposition of the bone particles.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the prosthetic form is presputtered for substantially 40 minutes at a power density of substantially 1.63 watts per cm2.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein sputtering is performed at an operating pressure of substantially 3.5 X 10 3 mm Hg and said bone particles are applied to a coating thickness of substantially 1 micron.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the bone particles are derived from ground animal bone having a consistency in part of substantially 125 mesh and in part of substantially larger pieces, said bone particles baked at substantially 125*C for substantially 18 hours to evaporate moisture therefrom.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein the bone particles are obtained by machining bone chips to a powder form and heating the powder to substantially 120*C for substantially 60 hours to remove moisture and gases therefrom.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US469182A US3918100A (en) | 1974-05-13 | 1974-05-13 | Sputtering of bone on prostheses |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US469182A US3918100A (en) | 1974-05-13 | 1974-05-13 | Sputtering of bone on prostheses |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3918100A true US3918100A (en) | 1975-11-11 |
Family
ID=23862778
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US469182A Expired - Lifetime US3918100A (en) | 1974-05-13 | 1974-05-13 | Sputtering of bone on prostheses |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3918100A (en) |
Cited By (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2620907A1 (en) * | 1976-05-12 | 1977-11-17 | Battelle Institut E V | ANCHORING FOR HIGHLY LOADED ENDOPROSTHESES |
FR2361437A1 (en) * | 1976-08-10 | 1978-03-10 | Research Corp | THREE-DIMENSIONAL PERMEABLE MATERIAL OF EXTENDED SURFACE |
US4146936A (en) * | 1975-12-30 | 1979-04-03 | Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited | Implants for bones, joints and tooth roots |
US4186486A (en) * | 1977-11-04 | 1980-02-05 | Maurice Gordon | Dental prosthesis |
EP0022724A1 (en) * | 1979-07-12 | 1981-01-21 | ANVAR Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche | Biodegradable implant, usable as bone prosthesis |
US4259072A (en) * | 1977-04-04 | 1981-03-31 | Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. | Ceramic endosseous implant |
US4291013A (en) * | 1978-10-09 | 1981-09-22 | Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung | Medicinally useful, shaped mass of collagen resorbable in the body |
FR2484246A1 (en) * | 1980-06-17 | 1981-12-18 | Europ Propulsion | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING BIOACTIVE COATINGS ON BONE PROSTHESES, AND PROSTHESES THUS OBTAINED |
US4322398A (en) * | 1978-02-20 | 1982-03-30 | Battelle Institut E.V. | Implantable drug depot and process for the production thereof |
US4338926A (en) * | 1980-11-21 | 1982-07-13 | Howmedica, Inc. | Bone fracture prosthesis with controlled stiffness |
FR2548011A2 (en) * | 1983-07-01 | 1985-01-04 | Europ Propulsion | PROCESS FOR MAKING BIOACTIVE DEPOSITS OF CALCIUM PHOSPHATES AND PRODUCTS OBTAINED |
US4521192A (en) * | 1982-09-14 | 1985-06-04 | Linkow Leonard I | Oral implant for oversized dental support openings |
EP0149425A1 (en) * | 1984-01-11 | 1985-07-24 | Mathys Co Robert | Glenoid cavity made of plastics |
US4596574A (en) * | 1984-05-14 | 1986-06-24 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Biodegradable porous ceramic delivery system for bone morphogenetic protein |
DE3447583A1 (en) * | 1984-12-28 | 1986-07-10 | Battelle-Institut E.V., 6000 Frankfurt | METHOD FOR PRODUCING IMPLANTABLE BONE REPLACEMENT MATERIALS |
FR2595572A1 (en) * | 1986-03-12 | 1987-09-18 | France Implant | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SURGICAL IMPLANTS AT LEAST PARTIALLY COATED WITH A LAYER IN A METAL COMPOUND, AND IMPLANTS CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHOD |
US4743229A (en) * | 1986-09-29 | 1988-05-10 | Collagen Corporation | Collagen/mineral mixing device and method |
WO1988007355A1 (en) * | 1987-03-30 | 1988-10-06 | Ab Idea | Method and means for fixing a joint prosthesis |
US4789663A (en) * | 1984-07-06 | 1988-12-06 | Collagen Corporation | Methods of bone repair using collagen |
WO1989012472A1 (en) * | 1988-06-14 | 1989-12-28 | Ab Idea | Implant and method of making it |
US4908030A (en) * | 1987-04-29 | 1990-03-13 | Vent-Plant Corporation, Inc. | Method of manufacturing synthetic bone coated surgical implants |
US5035711A (en) * | 1983-03-24 | 1991-07-30 | Kabushiki Kaisya Advance Kaihatsu Kenkyujo | Transcutaneously implantable element |
US5061286A (en) * | 1989-08-18 | 1991-10-29 | Osteotech, Inc. | Osteoprosthetic implant |
EP0470305A1 (en) * | 1990-08-07 | 1992-02-12 | Osteotech, Inc., | Osteoprosthetic implant |
US5108436A (en) * | 1988-09-29 | 1992-04-28 | Collagen Corporation | Implant fixation |
US5143730A (en) * | 1988-07-25 | 1992-09-01 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien | Resorbable bone wax |
FR2682968A1 (en) * | 1991-10-28 | 1993-04-30 | Icmc | Process for producing a bone implant, device allowing the process to be used and implant thus produced |
US5258029A (en) * | 1988-09-29 | 1993-11-02 | Collagen Corporation | Method for improving implant fixation |
EP0688194A1 (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1995-12-27 | Etex Corporation | Methods of coating implants with bony structure |
US5697932A (en) * | 1994-11-09 | 1997-12-16 | Osteonics Corp. | Bone graft delivery system and method |
US6296645B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2001-10-02 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Intramedullary nail with non-metal spacers |
US6371988B1 (en) | 1996-10-23 | 2002-04-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Bone grafts |
US6379385B1 (en) | 2000-01-06 | 2002-04-30 | Tutogen Medical Gmbh | Implant of bone matter |
US20030199881A1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2003-10-23 | Bonutti Peter M. | Method and apparatus for use in operating on a bone |
US20040002759A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Ferree Bret A. | Fusion and arthroplasty devices configured to receive bone growth promoting substances |
US20040153072A1 (en) * | 1998-08-20 | 2004-08-05 | Bonutti Peter M. | Spinal spacer |
US6783529B2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2004-08-31 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Non-metal inserts for bone support assembly |
US6808527B2 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2004-10-26 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Intramedullary nail with snap-in window insert |
US20050098237A1 (en) * | 2003-11-10 | 2005-05-12 | Medlin Dana J. | Case hardened orthopedic implant |
US7276081B1 (en) | 1995-10-16 | 2007-10-02 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Bone grafts |
US7410488B2 (en) | 2005-02-18 | 2008-08-12 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Hindfoot nail |
US7655009B2 (en) | 2003-12-01 | 2010-02-02 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Humeral nail |
US10610270B2 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2020-04-07 | Glw, Inc. | Hybrid intramedullary rods |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2239642A (en) * | 1936-05-27 | 1941-04-22 | Bernhard Berghaus | Coating of articles by means of cathode disintegration |
US2537070A (en) * | 1948-12-27 | 1951-01-09 | Puy Mfg Company Inc De | Surgical appliance and method for fixation of bone fragments |
US3593342A (en) * | 1969-01-27 | 1971-07-20 | Cutter Lab | Prosthetic joint |
US3605123A (en) * | 1969-04-29 | 1971-09-20 | Melpar Inc | Bone implant |
US3609867A (en) * | 1969-03-10 | 1971-10-05 | Research Corp | Plastic bone composition |
US3635811A (en) * | 1967-11-06 | 1972-01-18 | Warner Lambert Co | Method of applying a coating |
US3789029A (en) * | 1970-07-06 | 1974-01-29 | Research Corp | Plastic bone composition and method of making same |
US3790507A (en) * | 1969-03-10 | 1974-02-05 | Research Corp | Plastic bone composition |
-
1974
- 1974-05-13 US US469182A patent/US3918100A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2239642A (en) * | 1936-05-27 | 1941-04-22 | Bernhard Berghaus | Coating of articles by means of cathode disintegration |
US2537070A (en) * | 1948-12-27 | 1951-01-09 | Puy Mfg Company Inc De | Surgical appliance and method for fixation of bone fragments |
US3635811A (en) * | 1967-11-06 | 1972-01-18 | Warner Lambert Co | Method of applying a coating |
US3593342A (en) * | 1969-01-27 | 1971-07-20 | Cutter Lab | Prosthetic joint |
US3609867A (en) * | 1969-03-10 | 1971-10-05 | Research Corp | Plastic bone composition |
US3790507A (en) * | 1969-03-10 | 1974-02-05 | Research Corp | Plastic bone composition |
US3605123A (en) * | 1969-04-29 | 1971-09-20 | Melpar Inc | Bone implant |
US3789029A (en) * | 1970-07-06 | 1974-01-29 | Research Corp | Plastic bone composition and method of making same |
Cited By (75)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4146936A (en) * | 1975-12-30 | 1979-04-03 | Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited | Implants for bones, joints and tooth roots |
US4202055A (en) * | 1976-05-12 | 1980-05-13 | Battelle-Institut E.V. | Anchorage for highly stressed endoprostheses |
DE2620907A1 (en) * | 1976-05-12 | 1977-11-17 | Battelle Institut E V | ANCHORING FOR HIGHLY LOADED ENDOPROSTHESES |
FR2361437A1 (en) * | 1976-08-10 | 1978-03-10 | Research Corp | THREE-DIMENSIONAL PERMEABLE MATERIAL OF EXTENDED SURFACE |
US4259072A (en) * | 1977-04-04 | 1981-03-31 | Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. | Ceramic endosseous implant |
US4186486A (en) * | 1977-11-04 | 1980-02-05 | Maurice Gordon | Dental prosthesis |
US4347234A (en) * | 1978-01-09 | 1982-08-31 | Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung | Medicinally useful, shaped mass of collagen resorbable in the body |
US4322398A (en) * | 1978-02-20 | 1982-03-30 | Battelle Institut E.V. | Implantable drug depot and process for the production thereof |
US4291013A (en) * | 1978-10-09 | 1981-09-22 | Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung | Medicinally useful, shaped mass of collagen resorbable in the body |
EP0022724A1 (en) * | 1979-07-12 | 1981-01-21 | ANVAR Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche | Biodegradable implant, usable as bone prosthesis |
FR2484246A1 (en) * | 1980-06-17 | 1981-12-18 | Europ Propulsion | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING BIOACTIVE COATINGS ON BONE PROSTHESES, AND PROSTHESES THUS OBTAINED |
US4366183A (en) * | 1980-06-17 | 1982-12-28 | Societe Europeene De Propulsion | Process for making bioactive coatings on osseous prostheses, and prostheses thus obtained |
US4338926A (en) * | 1980-11-21 | 1982-07-13 | Howmedica, Inc. | Bone fracture prosthesis with controlled stiffness |
US4521192A (en) * | 1982-09-14 | 1985-06-04 | Linkow Leonard I | Oral implant for oversized dental support openings |
US5035711A (en) * | 1983-03-24 | 1991-07-30 | Kabushiki Kaisya Advance Kaihatsu Kenkyujo | Transcutaneously implantable element |
FR2548011A2 (en) * | 1983-07-01 | 1985-01-04 | Europ Propulsion | PROCESS FOR MAKING BIOACTIVE DEPOSITS OF CALCIUM PHOSPHATES AND PRODUCTS OBTAINED |
EP0130916A1 (en) * | 1983-07-01 | 1985-01-09 | SOCIETE EUROPEENNE DE PROPULSION (S.E.P.) Société Anonyme dite: | Method of producing bioactive calcium phosphate deposits, and products so obtained |
EP0149425A1 (en) * | 1984-01-11 | 1985-07-24 | Mathys Co Robert | Glenoid cavity made of plastics |
US4596574A (en) * | 1984-05-14 | 1986-06-24 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Biodegradable porous ceramic delivery system for bone morphogenetic protein |
US4789663A (en) * | 1984-07-06 | 1988-12-06 | Collagen Corporation | Methods of bone repair using collagen |
DE3447583A1 (en) * | 1984-12-28 | 1986-07-10 | Battelle-Institut E.V., 6000 Frankfurt | METHOD FOR PRODUCING IMPLANTABLE BONE REPLACEMENT MATERIALS |
FR2595572A1 (en) * | 1986-03-12 | 1987-09-18 | France Implant | PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SURGICAL IMPLANTS AT LEAST PARTIALLY COATED WITH A LAYER IN A METAL COMPOUND, AND IMPLANTS CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE METHOD |
US4743229A (en) * | 1986-09-29 | 1988-05-10 | Collagen Corporation | Collagen/mineral mixing device and method |
AU611900B2 (en) * | 1987-03-30 | 1991-06-27 | Lanka Limited | Method and means for fixing a joint prosthesis |
JPH02503273A (en) * | 1987-03-30 | 1990-10-11 | エー・ビー・アイデイア | Means of fixing the artificial joint trunk |
US5015256A (en) * | 1987-03-30 | 1991-05-14 | Ab Idea | Method and means for fixing a joint prosthesis |
WO1988007355A1 (en) * | 1987-03-30 | 1988-10-06 | Ab Idea | Method and means for fixing a joint prosthesis |
JP2561337B2 (en) | 1987-03-30 | 1996-12-04 | エー・ビー・アイデイア | Means to fix the artificial joint trunk |
EP0501595A1 (en) * | 1987-03-30 | 1992-09-02 | Ab Idea | Method and means for fixing a joint prosthesis |
US4908030A (en) * | 1987-04-29 | 1990-03-13 | Vent-Plant Corporation, Inc. | Method of manufacturing synthetic bone coated surgical implants |
WO1989012472A1 (en) * | 1988-06-14 | 1989-12-28 | Ab Idea | Implant and method of making it |
US5217496A (en) * | 1988-06-14 | 1993-06-08 | Ab Idea | Implant and method of making it |
US5143730A (en) * | 1988-07-25 | 1992-09-01 | Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien | Resorbable bone wax |
US5258029A (en) * | 1988-09-29 | 1993-11-02 | Collagen Corporation | Method for improving implant fixation |
US5108436A (en) * | 1988-09-29 | 1992-04-28 | Collagen Corporation | Implant fixation |
US5061286A (en) * | 1989-08-18 | 1991-10-29 | Osteotech, Inc. | Osteoprosthetic implant |
EP0470305A1 (en) * | 1990-08-07 | 1992-02-12 | Osteotech, Inc., | Osteoprosthetic implant |
FR2682968A1 (en) * | 1991-10-28 | 1993-04-30 | Icmc | Process for producing a bone implant, device allowing the process to be used and implant thus produced |
EP0688194A1 (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1995-12-27 | Etex Corporation | Methods of coating implants with bony structure |
EP0688194A4 (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1996-09-18 | Etex Corp | Methods of coating implants with bony structure |
US5697932A (en) * | 1994-11-09 | 1997-12-16 | Osteonics Corp. | Bone graft delivery system and method |
US6045555A (en) * | 1994-11-09 | 2000-04-04 | Osteonics Corp. | Bone graft delivery system and method |
US6142998A (en) * | 1994-11-09 | 2000-11-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Bone graft delivery surgical instruments |
US6309395B1 (en) | 1994-11-09 | 2001-10-30 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Bone graft delivery surgical instruments |
US20050004672A1 (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 2005-01-06 | John Pafford | Bone grafts |
US7981156B2 (en) | 1995-10-16 | 2011-07-19 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Bone grafts |
US20030195629A1 (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 2003-10-16 | John Pafford | Bone grafts |
US7276081B1 (en) | 1995-10-16 | 2007-10-02 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Bone grafts |
US6371988B1 (en) | 1996-10-23 | 2002-04-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Bone grafts |
US8486066B2 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2013-07-16 | Bonutti Skeletal Innovations Llc | Spacer |
US20030199881A1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2003-10-23 | Bonutti Peter M. | Method and apparatus for use in operating on a bone |
US9050152B2 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2015-06-09 | Bonutti Skeletal Innovations Llc | Method and apparatus for use in operating on a bone |
US9044322B2 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2015-06-02 | Bonutti Skeletal Innovations Llc | Method and apparatus for use in operating on a bone |
US8795363B2 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2014-08-05 | Bonutti Skeletal Innovations Llc | Wedge apparatus for use in operating on a bone |
US7892261B2 (en) | 1998-08-20 | 2011-02-22 | P Tech, Llc | Spinal implant and methods for changing spatial relationships between vertebrae |
US20040153072A1 (en) * | 1998-08-20 | 2004-08-05 | Bonutti Peter M. | Spinal spacer |
US8956417B2 (en) | 1998-08-20 | 2015-02-17 | Bonutti Skeletal Innovations Llc | Joint spacer |
US9044341B2 (en) | 1998-08-20 | 2015-06-02 | Bonutti Skeletal Innovations Llc | Joint spacer |
US20080058822A1 (en) * | 1998-08-20 | 2008-03-06 | Bonutti Peter M | Joint spacer |
US20040254582A1 (en) * | 1998-08-20 | 2004-12-16 | Bonutti Peter M. | Joint spacer |
US6783529B2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2004-08-31 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Non-metal inserts for bone support assembly |
US6786908B2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2004-09-07 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Bone fracture support implant with non-metal spacers |
US6709436B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2004-03-23 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Non-metal spacers for intramedullary nail |
US6296645B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2001-10-02 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Intramedullary nail with non-metal spacers |
US6379385B1 (en) | 2000-01-06 | 2002-04-30 | Tutogen Medical Gmbh | Implant of bone matter |
US6808527B2 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2004-10-26 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Intramedullary nail with snap-in window insert |
US20040002759A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Ferree Bret A. | Fusion and arthroplasty devices configured to receive bone growth promoting substances |
US20050098237A1 (en) * | 2003-11-10 | 2005-05-12 | Medlin Dana J. | Case hardened orthopedic implant |
US7655009B2 (en) | 2003-12-01 | 2010-02-02 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Humeral nail |
US7410488B2 (en) | 2005-02-18 | 2008-08-12 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Hindfoot nail |
USRE44501E1 (en) | 2005-02-18 | 2013-09-17 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Hindfoot nail |
USRE46008E1 (en) | 2005-02-18 | 2016-05-24 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Hindfoot nail |
USRE46078E1 (en) | 2005-02-18 | 2016-07-26 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Hindfoot nail |
US10610270B2 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2020-04-07 | Glw, Inc. | Hybrid intramedullary rods |
US11826083B2 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2023-11-28 | Glw, Inc. | Hybrid intramedullary rods |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3918100A (en) | Sputtering of bone on prostheses | |
US4944754A (en) | Method of manufacturing synthetic bone coated surgical implants | |
US4908030A (en) | Method of manufacturing synthetic bone coated surgical implants | |
US4746532A (en) | Method for the production of endosseous implants | |
Lacefield | Hydroxylapatite coatings | |
Cabrini et al. | Effect of different surface finishing and of hydroxyapatite coatings on passive and corrosion current of Ti6Al4V alloy in simulated physiological solution | |
US8920869B2 (en) | Osseoinductive metal implants for a living body and producing method thereof | |
US4818559A (en) | Method for producing endosseous implants | |
Redepenning et al. | Characterization of electrolytically prepared brushite and hydroxyapatite coatings on orthopedic alloys | |
Bordjih et al. | Evaluation of the effect of three surface treatments on the biocompatibility of 316L stainless steel using human differentiated cells | |
Garcia-Sanz et al. | Hydroxyapatite coatings: a comparative study between plasma-spray and pulsed laser deposition techniques | |
Ong et al. | Structure, solubility and bond strength of thin calcium phosphate coatings produced by ion beam sputter deposition | |
US5211833A (en) | Method for coating implants and surgical devices made of titanium and titanium alloys | |
Lo et al. | Physical, chemical, and biological characterization of pulsed laser deposited and plasma sputtered hydroxyapatite thin films on titanium alloy | |
Chung et al. | Biocompatibility of a titanium–aluminum nitride film coating on a dental alloy | |
TW363231B (en) | Cathode sputtering targets having a low rate of particle emission, precursors of these targets and processes for obtaining them | |
Dunn et al. | Adherence of ceramic coatings on chromium-cobalt structures | |
Silva et al. | Surface modification of Ti implants by plasma oxidation in hollow cathode discharge | |
Kim et al. | Highly adhesive hydroxyapatite coatings on alumina substrates prepared by ion-beam assisted deposition | |
Placko et al. | Effects of microstructure on the corrosion behavior of CoCr porous coatings on orthopedic implants | |
Ogiso et al. | Microstructural changes in bone of HA‐coated implants | |
Radder et al. | Bone-bonding behaviour of poly (ethylene oxide)-polybutylene terephthalate copolymer coatings and bulk implants: a comparative study | |
Pizzoferrato et al. | Morphometric and microanalytical analyses of alumina wear particles in hip prostheses | |
Khor et al. | Plasma spraying of combustion flame spheroidized hydroxyapatite (HA) powders | |
CN111455317A (en) | Degradable magnesium alloy coated bone nail and preparation method thereof |