US3910760A

US3910760A - Azeotropic solvents for permanent press treatments of cotton and cotton blend fabrics

Info

Publication number: US3910760A
Application number: US360281A
Authority: US
Inventors: Ralph J Berni; Ruth R Benerito; Elwood J Gonzales; Linda L Muller
Original assignee: US Department of Agriculture USDA
Current assignee: US Department of Agriculture USDA
Priority date: 1973-05-14
Filing date: 1973-05-14
Publication date: 1975-10-07
Anticipated expiration: 1992-10-07

Abstract

This invention comprises the treatment of cellulosic textiles in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst with N-methylolated ureas dissolved in azeotropes of water and any of a selected group of solvents including isopropyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, t-butyl alcohol, n-propyl alcohol, or dioxane. The cellulosic products thus modified have high dry and wet wrinkle recovery and the solvent used can be reclaimed with a minimum expenditure of energy as compared to all-aqueous treatments.

Description

United States Patent 11 1 Berni et al.

1 1 Oct. 7, 1975 [54] AZEOTROPIC SOLVENTS FOR PERMANENT PRESS TREATMENTS OF COTTON AND COTTON BLEND FABRICS [75] Inventors: Ralph J. Berni, Metairie; Ruth R.

Benerito, New Orleans; Elwood J. Gonzales, Gretna; Linda L. Muller, Metairie, all of La.

[73] Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, DC

[22] Filed: May 14, 1973 [21] Appl. No: 360,281

OTHER PUBLICATIONS Textile Research Journal, Feb. 1965, pp, 192-193. Textile Research Journal, Apr, 1961, pp. 349365.

American Dyestuff Reporter, Aug. 6, 1962. pp. 28-32,

3,772,292 Martin 8/185 Primary ExaminerBenjamin R, Padgett Assistant Examiner-Donald P. Walsh Attorney, Agent, or FirmM. Howard Silverstein; Max D. Hensley [57] ABSTRACT This invention comprises the treatment of cellulosic textiles in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst with N-methylolated ureas dissolved in azeotropes of water and any of a selected group of solvents including iso propyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, t-butyl alcohol, npropyl alcohol, or dioxane. The cellulosic products thus modified have high dry and wet wrinkle recovery and the solvent used can be reclaimed with a minimum expenditure of energy as compared to allaqueous treatments.

24 Claims, N0 Drawings AZEOTROPIC SOLVENTS FOR PERMANENT PRESS TREATMENTS OF COTTON AND COTTON BLEND FABRICS A non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license in the invention herein described, throughout the world for all purposes of the United States Government. with the power to grant sublicenses for such purposes, is hereby granted to the Government of the United States of America.

This invention relates to the treatment of textiles with methylolated cyclic urea crosslinking agents dissolved in azeotropic solvents with added catalysts to impart permanent press properties to cellulosic materials. This type of system should find use in decreasing water pollution since the azeotrope may be reclaimed at relatively low expenditure of power due to the decreased boiling points of these mixed solvents. From the standpoint of economics, cyclic processes involving reclamation of solvent would circumvent the need for discharge of waste water into streams resulting in a cheaper process.

DEFINITION For the purpose of this patent, an azeotropic mixture is defined as a solution of two or more liquids, the composition of which does not change upon distillation. Further, such a solution distills without a change in temperature or composition. Azeotropes of water and one or more other solvents are well known and have been used in prior art processes throughout various chemical processes in which solvent recycling is desirable.

The main object of the instant invention is to provide a process wherein enhanced dry and wet wrinkle recoveries may be imparted to cellulosic textiles via low boiling azeotropic solvents using a number of N-methylol cyclic urcas in the presence of external catalysis.

A second object of the instant invention is to apply the process to cellulosic textiles from predominantly nonaqueous solvents without drying the fabric before curing.

A further object of the present invention is the contribution of a solution to ecological problems of the textile industry. Bearing in mind that the azeotropes of this invention boil at temperatures lower than the boiling point of water alone, recycling of the azeotropic mixtures can be accomplished at lower expenditures of time and energy with the supplemental incentive and improvement in ecological service since disposal of waste water would be minimized or eliminated.

THE PRIOR ART To those skilled in the art it is well known that aqueous solutions of N-methylolated cyclic ureas such as dimethylolethylene urea (DMEU) or dimethyloldihydroxyethylene urea (DMDHEU) can be reacted with cellulosic textiles in the presence of added Lewis acid type catalysts, such as mineral acids or acid salts, to impart desirable permanent press properties to the finished fabric or garment. Ziifle et al. (Textile Res. J. 31, No. 4, pp. 349-365, 1964) have applied DMEU to cotton cellulose in the presence of several metal salt catalysts to obtain enhanced dry and wet wrinkle recovery. Further, Gonzales et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 3,645,667) have shown the utility of certain mixed solvents to dissolve DMEU to impart these same desirable permanent press properties.

in accordance with the main object of the instant invention, it is required that specific azeotropic solvents be used which both solubilize a number of resins with added catalysts and allow the reaction to proceed at relatively low cure temperatures with reclamation of solvent feasible at much lower temperatures because of the azeotropic nature of the solvents employed. Prior art processes required a drying step to produce desirable properties. Ziifle et al. employed a 60C drying period of 7 min. prior to curing at an elevated temperature in order to achieve the desirable permanent press properties In accordance with the second object of the instant invention described above, we do not require a drying step; in fact, the treatments are superior without a drying step previous to the curing step because of the high volatility of the azeotropic mixtures.

The impregnation of a cellulosic textile is generally carried out in this manner. The material is immersed in an azeotropic solvent such as isopropanol-water (87% to 12.3% by weight), tertiary butyl alcohol-water (88.3 to l 1.7%), n-propanal alcohol-water (71.7 to 28.3%), dioxane-water (8 1.6 to 18.4%), or methyl ethyl ketonewater (89% to 11%). The treating bath is also about 0.55 molar concentration in DMDHEU or DMEU with added 0.03 M Zn(NO as catalyst. Any of a number of N-methylolated compounds may be used in the process and they include urea formaldehyde, dimethylol urea, dihydroxyethylene urea, propylene urea, trimethylolmelamine and the like. Concentration of the N- methylol compounds can range from 2% on up to 50% limited only by their solubility in the azeotropes aforementioned. Catalysts that can be used are any of a number of Lewis acids and include ZnCl ,Zn(NO MgCl MG(NO citric acid, hydrochloric acid. Zn(BF,,) acetic acid, acetic acid-citric acid mixtures and the like, amine hydrochlorides, and aluminum chlorohydroxide. Concentration of the catalyst can range from 0.01 molar up to 0.5 molar. Once the textile has been impregnated from the treating bath to a wet pickup of about to it is then submitted to a cure of from about 100 to C for from 0.5 to 3 minutes. For the process of this invention, it is desirable to add a catalyst for the purpose of obtaining improved wrinkle recovery properties of a fabric.

The cellulosic textiles to which our invention can be applied include cotton, cotton-polyester blends, rayon, ramie, jute, flax, and the like and in the case of cotton we have specifically applied our invention to the textile in the form of woven fabrics with satisfactory results. Those skilled in the art can readily visualize the extention of this application to other forms of textiles in the realm of cellulosic materials.

The treated cotton fabrics were submitted to selected standard tests as well as the other tests indicated here. Breaking strength determinations were done by the ASTM Method D39-49; dry wrinkle recovery determinations were done by the ASTM Method D1295-6OT; flex abrasion (bar 575) values were obtained by the ASTM Method D1 l75-64T; and wet wrinkle recovery determinations were done by the Lawrence and Phillips method described in American Dyestuff Reporter, vol. 45, P. 548-550, 5 6 l 1956). Nitrogen values were obtained by the Kjeldahl Method and formaldehyde values were obtained by the chromotropic acid method.

The following examples are presented to illustrate the invention, and since procedure and conditions can be varied by those skilled in the art. the examples are not set forth to establish any particular limits.

EXAMPLE 1 Desized, scoured and bleached (80x80) cotton printcloth was twice padded with a 0.55 M solution of dimethyloldihydroxyethylencurea (DMDHEU) in 87.7% isopropanol 12.3% H O azeotrope with 0.03M Zn(NO added to about 90% wet pickup and cured for 3 minutes at 160C. The fabric was then rinsed free of excess reagents in hot tap (pH water for minutes, rinsed in distilled water, ironed dry and allowed to air equilibrate before testing. The fabric had a 7.0% weight add-on, a 1.61% nitrogen and a 3.38% formaldehyde content with dry and wet wrinkle recovery of 293 and 278 (W+F). The breaking strength was 30.4 lbs and the elongation at break was 4.4%. The abrasion resistance was 52 cycles. Control fabric properties were 200 and 156 (W+F) for the dry and wet wrinkle recovery, 55 lbs breaking strength and 7.1% elongation at break with 764 cycles for flex abrasion.

EXAMPLE 2 The following examples are provided to show that the cure temperature may be lowered to give excellent wrinkle recovery properties where fabrics are treated as in Example 1 with the resultant fabric properties listed in the following table.

Cure Temp. Add-on Nitrogen Formaldehyde Wrinkle (C' "l: l2 /1 Recovery- (3 min. (W+F) cure] Dry Wet EXAMPLE 3 The following examples are illustrated to show that other azeotropes can be substituted for that in Example l with the following conditions as listed in The following examples are illustrated to show that 0.55 M dimethylolethyleneurea (DMEU) can be used instead of DMDHEU with Zn( N09 catalyst as shown in the following table.

Cure Formal- Wrinkle Azeo- Temp (C l Nitro- Llehyde Add-on Recovery trope (3 minv gen A l: l (W+ cure) Dry Wet "l is 38.3% t-hutanol 11.7% Hp 2 is 1W6; methylethylketone 1 1'4 H 0 3 is 71.7% n-propylalcnl'ml 28.3% H D 4 is 81.6% dioxane 18.4); 14,0

We claim:

1. A process for improving the treatment of cellulosic textiles with N-methylolated ureas in the presence of Lewis acid catalyst wherein the improvement consists of dissolving said methylolated ureas in azeotropes of water and a member of the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, methylethyl ketone, t-butyl alcohol, npropyl alcohol, and dioxane, to produce nitrogencontaining chemically modified cellulosic textiles and a recyclable reagent bath.

2. An improved method of producing nitrogencontaining chemically modified cellulosic textiles in the reaction of the cellulosic textile with an N- methylolated compound, the improvement consisting of the employment of azeotropic recyclable mixtures, the method comprising:

a. impregnating a cellulosic textiel to a wet-pickup of about from 80 to 100% with a solution containing about from 2 to 50% of an N-methylolated com-- pound selected from the group consisting of dimethylolethyleneurea, dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea. urea formaldehyde, dimethylol urea, dihydroxyethylene urea, propylene urea, and trimethylolmelamine, and about from 0.01 to 0.5 mole of a Lewis acid catalyst selected from the group consisting of zinc nitrate, zinc chloride, magnesium chloride magnesium nitrate, citric acid, bydrochloric acid. zinc flouroborate, acetic acid, acetic acid/citric acid misture, and aluminum chlorhydroxide dissolved in an aqueous azeotropic mixture consisting of:

87.7 12.3% isopropanol-water,

88.3 11.7% tertiary butyl alcohol-water, 71.7 28.3% n-propyl alcohol-water, 81.6 18.4% dioxane-water, and

89 l 1% methylethyl ketone-water;

b. curing rhe wet impregnated cellulosie textile for about from 0.5 to 3 minutes at about from 100 to C, and

c; washing and drying the cured textile.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the N- methylolated compound is dimethylol ethyleneurea.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the N- methylolated compound is dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the N- methylolated compound is urea formaldehyde.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein the N- methylolated compound is dimethylol urea.

7. The method of claim 2 wherein the N- methylolated compound is dihydroxyethylene urea.

8. The method of claim 2 wherein methylolated compound is propylene urea.

9. The method of claim 2 wherein the N- methylolated compound is trimethylolmelamine.

10. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is zinc nitrate.

ll. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is zinc chloride.

12. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is magnesium chloride.

13. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is magnesium nitrate.

14. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is citric acid.

15. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is hydrochloric acid.

16. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is zinc fluoborate.

the N- 17. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is acetic acid.

18. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is a mixture of acetic acid and citric acid.

19. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is aluminum chlorhydroxide.

20. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 88% isopropanol and 12% water.

2|. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 88.3% tertiary butyl alcohol and l 1.7% water.

22. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 7l.7% n-propyl alcohol and 28.3% water.

23. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 8|.671 dioxane and 18.4% water.

24. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 89% methyl ethyl ketone and l I% water.

Claims

1. A PROCESS FOR IMPROVING THE TREATMENT OF CELLULOSIC TEXTILES WITH N-METHYLOLATED UREAS IN THE PRESENCE OF LEWIS ACID CATALYST WHEREIN THE IMPROVEMENT CONSISTS OF DISSOLVING SAID METHYLATED UREAS IN AZEOTROPES OF WATER AND A MEMBER OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL, METHYLETHYL KETONE, T-BUTY ALCOHOL, N-PROPYL ALCOHOL, AND DIOXANE, TO PRODUCE NITROGEN CONTAINING CHEMICALLY MODIFIED CELLULOSIC TESTILES AND A RECYCLABLE REAGENT BATH.

2. An improved method of producing nitrogen-containing chemically modified cellulosic textiles in the reaction of the cellulosic textile with an N-methylolated compound, the improvement consisting of the employment of azeotropic recyclable mixtures, the method comprising: a. impregnating a cellulosic textiel to a wet-pickup of about from 80 to 100% with a solution containing about from 2 to 50% of an N-methylolated compound selected from the group consisting of dimethylolethyleneurea, dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea, urea formaldehyde, dimethylol urea, dihydroxyethylene urea, propylene urea, and trimethylolmelamine, and about from 0.01 to 0.5 mole of a Lewis acid catalyst selected from the group consisting of zinc nitrate, zinc chloride, magnesium chloride, magnesium nitrate, citric acid, hydrochloric acid, zinc flouroborate, acetic acid, acetic acid/citric acid misture, and aluminum chlorhydroxide dissolved in an aqueous azeotropic mixture consisting of: 87.7 - 12.3% isopropanol-water, 88.3 - 11.7% tertiary butyl alcohol-water, 71.7 - 28.3% n-propyl alcohol-water, 81.6 - 18.4% dioxane-water, and 89 - 11% methylethyl ketone-water; b. curing rhe wet impregnated cellulosic textile for about from 0.5 to 3 minutes at about from 100* to 160*C, and c. washing and drying the cured textile.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is dimethylol ethyleneurea.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is urea formaldehyde.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is dimethylol urea.

7. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is dihydroxyethylene urea.

8. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is propylene urea.

9. The method of claim 2 wherein the N-methylolated compound is trimethylolmelamine.

10. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is zinc nitrate.

11. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is zinc chloride.

12. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is magnesium chloride.

13. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is magnesium nitrate.

14. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is citric acid.

15. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is hydrochloric acid.

16. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is zinc fluoborate.

17. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is acetic acid.

19. The method of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is aluminum chlorhydroxide.

21. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 88.3% tertiary butyl alcohol and 11.7% water.

22. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 71.7% n-propyl alcohol and 28.3% waTer.

23. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 81.6% dioxane and 18.4% water.

24. The method of claim 2 wherein the azeotropic mixture is 89% methyl ethyl ketone and 11% water.