US3887324A

US3887324A - Method for non-polluting combustion of waste gases

Info

Publication number: US3887324A
Application number: US406210A
Authority: US
Inventors: Robert D Reed; John Smith Zink; Robert F Schwartz; Horst Glomm; John C Corble; Harold F Koons
Original assignee: John Zink Co
Current assignee: KGI Inc
Priority date: 1972-01-10
Filing date: 1973-10-15
Publication date: 1975-06-03
Anticipated expiration: 1992-06-03

Abstract

A non-polluting waste-gas disposal system for processing plants or other operation subject to variable quantities of waste gas for disposal. The system includes a low-level burner normally adapted to handle the usual volumes of plant waste gas, required to be disposed, without visible flame, smoke or noise pollution. An elevated flare can be used in combination to consume gases in excess of the normal capacity of the low-level flare.

Description

United States Patent Reed et al. June 3, 1975 METHOD FOR NON-POLLUTING [56] References Cited Inventors: Robert Reed; J Smith Zink; 2,336,538 12/1943 Geisel et al 431/29 Robert Schwartz, all f Tulsa. 2,362,045 11/1944 B1155 431/29 x Okla; Horst Glomm, Frankfort, 2 390,806 12/1945 Nagel 4. 43l/9O X Germany; John C, Corblc, SL 3,043,366 7/1962 Wentwonh 431/121 X Albans, England; Harold F. Koons, Tulsa, Okla. Primary ExaminerCharles J. Myhre [73] Assigneez John link Company, Tulsa, Okla Assistant Exammer--W1ll1am C. Anderson [22] Filed. Oct. 15, 1973 ABSTRACT [21] Appl. No.: 406,210

A non-polluting waste-gas dlsposal system for process- Related Application Dam ing plants or other operation subject to variable quan- [62] Division of Ser, No. 216,659, Jan. 10, 1972, Pat. No. tities of waste gas for disposal. The system includes a 3,779,689. low-level burner normally adapted to handle the usual volumes of plant waste gas, required to be disposed, [52] US. Cl- 43 without visible flame, smoke or noise pollution. An el- 43l/29; 4 ll2l; 431/3; 431/4 evated flare can be used in combination to consume [5 l] Int. Cl. F23d 13/20 gases in excess of the normal capacity of the low-level [58] Field of Search 431/3, 4, 5, 29, 30, 32, flare.

431/60, 89, 90, l2l, 202, 28l, l90; 137/118 6 Claims, 9 Drawing Figures LL- I STE N-H STEAM-7 PATENTEDJUHB 191s 2 AIR 23 7\LAIR 24 STEAM SHEET PATENTEBJUH 3 I915 WASTE GAS STEAM-ll lllllll- FIG. 7

METHOD FOR NON-POLLUTING COMBUSTION OF WASTE GASES This is a division of application Ser. No. 216,659, filed Jan. 10, 1972, and now US Pat. No. 3,779,689.

BACKGROUND In many crowded areas of the world it is necessary, because of existing plant operation, to dispose of waste gases by burning or oxidizing, since the waste gases normally have no other utilitarian purpose. In order to maintain a plant in its existing community location, it is becoming increasingly necessary to provide such disposal without pollution of the atmosphere and without visible flame and noise and hence provide an acceptable disposal system to the surrounding community.

In addition, many plants, such as refineries, chemical processes and the like, form, at various stages of operation, variable quantities of gases which must be disposed. For example, in many processing operations the start-up or shut-down procedures typically will involve changes in the normal quantity of disposable gas until the efficient operation of the plant is reached. For one reason or another, many processes may be upset or overloaded, hence taxing the normal disposal system beyond its efficient operation. In the fuel burning art stable burning and complete combustion for safe operation can be expected when fuel flow ranges from 2 to 100 percent of design condition. When fuel flow falls below 2 percent of design flow there is great difficulty in securing safe and stable burning in a combustion space which is at high temperature level. At a temperature level of 150 F. or lower, safe, stable and complete burning in any typical burner or combustion system is difficult and virtually impossible. Because of the many operational variables found in many process plants it is vitally necessary that there be safe, stable and complete burning of any small or large waste gas volume in addition to stringent air-pollution regulations and safety. Because of widely varying quantities, the safe and efficient disposal is burdened. Some prior artisans have devised plural burner stages which operate sequentially upon reaching a given pressure but have the disadvantage of each stage starting at zero flow and these systems do not operate efficiently and economically.

SUMMARY It is the purpose and object of this invention to overcome the heretofore mentioned problems and provide a flare or disposal system for waste gas utilizing a lowlevel ground burning system which is substantially smokeless, noiseless, and non-polluting to the atmosphere. Such a low-level burner is designed to accept those quantities of gas for disposal under normal or non-normal operating conditions of the plant, and in some instances, may be used alone or in combination with an elevated flare apparatus for consumption of excess quantities of gas beyond the rated capacities of the low-level burner.

The invention further provides and is directed to a flare stack which comprises one or a plurality of substantially low-level burner areas to receive and provide efficient combustion of variable quantities of waste gas, and an upper stack for the venting of the products of combustion. The inner diameter of the upper stack being substantially unrestrictive to the flow ofthe products of combustion, or in any event of design to create a maximum flow velocity immediately at the point of discharge.

To abate the noise of combustion flame, the invention further provides a screen either opposite each burner area, or completely encircling the lower level burner areas as a plenum chamber to abate the noise of combustion, visual display of the flame, and to present air pressure differentials caused by wind forces.

The invention further provides a waste gas flow staging method whereby a predetermined minimum pressure can be experienced by burner stages, subsequent to the first, without starting at zero flow. As additional flow of waste gas is experienced a condition sensing means allows flow to a subsequent stage to be combined with the previous stage or stages at a predetermined pressure and flow above zero.

The above purposes, objects and other objects of the invention may be more readily obtained and understood by reference to the following drawings and descriptive matter.

DRAWINGS DESCRIPTION OF THE VIEWS FIG. 1 is an elevational view, partly in section, depicting a typical low-level burner of this invention.

FIG. 2 is a front view of a typical burner nozzle taken along the line 22 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 2A is a partial sectional view of the burner nozzle taken along the line 2A-2A of FIG. 2.

FIG. 3 is a partial sectional view of an additional embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a partial elevation of another embodiment.

FIG. 4A is a partial top sectional view of a burner opening utilizing the screen embodiment of FIG. 4.

FIGS. 5 and 6 are schematic descriptions generally depicting the gas disposal system of this invention.

FIG. 7 represents a schematic diagram of the flow staging for disposal of variable quantities of waste gases.

DESCRIPTION Before explaining the present invention in details, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and arrangement of parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings, since the invention is capable of other embodiments and ofbeing practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not limitation.

GROUND LEVEL FLARE STACK The embodiment shown in FIG. 1 includes a burner or flare stack I0 preferably of cylindrical shape fully opening at its upper end 12. The stack I0 may be fabricated to any desired height such that the effluent exhaust gases are at an acceptable elevation above the surrounding terrain or community. Typically such a stack is about 18 feet in diameter and may range from 40 to I00 feet or more in height, which in the burner art is of a relatively low-level. Although the stack may be fabricated in a variety of ways typically, as shown, construction comprises an outer metallic shell I4 which is lined with a suitable refractory material 16. Although the flare stack 10 is described as being circular it is to be understood that this is not to be limiting as other cross-sectional configuration, e.g., round, square,

rectangular or other geometrical configurations are to be inclusive of the invention. in any event in the preferred form of the apparatus the inner configuration of the stack is preferably the same throughout the vertical length than in any event not less than the internal crosssectional area at the location of the burners 20. The purposes for the maintaining of a substantially constant cross-sectional area throughout the length of the stack is based on the so-called natural-draft or chimneyeffect. That is, a structure as described generates a draft as the buoyant gases rise. Such an effect is useful in producing sufficient in-flow draft of combustion supporting air through openings 18 for burning the gases. Such a draft effect is a function of both the height of the stack and the temperature of the gases. Since the internal temperature level is usually fixed, the stack height becomes critical in the establishment of suffi cient draft of incoming air to support smokeless com bustion of the waste gas stream. Any reduction in crosssectional area in the vertical travel of the gases will produce an acceleration at the restriction but subtract from the draft-induced air because of the created pressure drop across the restriction. This may seriously reduce the air volume and the efficiency of the combustion process. However, additional factors enter into the design of the stack based largely upon present ecological requirements of government or other regulatory agencies. In addition, there are regulatory height restrictions and cost restrictions which must be considered. For example, it has been found that certain exit velocities from a stack must be maintained in order to have proper diffusion of pollutant products into the surrounding atmosphere to maintain a required partsper-million (ppm) condition.

A further factor is the makeup of the combustible waste gases and its burning temperature. For combustible gases there is chemically-fixed theoretical air demand according to the nature of the gases. Flame temperature, which may exist within the stack, is governed by the quantity of air in excess of the theoretical present as the burning progresses. For example, ethylene (Cd-L utilizing theoretical air demand of l4.4 cubic feetfCuft. of ethylene results in a temperature excess of 3,600 F. which far exceeds typical refractory endurance. A much more satisfactory temperature level is 2,000 F. which can be obtained by the admission of more than theoretical air for the burning. Two hundred fifty percent excess air or 50.5 Cu.ft/cubic ft. of ethylene will result in temperature within which standard re fractories can be utilized. The exit velocity of atypical stack based on 2,000 F. is in the order of 75 feet per second. in many instances this velocity is sufficient to diffuse pollutant products, such as into the atmosphere within required parts/million. However, if the velocity of discharge required for proper diffusion is greater than 75 feet per second and where the volume of waste or disposal gases is fixed the required velocity increase must occur by other means where structures of minimal height are necessitated by regulation, cost. or other factors. Reducing the discharge cross sectional area as in FIG. 3 is one such means. For example, if the velocity of a given quantity of combustion gas flow at the required temperature is 75 ft./second and 100 ft./second is required for proper diffusion of pollutants, there must be a 25 ft./second acceleration. The height of a vertical furnace with substantially con stant cross sectional area vertically for burning 30,000

lbs/hour C H is 62.68 feet which provides a flow velocity of ft./second. The height necessary to achieve a discharge velocity of lOO ft./second considering total pressure drop due to acceleration (0.53 inch Water Column) plus the pressure drop (0.35 inch WC) across the burners (0.88 inch WC total) divided by a net draft effect per foot of stack height (0.00905 inch WC) calls for a stack 97.24 feet high. If a flow restriction is placed within the stack, the pressure drop to be added is approximately:

( v 0.3 X /75) 0.3 0.233 inch of water (WC) At 2,000" F. the draft effect per foot of stack height is 0.0l 15 inch WC. Since the draft increase required is 0.233 inch WC the additional stack height necessary to provide for the added draft is:

0.233/00905 25.4l feet The total height required being:

62.68 feet 25.41 feet 88.09 feet This data, however, is based on flow efficiency at the restricted area of 100 percent which in most instances is not the case. For example, a thin edged orifice such as used in metering is approximately 6l percent efficient. When the ratio of the orifice length to diameter is 1.00 a coefficient becomes 0.85, but the point at which the preferred velocity occurs is down inside the orifice and is not effective as such in promoting diffusion. Accordingly, this invention teaches that maximum velocity discharge must occur immediately as the gases flow to the atmosphere for effective pollution control. This invention teaches a stack orifice contour which will provide exit flow coefficients ranging close to 1.00 which will provide a relatively low-stack height, proper diffusion of pollutants into the atmosphere and maximum velocity of diffusion yet providing cost savings. A typical example of such a stack discharge orifice cross-section is shown in FIG. 3. Preferably the restriction is positioned within the upper l0l5 percent of the stack height and comprises a converging wall 17 terminating with an arcuate contoured portion 19, being defined from a radius (R) centered anywhere along the terminal stack end 21.

BURNERS Reference is made to FIGS. 1, 2 and 2A. Suitably arranged at one or a plurality of peripheral locations are burner areas defined by vertical openings 18 which are adapted to receive a plurality of vertically arranged burners 20, as shown. In one preferred embodiment the burner tip is angularly oriented slightly upwardly and inwardly, e.g., 20 radially into the interior of the stack 10. It is to be'understood that other burner arrangements which will provide efficient mixing of the waste gas and air are inclusive of the invention. Although vertically arranged burner areas 18 are shown, the invention is adaptable to a horizontally arranged opening or plurality of horizontally oriented openings in the lower portion of the stack. Combustible waste gas is supplied from supply connection 23 to each burner nozzle 20 via a manifold 22 being divided to each burner nozzle via conduits 24. The manifold 22 may be appropriately supported by

cross brace numbers

26 and 28 to the stack side wall. Each of the burner nozzle designs as shown in this preferred embodiment include a diversion plate 30, surrounding the burner nozzle conduit 24 and which is provided with a plurality of circular or other shaped openings 32. The nozzle tip shown includes a central discharge orifice 25 and a plurality of angularly oriented openings 27. The latter openings are directed toward the upstream face of plate 30 to cause intimate mixing of the waste gas with the combusting supporting air draft flowing to and through plate 30 and perforations 32. It has been found that a burner nozzle design as shown is adaptable to provide acceptable time, temperature and turbulence to burn a wide variety of waste gas components of varying molecular weight without adjustments, without the formation of coke. carbon or other polymerized chemical deposits and with substantially complete combustion to eliminate atmospheric pollutants.

VISUAL, NOISE AND WIND SCREEN Circumferentially surrounding the bottom of stack is a screen generally designated by the numeral 36. In this embodiment the screen includes a plurality of slightly overlapping

panel members

38 and 40 which are alternately spaced vertically and horizontally of each other providing a gap for flow of combustion supporting air to the burners. In some instances a roof 42 is provided to prevent weather elements, snow, rain, etc., from interfering with the efficient operation of the burner and to define an air plenum surrounding the burner areas. The screen functions to (1) eliminate the sight of a visible flame; (2) reduce combustion noise; and (3) substantially eliminate air pressure differentials in the air plenum about the burner areas from the effect of wind.

Although in the above described embodiment a complete circumferential wind and noise screen or fence is shown it is to be understood that such a screen or fence may be segmented about each burner assembly. shown generally as 36A in the views of FIGS. 4 and 4A. That is, vertical wind and

noise screen louvers

50 and 52 extend upward from the ground opposite each burner area and are supported to the stack outer shell I4 by brace members 54. In some instances it is desirable to inject steam from a supply manifold 60 into conduit 62 for injection into each of the burner gas supply conduits 24 providing further assistance toward smokeless combustion of the gases to be disposed.

MODIFICATIONS Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6 the low-level flare or burner 10 is shown as used in combination with a high level flare 70. Such an elevated flare stack is well known in the art including at its upper end a combustion tip 72, as for example, shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,539,285 and which generally includes devices to ensure ignition in areas where wind velocity may tend to extinguish the flame. It should be understood that the use of an elevated flare is but a safety addendum to the low-level stack of this invention, being useful as an emergency or secondary disposal means in the event the low-level stack is sought to operate beyond the rated design capacities. As shown in FIG. 5, waste gases to be disposed enter through conduit 80 which is in communication with

conduits

90 and 82. Conduit 90 terminates below hydrostatic liquid level 92 while conduit 82 terminates below liquid level 86 which is of lesser level than 92. Hence waste gas initial flow occurs through 80-82 as long as the flow pressure is greater than liquid level 86 pressure but less than liquid level 92 pressure.

When the pressure in 80 rises to a point capable of displacing the liquid level 92 pressure flow of gases is initiated in 84-90 to be discharged to atmosphere through to 72-73 but this initiation of flow performs a useful service because of the Flow-Sensor 84 which at the initiation of flow creates a signal to the steam valve 94 to cause opening of the steam valve in a substantially linear relationship to the volume of flow of gases from through 90. The flow sensor 84 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,570.5 35 and creates a variable instrument signal, the magnitude of which is proportional to flow quantity. for transmission to 94.

Steam admitted by the valve 94 travels to the vicinity of 73 where the steam serves to suppress smoking as is well known in the arts.

Under normal operating conditions of flow the lowlevel stack 10 is maintained in constant operation to its design capacities with the auxiliary high level flare operating in the event of an upset in the plant operation involving larger quantities of gas which must be disposed or in which other intermediaries or products will be required to be removed to prevent explosions or other hazards.

FIG. 6 is another alternate embodiment of the integrated flare system with like parts having like numerals from FIG. 5. The primary difference is the elimination of the second liquid seal with waste gases passing directly through a flame or explosion arresting device 87 of a type well known to those skilled in the art, thence via conduit 21 to the particular burner area or areas. Excess gas flow through conduit 83 sufficient to overcome hydrostatic level 85 is then burned in the stack 70.

WASTE GAS STAGING FIG. 7 is incorporated as a part of this invention disclosure as a schematic diagram to depict the staging sequence for the burning of variable quantities of waste gas. The stack 10 depicts the circumferentially spaced burner areas designated by the numerals 1-6 and are staged in the operation as required for the particular quantity of waste gas to be disposed. Before successive burners are staged in the operation, however, there must be a pre-purging of the burners with a gas of some nature typically steam via

conduits

60 and 62 to each burner area. The sequence in operation for the introduction ofa gas stream and the steam are accomplished by pressure switches which are capable of emitting signals of controllable magnitude which in turn operate the sequencing valves as hereafter described. The pressure switches are shown in FIG. 7 as numbered squares (IL1H, 2L2H, 3L-3I-I, etc.). The L" after each number indicates a switch which emits its signal on a given smaller pressure rise of the waste gas while H indicates switches which emit signal on a rise greater in pressure than the L-switch. The same is true for the operation of the steam control valves sequentially identified as steam-7," 9, ll, 13 and 15 which are used in conjunction with those valves identified as gas-8, l0, l2, l4 and 16 respectively. In the embodiment shown the odd numbered steam valves are set to respond to the smallest emitted signal while the even numbered gas valves respond only to the greatest emitted signal. Staging of the gas is accomplished in the following manner. Burner I is constantly in operation. It receives gas via conduit 21 which may be isolated by appropriate valves shown if required for any reason. Pressure switches 1L and 1H are in communication with conduit 21 sensing the gas pressure therein. Controllable amounts of steam via

lines

60 and 62 maintain a constant injection or purge of burner 1 in the event there is no waste gas stream entering the conduit 21. When a small volume of gas is delivered to burner l the pressure in the conduit 21 is not capable of energizing pressure switch 1L. As the volume of gas increases the conduit pressure rises to a point where switch 1L is energized, emitting a small signal adequate for opening steam-7 valve for admission of purge via conduit 60 and 62-7 into burners located in area 2. This pressure, however, is not adequate for the opening of gas-8 valve until a further rise in conduit 21 pressure causes switch 1H to emit a greater signal thus opening gas-8 valve and burner 2 is now placed into service, there being, of course, ignition means of those types well known in the art to ignite and maintain ignition of the flame. Further increases in pressure then bring into operation pressure switches 2L and 2H to sequentially operate purge steam-9 valve and gas-l valve to cause burner 3 to be placed into operation with the operation continuing to the other burners as the increase in waste gas flow and pressure increases. Of course as the waste gas flow decreases the sequencing procedure is reversed.

While the purpose of the purge is to prevent burner malfunction or impairment, any gas may be used for this purpose. Steam is preferred because of the favorable condition of smoke suppression, after purging, as it enters a part of the reaction during the burning process.

What is claimed is: 1. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising the steps of:

flowing a purge gas through a conduit to a first gas-air mixing and burner stage immediately prior to the flowing of said waste gas through said conduit;

flowing said waste gas through said conduit to said first burner stage;

igniting said waste gas-air mixture; and the additional steps of:

sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas;

flowing a purge gas through a second gas-air mixing and burner stage responsive to an increase of said pressure or flow;

flowing said waste gas to said first and said second burner stages responsive to further increase in flow and pressure; and

igniting said waste gas-air mixture. 2. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising the steps of:

feeding a purge gas and said waste gas to a first gasair mixing and burner stage; and igniting said waste gas issuing therefrom; sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas; flowing a purge gas through a second gas-air mixing and burner stage responsive to a first condition of said pressure or flow; flowing said waste gas to said second burner stage responsive to a second condition of pressure or flow higher than said first condition; and igniting said waste gas-air mixture. 3. A method of claim 2 including the additional steps of:

flowing a purge gas through a third gas-air mixing and burner stage responsive to a third condition of said pressure or flow higher than said second condition; flowing said waste gas to said first, second and third burner stages responsive to a fourth condition of said pressure or flow higher than said third; and igniting said waste gas-air mixture. 4. A method of claim 2 including the additional steps of:

flowing a purge gas through a plurality of additional gas-air mixing and burner stages responsive to a third condition of said pressure or flow higher than said second condition; flowing said waste gas to said first, second and additional burner stages responsive to a fourth condition of said pressure or flow higher than said third; and igniting said waste gas. 5. A method of claim 3 including the additional step of:

sequencing said steam and waste gas to additional burner stages as a function of increases in said waste gas pressure or flow. 6. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising the steps of:

sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas; flowing said gas to a first ignitable burner stage responsive to a first condition of said pressure or flow; and flowing said gas to said first and a second ignitable burner stage responsive to a second condition of said pressure or flow higher than said first condition.

:- uw a

Claims

1. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising the steps of: flowing a purge gas through a conduit to a first gas-air mixing and burner stage immediately prior to the flowing of said waste gas through said conduit; flowing said waste gas through said conduit to said first burner stage; igniting said waste gas-air mixture; and the additional steps of: sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas; flowing a purge gas through a second gas-air mixIng and burner stage responsive to an increase of said pressure or flow; flowing said waste gas to said first and said second burner stages responsive to further increase in flow and pressure; and igniting said waste gas-air mixture.

2. A method of burning variable quantities of waste gas comprising the steps of: feeding a purge gas and said waste gas to a first gas-air mixing and burner stage; and igniting said waste gas issuing therefrom; sensing a pressure or flow condition of said waste gas; flowing a purge gas through a second gas-air mixing and burner stage responsive to a first condition of said pressure or flow; flowing said waste gas to said second burner stage responsive to a second condition of pressure or flow higher than said first condition; and igniting said waste gas-air mixture.

3. A method of claim 2 including the additional steps of: flowing a purge gas through a third gas-air mixing and burner stage responsive to a third condition of said pressure or flow higher than said second condition; flowing said waste gas to said first, second and third burner stages responsive to a fourth condition of said pressure or flow higher than said third; and igniting said waste gas-air mixture.

4. A method of claim 2 including the additional steps of: flowing a purge gas through a plurality of additional gas-air mixing and burner stages responsive to a third condition of said pressure or flow higher than said second condition; flowing said waste gas to said first, second and additional burner stages responsive to a fourth condition of said pressure or flow higher than said third; and igniting said waste gas.

5. A method of claim 3 including the additional step of: sequencing said steam and waste gas to additional burner stages as a function of increases in said waste gas pressure or flow.