US3850768A - Method of controlling the supply of al{11 o{11 {0 during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum - Google Patents

Method of controlling the supply of al{11 o{11 {0 during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3850768A
US3850768A US00378233A US37823373A US3850768A US 3850768 A US3850768 A US 3850768A US 00378233 A US00378233 A US 00378233A US 37823373 A US37823373 A US 37823373A US 3850768 A US3850768 A US 3850768A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
cell
reduction
current intensity
current
percent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00378233A
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Hatting W Schmidt
K Chaudhuri
P Bachofner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alcan Holdings Switzerland AG
Original Assignee
Alusuisse Holdings AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alusuisse Holdings AG filed Critical Alusuisse Holdings AG
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3850768A publication Critical patent/US3850768A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C3/00—Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts
    • C25C3/06—Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of melts of aluminium
    • C25C3/20—Automatic control or regulation of cells

Definitions

  • FIG. 1 of the accompanying drawing This shows a vertical section in the longitudinal direction through part of a known electrolysis cell.
  • the steel shell 12 which is lined with a thermal insulation 13 of heat-resisting, heat-insulating material and withcarbon 11, contains the fluoride melt (the electrolyte).
  • the aluminum 14 separated at the cathode lies on the carbon bottom 15 of the cell.
  • the surface 16 of the liquid aluminum constitutes the cathode.
  • In the carbon lining 11' there are inserted iron cathode bars 17 transverse to the longitudinal direction of the cell, and these conduct the electrical direct current from the carbon lining ll of the cell laterally outwards.
  • Anodes 18 of amorphous carbon dip from above into the fluoride melt l0, and supply the direct current to the electrolyte. They are firmly connected via conductor rods 19 and clamps 20with the anode beam 21.
  • the current flows from the cathode bars 17 of one cell to the anode beam 21 of the following cell through conventional current bus bars, not shown. From the anode beam 21 it flows through the conductor rods '19, the anodes 18, the electrolyte 10, the liquid aluminum 14, and the carbon lining 11 to the cathode bars 17.
  • the electrolyte 10 is covered with a crust 22 of solidified melt and there is a layer of aluminum oxide 23 lying above the crust.
  • cavities 25 occur between the electrolyte l0 and the solidified crust 22.
  • the horizontal extent of the lateral ledge 24 affects the plan area of the bath of liquid aluminum l4 and electrolyte 10.
  • the distance d from the lower side 26 of the anode to the surface 16 of the liquid aluminum can be adjusted by lifting or lowering of the anode beam 21 with the help of the lifting mechanism 27, which is mounted on pillars 28. This effects all the anodes.
  • An anode can be adjusted individually by releasing the respective clamp 20, shifting the respective conductor rod 19 upwards or downwards relatively to the anode beam 21, and retightening the clamp.
  • the anodes are consumed continuously on their lower side, by about 1.5 to 2 cms per day according to the type of cell.
  • the height of the liquid aluminum on the bottom of the cell increases continuously-by about 1.5 to 2 cms per day due to the aluminum separated at the cathode.
  • anode When an anode has been consumed, then it is exchanged for a fresh anode.
  • the cell In practice, the cell is operated in such a way that, some days after its start of use, the anodes of the cell no longer have the same degree of consumption, and therefore. they must be exchanged separately over a range of several weeks. For this reason, anodes of different starting dates operate together in the same cell, as appears from the drawing.
  • the principle of an aluminum electrolysis cell with one or more self-baking anodes is the same as that of an aluminum electrolysis cell with pre-baked anodes. Instead of pre-baked anodes, one or more anodes are used which are continually baked from a green electrode paste in a steel jacket during the electrolytic operationby the heat of the cell.
  • the direct current is supplied by lateral steel rods or from above by vertical steel studs. These anodes are renewed as required by pouring green electrode paste into the steel jacket. Adjustments of interpolar distance are made by vertical adjustments of the steel jacket.
  • the aluminum oxide 23 which is above it is brought into the electrolyte 10. This operation is known as servicing of the cell.
  • the electrolyte becomes depleted in aluminum oxide.
  • the concentration of aluminum oxide in the electrolyte falls'to somewhere between 1 and 2 percent, there arises the anode effect, which re I
  • the aluminum 14 produced electrolytically, which collects on the carbon bottom 15 of the cell is generally removed once a day from the cell by conventional tapping devices, for instance sucking devices.
  • One measureable quantity in the operation of the cell is its base voltage. This depends on the age of the cell, the condition of the carbon lining 11, and the composition of the molten electrolyte 10, as well as on the cell current intensity and current density.
  • the base voltage is also affected by the variation of the plan area of the bath in consequence of variation of the horizontal extent of the lateral ledge 24.
  • the base voltage is measured between corresponding points on the anode beams of the cell in question and of the next cell in series.
  • the voltage is the total of the ohmic voltage drops in the parts of the cell through which current flowsplus the EMF required for the electrolytic decomposition of the M in the electrolyte.
  • the base voltage of a cell can be expressed in the following formula:
  • the A1 0 concentration of the fluoride melt can be determined directly or indirectly.
  • the direct method involves taking a sample and its direct chemical analysis. This requires a lot of time and is not applicable during cell operation.
  • the indirect method involves determination of the term E independent of current in the EMF. This can lead to great errors.
  • E independent of current in the EMF.
  • For extrapolation use has hitherto been made of 'the current intensity and voltage at the normal working'point (i.e., at the point on a voltagecurrent graph representing normal working conditions that is to say representing nominal current intensity and nominal voltage), and at a second point with reduced current intensity.
  • the voltagecurrent graph in the neighbourhood of the normal working point frequently does not run straight. This is the reason why from extrapolation one usually does not obtain the correct value E
  • This disadvantage of the indirect method is avoided by use of methods according to the invention.
  • a method of controlling the supply of A1 0 during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum comprises the following operations carried out successively: (a) measuring the cell current intensity at a normal working point: (b) making a first reduction of the current intensity in one or more steps until attainment of cell stability and of straightness of the voltage-current graph: (c) measuring the values of voltage and current intensity of the cell at a time between half a minute and 2 minutes after the first current intensity reduction: (d) making a second reduction of current intensity to a total current intensity reduction of at most 25 percent, but at least of percent more than the first reduction, up to at latest 10 minutes after the first current intensity reduction, the percentages being of the current intensity at the working point: (e) measuring the values of voltage and current strength of the cell at a time between half a minute and 2 minutes after the second current intensity reduction: (f) restoring the current intensity to the normal working point: (g) extrapolating to the cell voltage at cell current equalling zero from the values of voltage and current intensity after the
  • the voltage-currcnt graph in most cases begins to run straight after around a 5 percent reduction of current intensity from the working point. At any rate this value of 5 percent can be checked by a simple test for each cell. It is to be recommended, not to go over about 8 percent at the first current intensity reduction, because at the second current intensity reduction a total reduction of 25 percent, reckoned from the normal working point, should not be exceeded, as is explained further below. If in fact the value of 8 percent is exceeded at the first current intensity reduction, then the differences in the values after the second current intensity reduction may be too small for accuracy, and thus too great errors will arise in the result of extrapolation.
  • A' time intervalbetween' thefir'st' 'ar'i'd'the' second egrrent intensity reduction is necessary, so that one can confirm that, after the first current intensity reduction, cell stability hasarisen (no significant fluctuations in voltage with constant cell current). On the other hand this interval must not exceed 10 minutes. This limit is to avoid the temperature of the electrolyte decreasing too much so that its specific electrical conductivity alters.
  • the first current intensity reduc tion
  • cell stability is not reached.
  • a cell always has I small voltage fluctuations, even if the current intensity is constant. These can be measured at the normal working point. Instability is present if the fluctuations become larger than normal. This may be caused by magnetic effects.
  • cell stability is not reached after the first current intensity reduction, then the current intensity must be reduced further by a slight percentage step. This further step forms a further part of the first current intensity reduction.” The total of the steps must not exceed 8 percent, or the whole procedure must be broken off and repeated at a later point in time.
  • the first current intensity reduction can thus take place for example in two steps, a first step of 5 percent and a second of 2 percent, in total 7 percent in the first current intensity reduction.
  • the second current intensity reduction must, in relation to the first current intensity reduction. produce an absolute difference of at least l0 percent, so that, as explained more fully above, a sufficiently large difference for extrapolation is achieved between the voltage values.
  • the total of the first and second current intensity reductions should not exceed 25 percent reckoned from the normal working point, because cell current intensities which are too low so strongly influence the magnetic conditions in the liquid aluminum that the cell voltage is falsified, for example by alteration of the interpolar distance.
  • the measurements preferably take place centrally for all cells through a computer.
  • the cell current intensity is the same for all the cells and so may be measured at a single place, with the help for example of a direct current transformer.
  • a direct current transformer is usually incorporated in the rectifier system.
  • each cell can be measured between corresponding points on the anode beams 21 (FIG. 1) of two successive cells. These voltages are supplied to the computer via suitable electric conductors.
  • FIG. 2 displays the opeations according to the invention in a diagram. What is shown is the cell current intensity I in amps as a function of time t in seconds.
  • the cell current intensity is shown at the normal working point. Here a measurement is made.
  • the cell current intensity amounts for example to 100,000 amps.
  • the first current intensity reduction to a lower value 52, eg to 95,000 amps which corresponds to a current intensity reduction of 5 percent (5,000 amps absolute).
  • voltages and current intensity are sampled from all the cells to be measured, and the measured values obtained are checked for cell stability and forlinearity'of voltage-current relationship. Linearity is detected by the slope of the voltage-current graph being constant.
  • the second current intensity reduction occurs at 53 down to 56, for example through a further percent decrease 15,000 amps absolute) to 80,000 amps.
  • voltages and current intensity are again sampled from each of the cells to be measured. From the values obtained on the one hand between the points 52 and 53 and on the other hand between the points 56 and 58, the term E of the EMF independent of current density is calculated for each cell by extrapolation.
  • the measurements are ended, and the normal current intensity e.g., 100,000 amps, can be again established, which is achieved at the point 59.
  • a further step of the first current intensity reduction can be undertaken to 54, e.g., to 92,000 amps (which corresponds to a further current intensity reduction of 3 percent), and a check again be made between 54 and 55 for cell stability.
  • the second current intensity reduction of 12 percent to 57 (80,000 amps) occurs at 55 to 57.
  • Voltages and current intensity are sampled from each of the cells between 57 and 58. If there is lack of stability between 54 and 55, one goes back to the normal starts the operations all over again after a time lapse of, say, one hour, during which any abnomial magnetic effects cuasing instability are likely to have declined.
  • the cells connected in series are generally given normal servicing in succession. If there are as many current reduction operations per day as there are normal servicings per cell per day, then every cell is measured at least once between two normal servicings. Preferably there are twice as many current reductions per day as there are normal services per cell per day.
  • a method of controlling the supply of Al O by at least two combined voltage and current intensity or Amperage measurements during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum comprising the following operations carried out successively: (a) measuring the cell current intensity at a normal working point; (b) thereafter making a first reduction of the current intensity by at least 5 percent and at most 8 percent in one or more steps until attainment of cell stability and straightness of the voltage-current graph, the percentages being of the current intensity at the working point; (c) subsequently measuring the values of voltage and current intensity of the cell at a time period between one-half of one minute and 2 minutes after the first current intensity reduction, this constituting the first of said combined measurements; ((1) making thereafter, a second reduction of current'intensity to a total current intensity reduction of at most 25 percent, but at least of 10 percent more than the first reduction, up to at latest 10 minutes after the first current intensity reduction; (e) subsequently measuring the values of voltage and current intensity of the cell at a time period between onehalf of one minute and 2 minutes after

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Non-Metals, Compounds, Apparatuses Therefor (AREA)
US00378233A 1972-07-18 1973-07-10 Method of controlling the supply of al{11 o{11 {0 during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum Expired - Lifetime US3850768A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH1075072A CH560767A5 (xx) 1972-07-18 1972-07-18

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3850768A true US3850768A (en) 1974-11-26

Family

ID=4366435

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00378233A Expired - Lifetime US3850768A (en) 1972-07-18 1973-07-10 Method of controlling the supply of al{11 o{11 {0 during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum

Country Status (16)

Country Link
US (1) US3850768A (xx)
JP (1) JPS5244285B2 (xx)
AT (1) AT325316B (xx)
AU (1) AU470789B2 (xx)
BE (1) BE802248A (xx)
BR (1) BR7305366D0 (xx)
CH (1) CH560767A5 (xx)
EG (1) EG11447A (xx)
GB (1) GB1392263A (xx)
IE (1) IE37881B1 (xx)
IT (1) IT994965B (xx)
NL (1) NL7309862A (xx)
NO (1) NO133941C (xx)
PH (1) PH11080A (xx)
TR (1) TR17683A (xx)
ZA (1) ZA734766B (xx)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993014248A1 (en) * 1992-01-10 1993-07-22 Comalco Aluminium Limited Trickle alumina feeder
WO1993014247A1 (en) * 1992-01-10 1993-07-22 Comalco Aluminium Limited Continuous alumina feeder

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5759841Y2 (xx) * 1977-05-30 1982-12-21
JPS581681Y2 (ja) * 1977-09-07 1983-01-12 三洋電機株式会社 スチ−ム式電気調理器
JPS594065U (ja) * 1982-06-25 1984-01-11 日本電気株式会社 品質管理図用計算尺

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3583896A (en) * 1968-03-25 1971-06-08 Reynolds Metals Co Detection and control of electrode upsets
US3712857A (en) * 1968-05-20 1973-01-23 Reynolds Metals Co Method for controlling a reduction cell

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3380897A (en) * 1964-11-16 1968-04-30 Reynolds Metals Co Method of determining ore concentration

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3583896A (en) * 1968-03-25 1971-06-08 Reynolds Metals Co Detection and control of electrode upsets
US3712857A (en) * 1968-05-20 1973-01-23 Reynolds Metals Co Method for controlling a reduction cell

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993014248A1 (en) * 1992-01-10 1993-07-22 Comalco Aluminium Limited Trickle alumina feeder
WO1993014247A1 (en) * 1992-01-10 1993-07-22 Comalco Aluminium Limited Continuous alumina feeder

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE2335030A1 (de) 1974-01-31
IE37881L (en) 1974-01-18
PH11080A (en) 1977-10-25
EG11447A (en) 1977-09-30
NO133941B (xx) 1976-04-12
GB1392263A (en) 1975-04-30
AU470789B2 (en) 1976-03-25
JPS5244285B2 (xx) 1977-11-07
IE37881B1 (en) 1977-11-09
AT325316B (de) 1975-10-10
AU5796973A (en) 1975-01-16
DE2335030B2 (de) 1976-03-18
IT994965B (it) 1975-10-20
BR7305366D0 (pt) 1974-08-22
NL7309862A (xx) 1974-01-22
NO133941C (xx) 1976-07-21
BE802248A (fr) 1973-11-05
TR17683A (tr) 1975-07-23
CH560767A5 (xx) 1975-04-15
ZA734766B (en) 1974-06-26
JPS4944920A (xx) 1974-04-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR850001767B1 (ko) 알루미늄 생산에 사용되는 화성전해 탱크에의 알루미나 유입속도와 함량을 정확하게 조절하는 방법
US7731824B2 (en) Measuring duct offgas temperatures to improve electrolytic cell energy efficiency
US3660256A (en) Method and apparatus for aluminum potline control
US3850768A (en) Method of controlling the supply of al{11 o{11 {0 during the operation of a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum
US3625842A (en) Alumina feed control
US3900371A (en) Method of controlling the thickness of the lateral ledges in a cell for the electrolytic recovery of aluminum
US3629079A (en) Alumina feed control
EP0195142B1 (en) Controlling alf 3 addition to al reduction cell electrolyte
US4654129A (en) Process for accurately maintaining a low alumina content in an electrolytic smelting cell for the production of aluminum
US3899402A (en) Method of tapping aluminum from a cell for electrolytic recovery of aluminum
US3539461A (en) Anode effect termination
NO162975B (no) Fremgangsmaate for setting av elektroder i elektrolyseceller.
US3829365A (en) Method of operating a cell for the recovery of aluminum by electrolysis of aluminum oxide in a fluoride melt
US4124465A (en) Protecting tube
Coursol et al. Impact of operations at low anode-cathode distance on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions at Aluminerie Alouette
US7255783B2 (en) Use of infrared imaging to reduce energy consumption and fluoride consumption
US4592813A (en) Full pot anode change in the production of aluminum
US3632488A (en) Reduction cell control system
RU2296188C2 (ru) Способ регулирования электролизера для получения алюминия
US3859184A (en) Method of operation of a cell for recovery of aluminium byelectrolysis of aluminium oxide in a fluoride melt
US7135104B2 (en) Method for regulating an electrolysis cell
Solli et al. Design and performance of a laboratory cell for determination of current efficiency in the electrowinning of aluminium
CA1240950A (en) Controlling aluminium reduction cell operation
US3578569A (en) Anode polarization detector
US4437950A (en) Method of controlling aluminum electrolytic cells