US3799750A - Can stock with differential protective coatings - Google Patents

Can stock with differential protective coatings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3799750A
US3799750A US00303888A US30388872A US3799750A US 3799750 A US3799750 A US 3799750A US 00303888 A US00303888 A US 00303888A US 30388872 A US30388872 A US 30388872A US 3799750 A US3799750 A US 3799750A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
per square
square foot
tinplate
differential
chromium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00303888A
Inventor
J Bird
P Carter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
United States Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Steel Corp filed Critical Steel Corp
Priority to US00303888A priority Critical patent/US3799750A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3799750A publication Critical patent/US3799750A/en
Assigned to USX CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE reassignment USX CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION (MERGED INTO)
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D11/00Electrolytic coating by surface reaction, i.e. forming conversion layers
    • C25D11/38Chromatising
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10S428/922Static electricity metal bleed-off metallic stock
    • Y10S428/923Physical dimension
    • Y10S428/924Composite
    • Y10S428/926Thickness of individual layer specified
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/12All metal or with adjacent metals
    • Y10T428/12493Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
    • Y10T428/12535Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.] with additional, spatially distinct nonmetal component
    • Y10T428/12542More than one such component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/12All metal or with adjacent metals
    • Y10T428/12493Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
    • Y10T428/12535Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.] with additional, spatially distinct nonmetal component
    • Y10T428/12611Oxide-containing component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/12All metal or with adjacent metals
    • Y10T428/12493Composite; i.e., plural, adjacent, spatially distinct metal components [e.g., layers, joint, etc.]
    • Y10T428/12708Sn-base component
    • Y10T428/12722Next to Group VIII metal-base component

Definitions

  • differential tinplate having a trivalent chromium oxide coating thereon to the extent that about 1.00 to 1.50 mg. of chromium per square foot is provided on the heavily tinned side and about 0.40 to 0.80 mg. chromium per square foot is provided on the reverse lightly tinned side.
  • the process involves the cathodic electrolysis of the differential tinplate in a dilute sodium-dichromate solution having a pH of from 3.5 to 5.5 at a temperature within the range 160 to 200 F.
  • the heavily tinned side thereof is subjected to an electrical current of 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot while the reverse .side is subjected to not more than 45 coluombs per square foot, at current densities within the range to 170 amperes per square foot.
  • US. patent application Ser. No. 14,283, filed Feb. 26, 1970 discloses a process for treating tinplate which provide exceptional resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining, detinning and abrasion.
  • the process comprises an electrolytic treatment whereby the tinplate strip is made cathodic in a dilute sodium-dichromate solution thereby depositing a trivalent chromium oxide, such as chromic sesquioxide, Cr O -xH O, which provides a suitable protective coating normally providing from 1.0 to 1.5 mg. chromium per square foot.
  • the coating provides exceptional resistance to sulfide staining and detinning, and further provides good adherence properties for lacquer, and resistance to oxide growth during storage.
  • the crux of that inventive process resides in the application of a large quantity of electricity at reasonably high temperatures, i.e., 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot at 160 to 200 F.
  • the protective chromium oxide coating does indeed provide the alleged beneficial results when applied to conventional tinplate grades solid commercially, i.e., those having tin coatings of at least about 0.50 pounds of tin per base box. This is equal to an individual tin surface of about 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot.
  • a chromium oxide coating is applied over tin coatings of less than 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot (i.e., less than 0.50 pounds per base box)
  • the solderability thereof is adversely affected.
  • the chromium oxide coating so adversely affects the solderability thereof that the such can stock cannot be satisfactorily soldered by the jet soldering machines used by the can making industry.
  • differential tinplate refers to tinplate stock having a heavier tin coating on one side thereof as compared to the other.
  • differential tinplate is commonly used by the can making industry to provide a can with a heavy tin coating on the inside, and a lighter tin coating on the outside where corrosive environments are less severe.
  • differential tinplate is sold with various combinations of different tin coatings thereon. The most common however are those having a lightly tinned side of 0.000575 pounds of tin per square foot of surface area, Le, a coating comparable to 0.25 pounds per base box.
  • differential tinplate namely those grades having a lightly tinned side of less than 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot of surface
  • chromium oxide to enhance its resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining and detinning and at the same time maintain good solderability of the lightly tinned side if a differential chromium oxide coating is provided.
  • the chromium oxide coating on the heavily tinned side should of course substantially be that provided by the process taught in patent application Ser. No. 14,233, i.e., normally from 1.0 to 1.5 mg. chromium per square foot of surface.
  • the lightly tinned side should have a chromium oxide coating no greater than sufficient to provide from 0.4 to 0.8 mg. chromuim per square foot of surface, which can be assured by providing a quantity of electricity of no more than about 45 coulombs per square foot of surface.
  • the coating weight 135 would have a tin coating of 0.00311 pounds of tin per square foot of surface.
  • these grades of differential tinplate are known to frequently possess somewhat inferior soldering characteristics, especially when baked, as for example, after enameling.
  • solderability is further adversely affected to the point where can makers can no longer get acceptable soldered joints.
  • the crux of this invention resides in our discovery that the solderability of the lighter tin coated side of differential tinplate is not adversely affected, even when baked, if a like trivalent chromium oxide coating is electrolytically deposited thereon providing only from 0.40 to 0.80 mg. chromium per square foot of surface. Since the heavier tin coated side normally had good solderability not affected by the amount of chromium oxide coating, this side may then be given a more extensive protective coating,
  • the process as taught in patent application Ser. No. 14,283 is applied. That is to say, the tinplate is immersed into a dilute sodium-dichromate solution having a pH of from 3.5 to 5.5 at a temperature within the range 160 to 200 F.
  • the tinplate is made cathode adjacent to a conductive anode on the heavily tinned side of the tinplate, and sufiicient electrical current is applied to effect from 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot of tinplate surface.
  • the applied current density does not appear to 'be critical since any current density within the range normally obtainable with commercial equipment will be effective.
  • the desired chromium oxide coating a various current densities between and 170 amperes per square foot of surface.
  • the total quantity of electrical current applied to that side directly should be no greater than 45 coulombs per square foot. Since it is preferred that both sides be treated simultaneously, the treating time for both sides will be the same. Therefore, it is necessary to merely utilize a correspondingly lower current density on the lightly tinned side of the tinplate sufficient to effect no more than 45 coulombs per square foot. It will be noted that there is no minimum value given for the coulombs applied to the lightly tinned side of the tinplate. Hence, any value between zero and 45 coulombs per square foot is sufficient.
  • the desired product can be made Without any current directly applied to the lightly tinned side of the tinplate.
  • the current applied to the heavily tinned side is so heavy at 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot that there is sufficient wrap-around current to deposit the minimum 0.4 mg. chromium per square foot on the lightly tinned side, even without a current directly applied thereto.
  • the current density for the lightly tinned side of the tinplate may therefore be varied from 0 to 200 amperes per square foot.
  • the strip was then rinsed in water and given the usual finishing treatment, i.e., drying, oiling and coiling.
  • the differential applied current was effected by providing a larger anode surface area for the heavy current side.
  • the strip was advanced through two separate tanks. In the first tank, the strip was passed adjacent to two S-foot anodes, both on the heavily tinned side of the strip. In the second tank, three anodes were used, two again on the heavily tinned side of the strip, and one on the lightly tinned side.
  • the resulting sheet had 1.25 mg. chromium per square foot on the heavier tinned side and 0.80 mg. chromium per square foot on the other side.
  • Can stock out from the strip was enameled and baked in accordance with usual canning procedures and easily soldered with jet soldering units.
  • the salt concentration of the sodium-dichromate solution may be varied between 20 and 30 grams per liter, while the pH value may vary between 3.5 and 5.5 but is preferably maintained at 4.0 to 4.2.
  • the temperature of the solution should be within the range to 200 F. or ideally at from 180 to F.
  • the total current applied to that side should be within the broad range of 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot, or preferably 125 to 150 coulombs per square foot, yielding from 1.00 to 1.50 mg.
  • the total current applied to that side should be maintained at no more than 45 coulombs per square foot, yielding 0.40 to 0.80 mg. of chromium per square foot.
  • a differential tinplate having exceptional resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining and detinning and good solderability comprising a conventional differential tinplate having a coating of more than 0.00115 pound of tin per square foot on the heavily tinned side and from 0.000575 to 0.00115 pound of tin per square foot on the lightly tinned side, said differential tinplate having a differential trivalent chromium oxide coating thereon sufficient to provide from 1.00 to 1.50 mg. of chromium per square foot on the heavily tinned side and from 0.40 to 0.80 mg. of chromium per square foot on the lightly tinned side.
  • a differential tinplate according to claim 1 in which the lightly tinned side thereof has a coating of about 0.000575 pound of tin per square foot.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electroplating Methods And Accessories (AREA)

Abstract

DIFFERENTIALLY TREATED DIFFERENTIAL TINPLATE HAVING A TRIVALENT CHROMIUM OXIDE COATING THEREON TO THE EXTENT THAT ABOUT 1.00 TO 1.50 MG. OF CHROMIUM PER SQUARE FOOT IS PROVIDED ON THE HEAVILY TINNED SIDE AND ABOUT 0.40 TO 0.80 MG. CHROMIUM PER SQUARE FOOT IS PROVIDED ON THE REVERSE LIGHTLY TINNED SIDE. THE PROCESS INVOLVES THE CATHODIC ELECTROLYSIS OF THE DIFFERENTIAL TINPLATE IN A DILUTE SODIUM-DICHROMATE SOLUTION HAVING A PH OF FROM 3.5 TO 5.5 AT A TEMPERATURE WITHIN THE RANGE 160 TO 200*F. THE HEAVILY TINNED SIDE THEREOF IS SUBJECTED TO AN ELECTRICAL CURRENT OF 100 TO 170 COULOMBS PER SQUARE FOOT WHILE THE REVERSE SIDE IS SUBJECTED TO NOT MORE THAN 45 COLUOMBS PER SQUARE FOOT, AT CURRENT DENSITIES WITHIN THE RANGE 10 TO 170 AMPERES PER SQUARE FOOT.

Description

United States Patent O 3,799,750 CAN STOCK WITH DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTIVE COATINGS James E. Bird, Franklin Township, Westmoreland County, and Paul R. Carter, Monroeville, Pa., assignors to United States Steel Corporation No Drawing. Application Aug. 27, 1971, Ser. No. 17 5,728, now Patent No. 3,7 49,651, dated July 31, 1973, which is a continuation-in-part of abandoned application Ser. No. 840,519, July 9, 1969. Divided and this application Nov. 6, 1972, Ser. No. 303,888
Int. Cl. B32b 15/04 US. Cl. 29-495 T 2 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Differentially treated differential tinplate having a trivalent chromium oxide coating thereon to the extent that about 1.00 to 1.50 mg. of chromium per square foot is provided on the heavily tinned side and about 0.40 to 0.80 mg. chromium per square foot is provided on the reverse lightly tinned side. The process involves the cathodic electrolysis of the differential tinplate in a dilute sodium-dichromate solution having a pH of from 3.5 to 5.5 at a temperature within the range 160 to 200 F. The heavily tinned side thereof is subjected to an electrical current of 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot while the reverse .side is subjected to not more than 45 coluombs per square foot, at current densities within the range to 170 amperes per square foot.
This is a division, of application Ser. No. 175,728, filed Aug. 27, 1971 now Pat. 3,749,651, dated July 31, 1973, which was a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 840,519, filed July 9, 1969, now abandoned.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION There are many known processes for treating tinplate to further enhance its corrosion resistance characteristics. Of particular concern are processes which inhibit corrosion of particularly corrosive foods, such as sulfur bearing food products which cause sulfide staining, or other corrosive foods wrich may cause detinning.
US. patent application Ser. No. 14,283, filed Feb. 26, 1970, discloses a process for treating tinplate which provide exceptional resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining, detinning and abrasion. The process comprises an electrolytic treatment whereby the tinplate strip is made cathodic in a dilute sodium-dichromate solution thereby depositing a trivalent chromium oxide, such as chromic sesquioxide, Cr O -xH O, which provides a suitable protective coating normally providing from 1.0 to 1.5 mg. chromium per square foot. The coating provides exceptional resistance to sulfide staining and detinning, and further provides good adherence properties for lacquer, and resistance to oxide growth during storage. The crux of that inventive process resides in the application of a large quantity of electricity at reasonably high temperatures, i.e., 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot at 160 to 200 F.
In practicing the above inventive process, we have learned that the protective chromium oxide coating does indeed provide the alleged beneficial results when applied to conventional tinplate grades solid commercially, i.e., those having tin coatings of at least about 0.50 pounds of tin per base box. This is equal to an individual tin surface of about 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot. When such a chromium oxide coating is applied over tin coatings of less than 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot (i.e., less than 0.50 pounds per base box), the solderability thereof is adversely affected. In fact, the chromium oxide coating so adversely affects the solderability thereof that the such can stock cannot be satisfactorily soldered by the jet soldering machines used by the can making industry.
Although corrosion resistant tinplate is seldom. sold with coatings lighter than 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot of surface area, i.e., less than 0.50 pounds per base box, such coatings are quite common on one surface of differential tinplate. Differential tinplate as used herein, refers to tinplate stock having a heavier tin coating on one side thereof as compared to the other. For economic reasons, differential tinplate is commonly used by the can making industry to provide a can with a heavy tin coating on the inside, and a lighter tin coating on the outside where corrosive environments are less severe..Differential tinplate is sold with various combinations of different tin coatings thereon. The most common however are those having a lightly tinned side of 0.000575 pounds of tin per square foot of surface area, Le, a coating comparable to 0.25 pounds per base box.
It follows, therefore, that although the process of patent application Ser. No. 14,283 is perfectly suitable for conventional tinplate, it is not suitable for differential tinplate having tin coatings on the. lightly tinned side of less than 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot of surface. When the process is applied to such differential tinplate, the solderability of the lightly tinned side is so adversely affected that can manufacturers cannot produce an acceptable solder thereon.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention is predicated upon our discovery that differential tinplate, namely those grades having a lightly tinned side of less than 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot of surface, can be suitably coated with chromium oxide to enhance its resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining and detinning and at the same time maintain good solderability of the lightly tinned side if a differential chromium oxide coating is provided. The chromium oxide coating on the heavily tinned side should of course substantially be that provided by the process taught in patent application Ser. No. 14,233, i.e., normally from 1.0 to 1.5 mg. chromium per square foot of surface. The lightly tinned side, however, should have a chromium oxide coating no greater than sufficient to provide from 0.4 to 0.8 mg. chromuim per square foot of surface, which can be assured by providing a quantity of electricity of no more than about 45 coulombs per square foot of surface.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a differentially treated differential tinplate having exceptional resistance to sulfide staining and detinning and at the same time maintain good solderability.
It is another object of this invention to provide a process for treating differential tinplate to provide a heavy chromium oxide coating on the heavily tinned side of the tinplate, thereby enhancing resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining and detinning, and to provide a lighter chromium oxide coating on the reverse side to maintain good solderability of the tinplate.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Although this invention could be applied to any differential tinplate, it is mostly beneficial to those grades wherein the heavily tinned side exceeds 0.00115 pounds of tin per square foot of surface, i.e., 0.50 pounds per base box, and the lightly tinned side contains less than that amount down to about 0.000575 pounds per square foot of surface. Concerning commercial grades therefore, this invention is most advantageously applied to the commercial grades 50*25, -25, -25 and -25. (The coating weight 135 would have a tin coating of 0.00311 pounds of tin per square foot of surface.) Even without chromium oxide coatings, these grades of differential tinplate are known to frequently possess somewhat inferior soldering characteristics, especially when baked, as for example, after enameling. As noted above, when such differential tinplate is provided with a chromium oxide coating as described in patent application Ser. No. 14,283, the solderability is further adversely affected to the point where can makers can no longer get acceptable soldered joints.
The crux of this invention resides in our discovery that the solderability of the lighter tin coated side of differential tinplate is not adversely affected, even when baked, if a like trivalent chromium oxide coating is electrolytically deposited thereon providing only from 0.40 to 0.80 mg. chromium per square foot of surface. Since the heavier tin coated side normally had good solderability not affected by the amount of chromium oxide coating, this side may then be given a more extensive protective coating,
e.g., normally in excess of 1 mg. chromium per square foot to provide suitable resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining and detinning. For the heavily tinned side therefore, the process as taught in patent application Ser. No. 14,283 is applied. That is to say, the tinplate is immersed into a dilute sodium-dichromate solution having a pH of from 3.5 to 5.5 at a temperature within the range 160 to 200 F. The tinplate is made cathode adjacent to a conductive anode on the heavily tinned side of the tinplate, and sufiicient electrical current is applied to effect from 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot of tinplate surface. The applied current density does not appear to 'be critical since any current density within the range normally obtainable with commercial equipment will be effective. Specifically we have produced the desired chromium oxide coating a various current densities between and 170 amperes per square foot of surface.
To assure that only 0.4 to 0.8 mg. chromium per square foot is applied to the lightly tinned side of the tinplate, the total quantity of electrical current applied to that side directly should be no greater than 45 coulombs per square foot. Since it is preferred that both sides be treated simultaneously, the treating time for both sides will be the same. Therefore, it is necessary to merely utilize a correspondingly lower current density on the lightly tinned side of the tinplate sufficient to effect no more than 45 coulombs per square foot. It will be noted that there is no minimum value given for the coulombs applied to the lightly tinned side of the tinplate. Hence, any value between zero and 45 coulombs per square foot is sufficient. Indeed, the desired product can be made Without any current directly applied to the lightly tinned side of the tinplate. This is because the current applied to the heavily tinned side is so heavy at 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot that there is sufficient wrap-around current to deposit the minimum 0.4 mg. chromium per square foot on the lightly tinned side, even without a current directly applied thereto. The current density for the lightly tinned side of the tinplate may therefore be varied from 0 to 200 amperes per square foot.
As a specific example of the process of this invention, we have passed 100-25 differential tinplate strip through a sodium-dichromate solution containing to grams of the salt per liter, while maintaining the solution at a pH of about 4.0 and a temperature of about 190 F. During the passage, the strip was connected as cathode in an electrolyzing circuit to a suitable current source. Conductive anodes of mild steel were disposed about 1 /2 inches from each face of the strip. The heavily tinned side of the strip was subjected to an electrical current of coulombs per square foot while the lighter tinned sidewas subjected to 40 coulombs per square foot. The strip was then rinsed in water and given the usual finishing treatment, i.e., drying, oiling and coiling. The differential applied current was effected by providing a larger anode surface area for the heavy current side. Specifically, the strip was advanced through two separate tanks. In the first tank, the strip was passed adjacent to two S-foot anodes, both on the heavily tinned side of the strip. In the second tank, three anodes were used, two again on the heavily tinned side of the strip, and one on the lightly tinned side. The resulting sheet had 1.25 mg. chromium per square foot on the heavier tinned side and 0.80 mg. chromium per square foot on the other side. Can stock out from the strip was enameled and baked in accordance with usual canning procedures and easily soldered with jet soldering units.
Although the above described specific example did utilize the optimum process parameters, these parameters may be varied somewhat depending upon personal preferances and economics. Specifically, the salt concentration of the sodium-dichromate solution may be varied between 20 and 30 grams per liter, while the pH value may vary between 3.5 and 5.5 but is preferably maintained at 4.0 to 4.2. The temperature of the solution should be within the range to 200 F. or ideally at from 180 to F. In order to provide a good heavy protective coating on the heavily coated side which will be resistant to sulfide staining and detinning, the total current applied to that side should be within the broad range of 100 to 170 coulombs per square foot, or preferably 125 to 150 coulombs per square foot, yielding from 1.00 to 1.50 mg. of chromium per square foot. In order to enhance solderability of the lightly tinned side, however, the total current applied to that side should be maintained at no more than 45 coulombs per square foot, yielding 0.40 to 0.80 mg. of chromium per square foot.
We claim:
1. A differential tinplate having exceptional resistance to oxidation, sulfide staining and detinning and good solderability comprising a conventional differential tinplate having a coating of more than 0.00115 pound of tin per square foot on the heavily tinned side and from 0.000575 to 0.00115 pound of tin per square foot on the lightly tinned side, said differential tinplate having a differential trivalent chromium oxide coating thereon sufficient to provide from 1.00 to 1.50 mg. of chromium per square foot on the heavily tinned side and from 0.40 to 0.80 mg. of chromium per square foot on the lightly tinned side.
2. A differential tinplate according to claim 1 in which the lightly tinned side thereof has a coating of about 0.000575 pound of tin per square foot.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,327,127 8/1943 Rath 29-195 T X 2,780,592 2/1957 Wick et al 29-195 T X 3,160,481 12/1964 Shoemaker 29195 T 3,479,162 11/1969 Yanabu et a1 29-195 T 3,491,001 1/ 1970 Shackleford et al. 20456 R 3,526,486 9/1970 Smith et al 29-195 T X L. DEWAYNE RUTLEDGE, Primary Examiner E. L. WEISE, Assistant Examiner
US00303888A 1972-11-06 1972-11-06 Can stock with differential protective coatings Expired - Lifetime US3799750A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00303888A US3799750A (en) 1972-11-06 1972-11-06 Can stock with differential protective coatings

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00303888A US3799750A (en) 1972-11-06 1972-11-06 Can stock with differential protective coatings

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3799750A true US3799750A (en) 1974-03-26

Family

ID=23174128

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00303888A Expired - Lifetime US3799750A (en) 1972-11-06 1972-11-06 Can stock with differential protective coatings

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3799750A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2362056A1 (en) * 1976-08-18 1978-03-17 Toyo Kohan Co Ltd STEEL SHEET USEFUL FOR FORMING CANS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE
FR2362943A1 (en) * 1976-08-25 1978-03-24 Toyo Kohan Co Ltd STEEL SHEET FOR DRINK AND FOOD CANS
FR2385818A1 (en) * 1977-04-01 1978-10-27 Cockerill Steel sheet with very thin protective tin coating - obtd. by electroplating; and then heating to form a tin-iron alloy
EP0063933A1 (en) * 1981-04-23 1982-11-03 Nippon Steel Corporation Steel strip having differentiated multilayer coatings and being useful for manufacture of cans
US4446156A (en) * 1978-02-23 1984-05-01 The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited Manufacture of tinplate and tinplate containers
US4863060A (en) * 1986-04-29 1989-09-05 Weirton Steel Corporation Flat-rolled steel can stock product
US5094924A (en) * 1988-10-19 1992-03-10 Kenzo Matsui Polyester resin film laminated steel sheet for drawn and ironed can
US20040134912A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2004-07-15 Tarulis George J Drawn wall ironed can for light colored fruits

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2362056A1 (en) * 1976-08-18 1978-03-17 Toyo Kohan Co Ltd STEEL SHEET USEFUL FOR FORMING CANS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE
FR2362943A1 (en) * 1976-08-25 1978-03-24 Toyo Kohan Co Ltd STEEL SHEET FOR DRINK AND FOOD CANS
FR2385818A1 (en) * 1977-04-01 1978-10-27 Cockerill Steel sheet with very thin protective tin coating - obtd. by electroplating; and then heating to form a tin-iron alloy
US4446156A (en) * 1978-02-23 1984-05-01 The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited Manufacture of tinplate and tinplate containers
US4483907A (en) * 1978-02-23 1984-11-20 The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited Manufacture of tinplate and tinplate containers
US4508480A (en) * 1978-02-23 1985-04-02 The Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited Manufacture of tinplate and tinplate containers
EP0063933A1 (en) * 1981-04-23 1982-11-03 Nippon Steel Corporation Steel strip having differentiated multilayer coatings and being useful for manufacture of cans
US4442181A (en) * 1981-04-23 1984-04-10 Nippon Steel Corporation Steel strip having differentiated multilayer coatings and being useful for manufacturing of cans
US4863060A (en) * 1986-04-29 1989-09-05 Weirton Steel Corporation Flat-rolled steel can stock product
US5094924A (en) * 1988-10-19 1992-03-10 Kenzo Matsui Polyester resin film laminated steel sheet for drawn and ironed can
US20040134912A1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2004-07-15 Tarulis George J Drawn wall ironed can for light colored fruits

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2085543A (en) Process for coating metals
US3174917A (en) Method of making tin plate
US3799750A (en) Can stock with differential protective coatings
US2746915A (en) Electrolytic metal treatment and article
USRE26223E (en) Base materials coated with an alloy of aujmtnum and manganese
US4126522A (en) Method of preparing aluminum wire for electrical conductors
US3816082A (en) Method of improving the corrosion resistance of zinc coated ferrous metal substrates and the corrosion resistant substrates thus produced
US3479260A (en) Treatment for ferrous surfaces
US1969553A (en) Electrolyte for the deposition of
US2748066A (en) Process of enameling steel
US2075623A (en) Zinc plating
US2230602A (en) Method of coating metals with lead
US2023364A (en) Metal coated ferrous article and process of making it
US3749651A (en) Can stock with differential protective coatings
US2769774A (en) Electrodeposition method
US1072091A (en) Process for protecting iron surfaces from corrosion.
US3838024A (en) Method of improving the corrosion resistance of substrates
US3785940A (en) Method for electrolytically treating the surface of a steel plate with a chromate solution
US2176066A (en) Tin-coated object
US3054737A (en) Process and bath for electrosmoothing ferrous metals
US3334030A (en) Production of electrolytic tinplate
US1898765A (en) Electrocleaning process
US2921888A (en) Electroplating titanium ano titanium alloys
USRE19773E (en) Euectrocleanuxg process
US2172344A (en) Method of chromium plating

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: USX CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE, STATELESS

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION (MERGED INTO);REEL/FRAME:005060/0960

Effective date: 19880112