US3699364A - Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure - Google Patents

Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3699364A
US3699364A US150108A US3699364DA US3699364A US 3699364 A US3699364 A US 3699364A US 150108 A US150108 A US 150108A US 3699364D A US3699364D A US 3699364DA US 3699364 A US3699364 A US 3699364A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
electrodes
transducer
compensating elements
surface wave
arrays
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US150108A
Inventor
Henry M Gerard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hughes Aircraft Co filed Critical Hughes Aircraft Co
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3699364A publication Critical patent/US3699364A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03HIMPEDANCE NETWORKS, e.g. RESONANT CIRCUITS; RESONATORS
    • H03H9/00Networks comprising electromechanical or electro-acoustic devices; Electromechanical resonators
    • H03H9/30Time-delay networks
    • H03H9/42Time-delay networks using surface acoustic waves
    • H03H9/44Frequency dependent delay lines, e.g. dispersive delay lines
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03HIMPEDANCE NETWORKS, e.g. RESONANT CIRCUITS; RESONATORS
    • H03H9/00Networks comprising electromechanical or electro-acoustic devices; Electromechanical resonators
    • H03H9/02Details
    • H03H9/02535Details of surface acoustic wave devices
    • H03H9/02818Means for compensation or elimination of undesirable effects
    • H03H9/02858Means for compensation or elimination of undesirable effects of wave front distortion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03HIMPEDANCE NETWORKS, e.g. RESONANT CIRCUITS; RESONATORS
    • H03H9/00Networks comprising electromechanical or electro-acoustic devices; Electromechanical resonators
    • H03H9/02Details
    • H03H9/125Driving means, e.g. electrodes, coils
    • H03H9/13Driving means, e.g. electrodes, coils for networks consisting of piezoelectric or electrostrictive materials
    • H03H9/133Driving means, e.g. electrodes, coils for networks consisting of piezoelectric or electrostrictive materials for electromechanical delay lines or filters

Definitions

  • This invention relates to acoustic surface wave devices and more specifically to improved electromechanical transducer structures for use with such devices.
  • a surface wave microwave acoustic circuit comprises a source of rf energy, a smooth slab-like element or substrate of material capable of supporting propagating surface waves and a utilization-device. Electromechanical transducers are coupled to the substrate to convert the rf energy to surface waves in the material and vice vers'a.
  • the basic surface wave device is primarily useful as a delay line. Frequently, it is desired to modify the propagating surface wave in a manner such as to enhance the operation of the basic devices and to form new devices having'unique properties.
  • the input and output transducers commonly take the form of arrays of conductive interdigitated electrodes which are bonded to the substrate surface.
  • delay lines which have response characteristics which are functions of delay time and frequency. Because of these'properties, such devices are termed delay line filters, and find use in a broad range of communications and radar systems.
  • pulse compression and expansion filters can be obtained by utilizing surface wave delay lines with interdigitated electrode transducers having a graded or varying interelectrode spacing.
  • SC-5 No. 6, December 1970 at pp. 310-319, for example, illustrates transducerpat terns of triangular and Gaussian shape.
  • dummy elements disposed in the interstices of adjacent active electrodes of an interdigitated electrode transducer.
  • the dummy elements while being inactive insofar as the transduction process is concerned, provide a more uniform transducer metalization density.
  • the resultant transducer therefore appears substantially homogeneous to the surface wave propagating in the piezoelectric substrate on which the transducer is disposed. Although the transducer appears uniform to the surface wave, its active electrode pattern can be selected for any desired response characteristic.
  • the compensated transducers are incorporated in weighted delay line filters, the phase distortion caused by non-uniform surface wave velocities is substantially eliminated.
  • the response characteristics of such filters therefore, more closely approximate the desired design characteristics.
  • FIG. 1 is asimplified pictorial view of a surface wave delay line filter in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a plan view of a portion of a filter such as that of FIG. 1 but utilizing a transducer of prior art both with andwithout the compensated interdigitated transducer of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a simplified pictorial view of a surface wave delay line filter.
  • an elongated slab or substrate of piezoelectric material is provided with an input trans-' ducer l1 and an output transducer 12.
  • a source of rf -energy indicated generally by block 13 is electrically coupled to input transducer 11.
  • Source 13 can also include suitable-electromagnetic tuning elements as are well known in the art.
  • a utilization circuit indicated generally as block 14 is, in turn, electrically coupled to systems.
  • the delay line may be of the dispersive type for pulse compression of a transmitted chirp radar pulse.
  • the piezoelectric material I from which substrate 10 is fabricated is of the type suitable for the propagation of acoustic surface waves.
  • the surface of substrate 10 is ground and polished to an optical quality finish in order to reduce surface imperfections to a minimum.
  • Input and output transducers 11 and 12 which will be described in greater detail-hereinbelow, are deposited, bonded or otherwise-mechanically attached to the upper polished surface of substrate 10.
  • Transducers Y11 and 12 can be formed of any suitable electrically conductive material such as aluminum or gold.
  • the thickness of the filtersof the general type depicted in FIG. 1 have a wide variety of uses as a glance at the current microwave literature will reveal.
  • a typical use for a delay line such as thatdepicted in FIG. 1 is in the signal processing portions of pulse compression radar that with 'a given amplitude rf input signal the'amplitude of the delayed rf output signal is a function of frequency.
  • the input transducer 21 comprises a pair of interdigitated con ductor patterns bonded to the upper surface of piezoelectric substrate 10.
  • Transducer 21 comprises a pair of elongated conductive pads 22 and 23 which are conveniently connected to the rf source,,not shown, by means of leads 24 and 25, respectively.
  • Electrodes 26 and 27 Extending partially across the surface of substrate 10 between pads 22 and 23 in the transverse direction are sets of interdigitated conducting electrodes 26 and 27. As with pads 22 and 23, electrodes 26 and 27 are deposited, bonded or otherwise mechanically attached to the surface of substrate 10. As is known in the art, the spacing x between adjacent electrodes 26 and 27 determines the frequency of maximum surface wave excitation. In general, for maximum coupling between the electrical and acoustic wave energy, the spacing x is an integral multiple of an acoustic half-wavelength. The amount of transverse overlap y between adjacent electrodes determines the efficiency of the electromagnetic-to-acoustic transfer, and, therefore, the degree of acoustic coupling.
  • rf energy having frequency components extending over a large range of frequencies is applied to'transducer 21 by means of conductive leads 24 and 25. Due to the relatively large electrode spacing x in the left-hand portion of the transducer, the lower frequency rf energy is converted by means of the piezoelectric effect into mechanicalperturbations or surface waves in the upper surface of substrate 10. The midrange frequency and higher frequency wave energy is similarly converted to propagating surface wave energy in the mid and right-hand regions of transducer 21, respectively. Due to the bidirectional nature of a transducer 21, a portion of the surface wave energy propagates toward the left where it can be absorbed, if desired, by an absorbing material such as black wax deposited on the upper surface of substrate 10 as shown in FIG. 1. I
  • the electrode mass can affectthe surface wave velocity and give rise to undesirable phase distortion. Furthermore, if the substrate material has a relatively strong electromechanical coupling coefficient such transducer structures can degrade-performance at low as well as high operating frequencies.
  • the variation in the amount of metalization of the substrate seen by the surface wave as it propagates beneath the transducer causes velocity variations; that is, 'as the surface wave propagates beneath the region of the transducer its velocity is decreased by the presence of the conductive electrodes 26 and 27.
  • the surface wave velocity is slower along the longitudinal centerline of transducer 21 than in the transverse regions near the than at the edges.
  • the velocity change is not only determined by the extent of relative metalization seen by the propagating surface wave, but is also proportional to the square of the effective surface wave electromechanical coupling coefficient referred to above.
  • phase difference between the central and edge regions of the propagating acoustic beam is proportional to velocity and path length, a velocity difference of only a fraction of a percent can result in very large cumulative phase distortions.
  • the equi-phase wavefront of the surface wave launched by transducer 21 therefore emerges with a curved shape somewhat as indicated by dotted lines 20.
  • the distorted surface wave reaches the output transducer it is converted to an rf output signal.
  • the rf output is degraded. If the output transducer is a mirror image of the input transducer 21, the wavefront of the propagating surface wave energy is even further degraded. Again, this problem is most severe in materials such as LiNbO which exhibit a strong coupling coefficient and is less severe in materials such as quartz which has a relatively low coupling coefficient.
  • FIG. 3 there is shown an improved transducer structure in keeping with the present invention which overcomes the above-described problem.
  • the transducer pattern of FIG. 3 is apodized or weighted in the same manner as that shown in FIG. 2.
  • dummy elements 26a and 27a have been provided in the interstices of the transducer pattern to provide a substantially uniform metalization density as seen by the propagating acoustic surface wave energy.
  • Dummy elements 260 are disposed between active electrodes 26 and dummy elements 27a are disposed between active electrodes 27.
  • dummy elements 26a and 27a are shown as being attached to pads 22 and 23, respectively. It is not 'edges because there is more metal along the centerline required, however, that these elements be conductive, or that they be conductively joined to the pads or to each other. What is required is that the dummy elements present substantially the same effective loading to the propagating surface wave as the missing electrode portions.
  • dummy elements 26a and 27a are inactive insofar as the transduction mechanism is concemed since they are at the same potential as their immediately adjacent electrodes 26 and 27, respectively. Their presence, however, provides a substantially uniform metalization density to surface wave energy, thus eliminating the differential surface wave velocity problem of the transducer structure of FIG. 2. The portions of the surface wave energy near the edges of the.
  • transducer see substantially the same amount of overlying metalization as the central portions.
  • the acoustic velocity is therefore substantially uniform for the entire wavefront and the emerging wavefront is linear as indicated by dotted lines 30.
  • the compensated transducer of FIG. 3 Although the most convenient method of fabricating the compensated transducer of FIG. 3 is with the use of the same conductive material for the active electrodes and the dummy elements, it is a matter of design choice.
  • the dummy elements can be formed of a different material, either conductive or nonconductive. If a different material is used, however, the width or thickness of the dummy elements may have to be changed from that of the active electrodes in order to compensate for the difference in effective surface wave loading of the different materials.
  • FIG. 4 there is shown a plan view of another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the device of FIG. 4 represents a typical weighted pulse compression filter.
  • the filter of FIG. 4 comprises a piezoelectric substrate 40 having a relatively broadband unweighted interdigitated input transducer 41 disposed on the upper surface thereof.
  • the output transducer 42 comprises conductive pads 43 and 44 with transversely extending electrodes 45 and 46.
  • the active electrodes 46 are is required. Dummy elements 45a are disposed in the interstices between active electrodes 45 and are conductively attached to pad 43.
  • broadband rf energy applied to input transducer 41 is converted to surface wave energy, a portion of which propagates axially along the surface in the direction of output transducer 42.
  • This surface wave energy is reconverted to rf energy of the output transducer 42 and extracted therefrom by means of conductive leads 47 and 48.
  • the high frequency energy undergoes the least time delay.
  • the low frequency energy undergoes the greatest time delay.
  • the transducer is weighted, the mid-frequency response of the transducer is greatest and tapers off for both the high and low frequencies. Phase distortion arising from the differential surface wave velocity in output transducer 42 is minimized by the inclusion of dummy elements 45a.
  • FIG. is a graphical representation of the insertion loss versus frequency characteristics of pulse compression filters similar to that of FIG. 4.
  • the experimental Hamming weighted response curve as indicated by broken line 50 centered about at mid-band frequency f,,.
  • the insertion loss for the uncompensated transducer departs substantially from the ideal response and is, in fact, unsuitable.
  • Curve 53 represents the insertion loss characteristic for a similarly weighted filter but with a compensated output transducer of the type illustrated in FIG. 3. As is readily seen, the insertion loss characteristic with the improved 'transducer of 'the present invention corresponds closely with the idealized design curve 50.
  • An acoustic surface wave'device comprising, in combination:
  • a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting propagating acoustic surface wave energy
  • At least one electromechanical transducer coupled to a surface of said substrate at a first region thereof; said transducer comprising a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes,
  • An acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
  • a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting a first plurality of longitudinally spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive a irst en of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, a portion of the electrode members of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and e a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
  • An electromechanical transducer for an'acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
  • first end of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, aportion of the electrodes of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends;
  • An electromechanical transducer for an acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Surface Acoustic Wave Elements And Circuit Networks Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

An improved transducer structure of the interdigitated electrode type is disclosed. In many microwave acoustic devices it is necessary to convert rf energy to acoustic surface wave energy and vice versa. When the acoustic medium is a piezoelectric substrate, interdigitated electrode transducers are widely employed. When such transducers are amplitude weighted, acoustic wave phase distortion of a serious nature can occur. Such phase distortion is eliminated by the use of an interdigitated transducer having dummy (i.e. non-active) electrodes disposed in the transducer pattern so as to present a substantially uniform metalization density to the propagating acoustic surface wave.

Description

United States-Patent I Gerard v I [54] ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICE HAVING IMPROVED TRANSDUCER STRUCTURE [72] Inventor: Henry M. Gerard, San Diego, Calif.
[73] 'Assigne'e: Hughes Aircraft Company, Culver City, Calif.
22 Filed: June4, 1971 21 Appl.No.: 150,108
Collins and Hagon, Applying Surface Wave Acoustics,
Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 97- 103 Altman, Tapping Microwave Acoustics for Better 7 Primary Examiner-J. V. Truhe Assistant Examiner-B. A. Reynolds Att0rneyW. H. MacAllister, Jr. and Don C. Dennison [57] ABSTRACT An improved transducer structure of the interdigitated electrode type is disclosed. In many microwave acoustic devices it is necessary to convert rf energy to acoustic surface wave energy and vice versa. When the acoustic medium is a piezoelectric substrate, interdigitated electrode transducers are widely employed. When such transducers are amplitude weighted, acoustic wave phase distortion of a serious nature can occur. Such phase distortion is eliminated by the use of an interdigitated transducer having dummy (i.e. non-active) electrodes disposed in the transducer pattern so as to present a substantially uniform metalization density to the propagating acoustic surface wave.
16 Claims, 5 Drawing Figures tion Meons Reflectionless Acoustic Termination Signal Processing, Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 94- I PATENTEDum 11 I972 I 3.699.364 sum 1 or 2 0 Fig.5.
Utilization Meuns Reflecfionless Acoustic Termination Reflectionless R. Acou st ic source Termmunon Henry M. Gerard,
INVENTOR.
ATTORN EY.
I ACo sTIC SURFACE wAvE DEVICE HAVING IMPROVED TRANSDUCER STRUCTURE RELATIONTOGOVERNMENT CONTRACT The invention herein described was made in the course of or under a contract or I subcontract thereunder, with the Department of the Army.
FIELD on THE INVENTION This invention relates to acoustic surface wave devices and more specifically to improved electromechanical transducer structures for use with such devices. 1
' DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART term is not altogether accurate, for it may also include I devices operating below the frequency range of approximately l,000 Ml-Iz which is traditionally regarded as the lower limit of the microwave region.
Because of developments in new materials, widespread interest now exists in microwave acoustic devices wherein the wave energy propagates along the surface of a material much as a ripple on a pond. In fact, if viewed microscopically, the surface of the material supporting these waves would resemble such a pond, completewith wave crests and valleys. One of the great advantages of surface wave devices results from the fact that the surface waves travel much slower than electromagnetic waves in free space. The wavelengths are therefore shorter and components such as delay lines, amplifiers, attenuators, filters, and I couplers of microminiature construction can be utilized to modify and process the surface wave energy.
In its simplest form a surface wave microwave acoustic circuit comprises a source of rf energy, a smooth slab-like element or substrate of material capable of supporting propagating surface waves and a utilization-device. Electromechanical transducers are coupled to the substrate to convert the rf energy to surface waves in the material and vice vers'a. Thus configured, the basic surface wave device is primarily useful as a delay line. Frequently, it is desired to modify the propagating surface wave in a manner such as to enhance the operation of the basic devices and to form new devices having'unique properties.
In general, piezoelectric materials are utilized in fabricating the surface wave substrate. With such substrates, the input and output transducers commonly take the form of arrays of conductive interdigitated electrodes which are bonded to the substrate surface. By properly designing the transducers, it is possible to obtain delay lines which have response characteristics which are functions of delay time and frequency. Because of these'properties, such devices are termed delay line filters, and find use in a broad range of communications and radar systems.
Because of the many advantages enjoyed by delay line filters they are especially attractive for use in modern radar systems. See, for example, the article Surface Wave Delay Lines Promise Filters for Radar, etc. by J. H. Collins and P. J. I-Iagon, Electronics, Jan. 19, 1970 at pp. -122. When used with chirp radar systems, for example, pulse compression and expansion filters can be obtained by utilizing surface wave delay lines with interdigitated electrode transducers having a graded or varying interelectrode spacing.
It is also desirable in many instances to suppress or control filter sidelobe response by varying the transducer interelectrode overlap. The article Surface Wave Device Applications and Component Developments by J. Bumsweig,- E. H. Gregory and R. J. Wagner, IEEE, Journal of Solid State Circuits, Vol.
. SC-5, No. 6, December 1970 at pp. 310-319, for example, illustrates transducerpat terns of triangular and Gaussian shape.
It has been found, however, that device operation is degraded when utilizing transducers having interdigitated electrodes which do not extend completely across the transverse transducer dimension. This degradation is caused by closely nonuniform metalization of such transducer patterns and results from unequal velocities of different portions of the propagating surface wave. The unequal surface wave velocity in turn results in phase distortion which manifests itself as poor filter response characteristics.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to improve the response characteristics of electromechanical transducers of the interdigitated electrode type.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an improved interdigitated transducer structure having a weighted amplitude versus frequency response characteristic.
. It is yet another object of the present invention to improve the response characteristics of surface wave delay line filters.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the principles of the present invention, these objects are accomplished by utilizing dummy" elements disposed in the interstices of adjacent active electrodes of an interdigitated electrode transducer. The dummy elements, while being inactive insofar as the transduction process is concerned, provide a more uniform transducer metalization density. The resultant transducer therefore appears substantially homogeneous to the surface wave propagating in the piezoelectric substrate on which the transducer is disposed. Although the transducer appears uniform to the surface wave, its active electrode pattern can be selected for any desired response characteristic.
When the compensated transducers are incorporated in weighted delay line filters, the phase distortion caused by non-uniform surface wave velocities is substantially eliminated. The response characteristics of such filters, therefore, more closely approximate the desired design characteristics.
3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The foregoing and other objects and features of the present invention can be more readily understood with reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction withthe accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements and in which! FIG. 1 is asimplified pictorial view of a surface wave delay line filter in accordance with the present invention; FIG. 2 is a plan view of a portion of a filter such as that of FIG. 1 but utilizing a transducer of prior art both with andwithout the compensated interdigitated transducer of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring more specifically to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a simplified pictorial view of a surface wave delay line filter. In FIG. 1 an elongated slab or substrate of piezoelectric material is provided with an input trans-' ducer l1 and an output transducer 12. A source of rf -energy indicated generally by block 13 is electrically coupled to input transducer 11. Source 13 can also include suitable-electromagnetic tuning elements as are well known in the art. A utilization circuit indicated generally as block 14 is, in turn, electrically coupled to systems. In a radar receiver, for example, the delay line may be of the dispersive type for pulse compression of a transmitted chirp radar pulse. Although many other uses forthe improved transducer structures of the present invention are known, the embodiments will be described in terms of frequency dispersive delay lines.
In additionto providing a time delay between the V input and output signals which is a function of frequen- I cy it is also frequently desirable to amplitude-weight the filter response characteristic. That is, it is sometimes desirable to design one orboth transducers so the output transducer 12. The piezoelectric material I from which substrate 10 is fabricated is of the type suitable for the propagation of acoustic surface waves.
- tended operation they can be employed with greater or lesser success.
Generally, the surface of substrate 10 is ground and polished to an optical quality finish in order to reduce surface imperfections to a minimum. Input and output transducers 11 and 12, which will be described in greater detail-hereinbelow, are deposited, bonded or otherwise-mechanically attached to the upper polished surface of substrate 10. Transducers Y11 and 12 can be formed of any suitable electrically conductive material such as aluminum or gold. The thickness of the filtersof the general type depicted in FIG. 1 have a wide variety of uses as a glance at the current microwave literature will reveal. A typical use for a delay line such as thatdepicted in FIG. 1 is in the signal processing portions of pulse compression radar that with 'a given amplitude rf input signal the'amplitude of the delayed rf output signal is a function of frequency.
In order to achieve. both frequency dispersive and frequency 1 dependent amplitude-weighting in such delay linedevices, interdigitated transducer structures such as that shown in FIG. 2 have been suggested. FIG.
2 is a plan view, partially broken away, of the input portion of a device such as shown in FIG. 1. The input transducer 21 comprises a pair of interdigitated con ductor patterns bonded to the upper surface of piezoelectric substrate 10. Transducer 21 comprises a pair of elongated conductive pads 22 and 23 which are conveniently connected to the rf source,,not shown, by means of leads 24 and 25, respectively.
Extending partially across the surface of substrate 10 between pads 22 and 23 in the transverse direction are sets of interdigitated conducting electrodes 26 and 27. As with pads 22 and 23, electrodes 26 and 27 are deposited, bonded or otherwise mechanically attached to the surface of substrate 10. As is known in the art, the spacing x between adjacent electrodes 26 and 27 determines the frequency of maximum surface wave excitation. In general, for maximum coupling between the electrical and acoustic wave energy, the spacing x is an integral multiple of an acoustic half-wavelength. The amount of transverse overlap y between adjacent electrodes determines the efficiency of the electromagnetic-to-acoustic transfer, and, therefore, the degree of acoustic coupling.
Due to the variation of transverse electrode overlapy, the maximum weighting for the transducer of FIG. 2
occurs in the longitudinal mid-region of the structure.
This variation in overlap y along the transducer has been termed apodization,- and the resultant structures are known as apodized interdigitated transducers.
In operation, rf energy having frequency components extending over a large range of frequencies is applied to'transducer 21 by means of conductive leads 24 and 25. Due to the relatively large electrode spacing x in the left-hand portion of the transducer, the lower frequency rf energy is converted by means of the piezoelectric effect into mechanicalperturbations or surface waves in the upper surface of substrate 10. The midrange frequency and higher frequency wave energy is similarly converted to propagating surface wave energy in the mid and right-hand regions of transducer 21, respectively. Due to the bidirectional nature of a transducer 21, a portion of the surface wave energy propagates toward the left where it can be absorbed, if desired, by an absorbing material such as black wax deposited on the upper surface of substrate 10 as shown in FIG. 1. I
higher operating frequencies the electrode mass can affectthe surface wave velocity and give rise to undesirable phase distortion. Furthermore, if the substrate material has a relatively strong electromechanical coupling coefficient such transducer structures can degrade-performance at low as well as high operating frequencies.
More specifically, it has been found that the variation in the amount of metalization of the substrate seen by the surface wave as it propagates beneath the transducer causes velocity variations; that is, 'as the surface wave propagates beneath the region of the transducer its velocity is decreased by the presence of the conductive electrodes 26 and 27. Thus, the surface wave velocity is slower along the longitudinal centerline of transducer 21 than in the transverse regions near the than at the edges. In general, the velocity change is not only determined by the extent of relative metalization seen by the propagating surface wave, but is also proportional to the square of the effective surface wave electromechanical coupling coefficient referred to above. Since the phase difference between the central and edge regions of the propagating acoustic beam is proportional to velocity and path length, a velocity difference of only a fraction of a percent can result in very large cumulative phase distortions. The equi-phase wavefront of the surface wave launched by transducer 21 therefore emerges with a curved shape somewhat as indicated by dotted lines 20.
As the distorted surface wave reaches the output transducer it is converted to an rf output signal. However, due to the averaging orintegrating effect of the output transducer, which is designed to accept an undistorted wavefront, the rf output is degraded. If the output transducer is a mirror image of the input transducer 21, the wavefront of the propagating surface wave energy is even further degraded. Again, this problem is most severe in materials such as LiNbO which exhibit a strong coupling coefficient and is less severe in materials such as quartz which has a relatively low coupling coefficient.
In FIG. 3 there is shown an improved transducer structure in keeping with the present invention which overcomes the above-described problem. The transducer pattern of FIG. 3 is apodized or weighted in the same manner as that shown in FIG. 2. However, dummy elements 26a and 27a have been provided in the interstices of the transducer pattern to provide a substantially uniform metalization density as seen by the propagating acoustic surface wave energy. Dummy elements 260 are disposed between active electrodes 26 and dummy elements 27a are disposed between active electrodes 27.
In FIG. 3 dummy elements 26a and 27a are shown as being attached to pads 22 and 23, respectively. It is not 'edges because there is more metal along the centerline required, however, that these elements be conductive, or that they be conductively joined to the pads or to each other. What is required is that the dummy elements present substantially the same effective loading to the propagating surface wave as the missing electrode portions.
It is seen that dummy elements 26a and 27a are inactive insofar as the transduction mechanism is concemed since they are at the same potential as their immediately adjacent electrodes 26 and 27, respectively. Their presence, however, provides a substantially uniform metalization density to surface wave energy, thus eliminating the differential surface wave velocity problem of the transducer structure of FIG. 2. The portions of the surface wave energy near the edges of the.
transducer see substantially the same amount of overlying metalization as the central portions. The acoustic velocity is therefore substantially uniform for the entire wavefront and the emerging wavefront is linear as indicated by dotted lines 30.
Although the most convenient method of fabricating the compensated transducer of FIG. 3 is with the use of the same conductive material for the active electrodes and the dummy elements, it is a matter of design choice. The dummy elements can be formed of a different material, either conductive or nonconductive. If a different material is used, however, the width or thickness of the dummy elements may have to be changed from that of the active electrodes in order to compensate for the difference in effective surface wave loading of the different materials.
In FIG. 4 there is shown a plan view of another embodiment of the present invention. The device of FIG. 4 represents a typical weighted pulse compression filter. The filter of FIG. 4 comprises a piezoelectric substrate 40 having a relatively broadband unweighted interdigitated input transducer 41 disposed on the upper surface thereof. The output transducer 42 comprises conductive pads 43 and 44 with transversely extending electrodes 45 and 46. The active electrodes 46 are is required. Dummy elements 45a are disposed in the interstices between active electrodes 45 and are conductively attached to pad 43.
In operation, broadband rf energy applied to input transducer 41 is converted to surface wave energy, a portion of which propagates axially along the surface in the direction of output transducer 42. This surface wave energy is reconverted to rf energy of the output transducer 42 and extracted therefrom by means of conductive leads 47 and 48. By virtue of the narrower electrode spacing in the left-hand region of the output transducer 42, the high frequency energy undergoes the least time delay. The low frequency energy, on the other hand, undergoes the greatest time delay. Also, since the transducer is weighted, the mid-frequency response of the transducer is greatest and tapers off for both the high and low frequencies. Phase distortion arising from the differential surface wave velocity in output transducer 42 is minimized by the inclusion of dummy elements 45a.
FIG. is a graphical representation of the insertion loss versus frequency characteristics of pulse compression filters similar to that of FIG. 4. The experimental Hamming weighted response curve as indicated by broken line 50 centered about at mid-band frequency f,,. As can be seen, the insertion loss for the uncompensated transducer departs substantially from the ideal response and is, in fact, unsuitable.
Curve 53 represents the insertion loss characteristic for a similarly weighted filter but with a compensated output transducer of the type illustrated in FIG. 3. As is readily seen, the insertion loss characteristic with the improved 'transducer of 'the present invention corresponds closely with the idealized design curve 50.
In all cases it is understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of but a small number of the many possible specific embodiments which can represent applications of the principles of the present invention. Numerous and varied other arrangements can be readily devised in accordance with these principles by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
What isclaim'ed is:
,1. An acoustic surface wave'device comprising, in combination:
a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting propagating acoustic surface wave energy;
at least one electromechanical transducer coupled to a surface of said substrate at a first region thereof; said transducer comprising a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes,
alternate ones of which are conductively connected to form two interdigitated electrode arrays, the transverse overlap between adjacent electrodes varying along the longitudinal direction of said arrays; and
compensating elements disposed in the interstices of the array electrodes in the non-overlapping regions thereof.
2. The device according to claim 1 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
3. The device according to claim 1 wherein said compensatin g elements are electrically conductive.
4. The device according to claim 3 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adjacent thereto.
5. An acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting a first plurality of longitudinally spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive a irst en of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, a portion of the electrode members of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and e a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
l 6. The device according to claim 5 wherein said compensating elements areelectrically nonconductive.
7. The device according to claim 5 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
8. The device according to claim 7- wherein said com-. pensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adjacent thereto.
9. An electromechanical transducer for an'acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
a pair of elongated spaced apart conductive members,
a first plurality of longitudinally-spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive members;
a first end of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, aportion of the electrodes of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and
a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
10. The transducer according to claim 9 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
1 1. The transducer according to claim 9 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
12. The transducer according to claim 11 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adverse thereto.
13. An electromechanical transducer for an acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination:
a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes, alternate ones of which are conductively connected to form two interdigitated electrode arrays, the transverse overlap between adjacent electrodes varying along the longitudinal direction of said arrays; and
compensating elements disposed in the interstices of the array electrodes in the nonoverlapping regions thereof. I
14. The transducer according to claim 13 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
15. The transducer according to claim 13 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive'.
16. The transducer according to claim 15 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adverse thereto.

Claims (16)

1. An acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination: a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting propagating acoustic surface wave energy; at least one electromechanical transducer coupled to a surface of said substrate at a first region thereof; said transducer comprising a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes, alternate ones of which are conductively connected to form two interdigitated electrode arrays, the transverse overlap between adjacent electrodes varying along the longitudinal direction of said arrays; and compensating elements disposed in the interstices of the array electrodes in the non-overlapping regions thereof.
2. The device according to claim 1 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
3. The device according to claim 1 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
4. The device according to claim 3 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adjacent thereto.
5. An acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination: a piezoelectric substrate capable of supporting propagating acoustic surface waVe energy; at least one electromechanical transducer coupled to a surface of said substrate at a first region thereof; said transducer comprising a pair of elongated spaced-apart conductive members; a first plurality of longitudinally spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive members; a first end of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, a portion of the electrode members of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
6. The device according to claim 5 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
7. The device according to claim 5 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
8. The device according to claim 7 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adjacent thereto.
9. An electromechanical transducer for an acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination: a pair of elongated spaced-apart conductive members; a first plurality of longitudinally-spaced electrodes extending transversely between said conductive members; a first end of alternate ones of said electrodes being conductively connected to one of said conductive members to form first and second arrays of interdigitated electrodes, a portion of the electrodes of at least one of said arrays having apodized second ends; and a plurality of compensating elements disposed in the interstices between the electrodes of said arrays in the regions of said apodization.
10. The transducer according to claim 9 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
11. The transducer according to claim 9 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
12. The transducer according to claim 11 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adverse thereto.
13. An electromechanical transducer for an acoustic surface wave device comprising, in combination: a plurality of substantially parallel spaced-apart conductive electrodes, alternate ones of which are conductively connected to form two interdigitated electrode arrays, the transverse overlap between adjacent electrodes varying along the longitudinal direction of said arrays; and compensating elements disposed in the interstices of the array electrodes in the nonoverlapping regions thereof.
14. The transducer according to claim 13 wherein said compensating elements are electrically nonconductive.
15. The transducer according to claim 13 wherein said compensating elements are electrically conductive.
16. The transducer according to claim 15 wherein said compensating elements are conductively coupled to the array electrodes longitudinally adverse thereto.
US150108A 1971-06-04 1971-06-04 Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure Expired - Lifetime US3699364A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15010871A 1971-06-04 1971-06-04

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3699364A true US3699364A (en) 1972-10-17

Family

ID=22533151

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US150108A Expired - Lifetime US3699364A (en) 1971-06-04 1971-06-04 Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3699364A (en)

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3781721A (en) * 1972-11-30 1973-12-25 Hughes Aircraft Co Acoustic surface wave device eliminating spurious end reflections
US3813618A (en) * 1971-07-16 1974-05-28 Thomson Csf Surface wave electromechanical filter
DE2435835A1 (en) * 1973-08-03 1975-03-13 Philips Nv ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE ARRANGEMENT
US4005378A (en) * 1975-11-25 1977-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Surface acoustic wave filter
US4007433A (en) * 1974-07-15 1977-02-08 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Public Corporation Elastic surface wave filter
US4023124A (en) * 1974-08-02 1977-05-10 U.S. Philips Corporation Acoustic surface wave devices
US4030050A (en) * 1974-09-26 1977-06-14 Plessey Handel Und Investments A.G. Acoustic surface wave filters
DE2820046A1 (en) * 1977-05-09 1978-11-16 Murata Manufacturing Co ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE COMPONENT
US4144508A (en) * 1976-07-29 1979-03-13 Plessey Handel Und Investments Ag Surface acoustic wave filters
US4205280A (en) * 1978-08-18 1980-05-27 Zenith Radio Corporation Surface wave device with suppressed boundary-reflected waves
DE3038056A1 (en) * 1979-10-08 1981-04-16 Toko, Inc., Tokyo ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICE
US4346322A (en) * 1979-03-22 1982-08-24 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Elastic surface wave device
US4473888A (en) * 1981-10-28 1984-09-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Saw monolithic convolver using dispersive transducers
US4857870A (en) * 1985-12-04 1989-08-15 Thomson-Csf Method of manufacturing a surface wave dispersive filter and a filter manufactured in accordance with this method
US5019742A (en) * 1986-03-12 1991-05-28 Northern Telecom Limited Saw device with apodized IDT
US5777419A (en) * 1995-08-15 1998-07-07 Motorola Inc. Surface acoustic wave device with minimized bulk scattering
US20040247153A1 (en) * 2001-07-24 2004-12-09 Werner Ruile Converter for surface waves with improved suppression of interfering excitation
US20060158061A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2006-07-20 Markus Hauser Electroacoustic transducer for a surface wave operating component
US20150382110A9 (en) * 2013-03-14 2015-12-31 Lewis Athanas Acoustic Transducer and Method for Driving Same

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3581248A (en) * 1969-03-26 1971-05-25 Zenith Radio Corp Acoustic filters
US3600710A (en) * 1968-08-12 1971-08-17 Zenith Radio Corp Acoustic surface wave filter

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3600710A (en) * 1968-08-12 1971-08-17 Zenith Radio Corp Acoustic surface wave filter
US3581248A (en) * 1969-03-26 1971-05-25 Zenith Radio Corp Acoustic filters

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Altman, Tapping Microwave Acoustics for Better Signal Processing, Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 94 96 *
Collins and Hagon, Applying Surface Wave Acoustics, Electronics, Nov. 10, 1969, pp. 97 103 *

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3813618A (en) * 1971-07-16 1974-05-28 Thomson Csf Surface wave electromechanical filter
US3781721A (en) * 1972-11-30 1973-12-25 Hughes Aircraft Co Acoustic surface wave device eliminating spurious end reflections
DE2435835A1 (en) * 1973-08-03 1975-03-13 Philips Nv ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE ARRANGEMENT
US3968460A (en) * 1973-08-03 1976-07-06 U.S. Philips Corporation Acoustic surface-wave devices
US4007433A (en) * 1974-07-15 1977-02-08 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Public Corporation Elastic surface wave filter
US4023124A (en) * 1974-08-02 1977-05-10 U.S. Philips Corporation Acoustic surface wave devices
US4030050A (en) * 1974-09-26 1977-06-14 Plessey Handel Und Investments A.G. Acoustic surface wave filters
US4005378A (en) * 1975-11-25 1977-01-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Surface acoustic wave filter
US4144508A (en) * 1976-07-29 1979-03-13 Plessey Handel Und Investments Ag Surface acoustic wave filters
DE2820046A1 (en) * 1977-05-09 1978-11-16 Murata Manufacturing Co ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE COMPONENT
US4205280A (en) * 1978-08-18 1980-05-27 Zenith Radio Corporation Surface wave device with suppressed boundary-reflected waves
US4346322A (en) * 1979-03-22 1982-08-24 Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Elastic surface wave device
DE3038056A1 (en) * 1979-10-08 1981-04-16 Toko, Inc., Tokyo ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICE
US4473888A (en) * 1981-10-28 1984-09-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Saw monolithic convolver using dispersive transducers
US4857870A (en) * 1985-12-04 1989-08-15 Thomson-Csf Method of manufacturing a surface wave dispersive filter and a filter manufactured in accordance with this method
US5019742A (en) * 1986-03-12 1991-05-28 Northern Telecom Limited Saw device with apodized IDT
US5777419A (en) * 1995-08-15 1998-07-07 Motorola Inc. Surface acoustic wave device with minimized bulk scattering
US20040247153A1 (en) * 2001-07-24 2004-12-09 Werner Ruile Converter for surface waves with improved suppression of interfering excitation
US7170372B2 (en) * 2001-07-24 2007-01-30 Epcos Ag Converter for surface waves with improved suppression of interfering excitation
US20060158061A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2006-07-20 Markus Hauser Electroacoustic transducer for a surface wave operating component
US7449812B2 (en) * 2003-03-03 2008-11-11 Epcos Ag Electroacoustic transducer for a surface wave operating component
US20150382110A9 (en) * 2013-03-14 2015-12-31 Lewis Athanas Acoustic Transducer and Method for Driving Same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3699364A (en) Acoustic surface wave device having improved transducer structure
US3753164A (en) Acoustic surface wave filter
US3883831A (en) Surface wave devices
US3786373A (en) Temperature compensated acoustic surface wave device
US3836876A (en) Acoustic surface wave devices
US4910839A (en) Method of making a single phase unidirectional surface acoustic wave transducer
US3401360A (en) Phased transducer arrays for elastic wave transmission
US4628222A (en) Protection of saw devices comprising metallized regions on dielectric substrates
US3686518A (en) Unidirectional surface wave transducers
US3980904A (en) Elastic surface wave device
US3760299A (en) Acoustic surface wave-apparatus having dielectric material separating transducer from acoustic medium
US3662293A (en) Acoustic-wave transmitting device
US3818379A (en) Acoustic surface wave device
EP0026114B1 (en) Surface acoustic wave device
US3827002A (en) Tunable electroacoustic transducers
US3736532A (en) Ultrasonic delay lines
US4434383A (en) Temperature stable surface acoustic wave device
US3686579A (en) Solid-state, acoustic-wave amplifiers
US4395686A (en) Attenuation of higher order width modes in magnetostatic wave devices
US4575696A (en) Method for using interdigital surface wave transducer to generate unidirectionally propagating surface wave
US3803520A (en) Acoustic surface wave device with improved transducer
CA2034392A1 (en) Electrode structure with constant velocity and predetermined reflectivity
US4870312A (en) Surface wave device having anti-reflective shield
GB2123637A (en) Surface acoustic wave device
US3582834A (en) Microwave ultrasonic delay line