US3649371A - Coatings for steel - Google Patents

Coatings for steel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3649371A
US3649371A US848689A US3649371DA US3649371A US 3649371 A US3649371 A US 3649371A US 848689 A US848689 A US 848689A US 3649371D A US3649371D A US 3649371DA US 3649371 A US3649371 A US 3649371A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bath
coating
ion
per liter
grams per
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US848689A
Inventor
Singkata Tongyai
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pennwalt Corp
Original Assignee
Pennwalt Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Pennwalt Corp filed Critical Pennwalt Corp
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3649371A publication Critical patent/US3649371A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/46Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing oxalates

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the art of coating ferrous metal and is particularly concerned with a method and a composition of matter useful for coating metals with an oxalate coating.
  • the invention also relates to the preparation and replenishment of coating baths for ferrous metals.
  • aqueous oxalic acid coating solutions contain a sulphur compound containing oxygen which liberates sulphur, hydrogen sulfide and/or sulphur dioxide under the acidic conditions of the coating solution.
  • These additives are called accelerating agents and are normally chosen from the class consisting of sulfides, sulfites, bisulfites, hydrosulfites, thiosulfates, and thionates. Usually in the form of an alkali metal salt.
  • oxalate coating baths which do not use sulphur compounds of the kind mentioned. They utilize, in many cases, an oxidizing compound e.g. chlorates, nitrites and organic nitro compounds. These are difllcult to use because, if not carefully controlled, they may oxidize either the oxalic acid in the bath or the oxalate coating on metals.
  • an oxidizing compound e.g. chlorates, nitrites and organic nitro compounds.
  • the composition may include about two grams per liter of sulfate ion.
  • a process for using this composition involves contacting it with ferrous metal while maintaining the solution at a temperature of to about 200 F.
  • a composition for preparing and replenishing the bath consists essentially of oxalic acid, ferric sulfate and a source of fluoride ion.
  • the fluoride ion is derived from the group consisting of alkali metal fluorides, alkali metal bifluorides, ammonium fluoride, ammonium bifluoritle, and hydrogen fluoride.
  • Suflicient ferrous oxalate to saturate the solution at the operating temperature and pH. Initially, lesser amounts may be employed because additional ferrous oxalate is generated during the coating operation.
  • the ferrous oxalate may be derived from ferrous salts and oxalate ion added to the bath.
  • a minimum of two percent by weight of oxalic acid i.e. about 20 grams per liter. The range is from about 20 grams per liter to about 400 grams per liter.
  • a coating is formed with less oxalic acid present but the resulting coating does not adhere as tightly to the metal as it does when larger amounts of oxalic acid is present.
  • Oxalic acid may also be obtained in the bath by indirect means, i.e. from hydrogen ion and oxalate ion.
  • Sources of oxalate ion can be for example; ferric or ferrous oxalate.
  • Examples of hydrogen ion sources are sulfuric acid, alkali metal bisulfates and alkali metal bifluorides.
  • mineral acids are added to the bath in order to adjust the pH.
  • oxalic acid may be used in place of the mineral acids.
  • Ferric ion from about 0.2 gram per liter to about 10 grams per liter.
  • the ferric ion is about 5 grams per liter and is added as the sulfate.
  • Other sources of ferric ion may also be used, e.g. hydrated ferric oxide, ferric hydroxide, ferric fluoride or a ferric fluoride complex.
  • the amount of ferric ion in the solution can be high, e.g. at the saturation level for the particular ferric salt, however, some free oxalic acid must also be present in the bath in order to obtain more adherent coatings.
  • Fluoride ion from about 2 percent to about 20 percent by weight, i.e. from about 20' grams per liter to about 200 grams per liter. More preferred is 2.15 percent to about 6 percent fluoride salt. Less than 2 percent fluoride ion may be used while coating certain steels, e.g. mild steel and 400 series steel, but higher operating temperatures and longer operating times are required. About 2.8 percent fluoride ion is recommended for 300* series stainless steel.
  • Fluoride ion used herein may be derived from fluoride complexes of iron hydrogen fluoride or any fluoride or bifiuoride salt. Hydrogen fluoride, ammonium bifluoride and the alkali metal bifluorides'are preferred.
  • the pH of the coating solution is within the range of to 2.5. More preferred is the pH range of 0.2 to 1.2. When the pH is less than 0.2, extra care must be practiced in using the bath to avoid over etching the metal to be coated. Bath pHs higher than 2.5 result in low quality coatings, because the metal surfaces are not sufficiently reactive under these conditions.
  • the pH of the bath may be adjusted using mineral acids, e.g. sulfuric, hydrofluoric, etc. Oxidizing acids, such as nitric acid may be used but are generally not preferred because they may attack the oxalate coating.
  • the bath pH may also be adjusted using organic acids. Oxalic acid is especially suitable for this purpose because it serves both as a source of hydrogen ion for pH purposes and oxalate ion for coating purposes. Both oxalic and sulfuric acid are preferred for pH adjustment.
  • the operating temperature of the bath during coating is from 130 F. to about 200 F. More preferred is the operating temperature range of from 150 F. to about 185 F. Below the lower temperature range mentioned, the coating reaction is too slow to be commercially significant. Above the higher temperature range too much etching of the metal occurs. Exceeding either end of the temperature range may affect the adhesion of the coating.
  • the stainless steels and mild steels which are coated by the coating solutions and processes of this invention vary in their composition. This factor causes them to behave differently in the coating solution. This is exhibited in the amount of time and the temperature a given steel is exposed to a bath in order to obtain an optimum coating. For example, good coatings on 400 series stainless steels may be obtained in four to seven minutes at 150- 155 E; series 316 and 304 stainless steel were observed to achieve good coatings at 160165 F. in seven minutes; and series 347 and 321 required to minutes at 165175 F.
  • composition of this invention may optionally include sulfate ion.
  • sulfate ion has been found to produce coatings on the metal surface having higher adherence than is obtainable in its absence and the preferred compositions of this invention include sulfate ion, usually obtained by adding ferric sulfate.
  • the amount of sulfate ion can be small, e.g. five grams per liter of ferrous sulfate provides enough sulfate ion to yield good coatings.
  • Ferric ion is usually added as a sulfate, and therefore, the sulfate ion is present in amounts equivalent to the added ferric ion.
  • the time required to form a coating on the metal surface varies from five to twenty-five minutes when the bath is at 155 F. to about 185 F. These conditions will provide a good coating on all mild and stainless steels. Longer or shorter coating times can be effected by chang ing the temperature or concentration of ingredients in the bath. Longer or shorter times will also be indicated depending upon coating thickness.
  • Etching of the metal surface to be coated prior to its exposure to the coating bath is not required but is preferred.
  • the main difference observable is that the resultant coatings are more even when the metals are etched prior to coating. This is believed to result because etching removes a mixture of metal oxides formed on the surface. These oxides are formed by oxidation of the mixture of metals present in stainless steel. These oxides vary in their rate of removal when the metal is in contact with the bath and thereby cause an uneven coating.
  • The-bath can be prepared or replenished by means of a packaged mixture containing the following ingredients in the indicated amounts.
  • the coating ingredients of the bath are, of course, consumed or depleted during the treatment of a succession of articles.
  • the depletion rate of the components in the baths of this invention is in part dependent upon the manner in which the bath is used. If the bath is operated on a continuous basis, the coating producing ingredients are consumed on a relatively uniform basis. Accordingly, replenishment of the bath is most readily and conveniently accomplished by adding the mixture as shown in Example 7. This will restore the three ingredients to the desired level. Under some circumstances, as for example; when the bath temperature is not controlled, one or more ingredients may be excessively consumed. If this happens, the individual ingredient may be replenished by supplementing the replenishing mixture.
  • the coating baths of this invention may be replenished in the usual manner familiar in the art which consists of adding the individual coating constituents as required.
  • Replenishment of the coating chemicals is effected in accordance with the needs as determined by pointage titration which technique is well known in the coating industry. It is obvious from the foregoing that the use of the admixtures prepared in the ratio indicated herein makes it possible to prepare and maintain a bath by weighing or measuring only one admixture which, of course, reduces the possibility of error in calculation which is inherent in the prior practice of separately weighing and adding different ingredients to the bath. This advantage is also present in situations where titrations indicate that one or another of the ingredients in the bath has been excessively consumed. In this situation, it is merely necessary to calculate how much more of the depleted ingredient must be added over that contained in the prepackaged composition. Illustrative examples of coating solutions falling under the purview of this invention are listed below, but are in no way intended to limit its scope.
  • EXAMPLE 1 A bath was prepared by dissolving 5 grams per liter ferrous sulfate (hydrated) and 86.7 grams per liter ferric oxalate (Fe (C O 6H O) in water. Sulfuric acid was added to lower the pH of bath without fluoride to 0.7 and then grams per liter sodium bifluoride was added. This bath coated 304 type stainless steel in 5 to 7 minutes at F. to F.
  • Example 2 A bath as described in Example 1 was prepared. About 110 grams per liter of oxalic acid was also added to the bath. Type 304 stainless steel was coated under the same conditions of Example lthis coating was improved in appearance and adhesion over that of Example 1.
  • EXAMPLE 3 A bath was prepared containing 95 grams per liter ferric oxalate, 8 grams per liter ferrous oxalate, 108 grams per liter oxalic acid (H C O -2H O) and 77.5 grams per liter sodium bifluoride. With this bath 304 stainless steel was coated at 165 F. to F. for seven minutes. A coating weight of 1800 mg./sq. ft. was obtained.
  • EXAMPLE 4 A bath was prepared containing 64.8 grams per liter anhydrous ferric sulfate, 2.1 grams per liter ferrous sulfate, 132.8 grams per liter oxalic acid (as the dihydrate) and 52.5 grams per liter of sodium bifiuoride. A coating of 2600 to 2800 mg./sq. ft. and having good adhesion was produced in seven minutes at a bath temperature of 165 F. to 175 F. on type 304 stainless steel.
  • EXAMPLE 6 A bath was prepared containing grams per liter anhydrous ferric sulfate, 220 grams per liter oxalic acid,
  • a bath was prepared by mixing 39.4 grams of ferric sulfate, 0.6 gram of ferrous sulfate, 85 grams of oxalic acid and 75 grams of sodium bifluoride and enough Water to make 800 milliliters of solution. The ingredients were prepackaged in this ratio and added to water as indicated. The bath was stirred and heated at 180 F. until the salts dissolved. The bath was used on 300 stainless steel panels until about 90 percent of its original concentration was consumed as determined by analysis for iron and oxalate content. The bath was then replenished using a mixture composed of the following:
  • compositions and process of the invention are useful for preparing adherent oxalate coatings on stainless steel without using sulfur accelerators. Accordingly they avoid the problems associated with coating solutions containing sulfur accelerators.
  • Sulfur accelerators is understood to mean reducing compounds such as sulfites and thiosulfates and does not include sulfates.
  • composition and process of this invention are easy to control because they do not require an accelerator ingredient and do not produce sulfur-containing sludge.
  • aqueous acidic solution consisting essentially of oxalic acid, ferric ion, fluoride ion, sulfate ion and saturated with ferrous ion for a time interval suflicient to form a substantial coating and at a reactive temperature within the range of from F. to 200 F. and wherein the solution has a pH range from 0.2 to 2.5.
  • aqueous acidic solution consists essentially of (a) Oxalic acid within the range of 20 to 400 grams per liter;

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
  • Cleaning And De-Greasing Of Metallic Materials By Chemical Methods (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)

Abstract

A FERROUS OXALATE COATING ON FERROUS METAL RESULTS FROM CONTACTING THE METAL WITH AN AQUEOUS SOLUTION OF FERROUS OXALATE, FERRIC ION, FLUORIDE ION, OXALIC ACID AT A PH OF 0-2.5 AND A TEMPERATURE OF 130* TO ABOUT 190*F. A MIXTURE FOR PREPARING AND REPLENISHING THE BATH CONSISTS OF OXALIC ACID, FERRIC SULFATE AND ALKALI METAL BIFLUORIDES.

Description

United States Patent O 3,649,371 COATINGS FOR STEEL Singkata Tongyai, Warrington, Pa., assignor to Pennwalt Corporation, Philadelphia, Pa. N Drawing. Filed Aug. 8, 1969, Ser. No. 848,689 Int. Cl. C23f 7/20 US. Cl. his-6.14 A 2 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A ferrous oxalate coating on ferrous metal results from contacting the metal with an aqueous solution of ferrous oxalate, ferric ion, fluoride ion, oxalic acid at a pH of 02.5 and a temperature of 130 to about 190 F. A mixture for preparing and replenishing the bath consists of oxalic acid, ferric sulfate and alkali metal bifluorides.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the invention This invention relates to the art of coating ferrous metal and is particularly concerned with a method and a composition of matter useful for coating metals with an oxalate coating. The invention also relates to the preparation and replenishment of coating baths for ferrous metals.
Description of the prior art Virtually all the processes for chemically coating ferrous metals, i.e. mild steel and stainless steel, employ aqueous solutions of oxalic acid. The expression stainless steel is used in its generally accepted meaning. A detailed list of steels which fall Within the term stainless steels can be found in recent editions of the Metals Handbook, published by the American Society for Metals. Stainless steels referred to as the 200, 300, and 400 series contain elements such as chromium and nickel either with or without cobalt and molybdenum. These ferrous metals when coated in an oxalate process receive an oxalate coating on their surface which acts as a lubricant and as a lubricant carrier during metal deformation operations.
Many of the commercial aqueous oxalic acid coating solutions contain a sulphur compound containing oxygen which liberates sulphur, hydrogen sulfide and/or sulphur dioxide under the acidic conditions of the coating solution. These additives are called accelerating agents and are normally chosen from the class consisting of sulfides, sulfites, bisulfites, hydrosulfites, thiosulfates, and thionates. Usually in the form of an alkali metal salt. These accelerating agents have many objectionable features:
(1) They produce strong and unpleasant smelling byproducts which are toxic.
(2) They are continuously consumed and must be continuously replaced. Since exact control of the replenishing process is diflicult to achieve the concentration of these agents in the bath varies during the life of the bath.
(3) They cause control problems due to the presence of sulphur containing sludge in the bath which constantly builds up as the bath is used.
(4) They add to the total cost of the bath.
(5) They are temperature sensitive and limit the bath operating temperature or necessitate implementing an oil layer on the bath as per US. Pat. 2,953,487.
There are also oxalate coating baths which do not use sulphur compounds of the kind mentioned. They utilize, in many cases, an oxidizing compound e.g. chlorates, nitrites and organic nitro compounds. These are difllcult to use because, if not carefully controlled, they may oxidize either the oxalic acid in the bath or the oxalate coating on metals.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention is concerned with a ferrous metal coating composition comprising an aqueous solution contaming:
(a) Suflicient ferrous oxalate to saturate the solution; (b) A minimum of two percent oxalic acid;
(0) A minimum of 0.2 percent ferric ion;
(d) A minimum of 2.0 percent fluoride ion;
and having a pH of 0 to about 2.0.
Optionally, the composition may include about two grams per liter of sulfate ion.
A process for using this composition involves contacting it with ferrous metal while maintaining the solution at a temperature of to about 200 F.
A composition for preparing and replenishing the bath consists essentially of oxalic acid, ferric sulfate and a source of fluoride ion. The fluoride ion is derived from the group consisting of alkali metal fluorides, alkali metal bifluorides, ammonium fluoride, ammonium bifluoritle, and hydrogen fluoride.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The coating solutions of this invention are prepared by adding the following chemicals to water:
(1) Suflicient ferrous oxalate to saturate the solution at the operating temperature and pH. Initially, lesser amounts may be employed because additional ferrous oxalate is generated during the coating operation. The ferrous oxalate may be derived from ferrous salts and oxalate ion added to the bath.
(2) A minimum of two percent by weight of oxalic acid, i.e. about 20 grams per liter. The range is from about 20 grams per liter to about 400 grams per liter. A coating is formed with less oxalic acid present but the resulting coating does not adhere as tightly to the metal as it does when larger amounts of oxalic acid is present.
Oxalic acid may also be obtained in the bath by indirect means, i.e. from hydrogen ion and oxalate ion. Sources of oxalate ion can be for example; ferric or ferrous oxalate. Examples of hydrogen ion sources are sulfuric acid, alkali metal bisulfates and alkali metal bifluorides.
Normally, mineral acids are added to the bath in order to adjust the pH. However, if desired, oxalic acid may be used in place of the mineral acids. Preferably, about 14.5 percent by Weight of oxalic acid dihydrate is added when other acids are excluded from the bath.
(3) Ferric ion, from about 0.2 gram per liter to about 10 grams per liter. Preferably, the ferric ion is about 5 grams per liter and is added as the sulfate. Other sources of ferric ion may also be used, e.g. hydrated ferric oxide, ferric hydroxide, ferric fluoride or a ferric fluoride complex. The amount of ferric ion in the solution can be high, e.g. at the saturation level for the particular ferric salt, however, some free oxalic acid must also be present in the bath in order to obtain more adherent coatings.
(4) Fluoride ion from about 2 percent to about 20 percent by weight, i.e. from about 20' grams per liter to about 200 grams per liter. More preferred is 2.15 percent to about 6 percent fluoride salt. Less than 2 percent fluoride ion may be used while coating certain steels, e.g. mild steel and 400 series steel, but higher operating temperatures and longer operating times are required. About 2.8 percent fluoride ion is recommended for 300* series stainless steel.
Fluoride ion used herein may be derived from fluoride complexes of iron hydrogen fluoride or any fluoride or bifiuoride salt. Hydrogen fluoride, ammonium bifluoride and the alkali metal bifluorides'are preferred.
The pH of the coating solution is within the range of to 2.5. More preferred is the pH range of 0.2 to 1.2. When the pH is less than 0.2, extra care must be practiced in using the bath to avoid over etching the metal to be coated. Bath pHs higher than 2.5 result in low quality coatings, because the metal surfaces are not sufficiently reactive under these conditions.
The pH of the bath may be adjusted using mineral acids, e.g. sulfuric, hydrofluoric, etc. Oxidizing acids, such as nitric acid may be used but are generally not preferred because they may attack the oxalate coating. The bath pH may may also be adjusted using organic acids. Oxalic acid is especially suitable for this purpose because it serves both as a source of hydrogen ion for pH purposes and oxalate ion for coating purposes. Both oxalic and sulfuric acid are preferred for pH adjustment.
The operating temperature of the bath during coating is from 130 F. to about 200 F. More preferred is the operating temperature range of from 150 F. to about 185 F. Below the lower temperature range mentioned, the coating reaction is too slow to be commercially significant. Above the higher temperature range too much etching of the metal occurs. Exceeding either end of the temperature range may affect the adhesion of the coating.
The stainless steels and mild steels which are coated by the coating solutions and processes of this invention vary in their composition. This factor causes them to behave differently in the coating solution. This is exhibited in the amount of time and the temperature a given steel is exposed to a bath in order to obtain an optimum coating. For example, good coatings on 400 series stainless steels may be obtained in four to seven minutes at 150- 155 E; series 316 and 304 stainless steel were observed to achieve good coatings at 160165 F. in seven minutes; and series 347 and 321 required to minutes at 165175 F.
The composition of this invention may optionally include sulfate ion. The presence of sulfate ion has been found to produce coatings on the metal surface having higher adherence than is obtainable in its absence and the preferred compositions of this invention include sulfate ion, usually obtained by adding ferric sulfate. The amount of sulfate ion can be small, e.g. five grams per liter of ferrous sulfate provides enough sulfate ion to yield good coatings. Ferric ion is usually added as a sulfate, and therefore, the sulfate ion is present in amounts equivalent to the added ferric ion.
The time required to form a coating on the metal surface varies from five to twenty-five minutes when the bath is at 155 F. to about 185 F. These conditions will provide a good coating on all mild and stainless steels. Longer or shorter coating times can be effected by chang ing the temperature or concentration of ingredients in the bath. Longer or shorter times will also be indicated depending upon coating thickness.
Etching of the metal surface to be coated prior to its exposure to the coating bath is not required but is preferred. The main difference observable is that the resultant coatings are more even when the metals are etched prior to coating. This is believed to result because etching removes a mixture of metal oxides formed on the surface. These oxides are formed by oxidation of the mixture of metals present in stainless steel. These oxides vary in their rate of removal when the metal is in contact with the bath and thereby cause an uneven coating.
The-bath can be prepared or replenished by means of a packaged mixture containing the following ingredients in the indicated amounts.
Percent Ingredient: by weight Ferric sulfate (anhydrous) -50 Oxalic acid -75 Sodium bifiuoride 0-15 This mixture is easily formulated and because its ingredients are not generally considered oxidizing or reducing agent-s, they are stable during storage. Other sources of ferric and fluoride ion may also be utilized to prepare a replenishing package. Additional fluoride ion than is indicated in the above formulation may be desired, especially if the bath is being prepared for the first time. Bulk sodium bifluoride may be added to raise the fluoride level of the bath. When the above package is used to replenish the bath, additional fluoride ion is not usually required. The coating ingredients of the bath are, of course, consumed or depleted during the treatment of a succession of articles. The depletion rate of the components in the baths of this invention is in part dependent upon the manner in which the bath is used. If the bath is operated on a continuous basis, the coating producing ingredients are consumed on a relatively uniform basis. Accordingly, replenishment of the bath is most readily and conveniently accomplished by adding the mixture as shown in Example 7. This will restore the three ingredients to the desired level. Under some circumstances, as for example; when the bath temperature is not controlled, one or more ingredients may be excessively consumed. If this happens, the individual ingredient may be replenished by supplementing the replenishing mixture.
If desired, the coating baths of this invention may be replenished in the usual manner familiar in the art which consists of adding the individual coating constituents as required.
Replenishment of the coating chemicals is effected in accordance with the needs as determined by pointage titration which technique is well known in the coating industry. It is obvious from the foregoing that the use of the admixtures prepared in the ratio indicated herein makes it possible to prepare and maintain a bath by weighing or measuring only one admixture which, of course, reduces the possibility of error in calculation which is inherent in the prior practice of separately weighing and adding different ingredients to the bath. This advantage is also present in situations where titrations indicate that one or another of the ingredients in the bath has been excessively consumed. In this situation, it is merely necessary to calculate how much more of the depleted ingredient must be added over that contained in the prepackaged composition. Illustrative examples of coating solutions falling under the purview of this invention are listed below, but are in no way intended to limit its scope.
EXAMPLE 1 A bath was prepared by dissolving 5 grams per liter ferrous sulfate (hydrated) and 86.7 grams per liter ferric oxalate (Fe (C O 6H O) in water. Sulfuric acid was added to lower the pH of bath without fluoride to 0.7 and then grams per liter sodium bifluoride was added. This bath coated 304 type stainless steel in 5 to 7 minutes at F. to F.
EXAMPLE 2 A bath as described in Example 1 was prepared. About 110 grams per liter of oxalic acid was also added to the bath. Type 304 stainless steel was coated under the same conditions of Example lthis coating was improved in appearance and adhesion over that of Example 1.
EXAMPLE 3 A bath was prepared containing 95 grams per liter ferric oxalate, 8 grams per liter ferrous oxalate, 108 grams per liter oxalic acid (H C O -2H O) and 77.5 grams per liter sodium bifluoride. With this bath 304 stainless steel was coated at 165 F. to F. for seven minutes. A coating weight of 1800 mg./sq. ft. was obtained.
EXAMPLE 4 A bath was prepared containing 64.8 grams per liter anhydrous ferric sulfate, 2.1 grams per liter ferrous sulfate, 132.8 grams per liter oxalic acid (as the dihydrate) and 52.5 grams per liter of sodium bifiuoride. A coating of 2600 to 2800 mg./sq. ft. and having good adhesion was produced in seven minutes at a bath temperature of 165 F. to 175 F. on type 304 stainless steel.
EXAMPLE A bath containing 3.5 grams per liter ferrous sulfate, 100 grams per liter ferric sulfate (technical grade with Fe 300 grams per liter oxalic acid and grams per liter sodium bifluoride and 5.5 grams per liter concentrated sulfuric acid produced 3100 mg. to 4300 mg./ sq. ft. of adherent coating at 155 F. to 162 F. in seven minutes on 304 type stainless steel.
EXAMPLE 6 A bath was prepared containing grams per liter anhydrous ferric sulfate, 220 grams per liter oxalic acid,
90 grams per liter sodium bifluoride and 2 grams per liter ferrous sulfate. This bath was heated to 180 F. for
at least one hour to dissolve all of the ferric sulfate and A bath was prepared by mixing 39.4 grams of ferric sulfate, 0.6 gram of ferrous sulfate, 85 grams of oxalic acid and 75 grams of sodium bifluoride and enough Water to make 800 milliliters of solution. The ingredients were prepackaged in this ratio and added to water as indicated. The bath was stirred and heated at 180 F. until the salts dissolved. The bath was used on 300 stainless steel panels until about 90 percent of its original concentration was consumed as determined by analysis for iron and oxalate content. The bath was then replenished using a mixture composed of the following:
Ingredient: Percent by Weight Ferric sulfate 46.0 Oxalic acid 45.0
Sodium bifiuoride The compositions and process of the invention are useful for preparing adherent oxalate coatings on stainless steel without using sulfur accelerators. Accordingly they avoid the problems associated with coating solutions containing sulfur accelerators. Sulfur accelerators is understood to mean reducing compounds such as sulfites and thiosulfates and does not include sulfates.
Thus the composition and process of this invention are easy to control because they do not require an accelerator ingredient and do not produce sulfur-containing sludge.
What is claimed is:
1. In a process for treating the surface of stainless steel to produce an oxalate coating thereon, the improvement comprising contacting the stainless steel surface with an aqueous acidic solution consisting essentially of oxalic acid, ferric ion, fluoride ion, sulfate ion and saturated with ferrous ion for a time interval suflicient to form a substantial coating and at a reactive temperature within the range of from F. to 200 F. and wherein the solution has a pH range from 0.2 to 2.5.
2. The process in accord with claim 1 in which the aqueous acidic solution consists essentially of (a) Oxalic acid within the range of 20 to 400 grams per liter;
(b) Fluoride ion within the range of 20 to 200 grams per liter;
(c) Ferric ion within the range of 0.2 to 10 grams per liter;
(d) Sulfate ion within the range of 2 to 5 grams per liter; and
(e) Ferrous ion at saturation level.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,895,568 1/1933 Curtin et a1 148-614 2,273,234 2/ 1942 Tanner 148-6.l4 2,550,660 5/1951 Amundsen et al. 148-614 2,577,887 12/1951 Gibson 148-614 2,785,097 3/1957 Goodspeed et al. 148-614 2,800,421 7/1957 Goodspeed et al. 148-614 2,846,341 8/1958 Johns et al. 148-614 2,935,431 5/1960 Shaw et al. 1486.14
RALPH S. KENDALL, Primary Examiner US. Cl. X.R. 148-624
US848689A 1969-08-08 1969-08-08 Coatings for steel Expired - Lifetime US3649371A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US84868969A 1969-08-08 1969-08-08

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3649371A true US3649371A (en) 1972-03-14

Family

ID=25304010

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US848689A Expired - Lifetime US3649371A (en) 1969-08-08 1969-08-08 Coatings for steel

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US3649371A (en)
JP (1) JPS4918531B1 (en)
BE (1) BE754550A (en)
CA (1) CA923409A (en)
DE (1) DE2036869A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2056540A5 (en)
GB (1) GB1267228A (en)
NL (1) NL7011607A (en)
SE (1) SE366780B (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3879237A (en) * 1973-01-16 1975-04-22 Amchem Prod Coating compositions for stainless steels
DE3031270A1 (en) * 1979-09-06 1981-03-19 Richardson Chemical Co., Des Plaines, Ill. METHOD FOR THE CHROME-FREE OR LOW-CHROME PASSIVATION OF METAL SURFACES AND BATH FOR CARRYING OUT THE METHOD
US4444601A (en) * 1979-09-06 1984-04-24 Richardson Chemical Company Metal article passivated by a bath having an organic activator and a film-forming element
US5723183A (en) * 1996-09-16 1998-03-03 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Metal coloring process
US20020062866A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-05-30 Sadao Sumiya Adjustment pipe for fuel injection valve, and press-fitting structure and press-fitting method for the same
US20040250748A1 (en) * 1999-05-24 2004-12-16 Ravenscroft Keith N. Composition and method for metal coloring process
US20060014042A1 (en) * 2004-07-15 2006-01-19 Block William V Hybrid metal oxide/organometallic conversion coating for ferrous metals
US7964044B1 (en) 2003-10-29 2011-06-21 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Ferrous metal magnetite coating processes and reagents
EP3249076A1 (en) * 2016-05-24 2017-11-29 Technochim SA Products for the preventive treatment of stainless steel and related methods

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS52107143U (en) * 1976-02-11 1977-08-15

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3879237A (en) * 1973-01-16 1975-04-22 Amchem Prod Coating compositions for stainless steels
DE3031270A1 (en) * 1979-09-06 1981-03-19 Richardson Chemical Co., Des Plaines, Ill. METHOD FOR THE CHROME-FREE OR LOW-CHROME PASSIVATION OF METAL SURFACES AND BATH FOR CARRYING OUT THE METHOD
US4298404A (en) * 1979-09-06 1981-11-03 Richardson Chemical Company Chromium-free or low-chromium metal surface passivation
US4444601A (en) * 1979-09-06 1984-04-24 Richardson Chemical Company Metal article passivated by a bath having an organic activator and a film-forming element
US5723183A (en) * 1996-09-16 1998-03-03 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Metal coloring process
US20040250748A1 (en) * 1999-05-24 2004-12-16 Ravenscroft Keith N. Composition and method for metal coloring process
US20020062866A1 (en) * 2000-11-29 2002-05-30 Sadao Sumiya Adjustment pipe for fuel injection valve, and press-fitting structure and press-fitting method for the same
US6834667B2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2004-12-28 Denso Corporation Adjustment pipe for fuel injection valve, and press-fitting structure and press-fitting method for the same
US7964044B1 (en) 2003-10-29 2011-06-21 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Ferrous metal magnetite coating processes and reagents
US20060014042A1 (en) * 2004-07-15 2006-01-19 Block William V Hybrid metal oxide/organometallic conversion coating for ferrous metals
US7144599B2 (en) 2004-07-15 2006-12-05 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Hybrid metal oxide/organometallic conversion coating for ferrous metals
US7481872B1 (en) 2004-07-15 2009-01-27 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Process for making bath composition for converting surface of ferrous metal to mixed oxides and organometallic compounds of aluminum and iron
US7625439B1 (en) 2004-07-15 2009-12-01 Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. Bath composition for converting surface of ferrous metal to mixed oxides and organometallic compounds of aluminum and iron
EP3249076A1 (en) * 2016-05-24 2017-11-29 Technochim SA Products for the preventive treatment of stainless steel and related methods
US10711352B2 (en) 2016-05-24 2020-07-14 Technochim Sa Products for the preventive treatment of stainless steel and related methods

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NL7011607A (en) 1971-02-10
CA923409A (en) 1973-03-27
DE2036869A1 (en) 1971-02-18
FR2056540A5 (en) 1971-05-14
BE754550A (en) 1971-02-08
SE366780B (en) 1974-05-06
JPS4918531B1 (en) 1974-05-10
GB1267228A (en) 1972-03-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2487137A (en) Producing coatings on metal
JPH0365436B2 (en)
US3619300A (en) Phosphate conversion coating of aluminum, zinc or iron
US3649371A (en) Coatings for steel
US4222779A (en) Non-chromate conversion coatings
US2577887A (en) Activation of oxalate metal coating compositions
US5203930A (en) Process of forming phosphate coatings on metal surfaces
JP2700061B2 (en) Method of forming phosphate film
JP2845246B2 (en) Method of forming phosphate film
IT1167480B (en) PROCESSES AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF PHOSPHATIC COATINGS
US2462196A (en) Protective phosphate coatings for metal surfaces
US3634262A (en) Process and compositions for treating aluminum and aluminum alloys
US2702768A (en) Ferrous surface coating process using alkali metal phosphates and hydroxylamines
CA1206852A (en) Process and composition for phosphating metal surfaces
US3632452A (en) Oxalate conversion coating method for stainless steel
US3181976A (en) Phosphating process and composition
US2121520A (en) Maintenance of phosphate coating baths
JPS5855229B2 (en) Surface conditioner for zinc phosphate treatment
US4233087A (en) Phosphate coating process
US3333988A (en) Phosphate coating process
JPS6127467B2 (en)
US4089710A (en) Phosphating method with control in response to conductivity change
US3307980A (en) Treatment of metal surfaces
US2800421A (en) Composition and method for coating stainless metals
US3697332A (en) Method for coating aluminum while avoiding objectionable wastes