US3605104A - Parasitic loop counterpoise antenna - Google Patents

Parasitic loop counterpoise antenna Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3605104A
US3605104A US851404A US3605104DA US3605104A US 3605104 A US3605104 A US 3605104A US 851404 A US851404 A US 851404A US 3605104D A US3605104D A US 3605104DA US 3605104 A US3605104 A US 3605104A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
counterpoise
curve
radiator element
electrolyte
elements
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US851404A
Inventor
Vaughan H Weston
Dipak L Sengupta
Joseph E Ferris
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
US Department of Army
Federal Aviation Administration
Original Assignee
US Department of Army
Federal Aviation Administration
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by US Department of Army, Federal Aviation Administration filed Critical US Department of Army
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3605104A publication Critical patent/US3605104A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q19/00Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
    • H01Q19/06Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using refracting or diffracting devices, e.g. lens
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q19/00Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
    • H01Q19/10Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q19/00Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
    • H01Q19/22Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using a secondary device in the form of a single substantially straight conductive element

Definitions

  • Th.s invention relates to an improved counterpoise antenna in which the radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise has been substantially reduced by the addition of parasitic loop elements above the radiator element.
  • This invention substantially reduces the radiation field existing below the plane of the counterpoise of a counterpoise antenna system by using one or more parasitic loop elements positioned above the active radiator element.
  • the parasitic loop or loops are positioned so that the radiation resulting from the electric current induced in the parasitic element by the electromagnetic field produced by the active radiator element is of proper magnitude and phase to cancel the radiation field existing below the plane of the counterpoise.
  • FIG. I is a plan view of a particular embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line 22 of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the radiation field pattern of both a conventional counterpoise antenna and a counterpoise antenna with the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the invention showing a collinear arrangement of the parasitic elements.
  • FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the invention showing a coplanar arrangement of the parasitic elements.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 there is shown an antenna system comprising an active radiator element 2, such as an Alford loop, for radiating electromagnetic energy, a surface 1 positioned below the radiator element to form a counterpoise or ground plane, and one or more parasitic loop elements 3 positioned above the radiator element.
  • the active radiator element 2 is chosen to fit the needs of the particular situation, and application of the invention is not restricted to a particular type of class of radiator elements.
  • the radiator element 2 is structurally supported above the counterpoise in a conventional manner so that the radiator element is electrically insulated from the counterpoise 1.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one possible manner of supporting the radiator element 2 through use of an insulating material 4 surrounding a transmission line 5 to supply the radiator element 2 with energy.
  • the counterpoise l is composed of a metallic substance so that a conductive plane surface is formed, and its dimensions are preferably large compared to the wave length of the radiator element.
  • the system also comprises one or more passive loop elements 3 positioned above the radiator element 2.
  • the parasitic element or elements may be structurally supported above the counterpoise 1 by means of dielectric support members which for the sake of simplicity have not been shown. These passive elements are made of a conducting metallic substance and are formed into a closed loop which may be of any desired crosssectional configuration.
  • One or more of the parasitic loop elements 3 may be used, and they may be successively stacked above the radiator element 9 as shown in FIG. 4 and referred to as a collinear system so that all the parasitic elements 8 share a common longitudinal axis with the radiator element 9. Alternatively as shown in FIG.
  • the parasitic loop elements 10 may be concentric about a central parasitic element 11 positioned above the radiator element 12 and referred to as a coplanar system so that all the parasitic loop elements share a common longitudinal axis with the radiator element.
  • the dimensions of the parasitic loop elements, their relative positions, and the number of parasitic elements employed are determined by mathematical calculations well known to those skilled in the art based on the desired radiation field distribution.
  • the radiation produced by the parasitic elements is calculated through the use of conventional techniques of electromagnetic field analysis by determining the current induced in the parasitic elements by the radiation field from the active radiator element. This parasitic radiation is then summed with the radiation from the active element to determine to total radiation field propagated by the system. As this calculation may be made in terms of the dimensions and placement of the parasitic elements, the parameters of the parasitic elements may be completely specified for a desired radiation field.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 An embodiment of an antenna system constructed in accordance with the invention described herein is illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
  • the requirements of this system were that the radiation field be omnidirectional above the plane of the counterpoise, and that it be zero below the plane of the counterpoise.
  • An Alford loop antenna, described in US. Pat. No. 2,283,897, was selected as the active radiator element because of its omnidirectional radiation field characteristics, and it was positioned 0.44) ⁇ above the counterpoise.
  • One parasitic loop element with a diameter of 2.5% was used, and it was positioned 0.59% above the counterpoise.
  • the loop was formed from a brass strip of rectangular cross section with a thickness of 9.l5 10 and a width of l.83 lO
  • the circular counterpoise was cut from an aluminum sheet of 0.125- inch thickness, and it had a diameter of 5.7).
  • the radiation field produced by the improved antenna system is shown by the solid line 6 in FIG. 3.
  • the broken line 7 represents the radiation field obtained from the Alford loop and the counterpoise without the parasitic loop element. It can be seen from FIG. 3 that the improved antenna system has practically eliminated the radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise.
  • An antenna system comprising a counterpoise in the form of a conducting metal surface, a radiator element for radiating electromagnetic radiation positioned above said counterpoise, and parasitic means comprising a plurality of circular loop elements positioned above said radiator element so that said radiator element is intermediate said parasitic means and said counterpoise and positioned in cooperative relation thereto as a function of the frequency of radiated energy.

Abstract

An antenna system comprising an active radiating element, such as an Alford loop, for radiating electromagnetic energy, a surface positioned below the radiator element to form a ground plane or counterpoise, and one or more passive parasitic loop elements positioned above the radiator so that the radiation from the parasitic elements is of a magnitude and polarity to cancel the radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise.

Description

United States Patent Inventors Appl. No.
Filed Patented Assignee PARASITIC LOOP COUNTERPOISE ANTENNA [50] Field of Search 343/834, 845. 846. 847. 848, 899, 908. 741, 837
[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,998,605 8/ l 961 Orlando 343/848 Primary Examiner-Eli Lieberman Attorneys-Alva H. Bandy, William G. Gapcynski and Lawrence A. Neureither ABSTRACT: An antenna system comprising an active radiating element, such as an Alford loop, for radiating electromagnetic energy, a surface positioned below the radiator element to form a ground plane or counterpoise, and one or more passive parasitic loop elements positioned above the radiator so that the radiation from the parasitic elements is of a magnitude and polarity to cancel the radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise.
3 Claims, 5 Drawing Figs.
US. Cl 343/837, 343/741, 343/848 lnt.Cl ..H0lq 19/10 PATENTEU SEP14l97l 3,505,104
MEASURED FAR FIELD ELEVATI PATTERNS OF VOR A NTENN 3 64in): Q4" m @4630 lNVE/V VAUGHAN H. WEST DIPAK L. SENGUPTA JOSEPH E. FERRIS FIG.5
ATTORNEY PARASITIC LOOP COUNTERPOISE ANTENNA BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention Th.s invention relates to an improved counterpoise antenna in which the radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise has been substantially reduced by the addition of parasitic loop elements above the radiator element.
2. Description of the Prior Art Often va particular application requires an antenna system which produces radiation above a given plane but does not establish a radiation field below the plane. Counterpoise antennas are normally used for this purpose, but due to the finite size of the counterpoise surface, edge diffraction effects cause a certain amount of radiation to be directed below the plane of the counterpoise, thus producing undesirable effects. For example, a counterpoise antenna ideally suited for use in an existing VHF Omni Range (VOR) system would produce no radiation field below the plane of its counterpoise. Existing antennas, however, due to the counterpoise edge diffraction effects, have considerable response in directions below the plane of the counterpoise. Because of the existence of a radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise, ground reflection effects and scattering from objects such as trees and buildings in the vicinity of VOR installations produce errors in the VOR bearing indicators. Elimination of these effects using present antenna systems would require an infinitely large counterpoise, and extension of counterpoise diameters beyond those presently used is impractical. One proposed solution involved the use of a stacked array of a plurality of Alford loop antennas above a counterpoise. By properly choosing the amplitude and phase of the excitation of the loops, the rate of decrease of the electromagnetic field below the horizon can be increased. Successful operation of this system requires proper phasing and feed networks for the Alford loops, and although the theoretical value for the rate of decrease of field is high, the actual response of the antenna below the plane of the counterpoise was found to be quite high. Horn and lens antenna systems theoretically provide partial solutions; however, the extreme size of these systems at the frequencies presently employed makes their use impractical.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION This invention substantially reduces the radiation field existing below the plane of the counterpoise of a counterpoise antenna system by using one or more parasitic loop elements positioned above the active radiator element. The parasitic loop or loops are positioned so that the radiation resulting from the electric current induced in the parasitic element by the electromagnetic field produced by the active radiator element is of proper magnitude and phase to cancel the radiation field existing below the plane of the counterpoise.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a counterpoise antenna system which has a minimal radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an improved counterpoise antenna system which can be used with existing VOR systems.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. I is a plan view of a particular embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line 22 of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the radiation field pattern of both a conventional counterpoise antenna and a counterpoise antenna with the invention.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the invention showing a collinear arrangement of the parasitic elements.
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the invention showing a coplanar arrangement of the parasitic elements.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT With reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 there is shown an antenna system comprising an active radiator element 2, such as an Alford loop, for radiating electromagnetic energy, a surface 1 positioned below the radiator element to form a counterpoise or ground plane, and one or more parasitic loop elements 3 positioned above the radiator element. The active radiator element 2 is chosen to fit the needs of the particular situation, and application of the invention is not restricted to a particular type of class of radiator elements. The radiator element 2 is structurally supported above the counterpoise in a conventional manner so that the radiator element is electrically insulated from the counterpoise 1. FIG. 2 illustrates one possible manner of supporting the radiator element 2 through use of an insulating material 4 surrounding a transmission line 5 to supply the radiator element 2 with energy.
The counterpoise l is composed of a metallic substance so that a conductive plane surface is formed, and its dimensions are preferably large compared to the wave length of the radiator element.
The system also comprises one or more passive loop elements 3 positioned above the radiator element 2. The parasitic element or elements may be structurally supported above the counterpoise 1 by means of dielectric support members which for the sake of simplicity have not been shown. These passive elements are made of a conducting metallic substance and are formed into a closed loop which may be of any desired crosssectional configuration. One or more of the parasitic loop elements 3 may be used, and they may be successively stacked above the radiator element 9 as shown in FIG. 4 and referred to as a collinear system so that all the parasitic elements 8 share a common longitudinal axis with the radiator element 9. Alternatively as shown in FIG. 5, the parasitic loop elements 10 may be concentric about a central parasitic element 11 positioned above the radiator element 12 and referred to as a coplanar system so that all the parasitic loop elements share a common longitudinal axis with the radiator element. The dimensions of the parasitic loop elements, their relative positions, and the number of parasitic elements employed are determined by mathematical calculations well known to those skilled in the art based on the desired radiation field distribution.
The radiation produced by the parasitic elements is calculated through the use of conventional techniques of electromagnetic field analysis by determining the current induced in the parasitic elements by the radiation field from the active radiator element. This parasitic radiation is then summed with the radiation from the active element to determine to total radiation field propagated by the system. As this calculation may be made in terms of the dimensions and placement of the parasitic elements, the parameters of the parasitic elements may be completely specified for a desired radiation field.
An embodiment of an antenna system constructed in accordance with the invention described herein is illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2. The requirements of this system were that the radiation field be omnidirectional above the plane of the counterpoise, and that it be zero below the plane of the counterpoise. An Alford loop antenna, described in US. Pat. No. 2,283,897, was selected as the active radiator element because of its omnidirectional radiation field characteristics, and it was positioned 0.44)\ above the counterpoise. One parasitic loop element with a diameter of 2.5% was used, and it was positioned 0.59% above the counterpoise. The loop was formed from a brass strip of rectangular cross section with a thickness of 9.l5 10 and a width of l.83 lO The circular counterpoise was cut from an aluminum sheet of 0.125- inch thickness, and it had a diameter of 5.7).. A frequency of 1080 MHz, was used to excite the active radiator element.
The radiation field produced by the improved antenna system is shown by the solid line 6 in FIG. 3. The broken line 7 represents the radiation field obtained from the Alford loop and the counterpoise without the parasitic loop element. It can be seen from FIG. 3 that the improved antenna system has practically eliminated the radiation field below the plane of the counterpoise.
We claim:
I. An antenna system comprising a counterpoise in the form of a conducting metal surface, a radiator element for radiating electromagnetic radiation positioned above said counterpoise, and parasitic means comprising a plurality of circular loop elements positioned above said radiator element so that said radiator element is intermediate said parasitic means and said counterpoise and positioned in cooperative relation thereto as a function of the frequency of radiated energy.
2. The device of claim 1 in which said circular loop elements are successively stacked above said radiator element so that said circular elements share a common longitudinal axis with said radiator element.
3. The device of claim I in which said circular loop elements are concentric about a central circular element positioned above the radiator element to that said circular elements are located in the same plane and share a common longitudinal axis with said radiator element, the mutual spacing of said circular elements and the spacing of said elements relative to said counterpoise and said radiating element relative to said counterpoise being a function of the frequency of radiated energy.

Claims (5)

1. An antenna system comprising a counterpoise in the form of a conducting metal surface, a radiator element for radiating electromagnetic radiation positioned above said counterpoise, and parasitic means comprising a plurality of circular loop elements positioned above said radiator element so that said radiator element is intermediate said parasitic means and said counterpoise and positioned in cooperative relation thereto as a function of the frequency of radiated energy.
2. The device of claim 1 in which said circular loop elements are successively stacked above said radiator element so that said circular elements share a common longitudinal axis with said radiator element.
2. Although the characteristic curve is mild in gradient than that of the solid electrolyte obtained in Example 1, this solid electrolyte is superior to the conventional one as may be readily appreciated upon comparison with the curve 1 representing the characteristic of the latter. Examples 3 to 8 Solid electrolytes were produced in the same manner as in example 1 but by mixing CeO2, Gd2O3 and MgO in the proportions shown in table 2 below. These solid electrolytes had pecific resistance--temperature characteristics as shown in FIG. 3 respectively.
2. A fuel cell of oxygen-hydrogen type as defined in claim 1, in which x and y representing mol numbers of 2O3 and MgO respectively arssssssssss
3. The device of claim 1 in which said circular loop elements are concentric about a central circular element positioned above the radiator element to that said circular elements are located in the same plane and share a common longitudinal axis with said radiator element, the mutual spacing of said circular elements and the spacing of said elements relative to said counterpoise and said radiating element relative to said counterpoise being a function of the frequency of radiated energy. FIG. 10 is a sectional view of an oxygen refiner in which the solid electrolyte according to the present invention is used; and FIG. 11 is a characteristic curve of the oxygen refiner, showing the relationship between the effluent rate of produce oxygen and the voltage. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring first to FIG. 1, the characteristic curves show the relationship between the composition of the electrolyte of this invention, consisting essentially of 2 mols of CeO2, x mol of Gd2O3 and y mol of MgO, and the specific resistance of the electrolyte at specific temperatures. The curve 1 is curve on which the electrolyte shows a specific resistance of 80 Omega cm. at 725* C., and the region inside of the curve is a region in which the electrolyte shows a specific resistance smaller than 80 Omega cm. and the region outside of the curve is a region in which the electrolyte shows a specific resistance larger than 80 Omega cm. The curve 2 is a curve on which the electrolyte shows a specific resistance of 30 Omega cm. at 800* C. and the region inside of this curve is a region in which the electrolyte shows a specific resistance smaller than 30 Omega cm. Namely, this curve epresents an electrolyte which is superior to thaT represented by the curve
US851404A 1969-08-19 1969-08-19 Parasitic loop counterpoise antenna Expired - Lifetime US3605104A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US85140469A 1969-08-19 1969-08-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3605104A true US3605104A (en) 1971-09-14

Family

ID=25310694

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US851404A Expired - Lifetime US3605104A (en) 1969-08-19 1969-08-19 Parasitic loop counterpoise antenna

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3605104A (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4183027A (en) * 1977-10-07 1980-01-08 Ehrenspeck Hermann W Dual frequency band directional antenna system
US4516133A (en) * 1981-09-09 1985-05-07 Japan Radio Company, Limited Antenna element having non-feed conductive loop surrounding radiating element
DE3908893A1 (en) * 1989-03-17 1990-09-20 Siemens Ag Ring radiating element using printed circuit technology
US5469178A (en) * 1992-09-30 1995-11-21 Motorola, Inc. Low profile antenna system for a cardlike communication receiver
US5703600A (en) * 1996-05-08 1997-12-30 Motorola, Inc. Microstrip antenna with a parasitically coupled ground plane
FR2826784A1 (en) * 2001-07-02 2003-01-03 Abel Franco ELECTROMAGNETIC PROTECTION ANTENNA FOR PORTABLE TRANSMITTER
US20070182658A1 (en) * 2006-02-07 2007-08-09 Nokia Corporation Loop antenna with a parasitic radiator
US7443348B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2008-10-28 Solidica, Inc. Omni-directional antenna
US9112258B1 (en) * 2012-06-12 2015-08-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Electrically small circularly polarized antenna
US20160064830A1 (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Aruba Networks, Inc. Alford loop antennas with parasitic elements
US10283851B2 (en) * 2017-09-19 2019-05-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Broadband circularly polarized antenna incorporating non-Foster active loading

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2998605A (en) * 1957-07-09 1961-08-29 Hazeltine Research Inc Antenna system

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2998605A (en) * 1957-07-09 1961-08-29 Hazeltine Research Inc Antenna system

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4183027A (en) * 1977-10-07 1980-01-08 Ehrenspeck Hermann W Dual frequency band directional antenna system
US4516133A (en) * 1981-09-09 1985-05-07 Japan Radio Company, Limited Antenna element having non-feed conductive loop surrounding radiating element
DE3908893A1 (en) * 1989-03-17 1990-09-20 Siemens Ag Ring radiating element using printed circuit technology
US5469178A (en) * 1992-09-30 1995-11-21 Motorola, Inc. Low profile antenna system for a cardlike communication receiver
US5703600A (en) * 1996-05-08 1997-12-30 Motorola, Inc. Microstrip antenna with a parasitically coupled ground plane
US6894658B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2005-05-17 Abel Franco Electromagnetic protection antenna for portable transmitter
WO2003005487A1 (en) * 2001-07-02 2003-01-16 Abel Franco Electromagnetic protection antenna for portable transmitter
US20040201540A1 (en) * 2001-07-02 2004-10-14 Abel Franco Electromagnetic protection antenna for protable transmitter
FR2826784A1 (en) * 2001-07-02 2003-01-03 Abel Franco ELECTROMAGNETIC PROTECTION ANTENNA FOR PORTABLE TRANSMITTER
US20070182658A1 (en) * 2006-02-07 2007-08-09 Nokia Corporation Loop antenna with a parasitic radiator
US7728785B2 (en) * 2006-02-07 2010-06-01 Nokia Corporation Loop antenna with a parasitic radiator
US7443348B2 (en) * 2006-05-30 2008-10-28 Solidica, Inc. Omni-directional antenna
US9112258B1 (en) * 2012-06-12 2015-08-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Electrically small circularly polarized antenna
US20160064830A1 (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Aruba Networks, Inc. Alford loop antennas with parasitic elements
US9509062B2 (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-11-29 Aruba Networks, Inc. Alford loop antennas with parasitic elements
US10283851B2 (en) * 2017-09-19 2019-05-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Broadband circularly polarized antenna incorporating non-Foster active loading

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yang et al. A wide beamwidth and wideband magnetoelectric dipole antenna
US7868842B2 (en) Base station antenna with beam shaping structures
Balanis Modern antenna handbook
Kishk Dielectric resonator antenna, a candidate for radar applications
US4398199A (en) Circularly polarized microstrip line antenna
GB2338346A (en) Wide-band micropstrip dipole antenna array
US3605104A (en) Parasitic loop counterpoise antenna
JPH0482405A (en) Triplet plane antenna
Chopra et al. Uniplanar microstrip antenna for endfire radiation
JPH0270104A (en) Wide directional microstrip antenna
Lechtreck Effects of coupling accumulation in antenna arrays
Pan et al. Singly-Fed Wideband 45$^\circ $ Slant-Polarized Omnidirectional Antennas
Wong et al. A wideband L-probe patch antenna array with wide beamwidth
Sharma et al. Beam focusing properties of circular monopole array antenna on a finite ground plane
Al-Alem et al. Wideband millimeter-wave dielectric resonator antenna
JPH02883B2 (en)
Sengupta The radiation characteristics of a zig-zag antenna
Bickmore A note on the aperture of electrically scanned arrays
JPS62281501A (en) Microstrip antenna having unexcited element
Tanner et al. A wire-grid lens antenna of wide application part I: The wire-grid lens--Concept and experimental confirmation
Makanae et al. A Study on gain enhancement of a leaf-shaped bowtie slot antenna array employing dielectric superstrates
Prakash et al. Printed circularly polarised asymmetric ultra-wideband antenna
Stegen et al. Arrays of closely-spaced nonresonant slots
Duan et al. Low profile SIW cavity-backed magneto-electric dipole with wide beamwidth radiation patterns
Sengupta et al. Experimental study of a spherical array of circularly polarized elements