US3522620A

US3522620A - Windshield wiper blade

Info

Publication number: US3522620A
Application number: US735170A
Authority: US
Inventors: Akira Nozawa; Tetsuichi Saho; Hideo Marumo; Minoru Saito
Original assignee: Lion Fat and Oil Co Ltd
Current assignee: Lion Fat and Oil Co Ltd
Priority date: 1964-02-13
Filing date: 1968-06-07
Publication date: 1970-08-04
Anticipated expiration: 1987-08-04

Description

United States Patent 3,522,620 WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADE Akira Nozawa, Tetsuichi Saho, Hideo Marumo, and Minor-u Saito, Tokyo, Japan, assignors to Lion Yushi Kabushiki Kaisha (Trade name: Lion Fat & Oil Co., Ltd.), Tokyo, Japan N 0 Drawing. Continuation-impart of application Ser. No. 404,932, Oct. 19, 1964. This application June 7, 1968, Ser. No. 735,170

Claims priority, application Japan, Feb. 13, 1964, 39/ 32,394 Int. Cl. A471 1/02; C08c 11/44; C08f 45/44 U.S. Cl. 15-250.36 15 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE An improved windshield wiper blade having a reduced frictional coeflicient, which essentially consists of an elastic substance such as natural rubber or synthetic rubber and at least one of certain nitrogen-containing organic compounds.

This application is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 404,932, filed Oct. 19, 1964'and now abandoned.

The present invention relates to a windshield wiper blade. More specifically speaking, it relates to a wiper blade made by blending 1 to 100 parts of at least one material selected from among the compounds represented by the following Formula I with 100 parts of an elastic substance selected from among natural rubber, and synthetic rubbers, and if desired, compound the resulting mixture with various known additives, and forming it in a mold.

R (I) r wherein R is an aliphatic hydrocarbon having 8 to 24 carbon atoms;

R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, CHRCHR"COOR"' and CHR"CHRCN, at least one R being CHRCHR"COOR or CHR"CHR"CN, in which R" is selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen radical and an aliphatic hydrocarbon radical hav ing 1 to carbon atoms, and R is an aliphatic hydrocarbon radical having 1 to 24 carbon atoms;

In is an integer selected from O, 1 and 2; and

m is an integer selected from 2 and 3.

The wiper blade formed in accordance with this invention possesses a low frictional resistance and a high re sistance to aging by virtue of blending said material se lected from the compounds having the Formula I.

Wiper blades which wipe rain drops, snow-flakes or dust off the front windshield of an automobile, a street car, or the like, are usually made of an elastic material such as rubber. When it is made of an elastic material alone, the load imposed on the wiper motor will be large and the wiper will be subjected to considerable vibration, so that it will have a poor cleaning effect.

To eliminate this trouble, a sulphurizing or halogenating treatment of the blade surface has been suggested for the purpose of reducing its frictional resistance. But such surface treatment will cause an aging of the blade surface, with the result that the surface becomes liable to cracking and the blade life is shortened.

The wiper in service, being fitted on the outside of a vehicle, is exposed to the direct sun and other weather 3,522,620 Patented Aug. 4, 1970 influences; accordingly it is vulnerable to aging. Since such surface treatment renders the blade less resistant to such influences, it is obvious that such treatment is undesirable. Moreover, surface treatment hardens the blade surface so that if there is any dust particle between blade and glass, the surface of glass will be scratched.

It has also been suggested that a wiper blade be chemically treated to increase the friction between the blade and windshield. Such chemical treatment, too, can produce only a temporary effect and it is unsatisfactory because it damages the rubber, resulting in its oxidation and aging.

Wiper blades formed in a mold from an elastic substance blended with various surface active substances have been kown. Such conventional wiper blades when much water is present between the windshield and the wiper blade, are relatively effective because the frictional coefficient is low enough to cause no trouble in practice. However, the problems in practice with the conventional wiper blade happen when it has just started raining :or it is raining so lightly that the frictional co-efiicient of the glass and wiper blade would not be depressed enough.

The present invention provides a wiper blade which reduces sufficiently the frictional co-efficient even when the windshield is dry or slightly moistened.

The present invention is the fruit of research directed to the production of a less frictional, more effective wiper blade without resorting to any surface treatment. According to this invention, 1 to 100 parts, preferably 10 to 30 parts, of said material of the Formula I is blended and kneaded with 100 parts of an elastic substance. A plasticizer, an antiaging agent and an ozonecrack inhibitor may be added and the resulting mixture formed into the product. The resulting wiper blade is not only less frictional and more effective in cleaning, but is also more resistant to aging with longer service life. The wiper blade made of this new material is so flexible that it will not be scratched by any dust particle sticking between the blade and the glass.

The present invention has the great industrial advantage of calling for no production stage such as surface treatment, after forming, because in this invention said material of the Formula I which considerably improves the property of the conventional wiper blade can be blended and kneaded with an elastic substance, together with such additives as carbon-black, anti-aging agent and ozonecrack inhibitor, and then the mixture can be vulcanized and molded.

The elastic substances which may be used in carrying out this invention include natural rubber, and synthetic rubbers, such as polybutadiene, copolymers of styrene and butadiene, and other known rubbery polymers.

The material to be added for the improvement of wiper blades in this invention can be 1 to 100 parts as against 100 parts of the elastic substance; but usually 5 to 60 parts of it, or preferably 10 to 30 parts, will be used. If it is employed in less than one part, smooth surface movement of the blade will not be assured; if, however, it is more than 100 parts, the wiper blade will become softened or deformed.

Other additives include magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate, carbon black, lead monoxide, clay and other common plasticizers; anti-aging agents; and ozone-crack inhibitors as well as sulphur for vulcanization. In this invention these substances will be added before forming,

3 stance to form a wiper blade according to the present invention are represented in the following Formula I.

R N(CH2)m' N l J 1i R wherein R is an aliphatic hydrocarbon having 8 to 24 carbon atoms and preferably alkyl and alkenyl;

R is selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen, CHRCHRCOOR" and CHRCHR"CN, at least one R' being CHRCHRCOOR" or CHR"CHR"CN, in which R is selected from the group consisting of a hydrogen radical and an aliphatic hydrocarbon radical having 1 to carbon atoms (preferably alkyl) and R is an aliphatic hydrocarbon radical (preferably alkyl and alkenyl) having 1 to 24 carbon atoms;

In is an integer selected from 0, 1 and 2; and

m is an integer selected from 2 and 3.

Illustrative examples of the compounds of Formula I are:

The wiper blade according to this invention is free from electrification; moves very smoothly with the surface tension drastically reduced; and is resistant to aging for a long period of time.

Actual examples of embodiments of this invention will now be given in comparison with conventionally treated wiper blades. It should not be considered, however, that these examples exhaust all the possible embodiments of this invention.

EXAMPLE 1 One hundred parts (by weight) of a plasticized chloroprene synthetic rubber (Neoprene WRT), was blended with four parts of magnesium oxide, five parts of zinc vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (3) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of the formula:

wherein R is a hydrocarbon radical derived from an aliphatic acid of rape seed oil, kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (4) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of the formula:

RN orrmmoHamHomomcN OHzGHzCN CHzGHzCN wherein R is a hydrocarbon radical derived from an aliphatic acid of beef tallow, kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (5) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of the formula:

kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (6) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of the formula:

wherein R is a hydrocarbon radical derived from an aliphatic acid of beef tallow, kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (7) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of the formula:

RNH (CH NH(CH NHCH CH COOCH wherein R is a hydrocarbon radical derived from an aliphatic acid of coconut oil, kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (8) was obtained by immersing the wiper blade (I) in a solution containing 1.5 parts by weight of sodium hypochlorite and 6.0 parts by weight of 35% hydrochloric acid in 1000 parts of water for 3 minutes and then surface-treating it.

Wiper blade (9) was obtained by blending parts of smoked sheet rubber with 35 parts of zinc white, 3 parts of sulphur, 3 parts of stearic acid, 3 parts of accelerator and 7 parts of dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, vulcanizing and forming it. This composition is similar to the compositions disclosed in U.S. Pat. 2,392,982.

With these wiper blades (1) to (9), the front Windshield of an automobile which had a flowing water film formed thereon was wiped and the load on the wiper motor was measured. The results were as follows:

Types of wiper blades Types of wiper blades Wiper motor load (amperes) Cleaning effect 1 Good. 2 Slight vibration, poor.

4.0 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 5.4 5.3 (i) (1) (1) (I) (I) In the case of wiper blades (2) to (7), the cleaning effect was substantially good, though the load on the wiper motor increased more or less. In the case of wiper blades (8) and (9), the load on the wiper motor was large and the cleaning effect was poor.

EXAMPLE 2 Wiper blades (1), (2) and (8) in Example 1 were submitted to 100 C., to a 70 hours aging test for investigation of tensile strength, elongation and hardness, the results being listed below.

Surface-treated wiper blade (8) was found very liable to changes and aging, while all the others were less liable to changes and aging.

Types of wiper blades Changes due to aging 1 2 8 Tensile strength, percent 5. -6. 0 -49 Elongation, percent 9. 6 +1. 4 +68 Hardness, 1 +6 +13 1 Hardness was measured according to the rules of Japan Industrial Standard (J IS).

EXAMPLE 3 Wiper blades (1), (2) and (8) in Example 1 were exposed to the atmosphere in the state of being elongated 10% for 6 months to investigate the growth of cracks. The results showed that numerous cracks occurred only in the case of (8).

EXAMPLE 4 kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (12) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with parts of vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (13) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of C H NHCH CH COOCH kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (14) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of C13H31NGH2CH2CH2NHCH2CH2C o 0 OH;

CH2CH2C O 0 CH3 vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (15) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of RNH CH NH CH NHCH CH CN wherein R is a hydrocarbon radical derived from an aliphatic acid of coconut oil, kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (16) was obtained by compounding the same mixture with 20 parts of kneading, vulcanizing and forming it.

Wiper blade (17) was obtained by imersing said wiper blade (10) in a solution containing 1.5 parts by weight of sodium hypochlorite and 6.0 parts :by weight of 35% hydrochloric acid in 1000 parts of water for 3 minutes for the purpose of surface treatment.

Wiper blade (18) was obtained by blending parts of smoked sheet rubber with 35 parts of zinc white, 3 parts of sulphur, 3 parts of stearic acid, 3 parts of accelerator and 7 parts of dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, vulcanizing, and forming it.

All these wiper blades were submitted to wiping tests on the front windshielf of an automobile which had a flowing water film formed thereon, for investigation of the load on the wiper motor. The results were as complied in the following table:

Cleaning efi'ect-uu 1 Violent vibration, poor. 2 Good.

In the case of wiper blade (10), the load on the wiper motor was so large that the blade vibrated heavily on the glass surface with a very poor wiping effect. Meanwhile the blades (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), and (16), containing the compounds according to the present invention respectively, and the :blade 17) and the blade (18) containing a surface active agent known per se caused nearly the same load on the wiper motor with no vibration and accordingly a good wiping effect was exhibited.

Next, the automobile front windshield onto which small water drops were attached was wiped and the load imposed on the wiper motor was measured. The results were shown in the following table:

2 Slight vibration, poor.

In the case of wiper blades (11) to (16), the cleaning effect was good, though the load on the wiper motor increased more or less. In the case of wiper blades 17) and (18), the load on the motor was large and the cleaning effect was poor.

EXAMPLE 5 Wiper blades (10) to (14) and (17 obtained in Example 4 were placed in an aging test machine for 70 hours at 100 C., and thereafter they were measured for tensile strength, elongation and hardness with the following results:

Types of wiper blades As seen from the above table wiper blade (17) surfacetreated exhibited serious changes on aging, but all the others were found less subject to such changes.

EXAMPLE 6 Wiper blades (10) to (14) and (17) obtained in Example 4 were exposed to the atmosphere for 6 months in the state of being elongated 10% for investigation of crack growth. The results showed that the blade (17) which had been surface-treated developed numerous cracks, but the others did not.

What is claimed is: v

1. A flexible rubber wiper blade having a reduced frictional co-eflicient made from a rubber composition consisting essentially of 100 parts by weight of an elastic material selected from among natural rubber and synthetic rubbers and friction reducing amounts of a compound selected from the compounds having the following formula:

R is an alpihatic hydrocarbon radical having 8 to 24 carbon atoms;

R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, CHR"CHR"COOR"' and CHRCHRCN, at least one R being CHR"CHR"COOR' or CHR"CHR" CN, in which R" is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and an aliphatic hydrocarbon radical having 1 to carbon atoms, and R is an aliphatic hydrocarbon radical having 1 to 24 carbon atoms;

In is an integer selected from 0, 1 and 2; and

m is an integer selected from 2 and 3.

2. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one of R is CHR"CHR"COOR".

3. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 2, wherein m 4. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 2, wherein m is 1.

5. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 2, wherein m is 2.

6. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one of R is CHR"CHRCN.

7. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 6, wherein m is 0.

8. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 6, wherein m is 1.

9. A wiper blade as claimed in claim 6, wherein m is 2.

10. The wiper blade of claim 1, in which said elastic material is selected from the group consisting of polybutadiene, copolymer of styrene and butadiene and chloroprene.

11. The wiper blade of claim 1, containing 10-30 parts by weight of said friction reducing compound.

12. The wiper blade of claim 1, containing 1 to parts by weight of said friction reducing compound.

13. The wiper blade of claim 1, containing 5-60 parts of said friction reducing compound.

14. The wiper blade of claim 1, containing 1030 parts of said friction reducing compound.

15. The wiper blade of claim 1, in which said friction reducing compound is selected from the group consisting of:

12/ 1941 Kyrides 252-357 1/ 1946 Flaxman 15-'250.36 4/ 1949 Isbell 26'0-482 8/1950 Ralston et al. 260-761 4/1957 Harrison et al 260--465.5

FOREIGN PATENTS 636,231 4/ 1950 Great Britain.

MORRIS LIEBMAN, Primary Examiner H. H. FLETCHER, Assistant Examiner US. Cl. X.R.