US3379520A - Tantalum-base alloys - Google Patents
Tantalum-base alloys Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3379520A US3379520A US625295A US62529567A US3379520A US 3379520 A US3379520 A US 3379520A US 625295 A US625295 A US 625295A US 62529567 A US62529567 A US 62529567A US 3379520 A US3379520 A US 3379520A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- alloy
- alloys
- tantalum
- rhenium
- tungsten
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C27/00—Alloys based on rhenium or a refractory metal not mentioned in groups C22C14/00 or C22C16/00
- C22C27/02—Alloys based on vanadium, niobium, or tantalum
Definitions
- Alloys of tantalum with certain ranges of rhenium and tungsten content can be provided with useful reversible precipitating phases by the addition of certain amounts of hafnium, zirconium, or both together, along with carbon and optionally also oxygen and nitrogen.
- These alloys have high strengths at elevated temperatures, substantial ductility at low temperatures, and can be fusion-welded without losing these characteristics.
- This invention relates to tantalum-base alloys, and more particularly to tantalum-tungsten-rhenium alloys.
- Another object of the invention is to provide such alloys in which one or more distinct precipitated phases can be provided by various heat treatments, so as to allow the design of optimum thermal and mechanical treatments to meet various requirements.
- the phases may preferably be different from each other in thermodynamic stability, morphology, distribution, size, strengthening characteristics, and effects on ductility.
- Still another object of the invention is to provide such ice alloys in which the precipitating phase is largely controlled by a metal capable of forming carbides and com pounds of other interstitial elements and which does not deleteriously affect the strength and ductility properties of the alloy in the condition in which the alloy is to be utilized.
- tantalum-base alloy containing substantial amounts of tungsten and rhenium giving it valuable ductility and strength, and also containing metal capable of forming carbides and other compounds of interstitial elements, carbon, and, in one form, oxygen and nitrogen, with the amounts and proportions of each so selected as to give useful precipitation-hardenable alloys.
- tantalum-base alloy containing about, by weight, 15% rhenium, tungsten in an amount such that the total of tungsten and rhenium is from at least 8% to about 16% of the total alloy composition, 0.5 4% halfnium or 0.252% zirconium, or 0.25-4% of mixtures of hafnium and zirconium, 0.005- 0.l% carbon, balance tantalum.
- the preferred atomic ratios of hafnium or zirconium, or both together, to carbon are from about 1:1 to about 2.5 :1.
- the alloys also contain oxygen and nitrogen in combined amount of ODDS-0.1%.
- alloys of the invention are as follows: 14% rhenium with 540% tungsten, and 2-3% rhenium with 79% tungsten. Percentages given in the specification are by weight except where indicated otherwise. Alloys of the invention can be heat treated to precipitate face-centered-cubic monometal carbides of tantalum modified by hafnium, zirconium or both, and optionally also containing oxygen, nitrogen or both.
- These equivalent precipitates can be expressed as (Ta, Hf)C, (Ta, Zr)C, (Ta, Hf, Zr)C, or the same with oxygen, nitrogen, or both, partially substituted for carbon, e.g., (Ta, Hf) (C, 0), (Ta, Hf) (C, N), and (Ta, Hf) (C, O, N).
- hafnium, zirconium, carbon, and optionally oxygen and nitrogen are those which produce alloys that are embodiments of the invention, both in terms of structure and variability of structure, and in terms of properties and utility.
- the limits specified herein for hafnium and zirconium are approximately equal to each other on an atomic basis. When the two metals 'are usedin combination, the com- 3 bined extreme limits of composition can be approached provided the alloy contains at least 0.5 atomic percent and no more than 4 atomic percent halfnium plus zirconiu-m.
- the characteristics and structures of the alloys of the invention which contain more than one precipitate are primarily controlled by the interplay in the tantalumtun'gsten-rhenium matrix between precipitates of Ta C, Hfo and complex compounds which will generally be preferred to hereinafter as (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N), with carbon being the predominant interstitial element.
- the tantalum carbide precipitate forms at "elevated temperatures in a relatively large particle, well distributed condition.
- the halfnium-tantalum-carbo-oxy-nitride precipitate and its equivalents form an extremely fine, well distributed phase of such a particle size as to effectively inhibit dislocation movement at elevated temperatures for strengthening purposes, while not seriously impairing ductility at room temperature.
- the particle size of the latter precipitate is so small that it often cannot be clearly discerned by optical microscopy at magnifications up to 1000X. It is generally recognized that the optimum particle size for a strengthening dispersoid in an alloy is the minimum particle size obtainable. In the first place, a given amount of dispersoid in a tfiner particle size will provide numerically more discrete particles, smaller in'terparti'cle spacing, and more effective inhibition of dislocation movement than if the particle siZe is larger.
- a dispersoid should be so small that it has a perfect crystalline structure without dislocations.
- the alloy system which we have discovered, in one embodiment, takes advantage of the principle of stabilizing disper'soids having very small diameters by virtue of complexing.
- the (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N,) precipitates in certain alloys of the invention seem to possess an extraordinary stability, both in terms of their formation and lack of dissolution at elevated temperatures, and in terms of their seeming reluctance to grow or agglomerate into larger particles at elevated temperatures.
- the total effective oxygen and nitrogen content range in alloys of the invention is from zero to 0.1%.
- Both electrodes were rectangular, having a width of 1.0 inch, a thickness of 0.75 inch and were produced by Welding together three equal length parts to a total length of 41 inches and a weight of about 15 pounds.
- the alloying constituents were provided as follows: the tantalum was 35 mesh powder containing 0.04% oxygen, 0.023% nitrogen and 0.01% carbon; the tungsten was 325 mesh powder containing 0.0080% oxygen and 0.002% carbon; the rhenium was -200 mesh powder containing less than 0.1500% oxygen and about 0.003% carbon; the hafnium was a mixture of -200 mesh and mesh powder containing respectively, 0.300% oxygen, 0.0028% nitrogen, 0.0049% hydrogen, and 0.300% oxygen and 1.04% hydrogen; the carbon was grade 38 powder procured from the Acheson Colloids Company of Port Huron, Mich.
- the powder was consolidated into the electrode parts by mechanical pressing followed by vacuum sintering at 3000 F. for one hour. Both alloys were melted with a maximum current of 3200 amps and a current density of 4265 amps per square inch.
- the average voltage for Alloy 10 was 29 volts, and for Alloy 11 was 30 volts.
- the pressure over the melt for Alloy 10 rose to 0.8 micron, while that for Alloy 11 rose to 0.5 micron.
- the ratio of mold-to-electrode diameters was 3: 1.
- Alloy 10 produced an electrode 3.0 inches in diameter by 3.4 inches long with a few shallow center cracks on the top.
- Alloy 11 produced an ingot 3.0 inches in diameter by 3.3 inches long in quite satisfactory condition.
- Table I shows the effect on hardness of heat treatment of the as-cast alloys. Although the two alloys differed substantially in both nominal and actual carbon contents, they were similar in hardness in the as-cast condition and upon annealing at the lower temperatures.
- the elevated temperature anneais were performed in a vacuum of 10- torr, with the heat treatment being terminated by the injection of helium gas into the furnace to slightly below atmospheric pressure, thereby causing a moderate rate of cooling.
- Annealing above 3500 F. caused little hardness change in the higher carbon content Alloy 11, but increased hardness in Alloy 10, which suggests the possibility of partial precipitation during cooling, indicating that Alloy 10' contained significant amounts of interstitial elements.
- the two ingots were extruded to sheet bar in cylindrical unalloyed molybdenum jackets.
- the ingots were ground to approximately 2.6 inches diameter and 2.5 inches long.
- the molybdenum jackets served both for oxidation protection and to make up the 3 inch diameter required for the extrusion facility utilized.
- the jacketed billets were soaked at 3750" F. for ten minutes prior to extrusion through a rectangular die of nominally 2.05 inches by 0.67 inch, corresponding to a nominal extrusion ratio of 5 to 1. Both alloys extruded readily to sheet bars approximately 1.75 inches by 0.7 inch by inches.
- Alloy 10 Alloy 11 Both alloys were substantially but not entirely recrystallized in the as-extruded condition. Few if any precipitates were visible in the Alloy 10 microstructure in the as-extruded condition, but the substructure was readily decorated by precipitation upon heating, particularly in the temperature range of 2250 F. to 2500 F. Above the latter temperature, the structural changes were characterized by increasing dissolution and what appears to be complete recrystallization at 3000 F. Alloy 11 contained an abundant dispersion in the as-extruded condition which did not undergo significant changes upon annealing except at 3000 F. when appreciable dissolution appeared to have occurred.
- the one-hour recrystallization temperature of the rolled Alloy 10 was found to be 2800% F, and that of Alloy 11, 3100 F.
- the as-rolled condition of Alloy 10 contained moderate amounts of the face-centered-cubic (f.c.c.) dispersed phase (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) together with a small amount of the monoclinic phase HfO
- the (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) phase underwent essentially complete dissolution above 2800 F. which was followed by rapid grain growth of the matrix, particularly above 3250 F.
- the as-rolled condition of Alloy 11 contained considerably more dispersed phase consisting almost entirely of hexagonal Ta C.
- the carbon contents were found to be between 1 and 2%, much higher than the 0.01% overall carbon content of the alloy, but still considerably less than the approximately 6% stoichiometrically required by the nominal compound (Hf, Ta)C. For this reason, and due to considerations of the stability of the various other f.c.c. phases which could be hypothesized in the present alloy system, and due to the fact that Alloy 11 having a higher carbon content did not contain as much of the monometal carbide (Hf, Ta)C, we have concluded that the f.c.c. phase in question is a complex (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N).
- the identification implies first, a hafnium-rich compound which contains a substantial amount of tantalum and little tungsten or rhenium (as indicated by the emission data), and second, the presence in the compound of substantial amounts of oxygen and perhaps nitrogen in addition to carbon.
- the lattice parameter values and the emission data indicate little substitution of tungsten or rhenium for tantalum in the precipitate.
- a small amount of the (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) phase was found in Alloy 11 below about 2800 F., as it has been detected in the as-rolled condition and upon aging at 2500 F. and 2750 F. The amount of this phase did not increase greatly with prolonged aging at the intermediate temperatures.
- Bend tests showed a minimum bend radius at room temperature and below of equivalent to zero T for both alloys in the rolled and recrystallized conditions.
- a radius of T indicates that the specimen bent through a full angle of 115 around a tool having a radius equal to the thickness of the sheet without cracking.
- Tests were conducted at a cross-head speed of 0.02 inch per minute to yield and then 0.05 inch per minute to failure. In all cases, testing performed above room temperature was done in a vacuum of about 10- torr. The material for tensile test specimens of Alloys and 11 was that rolled by the simplified procedure described above usin titanium sheathing.
- alloys of the present invention compare quite favorably with those described and claimed in the above-identified application, having higher strength at elevated temperature, and still retaining satisfactory ductility at room temperature. Alloy 11, which has a somewhat higher carbon content than does Alloy 10, showed a superiority in strength over Alloy 10. The ductility minimum appears to exist for both Alloys 10 and 11 in the intermediate temperature range of 15002000 F.
- recrystallization having deprived both Alloy 10 and Alloy 11 of the work hardening, resulted in lowered strength below 2500 F. Above 2500 F., the properties of the recrystallized conditions are similar to those of the worked condition. Alloy 11, in fact, appeared to be substantially stronger in the recrystallized condition at 3000 F. Also to be noted is the improved ductility in the recrystallized condition over that of the stress-relieved condition at room temperature.
- Table 111 also shows that the room temperature tensile elongation ductility of Alloys 10 and 11 is more than doubled by recrystallization.
- the elongation of these alloys is substantially lowered at 3000 and 3500 F. by recrystallization as compared to the stress-relieved condition.
- the increased ductility at room temperature is obviously beneficial, and the tensile data in the table indicates that the reduced elongation at elevated temperatures is generally accompanied by increased strength as would be expected, probably also beneficially increasing creep strength in the recrystallized condition.
- Electron beam fusion beads were made on initially stress-relieved speciments of Alloy 10 using 130 kilovolts, 4 milliamps, 30 inches per minute travel speed and focusing the beam about 0.5 inches above the surface for about 75% fusion penetration. The Welding did not appear to affect significantly either the bend ductility or the yield strength of the alloy at room temperature.
- a tantalum-base alloy consisting essentially of about, by weight: l-4% rhenium; 510% tungsten; said tungsten and rhenium being in amounts such that their total is from at least 8% to about 12% of the total alloy composition; at least one metal selected from the group consisting of 0.5-4% hafnium, 0.25-2 zirconium, and 0.25-4% of mixtures of hafnium and zirconium, said mixtures containing at least 0.5 atomic percent and no more than 4 atomic percent hafnium plus zirconium; 0.005-0.2% carbon; from zero to about 0.1% of at least one element selected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitrogen; balance essentially tantalum; said alloy being capable upon heat treatment of forming precipitates of TaC modified with and stabilized by at least one of hafnium and zirconium and also modified with and stabilized by from zero to a small but effective amount of at least one of oxygen and nitrogen.
- a tantalum-base alloy of claim 1 consisting essentially of about, by weight: 79% tungsten; 2-3% rhenium; at least one metal selected from the group consisting of 0.5-4% hafnium, 0.25-2% zirconium, and 0.254% of mixtures of hafnium and zirconium, said mixtures containing at least 0.5 atomic percent and no more than 4 atomic percent hafnium plus zirconium; 0.005-0.2% carbon; balance essentially tantalum.
- the alloy of claim 3 in which the modified and stabilized precipitates includes (Ta, Hf) (C, O, N).
- a tantalum-base alloy of claim 1 consisting essentially of about, by weight: 7.7% tungsten; 1.5% rhenium; 1.4% hafnium; 0.01% carbon; and at least one element selected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitrogen in total amount of 0.0050.1%; balance essentially tantalum.
- a tantalum-base alloy of claim 1 consisting essentially of about, by weight: 6.2% tungsten; 2.5% rhenium; 1.5% hafnium; 0.05% carbon; and at least one element selected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitro gen in total amount of 0.0050.1%; balance essentially tantalum.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Description
United States Patent O 3,379,520- TANTALUM-BASE ALLOYS Winston H. Chang, Cincinnati, Jack W. Clark, Milford,
and Gordon D. Oxx, Jr., Shaker Heights, Ohio, assignors to General Electric Company, a corporation of New ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Alloys of tantalum with certain ranges of rhenium and tungsten content can be provided with useful reversible precipitating phases by the addition of certain amounts of hafnium, zirconium, or both together, along with carbon and optionally also oxygen and nitrogen. This stabilizes the face-centered-cubic monometal carbide precipitates of tantalum as complex (Ta, Hf)C, (Ta, Zr)C, (Ta, Hf) (C, O, N) or their equivalents, which form very fine and efficiently strengthening precipitates, Ta C may also be present. These alloys have high strengths at elevated temperatures, substantial ductility at low temperatures, and can be fusion-welded without losing these characteristics.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 359,514, filed Apr. 13, 1964, now abandoned.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to tantalum-base alloys, and more particularly to tantalum-tungsten-rhenium alloys.
Several alloys in the tantalum-tungsten-rhenium system are known. Many such alloys have desirable properties and combinations of properties in their strength at high temperatures, ductility at low temperatures, ductility at room temperature in a welded condition, and otherwise. However, such alloys generally are not readily susceptible to strengthening by precipitation mechanisms or to aging through the solutioning and precipitation of dispersoids and the interplay of various precipitating phases.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to overcome the above-discussed limitations by providing alloys in the tantalum-tungsten-rhenium system which can be hardened by aging or softened by high temperature annealing and generally affected by precipitation mechanisms to materially change their mechanical properties in .a controlled manner.
Another object of the invention is to provide such alloys in which one or more distinct precipitated phases can be provided by various heat treatments, so as to allow the design of optimum thermal and mechanical treatments to meet various requirements. In the cases in which more than one precipitated phase is formed, the phases may preferably be different from each other in thermodynamic stability, morphology, distribution, size, strengthening characteristics, and effects on ductility.
Still another object of the invention is to provide such ice alloys in which the precipitating phase is largely controlled by a metal capable of forming carbides and com pounds of other interstitial elements and which does not deleteriously affect the strength and ductility properties of the alloy in the condition in which the alloy is to be utilized.
We have discovered that useful alloys can be produced, based on tantalum and containing substantial amounts of tungtsen and rhenium, which can be heat treated to control a precipitate comprising carbides of high melting point metals. Tests on such alloys show quite high strength levels at elevated temperatures along with the retention of substantial ductility at room temperature. Such room temperature ductility has been observedin' the stress-relieved and the recrystallized conditions and in welded sheet. Furthermore, we have discovered such alloys which are capable of being heat treated to form two distinct types of carbide precipitates, interactions between said precipitates being valuable and useful in the development of desired properties in the final alloy.
In accordance with the invention, therefore, we provide a tantalum-base alloy containing substantial amounts of tungsten and rhenium giving it valuable ductility and strength, and also containing metal capable of forming carbides and other compounds of interstitial elements, carbon, and, in one form, oxygen and nitrogen, with the amounts and proportions of each so selected as to give useful precipitation-hardenable alloys.
More particularly, we provide a tantalum-base alloy containing about, by weight, 15% rhenium, tungsten in an amount such that the total of tungsten and rhenium is from at least 8% to about 16% of the total alloy composition, 0.5 4% halfnium or 0.252% zirconium, or 0.25-4% of mixtures of hafnium and zirconium, 0.005- 0.l% carbon, balance tantalum. The preferred atomic ratios of hafnium or zirconium, or both together, to carbon are from about 1:1 to about 2.5 :1. In another form, the alloys also contain oxygen and nitrogen in combined amount of ODDS-0.1%. Other preferred ranges of tungsten and rhenium content in alloys of the invention are as follows: 14% rhenium with 540% tungsten, and 2-3% rhenium with 79% tungsten. Percentages given in the specification are by weight except where indicated otherwise. Alloys of the invention can be heat treated to precipitate face-centered-cubic monometal carbides of tantalum modified by hafnium, zirconium or both, and optionally also containing oxygen, nitrogen or both. These equivalent precipitates can be expressed as (Ta, Hf)C, (Ta, Zr)C, (Ta, Hf, Zr)C, or the same with oxygen, nitrogen, or both, partially substituted for carbon, e.g., (Ta, Hf) (C, 0), (Ta, Hf) (C, N), and (Ta, Hf) (C, O, N).
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The limits and relationships specified for tungsten and rhenium are those that have been found desirable for producing the strength, ductility, and welda'b ility advantage's of the invention.
The limits and proportions specified for hafnium, zirconium, carbon, and optionally oxygen and nitrogen are those which produce alloys that are embodiments of the invention, both in terms of structure and variability of structure, and in terms of properties and utility. The limits specified herein for hafnium and zirconium are approximately equal to each other on an atomic basis. When the two metals 'are usedin combination, the com- 3 bined extreme limits of composition can be approached provided the alloy contains at least 0.5 atomic percent and no more than 4 atomic percent halfnium plus zirconiu-m.
The characteristics and structures of the alloys of the invention which contain more than one precipitate are primarily controlled by the interplay in the tantalumtun'gsten-rhenium matrix between precipitates of Ta C, Hfo and complex compounds which will generally be preferred to hereinafter as (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N), with carbon being the predominant interstitial element. The tantalum carbide precipitate forms at "elevated temperatures in a relatively large particle, well distributed condition. The halfnium-tantalum-carbo-oxy-nitride precipitate and its equivalents, on the other hand, form an extremely fine, well distributed phase of such a particle size as to effectively inhibit dislocation movement at elevated temperatures for strengthening purposes, while not seriously impairing ductility at room temperature. The particle size of the latter precipitate is so small that it often cannot be clearly discerned by optical microscopy at magnifications up to 1000X. It is generally recognized that the optimum particle size for a strengthening dispersoid in an alloy is the minimum particle size obtainable. In the first place, a given amount of dispersoid in a tfiner particle size will provide numerically more discrete particles, smaller in'terparti'cle spacing, and more effective inhibition of dislocation movement than if the particle siZe is larger. Second, the smaller the particle size of the dispersoids, the less the statistical probability of slip or other deformation of the dispersoid particle itself by the movement of dislocations within the particles, due to the smaller population of dislocations that can exist in the ultra-fine dispersoid particles. Ideally, a dispersoid should be so small that it has a perfect crystalline structure without dislocations.
Apparently, the alloy system which we have discovered, in one embodiment, takes advantage of the principle of stabilizing disper'soids having very small diameters by virtue of complexing. In other words, the (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N,) precipitates in certain alloys of the invention seem to possess an extraordinary stability, both in terms of their formation and lack of dissolution at elevated temperatures, and in terms of their seeming reluctance to grow or agglomerate into larger particles at elevated temperatures. This is apparently caused at least in part by the complex nature of the precipitate, especially as compared to other precipitates in the same system such as Ta C and Hfo While the interstitial element purposetfully added for the formation of precipitates is carbon, the residual impurities oxygen and nitrogen present in the alloys seem to play a useful role in producing certain alloys of the invention. Although a preferred composition range for oxygen and nitrogen is stated above, small but effective amounts of the two elements present as residual impurities can satisfy the same ends, and alloys without any eifective oxygen or nitrogen are within the invention, provided the stabilized monometal carbide can be produced by heat treatment. Since TaC is not stable in the presence of Ta and Ta C, the Hf or Zr additions are necessary to stabilize the modified forms of TaC as (Ta, Hf)C or its equivalents. The total effective oxygen and nitrogen content range in alloys of the invention is from zero to 0.1%.
EXAMPLES During the research program which culminated in the resent invention, two alloys were melted, fabricated and tested. These were Alloy intended to have a composition of 7% tungsten, 3% rhenium, 1.5% hafnium, and Alloy 11 having an intended composition of 7% tungsten, 3% rhenium, 1.5% hafnium and 0.1% carbon. Electrodes were fabricated by powder metallurgical techniques for both of these alloys. The electrode for Alloy 10 contained 1.8% hafnium and the electrode for Alloy 4 11 contained 1.8% hafnium and 0.11% carbon. The tungsten and rhenium contents in the electrodes were those of the intended compositions.
Both electrodes were rectangular, having a width of 1.0 inch, a thickness of 0.75 inch and were produced by Welding together three equal length parts to a total length of 41 inches and a weight of about 15 pounds. The alloying constituents were provided as follows: the tantalum was 35 mesh powder containing 0.04% oxygen, 0.023% nitrogen and 0.01% carbon; the tungsten was 325 mesh powder containing 0.0080% oxygen and 0.002% carbon; the rhenium was -200 mesh powder containing less than 0.1500% oxygen and about 0.003% carbon; the hafnium was a mixture of -200 mesh and mesh powder containing respectively, 0.300% oxygen, 0.0028% nitrogen, 0.0049% hydrogen, and 0.300% oxygen and 1.04% hydrogen; the carbon was grade 38 powder procured from the Acheson Colloids Company of Port Huron, Mich. The powder was consolidated into the electrode parts by mechanical pressing followed by vacuum sintering at 3000 F. for one hour. Both alloys were melted with a maximum current of 3200 amps and a current density of 4265 amps per square inch. The average voltage for Alloy 10 was 29 volts, and for Alloy 11 was 30 volts. The pressure over the melt for Alloy 10 rose to 0.8 micron, while that for Alloy 11 rose to 0.5 micron. In both cases the ratio of mold-to-electrode diameters was 3: 1. Alloy 10 produced an electrode 3.0 inches in diameter by 3.4 inches long with a few shallow center cracks on the top. Alloy 11 produced an ingot 3.0 inches in diameter by 3.3 inches long in quite satisfactory condition. Straight polarity direct current was used in both cases. The actual analysis of the melted ingot of Alloy 10 was 7.69% tungsten, 1.53% rhenium, 1.39% hafnium, 0.0099% carbon, 0.0039% oxygen, -0.0059% nitrogen and 0.0004% hydrogen. The analysis of the Alloy 11 ingot was 6.19% tungsten, 2.54% rhenium, 1.49% hafnium, 0.0496% carbon, 0.0011% oxygen, 0.073% nitrogen and 0.0027% hydrogen.
Table I shows the effect on hardness of heat treatment of the as-cast alloys. Although the two alloys differed substantially in both nominal and actual carbon contents, they were similar in hardness in the as-cast condition and upon annealing at the lower temperatures. The elevated temperature anneais were performed in a vacuum of 10- torr, with the heat treatment being terminated by the injection of helium gas into the furnace to slightly below atmospheric pressure, thereby causing a moderate rate of cooling. Annealing above 3500 F. caused little hardness change in the higher carbon content Alloy 11, but increased hardness in Alloy 10, which suggests the possibility of partial precipitation during cooling, indicating that Alloy 10' contained significant amounts of interstitial elements. Some precipitates identified as Ta C, were visible in Alloy 11 on metallographic study, particularly after aging at 2500 F. or above 3500 F. Similar precipitates were much less abundant in the microstructures of Alloy 10 than in those of Alloy 11. The overall evidence indicates that, even in the as-cast and annealed condition, significant amounts of strengthening occurred in Alloy 10 caused by a dispersoid of a particles size so small that it was not resolved at the optical magnification used (1000 Relative to Alloy 10, Alloy 11 contained a much larger amount of a dispersoid identified as Ta C. The latter apparently predominated in all the annealed conditions except at 2500 P. where a finer precipitation of (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) made its appearance. The amount of dispersion was reduced considerably at 3000 F., but became increasingly more abundant again upon annealing at the higher temperatures. The hardness data of Table I suggests that considerable dissolution of the precipitates occurred at and above 3000 P. so that enhanced intragranular dispersion in the high temperature annealed conditions resulted from partial precipitation upon cooling. The coarseness and the Widmainstatten-type morphology of the dispersion indicated that the precipitation occurred during the initial stages of cooling. Such an abundance of coarse precipitation surpresses subsequent fine precipitation (upon cooling through the lower temperatures). This apparently caused the lack of hardening in the high temperature annealed conditions of Alloy 11.
The two ingots were extruded to sheet bar in cylindrical unalloyed molybdenum jackets. The ingots were ground to approximately 2.6 inches diameter and 2.5 inches long. The molybdenum jackets served both for oxidation protection and to make up the 3 inch diameter required for the extrusion facility utilized. The jacketed billets were soaked at 3750" F. for ten minutes prior to extrusion through a rectangular die of nominally 2.05 inches by 0.67 inch, corresponding to a nominal extrusion ratio of 5 to 1. Both alloys extruded readily to sheet bars approximately 1.75 inches by 0.7 inch by inches.
Specimens from the extruded alloys were annealed at various times at temperatures between 2000 F. and 300=0F. to guide subsequent rolling procedure and to study the aging reactions. The hardness changes of both alloys are included in Table I below. In both the extruded and annealed conditions the hardness of Alloy 10 remained higher than that of Alloy 11. The eitect of the one-hour annealing on the as-extruded condition lay essentially in the gradual hardness decrease. VHN refers to Vickers Hardness Number.
Hardness, "HN
OneHour Annealing Temp., F.
Alloy 10 Alloy 11 Both alloys were substantially but not entirely recrystallized in the as-extruded condition. Few if any precipitates were visible in the Alloy 10 microstructure in the as-extruded condition, but the substructure was readily decorated by precipitation upon heating, particularly in the temperature range of 2250 F. to 2500 F. Above the latter temperature, the structural changes were characterized by increasing dissolution and what appears to be complete recrystallization at 3000 F. Alloy 11 contained an abundant dispersion in the as-extruded condition which did not undergo significant changes upon annealing except at 3000 F. when appreciable dissolution appeared to have occurred.
Both alloys were satisfactorily rolled to 0.05 inch thick sheet by the same procedure. The molybdenum jacket Was removed from the extruded bars and the bars were rejacketed in titanium to produce a sandwich of tantalum alloy between two sheets of titanium welded around the edges for a total thickness of approximately 0.6 inch. The sandwich was rolled to a reduction in thickness f 60% at 2300 F. at a reduction per pass. The titanium jacket was then removed by pickling and, where necessary, by hand grinding. The material was then stress relieved at 2300 F. for 1.5 hours followed by direct final cross-rolling at 1000 F. to the desired thickness without a jacket. The total reduction in thickness effected at 1000 F. was about 66%, using 10% per pass. The slight scaling experienced at this temperature was readily pickled off in a solution of 60 milliliters H 0, 20 milliliters Hf, and 20 milliliters of HNO Both the sheet quality and the material yield were considered to be quite satisfactory.
Some material from each of the ingots had previously been rolled to 0.25 inch thick sheet by a different procedure. The procedure consisted of cross-rolling the molybdenum-jacketed bar for 50% at 2200 F., annealing at 2400 F. for one hour, cross-rolling at 2000 F. for 50%, annealing at 2200 F. for one hour, crossrolling at 1800 F. for 40-50%, removing the molybdenum jacket, and finish-rolling at 1000 F. The term cross-rolling indicates that each rolling pass is made at about to the previous pass. The extruded-on-molybdenum sheathing did not provide fully adequate protection against contamination, and the above-described pr cedure using a titanium jacket is a more satisfactory way of reproducing the sheet. However, the molybdenum-jacketed material did produce good sheet which was utilized for a study of the effects of annealing after the removal of the contaminated areas of the sheet. Subsequent studies on the effects of annealing on the material rolled in titanium sheathing showed little dilference in the reactions of the two types of materials. The effect of one-hour vacuum-annealing on hardness and grain growth is shown in Table II below. In the table, mm. stands for millimeter and RX stands for recrystallized.
TABLE II.-EFFECT OF ONE-HOUR ANNEALING ON HARD- NESS AND GRAIN SIZE OF ROLLED ALLOYS Alloy 10 Alloy 11 Annealing Temp.,
F. Hardness, Grain Hardness, Grain VHN Slze, mm. VHN Size, mm.
As Rolled 423 435 The one-hour recrystallization temperature of the rolled Alloy 10 was found to be 2800% F, and that of Alloy 11, 3100 F. The as-rolled condition of Alloy 10 contained moderate amounts of the face-centered-cubic (f.c.c.) dispersed phase (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) together with a small amount of the monoclinic phase HfO The (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) phase underwent essentially complete dissolution above 2800 F. which was followed by rapid grain growth of the matrix, particularly above 3250 F. The as-rolled condition of Alloy 11 contained considerably more dispersed phase consisting almost entirely of hexagonal Ta C. Using optical microscopy, the dispersion underwent little change with annealing until about 3000 F. when the volume fraction of the dispersion appeared to have decreased as a result of dissolution and agglomeration. It may be noted from Table II that, after recovery and softening at the lower temperatures, the hardnesses of both Alloy l0 and Alloy 11 show a definite increase upon annealing at 3000 F. and above. Dissolution apparently proceeds in Alloy 11 rapidly above the recrystallization temperature of 3100 P. so that, at 3250 F, the dispersed phase was evident mainly along the grain boundaries. Grain growth occurred slowly in r Alloy 11 up to 3200 F. but became accelerated upon annealing at 3500 F. as a consequence of complete dissolution of the dispersed phases.
Phase identification studies were performed on Alloy 10 and Alloy 11 by means of X-ray diffraction and emission analyses of residues extracted electrolytically from each alloy in various stages of processing as well as after selected heat treatments. In Alloy 10, the monoclinic HfO; and hexagonal Ta C were the predominant dispersed phases at temperatures above about 2800" F., as represented by the as-extruded condition and the as-cast, ex-
truded, or rolled conditions annealed at 3000 F. or above. At temperatures below about 2800 F., a new phase appeared in Alloy 10 having f.c.c. structure with a equal to 4.58 angstrom units. This phase was found in the asrolled condition as well as upon aging the extruded material in the range of 2200 -2750 F. Emission data showed that the phase was rich in hafnium, with the hafnium intensity decreasing when the f.c.c. phase disappeared upon aging at 3000 F. To further characterize the f.c.c. phase in question, residues extracted from two of the aged conditions in which the phase appeared were analyzed for carbon. The carbon contents were found to be between 1 and 2%, much higher than the 0.01% overall carbon content of the alloy, but still considerably less than the approximately 6% stoichiometrically required by the nominal compound (Hf, Ta)C. For this reason, and due to considerations of the stability of the various other f.c.c. phases which could be hypothesized in the present alloy system, and due to the fact that Alloy 11 having a higher carbon content did not contain as much of the monometal carbide (Hf, Ta)C, we have concluded that the f.c.c. phase in question is a complex (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N). The identification implies first, a hafnium-rich compound which contains a substantial amount of tantalum and little tungsten or rhenium (as indicated by the emission data), and second, the presence in the compound of substantial amounts of oxygen and perhaps nitrogen in addition to carbon.
In contrast to Alloy 10, Alloy 11 having a higher carbon content, lower oxygen and about the same nitrogen, has Ta C as its major dispersed phase at both high and low temperatures. The lattice parameter values and the emission data indicate little substitution of tungsten or rhenium for tantalum in the precipitate. A small amount of the (Hf, Ta) (C, O, N) phase was found in Alloy 11 below about 2800 F., as it has been detected in the as-rolled condition and upon aging at 2500 F. and 2750 F. The amount of this phase did not increase greatly with prolonged aging at the intermediate temperatures.
Bend tests showed a minimum bend radius at room temperature and below of equivalent to zero T for both alloys in the rolled and recrystallized conditions. A radius of T indicates that the specimen bent through a full angle of 115 around a tool having a radius equal to the thickness of the sheet without cracking.
Tensile tests Were performed at various temperatures between room temperature and 3500" F. on Alloys 10 and 11, the results of which are presented in Table III below for comparison with the results of similar tests on two alloys which are discussed and claimed in the above-identified copending application. In the table, SR indicates stress relieved material, and RX indicates recrystallized material. Ks.i. means thousands of pounds per square inch. For Alloys l and 11, the stress relief was one hour at 2000 F. The recrystallization treatment used on Alloy 10 was one hour at 2900 F.; the recrystallization treatment for Alloy 11 was one hour at 3150 F.; the alloy containing 8.9% tungsten and 2.6% rhenium was recrystallized at 2950 F. for one-half hour; the alloy containing 7.7% tungsten; 2.3% rhenium was recrystallized at 2900 F. for one-half hour. The Alloy 10 and Alloy 11 tests were performed on 0.05 inch thick sheet specimens having a gauge length of 0.5 inch long by Vs inch wide with the major surfaces being as-pickled in the rolled condition, and the testing conducted on a Instron apparatus at a nominal strain rate of 0.05 per minute. The tests on the two alloys presented for comparison were performed on specimens machined from sheet which had been rolled to approximately 0.090 inch thick and then ground from each side to about 0.07 inch, having a gauge length of /2 inch. Tests were conducted at a cross-head speed of 0.02 inch per minute to yield and then 0.05 inch per minute to failure. In all cases, testing performed above room temperature was done in a vacuum of about 10- torr. The material for tensile test specimens of Alloys and 11 was that rolled by the simplified procedure described above usin titanium sheathing.
TABLE III.TENSILE PROPERTIES OF ROLLED ALLOYS [Stress Relieved at 2,000 1 ./1 hr. Nominal Strain Rate: 0.05/min.]
Test Condi- Tensile Tensile/Density 0.2% Yield, Elonga- Ton1p., tion Strength, Ratio Inches Strength, tion,
F. Ksi. X10 K.s.i. Percent A. ALLOY 10 78 I SR 156.1 260 149. 0 10.2 "l RX 128.3 214 123.9 24.5 500 SR 130. 2 227 131. 3 11. 2 RX 03. 5 156 82. 3 23. 4 1 000 SR 131.3 219 117.2 10.2 RX 84. 5 411 G5. 3 23.6 1 mo 1 SR 117. 8 196 103.1 6. 4 Y ""L RX 104. 7 175 54.0 21. 3 2 000 F SR 101. 3 160 78.2 12.4 i RX 84.8 141 48.3 10.3 2 500 SR 66.7 111 55.9 30.4 RX 51.4 85 38.6 25.8 3 000 SR 27. 2 45 23. 6 74. 0 RX 28. 8 48 26.1 39.1 3 500 SR 19. 2 32 17. 5 54.2 RX 19.6 33 14.7 41.4
B. ALLOY 11 a SR 176. 8 295 170. 2 4.8 RX 147.8 246 131.3 11.9 500 1 SR 147. 8 246 135. 5 8. 2 l RX 118.7 198 100.0 14.2 1 000 R 147. 3 246 133. 1 7. 1 ""l RX 110.2 184 87.8 10.2 1 SR 128.0 213 115. 2 4.0 RX 125.8 210 72. s 13. s 2 000 SR 114. 8 191 106.1 7. 5 RX 97.4 162 56.3 13. 5 2 500 SR 71.3 119 65.0 18.5 RX 04.3 107 47.3 14.5 3 000 SR 30. 8 51 29. 5 35. 8 RX 37. 8 63 31. 7 23. 4 3 500 I SR 21. 36 12.7 71.0 "'"t RX 26.5 44 17.7 33.9
RX 79. 6 14. 0 RX 15. 4 60 RX 12. 3 30 RX 91. 0 34 2,500.- RX 21. s 54 311001-". RX 17. 5 40 3,500 RX 10. 9 32 As can be seen by an inspection of Table III, alloys of the present invention compare quite favorably with those described and claimed in the above-identified application, having higher strength at elevated temperature, and still retaining satisfactory ductility at room temperature. Alloy 11, which has a somewhat higher carbon content than does Alloy 10, showed a superiority in strength over Alloy 10. The ductility minimum appears to exist for both Alloys 10 and 11 in the intermediate temperature range of 15002000 F. It may be noted that recrystallization, having deprived both Alloy 10 and Alloy 11 of the work hardening, resulted in lowered strength below 2500 F. Above 2500 F., the properties of the recrystallized conditions are similar to those of the worked condition. Alloy 11, in fact, appeared to be substantially stronger in the recrystallized condition at 3000 F. Also to be noted is the improved ductility in the recrystallized condition over that of the stress-relieved condition at room temperature.
Table 111 also shows that the room temperature tensile elongation ductility of Alloys 10 and 11 is more than doubled by recrystallization. The elongation of these alloys is substantially lowered at 3000 and 3500 F. by recrystallization as compared to the stress-relieved condition. The increased ductility at room temperature is obviously beneficial, and the tensile data in the table indicates that the reduced elongation at elevated temperatures is generally accompanied by increased strength as would be expected, probably also beneficially increasing creep strength in the recrystallized condition.
Since weldability is a primary criterion of the extent of usefulness of refractory metal alloys, tests were made to determine whether the favorable properties of the recrystallized alloys would carry over into the welded condition. Electron beam fusion beads were made on initially stress-relieved speciments of Alloy 10 using 130 kilovolts, 4 milliamps, 30 inches per minute travel speed and focusing the beam about 0.5 inches above the surface for about 75% fusion penetration. The Welding did not appear to affect significantly either the bend ductility or the yield strength of the alloy at room temperature.
The foregoing. is a description of illustrative embodiments of the invention, and it is applicants intention in the appended claims to cover all forms which fall within the scope of the invention.
What is claimed is:
1. A tantalum-base alloy consisting essentially of about, by weight: l-4% rhenium; 510% tungsten; said tungsten and rhenium being in amounts such that their total is from at least 8% to about 12% of the total alloy composition; at least one metal selected from the group consisting of 0.5-4% hafnium, 0.25-2 zirconium, and 0.25-4% of mixtures of hafnium and zirconium, said mixtures containing at least 0.5 atomic percent and no more than 4 atomic percent hafnium plus zirconium; 0.005-0.2% carbon; from zero to about 0.1% of at least one element selected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitrogen; balance essentially tantalum; said alloy being capable upon heat treatment of forming precipitates of TaC modified with and stabilized by at least one of hafnium and zirconium and also modified with and stabilized by from zero to a small but effective amount of at least one of oxygen and nitrogen.
2. The alloy of claim 1 in which the modified and stabilized precipitate include (Ta, Hf) (C, O, N).
3. A tantalum-base alloy of claim 1 consisting essentially of about, by weight: 79% tungsten; 2-3% rhenium; at least one metal selected from the group consisting of 0.5-4% hafnium, 0.25-2% zirconium, and 0.254% of mixtures of hafnium and zirconium, said mixtures containing at least 0.5 atomic percent and no more than 4 atomic percent hafnium plus zirconium; 0.005-0.2% carbon; balance essentially tantalum.
4. The alloy of claim 3 in which the modified and stabilized precipitates includes (Ta, Hf) (C, O, N).
5. A tantalum-base alloy of claim 1 consisting essentially of about, by weight: 7.7% tungsten; 1.5% rhenium; 1.4% hafnium; 0.01% carbon; and at least one element selected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitrogen in total amount of 0.0050.1%; balance essentially tantalum.
6. A tantalum-base alloy of claim 1 consisting essentially of about, by weight: 6.2% tungsten; 2.5% rhenium; 1.5% hafnium; 0.05% carbon; and at least one element selected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitro gen in total amount of 0.0050.1%; balance essentially tantalum.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1/1965 France et al. -174 3/1966 Clark et a1. 75174 OTHER REFERENCES CHARLES N. LOVELL, Primary Examiner.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US625295A US3379520A (en) | 1967-03-23 | 1967-03-23 | Tantalum-base alloys |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US625295A US3379520A (en) | 1967-03-23 | 1967-03-23 | Tantalum-base alloys |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3379520A true US3379520A (en) | 1968-04-23 |
Family
ID=24505417
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US625295A Expired - Lifetime US3379520A (en) | 1967-03-23 | 1967-03-23 | Tantalum-base alloys |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3379520A (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3498854A (en) * | 1966-01-13 | 1970-03-03 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Precipitation hardened tantalum base alloy |
US3791821A (en) * | 1968-10-30 | 1974-02-12 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Tantalum base alloys |
US4067742A (en) * | 1976-04-01 | 1978-01-10 | Nasa | Thermal shock and erosion resistant tantalum carbide ceramic material |
US4095978A (en) * | 1974-11-01 | 1978-06-20 | Ugine Carbone | Hard tantalum nitride base alloys |
US4432794A (en) * | 1980-07-19 | 1984-02-21 | Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh | Hard alloy comprising one or more hard phases and a binary or multicomponent binder metal alloy |
US4447825A (en) * | 1980-02-28 | 1984-05-08 | Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | III-V Group compound semiconductor light-emitting element having a doped tantalum barrier layer |
US5383981A (en) * | 1993-06-14 | 1995-01-24 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Reusable crucible for containing corrosive liquids |
CN114836665A (en) * | 2022-05-17 | 2022-08-02 | 西北有色金属研究院 | Ta-W-Hf-Re-C alloy and preparation method of bar thereof |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3166414A (en) * | 1962-07-09 | 1965-01-19 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Tantalum base alloys |
US3243290A (en) * | 1963-07-22 | 1966-03-29 | Gen Electric | Tantalum base alloy |
-
1967
- 1967-03-23 US US625295A patent/US3379520A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3166414A (en) * | 1962-07-09 | 1965-01-19 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Tantalum base alloys |
US3243290A (en) * | 1963-07-22 | 1966-03-29 | Gen Electric | Tantalum base alloy |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3498854A (en) * | 1966-01-13 | 1970-03-03 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Precipitation hardened tantalum base alloy |
US3791821A (en) * | 1968-10-30 | 1974-02-12 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Tantalum base alloys |
US4095978A (en) * | 1974-11-01 | 1978-06-20 | Ugine Carbone | Hard tantalum nitride base alloys |
US4067742A (en) * | 1976-04-01 | 1978-01-10 | Nasa | Thermal shock and erosion resistant tantalum carbide ceramic material |
US4447825A (en) * | 1980-02-28 | 1984-05-08 | Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | III-V Group compound semiconductor light-emitting element having a doped tantalum barrier layer |
US4432794A (en) * | 1980-07-19 | 1984-02-21 | Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh | Hard alloy comprising one or more hard phases and a binary or multicomponent binder metal alloy |
US5383981A (en) * | 1993-06-14 | 1995-01-24 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Reusable crucible for containing corrosive liquids |
CN114836665A (en) * | 2022-05-17 | 2022-08-02 | 西北有色金属研究院 | Ta-W-Hf-Re-C alloy and preparation method of bar thereof |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Weiss et al. | Modification of alpha morphology in Ti-6Al-4V by thermomechanical processing | |
US5316598A (en) | Superplastically formed product from rolled magnesium base metal alloy sheet | |
US5041262A (en) | Method of modifying multicomponent titanium alloys and alloy produced | |
US4889170A (en) | High strength Ti alloy material having improved workability and process for producing the same | |
US4292077A (en) | Titanium alloys of the Ti3 Al type | |
US5558729A (en) | Method to produce gamma titanium aluminide articles having improved properties | |
US3767385A (en) | Cobalt-base alloys | |
EP0626018A1 (en) | Alloys of molybdenum, rhenium and tungsten | |
JPH01252747A (en) | High strength titanium material having excellent ductility and its manufacture | |
US3379520A (en) | Tantalum-base alloys | |
JP3022922B2 (en) | Method for producing plate or strip material with improved cold rolling characteristics | |
JPH06501056A (en) | Rapid solidification magnesium base alloy sheet | |
US5129960A (en) | Method for superplastic forming of rapidly solidified magnesium base alloy sheet | |
US3039868A (en) | Magnesium base alloys | |
US3243290A (en) | Tantalum base alloy | |
Hills et al. | The mechanical properties of quenched uranium-molybdenum alloys: Part I: Tensile tests on polycbystalline specimens | |
US3230119A (en) | Method of treating columbium-base alloy | |
US3595645A (en) | Heat treatable beta titanium base alloy and processing thereof | |
US3447921A (en) | Molybdenum-base alloy | |
US3061427A (en) | Alloy of titanium | |
US3206305A (en) | Niobium alloys | |
US3275434A (en) | Molybdenum-base alloy | |
US3390983A (en) | Tantalum base alloys | |
US3181946A (en) | Columbium base alloys | |
US2899303A (en) | Alpha titanium alloys containing |