US3362845A - Method and compositions for double coating a traveling web - Google Patents
Method and compositions for double coating a traveling web Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3362845A US3362845A US647936A US64793667A US3362845A US 3362845 A US3362845 A US 3362845A US 647936 A US647936 A US 647936A US 64793667 A US64793667 A US 64793667A US 3362845 A US3362845 A US 3362845A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- web
- coat
- base
- blade
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 title description 76
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 title description 64
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title description 18
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title description 12
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 42
- 239000000049 pigment Substances 0.000 description 35
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 34
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 34
- 238000006748 scratching Methods 0.000 description 22
- 230000002393 scratching effect Effects 0.000 description 22
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 21
- 239000011247 coating layer Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000000123 paper Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 18
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 17
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 15
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 15
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 13
- 235000010216 calcium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 13
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 13
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 13
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 13
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000011087 paperboard Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000004579 marble Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000004925 Acrylic resin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920000178 Acrylic resin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011362 coarse particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000006303 immediate early viral mRNA transcription Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001353 Dextrin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004375 Dextrin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004372 Polyvinyl alcohol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010073771 Soybean Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005018 casein Substances 0.000 description 1
- BECPQYXYKAMYBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N casein, tech. Chemical compound NCCCCC(C(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CC(C)C)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(C(C)O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=O)N=C(O)C(COP(O)(O)=O)N=C(O)C(CCC(O)=N)N=C(O)C(N)CC1=CC=CC=C1 BECPQYXYKAMYBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021240 caseins Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000008199 coating composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910002026 crystalline silica Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019425 dextrin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940102689 lustra Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000013808 oxidized starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920002451 polyvinyl alcohol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229940088417 precipitated calcium carbonate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000019710 soybean protein Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000010902 straw Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H19/00—Coated paper; Coating material
- D21H19/80—Paper comprising more than one coating
- D21H19/82—Paper comprising more than one coating superposed
- D21H19/822—Paper comprising more than one coating superposed two superposed coatings, both being pigmented
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/25—Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
- Y10T428/256—Heavy metal or aluminum or compound thereof
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/25—Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
- Y10T428/259—Silicic material
Definitions
- the coating of web material such as paper, paperboard, and the like
- the coating of web material may be performed by the use of roll coaters, air knife coaters, or blade coaters.
- Each type of coater has advantages and disadvantages peculiar to its own type.
- blade coaters have a distinct advantage of providing a very smooth surface even at low coat weights because of a leveling or filling action which is accomplished by the blade.
- Blade coaters find great utility, therefore, in the coating of paper and paperboard which is subsequently subjected to a printing operation, since the latter operation is enhanced if the medium to be printed has a smooth surface.
- a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment and an adhesive
- a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment and an adhesive
- the apparatus used to apply the first coating layer, or base coat is not important.
- the base coat is applied by a blade coater. Regardless of how the base coat is applied, the second coating layer, or top coat, is applied by a blade coater in order to produce a final coated sheet of highest quality.
- a web of paper or paperboard has an inherent roughness or unevenness which is attributable to its formation on a paper machine.
- a first layer of coating over the paper or paperboard fills in the roughness of the web to a great extent and tends to seal the fibers in the web.
- the second layer of coating enhances the filling of the roughness of the web and improves the continuity of the final coated surface, since it is applied over a relatively smoother surface than is the first layer of coating.
- the hard particles which cause the streaking may be dried adhesive or dried coating from the coating supply system, or they may be foreign materials which have not been removed from the coating system. It was believed that increased screening of the coating by use of finer screens would eliminate the problem. It is common in the industry to screen coatings with screens having mesh sizes in the range of to 150. Use of screens with mesh sizes above is not commercially feasible, but in an attempt to eliminate the scratching problem, coatings were passed through 325 mesh screens with the result that while a slight improvement in scratching was noted, the problem was far from solved.
- a particle which lodges under the blade soon becomes dislodged, either by finding a low area in the web or by being abraded away by the inherent roughness of the web until such time as the particle becomes of a size to successfully pass under the blade. But due to the filling of the low areas of the web by the base coat, the web is in a relatively smooth condition such that its roughness, and hence its abrasive effect on a lodged particle in the top coat, is reduced. A particle in the top coat which lodges under the blade is thus not removed by the web and may lodge indefinitely.
- This substitution of coarse materials in the base coat provides a means for controlling the base coat roughness by selection of the particle size of the coarse materials, which particle size may be varied to obtain the roughness necessary to eliminate scratching in the top coat.
- the adhesive or binder used to bind the pigment in the coatings to the traveling web can be any of the conventional water-dispersible adhesives used in aqueous paper coatings.
- adhesives are starches, casein, and other proteins such as alpha and soybean protein, polyvinyl alcohol, resin emulsions, resin latices, and combinations of adhesives such as starch-latex or soya protein-acrylic resin mixtures, all of which may be referred to as film-formers.
- the invention is not limited to the use of a particular starch as any of the usual starches, such as dextrins, oxidized starches, cationic, acid modified, pearl, and ethylated starches can be used.
- Fourteen point board was double coated with the above base and top coat formulations by inverted blade coaters, such coaters being known in the art, as for example the coater described in my US Patent 3,149,005.
- a first coating layer was applied to the traveling web of board in known manner, as by an applicator roll; the coating was smoothed with a doctor blade in known manner; the first layer of coating was substantially set by passing the traveling web into a drying zone, as for example a zone comprised of heated drier drums; a second layer of coating was applied over the first coating layer; the second layer of coating was smoothed with a doctor blade; and the resultant double coated web was substantially dried.
- a length of the so-coated board 100 feet, chosen at random, was examined for scratches which were evaluated as short (3 inches and less in length), medium (between 3 inches and 12 inches in length), and long (more than 12 inches in length). The following data was gathered:
- the Gamaco-T is a material marketed by the Georgia Marble Company and is prepared by crushing stone of high calcium carbonate content, to yield a product which typically has a calcium carbonate content of 98%.
- Ninety percent of the particle size range is finer than 10 microns, with 80% below 6.5 microns, 58% below 3 microns, 40% below 2.2 microns; the average particle size is approximately 2.5 microns.
- Atomite marketed by Thompson, Weinnman & Co., which is also a material prepared by grinding stone of high calcium carbonate content to yield a product which typically has a calcium carbonate content of 98.2%, can also be used successfully.
- the particle size range for Atomite is from 0.5 to 10 microns, with an average particle size of approximately 2.5 microns.
- the ground marble used is known as Georgia Marble Co. 525 and has the following particle size characteristics: 75% between 5 and 25 microns, with 90% below 25 microns; average particle size of 12 microns.
- the sand used above was 15 micron Minusil which is white, crystalline silica of angular shape, and two dimensional, primarily as slivers or vflakes, marketed by the Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation.
- This silica has the following particles size characteristics: 99.7% below microns; 98.2% below 15 microns; 90% below 10 microns; 60% below 5 microns; 40% below 3 microns; 28.5% below 2 microns; average particle size of 2 microns.
- 10 micron Minusil has also been employed succoat had a solids content of 58%. It can be seen that the scratch level is in the same range as the standard formulations, and that substitution of the Purecal O for regular coating clay in the base coat was ineffective in reducing scratching in the top coat.
- Purecal O a well known precipitated calcium carbonate, has an average particle size of approximately 0.25 micron.
- ground calcium carbonates are generally larger in particle size than precipitated calcium carbonates, and it is believed that particle size, along with the abrasive nature of the ground materials, is responsible for the improvements in scratching shown throughout this specification.
- a coarse pigment material which has an average particle size of at least 1.6 microns, and the preferred coarse pigment materials are calcium carbonate and silica, and their equivalents.
- EXAMPLES 15-1 6' It has been found that replacements of at least 20% of the coating clay in the top coat with the coarse materials herein disclosed will also reduce scratching in the top coat. If more than a 20% replacement is made in the top coat, printability of the final coated web may be adversely affected, but more than a 20% replacement may be utilized.
- the following data is illustrative of a 20% replacement of Gamaco-T or 10 micron Minusil for the coating clay in the top coat.
- the base coat was a standard formulation of 100 parts regular coating clay (Columbia clay), with 20% binder (16% acrylic resin and 4% protein) based on the clay content; solids content of 52.7%.
- the top coat formulation was 80 parts premium clay, 20 parts of either Gamaco-T or 10 micron Minusil, with 21 /2% binder (18% acrylic resin and 3 /2% protein) based on the clay content; solids content of 58% in both instances.
- the top coats were screened through a 100 mesh screen before application.
- the top coat was screened through a 100 mesh screen.
- the base coat has a solids content of 57% and the top Comparing the results of Examples 15 and 16 with Examples 1, 2, and 3 above where the standard formulations were used, it is seen that an effective reduction in the amount of scratching in the top coat was achieved by using the coarse materials in the top coat.
- the reason for improvements in scratching when using the coarse materials in the top coat is not fully understood, but it is believed that a lodged particle is abraded away by the coarse particles in the second coating layer as the coarse particles flow past the lodged particle.
- EXAMPLE 17 any of the usual paper coating adhesives can be employed in practicing the methods of this invention.
- the base coating used in Example 6 above containing as pigment equal parts of clay and Gamaco-T, was employed again, except that the acrylic-resin-p-rotein adhesive was repleced by 17 parts by weight of alpha protein.
- the base coating was applied at a coat weight of about 4 pounds, and the coated paper was dried. Then about 4 pounds of the standard top coating from Examples 1-4 was applied over the dried base coat, and the scratch level of the so-coated paper was sub stantially the same in excellence as that exhibited in Example 6.
- Example 6 was repeated, except that the resin-protein adhesive in the top coat was replaced by 16 parts by Weight of alpha protein.
- the scratch level was substantially the same as in Example 6.
- any of the conventional adhesives can be used in the top coat to bind the coarse pigments to the paper.
- Example 15 was repeated except that the resin-protein adhesive in the top coat was replaced by 18 parts by weight of an ethylated starch, and the resultant scratch level of the final coated paper was substantially the same as that of Example 15.
- the base stock to he coated in the manner of this invention may be subjected to a conventional surface size treatment, and if so, the size treatment is not considered to be one of the layers of coating according to this invention.
- the coarse materials employed in this invention may be applied at the size press, in which case, the sizing is considered to be the base coating.
- ground calcium carbonate and silica have been disclosed as materials to be incorporated in the base or top coats of a double coating process
- other coarse particles having an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns
- the method of coating a traveling web of paper, paperboard, and the like which involves the steps of (a) applying to the traveling web a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micro and filmforming binder, (b) substantially setting the first coating layer, (c) applying over the first coating layer a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micron and film-forming binder, (d) smoothing the second layer of coating with a doctor blade, and (e) substantially drying the resultant coated web, the improvement for the reduction of scratching in the second coating layer which comprises applying as the first coating layer a coating wherein the mineral pigment comprises at least about 10% of a coarse pigment material which has an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns.
- the coarse pigment material is selected from the group consisting of ground calcium carbonate and silica.
- the coarse pigment material comprises from about 25 to 100% of the mineral pigment in the first coating layer.
- binders include water-dispersible resins.
- paperboard, and the like which involves steps of (a) applying to the traveling web a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size of up to about 0.8 micron and filmfcrming binder, (b) substantially setting the first coating layer, (c) applying over the first coating layer a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size of up to about 0.8 micron and film-forming binder, (d) smoothing the second layer of coating with a doctor blade, and (e) substantially drying the resultant coated web, the improvement for the reduction of scratching in the second coating layer which comprises building a roughness in the first coating layer applied in step (a) above by replacing at least about 10% of the mineral pigment with a coarse pigment material which has an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns.
- the coarse pigment material is selected from the group consisting of ground calcium carbonate and silica.
- the method of coating a traveling web of paper, paperboard, and the like which involves steps of (a) applying to the traveling web a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micron and filmforming binder, (b) substantially setting the first coating layer, (c) applying over the first coating layer a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micron and film-forming binder, (cl) smoothing the second layer of coating with a doctor blade, and (e) substantially drying the resultant coated web, the improvement for the reduction of scratching in the second coating layer which comprises applying as the second coating layer a coating wherein the mineral pigment comprises at least about 20% of a coarse pigment material which has an average particle of at least about 1.6 microns.
- the coarse pigment material is selected from the group consisting of ground calcium carbonate and silica.
Landscapes
- Paper (AREA)
Description
United States Patent 3,362,845 METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DOUBLE COATING A TRAVELING WEB Maurice M. Brundige, Laurel, Md assignor to West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company, New York, N.Y., a carporation of Delaware No Drawing. Filed June 22, 1967, Ser. No. 647,936 12 Claims. (Cl. 117--76) ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Process of double coating a traveling web wherein coarse pigment materials having an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns are employed in the base or top coats to reduce and prevent streaking when the top coat is applied by a blade or knife coater.
Cross-reference to related application- This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. 332,292, filed Dec. 20, 1963, and now abandoned.
Brief summary 0 the invention This invention relates to the coating of web material. In general, the coating of web material, such as paper, paperboard, and the like, may be performed by the use of roll coaters, air knife coaters, or blade coaters. Each type of coater has advantages and disadvantages peculiar to its own type. For example, blade coaters have a distinct advantage of providing a very smooth surface even at low coat weights because of a leveling or filling action which is accomplished by the blade. Blade coaters find great utility, therefore, in the coating of paper and paperboard which is subsequently subjected to a printing operation, since the latter operation is enhanced if the medium to be printed has a smooth surface.
In the coating of paper and paperboard, it is sometimes desirable to apply two layers of coating to a traveling Web in order to obtain a coated surface with maximum smoothness and improved ink holdout. This invention concerns such a double coating process. A first layer of coating, comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment and an adhesive, is applied to a traveling web by one of the above mentioned coating apparatuses, and the coated web is dried. Then a second layer of coating, comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment and an adhesive, is applied, and the web is again dried. According to this invention, the apparatus used to apply the first coating layer, or base coat, is not important. In the preferred method, the base coat is applied by a blade coater. Regardless of how the base coat is applied, the second coating layer, or top coat, is applied by a blade coater in order to produce a final coated sheet of highest quality.
A web of paper or paperboard has an inherent roughness or unevenness which is attributable to its formation on a paper machine. A first layer of coating over the paper or paperboard fills in the roughness of the web to a great extent and tends to seal the fibers in the web. The second layer of coating enhances the filling of the roughness of the web and improves the continuity of the final coated surface, since it is applied over a relatively smoother surface than is the first layer of coating.
With the increased use of blade coaters in the industry to obtain maximum quality has come the problem of scratching or streaking which becomes more pronounced when the top coat is applied by a blade coater over the previously coated web. The base coat fills in low areas of the web and reduces the inherent roughness of the web. Oftentimes, when the top coat is applied by blade coater,
scratches or streaks occur in the top coat as it is being smoothed by the blade. Such paper is a reject product primarily because of appearance. The streaks are caused by hard particles in the coating which become lodged in the nip between the blade and the traveling web, and as the web travels under and past the blade, the absence of coating on the web, caused by the lodged particle, takes the form of a streak or scratch on the web. The streaking continues until either the particle becomes dislodged and passes under the blade or the particle is abraded away.
The hard particles which cause the streaking may be dried adhesive or dried coating from the coating supply system, or they may be foreign materials which have not been removed from the coating system. It was believed that increased screening of the coating by use of finer screens would eliminate the problem. It is common in the industry to screen coatings with screens having mesh sizes in the range of to 150. Use of screens with mesh sizes above is not commercially feasible, but in an attempt to eliminate the scratching problem, coatings were passed through 325 mesh screens with the result that while a slight improvement in scratching was noted, the problem was far from solved.
Through much experimentation, it has been found by the inventor that, surprisingly, the rougher the web is when it is presented for the second coating application, the less the amount of scratching that occurs in the top coat. It has been found that when the web is somewhat smoothed by a first layer of coating, scratch-producing particles in the coating for the top coat have a more diflicult time passing under the blade of a blade coater. This situation occurs, it is believed, because there are relatively few low areas in the web which can accommodate the lodged particles and carry them through the nip formed by the web and the blade. When the first layer of coating is applied, a particle which lodges under the blade soon becomes dislodged, either by finding a low area in the web or by being abraded away by the inherent roughness of the web until such time as the particle becomes of a size to successfully pass under the blade. But due to the filling of the low areas of the web by the base coat, the web is in a relatively smooth condition such that its roughness, and hence its abrasive effect on a lodged particle in the top coat, is reduced. A particle in the top coat which lodges under the blade is thus not removed by the web and may lodge indefinitely.
It has been found that the advantages of a double coating operation, such as higher coat weights, increased opacity, printing smoothness, and uniformity of ink holdout, can be obtained and yet scratching can be drastically and significantly reduced by applying a base coat which has what may be termed as a built-in, preselected roughness. Contrary to normal procedure, it has been found that an increase in the roughness of the base coat reduces the amount of scratching that occurs when the top coat is applied by a blade coater. Base coats containing such pigments as coarse calcium carbonate, ground marble, and sand as replacements for part or all of the regular coating pigments have been found to produce the properties desired in the base coat for the reduction or elimination of scratching in the top coat. This substitution of coarse materials in the base coat provides a means for controlling the base coat roughness by selection of the particle size of the coarse materials, which particle size may be varied to obtain the roughness necessary to eliminate scratching in the top coat. By building in a roughness in the base coat, scratch-producing particles in the top coat which become lodged under the blade during the smoothing of the top coat are carried away from the blade by the web or the roughness of the base coat abrades away the lodged particles until they successfully pass under the blade.
Replacements in the base coat of coarse pigment materials having an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns for from 10 to 100% of the regular coating pig ments, such as regular coating clay or precipitated chalk, have been found to be effective in the reduction of scratching when the top coat is applied over the base coat by a blade coater. The invention is not limited to the use of a particular coarse pigment.
As one skilled in the art of paper coating will readily appreciate, the invention is not limited to the use of a particular adhesive. The adhesive or binder used to bind the pigment in the coatings to the traveling web can be any of the conventional water-dispersible adhesives used in aqueous paper coatings. Such adhesives are starches, casein, and other proteins such as alpha and soybean protein, polyvinyl alcohol, resin emulsions, resin latices, and combinations of adhesives such as starch-latex or soya protein-acrylic resin mixtures, all of which may be referred to as film-formers. The invention is not limited to the use of a particular starch as any of the usual starches, such as dextrins, oxidized starches, cationic, acid modified, pearl, and ethylated starches can be used.
Detailed description The invention will be better understood by reference to the following illustrative examples.
EXAMPLES 1-4 In Examples 1-4, a standard base coating of the following formulation was employed:
A standard top coating of the following formulation was employed:
Parts Lustra clay (a premium grade clay) 80 Columbia clay 20 Rhoplex B15, 18% based on the pigment 18 Protein (soya), 3 /2 based on the pigment 3 /2 In all the data given throughout this specification, unless otherwise noted, the solids content of the base coatings ranged from 52.1 to 53.0%, and the solids content of the top coatings ranged from 57.8 to 59.6%, after reduction with water to form aqueous dispersions of coating. Coat weights are expressed as pounds per 3300 square feet of coated web materials.
Fourteen point board was double coated with the above base and top coat formulations by inverted blade coaters, such coaters being known in the art, as for example the coater described in my US Patent 3,149,005. A first coating layer was applied to the traveling web of board in known manner, as by an applicator roll; the coating was smoothed with a doctor blade in known manner; the first layer of coating was substantially set by passing the traveling web into a drying zone, as for example a zone comprised of heated drier drums; a second layer of coating was applied over the first coating layer; the second layer of coating was smoothed with a doctor blade; and the resultant double coated web was substantially dried. A length of the so-coated board, 100 feet, chosen at random, was examined for scratches which were evaluated as short (3 inches and less in length), medium (between 3 inches and 12 inches in length), and long (more than 12 inches in length). The following data was gathered:
STANDARD RUNS-TOP COATS SCREENED THROUGH A 100 MESH SCREEN Scratches on 100' of Web Example Coat Coat Weight Long Medium Short Total {iiifiiiji 31% 1G 12 8 36 @3311: iii 25 25 3 i%if1;::: iii} 24 21 9 STANDARD RUN-TOP COAT SOREENED THROUGH A 200 MESH SCREEN Basevn 2.6
EXAMPLES 5-13 Fourteen point board was doubled coated with the base and top coat formulations of Examples 1-4, in the same manner as above, except that replacements for the coating clay in the base coat of Examples 1-4 were made with coarse calcium carbonate, ground limestone, and sand. The data for these runs was as follows:
TOP COATS SCREENED THROUGH A 100 MESH SCREEN Percent Scratches on 100 of Web Example Coat (Format Replatlement Material erg av Long Medium Short Total Base 2.6 I {Tmnu 3O 4 50 Sand o 0 2 2 g 50 Gamaco-T o o 0 o 4.1 M 10 .do 14 1o 2s Ground Marble.-- is e s 24 Base 3.3 9 39 d0 a 5 3 11 TOP COATS SCREENED THROUGH x 200 MESH SCREEN Base 1.4 10 m 100 "men 0 o o o 11 do 0 1 1 2 Basc 3.1 12 i Gamaco-T 0 i 2 a ase. .8 13 L2 100 ..do 0 0 1 1 Comparing Examples 513 with Examples 1-4, it can be seen from the data that the amount or scratching in the top coats was greatly reduced by use of the substituted materials for regular coating clay in the base coats, when compared to the amount of scratching that occurred when the standard base coat formulation was employed. It can also be seen that as greater substitutions for clay were made, the level of scratching decreased. There is an improvement with only a substitution in the base coat; the preferred range is from 25 to 100% substitution.
The Gamaco-T is a material marketed by the Georgia Marble Company and is prepared by crushing stone of high calcium carbonate content, to yield a product which typically has a calcium carbonate content of 98%. Ninety percent of the particle size range is finer than 10 microns, with 80% below 6.5 microns, 58% below 3 microns, 40% below 2.2 microns; the average particle size is approximately 2.5 microns.
It has been found that Atomite, marketed by Thompson, Weinnman & Co., which is also a material prepared by grinding stone of high calcium carbonate content to yield a product which typically has a calcium carbonate content of 98.2%, can also be used successfully. The particle size range for Atomite is from 0.5 to 10 microns, with an average particle size of approximately 2.5 microns.
The ground marble used is known as Georgia Marble Co. 525 and has the following particle size characteristics: 75% between 5 and 25 microns, with 90% below 25 microns; average particle size of 12 microns.
The sand used above was 15 micron Minusil which is white, crystalline silica of angular shape, and two dimensional, primarily as slivers or vflakes, marketed by the Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation. This silica has the following particles size characteristics: 99.7% below microns; 98.2% below 15 microns; 90% below 10 microns; 60% below 5 microns; 40% below 3 microns; 28.5% below 2 microns; average particle size of 2 microns. 10 micron Minusil has also been employed succoat had a solids content of 58%. It can be seen that the scratch level is in the same range as the standard formulations, and that substitution of the Purecal O for regular coating clay in the base coat was ineffective in reducing scratching in the top coat. Purecal O, a well known precipitated calcium carbonate, has an average particle size of approximately 0.25 micron.
While the great utility of the ground and coarse materials is not fully understood, it is known that ground calcium carbonates are generally larger in particle size than precipitated calcium carbonates, and it is believed that particle size, along with the abrasive nature of the ground materials, is responsible for the improvements in scratching shown throughout this specification. Thus, it is preferred to use in the base coat of a double coating process a coarse pigment material which has an average particle size of at least 1.6 microns, and the preferred coarse pigment materials are calcium carbonate and silica, and their equivalents.
EXAMPLES 15-1 6' It has been found that replacements of at least 20% of the coating clay in the top coat with the coarse materials herein disclosed will also reduce scratching in the top coat. If more than a 20% replacement is made in the top coat, printability of the final coated web may be adversely affected, but more than a 20% replacement may be utilized. The following data is illustrative of a 20% replacement of Gamaco-T or 10 micron Minusil for the coating clay in the top coat. The base coat was a standard formulation of 100 parts regular coating clay (Columbia clay), with 20% binder (16% acrylic resin and 4% protein) based on the clay content; solids content of 52.7%. The top coat formulation was 80 parts premium clay, 20 parts of either Gamaco-T or 10 micron Minusil, with 21 /2% binder (18% acrylic resin and 3 /2% protein) based on the clay content; solids content of 58% in both instances. The top coats were screened through a 100 mesh screen before application.
TOP COATS SCREENED THROUGH A 100 MESH SCREEN Percent Scratches on 100 of Web Example Coat Coat Replacement Material Weight of Clay Long Medium Short Total 15 {Base 4.5 1 20 Gamaco-T O 3 4 7 Top 2.2 J 16 Base 4. 5 20 10 Micron 2 4 1 7 {T0p 2. 4 Minusil.
EXAMPLE 14 Precipitated materials used in the base coat rather than ground materials have been found to be ineffective in reducing scratching the top coat, as the following data illustrates:
Coat Percent Re- Scratches on Run Coat Weight placement Material 100 of Web,
of Clay Total 1195 .g; 70 Purecal o...
The top coat was screened through a 100 mesh screen. The base coat has a solids content of 57% and the top Comparing the results of Examples 15 and 16 with Examples 1, 2, and 3 above where the standard formulations were used, it is seen that an effective reduction in the amount of scratching in the top coat was achieved by using the coarse materials in the top coat. The reason for improvements in scratching when using the coarse materials in the top coat is not fully understood, but it is believed that a lodged particle is abraded away by the coarse particles in the second coating layer as the coarse particles flow past the lodged particle.
EXAMPLE 17 As previously stated, any of the usual paper coating adhesives can be employed in practicing the methods of this invention. In this instance, the base coating used in Example 6 above, containing as pigment equal parts of clay and Gamaco-T, was employed again, except that the acrylic-resin-p-rotein adhesive was repleced by 17 parts by weight of alpha protein. The base coating was applied at a coat weight of about 4 pounds, and the coated paper was dried. Then about 4 pounds of the standard top coating from Examples 1-4 was applied over the dried base coat, and the scratch level of the so-coated paper was sub stantially the same in excellence as that exhibited in Example 6.
Additional runs have shown that the resin-protein adhesives set forth in the base and top coats of Examples 1-4 can be replaced by other conventional paper coating adhesives. For example, in one run, Example 6 was repeated, except that the resin-protein adhesive in the top coat was replaced by 16 parts by Weight of alpha protein. The scratch level was substantially the same as in Example 6. Further, when the coarse pigments are used in the top coats, as in Examples 15 and 16, any of the conventional adhesives can be used in the top coat to bind the coarse pigments to the paper. In one run, Example 15 was repeated except that the resin-protein adhesive in the top coat was replaced by 18 parts by weight of an ethylated starch, and the resultant scratch level of the final coated paper was substantially the same as that of Example 15.
The base stock to he coated in the manner of this invention may be subjected to a conventional surface size treatment, and if so, the size treatment is not considered to be one of the layers of coating according to this invention. However, the coarse materials employed in this invention may be applied at the size press, in which case, the sizing is considered to be the base coating.
While ground calcium carbonate and silica have been disclosed as materials to be incorporated in the base or top coats of a double coating process, other coarse particles, having an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns, may also be used and combined in coating formulations with the usual coating clays which range in particle size from about 0.4 to 0.8 micron, to reduce scratching or streaking in the top coat. Therefore, various ingredients may be substituted for the coarse materials set forth herein without departing from the spirit of this invention or the scope of the appended claims.
I claim:
1. In the method of coating a traveling web of paper, paperboard, and the like which involves the steps of (a) applying to the traveling web a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micro and filmforming binder, (b) substantially setting the first coating layer, (c) applying over the first coating layer a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micron and film-forming binder, (d) smoothing the second layer of coating with a doctor blade, and (e) substantially drying the resultant coated web, the improvement for the reduction of scratching in the second coating layer which comprises applying as the first coating layer a coating wherein the mineral pigment comprises at least about 10% of a coarse pigment material which has an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the coarse pigment material is selected from the group consisting of ground calcium carbonate and silica.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the coarse pigment material comprises from about 10 to 100% of the mineral pigment in the first coating layer.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the coarse pigment material comprises from about 25 to 100% of the mineral pigment in the first coating layer.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the binders in the coatings employed in steps (a) and (c) are water-dispersible.
6. The method of claim wherein the binders include water-dispersible resins.
7. In the method of coating a traveling web of paper,
paperboard, and the like which involves steps of (a) applying to the traveling web a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size of up to about 0.8 micron and filmfcrming binder, (b) substantially setting the first coating layer, (c) applying over the first coating layer a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size of up to about 0.8 micron and film-forming binder, (d) smoothing the second layer of coating with a doctor blade, and (e) substantially drying the resultant coated web, the improvement for the reduction of scratching in the second coating layer which comprises building a roughness in the first coating layer applied in step (a) above by replacing at least about 10% of the mineral pigment with a coarse pigment material which has an average particle size of at least about 1.6 microns.
8. The method of claim 7 in which the coarse pigment material is selected from the group consisting of ground calcium carbonate and silica.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein the binders in the coatings employed in steps (a) and (c) are Water-dispersible.
10. In the method of coating a traveling web of paper, paperboard, and the like which involves steps of (a) applying to the traveling web a first layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micron and filmforming binder, (b) substantially setting the first coating layer, (c) applying over the first coating layer a second layer of coating comprising an aqueous dispersion of mineral pigment having an average particle size up to about 0.8 micron and film-forming binder, (cl) smoothing the second layer of coating with a doctor blade, and (e) substantially drying the resultant coated web, the improvement for the reduction of scratching in the second coating layer which comprises applying as the second coating layer a coating wherein the mineral pigment comprises at least about 20% of a coarse pigment material which has an average particle of at least about 1.6 microns.
11. The method of claim 10 in which the coarse pigment material is selected from the group consisting of ground calcium carbonate and silica.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein the binders in the coatings employed in steps (a) and (c) are Water-dispersible.
References (Iited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,913,329 6/1933 Bradner 1l7--156 X 2,395,992 3/1946 Clark 117156 X 2,498,005 2/1950 Rafton 106-306 X 2,666,718 1/1954 Davis 117--156 X 2,668,749 2/1954 Mettan 106306 X 2,676,118 4/1954 Thomas 117-83 X 2,685,571 8/1954 Stinchfield et a1. 1l7-156 X 2,949,382 8/1960 Dickerman et a1. 11783 X 3,015,575 1/1962 McKnight et al. 117-156 X 3,132,042 5/ 1964 Weber. 3,136,652 6/1964 Bicknell. 3,159,487 12/1964 Krieger et a1. 3,163,535 12/1964 Straw. 3,197,322 7/1965 Maskal et al 106-306 3,272,772 9/1966 Russell 106306 X 3,288,632 11/1966 Rush et al. 11768 WILLIAM D. MARTIN, Primary Examiner.
M. R. LUSIGNAN, Assistant Examiner.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3,362,845 January 9, 1968 Maurice M. Brundige It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
Column 1, line 22, after "Ser." insert No. column 5, line 2, for "or" read of line 65, after "scratching" insert in line 75, for "has" read had column 7, line 40 for "micro" read micron column 8 line 40 after "particle" insert size Signed and sealed this 11th day of February 1969.
(SEAL) Attest:
Edward M. Fletcher, Ir. EDWARD J. BRENNER Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US647936A US3362845A (en) | 1967-06-22 | 1967-06-22 | Method and compositions for double coating a traveling web |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US647936A US3362845A (en) | 1967-06-22 | 1967-06-22 | Method and compositions for double coating a traveling web |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US3362845A true US3362845A (en) | 1968-01-09 |
Family
ID=24598830
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US647936A Expired - Lifetime US3362845A (en) | 1967-06-22 | 1967-06-22 | Method and compositions for double coating a traveling web |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US3362845A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3468698A (en) * | 1965-01-05 | 1969-09-23 | Mead Corp | Process of producing pigment coated paper |
| US3503784A (en) * | 1965-10-15 | 1970-03-31 | Kuraray Co | Smooth surfaced sheet materials and method of manufacturing the same |
| FR2598160A1 (en) * | 1986-04-30 | 1987-11-06 | Yhtyneet Paperitehtaat Oy | COATED PAPER, COATED CARDBOARD, OR THE LIKE AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF |
| US6080215A (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 2000-06-27 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article and method of making such article |
| US6277160B1 (en) | 1995-08-11 | 2001-08-21 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article and method of making such article |
| RU2324782C2 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2008-05-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт бумаги" (ОАО "ЦНИИБ") | Solution for refining of fibrous material |
Citations (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1913329A (en) * | 1932-05-14 | 1933-06-06 | Champion Coated Paper Company | Filled surface paper and process of making same |
| US2395992A (en) * | 1944-04-01 | 1946-03-05 | Warren S D Co | Mineral-coated printing paper |
| US2498005A (en) * | 1946-10-31 | 1950-02-21 | Raffold Process Corp | Treatment of pigment comprising calcium carbonate |
| US2666718A (en) * | 1950-05-25 | 1954-01-19 | Nashua Corp | Preparation of sheet material with remoistenable gum coating |
| US2668749A (en) * | 1948-10-04 | 1954-02-09 | Calcium Carbonate Company | Process of preparing calcium carbonate composition |
| US2676118A (en) * | 1950-02-08 | 1954-04-20 | Warren S D Co | Casting support and process of manufacturing same |
| US2685571A (en) * | 1949-02-15 | 1954-08-03 | Warren S D Co | Mineral-coated paper and composition therefor |
| US2949382A (en) * | 1958-02-28 | 1960-08-16 | Cons Water Power & Paper Co | Method of making printable coated paper |
| US3015575A (en) * | 1958-03-10 | 1962-01-02 | Oxford Paper Co | Pressure-sensitive, heat-resistant recording material and method of making same |
| US3132042A (en) * | 1962-03-01 | 1964-05-05 | Kimberly Clark Co | Manufacture of cellulosic product |
| US3136652A (en) * | 1959-03-03 | 1964-06-09 | Warren S D Co | Method and apparatus for coating paper |
| US3159487A (en) * | 1961-09-21 | 1964-12-01 | Keuffel & Esser Co | Photosensitive diazotype material comprising a starch, silica and a binder |
| US3163535A (en) * | 1956-11-14 | 1964-12-29 | Gen Aniline & Film Corp | Alkali-soluble resins with non-colloidal silica for precoating diazotype materials |
| US3197322A (en) * | 1962-07-25 | 1965-07-27 | Dow Chemical Co | Preparation of calcium carbonate and the composition so made |
| US3272772A (en) * | 1961-08-30 | 1966-09-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Filled polymer compositions |
| US3288632A (en) * | 1962-08-23 | 1966-11-29 | Cons Papers Inc | Production of coated paper |
-
1967
- 1967-06-22 US US647936A patent/US3362845A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1913329A (en) * | 1932-05-14 | 1933-06-06 | Champion Coated Paper Company | Filled surface paper and process of making same |
| US2395992A (en) * | 1944-04-01 | 1946-03-05 | Warren S D Co | Mineral-coated printing paper |
| US2498005A (en) * | 1946-10-31 | 1950-02-21 | Raffold Process Corp | Treatment of pigment comprising calcium carbonate |
| US2668749A (en) * | 1948-10-04 | 1954-02-09 | Calcium Carbonate Company | Process of preparing calcium carbonate composition |
| US2685571A (en) * | 1949-02-15 | 1954-08-03 | Warren S D Co | Mineral-coated paper and composition therefor |
| US2676118A (en) * | 1950-02-08 | 1954-04-20 | Warren S D Co | Casting support and process of manufacturing same |
| US2666718A (en) * | 1950-05-25 | 1954-01-19 | Nashua Corp | Preparation of sheet material with remoistenable gum coating |
| US3163535A (en) * | 1956-11-14 | 1964-12-29 | Gen Aniline & Film Corp | Alkali-soluble resins with non-colloidal silica for precoating diazotype materials |
| US2949382A (en) * | 1958-02-28 | 1960-08-16 | Cons Water Power & Paper Co | Method of making printable coated paper |
| US3015575A (en) * | 1958-03-10 | 1962-01-02 | Oxford Paper Co | Pressure-sensitive, heat-resistant recording material and method of making same |
| US3136652A (en) * | 1959-03-03 | 1964-06-09 | Warren S D Co | Method and apparatus for coating paper |
| US3272772A (en) * | 1961-08-30 | 1966-09-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Filled polymer compositions |
| US3159487A (en) * | 1961-09-21 | 1964-12-01 | Keuffel & Esser Co | Photosensitive diazotype material comprising a starch, silica and a binder |
| US3132042A (en) * | 1962-03-01 | 1964-05-05 | Kimberly Clark Co | Manufacture of cellulosic product |
| US3197322A (en) * | 1962-07-25 | 1965-07-27 | Dow Chemical Co | Preparation of calcium carbonate and the composition so made |
| US3288632A (en) * | 1962-08-23 | 1966-11-29 | Cons Papers Inc | Production of coated paper |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3468698A (en) * | 1965-01-05 | 1969-09-23 | Mead Corp | Process of producing pigment coated paper |
| US3503784A (en) * | 1965-10-15 | 1970-03-31 | Kuraray Co | Smooth surfaced sheet materials and method of manufacturing the same |
| FR2598160A1 (en) * | 1986-04-30 | 1987-11-06 | Yhtyneet Paperitehtaat Oy | COATED PAPER, COATED CARDBOARD, OR THE LIKE AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF |
| US6277160B1 (en) | 1995-08-11 | 2001-08-21 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article and method of making such article |
| US6080215A (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 2000-06-27 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article and method of making such article |
| RU2324782C2 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2008-05-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт бумаги" (ОАО "ЦНИИБ") | Solution for refining of fibrous material |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105209684B (en) | Paper composition | |
| US3714107A (en) | High solids coating composition | |
| US20140004340A1 (en) | Light and smooth coating for paper or board, or a paint coating, formed using a composite structure | |
| US3578493A (en) | High solids coating composition | |
| JP2009041131A (en) | Method for producing coated white board and coated white board | |
| JPH08506860A (en) | Roll-up printing paper and manufacturing method thereof | |
| US1719166A (en) | Process of calendering mineral-coated paper and product | |
| KR20160135832A (en) | Paper filled with rosette-type precipitated calcium carbonate | |
| SK286317B6 (en) | Method of recycling pulp rejects | |
| DE19945580B4 (en) | Coated, optically lightened printing paper and process for its production | |
| US2006209A (en) | Dull finish coated paper | |
| US3413139A (en) | Method of making coated paper of low gloss and improved ink holdout | |
| US3017295A (en) | Coated paper and paperboard and process for making same | |
| US2210835A (en) | Paper-coating pigment and pigment composition | |
| US2305404A (en) | Method of making clay fillers | |
| US3468698A (en) | Process of producing pigment coated paper | |
| US1838358A (en) | Process for making coated paper | |
| DE3014619C2 (en) | ||
| RU2219300C2 (en) | Fibrous web processing method | |
| JP3755597B2 (en) | Coated paper for printing | |
| US2006208A (en) | Dull finish coated paper | |
| JP5867286B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of coated paper | |
| JP6149678B2 (en) | Coated white paperboard | |
| JP2009052168A (en) | Coated paper | |
| JP4635493B2 (en) | Dull coated paper |