US3298617A - Selective separation of heterogeneous particles - Google Patents

Selective separation of heterogeneous particles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3298617A
US3298617A US344822A US34482264A US3298617A US 3298617 A US3298617 A US 3298617A US 344822 A US344822 A US 344822A US 34482264 A US34482264 A US 34482264A US 3298617 A US3298617 A US 3298617A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
particles
hydrophobicity
mixture
flotation
gangue
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US344822A
Inventor
Edward G Engel
Ben W Rowland
Torok Andrew
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Georgia Kaolin Co
Original Assignee
Georgia Kaolin Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Georgia Kaolin Co filed Critical Georgia Kaolin Co
Priority to US344822A priority Critical patent/US3298617A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3298617A publication Critical patent/US3298617A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes

Definitions

  • This invention relates to selective separation of heterogeneous particles and particularly to the selective separation of particles of differing degrees of hydrophobicity. It is well known that many mineral ores such as the metal sulfides are readily wet by oils and take on a distinct hydrophobic quality whereas the gangue rock with which they are natively associated remains substantially unwet by such oils and retain a distinct hydrophilic quality. It is this significant difference in quality of hydrophobicity which is utilized in well-known flotation techniques for the separation of mineral ores from gangue rock.
  • Such flotation techniques are universally used for separation of ores, particularly metal sulfides from gangue rock and while quite satisfactory for a general or gross separation, they are not satisfactory for making an ultimate purification of such mineral ores.
  • molybdenum sulfide is generally separated from its associated gangue rock by flotation techniques to produce a resultant molybdenum sulfide of about 90 to 93% purity.
  • the remaining gangue rock is extremely difficult and expensive to separate from the ore and has posed a very real problem to the art.
  • This fluid mixture is then ground to reduce the particle size of the gangue and disperse the hydrophilic gangue phase in the water.
  • the resulting mineral sulphide agglomerates are separated from the water dispersion of comminuted gangue rock by any conventional well known method such as decantation.
  • Example I An undried mixture of molybdenum sulfide and gangue rock concentrate resulting from a previous commercial flotation operation and carrying with it the attached flotation oils was placed in a water vehicle.
  • the mixture contained about 92% molybdenum sulfide and the particle size range of gangue rock was in the range of 50 to 100 microns.
  • This mixture was placed in a sand grinder such as described in Field Patent 3,075,710 with 3959.6 grams of 20-30 mesh Ottawa sand; 3436 grams of molybice denum sulfide-gangue mixture and 4157.7 grams of water. The grinder was started.
  • the molybdenum sulfide began agglomerating into small spheres and the gangue rock, which was ground to smaller size, was dispersing in the water phase. This same result was observed at 10, 15, 20 and 30 minute intervals. The mixture was removed and separated. The molybdenum sulfide was agglomerated in spheres of about 1 millimeter diameter and 99% purity whereas the gangue rock had been ground to about 6 to 8 microns in size and remained dispersed in the water phase.
  • Example II A mixture of molybdenum sulfide-gangue rock identical with that of Example I was made up to 35% solids in water and placed in the sand grinder described in Example I. Results similar to those in Example I were obtained. At the end of 25 minutes the molybdenum had agglomerated into generally spherical particles of about millimeter diameter and the gangue rock was dispersed in the water phase at a size consisting of about 6 to 8 microns.
  • the method of separating finely divided heterogeneous particles of two different levels of hydrophobicity comprising the steps of making a flotation separation of the particles to provide a particle system rich in the more hydrophobic member of said heterogenous mixture and carrying a surface coating of flotation agents, mixing the resultant particles in water in the presence of the flotation agents carried thereon, grinding the mixture in a sand grinder to reduce the particle size of the solids and simultaneously agglomerate the particles of greater hydrophobicity while dispersing the particles of lesser hydrophobicity and separating the agglomerates from the resultant dispersion.

Landscapes

  • Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)

Description

United States Patent 3,298,617 SELECTIVE SEPARATION OF HETERO GENEOUS PARTICLES Edward G. Engel, Westfield, Ben W. Rowland, Hillside, and Andrew Torok, Parsippany, N.J., assignors to Georgia Kaolin Company, a corporation of New Jersey No Drawing. Filed Feb. 14, 1964, Ser. No. 344,822
2 Claims. (Cl. 241-20) This invention relates to selective separation of heterogeneous particles and particularly to the selective separation of particles of differing degrees of hydrophobicity. It is well known that many mineral ores such as the metal sulfides are readily wet by oils and take on a distinct hydrophobic quality whereas the gangue rock with which they are natively associated remains substantially unwet by such oils and retain a distinct hydrophilic quality. It is this significant difference in quality of hydrophobicity which is utilized in well-known flotation techniques for the separation of mineral ores from gangue rock. Such flotation techniques are universally used for separation of ores, particularly metal sulfides from gangue rock and while quite satisfactory for a general or gross separation, they are not satisfactory for making an ultimate purification of such mineral ores. For example molybdenum sulfide is generally separated from its associated gangue rock by flotation techniques to produce a resultant molybdenum sulfide of about 90 to 93% purity. The remaining gangue rock is extremely difficult and expensive to separate from the ore and has posed a very real problem to the art.
We have discovered a process by which the gangue rock can be removed to produce a miner-a1 ore fraction of about 99% purity. We shall describe the invention hereafter as applied to molybdenum sulfide-gangue rock mixtures although it may be similarly applied to other metal ores.
Preferably, we admix a moist, finely divided mineral ore-gangue rock mixture in water in the presence of flotation reagents including a hydrophobic liquid such as a flotation oil. This fluid mixture is then ground to reduce the particle size of the gangue and disperse the hydrophilic gangue phase in the water. The particles of metal sulphide agglomerate during grinding while the gangue rock disperses. The resulting mineral sulphide agglomerates are separated from the water dispersion of comminuted gangue rock by any conventional well known method such as decantation.
The following examples will illustrate the method of our invention and will more clearly explain the details of its operation.
Example I An undried mixture of molybdenum sulfide and gangue rock concentrate resulting from a previous commercial flotation operation and carrying with it the attached flotation oils was placed in a water vehicle. The mixture contained about 92% molybdenum sulfide and the particle size range of gangue rock was in the range of 50 to 100 microns. This mixture was placed in a sand grinder such as described in Field Patent 3,075,710 with 3959.6 grams of 20-30 mesh Ottawa sand; 3436 grams of molybice denum sulfide-gangue mixture and 4157.7 grams of water. The grinder was started. Within five minutes the molybdenum sulfide began agglomerating into small spheres and the gangue rock, which was ground to smaller size, was dispersing in the water phase. This same result was observed at 10, 15, 20 and 30 minute intervals. The mixture was removed and separated. The molybdenum sulfide was agglomerated in spheres of about 1 millimeter diameter and 99% purity whereas the gangue rock had been ground to about 6 to 8 microns in size and remained dispersed in the water phase.
Example II A mixture of molybdenum sulfide-gangue rock identical with that of Example I was made up to 35% solids in water and placed in the sand grinder described in Example I. Results similar to those in Example I were obtained. At the end of 25 minutes the molybdenum had agglomerated into generally spherical particles of about millimeter diameter and the gangue rock was dispersed in the water phase at a size consisting of about 6 to 8 microns.
While we have illustrated and described certain preferred practices of our invention in the foregoing description it will be apparent that this invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the following claims.
We claim:
1. The method of separating finely divided heterogeneous particles of two different levels of hydrophobicity comprising the steps of making a flotation separation of the particles to provide a particle system rich in the more hydrophobic member of said heterogenous mixture and carrying a surface coating of flotation agents, mixing the resultant particles in water in the presence of the flotation agents carried thereon, grinding the mixture in a sand grinder to reduce the particle size of the solids and simultaneously agglomerate the particles of greater hydrophobicity while dispersing the particles of lesser hydrophobicity and separating the agglomerates from the resultant dispersion.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the finely divided particles originally fed into the flotation system were in the range 50 to 100 microns in size.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,421,862 7/1922 Trent 209166 X 1,509,266 9/1924 Spearman 209166 1,667,277 4/1928 Wilkinson 209-5 X 1,797,356 3/1931 Martin 209-49 1,968,008 7/1934 Chapman 209-49 2,383,045 8/1945 Den Breejen 241l4 X 2,846,151 8/1958 Wehn 241-14 FOREIGN PATENTS 934,796 8/ 1963 Great Britain.
WILLIAM W. DYER, JR., Primary Examiner.
ROBERT C. RIORDON, H. F. PEPPER, Examiners.

Claims (1)

1. THE METHOD OF SEPARATING FINELY DIVIDED HETEROGENEOUS PARTICLES OF TWO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF HYDROPHOBICITY COMPRISING THE STEPS OF MAKING A FLOTATION SEPARATION OF THE PARTICLES TO PROVIDE A PARTICLE SYSTEM RICH IN GHE MORE HYDROPHOBIC MEMBER OF SAID HETEROGENOUS MIXTURE AND CARRYING A SURFACE COATING OF FLOATION AGENTS, MIXING THE RESULTANT PARTICLES IN WATER IN THE PRESENCE OF THE FLOTATION AGENTS CARRIED THEREON, GRINDING THE MIXTURE IN A SAND GRINDER TO REDUCE THE PARTICLE SIZE OF THE SOLIDS AND SIMULTANEOUSLY AGGLOMERATE THE PARTICLES OF GREATER HYDROPHOBICITY WHILE DISPERSING THE PARTICLES OF LESSER HYDROPHOBICITY AND SEPARATING THE AGGLOMERATES FROM THE RESULTANT DISPERSION.
US344822A 1964-02-14 1964-02-14 Selective separation of heterogeneous particles Expired - Lifetime US3298617A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US344822A US3298617A (en) 1964-02-14 1964-02-14 Selective separation of heterogeneous particles

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US344822A US3298617A (en) 1964-02-14 1964-02-14 Selective separation of heterogeneous particles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3298617A true US3298617A (en) 1967-01-17

Family

ID=23352199

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US344822A Expired - Lifetime US3298617A (en) 1964-02-14 1964-02-14 Selective separation of heterogeneous particles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3298617A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3401794A (en) * 1965-07-12 1968-09-17 Canadian Patents Dev Beneficiation of tin-bearing ores
US4284244A (en) * 1979-09-19 1981-08-18 Amax, Inc. Process for producing high grade molybdenum disulfide powder
US20100009379A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2010-01-14 Santore Maria M Nanoparticle-Textured Surfaces and Related Methods for Selective Adhesion, Sensing and Separation

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1421862A (en) * 1920-04-09 1922-07-04 Trent Process Corp Process of collecting and purifying minerals
US1509266A (en) * 1919-08-16 1924-09-23 Spearman Charles Process of ore separation
US1667277A (en) * 1926-08-04 1928-04-24 Minerals Separation North Us Treatment of fine coal
US1797356A (en) * 1929-09-23 1931-03-24 Rhetherford B Martin Concentration of ores
US1968008A (en) * 1929-03-26 1934-07-24 Minerals Separation North Us Concentration of minerals
US2383045A (en) * 1942-03-30 1945-08-21 Hydro Blast Corp Method and apparatus for sand reclamation
US2846151A (en) * 1953-08-17 1958-08-05 Bayer Ag Selective disintegration and separation of pigments
GB934796A (en) * 1959-08-24 1963-08-21 Ca Nat Research Council Aggregation and separation of solids suspended in a liquid medium

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1509266A (en) * 1919-08-16 1924-09-23 Spearman Charles Process of ore separation
US1421862A (en) * 1920-04-09 1922-07-04 Trent Process Corp Process of collecting and purifying minerals
US1667277A (en) * 1926-08-04 1928-04-24 Minerals Separation North Us Treatment of fine coal
US1968008A (en) * 1929-03-26 1934-07-24 Minerals Separation North Us Concentration of minerals
US1797356A (en) * 1929-09-23 1931-03-24 Rhetherford B Martin Concentration of ores
US2383045A (en) * 1942-03-30 1945-08-21 Hydro Blast Corp Method and apparatus for sand reclamation
US2846151A (en) * 1953-08-17 1958-08-05 Bayer Ag Selective disintegration and separation of pigments
GB934796A (en) * 1959-08-24 1963-08-21 Ca Nat Research Council Aggregation and separation of solids suspended in a liquid medium

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3401794A (en) * 1965-07-12 1968-09-17 Canadian Patents Dev Beneficiation of tin-bearing ores
US4284244A (en) * 1979-09-19 1981-08-18 Amax, Inc. Process for producing high grade molybdenum disulfide powder
US20100009379A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2010-01-14 Santore Maria M Nanoparticle-Textured Surfaces and Related Methods for Selective Adhesion, Sensing and Separation
US8382858B2 (en) * 2008-06-25 2013-02-26 University Of Massachusetts Nanoparticle-textured surfaces and related methods for selective adhesion, sensing and separation
US8652640B2 (en) 2008-06-25 2014-02-18 The University Of Massachusetts Nanoparticle-textured surfaces and related methods for selective adhesion, sensing and separation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3268071A (en) Process for the separation of solids by agglomeration
US3926789A (en) Magnetic separation of particular mixtures
US2990958A (en) Froth flotation method
Sirianni et al. Recent experience with the spherical agglomeration process
US5084254A (en) Natural calcium carbonate ores
US5190566A (en) Incorporation of a coprocessing additive into coal/oil agglomerates
US4690752A (en) Selective flocculation process for the recovery of phosphate
Panda et al. Beneficiation of synthetic iron ore kaolinite mixture using selective flocculation
US3919080A (en) Pyrite depression in coal flotation by the addition of sodium sulfite
US3298617A (en) Selective separation of heterogeneous particles
US2297689A (en) Separation of feldspar from quartz
US2364777A (en) Concentration of oxidized iron ores
USRE30360E (en) Magnetic separation of particulate mixtures
US4552652A (en) Method for removing inorganic sulfides from non-sulfide minerals
CN108435432B (en) A kind of combined flotation agent and its application for the carbon containing Pyrite-type gold ore flotation of high arsenic
US2526519A (en) Preparation of calcareous cement raw material
Phiri et al. Effect of desliming on flotation response of kansanshi mixed copper ore
US4284244A (en) Process for producing high grade molybdenum disulfide powder
US2358055A (en) Concentration of manganese ores
US3259326A (en) Method of slime beneficiation
US2238439A (en) Froth flotation process
US2162525A (en) Flotation of fine oxide ore minerals
US1274505A (en) Separation of mixed metallic sulfids.
US2469422A (en) Selective flotation of chromite ores
US2410021A (en) Flotation process