US3298617A - Selective separation of heterogeneous particles - Google Patents
Selective separation of heterogeneous particles Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3298617A US3298617A US344822A US34482264A US3298617A US 3298617 A US3298617 A US 3298617A US 344822 A US344822 A US 344822A US 34482264 A US34482264 A US 34482264A US 3298617 A US3298617 A US 3298617A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- particles
- hydrophobicity
- mixture
- flotation
- gangue
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
Definitions
- This invention relates to selective separation of heterogeneous particles and particularly to the selective separation of particles of differing degrees of hydrophobicity. It is well known that many mineral ores such as the metal sulfides are readily wet by oils and take on a distinct hydrophobic quality whereas the gangue rock with which they are natively associated remains substantially unwet by such oils and retain a distinct hydrophilic quality. It is this significant difference in quality of hydrophobicity which is utilized in well-known flotation techniques for the separation of mineral ores from gangue rock.
- Such flotation techniques are universally used for separation of ores, particularly metal sulfides from gangue rock and while quite satisfactory for a general or gross separation, they are not satisfactory for making an ultimate purification of such mineral ores.
- molybdenum sulfide is generally separated from its associated gangue rock by flotation techniques to produce a resultant molybdenum sulfide of about 90 to 93% purity.
- the remaining gangue rock is extremely difficult and expensive to separate from the ore and has posed a very real problem to the art.
- This fluid mixture is then ground to reduce the particle size of the gangue and disperse the hydrophilic gangue phase in the water.
- the resulting mineral sulphide agglomerates are separated from the water dispersion of comminuted gangue rock by any conventional well known method such as decantation.
- Example I An undried mixture of molybdenum sulfide and gangue rock concentrate resulting from a previous commercial flotation operation and carrying with it the attached flotation oils was placed in a water vehicle.
- the mixture contained about 92% molybdenum sulfide and the particle size range of gangue rock was in the range of 50 to 100 microns.
- This mixture was placed in a sand grinder such as described in Field Patent 3,075,710 with 3959.6 grams of 20-30 mesh Ottawa sand; 3436 grams of molybice denum sulfide-gangue mixture and 4157.7 grams of water. The grinder was started.
- the molybdenum sulfide began agglomerating into small spheres and the gangue rock, which was ground to smaller size, was dispersing in the water phase. This same result was observed at 10, 15, 20 and 30 minute intervals. The mixture was removed and separated. The molybdenum sulfide was agglomerated in spheres of about 1 millimeter diameter and 99% purity whereas the gangue rock had been ground to about 6 to 8 microns in size and remained dispersed in the water phase.
- Example II A mixture of molybdenum sulfide-gangue rock identical with that of Example I was made up to 35% solids in water and placed in the sand grinder described in Example I. Results similar to those in Example I were obtained. At the end of 25 minutes the molybdenum had agglomerated into generally spherical particles of about millimeter diameter and the gangue rock was dispersed in the water phase at a size consisting of about 6 to 8 microns.
- the method of separating finely divided heterogeneous particles of two different levels of hydrophobicity comprising the steps of making a flotation separation of the particles to provide a particle system rich in the more hydrophobic member of said heterogenous mixture and carrying a surface coating of flotation agents, mixing the resultant particles in water in the presence of the flotation agents carried thereon, grinding the mixture in a sand grinder to reduce the particle size of the solids and simultaneously agglomerate the particles of greater hydrophobicity while dispersing the particles of lesser hydrophobicity and separating the agglomerates from the resultant dispersion.
Landscapes
- Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)
Description
United States Patent 3,298,617 SELECTIVE SEPARATION OF HETERO GENEOUS PARTICLES Edward G. Engel, Westfield, Ben W. Rowland, Hillside, and Andrew Torok, Parsippany, N.J., assignors to Georgia Kaolin Company, a corporation of New Jersey No Drawing. Filed Feb. 14, 1964, Ser. No. 344,822
2 Claims. (Cl. 241-20) This invention relates to selective separation of heterogeneous particles and particularly to the selective separation of particles of differing degrees of hydrophobicity. It is well known that many mineral ores such as the metal sulfides are readily wet by oils and take on a distinct hydrophobic quality whereas the gangue rock with which they are natively associated remains substantially unwet by such oils and retain a distinct hydrophilic quality. It is this significant difference in quality of hydrophobicity which is utilized in well-known flotation techniques for the separation of mineral ores from gangue rock. Such flotation techniques are universally used for separation of ores, particularly metal sulfides from gangue rock and while quite satisfactory for a general or gross separation, they are not satisfactory for making an ultimate purification of such mineral ores. For example molybdenum sulfide is generally separated from its associated gangue rock by flotation techniques to produce a resultant molybdenum sulfide of about 90 to 93% purity. The remaining gangue rock is extremely difficult and expensive to separate from the ore and has posed a very real problem to the art.
We have discovered a process by which the gangue rock can be removed to produce a miner-a1 ore fraction of about 99% purity. We shall describe the invention hereafter as applied to molybdenum sulfide-gangue rock mixtures although it may be similarly applied to other metal ores.
Preferably, we admix a moist, finely divided mineral ore-gangue rock mixture in water in the presence of flotation reagents including a hydrophobic liquid such as a flotation oil. This fluid mixture is then ground to reduce the particle size of the gangue and disperse the hydrophilic gangue phase in the water. The particles of metal sulphide agglomerate during grinding while the gangue rock disperses. The resulting mineral sulphide agglomerates are separated from the water dispersion of comminuted gangue rock by any conventional well known method such as decantation.
The following examples will illustrate the method of our invention and will more clearly explain the details of its operation.
Example I An undried mixture of molybdenum sulfide and gangue rock concentrate resulting from a previous commercial flotation operation and carrying with it the attached flotation oils was placed in a water vehicle. The mixture contained about 92% molybdenum sulfide and the particle size range of gangue rock was in the range of 50 to 100 microns. This mixture was placed in a sand grinder such as described in Field Patent 3,075,710 with 3959.6 grams of 20-30 mesh Ottawa sand; 3436 grams of molybice denum sulfide-gangue mixture and 4157.7 grams of water. The grinder was started. Within five minutes the molybdenum sulfide began agglomerating into small spheres and the gangue rock, which was ground to smaller size, was dispersing in the water phase. This same result was observed at 10, 15, 20 and 30 minute intervals. The mixture was removed and separated. The molybdenum sulfide was agglomerated in spheres of about 1 millimeter diameter and 99% purity whereas the gangue rock had been ground to about 6 to 8 microns in size and remained dispersed in the water phase.
Example II A mixture of molybdenum sulfide-gangue rock identical with that of Example I was made up to 35% solids in water and placed in the sand grinder described in Example I. Results similar to those in Example I were obtained. At the end of 25 minutes the molybdenum had agglomerated into generally spherical particles of about millimeter diameter and the gangue rock was dispersed in the water phase at a size consisting of about 6 to 8 microns.
While we have illustrated and described certain preferred practices of our invention in the foregoing description it will be apparent that this invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the following claims.
We claim:
1. The method of separating finely divided heterogeneous particles of two different levels of hydrophobicity comprising the steps of making a flotation separation of the particles to provide a particle system rich in the more hydrophobic member of said heterogenous mixture and carrying a surface coating of flotation agents, mixing the resultant particles in water in the presence of the flotation agents carried thereon, grinding the mixture in a sand grinder to reduce the particle size of the solids and simultaneously agglomerate the particles of greater hydrophobicity while dispersing the particles of lesser hydrophobicity and separating the agglomerates from the resultant dispersion.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the finely divided particles originally fed into the flotation system were in the range 50 to 100 microns in size.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,421,862 7/1922 Trent 209166 X 1,509,266 9/1924 Spearman 209166 1,667,277 4/1928 Wilkinson 209-5 X 1,797,356 3/1931 Martin 209-49 1,968,008 7/1934 Chapman 209-49 2,383,045 8/1945 Den Breejen 241l4 X 2,846,151 8/1958 Wehn 241-14 FOREIGN PATENTS 934,796 8/ 1963 Great Britain.
WILLIAM W. DYER, JR., Primary Examiner.
ROBERT C. RIORDON, H. F. PEPPER, Examiners.
Claims (1)
1. THE METHOD OF SEPARATING FINELY DIVIDED HETEROGENEOUS PARTICLES OF TWO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF HYDROPHOBICITY COMPRISING THE STEPS OF MAKING A FLOTATION SEPARATION OF THE PARTICLES TO PROVIDE A PARTICLE SYSTEM RICH IN GHE MORE HYDROPHOBIC MEMBER OF SAID HETEROGENOUS MIXTURE AND CARRYING A SURFACE COATING OF FLOATION AGENTS, MIXING THE RESULTANT PARTICLES IN WATER IN THE PRESENCE OF THE FLOTATION AGENTS CARRIED THEREON, GRINDING THE MIXTURE IN A SAND GRINDER TO REDUCE THE PARTICLE SIZE OF THE SOLIDS AND SIMULTANEOUSLY AGGLOMERATE THE PARTICLES OF GREATER HYDROPHOBICITY WHILE DISPERSING THE PARTICLES OF LESSER HYDROPHOBICITY AND SEPARATING THE AGGLOMERATES FROM THE RESULTANT DISPERSION.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US344822A US3298617A (en) | 1964-02-14 | 1964-02-14 | Selective separation of heterogeneous particles |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US344822A US3298617A (en) | 1964-02-14 | 1964-02-14 | Selective separation of heterogeneous particles |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3298617A true US3298617A (en) | 1967-01-17 |
Family
ID=23352199
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US344822A Expired - Lifetime US3298617A (en) | 1964-02-14 | 1964-02-14 | Selective separation of heterogeneous particles |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3298617A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3401794A (en) * | 1965-07-12 | 1968-09-17 | Canadian Patents Dev | Beneficiation of tin-bearing ores |
US4284244A (en) * | 1979-09-19 | 1981-08-18 | Amax, Inc. | Process for producing high grade molybdenum disulfide powder |
US20100009379A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2010-01-14 | Santore Maria M | Nanoparticle-Textured Surfaces and Related Methods for Selective Adhesion, Sensing and Separation |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1421862A (en) * | 1920-04-09 | 1922-07-04 | Trent Process Corp | Process of collecting and purifying minerals |
US1509266A (en) * | 1919-08-16 | 1924-09-23 | Spearman Charles | Process of ore separation |
US1667277A (en) * | 1926-08-04 | 1928-04-24 | Minerals Separation North Us | Treatment of fine coal |
US1797356A (en) * | 1929-09-23 | 1931-03-24 | Rhetherford B Martin | Concentration of ores |
US1968008A (en) * | 1929-03-26 | 1934-07-24 | Minerals Separation North Us | Concentration of minerals |
US2383045A (en) * | 1942-03-30 | 1945-08-21 | Hydro Blast Corp | Method and apparatus for sand reclamation |
US2846151A (en) * | 1953-08-17 | 1958-08-05 | Bayer Ag | Selective disintegration and separation of pigments |
GB934796A (en) * | 1959-08-24 | 1963-08-21 | Ca Nat Research Council | Aggregation and separation of solids suspended in a liquid medium |
-
1964
- 1964-02-14 US US344822A patent/US3298617A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1509266A (en) * | 1919-08-16 | 1924-09-23 | Spearman Charles | Process of ore separation |
US1421862A (en) * | 1920-04-09 | 1922-07-04 | Trent Process Corp | Process of collecting and purifying minerals |
US1667277A (en) * | 1926-08-04 | 1928-04-24 | Minerals Separation North Us | Treatment of fine coal |
US1968008A (en) * | 1929-03-26 | 1934-07-24 | Minerals Separation North Us | Concentration of minerals |
US1797356A (en) * | 1929-09-23 | 1931-03-24 | Rhetherford B Martin | Concentration of ores |
US2383045A (en) * | 1942-03-30 | 1945-08-21 | Hydro Blast Corp | Method and apparatus for sand reclamation |
US2846151A (en) * | 1953-08-17 | 1958-08-05 | Bayer Ag | Selective disintegration and separation of pigments |
GB934796A (en) * | 1959-08-24 | 1963-08-21 | Ca Nat Research Council | Aggregation and separation of solids suspended in a liquid medium |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3401794A (en) * | 1965-07-12 | 1968-09-17 | Canadian Patents Dev | Beneficiation of tin-bearing ores |
US4284244A (en) * | 1979-09-19 | 1981-08-18 | Amax, Inc. | Process for producing high grade molybdenum disulfide powder |
US20100009379A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2010-01-14 | Santore Maria M | Nanoparticle-Textured Surfaces and Related Methods for Selective Adhesion, Sensing and Separation |
US8382858B2 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2013-02-26 | University Of Massachusetts | Nanoparticle-textured surfaces and related methods for selective adhesion, sensing and separation |
US8652640B2 (en) | 2008-06-25 | 2014-02-18 | The University Of Massachusetts | Nanoparticle-textured surfaces and related methods for selective adhesion, sensing and separation |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3268071A (en) | Process for the separation of solids by agglomeration | |
US3926789A (en) | Magnetic separation of particular mixtures | |
US2990958A (en) | Froth flotation method | |
Sirianni et al. | Recent experience with the spherical agglomeration process | |
US5084254A (en) | Natural calcium carbonate ores | |
US5190566A (en) | Incorporation of a coprocessing additive into coal/oil agglomerates | |
US4690752A (en) | Selective flocculation process for the recovery of phosphate | |
Panda et al. | Beneficiation of synthetic iron ore kaolinite mixture using selective flocculation | |
US3919080A (en) | Pyrite depression in coal flotation by the addition of sodium sulfite | |
US3298617A (en) | Selective separation of heterogeneous particles | |
US2297689A (en) | Separation of feldspar from quartz | |
US2364777A (en) | Concentration of oxidized iron ores | |
USRE30360E (en) | Magnetic separation of particulate mixtures | |
US4552652A (en) | Method for removing inorganic sulfides from non-sulfide minerals | |
CN108435432B (en) | A kind of combined flotation agent and its application for the carbon containing Pyrite-type gold ore flotation of high arsenic | |
US2526519A (en) | Preparation of calcareous cement raw material | |
Phiri et al. | Effect of desliming on flotation response of kansanshi mixed copper ore | |
US4284244A (en) | Process for producing high grade molybdenum disulfide powder | |
US2358055A (en) | Concentration of manganese ores | |
US3259326A (en) | Method of slime beneficiation | |
US2238439A (en) | Froth flotation process | |
US2162525A (en) | Flotation of fine oxide ore minerals | |
US1274505A (en) | Separation of mixed metallic sulfids. | |
US2469422A (en) | Selective flotation of chromite ores | |
US2410021A (en) | Flotation process |