US3218156A - Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys - Google Patents

Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3218156A
US3218156A US316513A US31651363A US3218156A US 3218156 A US3218156 A US 3218156A US 316513 A US316513 A US 316513A US 31651363 A US31651363 A US 31651363A US 3218156 A US3218156 A US 3218156A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
melt
cerium
vacuum
microns
mercury
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US316513A
Inventor
Sluis Jay L Vander
Frank G Vihtelic
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Howmet Turbine Components Corp
Howe Sound Co
Original Assignee
Howe Sound Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Howe Sound Co filed Critical Howe Sound Co
Priority to US316513A priority Critical patent/US3218156A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3218156A publication Critical patent/US3218156A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to HOWMET TURBINE COMPONENTS CORPORATION, A CORP.OF DE reassignment HOWMET TURBINE COMPONENTS CORPORATION, A CORP.OF DE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: HOWMET CORPORATON A CORP. OF DE
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/10Handling in a vacuum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C1/00Making non-ferrous alloys
    • C22C1/02Making non-ferrous alloys by melting

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process for de-oxidizing metal alloys.
  • the invention is particularly directed for use in the production of alloys which are prepared by means of vacuum melting techniques.
  • the use of vacuum melting techniques has been effective to reduce oxygen levels whereby this time, and combination of the cerium with the oxygen is effected under these relatively high pressure conditions.
  • the melt is subjected to a vacuum in the order of about 10 microns of mercury after the cerium has had an opportunity to go into solution and combine in the desired manner.
  • Elements commonly used as de-oxidizing agents include aluminum, titanium and zirconium. These elements form an oxide which cerned, it will be appreciated that variations thereof are contemplated.
  • the initial vacuum is preferably high enough to remove a substantial amount of impurities; however, a previously purified melt may not require any extensive initial period.
  • the cerium is to be added while employing a relatively low vacuum since it is necessary to maintain conditions whereby the cerium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen.
  • the final vacuum stage on the other hand, must be conducted at a sufficiently high vacuum whereby dissociation of the cerium and cerium oxide will be possible.
  • the final vacuum of 10 v microns or less can then be effected in the same manner method whereby alloys having an extremely low oxygen 1 content can be produced in an economical and efiicient manner.
  • the instant invention has particular application to the casting of large heats of vacuum cast metal which will subsequently be used as remelt stock in producing vacuum investment castings.
  • the invention also has application with respect to other vacuum melting practices where a reduction of oxygen in solution and dissolution of oxides in solution is desirable to improve the alloy properties both with respect to castability and
  • the method of this invention comprises a system for de-oxidizing alloys wherein the alloy is reduced to a molten state and subjected to a vacuum.
  • this technique provides for removal of a substantial amount of the impurities within the metal.
  • the present invention contemplates the addition "of a small percentage of cerium which is adapted to preferentially combine with the oxygen contained in the melt. After the addition of cerium, a relatively high vacuum is effected whereby the cerium oxide and excess cerium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
  • the amount of cerium added is between 0.01 and 0.5 percent by weight of the melt while amounts between 0.1 and 0.3 percent COlTlIl'lOIl.
  • alloys which can be effectively prepared in accordance with the techniques of this invention.
  • the instant invention is particularly applicable to iron, nickel and cobalt base alloys which are used under conditions requiring high strength as Well as substantial resistance to heat and corrosive atmospheres. In order to achieve the desired properties in such alloys, removal of oxygen has been a prime requirement. It will be understood, however, that in addition to the following types of alloys,
  • Example 1 Percent lNi 70 Mo 3.5 'Ti, Nb, Ta 2.5 .Fe Balance Example II Percent 35-.45 1.0 1.0
  • a partial pressure of inert gas can then be introduced into the vacuum chamber to achieve a vacuum of about 200 microns or less.
  • Cerium in amounts between 0.01 and 0.5 percent by weight of the melt and preferably in an amount between 0.1 and 0.3 percent is then added by introducing pure cerium or rare earth metal alloys into the melt. While maintaining the pressure at the last mentioned level, the cerium will go into solution and will combine with the oxygen whereby the cerium oxides are formed.
  • a calculation regarding the amount of oxygen should be made whereby the quantity or" cerium introduced will be at least sufiicient to combine with this amount of oxygen. The time necessary for this reaction will usually be about 5 to 10 minutes.
  • a pressure Well above microns is preferably maintained during the addition of cerium in order to insure that the cerium goes i't'n to solution and combines with the oxygen.
  • a pressure in the order of about 10 microns of mercury is preferably maintained during the phase of the operation providing for dissociation of cerium oxide and excess cerium from the melt.
  • the time necessary for the dissociation of the cerium oxide can only be estimated since this time will vary, depending on the particular melt practice and facilities available.
  • the cerium content of the melt can be analyzed during the melt cycle and the values obtained can be compared with the oxygen content of the initially refined metal. Since cerium additions Will be controlled within the above ranges in accordance with the oxygen content of the initially refined metal, the progress of the formation of cerium oxide can be determined, and the time necessary for this phase of the operation can be, thus, accurately estimated.
  • An average cycle on a 1000 pound melt will take from 25 minutes to two hours. The temperature of the melt will have a significant effect on the dissociation rate and the practice of the individual melt shop will, therefore, effect the exact time.
  • the system of the instant invention has been found to provide significant improvements in the physical proper- ;ties of the alloys treated.
  • the stress rupture life, impact pnoperties, tensile properties, thermal shock properties, and corrosion resistance are all positively efiected by the decxidation technique herein described.
  • cerium in any conventional way, for example through the use of cerium alloys or other combinations.
  • Misch metal is cited as a particular mechanism for providing the necessary amounts of metal capable of reacting in the desired fashion.
  • Other equivalents of cerium are also obviously contemplated.
  • cerium As used herein and in the aforementioned copending application, the term equivalents of cerium is meant to include the rare earth metals mainly, cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, illinium, Samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, yttrium, ytterbium, scandium, lutecium. Excellent results are secured when yttrium is employed instead of cerium in the examples heretofore described and in correspond ing amounts. The others of the rare earth metals can also be substituted for cerium in equivalent amounts.
  • L A method for tie-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt above 100 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight rare earth metal to the melt. whereby the rare earth metal will go into solution and combine With the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vaccum below 10 microns of mercury whereby rare earth metal oxide and excess rare earth metal will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
  • a method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy While maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt to about 200 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight rare earth metal to the melt whereby the rare earth metal will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum in the order of about microns of mercury whereby rare earth metal oxide and excess rare earth metal will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
  • a method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt above 100 microns of mercury by introducing inert gas into the vacuum chamber, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight yttrium to the melt whereby the yttrium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum below 10 microns of mercury whereby yttrium oxide and excess yttrium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
  • a method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt to about 200 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight cerium to the melt whereby the cerium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum in the order of about 10 microns of mercury whereby cerium oxide and excess cerium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
  • a method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt above 100 microns of mercury by introducing inert gas into the vacuum chamber, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight cerium to the melt whereby the cerium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum below 10 microns of mercury whereby cerium oxide and excess cerium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
  • a method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby remove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt to about 200 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight yttrium to the melt whereby the yttrium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum in the order of about 10 microns of mercury whereby yttrium oxide and excess yttrium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.

Description

United States Patent C 3,218,156 PROCESS FOR VACUUM DEOXIDATION OF ALLOYS Jay L. Vander Sluis, Grand Haven, and Frank G. Vihtelic,
Whitehall, MiclL, assignors to Howe Sound Company,
New York, N.Y., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Filed Oct. 16, 1963, Ser. No. 316,513
8 Claims. (Cl. 75--49) This is a continuation-in-part of our copending appli cation Serial No. 296,078, filed July 18, 1963, and entitled De-Oxidation of Alloys, and now abandoned.
This invention relates to a process for de-oxidizing metal alloys. The invention is particularly directed for use in the production of alloys which are prepared by means of vacuum melting techniques.
It is well-known that certain impurities in metal tend to closely aliect the physical and mechanical properties of such metals. This is particularly true in the case of are preferred. The application of vacuum over the melt is controlled whereby the initial melting operation is undertaken with a vacuum of greater than 100 microns of mercury whereby dissociation of a substantial amount of the impurities in the melt can be efiectively undertaken. The cerium is added to the melt in the desired amounts after the pressure over the melt is increased to about 200 microns of mercury. The cerium is added at oxygen and many varied techniques have been devised for eifecting de-oxidation of alloys containing detrimental amounts of oxygen.
In many instances, the use of vacuum melting techniques has been effective to reduce oxygen levels whereby this time, and combination of the cerium with the oxygen is effected under these relatively high pressure conditions. Finally, the melt is subjected to a vacuum in the order of about 10 microns of mercury after the cerium has had an opportunity to go into solution and combine in the desired manner. By employing the low pressure above noted, the cerium oxide and excess cerium will dissociate from the melt to leave an extremely pure alloy.
With reference to the initial stages of the process, it is to be noted that the vacuum conditions prevailing can be maintained during the entire melting operation. On the other hand, it is contemplated that a melt be subjected to a vacuum for initial removal of impurities irrespective of the manner in which the initial molten state is achieved.
' Insofar as the other vacuum values above listed are conthe resulting alloys were suitable for certain applications.
the melt whereby oxygen compounds could be formed 1 which were less detrimental insofar as the properties of the resulting alloy were concerned. Elements commonly used as de-oxidizing agents include aluminum, titanium and zirconium. These elements form an oxide which cerned, it will be appreciated that variations thereof are contemplated. Thus, the initial vacuum is preferably high enough to remove a substantial amount of impurities; however, a previously purified melt may not require any extensive initial period. The cerium is to be added while employing a relatively low vacuum since it is necessary to maintain conditions whereby the cerium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen. The final vacuum stage, on the other hand, must be conducted at a sufficiently high vacuum whereby dissociation of the cerium and cerium oxide will be possible.
has greater stability than the compounds normally included in the melt, and they also have a lower solubility whereby removal of some of the oxides is facilitated.
Known techniques employing de-oxidizers in the manner described above have, however, been unsuitable since As noted, the cerium additions are undertaken at a pressure which permits the cerium to go into solution and combine with the oxygen. Introduction of an inert atmosphere is preferably effected to achieve an increase in in the case of vacuum melting, the oxides formed possess extremely low dissociation pressures. For this reason, a
significant amount of the oxides cannot be removed from the melt by any practical method.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved pressure and the melt can be maintained under this atmosphere until after the cerium has gone into solution and the desired oxides formed. The final vacuum of 10 v microns or less can then be effected in the same manner method whereby alloys having an extremely low oxygen 1 content can be produced in an economical and efiicient manner.
It is a more specific object of this invention to provide an improved technique for the production of alloys substantially free of oxygen wherein the processing is carried out in combination with vacuum melting operations.
These and other objects of this invention will appear hereinafter and it will be understood that the specific examples set forth herein are provided solely for purposes of illustration and not by way of limitation.
as described above. Addition of the cerium as pure cerium, in the form of rare earth alloys, or any other conventional manner is contemplated.
The instant invention has particular application to the casting of large heats of vacuum cast metal which will subsequently be used as remelt stock in producing vacuum investment castings. However, the invention also has application with respect to other vacuum melting practices where a reduction of oxygen in solution and dissolution of oxides in solution is desirable to improve the alloy properties both with respect to castability and The method of this invention comprises a system for de-oxidizing alloys wherein the alloy is reduced to a molten state and subjected to a vacuum. As recognized by the prior art, this technique provides for removal of a substantial amount of the impurities within the metal. To provide for more effective purification of the melt, the present invention contemplates the addition "of a small percentage of cerium which is adapted to preferentially combine with the oxygen contained in the melt. After the addition of cerium, a relatively high vacuum is effected whereby the cerium oxide and excess cerium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
In accordance with this invention, the amount of cerium added is between 0.01 and 0.5 percent by weight of the melt while amounts between 0.1 and 0.3 percent COlTlIl'lOIl.
with respect to physical and mechanical properties in the as-cast state. In the preparation of certain alloys, for example the so-called iron, nickel and cobalt base super alloys, long vacuum refining cycles have heretofore been The present invention provides for substantial reductions in such cycles since the reduction of the oxygen level depends on the reaction of cerium and oxygen and not on the slow process of out gassing the melt.
The following comprise specific examples of alloys which can be effectively prepared in accordance with the techniques of this invention. As previously indicated, the instant invention is particularly applicable to iron, nickel and cobalt base alloys which are used under conditions requiring high strength as Well as substantial resistance to heat and corrosive atmospheres. In order to achieve the desired properties in such alloys, removal of oxygen has been a prime requirement. It will be understood, however, that in addition to the following types of alloys,
other alloys wherein oxygen presents a problem can be treated in accordance with the principles of this invention.
Example 1 Percent lNi 70 Mo 3.5 'Ti, Nb, Ta 2.5 .Fe Balance Example II Percent 35-.45 1.0 1.0
Nb 3.54.0 Fe Remainder i Example III Percent Si 1.25 Cr 14.0
Ni 16.0- W -c 3.5 .Fe Balance Example IV Percent Co 60.0 Cr 20.0
W 10.0 Nb 2.0 Ni 1.0 Fe, C, Mn, Si Balance In a typical procedure for treatment of any of'theabove alloys, the'constituents thereof can be first melted. down using standard melting techniques and standard. vacuum practices. The time necessary for initially refining the metal will vary with the individual melt practice, type of alloy, amount and nature of revert material used in the charge, condition of the melting plant, and on other obvious factors. The factors which are primarily considered when determining the length of the refining cycle are the vacuum pressure in the melting chamber and the melt temperature. Alloys are usually refined until a final vacuum pressure of about microms of mercury is achieved with a reasonably low leak rate. A typical 1000 to 2000 pound melt will have a melt-down and initial refining cycle in the range of seven to 12 hours. It will be understood, however, that the initial refining cycle does not constitute a novel aspect of this invention.
A partial pressure of inert gas can then be introduced into the vacuum chamber to achieve a vacuum of about 200 microns or less. Cerium in amounts between 0.01 and 0.5 percent by weight of the melt and preferably in an amount between 0.1 and 0.3 percent is then added by introducing pure cerium or rare earth metal alloys into the melt. While maintaining the pressure at the last mentioned level, the cerium will go into solution and will combine with the oxygen whereby the cerium oxides are formed. A calculation regarding the amount of oxygen should be made whereby the quantity or" cerium introduced will be at least sufiicient to combine with this amount of oxygen. The time necessary for this reaction will usually be about 5 to 10 minutes.
Since the vapor pressure of cerium at 2600 F. is about 100 microns, the additions of cerium must be undertaken .at a lower vacuum while the dissociation of cerium oxides and excess cerium must be conducted at a higher vacuum. As suggested by the above discussion, a pressure Well above microns is preferably maintained during the addition of cerium in order to insure that the cerium goes i't'n to solution and combines with the oxygen. On the other hand, a pressure in the order of about 10 microns of mercury is preferably maintained during the phase of the operation providing for dissociation of cerium oxide and excess cerium from the melt. When the desired removal of cerium oxide and cerium is completed, the metal will be ready for casting into ingot molds.
The time necessary for the dissociation of the cerium oxide can only be estimated since this time will vary, depending on the particular melt practice and facilities available. However, the cerium content of the melt can be analyzed during the melt cycle and the values obtained can be compared with the oxygen content of the initially refined metal. Since cerium additions Will be controlled within the above ranges in accordance with the oxygen content of the initially refined metal, the progress of the formation of cerium oxide can be determined, and the time necessary for this phase of the operation can be, thus, accurately estimated. An average cycle on a 1000 pound melt will take from 25 minutes to two hours. The temperature of the melt will have a significant effect on the dissociation rate and the practice of the individual melt shop will, therefore, effect the exact time.
The system of the instant invention has been found to provide significant improvements in the physical proper- ;ties of the alloys treated. The stress rupture life, impact pnoperties, tensile properties, thermal shock properties, and corrosion resistance are all positively efiected by the decxidation technique herein described.
The noted improvements are believed to result by reason of the reduction of deleterious oxides which has caused changes in the micro-structure of the treated alloys. By dissociating the metallic oxides from the melt in the manner described, the metal originally forming the deleterious oxides will go back into solution to serve its intended role as a solid solution strengthener, to enhance oxidation resistance, or for whatever other purpose it was added.
In the above description, reference has been made to the use of cerium; however, it will be understood that the addition of cerium can be eifected in any conventional way, for example through the use of cerium alloys or other combinations. The use of Misch metal is cited as a particular mechanism for providing the necessary amounts of metal capable of reacting in the desired fashion. Other equivalents of cerium are also obviously contemplated. As used herein and in the aforementioned copending application, the term equivalents of cerium is meant to include the rare earth metals mainly, cerium, lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium, illinium, Samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, yttrium, ytterbium, scandium, lutecium. Excellent results are secured when yttrium is employed instead of cerium in the examples heretofore described and in correspond ing amounts. The others of the rare earth metals can also be substituted for cerium in equivalent amounts.
It will be understood that various changes and modifications may be made in the above described procedures which provide the characteristics of this invention without departing from the spirit thereof particularly as defined in the following claims.
We claim:
L A method for tie-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt above 100 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight rare earth metal to the melt. whereby the rare earth metal will go into solution and combine With the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vaccum below 10 microns of mercury whereby rare earth metal oxide and excess rare earth metal will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
2. A method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy While maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt to about 200 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight rare earth metal to the melt whereby the rare earth metal will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum in the order of about microns of mercury whereby rare earth metal oxide and excess rare earth metal will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
3. A method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt above 100 microns of mercury by introducing inert gas into the vacuum chamber, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight yttrium to the melt whereby the yttrium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum below 10 microns of mercury whereby yttrium oxide and excess yttrium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
4. A method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt to about 200 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight cerium to the melt whereby the cerium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum in the order of about 10 microns of mercury whereby cerium oxide and excess cerium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
5. A method in accordance with claim 4 wherein the amount of cerium added is between 0.01 and 0.3 percent by weight of said melt.
6. A method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby romove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt above 100 microns of mercury by introducing inert gas into the vacuum chamber, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight cerium to the melt whereby the cerium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum below 10 microns of mercury whereby cerium oxide and excess cerium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
7. A method for de-oxidizing an alloy comprising the steps of melting the alloy while maintained under a vacuum below 100 microns of mercury to thereby remove a substantial amount of the impurities therein, increasing the pressure over the melt to about 200 microns of mercury, adding from about 0.01 to about 0.5 percent by weight yttrium to the melt whereby the yttrium will go into solution and combine with the oxygen therein, and reinstituting a vacuum in the order of about 10 microns of mercury whereby yttrium oxide and excess yttrium will vaporize and dissociate from the melt.
8. A method in accordance with claim 7 wherein the amount of yttrium added is between 0.01 and 0.3 percent by weight of said melt.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,144,200 1/1939 Rohn 49 XR 2,360,717 10/1944 Phelps 7558 FOREIGN PATENTS 870,162 6/1961 Great Britain.
OTHER REFERENCES Vacuum Metallurgy, Papers presented at the Vacuum Metallurgy Symposium of the Electrothermics and Metallurgy Division of the Electrochemical Society, October 6 and 7, 1954, Boston, Massachusetts, pages -105.
ASM Metals Handbook, 8th edition, vol. 1, published by American Society for Metals, Novelty, Ohio, 1961, pages 1227, 1230 and 1231.
BENJAMIN HENKIN, Primary Examiner.
WINSTON A. DOUGLAS, Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A METHOF FOR DE-OXIDIZING ANALLOY COMPRISING THE STEPS OF MELTING THE ALLOY WHILE MAINTAINED UNDER A VACUUM BELOW 100 MICRONS OF MERCURY TO THEREBY ROMOVE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF THE IMPURITIES THEREIN, INCREASING THE PRESSURE OVE THE MELT ABOVE 100 MICRONS OF MERCURY, ADDING FROM ABOUT 0.01 TO ABOUT 0.5 PERCENT BY WEIGHT RARE EARTH METAL TO THE MELT WHEREBY THE RARE EARTH METAL WILL GO INTO SOLUTION AND COMBINE WITH THE OXYGEN THEREIN, AND REINSTITUTING A VACCUM BELOW 10 MICRONS OF MERCURY WHEREBY RARE EARTH METAL OXIDE AND EXCESS RARE EARTH METAL WILL VAPORIZE AND DISSOCIATE FROM THE MELT.
US316513A 1963-10-16 1963-10-16 Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys Expired - Lifetime US3218156A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US316513A US3218156A (en) 1963-10-16 1963-10-16 Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US316513A US3218156A (en) 1963-10-16 1963-10-16 Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3218156A true US3218156A (en) 1965-11-16

Family

ID=23229367

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US316513A Expired - Lifetime US3218156A (en) 1963-10-16 1963-10-16 Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3218156A (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3816104A (en) * 1970-09-25 1974-06-11 Allegheny Ludlum Ind Inc Deoxidizing nickel base and cobalt base alloys
US3853540A (en) * 1973-04-11 1974-12-10 Latrobe Steel Co Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys
US4042381A (en) * 1976-07-06 1977-08-16 Republic Steel Corporation Control of inclusion morphology in steel
FR2438091A1 (en) * 1978-10-04 1980-04-30 Vasipari Kutato Intezet METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING THE INCLUSION CONTENT OF STEELS AND FOR REFINING THEIR STRUCTURE
US4826738A (en) * 1987-07-07 1989-05-02 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation and corrosion resistant chromia forming coatings
US4895201A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-01-23 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation resistant superalloys containing low sulfur levels
RU2696625C1 (en) * 2019-04-18 2019-08-06 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт авиационных материалов" (ФГУП "ВИАМ") Production method of carbon-free foundry heat-resistant nickel-based alloys

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2144200A (en) * 1936-06-27 1939-01-17 Heraeus Vacuumschmelze Ag Method of manufacturing siliconiron alloys
US2360717A (en) * 1942-11-27 1944-10-17 Cerium Corp Method of eliminating aluminate and silicate inclusions
GB870162A (en) * 1958-09-11 1961-06-14 British Iron Steel Research Improvements in or relating to the purification of metals

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2144200A (en) * 1936-06-27 1939-01-17 Heraeus Vacuumschmelze Ag Method of manufacturing siliconiron alloys
US2360717A (en) * 1942-11-27 1944-10-17 Cerium Corp Method of eliminating aluminate and silicate inclusions
GB870162A (en) * 1958-09-11 1961-06-14 British Iron Steel Research Improvements in or relating to the purification of metals

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3816104A (en) * 1970-09-25 1974-06-11 Allegheny Ludlum Ind Inc Deoxidizing nickel base and cobalt base alloys
US3853540A (en) * 1973-04-11 1974-12-10 Latrobe Steel Co Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys
US4042381A (en) * 1976-07-06 1977-08-16 Republic Steel Corporation Control of inclusion morphology in steel
FR2438091A1 (en) * 1978-10-04 1980-04-30 Vasipari Kutato Intezet METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING THE INCLUSION CONTENT OF STEELS AND FOR REFINING THEIR STRUCTURE
US4826738A (en) * 1987-07-07 1989-05-02 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation and corrosion resistant chromia forming coatings
US4895201A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-01-23 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation resistant superalloys containing low sulfur levels
RU2696625C1 (en) * 2019-04-18 2019-08-06 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт авиационных материалов" (ФГУП "ВИАМ") Production method of carbon-free foundry heat-resistant nickel-based alloys

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2144200A (en) Method of manufacturing siliconiron alloys
JPH0471983B2 (en)
JPH0718364A (en) Heat resistant magnesium alloy
CN110029252B (en) High-strength high-toughness oxidation-resistant aluminum magnesium alloy material for 5G mobile phone middle plate and preparation method thereof
US3218156A (en) Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys
JPH0841576A (en) High strneght magnesium alloy and heat treatment for magnesium alloy casting
US3532491A (en) Maraging steel suitable for heavy section applications
US3334998A (en) Magnesium base alloys
US3512963A (en) Process for improving elevated temperature strength and ductility of nickel-base alloys
US3829311A (en) Addition alloys
US4331475A (en) Process for aluminothermic production of chromium and chromium alloys low in nitrogen
US2267298A (en) Method of producing highly pure manganese titanium alloys
US3052576A (en) Metal composition having improved oxidation- and corrosion-resistance and magnetic characteristics, and method of preparing same
US2865736A (en) Method of alloying gaseous materials with metals
US2847301A (en) Process of producing stainless steel
US2721137A (en) Titanium base alloys
US2850381A (en) Process and alloy for adding rare earth elements and boron to molten metal baths
US2173312A (en) Silicon-iron alloy
US3287110A (en) Non-ferrous alloy and method of manufacture thereof
US1912382A (en) Method of making and casting aluminum alloys
US3402756A (en) Process of producing high-nitrogen alloy steel
US3969160A (en) High-strength ductile uranium alloy
US1261987A (en) Method of making aluminum-alloy articles.
CN113862529A (en) Aluminum alloy and preparation method thereof
US2693414A (en) Methods of casting titanium stabilized steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HOWMET TURBINE COMPONENTS CORPORATION 825 THIRD AV

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. SUBJECT TO AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 31, 1975.;ASSIGNOR:HOWMET CORPORATON A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:004164/0321

Effective date: 19830705