US3198716A - Magnetic material and method of preparing the same - Google Patents

Magnetic material and method of preparing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3198716A
US3198716A US161033A US16103361A US3198716A US 3198716 A US3198716 A US 3198716A US 161033 A US161033 A US 161033A US 16103361 A US16103361 A US 16103361A US 3198716 A US3198716 A US 3198716A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
particles
electrolyte
iron
current density
ions
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US161033A
Inventor
Fred E Luborsky
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Priority to US161033A priority Critical patent/US3198716A/en
Priority to GB44992/62A priority patent/GB955058A/en
Priority to CH1449862A priority patent/CH417786A/en
Priority to DEG36677A priority patent/DE1181927B/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3198716A publication Critical patent/US3198716A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F1/00Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties
    • H01F1/01Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials
    • H01F1/03Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity
    • H01F1/032Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of hard-magnetic materials
    • H01F1/04Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of hard-magnetic materials metals or alloys
    • H01F1/06Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of hard-magnetic materials metals or alloys in the form of particles, e.g. powder
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25CPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25C5/00Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metal powders or porous metal masses
    • C25C5/02Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metal powders or porous metal masses from solutions

Definitions

  • US. Patent 2,974,104 Paine et al., assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, discloses magnetic materials composed of elongated, single domain particles, exhibitin very hi h energy products. These magnetic materials are prepared by electrolytically depositing, at a constant optimum current density, particles of iron or iron-cobalt alloys into a liquid metal cathode, such as mercury, under quiescent interface conditions between the liquid cathode and the electrolyte.
  • a liquid metal cathode such as mercury
  • Such magnetic materials have been found to have a wide distribution of particle structures, a characteristic which results in a decrease in the magnetic quality of the assembly of particles.
  • To produce magnetic material of the greatest possible total magnetic energy it would be desirable to produce particles of the optimum shape and, consequently, particles whose structures or shapes are as nearly uniform as possible.
  • the present invention involves the disco ery that particles of substantially uniform structure may be produced it, during at least a portion of the electrodeposition cycle of the fine particles, the cathode current density is progressively lowered to maintain a substitially constant maximum coercive force in the electrodeposited particles.
  • the current c sity By so lowering the current c sity, it has been found that particles of nearly cont structure and of significantly improved magnetic properties are obtained.
  • a purified electrolyte is used in the foregoing electrodeposition procedure.
  • a purified electrolyte is meant an electrolyte specially treated to remove organic impuritie in a manner more fully set out hereinafter.
  • FEGURE 1 shows the intrinsic coercive force values of particles electrodeposited at constant current as a functioncn of current density and time
  • FEGURE 3 illustrates graphically two schedules for progressively lowering the current density to maintain Bdhdfllfi Patented Aug. 3, 1965 ICC a nearly constant coercive force and packing fraction in the eiectrodeposited particles.
  • the invention is based upon the following considerations.
  • the iron atoms condense into particles in a closely packed ordered array at the interface between the liquid cathode and the electrolyte.
  • a gradual change in the particle shape takes place as deposition proceeds.
  • This variation in particle shape is believed to be due to gradual changes in the environment of the growing particle or fiber as the electrodeposition proceeds. This results in part from an increase in the thickness of the mass of particles formed by the elongated iron fibers.
  • the increasing mass of particles near the surface of the mercury reduces the rate of flow of mercury to the surface where the fibers are growin Concurrently, the greater mass of iron particles tends to push upward toward the interface because of its greater buoyancy as compared with mercury.
  • the rate of iron deposition is dependent on the current density, and if this current density is kept constant in the face of the changing environment at the point of electrodeposition, the fiber structures will not grow uniformly.
  • the present invention compensates for this changing environment by progressively lowering the current density and hence the rate of iron deposition.
  • the gel contains only elongated fibers while under the gel in the r'luid mercury phase some essentially spherical particles are normally present.
  • the better quality elongated particles in gel form may then be relatively easily separated and removed from the poorer quality spherical particles.
  • a further advantage of the progressive decrease of the current density is a resulting increase of two to three-fold in the production rate of the fine particles.
  • to make a magnet having a total energy product of 6.0 million gauss-oersted from deposition at constant current requires deposition at 0.005 amp/cm. for 500 minutes or 0.0025 amp/cm. for 1000 minutes, or equivalent combinations, resulting in 0.05 gram of iron per cm. of mercur surface in 1000 minutes.
  • the same or better quality material has been made by starting deposition at 0.01 amp/cm. for 120 minutes and then progressively dropping the current density of 0.005 amp/cm. for 360 minutes. This produced about 0.065 gram of iron per cm. of mercury in only 480 minutes. This corresponds to a three-fold increase in yield per unit time.
  • FIGURE 1 plots the contour lines of constant intrinsic coercive force (H in oersteds of iron particles deposited at constant current with a charcoal-treated electrolyte.
  • the intrinsic coercive force values of the iron particles were measured at -196 C. in their dilute state after optimum aging and tin treatment. It'can be seen from FIGURE 1 that at a given constant current the coercive force of the deposited particles progressively changes during the electrodeposition procedure.
  • FIGURE 2 corresponds to FIGURE 1 except that the contour lines are those of constant packing fraction (P.F.) in percent rather than coercive force.
  • the contour lines of FIGURE 2 represent the packing fraction of iron particles in the gel phase deposited from a charcoaltreated electrolyte. It can be seen that as deposition continues at constant current, the packing fraction increases. It can also be seen from FIGURES l and 2 that the slope of the contour lines of constant coercive force and the slopes of the contour lines of constant packing fraction are approximately the same.
  • the rate at which the cathode current density should be progressively lowered to achieve optimum structural uniformity and magnetic properties can be determined by following along the slope of the best magnetic properties,
  • the slope for intrinsic coercive force will be about the same as that of total magnetic energy but the former is more conveniently measured and hence is used herein to determine the schedule for lowering the current density. This slope will correspond to the constant coercive force contour line (see FIGURE 1) having the highest value.
  • the density or packing fraction of the solid gel formed with the use of a purified electrolyte is maintained constant during electrodeposition, it has been found that structurally uniform particles are obtained.
  • the packing fraction is a measure of the volume density of the particles and specifically, the volume of electrodeposited particles per total volume of a given sample.
  • a proper schedule for lowering of the current density may be relatively easily determined by following that contour line of constant packing frac tion (FIGURE 2) corresponding to the best magnetic properties.
  • FIGURE 3 illustrates a program or schedule for progressively lowering the current density by following a constant maximum coercive force contour line (FIGURE 1) during electrodeposition of iron and iron cobalt, respectively.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates a program or schedule for progressively lowering the current density by following a constant maximum coercive force contour line (FIGURE 1) during electrodeposition of iron and iron cobalt, respectively.
  • FIGURE 3 illustrates a program or schedule for progressively lowering the current density by following a constant maximum coercive force contour line (FIGURE 1) during electrodeposition of iron and iron cobalt, respectively.
  • the electrodeposition procedure of the present invention may be carried out in the same manner set fourth in the above Paine et al. Patent 2,974,104 except that the current density is progressively lowered during electrodeposition to maintain a constant particle structure.
  • the process comprises electrolytically depositing ferromagnetic particles into a liquid metal cathode, preferably mercury, from an acidic electrolyte comprising ions of the ferromagnetic material while maintaining a quiescent interface between the cathode and the electrolyte.
  • the electrolyte or plating solution consists of the soluble salts of the ferromagnetic metals in the form of, for example, sulfates or chlorides.
  • the pH of the electrolyte is made acidic with, for example, sulfuric or hydrochloric acid, a preferred pH being about two.
  • a consumable anode is used of either the pure ferromagnetic metal or alloys of several ferromagnetic metals.
  • a non-consumable anode of an inert material such as platinum or graphite, may also be used.
  • a current density between 0.001 amp/cm. and 0.1 amp/cm. may be used although values around 0.01 amp/cm. are preferred.
  • the electrolyte will be at room temperature of 20-30 C. during the electrodeposition although other electrolyte temperatures may be used if suitable adjustments are made in current density and time of deposition.
  • the electrodeposited particles are removed as a mercury slurry. If the electrolyte has been treated so as to inhibit hydrogen evolution, the electrodeposited particles in the gel only are removed to obtain the best and most uniform particles.
  • the particles are then heat-treated, to optimize their physical shape and produce maximum coercive force, for from 5-20 minutes at temperatures up to 300 C. and preferably at about 150-200 C. and then cooled.
  • the fine particles may be coated with, for example, tin or antimony, the latter in accordance with US. Patent 2,999,778, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention.
  • Lead, as a matrix is then added in elemental form as chunks or pellets of lead as set forth in US.
  • Patent 2,999,777 assigned to the same as signee as the present invention.
  • the particles are then aligned and compressed and the remaining mercury removed as, for example, by vacuum distillation at an elevated temperature.
  • the mercury-free mixture of aligned particles and matrix is then ground into a powder and may be either hot or cold pressed and realigned into their final magnet structure.
  • the particles, subsequent to the coating step with tin or antimony, may be aligned in a mold by a magnetic field and compressed to any desired packing fraction.
  • the resulting magnets are suitable for evaluation of their magnetic properties but contain from 20 to percent mercury.
  • EXAMPLE 1 Iron particles were deposited using an electrolyte of approximately 2 molal FeSO in distilled water. The electrolyte was treated with roughly an equal volume of activated cocoanut charcoal (614 mesh) overnight, filtered into a circulating system containing a pump, a cotton filter cylinder, additional activated cocoanut charcoal, a temperature controller and the deposition cell. The pH was adjusted to 2.13. The cell was assembled on a shock mounted platform using an iron anode and a stainless steel screen, with Aa" openings, beneath the mercury pool. After some preliminary deposition to remove depositable impurities, deposition into fresh mercury was then performed fol-lowing the current density-time schedule depicted in FIGURE 3.
  • the particular current density variation with time was chosen so as to approximate the deposition of the best particles at all times as indicated by the property contour lines shown in FIGURE 1 and corresponding to uniform packing density lines as shown in FIGURE 2.
  • the electrolyte was slowly circulated at the rate of 0.15 liter/min. and maintained at 25 C. +-2 C.
  • the gel structure was then removed as a single unit by lifting it out on the screen.
  • a suitable portion was then aged for 20 minutes at 170 0, treated with excess saturated tin-mercury amalgam, placed into a mold, aligned and compressed to 50,000 pounds per square inch.
  • Table I compares the room temperature properties (collumn 3) of magnets prepared as set forth in Example 1 with the corresponding properties (columns 1 and 2) of the best iron particle magnets prepared by elec-trodeposition at 25 C. at constant current with untreated and charcoal-treated electrolyte.
  • 4 BJB is the ratio of residual to saturation induction.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Iron-cobalt alloy particles were deposited using the procedures set forth in Example 1 for pure iron particles, except that the electrolyte had a pH of 1.8 and contained 15.45 percent Co++ by weight as determined by chemical analysis.
  • the anode was an alloy of 37.5 percent Co62.5 percent Fe and the particles deposited contained 37.7 percent Ctr-62.3 percent Fe by weight.
  • the sample was aged at 200 C. for 40 minutes, tin-treated as before and then further aged at 180 C. for 20 minutes.
  • the sample was aged at 200 C. for 40 minutes, tin-treated as before and then further aged at 180 C. for 20 minutes. The
  • Table ll below summaries the room temperature properties (column 3) of magnets prepa ed in accordance with Example 2 and compares these properties with the properties (columns 1 and 2) of the best iron-cobalt particles prepared at constant current with untreated and with charcoal-treated electrolyte.
  • This invention is particularly useful in the electrodeposition of particles of iron or iron-cobalt alloys.
  • other known ferromagnetic materials including iron, cobalt, nickel and alloys of iron, cobalt and nickel with each other or with other ferromagnetic alloying constituents or with minor amounts of non-ferromagnetic constituents such as manganese or platinum.
  • Magnetic material comprising elongated, single domain particles selected from the class consisting of iron, cobalt, nickel and alloys of iron, cobalt and nickel, produced in accordance with the process of claim 1.
  • a process of preparing fine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles in the form of a gel into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle sutliciently long to produce elongated single-dornain magnetic particles from a purified electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions and combinations thereof, while maintaining a quiescent interface between said cathode and said electrolyte,
  • the cathode current density during a major portion of said electrodeposition cycle being progressively lowered within the range from a maximum of 5 amps./ cm.2 to a minimum of 0.001 amp/cm. to maintain a substantially constant maximum coercive force in the electrodeposited particles.
  • a process of preparing fine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles in the form of a gel into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle surliciently long to produce elongated single-dornain magnetic particles from a purified electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions and combinations thereof, while maintaining a quiescent interface between said cathode and said electrolyte,
  • the cathode current density during a major portion of said electrolytic deposition being progressively lowered within the range from a maximum of 5 amps./ cm? to a minimum of 0.001 amp/cm. to maintain a substantially constant packing fraction in the gel of fine particles, said packing fraction corresponding to that producing the highest magnetic propertiles.
  • a process of pre aring tine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle sufficiently long to produce elongated single-domain magnetic particles from a purified electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions, and combinations thereof, while maintaining 21 quiescent interface between said cathode and said electrolyte, to form a gel phase of electrodeposited elongated particles and a fluid phase comprising electrodeposited essentially spherical particles,
  • the cathode current density during a major portion of said electrolytic deposition being progressively low- 7 8 el'ed within the range from a maximum of 5 amps./ FOREIGN PATENTS cm. to a minimum of 0.001 arnpjcm. to maintain 803 844 11/53 Gmat Germany a substantially constant maximum coercive force in l the electrodeposited paflicles and recovering the gel OTHER REFERENCES Phase y o e trodeposited elongated pariicles. 5 Thompson, Electrochemistry, MacMillan Co., 1925,

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Electroplating And Plating Baths Therefor (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)
  • Electroplating Methods And Accessories (AREA)

Description

2 Sheets-Sheet 1 F. E. LUBORSKY Fig.1.
ww rs mm m on C 0 O LO 0 O, m m 0 NW Mum I m o n 0 0 a m A w m 4 7% P. z #5 5 a m y 8. H e 0 d 0 F. e w m iv 0 "W w m m My 7 77/V Minutes MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME I00 77/75 Minutes figs. 2.
Aug. 3, 1965 Filed Dec. 21, 1961 Aug. 3, 1965 F. E. LUBORSKY MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME Filed Dec. 21, 1961 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 IOOO I 0 7/75 Minutes [n venzi'or Fred 5 Lubonsky M's Attorney United States Patent 3,198,716 MAGIsTEllC MATERIAL AND METHGD G3 EREPARING THE EiAME Fred E. Luhorsiry, Schenectady, N .Y., assignor to General Electric Company, a corporation of New York Filed Dec. 21, 1%], der. No. 161M333 6 Qiaims. (Cl. 204-) This invention relates to permanent magnet materials comprising elongated, single domain particles having greater structural uniformity and higher magnetic quality than has heretofore been possible and to a process for preparing said magnetic material.
US. Patent 2,974,104, Paine et al., assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, discloses magnetic materials composed of elongated, single domain particles, exhibitin very hi h energy products. These magnetic materials are prepared by electrolytically depositing, at a constant optimum current density, particles of iron or iron-cobalt alloys into a liquid metal cathode, such as mercury, under quiescent interface conditions between the liquid cathode and the electrolyte.
Such magnetic materials have been found to have a wide distribution of particle structures, a characteristic which results in a decrease in the magnetic quality of the assembly of particles. To produce magnetic material of the greatest possible total magnetic energy, it would be desirable to produce particles of the optimum shape and, consequently, particles whose structures or shapes are as nearly uniform as possible.
it is a principal object of this invention to provide a process for electrolytically depositing elongated, single domain, magnetic particles possessing a high degree of structural uniformity. it is an additional object of this invention to provide elongated, single domain, magnetic materials having greater total magnetic energy than has heretofore been possible.
Briefly described, the present invention involves the disco ery that particles of substantially uniform structure may be produced it, during at least a portion of the electrodeposition cycle of the fine particles, the cathode current density is progressively lowered to maintain a substitially constant maximum coercive force in the electrodeposited particles. By so lowering the current c sity, it has been found that particles of nearly cont structure and of significantly improved magnetic properties are obtained. in accordance with a further p-ct cf the invention, it has been found that particles of even greater structural uniformity may be obtained if a purified electrolyte is used in the foregoing electrodeposition procedure. By a purified electrolyte is meant an electrolyte specially treated to remove organic impuritie in a manner more fully set out hereinafter.
The invention will be understood more clearly by reference to the following description taken in connect on with the accompanying drawing wherein:
FEGURE 1 shows the intrinsic coercive force values of particles electrodeposited at constant current as a functicn of current density and time;
2 shows the packing fraction values of particles electrodeposited at constant current as a function of current density and time; and
FEGURE 3 illustrates graphically two schedules for progressively lowering the current density to maintain Bdhdfllfi Patented Aug. 3, 1965 ICC a nearly constant coercive force and packing fraction in the eiectrodeposited particles.
While not intending to be limited to any specific theory, it is believed that the invention is based upon the following considerations. During electrodeposition of iron, or other ferromagnetic particles, into a liquid metal cathode, the iron atoms condense into particles in a closely packed ordered array at the interface between the liquid cathode and the electrolyte, When the particles are deposited at constant current, a gradual change in the particle shape takes place as deposition proceeds. This variation in particle shape is believed to be due to gradual changes in the environment of the growing particle or fiber as the electrodeposition proceeds. This results in part from an increase in the thickness of the mass of particles formed by the elongated iron fibers. The increasing mass of particles near the surface of the mercury reduces the rate of flow of mercury to the surface where the fibers are growin Concurrently, the greater mass of iron particles tends to push upward toward the interface because of its greater buoyancy as compared with mercury. On the other hand, the rate of iron deposition is dependent on the current density, and if this current density is kept constant in the face of the changing environment at the point of electrodeposition, the fiber structures will not grow uniformly. The present invention compensates for this changing environment by progressively lowering the current density and hence the rate of iron deposition.
in addition to the foregoing, it has been found that hydrogen gas bubbles and adsorbed impurities form on the surface of the mercury cathode during electrodeposition and create microscopic variations in current density at the point of electrodeposition. By treating the electrolyte with, for example, activated charcoal, the formation of hydrogen bubbles and adsorbed impurities is inhibited andthus uniformity of current density on a microscopic scale is provided. Whereas, in the absence of such treatment, the iron formed during electrodeposition is in the form of a loose dispersion in mercury, with the use of treated electrolyte the elongated iron particles deposit in the form of a solid gel in the mercury. In the former case, the loose dispersion contains a wide distribution of particle shapes including spherical particles. In the latter case, the gel contains only elongated fibers while under the gel in the r'luid mercury phase some essentially spherical particles are normally present. The better quality elongated particles in gel form may then be relatively easily separated and removed from the poorer quality spherical particles.
It can thus be seen that a progressive lowering of the current density during electrodeposition results in particles of greatly increased structural uniformity. By combining this procedure with the use of a purified electrolyte, the structural uniformity is enhanced to an even greater extent and in addition the separation of higher qua 'ty from lower quality magnetic particles is made possible.
A further advantage of the progressive decrease of the current density is a resulting increase of two to three-fold in the production rate of the fine particles. For example, to make a magnet having a total energy product of 6.0 million gauss-oersted from deposition at constant current, requires deposition at 0.005 amp/cm. for 500 minutes or 0.0025 amp/cm. for 1000 minutes, or equivalent combinations, resulting in 0.05 gram of iron per cm. of mercur surface in 1000 minutes. The same or better quality material has been made by starting deposition at 0.01 amp/cm. for 120 minutes and then progressively dropping the current density of 0.005 amp/cm. for 360 minutes. This produced about 0.065 gram of iron per cm. of mercury in only 480 minutes. This corresponds to a three-fold increase in yield per unit time.
The foregoing, and particularly the manner in which the current is lowered, will be more clearly understood by reference to the drawings. FIGURE 1 plots the contour lines of constant intrinsic coercive force (H in oersteds of iron particles deposited at constant current with a charcoal-treated electrolyte. The intrinsic coercive force values of the iron particles were measured at -196 C. in their dilute state after optimum aging and tin treatment. It'can be seen from FIGURE 1 that at a given constant current the coercive force of the deposited particles progressively changes during the electrodeposition procedure.
FIGURE 2 corresponds to FIGURE 1 except that the contour lines are those of constant packing fraction (P.F.) in percent rather than coercive force. The contour lines of FIGURE 2 represent the packing fraction of iron particles in the gel phase deposited from a charcoaltreated electrolyte. It can be seen that as deposition continues at constant current, the packing fraction increases. It can also be seen from FIGURES l and 2 that the slope of the contour lines of constant coercive force and the slopes of the contour lines of constant packing fraction are approximately the same.
The rate at which the cathode current density should be progressively lowered to achieve optimum structural uniformity and magnetic properties can be determined by following along the slope of the best magnetic properties, The slope for intrinsic coercive force will be about the same as that of total magnetic energy but the former is more conveniently measured and hence is used herein to determine the schedule for lowering the current density. This slope will correspond to the constant coercive force contour line (see FIGURE 1) having the highest value.
In addition, if the density or packing fraction of the solid gel formed with the use of a purified electrolyte is maintained constant during electrodeposition, it has been found that structurally uniform particles are obtained. By a progressive lowering of the current density during electrodeposition, a nearly constant packing fraction may be obtained. (The packing fraction is a measure of the volume density of the particles and specifically, the volume of electrodeposited particles per total volume of a given sample.) Thus, a proper schedule for lowering of the current density may be relatively easily determined by following that contour line of constant packing frac tion (FIGURE 2) corresponding to the best magnetic properties.
FIGURE 3 illustrates a program or schedule for progressively lowering the current density by following a constant maximum coercive force contour line (FIGURE 1) during electrodeposition of iron and iron cobalt, respectively. It will be seen from FIGURE 3 that the current density is maintained constant until the line of optimum coercive force is reached and then progressively lowered either uniformly, or stepwise, during substantially the remainder of the electrodeposition procedure to follow the slope of the contour line of FIGURES l and 2. During the initial period of deposition, the current density need not be maintained constant until the line of optimum coercive force is reached, but this has been found to achieve optimum results.
The electrodeposition procedure of the present invention may be carried out in the same manner set fourth in the above Paine et al. Patent 2,974,104 except that the current density is progressively lowered during electrodeposition to maintain a constant particle structure. As
there disclosed, the process comprises electrolytically depositing ferromagnetic particles into a liquid metal cathode, preferably mercury, from an acidic electrolyte comprising ions of the ferromagnetic material while maintaining a quiescent interface between the cathode and the electrolyte. The electrolyte or plating solution consists of the soluble salts of the ferromagnetic metals in the form of, for example, sulfates or chlorides. The pH of the electrolyte is made acidic with, for example, sulfuric or hydrochloric acid, a preferred pH being about two. A consumable anode is used of either the pure ferromagnetic metal or alloys of several ferromagnetic metals. A non-consumable anode of an inert material, such as platinum or graphite, may also be used. A current density between 0.001 amp/cm. and 0.1 amp/cm. may be used although values around 0.01 amp/cm. are preferred. Ordinarily, the electrolyte will be at room temperature of 20-30 C. during the electrodeposition although other electrolyte temperatures may be used if suitable adjustments are made in current density and time of deposition.
After electrodeposition is completed, the electrodeposited particles are removed as a mercury slurry. If the electrolyte has been treated so as to inhibit hydrogen evolution, the electrodeposited particles in the gel only are removed to obtain the best and most uniform particles. The particles are then heat-treated, to optimize their physical shape and produce maximum coercive force, for from 5-20 minutes at temperatures up to 300 C. and preferably at about 150-200 C. and then cooled. If desired, the fine particles may be coated with, for example, tin or antimony, the latter in accordance with US. Patent 2,999,778, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. Lead, as a matrix, is then added in elemental form as chunks or pellets of lead as set forth in US. Patent 2,999,777, assigned to the same as signee as the present invention. The particles are then aligned and compressed and the remaining mercury removed as, for example, by vacuum distillation at an elevated temperature. The mercury-free mixture of aligned particles and matrix is then ground into a powder and may be either hot or cold pressed and realigned into their final magnet structure.
For purposes of determining properties, the particles, subsequent to the coating step with tin or antimony, may be aligned in a mold by a magnetic field and compressed to any desired packing fraction. The resulting magnets are suitable for evaluation of their magnetic properties but contain from 20 to percent mercury.
The following examples illustrate the preparation of elongated magnetic particles in accordance With the practice of the present invention.
EXAMPLE 1 Iron particles were deposited using an electrolyte of approximately 2 molal FeSO in distilled water. The electrolyte was treated with roughly an equal volume of activated cocoanut charcoal (614 mesh) overnight, filtered into a circulating system containing a pump, a cotton filter cylinder, additional activated cocoanut charcoal, a temperature controller and the deposition cell. The pH was adjusted to 2.13. The cell was assembled on a shock mounted platform using an iron anode and a stainless steel screen, with Aa" openings, beneath the mercury pool. After some preliminary deposition to remove depositable impurities, deposition into fresh mercury was then performed fol-lowing the current density-time schedule depicted in FIGURE 3. The particular current density variation with time Was chosen so as to approximate the deposition of the best particles at all times as indicated by the property contour lines shown in FIGURE 1 and corresponding to uniform packing density lines as shown in FIGURE 2. The electrolyte was slowly circulated at the rate of 0.15 liter/min. and maintained at 25 C. +-2 C. The gel structure was then removed as a single unit by lifting it out on the screen. A suitable portion was then aged for 20 minutes at 170 0, treated with excess saturated tin-mercury amalgam, placed into a mold, aligned and compressed to 50,000 pounds per square inch.
Table I compares the room temperature properties (collumn 3) of magnets prepared as set forth in Example 1 with the corresponding properties (columns 1 and 2) of the best iron particle magnets prepared by elec-trodeposition at 25 C. at constant current with untreated and charcoal-treated electrolyte.
l (BHLMX is the maximum energy product.
2 H is the intrinsic coercive force.
3 B: is the residual induction.
4 BJB is the ratio of residual to saturation induction.
EXAMPLE 2 Iron-cobalt alloy particles were deposited using the procedures set forth in Example 1 for pure iron particles, except that the electrolyte had a pH of 1.8 and contained 15.45 percent Co++ by weight as determined by chemical analysis. The anode was an alloy of 37.5 percent Co62.5 percent Fe and the particles deposited contained 37.7 percent Ctr-62.3 percent Fe by weight. The sample was aged at 200 C. for 40 minutes, tin-treated as before and then further aged at 180 C. for 20 minutes. The
different aging treatment reflects the change in growth characteristic with changing cobalt alloy composition. The particular current density time program is also plotted in FIGURE 3, and was carried out by means of a suitably shaped motor driven cam to obtain the smoother variation in current with time shown. It should be noted that because the current density changes, the cobalt content or" the particles also changes. This cobalt content is calculated to change from about 32 percent cobalt at the beginning of the deposition to about 44 percent cobalt at the end of the deposition. This change does not significantly change the magnetic properties of the particles.
Table ll below summaries the room temperature properties (column 3) of magnets prepa ed in accordance with Example 2 and compares these properties with the properties (columns 1 and 2) of the best iron-cobalt particles prepared at constant current with untreated and with charcoal-treated electrolyte.
Although the coercive force of the particles made from untreated electrolyte (column 1) shows a higher value than from the treated electrolyte (columns 2 and 3), the coercive force in the dilute state was higher for the particles from the treated electrolyte. The difference results from the fact that the packing fraction for the best magnets (highest (BH) occurred at a higher packing fraction for the treated particles than the untreated particles.
This invention is particularly useful in the electrodeposition of particles of iron or iron-cobalt alloys. However, it is also useful with other known ferromagnetic materials including iron, cobalt, nickel and alloys of iron, cobalt and nickel with each other or with other ferromagnetic alloying constituents or with minor amounts of non-ferromagnetic constituents such as manganese or platinum.
What I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent of the United States is:
1. In a process of preparing fine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle .sufiiciently long to produce elongated single-domain magnetic particles from an electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions and combination thereof, while maintaining a quiescent interface between the cathode and the electrolyte, the improvement which comprises progressively lowring the cathode current density during a major portion of the electrodeposition cycle with-in the range from a maximum of 5 amps/cm. to a minimum of 0.001 amp./ cm. to maintain a substantially constant maximum coercive force in the electrodeposited particles.
2. Magnetic material comprising elongated, single domain particles selected from the class consisting of iron, cobalt, nickel and alloys of iron, cobalt and nickel, produced in accordance with the process of claim 1.
3. A process of preparing fine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles in the form of a gel into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle sutliciently long to produce elongated single-dornain magnetic particles from a purified electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions and combinations thereof, while maintaining a quiescent interface between said cathode and said electrolyte,
the cathode current density during a major portion of said electrodeposition cycle being progressively lowered within the range from a maximum of 5 amps./ cm.2 to a minimum of 0.001 amp/cm. to maintain a substantially constant maximum coercive force in the electrodeposited particles.
4. The process of claim 3 in which the electrolyte is purified with activated charcoal.
5. A process of preparing fine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles in the form of a gel into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle surliciently long to produce elongated single-dornain magnetic particles from a purified electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions and combinations thereof, while maintaining a quiescent interface between said cathode and said electrolyte,
the cathode current density during a major portion of said electrolytic deposition being progressively lowered within the range from a maximum of 5 amps./ cm? to a minimum of 0.001 amp/cm. to maintain a substantially constant packing fraction in the gel of fine particles, said packing fraction corresponding to that producing the highest magnetic propertiles.
6. A process of pre aring tine particle magnetic material comprising electrolytically depositing fine particles into a liquid metal cathode during an electrodeposition cycle sufficiently long to produce elongated single-domain magnetic particles from a purified electrolyte comprising ions selected from the class consisting of iron ions, cobalt ions, nickel ions, and combinations thereof, while maintaining 21 quiescent interface between said cathode and said electrolyte, to form a gel phase of electrodeposited elongated particles and a fluid phase comprising electrodeposited essentially spherical particles,
the cathode current density during a major portion of said electrolytic deposition being progressively low- 7 8 el'ed within the range from a maximum of 5 amps./ FOREIGN PATENTS cm. to a minimum of 0.001 arnpjcm. to maintain 803 844 11/53 Gmat Britain a substantially constant maximum coercive force in l the electrodeposited paflicles and recovering the gel OTHER REFERENCES Phase y o e trodeposited elongated pariicles. 5 Thompson, Electrochemistry, MacMillan Co., 1925,
124 125. References Cited by the Examiner pages and UNITED STATES PATENTS JOHN H. MACK, Prinmi'y Examiner.
2,974,104 3/61 Paine et a1 204-10 PH REB LD, WINSTON A. DOUGLAS, 3,100,167 8/63 Fall; et a1 26262.5 10 v V Examiners.

Claims (1)

1. IN A PROCESS OF PREPARING FINE PARTICLE MAGNETIC MATERIAL COMPRISING ELECTROLYTICALY DEPPOSITING FINE PARTICLES INTO A LIQUID METAL CATHODE DURING AN ELETRODEPOSITION CYCLE SUFFICIENTLY LONG TO PRODUCE ELEONGATED SINGLE-DOMAIN MAGNETIC PARTICLES FROM AN ELECTROLYTE COMPRISING IONS SELECTED FROM THE CLASS CONSISTING OF IRON IONS, COBALT IONS, NICKEL IONS AND COMBINATIONS THEROF, WHILE MAINTAINING A QUIESCENT INTERFACE BETWEEN THE CATHOD AND THE ELCTROLYTE, THE IMPROVEMENT WHICH COMPRISES PROGRESSIVELY LOWERING THE CATHODE CURRENT DENSITY DURING A MAJOR PORTION OF THE ELECTROPDEPOSITON CYCLE WITHIN THE RANGE FROM A MAXIMUM OF 5 AMPS./CM.2 TO A MINIMUM OF 0.001 AMP./ CM.2 TO MAINTAIN A SUBSTANTIALLY CONSTANT MAXIMUM COERCIVE FORCE IN THE ELECTRODEPOSITED PARTICLES.
US161033A 1961-12-21 1961-12-21 Magnetic material and method of preparing the same Expired - Lifetime US3198716A (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US161033A US3198716A (en) 1961-12-21 1961-12-21 Magnetic material and method of preparing the same
GB44992/62A GB955058A (en) 1961-12-21 1962-11-28 Improvements in magnetic material
CH1449862A CH417786A (en) 1961-12-21 1962-12-11 Process for producing fine particles of magnetic material
DEG36677A DE1181927B (en) 1961-12-21 1962-12-19 Process for the production of magnetic single-domain particles

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US161033A US3198716A (en) 1961-12-21 1961-12-21 Magnetic material and method of preparing the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3198716A true US3198716A (en) 1965-08-03

Family

ID=22579520

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US161033A Expired - Lifetime US3198716A (en) 1961-12-21 1961-12-21 Magnetic material and method of preparing the same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US3198716A (en)
CH (1) CH417786A (en)
DE (1) DE1181927B (en)
GB (1) GB955058A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3525677A (en) * 1969-03-24 1970-08-25 Ncr Co Electrodeposition of constant-composition thin films

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB803844A (en) * 1956-02-08 1958-11-05 Electro Chimie Metal Improvements in or relating to the electrolytic production of iron powder
US2974104A (en) * 1955-04-08 1961-03-07 Gen Electric High-energy magnetic material
US3100167A (en) * 1960-10-19 1963-08-06 Gen Electric Magnetic material

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2974104A (en) * 1955-04-08 1961-03-07 Gen Electric High-energy magnetic material
GB803844A (en) * 1956-02-08 1958-11-05 Electro Chimie Metal Improvements in or relating to the electrolytic production of iron powder
US3100167A (en) * 1960-10-19 1963-08-06 Gen Electric Magnetic material

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3525677A (en) * 1969-03-24 1970-08-25 Ncr Co Electrodeposition of constant-composition thin films

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB955058A (en) 1964-04-08
DE1181927B (en) 1964-11-19
CH417786A (en) 1966-07-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2239144A (en) Permanent magnet
Pavlović et al. The effect of particle structure on apparent density of electrolytic copper powder
DE112021006198B4 (en) Process for recovering aluminium residue with controlled particle size and application thereof
DE2119066A1 (en) Process for the production of noble metal and / or noble metal oxide coated objects, in particular electrodes
Fleischer Sintered Plates for Nickel‐Cadmium Batteries
DE3003819A1 (en) Electrode, esp. cathode for electrolysis of brine - has active coating of iron with specified nickel and/or cobalt content to reduce hydrogen overvoltage
US3198716A (en) Magnetic material and method of preparing the same
US2165027A (en) Process for producing magnetic sheet
CN108774737B (en) Preparation method of foam metal-based lead alloy composite anode material
US10793959B2 (en) Method for production of metal article of manufacture and uses thereof
DE2449832A1 (en) METHOD FOR PRODUCING A NEGATIVE ACCUMULATOR ELECTRODE FOR REVERSIBLE STORAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF HYDROGEN
SU1537711A1 (en) Method of producing copper powder by electrolysis
DE2213347B2 (en) Process for the production of amalgamated porous zinc electrodes for galvanic elements
CN114808041A (en) Preparation and activation regeneration method of Pb-based pseudomorphic stable anode for manganese electrodeposition
US4134800A (en) Process for electrolytic iron powder
DE1533319B1 (en) Process for the powder metallurgical production of porous zinc bodies from surface oxidized zinc particles
EP0046252A1 (en) Porous oxide diaphragm for alkaline electrolysis, its manufacture and use
US2538992A (en) Electrolytically deposited iron products
US3100167A (en) Magnetic material
US3510408A (en) Process for producing high surface area nickel powder
US3149408A (en) Process for the preparation of permanent magnetic structures
AT276454B (en) Process for the production of iron single crystals of the highest purity
DE2252712A1 (en) LEAD / ACID ACCUMULATOR
Ma CRYSTAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTROLYTIC METAL POWDERS. POWDERS FROM FUSED ELECTROLYTE BATHS
Bushrod et al. Stress in anodically formed lead dioxide