US3151049A - Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases - Google Patents

Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3151049A
US3151049A US323129A US32312963A US3151049A US 3151049 A US3151049 A US 3151049A US 323129 A US323129 A US 323129A US 32312963 A US32312963 A US 32312963A US 3151049 A US3151049 A US 3151049A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
stripping
coating
mole percent
bath
weight percent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US323129A
Inventor
James M Hendry
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Union Carbide Corp
Original Assignee
Union Carbide Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Union Carbide Corp filed Critical Union Carbide Corp
Priority to US323129A priority Critical patent/US3151049A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3151049A publication Critical patent/US3151049A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25FPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM OBJECTS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F5/00Electrolytic stripping of metallic layers or coatings

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases, and more particularly to stripping a substantially oxide-free, metalcontaining refractory coating from a base material.
  • refractory coatings by for example, high temperature, high velocity coating processes such as detonation gun plating, jet-plating and are torch methods.
  • high temperature, high velocity coating processes such as detonation gun plating, jet-plating and are torch methods.
  • the prior art has devised several methods of removing refractory coatings, including mechanical removal by grinding.
  • the coating may be ground off down to the base metal with removal of a small amount of the base metal below the original dimension to insure complete removal of the old coating and permit recoating. It has been found, however, that such procedure is time consuming, expensive, and not always advisable since grinding away a portion of the base metal to insure complete coating removal prevents the reclaimed base material from conforming to the original dimensions as specified by its user.
  • parts which are not cylindrical often may not be ground. Improper coating of such parts may necessitate their replacement and scrapping of the original part with its attendant expense and time delay.
  • a known stripping method uses electrolytic solutions such as aqueous sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate.
  • the coated part is immersed in the bath and connected as the anode of an electrical circuit while the steel tank containing the bath is connected as the cathode.
  • This method has been found satisfactory for removal of some coatings but is not suitable for stripping certain mixed refractory coatings such as tungsten carbide-chromium, carbide-nickel and chromium carbide-nickel-chromium.
  • the aforementioned sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate electrolytic baths do not conveniently remove refractory coatings applied by the detonation plating process using inert gas dilution, as more fully described and claimed in copending US. Serial No.
  • a further object is to provide an electrolytic method of and bath for stripping difiicultly removable metal-containing refractory coatings from base materials in a rapid and economical manner.
  • a method of electrolytically stripping a substantially oxide-free, metal-containing refractory coating from a base material in which the coated base part is immersed as an anode in an electrolyte bath container, for example, in a steel tank serving as the cathode.
  • a plate formed from steel or other suitable material such as carbon may be immersed in the bath and connected as the cathode.
  • the bath consists essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of an hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
  • the aforementioned acid may either by monohydroxy or polyhydroxy and-any soluble salt thereof is suitable, but the sodium, potassium and ammonium salts of tartaric and citric acid have been found especially appropriate.
  • sodium tartrate is preferred since it provides the desired concentration with the smallest amount of raw material due to its lower molecular weight.
  • Soluble salts of glycolic and tartronic acid might also be useful. Concentrations of the soluble salt below the lower limit of about 0.02 mole percent do not result in satisfactory stripping while concentrations above the upper limit of about 2.0 mole percent do not appreciably improve the stripping rate.
  • a narrower range of about 0.2 to 0.9 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid is preferred.
  • alkali metal carbonates such as potassium carbonate would be suitable.
  • the expression alkali metal is to be understood as including the ammonium radical as. a functional equivalent thereof. Concentrations below the lower limit of about 2.5 mole percent of the alkali metal carbonate result in prohibitively low current carrying capacity of the electrolytic bath, while concentrations above the upper limit of about 5.5 mole percent do not appreciably increase the current characteristics of such bath. A narrower range of about 3.0 to 4.6 mole percent of the alkali metal carbonate is preferred. Mutual solubility of the latter and the salt of a hydroxy organic acid in a common solution also has a moderating effect which helps to set the aforementioned compbsition limits.
  • the electrolytic bath of the present invention is the only solution which has been found suitable for removal of tungsten carbide-chromium carbide-nickel coatings on base materials, and in particular the preferred coating composition of about 70 weight percent of tungsten car- 'bide, 24 weight percent of chromium carbide, and 6 weight percent of nickel.
  • this preferred coating composition has improved oxidation resistance above about 1,000 F. and good resistance to attack by mild alkaline solutions.
  • the present electrolytic bath is also the only solution which has been found suitable for removal of chromium carbide-nickel-chromium coatings on base materials, and in particular the preferred coating composition of about 85 weight percent of chromium carbide, 12 weight percent of nickel, and 3 weight percent of chromium.
  • this improved coating composition has desirable properties of high wear and oxidation resistance under severe conditions of high temperature and high load. It is especially useful for coating jet engine turbine blade spacers. It is to be understood that the aforedescribed compositions refer to that of a powder mixture prior to high-temperature application, and that the actual composition of the resulting coating will be somewhat different from the starting compositions due to changes brought about by heating during the coating process.
  • the electrolytic stripping method and bath of the present invention may also be advantageously employed for removal of refractory coatings which can also be removed by known methods.
  • a tungsten carbide coating can be removed more rapidly by the present invention than by the prior art sodium carbonate electrolytic bath.
  • the base metal on parts stripped by the present method and electrolytic bath is clean and bright in contrast to black deposits 'present on the base metal using prior electrolytic methods.
  • the present salts are quite highly ionized and therefore provide high conductance and the necessary negative complcxing ions to permit the metals to combine with the negative radical.
  • the use of such salts in conjunction with an alkali metal carbonate also permits the high current densities required for rapid electrolytic stripping.
  • the temperature of the electrolytic bath may be maintained in a broad range of about F. to 200 F. during the stripping operation. Also, when coatings are being stripped from steel base parts, the electrolyte temperature should preferably be maintained in the range of about 160 F. to 180 F. for best results. When coatings are being stripped from aluminum base parts, the bath temperature should be in the range of about 120 F. to 150 F. and preferably about F. At this temperature a uniform polished appearance of the aluminum is obtained. At temperatures substantially below this value the stripping rate is decreased while at higher temperatures the aluminum begins to be attached.
  • the current density preferred in the practice of the electrolytic stripping method of the present invention varies for different base materials, coating compositions, coating thickness and shape of part. Although current densities of 3 to 6 amperes per sq. in. have been used, the current could be increased up to the level at which the base material becomes severely attacked, and on the other band could be reduced to a value at which the stripping time becomes impractically long.
  • the current density is preferably adjusted to a workable value of about 3 to 4 amperes per sq. in. and the parts are then immersed in the bath. Depending on the coating and its thickness, some parts may be stripped in 30 minfutes while other parts may take 8 hours or longer. Most bf the base materials, and in particular the steels, appear to form a very thin oxide layer on the' cleaned stripped base surface which prevents attack by the electrolytic bath. Thus, the finished parts can remain in the bath without damage after stripping is complete.
  • the present electrolytic bath is quite stable at operating temperatures against atmospheric oxidation and other destructive forces. It has been found that its useful life can be calculated on the basis that one pound of coating may be stripped by each 0.0036 lb.-moles of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid in the bath. 7
  • the base parts being stripped should be kept completely submerged at all times. Partial emergence of the coated part from the electrolytic bath can in some cases produce a serious corrosive eflect on the base metal at the point of emergence. Care must also be taken to suspend the coated parts so that contact does not take place with the cathode tank to produce short circuiting and possible damage to the part.
  • EXAMPLE I A steel round of about /z-inch diameter and having a 0.005 inch thick coating prepared from raw material having a composition of 85 weight percent chromium carbide-l2 weight percent nickel-3 weight percent chromium was immersed an as anode in an aqueouselectrolyte containing 1.02 mole percent (10 weight percent) dibasic ammonium citrate and 3.26 mole percent (15 weight percent) sodium carbonate. A steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The electrolyte temperature was to F. The stripping operation was carried out at 6 volts DC and 11 amperes for a current density at the coating of about 4 amperes per sq. in. After 30 minutes the coating was completely removed and the base part remained clean and bright.
  • EXAMPLE II Stripping of Tungsten Carbide-Chromium Carbide- Nickel Coating A steel round of about Az-inch diameter having a 0.0015 inch thick coating prepared from raw material having a composition of 70 weight percent tungsten carbide-24 weight percent chromium carbide-6 weight percent peres for a current density at the coating of about 3 amperes per sq. in. After minutes the coating was completely removed and the base metal was clean and bright. The electrolytic bath temperature was 170 to 172 F.
  • EXAMPLE III Stripping of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Coating A steel angle having a 0.027-inch thick coating prepared from raw material having composition of 91 weight percent tungsten carbide-9 weight percent cobalt and applied by the previously mentioned nitrogen diluted detonation plating process was immersed as an anode in an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.38 mole percent (5 weight percent) potassium sodium tartrate hydrate and 3.08 mole percent weight percent) sodium carbonate. A steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The electrolyte temperature was 150 to 185 F. The stripping operation was carried out at 5.0-5.5 volts D.C. and 21-22 amperes. After 50 minutes the coating was completely removed and the base metal was clean and bright.
  • EXAMPLE 1V Stripping of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Coating An aluminum strip 4-inch long, l-inch wide and A- -inch thick was coated on one side with a 0.030-inch thick coating prepared from raw material having composition of 91 weight percent tungsten carbide-9 weight percent cobalt and applied by the nitrogen diluted detonation plating process. This coated part was then immersed as an anode in an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.39 mole percent (3.5 weight percent) sodium tartrate and 3.38 mole percent (16.5 weight percent) sodium carbonate. A steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The stripping operation was carried out at 5 volts DC. and 15-20 amperes for a current density at the coating of about 4-5 amperes per sq. in. After 2 hours the coating was completely removed, and the base material was clean and bright. The base metal was only slightly attacked. The electrolyte temperature was 130 F.
  • EXAMPLE V Stripping of Tungsten Coating A brass cut about l-inch diameter and 3-inch long having a 0.0l0-inch thick coating of tungsten was immersed as an anode in an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.39 mole percent (3.5 weight percent) sodium tartrate and 3.38 mole percent (16.5 weight percent) sodium carbonate.
  • the electrolyte temperature was 140-155 F., and a steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode.
  • the stripping operation was carried out at 4.5 volts DC. and 25 amperes. After 50 minutes substantially all the coating was removed and only slight attack to the brass resulted.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 70 weight percent of tungsten carbide, 24 weight percent of chromium carbide and 6 percent nickel from a steel base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufiicient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in a temperature range of about 160 F. to 180 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder Water.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about weight percent of chromium carbide, 12 percent by weight of nickel and 3 percent by weight of chromium from a steel base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sutficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in a temperature range of about 160 F. to 180 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 91 weight percent tungsten carbide, 9 percent cobalt from a steel base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in the temperature range of about 160 F. to 180 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 91 weight percent tungsten carbide, 9 percent cobalt from an aluminum base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in the temperature range of about F. to 150 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a tungsten coating from brass base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode to a stripping solution in the temperature range of about -155 F said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 70 weight percent of tungsten carbide, 24 weight percent of chromium carbide and 6 percent nickel from an aluminum base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufiicient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in a temperature range of about 120 F. to F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
  • a method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 85 Weight percent of chromium carbide, 12 percent by weight of nickel and 3 percent by weight of chromium from an aluminum base material which com- 7 8 prises passing electric current at a current density sufii- References Cited in the file of this patent cient :1)! cause stripping from the coated base as an anode; UNITED STATES PATENTS throu a stripping solution in a temperature range 0 about 120 F.
  • said stripping solution consistilccuuough June 1932 ing essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a 5 aust June 1960 soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 FOREIGN PATENTS mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the re- 164,476 Australia mainder water.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)

Description

United States Patent 3,151,049 ELECTROLYTIC METHOD OF AND BATH FOR STRIPPING COATINGS FROM BASES James M. Hendry, Indianapolis, Ind., assignor to Union Carbide Corporation, a corporation of New York No Drawing. Continuation of application Ser. No.
763,808, Sept. 29, 1958. This application Nov. 12,
1963, Ser. No. 323,129.
8 Claims. (Cl. 204-446) This invention relates to an electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases, and more particularly to stripping a substantially oxide-free, metalcontaining refractory coating from a base material.
Many types of articles are provided with refractory coatings by for example, high temperature, high velocity coating processes such as detonation gun plating, jet-plating and are torch methods. After these coated parts have been in service sufiiciently long to wear to a point where replacement is necessary, it is desirable to have a method for quickly and economically removing the worn coating so that the base part can be coated again and placed back in service. In many instances the base part involves considerable expense in its original manufacture, so that reclaiming such parts can be of great importance. Also, in the course of applying refractory wear resistant coatings it may occasionally be necessary to remove coatings that do not meet specifications, in which case reclaiming the base part is again desirable.
The prior art has devised several methods of removing refractory coatings, including mechanical removal by grinding. On cylindrical parts, for example, the coating may be ground off down to the base metal with removal of a small amount of the base metal below the original dimension to insure complete removal of the old coating and permit recoating. It has been found, however, that such procedure is time consuming, expensive, and not always advisable since grinding away a portion of the base metal to insure complete coating removal prevents the reclaimed base material from conforming to the original dimensions as specified by its user. Also, parts which are not cylindrical often may not be ground. Improper coating of such parts may necessitate their replacement and scrapping of the original part with its attendant expense and time delay.
A known stripping method uses electrolytic solutions such as aqueous sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate. The coated part is immersed in the bath and connected as the anode of an electrical circuit while the steel tank containing the bath is connected as the cathode. This method has been found satisfactory for removal of some coatings but is not suitable for stripping certain mixed refractory coatings such as tungsten carbide-chromium, carbide-nickel and chromium carbide-nickel-chromium. Also, the aforementioned sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate electrolytic baths do not conveniently remove refractory coatings applied by the detonation plating process using inert gas dilution, as more fully described and claimed in copending US. Serial No. 738,283 filed May 28, 1958, in the name of J. F. Pelton, now US. Patent 2,972,550. Furthermore, no other known electrolytic baths have been found suitable for stripping these mixed refractory coatings, that is, the prior art solutions either completely fail to strip the coatings or only provide uneconomically low coating removal rates.
It is therefore a principal object of the present invention to provide an improved method of removing refractory coatings from all shapes of base materials in a rapid and economical manner without necessitating removal of any of the base material.
3,151,049 Patented Sept. 29, 1964 ice A further object is to provide an electrolytic method of and bath for stripping difiicultly removable metal-containing refractory coatings from base materials in a rapid and economical manner.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a method of electrolytically stripping a substantially oxide-free, metal-containing refractory coating from a base material is provided in which the coated base part is immersed as an anode in an electrolyte bath container, for example, in a steel tank serving as the cathode. Alternatively, a plate formed from steel or other suitable material such as carbon may be immersed in the bath and connected as the cathode. The bath consists essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of an hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water. The aforementioned acid may either by monohydroxy or polyhydroxy and-any soluble salt thereof is suitable, but the sodium, potassium and ammonium salts of tartaric and citric acid have been found especially appropriate. In particular, sodium tartrate is preferred since it provides the desired concentration with the smallest amount of raw material due to its lower molecular weight. Soluble salts of glycolic and tartronic acid might also be useful. Concentrations of the soluble salt below the lower limit of about 0.02 mole percent do not result in satisfactory stripping while concentrations above the upper limit of about 2.0 mole percent do not appreciably improve the stripping rate. A narrower range of about 0.2 to 0.9 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid is preferred.
Although sodium carbonate is preferred as the means of providing the stripping bath with the desired current carrying capacity, other alkali metal carbonates such as potassium carbonate would be suitable. Also, the expression alkali metal is to be understood as including the ammonium radical as. a functional equivalent thereof. Concentrations below the lower limit of about 2.5 mole percent of the alkali metal carbonate result in prohibitively low current carrying capacity of the electrolytic bath, while concentrations above the upper limit of about 5.5 mole percent do not appreciably increase the current characteristics of such bath. A narrower range of about 3.0 to 4.6 mole percent of the alkali metal carbonate is preferred. Mutual solubility of the latter and the salt of a hydroxy organic acid in a common solution also has a moderating effect which helps to set the aforementioned compbsition limits.
The following tables indicate the effect of soluble salt of hydroxy organic acid and alkali metal carbonate concentration on electrolytic stripping rates.
TABLE I.-EFFECT OF IIYDROXY OBGANIC ACID SALT i The electrolytic bath of the present invention is the only solution which has been found suitable for removal of tungsten carbide-chromium carbide-nickel coatings on base materials, and in particular the preferred coating composition of about 70 weight percent of tungsten car- 'bide, 24 weight percent of chromium carbide, and 6 weight percent of nickel. As more fully described and claimed in copending U.S. Serial No. 738,300 filed May 28, 1958, in the name of J. F. Pelton and J. M. Koifskey, Jr., now US. Patent 3,071,489, this preferred coating composition has improved oxidation resistance above about 1,000 F. and good resistance to attack by mild alkaline solutions. The present electrolytic bath is also the only solution which has been found suitable for removal of chromium carbide-nickel-chromium coatings on base materials, and in particular the preferred coating composition of about 85 weight percent of chromium carbide, 12 weight percent of nickel, and 3 weight percent of chromium. As more fully described and claimed in copending US. Serial No. 738,299 filed May 28, 1958, in the name of J. F. Pelton and J. M. Kotfskey, Jr., now abandoned, this improved coating composition has desirable properties of high wear and oxidation resistance under severe conditions of high temperature and high load. It is especially useful for coating jet engine turbine blade spacers. It is to be understood that the aforedescribed compositions refer to that of a powder mixture prior to high-temperature application, and that the actual composition of the resulting coating will be somewhat different from the starting compositions due to changes brought about by heating during the coating process.
The electrolytic stripping method and bath of the present invention may also be advantageously employed for removal of refractory coatings which can also be removed by known methods. For example, a tungsten carbide coating can be removed more rapidly by the present invention than by the prior art sodium carbonate electrolytic bath. Also, the base metal on parts stripped by the present method and electrolytic bath is clean and bright in contrast to black deposits 'present on the base metal using prior electrolytic methods.
While the invention is not to be limited thereto, the following theory is believed to provide an explanation of the improved operation of this invention. Many of the particular coatings that are conveniently stripped by this method and bath alone have an increased binder content as compared to other materials which can be stripped by the prior art methods. The available hydroxy groups of the soluble salts of hydroxy and polyhydroxy organic acids are believed to form ionized complexes with the binder material such as cobalt or nickel. These ionized complexes are then carried by the electrical current from the anode base part and deposited on the cathode. In contrast to non-ionized organic hydroxy compounds such as glycerine, the present salts are quite highly ionized and therefore provide high conductance and the necessary negative complcxing ions to permit the metals to combine with the negative radical. The use of such salts in conjunction with an alkali metal carbonate also permits the high current densities required for rapid electrolytic stripping.
The temperature of the electrolytic bath may be maintained in a broad range of about F. to 200 F. during the stripping operation. Also, when coatings are being stripped from steel base parts, the electrolyte temperature should preferably be maintained in the range of about 160 F. to 180 F. for best results. When coatings are being stripped from aluminum base parts, the bath temperature should be in the range of about 120 F. to 150 F. and preferably about F. At this temperature a uniform polished appearance of the aluminum is obtained. At temperatures substantially below this value the stripping rate is decreased while at higher temperatures the aluminum begins to be attached.
The current density preferred in the practice of the electrolytic stripping method of the present invention varies for different base materials, coating compositions, coating thickness and shape of part. Although current densities of 3 to 6 amperes per sq. in. have been used, the current could be increased up to the level at which the base material becomes severely attacked, and on the other band could be reduced to a value at which the stripping time becomes impractically long. In practice, the current density is preferably adjusted to a workable value of about 3 to 4 amperes per sq. in. and the parts are then immersed in the bath. Depending on the coating and its thickness, some parts may be stripped in 30 minfutes while other parts may take 8 hours or longer. Most bf the base materials, and in particular the steels, appear to form a very thin oxide layer on the' cleaned stripped base surface which prevents attack by the electrolytic bath. Thus, the finished parts can remain in the bath without damage after stripping is complete.
The present electrolytic bath is quite stable at operating temperatures against atmospheric oxidation and other destructive forces. It has been found that its useful life can be calculated on the basis that one pound of coating may be stripped by each 0.0036 lb.-moles of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid in the bath. 7
During the stripping operation the base parts being stripped should be kept completely submerged at all times. Partial emergence of the coated part from the electrolytic bath can in some cases produce a serious corrosive eflect on the base metal at the point of emergence. Care must also be taken to suspend the coated parts so that contact does not take place with the cathode tank to produce short circuiting and possible damage to the part.
The operation of the present invention is further illustrated by the following examples.
EXAMPLE I A steel round of about /z-inch diameter and having a 0.005 inch thick coating prepared from raw material having a composition of 85 weight percent chromium carbide-l2 weight percent nickel-3 weight percent chromium was immersed an as anode in an aqueouselectrolyte containing 1.02 mole percent (10 weight percent) dibasic ammonium citrate and 3.26 mole percent (15 weight percent) sodium carbonate. A steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The electrolyte temperature was to F. The stripping operation was carried out at 6 volts DC and 11 amperes for a current density at the coating of about 4 amperes per sq. in. After 30 minutes the coating was completely removed and the base part remained clean and bright.
EXAMPLE II Stripping of Tungsten Carbide-Chromium Carbide- Nickel Coating A steel round of about Az-inch diameter having a 0.0015 inch thick coating prepared from raw material having a composition of 70 weight percent tungsten carbide-24 weight percent chromium carbide-6 weight percent peres for a current density at the coating of about 3 amperes per sq. in. After minutes the coating was completely removed and the base metal was clean and bright. The electrolytic bath temperature was 170 to 172 F.
EXAMPLE III Stripping of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Coating A steel angle having a 0.027-inch thick coating prepared from raw material having composition of 91 weight percent tungsten carbide-9 weight percent cobalt and applied by the previously mentioned nitrogen diluted detonation plating process was immersed as an anode in an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.38 mole percent (5 weight percent) potassium sodium tartrate hydrate and 3.08 mole percent weight percent) sodium carbonate. A steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The electrolyte temperature was 150 to 185 F. The stripping operation was carried out at 5.0-5.5 volts D.C. and 21-22 amperes. After 50 minutes the coating was completely removed and the base metal was clean and bright.
EXAMPLE 1V Stripping of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Coating An aluminum strip 4-inch long, l-inch wide and A- -inch thick was coated on one side with a 0.030-inch thick coating prepared from raw material having composition of 91 weight percent tungsten carbide-9 weight percent cobalt and applied by the nitrogen diluted detonation plating process. This coated part was then immersed as an anode in an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.39 mole percent (3.5 weight percent) sodium tartrate and 3.38 mole percent (16.5 weight percent) sodium carbonate. A steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The stripping operation was carried out at 5 volts DC. and 15-20 amperes for a current density at the coating of about 4-5 amperes per sq. in. After 2 hours the coating was completely removed, and the base material was clean and bright. The base metal was only slightly attacked. The electrolyte temperature was 130 F.
EXAMPLE V Stripping of Tungsten Coating A brass cut about l-inch diameter and 3-inch long having a 0.0l0-inch thick coating of tungsten was immersed as an anode in an aqueous electrolyte containing 0.39 mole percent (3.5 weight percent) sodium tartrate and 3.38 mole percent (16.5 weight percent) sodium carbonate. The electrolyte temperature was 140-155 F., and a steel container for the electrolyte was connected as the cathode. The stripping operation was carried out at 4.5 volts DC. and 25 amperes. After 50 minutes substantially all the coating was removed and only slight attack to the brass resulted.
It is to be understood that certain modifications can be made to the specific forms of the invention as disclosed herein, without departing from the scope of such invention.
This application is a continuation of my co-pending application Serial No. 763,808, filed September 29, 1958, and now abandoned.
What is claimed is:
l. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating taken from the class of coatings consisting of pure refractory metals, and a mixture of at least 85 weight percent of a metal carbide and a metal; from a base metal taken from the class consisting of steel, aluminum and brass which comprises passing electric current at a current cent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
2. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 70 weight percent of tungsten carbide, 24 weight percent of chromium carbide and 6 percent nickel from a steel base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufiicient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in a temperature range of about 160 F. to 180 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder Water.
3. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about weight percent of chromium carbide, 12 percent by weight of nickel and 3 percent by weight of chromium from a steel base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sutficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in a temperature range of about 160 F. to 180 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
4. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 91 weight percent tungsten carbide, 9 percent cobalt from a steel base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in the temperature range of about 160 F. to 180 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
5. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 91 weight percent tungsten carbide, 9 percent cobalt from an aluminum base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in the temperature range of about F. to 150 F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
6. A method for electrolytically stripping a tungsten coating from brass base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufficient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode to a stripping solution in the temperature range of about -155 F said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
7. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 70 weight percent of tungsten carbide, 24 weight percent of chromium carbide and 6 percent nickel from an aluminum base material which comprises passing electric current at a current density sufiicient to cause stripping from the coated base as an anode through a stripping solution in a temperature range of about 120 F. to F., said stripping solution consisting essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the remainder water.
8. A method for electrolytically stripping a coating comprising about 85 Weight percent of chromium carbide, 12 percent by weight of nickel and 3 percent by weight of chromium from an aluminum base material which com- 7 8 prises passing electric current at a current density sufii- References Cited in the file of this patent cient :1)! cause stripping from the coated base as an anode; UNITED STATES PATENTS throu a stripping solution in a temperature range 0 about 120 F. to 150 K, said stripping solution consistilccuuough June 1932 ing essentially of about 0.02 to 2.0 mole percent of a 5 aust June 1960 soluble salt of a hydroxy organic acid, about 2.5 to 5.5 FOREIGN PATENTS mole percent of an alkali metal carbonate and the re- 164,476 Australia mainder water.

Claims (1)

1. A METHOD FOR ELECTROLYTICALLY STRIPPING A COATING TAKEN FROM THE CLASS OF COATING CONSISTING OF PURE REFRACTORY METALS, AND A MIXTURE OF AT LEAST 85 WEIGHT PERCENT OF A METAL CARBIDE AND A METAL; FROM A BASE METAL TAKEN FROM THE CLASS CONSISTING OF STEEL, ALUMINUM AND BRASS WHICH COMPRISES PASSING ELECTRIC CURRENT AT A CURRENT DENSITY SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE STRIPPING FROM THE COATED BASE AS AN ANODE THROUGH A STRIPPING SOLUTION IN A TEMPERATURE RANGE OF ABOUT 120*F. TO 200*F., SAID STRIPPING SOLUTION CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF ABOUT 0.02 TO 2.0 MOLE PERCENT OF A SOLUBLE SALT OF A HYDROXY ORGANIC ACID, ABOUT 2.5 TO 5.5 MOLE PERCENT OF AN ALKALI METAL CARBONATE AND THE REMAINDER WATER.
US323129A 1958-09-29 1963-11-12 Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases Expired - Lifetime US3151049A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US323129A US3151049A (en) 1958-09-29 1963-11-12 Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US870000XA 1958-09-29 1958-09-29
US323129A US3151049A (en) 1958-09-29 1963-11-12 Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3151049A true US3151049A (en) 1964-09-29

Family

ID=26775405

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US323129A Expired - Lifetime US3151049A (en) 1958-09-29 1963-11-12 Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from bases

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3151049A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3407129A (en) * 1965-05-24 1968-10-22 Gen Dynamics Corp Process for reclaiming spent electrolytes used for electrolytically descaling steel
US3492210A (en) * 1967-10-16 1970-01-27 Hamilton Cosco Inc Electrolytic stripping of nonferrous metals from a ferrous metal base
US3912603A (en) * 1973-12-20 1975-10-14 Hoechst Ag Electrolytic bath for the removal of metals
US4287033A (en) * 1980-04-14 1981-09-01 Calspan Corporation Electrochemical method for removing metallic sheaths
US4349423A (en) * 1978-05-25 1982-09-14 Skf Industrial Trading & Development Co. B.V. Process for decomposing hard metal scrap
DE3318598A1 (en) * 1982-05-27 1983-12-01 Occidental Chemical Corp., 48089 Warren, Mich. BATH AND METHOD FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF COATS FROM COPPER, COPPER ALLOY OR CHROME FROM A FERROUS BASE METAL
US4886588A (en) * 1989-04-10 1989-12-12 Union Carbide Corporation Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coating from aluminum bases
US5062941A (en) * 1990-10-22 1991-11-05 Union Carbide Coatings Service Technology Corporation Electrolytic process for stripping a metal coating from a titanium based metal substrate
WO2011110324A1 (en) * 2010-03-09 2011-09-15 Lufthansa Technik Ag Method for electrochemically stripping coatings from gas turbine components
CN102634841A (en) * 2012-04-20 2012-08-15 福建泉州市耐特制辊有限公司 Tungsten-removing treatment method of tungsten carbide work piece
US20130001100A1 (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-01-03 Varel International Ind., L.P. Ultrasound Assisted Electrochemical Catalyst Removal For Superhard Materials
EP2367970A4 (en) * 2008-11-27 2014-01-22 Kudu Ind Inc METHOD FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC STRIPPING OF A PROJECTED METALLIC COATING ON A SUBSTRATE
CN103820845A (en) * 2014-02-26 2014-05-28 湖北京山轻工机械股份有限公司 Solution for electrochemical treatment of surface of tungsten carbide workpiece

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1863868A (en) * 1929-03-06 1932-06-21 Ternstedt Mfg Co Chromium stripping bath
US2939825A (en) * 1956-04-09 1960-06-07 Cleveland Twist Drill Co Sharpening, shaping and finishing of electrically conductive materials

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1863868A (en) * 1929-03-06 1932-06-21 Ternstedt Mfg Co Chromium stripping bath
US2939825A (en) * 1956-04-09 1960-06-07 Cleveland Twist Drill Co Sharpening, shaping and finishing of electrically conductive materials

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3407129A (en) * 1965-05-24 1968-10-22 Gen Dynamics Corp Process for reclaiming spent electrolytes used for electrolytically descaling steel
US3492210A (en) * 1967-10-16 1970-01-27 Hamilton Cosco Inc Electrolytic stripping of nonferrous metals from a ferrous metal base
US3912603A (en) * 1973-12-20 1975-10-14 Hoechst Ag Electrolytic bath for the removal of metals
US4349423A (en) * 1978-05-25 1982-09-14 Skf Industrial Trading & Development Co. B.V. Process for decomposing hard metal scrap
US4287033A (en) * 1980-04-14 1981-09-01 Calspan Corporation Electrochemical method for removing metallic sheaths
DE3318598A1 (en) * 1982-05-27 1983-12-01 Occidental Chemical Corp., 48089 Warren, Mich. BATH AND METHOD FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF COATS FROM COPPER, COPPER ALLOY OR CHROME FROM A FERROUS BASE METAL
AU619966B2 (en) * 1989-04-10 1992-02-06 Union Carbide Coatings Service Technology Corp. Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from aluminum bases
US4886588A (en) * 1989-04-10 1989-12-12 Union Carbide Corporation Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coating from aluminum bases
EP0395813A1 (en) * 1989-04-10 1990-11-07 Praxair S.T. Technology, Inc. Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coatings from aluminum bases
US5062941A (en) * 1990-10-22 1991-11-05 Union Carbide Coatings Service Technology Corporation Electrolytic process for stripping a metal coating from a titanium based metal substrate
EP2367970A4 (en) * 2008-11-27 2014-01-22 Kudu Ind Inc METHOD FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC STRIPPING OF A PROJECTED METALLIC COATING ON A SUBSTRATE
WO2011110324A1 (en) * 2010-03-09 2011-09-15 Lufthansa Technik Ag Method for electrochemically stripping coatings from gas turbine components
DE102010010770A1 (en) * 2010-03-09 2011-09-15 Lufthansa Technik Ag Process for the electrochemical stripping of gas turbine components
US20130001100A1 (en) * 2011-06-28 2013-01-03 Varel International Ind., L.P. Ultrasound Assisted Electrochemical Catalyst Removal For Superhard Materials
US9469914B2 (en) * 2011-06-28 2016-10-18 Varel International Ind., L.P. Ultrasound assisted electrochemical catalyst removal for superhard materials
CN102634841A (en) * 2012-04-20 2012-08-15 福建泉州市耐特制辊有限公司 Tungsten-removing treatment method of tungsten carbide work piece
CN102634841B (en) * 2012-04-20 2014-11-05 福建泉州市耐特制辊有限公司 Tungsten-removing treatment method of tungsten carbide work piece
CN103820845A (en) * 2014-02-26 2014-05-28 湖北京山轻工机械股份有限公司 Solution for electrochemical treatment of surface of tungsten carbide workpiece

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3619390A (en) Aqueous electrolytic stripping bath to remove metal coatings from bases of steel
US6071570A (en) Electrodes of improved service life
US4128463A (en) Method for stripping tungsten carbide from titanium or titanium alloy substrates
JPH03501753A (en) Electrochemical processing method for articles made of conductive materials
US2545566A (en) Electrodeposition of metals and alloys
US3492210A (en) Electrolytic stripping of nonferrous metals from a ferrous metal base
CN107338469A (en) A kind of method of ironware surface zinc layers and chromium passivating layer electrolytic deplating process
US4886588A (en) Electrolytic method of and bath for stripping coating from aluminum bases
US2313371A (en) Electrodeposition of tin and its alloys
US3167403A (en) Base materials coated with an alloy of aluminum and manganese
Zelley Formation of immersion zinc coatings on aluminum
CA1132087A (en) Plating on aluminum alloys
US3793172A (en) Processes and baths for electro-stripping plated metal deposits from articles
JPH04263100A (en) Method for electrolyzing to separate metal film from titanium base metal supporting body
CN116121840B (en) Gas explosion decoction method for PVD films on metal surfaces
US4356069A (en) Stripping composition and method for preparing and using same
US3684577A (en) Removal of conductive coating from dimensionally stable electrodes
US2578898A (en) Electrolytic removal of metallic coatings from various base metals
US2547120A (en) Process for plating a carbon or graphite part with chromium
US3458407A (en) Method of producing nickel powder
US4026786A (en) Preparation of PbO2 anode
CN101565850A (en) Removing liquid of chromium nitride film layer and removing method of film layer
US2588566A (en) Electrolytic process for stripping copper
US2439935A (en) Indium electroplating
US2418970A (en) Process of electrolytically depositing iron and iron alloys