US2853406A - Metal coating - Google Patents

Metal coating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2853406A
US2853406A US578559A US57855956A US2853406A US 2853406 A US2853406 A US 2853406A US 578559 A US578559 A US 578559A US 57855956 A US57855956 A US 57855956A US 2853406 A US2853406 A US 2853406A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
etching
bath
metal
acid
nitric acid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US578559A
Inventor
Ludwig K Schuster
Jr Alfonso L Baldi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kelsey Hayes Co
Original Assignee
Kelsey Hayes Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kelsey Hayes Co filed Critical Kelsey Hayes Co
Priority to US578559A priority Critical patent/US2853406A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2853406A publication Critical patent/US2853406A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/24Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing hexavalent chromium compounds

Definitions

  • etching acid such as nitric acid, picric acid and soluble persulfates, that preferentially attack the metal grain boundaries, wetting the resulting surface with a dilute aqueous solution of chromic acid, and drying the chromic acid solution on the so-treated surface.
  • the etch should dissolve away at least about 50 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface. This is most readily obtained by contacting the surface with 'nitric acid having a concentration of from 1 to 20% by weight for a period of 2 to 70 seconds at a temperature of 60 to 150 F.
  • the etching conditions can be varied throughout this range, although best results are obtained with at least about 100 milligrams of metal removed per square foot of etched surface. For some purposes, as when the coated metal is covered with an organic resin film and then subjected to salt type corrosion conditions, the best protection is obtained if the etch removal is not over 450 milligrams per square foot of etched surface.
  • etching agent When the etching agent is applied by spray or other arrangement that continually brings a fresh etching solution into intimate and forceful contact with the surface, etching times, temperatures and/ or etchant concentrations can be on the low side, since such a technique generally causes the etchings to proceed more vigorously.
  • ferrous metals may tend to become passivated, or may not be fully active, so that the etching results may vary over different parts of the surface. Improved uniformity is obtained by subjecting the ferrous metal to an activation either during or before the nitric acid treatment.
  • One simple activation treatment is dipping in:
  • Acids such as- HCI H SO H PO H PO Patented Sept. 23, 1958 "ice 2 H BO plus a small amount of HNO Citric acid Acetic acid Trichloroacetic acid Tartaric acid, and even Tannic acid Acid reacting salts including NaHF 2 4) 3 z 4) 3 And reducing agents such as NaHSO MnCl Potassium thiocyanate plus a small amount of hydrochloric acid Hydroxylamine or its salts such as the sulfate Hydroquinone plus a small amount of formic acid A dip in an acqeous solution of any of the above materials at concentrations as low as by welghtwlll so affect the metal that it will not show any passivity in the nitric acid etch, even if the activating dip is folfowed by a thorough rinse before the nitric acid etch is egun.
  • reducing agents such as NaHSO MnCl Potassium thiocyanate plus a small amount of hydrochloric acid Hydroxy
  • passivity inhibiting treatments such as dipping the ferrous metal in a bath, as for example a solution of copper sulfate slightly acidified with sulfuric acid, that chemically applies a coating is also effective, as is mechanical Working of the metal surface as by scratch brushing, and cathodic electrolytic treatment of the metal.
  • the mechanical working and the cathodic treatment can be performed either before or during the nitric acid treatment.
  • the etching can be very effectively carried out in a very uniform manner without using the highest etching times, temperatures or acid concentrations.
  • the cleaning can be of any kind such as degreasing with organic solvents like trichloroethylene,
  • an alkaline cleaner such as aqueous solutions of sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide and/or sodium silicate, or electrolytic treatment in the above type of alkaline cleaning solutions.
  • Inorganic impurities and slight amounts of organic impurities can sometimes be removed by the nitric acid or persulfate etch without any pro-cleaning step. Any soluble persulfate such as ammonium, potassium or even barium persulfate will give the desired etch. However, nitric acid is the least expensive of the above grainboundary etchants, and is preferred for this reason.
  • etching with nitric acicl,' if the etchant is used as a dip or as a recirculated spray, it gradually accumulates a large amount of dissolved iron and eventually has to be dumped or sent to salvage.
  • higher temperatures there is also a tendency for the bath to begin to generate rapidly increasing amounts of nitrogen oxide fumes. At that time the bath should be changed since its etching ability is sharply reduced and furthermore the fumes are highly toxic.
  • the etched metal is rinsed in cold water. This minimizes contamination of the succeeding chromic acid bath with residues from the nitric acid treatment. In many' cases the surface of the rinsed metal will show some smut brought out by the etch. This smut should be removed as by wiping or brushing. Brushes with stainless steel bristles are very effective smut removers, particularly when used in the form of revolving brushes. Other types of bristles such as hog hairs can also be used, and stationary wipers such as rubber, plastic or cellulose sponges are effective if the metal surface is brushed over them.
  • the article being treated is immersed in a dilute solution of chromic acid for a sufficient period to completely wet its surface.
  • Concentrations of chromic acid of from about /2 to'about 10% by weight give the most advantageous results. If the chromic acid concentration is too high, the resulting coating after drying loses some of its desirablewater-repellent characteristics as well as corrosion resistance. Concentrations in the neighborhood of 1 /2 to 5% are preferred. Concentrations below /z% do not provide a coatin that is sufficiently protective.
  • the chromic acid solution need not be applied for any particular time or at any particular temperature. So long as the surface to be treated is covered with an unbroken film of the solution and the drying is carried out without breaking the film, the desired results will be obtained.
  • the inclusion of wetting agents in the chromic acid solution or of elevated treating temperatures promotes the uniform wetting of the surface. Wetting agents so used should be relatively inert to the chromic acid. Polyethylene oxide ethers of alkyl phenols, such as described in U. S.
  • Patent 2,115,192 long-chained alkyl sulfates such as sodium lauryl sulfate and quaternary ammonium compounds such as myristo amido propyl dirnethyl benzyl ammonium chloride are suitable in concentrations as low as 0.05%. Even tertiary butyl alcohol is satisfactory but in somewhat larger concentrations, e. g. 0.5%.
  • wetting agents especially nonionics with other nonionics or nonionics with cationics or anionics are particularly useful.
  • the chromic acid solution can be sprayed on for example with spray nozzles through which air is blown under pressure.
  • the metal after removing from the dip, can be passed between roughened or smooth rubber or resilient plastic rolls that are squeezed toward each other. In rolling over the chromic acid film on the metal, the rolls act to spread it around uniformly. At the same time, heavy dip coatings are squeezed out somewhat and reduced in amount.
  • the squeezing rolls can be wet beforehand with some of the same coating solution on the metal. Where spraying of the chromic acid is employed an electrostatic field helps provide better coating uniformity.
  • the chromic acid treated metal can be dried as soon as the solution is applied. Oven drying or drying with a blast of hot air is preferred, although more standing at room temperature is effective. The time required for drying varies with the source of heat used but can be as low as about 1 minute, or even a second or two. The use of hot chromic acid solutions reduces the drying time.
  • a peculiar characteristic of the final dried coating is that it does not show its maximum corrosion resistance when it is first formed.
  • the coating seems to undergo spontaneous internal changes on standing and after 2 or 3 days becomes a very high quality protective layer that is strongly water-repellent. Before that time its waterrepellence is much lower and in the first 3 hours it is actually readily wet by water. In fact, wetting it during the first 3 hours causes the coating to dissolve at least in part, so that another drying operation is needed, followed by another 2 or 3 day cure to bring out the maximum protection.
  • the curing can be shortened or entirely eliminated by covering the coating with a film of lacquer or other organic resin such as paint, and drying the resin film. If this drying or the previous drying of the chromic acid is effected at a temperature of at least 250 F. the resulting resin-coated surface can be immediately immersed in water and will show substantially its maximum corrosion resistance while so immersed. 'Since the application and drying of resin films can be completed in a few minutes or less, this is a particularly desirable after-treatment in accordance with this invention where the protected metal is to be produced commercially on a continuous production line, for example, and the 3 hour avoidance of liquid Water is diflicult to assure.
  • Example I Black plate panels (SAE 1010 cold rolled steel) 10 mils thick and with a No. 7 finish were cleaned by dipping for one minute at 180 F. in water containing 3% trisodium phosphate and 1% sodium gluconate and then rinsed in fresh water. The cleaned panels were then etched by dipping in a solution of 10% nitric acid in water for 5 seconds, at a temperature of 75 F. Following this, the panels were rinsed in fresh water, and then immersed in a solution of 1.5% chromic acid (CrO in water for 5 seconds, at a temperature of 180 F. They were then passed through a set of rough rubber rolls to remove excess solution, and dried at room temperature (70 F.) with an air blast.
  • RhO chromic acid
  • the final panels after aging for three days out or" contact with water, have a tough, corrosion-resistant film over the entire surface. A one hundred hour exposure to an atmosphere of relative humidity at F. produced no appreciable corrosion.
  • the coated panels alsoshowed an unusually good lacwood oil at 400 F., cooking these ingredients together at 400 F. for one-half hour after which the mixture is cooled to 75 F. and thinned to a solids content of 50%.
  • the lacquer is diluted with benzene to obtain a viscosity of 76 seconds at 75 F. as measured with a Parlin viscosity cup #7 AMD, and then baked for 10 minutes at 410 F.
  • the average weight of the baked lacquer was 900 milligrams per square foot.
  • Lacquer coated panels produced as aforesaid were immersed in boiling solution of 3% sodium chloride and 1 /z% acetic acid for a period of from /2 to 2 hours. They were then rinsed, wiped dry, and the lacquer adherence tested by firmly pressing against the lacquered surface the adhesive surface of a piece of pressure-sensitive tape. To make the tests more rigorous the panels were bent along a line across which the tape was secured. The tape was then quickly pulled ofr and examined. If the lacquer adherence is not excellent, patches of it can be readily seen on the tape. In this test all panels showed excellent lacquer adherence.
  • Example II to IX inclusive the procedure and tests of Example I were repeated without change except for the particular variations noted in the respective examples. All of the tests for lacquer adherence showed superior result, ranging from very good to excellent. Tests for corrosion resistance likewise ranged from very good to excellent.
  • Example II 1% nitric acid was used at 150 F. for 70 seconds, instead of 10% nitric acid at 8590 F. for seconds.
  • Example III Picric acid in a 1.5% solution in water a: 155 F. was used for 12 seconds, instead of the nitric acid etch.
  • Example IV A fresh 4% solution of ammonium persulfate ([NH S O sometimes called ammonium peroxydisulfate) in water at 75 F. was used for 15 seconds as the etching step.
  • Example V 3% nitric acid was used. 5% chromic acid was used.
  • Example VI 5% chromic acid was used.
  • the panels were aged 3 days before being tested forlacquer adherence after the lacquer baking was completed.
  • the lacquer adhesion was about the same as in the product of Example V.
  • Example VII 20% nitric acid was used, and in place of the black plate a SAE 1025 cold rolled steel stamped into the shape of a handle was treated, the rolling step being omitted.
  • Example VIII 20% nitric acid was used.
  • the panels were aged 3 days before the lacquer coating was applied.
  • the lacquer adhesion was substantially the same as in Examples V and VI.
  • Example IX chromic acid was used.
  • Example X Several eight inch by four inch panels of 0.0095 inch thick #7 finish black plate were cleaned by immersing in an aqueous solution of alkaline cleaner (water containing 5% vNoOH and 5% Na SiO at 200 F. and then carefully rinsed with water. The rinsed panels were immersed in a 1% by weight aqueous solution of nitric acid at 75 F. for 5 seconds and then again rinsed thoroughly with water and wiped to remove any smut that developed from the nitric acid treatment. The wiped panels were immersed for 15 seconds in a /2% solution of CrO in water, then drained for /2 minute and then placed for 3 minutes in an air oven maintained at 250 F.
  • alkaline cleaner water containing 5% vNoOH and 5% Na SiO
  • the coated metal After aging for 2 days, the coated metal showed very little corrosition when subjected to an accelerated coldhot humid cycle test, with alternate periods of 2 hours at 32 F. and 24 hours at 125 13., all of 98% humidity. Similar panels treated in the same way but having the chromic acid solution of only show at least four times as much corrosion and are in fact substantially entirely covered with corrosion, whereas the coating in accordance with the present invention /2% CrO has large areas entirely free of corrosion.
  • Example XI The process of Example X is repeated but the steel, after cleaning, is subjected for 0.25 second to a 1% solution of H at 70 35., followed by a rinse.
  • the nitric acid bath was applied in the form of jets impinging on the steel with a velocity of 25 feet per second, and the time of the nitric acid treatment was reduced to 2.25 seconds.
  • a spray was also used for the application of the chromic acid.
  • the final panels were more uniform in appearance than the panels of Example X, but otherwise showed about the same corrosion resistance.
  • Example XII Hot rolled SAE 3140 steel (containing 1.4% nickel and 0.5% chromium) in 11 mil thick sheets, was subjected to the treatment of Example XI and resulted in coated sheets with an unusually high corrosion resistance.
  • a nitric acid etching bath can be 'made to have an exceedingly long life if there is bubbled through it a non-reactive gas such as air, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, helium or even hydrogen.
  • a non-reactive gas such as air, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, helium or even hydrogen.
  • a preferred way to adjust the drag out is to add the fresh nitric acid in such a concentration that it counteracts any tendency for the bath volume to change.
  • a high concentration (70% by weight) of replenishing acid can be used, and vice versa.
  • the bath can generally be used about half again as long as without blowing.
  • blowing or bubbling acts to remove volatile nitric acid reduction products from the bath as fast as they are formed, and thereby keeps them from reacting with the ferrous iron, a relatively large quantity of which accumulates in the bath.
  • the bath which originally turns green gradually becomes more reddish and after 16 to 18 hours of continual use suddenly begins to liberate large quantities of N0 fumes and has to be dumped. If before it gets too red, air is bubbled through, the sudden fume evolution is delayed or completely avoided.
  • the proximity of the sudden change is usually indicated by the etching becoming uneven and streaky.
  • the bubbling avoids this unevenness as well as the bath dumping.
  • etching is limited to the upper portion of the bath, this can be considered the bottom limit of the bubbling.
  • hydrogen is listed above as a suitable bubbling gas, it is highly inflammable and care should be taken with it to avoid ignition, as by providing good ventilation.
  • the above bubbling technique is useful wherever a ferrous metal is to be partially or completely dissolved by nitric acid, and particularly where the nitric acid is at a temperature of not over 100 F.
  • a feature of the present invention is that there appears to be some peculiar coaction between the chromium oxide coating and the grain boundary etch.
  • the process of the invention is modified by substituting a sulfuric acid etch for the grain boundary etch, the final coated metal is much more readily corrodible even though exactly the same amount of metal is removed by the etching.
  • any corrodible ferrous metal including plain carbon and low alloy steels, that is steels having no more than about 2% of alloying metals. They can have a carbon content varying from extremely low values, 0.05% or even less, to as much as 1.4% or higher.
  • the phosphorus and sulfur contents can range from substantially zero to several tenths of a percent. Generally phosphorus maxima are about 0.15% and sulfur maxima about 0.3%.
  • These materials include the steels ordinarily considered as carbon steels (SAE 1010 to 1095), free cutting steels, plain carbon tool steels, including those that have up to several percent of silicon, and casting metals.
  • the metal can be in any shape, including sheet, foil,
  • Wire, plate, bar, rod, tube, or fabricated forms such as 7 girders, beams, machined elements, etc.
  • the chromic acid solution is preferably applied in the form of a uniform spray since dipping generally produces nonuniform coatings by reason of the drainage problems.
  • the excellent adhesion of resin layers on the chromium oxide coatings of the present invention makes itself manifest with all types of resins such as ordinary paints including those with straight linseed oil vehicles, either raw or blown, or in mixtures with tung oil, oticica or tung oil paints or varnishes, resin-modified linseed, oiticica or tung oil paints or varnishes and nitrocellulose or cellulose 8 acetate, or cellulose acetatebutyrate lacquers.
  • High quality paints such as melamine resin-modified drying oil and alkyd resin-modified drying oil paints are very eifective. Reference is made to the type of organic coatings described in Paint and Varnish Technology (1948) by William Von Fisher, page 334, as particularly suitable.
  • a method for improving the surface of corrodible ferrous metal which comprises etching the surface of said metal with nitric acid having a concentration of from 1 to 20% by weight for a period of 2 to 70 seconds at a temperature of 60 to 150 F., applying on the etched surface an aqueous chromic acid solution having a concentration of from /2 to 10% by weight, and drying the chromic acid solution on said surface.
  • a method for improving the surface of corrodible ferrous metal which comprises treating said surface with an etching agent selected from the group of nitric acid, picric acid and soluble persulfates to etch away at least about 50 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface, thereafter wetting said surface with an aqueous chromic acid solution having a chromic acid concentration of from A2 to 10% by weight, and drying the chromic acid solution on the metal surface.
  • an etching agent selected from the group of nitric acid, picric acid and soluble persulfates
  • a method for improving the surface of a plain carbon steel which comprises the steps of etching said surface with an etching agent from the group of nitric acid, picric acid, and soluble persulfates, to etch away from about to 450 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface, rinsing the etched surface, wetting the rinsed surface with an aqueous solution of chromic acid containing from /2 to 10% by weight of chromic acid, drying the chromic acid solution on the surface of the metal, and then keeping the resultant product out of contact with liquid water for at least three hours.
  • an etching agent from the group of nitric acid, picric acid, and soluble persulfates
  • a method for improving the surface of a plain carbon steel which comprises the steps of etching said surface with an etching agent selected from the group of nitric acid, picric acid, and soluble persulfates, to etch away from about 100 to 450 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface, rinsing the etched surface, wetting the rinsed surface with an aqueous solution of chromic acid containing from /2 to 10% by weight of chromic acid, drying the chromic acid solution on the surface of the metal, and then applying a resin coating on the dried surface.
  • an etching agent selected from the group of nitric acid, picric acid, and soluble persulfates

Description

United States Patent O METAL COATING Ludwig K. Schuster, Philadelphia, and Alfouso L. Bald], Jr., Drexel Hill, Pa., assignors, by mesne assignments, to Kelsey-Hayes Company, Detroit, Mich, a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application April 17, 1956 Serial No. 578,559
8 Claims. (Cl. 148-63) Among the objects of the present invention is the provision of novel coating methods which impart to ferrous metal surfaces coatings that make very good anchorages for lacquer and other organic films, and which possess high corrosion resistance with or without a covering organic film. Further objects of the present invention include the provision of novel corrosion resistant surfaces for corrodible ferrous metal. Additional objects of this invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following description of several of its exemplifications.
The above objects are achieved in accordance with the present invention by first etching the ferrous metal surface with an etching acid such as nitric acid, picric acid and soluble persulfates, that preferentially attack the metal grain boundaries, wetting the resulting surface with a dilute aqueous solution of chromic acid, and drying the chromic acid solution on the so-treated surface.
The etch should dissolve away at least about 50 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface. This is most readily obtained by contacting the surface with 'nitric acid having a concentration of from 1 to 20% by weight for a period of 2 to 70 seconds at a temperature of 60 to 150 F. The etching conditions can be varied throughout this range, although best results are obtained with at least about 100 milligrams of metal removed per square foot of etched surface. For some purposes, as when the coated metal is covered with an organic resin film and then subjected to salt type corrosion conditions, the best protection is obtained if the etch removal is not over 450 milligrams per square foot of etched surface. When the etching agent is applied by spray or other arrangement that continually brings a fresh etching solution into intimate and forceful contact with the surface, etching times, temperatures and/ or etchant concentrations can be on the low side, since such a technique generally causes the etchings to proceed more vigorously.
Under some nitric acid etching conditions the ferrous metals may tend to become passivated, or may not be fully active, so that the etching results may vary over different parts of the surface. Improved uniformity is obtained by subjecting the ferrous metal to an activation either during or before the nitric acid treatment. One simple activation treatment is dipping in:
Acids such as- HCI H SO H PO H PO Patented Sept. 23, 1958 "ice 2 H BO plus a small amount of HNO Citric acid Acetic acid Trichloroacetic acid Tartaric acid, and even Tannic acid Acid reacting salts including NaHF 2 4) 3 z 4) 3 And reducing agents such as NaHSO MnCl Potassium thiocyanate plus a small amount of hydrochloric acid Hydroxylamine or its salts such as the sulfate Hydroquinone plus a small amount of formic acid A dip in an acqeous solution of any of the above materials at concentrations as low as by welghtwlll so affect the metal that it will not show any passivity in the nitric acid etch, even if the activating dip is folfowed by a thorough rinse before the nitric acid etch is egun. In fact, where the activating dip tends to introduce water soluble materials into the final coating, it is preferred to have such a rinsing effected before the nitric acid etch. Not more than a second or two, and sometimes only a fraction of a second, are required for the passivity inhibiting treatment to insure the desired results. Thus, a 3 second treatment at 50 F. or at 70 F. in a 10% NaHSO in water will prevent passivity. A 2.3% solution of HCI in water will also produce the desired results with a /2 second dip at 35 F.
- Other passivity inhibiting treatments such as dipping the ferrous metal in a bath, as for example a solution of copper sulfate slightly acidified with sulfuric acid, that chemically applies a coating is also effective, as is mechanical Working of the metal surface as by scratch brushing, and cathodic electrolytic treatment of the metal. The mechanical working and the cathodic treatment can be performed either before or during the nitric acid treatment.
Because of the greater effectiveness of the nitric acid etch after the metal is subjected to an activating step, the etching can be very effectively carried out in a very uniform manner without using the highest etching times, temperatures or acid concentrations.
Where the metal to be coated is not perfectly clean, it should be subjected to a careful cleaning operation before the etch. The cleaning can be of any kind such as degreasing with organic solvents like trichloroethylene,
treatment with an alkaline cleaner such as aqueous solutions of sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide and/or sodium silicate, or electrolytic treatment in the above type of alkaline cleaning solutions.
When the metal to be treated possesses a considerable amount of scale or rust it may be advantageously pickled in a conventional manner with an acid such as sulfuric or hydrochloric acid in order to improve the surface characteristics. Care should be taken that this pickling step (which is optional.) is not carried to the point where the entire surface of the metal is deeply pocked or etched. Thus, a moderate etch obtained as by treatment in' 10% by weight sulfuric acid in water, at a temperature of F. for a period of 15 minutes, does not impair the advantageous results of the invention. Further pickling than this, however, should generally be'avoided. When pickling is used, the etching it produces can in general be ignored in considering the metal removal to be obtained by the grain-boundary etch of the present invention.
Inorganic impurities and slight amounts of organic impurities can sometimes be removed by the nitric acid or persulfate etch without any pro-cleaning step. Any soluble persulfate such as ammonium, potassium or even barium persulfate will give the desired etch. However, nitric acid is the least expensive of the above grainboundary etchants, and is preferred for this reason.
During etching with nitric acicl,',if the etchant is used as a dip or as a recirculated spray, it gradually accumulates a large amount of dissolved iron and eventually has to be dumped or sent to salvage. The use of lower etching temperatures, below 100 F. for example, seems to give the bath a somewhat longer life, that is enables it to be used with a somewhat larger content of dissolved iron. When higher temperatures are used, there is also a tendency for the bath to begin to generate rapidly increasing amounts of nitrogen oxide fumes. At that time the bath should be changed since its etching ability is sharply reduced and furthermore the fumes are highly toxic.
Inasmuch as the etching operation generates heat, it is helpful to cool the bath with running water or with re frigeration for example, in order to keep the tempera ture from rising unduly.
Following the nitric acid treatment, the etched metal is rinsed in cold water. This minimizes contamination of the succeeding chromic acid bath with residues from the nitric acid treatment. In many' cases the surface of the rinsed metal will show some smut brought out by the etch. This smut should be removed as by wiping or brushing. Brushes with stainless steel bristles are very effective smut removers, particularly when used in the form of revolving brushes. Other types of bristles such as hog hairs can also be used, and stationary wipers such as rubber, plastic or cellulose sponges are effective if the metal surface is brushed over them.
Next, the article being treated is immersed in a dilute solution of chromic acid for a sufficient period to completely wet its surface. Concentrations of chromic acid of from about /2 to'about 10% by weight give the most advantageous results. If the chromic acid concentration is too high, the resulting coating after drying loses some of its desirablewater-repellent characteristics as well as corrosion resistance. Concentrations in the neighborhood of 1 /2 to 5% are preferred. Concentrations below /z% do not provide a coatin that is sufficiently protective.
The chromic acid solution need not be applied for any particular time or at any particular temperature. So long as the surface to be treated is covered with an unbroken film of the solution and the drying is carried out without breaking the film, the desired results will be obtained. The inclusion of wetting agents in the chromic acid solution or of elevated treating temperatures promotes the uniform wetting of the surface. Wetting agents so used should be relatively inert to the chromic acid. Polyethylene oxide ethers of alkyl phenols, such as described in U. S. Patent 2,115,192, long-chained alkyl sulfates such as sodium lauryl sulfate and quaternary ammonium compounds such as myristo amido propyl dirnethyl benzyl ammonium chloride are suitable in concentrations as low as 0.05%. Even tertiary butyl alcohol is satisfactory but in somewhat larger concentrations, e. g. 0.5%.
Mixtures of wetting agents, especially nonionics with other nonionics or nonionics with cationics or anionics are particularly useful. A mixture of the above alkylated aryl polyethers with a medium length solubilized alkyl phosphate gives particularly well regulated wetting and forming characteristics.
To better assure a uniform application of the chromic acid solution, it can be sprayed on for example with spray nozzles through which air is blown under pressure. Alternatively, if a chromic acid dip is used on a metal sheet or plate, the metal, after removing from the dip, can be passed between roughened or smooth rubber or resilient plastic rolls that are squeezed toward each other. In rolling over the chromic acid film on the metal, the rolls act to spread it around uniformly. At the same time, heavy dip coatings are squeezed out somewhat and reduced in amount. The squeezing rolls can be wet beforehand with some of the same coating solution on the metal. Where spraying of the chromic acid is employed an electrostatic field helps provide better coating uniformity.
The chromic acid treated metal can be dried as soon as the solution is applied. Oven drying or drying with a blast of hot air is preferred, although more standing at room temperature is effective. The time required for drying varies with the source of heat used but can be as low as about 1 minute, or even a second or two. The use of hot chromic acid solutions reduces the drying time.
Best results are obtained when the chromic acid coating reaches a temperature of 250 F. during the drying. A
slightly lower corrosion resistance results if the drying is at lower temperatures.
A peculiar characteristic of the final dried coating is that it does not show its maximum corrosion resistance when it is first formed. The coating seems to undergo spontaneous internal changes on standing and after 2 or 3 days becomes a very high quality protective layer that is strongly water-repellent. Before that time its waterrepellence is much lower and in the first 3 hours it is actually readily wet by water. In fact, wetting it during the first 3 hours causes the coating to dissolve at least in part, so that another drying operation is needed, followed by another 2 or 3 day cure to bring out the maximum protection.
The curing can be shortened or entirely eliminated by covering the coating with a film of lacquer or other organic resin such as paint, and drying the resin film. If this drying or the previous drying of the chromic acid is effected at a temperature of at least 250 F. the resulting resin-coated surface can be immediately immersed in water and will show substantially its maximum corrosion resistance while so immersed. 'Since the application and drying of resin films can be completed in a few minutes or less, this is a particularly desirable after-treatment in accordance with this invention where the protected metal is to be produced commercially on a continuous production line, for example, and the 3 hour avoidance of liquid Water is diflicult to assure.
The following illustrative examples, in which the quantities are stated in parts by weight unless otherwise noted, will more clearly show different techniques for practicing the present invention.
Example I Black plate panels (SAE 1010 cold rolled steel) 10 mils thick and with a No. 7 finish were cleaned by dipping for one minute at 180 F. in water containing 3% trisodium phosphate and 1% sodium gluconate and then rinsed in fresh water. The cleaned panels were then etched by dipping in a solution of 10% nitric acid in water for 5 seconds, at a temperature of 75 F. Following this, the panels were rinsed in fresh water, and then immersed in a solution of 1.5% chromic acid (CrO in water for 5 seconds, at a temperature of 180 F. They were then passed through a set of rough rubber rolls to remove excess solution, and dried at room temperature (70 F.) with an air blast.
The final panels, after aging for three days out or" contact with water, have a tough, corrosion-resistant film over the entire surface. A one hundred hour exposure to an atmosphere of relative humidity at F. produced no appreciable corrosion.
The coated panels alsoshowed an unusually good lacwood oil at 400 F., cooking these ingredients together at 400 F. for one-half hour after which the mixture is cooled to 75 F. and thinned to a solids content of 50%. The lacquer is diluted with benzene to obtain a viscosity of 76 seconds at 75 F. as measured with a Parlin viscosity cup #7 AMD, and then baked for 10 minutes at 410 F. The average weight of the baked lacquer was 900 milligrams per square foot.
Lacquer coated panels produced as aforesaid were immersed in boiling solution of 3% sodium chloride and 1 /z% acetic acid for a period of from /2 to 2 hours. They were then rinsed, wiped dry, and the lacquer adherence tested by firmly pressing against the lacquered surface the adhesive surface of a piece of pressure-sensitive tape. To make the tests more rigorous the panels were bent along a line across which the tape was secured. The tape was then quickly pulled ofr and examined. If the lacquer adherence is not excellent, patches of it can be readily seen on the tape. In this test all panels showed excellent lacquer adherence.
In Examples II to IX inclusive, the procedure and tests of Example I were repeated without change except for the particular variations noted in the respective examples. All of the tests for lacquer adherence showed superior result, ranging from very good to excellent. Tests for corrosion resistance likewise ranged from very good to excellent.
Example II 1% nitric acid was used at 150 F. for 70 seconds, instead of 10% nitric acid at 8590 F. for seconds.
Example III Picric acid in a 1.5% solution in water a: 155 F. was used for 12 seconds, instead of the nitric acid etch.
Example IV A fresh 4% solution of ammonium persulfate ([NH S O sometimes called ammonium peroxydisulfate) in water at 75 F. was used for 15 seconds as the etching step.
Example V 3% nitric acid was used. 5% chromic acid Was used.
Example VI 5% chromic acid was used.
The panels were aged 3 days before being tested forlacquer adherence after the lacquer baking was completed. The lacquer adhesion was about the same as in the product of Example V.
Example VII 20% nitric acid was used, and in place of the black plate a SAE 1025 cold rolled steel stamped into the shape of a handle was treated, the rolling step being omitted.
Example VIII 20% nitric acid was used.
5% chromic acid was used.
The panels were aged 3 days before the lacquer coating was applied. The lacquer adhesion was substantially the same as in Examples V and VI.
Example IX chromic acid was used.
Example X Several eight inch by four inch panels of 0.0095 inch thick #7 finish black plate were cleaned by immersing in an aqueous solution of alkaline cleaner (water containing 5% vNoOH and 5% Na SiO at 200 F. and then carefully rinsed with water. The rinsed panels were immersed in a 1% by weight aqueous solution of nitric acid at 75 F. for 5 seconds and then again rinsed thoroughly with water and wiped to remove any smut that developed from the nitric acid treatment. The wiped panels were immersed for 15 seconds in a /2% solution of CrO in water, then drained for /2 minute and then placed for 3 minutes in an air oven maintained at 250 F.
After aging for 2 days, the coated metal showed very little corrosition when subjected to an accelerated coldhot humid cycle test, with alternate periods of 2 hours at 32 F. and 24 hours at 125 13., all of 98% humidity. Similar panels treated in the same way but having the chromic acid solution of only show at least four times as much corrosion and are in fact substantially entirely covered with corrosion, whereas the coating in accordance with the present invention /2% CrO has large areas entirely free of corrosion.
Example XI The process of Example X is repeated but the steel, after cleaning, is subjected for 0.25 second to a 1% solution of H at 70 35., followed by a rinse. The nitric acid bath was applied in the form of jets impinging on the steel with a velocity of 25 feet per second, and the time of the nitric acid treatment was reduced to 2.25 seconds. A spray was also used for the application of the chromic acid. The final panels were more uniform in appearance than the panels of Example X, but otherwise showed about the same corrosion resistance.
Example XII Hot rolled SAE 3140 steel (containing 1.4% nickel and 0.5% chromium) in 11 mil thick sheets, was subjected to the treatment of Example XI and resulted in coated sheets with an unusually high corrosion resistance.
It has also been discovered that a nitric acid etching bath can be 'made to have an exceedingly long life if there is bubbled through it a non-reactive gas such as air, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, helium or even hydrogen. Thus, by blowing air through the bath at the rate of 25 cubic feet per minute for each square foot of mean horizontal cross-sectional area the bath occupies, that is enough to create continuous turbulence in the bath, the need to dump the bath is entirely eliminated. All that is required is the gradual addition of fresh nitric acid to make up for the acid consumed by the etching. The metal etched will generally drag out enough bath to keep the bath volume down, but extra amounts of the bath can be removed if desired.
A preferred way to adjust the drag out is to add the fresh nitric acid in such a concentration that it counteracts any tendency for the bath volume to change. Thus, where the volume is increasing a high concentration (70% by weight) of replenishing acid can be used, and vice versa.
If no replenishing is made, the bath can generally be used about half again as long as without blowing.
It is believed that the blowing or bubbling acts to remove volatile nitric acid reduction products from the bath as fast as they are formed, and thereby keeps them from reacting with the ferrous iron, a relatively large quantity of which accumulates in the bath. In any event, when no blowing is used, the bath which originally turns green, gradually becomes more reddish and after 16 to 18 hours of continual use suddenly begins to liberate large quantities of N0 fumes and has to be dumped. If before it gets too red, air is bubbled through, the sudden fume evolution is delayed or completely avoided.
The proximity of the sudden change is usually indicated by the etching becoming uneven and streaky. The bubbling avoids this unevenness as well as the bath dumping.
For commercial operationsit is preferred to continually bubble air or other non-reactive gas through the bath so that no other precaution need be taken. As little as 15 cubic feet per minute for each square foot of mean horizontal cross-sectional area of the bath canbe used to advantage. The bubbling of very large quantities of gas provides no better results than 25 cubic feet per minute figure given above, and is therefore more wasteful. Where the smaller bubbling rates are used it is important to distribute the bubbling over the entire bath as by having bubbling orifices spread no more than about inches apart all over the bottom of the bath. Greater separation such as 8 to 10 inches can be used with the cubic foot per minute figure, and at the same time the bubbling need not extend to the very bottom of the bath but can stop six inches or so above the bottom. If the etching is limited to the upper portion of the bath, this can be considered the bottom limit of the bubbling. Although hydrogen is listed above as a suitable bubbling gas, it is highly inflammable and care should be taken with it to avoid ignition, as by providing good ventilation. p
The above bubbling technique is useful wherever a ferrous metal is to be partially or completely dissolved by nitric acid, and particularly where the nitric acid is at a temperature of not over 100 F.
A feature of the present invention is that there appears to be some peculiar coaction between the chromium oxide coating and the grain boundary etch. Thus, if the process of the invention is modified by substituting a sulfuric acid etch for the grain boundary etch, the final coated metal is much more readily corrodible even though exactly the same amount of metal is removed by the etching.
The desirable characteristic of the new coating is obtained with any corrodible ferrous metal including plain carbon and low alloy steels, that is steels having no more than about 2% of alloying metals. They can have a carbon content varying from extremely low values, 0.05% or even less, to as much as 1.4% or higher. The phosphorus and sulfur contents can range from substantially zero to several tenths of a percent. Generally phosphorus maxima are about 0.15% and sulfur maxima about 0.3%. These materials include the steels ordinarily considered as carbon steels (SAE 1010 to 1095), free cutting steels, plain carbon tool steels, including those that have up to several percent of silicon, and casting metals.
The metal can be in any shape, including sheet, foil,
Wire, plate, bar, rod, tube, or fabricated forms such as 7 girders, beams, machined elements, etc. Where the surfaces being treated are contoured, as in forgings or machined members, the chromic acid solution is preferably applied in the form of a uniform spray since dipping generally produces nonuniform coatings by reason of the drainage problems.
This inventon may be used for a wide variety of purposes. Wherever corrosion resistance is important it is of particular value. Thin sheets of these materials may be bonded to underlying bases of dissimilar metals to impart desired properties thereto. When coated with lacquers, sheets of these products are ideally adapted for use as substitutes for so-called tin cans in the food industry and wherever else tin coated ferrous materials have been employed. Because of their low cost they are of particular interest to the canning and other industries.
The excellent adhesion of resin layers on the chromium oxide coatings of the present invention makes itself manifest with all types of resins such as ordinary paints including those with straight linseed oil vehicles, either raw or blown, or in mixtures with tung oil, oticica or tung oil paints or varnishes, resin-modified linseed, oiticica or tung oil paints or varnishes and nitrocellulose or cellulose 8 acetate, or cellulose acetatebutyrate lacquers. High quality paints such as melamine resin-modified drying oil and alkyd resin-modified drying oil paints are very eifective. Reference is made to the type of organic coatings described in Paint and Varnish Technology (1948) by William Von Fisher, page 334, as particularly suitable.
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
What is claimed is:
1. A method for improving the surface of corrodible ferrous metal which comprises etching the surface of said metal with nitric acid having a concentration of from 1 to 20% by weight for a period of 2 to 70 seconds at a temperature of 60 to 150 F., applying on the etched surface an aqueous chromic acid solution having a concentration of from /2 to 10% by weight, and drying the chromic acid solution on said surface.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the drying is carried out at an elevated temperature, the dried chromic acid solution reaching a temperature of at least 250 F.
3. A method for improving the surface of corrodible ferrous metal which comprises treating said surface with an etching agent selected from the group of nitric acid, picric acid and soluble persulfates to etch away at least about 50 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface, thereafter wetting said surface with an aqueous chromic acid solution having a chromic acid concentration of from A2 to 10% by weight, and drying the chromic acid solution on the metal surface.
4. A method for improving the surface of a plain carbon steel which comprises the steps of etching said surface with an etching agent from the group of nitric acid, picric acid, and soluble persulfates, to etch away from about to 450 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface, rinsing the etched surface, wetting the rinsed surface with an aqueous solution of chromic acid containing from /2 to 10% by weight of chromic acid, drying the chromic acid solution on the surface of the metal, and then keeping the resultant product out of contact with liquid water for at least three hours.
5. A method for improving the surface of a plain carbon steel which comprises the steps of etching said surface with an etching agent selected from the group of nitric acid, picric acid, and soluble persulfates, to etch away from about 100 to 450 milligrams of metal per square foot of etched surface, rinsing the etched surface, wetting the rinsed surface with an aqueous solution of chromic acid containing from /2 to 10% by weight of chromic acid, drying the chromic acid solution on the surface of the metal, and then applying a resin coating on the dried surface.
6. The product produced by the method of claim 3.
7. In a process for prolonging the effectiveness of an aqueous nitric acid etching bath in the etching of ferrous metal the step of bubbling a non-reactive gas through the bath during the etching, the bubbling being in quantitles of at least 15 cubic feet per minute for each square foot of mean horizontal cross-sectional area of the bath.
8. The combination of claim 7 in which the bath is kept at a temperature below 100 F.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED vSTATES PATENTS 2,142,646 I-Iandforth et a1. Ian. 3, 1939 2,171,545 Edwards et al. Sept. 5, 1939 2,535,794 Hempel Dec. 26, 1950 FOREIGN PATENTS 597,754 Great Britain -a Feb. 3, 1948 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent Nos 2,853,406 September 23, 1958 Ludwig K., Sohuster et a1,
It is hereby certified that error appears in the-printed specification of the above-numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
Column 6, line 2, for NoOH" read NaOH Signedand sealed this 9th day of December 1958.,
' SEAL fittest: KARL H, .AXLINE ROBERT C. WATSON Commissioner of Patents Attesting Oflicer

Claims (2)

1. A METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE SURFACE OF CORRODIBLE FERROUS METAL WHICH COMPRISES ETCHING THE SURFACE OF SAID METAL WITH NITRIC ACID HAVING A CONCENTRATION OF FROM 1 TO 20% BY WEIGHT FOR A PERIOD OF 2 TO 70 SECONDS AT A TEMPERATURE OF 60 TO 150*F., APPLYING ON THE ETCHED SURFACE AN AQUEOUS CHROMIC ACID SOLUTION HAVING A CONCENTRATION OF FROM 1/2 TO 10% BY WEIGHT, AND DRY, ING THE CHROMIC ACID SOLUTION ON SAID SURFACE,
7. IN A PROCESS FOR PROLONGING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN AQUEOUS NITRIC ACID ETCHING BATH IN THE ETCHING OF FERROUS METAL THE STEP OF BUBBLING A NON-REACTIVE GAS THROUGH THE BATH DURING THE ETCHING, THE BUBBLING BEING IN QUANTITITES OF AT LEAST 15 CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE FOR EACH SQUARE FOOT OF MEAN HORIZONTAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF THE BATH.
US578559A 1956-04-17 1956-04-17 Metal coating Expired - Lifetime US2853406A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US578559A US2853406A (en) 1956-04-17 1956-04-17 Metal coating

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US578559A US2853406A (en) 1956-04-17 1956-04-17 Metal coating

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2853406A true US2853406A (en) 1958-09-23

Family

ID=24313387

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US578559A Expired - Lifetime US2853406A (en) 1956-04-17 1956-04-17 Metal coating

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2853406A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3053702A (en) * 1959-05-19 1962-09-11 Gennsalt Chemicals Corp Metal coating
US3085034A (en) * 1958-07-10 1963-04-09 Polymer Processes Inc Coating process
US3202551A (en) * 1961-09-13 1965-08-24 Hoechst Ag Method for producing adherent coatings on iron and steel parts

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2142646A (en) * 1935-05-24 1939-01-03 Du Pont Production of nitric acid
US2171545A (en) * 1936-06-12 1939-09-05 Aluminum Co Of America Protective coating for aluminum and its alloys
GB597754A (en) * 1945-08-24 1948-02-03 Alfred Edward Pugh Process for treating ferrous sheets and other ferrous articles
US2535794A (en) * 1947-01-24 1950-12-26 Heresite & Chemical Company Method of preparing ferrous metal objects for the application of synthetic resins

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2142646A (en) * 1935-05-24 1939-01-03 Du Pont Production of nitric acid
US2171545A (en) * 1936-06-12 1939-09-05 Aluminum Co Of America Protective coating for aluminum and its alloys
GB597754A (en) * 1945-08-24 1948-02-03 Alfred Edward Pugh Process for treating ferrous sheets and other ferrous articles
US2535794A (en) * 1947-01-24 1950-12-26 Heresite & Chemical Company Method of preparing ferrous metal objects for the application of synthetic resins

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3085034A (en) * 1958-07-10 1963-04-09 Polymer Processes Inc Coating process
US3053702A (en) * 1959-05-19 1962-09-11 Gennsalt Chemicals Corp Metal coating
US3202551A (en) * 1961-09-13 1965-08-24 Hoechst Ag Method for producing adherent coatings on iron and steel parts

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7351295B2 (en) Cleaning and polishing rusted iron-containing surfaces
US2777785A (en) Composition for and method of treating metals as well as the treated product
JPS5811515B2 (en) Composition for forming a zinc phosphate film on metal surfaces
JP3340209B2 (en) Method for forming self-precipitating polymer coating layer in which pinhole formation is suppressed on zinc-containing surface, and composition for pinhole prevention treatment
US2301983A (en) Coated ferrous article and method of making
US5766684A (en) Stainless steel acid treatment
US2535794A (en) Method of preparing ferrous metal objects for the application of synthetic resins
US3506499A (en) Method of surface-treating zinc,aluminum and their alloys
US2853406A (en) Metal coating
US20040094235A1 (en) Chrome free treatment for aluminum
US3081238A (en) Electrolytic treatment of metal surfaces
US2927046A (en) Coated metals and solutions and process for making the same
US3895969A (en) Composition and process for inhibiting corrosion of non-ferrous metal surfaced articles and providing surface for synthetic resin coating compositions
US2723952A (en) Method of electrolytically coating magnesium and electrolyte therefor
JPH02104682A (en) Method for cleaning surface of aluminum material for cap and treating agent therefor
US2784122A (en) Process of retarding corrosion of coated metal articles and coated metal article
JPS59113199A (en) Surface treatment of aluminum alloy casting or aluminum alloy die casting
US3052575A (en) Method of inhibiting corrosion
US2861906A (en) Metal treatment
US2760890A (en) Composition for and method of producing corrosion resistant metal coating
JP2002053977A (en) Hydrophilization method for metallic surface
US1549411A (en) Material and process for preparing metal for painting
US3301719A (en) Chemical conversion coating for magnesium
USH300H (en) Stripping agent for chemically resistant coatings
US4180406A (en) Post treating zinc surfaces