US2717231A - Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures - Google Patents

Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2717231A
US2717231A US431432A US43143254A US2717231A US 2717231 A US2717231 A US 2717231A US 431432 A US431432 A US 431432A US 43143254 A US43143254 A US 43143254A US 2717231 A US2717231 A US 2717231A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fraction
naphtha
diolefin
aromatic
hydrocarbon
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US431432A
Inventor
Irvin H Lutz
Oran W Collier
David J Bellman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
American Oil Co
Original Assignee
American Oil Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by American Oil Co filed Critical American Oil Co
Priority to US431432A priority Critical patent/US2717231A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2717231A publication Critical patent/US2717231A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G67/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
    • C10G67/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only
    • C10G67/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only including solvent extraction as the refining step in the absence of hydrogen

Definitions

  • This invention relates to catalytic refining of hydrocarbon fractions containing substantial proportions of aromatics and diolefins. More particularly, it relates to the recovery of substantially pure aromatics such as benzene from such fractions and to the conversion of diolefins present therein to hydrocarbons suitable for use in internal combustion engine fuel.
  • a hydrocarbon fraction typical of that which may be refined according to this invention is the liquid product of approximately gasoline boiling range which results from the pyrolysis of an ethane-propane gas stream during the production of ethylene.
  • a normally liquid hydrocarbon fraction usually boiling within the range of from about 100 to about 400 R, which comprises a predominant amount of benzene, a substantial portion of diolefins and some monoolefins.
  • the present invention has application to similar fractions from other sources which will hereinafter be set forth in detail, the following description will make particular reference to an aromatic-diolefin fraction resulting'from such a pyrolysis.
  • Such a product is sometimes referred to in the art as Drip Oil or Dripolene.
  • a further object is to convert the diolefins in such an aromatic-diolefin fraction to suitable motor fuel constituents.
  • An additional object is to enhance the value of such aromatic-diolefin byproducts by recovering valuable benzene therefrom and by converting the diolefins to suitable motor fuel components.
  • a still further object is to conduct this refining operation in presently available hydroforming equipment 2 ,7 l 7,23 l Patented Sept. 6, 1955 simultaneously with the hydroforming of a virgin naphtha or the like.
  • a relatively small amount of a rather narrow boiling fraction containing substantial amounts of olefins, diolefins and aromatics, from which the aromatics are not otherwise readily and economically recoverable in a substantially pure state is introduced to a hydroforming reactor during the hydroforming of a virgin naphtha or the like.
  • Fractions containing an amount of diolefins substantially greater than occurs in cracked naphthas e. g. atleast about 5% and ordinarily at least about 7 or 8% and a yet substantially greater amount of aromatics, e. g. at least about and usually at least about by volume,
  • hydroforming process isnow well-known to those skilled in the art and is described in numerous patents such as U. S. Letters Patents 2,320,147, 2,357,365 and 2,388,536.
  • a feature of the conventional hydroforming process is the fact that there is invariably a net'production of hydrogen.
  • the extent of hydrogen production depends upon the charging stock employed and ma great extent upon the amount of cracked naphtha, if any, in the charge.
  • a portion of the net hydrogen normally produced is employed in situ'to aid in the recovery of benzene and high octane liquid products from the aromatic diolefin fraction.
  • benzene is the predominant aromatic in the fraction the present invention is described with particular reference to its recovery, but the other aromatics present, such as the xylenes, toluene, etc., may likewise be recovered by this general technique.
  • the aromatic-diolefin fraction By introducing the aromatic-diolefin fraction to the hydroformer, substantially all of the benzene present in the fraction may be readily recovered in substantially pure state from the hydroformer product by prefractionation and extractive distillation. Furthermore, the yield of gasoline is in creased and in certain instances the octane number thereof is raised. 1
  • the two streams should be mixed within the reactor and in the presence of an excess of uncombined hydrogen. They may, for example, be mixed in the open space at the top of the reactor in the presence of recycle hydrogen or the aromatic-diolefin stream may be introduced to the reactor at one or more points spaced from the naphtha inlet and down-stream of the location where the naphtha is introduced where recycle hydrogen and hydrogen produced in situ by dehydrogenation are available.
  • a distributor means is desirable when the two streams are mixed in the top of the reactor prior to contacting the catalyst and when down-stream injection is employed, according to the alternative procedure, the points of injection are preferably chosen to correspond with the reactor level at which the catalyst no longer is efiiciently utilized for dehydrogenation.
  • Such loss in efliciency may be caused either by the depletion of naphthene or parafiin content of the charge, as a result of conversion, or by the incidence of such a low temperature, as a result of the endothermic reaction, that the velocity of dehydrogenation is decreased.
  • no increase in coke on the catalyst or decrease in activity thereof has been noted over consid-' erable periods of time during which the aromatic-diolefinfraction was charged. In certain instances a net decrease in coke on the catalyst has been noted.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a fixed bed system for practicing this invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic flow diagram of fluid system for practicing the invention.
  • the hydroforming of a naphthenic heavy naphtha will be described. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to that particular stock but is applicable generally to charging stocks rich in hydrogen which liberate hydrogen in the initial stage of the hydroforming reaction.
  • the second charging stock comprising a predominant amount of aromatics and a substantial amount of diolefins, is a liquid fraction, having a boiling range of from about 100 to about 360 F., which is a by-product of the pyrolysis of an ethanepropane mixture at a temperature in the range of from about 1300 to 1400 F.
  • Average analytical data for such a material taken on many different samples over a period of about seven months are set forth below:
  • Pentadienes 7.7%. Pentylenes 6.3%. Benzene 34.2%. Toulene 7.8%. Xylene Approx. 1%. Styrene Approx. 3%. Dicyclopentadiene 5%. Unidentified 29.6%.
  • Both stocks should boil approximately within the gasoline boiling range, i. e. about to about 400 or 430 F.
  • reactor 10 may correspond to reactor 17 or 17' in the system illustrated in U. S. 2,388,536 and since the general system is fully described in that patent it will require no further de tailed description.
  • the invention is specifically described herein with reference to introduction of the aromatic-diolefin stream to the top of the reactor via line 17, it may be introduced thereto via line 16 wherein it is admixed with recycle gases containing a large amount of uncombined hydrogen; it may likewise be introduced to the reactor via line 17a and lines 18, 19 and/or 20. If such operation is employed the valve in line 17 leading to the reactor will preferably be closed just as the valve in line 17a is preferably closed when the stream is introduced into the top of the reactor via line 17 as is hereinafter specifically described.
  • the reactor 10 may be divided into separate beds by catalyst supporting grids so that distributing spaces are provided between the several beds.
  • a solid bed or a reactor having separate beds of catalyst is employed is substantially independent of the method in which the aromatic-diolefin stream is introduced but it is preferred when employing spaced injection via lines 17a and 18, 19 and/or 20 to employ separate beds and to introduce the stream into the distributing spaces between the several beds.
  • Perforated pipes or other known means may be employed for distributing the aromatic-diolefin stream uniformly throughout the cross sectional area of the bed if the stream is introduced via line 17a to a reactor containing a solid catalyst bed.
  • the charge capacity of the reactor varies somewhat with the type of naphtha introduced, thus for a naphthenic heavy naphtha the total charge, including the aromatic diolefin stream, is about 6300 barrels per day and the same for a so-called high benzene content naphthenic naphtha (herein more fully defined) and for a parafiinic heavy naphtha the total charge is from about 7500 to 7800 barrels per day.
  • the catalyst itself is preferably molybdenum oxide on active alumina as described, for example, in the patents hereinabove referred to; the catalyst may, however, be an equal molecular mixture of nickel and tungsten sulfides, chromium oxide supported by activated alumina or any other hydrogenation-dehydrogenation catalyst suitable for use in the hydroforming reaction.
  • the naphtha charging stock is introduced through line 15 at a temperature at from about 950 to 1050 F., e. g., about 1000 F. and recycled hydrogen is introduced through line 16 or if preferred it may be mixed with the naphtha charge prior to introduction to the reactor and introduced through line 15. It is preferred to carry out the hydroforming reaction at temperatures above about 900 F. because of more desirable equilibrium. relationships which favor production of aromatics, particularly benzene.
  • the hydrogen is introduced preferably at a temperature about 50 to 200 higher than the temperature of the introduced naphtha.
  • the space velocity is within the approximate range of about 0.2 to 2 volumes of total charge (liquid basis) per hour,by volume of catalyst space. In the event spaced injection of thearomaticdiolefin stream through lines 18, 19 and/ or 20 is employed the space velocity may be lower in the upper part of the reactor where only the naphtha is charged then in the lower part of the reactor where the naphtha is supplemented by the diolefin fraction.
  • naphthenic naphtha from about 5 to about 20 per cent by volume may be charged while with a paraffinic heavy naphtha from about 5 to about 18 per cent by volume of the aromatic-diolefin may be introduced.
  • the total products are withdrawn through line 21 and cooler 22, then introduced into a separator 23 from which hydrogen is recycled throughheater 24 and line 16 back to the reactor while the liquid product is withdrawn through line 25, passed through heater 26 prior to pregasoline.
  • the bottoms from prefractionator 27 pass through line 28 via heater 29 and are then introduced to aromatic-diolefin fraction.
  • phenol introduced via line 42.
  • the rafiinate is withdrawn via line 38 for blending in gasoline.
  • the solution of benzene in phenol passes through line 40 to solvent stripper 41 wherein the phenol is stripped substantially free of benzene and the stripped phenol solvent is recycled through line 42 to the extractive distillation column 37 via cooler 39.
  • the benzene distillate goes overhead from column 41 via line 43 and may optionally be rerun in column 45 to recover pure benzene. In genera] the final rerunning step has been found unnecessary because substantially pure benzene comes overhead from stripper 41.
  • the method of recovering benzene from the hydroformer product is that which is preferred but it is not intended that this invention be limited thereto since other suitable methods known to the art may be employed if desired, such as azeotropic distillation, etc.
  • azeotropic distillation etc.
  • various other solvents may be employed such as resorcinol, cresylic acid, etc.
  • the paraflinicnaphtha is a stock boiling in about the same range as the heavy naphthenic naphtha (from about 200 to about 110 F.) which likewise contains substantially no benzene, methylcyclopentane or cyclohexane but comprises parafiins to a large extent.
  • the conversion of total hydroformer charge to gasoline from each of these naphthas is substantially improved by the addition of the aromaticdiolefin fraction as herein described.
  • Aromatic-Diolefin Charge 159 251 230 230 238 Benzene in Naphtha 268 240 207 223 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Benzene Produced From Non-Benzene ck 708 677 606 551 58 58 79 73 Total Benzene Recovery 976 917 972 1,025 55 65 263 263 79 297 Percent Benzene Recovery From Aromatic-Diolefin Charge 79 83 89 89 94 Polymer 56 56 60 51 152 160 171 171 130 130 Coke, #ID 7, 900 c, 900 7, 900 6, 12, 500 12, 550 9, 300 10, 500 17, 000 10, 500 Make Gas, MGF/ g 4, 880 4, 600 5, 080 2, 570 4, 230 3, 940 3, 260 3, 4, 600 3, 210
  • Fig. 2 the application of this invention to a fluid type hydroforming system is illustrated.
  • Recycled hydrogen from line 16 is compressed by compressor 48 and itpicks up hot-regenerated catalyst from the base of 75 standpipe 49 in amounts regulated by valves 50 and carries this catalyst by line 51 to the base of reactor 52.
  • the naphtha may be introduced through line 53 directly into the reactor or it may be introduced into the reactor through line 51. It is preferred to introduce the naphtha via line 53 directly to the catalyst bed at a point above the grid or at least above the point of hydrogen inlet so that the recycle hydrogen may condition the catalyst, to some extent, prior to contact of said catalyst with introduced naphtha.
  • the general operating conditions may be substantially the same as in the previous example but in this case the catalyst is in finely divided form with a particle size chiefly within the range of from about ot 100 microns.
  • the catalyst is uniformly distributed in the reactor by grid 54 and the upward gas velocity in the reactor is of the order of about .2 to 2 feet per second so that the catalyst will form a fluidized liquid-like dense turbulent suspended phase superimposed by a light dispersed catalyst phase.
  • the aromatic-diolefin fraction is introduced through line 55 and distributors 56 at a downstream point in the reactor, preferably at about the middle of the dense turbulent catalyst phase and above the naphtha inlet so as to take advantage of additional hydrogen liberated in the dehydrogenation reactions.
  • the aromatic-diolefin stream may be introduced to the reactor via line 55a to line 51 where it is admixed with the recycle gas containing large amounts of uncombined hydrogen.
  • the catalyst is withdrawn for regeneration through standpipe 57 from the base of which it is picked up by air introduced through line 58.
  • the product stream may pass through one or more cyclone separators 59 for knocking back entrained solids and it may then pass by line 60 to scrubber 61 into which a nonvolatile scrubbing oil may be introduced through line 62.
  • the catalyst fines from the products may be Withdrawn through line 63 and returned through line 64 and line 51 to the reactor or withdrawn through line 65.
  • the invention is applicable to similar fractions produced by the pyrolysis of various liquid petroleum fractions as well as to other such products obtained by pyrolyzing petroleum gases, generally.
  • Typical of such aromatic-diolefin fractions are the liquid fractions boiling chiefly in the gasoline range obtained by pyrolyzing heavy charge stocks such as a reduced crude, a visbreaker tar, etc., at temperatures of from 1200 F. to about 1400 F.
  • heavy charge stocks such as a reduced crude, a visbreaker tar, etc.
  • a 7% mixed parafiinic reduced crude having the inspection data set forth below in Table III was cracked at temperatures ranging from about 1200 F. to about 1500 F. by passing the same up through molten lead maintained at such temperatures.
  • Table IV is inspection and product distribution of the C6 to 400 F. gasoline fractions obtained at various cracking temperatures.
  • lyst free-product stream then passes through line 21 and cooler 22 to separator 23 from which hydrogen is recycled through line 16 and the products are withdrawn through line 25 for fractionation and recovery in the same manner as shown in Fig. 1 with respect to fixed bed operation.
  • a heater corresponding to heater 24 in Fig. 1 may be employed preferably between compressor 48 and standpipe 49.
  • the present invention is not limited to refining the liquid product resulting from pyrolysis of ethane and propane but is applicable generally to the treatment of hydrocarbon fractions boiling chiefly in the gasoline boiling range containing a substantial amount of aromatics such as benzene and of diolefins of potential value as motor fuel constituents, i. e., diolefins of such configuration that hydrogenation thereof would produce a substan:
  • fractions resulting from cracking the reduced crude at temperatures between about 1300 F. and 1400 F. contain the larger quantities of aromatics and diolefins and would, therefore, be especially suitable for treatment in accordance herewith.
  • the gasoline fractions produced by pyrolysis at lowertemperatures do contain, however, substantial amounts of both diolefins and aromatics and may be charged to the hydroformer with advantage.
  • the C4. and C5 fractions from this pyrolysis also contain some diolefins and may be blended with the C6 to 400 F. fraction for use in accordance herewith.
  • a method which comprises introducing a vaporized A petroleum naphtha charge into a space above the catalyst bed in a hydroforming reactor; introducing as a separate stream to said space between about 5% and about 30% by volume, based upon total hydrocarbon charge, of a liquid hydrocarbon fraction resulting from the pyrolysis of a petroleum fraction and boiling chiefly in the gasoline boiling range which contains a volume percentage of diolefins substantially in excess of that present in a cracked naphtha fraction and a volume of aromatics substantially in excess of said diolefin content, said bydrocarbon fraction being introduced at a temperature below the polymerization temperature of said diolefins; introducing into admixture with said naphtha and said hydrocarbon fraction in said space a substantial amount of uncombined hydrogen; and contacting the admixture of naphtha petroleum fraction, normally liquid hydrocarbon fraction and uncombined hydrogen with hydroforming catalyst under hydroforming conditions and recovering an aromatic hydrocarbon, initially present in said hydrocarbon fraction, from the hydroformer
  • hydroforming catalyst comprises molybdenum oxide mounted on active alumina.
  • aromatic-diolefin charge being introduced to the reaction zone at a temperature below the polymerization temperature of diolefin components and said aromaticdiolefin charge being contacted with free hydrogen while its temperature is raised to the temperature maintained in the reaction zone.
  • aromatic-diolefin charge is a lay-product of the pyrolysis of an ethanepropane mixture at a temperature in the range of about 1300 to 1400 F.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Description

Sept. 6, 1955 I. H. LUTZ ET AL 2,717,231.
PROCESS FOR TREATING AROMATIC-DIOLEFIN MIXTURES Filed May 21, 1954 2 Sheets-Sheet l Gasoline H Q g E: #3 EQVHQLS 5' :g 3.LVH.LN3ONOO 35 Q 3N3ZN38 o 1') rq I N 3 1 W m love/3X \& Q) xavomooss N A m N 3 L 1 1 HOiVNO/iQV/d AHVW/Hd X l 2 g i Q X I 9 Q n l g 23 INVENTORS I g m Irvin H. Luf; E, OIGZVLZZWEF D q o g?! man S 3 5 v 77 q ATTORNEY Sept. 6, 1955 1. H. LUTZ ET AL PROCESS FOR TREATING AROMATIC-DIOLEFIN MIXTURES 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 Filed May 21, 1954 kotfimcmmmt V: S n R r a E m///M m m O WH T D BY E BB E Q United States Patent PROCESS FOR TREATING AROMATIC-DIOLEFIN MIXTURES Application May 21, 1954, Serial No. 431,432
13 Claims. (Cl. 19650) This invention relates to catalytic refining of hydrocarbon fractions containing substantial proportions of aromatics and diolefins. More particularly, it relates to the recovery of substantially pure aromatics such as benzene from such fractions and to the conversion of diolefins present therein to hydrocarbons suitable for use in internal combustion engine fuel.
A hydrocarbon fraction typical of that which may be refined according to this invention is the liquid product of approximately gasoline boiling range which results from the pyrolysis of an ethane-propane gas stream during the production of ethylene. As a by-product of such a cracking operation there is produced a normally liquid hydrocarbon fraction, usually boiling within the range of from about 100 to about 400 R, which comprises a predominant amount of benzene, a substantial portion of diolefins and some monoolefins. Whereas the present invention has application to similar fractions from other sources which will hereinafter be set forth in detail, the following description will make particular reference to an aromatic-diolefin fraction resulting'from such a pyrolysis. Such a product is sometimes referred to in the art as Drip Oil or Dripolene.
Prior efforts to obtain substantially pure aromatics from such complex hydrocarbon fractions have been only partially successful. By the use of conventional techniques such as atmospheric fractional distillation or extractive distillation it is most diflicult if not impossible to effect a separation between benzene and closely boiling hydrocarbons which azeotrope therewith or are equally soluble in the solvent employed in extractive distillation. In addition, the diolefins present polymerize readily to resins and high boiling fractions with the evolution of heat which greatly increase the distillation difficulties. Fractional crystallization has been employed but it suffers from the economic standpoint and is not a process readily adapted to large scale operations. Even more important, none of these alternatives offers the possibility of upgrading substantially the entire fraction to premium liquid products. By the process of this invention, however, substantially pure aromatics, particularly benzene, may be recovered and diolefins may be converted to suitable motor fuel components in equipment presently available in many refineries.
It is an object of this invention to recover substantially pure aromatics such as benzene from difiicultly separable hydrocarbon fractions containing substantial quantities of aromatics and diolefins such as the liquid fraction of about gasoline boiling range which results from the pyrolysis of a petroleum gas stream. A further object is to convert the diolefins in such an aromatic-diolefin fraction to suitable motor fuel constituents. An additional object is to enhance the value of such aromatic-diolefin byproducts by recovering valuable benzene therefrom and by converting the diolefins to suitable motor fuel components. A still further object is to conduct this refining operation in presently available hydroforming equipment 2 ,7 l 7,23 l Patented Sept. 6, 1955 simultaneously with the hydroforming of a virgin naphtha or the like. These and additional objects and advantages will be apparent from the following description and claims taken in conjunction with the attached drawings.
In accordance with the present invention a relatively small amount of a rather narrow boiling fraction containing substantial amounts of olefins, diolefins and aromatics, from which the aromatics are not otherwise readily and economically recoverable in a substantially pure state, is introduced to a hydroforming reactor during the hydroforming of a virgin naphtha or the like. Fractions containing an amount of diolefins substantially greater than occurs in cracked naphthas, e. g. atleast about 5% and ordinarily at least about 7 or 8% and a yet substantially greater amount of aromatics, e. g. at least about and usually at least about by volume,
I may be advantageously refined in accordance herewith.
The hydroforming process isnow well-known to those skilled in the art and is described in numerous patents such as U. S. Letters Patents 2,320,147, 2,357,365 and 2,388,536. A feature of the conventional hydroforming process is the fact that there is invariably a net'production of hydrogen. The extent of hydrogen production depends upon the charging stock employed and ma great extent upon the amount of cracked naphtha, if any, in the charge. By this invention a portion of the net hydrogen normally produced is employed in situ'to aid in the recovery of benzene and high octane liquid products from the aromatic diolefin fraction.
Since benzene is the predominant aromatic in the fraction the present invention is described with particular reference to its recovery, but the other aromatics present, such as the xylenes, toluene, etc., may likewise be recovered by this general technique. By introducing the aromatic-diolefin fraction to the hydroformer, substantially all of the benzene present in the fraction may be readily recovered in substantially pure state from the hydroformer product by prefractionation and extractive distillation. Furthermore, the yield of gasoline is in creased and in certain instances the octane number thereof is raised. 1
It is particularly disadvantageous to admix the aromatic-diolefin stream with the naphtha before preheating the naphtha charge because solid deposition in the coils of the preheater, resulting from the rapid thermal polymerization of the diolefins present in the aromatic-diolefin stream, greatly lowers the heat transfer coefficient. Indeed, mixing the two streams at any point where solid deposition will be substantial and cumulative and not subject to periodic removal by burning in the regenerative cycle of the hydroforming process has been found to be essentially unsatisfactory. Whereas cracked naphthas containing minor quantities of diolefins may to some extent result in such difficulties, if so handled, it is apparent how much more serious the treatment of stocks containing 10% and more diolefins can be if not conducted in accordance herewith. In order to avoid such difiiculties, the aromatic-diolefin stream should be maintained at a temperaturebelow that at which a substantial amountof polymerization takes place until it is contacted with a substantial amount of uncombined hydrogen which serves to inhibit resin formation and/or reaches a point in the process where periodic burning in the regenerative cycle of the process will remove resins which might be formed. In the preferred embodiment the two streams should be mixed within the reactor and in the presence of an excess of uncombined hydrogen. They may, for example, be mixed in the open space at the top of the reactor in the presence of recycle hydrogen or the aromatic-diolefin stream may be introduced to the reactor at one or more points spaced from the naphtha inlet and down-stream of the location where the naphtha is introduced where recycle hydrogen and hydrogen produced in situ by dehydrogenation are available. A distributor means is desirable when the two streams are mixed in the top of the reactor prior to contacting the catalyst and when down-stream injection is employed, according to the alternative procedure, the points of injection are preferably chosen to correspond with the reactor level at which the catalyst no longer is efiiciently utilized for dehydrogenation. Such loss in efliciency may be caused either by the depletion of naphthene or parafiin content of the charge, as a result of conversion, or by the incidence of such a low temperature, as a result of the endothermic reaction, that the velocity of dehydrogenation is decreased. Surprisingly, no increase in coke on the catalyst or decrease in activity thereof has been noted over consid-' erable periods of time during which the aromatic-diolefinfraction was charged. In certain instances a net decrease in coke on the catalyst has been noted.
In the accompanying drawings:
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a fixed bed system for practicing this invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic flow diagram of fluid system for practicing the invention.
As a specific example of the invention, the hydroforming of a naphthenic heavy naphtha will be described. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to that particular stock but is applicable generally to charging stocks rich in hydrogen which liberate hydrogen in the initial stage of the hydroforming reaction. The second charging stock, comprising a predominant amount of aromatics and a substantial amount of diolefins, is a liquid fraction, having a boiling range of from about 100 to about 360 F., which is a by-product of the pyrolysis of an ethanepropane mixture at a temperature in the range of from about 1300 to 1400 F. Average analytical data for such a material taken on many different samples over a period of about seven months are set forth below:
TABLE I Gravity, API, 60 F 34.7.
Bromine number, cg. Brz/g 104.1.
Maleic anhydride value, mg. Brz/g 79.0.
Index of refraction, ND 1.4830.
ASTM distillation:
Initial B. P 100 F. 146 F. 162 F. 178 F. 188 F. 196 F. 206 F. 234 F. 296 F. 340 F. Final B. P 360 F.
Dissolved C3 and C4 (volume per cent) Approx. 8.0%.
Pentadienes 7.7%. Pentylenes 6.3%. Benzene 34.2%. Toulene 7.8%. Xylene Approx. 1%. Styrene Approx. 3%. Dicyclopentadiene 5%. Unidentified 29.6%.
Both stocks should boil approximately within the gasoline boiling range, i. e. about to about 400 or 430 F.
Referring to Fig. 1, reactor 10 may correspond to reactor 17 or 17' in the system illustrated in U. S. 2,388,536 and since the general system is fully described in that patent it will require no further de tailed description. In accordance with the present invention, however, there is preferably an open space above the bed of solid catalyst in the reactor so that suflicient space is available to permit rapid dispersion of the aro- V matic-diolefin stream introduced through line 17 in the hot naphtha which is introduced through line 15. Whereas the invention is specifically described herein with reference to introduction of the aromatic-diolefin stream to the top of the reactor via line 17, it may be introduced thereto via line 16 wherein it is admixed with recycle gases containing a large amount of uncombined hydrogen; it may likewise be introduced to the reactor via line 17a and lines 18, 19 and/or 20. If such operation is employed the valve in line 17 leading to the reactor will preferably be closed just as the valve in line 17a is preferably closed when the stream is introduced into the top of the reactor via line 17 as is hereinafter specifically described. Alternatively the reactor 10 may be divided into separate beds by catalyst supporting grids so that distributing spaces are provided between the several beds. Whether a solid bed or a reactor having separate beds of catalyst is employed is substantially independent of the method in which the aromatic-diolefin stream is introduced but it is preferred when employing spaced injection via lines 17a and 18, 19 and/or 20 to employ separate beds and to introduce the stream into the distributing spaces between the several beds. Perforated pipes or other known means may be employed for distributing the aromatic-diolefin stream uniformly throughout the cross sectional area of the bed if the stream is introduced via line 17a to a reactor containing a solid catalyst bed. The charge capacity of the reactor varies somewhat with the type of naphtha introduced, thus for a naphthenic heavy naphtha the total charge, including the aromatic diolefin stream, is about 6300 barrels per day and the same for a so-called high benzene content naphthenic naphtha (herein more fully defined) and for a parafiinic heavy naphtha the total charge is from about 7500 to 7800 barrels per day. The catalyst itself is preferably molybdenum oxide on active alumina as described, for example, in the patents hereinabove referred to; the catalyst may, however, be an equal molecular mixture of nickel and tungsten sulfides, chromium oxide supported by activated alumina or any other hydrogenation-dehydrogenation catalyst suitable for use in the hydroforming reaction.
With the catalyst bed at a temperature of about 900 to 1100 F., preferably about 1000 F. and a pressure of from about 100 to about 500 pounds per sq. inch, the naphtha charging stock is introduced through line 15 at a temperature at from about 950 to 1050 F., e. g., about 1000 F. and recycled hydrogen is introduced through line 16 or if preferred it may be mixed with the naphtha charge prior to introduction to the reactor and introduced through line 15. It is preferred to carry out the hydroforming reaction at temperatures above about 900 F. because of more desirable equilibrium. relationships which favor production of aromatics, particularly benzene. The hydrogen is introduced preferably at a temperature about 50 to 200 higher than the temperature of the introduced naphtha. Usually about 1 to 5, preferably 3 mols of recycled gas is employed per mol of charging stock and the recycle stock contains at least about 35% and preferably upwards about 70 percent hydrogen. The space velocity is within the approximate range of about 0.2 to 2 volumes of total charge (liquid basis) per hour,by volume of catalyst space. In the event spaced injection of thearomaticdiolefin stream through lines 18, 19 and/ or 20 is employed the space velocity may be lower in the upper part of the reactor where only the naphtha is charged then in the lower part of the reactor where the naphtha is supplemented by the diolefin fraction.
80 per -cent'overhead cut of the aromatic-diolefin fraction, said cut having a boiling range of from about 100 to about 300 F., and containing a somewhat higher concentration of aromatics and diolefins than set forth above for the total stream, is introduced via line 17 to the reactor and is dispersed in the naphtha being charged through line by means of a suitable distribution nozzle at the end of line 17 extending into the top of the reactor. The amount of this fraction which may be introduced will depend, apart from mechanical limitations,
upon the amount of hydrogen that is made available by dehydrogenation of the naphtha, theparticular naphtha charged, catalyst bed temperature limitations, etc. In general it has been found desirable to substitute the aromatic-diolefin fraction, essentially barrel for barrel, for a portion of the naphtha charge, i. e., a barrel of naphtha is withheld from the charge for each barrel of aromatic-diolefin introduced. Since the naphtha preheater on most hydroformers is ordinarily designed for a throughput corresponding to the capacity of the reactor it is not entirely satisfactory to reduce the amount of naphtha charged to a point much below the design figure. It may be said, however, that in general as much of the aromatic-diolefin fraction may be charged as is permissible from the engineering standpoint, taking into consideration capacity of the reactor, the amount'of hydrogen available for hydrogenation of the unsaturated material in the aromatic-diolefin charged 'andjfor use in purging the reactors, the reactor temperature limitations, etc. In the particular reactor employed (substantially as described in U. S. 2,388,536) it has been found that from about 5 to about 30 per cent by volume of the total charge may constitute aromatic-diolefin fraction when operating with a naphthenic heavy naphtha. With a high benzene content naphthenic naphtha from about 5 to about 20 per cent by volume may be charged while with a paraffinic heavy naphtha from about 5 to about 18 per cent by volume of the aromatic-diolefin may be introduced.
Thus, depending upon the particular naphthacharged,
from about 5 to about volume per cent of the-total charge may constitute aromatic-diolefin fraction.
The total products are withdrawn through line 21 and cooler 22, then introduced into a separator 23 from which hydrogen is recycled throughheater 24 and line 16 back to the reactor while the liquid product is withdrawn through line 25, passed through heater 26 prior to pregasoline. The bottoms from prefractionator 27 pass through line 28 via heater 29 and are then introduced to aromatic-diolefin fraction.
rently with phenol introduced via line 42. The rafiinate is withdrawn via line 38 for blending in gasoline. The solution of benzene in phenol passes through line 40 to solvent stripper 41 wherein the phenol is stripped substantially free of benzene and the stripped phenol solvent is recycled through line 42 to the extractive distillation column 37 via cooler 39. The benzene distillate goes overhead from column 41 via line 43 and may optionally be rerun in column 45 to recover pure benzene. In genera] the final rerunning step has been found unnecessary because substantially pure benzene comes overhead from stripper 41. The method of recovering benzene from the hydroformer product is that which is preferred but it is not intended that this invention be limited thereto since other suitable methods known to the art may be employed if desired, such as azeotropic distillation, etc. In addition to the use of phenol as the solvent various other solvents may be employed such as resorcinol, cresylic acid, etc.
In Table 11 below are set forth comparative runs wherein each of three different type naphthas were charged to the hydroformer'with and without the aromatic-diolefin fraction. The so-called high benzene content naphthenic naphtha is' a rather low boiling fraction (about 150 to about 275 F.) containing a relatively high percentage of benzene, methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane. The naphthenic heavy naphtha is a higher boiling naphtha fraction (about 250 toabout 425 F.) which contains essentially no benzene, methylcyclopentane or cyclohexane. The paraflinicnaphtha is a stock boiling in about the same range as the heavy naphthenic naphtha (from about 200 to about 110 F.) which likewise contains substantially no benzene, methylcyclopentane or cyclohexane but comprises parafiins to a large extent. As may be seen from Table II, the conversion of total hydroformer charge to gasoline from each of these naphthas is substantially improved by the addition of the aromaticdiolefin fraction as herein described. It should be understood that the percentage gasoline yields given in the table are based on the total charge less benzene in the A surprising feature of this invention as evidenced by the data in Table II lies in the fact that in addition to recovering substantially all of the benzene from the aromatic-diolefin fraction and producing more gasoline, there is substantially no increase in polymer and coke deposition remains the same or is decreased. In addition it should be noted that the amount of make-gas (hydrogen) is greatly reduced with increased amounts of aromatic-diolefin charged.
TABLE H .High Benzene Content Na h- Paratfinie thenic Naphtha" p Naphthemc Naphtha" Naphtha* Naphtha Ohargenu, 6,551 6, 663 6,470 5,898 6,314 6, 268 5,827 5,826 7, 740 7, 280 Aromatie-Dmlefin- O O 300 528 0 0 448 44 500 Total charge- 6, 551 6, 663 6, 770 6, 426 6, 314 6, 268 6, 275 6, 274 7, 740 7, 780 Percent Conversion to Gasoline"; 76 77. 5 77. 2 83. 7 78. 5 79. 3 83. 4 83.3 78. 83. 5 Benzene in Aromatic-Diolefin Charge 159 251 230 230 238 Benzene in Naphtha 268 240 207 223 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Benzene Produced From Non-Benzene ck 708 677 606 551 58 58 79 73 Total Benzene Recovery 976 917 972 1,025 55 65 263 263 79 297 Percent Benzene Recovery From Aromatic-Diolefin Charge 79 83 89 89 94 Polymer 56 56 60 51 152 160 171 171 130 130 Coke, #ID 7, 900 c, 900 7, 900 6, 12, 500 12, 550 9, 300 10, 500 17, 000 10, 500 Make Gas, MGF/ g 4, 880 4, 600 5, 080 2, 570 4, 230 3, 940 3, 260 3, 4, 600 3, 210
*Barrels per day unless otherwise indicated.
*fBased on total charge minus benzene in aromatie-diolefin charge.
In Fig. 2 the application of this invention to a fluid type hydroforming system is illustrated. Recycled hydrogen from line 16 is compressed by compressor 48 and itpicks up hot-regenerated catalyst from the base of 75 standpipe 49 in amounts regulated by valves 50 and carries this catalyst by line 51 to the base of reactor 52.
The naphtha may be introduced through line 53 directly into the reactor or it may be introduced into the reactor through line 51. It is preferred to introduce the naphtha via line 53 directly to the catalyst bed at a point above the grid or at least above the point of hydrogen inlet so that the recycle hydrogen may condition the catalyst, to some extent, prior to contact of said catalyst with introduced naphtha. The general operating conditions may be substantially the same as in the previous example but in this case the catalyst is in finely divided form with a particle size chiefly within the range of from about ot 100 microns. The catalyst is uniformly distributed in the reactor by grid 54 and the upward gas velocity in the reactor is of the order of about .2 to 2 feet per second so that the catalyst will form a fluidized liquid-like dense turbulent suspended phase superimposed by a light dispersed catalyst phase. The aromatic-diolefin fraction is introduced through line 55 and distributors 56 at a downstream point in the reactor, preferably at about the middle of the dense turbulent catalyst phase and above the naphtha inlet so as to take advantage of additional hydrogen liberated in the dehydrogenation reactions. Alternatively, the aromatic-diolefin stream may be introduced to the reactor via line 55a to line 51 where it is admixed with the recycle gas containing large amounts of uncombined hydrogen. The catalyst is withdrawn for regeneration through standpipe 57 from the base of which it is picked up by air introduced through line 58. The product stream may pass through one or more cyclone separators 59 for knocking back entrained solids and it may then pass by line 60 to scrubber 61 into which a nonvolatile scrubbing oil may be introduced through line 62. The catalyst fines from the products may be Withdrawn through line 63 and returned through line 64 and line 51 to the reactor or withdrawn through line 65. The catatial yield of suitable motor fuel components. Thus, the invention is applicable to similar fractions produced by the pyrolysis of various liquid petroleum fractions as well as to other such products obtained by pyrolyzing petroleum gases, generally. Typical of such aromatic-diolefin fractions are the liquid fractions boiling chiefly in the gasoline range obtained by pyrolyzing heavy charge stocks such as a reduced crude, a visbreaker tar, etc., at temperatures of from 1200 F. to about 1400 F. Thus, a 7% mixed parafiinic reduced crude having the inspection data set forth below in Table III was cracked at temperatures ranging from about 1200 F. to about 1500 F. by passing the same up through molten lead maintained at such temperatures.
TABLE III 7% reduced crude inspection Gravity, API 15.8. Viscosity:
S. F. sec. at 210 F 72.
S. F. sec. at 122 F Conradson carbon residue 9.43. Carbon and hydrogen analysis:
Wt. per cent C 86.7.
Wt. per cent H 11.84.
Wt. per cent ash 0.10.
, Wt. per cent sulfur 0.7. Refractive index, n Too dark. Initial boiling point 850 F. (1 mm.
- converted). Iodine No., cg./gm 21. Flash point 230+.
Set forth in Table IV is inspection and product distribution of the C6 to 400 F. gasoline fractions obtained at various cracking temperatures.
TABLE IV Average properties of Cit-400 F. gasoline fractions from bench-scale high temperature cracking of 7 wt. percent mixed parafiinic reduced crude charge rate: Approximately 1 liter/hr. of reduced crude o 1 200 F. 1 300 F. 1 400 F. 1 500 Fl CHOU Gasoline (hacking racking draclfing racking Gravity, API 48.6 40. 9 32. 7 30. 5 Bromine No., cgsJgm 107 97 62 35 MAV, mg. gm 92 142. 71 53 Wt. Percent SuIfonated- 7 91. 9 Aniline Point, FL..- 87.2 Below 19.6 Below 19. 6 Wt. Percent Sulfur. 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.6 Refractive Index, 11.0 1.4433 1. 4529 1. 4877 1. 4932 Composition, Wt. Perce Tot Arometicsm- 18. 1 38.4 70. 4 76.4 Benzene 2. 7 13. 0 33. 2 46. 4 Toluene 5. 3 12. 2 23. 5 24. 3 Xylene and 3.7 7.5 10 6 5.7 Mono-olefins..- 48.2 38.1 17 7 11.1 Dioleflns 9.3 14.4 7 3 5.1 Paraflins and Naphthenes (By 4 6 Difference) 24. 4 9. 1 7. 4
lyst free-product stream then passes through line 21 and cooler 22 to separator 23 from which hydrogen is recycled through line 16 and the products are withdrawn through line 25 for fractionation and recovery in the same manner as shown in Fig. 1 with respect to fixed bed operation. If the heat of the regenerated catalyst from standpipe 49 is not sufficient for the desired reaction a heater corresponding to heater 24 in Fig. 1 may be employed preferably between compressor 48 and standpipe 49.
The present invention is not limited to refining the liquid product resulting from pyrolysis of ethane and propane but is applicable generally to the treatment of hydrocarbon fractions boiling chiefly in the gasoline boiling range containing a substantial amount of aromatics such as benzene and of diolefins of potential value as motor fuel constituents, i. e., diolefins of such configuration that hydrogenation thereof would produce a substan:
It is apparent from the above mentioned table that fractions resulting from cracking the reduced crude at temperatures between about 1300 F. and 1400 F. contain the larger quantities of aromatics and diolefins and would, therefore, be especially suitable for treatment in accordance herewith. The gasoline fractions produced by pyrolysis at lowertemperatures do contain, however, substantial amounts of both diolefins and aromatics and may be charged to the hydroformer with advantage. The C4. and C5 fractions from this pyrolysis also contain some diolefins and may be blended with the C6 to 400 F. fraction for use in accordance herewith. The introduction of the aforementioned gasoline boiling range aromaticdiolefin mixture to the hydroformer is eifected in same manner as discussed above with respect to the overhead fraction of the product resulting from pyrolysis of a gas stream. Thus, such aromatic-diolefin fractions may be handled simi1arly,,regardless of source.
Other stocks somewhat lower boiling than residuums and'tars, e. g. cycleoils from catalytic cracking, petroleum naphtha fractions, etc-., have also been pyrolyzed at temperatures of about 1200" to 1500 F. to produce fractions boiling chiefly in the gasoline range which contain a substantial quantityof aromatics and diolefins,-at least about and. higher. Butane, mixtures of butane and other gases, etc., in addition to the gases previously referred to will likewise produce, under similar conditions, products which may advantageously be charged to hydroformers in accordance with the present invention. Moreover, aromatic-diolefin products of the type described herein may be produced in the so-called Gyro Process which'is a thermal cracking process of the type described in U. S. 2,101,800 and other patents.
It is to be understood that the specific methods of preparing these various aromatic-diolefin stocks suitable for use in accordance herewith are not per se part of the invention but it should be further understood that enumeration of the various charge stocks which may be pyrolyzecl is for purpose of illustration and not of limitation. Any liquid pyrolysis product, Whether from gaseous or liqurd petroleum hydrocarbon fraction, which boils chiefly 1n the gasoline range and which contains substantially more diolefins than are present in a cracked naphtha and an amount of aromatics substantially in excess of the diolefin content is included within the scope of the present invention, and may be advantageously charged to a hydroformer in accordance herewith.
Although this invention has been specifically described with respect to refining the 80 per cent overhead fraction of the liquid product resulting from the pyrolysis of ethane and propane it may be found more advantageous to treat the entire product or other fractions thereof. The 80% overhead fraction, having an end point of about 300 F. is particularly suitable since the benzene is more concentrated and the heaviest boiling substances, which are of somewhat more doubtful potential value as motor fuel constituents, are eliminated prior to introduction to the hydroformer.
Since aromatics generally have high octane numbers it may be found desirable under certain circumstances to leave the aromatics in the gasoline fraction rather than recovering the same in pure state.
The present application for Letters Patent is a continuation in part of our application for Letters Patent Serial No. 242,512, filed August 18, 1951, and now abandoned.
Alternative embodiments and conditions will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art.
Having thus described our invention, what we claim as novel and desire to protect by Letters Patent is as follows:
l. A method which comprises introducing a vaporized A petroleum naphtha charge into a space above the catalyst bed in a hydroforming reactor; introducing as a separate stream to said space between about 5% and about 30% by volume, based upon total hydrocarbon charge, of a liquid hydrocarbon fraction resulting from the pyrolysis of a petroleum fraction and boiling chiefly in the gasoline boiling range which contains a volume percentage of diolefins substantially in excess of that present in a cracked naphtha fraction and a volume of aromatics substantially in excess of said diolefin content, said bydrocarbon fraction being introduced at a temperature below the polymerization temperature of said diolefins; introducing into admixture with said naphtha and said hydrocarbon fraction in said space a substantial amount of uncombined hydrogen; and contacting the admixture of naphtha petroleum fraction, normally liquid hydrocarbon fraction and uncombined hydrogen with hydroforming catalyst under hydroforming conditions and recovering an aromatic hydrocarbon, initially present in said hydrocarbon fraction, from the hydroformer product.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the substantially pure aromatic hydrocarbon is recovered from the hydro-* former product by frac'tionating said product to produce a concentrate of said aromatic hydrocarbon and extractively distilling said concentrate in the presence of a phenolic solvent to separate said aromatic hydrocarbon.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the hydroforming catalyst comprises molybdenum oxide mounted on active alumina.
4. In a hydroforming process carried out at a temperature of about 900 to about 1100 F., a pressure of about to 500 pounds per square inch and in the presence of a hydroforming catalyst wherein a petroleum naphtha fraction is heated to a temperature of about 950 to about -1050 F. and introduced to a'reaction zone containing said catalyst and hydrogen-rich gases are continuously recycled to said reactor, the improvement which comprises introducing between about 5% and about 30% by volume based upon total hydrocarbon charge of a normally liquid hydrocarbon fraction resulting from the pyrolysis of a petroleum fraction stream and comprising substantial amounts of aromatics and diolefins boiling chiefly within the to said hydrogen-rich gases, before such gases are introduced to the reactor,
introducing the resulting admixture of normally liquid hydrocarbon fraction and hydrogen-rich gases to said reaction zone wherein said petroleum naphtha fraction is being hydroformed and recovering a substantially pure aromatic hydrocarbon initially present in said normally liquid hydrocarbon'fraction from the hydroformer product.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein said substantially pure aromatic hydrocarbon is recovered from the hydroformer product by first fractionating said hydroformer product to concentrate said aromatic hydrocarbon and recovering said aromatic hydrocarbon in substantially pure state from said concentrate by extractively distilling the same in the presence of a phenolic solvent.
6. The method of processing an aromatic-diolefin charge, containing a volume percentage of diolefins substantially in excess of that present in a cracked naphtha fraction and a volume of aromatics substantially in excess of said diolefin content, boiling within the range of 100 to 430 F. and produced by pyrolysis of an ethanepropane mixture at a temperature of about 1300 to 1400 P. which method comprises contacting a naphtha in a reaction zone in the presence of a hydroforming catalyst at a temperature in the range of about 900 to 1000 F. under a pressure of about 100 to 500 p. s. i. in the presence of a recycle hydrogen stream at a volume space velocity in the range of about .2 to 2 and introducing into said reaction zone an amount of said aromatic-diolefin charge in the range of about 5 to'30% by volume based on total hydrocarbon charge, and maintaining said aromatic-diolefin charge at a temperature below diolefin polymerization temperature until it is admixed with hydrogen introduced to the reaction zone.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the aromatic-diolefin charge is introduced directly into the reactor as a stream which is separate from the introduced naphtha charge.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the aromatic-diolefin charge is introduced to the reaction zone in the recycled hydrogen stream.
9. In a hydroforming process operated in the presence of a recycled hydrogen stream at a temperature in the range of 900 to 1000 F. and under a pressure in the range of about 100 to 500 p. s. i. wherein a petroleum naphtha charge is heated to a temperature in the range of about 900 to 1050 F. and introduced to a reaction zone containing a hydroforming catalyst, the improved method of operation which comprises replacing about 5 to about 30% of the petroleum naphtha charge with a separately introduced aromatic-diolefin charge resulting from the pyrolysis of a petroleum fraction, boiling chiefly in the gasoline boiling range and containing a volume gasoline boiling range,
percentage of diolefins substantially in excess of that present in a cracked naphtha fraction and a volume of aromatics substantially in excess of said diolefin content, said aromatic-diolefin charge being introduced to the reaction zone at a temperature below the polymerization temperature of diolefin components and said aromaticdiolefin charge being contacted with free hydrogen while its temperature is raised to the temperature maintained in the reaction zone.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the aromatic-diolefin charge is a lay-product of the pyrolysis of an ethanepropane mixture at a temperature in the range of about 1300 to 1400 F.
11. The method of claim 10 in which the aromatic- 12 diolefin charge boils in the range of about 100 to 300* F.
12. The method of claim 9 wherein the aromatic-dick:- fin charge is a product of the pyrolysis of a liquid hydrocarbon fraction. g 13. The method of claim 12 wherein the liquid hydrocarbon fraction is a reduced crude.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,394,617 Kuhl Feb. 12, 1946 2,398,674 Schulze Apr. 16, 1946 2,418,534 Watson Apr. 8, 1947 2,626,893 Morrow Jan. 27, 1953

Claims (1)

1. A METHOD WHICH COMPRISES INTRODUCING A VAPORIZED PETROLEUM NAPHTHA CHARGE INTO A SPACE ABOVE THE CATALYST BED IN A HYDROFORMING REACTOR; INTRODUCING AS A SEPARATE STREAM TO SAID SPACE BETWEEN ABOUT 5% AND ABOUT 30% BY VOLUME, BASED UPON TOTAL HYDROCARBON CHARGE, OF A LIQUID HYDROCARBON FRACTION RESULTING FROM THE PYROLYSIS OF A PETROLEUM FRACTION AND BOILING CHIEFLY IN THE GASOLINE BOILING RANGE WHICH CONTAINS A VOLUME PERCENTAGE OF DIOLEFINS SUBSTANTIALLY IN EXCESS OF THAT PRESENT IN A CRACKED NAPHTHA FRACTION AND A VOLUME OF AROMATICS SUBSTANTIALLY IN EXCESS OF SAID DIOLEFIN CONTENT, SAID HYDROCARBON FRACTION BEING INTRODUCED AT A TEMPERATURE BELOW THE POLYMERIZATION TEMPERATURE OF SAID DIOLEFINS; INTRODUCING INTO ADMIXTURE WITH SAID NAPHTHA AND SAID HYDROCARBON FRACTION IN SAID SPACE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF UNCOMBINED HYDROGEN; AND NORMALLY LIQUID HYDROOF NAPHTHA PETROLEUM FRACTION, NORMALLY LIQUID HYDROFORMING AN AROMATIC HYDROCARBON, INITIALLY PRESENT IN FORMING CATALYST UNDER HYDROCARBON, INITIALLY PRESENT IN SAID HYDROCARBON FRACTION, FROM THE HYDROFORMER PRODUCT.
US431432A 1954-05-21 1954-05-21 Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures Expired - Lifetime US2717231A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US431432A US2717231A (en) 1954-05-21 1954-05-21 Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US431432A US2717231A (en) 1954-05-21 1954-05-21 Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2717231A true US2717231A (en) 1955-09-06

Family

ID=23711913

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US431432A Expired - Lifetime US2717231A (en) 1954-05-21 1954-05-21 Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2717231A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3201340A (en) * 1962-01-23 1965-08-17 Sinclair Research Inc Method and apparatus for the catalytic reforming of naphthas in series
US3271294A (en) * 1962-10-26 1966-09-06 Kelley Joseph Matthew Hydroisomerization process
US3320155A (en) * 1962-10-26 1967-05-16 Exxon Research Engineering Co Octane improvement process for motor fuels
US3516923A (en) * 1968-09-27 1970-06-23 Sun Oil Co Process for upgrading propylene

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2394617A (en) * 1943-03-27 1946-02-12 Standard Oil Dev Co Chemical process
US2398674A (en) * 1943-07-06 1946-04-16 Phillips Petroleum Co Hydrocarbon conversion process
US2418534A (en) * 1944-08-18 1947-04-08 Texas Co Hydrocarbon conversion process
US2626893A (en) * 1949-03-28 1953-01-27 Standard Oil Dev Co Aviation fuel blending agent and method for producing same

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2394617A (en) * 1943-03-27 1946-02-12 Standard Oil Dev Co Chemical process
US2398674A (en) * 1943-07-06 1946-04-16 Phillips Petroleum Co Hydrocarbon conversion process
US2418534A (en) * 1944-08-18 1947-04-08 Texas Co Hydrocarbon conversion process
US2626893A (en) * 1949-03-28 1953-01-27 Standard Oil Dev Co Aviation fuel blending agent and method for producing same

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3201340A (en) * 1962-01-23 1965-08-17 Sinclair Research Inc Method and apparatus for the catalytic reforming of naphthas in series
US3271294A (en) * 1962-10-26 1966-09-06 Kelley Joseph Matthew Hydroisomerization process
US3320155A (en) * 1962-10-26 1967-05-16 Exxon Research Engineering Co Octane improvement process for motor fuels
US3516923A (en) * 1968-09-27 1970-06-23 Sun Oil Co Process for upgrading propylene

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3839484A (en) Pyrolyzing hydrocracked naphthas to produce unsaturated hydrocarbons
US2697684A (en) Reforming of naphthas
KR102309262B1 (en) Process for the production of light olefins and aromatics from a hydrocarbon feedstock
US2409695A (en) Method for improving aviation fuels
US2768127A (en) Improved residual oil conversion process for the production of chemicals
US2559285A (en) Catalytic cracking and destructive hydrogenation of heavy asphaltic oils
US2700637A (en) Process for the removal of asphaltic constituents from residual oils
US2355366A (en) Process for catalytically desulphurizing hydrocarbon oil
US2768936A (en) Conversion of asphaltic hydrocarbons
US4792390A (en) Combination process for the conversion of a distillate hydrocarbon to produce middle distillate product
US2682496A (en) Deashing residual oils with an acid of phosphorus
US3658681A (en) Production of low sulfur fuel oil
US2953612A (en) Catalytic hydrogenation of dripolene
US3042196A (en) Catalytic conversion of hydrocarbon oils with the use of different types of feed oils
US2426870A (en) Process for simultaneously dehydrogenating naphthenes and hydrogenating olefins
US3055956A (en) Process for the separation of naphthalene
US2297773A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion
US2981674A (en) Production of gasoline by thermal cracking, catalytic cracking and reforming
US2717231A (en) Process for treating aromatic-diolefin mixtures
US3281350A (en) Hf deasphalting for hydrocracking feed preparation
US2416894A (en) Combined hydrogenation and dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons
US2899380A (en) Charge oil
US3185639A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process
US3537982A (en) Method for hydrogenation
US2400795A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process