US2560433A - Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils - Google Patents

Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2560433A
US2560433A US39175A US3917548A US2560433A US 2560433 A US2560433 A US 2560433A US 39175 A US39175 A US 39175A US 3917548 A US3917548 A US 3917548A US 2560433 A US2560433 A US 2560433A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
contact
sulfur
vapors
hydrogen
oil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US39175A
Inventor
William I Gilbert
William A Horne
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Gulf Research and Development Co
Original Assignee
Gulf Research and Development Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Gulf Research and Development Co filed Critical Gulf Research and Development Co
Priority to US39175A priority Critical patent/US2560433A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2560433A publication Critical patent/US2560433A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S502/00Catalyst, solid sorbent, or support therefor: product or process of making
    • Y10S502/515Specific contaminant removal
    • Y10S502/517Sulfur or sulfur compound removal

Definitions

  • Desulfurization of hydrocarbons is in many cases necessary since such sulfur-containing materials corrode equipment in which they are refined, stored or used. It is known to desulfurize hydrocarbons by contacting vapors thereof with hydrogen and a contact agent. The contact agent absorbs the sulfur and is periodically regenerated for reuse in the process. Excessive costs have been encountered due to the destruction of the contact during the desulfurization process. This has been due to rapid powdering of the contact at the high temperatures employed or to loss of activity due to low heat stability.
  • This invention has for its object to provide improved procedure for desulfurizing hydrocarbon oils and fractions thereof. Another object is to provide a desulfurization process of the type wherein sulfur is absorbed on a contact agent followed by regeneration of the contact to remove the sulfur therefrom. Another object is to provide a desulfurization contact having a relatively low powdering rate and increased stability to heat at the elevated temperatures employed for desulfurization and regeneration. Another object is to provide a desulfurization contact which can be cheaply and easily prepared and which has a long, useful life, thus reducing the over-all cost of the desulfurization procedure. Other objects will appear hereinafter.
  • our invention includes contacting sulfurcontaining vapors of a hydrocarbon oil with hydrogen in the presence of a contactagent comprising a metal of the iron group or its oxide and a cracking catalyst base.
  • a contactagent comprising a metal of the iron group or its oxide and a cracking catalyst base.
  • the invention is applicable to the treatment of sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oils in general such as crude petroleum, reduced crude, topped crude, cracked gasoline distillate, straight run gasoline, naphtha, gas oil, shale oils, coal tar oils and oils from hydrogenation of coal.
  • sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oils in general such as crude petroleum, reduced crude, topped crude, cracked gasoline distillate, straight run gasoline, naphtha, gas oil, shale oils, coal tar oils and oils from hydrogenation of coal.
  • the sulfur-containing material is desulfurized before it has been subjected to any substantial refining procedure and therefore corrosion of refinery equipment is considerably reduced.
  • the contact agent we employ has a certain amount of cracking activity so that the high boiling petroleum hydrocarbon is simultaneously desulfurized and partially cracked to a more valuable form, such as gasoline. All of the above-mentioned oils may be desulfurized at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F. A temperature of about 700 to 850 F. is advantageous for the high boiling hydrocarbons whereas a temperature of 650 to 800 is preferred for the low boiling hydrocarbons.
  • the cracking catalyst base acts as a carrier for the iron group metal or iron group metal oxide and it does not of itself absorb the sulfur. However, it improves the desulfurization activity and as mentioned also effects a partial cracking.
  • Any refractory material having a substantial cracking activity can be used. Examples of suitable materials are silica-alumina cracking catalysts such as those prepared synthetically or by acid treatment of natural clays. Silica-zirconia, silicatitania, silica-alumina-titania synthetic cracking catalysts are well known and also can be used as a carrier for the sulfur absorbing iron group metal or metal oxide. In order to be satisfactory the cracking catalyst base should have a conversion index of above about 15.
  • a cracking catalyst that has been used in a conventional cracking operation can be advantageously employed as a carrier for the desulfurizing metal or metal oxide.
  • Such partial use of the cracking catalyst not only removes any of the catalyst particles which are defective in that they break up or powder easily but it also seems to result in an enlargement of the catalyst pores so that such partially used cracking catalyst can take up a larger amount of desulfurizing metal or metal oxide.
  • all of the cracking catalyst supports have the advantage over other porous types of supports that fewer impregnations are required to incorporate the necessary amount of the desulfurizing iron group metal or metal oxide. This decreased number of impregnations and calcinings of course reduces the initial cost of the contact and thus the cost per barrel of charged stock processed.
  • suitable cracking catalyst bases are shown in Table I along with conversion index. This table also includes examples of non-active porous materials which would be less suitable as carriers for the purpose of the present invention since they have conversion index substantially below 15.
  • Conversion index as used in the present speciflcation and in the claims means the amount of gasoline formed when a standard Pennsylvania Diesel fuel oil, topped to an initial boiling point of 450 F. and cut to an end point of 650 F. is passed over 90 cc. of the catalyst to be tested at a temperature of 845 F., a pressure of l atmosphere, a liquid space velocity of 1.0 volume of charge oil/hour/volume of catalyst for a throughput of 1.0 volume of oil per volume of catalyst. The vapors are condensed at 55 F. to obtain the synthetic" product. This product is then distilled in a inch long column packed with inch glass balls to a cut point of 370 F. The difference in weight between the synthetic product and the residual bottoms is the yield in grams of gasoline from which the yield of gasoline as weight per cent of charge can be calculated.
  • iron group metal or metal oxide i. e. nickel, cobalt, or iron or their oxides
  • nickel and especially nickel oxide since these result in a much greater removal of sulfur.
  • the cracking catalyst base is composited with the iron group metal or metal oxide in any desired manner so long as there is obtained a fairly extensive iron group metal or metal oxide surface supported by the cracking catalyst base.
  • the most convenient method of preparation is to impregnate the cracking catalyst base with a water solution of a water soluble salt of the iron group metal, which salt must be readily convertible into the metal or metal oxide.
  • a suitable salt is, for instance, the nitrate of nickel, iron or cobalt.
  • the material is drained, dried, and calcined at elevated temperature to form the oxide. This oxide may be reduced to the metal if it is desired to use the metal in the desulfurization. Such reduction is accomplished in a well known manner by contact with hydrogen at elevated temperature.
  • the cracking catalystbase also may be impregnated by immersing in the molten salt of the iron group metal. For instance, hydrated nickel nitrate can be melted and the cracking base impregnated with this molten material, followed by calcining, as described above.
  • the amount of iron group metal incorporated may vary considerably and will depend upon the amount of sulfur which is contained in the petroleum hydrocarbon to be desulfurized. A contact containing about 10 to per cent by weight of iron group metal or metal oxide in general can be used. Amounts of about 20 to 35 per cent nickel in the form of nickel or nickel oxide are quite satisfactory for hydrocarbon oils which; are usually desulfurized.
  • the hydrogen is employed in amounts of about to 6000 cubic feet per barrel of hydrocarbon in the liquid state.
  • 100 to 1000 cubic feet hydrogen per barrel of hydrocarbon is advantageous when desulfurizing low boiling hydrocarbons and 1000 to 6000 cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of hydrocarbon is advantageous when desulfurizing heavy hydrocarbons such as total crude, topped crude, and reduced crude.
  • the pressure during the desulfurization is advantageously between about 100 and 1000 pounds per square inch gauge.
  • the contact between the hydrogen and hydrocarbon vapors and the contact agent is conveniently brought about by passing a mixture of the hydrocarbon vapors and hydrogen over the contact agent at the temperatures mentioned above.
  • the space velocity i. e., the volume of liquid bydrocarbon charged per hour per volume of contact should in general be between about 0.2 and 6.0.
  • the space velocity is advantageously between about 1 and 6 when treating low boiling hydrocarbons and between about 0.2 and 2.0 when treating heavy hydrocarbons.
  • the hydrocarbon vapors may be diluted with other materials. This is advantageous in connectionwith the treatment of heavy petroleum hydrocarbons.
  • steam may be employed as a diluent and may be used to vaporize the heavy hydrocarbon and maintain the vapors thereof in vapor form during passage over the contact. Diluents also are advantageous in certain cases when treating lower boiling hydrocarbons.
  • Other suitable diluents are nitrogen and hydrocarbon vapors and gases such as straight run gasoline or methane.
  • Vapors of the hydrocarbon are passed over the contact agent with the hydrogen, all as described above, until hydrogen sulfide appears in substantial amounts in the eiiluent gases and vapors. At this stage the reaction is terminated and the contact agent is regenerated. The point at which such termination takes place will in general correspond to about 50 to 60 per cent conversion, more or less, of the iron group metal or metal oxide into metal sulfide and we accordingly prefer to terminate the desulfurization reaction at about this stage.
  • the contact agent is preferably regenerated by contact with an oxygen containing gas at elevated temperature in order to convert the iron group metal sulfide into iron group metal oxide.
  • a temperature of between about 1000 and 1400 F. is employed. It is desirable to employ a temperature above 1000 F. since lower temperatures do not result in the complete removal of the iron group sulfide unless uneconomically long periods of regeneration are used. While temperatures above 1400" F. can be used, such temperatures should be employed only with catalysts which are stable to such elevated temperatures. While our desulfurization contact agents are exceedingly stable, we prefer not to employ temperatures above 1400 F. since with repeated regenerations at such high temperatures they will gradually lose their activity. The regeneration is continued until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the eilluent gases.
  • the contact With repeated regenerations the contact accumulates a small amount of iron group metal sulfate, which is but very slowly decomposed into sulfur dioxide and iron group metal oxide and the regeneration-is not necessarily carried to a stage such that iron group metal sulfate is converted into the oxide. All that is necessary is to remove substantially all of the iron group metal sulfide and this is evidenced by the substantial absence of sulfur dioxide in the eflluent gases in the final stages 'of the regeneration.
  • a pressure of to 500 pounds per square inch gauge may be used during the regeneration and, if desired, a diluent gas, such as steam, nitrogen, flue gas, or the like, may be added to the oxygen containing gas in order to control the regeneration temperature.
  • the regeneration includes a final reduction step to convert the oxide into the 'metal. After regeneration the contact is again employed to remove sulfur from sulfur containing vapors of a hydrocarbon oil as previously described.
  • Example 1 Four desulfurization contacts were prepared by impregnating various porous carriers with nickel nitrate followed by calcining to nickel oxide. These four contact agents were employed to desulfurize a West Texas crude oil having the properties shown in Table II. The operating conditions for this desulfurization are shown in Table III and the relative resistance to powdering is given in Table IV.
  • “Porocei is activated natural alumina obtained by acid treating bauxite.
  • the activated alumina in Table IV is an activated synthetic alumina.
  • Example 2 The heat stability of a desulfurization contact comprising 28.8 per cent nickel oxide on a synthetic silica-alumina cracking catalyst was compared with a contact comprising 27.8 per cent nickel oxide on activated alumina. Both contacts were heated to elevated temperature (1600 F in the case of synthetic alumina-silica carrier and 1400" F. in the case of the alumina carrier) and the degree of desulfurization activity compared before and after such heating.
  • the material desulfurized in these tests was the same West Texas crude oil described in Example 1 and the operating conditions, were the same as described in Example 1. The results are given in It will be noted that the high temperature of 1600" F.
  • the density of the contact agent prepared from cracking catalyst type supports is generally about 45 to 50 pounds per cubic foot whereas the contact prepared from non-cracking catalyst type supports has a. density of about 55 to 70 pounds per cubic foot.
  • the decreased density of our contact lowers the initial cost on a volume basis and the smaller weight of contact charged to the re- .actors would reduce the required mechanical strength of the supporting screen as well as reactor mounting base.
  • the process for desu furizing a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil which comprises treating ,vapm-s of said oil with a contact agent comprising a member of the class consisting of metals of the iron group and their oxides composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index of above about 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, regenerating the contact agent at a temperature above about 1000 F. to remove substantially all of the sulfur therefrom andemploying the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
  • a contact agent comprising a member of the class consisting of metals of the iron group and their oxides composited with a silica-alumina refractory cata
  • the process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising a metal of the iron group composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index of above about 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400" F.
  • the process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising a member of the class consisting of metals of the iron group and their oxides composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material previously used to promote the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treatpd vapors, regenerating the contact agent to re-- move substantially all of the sulfur therefrom and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
  • a contact agent comprising a member of the class consisting of metals of the iron group and their oxides composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material previously used to promote the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons, in the presence
  • taining high boiling point petroleum oil which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising an oxide of a metal of the iron group composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent. the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index of above about 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400 F.
  • the process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing petroleum oil selected from the group consisting of crude, reduced crude and topped crude which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising nickel oxide composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index above 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in substantial amounts in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400" F.
  • the process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing petroleum oil selected from the group consisting of crude, reduced crude and topped crude which comprises treating vapors of said 011 with a contact agent comprising nickel oxide composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index above 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., terminating this treatment when about 50 to 60 per cent of the nickel oxide has been converted into nickel sulfide, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400 F. to convert the nickel sulfide into nickel oxide by combustion, continuing such treatment until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the combustion gases and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfurcontaining high boiling point petroleum oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
  • a contact agent comprising nickel oxide composited with a silica-alumina re
  • the process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing petroleum oil selected from the group consisting of crude, reduced crude and topped crude which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising nickel oxide com- 4.
  • the process for desulfurizing a sulfur-conposited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a, substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index above 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., at a space velocity of between about 0.2 and 2.0, at. a pressure of between about 100 and 1000 p. s. i. g.

Description

Patented July 10, 1951 DESULFURIZATION OF HYDROCARBON OILS William I. Gilbert and William A. Home, Oakmont, Pa", assignors to Gulf Research & Development Company, Pittsburgh, Pa., a, corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application July 16, 1948,
Serial No. 39,175
7 Claims. (Cl. 19628) This invention relates to an improved procedure for desulfurizing hydrocarbon oils.
Desulfurization of hydrocarbons is in many cases necessary since such sulfur-containing materials corrode equipment in which they are refined, stored or used. It is known to desulfurize hydrocarbons by contacting vapors thereof with hydrogen and a contact agent. The contact agent absorbs the sulfur and is periodically regenerated for reuse in the process. Excessive costs have been encountered due to the destruction of the contact during the desulfurization process. This has been due to rapid powdering of the contact at the high temperatures employed or to loss of activity due to low heat stability.
This invention has for its object to provide improved procedure for desulfurizing hydrocarbon oils and fractions thereof. Another object is to provide a desulfurization process of the type wherein sulfur is absorbed on a contact agent followed by regeneration of the contact to remove the sulfur therefrom. Another object is to provide a desulfurization contact having a relatively low powdering rate and increased stability to heat at the elevated temperatures employed for desulfurization and regeneration. Another object is to provide a desulfurization contact which can be cheaply and easily prepared and which has a long, useful life, thus reducing the over-all cost of the desulfurization procedure. Other objects will appear hereinafter.
These and other objects are accomplished by our invention, which includes contacting sulfurcontaining vapors of a hydrocarbon oil with hydrogen in the presence of a contactagent comprising a metal of the iron group or its oxide and a cracking catalyst base. We have found that such a contact agent has a markedly reduced powdering rate, increased heat stability, is easier to prepare by virtue of fewer required impregnations, has a lower density, and a decreased cost in cents per pound.
In the following examples and description we have set forth several of the preferred embodiments of our invention but it is to be understood that they are given by way of illustration and not in limitation thereof.
The invention is applicable to the treatment of sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oils in general such as crude petroleum, reduced crude, topped crude, cracked gasoline distillate, straight run gasoline, naphtha, gas oil, shale oils, coal tar oils and oils from hydrogenation of coal. particular advantage for the treatment of high boiling materials such as total crude petroleum,
It is of' reduced crude and topped crude. By treating these high boiling materials several advantages are obtained. Thus the sulfur-containing material is desulfurized before it has been subjected to any substantial refining procedure and therefore corrosion of refinery equipment is considerably reduced. Also, the contact agent we employ has a certain amount of cracking activity so that the high boiling petroleum hydrocarbon is simultaneously desulfurized and partially cracked to a more valuable form, such as gasoline. All of the above-mentioned oils may be desulfurized at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F. A temperature of about 700 to 850 F. is advantageous for the high boiling hydrocarbons whereas a temperature of 650 to 800 is preferred for the low boiling hydrocarbons.
The cracking catalyst base acts as a carrier for the iron group metal or iron group metal oxide and it does not of itself absorb the sulfur. However, it improves the desulfurization activity and as mentioned also effects a partial cracking. Any refractory material having a substantial cracking activity can be used. Examples of suitable materials are silica-alumina cracking catalysts such as those prepared synthetically or by acid treatment of natural clays. Silica-zirconia, silicatitania, silica-alumina-titania synthetic cracking catalysts are well known and also can be used as a carrier for the sulfur absorbing iron group metal or metal oxide. In order to be satisfactory the cracking catalyst base should have a conversion index of above about 15. A cracking catalyst that has been used in a conventional cracking operation can be advantageously employed as a carrier for the desulfurizing metal or metal oxide. Such partial use of the cracking catalyst not only removes any of the catalyst particles which are defective in that they break up or powder easily but it also seems to result in an enlargement of the catalyst pores so that such partially used cracking catalyst can take up a larger amount of desulfurizing metal or metal oxide. We have found, furthermore, that all of the cracking catalyst supports have the advantage over other porous types of supports that fewer impregnations are required to incorporate the necessary amount of the desulfurizing iron group metal or metal oxide. This decreased number of impregnations and calcinings of course reduces the initial cost of the contact and thus the cost per barrel of charged stock processed. Examples of suitable cracking catalyst bases are shown in Table I along with conversion index. This table also includes examples of non-active porous materials which would be less suitable as carriers for the purpose of the present invention since they have conversion index substantially below 15.
1 Inactive portions of catalyst discarded from a Thermofor cracking unit as described in Litchfield et al. U. S. patent application Serial No. 701,228, filed December 12, 1947.
Conversion index as used in the present speciflcation and in the claims means the amount of gasoline formed when a standard Pennsylvania Diesel fuel oil, topped to an initial boiling point of 450 F. and cut to an end point of 650 F. is passed over 90 cc. of the catalyst to be tested at a temperature of 845 F., a pressure of l atmosphere, a liquid space velocity of 1.0 volume of charge oil/hour/volume of catalyst for a throughput of 1.0 volume of oil per volume of catalyst. The vapors are condensed at 55 F. to obtain the synthetic" product. This product is then distilled in a inch long column packed with inch glass balls to a cut point of 370 F. The difference in weight between the synthetic product and the residual bottoms is the yield in grams of gasoline from which the yield of gasoline as weight per cent of charge can be calculated.
While any iron group metal or metal oxide, i. e. nickel, cobalt, or iron or their oxides can be used, we prefer nickel and especially nickel oxide since these result in a much greater removal of sulfur.
The cracking catalyst base is composited with the iron group metal or metal oxide in any desired manner so long as there is obtained a fairly extensive iron group metal or metal oxide surface supported by the cracking catalyst base. The most convenient method of preparation is to impregnate the cracking catalyst base with a water solution of a water soluble salt of the iron group metal, which salt must be readily convertible into the metal or metal oxide. A suitable salt is, for instance, the nitrate of nickel, iron or cobalt. After such impregnation the material is drained, dried, and calcined at elevated temperature to form the oxide. This oxide may be reduced to the metal if it is desired to use the metal in the desulfurization. Such reduction is accomplished in a well known manner by contact with hydrogen at elevated temperature. The cracking catalystbase also may be impregnated by immersing in the molten salt of the iron group metal. For instance, hydrated nickel nitrate can be melted and the cracking base impregnated with this molten material, followed by calcining, as described above. The amount of iron group metal incorporated may vary considerably and will depend upon the amount of sulfur which is contained in the petroleum hydrocarbon to be desulfurized. A contact containing about 10 to per cent by weight of iron group metal or metal oxide in general can be used. Amounts of about 20 to 35 per cent nickel in the form of nickel or nickel oxide are quite satisfactory for hydrocarbon oils which; are usually desulfurized.
The hydrogen is employed in amounts of about to 6000 cubic feet per barrel of hydrocarbon in the liquid state. 100 to 1000 cubic feet hydrogen per barrel of hydrocarbon is advantageous when desulfurizing low boiling hydrocarbons and 1000 to 6000 cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of hydrocarbon is advantageous when desulfurizing heavy hydrocarbons such as total crude, topped crude, and reduced crude. The pressure during the desulfurization is advantageously between about 100 and 1000 pounds per square inch gauge.
The contact between the hydrogen and hydrocarbon vapors and the contact agent is conveniently brought about by passing a mixture of the hydrocarbon vapors and hydrogen over the contact agent at the temperatures mentioned above. The space velocity, i. e., the volume of liquid bydrocarbon charged per hour per volume of contact should in general be between about 0.2 and 6.0. The space velocity is advantageously between about 1 and 6 when treating low boiling hydrocarbons and between about 0.2 and 2.0 when treating heavy hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbon vapors may be diluted with other materials. This is advantageous in connectionwith the treatment of heavy petroleum hydrocarbons. For instance, steam may be employed as a diluent and may be used to vaporize the heavy hydrocarbon and maintain the vapors thereof in vapor form during passage over the contact. Diluents also are advantageous in certain cases when treating lower boiling hydrocarbons. Other suitable diluents are nitrogen and hydrocarbon vapors and gases such as straight run gasoline or methane.
Vapors of the hydrocarbon are passed over the contact agent with the hydrogen, all as described above, until hydrogen sulfide appears in substantial amounts in the eiiluent gases and vapors. At this stage the reaction is terminated and the contact agent is regenerated. The point at which such termination takes place will in general correspond to about 50 to 60 per cent conversion, more or less, of the iron group metal or metal oxide into metal sulfide and we accordingly prefer to terminate the desulfurization reaction at about this stage.
The contact agent is preferably regenerated by contact with an oxygen containing gas at elevated temperature in order to convert the iron group metal sulfide into iron group metal oxide. A temperature of between about 1000 and 1400 F. is employed. It is desirable to employ a temperature above 1000 F. since lower temperatures do not result in the complete removal of the iron group sulfide unless uneconomically long periods of regeneration are used. While temperatures above 1400" F. can be used, such temperatures should be employed only with catalysts which are stable to such elevated temperatures. While our desulfurization contact agents are exceedingly stable, we prefer not to employ temperatures above 1400 F. since with repeated regenerations at such high temperatures they will gradually lose their activity. The regeneration is continued until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the eilluent gases. With repeated regenerations the contact accumulates a small amount of iron group metal sulfate, which is but very slowly decomposed into sulfur dioxide and iron group metal oxide and the regeneration-is not necessarily carried to a stage such that iron group metal sulfate is converted into the oxide. All that is necessary is to remove substantially all of the iron group metal sulfide and this is evidenced by the substantial absence of sulfur dioxide in the eflluent gases in the final stages 'of the regeneration. A pressure of to 500 pounds per square inch gauge may be used during the regeneration and, if desired, a diluent gas, such as steam, nitrogen, flue gas, or the like, may be added to the oxygen containing gas in order to control the regeneration temperature. In the event the reduced or free metal is to be employed instead of the oxide, the regeneration includes a final reduction step to convert the oxide into the 'metal. After regeneration the contact is again employed to remove sulfur from sulfur containing vapors of a hydrocarbon oil as previously described.
Example 1 Four desulfurization contacts were prepared by impregnating various porous carriers with nickel nitrate followed by calcining to nickel oxide. These four contact agents were employed to desulfurize a West Texas crude oil having the properties shown in Table II. The operating conditions for this desulfurization are shown in Table III and the relative resistance to powdering is given in Table IV.
TABLE II Inspection on West Texas crude oil charge stock Gravity, API 34.1 Sulfur, weight percent 1.48 Viscosity, S. U. S. at 100 F 42.7 Carbon Residue, weight percent 4.39 Distillation:
I. B. P., F 88 10, percent at T 219 50, percent at "F 548 90, percent at "F Gasoline, 400 F., E. P., vol. percent 33.4
TABLE III Operating conditions Charge stock "West Texas Crude Oil Temperature, F 850 Pressure, p. s. i. g 500 Space velocity, volume of oil/hr./volume of contact 1.0 Throughput, volume of oil/volume of contact 4.0 Hydrogen, cu. ft./bbl 2,000
TABLE IV Contact powdering Per Cent Fines at B8 Contact Support life,
lmo. 2mos. 3mos. Months Porooel, 27.6% N i0 32. 5 l. 5 Activated Alumina, 27.8% N i0..." 12.5 25. 0 37.0 4 Synthetic Silica-Alumina Cracking Catalyst, 28.8% NiO 4. o 8.0 12. o 1:; Natural Silica-Alumina Cracking Catalyst, 20.3% NiO 4.0 l3
"Porocei is activated natural alumina obtained by acid treating bauxite. The activated alumina" in Table IV is an activated synthetic alumina.
It will be noted that carriers such as activated alumina and "Porocel" had an exceedingly short half life and were quickly converted into powders under the desulfurization conditions. It is quite evident from the data in Table IV that the contact agents prepared from cracking catalysts powdered at a much slower rate than non-cracking carriers. Kieselguhr and silica gel supported nickel oxide contacts have also been tested qualitatively and found to powder much more rapidly than the cracking catalyst contacts described herein. In a fixed bed, channeling of the hydrocarbon charge through the contact bed would take place if the contact powdered at a rapid rate and as a consequence the contact time would decrease and result in a decrease in desulfuriza- 'tion.
Example 2.The heat stability of a desulfurization contact comprising 28.8 per cent nickel oxide on a synthetic silica-alumina cracking catalyst was compared with a contact comprising 27.8 per cent nickel oxide on activated alumina. Both contacts were heated to elevated temperature (1600 F in the case of synthetic alumina-silica carrier and 1400" F. in the case of the alumina carrier) and the degree of desulfurization activity compared before and after such heating. The material desulfurized in these tests was the same West Texas crude oil described in Example 1 and the operating conditions, were the same as described in Example 1. The results are given in It will be noted that the high temperature of 1600" F. had practically no effect on the desulfurization efficiency of the cracking catalyst supported contact whereas the non-cracking support type of contact was damaged when subjected to even 1400 F. This is evidenced by higher sulfur content and lower gravity of the product obtained. Powdering of the synthetic silica-alumine; cracking support on heating to 1400 F. during regeneration is negligible whereas the activated alumina was nearly completely converted to powder.
It is therefore to be seen that we have provided a desulfurization contact which has exceedingly high stability under the destructive high temperature conditions ordinarily employed in desulfurization and regeneration of desulfurization contacts. Not only are these contacts more stable under desulfurization and regeneration conditions but they also have a lower cost than the non-cracking catalyst type supports.
The density of the contact agent prepared from cracking catalyst type supports is generally about 45 to 50 pounds per cubic foot whereas the contact prepared from non-cracking catalyst type supports has a. density of about 55 to 70 pounds per cubic foot. The decreased density of our contact lowers the initial cost on a volume basis and the smaller weight of contact charged to the re- .actors would reduce the required mechanical strength of the supporting screen as well as reactor mounting base.
To summarize the factors which contribute to the contact cost per barrel of charge are: contact life, powdering rate and initial cost of contact per pound. Assuming the initial cost of contact to be the same in all cases it may be calculated that the cracking catalyst type contact would cost about '75 per cent less than the better noncracking catalyst type contacts and may be as much as 90 per cent less considering lower initial cost of preparation.
What we claim is: x
1. The process for desu furizing a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil which comprises treating ,vapm-s of said oil with a contact agent comprising a member of the class consisting of metals of the iron group and their oxides composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index of above about 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, regenerating the contact agent at a temperature above about 1000 F. to remove substantially all of the sulfur therefrom andemploying the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
2. The process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising a metal of the iron group composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index of above about 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400" F. to convert the iron group metal sulfide into iron group oxide, continuing such treatment until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the eiiluent, treating the contact with hydrogen and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
3. The process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising a member of the class consisting of metals of the iron group and their oxides composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material previously used to promote the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 600 and 950 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treatpd vapors, regenerating the contact agent to re-- move substantially all of the sulfur therefrom and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
taining high boiling point petroleum oil which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising an oxide of a metal of the iron group composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent. the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index of above about 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400 F. to convert the iron group metal sulfide into iron group metal oxide, continuing such treatment until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the efiiuent and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfurcontaining high boiling point petroleum oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
5. The process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing petroleum oil selected from the group consisting of crude, reduced crude and topped crude which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising nickel oxide composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index above 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in substantial amounts in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400" F. to convert the nickel sulfide into nickel oxide, continuing such treatment until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the efiluent and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing high boiling point petroleum oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
6. The process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing petroleum oil selected from the group consisting of crude, reduced crude and topped crude which comprises treating vapors of said 011 with a contact agent comprising nickel oxide composited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index above 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., terminating this treatment when about 50 to 60 per cent of the nickel oxide has been converted into nickel sulfide, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400 F. to convert the nickel sulfide into nickel oxide by combustion, continuing such treatment until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the combustion gases and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfurcontaining high boiling point petroleum oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
7. The process for desulfurizing a sulfur-containing petroleum oil selected from the group consisting of crude, reduced crude and topped crude which comprises treating vapors of said oil with a contact agent comprising nickel oxide com- 4. The process for desulfurizing a sulfur-conposited with a silica-alumina refractory catalytic material capable of promoting, to a, substantial extent, the conversion of higher boiling hydrocarbons into lower boiling hydrocarbons and having a conversion index above 15, in the presence of hydrogen, at a temperature between about 750 and 850 F., at a space velocity of between about 0.2 and 2.0, at. a pressure of between about 100 and 1000 p. s. i. g. and a hydrogen to oil ratio of between about 1000 and 6000 cubic feet per barrel, terminating this treatment when a substantial amount of hydrogen sulfide appears in the treated vapors, passing an oxygen-containing gas over the contact agent at a temperature between about 1000 and 1400 F. to convert the nickel sulfide into nickel oxide by combustion, continuing such treatment until substantially no sulfur dioxide appears in the combustion gases and employing the regenerated contact agent to treat vapors of a sulfur-containing high boiling point petroleum oil in the presence of hydrogen under the conditions specified above.
WILLIAM I. GILBERT. WILLIAM A. HORNE.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS

Claims (1)

1. THE PROCESS FOR DESULFURIZING A SULFUR-CONTAINING HYDROCARBON OIL WHICH COMPRISES TREATING VAPORS OF SAID OIL WITH A CONTACT AGENT COMPRISING A MEMBER OF THE CLASS CONSISTING OPF METALS OF THE IRON GROUP AND THEIR OXIDES COMPOSITED WITH A SILICA-ALUMINA REFRACTORY CATALYTIC MATERIAL CAPABLE OF PROMOTING, TO A SUBSTANTIAL EXTENT, THE CONVERSION OF HIGHER BOILING HYDROCARBONS INTO LOWER BOILING HYDROCARBONS AND HAVING A CONVERSION INDEX OF ABOVE ABOUT 15, IN THE PRESENCE OF HYDROGEN AT A TEMPERATURE BETWEEN ABOUT 600* AND 950* F., TERMINATING THIS TREATMENT WHEN A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE APPEARS IN THE TREATED VAPORS, REGENERATING THE CONTACT AGENT AT A TEMPERATURE ABOVE ABOUT 1000* F. TO REMOVE SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE SULFUR THEREFROM AND EMPLOYING THE REGENERATED CONTACT AGENT TO TREAT VAPORS OF A SULFUR-CONTAINING HYDROCARBON OIL IN THE PRESENCE OF HYDROGEN UNDER THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED ABOVE.
US39175A 1948-07-16 1948-07-16 Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils Expired - Lifetime US2560433A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US39175A US2560433A (en) 1948-07-16 1948-07-16 Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US39175A US2560433A (en) 1948-07-16 1948-07-16 Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2560433A true US2560433A (en) 1951-07-10

Family

ID=21904069

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US39175A Expired - Lifetime US2560433A (en) 1948-07-16 1948-07-16 Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2560433A (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2646388A (en) * 1951-04-20 1953-07-21 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrodesulfurization process
US2700687A (en) * 1952-03-29 1955-01-25 Standard Oil Dev Co Desulfurization of oxo alcohols
US2746907A (en) * 1952-01-11 1956-05-22 Union Oil Co Process for hydro-desulfurization of light hydrocarbons using a nickel oxide catalyst
US2755225A (en) * 1951-10-18 1956-07-17 British Petroleum Co Treatment of crude petroleum
US2774717A (en) * 1952-05-16 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Removal of cyclic sulfur compounds from a highly olefinic gasoline
US2774718A (en) * 1952-02-19 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Process for hydrofining a highly olefinic gasoline
US2774720A (en) * 1952-05-16 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Stabilization of a highly olefinic gasoline
US2774719A (en) * 1952-05-16 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Hydrodesulfurizing a highly olefinic gasoline containing cyclic sulfur compounds
US2776244A (en) * 1953-05-11 1957-01-01 Wigton Abbott Corp Preparation of nickel oxide desulfurizing catalyst and utilization thereof for desulfurizing
US2794842A (en) * 1953-04-13 1957-06-04 Phillips Petroleum Co Catalytic polymerization of olefins
US2806003A (en) * 1952-07-12 1957-09-10 Grande Paroisse Azote Et Prod Method for converting into methane the hydrocarbons contained in gasiform mixtures intended more particularly for the synthetic production of ammonia
US2858268A (en) * 1954-06-01 1958-10-28 Pure Oil Co Manufacture of special naphthas
US2914459A (en) * 1954-04-06 1959-11-24 Houdry Process Corp Cracking of residual oils containing asphaltic and metallic contaminants
DE1080726B (en) * 1957-05-27 1960-04-28 Max Gerhold Dipl Ing Dr Techn Process and device for the thermal or thermal-catalytic conversion of liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons containing organic sulfur compounds
US2949429A (en) * 1956-04-06 1960-08-16 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for preparing improved nickel oxide polymerization catalysts
US2960459A (en) * 1958-12-08 1960-11-15 Sun Oil Co Hydrocracking of hydrocarbon oils with spent cracking catalyst containing ferric oxide
US3039975A (en) * 1956-07-02 1962-06-19 Texaco Inc Study of catalyst flow in fluid catalytic cracking by means of radioactive tracers
US3132091A (en) * 1960-09-26 1964-05-05 Union Oil Co Hydrocracking process with reactivation of the catalyst
US3211642A (en) * 1964-08-13 1965-10-12 California Research Corp Hydrocracking and rejuvenation of hydrocracking catalyst
US3458299A (en) * 1964-06-23 1969-07-29 Union Oil Co Hydrocracking process
US20090139902A1 (en) * 2007-11-28 2009-06-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US20100018904A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-01-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System
US20100025293A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Sequential Hydroconversion and Hydrodesulfurization of Whole Crude Oil
US20100025291A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Treatment of Heavy Oils Using Light Hydrocarbon Components as a Diluent
US20110083996A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2011-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Alternative Process for Treatment of Heavy Crudes in a Coking Refinery

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2273299A (en) * 1938-10-08 1942-02-17 Albert C Travis Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2273298A (en) * 1938-09-23 1942-02-17 Albert Chester Travis Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2409690A (en) * 1943-12-10 1946-10-22 Standard Oil Dev Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2415716A (en) * 1939-12-30 1947-02-11 Texas Co Catalytic treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2415537A (en) * 1944-09-18 1947-02-11 Phillips Petroleum Co Catalytic conversion of hydrocarbon oil
US2433426A (en) * 1945-06-01 1947-12-30 Floridin Company Desulfurizing adsorbent and process for preparing same
US2450724A (en) * 1946-12-28 1948-10-05 Universal Oil Prod Co Conversion of sulfur containing hydrocarbons
US2516876A (en) * 1946-09-27 1950-08-01 Gulf Research Development Co Desulfurization of light petroleum hydrocarbons
US2516877A (en) * 1946-09-27 1950-08-01 Gulf Research Development Co Desulfurization of heavy petroleum hydrocarbons

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2273298A (en) * 1938-09-23 1942-02-17 Albert Chester Travis Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2273299A (en) * 1938-10-08 1942-02-17 Albert C Travis Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2415716A (en) * 1939-12-30 1947-02-11 Texas Co Catalytic treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2409690A (en) * 1943-12-10 1946-10-22 Standard Oil Dev Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2415537A (en) * 1944-09-18 1947-02-11 Phillips Petroleum Co Catalytic conversion of hydrocarbon oil
US2433426A (en) * 1945-06-01 1947-12-30 Floridin Company Desulfurizing adsorbent and process for preparing same
US2516876A (en) * 1946-09-27 1950-08-01 Gulf Research Development Co Desulfurization of light petroleum hydrocarbons
US2516877A (en) * 1946-09-27 1950-08-01 Gulf Research Development Co Desulfurization of heavy petroleum hydrocarbons
US2450724A (en) * 1946-12-28 1948-10-05 Universal Oil Prod Co Conversion of sulfur containing hydrocarbons

Cited By (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2646388A (en) * 1951-04-20 1953-07-21 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrodesulfurization process
US2755225A (en) * 1951-10-18 1956-07-17 British Petroleum Co Treatment of crude petroleum
US2746907A (en) * 1952-01-11 1956-05-22 Union Oil Co Process for hydro-desulfurization of light hydrocarbons using a nickel oxide catalyst
US2774718A (en) * 1952-02-19 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Process for hydrofining a highly olefinic gasoline
US2700687A (en) * 1952-03-29 1955-01-25 Standard Oil Dev Co Desulfurization of oxo alcohols
US2774720A (en) * 1952-05-16 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Stabilization of a highly olefinic gasoline
US2774717A (en) * 1952-05-16 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Removal of cyclic sulfur compounds from a highly olefinic gasoline
US2774719A (en) * 1952-05-16 1956-12-18 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Hydrodesulfurizing a highly olefinic gasoline containing cyclic sulfur compounds
US2806003A (en) * 1952-07-12 1957-09-10 Grande Paroisse Azote Et Prod Method for converting into methane the hydrocarbons contained in gasiform mixtures intended more particularly for the synthetic production of ammonia
US2794842A (en) * 1953-04-13 1957-06-04 Phillips Petroleum Co Catalytic polymerization of olefins
US2776244A (en) * 1953-05-11 1957-01-01 Wigton Abbott Corp Preparation of nickel oxide desulfurizing catalyst and utilization thereof for desulfurizing
US2914459A (en) * 1954-04-06 1959-11-24 Houdry Process Corp Cracking of residual oils containing asphaltic and metallic contaminants
US2858268A (en) * 1954-06-01 1958-10-28 Pure Oil Co Manufacture of special naphthas
US2949429A (en) * 1956-04-06 1960-08-16 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for preparing improved nickel oxide polymerization catalysts
US3039975A (en) * 1956-07-02 1962-06-19 Texaco Inc Study of catalyst flow in fluid catalytic cracking by means of radioactive tracers
DE1080726B (en) * 1957-05-27 1960-04-28 Max Gerhold Dipl Ing Dr Techn Process and device for the thermal or thermal-catalytic conversion of liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons containing organic sulfur compounds
US2960459A (en) * 1958-12-08 1960-11-15 Sun Oil Co Hydrocracking of hydrocarbon oils with spent cracking catalyst containing ferric oxide
US3132091A (en) * 1960-09-26 1964-05-05 Union Oil Co Hydrocracking process with reactivation of the catalyst
US3458299A (en) * 1964-06-23 1969-07-29 Union Oil Co Hydrocracking process
US3211642A (en) * 1964-08-13 1965-10-12 California Research Corp Hydrocracking and rejuvenation of hydrocracking catalyst
US20090139902A1 (en) * 2007-11-28 2009-06-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US8632673B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2014-01-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US20100018904A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-01-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System
US20100025293A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Sequential Hydroconversion and Hydrodesulfurization of Whole Crude Oil
US20100025291A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Treatment of Heavy Oils Using Light Hydrocarbon Components as a Diluent
US8372267B2 (en) 2008-07-14 2013-02-12 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the sequential hydroconversion and hydrodesulfurization of whole crude oil
US9260671B2 (en) 2008-07-14 2016-02-16 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the treatment of heavy oils using light hydrocarbon components as a diluent
US20110083996A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2011-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Alternative Process for Treatment of Heavy Crudes in a Coking Refinery
US8491779B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2013-07-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Alternative process for treatment of heavy crudes in a coking refinery

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2560433A (en) Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2880171A (en) Hydrodesulfurization of hydrocarbons with catalyst composed of molybdenum and two members of the iron group metals
US2542970A (en) Refining of cracked naphthas by selective hydrogenation
MXPA02004332A (en) Desulfurization and novel sorbents for same.
US5358630A (en) Regenerating zeolitic cracking catalyst
US4464252A (en) Adsorbents for sulfur removal
US2440673A (en) Method of utilizing a fuel gas in refining a petroleum fraction
GB1575434A (en) Method of presulphiding hydrodesulphurization catalysts
US4582819A (en) Catalytic absorbent and a method for its preparation
US4695366A (en) Desulfurization process
US2668142A (en) Reforming process and catalysts
US4442221A (en) Process for regenerating a spent copper composite sulfur sorbent
JPS60238144A (en) Arsenic compound removing agent
US2732329A (en) nisoi
US3931048A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion catalytic composite
CA1144502A (en) Pollutants control in cracking system using a combustion promoter
US4738771A (en) Hydrocarbon upgrading process
US3673108A (en) Hydrocracking catalyst activation treatment
US2911359A (en) Desulfurization process and catalyst
US3211668A (en) Rejuvenation of nitrogen compoundpoisoned catalysts
US3285860A (en) Method of preparing nickel-molyb-denum-alumina catalysts
US3657112A (en) Hydrodesulfurization of heavy hydrocarbon oil with hydrogen presaturation
US2885352A (en) Process for hydrodesulfurization employing a platinum-alumina catalyst
US2640009A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbons with hydrogen
US2774719A (en) Hydrodesulfurizing a highly olefinic gasoline containing cyclic sulfur compounds