US20100018904A1 - Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System - Google Patents

Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100018904A1
US20100018904A1 US12/502,590 US50259009A US2010018904A1 US 20100018904 A1 US20100018904 A1 US 20100018904A1 US 50259009 A US50259009 A US 50259009A US 2010018904 A1 US2010018904 A1 US 2010018904A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
catalyst
hdm
hds
effluent
reaction zone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/502,590
Inventor
Stephane Cyrille Kressmann
Raheel Shafi
Ali Hussain Alzaid
Esam Z. Hamad
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Saudi Arabian Oil Co
Original Assignee
Saudi Arabian Oil Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Saudi Arabian Oil Co filed Critical Saudi Arabian Oil Co
Priority to US12/502,590 priority Critical patent/US20100018904A1/en
Assigned to SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY reassignment SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ALZAID, ALI HUSSAIN, SHAFI, RAHEEL, HAMAD, ESAM Z., KRESSMANN, STEPHANE CYRILLE
Publication of US20100018904A1 publication Critical patent/US20100018904A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/12Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including cracking steps and other hydrotreatment steps
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
    • C10G45/14Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing with moving solid particles
    • C10G45/18Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing with moving solid particles according to the "moving-bed" technique
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • C10G47/24Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions with moving solid particles
    • C10G47/28Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions with moving solid particles according to the "moving-bed" technique

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a pre-refining process for the upgrading of heavy sour crude oils using a catalytic hydrotreating process employing Hydrodemetallization (HDM), Hydrodesulfurization (HDS), and Hydroconversion (HDC), to produce sweeter, lighter crudes using a series of moving catalyst beds in discrete reactors.
  • HDM Hydrodemetallization
  • HDS Hydrodesulfurization
  • HDC Hydroconversion
  • Deactivation of catalyst within a hydroprocessing unit can occur via two primary mechanisms: (1) metal deposition and (2) coke formation. For both of these mechanisms, increasing the operating temperature helps to maintain the catalyst performance; however, all process units have maximum temperature limits normally based upon the metallurgy of the process unit. These maxima limit the time for that a catalyst can operate without being replaced with fresh catalyst. Furthermore, replacement of spent catalyst with fresh catalyst usually requires complete shutdown of the process unit in order to unload the deactivated spent catalyst and load a fresh batch of catalyst into the process. This shutdown time reduces the on-stream time and therefore negatively impacts the economics of the process.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a process for prerefining heavy sour crude oils by admixing whole crude oil feedstock with hydrogen at a pressure in the range of about 30 and 150 bars to create a premixture.
  • This premixture is heated to a first temperature, wherein the first temperature is within a range of about 300 and 500° C.
  • the heated premixture is introduced into a first reactor vessel through a first vessel inlet, wherein the first reactor vessel is operable to receive a first catalyst.
  • the first catalyst enters the first reactor vessel through a first catalyst inlet and exits the first reactor vessel through a first catalyst outlet.
  • the heated premixture can be contacted with the first catalyst within the first reactor vessel such that the premixture is at least partially demetallized, forming a first effluent.
  • the first effluent is characterized as having a lower amount of metal content than the heated premixture.
  • the first effluent can be introduced into a second reactor vessel through a second vessel inlet, wherein the second reactor vessel is operable to receive a second catalyst.
  • the second catalyst enters the second reactor vessel through a second catalyst inlet and exits the second reactor vessel through a second catalyst outlet.
  • the first effluent is contacted with the second catalyst within the second reactor vessel thereby forming a second effluent.
  • the second effluent is characterized as having a lower amount of metal and sulfur content than the first effluent.
  • the second effluent is introduced into a third reactor vessel through a third vessel inlet, wherein the third reactor vessel is operable to receive a third catalyst.
  • the third catalyst enters the third reactor vessel through a third catalyst inlet and exits the third reactor vessel through a third catalyst outlet.
  • the second effluent is contacted with the third catalyst within the third reactor vessel thereby forming a third effluent.
  • the third effluent is characterized as having a lower amount of sulfur content than the second effluent.
  • the third effluent is introduced into a fourth reactor vessel through a fourth vessel inlet, wherein the fourth reactor vessel is operable to receive a fourth catalyst.
  • the fourth catalyst enters the fourth reactor vessel through a fourth catalyst inlet and exits the fourth reactor vessel through a fourth catalyst outlet.
  • the third effluent is contacted with the fourth catalyst within the fourth reactor vessel thereby forming a fourth effluent.
  • the fourth effluent is characterized as having a reduced amount of metal and sulfur content than the third effluent.
  • the fourth effluent has a sulfur content between about 0.1 and 1.0 wt %, as well as an increased API gravity of more than one degree as compared to whole crude oil feedstock.
  • the rate of addition of said catalysts to said reactors is defined as the Catalyst Replacement Rate.
  • the process includes introducing a heated-pressurized mixture of the whole crude oil feedstock and hydrogen into an HDM reaction zone through an HDM reaction inlet, wherein the heated-pressurized mixture is at a first temperature within a range of about 300 to 500° C. Additionally, the heated-pressurized mixture is at a first pressure within a range of about 30 to 200 bar. Furthermore, the HDM reaction zone further includes an HDM moving bed, and the HDM reaction zone is operable to receive an HDM catalyst through an HDM catalyst inlet. The HDM reaction zone has an HDM catalyst outlet that is operable to emit the HDM catalyst from the HDM reaction zone. The HDM catalyst is introduced into the HDM reaction zone through the HDM catalyst inlet.
  • the premixture is contacted with the HDM catalyst within the HDM reaction zone such that the premixture is at least partially demetallized, forming the first effluent, with the first effluent being characterized as having a reduction of about 30 to 90% of the amount of metals as compared to the whole crude oil feedstock.
  • the first effluent can be introduced into an HDM/HDS reaction zone through an HDM/HDS reaction inlet.
  • the HDM/HDS reaction zone further includes an HDM/HDS moving bed, and the HDM/HDS reaction zone is operable to receive an HDM/HDS catalyst through an HDM/HDS catalyst inlet.
  • the HDM/HDS reaction zone has an HDM/HDS catalyst outlet, with the HDM/HDS catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDM/HDS catalyst from the HDM/HDS reaction zone.
  • the HDM/HDS catalyst can be introduced into the HDM/HDS reaction zone through the HDM/HDS catalyst inlet, wherein the first effluent is contacted with the HDM/HDS catalyst within the HDM/HDS reaction zone to form the second effluent, wherein the second effluent has a reduced metals and sulfur content as compared to the first effluent.
  • the second effluent can be introduced into an HDS reaction zone through an HDS reaction inlet, wherein the HDS reaction zone further comprises an HDS moving bed.
  • the HDS reaction zone is operable to receive an HDS catalyst through an HDS catalyst inlet, and the HDS reaction zone has an HDS catalyst outlet, with the HDS catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDS catalyst from the HDS reaction zone.
  • the HDS catalyst is introduced into the HDS reaction zone through the HDS catalyst inlet where it is contacted with the second effluent within the HDS reaction zone to form the third effluent, wherein the third effluent has a reduced sulfur content as compared to the second effluent.
  • the third effluent can then be introduced into an HDC reaction zone through an HDC reaction inlet, wherein the HDC reaction zone further comprises an HDC moving bed.
  • the HDC reaction zone is operable to receive an HDC catalyst through an HDC catalyst inlet, and the HDC reaction zone has an HDC catalyst outlet, with the HDC catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDC catalyst from the HDC reaction zone.
  • the HDC catalyst is introduced into the HDC reaction zone through the HDC catalyst inlet where it is contacted with the third effluent within the HDC reaction zone to form the fourth effluent, wherein the fourth effluent is characterized as having an increased API Gravity of at least about 1° greater than the whole crude oil feedstock and a reduced amount of metal and sulfur content as compared to the whole crude oil feedstock.
  • the first temperature is within a range of about 340 and 390° C. and the first pressure is within a range of about 30 and 150 bar.
  • the HDM catalyst, the HDM/HDS catalyst, and the HDS catalyst are selected from the group consisting of sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals on an inorganic oxide support, wherein the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof.
  • group VB metals refers to the group consisting of vanadium, niobium, and tantalum.
  • group VIB metals refers to the group consisting of chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten.
  • group VIIIB metals refers to iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhenium, iridium, nickel, palladium, or platinum, preferably iron, cobalt and nickel.
  • the HDC catalyst can be in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders or pellets or a combination thereof.
  • the HDM catalyst, the HDM/HDS catalyst, and the HDS catalyst are selected from the group consisting of Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof.
  • the HDC catalyst can be selected from the group consisting of sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals on an inorganic oxide support, wherein the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, a zeolite, and combinations thereof.
  • the HDC catalyst can preferably be in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders, pellets, and combinations thereof Furthermore, each catalyst can have a flow rate within its respective moving bed, wherein the flow rate of each of said catalysts is at a rate of approximately 0.5% to 5% of the Tan-Tan height of the reactor per day.
  • the process can be configured in such a way that each of said moving beds can be operated in a co-current or countercurrent fashion.
  • the HDM catalyst has a HDM catalyst flow rate
  • the first effluent has a baseline effluent metal concentration
  • the process can include monitoring a metal concentration of the first effluent and increasing the HDM catalyst flow rate whenever the metal concentration of the first effluent exceeds the baseline effluent metal concentration.
  • the HDM/HDS catalyst can have an HDM/HDS catalyst flow rate
  • the second effluent can have a second baseline effluent metal concentration
  • the second effluent can have a baseline sulfur concentration.
  • Both a metal and a sulfur concentration of the second effluent can be monitored, and whenever the metal concentration of the second effluent exceeds the second baseline effluent metal concentration or whenever the sulfur concentration of the second effluent exceeds the baseline sulfur concentration, the HDM/HDS catalyst flow rate can be increased.
  • the HDS catalyst has an HDS catalyst flow rate
  • the third effluent has an HDS baseline sulfur concentration.
  • the process preferably includes monitoring of a sulfur concentration of the third effluent and increasing the HDS catalyst flow rate whenever the sulfur concentration of the third effluent exceeds the baseline sulfur concentration.
  • the HDC catalyst has an HDC catalyst flow rate
  • the whole crude oil feedstock and the fourth effluent have a baseline API gravity.
  • the process further includes monitoring the baseline API gravity of the whole crude oil feedstock and the fourth effluent and increasing the HDC catalyst flow rate whenever the difference between the baseline API gravity of the fourth effluent and the baseline API gravity of the whole crude oil feedstock does not exceed 1°.
  • the third effluent is characterized as having a sulfur content of between about 0.1 and 1.0 weight percent.
  • the process can further include separating the whole crude oil feedstock into two fractions prior to introducing the heated-pressurized mixture into the HDM reaction zone.
  • the first fraction has a maximum boiling point of about 210° C.
  • the second fraction has a minimum boiling point of greater than about 210° C.
  • the first fraction can bypass said reaction zones and can be combined with the fourth effluent, wherein the second fraction is mixed with the hydrogen to form the heated-pressurized mixture.
  • the process can further include introducing a first effluent slip stream to an HDM sampling vessel, introducing a second effluent slip stream to an HDM/HDS sampling vessel, introducing a third effluent slip stream to an HDS sampling vessel, and introducing a fourth effluent slip stream to an HDC sampling vessel.
  • the HDM sampling vessel, the HDM/HDS sampling vessel, the HDS sampling vessel, and the HDC sampling vessel are each operable to allow for sampling of their respective slip streams while the process is in operation.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides a pre-refining process for the upgrading of heavy, sour crude oils through HDM, HDS, and HDC of the crude oils to unexpectedly produce sweeter, lighter crudes using a moving catalyst system.
  • heavy oil feedstock such as a whole crude oil feedstock
  • hydrogen not shown
  • the heavy oil feedstock and hydrogen are admixed at a pressure of between about 80 and 110 bar.
  • the premixture is preferably heated (not shown) to a first temperature of between about 300° C. and 500° C., and more preferably, the premixture is heated in the range of about 350° C. and 450° C.
  • the premixture is introduced via line [ 2 ] into HDM reactor [ 10 ], which contains a first catalyst.
  • the first catalyst is an HDM catalyst.
  • Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals, optionally in supported form on ⁇ -alumina and/or ⁇ -alumina and silica in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets.
  • More preferred first catalysts can include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof
  • the active metal species on the surface of the catalyst is the sulfide form of the metal.
  • One exemplary first catalyst utilizes Nickel sulfide and Molybdenum sulfide active species, wherein the weight ratio of Ni to (Ni+Mo) is greater than about 0.15.
  • the inorganic oxide support material is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof.
  • the first catalyst is supported on a ⁇ -alumina based support having a surface area of between about 100 and 300 m 2 /g, preferably between about 140 and 240 m 2 /g.
  • the catalyst can be described as generally having a high pore volume, which in certain embodiments is greater than about 0.5 cc/g, preferably greater than about 1 cc/g. The pore volume is believed to facilitate the uptake of active metals on the catalyst surface.
  • the first catalyst is introduced into HDM reactor [ 10 ] via line [ 6 ] and exits HDM reactor [ 10 ] via line [ 4 ].
  • the flow of the first catalyst can be reversed such that the first catalyst is introduced into HDM reactor [ 10 ] via line [ 4 ] and exits HDM reactor [ 10 ] via line [ 6 ].
  • the exit stream from HDM reactor [ 10 ] defines the first effluent.
  • a slipstream of the first effluent can be sampled via line [ 5 ] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the first catalyst by measuring the metal concentration (for instance Nickel and Vanadium) of the slipstream.
  • the metal concentration for instance Nickel and Vanadium
  • the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the first catalyst is increased until the metal concentration within the slipstream has returned to desired levels.
  • the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the first catalyst is between about 0.05 to 10 wt %, more preferably between about 0.05 to 0.5 wt %, of the total catalyst inventory per day.
  • the first catalyst can be replaced as a function of the total metals content (e.g., nickel and vanadium) detected at the outlet of the HDM reactor [ 10 ].
  • the first effluent is introduced via line [ 12 ] into HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ], which contains the second catalyst.
  • the second catalyst is an HDM/HDS catalyst.
  • Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals optionally supported on ⁇ -alumina and/or ⁇ -alumina and silica in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets.
  • the second catalyst includes a ⁇ -alumina support.
  • More preferred second catalyst can include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • the second catalyst includes Nickel and Molybdenum, wherein the weight ratio of nickel to (nickel+molybdenum) is up to about 0.3.
  • the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof.
  • the second catalyst is introduced into HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] via line [ 16 ] and exits HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] via line [ 14 ].
  • the flow of the second catalyst is reversed such that the second catalyst is introduced into HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] via line [ 14 ] and exits HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] via line [ 16 ].
  • the exit stream from HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] defines the second effluent.
  • a slipstream of the second effluent can be sampled via line [ 15 ] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the second catalyst by measuring the metal and sulfur concentration of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed WABT, whenever the metal and/or sulfur concentrations of the slipstream exceeds a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the second catalyst can be increased until the metal and/or sulfur concentrations within the slipstream have returned to desired levels.
  • the second catalyst can typically be replaced as a function of the total metals content (e.g., nickel and vanadium) or the total sulfur content detected at the outlet of the HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ].
  • the second effluent would have approximately 30 to 90% less metals than the heavy oil feedstock.
  • the second effluent is introduced via line [ 22 ] into HDS reactor [ 30 ], which contains the third catalyst.
  • the third catalyst is an HDS catalyst.
  • Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals, optionally supported on ⁇ -alumina and/or ⁇ -alumina and silica, the catalysts being in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets.
  • More preferred third catalysts include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • the third catalyst includes Nickel and Molybdenum, wherein the weight ratio of Ni to (Ni+Mo) is between about 0.1 and 0.3.
  • the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof.
  • the HDS catalyst support is a ⁇ -alumina support having a surface area of between about 150 and 300 m 2 /g, preferably between about 180 and 240 m 2 /g.
  • the catalyst can be described as generally having a pore volume that is smaller than the pore volume of the HDM catalyst, for example, the HDS catalyst can have a pore volume that is less than about 1 cc/g. The pore volume is believed to facilitate the uptake of metals on the catalyst surface.
  • the third catalyst is introduced into HDS reactor [ 30 ] via line [ 26 ] and exits HDS reactor [ 30 ] via line [ 24 ].
  • the flow of the third catalyst is reversed such that the third catalyst is introduced into HDS reactor [ 30 ] via line [ 24 ] and exits HDS reactor [ 30 ] via line [ 26 ].
  • the stream from HDS reactor [ 30 ] defines the third effluent.
  • a slipstream of the third effluent can be sampled via line [ 25 ] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the third catalyst by measuring the sulfur concentration of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed WABT, whenever the sulfur concentration of the slipstream exceeds a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the third catalyst is increased until the sulfur concentration within the slipstream has returned to desired levels.
  • the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the second catalyst is between about 0.01 to 5 wt %, more preferably between about 0.05 to 0.5 wt %, of the total catalyst inventory per day.
  • the replacement rate of the third catalyst can be based on a function of the total sulfur content of the effluent from HDS reactor [ 30 ].
  • the third effluent is introduced via line [ 32 ] into HDC reactor [ 40 ], which contains the fourth catalyst.
  • the fourth catalyst is an HDC catalyst.
  • Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals, optionally supported form on ⁇ -alumina and/or ⁇ -alumina and silica and/or a zeolite in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets.
  • the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of zeolite Y, ZSM-5, LWZ-15, AWLZ-15, and combinations thereof.
  • the support utilized for the fourth catalyst is more acidic than the supports utilized for each of the first, second and third catalysts.
  • An exemplary catalyst support includes silica in conjunction with ⁇ -alumina, wherein the alumina can be present in an amount of between about 1 and 40% by weight.
  • the catalyst support can include silica and a zeolite, wherein the zeolite can be present in an amount of between about 1 and 40% by weight.
  • More preferred fourth catalysts include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • the catalyst includes Nickel and Molybdenum, or Nickel and Tungsten, wherein the weight ratio of nickel to (nickel and the second metal) is between about 0.25 and 0.5, wherein the second metal is either Molybdenum or Tungsten.
  • the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, zeolite, zeolite Y, AWLZ-15, and any combination thereof.
  • the fourth catalyst is introduced into HDC reactor [ 40 ] via line [ 36 ] and exits HDC reactor [ 40 ] via line [ 34 ].
  • the flow of the fourth catalyst is reversed such that the fourth catalyst is introduced into HDC reactor [ 40 ] via line [ 34 ] and exits HDC reactor [ 40 ] via line [ 36 ].
  • the e stream from HDC reactor [ 40 ] defines the fourth effluent. It is believed that the addition of the HDC reactor [ 40 ] to the process results in further hydroconversion and deeper hydrodesulfurization of the heavy oil feedstock, thereby resulting in a more improved product. Without wishing to be bound to any specific theory, it is believed that the fourth catalyst may facilitate ring opening, thereby improving the removal of bound sulfur.
  • a slipstream of the fourth effluent is sampled via line [ 35 ] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the fourth catalyst by measuring the API gravity and/or sulfur content of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed WABT, whenever the API gravity of the slipstream is below a desired level and/or the sulfur content of the slipstream is above a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the fourth catalyst is increased until the API gravity and/or the sulfur content within the slipstream have met the desired levels.
  • the replacement rate of the HDC catalyst can be a function of the conversion of, or the presence of, the 540° C.+material present in the effluent of the HDC reactor [ 40 ]. In certain embodiments, once the catalyst has become stabilized (i.e., reached a coke equilibrium), the amount of catalyst removed from the reactor should approximately match the amount of catalyst added to the reactor.
  • the fourth effluent can be introduced to a liquid gas separator (not shown) in order to separate any gaseous products, wherein the liquid product is a synthetically produced crude oil having reduced metal and sulfur content, and an increased API gravity.
  • the reaction between the respective feed streams and the respective catalysts is exothermic. Therefore, the temperature proximate the feed stream inlet of each reactor will be less than the temperature proximate the exit stream of each reactor.
  • the temperature of the catalyst bed known as the Weighted Average Bed Temperature (WABT) is defined as being:
  • the WABT is used as a control point for improved catalyst performance.
  • the WABT for each reactor can be increased or decreased as appropriate to maintain the desired level of HDM, HDS or HDC within each reactor.
  • the WABT is controlled by controlling the inlet temperature for each reactor. Due to the exothermic nature of the HDM, HDM/HDS, HDS and HDC reactions, the reactor outlet temperature is higher than the inlet temperature. The WABT is therefore the weighted average. In operation, the WABT will be set by optimization between the Catalyst Replacement Rate and the WABT to achieve the target for each section.
  • each of the reactors is adiabatic and there is no external heating.
  • the fourth effluent will pass through a feed/effluent heat exchanger in order to cool the fourth effluent while simultaneously preheating the premixture or the crude oil feedstock.
  • the premixture is preheated to a temperature within the range of about 300° C. to 500° C.
  • optional HDM sampling vessel [ 8 ], HDM/HDS sampling vessel [ 18 ], HDS sampling vessel [ 28 ] and HDC sampling vessel [ 38 ] are provided upstream of their respective sampling lines.
  • the WABTs of HDM reactor [ 10 ], HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ], and HDS reactor [ 30 ] a preferably maintained within the range of about 350° C. and 420° C.
  • the WABT of HDC reactor [ 40 ] is preferably within the range of about 350° C. and 450° C., preferably within the range of about 380° C. and 425° C.
  • the WABT of the HDC reactor [ 40 ] is greater than the WABTs of the HDM reactor [ 10 ], the HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] and the HDS reactor [ 30 ].
  • the HDM reactor [ 10 ] is operated at a temperature of between about 370° C.
  • the HDS reactor [ 30 ] is operated at a temperature of between about 370° C. and 410° C.
  • the HDC reactor [ 40 ] is operated at a temperature of between about 380° C. and 425° C.
  • the HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ] is operated at a temperature that is less than the operating temperature of the HDC reactor [ 40 ].
  • the heavy oil feedstock is separated into first and second fractions prior to introduction into HDM reactor [ 10 ], with the first fraction having a maximum boiling point of about 210° C. or less and the second fraction containing the volumetric balance of the whole crude oil.
  • the first fraction can then bypass HDM reactor [ 10 ], HDM/HDS reactor [ 20 ], HDS reactor [ 30 ], and HDC reactor [ 40 ], and instead be optionally processed separately prior to recombining with the fourth effluent.
  • the specific conditions include the following: total hydrogen pressure of the reactor system is maintained at 100 bar; hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio is maintained at 800 normal liters of hydrogen per liter of Arab Heavy Feedstock; temperature of the catalyst system was operated at between 370° C. and 380° C.; and the liquid hourly space velocity for the combined four reactors was 0.5 per hour.
  • the Catalyst Replacement Rate for the first catalyst was maintained within the range of 0.05 to 0.5 weight percent of the total catalyst inventory per day.
  • the Catalyst Replacement Rate for the third catalyst was maintained within the range of 0.01 to 5 weight percent of the total catalyst inventory per day.
  • the resulting product was analyzed, with the results shown in Table II below.
  • the final product is a synthetic crude oil having a lower density; increased API gravity; and, reduced amounts of CCR, vanadium, nickel, and sulfur.
  • the present invention may easily be produced in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics.
  • the present embodiment is, therefore, to be considered as merely illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalence of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
  • the present invention may suitably comprise, consist or consist essentially of the elements disclosed and may be practiced in the absence of an element not disclosed.

Abstract

A pre-refining catalytic hydrotreating process for the desulfurization, demetallization, and upgrading of heavy, sour crude oils operating at a moderate temperature and pressure through the utilization of moving catalyst bed technology.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/080,452 filed on Jul. 14, 2008, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a pre-refining process for the upgrading of heavy sour crude oils using a catalytic hydrotreating process employing Hydrodemetallization (HDM), Hydrodesulfurization (HDS), and Hydroconversion (HDC), to produce sweeter, lighter crudes using a series of moving catalyst beds in discrete reactors.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The removal of sulfur compounds from crude oil and its fractions has been of significant importance for several decades, but has become even more important in recent years due to tightening environmental legislation. While much of the prior art focuses on the desulfurization of individual crude oil fractions, a large segment of the art today and in the past has addressed the requirement for hydroprocessing of whole crude oil. The majority of the interest in recent years has been on the upgrading of very heavy (API gravity <20) crude oil, shale and tar-sands to produce light sweet synthetic crudes. The major driving force for these processes is the demand for light crude oils in refineries and the low value of highly viscous feedstocks. Furthermore, demand is shifting from high sulfur fuel oils to low-and ultra-low sulfur fuel oil products, having a sulfur content of less than about 1 wt % (LSFO) and 0.5 wt % (ULSFO). Therefore, the ability to produce LSFO or ULSFO instead of high sulfur fuel oils is advantageous.
  • One of the major technical challenges posed when hydrotreating heavy oil fractions or whole crude is the effect of minor concentrations of contaminants such as organic nickel and vanadium compounds. These organometallic components have been proven to detrimentally impact the activity of hydrotreating catalysts.
  • Another major challenge faced by processing whole crude oil is that the concentration of coke precursors can be very high. These coke precursors, such as asphaltenic plates detrimentally impact the activity of the hydro-desulfurization (HDS) catalysts in question. This means that the performance of a conventional process would decrease over time, requiring catalyst replacement to ensure continued operation. This catalyst replacement can be both costly and time consuming, significantly impacting the economic feasibility of such a process.
  • Deactivation of catalyst within a hydroprocessing unit can occur via two primary mechanisms: (1) metal deposition and (2) coke formation. For both of these mechanisms, increasing the operating temperature helps to maintain the catalyst performance; however, all process units have maximum temperature limits normally based upon the metallurgy of the process unit. These maxima limit the time for that a catalyst can operate without being replaced with fresh catalyst. Furthermore, replacement of spent catalyst with fresh catalyst usually requires complete shutdown of the process unit in order to unload the deactivated spent catalyst and load a fresh batch of catalyst into the process. This shutdown time reduces the on-stream time and therefore negatively impacts the economics of the process.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a process for prerefining heavy sour crude oils by admixing whole crude oil feedstock with hydrogen at a pressure in the range of about 30 and 150 bars to create a premixture. This premixture is heated to a first temperature, wherein the first temperature is within a range of about 300 and 500° C. The heated premixture is introduced into a first reactor vessel through a first vessel inlet, wherein the first reactor vessel is operable to receive a first catalyst. The first catalyst enters the first reactor vessel through a first catalyst inlet and exits the first reactor vessel through a first catalyst outlet. The heated premixture can be contacted with the first catalyst within the first reactor vessel such that the premixture is at least partially demetallized, forming a first effluent. The first effluent is characterized as having a lower amount of metal content than the heated premixture.
  • The first effluent can be introduced into a second reactor vessel through a second vessel inlet, wherein the second reactor vessel is operable to receive a second catalyst. The second catalyst enters the second reactor vessel through a second catalyst inlet and exits the second reactor vessel through a second catalyst outlet. The first effluent is contacted with the second catalyst within the second reactor vessel thereby forming a second effluent. The second effluent is characterized as having a lower amount of metal and sulfur content than the first effluent.
  • The second effluent is introduced into a third reactor vessel through a third vessel inlet, wherein the third reactor vessel is operable to receive a third catalyst. The third catalyst enters the third reactor vessel through a third catalyst inlet and exits the third reactor vessel through a third catalyst outlet. The second effluent is contacted with the third catalyst within the third reactor vessel thereby forming a third effluent. The third effluent is characterized as having a lower amount of sulfur content than the second effluent.
  • The third effluent is introduced into a fourth reactor vessel through a fourth vessel inlet, wherein the fourth reactor vessel is operable to receive a fourth catalyst. The fourth catalyst enters the fourth reactor vessel through a fourth catalyst inlet and exits the fourth reactor vessel through a fourth catalyst outlet. The third effluent is contacted with the fourth catalyst within the fourth reactor vessel thereby forming a fourth effluent. The fourth effluent is characterized as having a reduced amount of metal and sulfur content than the third effluent. In one embodiment, the fourth effluent has a sulfur content between about 0.1 and 1.0 wt %, as well as an increased API gravity of more than one degree as compared to whole crude oil feedstock. The rate of addition of said catalysts to said reactors is defined as the Catalyst Replacement Rate.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the process includes introducing a heated-pressurized mixture of the whole crude oil feedstock and hydrogen into an HDM reaction zone through an HDM reaction inlet, wherein the heated-pressurized mixture is at a first temperature within a range of about 300 to 500° C. Additionally, the heated-pressurized mixture is at a first pressure within a range of about 30 to 200 bar. Furthermore, the HDM reaction zone further includes an HDM moving bed, and the HDM reaction zone is operable to receive an HDM catalyst through an HDM catalyst inlet. The HDM reaction zone has an HDM catalyst outlet that is operable to emit the HDM catalyst from the HDM reaction zone. The HDM catalyst is introduced into the HDM reaction zone through the HDM catalyst inlet. Next, the premixture is contacted with the HDM catalyst within the HDM reaction zone such that the premixture is at least partially demetallized, forming the first effluent, with the first effluent being characterized as having a reduction of about 30 to 90% of the amount of metals as compared to the whole crude oil feedstock.
  • The first effluent can be introduced into an HDM/HDS reaction zone through an HDM/HDS reaction inlet. The HDM/HDS reaction zone further includes an HDM/HDS moving bed, and the HDM/HDS reaction zone is operable to receive an HDM/HDS catalyst through an HDM/HDS catalyst inlet. Furthermore, the HDM/HDS reaction zone has an HDM/HDS catalyst outlet, with the HDM/HDS catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDM/HDS catalyst from the HDM/HDS reaction zone. The HDM/HDS catalyst can be introduced into the HDM/HDS reaction zone through the HDM/HDS catalyst inlet, wherein the first effluent is contacted with the HDM/HDS catalyst within the HDM/HDS reaction zone to form the second effluent, wherein the second effluent has a reduced metals and sulfur content as compared to the first effluent.
  • The second effluent can be introduced into an HDS reaction zone through an HDS reaction inlet, wherein the HDS reaction zone further comprises an HDS moving bed. The HDS reaction zone is operable to receive an HDS catalyst through an HDS catalyst inlet, and the HDS reaction zone has an HDS catalyst outlet, with the HDS catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDS catalyst from the HDS reaction zone. The HDS catalyst is introduced into the HDS reaction zone through the HDS catalyst inlet where it is contacted with the second effluent within the HDS reaction zone to form the third effluent, wherein the third effluent has a reduced sulfur content as compared to the second effluent.
  • The third effluent can then be introduced into an HDC reaction zone through an HDC reaction inlet, wherein the HDC reaction zone further comprises an HDC moving bed. The HDC reaction zone is operable to receive an HDC catalyst through an HDC catalyst inlet, and the HDC reaction zone has an HDC catalyst outlet, with the HDC catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDC catalyst from the HDC reaction zone. The HDC catalyst is introduced into the HDC reaction zone through the HDC catalyst inlet where it is contacted with the third effluent within the HDC reaction zone to form the fourth effluent, wherein the fourth effluent is characterized as having an increased API Gravity of at least about 1° greater than the whole crude oil feedstock and a reduced amount of metal and sulfur content as compared to the whole crude oil feedstock.
  • In another embodiment, the first temperature is within a range of about 340 and 390° C. and the first pressure is within a range of about 30 and 150 bar. In another embodiment, the HDM catalyst, the HDM/HDS catalyst, and the HDS catalyst are selected from the group consisting of sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals on an inorganic oxide support, wherein the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof. As used herein, group VB metals refers to the group consisting of vanadium, niobium, and tantalum. As used herein, group VIB metals refers to the group consisting of chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten. As used herein, group VIIIB metals refers to iron, ruthenium, osmium, cobalt, rhenium, iridium, nickel, palladium, or platinum, preferably iron, cobalt and nickel. The HDC catalyst can be in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders or pellets or a combination thereof. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the HDM catalyst, the HDM/HDS catalyst, and the HDS catalyst are selected from the group consisting of Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • In one embodiment, the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof. Additionally, the HDC catalyst can be selected from the group consisting of sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals on an inorganic oxide support, wherein the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, a zeolite, and combinations thereof. The HDC catalyst can preferably be in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders, pellets, and combinations thereof Furthermore, each catalyst can have a flow rate within its respective moving bed, wherein the flow rate of each of said catalysts is at a rate of approximately 0.5% to 5% of the Tan-Tan height of the reactor per day. The process can be configured in such a way that each of said moving beds can be operated in a co-current or countercurrent fashion.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the HDM catalyst has a HDM catalyst flow rate, and the first effluent has a baseline effluent metal concentration, such that the process can include monitoring a metal concentration of the first effluent and increasing the HDM catalyst flow rate whenever the metal concentration of the first effluent exceeds the baseline effluent metal concentration. Likewise, the HDM/HDS catalyst can have an HDM/HDS catalyst flow rate, the second effluent can have a second baseline effluent metal concentration, and the second effluent can have a baseline sulfur concentration. Both a metal and a sulfur concentration of the second effluent can be monitored, and whenever the metal concentration of the second effluent exceeds the second baseline effluent metal concentration or whenever the sulfur concentration of the second effluent exceeds the baseline sulfur concentration, the HDM/HDS catalyst flow rate can be increased.
  • In another preferred embodiment, the HDS catalyst has an HDS catalyst flow rate, and the third effluent has an HDS baseline sulfur concentration. The process preferably includes monitoring of a sulfur concentration of the third effluent and increasing the HDS catalyst flow rate whenever the sulfur concentration of the third effluent exceeds the baseline sulfur concentration.
  • In yet another preferred embodiment, the HDC catalyst has an HDC catalyst flow rate, and the whole crude oil feedstock and the fourth effluent have a baseline API gravity. The process further includes monitoring the baseline API gravity of the whole crude oil feedstock and the fourth effluent and increasing the HDC catalyst flow rate whenever the difference between the baseline API gravity of the fourth effluent and the baseline API gravity of the whole crude oil feedstock does not exceed 1°.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the third effluent is characterized as having a sulfur content of between about 0.1 and 1.0 weight percent. Additionally, the process can further include separating the whole crude oil feedstock into two fractions prior to introducing the heated-pressurized mixture into the HDM reaction zone. In this embodiment, the first fraction has a maximum boiling point of about 210° C., and the second fraction has a minimum boiling point of greater than about 210° C. Additionally, the first fraction can bypass said reaction zones and can be combined with the fourth effluent, wherein the second fraction is mixed with the hydrogen to form the heated-pressurized mixture.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the process can further include introducing a first effluent slip stream to an HDM sampling vessel, introducing a second effluent slip stream to an HDM/HDS sampling vessel, introducing a third effluent slip stream to an HDS sampling vessel, and introducing a fourth effluent slip stream to an HDC sampling vessel. The HDM sampling vessel, the HDM/HDS sampling vessel, the HDS sampling vessel, and the HDC sampling vessel are each operable to allow for sampling of their respective slip streams while the process is in operation.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • So that the manner in which the above-recited features, advantages, and objectives of the invention, as well as others that will become apparent, are attained and can be understood in detail, more particular description of the invention briefly summarized above may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the drawings that form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only several embodiments of the invention and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • For purposes of this application, hydrodemetallization, hydrodesulfurization and hydroconversion will be shortened to HDM, HDS, and HDC, respectively. The present invention provides a pre-refining process for the upgrading of heavy, sour crude oils through HDM, HDS, and HDC of the crude oils to unexpectedly produce sweeter, lighter crudes using a moving catalyst system. In FIG. 1, which represents an embodiment of the present invention, heavy oil feedstock, such as a whole crude oil feedstock, is admixed with hydrogen (not shown) at a pressure of between about 30 bars and 200 bars, and more preferably about 60 bars to 100 bars, creating a premixture. In an alternate embodiment, the heavy oil feedstock and hydrogen are admixed at a pressure of between about 80 and 110 bar. The premixture is preferably heated (not shown) to a first temperature of between about 300° C. and 500° C., and more preferably, the premixture is heated in the range of about 350° C. and 450° C. The premixture is introduced via line [2] into HDM reactor [10], which contains a first catalyst. The first catalyst is an HDM catalyst. Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals, optionally in supported form on γ-alumina and/or γ-alumina and silica in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets. More preferred first catalysts can include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof In certain embodiments, the active metal species on the surface of the catalyst is the sulfide form of the metal. One exemplary first catalyst utilizes Nickel sulfide and Molybdenum sulfide active species, wherein the weight ratio of Ni to (Ni+Mo) is greater than about 0.15. Preferably, the inorganic oxide support material is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the first catalyst is supported on a γ-alumina based support having a surface area of between about 100 and 300 m2/g, preferably between about 140 and 240 m2/g. The catalyst can be described as generally having a high pore volume, which in certain embodiments is greater than about 0.5 cc/g, preferably greater than about 1 cc/g. The pore volume is believed to facilitate the uptake of active metals on the catalyst surface. In one embodiment, the first catalyst is introduced into HDM reactor [10] via line [6] and exits HDM reactor [10] via line [4]. In another embodiment, the flow of the first catalyst can be reversed such that the first catalyst is introduced into HDM reactor [10] via line [4] and exits HDM reactor [10] via line [6]. The exit stream from HDM reactor [10] defines the first effluent.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, a slipstream of the first effluent can be sampled via line [5] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the first catalyst by measuring the metal concentration (for instance Nickel and Vanadium) of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed Weighted Average Bed Temperature (WABT), whenever the metal concentration of the slipstream exceeds a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the first catalyst is increased until the metal concentration within the slipstream has returned to desired levels. In one embodiment, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the first catalyst is between about 0.05 to 10 wt %, more preferably between about 0.05 to 0.5 wt %, of the total catalyst inventory per day. The first catalyst can be replaced as a function of the total metals content (e.g., nickel and vanadium) detected at the outlet of the HDM reactor [10].
  • Upon exiting HDM reactor [10], the first effluent is introduced via line [12] into HDM/HDS reactor [20], which contains the second catalyst. The second catalyst is an HDM/HDS catalyst. Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals optionally supported on γ-alumina and/or γ-alumina and silica in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets. In one exemplary embodiment, the second catalyst includes a γ-alumina support. More preferred second catalyst can include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof. In one exemplary embodiment, the second catalyst includes Nickel and Molybdenum, wherein the weight ratio of nickel to (nickel+molybdenum) is up to about 0.3. Preferably, the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the second catalyst is introduced into HDM/HDS reactor [20] via line [16] and exits HDM/HDS reactor [20] via line [14]. In another embodiment, the flow of the second catalyst is reversed such that the second catalyst is introduced into HDM/HDS reactor [20] via line [14] and exits HDM/HDS reactor [20] via line [16]. The exit stream from HDM/HDS reactor [20] defines the second effluent.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, a slipstream of the second effluent can be sampled via line [15] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the second catalyst by measuring the metal and sulfur concentration of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed WABT, whenever the metal and/or sulfur concentrations of the slipstream exceeds a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the second catalyst can be increased until the metal and/or sulfur concentrations within the slipstream have returned to desired levels. In certain embodiments, similar to what is done with respect to the replacement of the first catalyst, the second catalyst can typically be replaced as a function of the total metals content (e.g., nickel and vanadium) or the total sulfur content detected at the outlet of the HDM/HDS reactor [20]. Preferably, the second effluent would have approximately 30 to 90% less metals than the heavy oil feedstock.
  • Upon exiting HDM/HDS reactor [20], the second effluent is introduced via line [22] into HDS reactor [30], which contains the third catalyst. The third catalyst is an HDS catalyst. Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals, optionally supported on γ-alumina and/or γ-alumina and silica, the catalysts being in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets. More preferred third catalysts include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, the third catalyst includes Nickel and Molybdenum, wherein the weight ratio of Ni to (Ni+Mo) is between about 0.1 and 0.3. Preferably, the inorganic oxide support is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the HDS catalyst support is a γ-alumina support having a surface area of between about 150 and 300 m2/g, preferably between about 180 and 240 m2/g. The catalyst can be described as generally having a pore volume that is smaller than the pore volume of the HDM catalyst, for example, the HDS catalyst can have a pore volume that is less than about 1 cc/g. The pore volume is believed to facilitate the uptake of metals on the catalyst surface. In one embodiment, the third catalyst is introduced into HDS reactor [30] via line [26] and exits HDS reactor [30] via line [24]. In another embodiment, the flow of the third catalyst is reversed such that the third catalyst is introduced into HDS reactor [30] via line [24] and exits HDS reactor [30] via line [26]. The stream from HDS reactor [30] defines the third effluent.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, a slipstream of the third effluent can be sampled via line [25] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the third catalyst by measuring the sulfur concentration of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed WABT, whenever the sulfur concentration of the slipstream exceeds a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the third catalyst is increased until the sulfur concentration within the slipstream has returned to desired levels. In one embodiment, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the second catalyst is between about 0.01 to 5 wt %, more preferably between about 0.05 to 0.5 wt %, of the total catalyst inventory per day. Generally, the replacement rate of the third catalyst can be based on a function of the total sulfur content of the effluent from HDS reactor [30].
  • Upon exiting HDS reactor [30], the third effluent is introduced via line [32] into HDC reactor [40], which contains the fourth catalyst. The fourth catalyst is an HDC catalyst. Preferred catalysts include sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals, optionally supported form on γ-alumina and/or γ-alumina and silica and/or a zeolite in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders and/or pellets. Preferably, the zeolite is selected from the group consisting of zeolite Y, ZSM-5, LWZ-15, AWLZ-15, and combinations thereof. Generally, the support utilized for the fourth catalyst is more acidic than the supports utilized for each of the first, second and third catalysts. An exemplary catalyst support includes silica in conjunction with γ-alumina, wherein the alumina can be present in an amount of between about 1 and 40% by weight. Similarly, the catalyst support can include silica and a zeolite, wherein the zeolite can be present in an amount of between about 1 and 40% by weight. More preferred fourth catalysts include Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof. In certain exemplary embodiments, the catalyst includes Nickel and Molybdenum, or Nickel and Tungsten, wherein the weight ratio of nickel to (nickel and the second metal) is between about 0.25 and 0.5, wherein the second metal is either Molybdenum or Tungsten. Preferably, the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, zeolite, zeolite Y, AWLZ-15, and any combination thereof. In one embodiment, the fourth catalyst is introduced into HDC reactor [40] via line [36] and exits HDC reactor [40] via line [34]. In another embodiment, the flow of the fourth catalyst is reversed such that the fourth catalyst is introduced into HDC reactor [40] via line [34] and exits HDC reactor [40] via line [36]. The e stream from HDC reactor [40] defines the fourth effluent. It is believed that the addition of the HDC reactor [40] to the process results in further hydroconversion and deeper hydrodesulfurization of the heavy oil feedstock, thereby resulting in a more improved product. Without wishing to be bound to any specific theory, it is believed that the fourth catalyst may facilitate ring opening, thereby improving the removal of bound sulfur.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, a slipstream of the fourth effluent is sampled via line [35] in order to monitor the effectiveness of the fourth catalyst by measuring the API gravity and/or sulfur content of the slipstream. For example, for a fixed WABT, whenever the API gravity of the slipstream is below a desired level and/or the sulfur content of the slipstream is above a desired level, the Catalyst Replacement Rate of the fourth catalyst is increased until the API gravity and/or the sulfur content within the slipstream have met the desired levels. In certain embodiments, the replacement rate of the HDC catalyst can be a function of the conversion of, or the presence of, the 540° C.+material present in the effluent of the HDC reactor [40]. In certain embodiments, once the catalyst has become stabilized (i.e., reached a coke equilibrium), the amount of catalyst removed from the reactor should approximately match the amount of catalyst added to the reactor.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the fourth effluent can be introduced to a liquid gas separator (not shown) in order to separate any gaseous products, wherein the liquid product is a synthetically produced crude oil having reduced metal and sulfur content, and an increased API gravity.
  • The reaction between the respective feed streams and the respective catalysts is exothermic. Therefore, the temperature proximate the feed stream inlet of each reactor will be less than the temperature proximate the exit stream of each reactor. The temperature of the catalyst bed, known as the Weighted Average Bed Temperature (WABT) is defined as being:
  • WABT = T i + ( T o - T i ) 2
  • wherein Ti is the inlet temperature and To is the outlet temperature. In one embodiment of the present invention, the WABT is used as a control point for improved catalyst performance. For example, in an embodiment of the present invention, the WABT for each reactor can be increased or decreased as appropriate to maintain the desired level of HDM, HDS or HDC within each reactor. The WABT is controlled by controlling the inlet temperature for each reactor. Due to the exothermic nature of the HDM, HDM/HDS, HDS and HDC reactions, the reactor outlet temperature is higher than the inlet temperature. The WABT is therefore the weighted average. In operation, the WABT will be set by optimization between the Catalyst Replacement Rate and the WABT to achieve the target for each section. In an embodiment of the present invention, each of the reactors is adiabatic and there is no external heating. In another embodiment of the present invention, the fourth effluent will pass through a feed/effluent heat exchanger in order to cool the fourth effluent while simultaneously preheating the premixture or the crude oil feedstock. Preferably, the premixture is preheated to a temperature within the range of about 300° C. to 500° C. In one embodiment, optional HDM sampling vessel [8], HDM/HDS sampling vessel [18], HDS sampling vessel [28] and HDC sampling vessel [38] are provided upstream of their respective sampling lines.
  • The WABTs of HDM reactor [10], HDM/HDS reactor [20], and HDS reactor [30] a preferably maintained within the range of about 350° C. and 420° C. The WABT of HDC reactor [40] is preferably within the range of about 350° C. and 450° C., preferably within the range of about 380° C. and 425° C. In certain embodiments, the WABT of the HDC reactor [40] is greater than the WABTs of the HDM reactor [10], the HDM/HDS reactor [20] and the HDS reactor [30]. In an exemplary embodiment, the HDM reactor [10] is operated at a temperature of between about 370° C. and 415° C., the HDS reactor [30] is operated at a temperature of between about 370° C. and 410° C., and the HDC reactor [40] is operated at a temperature of between about 380° C. and 425° C. Optionally, the HDM/HDS reactor [20] is operated at a temperature that is less than the operating temperature of the HDC reactor [40].
  • In an additional embodiment of the present invention, the heavy oil feedstock is separated into first and second fractions prior to introduction into HDM reactor [10], with the first fraction having a maximum boiling point of about 210° C. or less and the second fraction containing the volumetric balance of the whole crude oil. The first fraction can then bypass HDM reactor [10], HDM/HDS reactor [20], HDS reactor [30], and HDC reactor [40], and instead be optionally processed separately prior to recombining with the fourth effluent.
  • Example Production of Low Sulfur Crude Oil
  • An Arab Heavy Feedstock having properties as shown in Table I below was processed in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • TABLE I
    Properties of Arab Heavy Feedstock
    Crude Origin Units Arabian Heavy Export
    Density at 15° C. g/ml 0.89
    API Gravity ° 27
    CCR wt % 8.2
    Vanadium wtppm 56.4
    Nickel wtppm 16.4
    Sulphur wt % 2.83
    NaCl content wtppm <5
    C wt % 84.9
    H wt % 11.89
  • The specific conditions include the following: total hydrogen pressure of the reactor system is maintained at 100 bar; hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio is maintained at 800 normal liters of hydrogen per liter of Arab Heavy Feedstock; temperature of the catalyst system was operated at between 370° C. and 380° C.; and the liquid hourly space velocity for the combined four reactors was 0.5 per hour. The Catalyst Replacement Rate for the first catalyst was maintained within the range of 0.05 to 0.5 weight percent of the total catalyst inventory per day. The Catalyst Replacement Rate for the third catalyst was maintained within the range of 0.01 to 5 weight percent of the total catalyst inventory per day. The resulting product was analyzed, with the results shown in Table II below.
  • TABLE II
    Properties of Resulting Product
    Synthetic Crude Oil
    Crude Origin Units Produced
    Refractive index 1.4948
    Density at 15° C. g/ml 0.8762
    API Gravity ° 29.9
    CCR wt %
    Vanadium Wtppm 23.4
    Nickel Wtppm 8.7
    Sulphur wt % 0.5547
    NaCl content Wtppm
  • As shown in Table II, the final product is a synthetic crude oil having a lower density; increased API gravity; and, reduced amounts of CCR, vanadium, nickel, and sulfur.
  • As will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may easily be produced in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The present embodiment is, therefore, to be considered as merely illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalence of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein. Furthermore, the present invention may suitably comprise, consist or consist essentially of the elements disclosed and may be practiced in the absence of an element not disclosed.

Claims (16)

1. A process for prerefining heavy sour crude oils, the process comprising:
introducing a heated-pressurized mixture of whole crude oil feedstock and hydrogen into an HDM reaction zone through an HDM reaction inlet, wherein the heated-pressurized mixture is at a first temperature within a range of about 300 to 500° C., wherein the heated-pressurized mixture is at a first pressure within a range of about 30 to 200 bar, wherein the HDM reaction zone further comprises an HDM moving bed, the HDM reaction zone being operable to receive an HDM catalyst through an HDM catalyst inlet, the HDM reaction zone having an HDM catalyst outlet, the HDM catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDM catalyst from the HDM reaction zone;
introducing the HDM catalyst into the HDM reaction zone through the HDM catalyst inlet;
contacting the premixture with the HDM catalyst within the HDM reaction zone such that the premixture is at least partially demetallized, forming a first effluent, the first effluent being characterized as having 30 to 90% reduced amounts of metals as compared to the whole crude oil feedstock;
introducing the first effluent into an HDM/HDS reaction zone through an HDM/HDS reaction inlet, wherein the HDM/HDS reaction zone further comprises an HDM/HDS moving bed, the HDM/HDS reaction zone being operable to receive an HDM/HDS catalyst through an HDM/HDS catalyst inlet, the HDM/HDS reaction zone having an HDM/HDS catalyst outlet, the HDM/HDS catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDM/HDS catalyst from the HDM/HDS reaction zone;
introducing the HDM/HDS catalyst into the HDM/HDS reaction zone through the HDM/HDS catalyst inlet;
contacting the first effluent with the HDM/HDS catalyst within the HDM/HDS reaction zone to form a second effluent, wherein the second effluent has a reduced metals and sulfur content as compared to the first effluent;
introducing the second effluent into an HDS reaction zone through an HDS reaction inlet, wherein the HDS reaction zone further comprises an HDS moving bed, the HDS reaction zone being operable to receive an HDS catalyst through an HDS catalyst inlet, the HDS reaction zone having an HDS catalyst outlet, the HDS catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDS catalyst from the HDS reaction zone;
introducing the HDS catalyst into the HDS reaction zone through the HDS catalyst inlet;
contacting the second effluent with the HDS catalyst within the HDS reaction zone to form a third effluent, wherein the third effluent has a reduced sulfur content as compared to the second effluent;
introducing the third effluent into an HDC reaction zone through an HDC reaction inlet, wherein the HDC reaction zone further comprises an HDC moving bed, the HDC reaction zone being operable to receive an HDC catalyst through an HDC catalyst inlet, the HDC reaction zone having an HDC catalyst outlet, the HDC catalyst outlet being operable to emit the HDC catalyst from the HDC reaction zone;
introducing the HDC catalyst into the HDC reaction zone through the HDC catalyst inlet;
contacting the third effluent with the HDC catalyst within the HDC reaction zone to form a fourth effluent, wherein the fourth effluent is characterized as having an increased API Gravity of at least 1° greater than the whole crude oil feedstock and a reduced amount of metal and sulfur content as compared to the whole crude oil feedstock.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the first temperature is within a range of about 340 and 390 degrees Celsius.
3. The process of claim 1, wherein the first pressure is in a range of about 30 and 150 bar.
4. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDM catalyst, the HDM/HDS catalyst, and the HDS catalyst comprise at least one metal sulfide selected from the group consisting of sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals supported on an inorganic oxide, wherein the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof, wherein the fourth catalyst is in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders or pellets or a combination thereof.
5. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDM catalyst, the HDM/HDS catalyst, and the HDS catalyst are selected from the group consisting of Nickel promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Nickel promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Molybdenum supported on an inorganic oxide, Cobalt promoting Tungsten supported on an inorganic oxide, and combinations thereof.
6. The process of claim 5, wherein the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, and combinations thereof.
7. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDC catalyst comprises a metal selected from the group consisting of sulfides of the group VB, VIB and VIIIB metals on an inorganic oxide, wherein the inorganic oxide is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica alumina, a zeolite, and combinations thereof, wherein the fourth catalyst is in the form of extrudates, spheres, cylinders, pellets, and combinations thereof.
8. The process of claim 1, wherein each catalyst has a flow rate within its respective moving bed, wherein the flow rate of each of said catalysts is at a rate of approximately 0.5% to 5% of the Tan-Tan height of the reactor per day.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein each of said moving beds can be operated in a co-current or countercurrent fashion.
10. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDM catalyst has a HDM catalyst flow rate, wherein the first effluent has a baseline effluent metal concentration, the process farther comprising monitoring a metal concentration of the first effluent and increasing the HDM catalyst flow rate whenever the metal concentration of the first effluent exceeds the baseline effluent metal concentration.
11. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDM/HDS catalyst has an HDM/HDS catalyst flow rate, wherein the second effluent has a second baseline effluent metal concentration, wherein the second effluent has a baseline sulfur concentration, the process further comprising monitoring a metal concentration and a sulfur concentration of the second effluent and increasing the HDM/HDS catalyst flow rate whenever the metal concentration of the second effluent exceeds the second baseline effluent metal concentration or whenever the sulfur concentration of the second effluent exceeds the baseline sulfur concentration.
12. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDS catalyst has an HDS catalyst flow rate, wherein the third effluent has an HDS baseline sulfur concentration, the process farther comprising monitoring a sulfur concentration of the third effluent and increasing the HDS catalyst flow rate whenever the sulfur concentration of the third effluent exceeds the baseline sulfur concentration.
13. The process of claim 1, wherein the HDC catalyst has an HDC catalyst flow rate, wherein the whole crude oil feedstock and the fourth effluent have a baseline API gravity, the process further comprising monitoring the baseline API gravity of the whole crude oil feedstock and the fourth effluent and increasing the HDC catalyst flow rate whenever the difference between the baseline APT gravity of the fourth effluent and the baseline API gravity of the whole crude oil feedstock does not exceed 1°.
14. The process of claim 1, wherein the third effluent is characterized as having a sulfur content of between 0.1 and 1.0 weight percent.
15. The process of claim 1, further comprising separating the whole crude oil feedstock into two fractions prior to introducing the heated-pressurized mixture into the HDM reaction zone, wherein the first fraction has a maximum boiling point of about 210° C., wherein the second fraction has a minimum boiling point of greater than about 210° C., wherein the first fraction bypasses said reaction zones and is combined with the fourth effluent, wherein the second fraction is mixed with the hydrogen to form the heated-pressurized mixture.
16. The process of claim 1, further comprising:
introducing a first effluent slip stream to an HDM sampling vessel;
introducing a second effluent slip stream to an HDM/HDS sampling vessel;
introducing a third effluent slip stream to an HDS sampling vessel; and
introducing a fourth effluent slip stream to an HDC sampling vessel, wherein the HDM sampling vessel, the HDM/HDS sampling vessel, the HDS sampling vessel, and the HDC sampling vessel are all operable to allow for sampling of their respective slip streams while the process is in operation.
US12/502,590 2008-07-14 2009-07-14 Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System Abandoned US20100018904A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/502,590 US20100018904A1 (en) 2008-07-14 2009-07-14 Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8045208P 2008-07-14 2008-07-14
US12/502,590 US20100018904A1 (en) 2008-07-14 2009-07-14 Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100018904A1 true US20100018904A1 (en) 2010-01-28

Family

ID=41165617

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/502,590 Abandoned US20100018904A1 (en) 2008-07-14 2009-07-14 Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20100018904A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2010009082A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9546330B2 (en) 2012-05-04 2017-01-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated ebullated-bed process for whole crude oil upgrading
WO2017210287A1 (en) * 2016-06-02 2017-12-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for upgrading heavy oils
US9879188B2 (en) 2015-07-27 2018-01-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated ebullated-bed hydroprocessing, fixed bed hydroprocessing and coking process for whole crude oil conversion into hydrotreated distillates and petroleum green coke
WO2019018225A1 (en) * 2017-07-17 2019-01-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils
US10301556B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2019-05-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for the conversion of feedstock hydrocarbons to petrochemical products
US10438835B2 (en) * 2015-02-16 2019-10-08 Infineon Technologies Ag System reference with compensation of electrical and mechanical stress and life-time drift effects
US10603657B2 (en) 2016-04-11 2020-03-31 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Nano-sized zeolite supported catalysts and methods for their production
US10689587B2 (en) 2017-04-26 2020-06-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and processes for conversion of crude oil
US11130920B1 (en) 2020-04-04 2021-09-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated process and system for treatment of hydrocarbon feedstocks using stripping solvent

Families Citing this family (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2807233B1 (en) 2012-01-27 2020-12-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated solvent deasphalting, hydrotreating and steam pyrolysis process for direct processing of a crude oil
EP2807236B1 (en) 2012-01-27 2020-12-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated hydrotreating and steam pyrolysis process for direct processing of a crude oil
CN104105783B (en) 2012-01-27 2016-11-23 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 The hydrotreating including integration that residue bypasses and steam pyrolysis method for directly processing crude oil
CN107216914B (en) 2012-01-27 2020-02-21 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 Integrated hydrotreating and steam pyrolysis process including hydrogen redistribution for direct processing of crude oil
CN104245892B (en) 2012-03-20 2016-10-12 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 Process and fluid catalytic cracking for processing the integrated hydrogenation of crude oil
US9228139B2 (en) 2012-03-20 2016-01-05 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated hydroprocessing and steam pyrolysis of crude oil to produce light olefins and coke
JP6166344B2 (en) 2012-03-20 2017-07-19 サウジ アラビアン オイル カンパニー Integrated hydroprocessing, steam pyrolysis, and catalytic cracking to produce petrochemicals from crude oil
WO2013142617A1 (en) 2012-03-20 2013-09-26 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated hydroprocessing, steam pyrolysis and slurry hydroprocessing of crude oil to produce petrochemicals
US10844296B2 (en) 2017-01-04 2020-11-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Conversion of crude oil to aromatic and olefinic petrochemicals
US10851316B2 (en) 2017-01-04 2020-12-01 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Conversion of crude oil to aromatic and olefinic petrochemicals
EP3577199B1 (en) 2017-02-02 2021-12-22 SABIC Global Technologies B.V. Integrated hydrotreating and steam pyrolysis process for the direct processing of a crude oil to produce olefinic and aromatic petrochemicals
US10954457B2 (en) 2019-02-13 2021-03-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods including direct hydroprocessing and high-severity fluidized catalytic cracking for processing crude oil
US11220637B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2022-01-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating selective hydrogenation and FCC
US11220640B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2022-01-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating selective hydrogenation, FCC and naphtha reforming
US11091709B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2021-08-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating selective hydrogenation, ring opening and naphtha reforming
US11001773B1 (en) 2019-10-30 2021-05-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating selective hydrogenation and selective hydrocracking
US11091708B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2021-08-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating selective hydrogenation and ring opening
US11390818B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2022-07-19 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating hydrodealkylation
US11377609B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2022-07-05 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and PFO treatment integrating hydrodealkylation and naphtha reforming
US20210130717A1 (en) 2019-10-30 2021-05-06 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and process for steam cracking and pfo treatment integrating selective hydrogenation, selective hydrocracking and naphtha reforming
US11193072B2 (en) 2019-12-03 2021-12-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processing facility to form hydrogen and petrochemicals
US11572517B2 (en) 2019-12-03 2023-02-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processing facility to produce hydrogen and petrochemicals
US11426708B2 (en) 2020-03-02 2022-08-30 King Abdullah University Of Science And Technology Potassium-promoted red mud as a catalyst for forming hydrocarbons from carbon dioxide
US11492255B2 (en) 2020-04-03 2022-11-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Steam methane reforming with steam regeneration
US11420915B2 (en) 2020-06-11 2022-08-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Red mud as a catalyst for the isomerization of olefins
US11495814B2 (en) 2020-06-17 2022-11-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Utilizing black powder for electrolytes for flow batteries
US11492254B2 (en) 2020-06-18 2022-11-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hydrogen production with membrane reformer
US11583824B2 (en) 2020-06-18 2023-02-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hydrogen production with membrane reformer
US11427519B2 (en) 2021-01-04 2022-08-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Acid modified red mud as a catalyst for olefin isomerization
US11724943B2 (en) 2021-01-04 2023-08-15 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Black powder catalyst for hydrogen production via dry reforming
US11718522B2 (en) 2021-01-04 2023-08-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Black powder catalyst for hydrogen production via bi-reforming
US11814289B2 (en) 2021-01-04 2023-11-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Black powder catalyst for hydrogen production via steam reforming
US11820658B2 (en) 2021-01-04 2023-11-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Black powder catalyst for hydrogen production via autothermal reforming
US11787759B2 (en) 2021-08-12 2023-10-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Dimethyl ether production via dry reforming and dimethyl ether synthesis in a vessel
US11718575B2 (en) 2021-08-12 2023-08-08 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methanol production via dry reforming and methanol synthesis in a vessel
US11578016B1 (en) 2021-08-12 2023-02-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Olefin production via dry reforming and olefin synthesis in a vessel
US11617981B1 (en) 2022-01-03 2023-04-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Method for capturing CO2 with assisted vapor compression
US20230212761A1 (en) * 2022-01-03 2023-07-06 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods for producing syngas from H2S and CO2 in an electrochemical cell
US11827855B1 (en) 2022-07-06 2023-11-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process and nano-ZSM-5 based catalyst formulation for cracking crude oil to produce light olefins and aromatics
US11866651B1 (en) 2022-11-09 2024-01-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process and catalyst formulation for cracking crude oil
US11866660B1 (en) 2022-11-09 2024-01-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process and catalyst formulation for cracking crude oil
US11814594B1 (en) 2022-12-12 2023-11-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for hydroprocessing and cracking crude oil
US11814593B1 (en) 2022-12-12 2023-11-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Processes for hydroprocessing and cracking crude oil
US11905475B1 (en) 2023-02-02 2024-02-20 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Multi-zone catalytic cracking of crude oils
US11898110B1 (en) 2023-02-02 2024-02-13 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Multi-zone catalytic cracking of crude oils
US11866659B1 (en) 2023-02-02 2024-01-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Multi-zone catalytic cracking of crude oils
US11866661B1 (en) 2023-02-02 2024-01-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Multi-zone catalytic cracking of crude oils
US11866663B1 (en) 2023-02-02 2024-01-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Multi-zone catalytic cracking of crude oils
US11866662B1 (en) 2023-02-02 2024-01-09 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Multi-zone catalytic cracking of crude oils

Citations (97)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2560433A (en) * 1948-07-16 1951-07-10 Gulf Research Development Co Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2600931A (en) * 1950-08-29 1952-06-17 Gulf Oil Corp Process for refining high sulfur crude oils
US2646388A (en) * 1951-04-20 1953-07-21 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrodesulfurization process
US2755225A (en) * 1951-10-18 1956-07-17 British Petroleum Co Treatment of crude petroleum
US2771401A (en) * 1954-08-05 1956-11-20 Exxon Research Engineering Co Desulfurization of crude oil and crude oil fractions
US2909476A (en) * 1954-12-13 1959-10-20 Exxon Research Engineering Co Upgrading of crude petroleum oil
US2912375A (en) * 1957-12-23 1959-11-10 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrogenation of petroleum oils with "shot" size catalyst and regeneration catalyst
US2939835A (en) * 1953-12-31 1960-06-07 Nagynyomasu Treatment of mineral oils to produce light and middle oils
US3119765A (en) * 1959-10-19 1964-01-28 Exxon Research Engineering Co Catalytic treatment of crude oils
US3262874A (en) * 1964-01-29 1966-07-26 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrorefining of petroleum crude oil and catalyst therefor
US3501396A (en) * 1969-04-14 1970-03-17 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrodesulfurization of asphaltene-containing black oil
US3617524A (en) * 1969-06-25 1971-11-02 Standard Oil Co Ebullated bed hydrocracking
US3623974A (en) * 1969-12-10 1971-11-30 Cities Service Res & Dev Co Hydrotreating a heavy hydrocarbon oil in an ebullated catalyst zone and a fixed catalyst zone
US3684688A (en) * 1971-01-21 1972-08-15 Chevron Res Heavy oil conversion
US3686093A (en) * 1970-02-27 1972-08-22 Robert Leard Irvine Hydrocracking arrangement
US3694351A (en) * 1970-03-06 1972-09-26 Gulf Research Development Co Catalytic process including continuous catalyst injection without catalyst removal
US3706657A (en) * 1970-12-31 1972-12-19 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrodesulfurization of crude and residual oils at reduced space velocity
US3730880A (en) * 1969-12-12 1973-05-01 Shell Oil Co Residual oil hydrodesulfurization process
US3730879A (en) * 1970-11-19 1973-05-01 Gulf Research Development Co Two-bed catalyst arrangement for hydrodesulrurization of crude oil
US3787315A (en) * 1972-06-01 1974-01-22 Exxon Research Engineering Co Alkali metal desulfurization process for petroleum oil stocks using low pressure hydrogen
US3806444A (en) * 1972-12-29 1974-04-23 Texaco Inc Desulfurization of petroleum crude
US3809644A (en) * 1972-08-01 1974-05-07 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Multiple stage hydrodesulfurization of residuum
US3826737A (en) * 1972-02-21 1974-07-30 Shell Oil Co Process for the catalytic treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US3876533A (en) * 1974-02-07 1975-04-08 Atlantic Richfield Co Guard bed system for removing contaminant from synthetic oil
US3876530A (en) * 1973-08-22 1975-04-08 Gulf Research Development Co Multiple stage hydrodesulfurization with greater sulfur and metal removal in initial stage
US3887455A (en) * 1974-03-25 1975-06-03 Exxon Research Engineering Co Ebullating bed process for hydrotreatment of heavy crudes and residua
US3901792A (en) * 1972-05-22 1975-08-26 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Multi-zone method for demetallizing and desulfurizing crude oil or atmospheric residual oil
US3915841A (en) * 1974-04-12 1975-10-28 Gulf Research Development Co Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock
US3926784A (en) * 1973-08-22 1975-12-16 Gulf Research Development Co Plural stage residue hydrodesulfurization process with hydrogen sulfide addition and removal
US3957622A (en) * 1974-08-05 1976-05-18 Universal Oil Products Company Two-stage hydroconversion of hydrocarbonaceous Black Oil
US3976559A (en) * 1975-04-28 1976-08-24 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combined catalytic and alkali metal hydrodesulfurization and conversion process
US4003824A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-01-18 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Desulfurization and hydroconversion of residua with sodium hydride and hydrogen
US4003823A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-01-18 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combined desulfurization and hydroconversion with alkali metal hydroxides
US4006076A (en) * 1973-04-27 1977-02-01 Chevron Research Company Process for the production of low-sulfur-content hydrocarbon mixtures
US4007109A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-02-08 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combined desulfurization and hydroconversion with alkali metal oxides
US4007111A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-02-08 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Residua desulfurization and hydroconversion with sodamide and hydrogen
US4017382A (en) * 1975-11-17 1977-04-12 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodesulfurization process with upstaged reactor zones
US4017381A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-04-12 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Process for desulfurization of residua with sodamide-hydrogen and regeneration of sodamide
US4045182A (en) * 1975-11-17 1977-08-30 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodesulfurization apparatus with upstaged reactor zones
US4045331A (en) * 1975-10-23 1977-08-30 Union Oil Company Of California Demetallization and desulfurization of petroleum feed-stocks with manganese on alumina catalysts
US4048060A (en) * 1975-12-29 1977-09-13 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Two-stage hydrodesulfurization of oil utilizing a narrow pore size distribution catalyst
US4052295A (en) * 1975-03-24 1977-10-04 Shell Oil Company Process for the desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils with water vapor addition to the reaction zone
US4076613A (en) * 1975-04-28 1978-02-28 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Combined disulfurization and conversion with alkali metals
US4089774A (en) * 1975-08-28 1978-05-16 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US4118310A (en) * 1977-06-28 1978-10-03 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodesulfurization process employing a guard reactor
US4119528A (en) * 1977-08-01 1978-10-10 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Hydroconversion of residua with potassium sulfide
US4120780A (en) * 1976-07-09 1978-10-17 Chiyoda Chemical Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. Catalysts for hydrodemetallization of hydrocarbons containing metallic compounds as impurities and process for hydro-treating such hydrocarbons using such catalysts
US4234402A (en) * 1978-10-24 1980-11-18 Kirkbride Chalmer G Sulfur removal from crude petroleum
US4259294A (en) * 1978-01-20 1981-03-31 Shell Oil Company Apparatus for the hydrogenation of heavy hydrocarbon oils
US4332671A (en) * 1981-06-08 1982-06-01 Conoco Inc. Processing of heavy high-sulfur crude oil
US4348270A (en) * 1979-11-13 1982-09-07 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Catalysts and hydrocarbon treating processes utilizing the same
US4406777A (en) * 1982-01-19 1983-09-27 Mobil Oil Corporation Fixed bed reactor operation
US4411768A (en) * 1979-12-21 1983-10-25 The Lummus Company Hydrogenation of high boiling hydrocarbons
US4431525A (en) * 1982-04-26 1984-02-14 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Three-catalyst process for the hydrotreating of heavy hydrocarbon streams
US4431526A (en) * 1982-07-06 1984-02-14 Union Oil Company Of California Multiple-stage hydroprocessing of hydrocarbon oil
US4568450A (en) * 1982-08-19 1986-02-04 Union Oil Company Of California Hydrocarbon conversion process
US4588709A (en) * 1983-12-19 1986-05-13 Intevep, S.A. Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues
US4617110A (en) * 1984-06-11 1986-10-14 Phillips Petroleum Company Control of a hydrofining process for hydrocarbon-containing feed streams which process employs a hydrodemetallization reactor in series with a hydrodesulfurization reactor
US4619759A (en) * 1985-04-24 1986-10-28 Phillips Petroleum Company Two-stage hydrotreating of a mixture of resid and light cycle oil
US4626340A (en) * 1985-09-26 1986-12-02 Intevep, S.A. Process for the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks characterized by high molecular weight, low reactivity and high metal contents
US4642179A (en) * 1983-12-19 1987-02-10 Intevep, S.A. Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues
US4652361A (en) * 1985-09-27 1987-03-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalytic hydrofining of oil
US4657665A (en) * 1985-12-20 1987-04-14 Amoco Corporation Process for demetallation and desulfurization of heavy hydrocarbons
US4729826A (en) * 1986-02-28 1988-03-08 Union Oil Company Of California Temperature controlled catalytic demetallization of hydrocarbons
US4832829A (en) * 1987-04-27 1989-05-23 Intevep S.A. Catalyst for the simultaneous hydrodemetallization and hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks
US4894144A (en) * 1988-11-23 1990-01-16 Conoco Inc. Preparation of lower sulfur and higher sulfur cokes
US4925554A (en) * 1988-02-05 1990-05-15 Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. Hydrotreating process for heavy hydrocarbon oils
US4968409A (en) * 1984-03-21 1990-11-06 Chevron Research Company Hydrocarbon processing of gas containing feed in a countercurrent moving catalyst bed
US5009768A (en) * 1989-12-19 1991-04-23 Intevep, S.A. Hydrocracking high residual contained in vacuum gas oil
US5045117A (en) * 1990-09-18 1991-09-03 Rockwell International Corporation System for removing flux residues from printed wiring assemblies
US5076908A (en) * 1989-07-19 1991-12-31 Chevron Research & Technology Company Method and apparatus for an on-stream particle replacement system for countercurrent contact of a gas and liquid feed stream with a packed bed
US5176820A (en) * 1991-01-22 1993-01-05 Phillips Petroleum Company Multi-stage hydrotreating process and apparatus
US5178749A (en) * 1983-08-29 1993-01-12 Chevron Research And Technology Company Catalytic process for treating heavy oils
US5258115A (en) * 1991-10-21 1993-11-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Delayed coking with refinery caustic
US5264188A (en) * 1991-01-22 1993-11-23 Phillips Petroleum Company Multi-stage hydrotreating process and apparatus
US5417846A (en) * 1990-03-29 1995-05-23 Institut Francais Du Petrole Hydrotreatment method for a petroleum residue or heavy oil with a view to refining them and converting them to lighter fractions
US5472928A (en) * 1989-07-19 1995-12-05 Scheuerman; Georgieanna L. Catalyst, method and apparatus for an on-stream particle replacement system for countercurrent contact of a gas and liquid feed stream with a packed bed
US5591325A (en) * 1993-08-18 1997-01-07 Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. Process for hydrotreating heavy oil and hydrotreating apparatus
US5779992A (en) * 1993-08-18 1998-07-14 Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. Process for hydrotreating heavy oil and hydrotreating apparatus
US5916529A (en) * 1989-07-19 1999-06-29 Chevron U.S.A. Inc Multistage moving-bed hydroprocessing reactor with separate catalyst addition and withdrawal systems for each stage, and method for hydroprocessing a hydrocarbon feed stream
US5925238A (en) * 1997-05-09 1999-07-20 Ifp North America Catalytic multi-stage hydrodesulfurization of metals-containing petroleum residua with cascading of rejuvenated catalyst
US6132597A (en) * 1997-06-10 2000-10-17 Institut Francais Du Petrole Hydrotreating hydrocarbon feeds in an ebullating bed reactor
US6235190B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2001-05-22 Uop Llc Distillate product hydrocracking process
US6270654B1 (en) * 1993-08-18 2001-08-07 Ifp North America, Inc. Catalytic hydrogenation process utilizing multi-stage ebullated bed reactors
US6280606B1 (en) * 1999-03-22 2001-08-28 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting heavy petroleum fractions that comprise a distillation stage, ebullated-bed hydroconversion stages of the vacuum distillate, and a vacuum residue and a catalytic cracking stage
US20010027936A1 (en) * 2000-01-11 2001-10-11 Frederic Morel Process for converting petroleum fractions, comprising an ebullated bed hydroconversion step, a separation step, a hydrodesulphurisation step and a cracking step
US6306287B1 (en) * 1998-10-14 2001-10-23 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for hydrotreatment of a heavy hydrocarbon fraction using permutable reactors and introduction of a middle distillate
US6309537B1 (en) * 1998-12-10 2001-10-30 Institut Francais Du Petrole Hydrotreating hydrocarbon feeds in an ebullating bed reactor
US6447671B1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2002-09-10 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting heavy petroleum fractions, comprising an ebullated bed hydroconversion step and a hydrotreatment step
US6554994B1 (en) * 1999-04-13 2003-04-29 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Upflow reactor system with layered catalyst bed for hydrotreating heavy feedstocks
US20040055934A1 (en) * 2000-12-11 2004-03-25 Pascal Tromeur Method for hydrotreatment of a heavy hydrocarbon fraction with switchable reactors and reactors capable of being shorted out
US20050082202A1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2005-04-21 Process Dynamics, Inc. Two phase hydroprocessing
US20050155909A1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2005-07-21 Jgc Corporation Method of refining petroleum and refining apparatus
US20060060501A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Thierry Gauthier Process for hydroconversion of a heavy feedstock with dispersed catalyst
US20060060509A1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2006-03-23 Yoshimitsu Miyauchi Process for the hydroprocessing of heavy hydrocarbon feeds using at least two reactors
US20060254956A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2006-11-16 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods for making higher value products from sulfur containing crude oil
US20070187294A1 (en) * 2003-07-09 2007-08-16 Jorge Ancheyta Juarez Process for the catalytic hydrotretment of heavy hydrocarbons of petroleum

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0631324B2 (en) * 1982-07-19 1994-04-27 シエブロン・リサ−チ・コンパニ− How to improve the quality of hydrocarbon feeds
JP2004263117A (en) * 2003-03-04 2004-09-24 Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd Catalytic hydrogenation method for crude oil

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2560433A (en) * 1948-07-16 1951-07-10 Gulf Research Development Co Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2600931A (en) * 1950-08-29 1952-06-17 Gulf Oil Corp Process for refining high sulfur crude oils
US2646388A (en) * 1951-04-20 1953-07-21 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrodesulfurization process
US2755225A (en) * 1951-10-18 1956-07-17 British Petroleum Co Treatment of crude petroleum
US2939835A (en) * 1953-12-31 1960-06-07 Nagynyomasu Treatment of mineral oils to produce light and middle oils
US2771401A (en) * 1954-08-05 1956-11-20 Exxon Research Engineering Co Desulfurization of crude oil and crude oil fractions
US2909476A (en) * 1954-12-13 1959-10-20 Exxon Research Engineering Co Upgrading of crude petroleum oil
US2912375A (en) * 1957-12-23 1959-11-10 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrogenation of petroleum oils with "shot" size catalyst and regeneration catalyst
US3119765A (en) * 1959-10-19 1964-01-28 Exxon Research Engineering Co Catalytic treatment of crude oils
US3262874A (en) * 1964-01-29 1966-07-26 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrorefining of petroleum crude oil and catalyst therefor
US3501396A (en) * 1969-04-14 1970-03-17 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrodesulfurization of asphaltene-containing black oil
US3617524A (en) * 1969-06-25 1971-11-02 Standard Oil Co Ebullated bed hydrocracking
US3623974A (en) * 1969-12-10 1971-11-30 Cities Service Res & Dev Co Hydrotreating a heavy hydrocarbon oil in an ebullated catalyst zone and a fixed catalyst zone
US3730880A (en) * 1969-12-12 1973-05-01 Shell Oil Co Residual oil hydrodesulfurization process
US3686093A (en) * 1970-02-27 1972-08-22 Robert Leard Irvine Hydrocracking arrangement
US3694351A (en) * 1970-03-06 1972-09-26 Gulf Research Development Co Catalytic process including continuous catalyst injection without catalyst removal
US3730879A (en) * 1970-11-19 1973-05-01 Gulf Research Development Co Two-bed catalyst arrangement for hydrodesulrurization of crude oil
US3706657A (en) * 1970-12-31 1972-12-19 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrodesulfurization of crude and residual oils at reduced space velocity
US3684688A (en) * 1971-01-21 1972-08-15 Chevron Res Heavy oil conversion
US3826737A (en) * 1972-02-21 1974-07-30 Shell Oil Co Process for the catalytic treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US3901792A (en) * 1972-05-22 1975-08-26 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Multi-zone method for demetallizing and desulfurizing crude oil or atmospheric residual oil
US3787315A (en) * 1972-06-01 1974-01-22 Exxon Research Engineering Co Alkali metal desulfurization process for petroleum oil stocks using low pressure hydrogen
US3809644A (en) * 1972-08-01 1974-05-07 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Multiple stage hydrodesulfurization of residuum
US3806444A (en) * 1972-12-29 1974-04-23 Texaco Inc Desulfurization of petroleum crude
US4006076A (en) * 1973-04-27 1977-02-01 Chevron Research Company Process for the production of low-sulfur-content hydrocarbon mixtures
US3876530A (en) * 1973-08-22 1975-04-08 Gulf Research Development Co Multiple stage hydrodesulfurization with greater sulfur and metal removal in initial stage
US3926784A (en) * 1973-08-22 1975-12-16 Gulf Research Development Co Plural stage residue hydrodesulfurization process with hydrogen sulfide addition and removal
US3876533A (en) * 1974-02-07 1975-04-08 Atlantic Richfield Co Guard bed system for removing contaminant from synthetic oil
US3887455A (en) * 1974-03-25 1975-06-03 Exxon Research Engineering Co Ebullating bed process for hydrotreatment of heavy crudes and residua
US3915841A (en) * 1974-04-12 1975-10-28 Gulf Research Development Co Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock
US3957622A (en) * 1974-08-05 1976-05-18 Universal Oil Products Company Two-stage hydroconversion of hydrocarbonaceous Black Oil
US4052295A (en) * 1975-03-24 1977-10-04 Shell Oil Company Process for the desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils with water vapor addition to the reaction zone
US4003824A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-01-18 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Desulfurization and hydroconversion of residua with sodium hydride and hydrogen
US3976559A (en) * 1975-04-28 1976-08-24 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combined catalytic and alkali metal hydrodesulfurization and conversion process
US4007109A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-02-08 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combined desulfurization and hydroconversion with alkali metal oxides
US4007111A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-02-08 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Residua desulfurization and hydroconversion with sodamide and hydrogen
US4120779A (en) * 1975-04-28 1978-10-17 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Process for desulfurization of residua with sodamide-hydrogen and regeneration of sodamide
US4017381A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-04-12 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Process for desulfurization of residua with sodamide-hydrogen and regeneration of sodamide
US4003823A (en) * 1975-04-28 1977-01-18 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combined desulfurization and hydroconversion with alkali metal hydroxides
US4076613A (en) * 1975-04-28 1978-02-28 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Combined disulfurization and conversion with alkali metals
US4089774A (en) * 1975-08-28 1978-05-16 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US4045331A (en) * 1975-10-23 1977-08-30 Union Oil Company Of California Demetallization and desulfurization of petroleum feed-stocks with manganese on alumina catalysts
US4045182A (en) * 1975-11-17 1977-08-30 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodesulfurization apparatus with upstaged reactor zones
US4017382A (en) * 1975-11-17 1977-04-12 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodesulfurization process with upstaged reactor zones
US4048060A (en) * 1975-12-29 1977-09-13 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Two-stage hydrodesulfurization of oil utilizing a narrow pore size distribution catalyst
US4120780A (en) * 1976-07-09 1978-10-17 Chiyoda Chemical Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. Catalysts for hydrodemetallization of hydrocarbons containing metallic compounds as impurities and process for hydro-treating such hydrocarbons using such catalysts
US4118310A (en) * 1977-06-28 1978-10-03 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodesulfurization process employing a guard reactor
US4119528A (en) * 1977-08-01 1978-10-10 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Hydroconversion of residua with potassium sulfide
US4259294A (en) * 1978-01-20 1981-03-31 Shell Oil Company Apparatus for the hydrogenation of heavy hydrocarbon oils
US4234402A (en) * 1978-10-24 1980-11-18 Kirkbride Chalmer G Sulfur removal from crude petroleum
US4348270A (en) * 1979-11-13 1982-09-07 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Catalysts and hydrocarbon treating processes utilizing the same
US4411768A (en) * 1979-12-21 1983-10-25 The Lummus Company Hydrogenation of high boiling hydrocarbons
US4332671A (en) * 1981-06-08 1982-06-01 Conoco Inc. Processing of heavy high-sulfur crude oil
US4406777A (en) * 1982-01-19 1983-09-27 Mobil Oil Corporation Fixed bed reactor operation
US4431525A (en) * 1982-04-26 1984-02-14 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Three-catalyst process for the hydrotreating of heavy hydrocarbon streams
US4431526A (en) * 1982-07-06 1984-02-14 Union Oil Company Of California Multiple-stage hydroprocessing of hydrocarbon oil
US4568450A (en) * 1982-08-19 1986-02-04 Union Oil Company Of California Hydrocarbon conversion process
US5178749A (en) * 1983-08-29 1993-01-12 Chevron Research And Technology Company Catalytic process for treating heavy oils
US4642179A (en) * 1983-12-19 1987-02-10 Intevep, S.A. Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues
US4588709A (en) * 1983-12-19 1986-05-13 Intevep, S.A. Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues
US4968409A (en) * 1984-03-21 1990-11-06 Chevron Research Company Hydrocarbon processing of gas containing feed in a countercurrent moving catalyst bed
US4617110A (en) * 1984-06-11 1986-10-14 Phillips Petroleum Company Control of a hydrofining process for hydrocarbon-containing feed streams which process employs a hydrodemetallization reactor in series with a hydrodesulfurization reactor
US4619759A (en) * 1985-04-24 1986-10-28 Phillips Petroleum Company Two-stage hydrotreating of a mixture of resid and light cycle oil
US4626340A (en) * 1985-09-26 1986-12-02 Intevep, S.A. Process for the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks characterized by high molecular weight, low reactivity and high metal contents
US4652361A (en) * 1985-09-27 1987-03-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalytic hydrofining of oil
US4657665A (en) * 1985-12-20 1987-04-14 Amoco Corporation Process for demetallation and desulfurization of heavy hydrocarbons
US4729826A (en) * 1986-02-28 1988-03-08 Union Oil Company Of California Temperature controlled catalytic demetallization of hydrocarbons
US4832829A (en) * 1987-04-27 1989-05-23 Intevep S.A. Catalyst for the simultaneous hydrodemetallization and hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks
US4925554A (en) * 1988-02-05 1990-05-15 Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. Hydrotreating process for heavy hydrocarbon oils
US4894144A (en) * 1988-11-23 1990-01-16 Conoco Inc. Preparation of lower sulfur and higher sulfur cokes
US5076908A (en) * 1989-07-19 1991-12-31 Chevron Research & Technology Company Method and apparatus for an on-stream particle replacement system for countercurrent contact of a gas and liquid feed stream with a packed bed
US5916529A (en) * 1989-07-19 1999-06-29 Chevron U.S.A. Inc Multistage moving-bed hydroprocessing reactor with separate catalyst addition and withdrawal systems for each stage, and method for hydroprocessing a hydrocarbon feed stream
US5472928A (en) * 1989-07-19 1995-12-05 Scheuerman; Georgieanna L. Catalyst, method and apparatus for an on-stream particle replacement system for countercurrent contact of a gas and liquid feed stream with a packed bed
US5009768A (en) * 1989-12-19 1991-04-23 Intevep, S.A. Hydrocracking high residual contained in vacuum gas oil
US5417846A (en) * 1990-03-29 1995-05-23 Institut Francais Du Petrole Hydrotreatment method for a petroleum residue or heavy oil with a view to refining them and converting them to lighter fractions
US5045117A (en) * 1990-09-18 1991-09-03 Rockwell International Corporation System for removing flux residues from printed wiring assemblies
US5176820A (en) * 1991-01-22 1993-01-05 Phillips Petroleum Company Multi-stage hydrotreating process and apparatus
US5264188A (en) * 1991-01-22 1993-11-23 Phillips Petroleum Company Multi-stage hydrotreating process and apparatus
US5258115A (en) * 1991-10-21 1993-11-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Delayed coking with refinery caustic
US5591325A (en) * 1993-08-18 1997-01-07 Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. Process for hydrotreating heavy oil and hydrotreating apparatus
US5779992A (en) * 1993-08-18 1998-07-14 Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd. Process for hydrotreating heavy oil and hydrotreating apparatus
US6270654B1 (en) * 1993-08-18 2001-08-07 Ifp North America, Inc. Catalytic hydrogenation process utilizing multi-stage ebullated bed reactors
US5925238A (en) * 1997-05-09 1999-07-20 Ifp North America Catalytic multi-stage hydrodesulfurization of metals-containing petroleum residua with cascading of rejuvenated catalyst
US6132597A (en) * 1997-06-10 2000-10-17 Institut Francais Du Petrole Hydrotreating hydrocarbon feeds in an ebullating bed reactor
US20050082202A1 (en) * 1997-06-24 2005-04-21 Process Dynamics, Inc. Two phase hydroprocessing
US6235190B1 (en) * 1998-08-06 2001-05-22 Uop Llc Distillate product hydrocracking process
US6306287B1 (en) * 1998-10-14 2001-10-23 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for hydrotreatment of a heavy hydrocarbon fraction using permutable reactors and introduction of a middle distillate
US6309537B1 (en) * 1998-12-10 2001-10-30 Institut Francais Du Petrole Hydrotreating hydrocarbon feeds in an ebullating bed reactor
US6280606B1 (en) * 1999-03-22 2001-08-28 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting heavy petroleum fractions that comprise a distillation stage, ebullated-bed hydroconversion stages of the vacuum distillate, and a vacuum residue and a catalytic cracking stage
US6447671B1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2002-09-10 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting heavy petroleum fractions, comprising an ebullated bed hydroconversion step and a hydrotreatment step
US6554994B1 (en) * 1999-04-13 2003-04-29 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Upflow reactor system with layered catalyst bed for hydrotreating heavy feedstocks
US20010027936A1 (en) * 2000-01-11 2001-10-11 Frederic Morel Process for converting petroleum fractions, comprising an ebullated bed hydroconversion step, a separation step, a hydrodesulphurisation step and a cracking step
US6620311B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2003-09-16 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting petroleum fractions, comprising an ebullated bed hydroconversion step, a separation step, a hydrodesulphurization step and a cracking step
US20040055934A1 (en) * 2000-12-11 2004-03-25 Pascal Tromeur Method for hydrotreatment of a heavy hydrocarbon fraction with switchable reactors and reactors capable of being shorted out
US20050155909A1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2005-07-21 Jgc Corporation Method of refining petroleum and refining apparatus
US20060060509A1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2006-03-23 Yoshimitsu Miyauchi Process for the hydroprocessing of heavy hydrocarbon feeds using at least two reactors
US20070187294A1 (en) * 2003-07-09 2007-08-16 Jorge Ancheyta Juarez Process for the catalytic hydrotretment of heavy hydrocarbons of petroleum
US20060060501A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Thierry Gauthier Process for hydroconversion of a heavy feedstock with dispersed catalyst
US20060254956A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2006-11-16 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods for making higher value products from sulfur containing crude oil

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Weisser, O. et al. (1973). Sulphide Catalysts Their Properties and Applications, Pergamon Press, 506 pgs. (Office action cites page 19). *

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9546330B2 (en) 2012-05-04 2017-01-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated ebullated-bed process for whole crude oil upgrading
US10438835B2 (en) * 2015-02-16 2019-10-08 Infineon Technologies Ag System reference with compensation of electrical and mechanical stress and life-time drift effects
US9879188B2 (en) 2015-07-27 2018-01-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated ebullated-bed hydroprocessing, fixed bed hydroprocessing and coking process for whole crude oil conversion into hydrotreated distillates and petroleum green coke
US10898885B2 (en) 2016-04-11 2021-01-26 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Nano-sized zeolite supported catalysts and methods for their production
US10603657B2 (en) 2016-04-11 2020-03-31 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Nano-sized zeolite supported catalysts and methods for their production
US11084992B2 (en) * 2016-06-02 2021-08-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for upgrading heavy oils
WO2017210287A1 (en) * 2016-06-02 2017-12-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for upgrading heavy oils
JP2019522076A (en) * 2016-06-02 2019-08-08 サウジ アラビアン オイル カンパニーSaudi Arabian Oil Company Improved system and method for heavy oil
US20170349846A1 (en) * 2016-06-02 2017-12-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for upgrading heavy oils
US10301556B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2019-05-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for the conversion of feedstock hydrocarbons to petrochemical products
US10689587B2 (en) 2017-04-26 2020-06-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and processes for conversion of crude oil
US10689585B2 (en) 2017-07-17 2020-06-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils
WO2019018225A1 (en) * 2017-07-17 2019-01-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils
US10696910B2 (en) 2017-07-17 2020-06-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils by oil upgrading followed by distillation
US10696909B2 (en) 2017-07-17 2020-06-30 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils by oil upgrading followed by steam cracking
WO2019018224A1 (en) * 2017-07-17 2019-01-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils by oil upgrading followed by refining
US11001770B2 (en) 2017-07-17 2021-05-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils by oil upgrading followed by refining
WO2019018223A1 (en) * 2017-07-17 2019-01-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Systems and methods for processing heavy oils by oil upgrading followed by distillation
US11130920B1 (en) 2020-04-04 2021-09-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated process and system for treatment of hydrocarbon feedstocks using stripping solvent
US11384298B2 (en) 2020-04-04 2022-07-12 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated process and system for treatment of hydrocarbon feedstocks using deasphalting solvent

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2010009082A1 (en) 2010-01-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100018904A1 (en) Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System
US8372267B2 (en) Process for the sequential hydroconversion and hydrodesulfurization of whole crude oil
US8632673B2 (en) Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US8926824B2 (en) Process for the conversion of residue integrating moving-bed technology and ebullating-bed technology
KR101698596B1 (en) Hydrocracking process including switchable reactors with feedstocks containing 200 ppm by weight - 2% by weight of asphaltenes
US10221366B2 (en) Residue hydrocracking
EP2300566B1 (en) Process for the treatment of heavy oils using light hydrocarbon components as a diluent
US9920264B2 (en) Process of hydroconversion-distillation of heavy and/or extra-heavy crude oils
US20180119027A1 (en) System for upgrading residuum hydrocarbons
RU2663896C2 (en) Residue hydrocracking processing
CA2902258C (en) Integration of residue hydrocracking and hydrotreating
EP2441817B1 (en) Ebullated bed hydrotreating process of heavy crude oil
AU2003213744B2 (en) Distillate desulfurization process
US20210363439A1 (en) Methods of whole crude and whole crude wide cut hydrotreating low hetroatom content petroleum
JP2009040844A (en) Method for producing reformed crude oil
JP2000265177A (en) Hydrogenation treatment of heavy oil
US8920631B2 (en) Process for the sequential hydroconversion and hydrodesulfurization of whole crude oil
CN104611048A (en) Two-stage hydrotreating method of high dry point raw material

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY, SAUDI ARABIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KRESSMANN, STEPHANE CYRILLE;SHAFI, RAHEEL;ALZAID, ALI HUSSAIN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:023363/0907;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090929 TO 20091007

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION