US2300877A - Process for treating hydrocarbons - Google Patents

Process for treating hydrocarbons Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2300877A
US2300877A US352299A US35229940A US2300877A US 2300877 A US2300877 A US 2300877A US 352299 A US352299 A US 352299A US 35229940 A US35229940 A US 35229940A US 2300877 A US2300877 A US 2300877A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
catalyst
temperature
hydrogen
oxide
pressure
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US352299A
Inventor
Harry E Drennan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Phillips Petroleum Co
Original Assignee
Phillips Petroleum Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Phillips Petroleum Co filed Critical Phillips Petroleum Co
Priority to US352299A priority Critical patent/US2300877A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2300877A publication Critical patent/US2300877A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G29/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, with other chemicals
    • C10G29/06Metal salts, or metal salts deposited on a carrier
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G17/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with acids, acid-forming compounds or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge
    • C10G17/095Refining of hydrocarbon oils in the absence of hydrogen, with acids, acid-forming compounds or acid-containing liquids, e.g. acid sludge with "solid acids", e.g. phosphoric acid deposited on a carrier
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G29/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, with other chemicals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G29/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, with other chemicals
    • C10G29/16Metal oxides

Definitions

  • An object of this invention is to provide an improvedprocess for refining hydrocarbons.
  • a further object of this invention is to provide an improved processior the removal of sulfur from hydrocarbons.
  • the applicant has discovered a new and improved process for treating hydrocarbons to improve the color and gum stability and to render them sweet to the doctor test.
  • the process is carried out by vaporizing hydrocarbon fractions containing mercaptan sulfur and passing the vapors into contact with a desulfurization catalyst under such temperature and pressure conditions as will be hereinafter set forth.
  • the mercaptan sulfur is removed and retained by the catalyst and the vapors may then be passed at suitable hydrogenation temperature into contact with ,a hydrogenation catalyst to hydrogenate the unstable constituents which are responsible for color and gum instability.
  • the conditions under which the desulfurization is carried out in the applicant's process are such that the mercaptan sulfur is removed without the formation of undesirable quantities of hydrogen sulfide. This P rmits the use of desulfurizationin combination with relatively low pressure hydrogenation.
  • the desulfurization and hydrogenation are preferably carried out at substantially the same pressures.
  • the pressure at which hydrogenation is carried out may be slightly lower than the desulfurization pressure due to the resistance of flow or the gases through the desulfurizatlon catalyst.
  • iron oxide as a desulfurization catalyst, the process has been operated successfully at pressures of 5 to 500 pounds per square inch gauge. A pressure of 50 pounds per square inch gauge has been found to be satisfactory.
  • the operating pressure may be varied as the condition of the catalyst varies with use, for example a lower pressure may be used with a very active catalyst while a higher pressure may be necessary with a partly spent catalyst to effectively hydrogenate the hydrocarbon fracticn to the stability desired.
  • the desulfurlzation is preferably carried out iii the range of 500 F. to 850 F.
  • This range includes optimum temperatures for desulfurization with ferrous oxide, ferric oxide, or both as catalysts.
  • Mercaptan sulfur is readily removed with ferric oxide in the temperature range between 700 F. and 750 F. at superatmospheric pressures.
  • the ferric oxide catalyst may be reduced to ferrous oxide with hydrogen or carbon monoxide in known manner. The applicant has found that ferrous oxide effects removal of mercaptans from the hydrocarbons in the temperature range around 550 F. at superatmospheric pressure.
  • the operating temperature be high enough to remove all mercaptan sulfur but not so high that the sulfur compounds will be converted to hydrogen'sulfide and pass out with the hydrocarbon vapors.
  • the hot vapors from the desulfurlzation step as carried out by the present ,invention may be passed directly into contact with the hydrogenation catalyst without necessity of further treatment for the removal of sulfur.
  • a hydrogenation catalyst that is susceptible to poisoning by hydrogen sulfide may be used in conjunction with the desulfurization step.
  • the desulfurization catalyst may be heated to the proper temperature by preheating the vapors to be refined to such a temperature that the vapors heat the catalyst to the required extent upon contact therewith or the catalyst may be heated by any other suitable means.
  • the desulfurization step may be operated at a temperature higher than that required in the hydrogenation step, so that the hot vapors will heat the hydrogenation catalyst upon contact or the hydrogenation catalyst may be heated by any other suitable means.
  • the hydrocarbon vapors from the iron oxide catalyst are sweet to the doctor test and free from hydrogen sulfide.
  • the temperature at which the sweet hydrocarbon vapors may be hydrogenated depends in part upon the catalyst used, the type of hydrocarbon fraction being hydrogenated and the degree or extent to which it is desired to hydrogenate the hydrocarbon. Factors such as pressure, temperature, rate, and hydrogen concentration, may be varied to effect the desired degree of hydrogenation.
  • a temperature of 450 F. was found to be sufficient to improverthe color from to +30 Saybolt and increase the induction period from 4 hours to 16 hours.
  • any suitable catalyst which will remove mercaptan sulfur without the formation of hydrogen sulfide may be used.
  • Metallic oxides including copper oxide, iron oxide and nickel oxide have been found to be suitable catalysts. Regeneration of the catalyst is a factor to be considered in its selection.
  • Ferrous sulfide for example, reacts readily with oxygen at 700 F.
  • the iron oxide catalyst may be regenerated in situ by flushing out the tower containing the spent catalyst with steam at 700 F. and then passing air through the catalyst to convert ferrous sulfide to iron oxide.
  • the reaction is exothermic and requires no addition of heat, but steam may be used to control the temperature during regeneration.
  • Other oxide catalysts may be regenerated in asimilar manner.
  • Metals, including iron and copper may be used as catalysts and regenerated by oxidation and reduction.
  • the figure is a diagrammatic elevation view of a plant suitable for carrying out the process according to the present invention.
  • the hydrocarbons to be refined are fed as liquid to the system through the pipe i into the top of the stabilizer 2 and flow downward over suitable barangs or bubble plates 3.
  • Sweet gas is introduced to the bottom of the stabilizer through pipe 4.
  • the removal of light ends and hydrogen sulfide is accomplished in the stabilizer at subatmospheric pressure by the action of the sweet gas passing in countercurrent to the hydrocarbon liquid.
  • the light ends, gas, and hydrogen sulfide leave the top of the stabilizer through the vacuum line 5 from which they may be passed to a gasoline recovery plant not shown in the drawing.
  • hot hydrocarbon vapors are contacted by the catalyst which is maintained at the desired temperature by the heat from the vapors.
  • Ferrous oxide catalyst reacts with the mercaptan sulfur in the vapors and some of the ferrous oxide is converted into ferrous sulfide.
  • Sweetened hydrocarbon vapors are withdrawn from the catalyst chamber I 5 through the pipe i6 into a second catalyst chamber I! which contains an active hydrogenation catalyst, for example reduced nickel on a 16-30 mesh pumice base.
  • the catalyst is maintained at the desired temperature by the hot vapors which are mixed with hydrogen as they enter the catalyst chamber H. The mixture passes over the catalyst bed where it is. partially hydrogenated.
  • the partially hydro-- genated vapors and unreacted hydrogen flow from the catalyst chamber I!
  • the catalyst chamber i5 When the iron oxide or other catalyst in the catah'st chamber is becomes spent, the catalyst chamber i5 is flushed with steam entering through the pipes II, 14, and the valve 35 to remove most of the hydrocarbon vapors.
  • the air may then be introduced through the same pipes 3i, 34 to regenerate the catalyst.
  • the iron oxide catalyst is preheated by the steam to a temperature at which air will react with the iron sulfide to raise the temperature to about 120071. The temperature may then be controlled during the regeneration by admission of steam with the air.
  • the iron sulfide is oxidized to iron oxide and the sulfur burnsto sulfur dioxide and passes out of the catalyst chamber through valve 36 with the air and steam.
  • the iron oxide may be reduced with hydrogen or carbon monoxide or a mixture at a temperature between 750 F. and 1,000 P. until the ferric oxide is substantially all reduced to ferrous oxide.
  • the catalyst is then readyfor further use to desulfurize the hydrocarbon vapors. steam, air, and hydrogen may be admitted to the catalyst chamber il through the valve 36 for regeneration of the hydrogenation catalyst.
  • the iron oxide catalyst has been used until 45% of the oxide was converted to the sulfide. This is equivalent to operation for 45 days with a charging rate of two volumes of liquid hydro-- carbon per volume of catalyst per hour.
  • the life of the nickel catalyst has not been determined but it has been run 45 days at the above charging rate.
  • the long life of the nickel catalyst is due in part to the fact that at the temperature of operhtion for hydrogenation no desulfurization takes place- If the nickel catalyst becomes inactive or spent it may be regenerated in the same manner as that described for the iron oxide, by oxidation with air followed by reduction with hydrogen. It is necessary to heat the air to maintain a temperature sumciently high in the nickel catalyst chamber to oxidize the nickel sulfide to the oxide. Reduction can be carried out at 750' F. to 850' F.
  • Example I Raw cracked gasoline made by cracking gas oil from a Texas Panhandle crude oil of high sulfur content was vaporized and contacted with ferrous oxide at 550 F. and 50 pounds per square inch gauge pressure at the rate of two volumes of liquid gasoline per volume of catalyst per hour for removal of mercaptan sulfur.
  • the hot vapors from the ferrous oxide were mixed with four cubic feet of hydrogen per gallon of gasoline and contacted with an equal volume of catalyst comprising nickel on a refractory material at pounds per square inch gauge.
  • the sample in the above example was weathered, which is responsible for the low values for the gravity, percentage distilled at 212 F., Reid vapor pressure, and octane number.
  • a process of treating a hydrocarbon fraction containing mercaptan sulfur and colorand gum-forming constituents to render it sweet to the doctor test and improve its colorand gumstability which comprises desulfurizingsaid fraction by contact at a pressure of 5 to 500 pounds per square inch gauge and at a temperature of 500 to 850 F.
  • said mercaptan sulfur is retained by said ferrous oxide and that no hydrogen sulfide is formed and no hydrogen sulfide is contained in the efiluent, comminglingthe hot eilluent with hydrogen, and passing the' resulting mixture at a hydrogenating tempera ture lower than said desuliurization temperature and such that no desulturization takes place and at a pressure substantially equal to saiddes'uliurization pressure over a hydrogen sulfidepoisonable reduced nickel hydrogenation catalyst to hydrogenate the unstable constituents which are responsible for -color-and gum-instability, said process being carried out without decrease in the octane number and lead susceptibility of said cracked gasoline.

Description

Nov. 3, 1942. H. E. DRENNAN 2,300,877
PROCESS FOR TREATING HYDROCARBONS Filed Aug. 12, 1940 BIJBWVHD.
aaawvm NOILVZIHOA'IHQQO VACUUM LINE INVENTOR H. E. DRENNAN Patented Nov. 3, 1942 2,300,877 raoenss ron 'mns'r'mo mnoosimoss Harry E. Brennan, Bartlesville, kla., assignor to Phillips Petroleum Company, a corporation of Delaware Application August 12, 1940, Serial No. 352,299
3Claims.
An object of this invention is to provide an improvedprocess for refining hydrocarbons.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved processior the removal of sulfur from hydrocarbons.
The applicant has discovered a new and improved process for treating hydrocarbons to improve the color and gum stability and to render them sweet to the doctor test. The process is carried out by vaporizing hydrocarbon fractions containing mercaptan sulfur and passing the vapors into contact with a desulfurization catalyst under such temperature and pressure conditions as will be hereinafter set forth. The mercaptan sulfur is removed and retained by the catalyst and the vapors may then be passed at suitable hydrogenation temperature into contact with ,a hydrogenation catalyst to hydrogenate the unstable constituents which are responsible for color and gum instability. The conditions under which the desulfurization is carried out in the applicant's process are such that the mercaptan sulfur is removed without the formation of undesirable quantities of hydrogen sulfide. This P rmits the use of desulfurizationin combination with relatively low pressure hydrogenation.
In carrying out this process for refining gasoline or other. petroleum hydrocarbons the desulfurization and hydrogenation are preferably carried out at substantially the same pressures. In actual practice the pressure at which hydrogenation is carried out may be slightly lower than the desulfurization pressure due to the resistance of flow or the gases through the desulfurizatlon catalyst. Using iron oxide as a desulfurization catalyst, the process has been operated successfully at pressures of 5 to 500 pounds per square inch gauge. A pressure of 50 pounds per square inch gauge has been found to be satisfactory. The operating pressure may be varied as the condition of the catalyst varies with use, for example a lower pressure may be used with a very active catalyst while a higher pressure may be necessary with a partly spent catalyst to effectively hydrogenate the hydrocarbon fracticn to the stability desired. with the iron oxide catalyst the desulfurlzation is preferably carried out iii the range of 500 F. to 850 F. This range includes optimum temperatures for desulfurization with ferrous oxide, ferric oxide, or both as catalysts. Mercaptan sulfur is readily removed with ferric oxide in the temperature range between 700 F. and 750 F. at superatmospheric pressures. The ferric oxide catalyst may be reduced to ferrous oxide with hydrogen or carbon monoxide in known manner. The applicant has found that ferrous oxide effects removal of mercaptans from the hydrocarbons in the temperature range around 550 F. at superatmospheric pressure. In the present process it is desirable that the operating temperature be high enough to remove all mercaptan sulfur but not so high that the sulfur compounds will be converted to hydrogen'sulfide and pass out with the hydrocarbon vapors. The hot vapors from the desulfurlzation step as carried out by the present ,invention may be passed directly into contact with the hydrogenation catalyst without necessity of further treatment for the removal of sulfur. The advantages of this process will be apparent to those skilled in the art. A hydrogenation catalyst that is susceptible to poisoning by hydrogen sulfide may be used in conjunction with the desulfurization step. If the hydrogenation catalyst is not susceptible to poisoning by hydrogen sulfide, higher desulfurization temperatures will not be detrimental to the hydrogenation catalyst by reason of hydrogen sulfide formation, but the applicant has found that higher temperatures are unnecessary with the present process. The desulfurization catalyst may be heated to the proper temperature by preheating the vapors to be refined to such a temperature that the vapors heat the catalyst to the required extent upon contact therewith or the catalyst may be heated by any other suitable means. The desulfurization step may be operated at a temperature higher than that required in the hydrogenation step, so that the hot vapors will heat the hydrogenation catalyst upon contact or the hydrogenation catalyst may be heated by any other suitable means. The hydrocarbon vapors from the iron oxide catalyst are sweet to the doctor test and free from hydrogen sulfide.
The temperature at which the sweet hydrocarbon vapors may be hydrogenated depends in part upon the catalyst used, the type of hydrocarbon fraction being hydrogenated and the degree or extent to which it is desired to hydrogenate the hydrocarbon. Factors such as pressure, temperature, rate, and hydrogen concentration, may be varied to effect the desired degree of hydrogenation. In hydrogenating a cracked gasoline from a Texas Panhandle crude oil over a reduced nickel catalyst at 50 pounds per square inch gauge pressure and at a rate of two volumes of liquid hydrocarbon (cracked gasoline) per volume of catalyst per hour, a temperature of 450 F. was found to be sufficient to improverthe color from to +30 Saybolt and increase the induction period from 4 hours to 16 hours. p
In the desulfurization step any suitable catalyst which will remove mercaptan sulfur without the formation of hydrogen sulfide may be used. Metallic oxides including copper oxide, iron oxide and nickel oxide have been found to be suitable catalysts. Regeneration of the catalyst is a factor to be considered in its selection. Ferrous sulfide, for example, reacts readily with oxygen at 700 F. The iron oxide catalyst may be regenerated in situ by flushing out the tower containing the spent catalyst with steam at 700 F. and then passing air through the catalyst to convert ferrous sulfide to iron oxide. The reaction is exothermic and requires no addition of heat, but steam may be used to control the temperature during regeneration. Other oxide catalysts may be regenerated in asimilar manner. Metals, including iron and copper, may be used as catalysts and regenerated by oxidation and reduction.
The figure is a diagrammatic elevation view of a plant suitable for carrying out the process according to the present invention. With reference to the figure, the hydrocarbons to be refined are fed as liquid to the system through the pipe i into the top of the stabilizer 2 and flow downward over suitable baiiles or bubble plates 3. Sweet gas is introduced to the bottom of the stabilizer through pipe 4. The removal of light ends and hydrogen sulfide is accomplished in the stabilizer at subatmospheric pressure by the action of the sweet gas passing in countercurrent to the hydrocarbon liquid. The light ends, gas, and hydrogen sulfide leave the top of the stabilizer through the vacuum line 5 from which they may be passed to a gasoline recovery plant not shown in the drawing. Liquid from the base of the stabilizer fiows through the float controlled valve 6 and pipe 1 to the pump 8. Pump 8 discharges the liquid hydrocarbons through valve 9 and pipe l0 into the heating coil ii of furnace I! at superatmospheric pressure, for example 50 pounds per square inch gauge. From the furnace the hydrocarbons at 500-850" F. pass through pipe i3 and valve it into the catalyst chamber is. The catalyst chamber i5 is filled with a suitable desulfurization catalyst, for example ferrous oxide which has been screened to 16 to mesh to reduce its resistance to fiuid now. The
hot hydrocarbon vapors are contacted by the catalyst which is maintained at the desired temperature by the heat from the vapors. Ferrous oxide catalyst reacts with the mercaptan sulfur in the vapors and some of the ferrous oxide is converted into ferrous sulfide. Sweetened hydrocarbon vapors are withdrawn from the catalyst chamber I 5 through the pipe i6 into a second catalyst chamber I! which contains an active hydrogenation catalyst, for example reduced nickel on a 16-30 mesh pumice base. The catalyst is maintained at the desired temperature by the hot vapors which are mixed with hydrogen as they enter the catalyst chamber H. The mixture passes over the catalyst bed where it is. partially hydrogenated. The partially hydro-- genated vapors and unreacted hydrogen flow from the catalyst chamber I! through valve i8 and pipe iii to a condenser 20 in which the hydrocarbon vapors are condensed. The condensate and hydrogen pass from condenser 211 through pipe 2| to the run tank 22 where the condensate is separated from the hydrogen and light hydrocarbon vapors. The condensate from the run tank passes through the float controlled valve 24 and pipe 25 to storage. Hydrogen and light vapors from the top of the run tank flow through pipe 26 and valve 2'! to compressor 28 from which they are discharged "through pipe 29 and valve 30 into the catalyst chamber II where it is mixed with incoming hydrocarbon vapors. Hydrogen is thus recycled at the rate of to 400 cubic feet per barrel of hydrocarbon condensate. Make-up hydrogen enters the system through pipe 3|, valve 32 and pipe 33 to the intake of the compressor 28 where it is mixed with the recycle stream ofhydrogen.
When the iron oxide or other catalyst in the catah'st chamber is becomes spent, the catalyst chamber i5 is flushed with steam entering through the pipes II, 14, and the valve 35 to remove most of the hydrocarbon vapors. The air may then be introduced through the same pipes 3i, 34 to regenerate the catalyst. The iron oxide catalyst is preheated by the steam to a temperature at which air will react with the iron sulfide to raise the temperature to about 120071. The temperature may then be controlled during the regeneration by admission of steam with the air. The iron sulfide is oxidized to iron oxide and the sulfur burnsto sulfur dioxide and passes out of the catalyst chamber through valve 36 with the air and steam. After the oxidation of the ferrous sulfide to iron oxide (prin p ric oxide), the iron oxide may be reduced with hydrogen or carbon monoxide or a mixture at a temperature between 750 F. and 1,000 P. until the ferric oxide is substantially all reduced to ferrous oxide. The catalyst is then readyfor further use to desulfurize the hydrocarbon vapors. steam, air, and hydrogen may be admitted to the catalyst chamber il through the valve 36 for regeneration of the hydrogenation catalyst.
The iron oxide catalyst has been used until 45% of the oxide was converted to the sulfide. This is equivalent to operation for 45 days with a charging rate of two volumes of liquid hydro-- carbon per volume of catalyst per hour. The life of the nickel catalyst has not been determined but it has been run 45 days at the above charging rate. The long life of the nickel catalyst is due in part to the fact that at the temperature of operhtion for hydrogenation no desulfurization takes place- If the nickel catalyst becomes inactive or spent it may be regenerated in the same manner as that described for the iron oxide, by oxidation with air followed by reduction with hydrogen. It is necessary to heat the air to maintain a temperature sumciently high in the nickel catalyst chamber to oxidize the nickel sulfide to the oxide. Reduction can be carried out at 750' F. to 850' F.
Example I Raw cracked gasoline made by cracking gas oil from a Texas Panhandle crude oil of high sulfur content was vaporized and contacted with ferrous oxide at 550 F. and 50 pounds per square inch gauge pressure at the rate of two volumes of liquid gasoline per volume of catalyst per hour for removal of mercaptan sulfur. The hot vapors from the ferrous oxide were mixed with four cubic feet of hydrogen per gallon of gasoline and contacted with an equal volume of catalyst comprising nickel on a refractory material at pounds per square inch gauge.
Mixing of cool hydrogen with the 550 F. vapors was sufiicient to maintain the temperature of the hydrogenation catalyst at approximately 450 F. Tests made on the gasoline before and after refining were as follows:
Charge Make Gravity, A. P. I 55. 6 55. Color +17 +30 Percentage sulfur"... 155 lO-i Induction period (hrs. 4 16 Percentage unsaturatesv 14 12 Percentage aromatics-.- 28 24 Reid vapor pressure... 6.1 r 4. 3 Initial boiling point.. 110 115 Percentage at 212 F-- 22 21 End point 408 410 Octane number (L-3) 60. 8 61.0 Octane number-H cc. TEL 1 (L3) 67.0 68. 6 Octane number+2 cc. TEL 1 (11-3). 71.2 73.0 Octane number-k3 cc. TEL I (Ii-3) 73. 5 73.3
K Tetraethyl lead.
The sample in the above example was weathered, which is responsible for the low values for the gravity, percentage distilled at 212 F., Reid vapor pressure, and octane number.
It will be noted that the pressure and temperature conditions of the present process are such that the treatment may take place in liquid phase.
I claim:
1. A process of treating a hydrocarbon fraction containing mercaptan sulfur and colorand gum-forming constituents to render it sweet to the doctor test and improve its colorand gumstability which comprises desulfurizingsaid fraction by contact at a pressure of 5 to 500 pounds per square inch gauge and at a temperature of 500 to 850 F. with a metal oxide capable of reacting with mercaptan sulfur to form the corresponding sulfide under conditions and for a contact time such that substantially all of said mercaptan sulfur is removed and retained by said metal oxide and that no hydrogen sulfide is formed and no hydrogen sulfide is contained in the eiiiuent, commingling the hot eflluent with hydrogen, and passing the resulting mixture at a hydrogenating temperature below said desuliurization' temperature and such that no desuliurlzation takes place and at a pressure substantially equal to said desulturization pressure over a hydrogensulflde-poisonable hydrogenation catalyst to hydrogenate the unstable constituents which are responsible for colorand gum-instability, said process being carried out without decrease in the octane number and lead-susceptibility of said traction.
2. A rocessor treating raw cracked gasoline containing mercaptan sulfur and colorand gumforming constituents to render it sweet to the doctor test and improve its colorand gum-stability and give it a color of at least 30, which comprises desuli'urizing said gasoline by contact at a pressure oi. 5 to 500 pounds per square inch gauge and at a temperature 01 500 to 850 F. with ferrous oxide under conditions and for a contact time such that substantially all 0! said mercaptan sulfur is retained by said ferrous oxide and that no hydrogen sulfide is formed and no hydrogen sulfide is contained in the efiluent, comminglingthe hot eilluent with hydrogen, and passing the' resulting mixture at a hydrogenating tempera ture lower than said desuliurization temperature and such that no desulturization takes place and at a pressure substantially equal to saiddes'uliurization pressure over a hydrogen sulfidepoisonable reduced nickel hydrogenation catalyst to hydrogenate the unstable constituents which are responsible for -color-and gum-instability, said process being carried out without decrease in the octane number and lead susceptibility of said cracked gasoline.
3. A process as recited in claim 2 wherein said desulrurization step is conducted at. about pounds per square inch gauge and at a temperature of about 550 F. and wherein said hydrogenation is conducted at about the same'pressure but at a temperature of about 450 F.
HARRY E. DRENNAN.
GERTIFIGATE on'o'o'mmqn. I Patentlo. ,3 ,877 I V a Y I I p mm 1:. annual; It is hereby certifie d'that e'rr'qi'abpears 1n the printed pedifta'tio n of the above numbered patent requ i rln'g correction as follows; Pa g 5; first column, in the mu last .line' thereof, for 975.5" ro'ad --7 .5--; and that the said Letters Patent should be ead with this correctidn therein that the same may -con foi'm to the record of the cas in th Patenfi Office. l
Signed and sealed this 29th day of December, 1334.2.
, v r v -iienry--van madam,- (Seal) I v Aiilng Comiasioqgi o1;- Pate ants
US352299A 1940-08-12 1940-08-12 Process for treating hydrocarbons Expired - Lifetime US2300877A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US352299A US2300877A (en) 1940-08-12 1940-08-12 Process for treating hydrocarbons

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US352299A US2300877A (en) 1940-08-12 1940-08-12 Process for treating hydrocarbons

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2300877A true US2300877A (en) 1942-11-03

Family

ID=23384576

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US352299A Expired - Lifetime US2300877A (en) 1940-08-12 1940-08-12 Process for treating hydrocarbons

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2300877A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2417308A (en) * 1943-04-12 1947-03-11 Union Oil Co Desulphurization and hydroforming
US2433426A (en) * 1945-06-01 1947-12-30 Floridin Company Desulfurizing adsorbent and process for preparing same
US2671754A (en) * 1951-07-21 1954-03-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process providing for the two-stage hydrogenation of sulfur containing oils
US2763358A (en) * 1953-08-19 1956-09-18 Exxon Research Engineering Co Integrated process for the production of high quality motor fuels and heating oils
US2766179A (en) * 1954-05-03 1956-10-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process
US2769753A (en) * 1953-06-03 1956-11-06 Pure Oil Co Combination process for catalytic hydrodesulfurization and reforming of high sulfur hydrocarbon mixtures
US3063936A (en) * 1958-08-22 1962-11-13 Ici Ltd Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US3484496A (en) * 1965-10-04 1969-12-16 British Petroleum Co Desulphurisation and hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons
US3484501A (en) * 1965-10-04 1969-12-16 British Petroleum Co Operation of reactor systems

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2417308A (en) * 1943-04-12 1947-03-11 Union Oil Co Desulphurization and hydroforming
US2433426A (en) * 1945-06-01 1947-12-30 Floridin Company Desulfurizing adsorbent and process for preparing same
US2671754A (en) * 1951-07-21 1954-03-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process providing for the two-stage hydrogenation of sulfur containing oils
US2769753A (en) * 1953-06-03 1956-11-06 Pure Oil Co Combination process for catalytic hydrodesulfurization and reforming of high sulfur hydrocarbon mixtures
US2763358A (en) * 1953-08-19 1956-09-18 Exxon Research Engineering Co Integrated process for the production of high quality motor fuels and heating oils
US2766179A (en) * 1954-05-03 1956-10-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process
US3063936A (en) * 1958-08-22 1962-11-13 Ici Ltd Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US3484496A (en) * 1965-10-04 1969-12-16 British Petroleum Co Desulphurisation and hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons
US3484501A (en) * 1965-10-04 1969-12-16 British Petroleum Co Operation of reactor systems

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2560433A (en) Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2769753A (en) Combination process for catalytic hydrodesulfurization and reforming of high sulfur hydrocarbon mixtures
US3155608A (en) Process for reducing metals content of catalytic cracking feedstock
US2183591A (en) Peocess for treatment of hydro
US3063936A (en) Desulfurization of hydrocarbon oils
US2300877A (en) Process for treating hydrocarbons
US2433603A (en) Catalytic treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons
US2905625A (en) Purification of hydrocarbon fractions
US2371298A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbon oils
US2143078A (en) Catalytic desulphurization of petroleum
US3215618A (en) Hydrorefining of coke-forming hydrocarbon distillates
US2580478A (en) Combination process for the catalytic hydrodesulfurization and reforming of hydrocarbon mixtures
US2206921A (en) Process for desulphurization of hydrocarbons
US2904500A (en) Hydrogen treatment of hydrocarbons
US2647076A (en) Catalytic cracking of petroleum hydrocarbons with a clay treated catalyst
Cole et al. Hydrodesulfurization of Gasoline Fractions with Tungsten–Nickel Sulfide Catalyst
US2198545A (en) Process for the treatment of light distillates
US2522065A (en) Catalytic desulfurization and reforming process
US2917456A (en) Process for hydrodesulfurizing crude oil in the presence of coke
US2352059A (en) Treatment of hydrocarbons
US2891003A (en) Method of hydrodesulfurizing olefinic gasoline using an iron oxide-chromium oxide catalyst
US2761816A (en) Hydrodesulfurization process using a cobalt molybdate catalyst presulfided with the feed under specific conditions
US2890165A (en) Hydrocarbon desulfurization process
US1944236A (en) Process for simultaneously producing high grade motor fuels and lubricants from heavy hydrocarbons by the action of hydrogen
US2357121A (en) Process for desulphurizing a hydrocarbon distillate