US20230227307A1 - Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons - Google Patents
Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20230227307A1 US20230227307A1 US17/992,855 US202217992855A US2023227307A1 US 20230227307 A1 US20230227307 A1 US 20230227307A1 US 202217992855 A US202217992855 A US 202217992855A US 2023227307 A1 US2023227307 A1 US 2023227307A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reactor
- catalyst
- pressure
- gas
- hydrogen
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 181
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 128
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 119
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 96
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 92
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 92
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 title claims abstract description 88
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 title claims abstract description 88
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 77
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 182
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 137
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 84
- UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron oxide Chemical compound [Fe]=O UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 180
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical group [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 132
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 64
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 63
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 63
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 claims description 60
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 60
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 46
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 claims description 38
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 71
- 229920006343 melt-processible rubber Polymers 0.000 description 36
- 235000013980 iron oxide Nutrition 0.000 description 27
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 22
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 14
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 11
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 11
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 10
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000010410 dusting Methods 0.000 description 8
- 229910052595 hematite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000011019 hematite Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910001567 cementite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(3+);oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Fe+3].[Fe+3] LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-NJFSPNSNSA-N Carbon-14 Chemical compound [14C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-NJFSPNSNSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- SZVJSHCCFOBDDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(II,III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]O[Fe]=O SZVJSHCCFOBDDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 6
- VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe3+ Chemical compound [Fe+3] VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zirconium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Zr]=O MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910052681 coesite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052906 cristobalite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- QDOXWKRWXJOMAK-UHFFFAOYSA-N dichromium trioxide Chemical compound O=[Cr]O[Cr]=O QDOXWKRWXJOMAK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052598 goethite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- AEIXRCIKZIZYPM-UHFFFAOYSA-M hydroxy(oxo)iron Chemical compound [O][Fe]O AEIXRCIKZIZYPM-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 239000002923 metal particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052682 stishovite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 229910052905 tridymite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000282326 Felis catus Species 0.000 description 3
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052593 corundum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001376 precipitating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000010453 quartz Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910001845 yogo sapphire Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KKCBUQHMOMHUOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Na2O Inorganic materials [O-2].[Na+].[Na+] KKCBUQHMOMHUOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propane Chemical compound CCC ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 2
- AMWRITDGCCNYAT-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese oxide Inorganic materials [Mn].O[Mn]=O.O[Mn]=O AMWRITDGCCNYAT-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethane Chemical compound CC OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethene Chemical compound C=C VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005977 Ethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005054 agglomeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001273 butane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003421 catalytic decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003467 diminishing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007599 discharging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004146 energy storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002149 energy-dispersive X-ray emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002803 fossil fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002309 gasification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910001608 iron mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(2+);oxygen(2-) Chemical class [O-2].[Fe+2] VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005461 lubrication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007885 magnetic separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013528 metallic particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- IJDNQMDRQITEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-butane Chemical compound CCCC IJDNQMDRQITEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-pentane Natural products CCCCC OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005456 ore beneficiation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010970 precious metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001294 propane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001172 regenerating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000629 steam reforming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008719 thickening Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007306 turnover Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004846 x-ray emission Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B3/00—Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
- C01B3/02—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen
- C01B3/22—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds
- C01B3/24—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds of hydrocarbons
- C01B3/26—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds of hydrocarbons using catalysts
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J19/0006—Controlling or regulating processes
- B01J19/0013—Controlling the temperature of the process
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J19/24—Stationary reactors without moving elements inside
- B01J19/2445—Stationary reactors without moving elements inside placed in parallel
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J19/24—Stationary reactors without moving elements inside
- B01J19/245—Stationary reactors without moving elements inside placed in series
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
- B01J23/74—Iron group metals
- B01J23/745—Iron
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J8/00—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
- B01J8/0005—Catalytic processes under superatmospheric pressure
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J8/00—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
- B01J8/18—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles
- B01J8/24—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles according to "fluidised-bed" technique
- B01J8/26—Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles according to "fluidised-bed" technique with two or more fluidised beds, e.g. reactor and regeneration installations
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B3/00—Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
- C01B3/02—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen
- C01B3/22—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds
- C01B3/24—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds of hydrocarbons
- C01B3/28—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds of hydrocarbons using moving solid particles
- C01B3/30—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds of hydrocarbons using moving solid particles using the fluidised bed technique
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B32/00—Carbon; Compounds thereof
- C01B32/20—Graphite
- C01B32/205—Preparation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
- C21B15/00—Other processes for the manufacture of iron from iron compounds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2203/00—Processes utilising sub- or super atmospheric pressure
- B01J2203/06—High pressure synthesis
- B01J2203/0605—Composition of the material to be processed
- B01J2203/061—Graphite
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
- B01J2219/00049—Controlling or regulating processes
- B01J2219/00162—Controlling or regulating processes controlling the pressure
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/02—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/0266—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a decomposition step
- C01B2203/0277—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a decomposition step containing a catalytic decomposition step
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/06—Integration with other chemical processes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/10—Catalysts for performing the hydrogen forming reactions
- C01B2203/1041—Composition of the catalyst
- C01B2203/1047—Group VIII metal catalysts
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/12—Feeding the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1205—Composition of the feed
- C01B2203/1211—Organic compounds or organic mixtures used in the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1235—Hydrocarbons
- C01B2203/1241—Natural gas or methane
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon.
- Hydrogen has many commercial uses, such as a clean and environmentally friendly alternative to fuel in internal combustion engines.
- Carbon, or more particularly graphite is considered a key material in the emerging green technology market. It has been shown to be useful in energy storage, electrical conduction devices, catalyst supports, lubrication additives and modern electronics equipment. All references to carbon within this patent relates to the graphitic form of carbon, therefore these terms are used interchangeably throughout.
- Natural gas can be catalytically cracked into both hydrogen gas and solid carbon according to Equation (1).
- the invention provides a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas.
- the present invention provides a process for catalytically converting hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon using a low grade catalyst.
- low grade will be understood to imply that the material that is not synthesised. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, synthesised materials are produced by the chemical reaction of precursor materials. Standard synthesis techniques for catalysts which are excluded from the present invention are, for example, impregnating nano-sized catalytic elements onto inert supports. Whilst the term “low grade” does include naturally occurring materials, it should not be understood to exclude materials that have gone through physical beneficiation such as crushing and screening or classification.
- the pressure is greater than atmospheric pressure.
- the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 100 bar.
- the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 50 bar.
- the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure between 0 bar and 20 bar.
- the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure between 2 bar and 10 bar.
- the inventors have discovered that the method of the present invention allows for the use of a low grade catalyst whilst still obtaining high conversion rates and yield.
- the inventors understand that the use of iron ore is advantageous because the metal species catalyses the decomposition reaction and the mineralogy of the ore exposes the catalytic elements to the hydrocarbon gas. It is understood by the applicant that the force of the precipitation of the graphite layers on the surface of the catalytic components is sufficient to fracture the coated catalyst particles apart from the catalyst, exposing further catalytic iron oxide. The catalyst is therefore self-supporting and does not require significant preparation prior to use.
- the hydrocarbon gas is methane.
- the hydrocarbon gas is natural gas.
- the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 20 mm.
- the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 15 mm. More preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 10 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 5 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 1 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 0.5 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 0.1 mm.
- the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is performed within a pressurised reactor.
- the pressurised reactor is selected from the group of static, moving or fluidized bed reactors.
- the catalyst is disposed on a substantially horizontal surface of the reactor and subjected to a transverse flow of hydrocarbon gas.
- the catalyst is suspended in a fluidised bed reactor and hydrocarbon gas is flowed through the fluidised bed.
- the step of contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is performed in a plurality of pressurised reactors arranged in series,
- the arrangement of the reactors in series allows gas to flow from a first reactor to a subsequent reactor(s).
- each subsequent reactor in the series operates at a lower pressure than the preceding reactor, allowing gas to travel to reactors of lower pressure.
- any unreacted hydrocarbon gas passes to subsequent reactors of lower pressure to contact additional catalyst for further processing and more complete conversion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon
- the arrangement of the reactors in series allows catalyst to flow from a first reactor to a subsequent reactor.
- each subsequent reactor in the series is operated at a higher pressure than the preceding reactor, allowing catalyst to travel to reactors of higher pressure. At low pressures, some of the catalyst may remain only partially deactivated.
- partially deactivated catalyst passes to subsequent reactors of higher pressure to be contacted by additional hydrocarbon gas for further processing and the production of a higher purity graphitic carbon.
- the subsequent reactors may be provided below the preceding reactors such that the flow of the catalyst between the reactors can be assisted by gravity. The applicant has termed this as a cascade-style arrangement.
- two pressurised reactors are used in series.
- the utility and economic drivers of the conversation of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon are the competing kinetic and thermodynamic drivers of the reaction.
- the hydrocarbon gas decomposes which ultimately results in graphitic carbon precipitating onto the surface of metallic particles of the catalyst. The precipitation continues until the methane can no longer penetrate the enveloping graphite and reach the catalyst.
- Kinetically, the reaction is driven by increased reaction pressure, as this better enables methane to diffuse into the graphite structure that envelops the active catalyst surfaces, leading to greater catalyst utilisation. Increased catalyst utilisation also leads to a higher purity graphite product.
- the competing factor is that the thermodynamics of the reaction preferentially indicate undertaking the reaction at lower pressure.
- thermodynamic equilibrium limit TEL
- the inventors have found that the competing kinetic and thermodynamic drivers of the reaction can be controlled by altering the pressure of each subsequent reactor. This allows high catalyst activity at higher pressure but also results in high conversion of the hydrocarbon gas feed in the reactors of lower pressure.
- the benefit of using multiple reactors in series is it allows the use of elevated reaction pressures to increase the product yield per unit catalyst utilised (catalyst utility) whilst maintaining high methane conversion efficiencies (TEL).
- each reactor is provided with unreacted catalyst.
- each of the reactors are loaded with unreacted catalyst prior to being contacted with the hydrocarbon gas.
- a portion of the hydrocarbon gas is converted to hydrogen and graphitic carbon in the reactor with the highest pressure.
- the first reactor has an associated TEL, resulting in an under-conversion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen gas and carbon.
- the resultant hydrocarbon gas/hydrogen mixture transfers to one or more successive lower pressure reactors.
- the lower pressure reactors have a higher associated TEL, enabling further conversion of hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen gas and carbon.
- unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided to each reactor.
- hydrocarbon gas is continuously flowed through the reactor.
- Unreacted catalyst is provided in the lowest pressure reactor, which following the catalytic conversion of the methane, produces a partially deactivated catalyst.
- the partially deactivated catalyst is transferred into the next reactor of higher pressure in the series for further catalytic conversion of methane.
- the higher pressure of the reactor allows for further deactivation of the catalyst.
- the transfer of the partially deactivated catalyst repeats along multiple reactors of increasing pressure.
- the multiple reactors are arranged in a series which allows for both the hydrocarbon gas and catalyst to flow between reactors in opposite directions.
- unreacted catalyst is provided in the lowest pressure reactor and unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided in the highest pressure reactor.
- the catalyst is transferred between the chambers of increasing pressure counter-currently to the gas flow between the chambers.
- the applicant has termed this arrangement a counter-current multiple pressure reactor (counter-current MPR).
- the partially deactivated catalyst retains activity in the higher pressure reactors, and the resultant graphite product has higher purity (as % of mass) with correspondingly higher value.
- the inventors have found that the counter-current MPR arrangement allows for more complete conversion of the hydrocarbon gas and a higher purity graphitic carbon product. As there is no catalyst flow in parallel gas MPRs or no gas flow in parallel catalyst MPRs, the design is much simpler than the counter-current MPR.
- the process is configured to preferentially produce either higher purity hydrogen or graphitic carbon.
- both the hydrogen and graphitic carbon products are always produced in constant proportion of 1:3 (hydrogen to graphitic carbon) on a mass basis as dictated by the basic reaction stoichiometry. Despite this, emphasis can be given to increase the purity of one of the products over the other.
- the process comprises:
- the process is conducted in a single fluidised bed reactor.
- the process comprises:
- the process in conducted in a fluidised bed reactor.
- a method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore comprising contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species.
- the pressure is greater than atmospheric pressure.
- the carbon-coated metal species is a graphite coated metal species.
- the force of the precipitation of the graphite layers on the surface of the catalytic components is sufficient to fracture the coated catalyst particles apart from the remaining ore gangue. Once the coated catalyst particles have fractured, further catalytic components within the ore are exposed to the hydrocarbon gas.
- the catalytic metal containing ore is iron ore.
- BIF banded iron formation
- the process is conducted in a pressurised dusting reactor.
- the catalytic metal containing ore is contacted with the hydrocarbon gas within the pressurised dusting reactor to produce nano/micron sized graphite coated metal particles.
- the larger (>1 mm) non-catalytic gangue species are left unchanged, Due to this size difference, physical separation techniques can be employed to separate out the graphite coated metal particles from the gangue.
- the dusting reactor is a fluidized bed reactor.
- the inventors have discovered that the use of a fluidised bed reactor has the advantage of simultaneously separating the nano micron sized graphite coated metal particles from the larger gangue species during the beneficiation process.
- the smaller sized graphite coated metal particles are entrained in the process gas stream and removed from the reactor via this gas stream, whereas the larger gangue particles remain within the reactor.
- the smaller graphite coated metal species are removed from the gas stream by a gas-solid separator that allows the particles to settle.
- the gangue can be continuously removed from the dusting reactor via gravity by periodic discharging.
- the graphite is removed from the graphite coated metal species by contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas.
- the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor.
- the removal of the graphite from the graphite coated metal species is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor at a pressure of 0 bar to 100 bar. It is understood by the inventors that higher pressures favour the removal of the graphite, In a preferred form of the present invention, the removal of the graphite from the graphite coated metal species is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor at a pressure of 10 bar to 20 bar.
- the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas produces methane.
- the methane is recycled to produce hydrogen. More specifically, the step of recycling the methane comprises,
- the hydrogen produced in the step of recycling the methane is used in the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas to remove the graphite from the graphite coated metal species.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of the process for producing hydrogen and graphite in accordance with the counter-current MPR of the present invention
- FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of the process for producing hydrogen and graphite in accordance with the parallel gas MPR of the present invention
- FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of the process for producing hydrogen and graphite in accordance with the parallel catalyst MPR of the present invention
- FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of the process for the beneficiation of a catalytic metal containing ore in accordance with a first embodiment
- FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of XRD plots of the analytical grade iron oxides and iron ore catalyst samples
- FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of carbon purity (wt %) and carbon yield (grams of carbon per gram of iron—GC/GFe) of iron oxide catalysts post reaction;
- FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a three stage cascading counter-flow system
- FIG. 8 shows a schematic representation of the experimental conditions used to test the methane conversion of a MPR system with 3 reactors in series using static fixed bed reactors;
- FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of the methane conversion results of hematite catalyst for different reaction pressures
- FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of carbon purity (wt %) and carbon yield (gram of carbon per gram of iron—GC/GFe) of hematite catalyst for different reaction pressures;
- FIG. 11 is schematic shows a schematic representation of the variables for the mass balance calculation of a counter-current MPR system
- FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of the mass balance calculation results of both the counter-current MPR and parallel MPR showing the catalyst mass-flow required for a balanced system with a hydrogen production rate of 2000 m 3 /hr,
- the invention described herein may include one or more range of values (e.g. size, concentration etc).
- a range of values will be understood to include all values within the range, including the values defining the range, and values adjacent to the range which lead to the same or substantially the same outcome as the values immediately adjacent to that value which defines the boundary to the range.
- the invention relates to a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas.
- the present invention provides a process for catalytically converting hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon using a low grade iron oxide-containing catalyst.
- the hydrocarbon gas may be any gas stream that comprises light hydrocarbons.
- hydrocarbon gas include, but are not limited to, natural gas, coal seam gas, landfill gas and biogas.
- the composition of the hydrocarbon gas may vary significantly but it will generally comprise one or more light hydrocarbons from a group comprising methane, ethane, ethylene, propane and butane.
- the hydrocarbon gas is natural gas.
- the process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from natural gas comprises:
- a counter-current MPR process 10 using three fluidised bed reactors, for producing hydrogen 12 and graphitic carbon 14 from a hydrocarbon gas, for example natural gas, 16 is described.
- the process utilises three reactors operating at varying pressures, a high pressure reactor 18 at 18 bar, a medium pressure reactor 20 at 6 bar and a low pressure reactor 22 at 1 bar.
- the temperatures of the reactors are each 850° C.
- the reactors 18 , 20 and 22 are arranged in series, such that hydrogen and unreacted hydrocarbon natural gas is transferred between adjacent reactors. i.e. from the high pressure reactor 18 to the medium pressure reactor 20 and from the medium pressure reactor 20 to the low pressure reactor 22 .
- Each reactor 22 , 20 and 18 is respectively loaded with low grade iron oxide catalyst, for example iron ore 24 ′′, 24 ′ and 24 . Where 24 is fresh unreacted catalyst and 24 ′, 24 ′′ are progressively more utilised, having more graphitic carbon attached and less overall catalytic activity remaining.
- Stream 14 contains only trace amounts of fully spent catalyst, with the vast majority (>90% wt at reaction temperatures of 850° C.) of this stream being graphitic carbon.
- the amount of catalyst required for this reaction is relative to the quantity of hydrogen required, the process conditions and the type of catalyst.
- a 2000 m 3 /hr hydrogen production plant operating under the conditions above with 3 reactors would require approximately 14 kg/hr of iron
- Natural gas 16 is directed through the reactors in series from the high pressure reactor 18 , to the medium pressure reactor 20 and low pressure reactor 22 .
- Each reactor converts a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, with each successive gas stream 28 , 30 , 12 containing higher portions of hydrogen.
- Fresh natural gas 16 initially contacts the catalyst 24 ′′ in the high pressure reactor 18 at a temperature of 850° . and a pressure of 18 bar to convert a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, thus the corresponding gas stream 28 being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas.
- This reactor also deposits some graphitic carbon onto catalyst 24 ′′ contributing to the total graphitic carbon in steam 14 .
- Gas stream 28 is transferred to the medium pressure reactor 20 where it contacts the catalyst 24 ′ at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 6 bar to convert the natural gas into hydrogen and carbon.
- the lower pressure of the medium pressure reactor 20 enables conversion of the gas stream 28 , thus contributing to the total hydrogen steam 12 .
- the process deposits graphitic carbon onto the catalyst 24 ′ and in so contributes to the total graphitic carbon stream 14 .
- a portion of the natural gas in gas stream 28 remains unreacted and mixes with the produced hydrogen gas to form gas stream 30 .
- Gas stream 30 is transferred to the low pressure reactor 22 where it contacts the catalyst 24 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 1 bar (atmospheric pressure).
- the lower pressure of the low pressure reactor 22 enables the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction to favour the decomposition direction of the reaction, thereby allowing more conversion of the second gas stream 30 into carbon and hydrogen gas .
- the process deposits graphitic carbon onto the catalyst 24 , and in so contributes to the total graphitic carbon stream 14 .
- This reactor also contributes to the hydrogen gas in the total hydrogen steam 12 which exits the reactor for use or further processing.
- the proportion of graphitic carbon in the iron oxide streams 24 , 24 ′, 24 ′′ and 14 are 0%, 91%, 95%, 98% respectively.
- the catalyst 24 depletes to form a partially deactivated catalyst 24 ′.
- the partially deactivated catalyst 24 ′ is transferred between the reactors counter-currently to the natural gas 16 flow.
- the catalyst 24 is introduced into the lowest pressure reactor 22 , and is subsequently passed to higher pressure reactors.
- the partially deactivated catalyst 24 ′ would therefore retain activity in the higher pressure reactor 20 , and the resultant graphitic carbon 14 has the higher carbon-purity (as % of mass) with correspondingly higher value.
- FIG. 2 a parallel gas MPR process 50 is shown.
- Parallel gas MPR process 50 shares common features with counter-current MPR process 10 and like numerals denote like parts.
- the process utilises three reactors operating at varying pressures, a high pressure reactor 18 at 18 bar, a medium pressure reactor 20 at 6 bar and a low pressure reactor 22 at 1 bar.
- the temperatures of the reactors are each 850° C.
- the reactors 18 , 20 and 22 are arranged in series, such that unreacted hydrocarbon natural gas can be transferred between adjacent reactors. i.e. from the high pressure reactor 18 to the medium pressure reactor 20 and from the medium pressure reactor 20 to the low pressure reactor 22 .
- Each reactor 18 , 20 and 22 is respectively loaded with an iron ore catalyst 52 .
- each reactor 22 , 20 and 18 is provided with unreacted catalyst 52 prior to being contacted with the hydrocarbon gas.
- the amount of catalyst required for this reaction is relative to the quantity of hydrogen required, the process conditions and the type of catalyst.
- a 2000 m 3 /hr hydrogen production plant operating under the conditions above with 3 reactors would require approximately 27 kg/hr of iron.
- Natural gas 16 is directed through the reactors in series from the high pressure reactor 18 , to the medium pressure reactor 20 and low pressure reactor 22 .
- Each reactor converts a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, with each successive gas stream 28 , 30 , 12 containing higher portions of hydrogen.
- Unreacted natural gas 16 initially contacts at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 18 bar the catalyst 34 in the high pressure reactor 18 to convert a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, producing a gas stream 28 which is a mixture of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas.
- Graphite is also deposited onto catalyst 34 , producing partial graphite stream 54 .
- Gas stream 28 passes to the medium pressure reactor 20 where it contacts at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 6 bar the catalyst 52 to convert the natural gas into hydrogen and carbon.
- the lower pressure of the medium pressure reactor 20 enables further conversion of the gas stream 28 , thus contributing to the total hydrogen steam 12 .
- the process deposits carbon onto the catalyst 52 , producing partial graphite stream 56 .
- a portion of the natural gas in gas stream 28 remains unreacted and mixes with the produced hydrogen gas to form gas stream 30 .
- Gas stream 30 passes to the low pressure reactor 22 where it contacts at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 1 bar (atmospheric pressure) the catalyst 52 .
- the lower pressure of the low pressure reactor 22 enables the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction to favour the decomposition direction of the reaction, thereby allowing conversion of the natural gas in second gas stream 30 into carbon and hydrogen gas.
- the process deposits carbon onto the catalyst 52 , producing partial graphite stream 58 .
- This reactor also contributes to the hydrogen gas in the total hydrogen steam 12 , and exits the reactor for use or further processing.
- Partial graphite streams 54 , 56 and 58 contain a mixture of unreacted iron ore and graphitic material. Given the varying pressures of the each reactor 22 , 20 and 18 each partial graphite stream will have different conversion rates. Partial graphite stream 58 will have the highest iron impurity, followed by partial graphite stream 56 and then partial graphite stream 54 .
- the reactors 18 , 20 , 22 have conversion efficiencies of 54%, 75% and 94% respectively, and correspondingly the gas streams 28 , 30 and 12 have hydrogen concentrations of 70%, 86% and 97% wt respectively.
- Parallel MPR process 60 shares common features with counter-current MPR process 10 and like numerals denote like parts.
- the process utilises three reactors operating at varying pressures, a high pressure reactor 18 at 18 bar, a medium pressure reactor 20 at 6 bar and a low pressure reactor 22 at 1 bar.
- the temperatures of the reactors are each 850° C.
- Each reactor 18 , 20 and 22 is respectively loaded with a low grade iron oxide containing catalyst, for example iron ore 24 ′′, 24 ′ and 24 . Where 24 is unreacted catalyst and 24 ′, 24 ′′ are progressively more utilised, having more carbon attached and less overall catalytic activity remaining.
- Stream 14 contains only trace amounts of fully spent catalyst, with the vast majority (>90% wt at reaction temperatures of 850° C.) of this stream being graphite.
- the reactors 18 , 20 and 22 are arranged in series, such that catalyst 24 ′′, 24 ′ and 24 is transferred between adjacent reactors. i.e. from the low pressure reactor 22 to the medium pressure reactor 20 and from the medium pressure reactor 20 to the high pressure reactor 18 .
- unreacted natural gas 16 is provided to each reactor 22 , 20 and 18 .
- the catalyst 24 depletes to form a partially deactivated catalyst 24 ′.
- the partially deactivated catalyst 24 ′, 24 ′′ is transferred between the reactors.
- the catalyst 24 is introduced into the lowest pressure reactor 22 , and is subsequently passed to higher pressure reactors 20 , 18 .
- the partially deactivated catalyst 24 ′ would therefore retain activity in the higher pressure reactor 20 , and the resultant carbon 14 has the higher carbon-purity (as % of mass) with correspondingly higher value.
- Natural gas 16 contacts the catalyst 24 in the low pressure reactor 22 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 18 bar to convert a portion of the natural gas 16 into hydrogen to produce a gas stream 68 , being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas.
- Graphitic carbon is deposited onto catalyst 24 to produce catalyst 24 ′ contributing to the total carbon in stream 14 .
- Natural gas 16 contacts the catalyst 24 ′ in the medium pressure reactor 20 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 6 bar to of the natural gas 16 into hydrogen to produce a gas stream 64 , being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas.
- Graphitic carbon is deposited onto catalyst 24 ′ to produce catalyst 24 ′′ contributing to the total carbon in stream 14 .
- Natural gas 16 contacts the catalyst 24 ′′ in the high pressure reactor 18 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 18 bar to convert a portion of the natural gas 16 hydrogen to produce a gas stream 62 , being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas.
- Graphitic carbon is deposited onto catalyst 2 ′′ to produce catalyst graphitic carbon 14 .
- Low grade iron ore 102 is passes through a surge bin 104 and into a dusting reactor 106 .
- the iron ore 102 is contacted at a temperature between 850° C. and a pressure between 10 and 20 bar with a hydrocarbon gas 108 to produce a graphite coated iron stream 110 and a waste stream 112 comprising of larger (>1 mm) gangue particles.
- the size difference between the graphite coated iron stream 110 and a waste stream 112 separates the streams.
- the graphite coated iron stream 110 is passed through a gas/solids separator 114 to separate the gas stream 116 from the solids stream 118 , which is passed to a reduction reactor 120 .
- the graphite coated iron particles of the solids stream 118 contact with hydrogen gas 122 at a temperature between 800° C. and 900° C. and a pressure between 10 and 20 bar in order to remove the carbon coating, leaving a iron concentrate stream 124 .
- the reaction also forms a methane gas stream 126 , which is recycled into other parts of the process.
- the methane gas stream 126 is contacted at a temperature between 800° C. and 900° C. with further iron ore 102 passed through a surge bin 130 in a hydrogen reactor 127 to produce hydrogen gas 122 and a graphite powder 128 .
- the hydrogen gas 122 is transferred back into the reduction reactor 120 .
- iron ore as the catalyst for the economical production of hydrogen and graphite via the thereto-catalytic decomposition of methane.
- the present invention provides a method which enables the use of low grade iron oxide as a catalyst for the decomposition of methane.
- samples of low grade iron oxide were compared to high grade iron oxide samples.
- Two types of high grade iron oxide were tested; hematite (99%, ⁇ 5 ⁇ m, Sigma-Aldrich) and magnetite (95%, ⁇ 5 ⁇ m, Sigma-Aldrich); as well as two iron ore samples: Hematite ore (Pilbara mine) and goethite ore (Yandi mine).
- the ore samples were milled to ⁇ 150 ⁇ m but otherwise untreated.
- the ‘as received’ compositional data, particle size distribution, and surface area of all the samples are detailed in Table 1.
- Each sample was placed in a separate single stage reactor.
- the reactors were vertical 1/2′′ diameter stainless steel (SS316 Swagelok) tube, with 3 ⁇ 8′′ quartz tube internal liners.
- the quartz tube internal liners reduce the catalytic effect of the stainless steel reactor walls by restricting contact with the reacting methane gas.
- 20 g catalyst samples were contained within a 3 ⁇ 8′′ ‘test-tube like’ quartz chamber.
- the XRD plots of the high grade iron oxide catalyst samples namely analytical grade (hematite and magnetite) and low grade iron oxide catalyst samples (hematite ore and goethite ore) are shown in FIG. 5 .
- Each sample was reacted at temperatures ranging from 750-950° C., using 10 sccm pure methane (UHP), and a reaction pressure between 1-9 bar (absolute). After complete deactivation (approximately 19 hr) the reaction was terminated and the samples were cooled with 20 sccm of pure nitrogen (UHP). The resulting carbon (and embedded catalyst particles) was weighed to determine the total carbon yield per gram of iron catalyst used.
- UHP sccm pure methane
- FIG. 6 shows the results of these experiments at reaction conditions of 850° C. and atmospheric pressure.
- the results show that the low grade iron ore samples performed almost as well as the high grade oxides, with carbon yields ranging from 9.2 to 8.9 grams of carbon per gram of iron, corresponding to carbon purities of 90 wt % to 89 wt % respectively. These values are shown to closely correlate with the quantitative XRD derived values, with differences of less than 2 wt % (represented as hollow shapes in FIG. 6 ).
- a three reactor counter-current MPR was set up in a cascade arrangement as shown in the schematic of FIG. 7 .
- the reactor set-up comprised three independent reactor stages (3 ⁇ 1 ⁇ 2′′ OD 316SS Swagelok, 700 mm length) with different set back-pressures (12 bar, 4 bar and atmospheric) and an isothermal temperature of 850° C. Instead of linking the reactors in series, each was fed and analysed independently in order to assess their individual performances.
- the feed gas compositions of each reactor were set to simulate their operation in series, where each of the reactors were operating at their theoretical maximum possible conversion at the reaction pressure (Table 2).
- the performance of each stage was determined by monitoring the effluent from each reactor using a Gas Chromatograph (GC). A schematic of this process is shown in FIG. 8 . An excess amount of iron oxide was used to simulate continuous catalyst flow conditions within this static system to allow a momentary glimpse of the expected steady-state continuous operation.
- GC Gas Chromatograph
- reaction pressure was tested using 20 mg of catalyst at pressure intervals of 1 bar, with all other reaction conditions remaining the same as the previous experiments (namely 850° C., 20 sccm methane, auto-reduction, 19 hr duration).
- the profile, as shown in FIG. 10 shows that the carbon yield per gram of iron increases from ⁇ 9 g to 22 g across the pressure range of atmospheric pressure to 9 bar absolute, corresponding to carbon purities of ⁇ 90-96% respectively.
- the overall feasibility of the MPR systems are dependent on the balance of the mass flows. This is of particular importance for the counter flow MPR because of the strict interdependence of the catalyst mass flow with (1) the number of reactor pressure stages, (2) the range of pressures, and (3) the catalyst carbon capacity profile. An empirical mass balance calculation was done to determine the feasibility of attaining balance.
- the catalyst flow rate within each reactor can be determined by dividing the carbon deposition rate by the catalyst utility for each reactor; which are both bounded by the reactor pressure range.
- Parallel flow MPRs have the advantage of design simplicity and fewer constraints determining the number of stages and pressure limits.
- the biggest constraint for the counter-current MPR arrangement is balancing the catalyst mass flow between all reactor stages in order to enable continuous operation.
- the catalyst flow rate required at each stage is dependent on (1) the number of reactor stages and (2) the catalyst carbon capacity profile relative to pressure. This balance is illustrated in FIG. 11 .
- This calculation is to determine the number of pressure stages that balances the catalyst flow rate between all stages, for a given catalyst carbon capacity profile and reaction temperature (assuming isothermal conditions).
- the catalyst utility at each stage is the difference between the total catalyst utility at the reactor pressure and the adjacent lower pressure reactor.
- the catalyst mass flow rate through each reactor stage then becomes:
- P, R, and T are the STP pressure, gas constant and temperature respectively
- ⁇ dot over (Q) ⁇ CH 4 (I) is the initial methane feed rate
- ⁇ Rn is the TEL at reactor ‘n’
- ⁇ and ⁇ are coefficients relating to the pressure effects on the carbon capacity
- KT is the equilibrium constant at temperature T.
- reactor (n ⁇ 1) and (n+2) reactors do not exist, and for a three stage reactor (n ⁇ 1) and (n+3) reactors do not exist.
- Typical low grade iron ore rock consists of distinct sections of high grade iron oxide and low grade counterpart. This type of rock is known as banded iron formation (BIF).
- BIF banded iron formation
- the sample was loaded into a static reactor bed and was contacted at 900° C. with methane gas and atmospheric pressure for a period of 4 hours. Following reaction, the high grade iron oxide band had fragmented whereas the low grade counterpart was largely unaffected.
- the first reaction that occurs is the reduction of the aggregate iron oxide species ore into iron carbide, emitting water vapour, H 2 , CO 2 and trace CO.
- Continued reaction causes the aggregate iron carbide to fragment via metal dusting (as described earlier) and in the absence of oxides the system emits H 2 gas only.
- This dusting causes all the iron species to disintegrate into micron and nano fragments due to the encapsulating graphitic layers.
- the gangue of the iron ore typically highly stable minerals containing SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 ) are unaffected by these process conditions and remain intact and unaltered.
- the product of the process is therefore left with larger aggregates of gangue and tiny particles of graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide.
- the size and density difference between the iron species and the gangue can then be exploited to separate the two in cyclonic separator.
- compositional data of the samples after the reaction and physical separation by size is shown in Table 4.
- the analysis showed that the size separation was able to separate the majority of the iron species, with sample A corresponding to the majority of iron.
- the compositional data was determined by XRF analysis, which requires the sample to be oxidised beforehand, thus showing all iron species as oxides instead of ferrite.
- Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis prior to calcination showed the iron species to be ferrite. Empirically, removing this oxide from the iron composition we are able to calculate that the process is able to extract a product that is 85 wt % iron from an original total rock composition of approximately 35 wt %
- the graphitic carbon can then be removed from the graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide by a process called methanation.
- methanation the iron/carbon particles are contacted with hydrogen gas at elevated temperatures, to form methane gas by way of the following reaction 2.
- the graphitic carbon can then be removed from the graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide by contacting at 800° C. and 20 bar the graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide with hydrogen gas.
- the advantages of the beneficiation method of the present invention over classical methods of iron ore beneficiation is that the produced iron oxide species are reduced (oxygen removed leaving ferric iron) in addition to the gangue being removed.
- This reduced iron is 90-95% wt iron whereas high grade iron ore is typically 55-63% wt (70% theoretical maximum).
- Reduced iron is a premium product compared to iron ore and thus commands a higher price.
- the reduced iron product potentially has lower transportation costs because ballast oxygen is not transported—a saving of 30-40% by weight and ⁇ 50% by volume.
- Classical beneficiation processes used in industry for iron ore include milling, magnetic separation, floatation, gravity concentration, thickening/filtering and agglomeration.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Catalysts (AREA)
- Carbon And Carbon Compounds (AREA)
- Hydrogen, Water And Hydrids (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas comprising: contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon, wherein the catalyst is a low grade iron oxide.
Description
- The present invention relates to a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon.
- Hydrogen has many commercial uses, such as a clean and environmentally friendly alternative to fuel in internal combustion engines. Carbon, or more particularly graphite, is considered a key material in the emerging green technology market. It has been shown to be useful in energy storage, electrical conduction devices, catalyst supports, lubrication additives and modern electronics equipment. All references to carbon within this patent relates to the graphitic form of carbon, therefore these terms are used interchangeably throughout.
- Conventional methods of producing hydrogen from fossil fuels however produce carbon dioxide (natural gas steam reforming and coal gasification) which is harmful to the environment.
- Natural gas can be catalytically cracked into both hydrogen gas and solid carbon according to Equation (1).
-
CH4→C+2H2 (1) - In such a process, the carbon deposits onto the surface of the catalyst and hydrogen gas evolves. There are a wide number of known catalysts for the process, including precious metals and carbon-based catalysts.
- Whilst the above process is known, it has not been exploited commercially for a number of economic reasons. This primarily relates to the underlying catalyst costs, both in the initial supply, as well as costs in recycling and regenerating the catalyst. The vast majority of researchers in this area have utilised expensive and complex supported catalysts which, despite their high catalyst activity and product yield, result in extremely high catalyst turnover costs. These costs are a significant barrier to commercialising the use of such catalysts. There is a significant need for new and improved processes and catalysts for the catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons to hydrogen and a solid carbon which are stable and commercially valuable.
- The preceding discussion of the background art is intended to facilitate an understanding of the present invention only. It should be appreciated that the discussion is not an acknowledgement or admission that any of the material referred to was part of the common general knowledge in Australia as at the priority date of the application.
- In its broadest aspect, the invention provides a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas. In particular the present invention provides a process for catalytically converting hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon using a low grade catalyst.
- Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the term “low grade” will be understood to imply that the material that is not synthesised. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, synthesised materials are produced by the chemical reaction of precursor materials. Standard synthesis techniques for catalysts which are excluded from the present invention are, for example, impregnating nano-sized catalytic elements onto inert supports. Whilst the term “low grade” does include naturally occurring materials, it should not be understood to exclude materials that have gone through physical beneficiation such as crushing and screening or classification.
- Throughout the specification, unless otherwise stated, all pressures are provided in bar (gauge), with 0 bar being atmospheric pressure.
- In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas comprising:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
wherein the catalyst is a low grade iron oxide.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
- Preferably, the pressure is greater than atmospheric pressure.
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
more specifically comprises the steps of: - reducing at least a portion of the iron oxide to iron;
- decomposing the hydrocarbon gas to produce hydrogen gas and an iron carbide intermediate; and
- precipitating graphitic carbon on the surface of the iron.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 100 bar. Preferably, the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 50 bar. More preferably, the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure between 0 bar and 20 bar. Still preferably, the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is conducted at a pressure between 2 bar and 10 bar.
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
is preferably conducted at a temperature of 700° C. to 950° C.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
- In a second form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
is preferably conducted at a temperature of 800° C. to 900° C.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
- In a third form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
is preferably conducted at a temperature of 650° C. to 750° C.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
- The inventors have discovered that the method of the present invention allows for the use of a low grade catalyst whilst still obtaining high conversion rates and yield.
- Without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors understand that the use of iron ore is advantageous because the metal species catalyses the decomposition reaction and the mineralogy of the ore exposes the catalytic elements to the hydrocarbon gas. It is understood by the applicant that the force of the precipitation of the graphite layers on the surface of the catalytic components is sufficient to fracture the coated catalyst particles apart from the catalyst, exposing further catalytic iron oxide. The catalyst is therefore self-supporting and does not require significant preparation prior to use.
- In one form of the present invention, the hydrocarbon gas is methane. Preferably, the hydrocarbon gas is natural gas.
- In one form of the present invention, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 20 mm. Preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 15 mm. More preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 10 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 5 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 1 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 0.5 mm. Still preferably, the catalyst is milled to a particle size of less than 0.1 mm.
- In one form of the present invention, the step of contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is performed within a pressurised reactor. Preferably, the pressurised reactor is selected from the group of static, moving or fluidized bed reactors.
- In one form of the present invention, the catalyst is disposed on a substantially horizontal surface of the reactor and subjected to a transverse flow of hydrocarbon gas. In a second form of the present invention, the catalyst is suspended in a fluidised bed reactor and hydrocarbon gas is flowed through the fluidised bed.
- In one form of the present invention, the step of contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is performed in a plurality of pressurised reactors arranged in series,
- In one form of the present invention, the arrangement of the reactors in series allows gas to flow from a first reactor to a subsequent reactor(s). Preferably, each subsequent reactor in the series operates at a lower pressure than the preceding reactor, allowing gas to travel to reactors of lower pressure. In the series arrangement, any unreacted hydrocarbon gas passes to subsequent reactors of lower pressure to contact additional catalyst for further processing and more complete conversion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon
- In an alternative form of the present invention, the arrangement of the reactors in series allows catalyst to flow from a first reactor to a subsequent reactor. Preferably, each subsequent reactor in the series is operated at a higher pressure than the preceding reactor, allowing catalyst to travel to reactors of higher pressure. At low pressures, some of the catalyst may remain only partially deactivated. In the series arrangement, partially deactivated catalyst passes to subsequent reactors of higher pressure to be contacted by additional hydrocarbon gas for further processing and the production of a higher purity graphitic carbon. It is envisaged by the applicant that the subsequent reactors may be provided below the preceding reactors such that the flow of the catalyst between the reactors can be assisted by gravity. The applicant has termed this as a cascade-style arrangement.
- In one form of the present invention, two pressurised reactors are used in series.
-
- the first reactor is at a pressure between 15 and 25 bar;
- the second reactor is at a pressure between 0 and 1 bar;
- In an alternate form of the present invention, three pressurised reactors are used in series. Where three pressurised reactors are used in series,
-
- the first reactor is at a pressure between 15 and 25 bar;
- the second reactor is at a pressure between 5 and 10 bar; and
- the third the first reactor is at a pressure between 0 and 1 bar.
- In an alternate form of the present invention, four pressurised reactors are used in series. Where four pressurised reactors are used in series,
-
- the first reactor is at a pressure between 20 and 30 bar;
- the second reactor is at a pressure between 5 and 15 bar;
- the third reactor is at a pressure between 4 and 6 bar; and
- the fourth reactor is at a pressure between 0 and 1 bar.
- In an alternate form of the present invention, five pressurised reactors are used in series. Where five pressurised reactors are used in series,
-
- the first reactor is at a pressure between 25 and 35 bar;
- the second reactor is at a pressure between 10 and 20 bar;
- the third reactor is at a pressure between 5 and 10 bar;
- the fourth reactor is at a pressure between 4 and 6 bar; and
- the fifth reactor is at a pressure between 0 and 1 bar.
- The utility and economic drivers of the conversation of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon are the competing kinetic and thermodynamic drivers of the reaction. As discussed previously, the hydrocarbon gas decomposes which ultimately results in graphitic carbon precipitating onto the surface of metallic particles of the catalyst. The precipitation continues until the methane can no longer penetrate the enveloping graphite and reach the catalyst. Kinetically, the reaction is driven by increased reaction pressure, as this better enables methane to diffuse into the graphite structure that envelops the active catalyst surfaces, leading to greater catalyst utilisation. Increased catalyst utilisation also leads to a higher purity graphite product. The competing factor is that the thermodynamics of the reaction preferentially indicate undertaking the reaction at lower pressure. At higher pressures there is an increased gas volume of the products (2 moles of hydrogen produced per mole of methane feed) which leads to an equilibrium position that is more favoured towards the initial reagents over the products. This equilibrium position limits the % of methane feed that can be converted to hydrogen. This is known in the art as the thermodynamic equilibrium limit (TEL), which decreases as the reaction pressure is increased.
- By providing a plurality of reactors in series, the inventors have found that the competing kinetic and thermodynamic drivers of the reaction can be controlled by altering the pressure of each subsequent reactor. This allows high catalyst activity at higher pressure but also results in high conversion of the hydrocarbon gas feed in the reactors of lower pressure. The benefit of using multiple reactors in series is it allows the use of elevated reaction pressures to increase the product yield per unit catalyst utilised (catalyst utility) whilst maintaining high methane conversion efficiencies (TEL).
- In one form of the present invention where multiple reactors are used in a series which allows gas flow between reactors, each reactor is provided with unreacted catalyst. In this arrangement, each of the reactors are loaded with unreacted catalyst prior to being contacted with the hydrocarbon gas. A portion of the hydrocarbon gas is converted to hydrogen and graphitic carbon in the reactor with the highest pressure. The first reactor has an associated TEL, resulting in an under-conversion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen gas and carbon. The resultant hydrocarbon gas/hydrogen mixture transfers to one or more successive lower pressure reactors. The lower pressure reactors have a higher associated TEL, enabling further conversion of hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen gas and carbon. When unreacted catalyst is provided in each reactor, the applicant has termed this arrangement a parallel gas multiple pressure reactor (parallel gas MPR).
- In a second form of the present invention where multiple reactors are used in a series which allows catalyst flow between reactors, unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided to each reactor. In this arrangement, hydrocarbon gas is continuously flowed through the reactor. Unreacted catalyst is provided in the lowest pressure reactor, which following the catalytic conversion of the methane, produces a partially deactivated catalyst. The partially deactivated catalyst is transferred into the next reactor of higher pressure in the series for further catalytic conversion of methane. The higher pressure of the reactor allows for further deactivation of the catalyst. The transfer of the partially deactivated catalyst repeats along multiple reactors of increasing pressure. When unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided in each reactor, the applicant has termed this arrangement a parallel catalyst multiple pressure reactor (parallel catalyst MPR).
- In a third form of the present invention the multiple reactors are arranged in a series which allows for both the hydrocarbon gas and catalyst to flow between reactors in opposite directions. In this arrangement, unreacted catalyst is provided in the lowest pressure reactor and unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided in the highest pressure reactor. The catalyst is transferred between the chambers of increasing pressure counter-currently to the gas flow between the chambers. The applicant has termed this arrangement a counter-current multiple pressure reactor (counter-current MPR). The partially deactivated catalyst retains activity in the higher pressure reactors, and the resultant graphite product has higher purity (as % of mass) with correspondingly higher value.
- The inventors have found that the counter-current MPR arrangement allows for more complete conversion of the hydrocarbon gas and a higher purity graphitic carbon product. As there is no catalyst flow in parallel gas MPRs or no gas flow in parallel catalyst MPRs, the design is much simpler than the counter-current MPR.
- In one form of the present invention, the process is configured to preferentially produce either higher purity hydrogen or graphitic carbon. As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, both the hydrogen and graphitic carbon products are always produced in constant proportion of 1:3 (hydrogen to graphitic carbon) on a mass basis as dictated by the basic reaction stoichiometry. Despite this, emphasis can be given to increase the purity of one of the products over the other.
- In one form of the present invention where the process is adapted to preferentially produce higher purity hydrogen, the process comprises:
-
- contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas at a temperature between 800° C. and 900° C. at atmospheric pressure to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon.
- Preferably, the process is conducted in a single fluidised bed reactor.
- If higher purity hydrogen is preferred then emphasis is given to conditions which increase methane conversion efficiencies. For higher purity hydrogen in a single stage reactor this means typically lower pressures and higher temperatures, as this allows for the highest conversion as per thermodynamics. The higher conversion is at the expense of higher catalyst consumption and lower purity graphite as a result of smaller yields per unit of catalyst.
- In one form of the present invention, where the process is adapted to preferentially produce higher purity graphitic carbon, the process comprises:
-
- contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas at a temperature between 650° C. and 950° C. at a pressure between 2 and 100 bar to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon.
- Preferably, the process in conducted in a fluidised bed reactor.
- If higher purity graphitic carbon is preferred, then emphasis is given to the conditions which increase the catalyst utility. The quality of graphite is a function of the purity with respects to the non-carbon inclusions and the degree of crystallinity. For higher purity graphitic carbon in a single stage reactor this means typically larger range of temperatures and higher pressures, as this allows for the highest utilisation of the catalyst.
- In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore, the method comprising contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species.
- Preferably, the pressure is greater than atmospheric pressure.
- In one form of the present invention, the carbon-coated metal species is a graphite coated metal species.
- In one form of the present invention, the step of;
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
more specifically comprises the steps of; - reducing at least a portion of the catalytic metal containing ore to catalytic metal species;
- decomposing the hydrocarbon gas to produce hydrogen gas and an catalytic metal carbide intermediate; and
- precipitating graphitic carbon on the surface of the catalytic metal.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is understood by the applicant that the force of the precipitation of the graphite layers on the surface of the catalytic components is sufficient to fracture the coated catalyst particles apart from the remaining ore gangue. Once the coated catalyst particles have fractured, further catalytic components within the ore are exposed to the hydrocarbon gas.
- In one form of the present invention the catalytic metal containing ore is iron ore.
- As discussed previously, the metal species in iron ore catalyses the decomposition reaction. The majority of the iron on the Earth's crust is as a form called ‘banded iron formation (BIF)’ which consists of layers of iron separated by layers of non-iron minerals, typically SiO2. The benefit of this arrangement is that the gas always has access to the iron layers because they are never fully encased in non-iron species. In addition, iron ore has relatively high concentration of iron. By contrast, the catalytic elements in the other ores are too low in concentration and are not stratified in layers, therefore are often encapsulated by non-catalytic species and the process gas is unable to contact them to react.
- In one form of the present invention, the process is conducted in a pressurised dusting reactor. Preferably, the catalytic metal containing ore is contacted with the hydrocarbon gas within the pressurised dusting reactor to produce nano/micron sized graphite coated metal particles. Advantageously, the larger (>1 mm) non-catalytic gangue species are left unchanged, Due to this size difference, physical separation techniques can be employed to separate out the graphite coated metal particles from the gangue.
- In one form of the present invention the dusting reactor is a fluidized bed reactor. The inventors have discovered that the use of a fluidised bed reactor has the advantage of simultaneously separating the nano micron sized graphite coated metal particles from the larger gangue species during the beneficiation process. The smaller sized graphite coated metal particles are entrained in the process gas stream and removed from the reactor via this gas stream, whereas the larger gangue particles remain within the reactor. In one form of the present invention, the smaller graphite coated metal species are removed from the gas stream by a gas-solid separator that allows the particles to settle. The gangue can be continuously removed from the dusting reactor via gravity by periodic discharging.
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is preferably conducted at a temperature of 700° C. to 950° C.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is preferably conducted at a temperature of 800° C. to 900° C.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is preferably conducted at a temperature of 650° C. to 750° C.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 100 bar.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 50 bar.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 20 bar.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the step of:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
is conducted at a pressure of 0 bar to 10 bar,
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species,
- In one form of the present invention, the graphite is removed from the graphite coated metal species by contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas. Preferably, the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor.
- In one form of the present invention, the removal of the graphite from the graphite coated metal species is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor at a pressure of 0 bar to 100 bar. It is understood by the inventors that higher pressures favour the removal of the graphite, In a preferred form of the present invention, the removal of the graphite from the graphite coated metal species is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor at a pressure of 10 bar to 20 bar.
- The step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas produces methane. In one form of the present invention, the methane is recycled to produce hydrogen. More specifically, the step of recycling the methane comprises,
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. a low grade iron ore catalyst with the methane to catalytically convert at least a portion of the methane to hydrogen and graphitic carbon.
- In one form of the present invention, the hydrogen produced in the step of recycling the methane is used in the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas to remove the graphite from the graphite coated metal species.
- When beneficiating iron ore, the removal of the graphite within the reduction reaction leaves the metal species in high purity form, often as iron metal.
- Further features of the present invention are more fully described in the following description of several non-limiting embodiments thereof. This description is included solely for the purposes of exemplifying the present invention. It should not be understood as a restriction on the broad summary, disclosure or description of the invention as set out above. The description will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
-
FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of the process for producing hydrogen and graphite in accordance with the counter-current MPR of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of the process for producing hydrogen and graphite in accordance with the parallel gas MPR of the present invention; -
FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of the process for producing hydrogen and graphite in accordance with the parallel catalyst MPR of the present invention -
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of the process for the beneficiation of a catalytic metal containing ore in accordance with a first embodiment; -
FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of XRD plots of the analytical grade iron oxides and iron ore catalyst samples; -
FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of carbon purity (wt %) and carbon yield (grams of carbon per gram of iron—GC/GFe) of iron oxide catalysts post reaction; -
FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of a three stage cascading counter-flow system; -
FIG. 8 shows a schematic representation of the experimental conditions used to test the methane conversion of a MPR system with 3 reactors in series using static fixed bed reactors; -
FIG. 9 is a graphical representation of the methane conversion results of hematite catalyst for different reaction pressures; -
FIG. 10 is a graphical representation of carbon purity (wt %) and carbon yield (gram of carbon per gram of iron—GC/GFe) of hematite catalyst for different reaction pressures; -
FIG. 11 is schematic shows a schematic representation of the variables for the mass balance calculation of a counter-current MPR system; -
FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of the mass balance calculation results of both the counter-current MPR and parallel MPR showing the catalyst mass-flow required for a balanced system with a hydrogen production rate of 2000 m3/hr, - Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention described herein is susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. The invention includes all such variation and modifications. The invention also includes all of the steps, features, formulations and compounds referred to or indicated in the specification, individually or collectively and any and all combinations or any two or more of the steps or features.
- Each document, reference, patent application or patent cited in this text is expressly incorporated herein in their entirety by reference, which means that it should be read and considered by the reader as part of this text. That the document, reference, patent application or patent cited in this text is not repeated in this text is merely for reasons of conciseness. None of the cited material or the information contained in that material should, however be understood to be common general knowledge.
- Manufacturer's instructions, descriptions, product specifications, and product sheets for any products mentioned herein or in any document incorporated by reference herein, are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and may be employed in the practice of the invention.
- The present invention is not to be limited in scope by any of the specific embodiments described herein. These embodiments are intended for the purpose of exemplification only. Functionally equivalent products, formulations and methods are clearly within the scope of the invention as described herein.
- The invention described herein may include one or more range of values (e.g. size, concentration etc). A range of values will be understood to include all values within the range, including the values defining the range, and values adjacent to the range which lead to the same or substantially the same outcome as the values immediately adjacent to that value which defines the boundary to the range.
- Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.
- Other definitions for selected terms used herein may be found within the detailed description of the invention and apply throughout. Unless otherwise defined, all other scientific and technical terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention belongs.
- Features of the invention will now be discussed with reference to the following non-limiting description and examples.
- In a general form, the invention relates to a process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas. In particular the present invention provides a process for catalytically converting hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon using a low grade iron oxide-containing catalyst.
- The hydrocarbon gas may be any gas stream that comprises light hydrocarbons. Illustrative examples of hydrocarbon gas include, but are not limited to, natural gas, coal seam gas, landfill gas and biogas. The composition of the hydrocarbon gas may vary significantly but it will generally comprise one or more light hydrocarbons from a group comprising methane, ethane, ethylene, propane and butane.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the hydrocarbon gas is natural gas.
- The process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from natural gas comprises:
-
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
wherein the catalyst is a low grade iron oxide.
- contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
- Referring to
FIG. 1 , acounter-current MPR process 10, using three fluidised bed reactors, for producinghydrogen 12 andgraphitic carbon 14 from a hydrocarbon gas, for example natural gas, 16 is described. - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 1 , the process utilises three reactors operating at varying pressures, ahigh pressure reactor 18 at 18 bar, amedium pressure reactor 20 at 6 bar and alow pressure reactor 22 at 1 bar. The temperatures of the reactors are each 850° C. Thereactors high pressure reactor 18 to themedium pressure reactor 20 and from themedium pressure reactor 20 to thelow pressure reactor 22. - Each
reactor example iron ore 24″, 24′ and 24. Where 24 is fresh unreacted catalyst and 24′, 24″ are progressively more utilised, having more graphitic carbon attached and less overall catalytic activity remaining.Stream 14 contains only trace amounts of fully spent catalyst, with the vast majority (>90% wt at reaction temperatures of 850° C.) of this stream being graphitic carbon. - The amount of catalyst required for this reaction is relative to the quantity of hydrogen required, the process conditions and the type of catalyst. A 2000 m3/hr hydrogen production plant operating under the conditions above with 3 reactors would require approximately 14 kg/hr of iron
-
Natural gas 16 is directed through the reactors in series from thehigh pressure reactor 18, to themedium pressure reactor 20 andlow pressure reactor 22. Each reactor converts a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, with eachsuccessive gas stream natural gas 16 initially contacts thecatalyst 24″ in thehigh pressure reactor 18 at a temperature of 850° . and a pressure of 18 bar to convert a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, thus thecorresponding gas stream 28 being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas. This reactor also deposits some graphitic carbon ontocatalyst 24″ contributing to the total graphitic carbon insteam 14. -
Gas stream 28 is transferred to themedium pressure reactor 20 where it contacts thecatalyst 24′ at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 6 bar to convert the natural gas into hydrogen and carbon. The lower pressure of themedium pressure reactor 20 enables conversion of thegas stream 28, thus contributing to thetotal hydrogen steam 12. The process deposits graphitic carbon onto thecatalyst 24′ and in so contributes to the totalgraphitic carbon stream 14. A portion of the natural gas ingas stream 28 remains unreacted and mixes with the produced hydrogen gas to formgas stream 30. -
Gas stream 30 is transferred to thelow pressure reactor 22 where it contacts thecatalyst 24 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 1 bar (atmospheric pressure). The lower pressure of thelow pressure reactor 22 enables the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction to favour the decomposition direction of the reaction, thereby allowing more conversion of thesecond gas stream 30 into carbon and hydrogen gas . The process deposits graphitic carbon onto thecatalyst 24, and in so contributes to the totalgraphitic carbon stream 14. This reactor also contributes to the hydrogen gas in thetotal hydrogen steam 12 which exits the reactor for use or further processing. - Theoretical empirical calculations dictate that the
reactors - The proportion of graphitic carbon in the iron oxide streams 24, 24′, 24″ and 14 are 0%, 91%, 95%, 98% respectively.
- In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 1 , when thenatural gas 16 contacts thecatalyst 24 at a high temperature to producehydrogen gas 12 andcarbon 14, thecatalyst 24 depletes to form a partially deactivatedcatalyst 24′. The partially deactivatedcatalyst 24′ is transferred between the reactors counter-currently to thenatural gas 16 flow. Thecatalyst 24 is introduced into thelowest pressure reactor 22, and is subsequently passed to higher pressure reactors. The partially deactivatedcatalyst 24′ would therefore retain activity in thehigher pressure reactor 20, and the resultantgraphitic carbon 14 has the higher carbon-purity (as % of mass) with correspondingly higher value. - In
FIG. 2 , a parallelgas MPR process 50 is shown. Parallelgas MPR process 50 shares common features withcounter-current MPR process 10 and like numerals denote like parts. - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 2 , the process utilises three reactors operating at varying pressures, ahigh pressure reactor 18 at 18 bar, amedium pressure reactor 20 at 6 bar and alow pressure reactor 22 at 1 bar. The temperatures of the reactors are each 850° C. Thereactors high pressure reactor 18 to themedium pressure reactor 20 and from themedium pressure reactor 20 to thelow pressure reactor 22. - Each
reactor iron ore catalyst 52. In contrast to thecounter-current MPR process 10 shown above, eachreactor unreacted catalyst 52 prior to being contacted with the hydrocarbon gas. - The amount of catalyst required for this reaction is relative to the quantity of hydrogen required, the process conditions and the type of catalyst. A 2000 m3/hr hydrogen production plant operating under the conditions above with 3 reactors would require approximately 27 kg/hr of iron.
-
Natural gas 16 is directed through the reactors in series from thehigh pressure reactor 18, to themedium pressure reactor 20 andlow pressure reactor 22. Each reactor converts a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, with eachsuccessive gas stream natural gas 16 initially contacts at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 18 bar the catalyst 34 in thehigh pressure reactor 18 to convert a portion of the natural gas into hydrogen, producing agas stream 28 which is a mixture of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas. Graphite is also deposited onto catalyst 34, producingpartial graphite stream 54. -
Gas stream 28 passes to themedium pressure reactor 20 where it contacts at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 6 bar thecatalyst 52 to convert the natural gas into hydrogen and carbon. The lower pressure of themedium pressure reactor 20 enables further conversion of thegas stream 28, thus contributing to thetotal hydrogen steam 12. The process deposits carbon onto thecatalyst 52, producingpartial graphite stream 56. A portion of the natural gas ingas stream 28 remains unreacted and mixes with the produced hydrogen gas to formgas stream 30. -
Gas stream 30 passes to thelow pressure reactor 22 where it contacts at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 1 bar (atmospheric pressure) thecatalyst 52. The lower pressure of thelow pressure reactor 22 enables the thermodynamic equilibrium of the reaction to favour the decomposition direction of the reaction, thereby allowing conversion of the natural gas insecond gas stream 30 into carbon and hydrogen gas. The process deposits carbon onto thecatalyst 52, producingpartial graphite stream 58. This reactor also contributes to the hydrogen gas in thetotal hydrogen steam 12, and exits the reactor for use or further processing. - Partial graphite streams 54, 56 and 58 contain a mixture of unreacted iron ore and graphitic material. Given the varying pressures of the each
reactor Partial graphite stream 58 will have the highest iron impurity, followed bypartial graphite stream 56 and thenpartial graphite stream 54. - Empirically, the
reactors - In
FIG. 3 , a parallelcatalyst MPR process 60 is shown.Parallel MPR process 60 shares common features withcounter-current MPR process 10 and like numerals denote like parts. - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 3 , the process utilises three reactors operating at varying pressures, ahigh pressure reactor 18 at 18 bar, amedium pressure reactor 20 at 6 bar and alow pressure reactor 22 at 1 bar. The temperatures of the reactors are each 850° C. - Each
reactor example iron ore 24″, 24′ and 24. Where 24 is unreacted catalyst and 24′, 24″ are progressively more utilised, having more carbon attached and less overall catalytic activity remaining.Stream 14 contains only trace amounts of fully spent catalyst, with the vast majority (>90% wt at reaction temperatures of 850° C.) of this stream being graphite. - The
reactors catalyst 24″, 24′ and 24 is transferred between adjacent reactors. i.e. from thelow pressure reactor 22 to themedium pressure reactor 20 and from themedium pressure reactor 20 to thehigh pressure reactor 18. - In contrast to the
counter-current MPR process 10 shown above, unreactednatural gas 16 is provided to eachreactor - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 8 , when thenatural gas 16 contacts thecatalyst 24 at a high temperature to producehydrogen gas 12 andcarbon 14, thecatalyst 24 depletes to form a partially deactivatedcatalyst 24′. The partially deactivatedcatalyst 24′, 24″ is transferred between the reactors. Thecatalyst 24 is introduced into thelowest pressure reactor 22, and is subsequently passed tohigher pressure reactors catalyst 24′ would therefore retain activity in thehigher pressure reactor 20, and theresultant carbon 14 has the higher carbon-purity (as % of mass) with correspondingly higher value. -
Natural gas 16 contacts thecatalyst 24 in thelow pressure reactor 22 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 18 bar to convert a portion of thenatural gas 16 into hydrogen to produce agas stream 68, being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas. Graphitic carbon is deposited ontocatalyst 24 to producecatalyst 24′ contributing to the total carbon instream 14. -
Natural gas 16 contacts thecatalyst 24′ in themedium pressure reactor 20 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 6 bar to of thenatural gas 16 into hydrogen to produce agas stream 64, being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas. Graphitic carbon is deposited ontocatalyst 24′ to producecatalyst 24″ contributing to the total carbon instream 14. -
Natural gas 16 contacts thecatalyst 24″ in thehigh pressure reactor 18 at a temperature of 850° C. and a pressure of 18 bar to convert a portion of thenatural gas 16 hydrogen to produce agas stream 62, being a mixture comprising of hydrogen and unreacted natural gas. Graphitic carbon is deposited ontocatalyst 2″ to produce catalystgraphitic carbon 14. - Referring to
FIG. 4 , aprocess 100 for the beneficiation of a catalytic metal containing ore forexample iron ore 102 is described. - Low
grade iron ore 102 is passes through asurge bin 104 and into a dustingreactor 106. In the dustingreactor 106, theiron ore 102 is contacted at a temperature between 850° C. and a pressure between 10 and 20 bar with ahydrocarbon gas 108 to produce a graphite coatediron stream 110 and awaste stream 112 comprising of larger (>1 mm) gangue particles. The size difference between the graphite coatediron stream 110 and awaste stream 112 separates the streams. The graphite coatediron stream 110 is passed through a gas/solids separator 114 to separate thegas stream 116 from thesolids stream 118, which is passed to areduction reactor 120. - In the
reduction reactor 120, the graphite coated iron particles of the solids stream 118 contact withhydrogen gas 122 at a temperature between 800° C. and 900° C. and a pressure between 10 and 20 bar in order to remove the carbon coating, leaving airon concentrate stream 124. The reaction also forms amethane gas stream 126, which is recycled into other parts of the process. In the embodiment shown inFIG. 2 , themethane gas stream 126 is contacted at a temperature between 800° C. and 900° C. withfurther iron ore 102 passed through asurge bin 130 in ahydrogen reactor 127 to producehydrogen gas 122 and agraphite powder 128. As shown inFIG. 4 , thehydrogen gas 122 is transferred back into thereduction reactor 120. - The use of iron ore as the catalyst for the economical production of hydrogen and graphite via the thereto-catalytic decomposition of methane.
- The present invention provides a method which enables the use of low grade iron oxide as a catalyst for the decomposition of methane. In order to demonstrate the catalytic activity of the low grade iron oxide catalyst of the present invention, samples of low grade iron oxide were compared to high grade iron oxide samples. Two types of high grade iron oxide were tested; hematite (99%, <5 μm, Sigma-Aldrich) and magnetite (95%, <5 μm, Sigma-Aldrich); as well as two iron ore samples: Hematite ore (Pilbara mine) and goethite ore (Yandi mine). The ore samples were milled to <150 μm but otherwise untreated. The ‘as received’ compositional data, particle size distribution, and surface area of all the samples are detailed in Table 1.
-
TABLE 1 Compositional, particle size and surface area data for the iron oxide samples. Ca Mn Mg Ti Fe P Si Al Oxide Oxide Oxide Dioxide Iron Oxide Type % % % % % % % % Analytical Grade Fe2O3 69.9 — — — — — — — Analytical Grade Fe3O4 72.3 — — — — — — — Hematite ore (Pilbrara) 62.9 0.1 4.0 2.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Goethite ore (Yandi mine) 57.9 0.0 5.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 K Balance Surface S Oxide Cl Oxide D10 D50 D90 area Iron Oxide Type % % % % um um um m2/g Analytical Grade Fe2O3 — — — 30.1 0.2 0.4 1.65 5.37 Analytical Grade Fe3O4 — — — 27.7 0.17 1.42 3.24 6.24 Hematite ore (Pilbrara) 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5 3.2 44.5 141.0 7.62 Goethite ore (Yandi mine) 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.9 3.1 47.8 156.8 29.76 - Each sample was placed in a separate single stage reactor. The reactors were vertical 1/2″ diameter stainless steel (SS316 Swagelok) tube, with ⅜″ quartz tube internal liners. The quartz tube internal liners reduce the catalytic effect of the stainless steel reactor walls by restricting contact with the reacting methane gas. 20 g catalyst samples were contained within a ⅜″ ‘test-tube like’ quartz chamber.
- The XRD plots of the high grade iron oxide catalyst samples, namely analytical grade (hematite and magnetite) and low grade iron oxide catalyst samples (hematite ore and goethite ore) are shown in
FIG. 5 . - Each sample was reacted at temperatures ranging from 750-950° C., using 10 sccm pure methane (UHP), and a reaction pressure between 1-9 bar (absolute). After complete deactivation (approximately 19 hr) the reaction was terminated and the samples were cooled with 20 sccm of pure nitrogen (UHP). The resulting carbon (and embedded catalyst particles) was weighed to determine the total carbon yield per gram of iron catalyst used.
-
FIG. 6 shows the results of these experiments at reaction conditions of 850° C. and atmospheric pressure. The results show that the low grade iron ore samples performed almost as well as the high grade oxides, with carbon yields ranging from 9.2 to 8.9 grams of carbon per gram of iron, corresponding to carbon purities of 90 wt % to 89 wt % respectively. These values are shown to closely correlate with the quantitative XRD derived values, with differences of less than 2 wt % (represented as hollow shapes inFIG. 6 ). - As would be understood by a person skilled in the art, a common way to increase the activity of a catalyst is to make it very high purity in order to increase the reactive area. Iron oxide catalysts, such as the high grade iron oxide sample tested must be must be specifically synthesized to have a purity of >99%. The results of this experiment indicate that the particular process condition of the present invention allow for the use of a low grade catalyst, whilst still obtaining high conversion rates and yield.
- Thermo-Catalytic methane Decomposition using Counter-Current MPR.
- A three reactor counter-current MPR was set up in a cascade arrangement as shown in the schematic of
FIG. 7 . - Experimental evaluation of the counter-current MPR system was undertaken using a static (non-continuous) system. This was done by testing the effect of pressure on the methane conversion efficiency and the carbon yield. The results confirmed that an increase in pressure lowered the methane conversion, and increased the carbon yield, and conversely a lower pressure increased the methane conversion and lowered the total carbon yield.
- Effect of Reaction Pressure on the methane Conversion Limit.
- The reactor set-up comprised three independent reactor stages (3×½″ OD 316SS Swagelok, 700 mm length) with different set back-pressures (12 bar, 4 bar and atmospheric) and an isothermal temperature of 850° C. Instead of linking the reactors in series, each was fed and analysed independently in order to assess their individual performances. The feed gas compositions of each reactor were set to simulate their operation in series, where each of the reactors were operating at their theoretical maximum possible conversion at the reaction pressure (Table 2). The performance of each stage was determined by monitoring the effluent from each reactor using a Gas Chromatograph (GC). A schematic of this process is shown in
FIG. 8 . An excess amount of iron oxide was used to simulate continuous catalyst flow conditions within this static system to allow a momentary glimpse of the expected steady-state continuous operation. -
TABLE 2 Process conditions for the MPR experimental trial Reactor Stage R1 R2 R3 Pressure (bar) 1 4 12 Temperature (° C.) 850 850 850 Theoretical TEL (%) 91.9 72.3 54.4 Methane input flow (sccm) 2.8 4.8 10 Hydrogen input flow (sccm) 14.4 10.4 0 - The results obtained from this experiment are shown in
FIG. 9 and are in good correlation with theoretical expectations and validate the theory. All three reactor stages correlated well with the expected thermodynamic equilibrium limit (shown as dashed lines) for a period exceeding 20 hr, after which the reaction was terminated. It is clear that the high hydrogen concentration did not affect the ability for the reaction to attain conversions at the thermodynamic equilibrium limit when the MPR system was used. - These results indicate that a continuous MPR system can sustain stable conversions at the thermodynamic equilibrium limit regardless of the level of hydrogen.
- The effects of reaction pressure were tested using 20 mg of catalyst at pressure intervals of 1 bar, with all other reaction conditions remaining the same as the previous experiments (namely 850° C., 20 sccm methane, auto-reduction, 19 hr duration).
- The results indicate that there is a positive linear relationship between the reaction pressure and the total carbon yield. The profile, as shown in
FIG. 10 shows that the carbon yield per gram of iron increases from −9 g to 22 g across the pressure range of atmospheric pressure to 9 bar absolute, corresponding to carbon purities of −90-96% respectively. - The overall feasibility of the MPR systems are dependent on the balance of the mass flows. This is of particular importance for the counter flow MPR because of the strict interdependence of the catalyst mass flow with (1) the number of reactor pressure stages, (2) the range of pressures, and (3) the catalyst carbon capacity profile. An empirical mass balance calculation was done to determine the feasibility of attaining balance.
- The catalyst flow rate within each reactor can be determined by dividing the carbon deposition rate by the catalyst utility for each reactor; which are both bounded by the reactor pressure range.
-
-
-
- {dot over (M)}catt(Rn) is the mass flow rate of catalyst, Mc(Rn) is the carbon deposition rate, and
- ΔC(Rn) is the catalyst utility through reactor ‘Rn’.
- Parallel flow MPRs have the advantage of design simplicity and fewer constraints determining the number of stages and pressure limits.
- The biggest constraint for the counter-current MPR arrangement is balancing the catalyst mass flow between all reactor stages in order to enable continuous operation. The catalyst flow rate required at each stage is dependent on (1) the number of reactor stages and (2) the catalyst carbon capacity profile relative to pressure. This balance is illustrated in
FIG. 11 . - The purpose of this calculation is to determine the number of pressure stages that balances the catalyst flow rate between all stages, for a given catalyst carbon capacity profile and reaction temperature (assuming isothermal conditions).
- If the catalyst mass flow rate is set so that it is fully deactivated when exiting each reactor stage, the catalyst utility at each stage is the difference between the total catalyst utility at the reactor pressure and the adjacent lower pressure reactor. Thus:
-
ΔC Rn =C n −C n−1 - Where ‘n’ is the reactor number (n=1 is the lowest pressure reactor).
- The catalyst mass flow rate through each reactor stage then becomes:
-
- Where P, R, and T are the STP pressure, gas constant and temperature respectively, {dot over (Q)}CH
4 (I) is the initial methane feed rate, ξRn is the TEL at reactor ‘n’, α and β are coefficients relating to the pressure effects on the carbon capacity, KT is the equilibrium constant at temperature T. - For a reactor system with only one reactor (n=1), reactor (n−1) and (n+1) reactor stages do not exist; thus this can be simplified to:
-
- Similarly for a two stage reactor, reactor (n−1) and (n+2) reactors do not exist, and for a three stage reactor (n−1) and (n+3) reactors do not exist.
- For a multistage process to be continuous the catalyst flow rate must equate:
-
{dot over (M)} catt(R1) ={dot over (M)} catt(R2) - Thus for a two stage reactor:
-
- For isothermal conditions this can be simplified to:
-
- If reactor ‘R1’ is operating at atmospheric pressure and operating at the TEL then ξR1 is known, and ξR2 can be solved using the above equation. This solution would solve for the pressure required for
reactor 2 to equate the catalyst flow rate. - This can similarly be done for larger numbers of reactors:
-
-
- The above can then be extrapolated to additional reactor stages.
- The empirical results using the linear extrapolated values for pressures above 9 bar(abs) are graphically demonstrated in
FIG. 12 . These results show that the counter flow MPR would consume considerably less catalyst than the parallel flow process under all scenarios. The counter-flow process with 5 reaction stages requires only 19% of the catalyst required for a single reactor, whereas the parallel-flow process requires 42% with the same number of stages. The counter-flow process however is only able to have a maximum of 5 reactor stages for the catalyst mass flow to be constant for all stages. In contrast, the number of parallel-flow process stages is limitless; however it can be seen that each stage has diminishing returns and overall require significantly more catalyst than the counter-flow option. The catalyst mass flow rates are calculated based on an assumed hydrogen output flow rate of 2000 m3/hr. - Beneficiation of Iron Ore.
- Typical low grade iron ore rock consists of distinct sections of high grade iron oxide and low grade counterpart. This type of rock is known as banded iron formation (BIF). A 6.39 g sample of BIF iron ore was prepared, an analysis of the characteristics are shown in Table 3.
-
TABLE 3 Sample Analysis OXIDE SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 Mn3O4 MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 Iron ore rich section 10.62 0.06 0.11 88.8 0.01 0.12 0.02 0.23 0.01 0.03 Iron ore poor section 84.1 0.04 0.14 12.9 <0.01 0.07 0.21 0.11 0.03 0.02 OXIDE SO3 Cr2O3 ZrO2 SrO ZnO CuO NiO BaO PbO L.O.I. TOTAL Iron ore rich section <0.01 0.13 0.02 0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.27 <0.01 <0.01 1.98 102.43 Iron ore poor section <0.01 0.21 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.43 <0.01 <0.01 1 99.26 - The sample was loaded into a static reactor bed and was contacted at 900° C. with methane gas and atmospheric pressure for a period of 4 hours. Following reaction, the high grade iron oxide band had fragmented whereas the low grade counterpart was largely unaffected.
- Without wishing to be bound by theory it is understood by the inventors that the first reaction that occurs is the reduction of the aggregate iron oxide species ore into iron carbide, emitting water vapour, H2, CO2 and trace CO. Continued reaction causes the aggregate iron carbide to fragment via metal dusting (as described earlier) and in the absence of oxides the system emits H2 gas only. This dusting causes all the iron species to disintegrate into micron and nano fragments due to the encapsulating graphitic layers. The gangue of the iron ore (typically highly stable minerals containing SiO2 and Al2O3) are unaffected by these process conditions and remain intact and unaltered. The product of the process is therefore left with larger aggregates of gangue and tiny particles of graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide. The size and density difference between the iron species and the gangue can then be exploited to separate the two in cyclonic separator.
- The compositional data of the samples after the reaction and physical separation by size is shown in Table 4.
-
TABLE 4 Sample Analysis OXIDE WT % SiO2 TiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 Mn3O4 MgO CaO Na2O Sample A 11 0.05 0.12 89.05 <0.01 0.13 0.02 0.21 Sample B 79.13 <0.01 0.14 19.72 <0.01 0.11 0.06 0.08 OXIDE WT % K2O P2O5 SO3 Cr2O3 ZrO2 SrO Sample A 0.02 0.04 <0.01 0.05 0.02 0.01 Sample B 0.05 0.03 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 OXIDE WT % ZnO NiO BaO PbO CuO Total Sample A <0.03 0.08 <0.01 <0.01 0.07 100.87 Sample B <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 99.29 - The analysis showed that the size separation was able to separate the majority of the iron species, with sample A corresponding to the majority of iron. The compositional data was determined by XRF analysis, which requires the sample to be oxidised beforehand, thus showing all iron species as oxides instead of ferrite. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis prior to calcination showed the iron species to be ferrite. Empirically, removing this oxide from the iron composition we are able to calculate that the process is able to extract a product that is 85 wt % iron from an original total rock composition of approximately 35 wt %
- It is envisaged that the graphitic carbon can then be removed from the graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide by a process called methanation. In this reaction the iron/carbon particles are contacted with hydrogen gas at elevated temperatures, to form methane gas by way of the following
reaction 2. -
C+2H2→CH4 (2) - As the iron particles are very small and this reaction is exothermic the iron particles agglomerate to form larger particles of pure iron.
- It is envisaged that the graphitic carbon can then be removed from the graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide by contacting at 800° C. and 20 bar the graphite encapsulated ferric iron/iron carbide with hydrogen gas.
- The advantages of the beneficiation method of the present invention over classical methods of iron ore beneficiation is that the produced iron oxide species are reduced (oxygen removed leaving ferric iron) in addition to the gangue being removed. This reduced iron is 90-95% wt iron whereas high grade iron ore is typically 55-63% wt (70% theoretical maximum). Reduced iron is a premium product compared to iron ore and thus commands a higher price. Also, the reduced iron product potentially has lower transportation costs because ballast oxygen is not transported—a saving of 30-40% by weight and −50% by volume. Classical beneficiation processes used in industry for iron ore include milling, magnetic separation, floatation, gravity concentration, thickening/filtering and agglomeration.
- Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention described herein is susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. The invention includes all such variation and modifications. The invention also includes all of the steps, features, formulations and compounds referred to or indicated in the specification, individually or collectively and any and all.
Claims (25)
1. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from a hydrocarbon gas comprising:
contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas to catalytically convert at least a portion of the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen and graphitic carbon,
wherein the catalyst is a low grade iron oxide.
2. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 1 , wherein the pressure is greater than atmospheric pressure.
3. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 1 , wherein the pressure is 0 bar to 100 bar.
4. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the temperature is between 700° C. and 950° C.
5. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the temperature is between 800° C. and 900° C.
6. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the temperature is between 650° C. and 750° C.
7. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the hydrocarbon gas is methane.
8. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to any one of claims 1 to 9 , wherein the hydrocarbon gas is natural gas.
9. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein, the step of contacting the catalyst with the hydrocarbon gas is performed in a plurality of pressurised reactors arranged in series.
10. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 9 , wherein the arrangement of the reactors in series allows gas to flow from a first reactor to a subsequent reactor and each subsequent reactor in the series operates at a lower pressure than the preceding reactor, allowing gas to travel to reactors of lower pressure.
11. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 10 , wherein each reactor is provided with unreacted catalyst.
12. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 9 , wherein the arrangement of the reactors in series allows catalyst to flow from a first reactor to a subsequent reactor and each subsequent reactor in the series is operated at a higher pressure than the preceding reactor, allowing catalyst to travel to reactors of higher pressure.
13. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 12 , wherein unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided to each reactor.
14. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 9 , wherein the arrangement of the reactors in series allows for both the hydrocarbon gas and catalyst to flow between reactors in opposite directions.
15. A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon according to claim 14 , wherein unreacted catalyst is provided in the lowest pressure reactor and unreacted hydrocarbon gas is provided in the highest pressure reactor and catalyst is transferred between the chambers of increasing pressure counter-currently to the gas flow between the chambers.
16. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore, the method comprising contacting at a temperature between 600° C. and 1000° C. the catalytic metal containing ore with a hydrocarbon gas to form a carbon-coated metal species.
17. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to claim 16 , wherein the carbon-coated metal species is a graphite coated metal species.
18. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to claim 16 or claim 17 , wherein the catalytic metal containing ore is iron ore.
19. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to any one of claims 16 to 18 , wherein the pressure is greater than atmospheric pressure.
20. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to any one of claims 16 to 18 . wherein the pressure is 0 bar to 100 bar.
21. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to any one of claims 16 to 19 , wherein the temperature is between 700° C. and 950° C.
22. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to any one of claims 16 to 21 , wherein the graphite is removed from the graphite coated metal species by contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas.
23. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to any one of claims 16 to 22 , wherein the removal of the graphite from the graphite coated metal species is performed in a pressurised reduction reactor at a pressure of 0 bar to 100 bar.
24. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to any one of claims 16 to 23 , wherein the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C., the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas produces methane which is recycled to produce hydrogen.
25. A method for the beneficiation of catalytic metal containing ore according to claim 24 , wherein the hydrogen produced in the step of recycling the methane is used in the step of contacting at temperature of 700° C. to 900° C. the graphite coated metal species with hydrogen gas to remove the graphite from the graphite coated metal species.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/992,855 US20230227307A1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2022-11-22 | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2015901175A AU2015901175A0 (en) | 2015-03-31 | Thermocatalytic methane decomposition | |
AU2015901175 | 2015-03-31 | ||
PCT/AU2016/000115 WO2016154666A1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
US201715563430A | 2017-09-29 | 2017-09-29 | |
US17/992,855 US20230227307A1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2022-11-22 | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/563,430 Continuation US11505458B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
PCT/AU2016/000115 Continuation WO2016154666A1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | A process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20230227307A1 true US20230227307A1 (en) | 2023-07-20 |
Family
ID=57003724
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/563,430 Active 2038-01-19 US11505458B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
US17/992,855 Abandoned US20230227307A1 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2022-11-22 | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/563,430 Active 2038-01-19 US11505458B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
Country Status (18)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US11505458B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3277623A4 (en) |
JP (3) | JP7007256B2 (en) |
KR (2) | KR102571186B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN108064214B (en) |
AU (4) | AU2016240393B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112017021057B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2980471A1 (en) |
CL (1) | CL2017002468A1 (en) |
EA (1) | EA035857B1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2017012559A (en) |
MY (1) | MY188748A (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ735781A (en) |
PH (1) | PH12017501770A1 (en) |
SA (1) | SA517390046B1 (en) |
SG (1) | SG11201707907SA (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016154666A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA201706455B (en) |
Families Citing this family (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11505458B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2022-11-22 | Hazer Group Limited | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
WO2017031529A1 (en) | 2015-08-26 | 2017-03-02 | Hazer Group Ltd | A process of controlling the morphology of graphite |
WO2018170543A1 (en) * | 2017-03-20 | 2018-09-27 | Hazer Group Limited | System for the production of hydrogen and graphitic carbon |
EP3609615A1 (en) | 2017-04-14 | 2020-02-19 | King Abdullah University Of Science And Technology | Treated iron ore catalysts for production of hydrogen and graphene |
DE102018132661B4 (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2020-10-01 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Process for hydrocarbon pyrolysis with spatially separated heating and reaction zones within the reactor space |
AT522315B1 (en) | 2019-03-28 | 2020-10-15 | Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH | Process for the production of hydrogen and carbon from a hydrocarbon-containing gas |
US20210047180A1 (en) * | 2019-08-14 | 2021-02-18 | General Electric Company | Production system and method for generating hydrogen gas and carbon products |
JP7413704B2 (en) * | 2019-10-08 | 2024-01-16 | 戸田工業株式会社 | Catalyst for thermal decomposition of hydrocarbons, carbon nanotubes using the same, and hydrogen production method |
US11685651B2 (en) | 2019-10-25 | 2023-06-27 | Mark Kevin Robertson | Catalytic decomposition of hydrocarbons for the production of hydrogen and carbon |
CN110721691B (en) * | 2019-11-12 | 2020-07-24 | 中南大学 | CFAN catalyst, preparation thereof and application thereof in methane hydrogen production |
US11401163B2 (en) | 2020-10-19 | 2022-08-02 | Xenophon Verykios | Catalytic materials for pyrolysis of methane and production of hydrogen and solid carbon with substantially zero atmospheric carbon emissions |
KR102471954B1 (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2022-11-29 | 노용규 | Hydrocarbon pyrolysis apparatus and operation method thereof |
KR102482738B1 (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2022-12-28 | 노용규 | Hydrocarbon pyrolysis apparatus and operation method thereof |
US20240059560A1 (en) * | 2021-01-07 | 2024-02-22 | The Johns Hopkins University | Production of hydrogen from hydrocarbons |
JP2023128516A (en) * | 2022-03-03 | 2023-09-14 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Method for producing catalyst and method for direct decomposition of hydrocarbons using catalyst |
JP7482164B2 (en) * | 2022-03-11 | 2024-05-13 | 三菱重工業株式会社 | Direct cracking of hydrocarbons |
US20240124301A1 (en) * | 2022-10-07 | 2024-04-18 | Sk Innovation Co., Ltd. | Process for producing hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon from methane-containing feedstock |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2810657C2 (en) * | 1978-03-11 | 1980-01-24 | Hamburger Stahlwerke Gmbh, 2103 Hamburg | Process for the direct reduction of iron ores |
AU741669B2 (en) * | 1997-08-04 | 2001-12-06 | Bechtel Corporation | Method for direct reduction and upgrading of fine-grained refractory and earthy iron ores and slags |
JP4758130B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2011-08-24 | 国立大学法人北見工業大学 | Method for producing nanocarbon and catalytic reactor for producing nanocarbon |
JP4779446B2 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2011-09-28 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Catalyst regeneration method, hydrogen generator and fuel cell system |
KR100743189B1 (en) * | 2005-12-26 | 2007-07-27 | 주식회사 포스코 | Apparatus and method for manufacturing molten irons |
EP2024275A2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2009-02-18 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Nanostructure-reinforced composite articles and methods |
KR100888247B1 (en) * | 2007-08-02 | 2009-03-10 | 성균관대학교산학협력단 | A fluidized bed reactor for hydrogen production without co2 from hydrocarbon over carbon catalyst and an apparatus comprising the same |
WO2011029144A1 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2011-03-17 | The University Of Western Australia | A process for producing hydrogen from hydrocarbons |
JP2012158790A (en) * | 2011-01-31 | 2012-08-23 | Nippon Steel Corp | Method for reducing iron-making raw material using microwave |
JP2013249496A (en) * | 2012-05-30 | 2013-12-12 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Method for manufacturing mixture of reduced iron and slag |
US11505458B2 (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2022-11-22 | Hazer Group Limited | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons |
-
2016
- 2016-03-31 US US15/563,430 patent/US11505458B2/en active Active
- 2016-03-31 JP JP2018502293A patent/JP7007256B2/en active Active
- 2016-03-31 EA EA201792048A patent/EA035857B1/en unknown
- 2016-03-31 BR BR112017021057-6A patent/BR112017021057B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2016-03-31 WO PCT/AU2016/000115 patent/WO2016154666A1/en active Application Filing
- 2016-03-31 SG SG11201707907SA patent/SG11201707907SA/en unknown
- 2016-03-31 AU AU2016240393A patent/AU2016240393B2/en active Active
- 2016-03-31 KR KR1020177030318A patent/KR102571186B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2016-03-31 KR KR1020237019348A patent/KR20230106169A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2016-03-31 MY MYPI2017703581A patent/MY188748A/en unknown
- 2016-03-31 MX MX2017012559A patent/MX2017012559A/en unknown
- 2016-03-31 EP EP16771087.0A patent/EP3277623A4/en active Pending
- 2016-03-31 CA CA2980471A patent/CA2980471A1/en active Pending
- 2016-03-31 CN CN201680019418.4A patent/CN108064214B/en active Active
- 2016-03-31 NZ NZ73578116A patent/NZ735781A/en unknown
-
2017
- 2017-09-26 ZA ZA2017/06455A patent/ZA201706455B/en unknown
- 2017-09-26 PH PH12017501770A patent/PH12017501770A1/en unknown
- 2017-09-28 SA SA517390046A patent/SA517390046B1/en unknown
- 2017-09-29 CL CL2017002468A patent/CL2017002468A1/en unknown
-
2018
- 2018-11-19 AU AU2018101787A patent/AU2018101787B4/en not_active Expired
- 2018-11-19 AU AU2018267558A patent/AU2018267558A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2018-11-19 AU AU2018101788A patent/AU2018101788B4/en not_active Expired
-
2021
- 2021-10-12 JP JP2021167526A patent/JP2022009048A/en active Pending
-
2022
- 2022-11-22 US US17/992,855 patent/US20230227307A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2023
- 2023-07-27 JP JP2023122178A patent/JP2023139231A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20230227307A1 (en) | Process for producing hydrogen and graphitic carbon from hydrocarbons | |
US9221685B2 (en) | Methods of capturing and sequestering carbon | |
US9475699B2 (en) | Methods for treating an offgas containing carbon oxides | |
MX2015000580A (en) | Methods and systems for forming ammonia and solid carbon products. | |
US11814289B2 (en) | Black powder catalyst for hydrogen production via steam reforming | |
US20230081569A1 (en) | Systems, methods and materials for hydrogen sulfide conversion | |
US20210114003A1 (en) | Treated iron ore catalysts for production of hydrogen and graphene | |
AU2015203898A1 (en) | A catalyst and a process for catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide-containing gas and hydrogen streams to hydrocarbons | |
EP2945920B1 (en) | A catalyst and a process for catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide-containing gas and hydrogen streams to hydrocarbons | |
CN106588526A (en) | System for preparing olefin by taking coal and refinery dry gas as raw materials and method for preparing olefin | |
CA1228482A (en) | Reduction of metal compounds | |
US7285257B2 (en) | Method of removing tar-forming gases from CVD/CVI furnace effluent | |
Swift et al. | Decomposition of calcium sulfate in a two-zone reactor | |
KR20180031733A (en) | CLC methods and facilities for producing high purity nitrogen | |
EP4349772A1 (en) | Method for producing hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon from methane-containing feedstock | |
US9139492B2 (en) | Method for processing coke oven gas | |
RU2556941C2 (en) | Method of producing synthesis gas |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HAZER GROUP LIMITED, AUSTRALIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CORNEJO, ANDREW;CHUA, HUI TONG;SIGNING DATES FROM 20181108 TO 20181122;REEL/FRAME:062255/0575 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |