US20230182119A1 - Scalable pt cluster and ruo2 heterojunction anode catalysts - Google Patents
Scalable pt cluster and ruo2 heterojunction anode catalysts Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20230182119A1 US20230182119A1 US18/104,100 US202318104100A US2023182119A1 US 20230182119 A1 US20230182119 A1 US 20230182119A1 US 202318104100 A US202318104100 A US 202318104100A US 2023182119 A1 US2023182119 A1 US 2023182119A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- ruo
- catalyst
- heterojunction
- nanodendrites
- performance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 106
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- WOCIAKWEIIZHES-UHFFFAOYSA-N ruthenium(iv) oxide Chemical compound O=[Ru]=O WOCIAKWEIIZHES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 107
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000011852 carbon nanoparticle Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 21
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 17
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Substances [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 91
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 28
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 21
- DWANEFRJKWXRSG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,2-tetradecanediol Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCC(O)CO DWANEFRJKWXRSG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 20
- 229910002849 PtRu Inorganic materials 0.000 description 20
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 20
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 16
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 16
- USIUVYZYUHIAEV-UHFFFAOYSA-N diphenyl ether Chemical compound C=1C=CC=CC=1OC1=CC=CC=C1 USIUVYZYUHIAEV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 16
- 125000001997 phenyl group Chemical group [H]C1=C([H])C([H])=C(*)C([H])=C1[H] 0.000 description 15
- 238000013341 scale-up Methods 0.000 description 15
- MHDVGSVTJDSBDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N dibenzyl ether Chemical compound C=1C=CC=CC=1COCC1=CC=CC=C1 MHDVGSVTJDSBDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 12
- 229910002848 Pt–Ru Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 11
- QGLWBTPVKHMVHM-KTKRTIGZSA-N (z)-octadec-9-en-1-amine Chemical compound CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCCN QGLWBTPVKHMVHM-KTKRTIGZSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 10
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 10
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229920000554 ionomer Polymers 0.000 description 9
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 9
- OCJBOOLMMGQPQU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,4-dichlorobenzene Chemical compound ClC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1 OCJBOOLMMGQPQU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- HEDRZPFGACZZDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chloroform Chemical compound ClC(Cl)Cl HEDRZPFGACZZDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000003917 TEM image Methods 0.000 description 8
- 229940117389 dichlorobenzene Drugs 0.000 description 8
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 7
- 210000001787 dendrite Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 6
- VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-Hexane Chemical compound CCCCCC VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- VEJOYRPGKZZTJW-FDGPNNRMSA-N (z)-4-hydroxypent-3-en-2-one;platinum Chemical group [Pt].C\C(O)=C\C(C)=O.C\C(O)=C\C(C)=O VEJOYRPGKZZTJW-FDGPNNRMSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005580 one pot reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229910052707 ruthenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- WRIDQFICGBMAFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N (E)-8-Octadecenoic acid Natural products CCCCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCC(O)=O WRIDQFICGBMAFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- IYWJIYWFPADQAN-LNTINUHCSA-N (z)-4-hydroxypent-3-en-2-one;ruthenium Chemical group [Ru].C\C(O)=C\C(C)=O.C\C(O)=C\C(C)=O.C\C(O)=C\C(C)=O IYWJIYWFPADQAN-LNTINUHCSA-N 0.000 description 4
- LQJBNNIYVWPHFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 20:1omega9c fatty acid Natural products CCCCCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC(O)=O LQJBNNIYVWPHFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- QSBYPNXLFMSGKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9-Heptadecensaeure Natural products CCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC(O)=O QSBYPNXLFMSGKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000005642 Oleic acid Substances 0.000 description 4
- ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Oleic acid Natural products CCCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC(O)=O ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002484 cyclic voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000976 ink Substances 0.000 description 4
- QXJSBBXBKPUZAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N isooleic acid Natural products CCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCCC(O)=O QXJSBBXBKPUZAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000005304 joining Methods 0.000 description 4
- ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-KTKRTIGZSA-N oleic acid Chemical compound CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC(O)=O ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-KTKRTIGZSA-N 0.000 description 4
- -1 oleylamine Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000003960 organic solvent Substances 0.000 description 4
- KJTLSVCANCCWHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ruthenium Chemical compound [Ru] KJTLSVCANCCWHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000010411 electrocatalyst Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000024 high-resolution transmission electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 3
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Argon Chemical compound [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004812 Fluorinated ethylene propylene Substances 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002848 electrochemical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002003 electron diffraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002149 energy-dispersive X-ray emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910021397 glassy carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002173 high-resolution transmission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N perchloric acid Chemical compound OCl(=O)(=O)=O VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920009441 perflouroethylene propylene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005518 polymer electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000376 reactant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004098 selected area electron diffraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004729 solvothermal method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000527 sonication Methods 0.000 description 2
- NQTSTBMCCAVWOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-dimethoxyphosphoryl-3-phenoxypropan-2-one Chemical compound COP(=O)(OC)CC(=O)COC1=CC=CC=C1 NQTSTBMCCAVWOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000012901 Milli-Q water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000557 Nafion® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000008331 Pinus X rigitaeda Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000011613 Pinus brutia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000018646 Pinus brutia Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000005210 alkyl ammonium group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012080 ambient air Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003011 anion exchange membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010953 base metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- NDKBVBUGCNGSJJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].C[N+](C)(C)CC1=CC=CC=C1 NDKBVBUGCNGSJJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010290 biphenyl Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004305 biphenyl Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000006267 biphenyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000003575 carbonaceous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006555 catalytic reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002009 diols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- AINBZKYUNWUTRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethanol;propan-2-ol Chemical compound CCO.CC(C)O AINBZKYUNWUTRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HQQADJVZYDDRJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethene;prop-1-ene Chemical group C=C.CC=C HQQADJVZYDDRJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-] XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001095 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000474 mercury oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- UKWHYYKOEPRTIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury(ii) oxide Chemical compound [Hg]=O UKWHYYKOEPRTIC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZUOUZKKEUPVFJK-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenylbenzene Natural products C1=CC=CC=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 ZUOUZKKEUPVFJK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 231100000572 poisoning Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000000607 poisoning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- XTUSEBKMEQERQV-UHFFFAOYSA-N propan-2-ol;hydrate Chemical compound O.CC(C)O XTUSEBKMEQERQV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007669 thermal treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004627 transmission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000101 transmission high energy electron diffraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001106 transmission high energy electron diffraction data Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011882 ultra-fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052727 yttrium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/38—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of noble metals
- B01J23/54—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of noble metals combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
- B01J23/56—Platinum group metals
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J21/00—Catalysts comprising the elements, oxides, or hydroxides of magnesium, boron, aluminium, carbon, silicon, titanium, zirconium, or hafnium
- B01J21/18—Carbon
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J35/00—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J35/20—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their non-solid state
- B01J35/23—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their non-solid state in a colloidal state
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J35/00—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
- B01J35/40—Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by dimensions, e.g. grain size
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
- B01J37/009—Preparation by separation, e.g. by filtration, decantation, screening
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
- B01J37/04—Mixing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
- B01J37/08—Heat treatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/38—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of noble metals
- B01J23/40—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of noble metals of the platinum group metals
- B01J23/46—Ruthenium, rhodium, osmium or iridium
- B01J23/462—Ruthenium
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2523/00—Constitutive chemical elements of heterogeneous catalysts
- B01J2523/80—Constitutive chemical elements of heterogeneous catalysts of Group VIII of the Periodic Table
- B01J2523/82—Metals of the platinum group
- B01J2523/821—Ruthenium
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J2523/00—Constitutive chemical elements of heterogeneous catalysts
- B01J2523/80—Constitutive chemical elements of heterogeneous catalysts of Group VIII of the Periodic Table
- B01J2523/82—Metals of the platinum group
- B01J2523/828—Platinum
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/50—Fuel cells
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to catalytic materials, specifically to heterojunction materials from nanodendrites.
- RHE reversible hydrogen electrode
- At least one embodiment relates to a method of forming a PtRuO 2 heterojunction catalyst.
- the method includes forming a solution of platinum precursor, a ruthenium precursor, diphenyl ether, 1,2-tetradecanediol, oleylamine, and dichlorobenzene.
- the solution is heated to a reaction temperature between 230-270° C. for 5 min-1 h, forming nanodendrites.
- the nanodendrites are separated from the solution and suspended in organic solvent forming a suspension.
- the carbon is mixed with the suspension.
- the carbon material is isolated from the suspension and annealed, converting Ru to RuO 2 .
- Another embodiment relates to a method of forming a nanodendrites.
- the method comprises forming a solution of platinum precursor, a ruthenium precursor, diphenyl ether, 1,2-tetradecanediol, oleylamine, and dichlorobenzene.
- the solution is heated to a reaction temperature between 230-270° C. for 5 min-1 h.
- PtRu 8 are separated nanodendrites from the solution.
- the catalyst comprises a carbon substrate and a catalytic material support on the substrate, the catalytic material comprising PtRuO 2 .
- the Pt particles have a diameter of 1-5 nm and RuO 2 particles have a diameter of 2 - 20 nm, the Pt particles and the RuO 2 particles being atomically connected.
- FIGS. 1 A- 1 H show transmission electron microscopy (“TEM”) characterization of PtRu 8 nanodendrites: TEM image of as synthesized nanodendrites ( FIG. 1 A ), TEM image ( FIG. 1 B ), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (“HRTEM”) image ( FIG. 1 C ), select area electron diffraction ( FIG. 1 D ), high-angle annular dark-field (“HAADF”) image ( FIG. 1 E ), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (“EDS”) mapping of carbon-supported PtRu 8 nanodendrites ( FIGS. 1 F- 1 H ).
- TEM transmission electron microscopy
- FIGS. 2 A- 2 H show TEM characterization of Pt—RuO 2 heterojunctions: TEM image ( FIG. 2 A ), HRTEM image ( FIG. 2 B ), select area electron diffraction ( FIGS. 2 C- 2 D ), HAADF image ( FIG. 2 E ), and EDS mapping of Pt—RuO 2 heterojunctions ( FIGS. 2 F- 2 H ).
- FIGS. 3 A- 3 B show cyclic voltammograms ( FIG. 3 A ) and HOR curves ( FIG. 3 B ) of Pt—RuO 2 and Pt TKK in 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (“NaOH”).
- FIGS. 3 C- 3 D show cyclic voltammograms ( FIG. 3 C ) and HOR curves ( FIG. 3 D ) of Pt—RuO 2 and Pt TKK in 0.1 M benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (“BTMAOH”). Cyclic voltammograms were recorded at 50 mV/s; HOR polarization curves were recorded at 20 mV/s, 900 rpm.
- FIG. 4 A shows AEMFC performance comparison between MEAs; anode catalyst: Pt—RuO 2 /C, TKK-Pt/C, and JM HiSPEC® 12100 Pt—Ru/C; cathode catalyst: Pt/C (0.6 mg Pt /cm 2 ).
- FIG. 4 B shows AEMFC peak power density comparison as a function of anode catalyst cost; AEMFC performance was taken from literatures. Anode catalyst cost was calculated from a 5-year average of base metal price.
- FIGS. 5 A- 5 B show TEM images of scale-up Pt—RuO 2 nanoparticles supported on high surface area carbon;
- FIG. 5 C shows the corresponding X-ray diffraction (“XRD”) pattern (RuO 2 standard PDF#01-071-48251; Pt standard PDF#01-087-0647).
- XRD X-ray diffraction
- FIG. 6 shows a graph of the kinetic performance of Pt/C and Pt—RuO 2 /C anode catalyzed MEAs in terms of iR-corrected polarization curves at 80° C. with humidified H 2 (2000 sccm) and O 2 (1000 sccm) at 285 kPa backpressure.
- FIG. 7 is a graph of the effect of Pt loading at anode on AEMFC performance.
- Anode catalyst JM HiSPEC® 12100 PtRu/C
- cathode JM HiSPEC® 9100 Pt/C (0.6 mg Pt /cm 2 ).
- Fuel cells performances were obtained at 80° C. with fully humidified 2000 sccm H 2 and 1000 sccm O 2 at 285 kPa backpressure.
- FIGS. 8 A- 8 B are graphs showing the effect of flow rate on AEMFC performance.
- FIG. 8 A shows Pt—RuO 2 /C anode catalyzed MEA
- FIG. 8 B shows JM HiSPEC® 12100 Pt—Ru/C anode (0.5 mg Pt /cm 2 ) catalyzed MEA at 80° C. and 285 kPa backpressure under fully humidified gas feed.
- FIG. 9 is a graph of the AEMFC performance in H 2 /CO 2 -free air with Pt—RuO 2 /C as an anode and Pt/C as a cathode. Fuel cells performances were obtained with fully humidified 2000 sccm H 2 and 1000 sccm CO 2 -free air at 285 kPa backpressure.
- FIGS. 10 A- 10 C show TEM images and EDS spectroscopy of PtRu nanoparticles synthesized in dibenzyl ether with oleylamine/oleic acid (0.5 mL each) as surfactants and 1,2-tetradecanediol (84 mg) as reducing agent.
- FIGS. 11 A- 11 C show TEM images and EDX spectroscopy of PtRu nanoparticles synthesized in diphenyl ether with one-pot synthesis.
- Certain embodiments relate to a Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalysts. Such catalysts may be used for cost-effective HOR. Rather than strictly alloying elemental Pt and elemental Ru, one embodiment synthesizes Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalysts from PtRu 8 nanodendrites.
- heterojunctions may comprise Pt—RuO 2 catalysts or are other stoichiometric ratios. Further, other elements, such as Ni and Co, may be used rather than Ru.
- the heterojunction catalysts are prepared from nanodendrites; one embodiment uses PtRu 8 nanodendrites.
- the PtRu 8 nanodendrites are formed through a solvothermal synthesis process using an organic solvent, such as diphenyl ether, and an organic reducing agent, such as an organic diol (e.g., 1,2-tetradecanediol), and a surfactant, such as oleylamine, which helps the particle uniformity and size control.
- the metals that form the nanodendrites are supplied via respective precursors, for example platinum precursors and ruthenium precursors
- the Pt precursor is platinum (II) acetylacetonate [Pt(acac) 2 ].
- the Ru precursor is ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate [Ru(acac) 3 ].
- the ratio of Pt precursor to Ru precursor should be selected to approximate the desired ration in the catalytic material, such as for PtRu 8 , a ratio of Pt:Ru precursors of 1:12 to 1:6.
- the nanodendrites are formed through addition of 5-15 mg/ml (e.g., 10 mg/ml) Ru(acac) 3 , 0.5-1.5 mg/ml (e.g., 1 mg/ml) Pt(acac) 2 in diphenyl ether with 0.2-10 mg/ml (e.g., 5 mg/ml) of 1,2-tetradecanediol and 0.01-0.5 ml/ml (e.g., 0.2 ml/ml) oleylamine. These relative amounts may be scaled in some embodiments for a larger reaction batch.
- the nanodendrite reaction proceeds at a dendrite reaction temperature, such as 230-270° C.
- a dendrite reaction time such as 5 min to 1 h.
- dichlorobenzene is not injected until the temperature of the solution of 1,2-tetradecanediol and diphenyl reaches 200° C. as it is being heated.
- a one pot synthesis approach is utilized with all of the ingredients added and the solution heated to the dendrite reaction temperature.
- PtRu 8 nanodendrites are separated from the solvents.
- the separation is by centrifuge (10000 rpm for 10 min).
- the collected nanodendrites are then dispersed in an organic solvent, such as chloroform.
- the collected nanodendrites are then used to form the heterojunction catalyst.
- the nanodendrites suspended in an organic solvent are mixed with carbon.
- the carbon is in the form of carbon nanoparticles, such as 20-100 nm in diameter.
- the ratio of carbon to catalytic material (such as PtRuO 2 ) nanodendrites is 50:1 to 3:1.
- the mixture is agitated, such as by sonication, for a mixing time and then precipitated, such as by addition of hexane.
- the nanodendrite/carbon mixture is annealed to convert the elemental Ru to RuO 2 .
- the annealing step also removes remaining solvent or surfactant.
- the annealing is at an annealing temperature within the range of 100-200° C. (e.g., 185° C.) in an ambient air environment.
- the annealing is for an annealing time, such as overnight (8-12 hours).
- the heterojunction catalyst comprises ultrafine Pt particles atomically connected with RuO 2 .
- Ultrafine particles are those below 5 nm, such as 1-5 nm, preferably 2-3 nm.
- RuO 2 size is not well defined and can be 3-5 nm to 20 nm.
- 2-3 nm (or smaller) Pt is surrounded by 2-3 nm (or smaller) RuO 2 .
- the structure of the catalytic material is a heterojunction with atomically connected interface between Pt and RuO 2 .
- Certain embodiments may facilitate a lower electrode loading due to the improved performance properties.
- Carbon-supported heterojunction catalysts were prepared by solvothermal synthesis and subsequent thermal treatment. Scale-up synthesis to 1 g/batch yield enables a thorough investigation of its MEA performance in combination with rotating disk electrode (“RDE”) studies.
- the results show a unique morphology with ultrafine Pt particle sizes, and atomically connected interfaces between Pt and RuO 2 provide high catalytic activity toward HOR while maintaining significantly improved H 2 mass transport in MEAs via minimizing undesirable phenyl group adsorption in the polymer electrolyte.
- the results also demonstrate MEA performance of low anode loading Pt—RuO 2 /C with those of the state-of-the-art Pt/C and Pt—Ru/C catalysts.
- Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst with ultrafine Pt cluster and atomically connected interface was developed by converting Ru-rich phase of PtRu 8 nano-dendrite into Pt—RuO 2 .
- the synthetic condition of PtRu 8 nanodendrites were investigated and preliminary scale-up was explored. With successful demonstration of one-pot synthesis, further scale-up should be attainable.
- the Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst showed excellent catalytic activity towards HOR and significantly lower phenyl group adsorption properties compared with commercial Pt/C catalyst.
- the AEMFC test suggests that the structure of the Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst provides high access of H 2 at ultra-low loading anode in combination of the good kinetic activity and less degree of phenyl adsorption, making an ideal low PGM loading catalyst for AEMFCs.
- This result is the first report that that highly active Pt—Ru bimetallic HOR catalyst can be prepared without alloying Pt and Ru components but providing unique morphology of ultrafine Pt cluster and Pt—RuO 2 heterojunctions.
- the Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst was prepared from PtRu nanodendrites. Several pathways to the PtRu nanoparticles with high surface area were explored using different combinations of solvent, surfactant, and reducing agent. Some of the pathways were seen to produce Pt rich PtRu nanoparticles, while others produced Ru rich PtRu nanoparticles, which are the desired form for the heterojunction catalyst.
- FIG. 10 A we found Pt 2 Ru 1 nanoparticles of ⁇ 5 nm could be made in dibenzyl ether solvent at elevated temperature ( FIGS. 10 A-C ).
- this pathway used dibenzyl ether with oleylamine/oleic acid (0.5 mL each) as surfactants and 1,2-tetradecanediol (84 mg) as reducing agent.
- the particles synthesized in dibenzyl ether in the presence of oleic acid is Pt-rich and not uniform because the presence of oleic acid hinders the reduction of Ru precursors; thus, we did not pursue this synthetic route.
- Ru-rich nanoparticles with minimal particle size and uniform size distributions could be synthesized in diphenyl ether using 1,2-tetradecanediol and oleylamine.
- experiments for the synthesis of PtRu8 nano-dendrite were performed in an Ar flow environment in a round bottom flask.
- 0.12 g Ru(acac) 3 , 2 mL oleylamine, 0.063 g 1,2-tetradecanediol, and 10 mL diphenyl ether were heated up to 260° C.
- the PtRu 8 nanodendrites are separated from the solvents by centrifuge (10000 rpm for 10 min). The collected nanodendrites are then dispersed in chloroform for the annealing step.
- the Ru content in the particle is only slightly lower than the precursor ratio, indicating a very high conversion rate of the Ru precursor.
- PtRu 8 nanodendrites can be loaded onto carbon support uniformly.
- HRTEM image FIG. 1 C
- SAED selected area electron diffraction
- FIG. 1 D demonstrated the crystalline nature of the nanodendrites.
- HAADF imaging and corresponding EDS mapping revealed that the PtRu 8 nanodendrites are composed of Pt-rich core surrounded with Ru-rich branches ( FIGS. 1 E- 1 H ).
- PtRu 8 nanodendrites starts with Pt-rich nuclei because Pt is easier to be reduced than Ru.
- Pt(acac) 2 is depleted, and Ru-rich branches continue to grow on the surface, leading to the dendrite structure.
- collected PtRu 8 nanodendrites were dispersed in chloroform and were then mixed with proper amount of carbon, which can be calculated from the target PtRu loading on carbon, which was also dispersed in chloroform by sonication.
- the mixture was sonicated for 20 min and the carbon supported PtRu 8 nanodendrites were precipitated with hexane and further separated from solvents by centrifuge. This process also works for scale-up sample preparation; larger amounts of solvents were used to ensure good dispersion of PtRu 8 nanodendrites on carbon.
- the carbon supported PtRu 8 nanodendrites were annealed in air at 185° C. overnight to convert elemental Ru into RuO 2 and to remove the surfactant adsorbed on the surface of catalyst.
- the process of loading PtRu 8 nanodendrites on carbon is also scalable.
- more than 1 g of Pt—RuO 2 /C heterojunction catalyst was obtained by combining the two batch of scale-up synthesis and subsequent annealing in air.
- injecting precursors into hot reactive solution is not favorable for scale-up.
- Similar particle size and composition were obtained with one-pot synthesis, indicating this newly developed recipe is indeed scalable.
- the Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst was obtained by annealing of the carbon supported PtRu 8 nanodendrites in the air at 185° C. overnight, and Ru was converted into RuO 2 .
- FIGS. 2 A- 2 H the uniform dendrite structure was converted into a composite structure with lower contrast due to RuO 2 formation.
- the HRTEM image in FIG. 2 B and SEAD in FIGS. 2 C- 2 D indicate the formation of Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction structures with atomically connected interfaces.
- the HAADF imaging and EDS mapping results in FIGS. 2 E- 2 H further demonstrate the Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction structure.
- the size of the Pt-rich particle is slightly smaller, indicating some of the Ru in these Pt-rich areas is also oxidized and migrated to the RuO 2 region. Also observed was some Pt dispersed in the Ru-rich area, which may be beneficial to the performance at a low-Pt loading AEMFC anode. In some embodiments, during the formation of Ru rich dendrites, there are still Pt precursors left, thus small amount of Pt is observed in Ru rich dendrites.
- ICP-MS confirms that the atomic ratio of Pt:Ru in the heterojunction catalysts prepared from the scale-up synthesis is 1:8.
- TEM images FIGS. 5 A- 5 B ) showed the six times scale-up Pt—RuO 2 nanoparticles are monodisperse (most particles fall in the range of 3-6 nm in diameter) and are uniformly distributed on high surface area carbon support.
- XRD pattern also proves that the RuO 2 dominates the particle composition ( FIG. 5 C ).
- the carbon supported Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst from the scale-up synthesis was further investigated in the RDE and AEMFC testing.
- FIG. 4 A compares the polarization curve, cell high frequency resistance (“HFR”) and power density of the MEAs employing low Pt loading Pt/C, PtRu/C, and Pt—RuO 2 /C anode catalysts. Under the H 2 /O 2 conditions, the MEA using Pt—RuO 2 /C anode catalyst exhibits exceptionally high performance in spite of the lower Pt loading.
- the peak power density of the MEA using Pt—RuO 2 /C anode reached 0.77 W/cm 2 , as opposed to the MEA using Pt/C and PtRu/C anode catalysts of which the peak power density was 0.28 and 0.55 W/cm 2 , respectively.
- All MEAs have similar cell HFR ( ⁇ 0.045 W/cm 2 ), confirming that the different performance is not originated from MEA hydration and catalyst-AEM interface.
- the kinetic performance difference between the Pt/C and Pt—RuO 2 /C catalyzed MEAs is negligible, for example, the iR-corrected current density of the MEAs at 0.95 V are similar (0.026 A/cm 2 for Pt/C vs.
- the performance comparison between PtRu/C and Pt—RuO 2 /C catalyzed MEAs indicates that the kinetic performance of the MEA using PtRu/C catalysts is slightly higher than that of the MEA using Pt—RuO 2 /C (0.036 A/cm 2 for PtRu/C vs. 0.028 A/cm 2 for Pt—RuO 2 /C at 0.95 V).
- the performance at the high current density region, ca. >1.0 A/cm 2 the Pt—RuO 2 /C catalyzed MEA showed significantly higher performance than the PtRu/C catalyzed MEA.
- the Pt—RuO 2 /C catalyzed MEA shows only slightly inferior performance of 0.72 W/cm 2 at a much lower flow rate, while more significant performance loss is observed for the PtRu/C catalyzed MEA ( FIGS. 8 A- 8 B ).
- the Pt—RuO 2 /C MEA shows the peak power density of 0.33 W/cm 2 at 0.48 V, achieving the specific power (13.2 W/mg Pt ) under H 2 /CO 2 -free air conditions ( FIG. 9 ).
- FIG. 4 B plots the peak power density of the MEAs as a function of anode catalyst cost with two target lines (i.e., 2020 US DOE MEA cost target (0.2 cents/cm 2 ) and the rated performance at rated power (1 W/cm 2 ) under H 2 /air conditions.
- Pt—Ru alloy catalysts have better performance than Pt-, Pd-, Ru-, and Ir-based catalysts at a given catalyst cost.
- Pt—Ru alloy catalysts shown four catalysts are located on the upper-performance-cost limit (red dashed line).
- Those catalysts are the commercial PtRu HiSPEC® 10000 (Pt nominally 40 wt. %, Ru nominally 20 wt. %) supported on Vulcan XC—72R carbon.
- Two Ni-based non-PGM catalysts are located on or even beyond the upper-performance-cost limit. However, their cell performance needs to improve to reach the DOE performance target.
- the Pt—RuO 2 heterojunction catalyst we prepared from this work is also located beyond the upper-performance-cost limit, suggesting that the formation of ultrafine Pt cluster with Pt—Ru heterojunction is a promising approach to meet fuel cell cost and performance targets for transportation application. Further optimization of catalyst composition and morphology of the heterojunction catalysts with developing non-PGM ORR catalysts may need for advanced AEMFC systems.
- the TEM images were obtained on an FEI Tecnai F20 and JEM-2100F microscopes with accelerating voltage at 300 and 200 kV, respectively. Selected area electron diffraction patterns and EDS results were recorded with JEM-2100F microscope equipped with an Oxford EDS detector. HAADF images and energy dispersive X spectroscopy mapping were recorded on a FEI Talos F200X scanning transmission electron microscope (“STEM”) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV at the Center for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory. XRD patterns were recorded from a Siemens diffractometer D5000. The ICP results of PtRu sample are 7.4 (Ru):1 (Pt), 7.6:1, and 7.7:1 for 3 runs. It is averaged to 7.6:1 and the sample in the manuscript was denoted to PtRu 8 .
- a home-made fluorinated ethylene propylene (“FEP”) cell was used for electrochemical characterization of the catalyst.
- 0.1 M aqueous solution of NaOH (99.99% from Sigma Aldrich) and BTMAOH (40% wt. solution in water from TCI Chemical) were used as electrolyte.
- a mercury/mercury oxide (Hg/HgO) electrode (Pine) was the reference electrode and a graphite rod (Sigma Aldrich) was the counter electrode. The reference potential was converted to RHE. Cyclic voltammograms were recorded in nitrogen purged electrolyte. Before hydrogen oxidation reaction curves were recorded at 900 rpm, the electrolyte was saturated with hydrogen and the working electrode was subject to 1.40 V for 30 seconds to remove the cation adsorption.
- the catalyst inks for anode were formulated using Pt/C (TKK TEC10E20A, 19.4 wt. % Pt), synthesized Pt—RuO 2 /C (15% metal loading on TKK carbon support) with alkyl ammonium tethered poly(fluorene) (“FLN”) ionomer (5 wt. % in 1:1 solution of isopropanol-ethanol) in 20:80 v/v % water — isopropanol solution.
- FLN alkyl ammonium tethered poly(fluorene)
- the two sets of anodes were prepared with different Pt loading where I/C ratios were 40% for Pt/C and synthesized Pt—RuO 2 /C, respectively.
- the Pt/C (HiSPEC® 9100, Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells, USA) and FLN ionomer were used for the cathode in all MEAs.
- Pt loading and I/C ratio were 0.6 mgPt/cm 2 and 42%, respectively.
- the catalyst ink was brush painted on the BC-29 (gas diffusion layer, 5 cm 2 , 270 ⁇ m thickness) on the vacuum table at 60° C.
- TPN quaternized poly(terphenylene)
- Coupled means the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent or fixed) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members coupled directly to each other, with the two members coupled to each other using a separate intervening member and any additional intermediate members coupled with one another, or with the two members coupled to each other using an intervening member that is integrally formed as a single unitary body with one of the two members.
- circuit A communicably “coupled” to circuit B may signify that the circuit A communicates directly with circuit B (i.e., no intermediary) or communicates indirectly with circuit B (e.g., through one or more intermediaries).
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Catalysts (AREA)
- Inert Electrodes (AREA)
Abstract
A synthesis process for forming nanodendrites. The nanodendrites are utilized in a process to form a heterojunction catalyst. Nanodendrites may include PtRu8 nanodendrites that can be oxidized through annealing to form PtRuO2. One heterojunction catalyst comprises PtRuO2 on a carbon support.
Description
- This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/584,385, filed Sep. 26, 2019, the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 awarded by the United States Department of Energy to UChicago Argonne, LLC, operator of Argonne National Laboratory. The government has certain rights in the invention.
- The present disclosure relates to catalytic materials, specifically to heterojunction materials from nanodendrites.
- The recent development of novel membranes and ionomers with enhanced hydroxide conductivity and alkaline stability opens up new opportunities for the alkaline anion-exchange membrane fuel cells (“AEMFCs”). However, most of the membrane electrode assemblies (“MEAs”) demonstrating high peak power density in literature used a substantial amount of Pt-group metal (“PGM”) catalysts for the anode and cathode. Developing cost-effective oxygen reduction reaction (“ORR”) catalysts for AEMFCs has been partly successful as the MEAs employing less expensive ORR catalysts showed ˜1 W/cm2 peak power density. However, developing low-cost electrocatalysts for the hydrogen oxidation reaction (“HOR”) of the AEMFCs has limited success; therefore, the cost-benefits of AEMFCs over the proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (“PEMFCs”) have diminished. Replacing Pt-based HOR catalysts with highly active Pd-based catalysts has become less attractive as the price of Pd is getting higher than that of Pt. Replacing Pt catalysts with non-PGM catalysts has had only limited success because of the relatively low catalytic activity and anode flooding. Reducing Pt loading in the AEMFC anode is a potential solution to reduce the overall cost of AEMFCs. Recently, Omasta, et al., reported ˜0.8 W/cm2 peak power density with a low Pt-loading anode-catalyzed MEA (Anode Pt loading=0.073 mgPt cm−2).
- To develop highly efficient HOR catalysts for the advanced AEMFC system, not only does the intrinsic kinetic activity of the electrocatalyst need to be taken into account, so too do other parameters, such as compatibility of the catalyst with ionomer of MEA, water management, and the scalability of the catalyst synthetic procedure. Our previous work of HOR on bulk alloy electrode surfaces demonstrated that Pt—Ru bimetallic alloy catalysts have benefits because Ru would provide the sites for OHad, which can then effectively remove the hydrogen intermediates that are present on the nearby Pt sites. Further, work at Los Alamos National Laboratory found that Pt—Ru bimetallic alloy catalysts also have benefits to minimize the phenyl group adsorption which significantly increases the HOR current density up to 0.5 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (“RHE”). Since most ionomeric binders used for the electrolytes of AEMFCs contain phenyl group, the unique low phenyl group adsorbing characteristics of Pt—Ru bimetallic alloy catalysts have shown the dramatic increase in AEMFC power density to ˜1.5 W/cm2 for MEAs using polyaromatic ionomers. Other researchers demonstrated the AEMFC power density of >2.0 W/cm2 with the MEAs using less phenyl-containing polyolefinic ionomers. Incorporating Ru element to Pt catalyst may significantly reduce the HOR catalyst cost as the Ru price is only ˜30% of Pt; however, it is still challenging to maintain the excellent anode performance at low Pt-loading anode with Pt—Ru bimetallic alloys because the water generated from HOR in the thin catalyst layer promotes anode flooding.
- At least one embodiment relates to a method of forming a PtRuO2 heterojunction catalyst. The method includes forming a solution of platinum precursor, a ruthenium precursor, diphenyl ether, 1,2-tetradecanediol, oleylamine, and dichlorobenzene. The solution is heated to a reaction temperature between 230-270° C. for 5 min-1 h, forming nanodendrites. The nanodendrites are separated from the solution and suspended in organic solvent forming a suspension. The carbon is mixed with the suspension. The carbon material is isolated from the suspension and annealed, converting Ru to RuO2.
- Another embodiment relates to a method of forming a nanodendrites. The method comprises forming a solution of platinum precursor, a ruthenium precursor, diphenyl ether, 1,2-tetradecanediol, oleylamine, and dichlorobenzene. The solution is heated to a reaction temperature between 230-270° C. for 5 min-1 h. PtRu8 are separated nanodendrites from the solution.
- Yet another embodiment relates to a heterojunction catalyst. The catalyst comprises a carbon substrate and a catalytic material support on the substrate, the catalytic material comprising PtRuO2. The Pt particles have a diameter of 1-5 nm and RuO2 particles have a diameter of 2-20 nm, the Pt particles and the RuO2 particles being atomically connected.
- This summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other aspects, inventive features, and advantages of the devices or processes described herein will become apparent in the detailed description set forth herein, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements.
-
FIGS. 1A-1H show transmission electron microscopy (“TEM”) characterization of PtRu8 nanodendrites: TEM image of as synthesized nanodendrites (FIG. 1A ), TEM image (FIG. 1B ), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (“HRTEM”) image (FIG. 1C ), select area electron diffraction (FIG. 1D ), high-angle annular dark-field (“HAADF”) image (FIG. 1E ), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (“EDS”) mapping of carbon-supported PtRu8 nanodendrites (FIGS. 1F-1H ). -
FIGS. 2A-2H show TEM characterization of Pt—RuO2 heterojunctions: TEM image (FIG. 2A ), HRTEM image (FIG. 2B ), select area electron diffraction (FIGS. 2C-2D ), HAADF image (FIG. 2E ), and EDS mapping of Pt—RuO2 heterojunctions (FIGS. 2F-2H ). -
FIGS. 3A-3B show cyclic voltammograms (FIG. 3A ) and HOR curves (FIG. 3B ) of Pt—RuO2 and Pt TKK in 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (“NaOH”).FIGS. 3C-3D show cyclic voltammograms (FIG. 3C ) and HOR curves (FIG. 3D ) of Pt—RuO2 and Pt TKK in 0.1 M benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (“BTMAOH”). Cyclic voltammograms were recorded at 50 mV/s; HOR polarization curves were recorded at 20 mV/s, 900 rpm. -
FIG. 4A shows AEMFC performance comparison between MEAs; anode catalyst: Pt—RuO2/C, TKK-Pt/C, and JM HiSPEC® 12100 Pt—Ru/C; cathode catalyst: Pt/C (0.6 mgPt/cm2). AEMFC performance at 80° C. with humidified H2 (2000 sccm) and O2 (1000 sccm) at 285 kPa backpressure.FIG. 4B shows AEMFC peak power density comparison as a function of anode catalyst cost; AEMFC performance was taken from literatures. Anode catalyst cost was calculated from a 5-year average of base metal price. -
FIGS. 5A-5B show TEM images of scale-up Pt—RuO2 nanoparticles supported on high surface area carbon;FIG. 5C shows the corresponding X-ray diffraction (“XRD”) pattern (RuO2 standard PDF#01-071-48251; Pt standard PDF#01-087-0647). -
FIG. 6 shows a graph of the kinetic performance of Pt/C and Pt—RuO2/C anode catalyzed MEAs in terms of iR-corrected polarization curves at 80° C. with humidified H2 (2000 sccm) and O2 (1000 sccm) at 285 kPa backpressure. Cathode: Pt/C (0.6 mgPt/cm2). -
FIG. 7 is a graph of the effect of Pt loading at anode on AEMFC performance. Anode catalyst: JM HiSPEC® 12100 PtRu/C, cathode: JM HiSPEC® 9100 Pt/C (0.6 mgPt/cm2). Fuel cells performances were obtained at 80° C. with fully humidified 2000 sccm H2 and 1000 sccm O2 at 285 kPa backpressure. -
FIGS. 8A-8B are graphs showing the effect of flow rate on AEMFC performance.FIG. 8A shows Pt—RuO2/C anode catalyzed MEA, andFIG. 8B shows JM HiSPEC® 12100 Pt—Ru/C anode (0.5 mgPt/cm2) catalyzed MEA at 80° C. and 285 kPa backpressure under fully humidified gas feed. -
FIG. 9 is a graph of the AEMFC performance in H2/CO2-free air with Pt—RuO2/C as an anode and Pt/C as a cathode. Fuel cells performances were obtained with fully humidified 2000 sccm H2 and 1000 sccm CO2-free air at 285 kPa backpressure. -
FIGS. 10A-10C show TEM images and EDS spectroscopy of PtRu nanoparticles synthesized in dibenzyl ether with oleylamine/oleic acid (0.5 mL each) as surfactants and 1,2-tetradecanediol (84 mg) as reducing agent. -
FIGS. 11A-11C show TEM images and EDX spectroscopy of PtRu nanoparticles synthesized in diphenyl ether with one-pot synthesis. - Before turning to the figures, which illustrate certain exemplary embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the description or illustrated in the figures. It should also be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting.
- Certain embodiments relate to a Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalysts. Such catalysts may be used for cost-effective HOR. Rather than strictly alloying elemental Pt and elemental Ru, one embodiment synthesizes Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalysts from PtRu8 nanodendrites.
- One embodiment relates to a method of forming heterojunction catalysts. Specifically, heterojunctions may comprise Pt—RuO2 catalysts or are other stoichiometric ratios. Further, other elements, such as Ni and Co, may be used rather than Ru.
- The heterojunction catalysts are prepared from nanodendrites; one embodiment uses PtRu8 nanodendrites. In one embodiment, the PtRu8 nanodendrites are formed through a solvothermal synthesis process using an organic solvent, such as diphenyl ether, and an organic reducing agent, such as an organic diol (e.g., 1,2-tetradecanediol), and a surfactant, such as oleylamine, which helps the particle uniformity and size control.
- The metals that form the nanodendrites are supplied via respective precursors, for example platinum precursors and ruthenium precursors In one embodiment, the Pt precursor is platinum (II) acetylacetonate [Pt(acac)2]. In one embodiment, the Ru precursor is ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate [Ru(acac)3]. The ratio of Pt precursor to Ru precursor should be selected to approximate the desired ration in the catalytic material, such as for PtRu8, a ratio of Pt:Ru precursors of 1:12 to 1:6.
- In one embodiment, the nanodendrites are formed through addition of 5-15 mg/ml (e.g., 10 mg/ml) Ru(acac)3, 0.5-1.5 mg/ml (e.g., 1 mg/ml) Pt(acac)2 in diphenyl ether with 0.2-10 mg/ml (e.g., 5 mg/ml) of 1,2-tetradecanediol and 0.01-0.5 ml/ml (e.g., 0.2 ml/ml) oleylamine. These relative amounts may be scaled in some embodiments for a larger reaction batch. The nanodendrite reaction proceeds at a dendrite reaction temperature, such as 230-270° C. (e.g., 260° C.), and a dendrite reaction time, such as 5 min to 1 h. In one embodiment, dichlorobenzene is not injected until the temperature of the solution of 1,2-tetradecanediol and diphenyl reaches 200° C. as it is being heated. In another embodiment, a one pot synthesis approach is utilized with all of the ingredients added and the solution heated to the dendrite reaction temperature.
- PtRu8 nanodendrites are separated from the solvents. In one embodiment, the separation is by centrifuge (10000 rpm for 10 min). The collected nanodendrites are then dispersed in an organic solvent, such as chloroform.
- The collected nanodendrites are then used to form the heterojunction catalyst. The nanodendrites suspended in an organic solvent are mixed with carbon. In one embodiment, the carbon is in the form of carbon nanoparticles, such as 20-100 nm in diameter. In one embodiment, the ratio of carbon to catalytic material (such as PtRuO2) nanodendrites is 50:1 to 3:1. The mixture is agitated, such as by sonication, for a mixing time and then precipitated, such as by addition of hexane.
- The nanodendrite/carbon mixture is annealed to convert the elemental Ru to RuO2. The annealing step also removes remaining solvent or surfactant. In on embodiment, the annealing is at an annealing temperature within the range of 100-200° C. (e.g., 185° C.) in an ambient air environment. In one embodiment, the annealing is for an annealing time, such as overnight (8-12 hours).
- In one embodiment, the heterojunction catalyst comprises ultrafine Pt particles atomically connected with RuO2. Ultrafine particles are those below 5 nm, such as 1-5 nm, preferably 2-3 nm. RuO2 size is not well defined and can be 3-5 nm to 20 nm. In one embodiment, 2-3 nm (or smaller) Pt is surrounded by 2-3 nm (or smaller) RuO2. The structure of the catalytic material is a heterojunction with atomically connected interface between Pt and RuO2.
- Certain embodiments may facilitate a lower electrode loading due to the improved performance properties.
- Carbon-supported heterojunction catalysts were prepared by solvothermal synthesis and subsequent thermal treatment. Scale-up synthesis to 1 g/batch yield enables a thorough investigation of its MEA performance in combination with rotating disk electrode (“RDE”) studies. The results show a unique morphology with ultrafine Pt particle sizes, and atomically connected interfaces between Pt and RuO2 provide high catalytic activity toward HOR while maintaining significantly improved H2 mass transport in MEAs via minimizing undesirable phenyl group adsorption in the polymer electrolyte. The results also demonstrate MEA performance of low anode loading Pt—RuO2/C with those of the state-of-the-art Pt/C and Pt—Ru/C catalysts.
- In summary, Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst with ultrafine Pt cluster and atomically connected interface was developed by converting Ru-rich phase of PtRu8 nano-dendrite into Pt—RuO2. The synthetic condition of PtRu8 nanodendrites were investigated and preliminary scale-up was explored. With successful demonstration of one-pot synthesis, further scale-up should be attainable. The Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst showed excellent catalytic activity towards HOR and significantly lower phenyl group adsorption properties compared with commercial Pt/C catalyst. The AEMFC test suggests that the structure of the Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst provides high access of H2 at ultra-low loading anode in combination of the good kinetic activity and less degree of phenyl adsorption, making an ideal low PGM loading catalyst for AEMFCs. This result is the first report that that highly active Pt—Ru bimetallic HOR catalyst can be prepared without alloying Pt and Ru components but providing unique morphology of ultrafine Pt cluster and Pt—RuO2 heterojunctions.
- The Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst was prepared from PtRu nanodendrites. Several pathways to the PtRu nanoparticles with high surface area were explored using different combinations of solvent, surfactant, and reducing agent. Some of the pathways were seen to produce Pt rich PtRu nanoparticles, while others produced Ru rich PtRu nanoparticles, which are the desired form for the heterojunction catalyst.
- As shown in
FIG. 10A , we found Pt2Ru1 nanoparticles of ˜5 nm could be made in dibenzyl ether solvent at elevated temperature (FIGS. 10A-C ). Specifically, this pathway used dibenzyl ether with oleylamine/oleic acid (0.5 mL each) as surfactants and 1,2-tetradecanediol (84 mg) as reducing agent. The particles synthesized in dibenzyl ether in the presence of oleic acid is Pt-rich and not uniform because the presence of oleic acid hinders the reduction of Ru precursors; thus, we did not pursue this synthetic route. - Further, a sample with 1,2-tetradecanediol as a reducing agent resulted in an elemental percentage of PtL 69.7 atomic %, RuK 31.3 atomic %. Without reducing agent, Ru content in the particle is even lower (PtL 85.4 atomic %, RuK 14.6 atomic %), indicating the mild reducing capability of oleylamine is not sufficient to completely reduce Ru precursor under this reaction condition. Even with this modification, the dibenzyl ether route does not provide sufficient Ru content.
- Ru-rich nanoparticles with minimal particle size and uniform size distributions could be synthesized in diphenyl ether using 1,2-tetradecanediol and oleylamine. Specifically, experiments for the synthesis of PtRu8 nano-dendrite were performed in an Ar flow environment in a round bottom flask. Typically, 0.12 g Ru(acac)3, 2 mL oleylamine, 0.063
g 1,2-tetradecanediol, and 10 mL diphenyl ether were heated up to 260° C. in a round bottom flask with Ar flow and 0.012 g Pt(acac)2 dispersed in 1 mL dichlorobenzene was injected when the temperature of former solution reach 200° C. The mixture was heated up slowly to 260° C. The reaction time was controlled to 20-30 min starting from injection. - Scale-up synthesis was performed in a bigger round bottom flask with similar synthesis procedure and 6 times higher reaction precursors and reaction volume. Note, severe boiling was observed above 230° C. because the boiling point of dichlorobenzene is only 180° C. Care should be taken on the heating rate to avoid pressure buildup in the flask. Composition of dichlorobenzene could be decreased for larger reaction volume.
- Further, a one-pot synthesis was performed in a similar procedure except that all the reaction precursors were heated up in a round bottom flask. By doing so, we eliminated the hot injection step.
- For those nanodendrites to be used further in formation of the catalyst, the PtRu8 nanodendrites are separated from the solvents by centrifuge (10000 rpm for 10 min). The collected nanodendrites are then dispersed in chloroform for the annealing step.
- Similar particle size and composition were obtained with both 0.5 mL and 2 mL oleylamine as a surfactant and/or slightly changed amount of reducing agent (relative to the prior samples tested) (
FIG. 1A ) for which the lower surfactant and reducing agent amount is sufficient for the reaction and further increase does not affect the product significantly. Samples yielded a content of: 0.5 mL surfactant and 84 mg reducing agent (PtL 16 atomic %, RuK 84 atomic %); 2 mL surfactant and 84 mg reducing agent (PtL 14.6 atomic % m RuK 85.4 atomic %); and 2 mL surfactant and 65 mg reducing agent (PtL 16.5 atomic %, RuK 83.5 atomic %). - The Ru content in the particle is only slightly lower than the precursor ratio, indicating a very high conversion rate of the Ru precursor. As shown in
FIG. 1B , PtRu8 nanodendrites can be loaded onto carbon support uniformly. HRTEM image (FIG. 1C ) and selected area electron diffraction (“SAED”) pattern (FIG. 1D ) demonstrated the crystalline nature of the nanodendrites. Although the SAED pattern is weak with ultra-small particle size, HAADF imaging and corresponding EDS mapping revealed that the PtRu8 nanodendrites are composed of Pt-rich core surrounded with Ru-rich branches (FIGS. 1E-1H ). From these results, the formation of PtRu8 nanodendrites starts with Pt-rich nuclei because Pt is easier to be reduced than Ru. As the reaction progresses, Pt(acac)2 is depleted, and Ru-rich branches continue to grow on the surface, leading to the dendrite structure. - Collected PtRu8 nanodendrites were dispersed in chloroform and were then mixed with proper amount of carbon, which can be calculated from the target PtRu loading on carbon, which was also dispersed in chloroform by sonication. The mixture was sonicated for 20 min and the carbon supported PtRu8 nanodendrites were precipitated with hexane and further separated from solvents by centrifuge. This process also works for scale-up sample preparation; larger amounts of solvents were used to ensure good dispersion of PtRu8 nanodendrites on carbon. The carbon supported PtRu8 nanodendrites were annealed in air at 185° C. overnight to convert elemental Ru into RuO2 and to remove the surfactant adsorbed on the surface of catalyst.
- Initially synthesis the Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalysts on a small scale (0.2 g/batch). Later, a scale-up synthesis of the Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst was investigated by addressing heat transfer and mass transport challenges. With six times higher volume reaction, the boiling of the reactants above 230° C. is more severe than small batch synthesis because the amount of dichlorobenzene (boiling point=180° C.) is also six times higher while the removal rate of dichlorobenzene by argon flow is limited. The heating rate also decreases as more time is needed for reactants to reach the same reaction temperature. However, similar particle size and composition was obtained with the scale-up synthesis (content 14.1 PtL atomic % and 85.9 RuK atomic %). More importantly, scale-up synthesis is highly reproducible.
- The process of loading PtRu8 nanodendrites on carbon is also scalable. Overall, more than 1 g of Pt—RuO2/C heterojunction catalyst was obtained by combining the two batch of scale-up synthesis and subsequent annealing in air. Notably, injecting precursors into hot reactive solution (hot-injection) is not favorable for scale-up. Similar particle size and composition were obtained with one-pot synthesis, indicating this newly developed recipe is indeed scalable.
- The Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst was obtained by annealing of the carbon supported PtRu8 nanodendrites in the air at 185° C. overnight, and Ru was converted into RuO2. As shown in
FIGS. 2A-2H , the uniform dendrite structure was converted into a composite structure with lower contrast due to RuO2 formation. The HRTEM image inFIG. 2B and SEAD inFIGS. 2C-2D indicate the formation of Pt—RuO2 heterojunction structures with atomically connected interfaces. The HAADF imaging and EDS mapping results inFIGS. 2E-2H further demonstrate the Pt—RuO2 heterojunction structure. Compared with the PtRu8 nanodendrites, the size of the Pt-rich particle is slightly smaller, indicating some of the Ru in these Pt-rich areas is also oxidized and migrated to the RuO2 region. Also observed was some Pt dispersed in the Ru-rich area, which may be beneficial to the performance at a low-Pt loading AEMFC anode. In some embodiments, during the formation of Ru rich dendrites, there are still Pt precursors left, thus small amount of Pt is observed in Ru rich dendrites. - ICP-MS confirms that the atomic ratio of Pt:Ru in the heterojunction catalysts prepared from the scale-up synthesis is 1:8. TEM images (
FIGS. 5A-5B ) showed the six times scale-up Pt—RuO2 nanoparticles are monodisperse (most particles fall in the range of 3-6 nm in diameter) and are uniformly distributed on high surface area carbon support. XRD pattern also proves that the RuO2 dominates the particle composition (FIG. 5C ). The carbon supported Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst from the scale-up synthesis was further investigated in the RDE and AEMFC testing. - While RDE test in the acidic electrolyte (mostly perchloric acid and sulfuric acid) has been proved as an efficient technique for the catalyst screening of PENIFCs, a systematic study to compare the RDE results in the alkaline electrolyte with the AEMFC performance is yet to be established. Conventionally, NaOH or KOH electrolyte has been used to reveal the kinetic performance of the catalyst in an RDE setup. Our recent work suggested that this might be insufficient for catalyst screening of AEMFCs, as catalyst/ionomer interactions such as phenyl group adsorption and cation-hydroxide-water co-adsorption could mask the intrinsic kinetic performance of a catalyst. In short, under AEMFC operating conditions, the HOR rate imposes limits on its performance, not to discount the need for continuous improvement of ORR catalysis, which is believed to be facile compared with the sluggish ORR in PENIFC.
- In this work, we carried out the RDE study using two different electrolytes, namely NaOH and BTMAOH, all in 0.1 M solution of Milli-Q water. We first compared the HOR performance by the slope between 0 and 0.1 mA/cm2 instead of the exchange current density, which is difficult to obtain for nanoscale system. Then, we compared HOR current density at 0.05-0.3 V, which is relevant to the AEMFC operating condition. The results are presented in
FIGS. 3A-3D . In NaOH, the TKK Pt/C catalyst shows a typical Pt Hupd feature between 0.05 V and 0.40 V. Pt—RuO2 catalyst shows big capacitance feature in the same potential region, indicating a RuO2 rich surface (FIG. 3A ). For HOR performance, Pt/C TKK and Pt—RuO2/C show almost identical kinetic performance near 0 V (FIG. 3B , inset). Note that with the same metal loading, the synthesized Pt—RuO2/C catalyst has approximately 3.5% wt. of Pt only, as opposed to the commercial catalyst with 19.4% wt. of Pt. The Pt clusters and their unique heterojunctions with RuO2 indeed exhibit excellent kinetic performance. When the electrolyte was switched to BTMAOH, TKK Pt/C shows a significant reducing current below 0.2 V, which is likely caused by phenyl group adsorption and subsequent reduction. For Pt—RuO2, very little current drop is observed, which indicates Pt—RuO2 interaction with the phenyl group is much weaker than that of pure Pt (FIG. 3C ). In 0.1 M BTMAOH electrolytes, Pt—RuO2 shows higher current at 0.05-0.3 V, where the catalyst/phenyl group interactions take place (FIG. 3D ). Overall, RDE results suggest that our Pt—RuO2/C catalyst from the scale-up synthesis has comparable HOR kinetic performance with the commercial Pt/C but higher tolerance of phenyl group poisoning even at significantly lower Pt loading. - We evaluated the performance of Pt—RuO2/C heterojunction and other state-of-the-art Pt-based anode catalysts in MEA. The MEAs tested have the same MEA components except for the anode catalyst. The ionomer to carbon (“I/C”) ratio of the anode was optimized for the best AEMFC performance.
FIG. 4A compares the polarization curve, cell high frequency resistance (“HFR”) and power density of the MEAs employing low Pt loading Pt/C, PtRu/C, and Pt—RuO2/C anode catalysts. Under the H2/O2 conditions, the MEA using Pt—RuO2/C anode catalyst exhibits exceptionally high performance in spite of the lower Pt loading. The peak power density of the MEA using Pt—RuO2/C anode reached 0.77 W/cm2, as opposed to the MEA using Pt/C and PtRu/C anode catalysts of which the peak power density was 0.28 and 0.55 W/cm2, respectively. All MEAs have similar cell HFR (˜0.045 W/cm2), confirming that the different performance is not originated from MEA hydration and catalyst-AEM interface. The kinetic performance difference between the Pt/C and Pt—RuO2/C catalyzed MEAs is negligible, for example, the iR-corrected current density of the MEAs at 0.95 V are similar (0.026 A/cm2 for Pt/C vs. 0.028 A/cm2 for Pt—RuO2/C) at the similar metal loading (FIG. 6 ), while the performance difference became significant as the current density increases. For instance, the current density of the Pt—RuO2/C catalyzed MEA at 0.85 V is 0.22 A/cm2, ˜2 times of the Pt/C catalyzed MEA. This result is consistent with the RDE experiment where the kinetic activity of Pt—RuO2/C and Pt/C is comparable, but the overall activity of the Pt/C catalyst is hindered by the adverse adsorption of the phenyl groups of the ionomer. The performance comparison between PtRu/C and Pt—RuO2/C catalyzed MEAs indicates that the kinetic performance of the MEA using PtRu/C catalysts is slightly higher than that of the MEA using Pt—RuO2/C (0.036 A/cm2 for PtRu/C vs. 0.028 A/cm2 for Pt—RuO2/C at 0.95 V). However, the performance at the high current density region, ca. >1.0 A/cm2, the Pt—RuO2/C catalyzed MEA showed significantly higher performance than the PtRu/C catalyzed MEA. - The notably higher performance of Pt—RuO2/C catalyzed MEA could not alone be explained by the phenyl group adsorption since both catalysts have minimal phenyl group adsorption. There are two possible reasons behind the high performance of Pt—RuO2/C. First, the lower ratio of metal to carbon in electrocatalysts (15% for Pt—RuO2/C vs. 75% for PtRu/C) increases the electrode thickness which improves the mass transport at the low loading anode. The electrode thickness effect is also apparent in the fuel cell performance as a function of anode PGM loading (
FIG. 7 ). The peak power density of Pt—RuO2/C MEA increased only about 20% with 4-times higher anode catalyst loading, while the peak power density of PtRu/C MEA increased ˜3.5 times with 4-times higher anode catalyst loading. This indicates that our novel Pt—RuO2/C heterojunction catalyst works really well for low PGM loading electrodes, on the other hand, the commercial PtRu/C catalysts with high metal content only perform well at higher PGM loadings. Second, the ultrafine Pt clusters surrounded by large RuO2 particles create desirable morphology for the mass transport. The superior H2 mass transport of the Pt—RuO2/C at the low loading electrode is also evidenced by the AEMFC performance at reduced H2 flow. The Pt—RuO2/C catalyzed MEA shows only slightly inferior performance of 0.72 W/cm2 at a much lower flow rate, while more significant performance loss is observed for the PtRu/C catalyzed MEA (FIGS. 8A-8B ). The Pt—RuO2/C MEA shows the peak power density of 0.33 W/cm2 at 0.48 V, achieving the specific power (13.2 W/mgPt) under H2/CO2-free air conditions (FIG. 9 ). - We further compare the reported AEMFC performance as a function of the cost of anode catalyst. For this analysis, we collected the peak power density of AEMFCs using state-of-the-art anode catalysts in literature and compared the AEMFC performance normalized for anode catalyst cost per cm2 area based on the 5 year average price of metals.
FIG. 4B plots the peak power density of the MEAs as a function of anode catalyst cost with two target lines (i.e., 2020 US DOE MEA cost target (0.2 cents/cm2) and the rated performance at rated power (1 W/cm2) under H2/air conditions.FIG. 4B shows that Pt—Ru alloy catalysts have better performance than Pt-, Pd-, Ru-, and Ir-based catalysts at a given catalyst cost. Among the Pt—Ru alloy catalysts shown, four catalysts are located on the upper-performance-cost limit (red dashed line). Those catalysts are the commercial PtRu HiSPEC® 10000 (Pt nominally 40 wt. %, Ru nominally 20 wt. %) supported on Vulcan XC—72R carbon. Two Ni-based non-PGM catalysts are located on or even beyond the upper-performance-cost limit. However, their cell performance needs to improve to reach the DOE performance target. The Pt—RuO2 heterojunction catalyst we prepared from this work is also located beyond the upper-performance-cost limit, suggesting that the formation of ultrafine Pt cluster with Pt—Ru heterojunction is a promising approach to meet fuel cell cost and performance targets for transportation application. Further optimization of catalyst composition and morphology of the heterojunction catalysts with developing non-PGM ORR catalysts may need for advanced AEMFC systems. - The TEM images were obtained on an FEI Tecnai F20 and JEM-2100F microscopes with accelerating voltage at 300 and 200 kV, respectively. Selected area electron diffraction patterns and EDS results were recorded with JEM-2100F microscope equipped with an Oxford EDS detector. HAADF images and energy dispersive X spectroscopy mapping were recorded on a FEI Talos F200X scanning transmission electron microscope (“STEM”) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV at the Center for Nanoscale Materials, Argonne National Laboratory. XRD patterns were recorded from a Siemens diffractometer D5000. The ICP results of PtRu sample are 7.4 (Ru):1 (Pt), 7.6:1, and 7.7:1 for 3 runs. It is averaged to 7.6:1 and the sample in the manuscript was denoted to PtRu8.
- Synthesized Pt—RuO2/C (17% metal wt. on high surface area carbon, Pt/Ru
atomic ratio 1/6) and commercial Pt/C (TKK TEC10E20A, 19.4% Pt wt.) were dispersed in water under untrasonication. The catalyst concentration of both inks was 1.25 mg/mL. The ink was pipetted onto a glassy carbon disk (5 mm in diameter) to make 20 μg/cm2 metal loading and dried in air at room temperature. 10 μL of Nafion D521 (diluted to 0.1% wt.) was then added on the surface as a binder to keep the catalyst on the glassy carbon. - A home-made fluorinated ethylene propylene (“FEP”) cell was used for electrochemical characterization of the catalyst. 0.1 M aqueous solution of NaOH (99.99% from Sigma Aldrich) and BTMAOH (40% wt. solution in water from TCI Chemical) were used as electrolyte. A mercury/mercury oxide (Hg/HgO) electrode (Pine) was the reference electrode and a graphite rod (Sigma Aldrich) was the counter electrode. The reference potential was converted to RHE. Cyclic voltammograms were recorded in nitrogen purged electrolyte. Before hydrogen oxidation reaction curves were recorded at 900 rpm, the electrolyte was saturated with hydrogen and the working electrode was subject to 1.40 V for 30 seconds to remove the cation adsorption.
- The catalyst inks for anode were formulated using Pt/C (TKK TEC10E20A, 19.4 wt. % Pt), synthesized Pt—RuO2/C (15% metal loading on TKK carbon support) with alkyl ammonium tethered poly(fluorene) (“FLN”) ionomer (5 wt. % in 1:1 solution of isopropanol-ethanol) in 20:80 v/v % water — isopropanol solution. The two sets of anodes were prepared with different Pt loading where I/C ratios were 40% for Pt/C and synthesized Pt—RuO2/C, respectively. The Pt/C (HiSPEC® 9100, Johnson Matthey Fuel Cells, USA) and FLN ionomer were used for the cathode in all MEAs. For cathodes, Pt loading and I/C ratio were 0.6 mgPt/cm2 and 42%, respectively. The catalyst ink was brush painted on the BC-29 (gas diffusion layer, 5 cm2, 270 μm thickness) on the vacuum table at 60° C.
- The quaternized poly(terphenylene) (“TPN”) membrane was used as polymer electrolyte. Prepared anode, cathode and membrane were used to fabricate MEA after converting to hydroxide form by immersing in 1 M NaOH solution. The MEA was then placed into the fuel cell hardware (5 cm2, serpentine flow field) supplied by Fuel Cell Technologies Inc.
- The pure hydrogen at 2000 sccm and oxygen or CO2-free air at 1000 sccm supplied to anode and cathode respectively at 100% relative humidity. All the fuel cell tests were performed at operating temperature of 80° C. The polarization curves were acquired at absolute backpressures of 285 kPa using a fuel cell station (Fuel Cell Technologies Inc., USA). Built-in impedance analyzer was used to measure the HFR while obtaining the polarization curves.
- No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for.”
- As utilized herein, the terms “approximately,” “about,” “substantially,” and similar terms are intended to have a broad meaning in harmony with the common and accepted usage by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject matter of this disclosure pertains. It should be understood by those of skill in the art who review this disclosure that these terms are intended to allow a description of certain features described and claimed without restricting the scope of these features to the precise numerical ranges provided. Accordingly, these terms should be interpreted as indicating that insubstantial or inconsequential modifications or alterations of the subject matter described and claimed are considered to be within the scope of the disclosure as recited in the appended claims.
- It should be noted that the term “exemplary” and variations thereof, as used herein to describe various embodiments, are intended to indicate that such embodiments are possible examples, representations, or illustrations of possible embodiments (and such terms are not intended to connote that such embodiments are necessarily extraordinary or superlative examples).
- The term “coupled” and variations thereof, as used herein, means the joining of two members directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary (e.g., permanent or fixed) or moveable (e.g., removable or releasable). Such joining may be achieved with the two members coupled directly to each other, with the two members coupled to each other using a separate intervening member and any additional intermediate members coupled with one another, or with the two members coupled to each other using an intervening member that is integrally formed as a single unitary body with one of the two members. If “coupled” or variations thereof are modified by an additional term (e.g., directly coupled), the generic definition of “coupled” provided above is modified by the plain language meaning of the additional term (e.g., “directly coupled” means the joining of two members without any separate intervening member), resulting in a narrower definition than the generic definition of “coupled” provided above. Such coupling may be mechanical, electrical, or fluidic. For example, circuit A communicably “coupled” to circuit B may signify that the circuit A communicates directly with circuit B (i.e., no intermediary) or communicates indirectly with circuit B (e.g., through one or more intermediaries).
- The term “or,” as used herein, is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list. Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is understood to convey that an element may be either X, Y, Z; X and Y; X and Z; Y and Z; or X, Y, and Z (i.e., any combination of X, Y, and Z). Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z to each be present, unless otherwise indicated.
- References herein to the positions of elements (e.g., “top,” “bottom,” “above,” “below”) are merely used to describe the orientation of various elements in the FIGURES. It should be noted that the orientation of various elements may differ according to other exemplary embodiments, and that such variations are intended to be encompassed by the present disclosure.
- Although the figures and description may illustrate a specific order of method steps, the order of such steps may differ from what is depicted and described, unless specified differently above. Also, two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence, unless specified differently above.
Claims (7)
1. A heterojunction catalyst comprising:
a carbon substrate comprising carbon nanoparticles having a diameter of 20-100 nm; and
a catalytic material supported on the carbon substrate, the catalytic material comprising PtRuO2;
wherein the Pt particles have a diameter of less than 5 nm and the RuO2 comprises RuO2 particles have a diameter of 2-20 nm, and
wherein the Pt particles and the RuO2 particles are atomically connected.
2. The heterojunction catalyst of claim 1 , wherein the carbon substrate and catalytic material is 50:1 to 3:1.
3. The heterojunction catalyst of claim 1 , wherein the Pt particles have a diameter of 1-5 nm.
4. The heterojunction catalyst of claim 3 , wherein the Pt particles have a diameter of 2-3 nm.
4. The heterojunction catalyst of claim 1 , wherein the RuO2 particles have a diameter of 2-3 nm.
6. The heterojunction catalyst of claim 1 , wherein each Pt particle is surrounded by the RuO2 particles.
7. The heterojunction catalyst of claim 1 , wherein the PtRuO2 is uniformly distributed on the carbon substrate.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US18/104,100 US20230182119A1 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2023-01-31 | Scalable pt cluster and ruo2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/584,385 US11596928B2 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-26 | Scalable Pt cluster and RuO2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
US18/104,100 US20230182119A1 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2023-01-31 | Scalable pt cluster and ruo2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/584,385 Division US11596928B2 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-26 | Scalable Pt cluster and RuO2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20230182119A1 true US20230182119A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 |
Family
ID=75162865
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/584,385 Active 2040-08-21 US11596928B2 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-26 | Scalable Pt cluster and RuO2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
US18/104,100 Pending US20230182119A1 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2023-01-31 | Scalable pt cluster and ruo2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/584,385 Active 2040-08-21 US11596928B2 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-26 | Scalable Pt cluster and RuO2 heterojunction anode catalysts |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US11596928B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113707895B (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2022-09-16 | 浙江大学 | Preparation method and application of heterostructure catalyst with rich interface active sites |
CN114447352B (en) * | 2022-01-25 | 2024-05-10 | 江苏擎动新能源科技有限公司 | PtRu/C catalyst and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2602070A (en) | 1950-09-15 | 1952-07-01 | Int Nickel Co | Process for the preparation of pure nickel hydroxide |
US4000048A (en) | 1973-06-25 | 1976-12-28 | Diamond Shamrock Technologies S.A. | Novel cathode |
JPS55138086A (en) | 1979-04-10 | 1980-10-28 | Asahi Glass Co Ltd | Preparation of hydrogen |
US4331523A (en) | 1980-03-31 | 1982-05-25 | Showa Denko Kk | Method for electrolyzing water or aqueous solutions |
US5681445A (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1997-10-28 | Hydro-Quebec | Modified surface bipolar electrode |
US6162530A (en) | 1996-11-18 | 2000-12-19 | University Of Connecticut | Nanostructured oxides and hydroxides and methods of synthesis therefor |
CN1209482C (en) | 1998-06-10 | 2005-07-06 | 美国南诺考尔股份有限公司 | Active raw material for thermal sprayed system, thermal sprayed electrodes of energy storage and conversion device made of it and manufacture method thereof |
US20100084282A1 (en) | 2008-10-08 | 2010-04-08 | Nhthree, Llc | Method and apparatus for dissociating water |
US20130133483A1 (en) * | 2010-03-08 | 2013-05-30 | University Of Rochester | Synthesis of Nanoparticles Using Reducing Gases |
CN102212840A (en) | 2010-04-06 | 2011-10-12 | 北京化工大学 | Metal anode for aqueous solution electrolysis system |
WO2012043085A1 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2012-04-05 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Hydrogen production system |
US20130089739A1 (en) | 2011-10-07 | 2013-04-11 | King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) | Nanostructured metal oxides and mixed metal oxides, methods of making these nanoparticles, and methods of their use |
US9255334B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2016-02-09 | Uchicago Argonne, Llc | Hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst |
CN108736029B (en) * | 2018-06-01 | 2021-10-01 | 东莞理工学院 | Hollow sphere chain structure silver-platinum ruthenium composite material and application thereof in electrocatalytic oxidation of ethanol |
-
2019
- 2019-09-26 US US16/584,385 patent/US11596928B2/en active Active
-
2023
- 2023-01-31 US US18/104,100 patent/US20230182119A1/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20210094021A1 (en) | 2021-04-01 |
US11596928B2 (en) | 2023-03-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20230182119A1 (en) | Scalable pt cluster and ruo2 heterojunction anode catalysts | |
US8187769B2 (en) | Supported catalyst for fuel cell, method of preparing the same, electrode for fuel cell including the supported catalyst, membrane electrode assembly including the electrode, and fuel cell including the membrane electrode assembly | |
Wang et al. | Ultrafine Pt cluster and RuO 2 heterojunction anode catalysts designed for ultra-low Pt-loading anion exchange membrane fuel cells | |
US7902111B2 (en) | Supported catalyst for fuel cell, method of preparing the same, electrode for fuel cell including the supported catalyst, and fuel cell including the electrode | |
KR101197172B1 (en) | Method for one-pot synthesizing of catalyst for fuel cell having nano structure shape | |
US9006128B2 (en) | Catalyst for fuel cell and method for preparing the same | |
US8748334B2 (en) | Process for producing electrode catalyst for fuel cell | |
US10562018B2 (en) | Electrode catalyst, and membrane electrode assembly and fuel cell using electrode catalyst | |
US9731276B2 (en) | Composite, catalyst including the same, fuel cell and lithium air battery including the same | |
US20060264319A1 (en) | Method of preparing electrochemical catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cell | |
EP3796439A1 (en) | Electrode catalyst, composition for forming gas diffusion electrode, gas diffusion electrode, membrane-electrode assembly, and fuel cell stack | |
US8956771B2 (en) | Electrode catalyst for fuel cell, method of preparation, MEA including the catalyst, and fuel cell including the MEA | |
KR101624641B1 (en) | Electrode catalyst for fuel cell, manufacturing method thereof, membrane electrode assembly and fuel cell including the same | |
EP3214681A1 (en) | Electrode catalyst layer for fuel cell, and fuel cell membrane electrode assembly and fuel cell using said catalyst layer | |
JP2007273340A (en) | High-durability electrode catalyst for fuel cell, and fuel cell using the same | |
EP3041965B1 (en) | A modified bimetallic nanoparticle and a process to prepare the same | |
Li et al. | Platinum-tellurium alloy metallene toward formic acid oxidation reaction | |
US9466843B2 (en) | Electrode catalyst and method of preparing electrode catalyst for fuel cell, and membrane electrode assembly and fuel cell including same | |
US20210288334A1 (en) | A bimetallic catalyst and fuel for use in a direct dimethyl ether fuel cell | |
US9911983B2 (en) | Electrode catalyst for fuel cell, method of preparing the same, and membrane electrode assembly and fuel cell, each including the same | |
CA3026335C (en) | Electrode catalyst, method for producing the same, and electrode catalyst layer using electrode catalyst | |
CN111211334A (en) | PtNi/C alloy catalyst and preparation method and application thereof | |
KR102288596B1 (en) | Catalyst electrode for fuel cell, manufacturing method thereof and a fuel cell comprising the catalyst electrode for fuel cell | |
JP4037814B2 (en) | Membrane-electrode assembly for fuel cell and fuel cell | |
US20220238892A1 (en) | Method for producing alloy fine particle-supported catalyst, electrode, fuel cell, method for producing alloy fine particle, alloy fine particle-supported catalyst, alloy fine particle, method for producing membrane electrode assembly, and method for producing fuel cell |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WANG, RONGYUE;STAMENKOVIC, VOJISLAV;STRMCNIK, DUSAN;SIGNING DATES FROM 20191028 TO 20201118;REEL/FRAME:062564/0990 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |