US20220258222A1 - Systems and methods for extrusion correction - Google Patents
Systems and methods for extrusion correction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20220258222A1 US20220258222A1 US17/673,011 US202217673011A US2022258222A1 US 20220258222 A1 US20220258222 A1 US 20220258222A1 US 202217673011 A US202217673011 A US 202217673011A US 2022258222 A1 US2022258222 A1 US 2022258222A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- simulated
- work piece
- clamp
- clamp blocks
- computer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 83
- 238000001125 extrusion Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 229910000838 Al alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010402 computational modelling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004512 die casting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001746 injection moulding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007528 sand casting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005242 forging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012804 iterative process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005304 joining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21C—MANUFACTURE OF METAL SHEETS, WIRE, RODS, TUBES OR PROFILES, OTHERWISE THAN BY ROLLING; AUXILIARY OPERATIONS USED IN CONNECTION WITH METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL
- B21C31/00—Control devices, e.g. for regulating the pressing speed or temperature of metal; Measuring devices, e.g. for temperature of metal, combined with or specially adapted for use in connection with extrusion presses
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21C—MANUFACTURE OF METAL SHEETS, WIRE, RODS, TUBES OR PROFILES, OTHERWISE THAN BY ROLLING; AUXILIARY OPERATIONS USED IN CONNECTION WITH METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL
- B21C35/00—Removing work or waste from extruding presses; Drawing-off extruded work; Cleaning dies, ducts, containers, or mandrels
- B21C35/02—Removing or drawing-off work
- B21C35/023—Work treatment directly following extrusion, e.g. further deformation or surface treatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21C—MANUFACTURE OF METAL SHEETS, WIRE, RODS, TUBES OR PROFILES, OTHERWISE THAN BY ROLLING; AUXILIARY OPERATIONS USED IN CONNECTION WITH METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL
- B21C23/00—Extruding metal; Impact extrusion
- B21C23/02—Making uncoated products
- B21C23/04—Making uncoated products by direct extrusion
- B21C23/14—Making other products
- B21C23/142—Making profiles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
- B21C—MANUFACTURE OF METAL SHEETS, WIRE, RODS, TUBES OR PROFILES, OTHERWISE THAN BY ROLLING; AUXILIARY OPERATIONS USED IN CONNECTION WITH METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL
- B21C35/00—Removing work or waste from extruding presses; Drawing-off extruded work; Cleaning dies, ducts, containers, or mandrels
- B21C35/02—Removing or drawing-off work
- B21C35/03—Straightening the work
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates generally to the field of metal extrusion.
- Some extrusion applications such as automotive applications, may require relatively strict tolerances, such as bow and twist tolerances, for substantially complex, multi-void structural extrusions.
- Traditional extrusion process capabilities may not be capable of meeting certain tolerance requirements. Failure to meet tolerance requirements may result in increased scrap material and higher part costs and/or loss of business altogether due to lack of capabilities.
- Some traditional correction methods may be cost prohibitive, particularly at high part volumes.
- the disclosure describes a method for work piece correction.
- the method may include providing a work piece and analyzing a geometry of the work piece. Based on the analysis of the geometry of the work piece, the method may include determining an initial design of one or more simulated clamp blocks, and conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of work piece correction using the initial design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks. The method may include determining whether results of the initial computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria. The method may include iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analysis until a final clamp block design produce results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria.
- the method may include manufacturing one or more clamp blocks based on the final clamp block design.
- the method may include installing the one or more clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system and applying one or more extrusion corrections to the work piece.
- the disclosure describes a method for fabricating an aluminum alloy work piece.
- the method may include analyzing a geometry of a work piece design. Based on the analysis of the geometry of the work piece design, the method may include determining a clamp block design of one or more simulated clamp blocks and conducting a computer-simulated analysis of an extrusion correction using the clamp block design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks. The method may include determining whether results of the computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria.
- the method may include extruding an aluminum alloy work piece based on the work piece design and manufacturing one or more clamp blocks based on the clamp block design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks.
- the method may include installing the one or more clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system, installing the extruded aluminum alloy work piece into the clamping system, and applying one or more extrusion corrections to the extruded aluminum alloy work piece.
- the disclosure describes a method of correcting an extruded aluminium alloy work piece.
- the method may include analyzing a geometry of the extruded aluminum alloy work piece, wherein the extruded aluminum alloy work piece may include one or more internal cavities and an exterior surface. Based on the analysis of the geometry of the extruded aluminum alloy work piece, the method may include determining an initial design of one or more simulated internal clamp blocks configured to be received within at least one of the one or more internal cavities and one or more simulated external clamp blocks each configured to abut at least a portion of the exterior surface.
- the method may include conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of an extrusion correction using the initial design of the one or more simulated internal clamp blocks and the one or more simulated external clamp blocks, and determining whether results of the initial computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria.
- the method may include iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated internal clamp blocks and one or more simulated external clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analyses until a final internal clamp block design and external clamp block design produce results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria.
- the method may include manufacturing one or more internal clamp blocks based on the final internal clamp block design and one or more external clam blocks based on the final external clamp block design.
- the method may include installing the one or more external clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system, loading the extruded aluminum alloy work piece into the clamping system such that the internal clamp blocks are disposed within the one or more internal cavities, and applying one or more extrusion corrections to the extruded aluminum work piece.
- FIG. 1A shows a front perspective view of an embodiment of a clamping system in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 1B shows a rear elevation view of the clamping system of FIG. 1A ;
- FIG. 2A shows perspective view of an embodiment of external clamp blocks installed in an example clamping system holding an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 2B shows a perspective view of an embodiment of internal clamp blocks installed in an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 3A shows an embodiment external clamp blocks installed in an example clamping system holding an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 3B shows an embodiment internal clamp blocks installed in an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 4A shows an embodiment of a finite element mesh used for a computer-simulated analysis applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 4B shows an embodiment of a computer-simulated analysis displacement output applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 4C shows an embodiment of a computer-simulated analysis stress output applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure
- FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a computer-simulated analysis reaction torque output applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure.
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method of work piece correction in accordance with the disclosure.
- the term “or” is an inclusive “or” operator, and is equivalent to the term “and/or,” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
- the term “based on” is not exclusive and allows for being based on additional factors not described, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
- the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references.
- the meaning of “in” includes “in” and includes plural references.
- the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on.”
- the present disclosure describes, in some embodiments, using a unique end-clamping method to correct dimensions and geometries of extruded parts.
- the disclosed method may be implemented along with hydraulically driven cylinders to mechanically form (e.g., stretch and/or twist) extrusions resulting in a repeatable and low cost forming method.
- the method may help increase accuracy of a part's dimensions and may bring the dimensions of certain extrusions within desired tolerance requirements.
- This method may be also be used in particularly complex and/or large extrusions that may be used in automotive applications, for example, or other applications that may benefit from relatively large extruded parts with relatively tight tolerances and/or relatively high volumes.
- the disclosure may describe a mechanical calibration and/or correction method that may be applied after an extrusion process to achieve the desired tolerances.
- the method may also provide advantages for correcting complex, multi-void structural extrusions.
- the disclosed system and methods may include providing precise correction and/or calibration of extruded components in line with the expectations of particular industries or applications, such as the automotive industry.
- the disclosed system and methods may include efficiencies that will be evident to those skilled in the art, and may accordingly provide for lower costs as compared to traditional methods of providing precision components for certain applications, such as automotive applications.
- the disclosed extrusion correction method may be performed using a clamping system such as that shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B .
- a clamping system 50 may be used along with these methods to hold and alter an extruded work piece 52 .
- the clamping system 50 may have a first hydraulic clamp 60 that may grip a first work piece end 54 and a second hydraulic clamp 62 that may grip a second work piece end 56 .
- the first and second clamps 60 , 62 may be mounted on one or more base 58 .
- the extrusion work piece 52 may have substantially any length, but in certain embodiments may have a length between about 2,500 mm and about 3,500 mm, or of about 3,000 mm in certain embodiments.
- the components of the clamping system 50 may be sized so as to accommodate the extrusion size.
- the base 58 may be between about 4,500 mm and about 6,000 mm in length, or about 5,300 mm in length in other embodiments.
- each of the first and second clamps 60 , 62 may be about 500 mm in length, or whatever length may best accommodate the particular work piece (e.g., extrusion). It is contemplated that the clamping system 50 and the methods disclosed herein may be used for extrusion work pieces having various lengths, thicknesses, weights, and interior and exterior dimensions.
- hydraulics may be used in the clamps to extend, compress, twist, or rotate the extrusion work piece 52 as needed to attain the desired dimensions or characteristics.
- the disclosure describes extrusions and work pieces produced via extrusion, those skilled in the art will recognize that the techniques described herein may be used with work parts produced via other manufacturing processes, such as casting, injection molding, sand casting, die casting, etc.
- the clamping system 50 may include a plurality of internal and external clamp blocks or that may make up a “clamp block set” that may interface with the extrusion work piece 52 as shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- a set of external clamp blocks 70 and internal clamp blocks 72 may be designed and created.
- the clamp block set may be unique to each individual work piece that is formed, or unique to a run of work pieces created to the same specifications and/or dimensions.
- it is contemplated that a clamp block set may be created based on the unique geometry of an extrusion work piece that a user may expect to produce at relatively high volumes. The same or similar clamp block set may then be used repeatedly for each extrusion work piece produced sharing that geometry. In such a manner, a volume of extruded work pieces may be created in view of the desired tolerances so as to produce consistent parts with the desired dimensions.
- the clamp block set 70 , 72 may act to transfer tension, torque, and/or moments into the extruded work piece 52 and apply substantially consistent stress and strain across the entirety of extrusion while the part may be twisted or otherwise manipulated to correct its dimensions.
- the position, size, and shape of the internal and external clamp blocks 70 , 72 may help assure that the yield strength limit of the extruded material may be met through the entire length and cross section of the extrusion work piece 52 .
- the internal and external blocks 70 , 72 may act to limit the amount that the extruded work piece 52 may be allowed to locally deform, such as in cross section or along the part's length, which may be undesirable in certain applications.
- a set of both the external clamp blocks 70 and internal clamp blocks 72 may be removably disposed in the first clamp 60 and the second clamp 62 .
- FIG. 3A shows an embodiment of an example set of external clamp blocks 70 and FIG. 3B shows an example set of internal clamp blocks 72 that may be used for example extrusion work piece 52 .
- the example set of external clamp blocks 70 in FIG. 3A may be designed and shaped specifically based on the geometry of the example extrusion work piece 52 .
- the shape and contours 71 of the external clamp blocks 70 may be formed so as to generally follow the contours of the external surface of the extrusion work piece 52 and contact a relatively large portion of the surface area around the first and second ends 54 , 56 of the extrusion 52 .
- such a contour following the geometry of external clamping may help maximize the uniformity of pressure applied across each portion of the extrusion work piece 52 when the clamping system 50 applies force to twist, stretch, or otherwise adjust the work piece.
- the external clamp blocks 70 may each be configured for removable connection to respective portions of the first clamp 60 and/or second clamp 62 , such as using pins 73 , bolts, or other suitable coupling mechanisms.
- unique sets of external clamp blocks 70 may be designed for each work piece design so as to follow the contours of the particular work piece profile.
- the example set of internal clamp blocks 72 is shown disposed within internal cavities of the example extrusion work piece 52 .
- the internal clamp blocks 72 may be designed and formed to fit interior surfaces 75 of one or more interior cavities formed in the extrusion work piece 52 .
- the shape of the internal clamp blocks 72 may provide for the blocks to contact a relatively large proportion of the interior surface 75 area of the extrusion work piece 52 .
- the contour-following shape of the internal clamp blocks 72 may help maximize the uniformity of pressure applied across each portion of the extrusion work piece 52 when the clamping system 50 applies force to twist, stretch, or otherwise adjust the work piece.
- the internal clamp blocks 72 may include one or more pinholes 74 that may allow pins on each of the first and second clamps 60 , 62 to hold the internal blocks in place.
- the design, shape, and size of the external and internal clamp blocks 70 , 72 and their locations with respect to the extrusion work piece 52 may be determined using computational modelling. For example, the geometry of the blocks 70 , 72 , the work piece 52 , and their interface with one another may be modelled and a mesh may be applied for finite element analysis. In some embodiments, material properties of the blocks 70 , 72 and the extruded work piece 52 may be input into the model for use during the analysis. Axial tension, rotational torque, and moments may be applied within the model, which may result in an output of the extruded work piece's stress, strain, and deformation. FIGS.
- FIG. 4A, 4B, and 4C show an example of the stress, strain, and deformation outputs as applied to an example extrusion work piece 52 .
- the clamping of the first and second ends of a simulated extrusion work piece may be simulated and tested with inner “fixed” support (i.e., internal clamp blocks) and external clamp blocks.
- FIG. 4A shows the output of an embodiment of a finite element mesh used for computer simulated analysis.
- FIG. 4B shows the output of an embodiment of a computer-simulated displacement analysis
- FIG. 4C shows the output of an embodiment of a computer-simulated stress analysis.
- the simulations shown in FIG. 4 indicate even twist calibration over the entire profile length of the simulated extrusion work piece, and identify process parameters and forces.
- the yield limit was reached over the entire profile length and cross section.
- one or more modelling iterations may be used until the clamp block design, shape, and placement may optimized to achieve the correct or nearest to correct formed geometry of the extruded work piece, both for external clamp blocks and internal clamp blocks.
- Computational modelling may also predict various machine process parameters including maximum torque and maximum tension to aid with machine design and specifications.
- FIG. 5 shows a sample of a computer-simulated analysis reaction torque output.
- the graph shows reaction torque versus twist angle in a simulated extrusion work piece that may be used to identify optimal clamp block geometry and locations.
- the profile length of the simulated extrusion work piece may have been about 3,000 mm, made from an alloy with T4S temper aged to 95-100 Mpa yield strength.
- the maximum simulated twist momentum was about 15,000 Nm, and the maximum stretch force was about 400 kN.
- the extrusion work piece or profiles may be pre-stretched after extrusion, and, in some embodiments, during correction the profiles may not be stretched more than about 0.5%.
- a 6xxx aluminium alloy profile was measured for stability of spring back and other parameters.
- the work piece was twisted to 2 degrees nominal and 0.8% lineal stretch.
- the work piece exhibited consistent axial and torsional spring back, and consistent linear deformation over the length, which confirmed prior computer simulation analysis, such as the analysis shown and described in FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C .
- This example indicated that a tolerance of plus or minus 0.45 degrees may be achievable, which may be within 0.50 degree tolerances over 3,000 mm, which that may be desired in some applications. Accordingly, the system and methods disclosed herein may represent an improvement of up to or exceeding 6 times tighter tolerances than traditional extrusion.
- the detailed clamp block geometry may be specific to each component, but may generally contain several consistent features.
- the clamp blocks may generally be made from steel, aluminium, or composite material, but other suitable materials may be used in other embodiments.
- the clamp blocks may be formed to include machined or extruded surface contours to match the extrusion work piece being corrected.
- the clamp blocks may include lead-in chamfers for ease of assembly.
- the edges of the internal clamp blocks may be chamfered to provide for easier insertion into the internal cavities of the work piece.
- the external and internal clamp blocks may include pinholes or otherwise be tapped, dovetailed, etc., to provide for removable mechanical joining of the clamp blocks to each respective clamp in the clamping system.
- the clamp blocks may include a series of serrated surfaces to aid in gripping the extrusion work piece to apply tension, moments, torque, etc.
- surfaces on the external clamp blocks that may contact surfaces of the extrusion work piece may include ridges or other serrated surfaces to provide grip.
- the clamp blocks may include tapered sides that may allow for a taper locking mechanism to removably secure the clamp blocks to the clamps.
- the clamp blocks may be made from single piece or multi-piece construction, or a combination of both. In some embodiments, multi-piece construction may serve as a collapsing mandrel for ease of disengaging from the extrusion work piece after manipulation of the work piece may be completed.
- FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of an embodiment of method 200 of using the disclosed extrusion correction system.
- the method may include analyzing a work piece to determine its features, geometry, and other factors. For example, a user may determine whether the extrusion work piece includes any internal cavities, and what types of corrections may be called for to bring the work piece into the desired tolerance.
- computer or other electronic measuring or scanning instruments may be used to aid in examining the work piece, such as 3D scanners, laser scanners, etc.
- the method may include designing one or more simulated external clamp blocks that may form to the contours of external surfaces of the extrusion work piece, and designing one or more simulated internal clamp blocks that may form to the contours of the internal cavities of the extrusion work piece, if any.
- the external and internal clamp blocks may be designed so as to substantially maximize surface area contact between external surfaces of the work piece and the external clamp blocks and between internal surfaces of the work piece and the internal clamp blocks.
- the method may include conducting the computer model simulation using the designed clamp blocks, such as the simulations shown and described with reference to FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C , and analyzing the results.
- the method may include returning to step 204 to re-design the clamp blocks based on the simulation results.
- the design of the clamp blocks may be an iterative process whereby the simulated blocks may be adjusted and tested repeatedly until the clamp block design is optimized or brought within acceptable predefined parameters for a particular work piece, geometry, material type, shape, size, etc.
- machine learning or other artificial intelligence techniques may be used to identify the optimal design for and number of the clamp blocks based on the geometry of the particular work piece, material type, application, etc.
- a database of work piece geometry may be compiled or drawn upon with corresponding simulation results and/or real-world testing results associated with particular shapes of clamp blocks.
- a machine learning algorithm may further refine the optimal shapes for use with particular work piece geometries, and improved clamp block shapes may be suggested.
- the method may include fabricating or otherwise creating the modeled clamp blocks for use in the clamping system. It is contemplated herein that one of a variety of suitable fabrication methods may be used to create the clamp blocks, such as die casting, sand casting, milling, forging, injection molding, etc.
- the clamp blocks may include pinholes or other mechanisms for establishing a mechanical connection with the clamps of the clamping system.
- the method may include installing the clamp blocks onto the clamps of the clamping system, such as by fitting the pinholes onto pins on the hydraulic clamps, and/or inserting internal clamp blocks into internal cavities of the work piece, if any.
- the method may include securing the work piece in the clamp blocks and applying corrections to the work piece to bring the work piece dimensions within desired tolerances.
- the method may include testing the work piece to determine whether certain predetermined parameters regarding tolerance, stretch, strain, twist, or other properties are within predetermined thresholds. For example, some testing may include measuring the dimensions of the work piece to confirm that those dimensions meet the desired tolerances for the particular work piece design and/or customer or application limitations. Some testing may include measuring the work piece's stress, strain, and deformation, for example, to determine that the levels and distribution of such parameters may be within predetermined thresholds.
- the method may include refining the clamp block design in view of the work piece geometry and any shortcomings identified in the testing step. Additional simulations may then be run at 206 with the redefined clamp block design in a similar manner as described above.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Extrusion Of Metal (AREA)
Abstract
A method for work piece correction including providing a work piece and analyzing its geometry. Based on the analysis, the method includes determining an initial design of simulated clamp blocks and conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of work piece correction using the initial design. The method includes determining whether the initial computer-simulated analysis meets predetermined performance criteria and iteratively repeating additional computer-simulated analyses using additional designs until a final clamp block design produces results that meet predetermined performance criteria. The method includes forming clamp blocks based on the final clamp block design, installing the clamp blocks into clamps of a clamping system, and applying extrusion corrections to the work piece.
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/149,843, filed Feb. 16, 2021, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
- The present disclosure relates generally to the field of metal extrusion.
- The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. The work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
- Some extrusion applications, such as automotive applications, may require relatively strict tolerances, such as bow and twist tolerances, for substantially complex, multi-void structural extrusions. Traditional extrusion process capabilities may not be capable of meeting certain tolerance requirements. Failure to meet tolerance requirements may result in increased scrap material and higher part costs and/or loss of business altogether due to lack of capabilities. Some traditional correction methods may be cost prohibitive, particularly at high part volumes.
- The following presents a simplified summary of the present disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosure. This summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure. It is not intended to identify key or critical elements of the disclosure or to delineate the scope of the disclosure. The following summary merely presents some concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description provided below.
- In an embodiment, the disclosure describes a method for work piece correction. The method may include providing a work piece and analyzing a geometry of the work piece. Based on the analysis of the geometry of the work piece, the method may include determining an initial design of one or more simulated clamp blocks, and conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of work piece correction using the initial design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks. The method may include determining whether results of the initial computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria. The method may include iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analysis until a final clamp block design produce results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria. Based on the results of the computer-simulated analysis meeting the predetermined performance criteria, the method may include manufacturing one or more clamp blocks based on the final clamp block design. The method may include installing the one or more clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system and applying one or more extrusion corrections to the work piece.
- In another embodiment, the disclosure describes a method for fabricating an aluminum alloy work piece. The method may include analyzing a geometry of a work piece design. Based on the analysis of the geometry of the work piece design, the method may include determining a clamp block design of one or more simulated clamp blocks and conducting a computer-simulated analysis of an extrusion correction using the clamp block design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks. The method may include determining whether results of the computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria. The method may include extruding an aluminum alloy work piece based on the work piece design and manufacturing one or more clamp blocks based on the clamp block design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks. The method may include installing the one or more clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system, installing the extruded aluminum alloy work piece into the clamping system, and applying one or more extrusion corrections to the extruded aluminum alloy work piece.
- In another embodiment, the disclosure describes a method of correcting an extruded aluminium alloy work piece. The method may include analyzing a geometry of the extruded aluminum alloy work piece, wherein the extruded aluminum alloy work piece may include one or more internal cavities and an exterior surface. Based on the analysis of the geometry of the extruded aluminum alloy work piece, the method may include determining an initial design of one or more simulated internal clamp blocks configured to be received within at least one of the one or more internal cavities and one or more simulated external clamp blocks each configured to abut at least a portion of the exterior surface. The method may include conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of an extrusion correction using the initial design of the one or more simulated internal clamp blocks and the one or more simulated external clamp blocks, and determining whether results of the initial computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria. The method may include iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated internal clamp blocks and one or more simulated external clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analyses until a final internal clamp block design and external clamp block design produce results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria. Based on the results of the computer-simulated analysis meeting the predetermined performance criteria, the method may include manufacturing one or more internal clamp blocks based on the final internal clamp block design and one or more external clam blocks based on the final external clamp block design. The method may include installing the one or more external clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system, loading the extruded aluminum alloy work piece into the clamping system such that the internal clamp blocks are disposed within the one or more internal cavities, and applying one or more extrusion corrections to the extruded aluminum work piece.
- Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments are described in reference to the following drawings. In the drawings, like reference numerals refer to like parts through all the various figures unless otherwise specified.
- For a better understanding of the present disclosure, a reference will be made to the following detailed description, which is to be read in association with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1A shows a front perspective view of an embodiment of a clamping system in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 1B shows a rear elevation view of the clamping system ofFIG. 1A ; -
FIG. 2A shows perspective view of an embodiment of external clamp blocks installed in an example clamping system holding an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 2B shows a perspective view of an embodiment of internal clamp blocks installed in an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 3A shows an embodiment external clamp blocks installed in an example clamping system holding an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 3B shows an embodiment internal clamp blocks installed in an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 4A shows an embodiment of a finite element mesh used for a computer-simulated analysis applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 4B shows an embodiment of a computer-simulated analysis displacement output applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 4C shows an embodiment of a computer-simulated analysis stress output applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; -
FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a computer-simulated analysis reaction torque output applied to an example work piece in accordance with the disclosure; and -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method of work piece correction in accordance with the disclosure. - Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity so not all connections and options have been shown to avoid obscuring the inventive aspects. For example, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are not often depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be further appreciated that certain actions and/or steps may be described or depicted in a particular order of occurrence while those skilled in the art will understand that such specificity with respect to sequence is not actually required. It will also be understood that the terms and expressions used herein are to be defined with respect to their corresponding respective areas of inquiry and study except where specific meaning have otherwise been set forth herein.
- The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and which show, by way of illustration, specific exemplary embodiments by which the invention may be practiced. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Among other things, the present invention may be embodied as methods or devices. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
- Throughout the specification and claims, the following terms take the meanings explicitly associated herein, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The phrase “in one embodiment” as used herein does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, although it may. Furthermore, the phrase “in another embodiment” as used herein does not necessarily refer to a different embodiment, although it may. Thus, as described below, various embodiments of the invention may be readily combined, without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
- In addition, as used herein, the term “or” is an inclusive “or” operator, and is equivalent to the term “and/or,” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “based on” is not exclusive and allows for being based on additional factors not described, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. In addition, throughout the specification, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references. The meaning of “in” includes “in” and includes plural references. The meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on.”
- The present disclosure describes, in some embodiments, using a unique end-clamping method to correct dimensions and geometries of extruded parts. In some embodiments, the disclosed method may be implemented along with hydraulically driven cylinders to mechanically form (e.g., stretch and/or twist) extrusions resulting in a repeatable and low cost forming method. In some embodiments, the method may help increase accuracy of a part's dimensions and may bring the dimensions of certain extrusions within desired tolerance requirements. This method may be also be used in particularly complex and/or large extrusions that may be used in automotive applications, for example, or other applications that may benefit from relatively large extruded parts with relatively tight tolerances and/or relatively high volumes. Thus, in some embodiments, the disclosure may describe a mechanical calibration and/or correction method that may be applied after an extrusion process to achieve the desired tolerances. In some embodiments, the method may also provide advantages for correcting complex, multi-void structural extrusions.
- Other advantages of the disclosed system and methods may include providing precise correction and/or calibration of extruded components in line with the expectations of particular industries or applications, such as the automotive industry. The disclosed system and methods may include efficiencies that will be evident to those skilled in the art, and may accordingly provide for lower costs as compared to traditional methods of providing precision components for certain applications, such as automotive applications.
- In some embodiments, the disclosed extrusion correction method may be performed using a clamping system such as that shown in
FIGS. 1A and 1B . Aclamping system 50 may be used along with these methods to hold and alter an extrudedwork piece 52. In some embodiments, theclamping system 50 may have a firsthydraulic clamp 60 that may grip a first work piece end 54 and a secondhydraulic clamp 62 that may grip a secondwork piece end 56. The first andsecond clamps more base 58. In some embodiments, theextrusion work piece 52 may have substantially any length, but in certain embodiments may have a length between about 2,500 mm and about 3,500 mm, or of about 3,000 mm in certain embodiments. In some embodiments, the components of theclamping system 50 may be sized so as to accommodate the extrusion size. For example, in some embodiments, thebase 58 may be between about 4,500 mm and about 6,000 mm in length, or about 5,300 mm in length in other embodiments. In some embodiments, each of the first andsecond clamps clamping system 50 and the methods disclosed herein may be used for extrusion work pieces having various lengths, thicknesses, weights, and interior and exterior dimensions. In some embodiments, hydraulics may be used in the clamps to extend, compress, twist, or rotate theextrusion work piece 52 as needed to attain the desired dimensions or characteristics. Additionally, although the disclosure describes extrusions and work pieces produced via extrusion, those skilled in the art will recognize that the techniques described herein may be used with work parts produced via other manufacturing processes, such as casting, injection molding, sand casting, die casting, etc. - In some embodiments, the
clamping system 50 may include a plurality of internal and external clamp blocks or that may make up a “clamp block set” that may interface with theextrusion work piece 52 as shown inFIGS. 2A and 2B . For each particular extrusion or other work piece geometry, a set of external clamp blocks 70 and internal clamp blocks 72 may be designed and created. In some embodiments, the clamp block set may be unique to each individual work piece that is formed, or unique to a run of work pieces created to the same specifications and/or dimensions. In some embodiments, it is contemplated that a clamp block set may be created based on the unique geometry of an extrusion work piece that a user may expect to produce at relatively high volumes. The same or similar clamp block set may then be used repeatedly for each extrusion work piece produced sharing that geometry. In such a manner, a volume of extruded work pieces may be created in view of the desired tolerances so as to produce consistent parts with the desired dimensions. - In some embodiments, the clamp block set 70, 72 may act to transfer tension, torque, and/or moments into the extruded
work piece 52 and apply substantially consistent stress and strain across the entirety of extrusion while the part may be twisted or otherwise manipulated to correct its dimensions. The position, size, and shape of the internal and external clamp blocks 70, 72, may help assure that the yield strength limit of the extruded material may be met through the entire length and cross section of theextrusion work piece 52. The internal andexternal blocks work piece 52 may be allowed to locally deform, such as in cross section or along the part's length, which may be undesirable in certain applications. In some embodiments, a set of both the external clamp blocks 70 and internal clamp blocks 72 may be removably disposed in thefirst clamp 60 and thesecond clamp 62. -
FIG. 3A shows an embodiment of an example set of external clamp blocks 70 andFIG. 3B shows an example set of internal clamp blocks 72 that may be used for exampleextrusion work piece 52. The example set of external clamp blocks 70 inFIG. 3A may be designed and shaped specifically based on the geometry of the exampleextrusion work piece 52. For example, the shape andcontours 71 of the external clamp blocks 70 may be formed so as to generally follow the contours of the external surface of theextrusion work piece 52 and contact a relatively large portion of the surface area around the first and second ends 54, 56 of theextrusion 52. In some embodiments, such a contour following the geometry of external clamping may help maximize the uniformity of pressure applied across each portion of theextrusion work piece 52 when theclamping system 50 applies force to twist, stretch, or otherwise adjust the work piece. In some embodiments, the external clamp blocks 70 may each be configured for removable connection to respective portions of thefirst clamp 60 and/orsecond clamp 62, such as usingpins 73, bolts, or other suitable coupling mechanisms. In some embodiments, unique sets of external clamp blocks 70 may be designed for each work piece design so as to follow the contours of the particular work piece profile. - Referring to
FIG. 3B , the example set of internal clamp blocks 72 is shown disposed within internal cavities of the exampleextrusion work piece 52. In some embodiments, the internal clamp blocks 72 may be designed and formed to fitinterior surfaces 75 of one or more interior cavities formed in theextrusion work piece 52. The shape of the internal clamp blocks 72 may provide for the blocks to contact a relatively large proportion of theinterior surface 75 area of theextrusion work piece 52. Similar to the external clamp blocks 70, the contour-following shape of the internal clamp blocks 72 may help maximize the uniformity of pressure applied across each portion of theextrusion work piece 52 when theclamping system 50 applies force to twist, stretch, or otherwise adjust the work piece. In some embodiments, the internal clamp blocks 72 may include one ormore pinholes 74 that may allow pins on each of the first andsecond clamps - In some embodiments, the design, shape, and size of the external and internal clamp blocks 70, 72 and their locations with respect to the
extrusion work piece 52 may be determined using computational modelling. For example, the geometry of theblocks work piece 52, and their interface with one another may be modelled and a mesh may be applied for finite element analysis. In some embodiments, material properties of theblocks work piece 52 may be input into the model for use during the analysis. Axial tension, rotational torque, and moments may be applied within the model, which may result in an output of the extruded work piece's stress, strain, and deformation.FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C show an example of the stress, strain, and deformation outputs as applied to an exampleextrusion work piece 52. In this example, the clamping of the first and second ends of a simulated extrusion work piece may be simulated and tested with inner “fixed” support (i.e., internal clamp blocks) and external clamp blocks.FIG. 4A shows the output of an embodiment of a finite element mesh used for computer simulated analysis.FIG. 4B shows the output of an embodiment of a computer-simulated displacement analysis, andFIG. 4C shows the output of an embodiment of a computer-simulated stress analysis. The simulations shown inFIG. 4 indicate even twist calibration over the entire profile length of the simulated extrusion work piece, and identify process parameters and forces. Additionally, the yield limit was reached over the entire profile length and cross section. During the modelling process, one or more modelling iterations may be used until the clamp block design, shape, and placement may optimized to achieve the correct or nearest to correct formed geometry of the extruded work piece, both for external clamp blocks and internal clamp blocks. Computational modelling may also predict various machine process parameters including maximum torque and maximum tension to aid with machine design and specifications. -
FIG. 5 shows a sample of a computer-simulated analysis reaction torque output. The graph shows reaction torque versus twist angle in a simulated extrusion work piece that may be used to identify optimal clamp block geometry and locations. In the illustrated example, the profile length of the simulated extrusion work piece may have been about 3,000 mm, made from an alloy with T4S temper aged to 95-100 Mpa yield strength. The maximum simulated twist momentum was about 15,000 Nm, and the maximum stretch force was about 400 kN. In some embodiments, the extrusion work piece or profiles may be pre-stretched after extrusion, and, in some embodiments, during correction the profiles may not be stretched more than about 0.5%. - In one example use of the disclosed system, a 6xxx aluminium alloy profile was measured for stability of spring back and other parameters. The work piece was twisted to 2 degrees nominal and 0.8% lineal stretch. In the test, the work piece exhibited consistent axial and torsional spring back, and consistent linear deformation over the length, which confirmed prior computer simulation analysis, such as the analysis shown and described in
FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C . This example indicated that a tolerance of plus or minus 0.45 degrees may be achievable, which may be within 0.50 degree tolerances over 3,000 mm, which that may be desired in some applications. Accordingly, the system and methods disclosed herein may represent an improvement of up to or exceeding 6 times tighter tolerances than traditional extrusion. - In some embodiments, the detailed clamp block geometry may be specific to each component, but may generally contain several consistent features. The clamp blocks may generally be made from steel, aluminium, or composite material, but other suitable materials may be used in other embodiments. As described above, the clamp blocks may be formed to include machined or extruded surface contours to match the extrusion work piece being corrected. In some embodiments, the clamp blocks may include lead-in chamfers for ease of assembly. For example, in some embodiments, the edges of the internal clamp blocks may be chamfered to provide for easier insertion into the internal cavities of the work piece. As shown in the figures, in some embodiments, the external and internal clamp blocks may include pinholes or otherwise be tapped, dovetailed, etc., to provide for removable mechanical joining of the clamp blocks to each respective clamp in the clamping system. In some embodiments, the clamp blocks may include a series of serrated surfaces to aid in gripping the extrusion work piece to apply tension, moments, torque, etc. For example, surfaces on the external clamp blocks that may contact surfaces of the extrusion work piece may include ridges or other serrated surfaces to provide grip. In some embodiments, the clamp blocks may include tapered sides that may allow for a taper locking mechanism to removably secure the clamp blocks to the clamps. In some embodiments, the clamp blocks may be made from single piece or multi-piece construction, or a combination of both. In some embodiments, multi-piece construction may serve as a collapsing mandrel for ease of disengaging from the extrusion work piece after manipulation of the work piece may be completed.
-
FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of an embodiment ofmethod 200 of using the disclosed extrusion correction system. At 202, the method may include analyzing a work piece to determine its features, geometry, and other factors. For example, a user may determine whether the extrusion work piece includes any internal cavities, and what types of corrections may be called for to bring the work piece into the desired tolerance. In some embodiments, computer or other electronic measuring or scanning instruments may be used to aid in examining the work piece, such as 3D scanners, laser scanners, etc. Based on the analysis, at 204, the method may include designing one or more simulated external clamp blocks that may form to the contours of external surfaces of the extrusion work piece, and designing one or more simulated internal clamp blocks that may form to the contours of the internal cavities of the extrusion work piece, if any. As described above, in some embodiments, the external and internal clamp blocks may be designed so as to substantially maximize surface area contact between external surfaces of the work piece and the external clamp blocks and between internal surfaces of the work piece and the internal clamp blocks. At 206, the method may include conducting the computer model simulation using the designed clamp blocks, such as the simulations shown and described with reference toFIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C , and analyzing the results. If, at 208, the output results of the simulation do not indicate desirable results, such as uniform stretch, strain, and twist across the entire length of the profile and other consistencies, the method may include returning to step 204 to re-design the clamp blocks based on the simulation results. In this way, the design of the clamp blocks may be an iterative process whereby the simulated blocks may be adjusted and tested repeatedly until the clamp block design is optimized or brought within acceptable predefined parameters for a particular work piece, geometry, material type, shape, size, etc. In some embodiments, machine learning or other artificial intelligence techniques may be used to identify the optimal design for and number of the clamp blocks based on the geometry of the particular work piece, material type, application, etc. For example, in some embodiments, a database of work piece geometry may be compiled or drawn upon with corresponding simulation results and/or real-world testing results associated with particular shapes of clamp blocks. As additional simulations and block geometries may be introduced into the database, a machine learning algorithm may further refine the optimal shapes for use with particular work piece geometries, and improved clamp block shapes may be suggested. - Once the optimal design for the clamp blocks has been identified via computer simulation, at 210, the method may include fabricating or otherwise creating the modeled clamp blocks for use in the clamping system. It is contemplated herein that one of a variety of suitable fabrication methods may be used to create the clamp blocks, such as die casting, sand casting, milling, forging, injection molding, etc. In some embodiments, the clamp blocks may include pinholes or other mechanisms for establishing a mechanical connection with the clamps of the clamping system. At 212, the method may include installing the clamp blocks onto the clamps of the clamping system, such as by fitting the pinholes onto pins on the hydraulic clamps, and/or inserting internal clamp blocks into internal cavities of the work piece, if any. At 214, the method may include securing the work piece in the clamp blocks and applying corrections to the work piece to bring the work piece dimensions within desired tolerances. In some embodiments, at 216, the method may include testing the work piece to determine whether certain predetermined parameters regarding tolerance, stretch, strain, twist, or other properties are within predetermined thresholds. For example, some testing may include measuring the dimensions of the work piece to confirm that those dimensions meet the desired tolerances for the particular work piece design and/or customer or application limitations. Some testing may include measuring the work piece's stress, strain, and deformation, for example, to determine that the levels and distribution of such parameters may be within predetermined thresholds. At 218, if the work piece does not pass one or more of these tests, the method may include refining the clamp block design in view of the work piece geometry and any shortcomings identified in the testing step. Additional simulations may then be run at 206 with the redefined clamp block design in a similar manner as described above.
- The foregoing description and drawings merely explain and illustrate the invention and the invention is not limited thereto. While the specification is described in relation to certain implementation or embodiments, many details are set forth for the purpose of illustration. Thus, the foregoing merely illustrates the principles of the invention. For example, the invention may have other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristic. The described arrangements are illustrative and not restrictive. To those skilled in the art, the invention is susceptible to additional implementations or embodiments and certain of these details described in this application may be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and, thus, within its scope and spirit.
Claims (20)
1. A method for work piece correction comprising:
providing a work piece;
analyzing a geometry of the work piece;
based on the analysis of the geometry of the work piece, determining an initial design of one or more simulated clamp blocks;
conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of work piece correction using the initial design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks;
determining whether results of the initial computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria;
iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analysis until a final clamp block design produce results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria;
based on the results of the computer-simulated analysis meeting the predetermined performance criteria, manufacturing one or more clamp blocks based on the final clamp block design;
installing the one or more clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system; and
applying one or more extrusion corrections to the work piece.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the work piece is made from an aluminum alloy.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the work piece is made using an extrusion process.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the work piece is made from a 6xxx series aluminum alloy.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the work piece has a length of at least 2,500 mm.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the work piece includes one or more internal cavities.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one simulated clamp block of the one or more simulated clamp blocks is an internal clamp block configured to be received into at least one internal cavity of the one or more internal cavities.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein at least one simulated clamp block of the one or more simulated clamp blocks is an external clamp block configured to abut at least a portion of an external surface of the work piece.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined performance criteria include at least one of stress, strain, or deformation experienced by the work piece.
10. A method for fabricating an aluminum alloy work piece, the method comprising:
analyzing a geometry of a work piece design;
based on the analysis of the geometry of the work piece design, determining a clamp block design of one or more simulated clamp blocks;
conducting a computer-simulated analysis of an extrusion correction using the clamp block design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks;
determining whether results of the computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria;
extruding an aluminum alloy work piece based on the work piece design;
manufacturing one or more clamp blocks based on the clamp block design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks;
installing the one or more clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system;
installing the extruded aluminum alloy work piece into the clamping system; and
applying one or more extrusion corrections to the extruded aluminum alloy work piece.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analyses until a final clamp block design produces results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria.
12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the work piece is made from a 6xxx series aluminum alloy.
13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the work piece has a length of at least 2,500 mm.
14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the work piece includes one or more internal cavities.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein at least one simulated clamp block of the one or more simulated clamp blocks is an internal clamp block configured to be received into at least one internal cavity of the one or more internal cavities.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein at least one simulated clamp block of the one or more simulated clamp blocks is an external clamp block configured to abut at least a portion of an external surface of the work piece.
17. The method of claim 10 , wherein the predetermined performance criteria include at least one of stress, strain, or deformation experienced by the work piece.
18. A method of correcting an extruded aluminium alloy work piece, the method comprising:
analyzing a geometry of the extruded aluminum alloy work piece, wherein the extruded aluminum alloy work piece includes one or more internal cavities and an exterior surface;
based on the analysis of the geometry of the extruded aluminum alloy work piece, determining an initial design of one or more simulated internal clamp blocks configured to be received within at least one of the one or more internal cavities and one or more simulated external clamp blocks each configured to abut at least a portion of the exterior surface;
conducting an initial computer-simulated analysis of an extrusion correction using the initial design of the one or more simulated internal clamp blocks and the one or more simulated external clamp blocks;
determining whether results of the initial computer-simulated analysis meet predetermined performance criteria;
iteratively repeating one or more additional computer-simulated analyses of the extrusion correction using at least one additional design of the one or more simulated internal clamp blocks and one or more simulated external clamp blocks based on the results of previous computer-simulated analyses until a final internal clamp block design and external clamp block design produce results of the computer-simulated analysis that meet the predetermined performance criteria;
based on the results of the computer-simulated analysis meeting the predetermined performance criteria, manufacturing one or more internal clamp blocks based on the final internal clamp block design and one or more external clam blocks based on the final external clamp block design;
installing the one or more external clamp blocks into one or more clamps of a clamping system;
loading the extruded aluminum alloy work piece into the clamping system such that the internal clamp blocks are disposed within the one or more internal cavities; and
applying one or more extrusion corrections to the extruded aluminum work piece.
19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the predetermined performance criteria include at least one of stress, strain, or deformation experienced by the work piece.
20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the initial computer-simulated analysis and the one or more additional computer simulated analyses include a finite element analysis.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/673,011 US20220258222A1 (en) | 2021-02-16 | 2022-02-16 | Systems and methods for extrusion correction |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US202163149843P | 2021-02-16 | 2021-02-16 | |
US17/673,011 US20220258222A1 (en) | 2021-02-16 | 2022-02-16 | Systems and methods for extrusion correction |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20220258222A1 true US20220258222A1 (en) | 2022-08-18 |
Family
ID=82801926
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/673,011 Pending US20220258222A1 (en) | 2021-02-16 | 2022-02-16 | Systems and methods for extrusion correction |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20220258222A1 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104668306A (en) * | 2015-03-14 | 2015-06-03 | 郑英 | Production method of ultra-large-diameter thin-walled pressure-resistant aluminum alloy pipe |
CN104874645A (en) * | 2015-06-23 | 2015-09-02 | 湖州巨力铝型材有限公司 | Aluminum profile straightening machine |
US20190091745A1 (en) * | 2017-09-22 | 2019-03-28 | Audi Ag | Method and tool for calibration of a hollow profile component produced by extrusion for automobile manufacturing |
CN109670271A (en) * | 2019-01-15 | 2019-04-23 | 上海交通大学 | The straightening method of large thin-wall stiffened panel based on the forming of sensitive spot multi-point incremental |
-
2022
- 2022-02-16 US US17/673,011 patent/US20220258222A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104668306A (en) * | 2015-03-14 | 2015-06-03 | 郑英 | Production method of ultra-large-diameter thin-walled pressure-resistant aluminum alloy pipe |
CN104874645A (en) * | 2015-06-23 | 2015-09-02 | 湖州巨力铝型材有限公司 | Aluminum profile straightening machine |
US20190091745A1 (en) * | 2017-09-22 | 2019-03-28 | Audi Ag | Method and tool for calibration of a hollow profile component produced by extrusion for automobile manufacturing |
CN109670271A (en) * | 2019-01-15 | 2019-04-23 | 上海交通大学 | The straightening method of large thin-wall stiffened panel based on the forming of sensitive spot multi-point incremental |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20190242373A1 (en) | Fluid End for a Pump | |
JP2020046184A (en) | Stress-strain relationship estimation method | |
Keller et al. | Force-controlled adjustment of car body fixtures–verification and performance of the new approach | |
US20220258222A1 (en) | Systems and methods for extrusion correction | |
Nikiforov et al. | Numerical simulation of residual stresses in linear friction welded joints | |
JP7513889B2 (en) | Method for calculating stress intensity factor and method for evaluating fatigue strength | |
Ulrich et al. | An enhanced design method for 3D contact surfaces on shaft–hub connections joined through lateral extrusion | |
Van de Velde et al. | Towards best practice in numerical simulation of blind rivet nut installation | |
CN113642129B (en) | Workpiece correction load rapid application and deformation finite element acquisition method | |
KR100402923B1 (en) | Measurement process for determining the biaxial deformation behavior of metal materials, particularly sheet metal | |
Watts | Flaw tolerance of octet truss lattices with random flaws | |
JP7003790B2 (en) | Test piece, test piece manufacturing method, and test method | |
Adrian et al. | Curating Datasets of Flexible Assemblies to Predict Spring-Back Behavior for Machine Learning Purposes | |
Müller et al. | Joining by die-less hydroforming of profiles with oval cross section | |
Litrop et al. | Design of a shear test fixture system and optimization of a metal shear specimen for cyclic loading | |
Bormida | New equation for the resilience of the clamped part in bolted joint | |
CN117892599B (en) | Expansion method of ribbed cylinder piece and application thereof | |
Konrad et al. | Influence of Geometrical Shapes and Sheet Thicknesses on the Dimensional Accuracy of Single and Assembled Parts | |
Scherzer et al. | Simulation of the Presta process–Transfer of deformation history | |
CN115186534A (en) | Nonlinear correction weld fatigue parameter acquisition method | |
CN117494530B (en) | Sheet drilling jig layout optimization method based on improved wolf algorithm | |
CN116246741A (en) | Novel stress gradient characterization and verification method | |
Ma et al. | Development and Applications of Simulation System JSTAMP/NV for Tube Hydro‐Forming | |
Lipski et al. | Evaluation of the river hole sizing degree effect on the fatigue life | |
Payganeh et al. | Finite element comparison of single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HYDRO EXTRUSION USA, LLC., ILLINOIS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:TOZIER, MIKE;FALK, CONNY;NICKOLOPOULOS, NATHAN;SIGNING DATES FROM 20220214 TO 20220216;REEL/FRAME:059046/0193 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |