US20220161320A1 - Device for Preventing Ingress of Floating Matter on Free Surfaces of Ladle and Tundish During Continuous Casting Process - Google Patents
Device for Preventing Ingress of Floating Matter on Free Surfaces of Ladle and Tundish During Continuous Casting Process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20220161320A1 US20220161320A1 US17/434,851 US202017434851A US2022161320A1 US 20220161320 A1 US20220161320 A1 US 20220161320A1 US 202017434851 A US202017434851 A US 202017434851A US 2022161320 A1 US2022161320 A1 US 2022161320A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- plate
- discharge port
- ladle
- tundish
- radius
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22D—CASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
- B22D11/00—Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
- B22D11/10—Supplying or treating molten metal
- B22D11/103—Distributing the molten metal, e.g. using runners, floats, distributors
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22D—CASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
- B22D41/00—Casting melt-holding vessels, e.g. ladles, tundishes, cups or the like
- B22D41/08—Casting melt-holding vessels, e.g. ladles, tundishes, cups or the like for bottom pouring
Definitions
- the following description relates to a device for preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process.
- Dimples are often found on a free surface when liquid in a container is drained or suctioned through a narrow port.
- a swirling flow is caused by the Coriolis effect or external disturbance in the container, the dimple develops rapidly in a vertical direction, and reaches a discharge port or pump inlet.
- Such dimple penetration is called an air-core phenomenon.
- the air-core phenomenon during a liquid draining process results in serious problems for many industrial devices.
- the air-core phenomenon generated by a swirling flow in a liquid propellant tank causes fluctuations in a fuel supply rate. Since an effective drainage area occupied by a fluid in a liquid phase is narrowed due to an air core, the fuel supply rate may be significantly reduced by the air-core phenomenon.
- an air core may be created by a swirling flow initiated by the operation of a pump. Air entrained in the pump may cause cavitation on pump blades, a reduction in pump efficiency, vibration, and noise.
- a slag floating on a molten metal may be entrained as a slab due to the air-core phenomenon, which results in significant quality defects in steel products. Therefore, many studies have been made to prevent such an air-core phenomenon.
- Korean Patent Application Publication No. 10-2011-0028023 discloses a device for preventing a vortex of a molten steel in a tundish.
- An aspect provides a device for preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process.
- a device for preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish the ladle and the tundish each having a discharge port, during a continuous casting process the device configured for installation at the discharge ports of the ladle and the tundish, and including a disc-shaped plate, and a support part installed at the plate and configured to support the plate on a surface around each of the discharge ports of the ladle and the tundish.
- Each of a ratio of a width of the plate to a radius of the discharge port of the ladle and a ratio of the width of the plate to a radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value equal to or greater than 1.
- Each of the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle and the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value equal to or greater than 2.
- Each of the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle and the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value less than or equal to 8.
- Each of the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle and the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value less than or equal to 4.
- a ratio of a distance between surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle or a ratio of the distance between the surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value equal to or greater than 2.
- the ratio of the distance between the surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle or the ratio of the distance between the surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value less than or equal to 4.
- the support part may include a plurality of protruding elements protruding from the plate.
- the plurality of protruding elements may be arranged to be spaced apart from each other in a circumferential direction with respect to a central portion of the plate.
- the device according to an aspect may prevent ingress of float matter on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a continuous casting process system including a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective diagram illustrating a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a state in which a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment is installed.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating experimental equipment used to prove a technical effect of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a height of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment of FIG. 4 .
- FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a width of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment of FIG. 4 .
- FIGS. 7A to 7C are graphs illustrating elapsed times of a water-air interface during drainage derived using the experimental equipment of FIG. 4 , wherein FIG. 7A is a graph when there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters, FIG. 7B is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 15 mm and a height of 10 mm, and FIG. 7C is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 30 mm and a height of 20 mm.
- first, second, A, B, (a), (b), and the like may be used herein to describe components of the example embodiments. These terms are only used to distinguish one component from another component, and essential, order, or sequence of corresponding components are not limited by these terms. It will be understood that when one component is referred to as being “connected to”, “coupled to”, or “linked to” another component, one component may be “connected to”, “coupled to”, or “linked to” another component via a further component although one component may be directly connected to or directly linked to another component.
- a component included in any one example embodiment and another component including a function in common with that of the component will be described using the same designation in other example embodiments. Unless otherwise indicated, a description of one example embodiment may be applied to other example embodiments, and a detailed description will be omitted in an overlapping range.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a continuous casting process system including a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment.
- a continuous casting process system 10 may include a ladle 110 , a tundish 120 , a casting mold 130 , and a device 140 that suppresses a swirling flow generated in the ladle 110 and the tundish 120 to prevent ingress (or entrainment) of floating matters on a free surface of the ladle 110 and a free surface of the tundish 120 into the casting mold 130 .
- a first shroud 114 may be installed between the ladle 110 and the tundish 120
- a second shroud 124 may be installed between the tundish 120 and the casting mold 130 .
- a first valve 116 that opens and closes a flow of a fluid on a flow path from the ladle 110 to the tundish 120 may be installed on the first shroud 114 .
- a second valve 126 that opens and closes a flow of a fluid on a flow path from the tundish 120 to the casting mold 130 may be installed on the second shroud 124 .
- Devices for preventing ingress of floating matters 140 may be installed on a bottom surface of the ladle 110 and a bottom surface of the tundish 120 so as to be respectively adjacent to a discharge port 112 of the ladle 110 and a discharge port 122 of the tundish 120 .
- Taylor vortex plays an important role in concentrating an axial momentum initiated by draining a fluid to a central portion of each of the ladle 110 and the tundish 120 , and the strong axial momentum of the ladle 110 and the tundish 120 helps the growth of the Taylor vortex.
- the devices for preventing ingress of floating matters 140 that are respectively positioned adjacent (or directly) to the discharge ports 112 and 122 help to effectively block an interaction between the Taylor vortex and the axial momentum.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective diagram illustrating a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment
- FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a state in which the device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment is installed.
- the device for preventing ingress of floating matters 140 may include a plate 142 and a support part 144 .
- the plate 142 may have a shape suitable for effectively retarding the generation of an air core.
- the plate 142 may have a disk shape such as a circle, an ellipse or several polygons.
- the support part 144 is configured to support the plate 142 on a bottom surface 51 of the ladle 110 , in particular, the surface 51 around the discharge port 112 of the ladle 110 .
- the support part 144 is configured to support the plate 142 on a bottom surface of a tundish, in particular, a surface around a discharge port of the tundish.
- the support part 144 may include a plurality of protruding elements 1441 .
- the plurality of protruding elements 1441 may protrude from a lower surface of the plate 142 .
- the plurality of protruding elements 1441 may have a cylindrical shape.
- the plurality of protruding elements 1441 may be arranged to be spaced apart from each other in a circumferential direction with respect to a central portion of the plate 142 .
- the plurality of protruding elements 1441 may be arranged in a matrix form on the lower surface of the plate 142 .
- a descending pattern of a fluid may depend on a width 2 R of the plate 142 .
- the descending pattern of the fluid may depend on a ratio of the width 2 R of the plate 142 to a width 2 r of the discharge port 112 .
- the descending pattern of the fluid may not depend on a distance h between the plate 142 and the surface S 1 .
- a height of the plate 142 from the surface S 1 may not affect the descending pattern of the fluid.
- FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating experimental equipment used to prove a technical effect of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment.
- FIG. 4 the experimental equipment used for a liquid drainage experiment is illustrated in order to prove the technical effect of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment.
- Air and water in a set ratio were contained inside a tank T.
- a discharge port was formed at the bottom of the tank T.
- a width of the discharge port was set to 10 mm, that is, a radius of the discharge port was set to 5 mm.
- a width of the tank T was set to 90 mm
- a height of the water contained in the tank T was set to 250 mm from the bottom
- a height of an air layer was set to 100 mm from a free surface of the water.
- the free surface was implemented by removing an upper cover of the tank T.
- a motor M was connected to a shaft S connected to the tank T with a belt B, and the motor M was driven to rotate the tank T.
- a CCD camera C acquired an image of the water contained in the tank T at a rate of 20 frames per second. A level of a liquid over time was measured by a computer P based on the image received from the CCD camera C.
- the device for preventing ingress of floating matters was placed adjacent to the discharge port of the tank as a prototype.
- FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a height of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment of FIG. 4 .
- a graph illustrates a comparison according to the presence or absence of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters and a comparison according to a height of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters having a consistent width.
- Rot means the rotation of a tank
- SUPp means the device for preventing ingress of floating matters. Therefore, “No Rot” means that there is no rotation of the tank, and “No Supp” means that there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters.
- the time required for the water from the tank to be completely drained was about 21 seconds.
- FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a width of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment of FIG. 4 .
- a graph illustrates a comparison according to the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters spaced apart from the bottom surface of the tank at a consistent height.
- width means a maximum length in a horizontal direction of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters. Therefore, when the device for preventing ingress of floating matters has a circular disk shape, “width” may also be interpreted as “diameter”.
- the device has a width of 5 mm, that is, the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters is relatively small compared to a radius of 5 mm of a discharge port, a water level descended at a significantly rapid rate for first about 4 seconds.
- the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters increased relative to the radius of the discharge port of the tank, a sudden change in the water level during the initial drainage disappeared, and an initial descent rate of the water level significantly decreased.
- FIGS. 7A to 7C are graphs illustrating elapsed times of a water-air interface during drainage derived using the experimental equipment of FIG. 4 , wherein FIG. 7A is a graph when there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters, FIG. 7B is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 15 mm and a height of 10 mm, and FIG. 7C is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 30 mm and a height of 20 mm.
- FIGS. 7A to 7C in the case of FIG. 7A , it was confirmed that a dimple generated by the rotation of a tank was rapidly suctioned into a discharge port at about 3 seconds. During draining time, an air core remained. An air phase partially occupies a cross section of the discharge port, and thus a drain flow rate of water started to decrease after the generation of the air core.
- the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters is in an appropriate range, it is possible to effectively retard the generation of the air core, and it can be confirmed that it is advantageous in terms of the draining rate and complete draining time of a fluid.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Continuous Casting (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The following description relates to a device for preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process.
- Dimples are often found on a free surface when liquid in a container is drained or suctioned through a narrow port. When a swirling flow is caused by the Coriolis effect or external disturbance in the container, the dimple develops rapidly in a vertical direction, and reaches a discharge port or pump inlet. Such dimple penetration is called an air-core phenomenon. The air-core phenomenon during a liquid draining process results in serious problems for many industrial devices. For example, the air-core phenomenon generated by a swirling flow in a liquid propellant tank causes fluctuations in a fuel supply rate. Since an effective drainage area occupied by a fluid in a liquid phase is narrowed due to an air core, the fuel supply rate may be significantly reduced by the air-core phenomenon. In a sump pump station, an air core may be created by a swirling flow initiated by the operation of a pump. Air entrained in the pump may cause cavitation on pump blades, a reduction in pump efficiency, vibration, and noise. In addition, according to a tundish discharging process in a continuous casting process, a slag floating on a molten metal may be entrained as a slab due to the air-core phenomenon, which results in significant quality defects in steel products. Therefore, many studies have been made to prevent such an air-core phenomenon. For example, Korean Patent Application Publication No. 10-2011-0028023 discloses a device for preventing a vortex of a molten steel in a tundish.
- An aspect provides a device for preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process.
- According to an aspect, there is provided a device for preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish, the ladle and the tundish each having a discharge port, during a continuous casting process the device configured for installation at the discharge ports of the ladle and the tundish, and including a disc-shaped plate, and a support part installed at the plate and configured to support the plate on a surface around each of the discharge ports of the ladle and the tundish. Each of a ratio of a width of the plate to a radius of the discharge port of the ladle and a ratio of the width of the plate to a radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value equal to or greater than 1.
- Each of the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle and the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value equal to or greater than 2.
- Each of the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle and the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value less than or equal to 8.
- Each of the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle and the ratio of the width of the plate to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value less than or equal to 4.
- A ratio of a distance between surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle or a ratio of the distance between the surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value equal to or greater than 2.
- The ratio of the distance between the surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the ladle or the ratio of the distance between the surfaces around the plate and the discharge port to the radius of the discharge port of the tundish may have a value less than or equal to 4.
- The support part may include a plurality of protruding elements protruding from the plate.
- The plurality of protruding elements may be arranged to be spaced apart from each other in a circumferential direction with respect to a central portion of the plate.
- The device according to an aspect may prevent ingress of float matter on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process.
- The effect of preventing ingress of floating matters on free surfaces of a ladle and a tundish during a continuous casting process of the device according to an aspect is not limited to those mentioned above, and other effects not mentioned can be clearly understood to those skilled in the art from the description below.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a continuous casting process system including a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment. -
FIG. 2 is a perspective diagram illustrating a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a state in which a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment is installed. -
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating experimental equipment used to prove a technical effect of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment. -
FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a height of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment ofFIG. 4 . -
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a width of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment ofFIG. 4 . -
FIGS. 7A to 7C are graphs illustrating elapsed times of a water-air interface during drainage derived using the experimental equipment ofFIG. 4 , whereinFIG. 7A is a graph when there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters,FIG. 7B is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 15 mm and a height of 10 mm, andFIG. 7C is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 30 mm and a height of 20 mm. - Hereinafter, example embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the illustrative drawings. Regarding reference numerals assigned to components in each drawing, it should be noted that the same components will be designated by the same reference numerals, wherever possible, even though they are illustrated in different drawings. In addition, in the description of the example embodiments, detailed description of well-known related configurations or functions will be omitted when it is deemed that such description interferes with the understanding of the example embodiments.
- In addition, terms such as first, second, A, B, (a), (b), and the like may be used herein to describe components of the example embodiments. These terms are only used to distinguish one component from another component, and essential, order, or sequence of corresponding components are not limited by these terms. It will be understood that when one component is referred to as being “connected to”, “coupled to”, or “linked to” another component, one component may be “connected to”, “coupled to”, or “linked to” another component via a further component although one component may be directly connected to or directly linked to another component.
- A component included in any one example embodiment and another component including a function in common with that of the component will be described using the same designation in other example embodiments. Unless otherwise indicated, a description of one example embodiment may be applied to other example embodiments, and a detailed description will be omitted in an overlapping range.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a continuous casting process system including a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment. - Referring to
FIG. 1 , a continuouscasting process system 10 according to an example embodiment may include aladle 110, atundish 120, a castingmold 130, and adevice 140 that suppresses a swirling flow generated in theladle 110 and thetundish 120 to prevent ingress (or entrainment) of floating matters on a free surface of theladle 110 and a free surface of thetundish 120 into the castingmold 130. Afirst shroud 114 may be installed between theladle 110 and thetundish 120, and asecond shroud 124 may be installed between thetundish 120 and the castingmold 130. Afirst valve 116 that opens and closes a flow of a fluid on a flow path from theladle 110 to thetundish 120 may be installed on thefirst shroud 114. Asecond valve 126 that opens and closes a flow of a fluid on a flow path from thetundish 120 to the castingmold 130 may be installed on thesecond shroud 124. - Devices for preventing ingress of floating
matters 140 may be installed on a bottom surface of theladle 110 and a bottom surface of thetundish 120 so as to be respectively adjacent to adischarge port 112 of theladle 110 and adischarge port 122 of thetundish 120. Taylor vortex plays an important role in concentrating an axial momentum initiated by draining a fluid to a central portion of each of theladle 110 and thetundish 120, and the strong axial momentum of theladle 110 and thetundish 120 helps the growth of the Taylor vortex. Thus, the devices for preventing ingress of floatingmatters 140 that are respectively positioned adjacent (or directly) to the 112 and 122 help to effectively block an interaction between the Taylor vortex and the axial momentum.discharge ports -
FIG. 2 is a perspective diagram illustrating a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment, andFIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram illustrating a state in which the device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment is installed. - Referring to
FIGS. 2 and 3 , the device for preventing ingress of floatingmatters 140 according to an example embodiment may include aplate 142 and asupport part 144. - The
plate 142 may have a shape suitable for effectively retarding the generation of an air core. For example, theplate 142 may have a disk shape such as a circle, an ellipse or several polygons. - The
support part 144 is configured to support theplate 142 on a bottom surface 51 of theladle 110, in particular, the surface 51 around thedischarge port 112 of theladle 110. In addition, although not illustrated, thesupport part 144 is configured to support theplate 142 on a bottom surface of a tundish, in particular, a surface around a discharge port of the tundish. - The
support part 144 may include a plurality ofprotruding elements 1441. The plurality ofprotruding elements 1441 may protrude from a lower surface of theplate 142. For example, the plurality ofprotruding elements 1441 may have a cylindrical shape. The plurality ofprotruding elements 1441 may be arranged to be spaced apart from each other in a circumferential direction with respect to a central portion of theplate 142. Alternatively, the plurality ofprotruding elements 1441 may be arranged in a matrix form on the lower surface of theplate 142. - In one example embodiment, a descending pattern of a fluid may depend on a
width 2R of theplate 142. In a preferred example embodiment, the descending pattern of the fluid may depend on a ratio of thewidth 2R of theplate 142 to awidth 2 r of thedischarge port 112. - In one example embodiment, the descending pattern of the fluid may not depend on a distance h between the
plate 142 and the surface S1. In other words, a height of theplate 142 from the surface S1 may not affect the descending pattern of the fluid. -
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating experimental equipment used to prove a technical effect of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment. - Referring to
FIG. 4 , the experimental equipment used for a liquid drainage experiment is illustrated in order to prove the technical effect of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters according to an example embodiment. Air and water in a set ratio were contained inside a tank T. At this time, a discharge port was formed at the bottom of the tank T. For numerical analysis, a width of the discharge port was set to 10 mm, that is, a radius of the discharge port was set to 5 mm. Then, a width of the tank T was set to 90 mm, a height of the water contained in the tank T was set to 250 mm from the bottom, and a height of an air layer was set to 100 mm from a free surface of the water. Here, the free surface was implemented by removing an upper cover of the tank T. In addition, in order to implement a swirling flow phenomenon according to the drainage of water contained in the tank T, a motor M was connected to a shaft S connected to the tank T with a belt B, and the motor M was driven to rotate the tank T. In order to capture an instantaneous fluid drainage pattern, a CCD camera C acquired an image of the water contained in the tank T at a rate of 20 frames per second. A level of a liquid over time was measured by a computer P based on the image received from the CCD camera C. Finally, the device for preventing ingress of floating matters was placed adjacent to the discharge port of the tank as a prototype. -
FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a height of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment ofFIG. 4 . - Referring to
FIG. 5 , a graph illustrates a comparison according to the presence or absence of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters and a comparison according to a height of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters having a consistent width. In the category, “Rot” means the rotation of a tank, and “Supp” means the device for preventing ingress of floating matters. Therefore, “No Rot” means that there is no rotation of the tank, and “No Supp” means that there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters. - In a first case in which there is neither rotation of the tank nor device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the time required for the water from the tank to be completely drained, that is, the complete draining time, was about 21 seconds.
- In a second case in which there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters and there is rotation of the tank, a descent rate of a water level abruptly changed about 3 seconds after the drainage started. This is due to the ingress of air into the discharge port by the generation of an air core. A drain flow rate sharply decreased after the aforementioned time (about 3 seconds). In addition, the descent rate of the water level was slowed down. When compared to the first case, the complete draining time in the second case was almost doubled.
- When there is the device for preventing ingress of floating matters, no abrupt change in the drain flow rate occurred, and the complete draining time significantly decreased relative to the second case. In addition, the instantaneous drain flow rate became more uniform over the entire draining time. This result showed that a fluid descending pattern according to the water level is not significantly affected by the height of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters.
-
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a comparison of draining times and water heights according to changes in a width of a device for preventing ingress of floating matters from a bottom surface of a tank, derived using the experimental equipment ofFIG. 4 . - Referring to
FIG. 6 , a graph illustrates a comparison according to the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters spaced apart from the bottom surface of the tank at a consistent height. Here, “width” means a maximum length in a horizontal direction of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters. Therefore, when the device for preventing ingress of floating matters has a circular disk shape, “width” may also be interpreted as “diameter”. - In the case in which a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device has a width of 5 mm, that is, the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters is relatively small compared to a radius of 5 mm of a discharge port, a water level descended at a significantly rapid rate for first about 4 seconds. As the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters increased relative to the radius of the discharge port of the tank, a sudden change in the water level during the initial drainage disappeared, and an initial descent rate of the water level significantly decreased. However, at about 17 seconds, water levels in the cases in which the device for preventing ingress of floating matters has a relatively large width (W=20 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm) exceeded water levels in the cases in which the device for preventing ingress of floating matters has a relatively small width (W=5 mm, 10 mm). As a result, despite a size of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the complete draining time decreased. This result means that when the device for preventing ingress of floating matters has a width of 20 mm or more, the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters hardly affects a descending pattern of the water level.
-
FIGS. 7A to 7C are graphs illustrating elapsed times of a water-air interface during drainage derived using the experimental equipment ofFIG. 4 , whereinFIG. 7A is a graph when there is no device for preventing ingress of floating matters,FIG. 7B is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 15 mm and a height of 10 mm, andFIG. 7C is a graph when there is a device for preventing ingress of floating matters, the device having a width of 30 mm and a height of 20 mm. - Referring to
FIGS. 7A to 7C , in the case ofFIG. 7A , it was confirmed that a dimple generated by the rotation of a tank was rapidly suctioned into a discharge port at about 3 seconds. During draining time, an air core remained. An air phase partially occupies a cross section of the discharge port, and thus a drain flow rate of water started to decrease after the generation of the air core. - In the case of
FIG. 7B and the case ofFIG. 7C , no sudden suction of the dimple occurred. A sloshing, that is, repeated up-and-down movement of a free surface, appeared in a central portion of the tank during drainage. However, when compared to the case ofFIG. 7C , the case ofFIG. 7B showed a slightly faster drop in a water level during an initial draining period. After about 4 seconds, a descent rate of the water level in the case ofFIG. 7B significantly slowed down. However, the complete draining time in the case ofFIG. 7B was longer than that in the case ofFIG. 7C . - As described above, when the width of the device for preventing ingress of floating matters is in an appropriate range, it is possible to effectively retard the generation of the air core, and it can be confirmed that it is advantageous in terms of the draining rate and complete draining time of a fluid.
- A number of example embodiments have been described above. Nevertheless, it should be understood that various modifications may be made to these example embodiments. For example, suitable results may be achieved if the described techniques are performed in a different order and/or if components in a described system, architecture, device, or circuit are combined in a different manner and/or replaced or supplemented by other components or their equivalents.
Claims (8)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020190024783A KR102184274B1 (en) | 2019-03-04 | 2019-03-04 | Apparatus for preventing entrainment of floating matters on free surfaces of ladle and tundish during continuous casting process |
| KR10-2019-0024783 | 2019-03-04 | ||
| PCT/KR2020/002941 WO2020180063A1 (en) | 2019-03-04 | 2020-03-02 | Device for preventing ingress of floating matter on free surfaces of ladle and tundish during continuous casting process |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20220161320A1 true US20220161320A1 (en) | 2022-05-26 |
Family
ID=72337092
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US17/434,851 Abandoned US20220161320A1 (en) | 2019-03-04 | 2020-03-02 | Device for Preventing Ingress of Floating Matter on Free Surfaces of Ladle and Tundish During Continuous Casting Process |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20220161320A1 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR102184274B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN114096361A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2020180063A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR102595686B1 (en) | 2023-06-22 | 2023-10-27 | 김기훈 | Apparatus for removing slag stuck to tundish cover |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5375816A (en) * | 1993-11-16 | 1994-12-27 | Wci Steel Corporation | Slag detecting device and method |
| US5382003A (en) * | 1992-12-08 | 1995-01-17 | Sankaranarayanan; Ramani | Flow control device for the suppression of vortices |
| JP2000301297A (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2000-10-31 | Akechi Ceramics Co Ltd | Tundish |
Family Cites Families (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5917501Y2 (en) * | 1980-04-23 | 1984-05-22 | 日本鋼管株式会社 | Slag entrainment prevention device for metal container tapping hole |
| JPS632539A (en) * | 1986-06-23 | 1988-01-07 | Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> | Molten metal vessel having molten metal flowing-out hole |
| JPH07124719A (en) * | 1993-11-08 | 1995-05-16 | Nippon Steel Corp | Immersion nozzle for surface homogeneous casting |
| KR100286660B1 (en) * | 1996-12-23 | 2001-05-02 | 이구택 | Apparatus for suppressing vortex inside ladle or tundish |
| KR200267443Y1 (en) * | 1997-12-16 | 2002-06-26 | 이구택 | Reduction structure of slag mixing in molten steel in steelmaking process |
| DE19959540A1 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2001-06-13 | Sms Demag Ag | Passing melt from distributor through dip tube into continuous casting mold, is facilitated by promoting swirling flow |
| KR101277171B1 (en) * | 2008-04-02 | 2013-06-19 | 주식회사 포스코 | Shroud nozzle for continuous casting |
| KR101104232B1 (en) | 2009-09-11 | 2012-01-10 | 학교법인 동의학원 | Vortex Suppressor in Tundish |
| ES2658172T3 (en) * | 2009-11-06 | 2018-03-08 | Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation | Continuous casting procedure for molten metal |
| KR101175444B1 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2012-08-20 | 현대제철 주식회사 | Bottom Structure of Ladle |
| CN101844223B (en) * | 2010-06-22 | 2011-10-12 | 重庆大学 | Structure for preventing continuous casting tundish from producing rotational flows |
| CN102398004A (en) * | 2011-11-29 | 2012-04-04 | 中冶南方工程技术有限公司 | Sliding nozzle device to prevent vortex generation |
| CN102554207A (en) * | 2012-01-17 | 2012-07-11 | 中冶南方工程技术有限公司 | Sliding water gap device capable of preventing vortex |
| JP6520592B2 (en) * | 2015-09-11 | 2019-05-29 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Continuous metal casting apparatus and continuous metal casting method |
-
2019
- 2019-03-04 KR KR1020190024783A patent/KR102184274B1/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-03-02 WO PCT/KR2020/002941 patent/WO2020180063A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2020-03-02 US US17/434,851 patent/US20220161320A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2020-03-02 CN CN202080015913.4A patent/CN114096361A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5382003A (en) * | 1992-12-08 | 1995-01-17 | Sankaranarayanan; Ramani | Flow control device for the suppression of vortices |
| US5375816A (en) * | 1993-11-16 | 1994-12-27 | Wci Steel Corporation | Slag detecting device and method |
| JP2000301297A (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2000-10-31 | Akechi Ceramics Co Ltd | Tundish |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| KR102184274B1 (en) | 2020-11-30 |
| WO2020180063A1 (en) | 2020-09-10 |
| KR20200106353A (en) | 2020-09-14 |
| CN114096361A (en) | 2022-02-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR102184274B1 (en) | Apparatus for preventing entrainment of floating matters on free surfaces of ladle and tundish during continuous casting process | |
| JP2013202570A (en) | Sand collection nozzle and sand collection nozzle device | |
| JP5812289B2 (en) | Water sealing device and dust discharging method | |
| KR101260363B1 (en) | Gravity-fed basin for discharging industrial water into a discharge water | |
| KR101434504B1 (en) | a vertical pump having a apparatus of shaft protecting | |
| KR100775336B1 (en) | Vortex Suppressor of Tundish Molten Steel | |
| KR101104232B1 (en) | Vortex Suppressor in Tundish | |
| FI121163B (en) | A submerged evaporator | |
| JP3603167B2 (en) | Water tank equipment to remove or wash sand with stored water | |
| US3307334A (en) | Gas washers having improved gas flow characteristics | |
| US6059535A (en) | Pump with air purging and self-cleaning features | |
| JPH07256221A (en) | Cleaning device | |
| KR100790254B1 (en) | Photosensitive film developing apparatus | |
| JP2008212769A (en) | Aerator | |
| US12339065B2 (en) | Pump system for transferring molten metal | |
| US20210046667A1 (en) | Liquid collection device | |
| KR101807801B1 (en) | Scum removal apparatus | |
| JP2013019119A (en) | Method of dropping sediment to water bottom using tremie pipe and device of the same | |
| SU1035072A1 (en) | Device for batch vacuum treatment of metal | |
| KR102963426B1 (en) | Substrate processing apparatus | |
| SU812313A1 (en) | Continuous-action float filter | |
| KR101149183B1 (en) | Device for preventing impurities from intruding into submerged nozzle | |
| CN110632830A (en) | Wafer lithography apparatus | |
| JP3047546U (en) | Coolant cleaning device with defoaming mechanism | |
| US8230880B2 (en) | Arrangements for pumping fluids from sumps |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KYUNGPOOK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY-ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUNDATION, KOREA, REPUBLIC OF Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PARK, IL SEOUK;SON, JONG HYEON;LEE, JONG HUI;REEL/FRAME:057326/0556 Effective date: 20210824 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |