US20210206932A1

US20210206932A1 - Activation method using modifying agent

Info

Publication number: US20210206932A1
Application number: US17/145,603
Authority: US
Inventors: Stuart Arthur Bateman; Ranya Simons; Dong Yang Wu; Patrick James McMahon; Alexander Bilyk; Douglas Henry BERRY; Seana B. Kobak; James F. Kirchner; Lori Clarice Straus; Mark Paul Johnson
Original assignee: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization CSIRO; Boeing Co
Current assignee: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization CSIRO; Boeing Co
Priority date: 2005-01-21
Filing date: 2021-01-11
Publication date: 2021-07-08
Also published as: EP1828335B1; DE602006012798D1; US20080050598A1; JP2008528247A; JP5563195B2; KR20070095314A; EP1828335A4; CA2589526A1; BRPI0606574A2; CN101103085A; US20180251643A1; ATE460466T1; CA2589526C; KR101264450B1; US10888896B2; CN101103085B; US9909020B2; WO2006086828A1; EP1828335A1

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method of activating an organic coating to enhance adhesion of the coating to a further coating and/or to other entities comprising applying a solvent and a surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent to the organic coating.The invention also relates to a coated substrate having an activated coating, wherein the adhesion of the coating to a further coating and/or other entities has been enhanced by application of a solvent and a surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent to the coating.The invention further relates to an activation treatment for an organic coating to enhance adhesion of the coating to a further coating and/or to other entities comprising a solvent and a surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent and a method for the preparation of the activation treatment.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Divisional of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 15/884,206 filed on Jan. 30, 2018, which is a Continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional application Ser. No. 11/784,534 filed on Apr. 5, 2007, which is a Continuation-in-Part of international application PCT/AU2006/000070, filed on Jan. 20, 2006, which claims the benefit and priority of U.S. Provisional Application 60/646,204, filed on Jan. 21, 2005, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

FIELD

The present invention relates to a method of activating an organic coating, a coated substrate having an activated coating and an activation treatment for an organic coating. In particular, the activation method improves the adhesion of the organic coating to further coating layers and/or to other entities.

BACKGROUND

Organic coatings are generally used to protect the surface of materials from incidental damage, abrasion, chemical attack and from environmental or in-service degradation.
Organic coatings are also used to enhance the aesthetics and/or optical properties of an object or component.
The surface properties of many coatings dramatically change on drying, curing and/or aging to become more inert than might be predicted based on the chemistry of their individual components alone. Whilst this phenomenon in part provides the coating with chemical resistance, impact strength, abrasion resistance and durability, it also complicates the process of applying additional coating layers, particularly when they are not applied within a predetermined reapplication window. The same problem arises with applying other entities such as sealants, pin hole fillers and surfacers such as those used on composite substrates, decals and logos applied with pressure sensitive adhesives and the like, to such coatings. In cases which require the application of additional coating layers and/or other entities, a mechanical abrasion or stripping process of the coating is generally necessary before the re-application procedure can take place.
In the specific example of aircraft coatings, it is well known that adhesion will not meet in-service performance requirements when fresh layers of coating are applied over layers which have aged beyond the acceptable reapplication window. The acceptable window may be of the order of days under ambient conditions or potentially hours under certain conditions of high temperature or extreme humidity. Once the reapplication window has been exceeded, the standard practice for applying additional coating layers on aircraft involves mechanical abrasion of the aged coating.
Both chemical stripping and mechanical abrasion have limitations. Mechanical abrasion is labor intensive, the reproducibility is variable, and it is ergonomically costly due to the highly repetitive and vibratory nature of the work. As such there is a pressing need for the development of a surface treatment to improve the adhesion of aged or inert industrial organic coatings towards additional coating layers or other entities, for example, adhesives, sealants, fillers, stickers and the like.
Coating manufacturers have developed a method of improving the procedure of coating stripping through the development of barrier layers and intermediate coats which, for example, protect the primer and conversion coating of metal structures from the chemical stripping agents (U.S. Pat. No. 6,217,945).
Although this procedure would reduce the amount of infrastructure down time, it still relies on paint removal to provide a surface which will accept a fresh coating layer with acceptable adhesion. Haack (Surface and Interface Anal, (2000), 29, p 829) investigated the interaction of automotive polyurethane coatings using UV light to generate ozone. Promising results in terms of improved adhesion and reduced water contact angles were produced when paint formulations incorporating Ti02 were subjected to H202 and UV light. However, there are obvious practical difficulties associated with this strategy, particularly in terms of its commercial viability for application in areas susceptible to corrosion and for treating larger surfaces. Also the occupational health and safety issues make it less suited to commercial application.
In the biological field, Park et al. (Biomaterials, (1998), 19, p 851) employed the surface urethane NH group to graft chemical species onto polyurethane rubber, whilst Levy et al. (Biomaterials (2001) 22, p 2683) employed a strong base to remove the surface urethane NH proton to accelerate such nucleophilic grafting reactions. Both strategies are unsuitable for activating organic coatings. The chemical reaction kinetics of the first strategy would be too slow to be practical, particularly since, considering the low surface energy and inertness to bonding of such coatings, the urethane NH groups may not be oriented towards the air-coating interface. The use of very strong bases, as per the second strategy, may degrade existing paint layers, resulting in a mechanically weak foundation for fresh coatings to adhere to. Furthermore, the latter strategy is also unacceptable for activating large areas due to corrosion and health and safety considerations.
Other strategies in the biological field have employed free radical techniques to graft molecules onto the surface of biomedical polyurethane surfaces (Matuda et al, J. Biomed. Res., (2002), 59, p 386; Eaton et al, Biomaterials, (1996), 17, p 1977) Although commercially viable, the main difficulty with this strategy lies in promoting actual grafting of the substrate.
Controlled glycolysis or aminolysis as described in Polymer Engineering & Science (1978), 18, p 844, and J. Applied Polymer Science (1994), 51, p 675) has very slow kinetics at room temperature and as such is not a practical solution. The use of reagents such as dimethyl phosphonate(Polymer Degradation and
Stability, (2000), 67, p 159) is also not appropriate since they are highly toxic and act too slowly at room temperature.
The strategies disclosed above do not adequately address the need for the development of a surface treatment to improve the adhesion of aged or inert organic coatings to additional coating layers and/or other entities. The problems of commercial viability, health and safety considerations, viable kinetics, applicability to small and large surface areas still remain and need to be resolved.
It is to be understood that, if any prior art publication in the biological field is referred to herein, such reference does not constitute an admission of a known application to the field of industrial and architectural coatings.

SUMMARY

We have now found a method which allows the activation of organic coatings to improve their adhesive properties towards further coating layers of the same or different type, and/or other entities without compromising coating integrity, via the use of mild reagents and conditions.
The process of activation on aged coatings when they have exceeded the application window where adhesion will not meet in-service performance requirements when fresh layers of coating are applied over layers is also termed reactivation. Both activation and reactivation will be used interchangeably.
The term “mild” in this context refers to chemicals which are not known to be excessively corrosive, acidic, basic or toxic and are applicable for use in highly regulated industrial environments. One example of such an environment is a commercial aircraft paint hangar. Additionally the mild reagents used in the preferred application methods do not adversely affect the bulk aircraft coatings, or underlying coatings, such as primers or selectively strippable coatings, or underlying substrates, such as aluminium and composite.
Advantageously, this method no longer requires the traditional methods of mechanical abrasion or chemical stripping of an organic coating to improve its adhesive properties towards additional coatings and/or other entities.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of activating an aged or inert organic coating to enhance adhesion of the coating to a further coating and/or to other entities selected from adhesives, sealants, pin hole fillers and pressure sensitive decals or logos comprising applying a solvent and a surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent which facilitates surface reduction, surface hydrolysis, surface oxidation, surface exchange, light induced surface modification and/or adds chemical functionality to the surface of the organic coating.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a coated substrate having an activated coating, wherein the adhesion of the coating to a further coating and/or other entities selected from adhesives, sealants, pin hole fillers and pressure sensitive decals or logos has been enhanced by application of a solvent and a surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent which facilitates surface reduction, surface hydrolysis, surface oxidation, surface exchange, light induced surface modification and/or adds chemical functionality to the surface of the organic coating.
The solvent and the agent may be applied either simultaneously, sequentially or separately. Advantageously, the solvent and the agent are applied to the organic coating simultaneously in the form of an activation treatment.
The agent may act independently from the solvent or alternatively the combination of the solvent and the agent may be necessary to affect a change in coating surface chemistry and/or topography.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides an activation treatment for an organic coating to enhance adhesion of the coating to a further coating and/or to other entities selected from adhesives, sealants, pin hole fillers and pressure sensitive decals or logos comprising a solvent and a surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent which facilitates surface reduction, surface hydrolysis, surface oxidation, surface exchange, light induced surface modification and/or adds chemical functionality to the surface of the organic coating.
The invention also provides a method for the preparation of the activation treatment defined above comprising the step of mixing the solvent with the surface chemistry and/or surface topography modifying agent which facilitates surface reduction, surface hydrolysis, surface oxidation, surface exchange, light induced surface modification and/or adds chemical functionality to the surface of the organic coating.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In this specification, except where the context requires otherwise due to express language or necessary implication, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising” is used in an inclusive sense, i.e. to specify the presence of the stated features but not to preclude the presence or addition of further features in various embodiments of the invention.
As used in the specification the singular forms “a” “an” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a solvent” includes mixtures of solvents, reference to “an agent” includes mixtures of two or more such agents, and the like.
The method of the present invention involves activating an organic coating so as to enhance the adhesive properties of at least the surface of the coating towards additional coating layers and/or other entities, for example, adhesives, sealants, pin hole fillers, pressure sensitive decal or logo adhesives and the like. The term ‘activating’ is used in this context to mean the improvement of the adhesive properties of the organic coating relative to the adhesive properties of that coating, prior to application of the solvent and the agent.
The word “coating” is used herein its broadest sense and describes decorative topcoats; undercoats; intermediate coatings; primers; sealers; lacquers; coatings which are pigmented or clear; coatings designed for specific purposes, such as, corrosion prevention, temperature resistance, or camouflage; coatings which are high gloss, matte, textured, or smooth in finish; or coatings containing specialty additives, such as metal flakes.
In general, organic coatings which are cured, dried or aged beyond a certain time period develop resistance to forming strong adhesive linkages towards other entities. Their surface properties become more inert than might be predicted, based on the chemistry of their individual components alone. Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is believed that this phenomena may result from a reduction in coating surface energy and amount of reactive surface functional groups in conjunction with a higher cross-link density as a function of cure time/aging which makes chemical interaction and/or the formation of strong adhesive linkages with other entities difficult.
The organic coatings which may be activated include, but are not limited to, fully or partially cross-linked organic coatings. Examples of organic coatings include, polyurethane, epoxy, polyester, polycarbonate and/or acrylic coatings, more preferably polyurethane and epoxy coatings. Due to their superior mechanical properties and resistance to abrasion, chemical attack, and environmental degradation, such organic coatings are widely used to protect infrastructure in the aerospace, marine, military, automotive, and construction industries. Many of these coatings show a marked reduction in adhesion to other entities, such as additional coating layers, adhesives, sealants, pressure sensitive decals or logos and the like, with increased time of curing and/or aging.
The activation method involves applying the solvent and the agent to a surface of the organic coating. The surface treatment is not a conventional coating such as a primer coating or tie-coat, but rather a chemical method of modifying the surface of the existing coating so that it is more receptive to forming adhesive interactions with further coatings and/or other entities.
Without wishing to be limited by theory it is believed that the interaction of the agent and/or solvent combination with the coating modifies the coating surface chemistry and/or surface topography to enable it to be more receptive towards other entities including but not limited to additional coating layers. Such agents and/or solvents are chosen such that the bulk integrity of the coating and underlying coating and substrate structures are maintained.
Suitable agents include those which facilitate chemical and/or topographical modification of the coating surface such as but not limited to agents which facilitate surface reduction, surface hydrolysis, surface oxidation, surface exchange, light induced surface modification and/or add chemical functionality to the surface of the coating.
(a) Examples of agents capable of affecting surface reduction include:
(i) Reductants such as sodium borohydride, potassium borohydride, lithium borohydride, zinc borohydride, calcium borohydride and alkoxy, acetoxy and/or amino derivatives thereof such as sodium methoxy borohydride or lithium dimethylaminoborohydride; sodium cyanborohydride, borane and borane complexes; aluminium hydrides such as lithium aluminium hydride and diisobutyl aluminium hydride; calcium hydride; sodium hydride; Red Al (sodium bis (2-methoxyethoxy)aluminiumhydride); selectrides such as K-selectride (potassium tri-sec-butylborohydride); sodium dihydro-bis-(2-methoxy) aluminate; sodium borohydride mixed with aluminium trichloride; lithium triethylborohydride; and lithium tri-tert-butoxy aluminium hydride.
(b) Examples of agents capable of catalysing surface hydrolysis include:
(i) Acids such as organic acids, for example, formic acid, acetic acid, benzoic acid, propanoic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid and kemp's triacid; and inorganic acids, for example, phosphoric acid.
(c) Examples of agents capable of affecting surface oxidation include:
(i) Oxidants such as trichloroisocyanuric acid, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, potassium permanganate, potassium chromate, periodic acid and lead tetra acetate.
(d) Examples of agents capable of affecting surface exchange or transesterification include:
(i) metal alkoxides or chelates thereof, such as those outlined in “Alkoxides and alkylalkoxides of metals and metalloids” Mehrotra, R. C., Inorganic Chemical Actia, Reviews, (1967) p 99, including titanium or zirconium alkoxides or chelates thereof, for example those marketed by companies such as DuPont or Gelest, i.e.tetra-isopropyltitanate, tetra-n-propyl titanate, tetra-n-butyltitanate, tetra-2-ethylhexyltitanate, tetraethyltitanate, triethanolamine titanate chelate, tetra-n-propylzirconate, tetra-n-butylzirconate and triethanolamine zirconate chelate.
(e) Examples of agents capable of affecting light induced surface modification include:
(i) Free radical initiators such as initiators which are activated by the presence of light, preferably visible light induced free radical initiators or combinations of free radical initiators with tertiary amines and/or mono or multi-functional unsaturated species.
Suitable light activated initiators include but are not limited to camphorquinone and derivatives thereof; benzophenone and derivatives thereof, such as, diethylaminobenzophenone; and phenylphosphineoxide derivatives, such as, Irgacure (CIBA).
Tertiary amine agents include species such as N,N-dimethyl toluidine, N,N-dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate, methylimidazole, NNN′N′ tetramethyl-1,4-butanediamine and NNN′N′ tetramethylphenylenediamine.
The multi-functional unsaturated species may be selected from acrylates, for example, hydroxyl ethyl acrylate; methacrylates, for example, polyethyleneglycol monomethacrylate, hydroxyl ethyl methacrylate, glycidyl methacrylate, N,N-dimethylamino ethylmethacrylate, ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate and butane diol dimethacrylate; and acrylamides, for example, hydroxyethyl acrylamide and bis acrylamide.
It will be appreciated that the agents may also be prepared in-situ from their constituent components. For example, LiBH₄may be prepared in-situ from NaBH₄and LiCl and sodium methoxyborohydride from methanol and NaBH₄.
The agent(s) are generally present in an amount more than about 0.001%, preferably more than about 0.01%, and most preferably about 0.01% to about 20% based on the total weight of the activation treatment, or the combination of solvent(s), agent(s) and any further optional additive(s).
Preferably the solvent and/or agent only interact with the surface of the organic coating so that the integrity of the coating is not compromised.
The solvent may be a single solvent or a combination of two or more solvents. Preferably the solvent is an organic solvent. Suitable organic solvents or solvent combinations depend on the surface modifying agent employed (e.g. (a) to (e) above) and include but are not limited to:
(a) ester based solvents such as ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, tertiary butyl acetate and glycol ether acetates;
(b) ketones such as methyl ethyl ketone, methyl propyl ketone, methyl amyl ketone, methyl isoamyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone and acetone;
(c) alcohols such as aromatic alcohols, for example, benzyl alcohol; aliphatic alcohols, for example, tertiary butanol, n-butanol, secondary butanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, ethanol, methanol and cyclohexanol; and glycol ethers, for example, those marketed by Dow under the trade name Dowanol such as, ethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, tripropylene glycol and polypropylene glycol and their monoethers such as mono-C_{1_6}alkyl ethers including but not limited to those marketed by Dow under the trade name Downanol E-series and P-series glycol ethers.
(d) ethers such as glycol diethers, for example, the di-C_{1_6}alkyl ethers of glycols such as diethers of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol polyethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, tripropylene glycol and polypropylene glycol including but not limited to diethylene glycol dimethylether, dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether or diethylene glycol methyl butyl ether such as those marketed by Dow under the trade name Downanol E-series and P-series glycolethers; and cyclic ethers such as tetrahydrofuran;
(e) amides such as N-methyl pyrrolidinone;
(f) aromatics such as toluene and xylene;
(g) halogenated solvents such as dichloromethane and tetrachloroethylene; and
(h) water
In view of the toxicity and negative environmental impact of halogenated solvents (g), it will be understood that they should be used within the constraints of environmental, health and safety regulations.
Preferred solvents are ester based solvents such as ethyl acetate, ethoxyethyl acetate, isopropyl acetate and/or tertiary butyl acetate; ketone solvents such as methyl propyl ketone, methyl amyl ketone, methyl isoamyl ketone and/or methyl ethyl ketone; alcohols such as ethanol, methanol, ethoxyethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, butanol, tertiary butanol and secondary butanol; ether solvents such as C_1-6alkyl ethers or combinations thereof (i.e. mixed ethers) of ethylene glycols and propylene glycols including but not limited to glyme, diglyme, triglyme, tetraglyme and dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether and cyclic ethers, for example, tetrahydrofuran; amide solvents such as N-methyl pyrrolidinone; and water.
Preferred solvent combinations include glycol ether acetate combinations such as dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether tertiary butyl acetate; ether: alcohol combinations such as diproplyene glycol dimethyl ether: n-propanol, isopropanol, methanol, isobutanol, secondary butanol, tertiary butanol, ethoxy ethanol and/or ethylhexanol; ethylene glycol monomethyl ether: ethanol, methanol, ethoxyethanol and/or isopropanol; glycols and monoether combinations such as dipropylenegylcol-monomethylether, dipropylenegylcol-monobutylether, and/or dipropylenegylcol; ether combinations such as tetrahydrofuran: triglyme and tetrahydrofuran: dipropylene glycol dimethylether; ketones and acetate combinations such as methylethyl ketone: ethoxyethyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone: ethoxyethyl acetate; N-methyl pyrrolidinone: ethyl acetate; ethyl acetate: benzyl alcohol; dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether: polyethylene; and methyl propyl ketone: methyl ethyl ketone. Typical solvent combinations include high and low boiling point solvent combinations.
The solvent(s) are generally present in an amount of less than about 99.999%, preferably greater than about 70%, most preferably in an amount of about 80% to about 99.99% based on the total weight of the activation treatment or the combination of solvent(s), agent(s) and any further optional additive(s).
One or more additives and/or inerts known in the art of coatings may also be used in the method or activation treatment of the present invention. Examples include:
(a) rheology modifiers such as hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (e.g. Methocell 311, Dow), modified urea (e.g. Byk 411, 410) and polyhydroxycarboxylic acid amides (e.g. Byk 405);
(b) film formers such as esters of dicarboxylic acid (e.g. Lusolvan FBH, BASF) and glycol ethers (e.g. Dowanol, Dow);
(c) wetting agents such as fluorochemical surfactants (e.g. 3M Fluorad) and polyether modified poly-dimethyl-siloxane (e.g. Byk 307, 333);
(d) surfactants such as fatty acid derivatives (e.g. Bermadol SPS 2543, Akzo) and quaternary ammonium salts;
(e) dispersants such as non-ionic surfactants based on primary alcohols (e.g. Merpol 4481, Dupont) and alkylphenol-formaldehyde-bisulfide condensates (e.g. Clariants 1494);
(f) anti foaming agents;
(g) anti corrosion reagents such as phosphate esters (e.g. ADD APT, Anticor C6), alkylammonium salt of (2-benzothiazolythio) succinic acid (e.g. Irgacor 153 CIBA) and triazine dithiols;
(h) stabilizers such as benzimidazole derivatives (e.g. Bayer, Preventol BCM, biocidal film protection);
(i) leveling agents such as fluorocarbon-modified polymers (e.g. EFKA 3777);
(j) pigments or dyes such as fluorescents (Royale Pigment and chemicals);
(k) organic and inorganic dyes such as fluoroscein; and
(l) Lewis acids such as lithium chloride, zinc chloride, strontium chloride, calcium chloride and aluminium chloride.
The additive(s) are usually present in an amount of less than about 10% based on the total weight of the activation treatment or the combination of solvent(s), agent(s) and additive(s).
Specific activation methods forming embodiments of the present invention (which may optionally be used in combination) are as follows:
1. Surface Reduction
This method involves using a solvent and an agent such as a reductant, for example, lithium borohydride to cause surface reduction or break down of the organic coating surface. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that this method provides reactive entities or a suitable morphology to improve inter-coat adhesion with further coating layers and/or other entities. Suitable solvent or solvent combinations for use in this method are, for example, ether or alcohol based solvents and their combinations such as dipropylene glycol dimethylether and isopropanol.
2. Surface Hydrolysis
This method involves using a solvent and an agent such as a carboxylic acid, for example, acetic acid to cause surface hydrolysis or break down of the organic coating. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that this method provides reactive entities or a suitable morphology to improve inter-coat adhesion with further coating layers and/or other entities. Suitable solvent or solvent combinations for use in this method are, for example, ester or amide based solvents such as ethyl acetate or N-methyl pyrrolidinone.
3. Surface Oxidation
This method involves using a solvent and an agent such as an oxidant, for example, trichloroisocyanuric acid to cause surface oxidation or break down of the organic coating. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that this method provides reactive entities or a suitable morphology to improve inter-coat adhesion with further coating layers and/or other entities. Suitable solvent or solvent combinations for use in this method are, for example, ester or amide based solvents such as ethyl acetate or N-methyl pyrrolidinone.
4. Surface Exchange
This method involves exposure of the coating surface with a reagent capable of interacting (via transesterification or otherwise) with suitable chemical functionality such as ester and/or urethane moities or otherwise to modify its chemistry or topography such that it improves the intercoat adhesion with subsequent coating layers. Suitable solvent or solvent combinations for use in this method are, for example, ether or alcohol based solvents and their combinations such as dipropylene gylcol dimethylether and isopropanol or dipropylene glycol dimethylether and n-propanol.
5. Light Induced Photo-Grafting
This method involves applying an agent such as a visible light activated free radical initiator, for example, camphorquinone and an unsaturated species, for example, acrylate or methacrylate to the surface of the organic coating in a solvent. The influence of visible light causes free radical reactions to occur which modify the surface of the coating to improve the inter-coat adhesion of the further coating and/or other entities. Suitable solvents for use in this method include ketone or amide based solvents such as methyl amyl ketone and N-methyl pyrrolidinone. The substrate for the above methods having an activated coating may be of any type including metals such as aluminum; composites such as carbon fibre reinforced epoxy or glass reinforced epoxy; plastics such as polyimide; elastomers such as polysulfide elastomers; or materials containing glass, wood or fabric. There may also be various “sub” coating layers beneath the coating requiring reactivation such as other decorative coating layers, primers, intermediate layers, conversion or anticorrosion coating layers and the like.
Although polyurethane and epoxy based coatings, particularly polyurethane based coatings are typical, it will be understood that other organic coatings may be activated by the method of the invention.
When the solvent and agent are combined and applied in the form of an activation treatment this may take different physical forms such as solution, suspension, mixture, aerosol, emulsion, paste or combination thereof. Treatments which take the form of a solution or emulsion are preferred.
The activation treatment may be prepared by mixing the components together with any mixing equipment known to those skilled in the art such as but not limited to stirrers, shakers, high speed mixers, internal mixers, inline mixers such as static mixers, extruders, mills, ultra-sound and gas dispersers. When the activation treatment is in the form of a solution, the solution may be prepared as a concentrate and diluted before use or prepared ready for use.
The activation treatment or the application of the individual components thereof may be applied via any method known to those skilled in the art such as but not limited to spray, brush, dip, knife, blade, hose, roller, wipe, curtain, flood, flow, mist, pipette or combinations thereof Application by spray is typical.
The method of activation may be conducted at ambient temperatures or alternatively at higher temperatures if desirable. The activation treatment or individual components thereof may be applied to small or large areas, to sections of larger parts, components or full infrastructure such as infrastructure associated with the aerospace (e.g. aircraft), automotive (e.g. vehicles), marine (e.g. ships), transportation (e.g. trains), military (e.g. helicopter, missile) or construction industries (e.g. buildings, factories, floors) The surface may have simple or complex geometry or may be at any orientation. Treatment may be conducted once or multiple times prior to interaction with the separate entity.
The exposure time of the activation treatment on the coating is more limited by the throughput and applications requirements. As such the exposure time may be short for example one minute or extended for example 24 hours with no detriment to the integrity of the organic coating or materials that may be found on the organic coating such as sealants, and underlying coating structures and substrates.
The organic coating may remain activated in a non-contaminated environment for extended periods of time. In some circumstances, the activation treatment can remove contaminants from the surface in addition to activating the coating.
It may also be preferable to remove excess agent and/or treatment solution from the surface. This process may be conveniently carried out by techniques such as solvent or water rinsing; dry, water or solvent wiping; air or gas knife; vacuum application; removal by squeegee; and/or natural or forced convection evaporation.
Optionally the water or solvent used to remove excess agent and/or treatment solution from the surface of the coating undergoing reactivation can contain additives for example to enhance the removal process, modify the drying time, or reduce corrosion. Such additives include but not limited to ionic and non-ionic surfactants, detergents, anticorrosion additives and wetting agents such as but not limited to those described above. The additives may also include cleaning agents commonly used to clean aircraft such as but not limited to those marketed under the trade names Isoprep, Turco, CeeBee, Ridoline, Formula and Daraclean by companies such as Brulin, Elf Atochem North America, MacDermid, W.R. Grace, McGean-Rohco and Henkel.
After the coating surface is separate entities such as additional coating layers or coating details, adhesives sealants, pressure sensitive decals or logos, and the like may be applied either immediately or at a later time, providing the surface remains predominantly uncontaminated during storage or that the contamination can be conveniently removed. The activation solution may need to be reapplied in some cases.
Any suitable method known to those skilled in the art may be used to assess whether the adhesive linkage between the organic coating and further coatings and/or other entities is fit for purpose. Such tests include but are not limited to ASTM, ISO, and FAA standards, in-house test methods to simulate in-service performance, in-service performance itself, and durability testing either actual or accelerated. For the case of aerospace coatings, test methods based on water impact, such as whirling arm and the Single Impact Jet Apparatus (SIJA) (MIJA Limited, Cambridge, UK), have been found to be particularly useful for assessing inter-coat adhesion. In these cases, the amount of overcoat removal is related to the level of inter-coat adhesion.
For aerospace applications the activation method of the present invention offers the advantages of improved flow time for the process of reactivation, greater reproducibility and consistency over larger areas and between operators, and improved ergonomics of the process leading to reduced vibration or repetitive motion based injuries for completing the process of reactivation which added together provide a net cost saving.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ABBREVIATIONS

In the Examples, reference will be made to the following abbreviations in which:

AFM Atomic Force Microscopy
APP Applications
BAC Boeing Approved Color
BMS Boeing Material Specification
c Celsius
Cl Class
[ ] Concentration
DHS Desothane HS
F Fahrenheit
F Fail
FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared
h Hour
HH high humidity
HSS High strength Steel
IC Intermediate Coating
LH Low humidity
IPA Isopropanol
LiBH4 Lithium borohydride
MAK Methyl amyl ketone
MEK Methyl ethyl ketone
MPK Methyl propyl ketone
Mn Number average molecular weight
Mw Weight average molecular weight
MW Molecular weight
NBA n-butanol
NPA n-propanol
NPZ tetra-n-propylzirconate
NBT tetra-n-butyl titanate
NPT tetra-n-propyltitanate
OH&S Occupational Health and Safety
p Pass
PAC CS Pre-Applied Composite Coating System
Proglyde DMM (abbreviated, proglyde) dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether
RH Relative Humidity
SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy
SIJA Single Impact Jet Apparatus
SOLO Spray On—Leave On
sowo Spray On—Wipe Off
SOHO Spray On—Hose off
SS Stainless Steel
tBAC t-butyl acetate
TEAZ triethanolamine zirconate
THF Tetra hydrofuran
TPT tetra-isopropyltitanate
WARE Whirling Arm Rain Erosion
Wt % weight percentage
XPS X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the Examples, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is photographs showing the impact on different metalalkoxide modifying agents and concentration on inter-coat adhesion. (Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16 h, 120 F, 8% RH. Over-coat: BAC50103, C. Over-coat cure: 4 days, 120 F, 10% RH.);

FIG. 2 is photographs showing SIJA inter-coat adhesion. (Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16 h, 120 F, 8% RH. Over-coat: BAC50103, C. Over-coat cure: 4

days

120 F, 10% RH.);

FIG. 3 is showing the impact of modifying agent dwell time on over-adhesion performance.

(Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16

h

120 F, 8% RH. Over-coat: BAC50103, C. Over-coat cure: 4

days

120 F, 10% RH.);

FIG. 4 is photographs showing the preliminary stencil interaction results and corresponding SIJA adhesion.

(Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16 h, 120 F, 8% RH. Modifying agent dwell time before overcoat ?h. Over-coat: BAC50103, C. Over-coat cure: 4 days, 120 F, 10% RH.);

FIG. 5 is photographs showing the preliminary stencil interaction results and corresponding SIJA adhesion. (Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16 h. 120 F, 8% RH. Modifying agent dwell time before overcoat ?h. Over-coat: BAC50103, C. Over-coat cure: 4 days, 120 F, 10% RH);

FIG. 6 is photographs showing the preliminary water soak data: 3× applications each of modifying agent system in IPA. (Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16 h. 120 F, 8% RH. Over-coat: BAC50103, C. Over-coat cure: 4 days, 120 F, 10% RH.);

FIG. 7a is a photograph showing SOLO treatment solution application on stencil letter and premask diamond quality (Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Base cure condition: 16

h

120 F, 8% RH. Over-coat: 2 mil DHS BAC50103, C2. Over-coat cure before removal: 16 hr, 120 F.);

FIG. 7b is a photograph showing Effect of solvent combination on stencil letter clarity employing, base coat (DHS BAC70846, C2 with cure condition: 16 h, 120 F, 8% RH), modifying agent (5 wt % NPZ SOLO with dwell time 1 h), and over-coat (1 mil DHS BAC50103, C with cure condition before removal: 16 hr, ambient);

FIG. 7c is a photograph showing Image quality employing no modification agent or 5 WT % NPZ employing a 20:80 NPA:Proglyde combination. (Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C. Base cure condition: 3 Cycles of 4 hr, 120 F, 9% RH & 8 hr, 75 F 36% RH. Stencil coat: DHS BAC701 Black, C2.);

FIG. 8 is photographs showing scribe adhesion.

(Base coat: DHS BAC70846, C2. Cure condition: 16 h, 120 F, 8% RH.);

FIG. 9 is photographs showing stencil pull & scribe adhesion base coat. (DHS BAC70846, C2. Cure conditions: 16 h, 120 F, 8% RH. Over-coat: DHS BAC50103, C2, 1 mil. Over-coat cure: ambient.);


	Stencil Pull Time (min)	Scribe Test Time (h)

	5	1
	30	2
	60	3
	90	4

FIG. 10 is photographs showing SIJA inter-coat adhesion (DHS CA8000 paint); cure conditions as indicated.

FIG. 11 is photographs showing corresponding WARE results to FIG. 12; cure conditions as indicated.

FIG. 12 is photographs showing SIJA inter-coat adhesion (DHS CA8800 paint); cure conditions as indicated.

FIG. 13 is photographs showing SIJA inter-coat adhesion (Eclipse paint); cure conditions as indicated.

FIG. 14 is photographs showing SIJA inter-coat adhesion (DHS CA8000 paint); cure conditions as indicated.

FIG. 15 is photographs showing Whirling Arm Rain Erosion data: Modification agent (alkoxide): 5 wt % NPZ in 80% IPA: 20% proglyde;. DHS CA8800:

Basecoat—BAC70846, CTR Thinner, Overcoat—BAC70281, CTR Thinner. DHS CA8000: Basecoat—BAC70846, C Thinner, Overcoat—BAC707, C Thinner. Eclipse: Basecoat—BAC70846, TR109 Thinner, Overcoat—BAC707, TR109 Thinner.

Base coat cure conditions as indicated. Overcoat cure
conditions: 4 days at 120 F;

FIG. 16a is a photograph showing WARE data using DHS CA8800 paint: Basecoat—BAC707 Gray w/varied thinners, Cure conditions: 3 Cycle Cure—4 h, 120 F, 18% RH+8 h, 75 F 70% RH. Overcoat—BAC70846 White w/CTR thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F.

FIG. 16b is a photograph showing WARE data using DHS CA8800 paint: Basecoat—BAC707 Gray w/varied thinners, Cure conditions: 3 Cycle Cure—4 h, 120 F, 18% RH+8 h, 75 F, 70% RH. Overcoat—BAC51265 Blue w/CTR thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F;

FIG. 17a is a photograph showing WARE data: Basecoat—DHS CA8800 BAC70846 White w/CTR thinner, Cure Conditions: 3 Cycles of 4 h, 120 F, 18% RH+8 h, 75 F, 70% RH. Modification agents (alkoxides)—

5Z-60i: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % IPA and 40 wt % proglyde,
5Z-60n: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde.
Overcoat—DHS CA8800 BAC70281 Gray w/CTR thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F.

FIG. 17b is a photograph showing WARE data: Basecoat—DHS CA8000 BAC70846 White w/C thinner, Cure conditions: 3 Cycles of 4 h, 120 F, 3% RH+8 h, 75 F, 12% RH.

Modification agents (alkoxides)—
5Z-60i: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % IPA and 40 wt % proglyde,
5Z-60n: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde.
Overcoat—DHS CA8000 BAC707 Gray w/C thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F;

FIG. 18a is a photograph showing WARE data: Basecoat—Eclipse BAC70846 White w/TR-109 thinner, Cure conditions: 3 Cycles of 4 h, 120 F, 18% RH+8 h, 75 F, 70% RH. Modification agents (alkoxides)—

5Z-60i: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % IPA and 40 wt % proglyde,
5Z-60n: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde.
Overcoat—Eclipse BAC707 Gray w/TR-109 thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F;

FIG. 18b is a photograph showing WARE data: Basecoat-Eclipse BAC70846 White w/TR-109 Thinner, Cure Conditions: LH or HH (See below).

Modification agents (alkoxides)—
5Z-60i: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % IPA and 40 wt % proglyde,
5Z-60n: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde.
Overcoat—Eclipse BAC707 Gray w/TR-109 thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F. Basecoat Cure LH: 4 h, 120 F, 3% RH+8 h, 75 F, 12% RH for 3 cycles, Basecoat Cure HH: 4 h, 120 F, 18% RH+8 h, 75 F 70% RH for 2 or 3 cycles;

FIG. 18C is a photograph showing WARE data: Basecoat—Eclipse BAC70846 White w/TR-109 Thinner, Basecoat Cure—LH or HH (See below).

Modification agents (alkoxides)—5Z-60i: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % IPA and 40 wt % proglyde, 5Z-60n: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde.
Overcoat—Eclipse BAC707 Gray w/TR-109 thinner, Cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F.
First TC Cure LH: 4 h, 120 F, 3% RH+8 h, 75 F, 12% RH for 3 cycles,
First TC Cure HH: 4 h, 120 F, 18% RH+8 h, 75 F, 70% RH for 2 or 3 cycles;

FIG. 19

Basecoat—DHS CA8000 BAC70846 White w/C thinner, Cure conditions as indicated.
Modification agents (alkoxides) with 30 minute dwell:
5Z-60n: 5 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde,
7Z-60n: 7 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde,
9Z-60n: 9 wt % NPZ in 60 wt % NPA and 40 wt % proglyde.
Overcoat cure conditions: 4 days, 120 F.

Overcoats:

DHS CA8000—BAC5004 Blue w/C thinner, Eclipse-BAC5004 Blue w/TR-109 thinner,
Sky-Hullo FLV-II—900BL004 Blue w/IS-900, Type III thinner;

FIG. 20 is photographs showing the shelf life of metal alkoxide reactivation treatment solutions on adhesion.

FIG. 21a is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMSS-142 (polysulfide): Weight change.

FIG. 21b is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMSS-142 (polysulfide):Volume change.

FIG. 21c is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMSS-142 (polysulfide):Hardness change.

FIG. 22a is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-71, CL1 (EPR) elastomer: Weight change.

FIG. 22b is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-71, CL1 (EPR) elastomer: Volume change.

FIG. 22c is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-71, CL1 (EPR) elastomer: Hardness change. (0089)

FIG. 23a is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-71, CL2 (Silicone) elastomer: Weight change.

FIG. 23b is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-71, CL2 (Silicone) elastomer: Volume change. and

FIG. 23c is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-71, CL2 (Silicone) elastomer: Hardness change. (0090)

FIG. 24a is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-57 (Silicone) elastomer: Weight change.

FIG. 24b is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-57 (Silicone) elastomer: Volume change.

FIG. 24c is a graph showing soak and recovery experiments using BMS1-57 (Silicone) elastomer: Hardness change.

FIG. 25 is photographs showing images of elastomers and sealants on recovery;

FIG. 26 is a graph and photographs showing immersion results for titanium;

FIG. 27 is a graph and photographs showing immersion results for 2024T3 bare aluminum;

FIG. 28 is a graph and photographs showing immersion results for 2024T3 clad aluminium;

FIG. 29 is a graph and photographs showing immersion results for high strength steel;

FIG. 30 is a graph and photographs showing immersion results for stainless steel.

FIG. 31a is a photograph showing sandwich corrosion results: 1× magnification.

FIG. 31b is a photograph showing sandwich corrosion results: 10× magnification.

FIG. 32 is a graph and photograph showing immersion results for BMS8-79 composite material;

FIG. 33 is a graph and photograph showing immersion results for BMS8-256 composite material;

FIG. 34 is a graph and photograph showing immersion results for BMS8-256 with Metlbond;

FIG. 35 is a graph and photograph showing immersion results for BMS8-276 with SM905 composite material;

FIG. 36 is a drawing and photographs showing tapeline experiments: Untreated and treated with various modification agent formulations.

FIG. 37 is a graph showing impact on colour shift for DHS BAC70846 treated with various modification agents & not over-coated following accelerated exposure according to SAE J1960 relative to specimens left untreated and

FIG. 38 is a diagram of the Lab-SYSTEM.

FIG. 39 is photographs showing WARE data.

Basecoat—DHS CA8800 BAC900 clear with F thinner, Cure Conditions: 3 heat cycles (4 h, 120 F, 18% RH and 8 h, 75 F, 70% RH).
Modification agent—5% NPZ, 80:20 NPA: Proglyde
Post treatment of Modification agent—none or tack rag
Overcoat—DHS CA8800, white or blue cured for 2 weeks at ambient 72 F, 35% RH.

FIG. 40 is pencil hardness data for specimens left untreated prior to overcoat or treated with the modification agent prior to over-coating both prior to and following 30 day immersion into hydraulic fluid.

FIG. 41 is Gardner Impact adhesion test results employing no modification agent or 5 WT % NPZ alkoxide in isopropanol. (Base coat: DHS CA8800 BAC3613 Yellow, CTR thinner. Base cure condition: 3 Cycles of 4 hr, 120 F, 12% RH & 8 hr, 75 F 36% RH. Over-coat: DHS CA8800 various colors, CTR thinner. Overcoat Cure condition: 2 weeks ambient).

EXAMPLES

The invention will now be described with reference to the following non-limiting examples. Although the examples concentrate on coatings derived from polyurethane chemistries it will be understood that the same activation methodology could be applied to coatings such as but not limited to those based on epoxy, acrylic, polycarbonate, or polyester coatings through the appropriate choice of solvent(s), agent(s) and optional additives under appropriate activation conditions.
The specific “substrate” the polyurethane topcoat is applied to is not relevant. Hence the substrate can be metal (eg. aluminium), plastic (eg. polyimide), composite (eg. carbon fibre reinforced epoxy or glass reinforced epoxy) or an elastomer (eg. polysulfide elastomer) The substrate may be finished with surfacing materials, films, elastomers or coatings.
The polyurethane topcoat layer which requires reactivation may have topcoat, intermediate or priming layers beneath it and again these layers are not relevant. Typical examples of build-ups employed in the aerospace industry include:

- Aluminium substrate: cleaned, surface prepared with anodize or conversion coat, epoxy based primer(s), optionally selectively strippable intermediate coating layer, and polyurethane topcoat layers.
- Epoxy based composite: surface based primer(s), optionally prepared/cleaned, epoxy selectively strippable intermediate coating layer, and polyurethane top-coating layers.

The reactivation treatment solution is designed in such a way that it can be applied under industrial conditions and the integrity of the “substrate” or coating layers beneath the polyurethane coating which is undergoing reactivation are not adversely effected to a point where they are unsuitable for their intended purpose by interaction of treatment solution which may inadvertently come in contact with it for short periods.

Example 1: Hydrolysis Surface Activation Method

The example demonstrates that improved SIJA inter-coat adhesion relative to untreated specimens results from activation of the coating prior to over-coating. Inter-coat adhesion provided in this case is similar to specimens reactivated by sanding.

Example 2: Oxidation Surface Activation Method

Example 3 Reduction Surface Activation Method

The example demonstrates that improved SIJA inter-coat adhesion relative to untreated specimens results from activation of the coating prior to over-coating. Inter-coat adhesion in this case is similar to specimens reactivated by provided sanding.

Example 4: Light Induced Photo-Grafting Surface Activation Method

Example 5: Reduction Surface Activation Method

The example demonstrates that improved Scribe green adhesion (predictor of possible problems during masking tape removal) relative to untreated specimens results from activation of the coating prior to over-coating. Inter-coat adhesion provided in this case is similar to specimens reactivated by sanding.

Example 6: Reduction Surface Activation Method

Stripping study indicated that coatings reactivated by surface reduction methods strip quicker than specimens sanded prior to over-coating but slower than coatings over-coated without treatment.

Example 7 and 8 Evidence of Surface Chemistry Change

Results indicate that a higher Specific contribution to surface energy results (γsP), particularly to surfaces activated with the reduction strategy.

Examples 9 to 33 Reduction Surface Activation Method

Examples 34 and 5: Surface Activation Method with Exchange Agents

It is envisaged that suitable combinations of components of the activation treatment will differ depending on the type of coating to be activated. The appropriate choice of solvent(s), agent(s), optional additives and inerts, and activation conditions will differ depending on the type of coating to be activated.

General Experimental Detail

Painting Conditions and Protocol

Spray painting of many flat panels was carried out employing a Yamaha robotic painting arm incorporating a gravity fed Binks Mach lA automatic spray gun configured with a 94 nozzle. Spray painting was conducted using an inlet pressure of 40 PSI, a scan rate of 100 mm/s and a specimen to gun distance of 300 mm. The coating thickness was controlled by the gun's fluid needle control position and scan rates. These parameters were adjusted in line with paint thickness measurements and assessed using a Fischer Isoscope (MPOD) on aluminium substrates. When coating was completed on composite substrates, the coating layer thickness was estimated by calibration with the isoscope readings from aluminium panels. An analogous strategy was employed for the application of the primers, optional intermediary and topcoat layers. For the majority of the examples, the painted films were over-coated following taping through the middle of the coupon with 3M vinyl tape (#471) to form a paint edge on its removal. This edge was the impact target for SIJA (Single Impact Jet Apparatus) analysis.
Spray painting of curved or larger surfaces (eg: rain erosion foils) and some of the smaller flat panels was typically conducted using a Binks Ml-H HVLP gun configured with a 94 nozzle. Occasionally, a similar gravity fed HVLP gun or a pressure pot fed HVLP gun was used. In these cases the aluminium or composite was prepared in the same manner as the flat plates prior to the first top-coat being applied. Following cure of the first coating layer the front of the foils were masked (Intertape Polymer Group, PG-777 tape) prior toover-coating to form a leading edge once the over-coating was applied and tape removed.
Cure protocols were undertaken in a computer controlled temperature humidity chamber, such as a Thermoline Environmental chamber and/or a conventional curing oven.

Table 1 Paint Material Information

For the majority of the examples, the coatings used are listed in Table 1. In the examples, paint companies are generally abbreviated:

PRC-DeSoto International: PRC-DeSoto

Akzo-Nobel Aerospace Coatings: Akzo-Nobel

TABLE 1

		Intermediate
	Primer	Coat	Topcoat

Coating	Epoxy based	Intermediate	PRC-DeSoto
	primers suitable	coat that	International:
	for composite or	is selectively	Desothane
	aluminium based	strippable	HS,
	aerospace		Akzo-Nobel Aerospace
	componenets		Coatings: Eclipse,
			Deft Chemical Coating
Components			Base:
			CA8000/BxxxxxX
			such as
			CA8000/B70846X
			Activator: CA8000B
			Thinner 1: CA8000C
			Thinner 3: CA8000C2
			Or
			Base: CA8800/Byyyy
			Activator: CA8800Z
			Thinner 1: CA8800CTR
			Thinner 2: CA8800CT
			Thinner 3:
			CA8800CT2,
			Base: ECL-G-xxxx
			such
			as ECL-G-14
			(BAC70846)
			Curing Sol: PC-233
			Thinner TR-109
			Thinner TR-112;
			Sky-Hullo FLV-II
			Base: 900YYxxx such
			as
			900BL004 (Blue)
			Curing Sol:
			900X001CAT Thinner:
			IS-900, TyIII

Note:
the thinner designation C and C2 are used to indicate the relative rate at which the paint cures. C thinners - standard cure rate with C2 producing a correspondingly faster cure rate (from incorporation of high catalyst levels into the thinner). For Desothane CA8800 CTR is reduced rate, CT is standard rate and CT2 is fast rate cure thinner. For Akzo-Nobel fast cure thinner is designated TR-112 and standard thinner TR-109.

Painting Conditions and Protocol

Substrates were cleaned prior to priming and optionally where appropriate treated with an alodine type conversion coating or anodized.
Polyurethane topcoats, intermediate and primer layers were mixed and applied according to the paint manufacture instructions. Primer:
Typical conditions:

- For Composite or aluminium: application of common aerospace epoxy based primer optionally incorporating additives to aide corrosion resistance at 0.5 mil (12.5 micron) dry film thickness (dft) per manufacturer instructions.
  Intermediate coat:
- Optionally application of intermediate coat (IC) that is selectively strippable at 0.35 mils (10 microns) according to manufacturer instructions

Polyurethane topcoat:

- Application of polyurethane topcoat (eg: Desothane HS topcoat containing CA8000/B70846X base (white color of this topcoat also designated as BAC70846. In examples it is typically designated as Desothane HS 70846X or DHS BAC70846) at 1.0 to 4.0 mil (typically 1.0 mil (25 micron)). Painted panels flash off for 1 hour prior to cure and accelerated aging.

Standard cure I accelerated aging conditions Employed for topcoats were: (i) Cure painted panels in oven at 120° F., 5-10% RH (Relative Humidity) for 40 hours, followed by (ii) post cure in a humidity chamber at 120° F. (49° C.) and 50% RH for 48 hours, and then (iii) oven cure at 160° F. for 24 hours. Total cure time was 112 hours. Alternatively other “accelerated” aging protocols were employed as specified in the examples to render the polyurethane topcoat unreceptive to additional coating layers as indicated by poor adhesion under standard adhesion tests eg: 120° F. and 2-3% RH for 5 days or 120° F. and 5% RH for 16 hours or as specified in the examples.

Surface Modification

The solvents and agents used for surface modification were purchased from the MERK and Sigma-Aldrich or Dow Chemical Companies. Purity was of an Analytical or Laboratory Reagent grade purity. Isopropanol and n-propanol were generally of an anhydrous grade. However, alternative suppliers and grades of the reagents are known to be available.

TABLE 2

General Activation Protocol

Task	Strategy

Treatment	Spray application of the reactivation treatment solution
	employed a Binks Ml-H HVLP gun with a 92 or 94 nozzle
	and 20 psi inlet pressure or, on occasion, a similar HVLP
	gravity or pressure fed gun or by a flood application where
	indicated.
	The active agent (eg: reducing agent such as LiBH₄) was
	dissolved, dispersed or suspended in the solvent/s at a
	percentage based on weight and the hence prepared
	″reactivation treatment″ applied to the substrate for a given
	period
Post-	Spray on leave on application (SOLO)
Treatment	Optionally the polyurethane surface may be ″post″ treated
	Washed with water (or solvent) a period following treatment -
	spray on-hose off (SOHO) or
	Wiped with an isopropanol, ketone (eg: methyl-propyl
	ketone) or water soaked cloth - spray on wipe off (SOWO)
Re-	Samples were over-coated with polyurethane topcoat either:
coating	Same day (5 mins to 4 hours after treatment)
	Some period following reactivation.
	Unless otherwise specified for SIJA or rain erosion adhesion
	testing, overcoat thickness was 100 micron employing Eclipse
	or Desothl(lf HS coatings cured with standard thinners. Cure
	conditions were 120 F. under 8-20% RH for at least 48 hours
	unless specified.
	Scribe test overcoat paint thickness was typically 25 to 50
	microns

Analysis

Table 3 provides the equipment and conditions used for testing for analytical purposes.

TABLE 3

Testing Equipment & Conditions

Equipment	Conditions

SIJA	Adhesion testing was completed using a Single Impact
	Jet Apparatus (SIJA, Cambridge). The initial equipment
	was typically configured using a 0.8 mm nozzle
	typically and employed
	0.22 calibre 5.5 mm Crosman Accupell Pointed Pellets
	(#11246). Testing was completed following immersion in
	water for 16 to 18 hours, employing a line laser to
	locate the impact position, and using a 45° specimen to
	impact droplet geometry. A single water jet was
	employed at each site to test adhesion with the
	pressure employed for the ″shot″ indicated below its
	impact. The velocity of each individual shot was
	recorded for futurere f eren ce, but generally the
	pressure to velocity conversion is specified be low
	(±25 m/s).

	Pressure (PSI)	Velocity (m/s)

	L	350
	50	610
	100	725
	200	895

	Alternatively the impa ct was dictated by a ″dot″ or
	via the velocity employed eg. 600 m/s.
	In some cases the amount of overcoat removed, and hence
	the inter-coat adhesion was assessed employing image an
	alys is techniques to quantify the area of paint
	removed. However regardless of the impact velocity
	relative to the unmodified reference more overcoat
	removed corresponded with inferior inter-coat adhesion.
Scribe	Scribe adhesion was assessed according to (BOEING
Adhesion	Specification Standard) BS S7225, Class 5. This
	adhesion test is a five line cross-hatch tape (3M tape,
	No .250) pulltest. Briefly: Heat aged polyurethane
	coatings were reactivated and then over-coated (25-80
	micron thickness) curing the over-coat for 16 hours
	at room temperature and 50% RH. The coatings were then
	scribed according to BS S7225 (Cl5 scribe cross-hatch)
	and the adhesion test performed. The paint adhesion of
	specimens are rated on a scale of 10 to 1 with ″10 ″
	being no paint removed and ″1″ being all paint removed.
Whirling	Rain erosion testing was completed on a whirling arm
Arm Rain	rain erosion apparatus employing a 52 inch zero lift
	helicopter like propeller run at 3600 rpm. Reference
	and activated polyurethane topcoat foils were over-
	coated (85 to 120 micron paint thickness) following
	masking to produce a leading edge. The foils were
	attached to the propeller at a distance along the
	propeller correlating to a velocity of 380 mile per
	hour at the mid point of the foil. The effective rain
	field density of 2 mm droplets used during the
	experiment was 1 inch per hour. After 30 min the
	impact of rain erosion on the inter-coat adhesion of
	the foils was evaluated according to a 0.5 to 5 rating
	correlating with the amount of paint removed or tear
	length. The impact of water droplets on the leading
	edge of the over-coat formed on removal of the tape
	during the experiment erodes the over-coating layer
	relative to the strength of the inter-coat adhesion. (F
	or Fail or red markings indicate less than acceptable
	adhesion)
Paint	Procedure for the complete strip test is described in SAE
Stripping	MA4872, Annex A, pages 51 to 53. In this Stage an
	abbreviated version was completed using benzyl alcohol
	based paint strippers without thermal cycling to compare
	how the activated and over-coated specimens to untreated
	and reference specimens.
	Aged specimens (Aluminium or composite substrate) were
	untreated, sanded, or activated, were over-coated (60-
	75 micron), and cured for40 hours at 120° F. The edges
	were taped with Aluminium tape (such as 3M Scotch Brand
	No, 425) prior to commencing the test. Stripper was
	applied every 2 hours until the coating was removed.
	Lifting paint was removed just prior to reapplication of
	the stripper using a plastic squeegee.
Contact	Contact angle analysis was completed using ″FIRST TEN
Angle	ANGSTROMS″ semi-automated video equipped contact
	angle analyser. CH₂I₂and H ₂0 were employed as the
	reference solvents to calculate the dispersive (γs^d) and
	polar (γs^p) contributions to surface energy (γs) through the
	Young-Dupre
FTIR	FTIR analysis was carried out on a BRUKER FTIR/NIR
	spectrometer or Nicolet Instruments, employing NaCl
	plates or an ATR KRS-5 TiBr/TiI mixed crystal
	associated with the microscope. Extent of surface
	contamination was assessed by swabbing the surface
	with a ″Q-tip″ soaked with hexane. Following
	evaporation of the hexane solution onto NaCl, powder
	NaCl plates suitable for FTIR analysis were prepared
	by compression moulding.
SEM	SEM analysis of the polyurethane cross-sections were
	collected on a Oxford Pentafet detector controlled by
	an Oxford ISIS system. Cross-sections of the samples,
	prepared with a cut off saw appropriate for non-ferrous
	materials, were mounted in epoxy resin, ground and
	polished to a 1 micron finish and gold coated. Imaging
	and x-ray analysis was conducted using a 15 KV
	accelerating voltage and a 17 mm working distance. EDX
	analysis was specifically refined for carbon, nitrogen,
	oxygen, and chlorine.
Hydrogen	Activity of reducing agent was determined by employing
Evolution	Hydrogen Evolution techniques. The activity of the
	reducing agent solution (eg. LiBH4 in Proglyde DMM)
	was determined by measuring the quantity of hydrogen
	evolved following interaction with dilute aqueous acid.
Accelerated	Equipment: Atlas (Xenon Arc) Weatherometer
UV	Outer filter = borosilicate Inner filter = quartz
exposure	Light intensity: 0.55 W/m 2/nm
	@340 nm
	Operation Cycle (SAE J1960):
	Panels: Desothane HS 70846 White
	Test for:
	Colour shift of previously reactivated (but not over-
	coated) panels
	Reactivation potential of samples conditioned through
	aging protocol then a UV cycle.
Hydraulic	Specimens were tested for coating pencil hardness
fluid	prior to immersion into the fluid and rated in
exposure	hardness according to the following protocol (soft to
	hard). After 30 days immersion the specimens were
	re-tested. Values reported are the softest pencil that
	would cut into the paint surface.
	Hardness
	Scale (Soft to Hard)
	6B
	5B
	4B

	3B
	2B
	B
	HB
	F
	H
	2H
	3H

	4H

	5H
	6H
Gardner	Both sides of the test specimen were subject to
Impact	varying impact forces in 10 inch pound increments
Adhesion	using a Gardner 160 inch pound capacity impact
	testing machine with a 0.625 inch diameter
	hemispherical indenter. Values reported are the
	highest force recorded that produced no cracking of
	paint in either the forward or reverse impact
	Maximum impact tested was 80 inch pounds.

Example 1: Hydrolysis Method

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of Desothane HS 70846X white (30±5 μm, CA8000C thinner) cured 40 hour at 120° F. (9% RH) followed by 48 hour at 120° F. (50% RH) followed by 24 hour at 160° F., activated and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue (104±10 μm).
Activation Treatment: 30 min, horizontal application position (IPA wipe post treatment)

Example 2: Oxidation Method

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of Desothane HS 70846X white (30±5 μm, CA8000C2 thinner) cured 40 hour at 120° F. (9% RH), followed by 48 hour at 120° F. (50% RH) and 24 hour at 160° F., activated and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue (104±10 μm).
Activation treatment time 30 min, (IPA wipe post treatment)

Example 3: Reduction Method

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of Desothane HS 70846X white (30±5 μm CA8000C2 thinner) cured 40 hour at 120° F. (5% RH) followed by 48 hour at 120° F. (50% RH) and 24 hour at 160° F., activated and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue (104±10 μm).
Treatment 30 min, (SOHO—post treatment).

Example 4: Light Grafting Method

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of Desothane HS 70846X white (30±5 μm, CA8000C-thinner) cured 40 hour at 120° F., (9% RH), followed by 48 hour at 120° F., 50% RH and hour at 160° F., activated 120 min, wiped (IPA) and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue (104±10 μm).
Initiator System: Camphorquinone (1% w/w based on acrylate), Dimethyltoluidine (120% w/w based on camphorquinone) system placed under an 2×18W fluorescent desk lamp.

Example 5: Reduction Surface Activation Method—Green Scribe Adhesion

Green (scribe) inter-coat adhesion of Desothane HS 70846X white (30±5 μm CA8000C2 thinner) cured 40 hour at 120° F. (9% RH), followed by 48 hour at 120° F. (50% RH) and 24 hour at 160° F., activated and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue (68±10 μm, 16 h ambient cure). Green adhesion rating as per BSS7225.

Example 6 Reduction Activation Method—Stripping Rate Test

- A—Untreated, B—Sanded, C—Treatment with 2% NaBH₄in ethanol, 30 min

Example 7 Evidence of Surface Energy Change

Surface Energy Results for Activated Surfaces Employing a Thermally Aged Desothane HS 70846X Substrate (CA8000C Thinner)


			Surface Energy
		Contact Angle	(mJ/m2)

(°)

Specific

Dispersive

Treatment	Conditions	Water	CH2I2	γs^p	γs^d

C Thinner
Fresh		76.5	39.0	4.2	42.0
Aged Untreated		76.2	40.3	4.5	41.3
Aged IPA Wipe		75.8	35.0	4.0	44.0
Aged - 2%	EtOH/EtOH	37.0	36.6	23.7	43.2
Sodium	wash
Aged - 1%	EtOAc/IPA	69.7	29.4	5.8	46.6
Acetic Acid	wipe
Aged-	2 × 18 W	65.2	43.5	8.5	43.5
Camphorquinone	fluorescent
(1% w/w based	desk lamp,
on acrylate),	MAK wipe
Dimethyltoluidine
(120% w/w
based on
Camphorquinone)
methylamylketone

Fresh—4 hour at 120° F. (approx. 9% RH)
Aged—40 hour at 120° F. (approx. 9% RH), 48 hour at 120° F. (50% RH) and 24 hour at 160° F.

Example 8: Evidence of Surface Energy Change

Surface energy results for activated surfaces employing a thermally aged Desothane HS 70846 substrate (C2 thinner)


			Surface Energy
		Contact	(mJ/m2)

Angle (°)

Specific

Dispersive

Treatment	Conditions	Water	CH2I2	γs^p	γs^d

C2 Thinner
Fresh		71.4	27.6	5.0	47.3
Aged Untreated		74.6	45.5	5.7	38.5
Aged IPA Wipe		73.9	36.3	4.9	43.4
Aged - 2%	EtOH/	42.6	32.2	19.7	45.3
Sodium	EtOH
Borohydride	wash
Aged - 1%	EtOAc/	67.9	28.7	6.5	46.9
Acetic Acid	IPA wipe
Aged -	2 × 18 W	68.6	27.3	6.0	47.4
Camphorquinone	fluorescent
(1% w/w based	desk lamp,
on acrylate),	MAK wipe
Dimethyltoluidine
(120% w/w
based on
Camphorquinone)

Fresh - 4 hour at 120° F. (approx. 9% RH)
Aged - 40 hour at 120° F. (approx. 9% RH), 48 hour at 120° F. (50% RH) and 24 hour at 160 ° F.

Example 9

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified for 30 min (SOHO) and over-coated with Desothane S400X red 3 hours following hose-off with water.
Treatment Solutions Prepared in Progylde (Dipropylene Glycoldimethyl Ether).
Results indicated that improved inter-coat adhesion is possible employing “mild” reducing agents such as NaBH₄and LiBH₄.

Example 10

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified for 30 min(SOHO) and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue 3 hours following hose-off with water.
Treatment solutions prepared in dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether at 0.2% concentration. Results indicate that reducing agents with different strengths may be employed for the purpose of reactivation.

Example 11

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified for 30 min (SOHO) and over-coated with Desothane S400X red 3 hours following hose-off with water.
Treatment solutions prepared in dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether.
Example illustrates that a variety of different concentrations may be employed to “activate” the surface of polyurethane based coatings towards over-coating to provide improved adhesion.

Example 12

(i) SIJA Inter-Coat Adhesion of Aged Desothane HS 70846X
white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified (SOLO) for 3 h and over-coated with Desothane HS 5070X blue.
Treatment solutions prepared in dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether.
Example illustrates that very low concentrations of the reducing agent may be employed to “activate” the surface of polyurethane based coatings towards over-coating using a spray on leave on approach.
(ii) Scribe adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white reactivated under the conditions specified and over-coated with Desothane HS 5070X blue. The overcoat was allowed to cure under ambient conditions for 16 h prior to conducting the test
The example illustrates that excellent scribe adhesion results are possible employing low concentrations of reducing reagent under various application conditions.

Example 13

(i) SIJA Inter-Coat Adhesion of Aged Eclipse BAC70846 White Reactivated Under the Conditions Specified (SOLO) for 3 h and Over-Coated with Desothane HS 5070X Blue.
Treatment solutions prepared in Progylde (dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether) using LiBH₄as the reducing agent.
Example illustrates that a variety of different reducing agent concentrations may be employed to “activate” the surface of polyurethane based coatings towards over-coating from different manufacturers and polyurethane chemistries.
(ii) Scribe adhesion of aged Eclipse BAC70846 white reactivated under the conditions specified and over-coated with Desothane HS 5070X blue. The overcoat was allowed to cure under ambient conditions for 16 h prior to conducting the test
The example illustrates that improved scribe adhesion results were possible employing low concentrations of reducing reagent to reactivate different types of polyurethane topcoats under various application conditions.

Example 14

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS70846X white reactivated with LiBH4 (0.2 wt %) in the solvent/s specified (SOLO) for 3 h and over-coated with various coloured Desothane HS polyurethane topcoats.
Results indicate that different solvents may be employed for reactivation using reducing agents under appropriate conditions.

Example 15

(i) SIJA Inter-Coat Adhesion of Aged Desothane HS 70846X White Reactivated with LiBH4 (0.2 wt %) in Proglyde DMM and Co-Solvent Specified (SOLO) for 3 Hours and Over-Coated with Various Coloured Desothane HS Polyurethane Topcoats.
(ii) Example incorporating different alcohols (40%) and alcohol combinations (20:200).
Results indicate that under appropriate conditions a variety of solvent combinations may be employed for the purpose of reactivation with appropriate reducing agents.

Example 16

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified for 30 min(SOHO) and over-coated with Desothane S400X red 3 hours following hose-off with water.
1.0% Li (OCH3)xBH4-x in Proglyde prepared by addition of 0 (x=O), 1 (x=1, major component)), 2 (x=2, major component), and 3 (x=3, major component) equivalents (Eq) respectively of methanol “in-situ”.
Example illustrates that the active agent may be prepared “in situ” and that reactivation can be conducted in the presence of more than one different type of reducing reagent.

Example 17

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified for 30 min (SOHO) and over-coated with Desothane S400X red 3 hours following hose off with water.
Example illustrates that different treatment solution preparation methods can be employed to manufacture the reduction based reactivations formulation taking into consideration the different ways in which reducing agents are packaged and sold commercially. In certain circumstances the reactive agent may be generated “in situ” if required.

Example 18

Rain erosion adhesion results for Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) aged as specified. Reactivated using the formulations and treatment time specified before over-coated with Desothane HS 50103X blue.

- (i) Ageing protocol: 4 h (120F, 2-3% RH). SOLO based reactivation method
- (ii) Ageing protocol: 5 Days (120F, 2-3% RH) SOLO based reactivation treatment
- (iii) Ageing protocol: 4 h (120F, 2-3% RH) SOHO based reactivation method
- (iv) Ageing protocol: 5 days (120F, 2-3% RH) SOHO based reactivation method

Results illustrate that improved inter-coat adhesion is possible using reducing agents mixed into various reactivation treatment formulations and applied under various treatment times and protocols for substrates aged under various protocols.

Example 19

Rain erosion adhesion results for aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C-thinner) applied onto epoxy-carbon fibre composite incorporating primer, intermediate and topcoat layers reactivated under the conditions specified before being over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue.
Example illustrates that reactivation of aged polyurethane topcoats can be completed using the reducing methodology on “composite substrates” incorporating paint lay-ups including selectively strippable intermediate coating layers beneath the polyurethane topcoat.
Note: sanded and untreated reference in duplicate, chemically reactivated in triplicate.

Example 20

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated with LiBH₄(0.2 wt % in Proglyde DMM) for 2 h under the post treatment conditions specified before being over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue.
Example illustrates that various “post treatment” protocols may be employed depending on the application I process requirements without negatively impacting adhesion.

Example 21

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated with LiBH₄(0.1 wt % in Proglyde DMM) multiple times 30 min apart under the conditions specified before being over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue.
Example illustrates that multiple applications of the reactivation treatment solution does not diminish adhesion performance.

Example 22

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS70846X white (C2) reactivated with LiBH₄(0.1 wt % in ProglydeDMM) for (i) one hour before being subjected to the conditions specified and then washed (water) allowed to dry or (ii) for the treatment time specified before being over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue or S400X red.
The example demonstrates that reactivation can be conducted for a short (5 min) or extended period (8 days) and that the reactivated surface retains its reactivity towards subsequent paint layers under a variety of conditions.

Example 23

SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 7084X6 white (C2) reactivated with LiBH₄solutions themselves previously aged under ambient conditions for the period specified before being over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue.
(i) Treatment solutions: 0.2% LiBH₄in Progylde DM+the percentage IPA indicated stored for 50 days before being used to reactivate the aged polyurethane topcoat.
(ii) Treatment solutions: Various LiBH₄concentrations stored in Proglyde DMM/20 tBAC for 90 days prior to application
(iii) Treatment solution: LiBH₄prepared as a stock 0.5 wt % concentration in Proglyde DMM and stored for 6 months. Dilutions to the indicated concentrations and formulations were made just prior to application of the treatment solution for the purpose of reactivation in a SOLO format
(iv) Rain erosion adhesion data from Desothane HS 70846X white (C) cured at 120F (10% RH) 4 days prior to reactivation and over-coating with Desothane HS S601X blue. NOTE: Reactivated samples in triplicate, benchmark untreated and sanded in duplicate.
Treatment solutions (a) Aged for 25 days (b) Aged for 25 days
(c) Stock solution in Proglyde DMM aged for 25 days and IPA added just prior to application to provide the given concentration (d) prepared fresh (e) prepared fresh.
Examples illustrate that reactivation treatment solutions stored under ambient conditions retain their activity thus providing shelf life and pot-life robustness.

Example 24

Example demonstrates that application of the treatment solution can assist in the mitigation of common surface contaminants (residues), produced by the manufacturing assembly which can reduce both the visual appearance and inter-coat adhesion particularly when the reactivation treatment solution is applied as a SOHO or SOWO application technique.
(i) Illustration of application of common surface contaminates to the surface of an aged Desothane HS 70846X white topcoat prior to reactivation and over-coating with Desothane HS 5070X blue.
Corresponding SIJA inter-coat adhesion results from contaminant quadrants
(ii) SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS white 70846X topcoat contaminated with (a) petroleum jelly or (b) Aeroshell 33 prior to reactivation employing 0.1% LiBH4 in Proglyde DMM I 20 tBAC. Activation treatment left on for (30 minutes) prior to application of the designated post treatment conditions specified. Subsequently over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue.
(a) Petroleum jelly contaminant

(b) Aeroshell 33

The above example clearly demonstrates that improved inter-coat adhesion and paint appearance may be obtained when the Desothane HS coatings contaminated with common aerospace residues from manufacturing processes are reactivated prior to over-coating.
(iii) Supporting FTIR evidence for selected contaminants: Samples were swabbed with a hexane soaked “Q-tip” and the hexane containing sample absorbed onto NaCl. Following compression molding of the NaCl into Plaques, FTIR spectra was obtained.

(a) Petroleum Jelly Contaminant

NOTE: typical absorptions around 3000 cm-¹for the contaminant was removed or reduced following reactivation under the conditions listed.

(b) Aeroshell 33 Contaminant

NOTE: typical absorptions around 3000 cm-1 for contaminant was removed or reduced following reactivation under the conditions listed.
Examples illustrate that the level of contaminate is clearly reduced or removed following the reactivation treatment.
(iv) Supporting surface energy results for selected contaminants following no treatment, solvent wipe only and reactivation treatments of the contaminated aged Desothane HS 70846X white topcoat under the conditions specified.


	Surface Energy (mJ/m²)

					0.1% LiBH4
					(Proglyde, 2%

MEK/MPK

tBAc) MEK/

No Treatment

Wipe Only

MPK Wipe

	Dis-		Dis-		Dis-
Contamination	persive	Specific	persive	Specific	persive	Specific

None
	45	4.2	43	3.9	45	8.6
Microcut	48	3.2	45	4.2	45	6.9
Catoil	47	2.0	44	2.9	45	6.0
Boelube	37	6.0	46	3.5	46	5.9
Aeroshell 33	43	2.2	44	2.8	46	8.0
Petroleum	49	3.0	41	3.9	43	6.5
Jelly

The specific surface energy component of total surface energy is significantly reduced after contaminants are applied to the surface of the aged Desothane HS 70846X substrate. Wiping the surface with just solvent only marginally improved the specific contribution to surface energy (not back to untreated, non-contaminated) whilst specimens reactivated with LiBH4 under the conditions listed provided a significant improvement in the specific contribution to surface energy above that for non-contaminated substrates indicating simultaneous cleaning and reactivation has occurred.

Example 25

(i) Example 25. (i) SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated under the conditions specified—one (thin application) or two (thicker application) applications followed by water hose-off after the 30 minute treatment time (SOHO) and over-coated with Desothane S400X. Following cure of the over-coating the samples were immersed in Skydrol aviation fluid for a period of 30 days under ambient conditions prior to adhesion testing.
The example illustrates that the inter-coat adhesion between topcoat layers is resistant to hydraulic fluids.
(ii) SIJA inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane HS 70846X white reactivated under the conditions specified (SOLO, 180 min) and over-coated with Desothane HS S601X blue. Following cure of the over-coating the samples were immersed in water under ambient conditions or placed in a condensing humidity chamber at 120F/98% RH for a period of 30 days prior to adhesion testing and visual appearance assessment.
Results indicate that excellent inter-coat adhesion was obtained after 30 days water soak under ambient conditions or 30 days conditioning at 120F and 95% RH. Paint appearance is also acceptable and further improved by either using sediment (precipitate free) treatment solutions obtained from filtering, or post treatment protocols such as a tack rag wipe, wash (SOHO) or wipe (SOWO) processes.

Example 26

(i) The following example illustrates effects of spray application of 0.1% LiBH₄

- Proglyde DMM reactivation solution onto bare polysulfide based sealant (PRC-Desoto PR1772) that has been applied over primed carbon fiber reinforced epoxy.

Example illustrates that no lifting, bubbling of the sealant occurs even at thin sealant thicknesses.
Adhesion of the sealant to the substrate is maintained even through application of rubbing.
(ii) The following example illustrates scribe adhesion results from polysulfide sealant (PRC-Desoto PR 1772) cured for 4 h before treatment with a reactivation treatment solution comprised of 0.1% LiBH₄in proglyde for the time specified before overcoating with Desothane HS S601X Blue and curing for 16 h under ambient conditions.
The example illustrates that no deleterious effects occur following application of the treatment solution onto the sealant prior to over-coating even when the treatment solution is applied onto only moderately cured (young) sealants.
(iii) The following example provide weight change data for polysulfide sealant (PRC-Desoto PR 1772) when immersed into different solvents and reactivation treatment solutions.
(iv) The following example illustrates what impact application of LiBH₄I proglyde reactivation solutions has on selective strippable (intermediate) coating layers applied over primed composite panels.
The example demonstrates that no lifting or dissolution of the intermediate coating layer occurs through interaction of the reactivation treatment solution.
(v) The following examples provide immersion weight change data up to 28 days of various aerospace substrate materials in various solvents, typical aerospace paint stripper, and reactivation treatment solutions. (a) BMSS-256—carbon fiber reinforced epoxy (b) BMS8-79—glass fiber reinforced epoxy (c) BMS8-276—carbon fiber reinforced epoxy with Metlborid 1515 adhesive film (d) BMS 8-276 with Surface Master 905 adhesive film (e) Various metals, Al-aluminum, Ti—titanium, SS—stainless steel, HSS—high strength steel.
The examples demonstrate that the reactivation solutions may be formulated for minimal negative interaction with a range of materials from plastics, composites, elastomers, and metals relative to common solvents or chemical formulations often used in industries such as the aerospace sector. In the case of metals, weight loss is within measurement uncertainty

Example 27

The following examples demonstrate the reactivation solution may be used in conjunction with materials such as stencils and design masks and tapes for the production of decorative painted finishes.
(i) Reactivation (LiBH4 in proglyde:IPA 40:60 SOLO application 30 min) applied onto aged Desothane HS white 70846X topcoat (16 h, 120F, 8% RH) with pre-applied vinyl based stencil prior to painting with Desothane HS S601X blue (C2) cured for 16 h at ambient conditions.
(ii) Reactivation (LiBH₄in proglyde:IPA 40:60 SOLO application 30 min) applied onto aged Desothane HS white 70846X topcoat (16 h, 120F, 8% RH) with pre-applied vinyl based stencil prior to painting with Desothane HS S601X (C) blue at 120F for 16 h.
Example illustrates that crisp non-distorted designs are maintained even when the treatment solution is applied over the top of the mask.
(iii) Reactivation (0.15% LiBH4 in proglyde:IPA, 30 min, SOLO) applied onto aged Desothane HS white 70846X topcoat (16 h, 120F) with pre-applied vinyl based stencil prior to painting with Desothane HS S601X blue (C2).
Example illustrates that excellent green adhesion, verified by scribe and stencil pull tests, is possible after 1 h with reactivated samples unlike untreated and excellent letter clarity is possible across a range of stencil pull times.

Example 28

Desothane HS 3613X yellow or S400X red (C2) cured aged under the standard aging protocol was reactivated using the LiBH₄concentrations indicated for 30 min SOLO prior to overcoating with Desothane HS S601X blue.
The example illustrates that different coloured polyurethane coating may be reactivated using the reduction strategy.

Example 29

(i) SEM pictures of Desothane HS 70846X white polyurethane coatings both (C) and (C2) aged under the (a) standard cure cycle aging conditions and (b) low humidity conditions (120F, 5 days, 2-3% RH) prior to and following reactivation with 0.1% LiBH4 in proglyde.
Example a illustrates that the surface of the coating looks similar prior to and following reactivation. Example b illustrates that the surface of the coating looks similar prior to and following reactivation
(ii) Surface energy results for Desothane HS 70846X white polyurethane coatings both (C) and (C2) aged using the (a) standard cure conditions and (b) low humidity cure conditions (120F, 5 days, 2-3% RH) prior to and following reactivation with 0.1% LiBH4 in proglyde


Substrate	Surface Energy (mJ/m²)

Cure	Treatment*	Dispersive	Specific

Low Humidity Cycle (5 days, 120 F., 2-3% RH)

″C″	—	44.2	5.4
′C″	0.1% LiBH₄	43.9	6.3
″C2″	—	41.5	5.5
″C2″	0.1% LiBH₄	42.4	7.3

Ageing Cycle: 120° F., 5% RH 40 h, (ii) 120° F. 50% RH 48 h, and

(iii) oven cure at 160° F. for 24 h

″C″		43.6	3.6
″C″	0.1% LiBH₄	45.4	5.9
″C2″		45.2	4.2
″C2″	0.1% LiBH₄	45.5	7.3

Example illustrates that increases in the Specific contribution to surface energy results from exposure to the reactivation treatment solution for the coatings aged under difference conditions and with catalyst levels (eg: C and C2).
(iii) FTIR-ATR results from Desothane HS 70846X white polyurethane coatings (C2) aged under the standard conditions and reactivated as indicated.
(iv) SEM cross section images of cured aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) applied over primer and aluminium substrate (a) untreated, (b) sanded and (c) reactivated using 0.1% LiBH4 in proglyde 30 min SOLO prior to over-coating with Desothane HS S601X blue.
Examples illustrate that the over-coat does not wet the aged Desothane coating when untreated providing de-bonded regions. The de-bonded regions are not present in the sanded and. chemically reativated samples, providing evidence for improved interfacial interaction between the two polyurethane topcoat coating layers (white and blue).

Example 30

Example illustrates the impact of accelerated UV exposure on aged Desothane HS 70846X polyurethane coating relative to untreated reference for different lengths of exposure time.
(i) Change in colour for samples not over-coated
The example illustrates that the colour shift is similar for samples untreated, sanded, reactivated with 0.1% LiBH4 in proglyde that is either removed after 30 min (SOHO) or not removed (SOLO) if left not over-coated prior to various lengths of accelerated UV exposure time.
(ii) SIJA inter-coat adhesion results for Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) aged under the standard protocol and then accelerated UV conditions for 630 h before reactivation and over-coating with Desothane S601X.
The example illustrates that the reactivation protocol provides improved inter-coat adhesion for samples exposed to accelerated aging and UV exposure with similar result provided to those samples not exposed to UV.
This example is relevant to polyurethane coating that has undergone UV exposure for extended periods before requiring reactivation and over-coating, for example, in-service airplanes.

Example 31

Example shows a comparative paint stripping experiment between composite panels incorporating a primer, intermediate and polyurethane topcoat layers. In the example the stripping behaviour of aged Desothane HS 70846X white (C2) reactivated with the reduction method under the conditions listed prior to over-coating with Desothane HS S601X relative to untreated and sanded references.
The example illustrates that the chemically reactivated samples, strip in a similar time frame to the sanded and untreated references.
t=initial
Top row (from left to right): 17, 18, 19, 20
Bottom row (left to right): 21, 22, 23, 24

17—Untreated

18—Sanded

19, 20—0.05% Lithium Borohydride t-Butyl Acetate: Proglyde 2:98 (SOHO)
21, 22—0.01% Lithium Borohydride t-Butyl Acetate: Proglyde 2:98 (SOHO)
23, 24—0.05% Lithium Borohydride t-Butyl Acetate: Proglyde 2:98 (SOHO)
The example illustrates that the chemically reactivated samples strip in a similar time frame to the sanded and untreated references.

Example 32

The following example shows the impact on paint adhesion and appearance of Desothane HS S601X applied over untreated and reactivated aged Desothane HS 70846X coatings (themselves applied over primed aluminum) under cycling temperature and humidity for 500 cycles.
(i) Scribe adhesion was rated “10” for all samples
(ii) SIJA adhesion testing provided improved inter-coat adhesion similar to sanded following the cycling protocol.
(iii) No change of paint finish was noted in terms of “micro-cracking” or “pin head defect formation” following the cycling
The examples illustrate that no apparent reduction in adhesion or over-coat appearance occurs following cycling of temperature and humidity.

Example 33

Example demonstrates the paint adhesion and overcoat paint quality of rain erosion foils following simulation of typical paint masking hangar operations and heat cure. The examples show rain erosion foils, (incorporating primer, intermediate coating, and) topcoated with Desothane HS CA8000/B70846X base with C thinner cured/aged for 5 days at 3% RH and 120° F. which were reactivated for 1.5 hours using SOHO (prior to wash off) or the SOLO process indicated.
Following reactivation the samples either underwent a 6 hour 120F thermal cycle directly (then left under ambient conditions overnight) or alternatively prior to the thermal treatment were wrapped with Kraft paper or had 4 bands of masking tape perpendicularly wrapped around the samples. After removal of the paper and tape (wiping the tape lines with IPA) the samples were painted with Desothane HS CA8000/B50103 base with C thinner and following cure tested for adhesion and paint appearance relative to unreactivated and sanded controls.
(i) SOHO Reactivation
(ii) SOLO Reactivation
Results indicate:

- All the foils except for a random SOLO foil passed with good marks
- Excellent paint appearance was noted: No ghosting seen from the tape being on the foil that was cured for 6 hours and then being solvent wiped with IPA and no deleterious effects from application of Kraft paper were noted
- No significant difference from a 1 application situation and a 3 application situation

Example 34

The following example illustrates the inter-coat adhesion of aged Desothane 70846X and S400X red untreated and reactivated with tetraisopropyl titanate or sanded reference prior to over-coating with S601X blue and 5070X light blue.

(i) SIJA Adhesion

The example illustrates that treatment of the aged surface with tetraisopropyl titanate provides improved adhesion with different coloured aged polyurethane substrates and over-coatings.
(ii) The following example demonstrate the reactivation solution based on tetraisopropyl titanate may be used in conjunction with materials such as stencils and design masks and tapes for the production of decorative painted finishes.
Untreated Reference
5% Tetraisopropyl Titanate in IPA
The example illustrates that the use of the treatment solution based on tetraisopropyl titanate applied as a treatment solution for aged Desothane HS 70846X prior to over-coating with Desothane HS 5070X improved adhesion compared with the untreated reference and also provided minimal letter swelling or figure distortion, when it is applied SOLO directly over the design stencil prior to over-coating with polyurethane.

Example 35

Screening experiments assessed a variety of metal alkoxide modifying agents with different relative reactivities (moisture stabilities) as described in Table 4.
Initial experiments employed SIJA methods to probe the change in inter-coat adhesion with (i) the type of metal alkoxide used in the activation treatment system and (ii) its concentration. Under all conditions a SOLO approach was employed. FIG. 1 provides the SIJA data employing 0.5, 3 and 5 wt % concentrations of modifying agent. It should be pointed out that (i) there was no true concentration parity in the experiment although given the large concentration range investigated trends in performance could be assessed and (ii) all solutions were prepared in the one solvent system (IPA) to simplify the experiment even though it is known that alcoholysis is possible to provide mixed alkoxides. However, to counter this effect to some degree each solution was prepared freshly and applied directly. Considering that NPZ has a high molecular weight and was supplied as a 70% NPA solution the actual concentration was much lower than for similar titanium based reagents.
Metal alkoxides with small alkoxy groups (eg: TPT, NBT, NPZ see Table 4) appeared to provide limited benefit at concentrations of 0.5 wt % but under the reactivation conditions employed showed improved inter-coat adhesion at concentrations above 3 wt %. A lower reactivity for TEAZ was observed probably due to its greater moisture stability (Table 4). Closer investigation of concentration (FIG. 2) indicated that around 6-7 mmol of modifying agents per 100 g was required to see paint removal comparable to sanded specimens with less paint removed as the concentration was increased.
A preliminary investigation was also undertaken to assess the activity of the substrate over time considering that along with a standard reactivation time (eg 30 to 60 minutes) there may also be a requirement in the paint hangar for the activated surface to remain active after a heat cycle or for shorter or longer periods. Preliminary assessment results are provided in FIG. 3. The salient points from this study were that (i) NPZ treatment solutions appear to build up adhesive forces faster than TPT, (ii) both versions provided about the same level of intercoat adhesion after 1 h even though the respective molar concentration of NPZ was less, (iii) paint surfaces remain active after 24 h at ambient conditions, and (iv) the surfaces remained active after a heat cycle. Point (i) may be explained by the relative reactivity of the materials as provided by their difference in hydrolysis rate (Table 4). This type of activation window was considered commercially attractive and appeared to provide some flexibility for paint hangar scheduling.

TABLE 4

Properties Of Various Metal Alkoxides

Promoter/	Tetra-i-	Tetra-n-propyl	Tetra-n-
Property	propyltitanate	titanate	butyltitanate

Formula	Ti(O-i-C₃H₇)₄	Ti(O-n-C₃H₇)₄	Ti(O-n-C₄H₉)₄
MW	284	284	340
Abbreviation	TPT	NPT	NBT
Supply
	100%	100%	100%
Density	0.965	1.05	1.0
(g/mL
Pour Point	+17 (Melt Point)	−50	<−70
(° C.)
Flash point	23-60	38	50
Relative	0.5-2.0	0.5-2.0	1.0-2.5
hydrolysis
rate (mL
Relative moles	3.5	3.5	2.9
at 1 wt in
100
Formula	Zr(O-n-C₃H₇)₄	Zr(C₆H₁₄NO₃)₄	Zr(O-n-C₃H₇)₄
MW	327	683	327
Abbreviation	NPZ	TEAZ	NPZ
Supply
	70% (NPA)	100%	70% (NPA)
Density	1.07	1.34	1.07
(g/mL
Pour Point	−70	—	−70
(° C.)
Flash point	21-25	>100	21-25
(° C.)
Relative	0.02	>500	0.02
hydrolysis
rate
(g/mL
Relative moles	3.5	3.5	2.9
at 1 wt %
in 100 g

indicates data missing or illegible when filed

TABLE 5

Physical Properties of Various Solvents

	Boiling	Vapor
	point*	pressure	Flash Point
Solvent/Material	(QC)	(mmHg @ 20° C.)	(° C.)

Isopropanol (IPA)	82	33	12
n-Propanol (NPA)	97	14.9	22
n-Butanol (NBA)	116	4.5	35
Hexanol	156	0.5	59
Ethylhexanol	184	0.36	73
Dipropylene glycol	175	0.6	65
dimethylether
(Proglyde DMM)
Methyl ethylketone	80	71	−1
(MEK)
Methyl propylketone	101	27	7
(MPK)

*start of boiling point range provided

Based on the results provided for LiBH4 based modifying agents stencil and pre-mask swelling appeared to be more related to the physical properties of the solvent system employed rather than the low concentrations of the active agent. To confirm this with metal alkoxide modifying agents a brief study was undertaken with the results provided in FIGS. 4 and 5. As was shown for LiBH₄treatments in 100% Proglyde DMM extensively swelled the vinyl mask whilst 100% IPA provided no swelling. Since slight swelling began at a ratio of approximately 60:40 IPA: proglyde this ratio was considered a reasonable upper limit for the amount of glycol ether in formulations to be used with stencils. The effect of modifying agent concentration for NPZ in NPA or TPT in IPA was also undertaken (FIG. 5) with the results confirming that in 100% alcohol at least the concentration range (0.5 to 5.0 wt %) did not appear to negatively impact letter quality.
Preliminary 30 day water soak experiments were also undertaken with specimens reactivated and then over-coated. One to three applications of the modifying agent were investigated to simulate both thin and thick applications, over spray, multiple passes etc. Generally good over-coat appearance was observed even with high concentrations of TPT or NPZ (5 wt %) at 1 to 3 applications (FIG. 6).

Pre-Mask and Stencil Vinyl Swelling

Based on the preliminary results for stencil swelling, full stencil and premask diamond studies were undertaken. Using 100% IPA or NPA in the solvent system did not appear to provide appreciable stencil or pre-mask swelling and as such letter clarity was crisp even when the reactivation solution was applied over vinyl mask materials SOLO (FIG. 7a ) Following encouraging whirling arm rain erosion results (see later) additional stencil swelling experiments were undertaken employing 5 wt % NPZ in a range of solvents and combinations (FIG. 7b ). No negative impact was demonstrated by using a 20:80 ratio of proglyde DMM to IPA or NPA, although at a 40:60 ratio some slight wicking away from the edges of the stencil was noted. Considering the benefits provided by using a slightly higher proglyde concentration in terms of adhesion on thicker paint layers, this degree of stencil swelling may be acceptable and probably not observed on pre-mask vinyl considering its lower susceptibility to swelling or when applied for short dwell times (15 min). Alternatively, different solvent formulations can be employed depending on whether the application is for stencils which typically uses paint layer thickness on the order of one mil or premask or large body area applications where the paint layer thickness is typically two to five mils.
Tests using a 5 wt % NPZ are provided in FIG. 7C. It should be pointed out that using difficult to remove Chinese characters letter quality was significantly improved compared to untreated specimens and there was no appearance of stencil swelling when a 5% NPZ 20:80 proglyde:IPA solvent system was employed for reactivation.

Adhesion

Leveraging the preliminary results provided in the initial screening experiments above, the majority of subsequent experiments were completed employing a 3 wt % concentration of modifying agent in alcohol based solvents. Later, higher concentrations of modifying agent and the addition of proglyde to the solvent system was found necessary to provide acceptable whirling arm rain erosion results on thick layers of paint in certain circumstances. It should also be emphasised that as indicated in FIG. 2, concentration parity was not maintained between TPT and NPZ with a 3 wt % solution actually corresponding to a 10.5 and a 6.6 mmol/100 g concentration respectively.

Scribe Adhesion

Various scribe adhesion test results are provided in
FIG. 8. Although the 3.5 h, 120F cure stencil results did not provide a reference material that failed BSS7225 (and as such it was not possible to discriminate between the reactivation treatments) the 12 h ambient cure overcoats did with the reactivated samples providing a “10” rating similar to sanded for in contract to untreated with a “0” rating.
Stencil pull and scribe adhesion were also undertaken (FIG. 9) and mirror that completed for LiBH₄. Regardless of the treatment dwell (30 or 90 min), the treatments provided excellent scribe results (10 in BSS 7225) after 60 min under ambient conditions superior to that of both sanded (8) and untreated (3). In terms of stencil pull: pull times of 90 min (more severe) did provide a “thinner” letter for all the reactivations treatments. Results for TPT were somewhat superior to NPZ regardless of whether IPA or NPA was employed which might be attributed to the difference in effective concentration. However, stencil pull results were on the whole far better than untreated with effectively a full letter present at a stencil pull time of 60 min (similar to sanded specimens) whereas untreated specimens only provided a full letter at a pull time of 30 min.
SIJA and Rain Erosion Adhesion
Based on those strategies WARE foils were prepared with the main aim of (i) obtaining concentration parity between TPT and NPZ, (ii) employing Desothane CA8000 base coat cured with standard “C” thinner, (iii) exploring the potential for using proglyde as a co-solvent, and (iv) probing the effect of multiple applications. In all the experiments a relatively long application time was employed (4 h) to provide a sufficient time frame for the metal alkoxide to firstly react and then condense with the aged paint surface. Subsequent tests demonstrated that much shorter dwell (application) times, e. g. 30 minutes, were feasible.
The results from SIJA panels are provided in FIG. 10 and the WARE results obtained from foils provided in FIG. 11. Although reasonable paint removal was obtained for the untreated reference from the 16 h, 120F heat cycle cure (at 8% RH or 0.59 wt % air moisture), the 72 hr basecoat ambient cure (at 60% RH or 1.12 wt % air moisture) provided an untreated reference with only marginal paint loss. As such it was again difficult to compare the relative performance of the reactivation treatments. Table 6 provides tabular data for the WARE results given in FIG. 11. All foils produced “passes” with the “C” cured base coating under the 16 h, 120F, 8% RH cure. For the ambient cured foils, all the NPZ foils had superior WARE compared to the TPT foils. Fot the TPT foils, multiple applications appeared to help, although incorporation of 20% proglyde provided the greatest advantage with ⅔ foils passing the test (eg a marginal pass). The reason for this is complex: (i) the addition of proglyde assists in spraying a more uniform treatment film, (ii) proglyde has a much lower vapour pressure than IPA or NPA and as such the surface remained “wet” somewhat longer which presumably also assisted in promoting surface chemical reactions, (iii) proglyde is known to soften the paint and as such probably promoted metal alkoxide penetration into the coating surface and hence chemical reactions with embedded chemical groups, and (iv) through that process favors the formation of a surface/subsurface interpenetrating network during condensation of the alkoxide prior to or during cure of the over-coat.

TABLE 6

WARE results for FIG. 11

OHS BAC70846 Base coat: 16 h, 120 F., 8% RH, C2, Adhesion
promoter
2 h dwell, Overcoat BAC50103, 96 h 120 F., C2

			3% TPT	3% TPT in
		3% TPT	i IPA	PG:IPA,	5% NPZ	5% NPZ
Untreated	Sanded	in IPA	x2	1:4	in IPA	in NPA

0.5	4.3	4.8	4.6	4.4	4.6	4.5
0.	4.9	4.5	4.8	4.8	4.0	4.6
		4.9	4.8	4.0	4.6	4.7
0.4	4.6	4.7	4.7	4.4	4.4	4.6

OHS BAC70846 Base coat: 72 h, 75 F., 60% RH, C2, Adhesion

promoter

2 h dwell, Overcoat BAC707, 96 h 120 F., C2

			3% TPT	3% TPT in
		3% TPT	in IPA	PG: IPA,	5% NP	5% NPZ
Untreated	Sanded	in IPA	x2	1:4	in IPA	in NPA

2.0	4.9	2.0	2.4	4.1	4.8	4.8
2.4	4.9	2.3	3.5	3.7	4.5	4.9
		2.3	3.3	4.0	4.9	4.9
2.2	4.9	2.2	3.1	3.9	4.7	4.9

The findings from the trials with Desothane CA8000 on metal alkoxides may be summarised generally as follows:

- (i) NPZ is preferred over TPT
- (ii) NPA is preferred over IPA
- (iii) Small amounts of proglyde co-solvent appear to be helpful
- (iv) For maximum benefit, metal alkoxide concentrations should be >10 mmol/100 g
- (v) Multiple application provide a more limited benefit
- (vi) Reactivation of high humidity cured specimens appeared to be more complex compared with low humidity cure (surface chem. related/moisture present in coating etc.

Based on those findings a SIJA screening experiment was completed with Desothane CA8800 and Eclipse coatings employing the same two cure scenarios albeit that the ambient cure relative humidity was increased to 80% RH (1.56 wt % air moisture). The results are provided in FIGS. 12 and 13. Reactivation employing either TPT or NPZ using a variety of solvent systems provided improved levels of inter-coat adhesion under both cure conditions. The extent of improvement was such that further discrimination between the alkoxides and solvent systems employed was difficult to assess, although introduction of proglyde into the formulation as an 80:20 blend did appear to further enhance the performance. Further SIJA screening was also completed on Desothane CA8000 using 5 wt % NPZ and several proglyde to n-propanol and isopropanol solvent ratios as shown in FIG. 14. Results using 5 wt % NPZ in a solvent solution of proglyde and either IPA or NPA with 30 to 60 minute dwell time of the modifying agent prior to overcoat paint are provided in FIGS. 15 to 18. FIG. 15 shows the rain erosion results employing a 20:80 proglyde:IPA solution for different dwell times and for “high” humidity (1.31 wt % air moisture) and “low” humidity (0.22 wt % air moisture) cure scenarios. In all cases the modifying agent treatment provided excellent inter-coat adhesion to both Desothane CA8000 and CA8800 coatings with just the high humidity cure Eclipse providing failures. FIG. 16a explores the effect of Desothane CA8800 cure rates using reduced rate (CTR), standard rate (CT), and fast rate (CT2) cured overcoats and a CTR cured base coat employing the same reactivation treatment. For BAC70846 white over BAC707 gray good passes were obtained for the CTR and CT thinners. The faster CT2 cured over-coat did not provide so good a performance (⅔ foils rated above 4) although it should also be noted that sanded also failed under similar conditions. When BAC51265 Blue was used as the overcoat (CTR) and the BAC 707 gray base coat cured with the different thinners (FIG. 16b ), high passes were obtained for each of the cure rates. This suggests that reactivation of the basecoat is relatively insensitive to the cure rate (thinner) employed in the basecoat. FIGS. 17a and b documents the effect of higher proglyde concentrations (40%) and the impact of NPA or IPA as the alcohol in the 5 wt % NPZ formulation using difficult to over-coat systems including Desothane CA8800 gray on white cured under high humidity and CA8000 cured under low humidity conditions. In both cases excellent passes were obtained with little differentiation between the two types of alcohols employed.
Given those results the treatments were applied to high humidity cured Eclipse base coats which had been previously shown to fail when exposed to 5 wt % NPZ in 80:20 IPA:proglyde (FIG. 18a ) In the case of formulations employing 60% IPA no passes were obtained when three cycles of the humidity protocol were used even when two application and longer adhesion promoter dwell times were employed although specimens cured at low humidity were successfully reactivated (FIG. 18b ). Two cycles of the high humidity protocol, however, did provide good passes. In contrast the 60% NPA formulation provided passes with three cycles of the humidity cure protocol with ⅔ foils passing after only 1x 30 min application and with 2×30 or 60 min treatment solution applications 3/3 foils passed the adhesion test (FIG. 18c ). From these results, NPA performed slightly better than IPA for intercoat adhesion. This difference in NPZ formulations could be due to (i) longer dwell time re: vapour pressure or (ii) mixed alkoxides from the inter action of IPA in the solvent system not favouring reactivation of such materials. Intuitively one might predict that steric hindrance would be greater in the mixed alkoxide system which could reduce the reaction rate with the substrate surface or ability for it to interpenetrate into the coating.
To determine if higher concentrations of modifying agent would show even further improvements in WARE, NPZ formulations up to 9 wt % (19.8 mmol/lOO g) with a solvent of 60 wt % NPA/40 wt % proglyde were tested using CA8000 basecoat cured at 120F under low (3% RH, 0.22 wt % air moisture) and moderately high humidity (13% RH, 0.95 wt % air moisture) conditions for eight days. Various paintlines CA8000 (FIG. 19A), Eclipse (FIG. 19B), and Sky-Hullo (FIG. 19C) were used as overcoats. All foils (18/18) passed using 5 wt % NPZ, 13/18 foils passed using 7 wt %, and only 10/18 passed using 9 wt %. The Sky-Hullo over coat was particularly discriminating with 6/6 foils passing using 5 wt %, 4/6 using 7 wt %, and 1/6 using 9 wt %. Overall, the results in FIGS. 19A to 19C suggested that the optimum NPZ concentration is near 5 wt % and the optimum alkoxide concentration is near 0.11 mmol per gram.
Preliminary shelf life SIJA data is provided in Figure and suggested that the modifying agent was not negatively affected by storage under ambient conditions. After three months all of the solutions (stored in glass) were precipitate free indicating a low level of hydrolysis and hence polymerisation. Although the solutions were prepared in either NPA or IPA it was not anticipated that the addition of 20 to 40% proglyde would negatively impact storage stability, particularly since proglyde can be obtained essentially moisture free. Other storage containers such as high density polyethylene could be used. The modifying solution could also be stored as a two part kit, similar to how many aerospace paints are packaged, where one part would contain the NPZ either at wt % or at diluted concentration and the second part would contain aproglyde/alcohol solvent solution.

Sealant & Elastomer Interaction

Sealant and elastomer immersion results are provided in FIGS. 21 to 24. In those tests BMS5-142 sealant was immersed in modifying agent solutions with IPA or NPA as the solvent for a period of 24 h, whilst elastomers were immersed for 7 days and the change in weight, volume and hardness monitored both during the immersion as well as on recovery relative to MPK and water reference solutions. FIG. 25 provides images of the sample following recovery and illustrates that the samples were not obviously eroded or negatively impacted visually. Considering that MPK has solubility parameters of [dispersion, polar, and H-bonding] [16.0, 9.0 and 4.7 J/cm³], NPA [16.0, 6.8 and 17.4 J/cm³] and employing the rule of mixtures a 40:60 blend of ProglydelNPA [15.6, 5.0 and 12.0 J/cm3], the proglydelNPA solvent blend should not provide a substantial interaction with these types of materials.
In the case of BMS5-142 (polysulfide non-chromate sealant) weight gain reported in FIG. 21A was more significant for MPK relative to the reactivation treatment solutions and correspondingly the volume change in FIG. 21B was also greater. This result indicated a relatively low interaction between the treatments and the polysulfide sealant. After 7 days recovery all modifying agent treatment solution immersed samples were within 5% of their initial pre-treatment hardness, whilst both the water and MPK immersed samples were less than 10% softer.
BMSl-71, CLl (EPR) elastomers provided the greatest weight gain in MPK and material appeared to be extracted by the reference solutions. Weight loss on recovery in MPK was about 12% after 7 days compared to less than 4% for samples immersed in the treatments. Correspondingly shrinkage on recovery was greater for the MPK reference, whilst the 7 day recovery Shore hardness at 17% increase was slightly higher than the 9 to 12% increase for samples immersed in TPT or NPZ. Similar results in FIG. 23 were provided by BMSl-71, CL2 (Silicone). During immersion, that material also showed a great uptake of MPK after 7 days (70% weight increase) compared to the treatment and water solutions (15%), but weight and volume (<5%) and hardness changes (<10%) were all similar during recovery. BMSl-57 (Silicone) was also less susceptible to treatment solution uptake than MPK (20% weight gain re: 90%). Weight and volume loss during recovery were less than 10% (typically <5%) for all immersions, and presumably was caused by material extraction during immersion. Hardness increase for the treatment solutions upon recovery was about 20%, whilst for MPK it was 10%. The larger hardness increase could indicate a larger sensitivity of this elastomer to the treatment solutions than to MPK, a commonly used cleaning component. However, the treatment solutions are typically sprayed on as thin films rather than flooded or wiped on as is typical for cleaning solutions so the 7 day soak of the treatment solutions is an extreme condition.
Metal Interaction
Commonly used aerospace metals were also investigated for weight change and visual appearance following 30 day immersion in the metal alkoxide solutions compared with water (FIGS. 26 to 30). As a general point weight loss or gain was very low (not much more than the resolution of the 4 decimal place balance) and generally much less than water which appeared for most substrates to be the most aggressive. Weight gain for titanium was less than 0.07% for the treatment solutions re:0.14% for water although samples in the reactivation solution did appear to be more “tarnished”. This colour shift was reversed for 2024-T3 aluminium with water providing significant discolouration and weight change of 1.2% compared with less then 0.1% for the treatments. 2024-T3 clad samples accumulated a dull finish following immersion in water and less weight gain compared with the bare Al at just 0.8% increase. However treatment solution samples produced less than a 0.05 wt % increase. Weight gains for high strength and stainless steel immersed in treatment solutions were all less than 0.02 wt % and similar to or less than for water. Interestingly NPZ in IPA did not appear to tarnish high strength steel the way the other systems (inc. water) did although this observation did not translate into a significant difference in weight gain. Sandwich corrosion was tested according to ASTM Fl 110 with the results provided in FIG. 31. Without magnification both the reference water and treatment solutions appear to provide surface discolouration with outpitting to most of the surface.

Composite Interaction

Immersion results provided in FIGS. 32 for to 35 several relative composite systems are to MPK and CEEBEE paint stripper. Samples were cut and immersed without any edge taping and as such, considering the small sample size, represented a most severe immersion test since the cut edges are regions for easy treatment penetration for example through pores/fibre-matrix de-bonding from the cutting process and more generally from the effective “cut” surface to volume ratio. As general comments (i) the CEEBEE paint stripper appeared to be the most aggressive towards all systems resulting in weight gains in the 1.5 to 4% range after a month immersion (ii) generally immersion in the treatment solution also led to weight gain rather than loss (apart from BMS 8-276 with SM905), although in such cases the weight change was generally very low (less than 0.5% for all composites and about 0.1% for BMS 8-276 with SM 905. In several instances initial weight gain was larger (eg 24 hr 7 days) with this reducing after longer periods of immersion which may be possible if some material was extracted from the system over time or broke off.
Interaction with Tapes
Preliminary tape interaction studies are provided in FIG. 36 and were considered of critical importance to application of the modifying agent technology for decorative painting of air craft. In this experiment the effect of tape line, tape ghosting, and IPA wipe to remove residue were evaluated. In general no more paint wicking was observed for samples reactivated prior to/following taping with generally crisp lines present regardless of the modifying agent formulation applied. With TPT a larger amount of modifying agent residue was expected considering its effective concentration at 5 wt % was larger than the NPZ examples (17.5 mmol/lOO g re:11 mmol/lOO g). However no appreciable ghosting effects were obvious meaning that even a 1 mil overcoat thickness was sufficient to hide the tape lines.
Interaction with Coatings
During production there remains the potential for paints to be reactivated (eg through over-spray) but not over-coated. Considering that the process of reactivation modifies the surface of the paint, there remains the potential for some accelerated aging brought about via environmental factors such as heat, water and UV irradiation. To assess this, coupons painted with a white basecoat were subjected to accelerated aging according to SAEJ1960 protocols employing a weatherometer. FIG. 37 provides the change in colour (delta E) over time for coupons treated with modifying agent, sanded, or untreated relative to an untreated, painted coupon stored in the dark and measured at each time increment. Both untreated and sanded, UV exposed samples showed colour shift values in the range of one delta E unit during the experiment. As expected treated coupons at zero time show some colour shift compared the untreated coupon at zero time. Samples reactivated with titanium were slightly lighter and had a yellow/green colour shift prior to exposure. On exposure residue treatment not well bonded to the surface would be anticipated to be removed (washed away) due to the SAE J1960 protocol. This can account for the rapid change in delta E after the equivalent of three months exposure. However, in both 3/6 month cases the samples were shifted darker and after an initial drop in the yellow shift became more yellow at 6 months.
Generally speaking colour shifts for Zr based modifying agents were less than the Ti based one. With increasing exposure leading naturally to a slight darkening and yellowing of the coating not dissimilar in magnitude to untreated samples.

Further Performance

Further application of the modification agent is provided in FIGS. 39 to 41. FIG. 39 provides WARE results for clear coated samples (eg paints without pigment) either treated or non-treated prior to over-coating as well as the implication of the effects of any post-treatment process such as wiping with a tack rag prior to over-coating. In all cases the specimens treated with the modification agent provided superior inter-coat adhesion and on some occasions superior to sanded.
FIG. 40 provides hardness measurements prior to and following immersion in hydraulic fluid. The results indicated that the adhesion promoting mechanism is compatible with hydraulic fluid with pencil hardness values either approximately the same as or harder than specimens left untreated prior to over-coating thus providing another benefit.
FIG. 41 provides Gardner impact test results for treated and untreated specimens of various paint thickness. The test is used for predicting the ability of organic coatings to resist cracking or peeling caused by impacts producing rapid deformation of the underlying (metal) substrate). The results show that the modifying agent does not increase the brittleness of the paint and could possibly reinforce the some paint combinations at lower thickness.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method, comprising:

applying a solvent and a surface modifying agent to a surface of an aged or inert organic coating to surface hydrolyze the surface of the aged or inert organic coating.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the surface modifying agent is an acid.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the acid is an organic acid.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the organic acid is selected from the group consisting of formic acid, acetic acid, benzoic acid, propanoic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, and combination(s) thereof.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the acid is an inorganic acid.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the inorganic acid is phosphoric acid.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the modifying agent is present in a composition with the solvent when applying the solvent and the surface modifying agent to the surface, wherein the modifying agent is present in the composition in an amount of about 0.001% to about 20% based on the total weight of the combination of solvent and agent.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of an organic solvent, water, and combination(s) thereof.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the solvent is an organic solvent selected from the group consisting of an ester, a ketone, an alcohol, an ether, an amide, an aromatic, a halogenated solvent, and combination(s) thereof.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the organic solvent is an ester selected from the group consisting of ethyl acetate, ethoxyethyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, tertiary butyl acetate, and combination(s) thereof.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the ester is ethyl acetate.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of tetrahydrofuran, N-methyl pyrrolidinone, water, and combination(s) thereof.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the solvent is N-methyl pyrrolidinone.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the solvent is a combination of N-methyl pyrrolidinone: ethyl acetate.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the aged or inert organic coating is selected from the group consisting of a polyurethane, an epoxy, a polyester, a polycarbonate, an acrylic coating, and combination(s) thereof.

16. A coated substrate, comprising:

a surface hydrolyzed organic coating disposed on a substrate, the surface hydrolyzed organic coating formed by application of a solvent and a surface modifying agent to an aged or inert organic coating; and

a further coating disposed on the surface hydrolyzed organic coating, the further coating selected from the group consisting of an adhesive, a sealant, a pin hole filler, a decal, a logo, and combination(s) thereof.

17. The coated substrate of claim 16, wherein the substrate is selected from the group consisting of a metal, a composite, a plastic, an elastomer, glass, wood, a fabric, and combination(s) thereof.

18. The coated substrate of claim 16, wherein the surface modifying agent is an organic acid selected from the group consisting of formic acid, acetic acid, benzoic acid, propanoic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, and combination(s) thereof.

19. The coated substrate of claim 18, wherein the aged or inert organic coating is selected from the group consisting of a polyurethane, an epoxy, a polyester, a polycarbonate, an acrylic coating, and combination(s) thereof.

20. The coated substrate of claim 18, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of N-methyl pyrrolidinone, ethyl acetate, and combination(s) thereof.