US20210060724A1 - Lapping Tool - Google Patents
Lapping Tool Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20210060724A1 US20210060724A1 US17/000,680 US202017000680A US2021060724A1 US 20210060724 A1 US20210060724 A1 US 20210060724A1 US 202017000680 A US202017000680 A US 202017000680A US 2021060724 A1 US2021060724 A1 US 2021060724A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- lapping
- tool
- lapping tool
- angle
- angled
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B33/00—Honing machines or devices; Accessories therefor
- B24B33/08—Honing tools
- B24B33/085—Honing tools in which the honing element consists of a deformable body
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B37/00—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
- B24B37/11—Lapping tools
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B37/00—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
- B24B37/02—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working surfaces of revolution
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B37/00—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories
- B24B37/04—Lapping machines or devices; Accessories designed for working plane surfaces
Definitions
- the present technology relates to lapping, and specifically to lapping tools having features on the surface of the lap configured to engage and retain lapping compound.
- Lapping is a finishing technique that typically utilizes a lapping compound containing an abrasive for removing material from a surface to achieve a desired finish.
- the lapping achieves a desired bore size as well as a desired bore surface finish.
- the lapping compound tends to include loose abrasive with a fluid carrier such as a paste or grease.
- a lapping tool is designed to be made from a material with properties that are conducive to retaining, at least momentarily, the loose abrasive particles that will be the “micro cutting” points that will remove material from the workpiece. These material properties are often a hardness that is softer than the workpiece, and a grain structure that enables temporary grit retention.
- the present technology provides lapping tools having features on the surface of the lap configured to engage and retain lapping compound.
- a lapping tool in one aspect, includes a lapping surface, wherein the lapping surface includes at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface.
- the at least one angled feature is configured to receive abrasive grit.
- the at least one surface angle is selected according to a finish type to be imparted onto a workpiece by the lapping tool.
- a lapping tool in another aspect, includes a circular cross section and an outer surface that is a lapping surface.
- the lapping surface includes at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface.
- the at least one angled feature is configured to receive abrasive grit, and the at least one surface angle is selected according to a finish type to be imparted onto a workpiece by the lapping tool.
- FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a lapping tool of the present technology.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of the lapping tool of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 illustrates a cross section view along line B of FIG. 2 , which intersects one of the angled features in a perpendicular orientation.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a second example of a lapping tool of the present technology.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the lapping tool of FIG. 4 with a cross sectional line C.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a cross section view of the lapping tool of FIG. 4 along the line C of FIG. 5 , which intersects one of the angled features in a perpendicular orientation.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing one example of a surface angle of the present technology.
- FIG. 8 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing a second example of a surface angle of the present technology.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing a third example of a surface angle of the present technology.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing an example of a lapping tool of the present technology having an angled feature with a first surface angle and a second surface angle.
- Lapping tools of the present technology generally include features for engaging abrasive grits on the surface of the lap, which may result in the grits remove material from the workpiece efficiently and in a manner appropriate for the application.
- Features on the surface of the lap are designed to engage and retain the abrasive grits.
- the design of these features can determine the type of cutting action between the grit and the bore surface, so that cutting can be either aggressive, reducing material remove time, or gentle, improving surface texture to a finer finish.
- these features can be constructed in such a way as to provide for both types of cutting action with the same tool and the same abrasive grits.
- FIGS. 1-3 illustrate one example of a lapping tool 100 of the present technology.
- the lapping tool 100 is a bore lapping tool.
- the lapping tool 100 has a circular cross-section.
- the tool includes an arbor 102 , which is a driven component.
- a lapping sleeve 104 is mounted on the arbor 102 .
- the lapping sleeve 104 has a distal end 108 and a proximal end 110 , and lapping surface 116 .
- the arbor 102 may have a tapered outer surface 118
- the lapping sleeve 104 may have a corresponding tapered inner surface 120 , so that the outer surface 118 of the arbor 102 and the inner surface 120 of the lapping sleeve 104 are in contact along at a portion of, or the entirety of, the length of the lapping sleeve from the proximal end 110 to the distal end 108 .
- the distal end 108 of the lapping sleeve 104 may have a thickness that is greater than the thickness of the proximal end 110 of the lapping sleeve 104 .
- the lapping sleeve 104 may include at least one slit 106 , which allows the lapping sleeve 104 to expand or retract in diameter if it is moved axially relative to the arbor 102 . Having at least one slit 106 , and allowing the lapping sleeve to expand or retract in diameter may allow adjustment, if needed, to match the bore diameter of the workpiece. Expanding the lapping sleeve 104 may also compensate for the normal wear of the outside of the lapping sleeve 104 .
- Each slit 106 may be formed lengthwise along the lapping sleeve 104 , and may be straight or helical, to create an open circular cross section at every location along the length of the lapping sleeve 104 .
- the lapping sleeve 104 may include a retraction feature 112 .
- the retraction feature 112 may be located near the distal end 108 of the lapping sleeve 104 .
- the retraction feature 112 as shown is recessed into the lapping surface 116 , and may comprise a deep groove or a plurality of grooves, which can be engaged by some external apparatus configured and operable for applying a retraction force against the sleeve in the direction of convergence of the tapered surfaces for moving the sleeve relative to the arbor in a controlled manner in that direction, for reducing the diametrical extent of the sleeve to a desired extent.
- the lapping sleeve 104 also includes at least one angled feature 114 .
- the at least one angled feature 114 is a negative feature.
- the negative angled feature 114 may be formed by removing material from the lapping sleeve 104 .
- the negative angled feature 114 may be a helical groove, which may be right-handed or left-handed.
- the lapping sleeve 104 has a first angled feature 114 that is a right-handed helical groove, and a second angled feature 114 that is a left-handed helical groove.
- Angled features of the present technology may have other geometries and configurations. For example, straight grooves parallel to the bore axis could be suitable. Angled features may also be configured as dimples or another form of depression in the bore surface.
- FIGS. 4-6 illustrate a second example of a lapping tool 200 , in which the at least one angled feature 206 is a positive feature, where material is added and/or created in the form of protrusions, the spaces between the protrusions are the negative spaces that are configured to hold the lapping compound.
- lapping tool 200 includes lapping sleeve 202 , which has an lapping surface 204 that includes angled features 206 , and an inner surface 208 .
- the inner surface 208 may be tapered along the length of the lapping sleeve 202 , from the proximal end 210 to the distal end 212 .
- Angled features of the present technology include one or more surface angles.
- surface angle as used herein is the angle between an edge of the angled feature and the lapping surface of the lapping sleeve, which is equivalent to the angle formed between an edge of the angled feature and the workpiece surface of a workpiece.
- FIG. 3 shows a cross section of lapping sleeve 104 , along line B of FIG. 2 , which intersects one of the angled features 114 in a perpendicular orientation.
- the angled feature 114 forms a first surface angle A 1 with the lapping surface 116 of the lapping sleeve 104 , and a second surface angle A 2 with the lapping surface 116 of the lapping sleeve 104 .
- first surface angle A 1 has a different angle than second surface angle A 2 . Indeed, in the illustrated example, angle A 1 is smaller than angle A 2 .
- first surface angle A 1 may be equal to, less than, or greater than second surface angle A 2 .
- FIG. 6 shows a cross section of lapping sleeve 202 , along line C of FIG. 5 , which intersects one of the angled features 206 in a perpendicular orientation.
- the angled feature 206 forms a first surface angle D 1 with the lapping surface 204 of the lapping sleeve 202 , and a second surface angle D 2 with the lapping surface 204 of the lapping sleeve 202 .
- first surface angle D 1 has a different angle than second surface angle D 2 .
- first surface angle D 1 may be equal to, less than, or greater than second surface angle D 2 .
- Angled features of the present technology are configured to receive lapping compound, and particularly abrasive particles within lapping compound.
- lapping tools of the present technology are bore lapping tools
- the lapping tool both rotates and strokes axially relative to the workpiece bore when in use.
- the rotation may occur in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction.
- the stroking occurs in both a first direction and an opposite second direction, such as down and up, or back and forth, depending upon the orientation of the lapping tool.
- Lapping tools of the present technology may be configured such that at least one angled feature is substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion during the first direction of stroking, and the second angled feature is substantially perpendicular to the relative motion during the opposite second direction of stroking.
- first angled feature 114 that is a right-handed helical groove and a second angled feature 114 that is a left-handed helical groove
- first angled feature 114 will be substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion during one direction of stroking
- second angled feature 114 will be substantially perpendicular to the relative motion during the other direction of stroking.
- 3 and 4 is configured such that a first angled feature 206 will be substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion during one direction of stroking, and a second angled feature 206 will be substantially perpendicular to the relative motion during the other direction of stroking.
- FIGS. 7-9 are two-dimensional figures illustrating examples of the function of angled features of the present technology. Magnified edges of angled features are shown, with the mating surface between the lapping surface of the lapping tool and the workpiece being flat. However, it should be understood that the mating surface between the lapping tool and the workpiece can have any degree of curvature.
- the angled features in FIGS. 7-9 are substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion.
- a lapping tool 300 has an angled feature 302 and a lapping surface 304 .
- Workpiece 306 has workpiece surface 308 .
- the surface angle E 1 formed between lapping surface 304 , and also the workpiece surface 308 and the angled feature 302 of the lapping tool 300 is relatively large.
- the surface angle E 1 is greater than the optimum angle, discussed below, and may vary depending upon the materials being used, such as the type of abrasive being used and the material that is being lapped. However, in at least some examples the surface angle E 1 may be up to about 90°, such as being from about 65° to about 90°.
- Abrasive grit 310 from the lapping compound may be retained between angled feature 302 and the workpiece surface 308 .
- the direction of the motion of the lapping tool relative to the workpiece is shown as arrow M L .
- arrow M L there is a first normal force N L where the abrasive grit 310 contacts the lapping tool and a second normal force N W where the abrasive grit 310 contacts the workpiece surface 308 .
- N L first normal force
- N W second normal force
- T L first tangential force
- T W where the abrasive grit 310 contacts the workpiece surface 308 .
- Each of the tangential forces are essentially static or dynamic friction, depending on the relative motion or lack thereof between the abrasive grit and the workpiece surface. When there is motion, the tangential forces may also be cutting forces, when the motion results in the removal of material from the workpiece surface 308 .
- Lapping tools constructed as shown in FIG. 7 may produce a very fine surface finish, but tend to remove material very slowly. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that a large surface angle may not be able to support any substantial normal force to push the abrasive grit into the workpiece. In such an example, any removal of material may occur substantially by virtue of abrasive grits rolling. This performance may not be substantially affected by changing the size of the abrasive grits. With little or no force to drive the grit into the workpiece, large rolling abrasive grits may have an equivalent effect to small rolling abrasive grits.
- a lapping tool 400 has an angled feature 402 and an lapping surface 404 .
- Workpiece 406 has workpiece surface 408 .
- the surface angle F 1 is less than the optimum angle, discussed below, and may vary depending upon the materials being used. However, in at least some examples the surface angle F 1 may be down to about 0°, such as being from about 0° to about 15°.
- Abrasive grit 410 from the lapping compound may be retained between angled feature 402 and the workpiece surface 408 .
- the direction of the motion of the lapping tool relative to the workpiece is shown as arrow M L .
- arrow M L there is a first normal force N L where the abrasive grit 410 contacts the lapping tool and a second normal force N W where the abrasive grit 410 contacts the workpiece surface 408 .
- N L first normal force
- N W second normal force
- T L first tangential force
- T W where the abrasive grit 410 contacts the workpiece surface 408 .
- Each of the tangential forces are essentially static or dynamic friction, depending on the relative motion or lack thereof between the abrasive grit and the workpiece surface.
- the tangential forces may also be cutting forces, when the motion results in the removal of material from the workpiece surface 408 .
- T L has switched directions as compared to FIG. 7 .
- the two normal forces N W and N L in FIG. 8 may provide a moment that balances that of the tangential forces, such that the abrasive grit will tend to get trapped and will not tend to roll.
- the value of N L may approach the value of N W and the value of T L may approach the value of T W .
- the lapping tool 400 and the workpiece 406 have different material strengths, and usually the lapping tool 400 is a lower strength material.
- T L tends to reach a point where the lapping tool material deforms and cuts.
- the workpiece surface 408 became no rougher but the lapping surface 404 of lapping tool 400 did get rougher, showing that the abrasive grit 410 was cutting into the lapping tool 400 rather than the workpiece 406 .
- undesirable performance may occur, providing no benefit with regard to the workpiece surface texture or the rate of material removal, and producing faster wear of the lapping tool which diminishes the life of the lapping tool.
- a lapping tool 500 has an angled feature 502 and an lapping surface 504 .
- Workpiece 506 has workpiece surface 508 .
- Abrasive grit 510 from the lapping compound may be retained between angled feature 502 and the workpiece surface 508 .
- the direction of the motion of the lapping tool relative to the workpiece is shown as arrow M L .
- the surface angle G 1 formed between the angled feature 502 of the lapping tool 500 and the lapping surface 504 , and also the workpiece surface 508 has been configured to be an optimum lapping angle.
- an optimum lapping angle is one in which the tangential force of the lapping tool T L has been minimized, and is zero or substantially zero.
- the optimum angle may vary depending upon materials being used. However, in at least some examples, the optimum angle may be from about 15° to about 65°. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that when the surface angle is an optimum lapping angle, the abrasive grit has neither a tendency to slide away from the workpiece nor to cut the lapping tool.
- a surface angle having an optimum lapping angle may be able to support fairly large normal forces and force the abrasive grit into the lapping tool surface by yielding of the lapping tool material. With the abrasive grit in a position to be held by the lapping tool, forces high enough to drive larger grits to cut a coarser surface texture may be achieved. Additionally, higher workpiece material removal rates may be achieved.
- Lapping tools of the present technology may be self-charging, in that abrasive grit may be received and retained by the angled features in the normal course of the lapping tool moving relative to the workpiece in the presence of the lapping compound.
- Angled features of the present technology may also serve one or more additional functions or provide one or more additional benefits.
- the angled features may act as weakening features, which may reduce the expansion force required for expanding the lapping sleeve, as well as preventing or reducing the tendency for the lapping sleeve to bulge at some axial location as a result of application of the expansion force.
- weakening features are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 9,789,581.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a lapping tool 600 of the present technology and workpiece 608 having workpiece surface 610 .
- the lapping tool 600 has an angled feature 602 with a first surface angle 604 and a second surface angle 606 .
- the first surface angle 606 is configured as an optimum lapping angle, to provide a coarser finish when the lapping tool 600 is moved in a first direction H.
- the second surface angle 604 is a large angle configured to allow the abrasive grit to roll and provide a fine finish when the lapping tool 600 is moved in a second direction I. Accordingly, lapping tool 600 can be operated in the first direction H to produce relative fast material removal, or in the second direction I to produce a fine surface finish.
- the first and second directions of movement can be achieved by rotating the lapping tool 600 in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction.
- a lapping tool such as lapping tool 600 may be used to produce what is known as a plateau finish.
- a plateau finish is characterized on a micro level by relatively deep valleys in the workpiece surface but very small peaks. Plateau finishes are known to provide tribological benefits and are utilized in various applications where sliding friction and surface wear must be kept to a minimum.
- a plateau finish is typically produced by honing with a coarse abrasive grit followed by honing briefly with a fine abrasive grit.
- Lapping tool 600 may produce a plateau finish employing only one size of abrasive grit.
Abstract
Lapping tools are provided that include at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface. In some examples, angled features may include a first surface angle and a second surface angle. Each surface angle of the angled feature is configured to retain abrasive grit and provide a desired type of finish.
Description
- This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/894198, entitled “Lapping Tool” and filed on Aug. 30, 2020, currently pending, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- The present technology relates to lapping, and specifically to lapping tools having features on the surface of the lap configured to engage and retain lapping compound.
- Lapping is a finishing technique that typically utilizes a lapping compound containing an abrasive for removing material from a surface to achieve a desired finish. In bore lapping, the lapping achieves a desired bore size as well as a desired bore surface finish.
- The lapping compound tends to include loose abrasive with a fluid carrier such as a paste or grease. Traditionally a lapping tool is designed to be made from a material with properties that are conducive to retaining, at least momentarily, the loose abrasive particles that will be the “micro cutting” points that will remove material from the workpiece. These material properties are often a hardness that is softer than the workpiece, and a grain structure that enables temporary grit retention.
- This often requires, or at least is improved by, a “charging” process where some initial load serves to embed the abrasive particles into the surface of the lap. The carrier generally assists in initially adhering the abrasive particles to the surface of the lapping tool. This charging is usually short-lived and must be repeated frequently for best results. The charging process is fairly simple with lapping of flat surfaces, but it can be challenging for bore lapping, especially if the process is to be automated to remove the dependence on operator skill.
- The present technology provides lapping tools having features on the surface of the lap configured to engage and retain lapping compound.
- In one aspect, a lapping tool is provided that includes a lapping surface, wherein the lapping surface includes at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface. The at least one angled feature is configured to receive abrasive grit. The at least one surface angle is selected according to a finish type to be imparted onto a workpiece by the lapping tool.
- In another aspect, a lapping tool in provided that includes a circular cross section and an outer surface that is a lapping surface. The lapping surface includes at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface. The at least one angled feature is configured to receive abrasive grit, and the at least one surface angle is selected according to a finish type to be imparted onto a workpiece by the lapping tool.
- Specific examples have been chosen for purposes of illustration and description, and are shown in the accompanying drawings, forming a part of the specification.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates one example of a lapping tool of the present technology. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of the lapping tool ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 illustrates a cross section view along line B ofFIG. 2 , which intersects one of the angled features in a perpendicular orientation. -
FIG. 4 illustrates a second example of a lapping tool of the present technology. -
FIG. 5 illustrates the lapping tool ofFIG. 4 with a cross sectional line C. -
FIG. 6 illustrates a cross section view of the lapping tool ofFIG. 4 along the line C ofFIG. 5 , which intersects one of the angled features in a perpendicular orientation. -
FIG. 7 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing one example of a surface angle of the present technology. -
FIG. 8 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing a second example of a surface angle of the present technology. -
FIG. 9 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing a third example of a surface angle of the present technology. -
FIG. 10 illustrates a two-dimensional figure showing an example of a lapping tool of the present technology having an angled feature with a first surface angle and a second surface angle. - While specific examples are discussed herein in relation to bore lapping, and lapping sleeves, it should be understood that the present technology is applicable in lapping, generally, and is not limited to bore lapping.
- Lapping tools of the present technology generally include features for engaging abrasive grits on the surface of the lap, which may result in the grits remove material from the workpiece efficiently and in a manner appropriate for the application. Features on the surface of the lap are designed to engage and retain the abrasive grits. The design of these features can determine the type of cutting action between the grit and the bore surface, so that cutting can be either aggressive, reducing material remove time, or gentle, improving surface texture to a finer finish. In at least some examples, these features can be constructed in such a way as to provide for both types of cutting action with the same tool and the same abrasive grits.
-
FIGS. 1-3 illustrate one example of alapping tool 100 of the present technology. In the illustrated example, thelapping tool 100 is a bore lapping tool. Thelapping tool 100 has a circular cross-section. The tool includes anarbor 102, which is a driven component. Alapping sleeve 104 is mounted on thearbor 102. Thelapping sleeve 104 has adistal end 108 and aproximal end 110, and lappingsurface 116. Thearbor 102 may have a taperedouter surface 118, and thelapping sleeve 104 may have a corresponding taperedinner surface 120, so that theouter surface 118 of thearbor 102 and theinner surface 120 of thelapping sleeve 104 are in contact along at a portion of, or the entirety of, the length of the lapping sleeve from theproximal end 110 to thedistal end 108. Because of the taper of theinner surface 120 of thelapping sleeve 104, thedistal end 108 of thelapping sleeve 104 may have a thickness that is greater than the thickness of theproximal end 110 of thelapping sleeve 104. lappingsurface 116 Thelapping sleeve 104 may include at least oneslit 106, which allows thelapping sleeve 104 to expand or retract in diameter if it is moved axially relative to thearbor 102. Having at least oneslit 106, and allowing the lapping sleeve to expand or retract in diameter may allow adjustment, if needed, to match the bore diameter of the workpiece. Expanding thelapping sleeve 104 may also compensate for the normal wear of the outside of thelapping sleeve 104. Eachslit 106, may be formed lengthwise along thelapping sleeve 104, and may be straight or helical, to create an open circular cross section at every location along the length of thelapping sleeve 104. - If the
lapping tool 100 is to be used in an automated or semi-automated lapping process, thelapping sleeve 104 may include aretraction feature 112. Theretraction feature 112 may be located near thedistal end 108 of thelapping sleeve 104. The retraction feature 112 as shown is recessed into thelapping surface 116, and may comprise a deep groove or a plurality of grooves, which can be engaged by some external apparatus configured and operable for applying a retraction force against the sleeve in the direction of convergence of the tapered surfaces for moving the sleeve relative to the arbor in a controlled manner in that direction, for reducing the diametrical extent of the sleeve to a desired extent. Some examples of retraction features that can be used in the present technology are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 9,789,581. - The
lapping sleeve 104 also includes at least oneangled feature 114. As shown inFIGS. 1-3 , the at least oneangled feature 114 is a negative feature. The negativeangled feature 114 may be formed by removing material from thelapping sleeve 104. The negativeangled feature 114 may be a helical groove, which may be right-handed or left-handed. In the example shown inFIGS. 1-3 , thelapping sleeve 104 has a firstangled feature 114 that is a right-handed helical groove, and a secondangled feature 114 that is a left-handed helical groove. Angled features of the present technology may have other geometries and configurations. For example, straight grooves parallel to the bore axis could be suitable. Angled features may also be configured as dimples or another form of depression in the bore surface. - For example,
FIGS. 4-6 illustrate a second example of alapping tool 200, in which the at least oneangled feature 206 is a positive feature, where material is added and/or created in the form of protrusions, the spaces between the protrusions are the negative spaces that are configured to hold the lapping compound. As shown inFIGS. 4-6 ,lapping tool 200 includes lappingsleeve 202, which has anlapping surface 204 that includesangled features 206, and aninner surface 208. Theinner surface 208 may be tapered along the length of the lappingsleeve 202, from theproximal end 210 to thedistal end 212. - Angled features of the present technology include one or more surface angles. The term “surface angle” as used herein is the angle between an edge of the angled feature and the lapping surface of the lapping sleeve, which is equivalent to the angle formed between an edge of the angled feature and the workpiece surface of a workpiece.
-
FIG. 3 shows a cross section of lappingsleeve 104, along line B ofFIG. 2 , which intersects one of theangled features 114 in a perpendicular orientation. As shown, theangled feature 114 forms a first surface angle A1 with the lappingsurface 116 of the lappingsleeve 104, and a second surface angle A2 with the lappingsurface 116 of the lappingsleeve 104. In this example, first surface angle A1 has a different angle than second surface angle A2. Indeed, in the illustrated example, angle A1 is smaller than angle A2. In some examples, first surface angle A1 may be equal to, less than, or greater than second surface angle A2. - Similarly,
FIG. 6 shows a cross section of lappingsleeve 202, along line C ofFIG. 5 , which intersects one of theangled features 206 in a perpendicular orientation. As shown, theangled feature 206 forms a first surface angle D1 with the lappingsurface 204 of the lappingsleeve 202, and a second surface angle D2 with the lappingsurface 204 of the lappingsleeve 202. In this example, first surface angle D1 has a different angle than second surface angle D2. In some examples, first surface angle D1 may be equal to, less than, or greater than second surface angle D2. - Angled features of the present technology are configured to receive lapping compound, and particularly abrasive particles within lapping compound.
- When lapping tools of the present technology are bore lapping tools, the lapping tool both rotates and strokes axially relative to the workpiece bore when in use. The rotation may occur in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction. The stroking occurs in both a first direction and an opposite second direction, such as down and up, or back and forth, depending upon the orientation of the lapping tool.
- Lapping tools of the present technology may be configured such that at least one angled feature is substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion during the first direction of stroking, and the second angled feature is substantially perpendicular to the relative motion during the opposite second direction of stroking. For example, the
lapping tool 100 inFIGS. 1 and 2 , which has a firstangled feature 114 that is a right-handed helical groove and a secondangled feature 114 that is a left-handed helical groove, was selected because under the combined rotation and stroking motion of the lap, the firstangled feature 114 will be substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion during one direction of stroking, and the secondangled feature 114 will be substantially perpendicular to the relative motion during the other direction of stroking. Likewise, thelapping tool 200 shown inFIGS. 3 and 4 is configured such that a firstangled feature 206 will be substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion during one direction of stroking, and a secondangled feature 206 will be substantially perpendicular to the relative motion during the other direction of stroking. -
FIGS. 7-9 are two-dimensional figures illustrating examples of the function of angled features of the present technology. Magnified edges of angled features are shown, with the mating surface between the lapping surface of the lapping tool and the workpiece being flat. However, it should be understood that the mating surface between the lapping tool and the workpiece can have any degree of curvature. The angled features inFIGS. 7-9 are substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative motion. - As shown in
FIG. 7 , alapping tool 300 has anangled feature 302 and alapping surface 304.Workpiece 306 hasworkpiece surface 308. The surface angle E1 formed between lappingsurface 304, and also theworkpiece surface 308 and theangled feature 302 of thelapping tool 300 is relatively large. The surface angle E1 is greater than the optimum angle, discussed below, and may vary depending upon the materials being used, such as the type of abrasive being used and the material that is being lapped. However, in at least some examples the surface angle E1 may be up to about 90°, such as being from about 65° to about 90°.Abrasive grit 310 from the lapping compound may be retained betweenangled feature 302 and theworkpiece surface 308. The direction of the motion of the lapping tool relative to the workpiece is shown as arrow ML. In this example, there is a first normal force NL where theabrasive grit 310 contacts the lapping tool and a second normal force NW where theabrasive grit 310 contacts theworkpiece surface 308. There is also a first tangential force TL where theabrasive grit 310 contacts the lapping tool and a second tangential force TW where theabrasive grit 310 contacts theworkpiece surface 308. Each of the tangential forces are essentially static or dynamic friction, depending on the relative motion or lack thereof between the abrasive grit and the workpiece surface. When there is motion, the tangential forces may also be cutting forces, when the motion results in the removal of material from theworkpiece surface 308. - Lapping tools constructed as shown in
FIG. 7 , with a relatively large surface angle E1, may produce a very fine surface finish, but tend to remove material very slowly. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that a large surface angle may not be able to support any substantial normal force to push the abrasive grit into the workpiece. In such an example, any removal of material may occur substantially by virtue of abrasive grits rolling. This performance may not be substantially affected by changing the size of the abrasive grits. With little or no force to drive the grit into the workpiece, large rolling abrasive grits may have an equivalent effect to small rolling abrasive grits. - As shown in
FIG. 8 , alapping tool 400 has anangled feature 402 and anlapping surface 404.Workpiece 406 hasworkpiece surface 408. The surface angle F1 formed between theangled feature 402 of thelapping tool 400 and the lappingsurface 404, and also workpiecesurface 408, and is relatively small. The surface angle F1 is less than the optimum angle, discussed below, and may vary depending upon the materials being used. However, in at least some examples the surface angle F1 may be down to about 0°, such as being from about 0° to about 15°.Abrasive grit 410 from the lapping compound may be retained betweenangled feature 402 and theworkpiece surface 408. The direction of the motion of the lapping tool relative to the workpiece is shown as arrow ML. In this example, there is a first normal force NL where theabrasive grit 410 contacts the lapping tool and a second normal force NW where theabrasive grit 410 contacts theworkpiece surface 408. There is also a first tangential force TL where theabrasive grit 410 contacts the lapping tool and a second tangential force TW where theabrasive grit 410 contacts theworkpiece surface 408. Each of the tangential forces are essentially static or dynamic friction, depending on the relative motion or lack thereof between the abrasive grit and the workpiece surface. When there is motion, the tangential forces may also be cutting forces, when the motion results in the removal of material from theworkpiece surface 408. - As shown in
FIG. 8 , TL has switched directions as compared toFIG. 7 . Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the two normal forces NW and NL inFIG. 8 may provide a moment that balances that of the tangential forces, such that the abrasive grit will tend to get trapped and will not tend to roll. Further, as the surface angle F1 is reduced, the value of NL may approach the value of NW and the value of TL may approach the value of TW. However thelapping tool 400 and theworkpiece 406 have different material strengths, and usually thelapping tool 400 is a lower strength material. Experiments usinglapping tool 400 have shown that, before TW gets large enough to cut theworkpiece 406, TL tends to reach a point where the lapping tool material deforms and cuts. Specifically, theworkpiece surface 408 became no rougher but thelapping surface 404 of lappingtool 400 did get rougher, showing that theabrasive grit 410 was cutting into thelapping tool 400 rather than theworkpiece 406. Accordingly, when the surface angle is too small, undesirable performance may occur, providing no benefit with regard to the workpiece surface texture or the rate of material removal, and producing faster wear of the lapping tool which diminishes the life of the lapping tool. - As shown in
FIG. 9 , alapping tool 500 has anangled feature 502 and anlapping surface 504.Workpiece 506 hasworkpiece surface 508.Abrasive grit 510 from the lapping compound may be retained betweenangled feature 502 and theworkpiece surface 508. The direction of the motion of the lapping tool relative to the workpiece is shown as arrow ML. The surface angle G1 formed between theangled feature 502 of thelapping tool 500 and the lappingsurface 504, and also theworkpiece surface 508, has been configured to be an optimum lapping angle. As used herein, an optimum lapping angle is one in which the tangential force of the lapping tool TL has been minimized, and is zero or substantially zero. The optimum lapping angle can be calculated as: Optimum lapping Angle=ATAN(TW/NW). The optimum angle may vary depending upon materials being used. However, in at least some examples, the optimum angle may be from about 15° to about 65°. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that when the surface angle is an optimum lapping angle, the abrasive grit has neither a tendency to slide away from the workpiece nor to cut the lapping tool. A surface angle having an optimum lapping angle may be able to support fairly large normal forces and force the abrasive grit into the lapping tool surface by yielding of the lapping tool material. With the abrasive grit in a position to be held by the lapping tool, forces high enough to drive larger grits to cut a coarser surface texture may be achieved. Additionally, higher workpiece material removal rates may be achieved. - Lapping tools of the present technology may be self-charging, in that abrasive grit may be received and retained by the angled features in the normal course of the lapping tool moving relative to the workpiece in the presence of the lapping compound.
- Angled features of the present technology may also serve one or more additional functions or provide one or more additional benefits. For example, in examples where the angled features are negative features, such as lapping
sleeve 104, they may act as weakening features, which may reduce the expansion force required for expanding the lapping sleeve, as well as preventing or reducing the tendency for the lapping sleeve to bulge at some axial location as a result of application of the expansion force. Alterative examples of weakening features are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 9,789,581. -
FIG. 10 illustrates alapping tool 600 of the present technology andworkpiece 608 havingworkpiece surface 610. Thelapping tool 600 has anangled feature 602 with afirst surface angle 604 and asecond surface angle 606. Thefirst surface angle 606 is configured as an optimum lapping angle, to provide a coarser finish when thelapping tool 600 is moved in a first direction H. Thesecond surface angle 604 is a large angle configured to allow the abrasive grit to roll and provide a fine finish when thelapping tool 600 is moved in a second direction I. Accordingly, lappingtool 600 can be operated in the first direction H to produce relative fast material removal, or in the second direction I to produce a fine surface finish. When the lapping tool is a bore lapping tool, the first and second directions of movement can be achieved by rotating thelapping tool 600 in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction. - A lapping tool such as
lapping tool 600 may be used to produce what is known as a plateau finish. A plateau finish is characterized on a micro level by relatively deep valleys in the workpiece surface but very small peaks. Plateau finishes are known to provide tribological benefits and are utilized in various applications where sliding friction and surface wear must be kept to a minimum. A plateau finish is typically produced by honing with a coarse abrasive grit followed by honing briefly with a fine abrasive grit. Lappingtool 600 may produce a plateau finish employing only one size of abrasive grit. - From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that although specific examples have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit or scope of this disclosure. It is therefore intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting, and that it be understood that it is the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to particularly point out and distinctly claim the claimed subj ect matter.
Claims (20)
1. A lapping tool comprising a lapping surface, wherein the lapping surface includes at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface, the at least one angled feature being configured to receive abrasive grit, and the at least one surface angle being selected according to a finish type to be imparted onto a workpiece by the lapping tool.
2. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the lapping tool comprises a lapping sleeve, and the lapping sleeve includes the at least one angled feature.
3. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the lapping tool is a flat lapping tool.
4. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the at least one surface angle is configured as an optimum lapping angle.
5. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the at least one angled feature forms a first surface angle with the lapping surface and a second surface angle with the lapping surface.
6. The lapping tool of claim 5 , wherein the first surface angle is oriented to provide a first finish when the lapping tool is moved in a first direction, and the second surface angle is oriented to provide a second finish when the lapping tool is moved in a second direction.
7. The lapping tool of claim 6 , wherein the lapping tool is a flat lapping tool.
8. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the at least one angled feature is a helical groove.
9. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the lapping tool comprises a first angled feature and a second angled feature.
10. The lapping tool of claim 9 , wherein the first angled feature is a right-handed helical groove, and the second angled feature is a left-handed helical groove.
11. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the at least one angled feature is formed as a negative feature.
12. The lapping tool of claim 1 , wherein the at least one angled feature is formed as a positive feature.
13. A lapping tool comprising a circular cross section and an outer surface that is a lapping surface;
wherein the lapping surface includes at least one angled feature that forms at least one surface angle with the lapping surface, the at least one angled feature being configured to receive abrasive grit, and the at least one surface angle being selected according to a finish type to be imparted onto a workpiece by the lapping tool.
14. The lapping tool of claim 13 , wherein the lapping tool comprises a lapping sleeve, and the lapping sleeve includes the at least one angled feature.
15. The lapping tool of claim 13 , wherein the at least one surface angle is configured as an optimum lapping angle.
16. The lapping tool of claim 13 , wherein the at least one angled feature forms a first surface angle with the lapping surface and a second surface angle with the lapping surface.
17. The lapping tool of claim 16 , wherein the first surface angle is oriented to provide a first finish when the lapping tool is moved in a first direction, and the second surface angle is oriented to provide a second finish when the lapping tool is moved in a second direction.
18. The lapping tool of claim 13 , wherein the at least one angled feature is a helical groove.
19. The lapping tool of claim 13 , wherein the lapping tool comprises a first angled feature and a second angled feature.
20. The lapping tool of claim 19 , wherein the first angled feature is a right-handed helical groove, and the second angled feature is a left-handed helical groove.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/000,680 US20210060724A1 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2020-08-24 | Lapping Tool |
PCT/US2020/047724 WO2021041365A1 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2020-08-25 | Lapping tool |
EP20767915.0A EP4021681A1 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2020-08-25 | Lapping tool |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201962894198P | 2019-08-30 | 2019-08-30 | |
US17/000,680 US20210060724A1 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2020-08-24 | Lapping Tool |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20210060724A1 true US20210060724A1 (en) | 2021-03-04 |
Family
ID=74680586
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/000,680 Abandoned US20210060724A1 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2020-08-24 | Lapping Tool |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20210060724A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP4021681A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW202110578A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2021041365A1 (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1109401A (en) * | 1910-12-13 | 1914-09-01 | Rudolph Conrader | Lap. |
US2368575A (en) * | 1944-03-21 | 1945-01-30 | Sjogren Knut Robert | Lapping block |
US2401215A (en) * | 1945-01-09 | 1946-05-28 | Anderson Anton | Lap |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3526057A (en) * | 1968-02-14 | 1970-09-01 | Arthur J Hackman Jr | Art of precision surface abrading |
WO2006003697A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-12 | Toho Engineering Kabushiki Kaisha | Grinding pad and method of producing the same |
EP2629935B1 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2017-02-22 | Sunnen Products Company | Improved bore finishing tool |
WO2015047939A1 (en) * | 2013-09-25 | 2015-04-02 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Composite ceramic abrasive polishing solution |
-
2020
- 2020-08-24 US US17/000,680 patent/US20210060724A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2020-08-25 EP EP20767915.0A patent/EP4021681A1/en active Pending
- 2020-08-25 WO PCT/US2020/047724 patent/WO2021041365A1/en unknown
- 2020-08-27 TW TW109129384A patent/TW202110578A/en unknown
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1109401A (en) * | 1910-12-13 | 1914-09-01 | Rudolph Conrader | Lap. |
US2368575A (en) * | 1944-03-21 | 1945-01-30 | Sjogren Knut Robert | Lapping block |
US2401215A (en) * | 1945-01-09 | 1946-05-28 | Anderson Anton | Lap |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2021041365A1 (en) | 2021-03-04 |
TW202110578A (en) | 2021-03-16 |
EP4021681A1 (en) | 2022-07-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8512099B2 (en) | Method for the simultaneous double-sided material removal processing of a plurality of semiconductor wafers | |
KR102012913B1 (en) | Beveling method | |
CN104608046B (en) | The superfine processing method on the bearing roller face of cylinder | |
WO2016043098A1 (en) | Drill | |
EP1427557A1 (en) | Method for twist-free cutting of rotational symmetric surfaces | |
WO2001043902A2 (en) | Method for scroll-free machining rotationally symmetrical surfaces | |
US20220055177A1 (en) | Honing tool and fine machining method using the honing tool | |
JP2009202307A (en) | Grinding method for rolling and sliding device member and rolling and sliding device member | |
US20210060724A1 (en) | Lapping Tool | |
EP1700670A2 (en) | Super-abrasive machining tool and method of use | |
US6561879B2 (en) | Conditioning device for grinding wheels | |
US4254591A (en) | Internal lapping tool | |
US9969058B2 (en) | System and method for contoured peel grinding | |
JP5181727B2 (en) | Method for polishing rolling sliding device member and rolling sliding device member | |
JP3568446B2 (en) | Grinding method using electrodeposition whetstone | |
US6793560B2 (en) | Honing method | |
US10076793B2 (en) | Drilling tool and method for producing drill holes | |
US8360831B2 (en) | Sanding tool | |
JPS5882672A (en) | Cross hatch patterning method onto tubular surface | |
JP2001304267A (en) | Sliding member and its manufacturing method | |
CA3132396C (en) | Method for machining a bearing ring and for producing a rolling bearing | |
CN107932302A (en) | Inner wall of metal pipe burnishing device | |
JP2011125952A (en) | Honing method | |
JP2005007555A (en) | Hard film coated cutting tool | |
KR20190054767A (en) | Grinding wheel |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SUNNEN PRODUCTS CO., MISSOURI Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CLOUTIER, DANIEL R.;REEL/FRAME:053687/0242 Effective date: 20200902 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |