US20200223458A1 - Method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train - Google Patents

Method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20200223458A1
US20200223458A1 US16/649,957 US201816649957A US2020223458A1 US 20200223458 A1 US20200223458 A1 US 20200223458A1 US 201816649957 A US201816649957 A US 201816649957A US 2020223458 A1 US2020223458 A1 US 2020223458A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
otu
train
polygon
section block
section
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/649,957
Inventor
Gerhard Marte
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of US20200223458A1 publication Critical patent/US20200223458A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L1/00Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or vehicle train, e.g. pedals
    • B61L1/14Devices for indicating the passing of the end of the vehicle or vehicle train
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/02Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains
    • B61L25/025Absolute localisation, e.g. providing geodetic coordinates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/02Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or vehicle trains
    • B61L25/04Indicating or recording train identities
    • B61L27/0005
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/70Details of trackside communication
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61RAILWAYS
    • B61LGUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L2205/00Communication or navigation systems for railway traffic
    • B61L2205/04Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. GPS

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train.
  • the prior art discloses security measures that verify the completeness or integrity of a train.
  • An old security measure is that the dispatcher checks with a naked eye when a train is leaving the station that there is a train end signal at the end of the train.
  • axle counting devices are widespread, which count the number of axles when entering a station or a section block (counting the axles up).
  • the axle counting devices are electronic components with sensors. When leaving the station or the section block, another axle counting device counts down the number of axles (counting the axles down). When the axle counting device counts down to 0, the train is complete.
  • Axle counting devices are expensive to purchase and to maintain. It is also known that they can have functional problems at high temperatures.
  • WO 03/013935 A1 describes a method that checks the completeness of a train (train integrity), and confirms or reports the absence of train integrity.
  • train integrity the coordinates of a selected spot on the track of the train route are collected by GPS.
  • the coordinates of the spot on the track are collected by a GPS, which is positioned on the front of the train.
  • the front of the train is at this spot.
  • the coordinates of the spot on the track are saved.
  • the coordinates at the end of the train match the coordinates of the spot on the track, the end of the train has passed the spot on the track.
  • the coordinates for the spot on the track can also be retrieved from a database on the train.
  • the described method is susceptible to errors because it checks the matching of GPS point coordinates.
  • the error for the deviation of the spot on the track from the end point of the train can be due not only because of the fact that the train is no longer complete, but also in an inaccuracy or a failure of one of the GPS coordinates.
  • Another disadvantage of the method is that the GPS coordinates of the end of the train have to be checked until they match the track coordinates. It is also not possible with the method to determine which of the traveled section blocks of a railway section is currently occupied by the train.
  • the proposed method of train protection is be able to supplement or replace existing security procedures, wherein the necessary infrastructure investments is be as low as possible.
  • the method enables trains to travel at a fixed special distance from one another.
  • Polygon ID data geo-data, block ID and track ID
  • Track ID track number
  • GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
  • Section block ID defined track section on a defined railway section
  • the solution is achieved in a method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train by,
  • the OTU sending the identification of the respective traveled polygon at least once to an electronic data processing system for evaluation.
  • the method has the advantage over the prior art that it does not require the expensive and error-prone axle counting devices and other train length control systems.
  • the method shows with the highest certainty that a first section block is free of the last unit of a train, which is equipped with the OTU. This is due to the logic of the method. Only when a second section block adjoining the first section block is registered, is the first section block released. If the OTU fails after the registration of the first section block is canceled, then it remains in the first section block due to the stored logic, since the second section block is no longer registered.
  • the OTU (car OTU) replaces the train end signal, which means that the OTU can also be registered as a train end signal in the electronic data processing system.
  • the evaluation of the identification includes the time and the order of the traveled polygons and the time when the OTU moves from one section block to an adjacent section block. This allows to detect in real time which section block is currently occupied and which section blocks are currently free.
  • the identification of the respective polygon includes geo-data, the identification of the corresponding section block and the respective track identification.
  • the polygon-ID makes it possible that the position of the last unit of a train can be assigned unambiguously to a particular section block and mix-ups do not occur.
  • a polygon is expediently stored in the OTU for each section block at both ends of the section block.
  • the section block can be reported as free as early as possible, since the distance between the adjacent polygons of two neighboring section blocks is as small as possible.
  • a plurality of adjoining polygons is stored in the OTU over the entire length of the section block.
  • an uninterrupted polygon ID report takes place within the section block. This results in high security because the OTU can be detected in real time at almost any time.
  • the distance between a first polygon which is stored at the end of a first section block, and a second polygon adjacent to the first polygon, which second polygon is stored at the end of a second section block facing the first section block corresponds to the maximum braking distance of the train.
  • This distance selection of adjacent polygons of two section blocks ensures that a train that is stopped by a train signal, due to its braking distance, does not get into the second polygon. Because in this case the second polygon is certainly not reached by the OTU, the logic of the method guarantees that the first section block is not released. This is even true if the OTU leaves the first polygon as long as it does not reach the second polygon.
  • the OTU expediently sends the polygon identification, the direction of travel of the train and the status of the power supply to the electronic data processing system.
  • Other data that are stored and recorded in the OTU and can be sent to the electronic data processing system are the OTU ID, the date, the time, the speed, the direction, the data from the G sensor, the number of satellites, a meter counter of the distance covered, the radio provider ID and the status of the OTU.
  • the OTU determines the minimum length of the polygon by the maximum speed of the train and the maximum length of the polygon is defined by the length of the section block for which the polygon is stored in the OTU. If, for example, the OTU calculates its own position every second, the polygon length must be greater than 100 m if the train is traveling at 360 km/and is to be registered in the polygon.
  • the width of a first polygon corresponds at least to the maximum width of the train and, in the case of a multi-track railway section, the width of the first polygon is dimensioned in such a way that the first polygon is free of overlaps from further third polygons which are stored in the OTU for further tracks.
  • Specifying the width of the first polygon in the area claimed above makes it possible that the position of the OTU is certainly within the first polygon, since the positional accuracy is less than one meter and a train is always wider than one meter. Because polygons of adjacent tracks do not overlap, it is impossible to mix up polygons or section blocks assigned to the polygons.
  • the identification of a polygon leads to the fact that the second section block assigned to the second polygon is reported by the electronic data processing system as being occupied or blocked, and the first section block previously traveled by the train is reported as free by the electronic data processing system.
  • this logic of the method means that a section block is only reported to be free if another section block has been identified by the fact that the OTU position is located within a polygon that is assigned to the other section block. If the OTU is located between section blocks, a section block that has been left will not be released.
  • the train integrity is expediently determined by the fact that the OTU has switched from one section block to another. If there is a separation of the last unit from the front of the train, the OTU does not reach a polygon which is assigned to the other section block. If the last unit together with the OTU should continue to roll, the section block is only released when the last unit reaches a polygon that is assigned to the other section block. If the last unit comes to a stop before the other section block, the further section block is no longer released.
  • the OTU and the further OTU are synchronized by the electronic data processing system in order to calculate a distance between the two OTUs in the electronic data processing system and to send a change in the distance between the two OTUs, for example, caused by a coupling breakage of the train, to the train's electronic data processing system.
  • This makes it easy to determine the completeness of the train at any time, in addition to detecting within which polygons the OTU of the last unit is located.
  • the start and the end of an area of a section block at which the GNSS reception of the OTU is not sufficient is stored in the OTU with a start polygon or an end polygon and the area is considered as passed through when the polygon identification of the end polygon is received by the OTU via the electronic data processing system.
  • Areas with poor or no GNSS reception can be tunnels or canyons. The above features ensure that a tunnel or canyon is only released when the last unit of the train has passed through this area and the OTU is located within the end polygon and has been identified there.
  • the present method offers the additional benefit that not only the last unit of the train can be monitored, but all the cars can be included in the electronic data processing system. In order to do so, no further hardware components are necessary as the OTU can be used for the management of the car identifications.
  • the car identification can be scanned in with a text recognition program (OCR) and transmitted wirelessly, for example using WLAN, to the OTU.
  • OCR text recognition program
  • the car identifications are expediently linked to the freight documents of the respective car. This means that every freight document can be located at any time up to the destination station.
  • the polygons stored in the OTU contain information on the position of railway signals, and the position of the railway signals can be visualized in the driver's compartment of the train.
  • the train driver is informed sufficiently early about approaching train signals, even if the view is impaired, for example by fog and snowfall.
  • the distance to the approaching railway signal is visualized by a dynamic display. For example, a bar on a display can become shorter and shorter until the railway signal is passed.
  • Both the electronic data processing system as well as the OTU (car OTU) and the other OTU (locomotive OTU) have satellite radio. If the terrestrial radio connections fail, the OTU and the other OTU can therefore establish a radio connection via satellite reception. If the terrestrial radio connections fail, the OTU sends an alarm to be confirmed by the train driver, and the OTU initiates braking of the train if the train driver does not confirm.
  • the OTU is connected to the train's braking system in such a way that the OTU can trigger train braking. This is to ensure that in case of failure of terrestrial radio systems and a bridged dead man's switch in the driver's compartment an emergency braking can be initiated by the OTU.
  • the OTU is connected to the train's braking system in such a way that if the terrestrial radio connections fail, the OTU can establish a radio connection via satellite reception.
  • the OTU expediently sends an alarm to be confirmed by the train driver if the terrestrial radio connections fail, and the OTU initiates an emergency braking of the train if the train driver does not confirm.
  • FIG. 1 shows a first method diagram of a method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train;
  • FIG. 2 shows a supplementary illustration of the method diagram from FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 3 shows a track with an illustration of different polygon variants
  • FIG. 4 shows a plan view of a two-track railway section with polygons overlaid on the tracks
  • FIG. 5 shows a method diagram that defines the distance between a first and second polygon through the braking distance of the train.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show the functional diagram of the method.
  • Existing railway sections or tracks 27 are divided into section blocks as standard, a rail signal 15 being positioned at the transition from a first line block 11 to the neighboring second section block 13 .
  • Railway signal 15 releases second section block 13 or blocks it.
  • each track is divided into a plurality of section blocks. There are therefore no section blocks that extend simultaneously over side by side tracks.
  • a polygon Over each section block there is an imaginary boundary which is referred to as a geofence or as a polygon.
  • a polygon shall be understood to mean a virtual surface which is placed at least over part of a section block, so that a part of the section block lies within the polygon.
  • the polygon is defined by a plurality of geo-data.
  • the geo-data describes the periphery of a closed polygon. It is also conceivable that the polygon extends over the entire section block.
  • a polygon is uniquely identified (ID) using the following polygon ID data: the geo-data, the section block ID and the track ID.
  • ID polygon ID data
  • each section block and each track is uniquely identified, for example, by a number or a letter.
  • a train 17 is equipped at its end with a train end device.
  • the train end device is therefore carried along at the train end 19 and is referred to as OTU (On-Train Unit) 21 .
  • Train end 19 is defined by its direction of travel. The train end thus passes as the last part of the train 17 a spot on a section. Train end 19 corresponds to last unit 19 of train 17 .
  • Last unit 19 can be a car, a locomotive, a railcar or a control car, depending on the direction in which the train 17 is moving and how it is composed.
  • OTU 21 is equipped with a memory and a GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System). OTU 21 can be powered by a battery or an external power supply. At least all the polygons of the route to be traveled or the section blocks which will be passed are stored in the memory.
  • GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show a first polygon 23 and a second polygon 25 .
  • First polygon 23 is assigned to first section block 11
  • second polygon 25 is assigned to second section block 13 .
  • POIs Points of Interest
  • POIs are point coordinates on a digital map and are generally used for navigation or to approach a destination such as a pharmacy, museum etc.
  • POIs are suitable for determining that a defined POI has been crossed.
  • it cannot be determined in a system-independent manner on which track or on which section block a train is moving, is or was located. POIs are therefore unsuitable for determining whether a section block of a railway section is free.
  • FIG. 3 shows three different variants of how polygons can be stored in OTU 21 per one section block.
  • variant A one polygon 23 is stored per section block.
  • the data traffic in this variant is less than in variants B and C. In comparison to variants B and C, however, there is a loss of time until the release report of section block 25 and there is no position report between polygons of the neighboring section blocks.
  • one polygon 23 a , 23 b at the two ends of the section block is stored in the OTU 21 .
  • the section block is reported as free as early as possible since the distance between adjacent polygons 23 and 25 of section blocks 11 and 13 is as small as possible. There is no position report between polygons 23 a and 23 b.
  • a polygon chain along the entire length of section block 11 is stored in OTU 19 .
  • FIG. 4 shows a multi-track railway section with a first track 27 and a second track 29 running next to it.
  • a track section of first and second tracks 27 , 29 is defined as the first and third section blocks 11 and 14 .
  • First and third polygons 23 , 26 are stored in OTU 21 for first and third section blocks 11 , 14 .
  • the width of first and third polygons 23 , 26 is dimensioned such that they do not overlap. This ensures that only first polygon 23 , and not third polygon 26 , can be assigned to first section block 11 .
  • first and third polygons 23 , 26 must not be dimensioned too narrow, so that the GNSS position of OTU 21 is reliably within the respective polygon. Therefore, it is expedient if the polygon width is at least the maximum width of train 17 .
  • FIG. 5 shows a distance 31 between first polygon 23 and second polygon 25 , which corresponds to the maximum braking distance of the train, calculated from the maximum speed of the train with which it travels in first section block 11 .
  • Distance 31 ensures that OTU 21 does not come to lie within second polygon 25 when the train is forced to stop by the railway signal 15 between two section blocks 11 , 13 .
  • the provision of distance 31 therefore prevents train end 19 with OTU 21 from “slipping” into second polygon 25 during a braking maneuver at railway signal 15 , and the first section block 11 is thereby erroneously released.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Abstract

A method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train, wherein each train travelling into the section block is equipped with at least one train terminal (OTU—On Train Unit) at the end of the train, defined by the direction of travel of the train, which OTU is used for the periodic position detection of the train. The method comprises storing at least one polygon, which is defined by a plurality of geo-data, for each section block is stored in the OTU, registering the respectively traveled polygon at least once by the OTU by means of Global Navigation Satellite System, and sending the identification of the respectively traveled polygon with the OTU at least once to an electronic data processing system for evaluation.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a national phase entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/EP2018/075476 filed Sep. 20, 2018, which claims priority to Swiss Patent Application No. 01163/17 filed Sep. 21, 2017, the entirety of each of which is incorporated by this reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train.
  • PRIOR ART
  • The prior art discloses security measures that verify the completeness or integrity of a train. An old security measure is that the dispatcher checks with a naked eye when a train is leaving the station that there is a train end signal at the end of the train.
  • Automatic axle counting devices are widespread, which count the number of axles when entering a station or a section block (counting the axles up). The axle counting devices are electronic components with sensors. When leaving the station or the section block, another axle counting device counts down the number of axles (counting the axles down). When the axle counting device counts down to 0, the train is complete. Axle counting devices are expensive to purchase and to maintain. It is also known that they can have functional problems at high temperatures.
  • A wide variety of measures are known to secure the movement of trains. To avoid a collision of trains that follow one another or come towards each other, driving at a fixed special distance was introduced. To this end, the sections are divided into section blocks by signals. There can only be one train in a section block. This is achieved in that the trains are led or guided by the signal positioned at a transition from a first section block to a second section block. The next train is only allowed to enter this section block once a section block has been cleared. Ensuring that the section block is cleared is achieved with the axle counting devices described above. Only when the axle counting device has counted down to 0, i.e., all axles counted up can also be counted down, is the section block released.
  • WO 03/013935 A1 describes a method that checks the completeness of a train (train integrity), and confirms or reports the absence of train integrity. For this purpose, the coordinates of a selected spot on the track of the train route are collected by GPS. The coordinates of the spot on the track are collected by a GPS, which is positioned on the front of the train. When the spot on the track is selected, the front of the train is at this spot. The coordinates of the spot on the track are saved. When the coordinates at the end of the train match the coordinates of the spot on the track, the end of the train has passed the spot on the track. The coordinates for the spot on the track can also be retrieved from a database on the train.
  • The described method is susceptible to errors because it checks the matching of GPS point coordinates. The error for the deviation of the spot on the track from the end point of the train can be due not only because of the fact that the train is no longer complete, but also in an inaccuracy or a failure of one of the GPS coordinates. Another disadvantage of the method is that the GPS coordinates of the end of the train have to be checked until they match the track coordinates. It is also not possible with the method to determine which of the traveled section blocks of a railway section is currently occupied by the train.
  • Advantages of the Invention
  • The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by a method for train protection that can ensure completeness of the train with little investment.
  • In addition, the proposed method of train protection is be able to supplement or replace existing security procedures, wherein the necessary infrastructure investments is be as low as possible. For example, the method enables trains to travel at a fixed special distance from one another.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In the following description, the individual terms used are defined as follows:
  • Polygon=geofence=virtual area above the two tracks (rails) of a track body stored in the OTU
  • ID=unique identification
  • Polygon ID data=geo-data, block ID and track ID
  • Track ID=track number
  • OTU=On Train Unit
  • GNSS=Global Navigation Satellite System
  • Electronic data processing system=electronic data processing of the OTUs
  • Railway electronic data processing=electronic data, processing of the railway operator
  • Locomotive OTU=OTU at the locomotive driver's compartment
  • Car OTU=OTU at the end of the last car
  • Section block ID=defined track section on a defined railway section
  • POI=Point of Interest=point-like geo-object
  • The solution is achieved in a method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train by,
  • storing at least one polygon, which is defined by a plurality of geo-data, for each section block in the OTU,
  • registering the respective traveled polygon by the OTU at least once by means of GNSS if the position of the OTU is within the polygon (23, 25) and
  • the OTU sending the identification of the respective traveled polygon at least once to an electronic data processing system for evaluation.
  • The method has the advantage over the prior art that it does not require the expensive and error-prone axle counting devices and other train length control systems. The method shows with the highest certainty that a first section block is free of the last unit of a train, which is equipped with the OTU. This is due to the logic of the method. Only when a second section block adjoining the first section block is registered, is the first section block released. If the OTU fails after the registration of the first section block is canceled, then it remains in the first section block due to the stored logic, since the second section block is no longer registered.
  • Apart from the inexpensive OTU, there is no need for further infrastructure investments. Since the method is implemented exclusively by an electronic data processing component, existing railway system components are not affected. This makes it possible to inexpensively supplement existing safety procedures to increase redundancy. Also, it is possible to equip railway sections that do not have a safety procedure whether a section block is free of the last unit of a train, with the method according to the invention.
  • In addition, risks of rear impact collisions or crashes due to human error can be detected by the method.
  • In terms of data, the OTU (car OTU) replaces the train end signal, which means that the OTU can also be registered as a train end signal in the electronic data processing system.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the evaluation of the identification includes the time and the order of the traveled polygons and the time when the OTU moves from one section block to an adjacent section block. This allows to detect in real time which section block is currently occupied and which section blocks are currently free.
  • The identification of the respective polygon includes geo-data, the identification of the corresponding section block and the respective track identification. The polygon-ID makes it possible that the position of the last unit of a train can be assigned unambiguously to a particular section block and mix-ups do not occur.
  • A polygon is expediently stored in the OTU for each section block at both ends of the section block. As a result, the section block can be reported as free as early as possible, since the distance between the adjacent polygons of two neighboring section blocks is as small as possible.
  • Advantageously, a plurality of adjoining polygons is stored in the OTU over the entire length of the section block. In this variant, an uninterrupted polygon ID report takes place within the section block. This results in high security because the OTU can be detected in real time at almost any time.
  • The distance between a first polygon which is stored at the end of a first section block, and a second polygon adjacent to the first polygon, which second polygon is stored at the end of a second section block facing the first section block corresponds to the maximum braking distance of the train. This distance selection of adjacent polygons of two section blocks ensures that a train that is stopped by a train signal, due to its braking distance, does not get into the second polygon. Because in this case the second polygon is certainly not reached by the OTU, the logic of the method guarantees that the first section block is not released. This is even true if the OTU leaves the first polygon as long as it does not reach the second polygon.
  • It has proven to be useful if the train at its front, defined by the direction of travel, is equipped with another OTU (locomotive OTU) and if the direction of travel changes, the further OTU is recognized by the electronic data processing system as the OTU at the end of the train. This means that even if the train changes direction, the last unit of the train is always equipped with an OTU. A manual change of an OTU from the front of the train to the end of the train, which can lead to errors or forgetting the change, is therefore not necessary.
  • In addition to the identification, the OTU expediently sends the polygon identification, the direction of travel of the train and the status of the power supply to the electronic data processing system. Other data that are stored and recorded in the OTU and can be sent to the electronic data processing system are the OTU ID, the date, the time, the speed, the direction, the data from the G sensor, the number of satellites, a meter counter of the distance covered, the radio provider ID and the status of the OTU.
  • It proves to be advantageous if, for a given clocking of the position determination, the OTU determines the minimum length of the polygon by the maximum speed of the train and the maximum length of the polygon is defined by the length of the section block for which the polygon is stored in the OTU. If, for example, the OTU calculates its own position every second, the polygon length must be greater than 100 m if the train is traveling at 360 km/and is to be registered in the polygon.
  • The width of a first polygon corresponds at least to the maximum width of the train and, in the case of a multi-track railway section, the width of the first polygon is dimensioned in such a way that the first polygon is free of overlaps from further third polygons which are stored in the OTU for further tracks. Specifying the width of the first polygon in the area claimed above makes it possible that the position of the OTU is certainly within the first polygon, since the positional accuracy is less than one meter and a train is always wider than one meter. Because polygons of adjacent tracks do not overlap, it is impossible to mix up polygons or section blocks assigned to the polygons.
  • In a particular embodiment of the invention, the identification of a polygon leads to the fact that the second section block assigned to the second polygon is reported by the electronic data processing system as being occupied or blocked, and the first section block previously traveled by the train is reported as free by the electronic data processing system. As already described above, this logic of the method means that a section block is only reported to be free if another section block has been identified by the fact that the OTU position is located within a polygon that is assigned to the other section block. If the OTU is located between section blocks, a section block that has been left will not be released.
  • The train integrity is expediently determined by the fact that the OTU has switched from one section block to another. If there is a separation of the last unit from the front of the train, the OTU does not reach a polygon which is assigned to the other section block. If the last unit together with the OTU should continue to roll, the section block is only released when the last unit reaches a polygon that is assigned to the other section block. If the last unit comes to a stop before the other section block, the further section block is no longer released.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, the OTU and the further OTU are synchronized by the electronic data processing system in order to calculate a distance between the two OTUs in the electronic data processing system and to send a change in the distance between the two OTUs, for example, caused by a coupling breakage of the train, to the train's electronic data processing system. This makes it easy to determine the completeness of the train at any time, in addition to detecting within which polygons the OTU of the last unit is located.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, the start and the end of an area of a section block at which the GNSS reception of the OTU is not sufficient is stored in the OTU with a start polygon or an end polygon and the area is considered as passed through when the polygon identification of the end polygon is received by the OTU via the electronic data processing system. Areas with poor or no GNSS reception can be tunnels or canyons. The above features ensure that a tunnel or canyon is only released when the last unit of the train has passed through this area and the OTU is located within the end polygon and has been identified there.
  • It is useful if the car identifications of the individual cars of a train are transferred to the OTU in order to be able to send the position and time of the individual cars to the electronic data processing system. Thus, the present method offers the additional benefit that not only the last unit of the train can be monitored, but all the cars can be included in the electronic data processing system. In order to do so, no further hardware components are necessary as the OTU can be used for the management of the car identifications. The car identification can be scanned in with a text recognition program (OCR) and transmitted wirelessly, for example using WLAN, to the OTU.
  • The car identifications are expediently linked to the freight documents of the respective car. This means that every freight document can be located at any time up to the destination station.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, the polygons stored in the OTU contain information on the position of railway signals, and the position of the railway signals can be visualized in the driver's compartment of the train. As a result, the train driver is informed sufficiently early about approaching train signals, even if the view is impaired, for example by fog and snowfall. It is conceivable that the distance to the approaching railway signal is visualized by a dynamic display. For example, a bar on a display can become shorter and shorter until the railway signal is passed.
  • Both the electronic data processing system as well as the OTU (car OTU) and the other OTU (locomotive OTU) have satellite radio. If the terrestrial radio connections fail, the OTU and the other OTU can therefore establish a radio connection via satellite reception. If the terrestrial radio connections fail, the OTU sends an alarm to be confirmed by the train driver, and the OTU initiates braking of the train if the train driver does not confirm. The OTU is connected to the train's braking system in such a way that the OTU can trigger train braking. This is to ensure that in case of failure of terrestrial radio systems and a bridged dead man's switch in the driver's compartment an emergency braking can be initiated by the OTU.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention, the OTU is connected to the train's braking system in such a way that if the terrestrial radio connections fail, the OTU can establish a radio connection via satellite reception.
  • The OTU expediently sends an alarm to be confirmed by the train driver if the terrestrial radio connections fail, and the OTU initiates an emergency braking of the train if the train driver does not confirm.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Further advantages and features result from the following description of an exemplary embodiment of the invention with reference to the schematic representations. In a representation that is not to scale:
  • FIG. 1 shows a first method diagram of a method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train;
  • FIG. 2 shows a supplementary illustration of the method diagram from FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 shows a track with an illustration of different polygon variants;
  • FIG. 4 shows a plan view of a two-track railway section with polygons overlaid on the tracks, and
  • FIG. 5 shows a method diagram that defines the distance between a first and second polygon through the braking distance of the train.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show the functional diagram of the method. Existing railway sections or tracks 27 are divided into section blocks as standard, a rail signal 15 being positioned at the transition from a first line block 11 to the neighboring second section block 13. Railway signal 15 releases second section block 13 or blocks it. In the case of a multi-track railway section, each track is divided into a plurality of section blocks. There are therefore no section blocks that extend simultaneously over side by side tracks.
  • Over each section block there is an imaginary boundary which is referred to as a geofence or as a polygon. In the context of the present patent application, a polygon shall be understood to mean a virtual surface which is placed at least over part of a section block, so that a part of the section block lies within the polygon. The polygon is defined by a plurality of geo-data. The geo-data describes the periphery of a closed polygon. It is also conceivable that the polygon extends over the entire section block.
  • A polygon is uniquely identified (ID) using the following polygon ID data: the geo-data, the section block ID and the track ID. Here, each section block and each track is uniquely identified, for example, by a number or a letter.
  • A train 17 is equipped at its end with a train end device. The train end device is therefore carried along at the train end 19 and is referred to as OTU (On-Train Unit) 21. Train end 19 is defined by its direction of travel. The train end thus passes as the last part of the train 17 a spot on a section. Train end 19 corresponds to last unit 19 of train 17. Last unit 19 can be a car, a locomotive, a railcar or a control car, depending on the direction in which the train 17 is moving and how it is composed.
  • OTU 21 is equipped with a memory and a GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System). OTU 21 can be powered by a battery or an external power supply. At least all the polygons of the route to be traveled or the section blocks which will be passed are stored in the memory.
  • OTU 21 registers the polygon currently being traveled one or more times by means of GNSS. Once the corresponding polygon has been assigned to the position of OTU 21, the polygon ID is sent via radio to an electronic data processing system for evaluation. The polygon ID can be sent at the same time or after the assignment of the polygon. The evaluation of the polygon IDs makes it possible to determine with a high degree of certainty when and in what order which polygons were traveled on and when OTU 21 switched over from first section block 11 to the second section block. By real-time detection of the polygon in which OTU 21 is located, it is inevitably known which section block is occupied and which section blocks are free. FIGS. 1 and 2 show a first polygon 23 and a second polygon 25. First polygon 23 is assigned to first section block 11, and second polygon 25 is assigned to second section block 13.
  • If, as shown in FIG. 2, a coupling breakage occurs on one of the car couplings of train 17, the OTU does not arrive in the area of second polygon 25. Therefore, the first section block 11 is not released.
  • Without the use of axle counting devices the present method makes it possible to ensure that first section block 11 is free of last unit 19 of train 17.
  • POIs (Points of Interest) are point coordinates on a digital map and are generally used for navigation or to approach a destination such as a pharmacy, museum etc. On single-track railway sections, POIs are suitable for determining that a defined POI has been crossed. In the case of multi-track railroad bodies, it cannot be determined in a system-independent manner on which track or on which section block a train is moving, is or was located. POIs are therefore unsuitable for determining whether a section block of a railway section is free.
  • FIG. 3 shows three different variants of how polygons can be stored in OTU 21 per one section block.
  • In variant A, one polygon 23 is stored per section block. The data traffic in this variant is less than in variants B and C. In comparison to variants B and C, however, there is a loss of time until the release report of section block 25 and there is no position report between polygons of the neighboring section blocks.
  • In variant B, one polygon 23 a, 23 b at the two ends of the section block is stored in the OTU 21. The section block is reported as free as early as possible since the distance between adjacent polygons 23 and 25 of section blocks 11 and 13 is as small as possible. There is no position report between polygons 23 a and 23 b.
  • In variant C, a polygon chain along the entire length of section block 11 is stored in OTU 19. In this variant, there is an uninterrupted polygon ID report within section block 11. All three variants are independent of the direction of travel, since the reporting of the polygon ID is independent of the direction of travel from which polygon 23 is detected.
  • FIG. 4 shows a multi-track railway section with a first track 27 and a second track 29 running next to it. A track section of first and second tracks 27, 29 is defined as the first and third section blocks 11 and 14. First and third polygons 23, 26 are stored in OTU 21 for first and third section blocks 11, 14. The width of first and third polygons 23, 26 is dimensioned such that they do not overlap. This ensures that only first polygon 23, and not third polygon 26, can be assigned to first section block 11. On the other hand, first and third polygons 23, 26 must not be dimensioned too narrow, so that the GNSS position of OTU 21 is reliably within the respective polygon. Therefore, it is expedient if the polygon width is at least the maximum width of train 17.
  • FIG. 5 shows a distance 31 between first polygon 23 and second polygon 25, which corresponds to the maximum braking distance of the train, calculated from the maximum speed of the train with which it travels in first section block 11. Distance 31 ensures that OTU 21 does not come to lie within second polygon 25 when the train is forced to stop by the railway signal 15 between two section blocks 11, 13. The provision of distance 31 therefore prevents train end 19 with OTU 21 from “slipping” into second polygon 25 during a braking maneuver at railway signal 15, and the first section block 11 is thereby erroneously released.

Claims (19)

1-17. (canceled)
18. A method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of a last unit of a train, comprising:
equipping each train travelling into the section block with at least one train terminal (OTU—On Train Unit) at an end of the train defined by a direction of travel of the train;
using the OTU for a periodic position detection of the train;
storing at least one polygon, which is defined by a plurality of geo-data, for each section block in the OUT;
registering a respectively traveled polygon at least once by the OTU by Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) if the position of the OTU is within the polygon; and
using the OTU to send an identification of the respectively traveled polygon at least once to an electronic data processing system for evaluation.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the evaluation of the identification includes a time and an order of traveled polygons and a time when the OTU moves from one section block to an adjacent section block.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the identification of the respective polygon includes geo-data, the identification of the respective section block and the respective track identification.
21. The method of claim 18, further comprising storing a polygon in the OTU for each section block at both ends of the section block.
22. The method of claim 18, further comprising storing a plurality of adjoining polygons in the OTU over the entire length of the section block.
23. The method of claim 18, wherein the distance between a first polygon which is stored at the end of a first section block, and a second polygon adjacent to the first polygon, which second polygon is stored at the end of a second section block facing the first section block, corresponds to a maximum braking distance of the train.
24. The method of claim 18, wherein the train at its tip, defined by the direction of travel, is equipped with an additional OTU and when the direction of travel changes, the additional OTU is recognized by the electronic data processing system as the OTU at the end of the train.
25. The method of claim 18, wherein in addition to the identification, the OTU sends the polygon identification, the direction of travel of the train and a status of a power supply to the electronic data processing system.
26. The method of claim 18, wherein for a given clocking of the position determination, the OTU determines a minimum length of the polygon by a maximum speed of the train and a maximum length of the polygon is defined by the length of the section block for which the polygon is stored in the OTU.
27. The method of claim 18, wherein a width of a first polygon corresponds at least to a maximum width of the train and in a case of a multi-track railway section, the width of the first polygon is dimensioned in such a way that the first polygon is free of overlaps from further third polygons which are stored in the OTU for further tracks.
28. The method of claim 18, wherein the identification of a second polygon causes the second section block assigned to the second polygon to be reported by the electronic data processing system as being occupied or blocked and the first section block previously traveled by the train is reported as free by the electronic data processing system.
29. The method of claim 18, wherein a train integrity is determined by the OTU changing from one section block to another section block.
30. The method of claim 18, wherein the OTU and the additional OTU are synchronized by the electronic data processing system in order to calculate a distance between the OTU and the additional OTU in the electronic data processing system and to send a change in a distance between the OUT and the additional OUT.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the OTU and the additional OTU are synchronized by the electronic data processing system to calculate a distance between the OTU and the additional OTU in the electronic data processing system and to send a change in a distance between the OUT and the additional OUT caused by a coupling breakage of the train to the train's electronic data processing system.
32. The method of claim 18, wherein a start and an end of an area of a section block at which the GNSS reception of the OTU is not sufficient is stored in the OTU with a start polygon or an end polygon and that an area is considered as passed through when the polygon identification of the end polygon is received by the OTU via the electronic data processing system.
33. The method of claim 18, wherein the car identifications of the individual cars of a train are transmitted to the OTU in order to be able to send a relevant position and time of individual cars to the electronic data processing system.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein the car identification is linked to at least one freight document of the respective car.
35. The method of claim 18, wherein polygons stored in the OTU contain information on positioning of railway signals, and positions of the railway signals can be visualized in the driver's compartment of the train.
US16/649,957 2017-09-21 2018-09-20 Method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train Abandoned US20200223458A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH01163/17A CH714184A1 (en) 2017-09-21 2017-09-21 Method of ensuring that a track block of a railway track is free of the last unit of a train.
CH01163/17 2017-09-21
PCT/EP2018/075476 WO2019057823A1 (en) 2017-09-21 2018-09-20 Method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20200223458A1 true US20200223458A1 (en) 2020-07-16

Family

ID=61156935

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/649,957 Abandoned US20200223458A1 (en) 2017-09-21 2018-09-20 Method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20200223458A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3684670A1 (en)
CH (1) CH714184A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2019057823A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115285182B (en) * 2022-10-08 2023-02-17 卡斯柯信号(北京)有限公司 Method and device for calculating trigger section of train protection section

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160036519A1 (en) * 2014-06-13 2016-02-04 Trimble Navigation Limited Mobile ionospheric data capture system
US20180112983A1 (en) * 2016-10-24 2018-04-26 Invensense Inc. Method and system for global shape matching a trajectory
US20210107542A1 (en) * 2011-10-14 2021-04-15 Stc, Inc. Railway safety notification system and device with proportional warnings

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5699986A (en) * 1996-07-15 1997-12-23 Alternative Safety Technologies Railway crossing collision avoidance system
US6081769A (en) * 1998-02-23 2000-06-27 Wabtec Corporation Method and apparatus for determining the overall length of a train
WO2003013935A1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2003-02-20 Hermanus Adriaan Bernard Train integrity
US6915191B2 (en) * 2003-05-19 2005-07-05 Quantum Engineering, Inc. Method and system for detecting when an end of train has passed a point
DE102013101927A1 (en) * 2013-02-27 2014-08-28 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Device for automatically controlling rolling stock of train e.g. locomotive, has train end monitor attached with rolling stock of train, where device detects whether train end monitor is attached with rolling stock of train

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210107542A1 (en) * 2011-10-14 2021-04-15 Stc, Inc. Railway safety notification system and device with proportional warnings
US20160036519A1 (en) * 2014-06-13 2016-02-04 Trimble Navigation Limited Mobile ionospheric data capture system
US20180112983A1 (en) * 2016-10-24 2018-04-26 Invensense Inc. Method and system for global shape matching a trajectory

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CH714184A1 (en) 2019-03-29
EP3684670A1 (en) 2020-07-29
WO2019057823A1 (en) 2019-03-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6397130B1 (en) Multi-sensor route detector for rail vehicle navigation
US10000222B2 (en) Methods and systems of determining end of train location and clearance of trackside points of interest
ES2898658T3 (en) Method for safe train integrity monitoring and the use of on-board units of an automatic train protection system for train integrity monitoring
US6915191B2 (en) Method and system for detecting when an end of train has passed a point
US8214091B2 (en) System and method to determine train location in a track network
EP0836978B1 (en) Method and apparatus for initializing an automated train control system
ES2297653T3 (en) SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LOCKING WITH INTRINSECA SECURITY, FOR RAILWAY LINES OF LOW TRAFFIC DENSITY.
US9221478B2 (en) Method and device for monitoring train integrity
CN110730742B (en) Method for operating a rail-bound transport system
CN107531261B (en) Method and apparatus for locating rail vehicles traveling in CBTC (communication based train control System) train control and train safety System
ES2626175T3 (en) Procedure for calculating a range of positions of a railway vehicle on a railway and associated device
US20210016812A1 (en) Train control system and train control method including virtual train stop
ES2875537T3 (en) Method, vehicle device, as well as control device for operating a rail-guided transport system.
WO2006136783A1 (en) Safety arrangement
US20200223458A1 (en) Method for ensuring that a section block of a railway section is free of the last unit of a train
ES2825750T3 (en) System and method to manage the authorization of movement of a guided vehicle
JP4975053B2 (en) Train presence detection device
ES2826848T3 (en) Procedure, as well as a device, for determining a length of a rail-guided vehicle
EP3028920A1 (en) Communication method and system for exchanging information between guided vehicles
GB2555813A (en) Locating a railway vehicle within a railway network
JP4204971B2 (en) GPS measurement system for moving object
RU2288856C2 (en) System to prevent collision of train or locomotive with arriving or departing train
Raymond et al. Innovation brings satellite-based train control within reach
JPH0818557B2 (en) Car security control method for maintenance
EP3581459A1 (en) A method and an arrangement for monitoring and determining the completeness of a train

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION