US20200208169A1

US20200208169A1 - Methods and compositions for herbicide tolerance in plants

Info

Publication number: US20200208169A1
Application number: US16/604,027
Authority: US
Inventors: Sherry L. LeClere
Original assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC
Current assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC
Priority date: 2017-04-14
Filing date: 2018-04-13
Publication date: 2020-07-02
Anticipated expiration: 2038-04-13
Also published as: CN110621154A; BR112019021473A2; WO2018191663A1; EP3609314A4; US20220333126A1; EP3609314A1; US11352637B2

Abstract

Provided herein are novel methods and compositions for conferring tolerance to auxin herbicides to plants. Also provided are herbicide tolerant plants, seeds, cells, and plant parts containing modified AUX/IAA proteins, as well as methods of producing the same.

Description

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/485,751, filed Apr. 14, 2017, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of biotechnology. More specifically, the invention relates to compositions and methods for producing crop plants that are resistant to auxin herbicides. In particular, the invention relates to plants, plant issues and plant seeds that contain altered KsIAA16 genes and proteins that provide resistance to auxin herbicide compared to unaltered KsIAA16 genes and proteins.

INCORPORATION OF SEQUENCE LISTING

A sequence listing contained in the file named “MONS406WO_ST25.txt” which is 468 kilobytes measured in MS-Windows®) and created on Apr. 12, 2018, comprises 292 nucleotide sequences, is filed electronically herewith and incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Weeds are plants that compete with cultivated plants in an agronomic environment and cost farmers billions of dollars annually in crop losses and the expense of efforts to keep weeds under control. Weeds also serve as hosts for crop diseases and insect pests. The losses caused by weeds in agricultural production environments include decreases in crop yield, reduced crop quality, increased irrigation costs, increased harvesting costs, reduced land value, injury to livestock, and crop damage from insects and diseases harbored by the weeds. The principal means by which weeds cause these effects are: 1) competing with crop plants for water, nutrients, sunlight and other essentials for growth and development, 2) production of toxic or irritant chemicals that cause human or animal health problem, 3) production of immense quantities of seed or vegetative reproductive parts or both that contaminate agricultural products and perpetuate the species in agricultural lands, and 4) production on agricultural and nonagricultural lands of vast amounts of vegetation that must be disposed of.
Chemical herbicides are often used to control the growth and spread of weeds. Chemical herbicides are active at one or more target sites within a plant where they interrupt normal plant functions. Auxin is a central regulator in plant growth and development, and has been implicated in numerous developmental and response pathways, including cell division and elongation, plant patterning, root growth, vascular development, leaf shape, phototropism, and gravitropism. Because this plant hormone is key to so many critical plant pathways, perturbation of auxin levels or response often leads to plant death. This has led to the identification and commercialization of a number of compounds that can mimic the function of the naturally-occurring active auxin is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), making them effective herbicides. These auxin herbicides include compounds such as 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid (dicamba), and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). There is a need for crop plants that are resistant to auxin herbicides.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, a modified plant or seed is provided, wherein the modified plant or seed is sensitive to at least one endogenous auxin, and wherein the modified plant or seed exhibits tolerance to at least one synthetic auxin herbicide. The endogenous auxin may be selected from the group consisting of IAA and NAA, and the synthetic auxin herbicide may be selected from the group consisting of dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr, quinclorac and fluroxypyr. In some embodiments, the modified plant or seed comprises at least one modification in an endogenous gene encoding an AUX/IAA protein, wherein said at least one modification confers tolerance to an auxin herbicide as compared to a control plant without said at least one modification. In further embodiments, the modification results in an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified relative to a wild type AUX/IAA polypeptide, to be asparagine (N), isoleucine (I), or leucine (L) relative to a wild type AUX/IAA polypeptide and wherein X₂is isoleucine (I), valine (V), leucine (L), or methionine (M). In yet further embodiments the modification results in an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 219, wherein the modified plant or seed is not a Kochia scoparia plant or seed. The modification may result in an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 219, wherein the modified plant or seed is not a Kochia scoparia plant or seed. In certain embodiments, said modified plant or seed is a crop plant or crop seed, for example a monocot crop plant selected from the group consisting of maize, sorghum, wheat, canola, soy, and cotton, grapes, tomato, potato, lettuce, broccoli, cucumber, peanut, melon, leeks, onion, rice, and barley, or a dicot crop plant selected from the group consisting of soybean, alfalfa, sunflower, cotton, canola, and sugar beet. Said modification may result in increased tolerance to an auxin herbicide as compared to a control plant or seed lacking said modification.
In another aspect, a method of generating a modified plant is provided, comprising the steps of: (a.) introducing a modification in a AUX/IAA gene of a plant cell; (b.) identifying and selecting one or more plant cells of step (a.) comprising said modification in a degron domain of AUX/IAA; and c. regenerating at least one plant from at least one or more cells selected in step (b).
In a further aspect, a modified DNA molecule is provided that encodes a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide, wherein said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified to be asparagine (N), isoleucine (I), or leucine (L) relative to a wild type AUX/IAA polypeptide and wherein X₂is isoleucine (I), valine (V), leucine (L), or methionine (M). In some embodiments, X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine. In further embodiments, the modified AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a polypeptide sequence selected from the group consisting of: (a.) a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, or wherein any of SEQ ID NOs: 247-284; and (b.) a fragment of the sequence of (a.) having auxin/indole-3-acetic acid binding activity. In certain embodiments, the modified AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a polynucleotide sequence having at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 220 or the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 220.
In yet a further aspect, a DNA construct is provided comprising a modified DNA molecule provided herein operably linked to a heterologous promoter. The promoter may be an inducible promoter or a native auxin/indole-3-acetic acid gene promoter in the genome of a plant.
In another aspect, a recombinant plant, plant part, cell, or seed comprising a modified DNA molecule provided herein is provided. A plant genome comprising a modified DNA molecule provided herein is further provided.
In a further aspect, a method is provided for conferring auxin herbicide tolerance to a plant comprising expressing in said plant a modified DNA molecule described herein. Said method may comprise transforming said plant or a progenitor thereof with the modified DNA molecule. In some embodiments, the auxin herbicide is selected from the group consisting of dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr, quinclorac and fluroxypyr.
In another aspect, a method for producing an auxin herbicide tolerant plant is provided comprising: modifying an AUX/IAA polypeptide of said plant to alter residue X₁in a degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂relative to SEQ ID NO: 217, wherein X₂is an isoleucine, valine, leucine, or methionine. In certain embodiments, X₁is modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine. In further embodiments, modifying comprises site-specific mutagenesis. In some embodiments, the degron domain is modified by a base editing enzyme.
Plants produced by the methods described herein are further provided.
In yet a further aspect, methods are provided for detecting a plant exhibiting sensitivity at least one endogenous auxin and tolerance to at least one auxin herbicide, comprising the steps of: a. obtaining a genomic DNA sample from said plant; b. amplifying said DNA sample using a first primer and a second primer to produce an amplicon; c. detecting in said amplicon a polynucleotide sequence encoding the motif X₁WPPX₂within SEQ ID NO: 219. In some embodiments, said first primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 221 and said second primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 222. Detecting may comprise restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. In other embodiments, said first primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 223 and said second primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 224. Detecting may further comprise using a probe selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 225, SEQ ID NO: 226, or combinations thereof.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1: Shows the gene structure of KsIAA16 wherein nucleotide and amino acid differences between sensitive (S) and resistant (R) alleles are indicated.

FIG. 2: Shows a phylogenetic tree containing Arabidopsis AUX/IAA proteins as well as putative orthologous Kochia AUX/IAA proteins identified in transcriptome sequences. The members of this phylogenetic tree are: AtIAA1, (SEQ ID NO: 247); AtIAA2, (SEQ ID NO: 248); AtIAA3, (SEQ ID NO: 249); AtIAA4, (SEQ ID NO: 250); AtIAA5, (SEQ ID NO: 251); AtIAA6, (SEQ ID NO: 252); AtIAA7, (SEQ ID NO: 253); AtIAA8, (SEQ ID NO: 254); AtIAA9, (SEQ ID NO: 255); AtIAA10, (SEQ ID NO: 256); AtIAA11, (SEQ ID NO: 257); AtIAA12, (SEQ ID NO: 258); AtIAA13, (SEQ ID NO: 259); AtIAA14, (SEQ ID NO: 260); AtIAA15, (SEQ ID NO: 261); AtIAA16, (SEQ ID NO: 262); AtIAA17, (SEQ ID NO: 263); AtIAA18, (SEQ ID NO: 264); AtIAA19, (SEQ ID NO: 265); AtIAA20, (SEQ ID NO: 266); AtIAA26, (SEQ ID NO: 267); AtIAA27, (SEQ ID NO: 268); AtIAA28, (SEQ ID NO: 269); AtIAA29, (SEQ ID NO: 270); AtIAA30, (SEQ ID NO: 271); AtIAA31, (SEQ ID NO: 272); AtIAA32, (SEQ ID NO: 273); AtIAA33, (SEQ ID NO: 274); AtIAA34, (SEQ ID NO: 275); KsIAA1, (SEQ ID NO: 276); KsIAA3, (SEQ ID NO: 277); KsIAA6, (SEQ ID NO: 278); KsIAA7, (SEQ ID NO: 279); KsIAA8, (SEQ ID NO: 280); KsIAA9, (SEQ ID NO: 281); KsIAA13, (SEQ ID NO: 282); KsIAA18, (SEQ ID NO: 283); KsIAA31, (SEQ ID NO: 284).

FIG. 3: Shows a phylogenetic tree of orthologs of the KsIAA16 clade from amino acid sequences from Brassica napus, Glycine max, Triticum aestivum, Gossypium hirsutum, Sorghum bicolor, Zea mays, Vitis vinifera, Cucumis melo, Solanum tuberosum, Solanum lycopersicum, Lactuca sativa, Cucumis sativus, Medicago truncatula, and Helianthus annuus.

FIG. 4: Shows a multiple sequence alignment of representative members of the phylogenetic tree of FIG. 2, with degron motif indicated by the boxed amino acids.

FIG. 5: Shows root elongation response of seedlings of the resistant (R) and sensitive (S) Kochia biotypes in the presence and absence of natural and synthetic auxins.

FIG. 6: Shows fresh weight (percentage of Untreated Control) for Dicamba (Panel A), 2,4-D (Panel B) and Fluroxypyr (Panel C).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless defined otherwise herein, terms are to be understood according to conventional usage by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Examples of resources describing many of the terms related to molecular biology used herein can be found in Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of The Cell, 5th Edition, Garland Science Publishing, Inc.: New York, 2007; Rieger et al., Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular, 5th edition, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1991; King et al, A Dictionary of Genetics, 6th ed., Oxford University Press: New York, 2002; and Lewin, Genes IX, Oxford University Press: New York, 2007. The nomenclature for DNA bases as set forth at 37 C.F.R. § 1.822 is used.
The plant hormone auxin serves as a central regulator of genes involved numerous plant growth, developmental, and response pathways. The naturally occurring active auxin is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), but many other compounds have been found to mimic the function of IAA when applied to plants. This has led to the identification and commercialization of a number of compounds that function as effective herbicides.
While corn and other monocotyledonous crops are naturally tolerant to low levels of synthetic auxin herbicides, dicotyledonous crops such as soybean and cotton are highly sensitive. Efforts to develop auxin herbicide tolerant varieties have been focused on the heterologous expression of enzymes that inactivate the auxin herbicide, thereby rendering otherwise sensitive plants tolerant to the herbicide. For example, dicamba tolerant soybean plants have been produced to comprise a gene from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia that encodes for dicamba monooxygenase (DMO), an enzyme that inactivates dicamba by converting it to the non-herbicidal 3,6-dicholorosalicylic acid.
While this approach has been successful, recent advances in genome editing techniques have been of great interest in the development crops with improved traits. With regard to the trait of auxin herbicide tolerance, genome editing can be used to generate specific mutations that alter the mechanism of auxin perception in a plant, such that the plant is resistant to the effect of synthetic auxins, including auxin herbicides, but is still sensitive to endogenous auxins. This modification in auxin perception would potentially not result in any significant fitness penalties. Not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, a plant that is tolerant due to altered auxin perception would not need to expend resources to highly express any metabolic proteins for herbicide detoxification, which in turn, would leave the plant more resources to commit to other growth properties.
In order to utilize genome editing techniques to modify auxin perception in tolerant plants, specific mutations that confer the desired auxin perception phenotype must be identified. A great deal of work has been done to identify and characterize mutations that result in altered auxin perception in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, however none of the known mutations resulted in resistance to synthetic auxins, while maintaining sensitivity to endogenous IAA. As a result, most known mutations were found to result in plant growth defects in Arabidopsis.
Auxin herbicide resistant field isolates potentially provide a distinct set of examples where plants have an altered auxin perception yet maintain sufficient fitness to propagate under harsher conditions than what is typically provided by controlled environments. Efforts to identify the genetic basis of auxin herbicide resistance in any field-derived weed species have been previously hindered by the low frequency of resistance alleles and slow spread of auxin herbicide resistant weeds.
One weed of particular agricultural importance is Kochia scoparia L. Schrad, a robust dicotyledonous weed species. Despite the problematic rise and spread of dicamba resistant Kochia, the genetic basis for this resistance has not been reported. The present disclosure shows for the first time the genetic basis for the dicamba resistant phenotype exhibited by a Kochia biotype from Western Nebraska. Surprisingly, the present inventors have shown that the dicamba resistance in this Kochia biotype is due to a two nucleotide base change resulting in a glycine to asparagine amino acid change within the highly conserved “GWPPV/I” motif located in the degron domain of a auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) protein most closely resembling IAA16 in Arabidopsis. Additionally, it was demonstrated that the mutant IAA16 protein from the resistant Kochia biotype appeared to have altered auxin perception.
As used herein, terms in the singular and the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” for example, include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “plant,” “the plant,” or “a plant” also includes a plurality of plants; also, depending on the context, use of the term “plant” can also include genetically similar or identical progeny of that plant; use of the term “a nucleic acid” optionally includes, as a practical matter, many copies of that nucleic acid molecule; similarly, the term “probe” optionally (and typically) encompasses many similar or identical probe molecules.
As used herein, “plant” refers to a whole plant, any part thereof, or a cell or tissue culture derived from a plant, comprising any of: whole plants, plant components or organs (e.g., leaves, stems, roots, etc.), plant tissues, seeds, plant cells, and/or progeny of the same. A progeny plant can be from any filial generation, e.g., F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, etc. A plant cell is a biological cell of a plant, taken from a plant or derived through culture from a cell taken from a plant.
As used herein, “modified”, in the context of plants, seeds, plant components, plant cells, and plant genomes, refers to a state containing changes or variations from their natural or native state. For instance, a “native transcript” of a gene refers to an RNA transcript that is generated from an unmodified gene. Typically, a native transcript is a sense transcript. Modified plants or seeds contain molecular changes in their genetic materials, including either genetic or epigenetic modifications. Typically, modified plants or seeds, or a parental or progenitor line thereof, have been subjected to mutagenesis, genome editing (e.g., without being limiting, via methods using site-specific nucleases), genetic transformation (e.g., without being limiting, via methods of Agrobacterium transformation or microprojectile bombardment), or a combination thereof. In one aspect, a modified plant provided herein comprises no non-plant genetic material or sequences. In yet another aspect, a modified plant provided herein comprises no interspecies genetic material or sequences.
As used herein, an “endogenous gene” or a “native copy” of a gene refers to a gene that originates from within a given organism, cell, tissue, genome, or chromosome. An “endogenous gene” or a “native copy” of a gene is a gene that was not previously modified by human action. Similarly, an “endogenous protein” refers to a protein encoded by an endogenous gene.
As used herein, “synthetic auxin herbicide” or “auxin herbicide” means any herbicide that exerts herbicidal activity through mimicking an endogenous plant auxin or inhibit the movement of auxinic compounds out of cells. Examples of synthetic auxin herbicides include benzoic acids, phenoxycarboxylic acids, pyridine carboxylic acids, quinoline carboxylic acids, semi-carbasones, Diflufenzopyr, 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, MCPA, MCPB, Mecoprop, Dicamba, Clopyralid, Fluroxypyr, Picloram, Triclopyr, Aminopyralid, Aminocyclopyrachlor, and Quinclorac.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a non-transgenic plant comprising a synthetic mutation in a degron domain of an AUX/IAA protein. In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a non-transgenic plant comprising a synthetic mutation in a degron domain of an IAA16 protein. As used herein, the term “synthetic mutation” refers to non-spontaneous mutation and occurs as a result genome modification, for example by a site-specific genome modification enzyme.
Several embodiments relate to a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide, said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine or leucine, and wherein X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. Several embodiments relate to a nucleic acid sequence encoding a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide, said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine or leucine, and wherein X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. Several embodiments relate to a plant, plant part, plant cell, or plant seed comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide and/or a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide, said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine or leucine, and wherein X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. In some embodiments, a plant, plant part, plant cell, or plant seed comprising a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide, said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine, and wherein X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine is resistant to the effect of synthetic auxins, including auxin herbicides, but is still sensitive to endogenous auxins.
In one aspect, a modification to a nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein results in at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, at least 20, at least 25, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 75, or at least 100 missense mutations as compared to an endogenous protein. In another aspect, a modification to a nucleic acid molecule encoding a AUX/IAA protein results in at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, at least 20, at least 25, at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 75, or at least 100 missense mutations as compared to an unmodified sequence. As used herein, a “missense mutation” refers to a single nucleotide change that results in a codon that codes for a different amino acid. For example, the codon “CGU” encodes an arginine amino acid. If a missense mutation changes the G to a U, producing a “CUU” codon, the codon now encodes a leucine amino acid. Missense mutations can be caused by an insertion, deletion, substitution, or inversion.
In further embodiments, methods of designing and producing crop plants that exhibit tolerance to auxin herbicides are provided. In some embodiments, methods of designing plants that exhibit tolerance to auxin herbicides by modifying the genome of a plant cell to alter a gene involved auxin herbicide tolerance as described herein is provided. Genome modification can be accomplished through targeted mutagenesis as described herein.
Several embodiments relate to a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide capable of providing auxin resistance to a plant. Several embodiments relate to nucleic acid sequences encoding modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptides, as well as compositions and methods of using modified polypeptides. In some embodiments, nucleic acid sequences encoding modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptides provide for tolerance to auxin herbicide in plants comprising the recombinant DNA molecules.
Several embodiments relate to nucleic acid molecules, polynucleotides, polypeptides, proteins, cells, seeds, or plants that are the result of genetic engineering and as such would not normally be found in nature and are created by human intervention. Several embodiments relate to a plant genome comprising a DNA sequence that does not naturally occur in such plant genome and as such is the result of human intervention. In some embodiments, a DNA sequence provided herein encodes a modified AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain. In certain embodiments, modified AUX/IAA polypeptides comprising an alteration relative to the polypeptide encoded by KsIAA16S (SEQ ID NO: 218) in a degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂are provided. In some embodiments, recombinant polypeptides comprising modified degron domains comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to a different amino acid, for example to a hydrophilic amino acid such as arginine, asparagine, aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, lysine, serine, or threonine, and X₂is a hydrophobic amino acid such a leucine or isoleucine are provided. In some embodiments, a recombinant polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine, and X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine, or methionine is provided. In some embodiments, polypeptides comprising a polypeptide sequence wherein any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, or wherein any of SEQ ID NOs: 247-284 has been altered to have a modified degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, for example wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine or leucine, and X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine are provided.
Several embodiments relate to polynucleotides encoding polypeptide sequences capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception, for example polypeptides wherein any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, or wherein any of SEQ ID NOs: 247-284 have been altered to have a modified degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, for example wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine, and X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine, or methionine. In some embodiments, polynucleotides comprising the polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 220 (KsIAA16R). In some embodiments, plants, plant parts, plant cells, or seeds comprising polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences described herein are provided.
In some embodiments, nucleic acid molecules may be synthesized and modified by methods known in the art, either completely or in part, where it is desirable to provide sequences useful for DNA manipulation (such as restriction enzyme recognition sites or recombination-based cloning sites), plant-preferred sequences (such as plant-codon usage or Kozak consensus sequences), or sequences useful for DNA construct design (such as spacer or linker sequences). In some embodiments, nucleic acid molecules having at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, at least 99.5%, or 100% sequence identity to a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110 and capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception which confers tolerance to auxin herbicides are provided.
Several embodiments relate to polypeptide sequences having at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, at least 99%, at least 99.5%, or 100% sequence identity to a polypeptide sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, and capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception which confers tolerance to auxin herbicides.
In some embodiments, fragments of a polynucleotide or polypeptide sequence capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception which confers tolerance to auxin herbicides are provided. In specific embodiments, fragments of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110 comprising at least about 50, 95, 150, 250, 500, 750, or at least about 1000 contiguous nucleotides, or longer, of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, and capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception which confers tolerance to auxin herbicides are provided.
The AUX/IAA family of proteins contains four conserved domains, wherein domain II constitutes a 17 amino acid sequence that functions as a degron domain that confers auxin-dependent degradation. In particular, this degron domain contains the motif “GWPPV/I”, which is strictly conserved among all AUX/IAA proteins. In some embodiments, polynucleotides encoding an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a fragment or variant of the amino acid sequences provided herein and comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein modification of the degron domain provides a polypeptide capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception which confers tolerance to synthetic auxin herbicides are provided. In certain embodiments, polypeptides encoded by polynucleotides comprise a fragment or variant of the amino acid sequences provided herein and comprise a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine, and wherein X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine.
As used herein, the term “DNA” or “DNA molecule” refers to a double-stranded DNA molecule of genomic or synthetic origin, i.e. a polymer of deoxyribonucleotide bases or a polynucleotide molecule, read from the 5′ (upstream) end to the 3′ (downstream) end. As used herein, the term “DNA sequence” refers to the nucleotide sequence of a DNA molecule. The nomenclature used herein corresponds to that of by Title 37 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations § 1.822, and set forth in the tables in WIPO Standard ST.25 (1998), Appendix 2, Tables 1 and 3.
As used herein, the term “isolated DNA molecule” refers to a DNA molecule at least partially separated from other molecules normally associated with it in its native or natural state. In one embodiment, the term “isolated” refers to a DNA molecule that is at least partially separated from some of the nucleic acids which normally flank the DNA molecule in its native or natural state. Thus, DNA molecules fused to regulatory or coding sequences with which they are not normally associated, for example as the result of recombinant techniques, are considered isolated herein. Such molecules are considered isolated when integrated into the chromosome of a host cell or present in a nucleic acid solution with other DNA molecules, in that they are not in their native state.
Any number of methods well known to those skilled in the art can be used to isolate and manipulate a polynucleotide, or fragment thereof, as disclosed herein. For example, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology can be used to amplify a particular starting polynucleotide molecule and/or to produce variants of the original molecule. Polynucleotide molecules, or fragment thereof, can also be obtained by other techniques, such as by directly synthesizing the fragment by chemical means, as is commonly practiced by using an automated oligonucleotide synthesizer. A polynucleotide can be single-stranded (ss) or double-stranded (ds). “Double-stranded” refers to the base-pairing that occurs between sufficiently complementary, anti-parallel nucleic acid strands to form a double-stranded nucleic acid structure, generally under physiologically relevant conditions. Embodiments of the method include those wherein the polynucleotide is at least one selected from the group consisting of sense single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), a double-stranded DNA/RNA hybrid, anti-sense ssDNA, or anti-sense ssRNA; a mixture of polynucleotides of any of these types can be used.
As used herein, the term “percent sequence identity” or “% sequence identity” refers to the percentage of identical nucleotides or amino acids in a linear polynucleotide or polypeptide sequence of a reference (“query”) sequence (or its complementary strand) as compared to a test (“subject”) sequence (or its complementary strand) when the two sequences are optimally aligned (with appropriate nucleotide or amino acid insertions, deletions, or gaps totaling less than 20 percent of the reference sequence over the window of comparison). Optimal alignment of sequences for aligning a comparison window are well known to those skilled in the art and may be conducted by tools such as the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman, the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman, and by computerized implementations of these algorithms such as GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA available as part of the Sequence Analysis software package of the GCG® Wisconsin Package® (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, Calif.), MEGAlign (DNAStar Inc., Madison, Wis.), and MUSCLE (version 3.6) (Edgar, “MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput” Nucleic Acids Research 32(5):1792-7 (2004)) for instance with default parameters. An “identity fraction” for aligned segments of a test sequence and a reference sequence is the number of identical components that are shared by the two aligned sequences divided by the total number of components in the portion of the reference sequence segment being aligned, that is, the entire reference sequence or a smaller defined part of the reference sequence. Percent sequence identity is represented as the identity fraction multiplied by 100. The comparison of one or more sequences may be to a full-length sequence or a portion thereof, or to a longer sequence.
As used herein, the term “protein-coding polynucleotide molecule” refers to a polynucleotide molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes a protein. A “protein-coding sequence” means a polynucleotide sequence that encodes a protein. Such a polynucleotide is at least one selected from the group consisting of sense single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), a double-stranded DNA/RNA hybrid, anti-sense ssDNA, or anti-sense ssRNA; or a mixture of polynucleotides of any of these types.
A “sequence” means a sequential arrangement of nucleotides or amino acids. The boundaries of a protein-coding sequence may be determined by a translation start codon at the 5′-terminus and a translation stop codon at the 3′-terminus. In some embodiments, a protein-coding molecule may comprise a DNA sequence encoding a protein sequence. In some embodiments, a protein-coding molecule may comprise a RNA sequence encoding a protein sequence. As used herein, “transgene expression”, “expressing a transgene”, “protein expression”, and “expressing a protein” mean the production of a protein through the process of transcribing a DNA molecule into messenger RNA (mRNA) and translating the mRNA into polypeptide chains, which are ultimately folded into proteins.
Because of the degeneracy of the genetic code, a variety of different polynucleotide sequences can encode polypeptides, such as the altered polypeptides disclosed herein. A table showing all possible triplet codons (and where U also replaces T) and the amino acid encoded by each codon is described in Lewin (1985). In addition, it is well within the capability of one of skill in the art to create alternative polynucleotide sequences encoding the same, or essentially the same, altered polypeptides as described herein. These variant or alternative polynucleotide sequences are within the scope of the embodiments described herein. As used herein, references to “essentially the same” sequence refers to sequences which encode amino acid substitutions, deletions, additions, or insertions which do not materially alter the functional activity of the polypeptide encoded by the polynucleotides of the embodiments described herein. Allelic variants of the nucleotide sequences encoding a wild type or altered polypeptide are also encompassed within the scope of the embodiments described herein. Substitution of amino acids other than those specifically exemplified or naturally present in a wild type or altered AUX/IAA polypeptide are also contemplated within the scope of the embodiments described herein, so long as the polypeptide having the substitution still retains substantially the same functional activity (e.g., selective auxin perception) described herein.

I. Genome Editing

Targeted modification of plant genomes through the use of genome editing methods can be used to create improved plant lines through modification of plant genomic DNA. In addition, genome editing methods can enable targeted insertion of one or more nucleic acids of interest into a plant genome. Examples methods for introducing donor polynucleotides into a plant genome or modifying genomic DNA of a plant include the use of sequence specific nucleases, such as zinc-finger nucleases, engineered or native meganucleases, TALE-endonucleases, or an RNA-guided endonucleases (for example, a Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 system, a CRISPR/Cpf1 system, a CRISPR/CasX system, a CRISPR/CasY system, a CRISPR/Cascade system). Several embodiments relate to methods of genome editing is using single-stranded oligonucleotides to introduce precise base pair modifications in a plant genome, as described by Sauer et al (Plant Physiol. 2016 April; 170(4): 1917-1928). Methods of genome editing to modify, delete, or insert nucleic acid sequences into genomic DNA are known in the art.
Several embodiments relate to a CRISPR/Cas9 system used to modify or replace an existing coding sequence within a plant genome, such as a sequence encoding an AUX/IAA polypeptide. Several embodiments relate to a CRISPR/Cpf1 system used to modify or replace an existing coding sequence within a plant genome, such as a sequence encoding an AUX/IAA polypeptide. Several embodiments relate to a Cas9-cytidine deaminase used to modify an existing coding sequence within a plant genome, such as a sequence encoding an AUX/IAA polypeptide. Several embodiments relate to a Cpf1-cytidine deaminase used to modify an existing coding sequence within a plant genome, such as a sequence encoding an AUX/IAA polypeptide. In further embodiments, transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) are used for modification or replacement of an existing coding sequence within a plant genome, such as a sequence encoding an AUX/IAA polypeptide. In some embodiments, an existing AUX/IAA polypeptide coding sequence within a plant genome is modified by non-templated genome editing with a sequence specific nuclease. In some embodiments, an existing AUX/IAA polypeptide coding sequence within a plant genome is modified by templated genome editing with a sequence specific nuclease. In some embodiments, a sequence specific nuclease and a donor nucleic acid encoding a modified degron domain is introduced into a plant cell. In some embodiments the modified degron domain encodes a X1WPPX2 motif capable of conferring to a plant tolerance to auxin herbicides. In some embodiments, X1 has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine. In some embodiments, X2 is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. Modification or replacement of an endogenous AUX/IAA-encoding sequence according to the methods provided herein results in expression of a polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, for example wherein one or more of X₁and X₂has been altered. Several embodiments therefore relate to providing a sequence specific nuclease capable of recognizing a specific nucleotide sequence of interest, such as an AUX/IAA sequence, within a genome of a plant to allow for alteration of the AUX/IAA sequence by non-templated editing or integration of a donor nucleic acid at that site.
Modifications to an AUX/IAA-encoding sequence, for example a sequence provided herein as one of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, may result in a sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂as described herein, capable of conferring to a plant altered auxin perception which confers tolerance to auxin herbicides. In some embodiments, X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine. In some embodiments, X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine.
In an aspect, a “modification” comprises the insertion of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, at least 25, at least 50, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, at least 500, at least 750, at least 1000, at least 1500, at least 2000, at least 3000, at least 4000, at least 5000, or at least 10,000 nucleotides. In another aspect, a “modification” comprises the deletion of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, at least 25, at least 50, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, at least 500, at least 750, at least 1000, at least 1500, at least 2000, at least 3000, at least 4000, at least 5000, or at least 10,000 nucleotides. In a further aspect, a “modification” comprises the inversion of at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, at least 25, at least 50, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, at least 500, at least 750, at least 1000, at least 1500, at least 2000, at least 3000, at least 4000, at least 5000, or at least 10,000 nucleotides. In still another aspect, a “modification” comprises the substitution of at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, at least 15, at least 25, at least 50, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, at least 500, at least 750, at least 1000, at least 1500, at least 2000, at least 3000, at least 4000, at least 5000, or at least 10,000 nucleotides. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of an “A” for a “C”, “G” or “T” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of a “C” for an “A”, “G” or “T” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of a “G” for an “A”, “C” or “T” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of a “T” for an “A”, “C” or “G” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of a “C” for a “U” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of a “G” for an “A” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of an “A” for a “G” in a nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, a “modification” comprises the substitution of a “T” for a “C” in a nucleic acid sequence.
In some embodiments, a recombinant DNA construct, such as a transgene or expression cassette comprising nucleic acid sequence encoding an AUX/IAA protein is provided. In some embodiments, the AUX/IAA protein is an IAA16 homolog. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid sequence encodes an AUX/IAA protein comprising a modified degron domain. In some embodiments, the modified degron domain comprises a X₁WPPX₂motif capable of conferring to a plant tolerance to auxin herbicides. In some embodiments, X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine. In some embodiments, X₂is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. In some embodiments, the transgene or expression cassette comprises a promoter derived from an endogenous promoter of an IAA gene operably linked to the AUX/IAA-encoding sequence. In some embodiments, the transgene or expression cassette, may be inserted or integrated into a locus within the genome of a plant or plant cell. In some embodiments, the transgene or expression cassette, may be inserted or integrated into a specific site or locus within the genome of a plant or plant cell via site-directed integration. In some embodiments, a recombinant DNA construct comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide wherein any one of SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110 have been altered to have a modified degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, or a sequence encoding a fragment of such a polypeptide. In some embodiments, a recombinant DNA construct may further comprise one or two homology arms flanking an insertion sequence (i.e., the sequence, transgene, cassette, etc., to be inserted into the plant genome).
Several embodiments relate to a recombinant DNA construct comprising an expression cassette(s) encoding a site-specific nuclease and/or any associated protein(s) to carry out genome modification. These nuclease expressing cassette(s) may be present in the same molecule or vector as a donor template for templated editing or an expression cassette comprising nucleic acid sequence encoding an AUX/IAA protein as described herein (in cis) or on a separate molecule or vector (in trans). Several methods for site-directed integration are known in the art involving different sequence-specific nucleases (or complexes of proteins and/or guide RNA) that cut the genomic DNA to produce a double strand break (DSB) or nick at a desired genomic site or locus. As understood in the art, during the process of repairing the DSB or nick introduced by the nuclease enzyme, the donor template DNA, transgene, or expression cassette may become integrated into the genome at the site of the DSB or nick. The presence of the homology arm(s) in the DNA to be integrated may promote the adoption and targeting of the insertion sequence into the plant genome during the repair process through homologous recombination, although an insertion event may occur through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Examples of site-specific nucleases that may be used include zinc-finger nucleases, engineered or native meganucleases, TALE-endonucleases, and RNA-guided endonucleases (e.g., Cas9, CasX, CasY or Cpf1). For methods using RNA-guided site-specific nucleases (e.g., Cas9, CasX, CasY or Cpf1), the recombinant DNA construct(s) may also comprise a sequence encoding one or more guide RNAs to direct the nuclease to the desired site within the plant genome. In some embodiments, one or more guide RNAs may be provided on a separate molecule or vector (in trans).

II. Site-Specific Genome Modification Enzymes

As used herein, the term “double-strand break inducing agent” refers to any agent that can induce a double-strand break (DSB) in a DNA molecule. In some embodiments, the double-strand break inducing agent is a site-specific genome modification enzyme.
As used herein, the term “site-specific genome modification enzyme” refers to any enzyme that can modify a nucleotide sequence in a sequence-specific manner. In some embodiments, a site-specific genome modification enzyme modifies the genome by inducing a single-strand break. In some embodiments, a site-specific genome modification enzyme modifies the genome by inducing a double-strand break. In some embodiments, a site-specific genome modification enzyme comprises a cytidine deaminase. In some embodiments, a site-specific genome modification enzyme comprises an adenine deaminase. In the present disclosure, site-specific genome modification enzymes include endonucleases, recombinases, transposases, deaminases, helicases and any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a sequence-specific nuclease.
Several embodiments relate to promoting recombination by providing a site-specific genome modification enzyme, for example, a sequence-specific nuclease, to a plant cell. In some embodiments, recombination is promoted by providing a single-strand break inducing agent. In some embodiments, recombination is promoted by providing a double-strand break inducing agent. In some embodiments, recombination is promoted by providing a strand separation inducing reagent. In one aspect, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is selected from an endonuclease, a recombinase, a transposase, a deaminase, a helicase or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, recombination occurs between B chromosomes. In some embodiments, recombination occurs between a B chromosome and an A chromosome.
Several embodiments relate to promoting integration of one or more DNAs of interest by providing a site-specific genome modification enzyme. In some embodiments, integration of one or more DNAs of interest is promoted by providing a single-strand break inducing agent. In some embodiments, integration of one or more DNAs of interest is promoted by providing a double-strand break inducing agent. In some embodiments, integration of one or more DNAs of interest is promoted by providing a strand separation inducing reagent. In one aspect, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is selected from an endonuclease, a recombinase, a transposase, a helicase or any combination thereof.
In one aspect, the endonuclease is selected from a meganuclease, a zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN), a transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), an Argonaute (non-limiting examples of Argonaute proteins include Thermus thermophilus Argonaute (TtAgo), Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute (PfAgo), Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute (NgAgo), an RNA-guided nuclease, such as a CRISPR associated nuclease (non-limiting examples of CRISPR associated nucleases include Cas1, Cas1B, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8, Cas9 (also known as Csn1 and Csx12), Cas10, Csy1, Csy2, Csy3, Cse1, Cse2, Csc1, Csc2, Csa5, Csn2, Csm2, Csm3, Csm4, Csm5, Csm6, Cmr1, Cmr3, Cmr4, Cmr5, Cmr6, Csb1, Csb2, Csb3, Csx17, Csx14, Csx10, Csx16, CsaX, Csx3, Csx1, Csx15, Csf1, Csf2, Csf3, Csf4, Cpf1, CasX, CasY, Mad7, homologs thereof, or modified versions thereof).
In some embodiments, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a dCas9-Fok1 fusion protein. In another aspect, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a dCas9-recombinase fusion protein. As used herein, a “dCas9” refers to a Cas9 endonuclease protein with one or more amino acid mutations that result in a Cas9 protein without endonuclease activity, but retaining RNA-guided site-specific DNA binding. As used herein, a “dCas9-recombinase fusion protein” is a dCas9 with a protein fused to the dCas9 in such a manner that the recombinase is catalytically active on the DNA.
In some embodiments, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a dCas9-cytosine deaminase fusion protein. In another aspect, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a dCas9-adenine deaminase fusion protein. In some embodiments, one or more of a dCas9-cytosine deaminase fusion protein and a dCas9-adenine deaminase fusion protein are utilized to modify a nucleic acid sequence encoding the degron domain of an AUX/IAA protein. In some embodiments, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a degron domain is modified to encode a degron domain comprising the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine, and X₂is isoleucine, or valine, leucine, or methionine. In some embodiments, the AUX/IAA protein is an ortholog of KsIAA16.
In some embodiments, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a dCpf1-cytosine deaminase fusion protein. In another aspect, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a dCpf1-adenine deaminase fusion protein. In some embodiments, one or more of a dCpf1-cytosine deaminase fusion protein and a dCpf1-adenine deaminase fusion protein are utilized to modify a nucleic acid sequence encoding the degron domain of an AUX/IAA protein. In some embodiments, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a degron domain is modified to encode a degron domain comprising the motif X1WPPX2, wherein X1 has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine, and X2 is isoleucine, or valine, leucine, or methionine. In some embodiments, the AUX/IAA protein is an ortholog of KsIAA16.
In some embodiments, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a recombinase. Non-limiting examples of recombinases include a tyrosine recombinase attached to a DNA recognition motif provided herein is selected from the group consisting of a Cre recombinase, a Gin recombinase, a Flp recombinase, and a Tnp 1 recombinase. In an aspect, a Cre recombinase or a Gin recombinase provided herein is tethered to a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain, or a TALE DNA-binding domain, or a Cas9 nuclease. In another aspect, a serine recombinase attached to a DNA recognition motif provided herein is selected from the group consisting of a PhiC31 integrase, an R4 integrase, and a TP-901 integrase. In another aspect, a DNA transposase attached to a DNA binding domain provided herein is selected from the group consisting of a TALE-piggyBac and TALE-Mutator.
Site-specific genome modification enzymes, such as meganucleases, ZFNs, TALENs, Argonaute proteins (non-limiting examples of Argonaute proteins include Thermus thermophilus Argonaute (TtAgo), Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute (PfAgo), Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute (NgAgo), homologs thereof, or modified versions thereof), RNA-guided nucleases (non-limiting examples of RNA-guided nucleases include the CRISPR associated nucleases, such as Cas1, Cas1B, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8, Cas9 (also known as Csn1 and Csx12), Cas10, Csy1, Csy2, Csy3, Cse1, Cse2, Csc1, Csc2, Csa5, Csn2, Csm2, Csm3, Csm4, Csm5, Csm6, Cmr1, Cmr3, Cmr4, Cmr5, Cmr6, Csb1, Csb2, Csb3, Csx17, Csx14, Csx10, Csx16, CsaX, Csx3, Csx1, Csx15, Csf1, Csf2, Csf3, Csf4, Cpf1, CasX, CasY, Mad7, homologs thereof, or modified versions thereof) and engineered RNA-guided nucleases (RGNs), induce a genome modification such as a double-stranded DNA break (DSB) or single-strand DNA break at the target site of a genomic sequence. In some embodiments, breaks or nicks in the target DNA sequence are repaired by the natural processes of homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). In some embodiments, sequence modifications occur at or near the cleaved or nicked sites, which can include deletions or insertions that result in modification of the nucleic acid sequence, or integration of exogenous nucleic acids by homologous recombination or NHEJ.
Any of the DNA of interest provided herein can be integrated into a target site of a chromosome sequence by introducing the DNA of interest and the provided site-specific genome modification enzymes. Any method provided herein can utilize any site-specific genome modification enzyme provided herein.
Several embodiments relate to a method and/or a composition provided herein comprising at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, at least seven, at least eight, at least nine, or at least ten site-specific genome modification enzymes. In yet another aspect, a method and/or a composition provided herein comprises at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, at least seven, at least eight, at least nine, or at least ten polynucleotides encoding at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, at least seven, at least eight, at least nine, or at least ten site-specific genome modification enzymes.
In one aspect, a targeted genome modification as described herein comprises the use of a recombinase. In an aspect, a tyrosine recombinase attached to a DNA recognition motif provided herein is selected from the group consisting of a Cre recombinase, a Gin recombinase a Flp recombinase, and a Tnp 1 recombinase. In an aspect, a Cre recombinase or a Gin recombinase provided herein is tethered to a zinc-finger DNA binding domain. The Flp-FRT site-directed recombination system comes from the 2μ plasmid from the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this system, Flp recombinase (flippase) recombines sequences between flippase recognition target (FRT) sites. FRT sites comprise 34 nucleotides. Flp binds to the “arms” of the FRT sites (one arm is in reverse orientation) and cleaves the FRT site at either end of an intervening nucleic acid sequence. After cleavage, Flp recombines nucleic acid sequences between two FRT sites. Cre-lox is a site-directed recombination system derived from the bacteriophage P1 that is similar to the Flp-FRT recombination system. Cre-lox can be used to invert a nucleic acid sequence, delete a nucleic acid sequence, or translocate a nucleic acid sequence. In this system, Cre recombinase recombines a pair of lox nucleic acid sequences. Lox sites comprise 34 nucleotides, with the first and last 13 nucleotides (arms) being palindromic. During recombination, Cre recombinase protein binds to two lox sites on different nucleic acids and cleaves at the lox sites. The cleaved nucleic acids are spliced together (reciprocally translocated) and recombination is complete. In another aspect, a lox site provided herein is a loxP, lox 2272, loxN, lox 511, lox 5171, lox71, lox66, M2, M3, M7, or M11 site.
In another aspect, a serine recombinase attached to a DNA recognition motif provided herein is selected from the group consisting of a PhiC31 integrase, an R4 integrase, and a TP-901 integrase. In another aspect, a DNA transposase attached to a DNA binding domain provided herein is selected from the group consisting of a TALE-piggyBac and TALE-Mutator.
In some embodiments, a targeted genome modification as described herein comprises the use of a zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN). ZFNs are synthetic proteins consisting of an engineered zinc finger DNA-binding domain fused to the cleavage domain of the FokI restriction nuclease. ZFNs can be designed to cleave almost any long stretch of double-stranded DNA for modification of the zinc finger DNA-binding domain. ZFNs form dimers from monomers composed of a non-specific DNA cleavage domain of FokI nuclease fused to a zinc finger array engineered to bind a target DNA sequence. The DNA-binding domain of a ZFN is typically composed of 3-4 zinc-finger arrays. The amino acids at positions −1, +2, +3, and +6 relative to the start of the zinc finger ∞-helix, which contribute to site-specific binding to the target DNA, can be changed and customized to fit specific target sequences. The other amino acids form the consensus backbone to generate ZFNs with different sequence specificities. Rules for selecting target sequences for ZFNs are known in the art. The FokI nuclease domain requires dimerization to cleave DNA and therefore two ZFNs with their C-terminal regions are needed to bind opposite DNA strands of the cleavage site (separated by 5-7 nt). The ZFN monomer can cut the target site if the two-ZF-binding sites are palindromic. The term ZFN, as used herein, is broad and includes a monomeric ZFN that can cleave double stranded DNA without assistance from another ZFN. The term ZFN is also used to refer to one or both members of a pair of ZFNs that are engineered to work together to cleave DNA at the same site.
Without being limited by any scientific theory, because the DNA-binding specificities of zinc finger domains can in principle be re-engineered using one of various methods, customized ZFNs can theoretically be constructed to target nearly any gene sequence. Publicly available methods for engineering zinc finger domains include Context-dependent Assembly (CoDA), Oligomerized Pool Engineering (OPEN), and Modular Assembly.
Several embodiments relate to a method and/or composition provided herein comprising one or more, two or more, three or more, four or more, or five or more ZFNs directed to a target sequence in a gene encoding an AUX/IAA protein. In another aspect, a ZFN provided herein is capable of generating a targeted DSB. In one aspect, vectors comprising polynucleotides encoding one or more, two or more, three or more, four or more, or five or more ZFNs are provided to a cell by transformation methods known in the art (e.g., without being limiting, viral transfection, particle bombardment, PEG-mediated protoplast transfection or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation).
Several embodiments relate to generating a modification as described herein using a meganuclease. Meganucleases, which are commonly identified in microbes, are unique enzymes with high activity and long recognition sequences (>14 nt) resulting in site-specific digestion of target DNA. Engineered versions of naturally occurring meganucleases typically have extended DNA recognition sequences (for example, 14 to 40 nt). The engineering of meganucleases can be more challenging than that of ZFNs and TALENs because the DNA recognition and cleavage functions of meganucleases are intertwined in a single domain. Specialized methods of mutagenesis and high-throughput screening have been used to create novel meganuclease variants that recognize unique sequences and possess improved nuclease activity.
In one aspect, a method and/or composition provided herein comprises one or more, two or more, three or more, four or more, or five or more meganucleases directed to a target sequence in a gene encoding an AUX/IAA protein. In some embodiments, a meganuclease provided herein is capable of generating a targeted DSB. In some embodiments, vectors comprising polynucleotides encoding one or more, two or more, three or more, four or more, or five or more meganucleases are provided to a cell by transformation methods known in the art (e.g., without being limiting, viral transfection, particle bombardment, PEG-mediated protoplast transfection or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation).
In some embodiments, a targeted genome modification as described herein comprises the use of a transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN). TALENs are artificial restriction enzymes generated by fusing the transcription activator-like effector (TALE) DNA binding domain to a nuclease domain. In one aspect, the nuclease is selected from a group consisting of PvuII, MutH, TevI and FokI, AlwI, MlyI, SbfI, SdaI, StsI, CleDORF, Clo051, Pept071. The term TALEN, as used herein, is broad and includes a monomeric TALEN that can cleave double stranded DNA without assistance from another TALEN. The term TALEN is also used to refer to one or both members of a pair of TALENs that work together to cleave DNA at the same site. Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) can be engineered to bind practically any DNA sequence, such as a target sequence in a nucleic acid encoding an AUX/IAA protein. TALE proteins are DNA-binding domains derived from various plant bacterial pathogens of the genus Xanthomonas. The X pathogens secrete TALEs into the host plant cell during infection. The TALE moves to the nucleus, where it recognizes and binds to a specific DNA sequence in the promoter region of a specific DNA sequence in the promoter region of a specific gene in the host genome. TALE has a central DNA-binding domain composed of 13-28 repeat monomers of 33-34 amino acids. The amino acids of each monomer are highly conserved, except for hypervariable amino acid residues at positions 12 and 13. The two variable amino acids are called repeat-variable diresidues (RVDs). The amino acid pairs NI, NG, HD, and NN of RVDs preferentially recognize adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine/adenine, respectively, and modulation of RVDs can recognize consecutive DNA bases. This simple relationship between amino acid sequence and DNA recognition has allowed for the engineering of specific DNA binding domains by selecting a combination of repeat segments containing the appropriate RVDs.
In one aspect, a method and/or composition provided herein comprises one or more, two or more, three or more, four or more, or five or more TALENs. In another aspect, a TALEN provided herein is capable of generating a targeted DSB in a target sequence in a nucleic acid encoding an AUX/IAA protein. In one aspect, vectors comprising polynucleotides encoding one or more, two or more, three or more, four or more, or five or more TALENs are provided to a cell by transformation methods known in the art (e.g., without being limiting, viral transfection, particle bombardment, PEG-mediated protoplast transfection or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation).
In some embodiments, a targeted genome modification as described herein comprises the use of at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, at least six, at least seven, at least eight, at least nine, or at least ten RNA-guided nucleases. In some embodiments, a CRISPR/Cas9 system, a CRISPR/Cpf1 system, a CRISPR/CasX system, or a CRISPR/CasY system are alternatives may be used to generate modifications to a nucleic acid encoding an AUX/IAA protein. The CRISPR systems are based on RNA-guided engineered nucleases that use complementary base pairing to recognize DNA sequences at target sites. The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) system is an alternative to synthetic proteins whose DNA-binding domains enable them to modify genomic DNA at specific sequences (e.g., ZFN and TALEN). CRISPR/Cas systems are part of the adaptive immune system of bacteria and archaea, protecting them against invading nucleic acids such as viruses by cleaving the foreign DNA in a sequence-dependent manner. The immunity is acquired by the integration of short fragments of the invading DNA known as spacers between two adjacent repeats at the proximal end of a CRISPR locus. The CRISPR arrays, including the spacers, are transcribed during subsequent encounters with invasive DNA and are processed into small interfering CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) approximately 40 nt in length, which combine with the trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA) to activate and guide the Cas9 nuclease. This cleaves homologous double-stranded DNA sequences known as protospacers in the invading DNA. A prerequisite for cleavage is the presence of a conserved protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) downstream of the target DNA, which usually has the sequence 5′-NGG-3′ but less frequently NAG. Specificity is provided by the so-called “seed sequence” approximately 12 bases upstream of the PAM, which must match between the RNA and target DNA. Cpf1 acts in a similar manner to Cas9, but Cpf1 does not require a tracrRNA. Specificity of the CRISPR/Cas system is based on an RNA-guide that use complementary base pairing to recognize target DNA sequences. In some embodiments, the site-specific genome modification enzyme is a CRISPR/Cas system. In an aspect, a site-specific genome modification enzyme provided herein can comprise any RNA-guided Cas nuclease (non-limiting examples of RNA-guided nucleases include Cas1, Cas1B, Cas2, Cas3, Cas4, Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, Cas8, Cas9 (also known as Csn1 and Csx12), Cas10, Csy1, Csy2, Csy3, Cse1, Cse2, Csc1, Csc2, Csa5, Csn2, Csm2, Csm3, Csm4, Csm5, Csm6, Cmr1, Cmr3, Cmr4, Cmr5, Cmr6, Csb1, Csb2, Csb3, Csx17, Csx14, Csx10, Csx16, CsaX, Csx3, Csx1, Csx15, Csf1, Csf2, Csf3, Csf4, Cpf1, CasX, CasY, Mad7, homologs thereof, or modified versions thereof); and, optionally, the guide RNA necessary for targeting the respective nucleases.
Several embodiments relate to plant cells, plant tissue, plant seed and plants produced by the methods disclosed herein. Plants may be monocots or dicots, and may include, for example, rice, wheat, barley, oats, rye, sorghum, maize, grapes, tomatoes, potatoes, lettuce, broccoli, cucumber, peanut, melon, leeks, onion, soybean, alfalfa, sunflower, cotton, canola, and sugar beet plants.

III. Expression Constructs

Polynucleotides as described herein can be provided in an expression construct. Expression constructs generally include regulatory elements that are functional in the intended host cell in which the expression construct is to be expressed. Thus, a person of ordinary skill in the art can select regulatory elements for use in bacterial host cells, yeast host cells, plant host cells, insect host cells, mammalian host cells, and human host cells. Regulatory elements include promoters, transcription termination sequences, translation termination sequences, enhancers, and polyadenylation elements. As used herein, the term “expression construct” refers to a combination of nucleic acid sequences that provides for transcription of an operably linked nucleic acid sequence. As used herein, “operably linked” means two DNA molecules linked in manner so that one may affect the function of the other. Operably-linked DNA molecules may be part of a single contiguous molecule and may or may not be adjacent. For example, a promoter is operably linked with a polypeptide-encoding DNA molecule in a DNA construct where the two DNA molecules are so arranged that the promoter may affect the expression of the DNA molecule.
As used herein, the term “heterologous” refers to the relationship between two or more items derived from different sources and thus not normally associated in nature. For example, a protein-coding recombinant DNA molecule is heterologous with respect to an operably linked promoter if such a combination is not normally found in nature. In addition, a particular recombinant DNA molecule may be heterologous with respect to a cell, seed, or organism into which it is inserted when it would not naturally occur in that particular cell, seed, or organism.
An expression construct can comprise a promoter sequence operably linked to a polynucleotide sequence encoding a modified polypeptide as described herein. Promoters can be incorporated into a polynucleotide using standard techniques known in the art. Multiple copies of promoters or multiple promoters can be used in an expression construct as described herein. In some embodiments, a promoter can be positioned about the same distance from the transcription start site in the expression construct as it is from the transcription start site in its natural genetic environment. Some variation in this distance is permitted without substantial decrease in promoter activity. A transcription start site is typically included in the expression construct.
Embodiments relate to a recombinant DNA molecule encoding a modified AUX/IAA polypeptide, said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine, and wherein X₂is isoleucine or valine, wherein the recombinant DNA molecule is further defined as operably linked to a heterologous regulatory element. In specific embodiments, the heterologous regulatory element is a promoter functional in a plant cell. In further embodiments, the promoter is an inducible promoter.
If the expression construct is to be provided in or introduced into a plant cell, then plant viral promoters, such as, for example, a cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S (including the enhanced CaMV 35S promoter (see, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,106,739)) or a CaMV 19S promoter or a cassava vein mosaic can be used. Other promoters that can be used for expression constructs in plants include, for example, zein promoters including maize zein promoters, prolifera promoter, Ap3 promoter, heat shock promoters, T-DNA 1′- or 2′-promoter of A. tumefaciens, polygalacturonase promoter, chalcone synthase A (CHS-A) promoter from petunia, tobacco PR-la promoter, ubiquitin promoter, actin promoter, alcA gene promoter, pin2 promoter (Xu et al., 1993), maize Wipl promoter, maize trpA gene promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,625,136), maize CDPK gene promoter, and RUBISCO SSU promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,322) can also be used. Constitutive promoters (such as the CaMV, ubiquitin, actin, or NOS promoter), developmentally-regulated promoters, and inducible promoters (such as those promoters than can be induced by heat, light, hormones, or chemicals) are also contemplated for use with polynucleotide expression constructs described herein.
Expression constructs may optionally contain a transcription termination sequence, a translation termination sequence, a sequence encoding a signal peptide, and/or enhancer elements. Transcription termination regions can typically be obtained from the 3′ untranslated region of a eukaryotic or viral gene sequence. Transcription termination sequences can be positioned downstream of a coding sequence to provide for efficient termination. A signal peptide sequence is a short amino acid sequence typically present at the amino terminus of a protein that is responsible for the relocation of an operably linked mature polypeptide to a wide range of post-translational cellular destinations, ranging from a specific organelle compartment to sites of protein action and the extracellular environment. Targeting gene products to an intended cellular and/or extracellular destination through the use of an operably linked signal peptide sequence is contemplated for use with the polypeptides described herein. Classical enhancers are cis-acting elements that increase gene transcription and can also be included in the expression construct. Classical enhancer elements are known in the art, and include, but are not limited to, the CaMV 35S enhancer element, cytomegalovirus (CMV) early promoter enhancer element, and the SV40 enhancer element. Intron-mediated enhancer elements that enhance gene expression are also known in the art. These elements must be present within the transcribed region and are orientation dependent. Examples include the maize shrunken-1 enhancer element (Clancy and Hannah, 2002).

IV. Transformation Methods

Several embodiments relate to plant cells, plant tissues, plants, and seeds that comprise a recombinant DNA as described herein. In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA encodes a sequence-specific enzyme. In some embodiments, cells, tissues, plants, and seeds comprising the recombinant DNA molecules exhibit tolerance to auxin herbicides. In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA encoding a sequence-specific enzyme is bred out of plants exhibiting tolerance to auxin herbicides.
Suitable methods for transformation of host plant cells include virtually any method by which DNA or RNA can be introduced into a cell (for example, where a recombinant DNA construct is stably integrated into a plant chromosome or where a recombinant DNA construct or an RNA is transiently provided to a plant cell) and are well known in the art. Two effective methods for cell transformation are Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and microprojectile bombardment-mediated transformation. Microprojectile bombardment methods are illustrated, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318; 5,538,880; 6,160,208; and 6,399,861. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods are described, for example in U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Transformation of plant material is practiced in tissue culture on nutrient media, for example a mixture of nutrients that allow cells to grow in vitro. Recipient cell targets include, but are not limited to, meristem cells, shoot tips, hypocotyls, calli, immature or mature embryos, and gametic cells such as microspores and pollen. Callus can be initiated from tissue sources including, but not limited to, immature or mature embryos, hypocotyls, seedling apical meristems, microspores and the like. Cells containing a transgenic nucleus are grown into transgenic plants.
In transformation, DNA is typically introduced into only a small percentage of target plant cells in any one transformation experiment. Marker genes are used to provide an efficient system for identification of those cells that are stably transformed by receiving and integrating a recombinant DNA molecule into their genomes. Preferred marker genes provide selective markers which confer resistance to a selective agent, such as an antibiotic or an herbicide. Any of the herbicides to which plants of this disclosure can be resistant is an agent for selective markers. Potentially transformed cells are exposed to the selective agent. In the population of surviving cells are those cells where, generally, the resistance-conferring gene is integrated and expressed at sufficient levels to permit cell survival. Cells can be tested further to confirm stable integration of the exogenous DNA. Commonly used selective marker genes include those conferring resistance to antibiotics such as kanamycin and paromomycin (nptII), hygromycin B (aph IV), spectinomycin (aadA) and gentamycin (aac3 and aacC4) or resistance to herbicides such as glufosinate (bar or pat), dicamba (DMO) and glyphosate (aroA or EPSPS). Examples of such selectable markers are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318; 5,633,435; 5,780,708 and 6,118,047. Markers which provide an ability to visually screen transformants can also be employed, for example, a gene expressing a colored or fluorescent protein such as a luciferase or green fluorescent protein (GFP) or a gene expressing a beta-glucuronidase or uidA gene (GUS) for which various chromogenic substrates are known.
Several embodiments relate to methods and constructs for regenerating a plant from a cell with modified genomic DNA resulting from genome editing. The regenerated plant can then be used to propagate additional plants.
Several embodiments relate to a method of introducing an allelic variant of a gene encoding an AUX/IAA protein comprising: (a) introducing at least one modification to an endogenous AUX/IAA gene in at least one plant cell, thereby generating said allelic variant; (b) identifying and selecting at least one plant cell of step (a) comprising said allelic variant that exhibits tolerance to an auxin herbicide; and (c) regenerating a plant from the at least one plant cell selected in step (b). Several embodiments relate to a method of introducing an allelic variant of a gene encoding an AUX/IAA protein comprising: (a) introducing at least one modification to an endogenous AUX/IAA gene in at least one plant cell, thereby generating said allelic variant; (b) identifying and selecting at least one plant cell of step (a) comprising said allelic variant that exhibits tolerance to an auxin herbicide; (c) identifying and selecting at least one plant cell of step (b) that exhibits sensitivity to an endogenous auxin IAA; and (d) regenerating a plant from the at least one plant cell selected in step (c). In an aspect, the method comprises introducing a modification in a sequence encoding a degron domain of an AUX/IAA protein. In some embodiments the modified degron domain encodes a X1WPPX2 motif capable of conferring to a plant tolerance to auxin herbicides. In some embodiments, X1 has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine. In some embodiments, X2 is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. In another aspect, the method of introducing comprises introducing a recombinant DNA vector comprising a polynucleotide sequence specific enzyme direct to a target sequence in a nucleic acid encoding an AUX/IAA protein.
V. Auxin Herbicides and Plants with Auxin Herbicide Tolerance
Several embodiments relate to plant cells, plant tissues, plants, and seeds that comprise an AUX/IAA protein comprising a modified degron domain. In some embodiments, the modified degron domain comprises a X1WPPX2 motif capable of conferring tolerance to synthetic auxin herbicides to plant cells, plant tissues, plants, and seeds. In some embodiments, X1 has been modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine. In some embodiments, X2 is isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine. Plants may be monocots or dicots, and may include, for example, rice, wheat, barley, oats, rye, sorghum, maize, grapes, tomatoes, potatoes, lettuce, broccoli, cucumber, peanut, melon, pepper, carrot, squash, onion, soybean, alfalfa, sunflower, cotton, canola, and sugar beet plants.
Synthetic auxin herbicides are also called auxinic, growth regulator herbicides, or Group O or Group 4 herbicides, based on their mode of action. The mode of action of the synthetic auxin herbicides is that they appear to affect cell wall plasticity and nucleic acid metabolism, which can lead to uncontrolled cell division and growth. The group of synthetic auxin herbicides includes four chemical families: phenoxy, carboxylic acid (or pyridine), benzoic acid, and the newest family quinoline carboxylic acids.
The phenoxy herbicides are most common and have been used as herbicides since the 1940s when (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid (2,4-D) was discovered. Other examples include 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid (2,4-DB), 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid (2, 4-DP), (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4,5-T), 2-(2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy) Propionic Acid (2,4,5-TP), 2-(2,4-dichloro-3-methylphenoxy)-N-phenylpropanamide (clomeprop), (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetic acid (MCPA), 4-(4-chloro-o-tolyloxy) butyric acid (MCPB), and 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) propanoic acid (MCPP).
The next largest chemical family is the carboxylic acid herbicides, also called pyridine herbicides. Examples include 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid (Clopyralid), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid (picloram), (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) acetic acid (triclopyr), and 4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridyloxyacetic acid (fluroxypyr). The third chemical family is the benzoic acids, examples of which include 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba) and 3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid (choramben). The fourth and newest chemical family of the auxinic herbicides is the quinaline carboxylic acid family, which includes 7-chloro-3-methyl-8-quinolinecarboxylic acid (quinmerac) and 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acid (quinclorac). This latter is unique in that it also will control some grass weeds, unlike the other auxin-like herbicides which essentially control only broadleaf or dicotyledonous plants.
Synthetic auxin herbicides may be applied to a plant growth area comprising the plants and seeds provided by the compositions and methods described herein as a method for controlling weeds. Plants and seeds provided by the compositions and methods described herein comprise a synthetic auxin herbicide tolerance trait and as such are tolerant to the application of one or more auxin herbicides. The herbicide application may be the recommended commercial rate (1×) or any fraction or multiple thereof, such as twice the recommended commercial rate (2×). Auxin herbicide rates may be expressed as acid equivalent per pound per acre (lb ae/acre) or acid equivalent per gram per hectare (g ae/ha) or as pounds active ingredient per acre (lb ai/acre) or grams active ingredient per hectare (g ai/ha), depending on the herbicide and the formulation. The plant growth area may or may not comprise weed plants at the time of herbicide application.
Herbicide applications may be sequentially or tank mixed with one, two, or a combination of several auxin herbicides or any other compatible herbicide. Multiple applications of one herbicide or of two or more herbicides, in combination or alone, may be used over a growing season to areas comprising plants expressing a modified AUX/IAA protein as described herein for the control of a broad spectrum of dicot weeds, monocot weeds, or both, for example, two applications (such as a pre-planting application and a post-emergence application or a pre-emergence application and a post-emergence application) or three applications (such as a pre-planting application, a pre-emergence application, and a post-emergence application or a pre-emergence application and two post-emergence applications).
As used herein, “tolerance” or “herbicide tolerance” means a plant, seed, or cell's ability to resist the toxic effects of an herbicide when applied. The herbicide tolerance of a plant, seed, plant tissue, plant part, or cell may be measured by comparing the plant, seed, plant tissue, plant part, or cell to a suitable control. For example, the herbicide tolerance may be measured or assessed by applying an herbicide to a plant comprising a recombinant DNA molecule encoding a modified polypeptide capable of conferring herbicide tolerance (the test plant) and a plant not comprising the recombinant DNA molecule encoding the modified polypeptide capable of conferring herbicide tolerance (the control plant) and then comparing the plant injury of the two plants, where herbicide tolerance of the test plant is indicated by a decreased injury rate as compared to the injury rate of the control plant. An herbicide tolerant plant, seed, plant tissue, plant part, or cells exhibits a decreased response to the toxic effects of an herbicide when compared to a control plant, seed, plant tissue, plant part, or cell. As used herein, an “herbicide tolerance trait” is a transgenic trait imparting improved herbicide tolerance to a plant as compared to the wild-type plant.
As used herein, the term “comprising” means “including but not limited to”.
Having described several embodiments in detail, it will be apparent that modifications, variations, and equivalent embodiments are possible. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that the examples in the present disclosure are provided as non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Identification of Genetic Differences Between Dicamba-Resistant and Dicamba-Sensitive Kochia scoparia Biotypes

A dicamba resistant Kochia biotype which exhibits a nearly 30-fold increase in dicamba resistance believed to be conferred by a dominant or semi-dominant single genetic locus was obtained. Transcriptome sequencing of cDNA isolated from aerial tissues of vegetative-stage plants of the dicamba resistant Kochia biotype (R) and a dicamba sensitive Kochia biotype (S) allowed identification of putative Kochia orthologs of Arabidopsis genes known to be involved in auxin synthesis, transport and regulatory response. Comparators included one AUX1/LAX transporter, one ABP homolog, several multi-drug resistance-like proteins (MRP), four TIR/AFB co-receptors, and ten AUX/IAA proteins.
Leaf tissue was harvested separately from greenhouse-grown S and R Kochia biotypes and frozen on liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated from three biological replicates for each tissue using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA quantity was determined with a Nanodrop 8000 spectrophotometer and integrity assessed by BioAnalyzer assay with RIN greater than 6. Two mg of total RNA was used for sequencing library preparation with Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit V2 following manufacturer's protocol. qPCR (SYBR PCR Master Mix, Applied Biosystems) was utilized to quantify sequencing libraries. Sequencing was performed with HiSeq2000 sequencing using 50 base pair reads, as described previously (Rice et al., 2014). Paired end reads were used to build Kochia transcriptome assemblies for R (82,123,945 pairs) and S (68,928,684 pairs) biotypes. Reads were first quality trimmed using FASTX toolkit (version 0.0.13, minimum 50% of bases with quality score>=30) and then assembled using Trinity (version r2013_08_14, default settings, minimum transcript length=300) (Grabherr et al., Nat Biotechnol. 2011 29(7):644-52).
A significant difference between the Kochia R and S transcripts was observed. The R biotype exhibited a GG to AA nucleotide change compared to the sequence of transcripts from the S biotype. The GG to AA nucleotide change results in a glycine (G) to asparagine (N) amino acid substitution (FIG. 1). The protein (KsIAA16; SEQ ID NO:217) comprising this amino acid substitution (SEQ ID NO:219) is most closely related to the Arabidopsis AUX/IAA protein At.IAA16 (SEQ ID NO:262), which falls into the same clade as At.IAA7 (SEQ ID NO:253), At.IAA14 (SEQ ID NO:260), and At.IAA17 (SEQ ID NO:263) (FIG. 2). The observed amino acid change occurs within a highly conserved degron region (GWPPV/I) (FIG. 1). Changes within this five amino acid degron region have been reported to increase stability of AUX/IAA proteins, and result in dominant auxin resistance in a number of Arabidopsis mutants including axr5 (IAA1) (Yang et al., 2004), shy2 (IAA3) (Tian and Reed, 1999), axr2 (IAA7, (SEQ ID NO:247)) (Nagpal et al., 2000), slr (IAA14, (SEQ ID NO:260)) (Fukaki et al., 2002), axr3 (IAA17, (SEQ ID NO:263)) (Rouse et al., 1998), crane (IAA18, (SEQ ID NO:264)) (Uehara et al., 2008), bodenlos (IAA12, (SEQ ID NO:258)) (Hamann et al., 2002), msg2 (IAA19, (SEQ ID NO:265)) (Tatematsu et al., 2004), iaa16 (SEQ ID NO:262) (Rinaldi et al., 2012), and iaa28 (SEQ ID NO:269) (Rogg et al., 2001), as shown in Table 1. These findings indicate that the observed GG to AA nucleotide change, resulting in a glycine (G) to asparagine (N) amino acid substitution in KsIAA16 is likely the basis of the observed dicamba resistance in this Kochia biotype.

TABLE 1

Amino acid sequences within the degron domain
of Arabidopsis gain-of-function AUX/IAA mutants

	wild-
Mutant	type	Observed sequence
(protein)	protein	in degron region

Consensus:	SEQ ID:	G	W	P	P	V/I

crane1	264	R	W	P	P	V
(IAA18)

crane2	264	E	W	P	P	V
(IAA18)

axr5-1	247	G	W	P	S	V
(IAA1)

shy2-1	249	G	W	S	P	V
(IAA3)

shy2-3	249	E	W	P	P	V
(IAA3)

shy2-6	249	G	W	P	L	V
(IAA3)

axr2-1	253	G	W	S	P	V
(IAA7)

bdl	258	G	W	S	P	I
(IAA12)

slr1-1	260	G	W	P	S	V
(IAA14)

slr1-2	260	G	W	S	P	V
(IAA14)

slr1-3	260	G	W	A	P	V
(IAA14)

axr3-1	263	G	W	P	L	V
(IAA17)

axr3-3	263	G	W	P	P	G
(IAA17)

axr3-101	263	E	W	P	P	V
(IAA17)

msg2-1	265	G	W	P	S	V
(IAA19)

msg2-2	265	R	W	P	P	V
(IAA19)

msg2-3	265	G	W	P	L	V
(IAA19)

msg2-4	265	G	W	L	P	V
(IAA19)

iaa28-1	269	G	W	L	P	V

iaa16-1	262	G	W	L	P	V

Whereas mutations in the highly conserved GWPPV degron sequence have been previously reported to provide resistance to the endogenous auxin compound indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), these mutations have not been observed to impart resistance (e.g., decreased binding affinity) to herbicidal auxin compounds while remaining sensitive (e.g., still capable of binding) to the endogenous auxin IAA. Degron sequence mutants identified in Arabidopsis exhibit a significantly altered ability to perceive endogenous IAA resulting in deleterious phenotypes and undesirable off-types.

Example 2: Sequence-Based Identification of TIR/AFB Homologs from Kochia

A number of auxin perception pathways have been identified in plants. One of the most well-studied pathways involves the SCF ubiquitin ligase-catalyzed degradation of AUX/IAA transcriptional repressors, which is mediated by the TIR1/AFB family of F-box proteins. In the presence of auxin, TIR1, a subunit of the SCF complex, acts as an auxin receptor. Once TIR1 has bound auxin, it is able to bind members of the AUX/IAA protein family with a high affinity, thereby forming a complex between the two proteins and promoting ubiquitination of the AUX/IAA protein, tagging it for degradation. When AUX/IAA protein is bound to an auxin-bound TIR1 protein, the “GWPPV/I” motif in the degron region of the AUX/IAA protein is believed to be positioned to cover the entire auxin molecule. It has been observed that mutations in the degron motif result in stabilization of the AUX/IAA protein, which in turn leads to a reduced auxin response and a variety of growth defects in plant model systems.
Because AUX/IAA proteins act as auxin co-receptors in concert with TIR/AFB proteins, the identification of putative homologs of TIR/AFB proteins from Kochia was undertaken to determine if the KsIAA16 protein interacts with TIR/AFB proteins in the presence of auxins. Such an interaction would indicate that KsIAA16 is an auxin co-receptor.
A BLAST analysis of the Kochia transcriptome dataset was performed using known Arabidopsis TIR/AFB proteins as the query sequence. Using this approach, four TIR/AFB orthologs were identified in Kochia. Proteins were aligned with orthologs TIR1, AFB1, AFB2, AFB3, AFB4, and AFB5 from Arabidopsis as well as AFB6 orthologs from Phoenix dactylifera L. (date palm) and Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) (Parry et al., 2009). Alignments were performed using the Clustal W method in MegAlign software (DNASTAR, Madison, Wis.). The results indicated that Kochia contains one ortholog from each known clade of the Arabidopsis TIR/AFB family.

Example 3: Kochia Auxin Response Factors and Auxin Interaction Assay

Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) studies were conducted using the Matchmaker® Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid System: vectors, transformation protocols and yeast strains (Clonetech Laboratories, Inc.). The coding sequences for the KsIAA16R (SEQ ID NO: 220), KsIAA16S (SEQ ID NO: 218), KsTIR1 (SEQ ID NO: 285), KsAFB6 (SEQ ID NO: 287), KsAFB2 (SEQ ID NO: 289), and KsAFB5 (SEQ ID NO: 291) were PCR amplified using primers specified in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Primer sequences used in Y2H vector construction

	SEQ
Primer	ID
name	NO:	Sequence

KsIAA16-F	227	ATGTTGAGTAACGAGAGAGACAAG

KsIAA16-R	228	TCAGCTTCTGTTCTTGCACTTCTC

KsTIR1-F	229	CACCATGGAGCAACACCAACCCCAG

KsTIR1-R	230	CTTCTTAGCAATCAGCTCAAG

KsAFB2-F	231	CACCATGAATTATTTCCCAGAAGAAG

KsAFB2-R	232	CTACAAGGTCCATACGAATTCTG

KsAFB6-F	233	CACCATGGGTTCAAAAAAGTGCAAAAA
		TTC

KsAFB6-R	234	TCATAGCGTCAGAACAAAAGGAG

KsAFB5-F	235	CACCATGAGAGAGGGCACCGATAACAG

KsAFB5-R	236	CTACAATATCCTCACATGTTC

Y2H_
	237	TACGACGTACCAGATTACGCTCATATG
KsIAA16-F		TTGAGTAACGAGAGAGACAAG

Y2H_	238	AGCTCGAGCTCGATGGATCCCGAGAAG
KsIAA16-R		TGCAAGAACAGAAGCTGA

Y2H_	239	CTGATCTCAGAGGAGGACCTGCATATG
TIR1-F		GAGCAACACCAACCCCAG

Y2H_	240	GGCCGCTGCAGGTCGACGGATCCCTTA
TIR1-R		TTCAGTGCACAACGGTGATGC

Y2H_
	241	CTGATCTCAGAGGAGGACCTGCATATG
AFB2-F		AATTATTTCCCAGAAGAAG

Y2H_	242	GGCCGCTGCAGGTCGACGGATCCCCTA
AFB2-R		CAAGGTCCATACGAATTCTG

Y2H_
	243	CTGATCTCAGAGGAGGACCTGCATATG
AFB5-F		AGAGAGGGCACCGATAACAG

Y2H_	244	GGCCGCTGCAGGTCGACGGATCCCCTA
AFB5-R		CAATATCCTCACATGTTC

Y2H_	245	CTGATCTCAGAGGAGGACCTGCATATG
AFB6-F		GGTTCAAAAAAGTGCAAAAATTC

Y2H_
	246	GGCCGCTGCAGGTCGACGGATCCCTCA
AFB6-R		TAGCGTCAGAACAAAAGGAG

PCR products were gel purified and recombined into NdeI/NotI digested pGADT7 or pGBKT7 vectors using the In-Fusion® cloning system (Clonetech Laboratories, Inc.). The pGBKT7 vector contained the GAL4 DNA binding domain, rendering the fusions as the “bait,” whereas the “prey” were the fusions containing the pGADT7 vector, which contained the GAL4 activation domain. All vectors were first sequence verified and then the listed vector combinations were co-transformed into the yeast strain, Y2HGold. The vector combinations were as follows: pGADT7-T+pGBKT7 empty (negative control), pGADT7-T+pGBKT7-Lam (weak interaction control), pGADT7-T+pGBKT7-53 (strong interaction control), pGBKT7 empty was co-transformed with pGADT&KsIAA16 constructs as a negative control, and pGADT7-T was co-transformed with each pGDKT7TIR/AFB construct as a negative control. Transformants were plated on SC-Trp-Leu plates to select for those containing both plasmids. Four healthy colonies were selected at random and resuspended into 300 μL of 0.1% agar in water. Five μL of this dilution was replica spotted onto each plate. Plates were incubated at 30° C. for 3 days prior to evaluation of colony growth.
This method enabled the study of the binding/interaction of the Kochia R and S alleles of KsIAA16 with each of the Kochia TIR/AFB homologs (KsTIR1 (SEQ ID NO: 285), and KsAFB6 (SEQ ID NO: 287)) in the absence or presence of 100 μM or 500 μM exogenous concentrations of IAA, NAA, dicamba, and 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr, quinclorac, fluroxypyr or phenylacetic acid (PAA). All combinations of bait and prey vectors displayed good growth in the absence of selection, which indicated that transcript expression did not have any inherent negative effects on yeast growth. The results obtained from the Y2H assays are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.

TABLE 3

Y2H assay results testing KsIAA16S
and KsIAA16R binding with KsTIR1

Ability to bind in combination with KsTIR1

allele:

KsIAA16S

KsIAA16R

auxin:	[100 mM]	[500 mM]	[100 mM]	[500 mM]

no auxin

—

IAA	+++	+++	++	+++
NAA	+++	+++	+++	+++
Dicamba	+++	+++	−	−
2,4-D	+	+++	−	−
Picloram	−	−	−	−
Triclopyr	−	++	−	−
Quinclorac	−	−	−	−
Fluroxypyr	−	−	−	−
PAA	−	−	−	−

TABLE 4

Y2H assay results testing KsIAA16S
and KsIAA16R binding with KsAFB6

Ability to bind in combination with KsAFB6

allele:

KsIAA16S

KsIAA16R

auxin:	[100mM]	[500mM]	[100mM]	[500mM]

no auxin

—

IAA	+++	+++	−	++
NAA	+++	+++	−	++
Dicamba	−	−	−	−
2,4-D	−	+++	−	−
Picloram	−	+++	−	−
Triclopyr	+++	+++	−	−
Quinclorac	−	+++	−	−
Fluroxyp yr	−	−	−	−
PAA	−	−	−	−

In the absence of auxin, little to no growth was observed for both the R and S alleles of KsIAA16 with the KsTIR1 and KsAFB6 orthologs, indicating the proteins do not interact in the absence of auxin. KsIAA16S exhibited interaction with KsTIR1 in the presence of both 100 μM and 500 μM IAA, 2-(1-naphthyl) acetic acid (NAA), dicamba, and 2,4-D, as well as 500 μM triclopyr, but KsIAA16R only exhibited interaction with KsTIR1 in the presence of 100 μM and 500 μM IAA and NAA. KsIAA16R exhibited a decreased ability to interact with KsTIR1 in the presence of dicamba and 2,4-D. Not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, a decreased interaction KsIAA16R of with KsTIR1 in the presence of dicamba and 2,4-D resulting in increased stability of KsIAA16R in the presence of dicamba and 2,4-D would explain the resistance to these compounds observed in the dicamba resistant Kochia biotype. Similarly, KsIAA16S was observed to interact with KsAFB6 in the presence of 100 μM and 500 μM IAA, NAA, and triclopyr and 500 μM 2,4-D, picloram and quinclorac, but an interaction between KsIAA16R and KsAFB6 was only observed in the presence of the highest concentration of IAA and NAA tested (500 μM). This indicates that KsIAA16R has a reduced ability to interact with KsAFB6 in the presence of IAA and NAA, as only the higher concentration could facilitate binding, and an interaction between KsIAA16R and KsAFB6 was not observed in the presence of triclopyr, 2,4-D, quinclorac, or picloram at the concentrations tested. No interaction in the presence of PAA or fluroxypyr was observed with any of the protein combinations tested. Not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, the lack of observed Y2H interaction in the presence of fluroxypyr may be due to either an unstable interaction that prevents detection in the yeast system, or may be due to lack of metabolism of the fluroxypyr methylheptyl ester, which plants and bacteria are reported to cleave and release as free acid. These findings indicate that KsIAA16 functions as an auxin co-receptor in concert with KsTIR1 and/or KsAFB6, and that the combination of KsIAA16 with KsTIR1 and/or KsAFB6 is responsible, at least in part, for the perception of each of these auxin herbicides. Furthermore, this is the first reported characterization of an AFB6 homolog, as this clade has been lost from several of the more studied species including Arabidopsis, rice, sorghum, and maize (Hayashi, 2012; Mironova et al., 2010; Parry et al., 2009). Not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, these findings indicate that KsAFB6 can function as an auxin co-receptor, and in concert with KsIAA16, KsAFB6 is capable of interacting in the presence of several tested auxin herbicides.

Example 4: Characterization of Auxin-Mediated Root Elongation Response in Dicamba-Resistant and Dicamba-Sensitive Kochia

The root elongation response of seedlings from the R and S Kochia biotypes was tested to determine if the R biotype response was consistent with the Y2H findings. For root elongation studies, plant nutrient media was used, with 0.5% sucrose. Seeds were surface sterilized in 30% bleach with 0.1% Triton-X100 for 10 to 30 minutes, then rinsed twice in sterile water and resuspended in 0.1% agar for plating. Root lengths were measured to the nearest millimeter, and the average root length of 12 individuals was calculated unless otherwise noted. The root elongation data, shown in FIG. 5, show that the R Kochia biotype remained sensitive to root elongation inhibition by IAA and NAA, but was resistant to inhibition by dicamba, and 2,4-D. Additionally it was observed that the R biotype displayed a short root phenotype in the absence of auxin. These findings are consistent with the observed Y2H results showing that at the concentrations tested, IAA and NAA can facilitate some interaction of KsIAA16R with KsTIR1 and/or KsAFB6, but dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr, quinclorac, and fluroxypyr cannot. It appeared that the native auxin PAA also had an effect on root elongation. The observation outlined herein, in addition with the Y2H results, provide further support for the hypothesis that the auxin resistance observed in this Kochia biotype is due to the mutation in KsIAA16R.

Example 5: Development of Molecular Markers for the KsIAA16R Allele

Based on the identified base pair substitutions in KsIAA16 between the S and R Kochia biotypes, a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay and a Taqman® assay were developed for the purposes of genotyping.
For the RFLP assay, forward primer (SEQ ID NO: 221) and reverse primer (SEQ ID NO: 222) were designed to amplify a 146 bp product from genomic DNA of both resistant and susceptible plants. The mutation identified in the R biotype was found to generate an additional MluCI restriction site in the KsIAA16R allele. This allowed for the R and S alleles to be distinguished when digested products are run on a 4% agarose gel, given that the S allele product has only two MluCI restriction endonuclease cleavage sites and generates fragments of 120, 19, and 7 base pairs following digestion, whereas the R allele has three cleavage sites and generates fragments of 90, 30, 19, and 7 base pairs.
For the Taqman® assay, the forward primer (SEQ ID NO: 223) and the reverse primer (SEQ ID NO: 224) were designed to amplify the genomic DNA of both KsIAA16 alleles. The VIC-labeled probe (SEQ ID NO: 225) was designed to detect the R allele, and the FAM-labeled probe (SEQ ID NO: 226) was designed to detect the S allele. Each PCR reaction was performed using Taqman assay mix and TaqMan® universal master mix II in a 20 μL final volume in a 96-well plate. Assays were performed according to manufacturer conditions on a ViiA7 System (Applied Biosystems) using standard Taqman genotyping assay conditions of 95° C. for 15 sec, 60° C. for 60 sec with a plate read every cycle for 40 cycles. Allele calls were designated by the ViiA7 software, and known homozygous Kochia R and S genomic DNA, as well as no-DNA controls, were included in each experiment. These markers can be used for both detection of the R allele in individuals from field populations as well as to determine the genotypes of plants resulting from crossing events to allow determination of segregation patterns and for fitness studies.

Example 6: Segregation Patterns of the Dicamba Resistance Trait in Kochia

To determine whether the KsIAA16R allele co-segregates with the dicamba resistance phenotype, spray tests were performed on Kochia populations comprising S and R plants. Crosses between S and R individuals were performed, utilizing the S biotype as the female and the R biotype as the male in order to identify individuals resulting from cross pollination. Because of the anatomy of Kochia reproductive organs, preventing some self-pollination is difficult, however, utilization of the Taqman® genotyping assay enabled distinction between progeny were heterozygous for KsIAA16 (R/S) versus progeny resulting from simple pollination (S/S). Several verified heterozygous F₁plants were selected for F₂seed production. In addition, a subset of S/S and R/S individuals from the F₁generation was subjected to dicamba sprays to ensure that the marker could effectively identify the R allele. A perfect correlation was observed between plants that were determined to be heterozygous for the R allele and plants that showed resistance to dicamba in the F₁spray test. This result indicates dicamba resistance is a dominant or semi-dominant trait.
To determine whether the KsIAA16R allele co-segregates with the dicamba resistance phenotype, 720 F₂progeny from verified heterozygous F₁parental plants were sampled and genotyped, and tolerance to a dicamba spray concentration double the typical dicamba field use rate (1120 g/ha) was determined. Plant identity was maintained throughout the experiment, and genotype and percent visible dicamba injury was determined for each of the F₂progeny. The average injury per genotype was about 80% for S/S, about 40% for R/S, and about 20% for R/R. Based on the Taqman genotyping assay, 234 homozygous sensitive plants (S/S), 371 heterozygous plants (R/S), and 105 homozygous resistant plants (R/R), were identified. Fourteen plants returned an undetermined genotype, thus representing a 2% PCR reaction failure rate. These genotype numbers are significantly different (1:1.6:0.4) than the expected Mendelian 1:2:1 segregation pattern (P<0.05), indicating that germination and/or seedling establishment may be impacted by the resistance allele. A strong correlation was found between the genotype results and the observed dicamba injury, with a mean injury rating of 82.3% for S/S individuals, 35.9% for R/S individuals, and 24.6% for R/R individuals. Statistical analysis of these data using ANOVA indicated with high certainty that the dicamba resistance phenotype is associated with the presence of the KsIAA16R allele (p<0.0001), and Cramér-von Mises statistical analysis showed the trait to be semi-dominant.

Example 7: Expression and Testing of KsIAA16 in Arabidopsis thaliana

To determine if the presence of the KsIAA16R allele alone was necessary and sufficient to confer dicamba resistance, several transgene expression constructs were generated for study of KsIAA16 in Arabidopsis. Agrobacterium tumefaciens was used to introduce the binary vectors in the plants using the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Vectors contained either the ethanol inducible alcA promoter elements (Salter et al., 1998), the constitutive CaMV35S promoter, or the native Arabidopsis IAA16 promoter (AtIAA16P) driving either KsIAA16R (SEQ ID NO: 220) or KsIAA16S (SEQ ID NO: 218). GUS reporter constructs contained a 2.5 kb genomic DNA fragment from directly upstream of KsIAA16, which is expected to contain most of the promoter elements as well as the 5′UTR, driving uidA. All constructs contained either a Spectinomycin resistance gene (SPEC) or a glufosinate resistance gene (BAR) in the T-DNA region to serve as the selectable marker. For all constructs, T1 seed was harvested, surface sterilized, and plated on the appropriate selective media to identify independent T1 transformants. Single seed decent and segregation on selective media was used to estimate transgene insertion number and identify homozygous lines. For induction of the P-Alc promoter, ethanol was added to a final concentration of 0.01% just before plates were poured, and plates were used immediately. All plates were grown in a Percival growth chamber (Percival Scientific, Inc.) at 22° C. with 16 hour day/8 hour night light cycle and a light intensity of 200 mol/min/m². Relative humidity was maintained at 50%. GUS assays were performed according to standard protocols. Briefly, a 20 mg/mL X-Gluc (GoldBio, St. Louis, Mo.) stock in dimethylformamide was diluted into 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. This solution was added to plant tissues, and samples were placed under vacuum for 5 minutes to ensure penetration of the solution into the tissues. Samples were covered in foil to prevent light entry and place at 37° C. for 24 hours to allow color development. Staining solution was removed and chlorophyll was cleared by incubating samples in 50% ethanol for several hours. For seedling arrest counts, seedlings that displayed radical protrusion, but whose root never reached a length of more than 2-3 mm at 8 days after plating were considered arrested.
A large percentage of seedlings from lines carrying the 35S:KsIAA16 constructs and the P-Alc:KsIAA16 constructs appeared to arrest shortly after germination, potentially due to high levels of constitutive/basal expression (Table 5). Induction of expression from the P-Alc promoter using 0.01% ethanol increased arrest rates slightly, but not significantly. There was no difference in the 35S:KsIAA16 line in the presence or absence of ethanol.

TABLE 5

Transgenic Arabidopsis seedling arrest data

	% Arrested	% Arrested
	Seedlings	Seedlings
Construct	Uninduced	Induced

None (non-transgenic WT)	1.62 ± 0.94	4.15 ± 0.19
P-Alc:KsIAA16S	57.2 ± 10.7	76.4 ± 9.83
P-Alc:KsIAA16R	34.3 ± 15.4	46.1 ± 10.5
355:KsIAA16S	78.2 ± 4.73	77.2 ± 6.11
355:KsIAA16R	45.4 ± 14.4	42.6 ± 11.7

Lines carrying AtIAA16P:KsIAA16 constructs did not appear to have significant amounts of seedling arrest, and thus were used for further study. As shown in Table 6, four independent transformant lines carrying AtIAA16P:KsIAA16R showed resistance to dicamba in a root elongation inhibition assay, whereas only one of the four lines carrying AtIAA16P:KsIAA16S showed very slight resistance. Several lines from both constructs also showed slight resistance to root inhibition by IAA. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that the KsIAA16R allele functions in Arabidopsis similar to the way it functions in Kochia. In addition it appears that the putative overexpression of the KsIAA16S allele can sometimes cause resistance to exogenous auxins, albeit to a lesser extent. Not wishing to be bound by a particular theory, this may be due to an increased amount of total AUX/IAA protein present as compared to that in a wild-type plant, as slightly increased resistance to IAA in root elongation assays has been previously reported to result from the heterologous expression of the wild-type AUX/IAA gene PtrIAA14 (Liu et al., 2015). In aggregate, these results suggest that the expression pattern/magnitude of the KsIAA16 transgene affects auxin perception, since only those with the endogenous promoter of the closest Arabidopsis homolog (AtAA16P) produced plants with minimal off-types.

TABLE 6

Root Length (in mm) of T2 transgenics on
plant nutrient plus IAA or dicamba

Media:

Construct Line:	No auxin	+5 μM IAA	+5 μM Dicamba

non-transgenic WT	26.67 ± 0.96	5.83 ± 0.24	9.08 ± 0.66
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16S_T2-1	28.0 ± 0.88	7.0 ± 0.77	13.50 ± 1.01
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16S_T2-2	27.67 ± 1.67	9.5 ± 0.84	11.42 ± 1.28
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16S_T2-3	30.58 ± 2.14	5.67 ± 0.54	14.17 ± 0.9
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16S_T2-4	28.92 ± 1.1	5 ± 0.34	10.67 ± 0.72
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16R_T2-1	30.83 ± 1.87	12.17 ± 1.01	12.42 ± 1.27
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16R_T2-2	29 ± 1.8	18.17 ± 3.09	15.5 ± 1.45
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16R_T2-3	36.92 ± 1.91	22.75 ± 2.09	15.58 ± 1.57
AtIAA16P:KsIAA16R_T2-4	38.25 ± 2.11	27.25 ± 1.88	17.5 ± 2.12

To understand the expression patterns of KsIAA16 and how spatiotemporal expression compares with the observed Kochia resistance phenotypes, northern analysis of Kochia tissue was performed. Additionally a KsIAA16 promoter (P): β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter construct was generated and transformed in Arabidopsis to allow visualization of KsIAA16 expression in a heterologous system. Visualization of expression patterns of the KsIAA16P:GUS construct in Arabidopsis by X-gluc staining indicated that the reporter was not expressed in dry or imbibed seed, but was strongly expressed at or just after germination. Expression appeared broadly throughout most tissues, with the highest levels apparent in vasculature tissues and lateral root primordial. Expression remained strong throughout development, with diffuse staining apparent throughout all leaves and in inflorescence tissues and appearing strongest in vascular tissues. Staining was also apparent in the pollen and carpels in flowers, the septum of young siliques, and the abscission zones of mature siliques. Northern blot analysis of Kochia tissues from both sensitive and resistant lines showed that endogenous alleles of the KsIAA16 transcript were transcribed in all tissues analyzed. This broad expression pattern for KsIAA16 may explain the strong resistance to foliar dicamba sprays.

Example 8: Modification of AUX/IAA Genes in Crop Plants

Based on the identified base pair substitutions that result in a glycine to asparagine amino acid change within the degron domain of the KsIAA16 protein, corresponding base pair substitutions can be made in IAA16 orthologs of crops plants, such as maize, sorghum, wheat, canola, soy, cotton, grapes, tomato, potato, lettuce, broccoli, cucumber, peanut, melon, leeks, onion, rice, barley, or other orthologs identified herein. These sequences may be modified using targeted genome editing (e.g., single-stranded oligonucleotide-mediated genome editing, meganucleases, zinc finger nucleases, TALENs, or RNA-guided nuclease (e.g., CRISPR technology).

TABLE 7

Orthologs of the KsIAA16 clade

	SEQ
	ID	DNA/
Designation	NO	PRT	Species

MRT3708_6332P.5	1	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_6332C.5	2	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_5638P.5	3	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_5638C.5	4	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_56595P.2	5	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_56595C.2	6	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_12408P.4	7	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_12408C.4	8	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_40183P.1	9	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_40183C.1	10	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_19539P.5	11	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_19539C.5	12	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_62039P.1	13	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_62039C.1	14	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_38282P.2	15	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_38282C.2	16	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3708_11965P.4	17	PRT	Brassica napus
MRT3708_11965C.4	18	DNA	Brassica napus
MRT3847_266780P.5	19	PRT	Glycine max
MRT3847_266780C.5	20	DNA	Glycine max
MRT3847_64144P.5	21	PRT	Glycine max
MRT3847_64144C	22	DNA	Glycine max
MRT3847_57460P.4	23	PRT	Glycine max
MRT3847_57460C	24	DNA	Glycine max
MRT3847_273343P.3	25	PRT	Glycine max
MRT3847_273343C	26	DNA	Glycine max
MRT3847_343242P.1	27	PRT	Glycine max
MRT3847_343242C	28	DNA	Glycine max
MRT4565_269292P.2	29	PRT	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_269292C	30	DNA	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_281861P.1	31	PRT	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_281861C	32	DNA	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_280751P	33	PRT	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_280751C	34	DNA	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_221930P.2	35	PRT	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_221930C	36	DNA	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_291685P.1	37	PRT	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_291685C	38	DNA	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_219014P.2	39	PRT	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT4565_219014C	40	DNA	Triticum
			aestivum
MRT3635_87572P.1	41	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_87572C	42	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_79125P.1	43	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_79125C	44	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_25740P.3	45	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_25740C	46	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_4714P.2	47	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_4714C	48	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_86248P.1	49	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_86248C	50	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_90266P.1	51	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_90266C	52	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_81130P.1	53	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_81130C	54	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_11021P.3	55	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_11021C	56	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_21712P.3	57	PRT	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT3635_21712C	58	DNA	Gossypium
			hirsutum
MRT4558_20126P.2	59	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_20126C	60	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_15323P.2	61	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_15323C	62	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_11520P.3	63	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_11520C	64	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_39366P.1	65	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_39366C	66	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_41876P.2	67	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_41876C	68	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_19650P.2	69	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_19650C	70	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_17725P.2	71	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_17725C	72	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_31221P.1	73	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_31221C	74	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_18424P.2	75	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_18424C	76	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_25019P.2	77	PRT	Sorghum
			bicolor
MRT4558_25019C	78	DNA	Sorghum
			bicolor
Zm_B73_CR03.G1573030.2	79	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR03.G1573030.2	80	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR06.G1567330.4	81	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR06.G1567330.4	82	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR03.G1573030.3	83	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR03.G1573030.3	84	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.1	85	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.1	86	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.4	87	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.4	88	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR08.G1372595.4	89	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR08.G1372595.4	90	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR08.G1372595.2	91	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR08.G1372595.2	92	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.3	93	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.3	94	DNA	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.6	95	PRT	Zea mays
Zm_B73_CR05.G107360.6	96	DNA	Zea mays
Grape_G23841001	97	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G23841001.cds	98	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G07456001	99	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn__G07456001.cds	100	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G20121001	101	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G20121001.cds	102	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G16706001	103	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G16706001.cds	104	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G34355001	105	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G34355001.cds	106	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G15048001	107	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G15048001.cds	108	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G13515001	109	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G13515001.cds	110	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G16808001	111	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G16808001.cds	112	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G34468001	113	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G34468001.cds	114	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Grape_G23840001	115	PRT	Vitis vinifera
Vv_pn_G23840001.cds	116	DNA	Vitis vinifera
Melon_CR05.G1184860.1	117	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR05.G1184860.1.cds	118	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR05.G8296840.1	119	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR05.G8296840.1.cds	120	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR01.G21880170	121	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR01.G21880170.1.cds	122	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR02.G13303860.1	123	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR02.G13303860.1.cds	124	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR04.G42703650.1	125	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR04.G42703650.1.cds	126	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR03.G513090.1	127	PRT	Cucumis melo
_WSH_CR03.G513090.1.cds	128	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR01.G27930430.1	129	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR01.G27930430.1.cds	130	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR08.G2010270.1	131	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR08.G2010270.1.cds	132	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR01.G21857860.1	133	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR01.G21857860.1.cds	134	DNA	Cucumis melo
Melon_CR05.G1129600.1	135	PRT	Cucumis melo
CumMe_WSH_CR05.G1129600.1.cds	136	DNA	Cucumis melo
solanum_tuberosum_NM_001288469	137	PRT	Solanum
			tuberosum
solanum_tuberosum_NM_001288469	138	DNA	Solanum
			tuberosum
Tomato_H1706_CR01.G10036700.2.pep	139	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR01.G10036700.2.cds	140	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR09.G9206940.1.pep	141	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR09.G9206940.1.cds	142	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR06.G6397690.1.pep	143	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR06.G6397690.1.cds	144	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR06.G1533090.1.pep	145	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR06.G1533090.1.cds	146	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR03.G6662920.1.pep	147	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR03.G6662920.1.cds	148	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR04.G9333290.1.pep	149	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR04.G9333290.1.cds	150	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR03.G6654390.1.pep	151	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR03.G6654390.1.cds	152	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR09.G9201650.1.pep	153	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR09.G9201650.1.cds	154	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_CR01.G10036700.1.pep	155	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_CR01.G10036700.1.cds	156	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Tomato_H1706_UN.G146.1.pep	157	PRT	Solanum
			lycopersicum
S1_H1706_UN.G146.1.cds	158	DNA	Solanum
			lycopersicum
Ls_CR03.G18217910.3.pep	159	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR03.G18217910.3.cds	160	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR04.G10487150.1.pep	161	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR04.G10487150.1.cds	162	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR00.G117220650.1.pep	163	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR00.G117220650.1.cds	164	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR04.G31733300.1.	165	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR04.G31733300.1.cds	166	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR05.G19800880.1.pep	167	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR05.G19800880.1.cds	168	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR07.G13339890.1.pep	169	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR07.G13339890.1.cds	170	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR01.G11430140.2.pep	171	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR01.G11430140.2.cds	172	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR03.G4757280.1.pep	173	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR03.G4757280.1.cds	174	DNA	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR00.G147430470.1.pep	175	PRT	Lactuca sativa
Ls_CR00.G147430470.1.cds	176	DNA	Lactuca sativa
CumSa_CL_CR06.G5192480.1.pep	177	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR06.G5192480.1.cds	178	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR02.G3923960.1.pep	179	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR02.G3923960.1.cds	180	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_SF1059.G337640.1.pep	181	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_SF1059.G337640.1.cds	182	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR07.G4126220.1.pep	183	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR07.G4126220.1.cds	184	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR03.G1762590.1.pep	185	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR03.G1762590.1.cds	186	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR07.G3464540.1.pep	187	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR07.G3464540.1.cds	188	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR02.G279760.1.pep	189	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR02.G279760.1.cds	190	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR02.G2168140.1.pep	191	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR02.G2168140.1.cds	192	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR03.G1764230.1.pep [	193	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_CR03.G1764230.1.cds	194	DNA	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_SF18540.G80440.1.pep	195	PRT	Cucumis sativus
CumSa_CL_SF18540.G80440.1.cds	196	DNA	Cucumis sativus
MRT3880_29642P	197	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_29642C	198	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_23017P.2	199	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_23017C	200	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_21535P.1	201	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_21535C	202	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_5928P.1	203	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_5928C	204	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_30136P.2	205	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_30136C	206	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_5412P.2	207	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_5412c	208	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_34104P.1	209	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_34104c	210	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_60998P.1	211	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_60998c	212	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_8385P.2	213	PRT	Medicago
			truncatula
MRT3880_8385C	214	DNA	Medicago
			truncatula
HaIAA27	215	PRT	Helianthus
			annuus
FR669188.1	216	DNA	Helianthus
			annuus
KsIAA16S	217	PRT	Kochia scoparia
KsIAA16S	218	DNA	Kochia scoparia
KSIAA16R	219	PRT	Kochia scoparia
KSIAA16R	220	DNA	Kochia scoparia

Precise genome editing can be accomplished as described (Sauer, et al. (2016)). Single-stranded oligonucleotides are used to engineer the GG to AA nucleotide change in the degron motif of the AUX/IAA 16 ortholog of the desired plant species. Selection for the introduced mutation is by molecular analysis, genome sequence confirmation of the nucleotide changes, and auxin sensitivity assays.
Alternatively, one or more site-specific nucleases, for example zinc finger nucleases, TALENs, or RNA-guided nucleases (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cpf1, CRISPR-CasX, etc.) are introduced into a plant cell, along with a template comprising an exon encoding the mutated degron motif (GG to AA nucleotide change). The site-specific nuclease induces a double-strand break (DSB) in the chromosome around the exon of the AUX/IAA16 ortholog encoding the degron motif. Through homologous recombination, the template replaces the endogenous exon encoding the wild type degron motif. Plants carrying the mutated degron motif are selected using standard molecular analysis and auxin sensitivity assays.
Alternatively, one or more site-specific nucleases, for example zinc finger nucleases, TALENs, or RNA-guided nucleases (e.g., CRISPR) are introduced into a plant cell, with a template comprising an exon encoding the mutated degron motif (GG to AA nucleotide change). The site-specific nucleases induce two double-strand break (DSB) in the chromosome, one DSB 5′- and one DSB 3′ of the exon of the AUX/IAA16 ortholog encoding the degron motif. Through non-homologous end joining, the template replaces the endogenous exon encoding the wild type degron motif. Plants carrying the mutated degron motif are selected using standard molecular analysis and auxin sensitivity assays.
Alternatively, a base editing enzyme (e.g., Cas9-cytidine deaminase, Cpf1-cytidine deaminase, etc.) are introduced into a plant cell. The base editing enzyme catalyzes C-to-T base conversions in the exon of the AUX/IAA16 ortholog encoding the degron motif resulting in glycine (G) to asparagine (N) amino acid substitution in the degron motif. Plants carrying the mutated degron motif are selected using standard molecular analysis and auxin sensitivity assays.

Example 9. Cross-Resistance of Kochia R-Biotype to 2,4-D and Fluroxypyr

To elucidate whether the Kochia R-biotype is cross resistant to 2,4-D or fluroxypyr, greenhouse grown 10 to 15 cm tall Kochia plants were sprayed with either Dicamba at 0,140, 280, 560, 2240, 4480, 6720, 8960, or 17920 g a.e.ha⁻¹; 2,4-D at 0, 70, 140, 280, 560, 1120, 2240, 4480, 6720, 8960 g a.e.ha⁻¹or fluroxypyr at 0, 17.5, 35, 70, 140, 280, 420, 560, 1120, 2240 g a.e.ha⁻¹with a track sprayer. Fresh weights were determined at 21 DAT and used to calculate dose response curves using “R” software. The curves for R Kochia (filled circles) and S Kochia (open circles) are shown in FIG. 6 for Dicamba in Panel A, 2,4-D in Panel B, and Fluroxypyr in Panel C. Visible injury at 14 days after treatment (DAT) for R and S biotypes was observed for all treatments (not shown).

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A modified plant or seed, wherein the modified plant or seed is sensitive to at least one endogenous auxin, and wherein the modified plant or seed exhibits tolerance to at least one auxin herbicide.

2. The modified plant or seed of claim 1, wherein said endogenous auxin is selected from the group consisting of IAA and NAA, and wherein said auxin herbicide is selected from the group consisting of dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, triclopyr, quinclorac and fluroxypyr.

3. The modified plant or seed of claim 1, wherein said modified plant or seed comprises at least one modification in an endogenous gene encoding an AUX/IAA protein, wherein said at least one modification confers tolerance to an auxin herbicide as compared to a control plant without said at least one modification.

4. The modified plant or seed of claim 3, wherein said modification results in an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified relative to a wild type AUX/IAA polypeptide, to be asparagine (N), isoleucine (I), or leucine (L) relative to a wild type AUX/IAA polypeptide and wherein X₂is isoleucine (I), valine (V), leucine (L), or methionine (M).

5. The modified plant or seed of claim 4, wherein said modification results in an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 219, wherein the modified plant or seed is not a Kochia scoparia plant or seed.

6. The modified plant or seed of claim 5, wherein said modification results in an AUX/IAA polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 219, wherein the modified plant or seed is not a Kochia scoparia plant or seed.

7. The modified plant or seed of claim 1, wherein said modified plant or seed is a crop plant or crop seed.

8. The modified plant or seed of claim 7, wherein said crop plant is a monocot.

9. The modified plant or seed of claim 8, wherein said crop plant is selected from the group consisting of maize, sorghum, wheat, canola, soy, and cotton, grapes, tomato, potato, lettuce, broccoli, cucumber, peanut, melon, leeks, onion, rice, and barley.

10. The modified plant or seed of claim 7, wherein said crop plant is a dicot.

11. The modified plant or seed of claim 8, wherein said crop plant is selected from the group consisting of soybean, alfalfa, sunflower, cotton, canola, and sugar beet.

12. The modified plant or seed of claim 1, wherein said modification results in increased tolerance to an auxin herbicide as compared to a control plant or seed lacking said modification.

13. A method of generating a modified plant comprising the steps of:

a. introducing a modification in a AUX/IAA gene of a plant cell;

b. identifying and selecting one or more plant cells of step (a) comprising said modification in a degron domain of AUX/IAA; and

c. regenerating at least one plant from at least one or more cells selected in step (b).

14. A modified DNA molecule encoding a modified auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (AUX/IAA) polypeptide, wherein said AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a modified degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂, wherein X₁has been modified to be asparagine (N), isoleucine (I), or leucine (L) relative to a wild type AUX/IAA polypeptide and wherein X₂is isoleucine (I), valine (V), leucine (L), or methionine (M).

15. The modified DNA molecule of claim 14, wherein X₁has been modified from glycine to asparagine.

16. The modified DNA molecule of claim 14, wherein said modified AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a polypeptide sequence selected from the group consisting of:

a. a sequence having at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NOs: 2n−1, wherein n=1-110, or wherein any of SEQ ID NOs: 247-284; and

b. a fragment of the sequence of a) having auxin/indole-3-acetic acid binding activity.

17. The modified DNA molecule of claim 16, wherein said modified AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a polynucleotide sequence having at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 220.

18. The modified DNA molecule of claim 17, wherein said modified AUX/IAA polypeptide comprises a polynucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 220.

19. A DNA construct comprising the modified DNA molecule of claim 14 operably linked to a heterologous promoter.

20. The DNA construct of claim 19, wherein the promoter is an inducible promoter.

21. The DNA construct of claim 14, further defined as operably linked to a native auxin/indole-3-acetic acid gene promoter in the genome of a plant.

22. A recombinant plant, plant part, cell, or seed comprising the modified DNA molecule of claim 14.

23. A plant genome comprising the modified DNA molecule of claim 14.

24. A method for conferring auxin herbicide tolerance to a plant comprising expressing in said plant the modified DNA molecule of claim 14.

25. The method of claim 24, further defined as comprising transforming said plant or a progenitor thereof with the modified DNA molecule of claim 14.

26. A method for producing an auxin herbicide tolerant plant comprising:

modifying an AUX/IAA polypeptide of said plant to alter residue X₁in a degron domain that comprises the motif X₁WPPX₂relative to SEQ ID NO: 217, wherein X₂is an isoleucine, valine, leucine, or methionine.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein X₁is modified from glycine to asparagine, isoleucine, or leucine.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein said modifying comprises site-specific mutagenesis.

29. A plant produced by the method of claim 26.

30. A method of detecting a plant exhibiting sensitivity at least one endogenous auxin and tolerance to at least one auxin herbicide, comprising the steps of:

a. obtaining a genomic DNA sample from said plant;

b. amplifying said DNA sample using a first primer and a second primer to produce an amplicon;

c. detecting in said amplicon a polynucleotide sequence encoding the motif X₁WPPX₂within SEQ ID NO: 219.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein said first primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 221 and said second primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 222.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein detecting comprises restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

33. The method of claim 30, wherein said first primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 223 and said second primer has a sequence of SEQ ID NO: 224.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein detecting comprises using a probe selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 225, SEQ ID NO: 226, or combinations thereof.