US20190272052A1

US20190272052A1 - Spatial resolution in touch displays

Info

Publication number: US20190272052A1
Application number: US16/233,726
Authority: US
Inventors: Mats Petter Wallander; Håkan Bergström
Original assignee: FlatFrog Laboratories AB
Current assignee: FlatFrog Laboratories AB
Priority date: 2012-05-23
Filing date: 2018-12-27
Publication date: 2019-09-05
Also published as: US20180210572A1; US10168835B2

Abstract

A touch-sensitive apparatus comprises a first subset of components on a first end of the touch surface, and a second subset of components on a second end which is opposite to and parallel with the first end. The components include emitters and detectors, each emitter being operable for propagating a diverging energy beam (e.g. radiation) across the touch surface inside the panel, and each detector being operable for detecting transmitted energy from at least two emitters. The components in at least one of the first and second subsets are systematically arranged in spatially separate groups along at least one of the first and second ends, so as to achieve a reduced spacing and/or an increased uniformity of the transmission paths along a center line between the first and second ends compared to an equidistant arrangement of all components.

Description

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE TO ANY PRIORITY APPLICATIONS

Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Technical Field

The present invention relates to a touch-sensitive apparatus that operates by propagating energy beams across a touch surface of a panel.

Background Art

Touch-sensitive apparatus known in the art may be implemented to operate by transmitting light inside a solid light transmissive panel, which defines two parallel boundary surfaces connected by a peripheral edge surface. Light generated by a plurality of emitters is coupled into the panel so as to propagate by total internal reflection (TIR) between the boundary surfaces to a plurality of detectors. The light thereby defines propagation paths across the panel, between pairs of emitters and detectors. The emitters and detectors are arranged such that the propagation paths define a grid on the panel. An object that touches one of the boundary surfaces (“the touch surface”) will attenuate (“frustrate”) the light on one or more propagation paths and cause a change in the light received by one or more of the detectors. The location (coordinates), shape or area of the object may be determined by analyzing the received light at the detectors. This type of apparatus has an ability to detect plural objects in simultaneous contact with the touch surface, known as “multi-touch” in the art.
In one configuration, e.g. disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,673,327, 4,254,333 and US2006/0114237, the emitters and detectors are arranged in rows on opposite ends of the panel, and the light is propagated between opposite pairs of emitters and detectors so as to define a rectangular grid of propagation paths.
As an alternative, U.S. Pat. No. 7,432,893 proposes the use of a few large emitters arranged at the corners of the panel, or centrally on each end of the panel, to inject diverging light beams (“fan beams”) into the panel for receipt by arrays of detectors along all ends of the panel. This configuration may enable an increased spatial resolution for a given number of emitters and detectors, by increasing the density of the grid of propagation paths. The spatial resolution indicates the smallest object that can be detected by the touch-sensitive apparatus at a given location on the touch surface.
In an alternative configuration, e.g. disclosed in WO2009/077962, US2011/0234537, US2011/0157096, rows of regularly spaced fan beam emitters and detectors, respectively, are arranged on opposite ends of the panel to define a dense grid of propagation paths across the touch surface.
WO2010/064983 discloses further alternative configurations. In one configuration, which is intended to improve the uniformity of the grid of propagation paths, fan beam emitters and detectors are alternated with equal spacing around the periphery of the touch surface. In another configuration, which is intended to reduce interference phenomena that may occur when different emitters concurrently inject light of the same wavelength into the panel, fan beam emitters and detectors are arranged with randomized spacing around the periphery of the touch surface.
US 2009/0153519 discloses providing alternating emitter and detector ports around the panel. Alternatively, a unique electrode can serve both purposes of emitter and receiver.
There is a continued desire to improve the spatial resolution with respect to the uniformity of the spatial resolution across the touch surface or the minimum detectable object size at a given position on the touch surface of a touch-sensitive apparatus.

SUMMARY

It is an objective of the invention to at least partly overcome one or more limitations of the prior art.
An objective is to enable an improved spatial resolution for a given number of electro-optical components in a touch-sensitive apparatus that operates by propagating energy beams across a touch surface. One or more of these objectives, as well as further objectives that may appear from the description below, are at least partly achieved by means of a touch-sensitive apparatus according to the independent claims, embodiments thereof being defined by the dependent claims.
One aspect of the invention is a touch-sensitive apparatus, comprising a panel defining a touch surface, a first subset of components on a first end of the touch surface, a second subset of components on a second end of the touch surface, wherein the components comprise emitters and detectors, the emitters being operable for propagating diverging light beams across the touch surface, and the detectors being operable for detecting transmitted light from the emitters, wherein the components in at least one of the first and second subsets are systematically arranged in spatially separate groups along at least one of the first and second ends, wherein each group comprises at least two components, wherein said at least one of the first and second subsets have an inter-group spacing between the groups and an intra-group spacing between the components within each group, and wherein the groups in said at least one of the first and second subsets have systematically varying inter-group spacing and systematically varying intra-group spacing.
This aspect is based on the insight that conventional configurations that propagate diverging energy beams and have first and second subsets of equispaced components on opposite first and second ends of the touch surface will result in a convergence of the propagation paths towards the center line between the opposite subsets. Thereby, the grid of propagation paths will exhibit increased gaps without propagation paths near the center line, which is equal to a locally reduced spatial resolution. By arranging the components in at least one of the first and second subsets in spatially separate groups along at least one of the first and second ends, and with the groups in said at least one of the first and second subsets have systematically varying inter-group spacing and systematically varying intra-group spacing, the convergence of the propagation paths may be avoided or reduced and the propagation paths may be more distributed along the center line. By proper design of the groups, the first aspect thus provides an increased uniformity and/or a reduced spacing of propagation paths, at least near the center line, for a given number of components, compared to an equidistant arrangement of the components in the first and second subsets.
It should be noted that the components are systematically arranged in spatially separate groups, which indicates that the center-to-center spacing between adjacent components in different groups is larger than the center-to-center spacing between adjacent components within each group. The center-to-center spacing may also be denoted a “pitch”. The systematic arrangement in groups is contrasted by a randomized arrangement, which generally does not result in any ordered or systematic grouping of components. The arrangement of the components into spaced-apart groups may be systematic in different respects, e.g. by having the same number of components in all groups in a subset, by having the same combination of components within all groups in a subset, or by having the same ordering of components within all groups in a subset.
In one embodiment, all groups include the same number of components, e.g. two or three components. This may facilitate the design and manufacture of the apparatus.
In one embodiment, each of the first and second subsets contains an alternating sequence of emitters and detectors.
In one embodiment, the components in both the first subset and the second subset are systematically arranged in spatially separate groups along the first and second ends. For example, the groups in the first subset may consist of a sequence of one emitter and one detector with respect to a reference direction along the first and second ends, and the groups in the second subset may consist of a sequence of one detector and one emitter with respect to the reference direction.
In another embodiment, the first subset contains only emitters and the second subset contains only detectors.
In one embodiment, said at least one of the first and second subsets have an inter-group spacing between the groups and an intra-group spacing between the components within each group, such that a ratio of the inter-group spacing to the intra-group spacing is greater than 1.2, and possibly in the range of 1.3-8. In yet another embodiment, the groups in said at least one of the first and second subsets have systematically varying inter-group spacing and systematically varying intra-group spacing. The use of varying inter-group and/or intra-group spacing may serve to further reduce the spacing of propagation paths along the center line.
In one embodiment, the first and second subsets define a grid of transmission paths between the emitters and the detectors, wherein the groups are systematically arranged so as to generate a decreased spacing of transmission paths along a center line between the first and second ends compared to an equidistant arrangement of the components in the first and second subsets. Such an embodiment may serve to increase the spatial resolution of the touch-sensitive apparatus for a given number of components.
In one embodiment, the first and second subsets define transmission paths between the emitters and the detectors, said transmission paths forming intersection points with a center line between first and second ends, wherein the groups are systematically arranged so as to generate a decreased average number of transmission paths per intersection point compared to an equidistant arrangement of the components in the first and second subsets. Such an embodiment may serve to reduce the impact of the individual intersections on the transmitted energy measured by individual detectors, and thereby reduce a difference in touch sensitivity along the center line in relation to other parts of the touch surface. This has been found to reduce the occurrence of artifacts caused by systematic errors and noise when using certain image reconstruction algorithms for reconstructing a two-dimensional distribution of interaction or “attenuation” across the touch surface based on the transmitted energy detected by the detectors.
In one embodiment, the components are electro-optical components that are configured to generate radiation and detect radiation, respectively.
In one embodiment, the panel defines a front surface and a back surface, wherein the emitters are operable for propagation of diverging beams of radiation by internal reflections in the front and back surfaces, and wherein the front surface comprises the touch surface and is configured to allow the diverging beams of radiation to be attenuated by objects in contact with the touch surface. The back surface may be an external or internal surface of the panel.
In one embodiment, a ratio of the inter-group spacing to the intra-group spacing is 1.33.
In one embodiment, the intra-group spacing in at least one group, in at least one of the first and second subsets, is in the range 0.25-5 mm.
In one embodiment, at least one emitter and one detector, in at least one of the first and second subsets, are arranged as a component pair having an intra-group spacing corresponding substantially to the sum of half the width of said one emitter and half the width of said one detector.
In one embodiment, at least one of the first and second subsets comprises a plurality of said component pairs arranged at defined intervals along the first and/or second end.
In one embodiment, the components within a group are separated with least two different intra-group spacings.
In one embodiment, each detector within a group is separated by different intra-group spacings from at least two emitters in the same group.
In one embodiment, the groups comprise interleaved pairs of detectors and emitters, and wherein, for at least a first group, a detector of at least one detector pair and an emitter of at least one emitter pair are arranged as a component pair having an intra-group spacing corresponding substantially to the sum of half the width of said one emitter and half the width of said one detector.
In one embodiment, the panel is rectangular with horizontal and vertical rows of said components, wherein the components are systematically arranged in spatially separate groups in both the horizontal and vertical rows.
In one embodiment, the inter-group spacing on the first end is different from the inter-group spacing on the second end.
In one embodiment, the intra-group spacing on the first end is different from the intra-group spacing on the second end.
In one embodiment, the number of components in each group on the first end is different from the number of components in each group on the second end.
Still other objectives, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will appear from the following detailed description, from the attached claims as well as from the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Examples of the disclosure will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings.

FIGS. 1A-1B are section and top plan views of an optical touch-sensitive apparatus.

FIG. 2 is a 3D plot of an attenuation pattern generated based on energy signals from an optical touch-sensitive apparatus.

FIG. 3A illustrate a grid of detection lines in a prior art apparatus with interleaved emitters and detectors, and FIGS. 3B-3H illustrate the grid of detection lines when the apparatus in FIG. 3A is designed in accordance with examples of the disclosure.

FIG. 4A illustrate a grid of detection lines in a prior art apparatus with separated emitter and detector sides, and FIGS. 4B-4D illustrate the grid of detection lines when the apparatus in FIG. 4A is designed in accordance with examples of the disclosure.

FIG. 5A illustrate a grid of detection lines in a prior art apparatus with two orthogonal sub-grids, and FIGS. 5B and 5C illustrate a corresponding grid of detection lines when the apparatus is designed in accordance with examples of the disclosure.

FIG. 6a is a schematic illustration of at least a part of a subset of components with varying inter- and intra-group distances, according to an example of the disclosure;

FIG. 6b is another schematic illustration of at least a part of a subset of components with varying inter- and intra-group distances, according to an example of the disclosure;

FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of the positions of components along two perpendicular sides of at least part of a panel of a touch-sensitive apparatus, according to an example of the disclosure;

FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of an emitter and a detector arranged with an intra-group spacing, in a detailed view, according to an example of the disclosure;

FIGS. 9a-b are schematic illustrations of a touch-sensitive apparatus with light propagation paths above the touch surface according to examples of the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

In the following, examples of the present invention will be given in relation to a touch-sensitive apparatus designed to operate by light transmission. Throughout the description, the same reference numerals are used to identify corresponding elements.
FIGS. 1A-1B illustrate an example of a touch-sensitive apparatus 100 that is based on the concept of FTIR (Frustrated Total Internal Reflection). The apparatus 100 operates by transmitting light inside a panel 1, from light emitters 2 to light sensors or detectors 3, so as to illuminate a touch surface 4 from within the panel 1. The panel 1 is made of solid material in one or more layers and may have any shape. The panel 1 defines an internal radiation propagation channel, in which light propagates by internal reflections. In the example of FIG. 1, the propagation channel is defined between the boundary surfaces 5, 6 of the panel 1, where the top surface 5 allows the propagating light to interact with touching objects 7 and thereby defines the touch surface 4. This is achieved by injecting the light into the panel 1 such that the light is reflected by total internal reflection (TIR) in the touch surface 4 as it propagates through the panel 1. The light may be reflected by TIR in the bottom surface 6 or against a reflective coating thereon. It is also conceivable that the propagation channel is spaced from the bottom surface 6, e.g. if the panel comprises multiple layers of different materials. The apparatus 100 may be designed to be overlaid on or integrated into a display device or monitor.
The apparatus 100 allows an object 7 that is brought into close vicinity of, or in contact with, the touch surface 4 to interact with the propagating light at the point of touch. In this interaction, part of the light may be scattered by the object 7, part of the light may be absorbed by the object 7, and part of the light may continue to propagate in its original direction across the panel 1. Thus, the touching object 7 causes a local frustration of the total internal reflection, which leads to a decrease in the energy (or equivalently, the power or intensity) of the transmitted light, as indicated by the thinned lines downstream of the touching objects 7 in FIG. 1A.
The emitters 2 are distributed along the perimeter of the touch surface 4 to generate a corresponding number of light sheets inside the panel 1. Each light sheet is formed as a beam of light that expands (as a “fan beam”) in the plane of the panel 1 while propagating in the panel 1 from a respective incoupling region/point on the panel 1. The detectors 3 are distributed along the perimeter of the touch surface 4 to receive the light from the emitters 2 at a number of spaced-apart outcoupling regions/points on the panel 1. It should be understood that the incoupling and outcoupling regions/points merely refer to the positions where the beams enter and leave, respectively, the panel 1. The light from each emitter 2 will propagate inside the panel 1 to a number of different detectors 3 on a plurality of light propagation paths D. Even if the light propagation paths D correspond to light that propagates by internal reflections inside the panel 1, the light propagation paths D may conceptually be represented as “detection lines” that extend across the touch surface 4 between pairs of emitters 2 and detectors 3, as shown in FIG. 1B. Thereby, the emitters 2 and detectors 3 collectively define a grid of detection lines D (“detection grid”) on the touch surface 4. The spacing of intersections in the detection grid defines the spatial resolution of the apparatus 100, i.e. the smallest object than can be detected on the touch surface 4.
The detectors 3 collectively provide an output signal, which is received and sampled by a signal processor 10. The output signal contains a number of sub-signals, also denoted “projection signals”, each representing the energy of light emitted by a certain light emitter 2 and received by a certain light detector 3. Depending on implementation, the signal processor 10 may need to process the output signal for separation of the individual projection signals. The projection signals represent the received energy, intensity or power of light received by the detectors 3 on the individual detection lines D. Whenever an object touches a detection line, the received energy on this detection line is decreased or “attenuated”.
The signal processor 10 may be configured to process the projection signals so as to determine a property of the touching objects, such as a position (e.g. in the x,y coordinate system shown in FIG. 1B), a shape, or an area. This determination may involve a straight-forward triangulation based on the attenuated detection lines, e.g. as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,432,893 and WO2010/015408, or a more advanced processing to recreate a distribution of attenuation values (for simplicity, referred to as an “attenuation pattern”) across the touch surface 1, where each attenuation value represents a local degree of light attenuation. An example of such an attenuation pattern is given in the 3D plot of FIG. 2. The attenuation pattern may be further processed by the signal processor 10 or by a separate device (not shown) for determination of a position, shape or area of touching objects. The attenuation pattern may be generated e.g. by any available algorithm for image reconstruction based on projection signal values, including tomographic reconstruction methods such as Filtered Back Projection, FFT-based algorithms, ART (Algebraic Reconstruction Technique), SART (Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique), etc. Alternatively, the attenuation pattern may be generated by adapting one or more basis functions and/or by statistical methods such as Bayesian inversion. Examples of such reconstruction functions designed for use in touch determination are found in WO2009/077962, WO2011/049511, WO2011/139213, WO2012/050510, and WO2013062471, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Conventional image reconstruction techniques are found in the mathematical literature, e.g. “The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography” by Natterer, and “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging” by Kak and Slaney.
In the illustrated example, the apparatus 100 also includes a controller 12 which is connected to selectively control the activation of the emitters 2 and, possibly, the readout of data from the detectors 3. Depending on implementation, the emitters 2 and/or detectors 3 may be activated in sequence or concurrently, e.g. as disclosed in WO2010/064983. The signal processor 10 and the controller 12 may be configured as separate units, or they may be incorporated in a single unit. One or both of the signal processor 10 and the controller 12 may be at least partially implemented by software executed by a processing unit 14.
It is to be understood that FIG. 1 merely illustrates one example of a touch-sensitive apparatus. For example, instead of injecting and detecting light via the edge surface that connects the boundary surfaces 5, 6, light may be coupled into and/or out of the panel 1 via the top and/or bottom surfaces 5, 6, e.g. by the use of dedicated coupling elements attached to the panel 1. It is also conceivable that the light is coupled into and out of the panel 1 through different portions of the panel, e.g. via the boundary surface 5 and the boundary surface 6, respectively. Examples of alternative FTIR-based touch systems are e.g. disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,432,893, WO2010/046539, WO2012105893, and PCT/SE2012/051368 filed on Dec. 10, 2012, which are all incorporated herein by this reference.
Embodiments of the invention apply a systematic grouping of the emitters and detectors along the perimeter of the touch surface 4 to achieve desired properties of the detection grid on the touch surface 4, as will be further explained in relation to the top plan views in FIGS. 3A-3H. Each of FIGS. 3A-3H illustrates a grid of detection lines that are defined between rows of emitters (open circles) and detectors (open squares) on opposite ends or sides of a touch surface (not shown). A dotted line indicates the center line C between the rows of emitters and detectors, and small dots indicate the intersections of the detection lines with the center line C. For ease of presentation, the panel 1 has been omitted in FIGS. 3A-3H.
In a conventional fan beam arrangement, denoted “interleaved arrangement” herein and shown in FIG. 3A, emitters and detectors are arranged in alternating fashion with equal spacing in two rows along opposite ends of the touch surface. The interleaved arrangement results in a symmetric detection grid, and each intersection point on the center line C contains a large number of detection lines. As shown, the maximum spacing of intersections in the detection grid occurs on the center line C. In other words, the center line C defines the spatial resolution of the grid of detection lines that extend between the rows of alternating emitters and detectors.
In a first example, shown in FIG. 3B, the alternating emitters and detectors are arranged in groups (indicated by brackets) consisting of one emitter and one detector, where the order of components in the groups is “reversed” between the upper and lower rows, since the upper row consists of emitter-detector-groups, whereas the lower row consists of detector-emitter-groups, as seen in a direction from left to right. Within each of these groups, the emitter and detector are spaced by an intra-group spacing S_c, and the different groups are spaced by an inter-group spacing S_g. The components are arranged with equal S_cwithin all groups and with equal S_gbetween all groups. In the illustrated example, S_g/S_c=1.33.
By comparing FIG. 3B and FIG. 3A, it is realized that the systematic grouping of components results in a doubled number of intersection points on the center line C. This means that the spatial resolution of the touch-sensitive apparatus is increased without increasing the number of components per unit length in the opposite rows. Thus, embodiments of the invention make it possible to attain a higher spatial resolution for a given number of electro-optical components (emitters and detectors). The grouping of components may be seen as leading to a separation of intersection points that overlap in the conventional fan beam arrangement of FIG. 3A. It is currently believed that a useful separation is achieved when S_g/S_cexceeds about 1.2-1.3. Thereby, the grouping also results in a reduction, on average, in the number of detection lines that meet at each intersection point on the center line C. In the example of FIG. 3A, 5 detection lines meet at the intersection points on the center line C. In the example of FIG. 3B, 3 or 2 detection lines meet at each intersection point on the center line C. This has been found to enable a suppression of artifacts that may otherwise arise when the attenuation pattern is reconstructed using image reconstruction algorithms, e.g. algorithms for Filtered Back Projection. With the conventional fan beam arrangement in FIG. 3A, a larger number of projection signals are generally affected by objects that touch the intersection points on the center line C than by objects that touch the intersection points outside the center line C, since a touch on the center line C affects many more detection lines. Thereby, the image reconstruction algorithm may inherently over-emphasize regions near the center line, resulting in a locally increased sensitivity and a risk of enhancing noise and systematic errors in this region. Any such tendency is suppressed or at least reduced in the embodiment in FIG. 3B.
It should be noted that this advantageous effect is far from intuitive for the skilled person who is familiar with another class of optical touch systems, in which light is propagated in the free air above the touch surface and in which the location of touching objects is determined by detecting that the light paths across the touch surface are interrupted or blocked by the touching object. This class of optical touch systems is e.g. known from U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,690,363, 6,429,857, 7,042,444, US2010/0066016, U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,716, WO2010/081702 and WO2010/112404. As explained in WO2010/112404, to enable multi-touch determination of n−1 objects in simultaneous contact with a touch surface, each point on the touch surface needs to be passed by n different light paths. Thus, the general teaching is here that the emitters and detectors should be configured and arranged so as to maximize the number of intersecting propagation paths across the detection grid. In contrast, embodiments of the invention generally aim at reducing, on average, the number of intersecting propagation paths.
The arrangement in FIG. 3C is similar to the arrangement in FIG. 3B, but is designed with S_g/S_c=3, which results in a uniform spacing of intersection points on the center line C. This may or may not be a desired feature of the touch-sensitive apparatus, depending on implementation.
FIG. 3D is identical to FIG. 3C except for a relative displacement between the upper and lower rows. As seen, the spacing of intersection points on the center line C is the same as in FIG. 3C.
FIG. 3E illustrates a variant in which only the components in the upper row are arranged in groups. In the illustrated example, S_g/S_c=3. As seen, this also results in a doubled number of intersection points on the center line C compared to the conventional arrangement in FIG. 3A.
FIG. 3F illustrates a variant of the embodiment in FIG. 3E, with a different order of components within the groups in the upper row, i.e. detector-emitter-groups instead of emitter-detector groups as seen in a direction from left to right. The distribution of intersection points on the center line C is similar to the one in FIG. 3E.
In a second embodiment, shown in FIG. 3G, the emitters and detectors are arranged in groups with identical intra-group spacing S_gand with systematically varied inter-group spacing S_c. In the illustrated example, S_gis alternately set to 25c and 45c. As seen, this results in a varied spacing of intersection points on the center line C, which may or may not be a desirable feature. Furthermore, compared to the arrangements in FIGS. 3B-3D, the average number of detection lines at the intersection points on the center line C is reduced. In the example of FIG. 3G, there are 1 or 2 detection lines at each intersection point with the center line C. In a variant, not shown, the emitters and detectors may be arranged in groups with identical inter-group spacing S_cand with systematically varied intra-group spacing S_g.
In a third embodiment, shown in FIG. 3H, the emitters and detectors are arranged in groups with systematically varied inter- and intra-group spacings S_c, S_g. In the illustrated example, S_citerates over the sequence: [0.675c, S_c, 1.33S_c, S_c] from left to right along each of the rows, whereas S_giterates over the sequence: [3.33S_c, 3S_c, 2.67, 3S_c] from left to right along each of the rows. This is seen to result in a relatively uniform distribution of intersection points on the center line C, with 1 or 2 detection lines at each intersection point with the center line C.
Another conventional fan beam arrangement, denoted “non-interleaved arrangement” herein, is shown in FIG. 4A, in which the emitters are arranged with equal spacing on one end of the touch surface and the detectors are arranged with equal spacing on the opposite end. The non-interleaved arrangement results in a symmetric detection grid, and each intersection point on the center line C contains a large number of detection lines.
The arrangement in FIG. 4A may be modified by systematically grouping the emitters and detectors in the same way as described in relation to FIGS. 3B-3H. As an example, FIG. 4B illustrates the result of grouping the detectors in the upper row and the emitters in the lower row two-by-two. In the illustrated example, S_g/S_c=3. As seen, the number of detection lines at the intersection points on the center line C is reduced from 4 detection lines per intersection point in FIG. 4A to either 1, 2 or 4 detection lines per intersection point in FIG. 4B. Thus, the example in FIG. 4B may serve to reduce the occurrence of the above-mentioned artifacts in the reconstructed attenuation pattern.
FIG. 4C illustrates the result of grouping only the detectors in the upper row two-by-two, using S_g/S_c=3. As seen, the result is a significantly decreased spacing of intersection points on the center line C, with 1 or 2 detection lines per intersection point. Furthermore, the intersection points are essentially uniformly spaced on the center line C, which may be a desirable feature. A similar result is obtained by grouping only the emitters in the lower row two-by-two.
It is realized that the groups in all of the foregoing embodiments may contain more than two components. FIG. 4D illustrates a variant in which the detectors in the upper row are grouped three-by-three. As seen, the distributions of intersection points on the center line C is similar to the one in FIG. 4C.
FIG. 5A is a top plan view of a rectangular panel 1 which is surrounded on four sides by horizontal and vertical rows of fan beam emitters and detectors which are conventionally arranged in alternating fashion with equal spacing. The horizontal rows define a first sub-grid, and the vertical rows define a second sub-grid. The first and second sub-grids overlap to define combined detection grid. As seen, the conventional arrangement results in horizontal and vertical bands of reduced spatial resolution along the center lines between the opposing rows of components. FIG. 5B illustrates a touch-sensitive apparatus with a conventional fan beam arrangement in the vertical rows and a grouping according to the first embodiment (FIG. 3C) in the horizontal rows. Compared to FIG. 5A, the horizontal bands are significantly suppressed. FIG. 5C illustrates a touch-sensitive apparatus with groupings according to the first embodiment (FIG. 3C) in both the vertical and horizontal rows. Compared to FIG. 5A, both the vertical and the horizontal bands are significantly suppressed. It should be noted that FIGS. 5A-5C omit a further sub-grid, which is defined between the pairs of horizontal and vertical rows.
Although the touch-sensitive apparatus 100 has been described in some examples of this disclosure as having a panel 1 in which the light is transmitted, between the emitters and detectors, is should be understood that such light transmission can also be provided outside the panel 1. For example, as schematically illustrated in FIGS. 9a-b , the light path between the emitters 2 and the detectors propagate above the touch surface 4. In FIG. 9a , the emitters 2 and the detectors 3 are arranged above the touch surface 4, while being arranged below the touch surface 4 in FIG. 9b . In the latter case, the light path still propagates above the touch surface 4 by being deflected by reflective elements 20 arranged along the sides of the touch surface 4. The touch-sensitive apparatus 100 comprises a signal processor 10 as described in relation to FIGS. 1a-b , and touch detection is achieved as described previously. Thus, for all example embodiments described in this disclosure, the emitters 2 and detectors 3 may be arranged as schematically illustrated in any of FIGS. 1a and 9a -b.
FIG. 6a shows a schematic example of components arranged with varying inter- (S_g) and intra-group (S_c) distances along at least part of an end of a touch surface 4. Hence, the touch-sensitive apparatus 100 may comprise a panel 1 defining a touch surface 4, a first subset of components 2, 3, on a first end of the touch surface 4, a second subset of components 2, 3, on a second end of the touch surface 4, wherein the components comprise emitters 2 and detectors 3. The emitters 2 are being operable for propagating diverging light beams across the touch surface 4, e.g. above the touch surface 4 as shown in FIGS. 9a-b , and the detectors 3 are being operable for detecting the transmitted light from the emitters 2. The components 2, 3, in at least one of the first and second subsets are systematically arranged in spatially separate groups (G) along at least one of the first and second ends. Each group comprises at least two components, as shown in FIGS. 6a-b . At least one of the first and second subsets have an inter-group spacing (S_g) between the groups and an intra-group spacing (S_c) between the components within each group. The groups in said at least one of the first and second subsets have systematically varying inter-group (S_g) spacing and systematically varying intra-group spacing (S_c). This is schematically illustrated in FIGS. 6 a-b by the different lengths of inter-group spacings S_gand S_g′, as well as the different lengths of intra-group spacings S_cand S_c′.
FIG. 7 shows a schematic top-down view of emitters 2 and detectors 3 arranged along perpendicular sides of a touch surface 4. The units of the x- and y-axes are in this example given in mm. The intra-group spacing (S_c) may in this example thus be viewed as the distance between an adjacent emitter- detector pair 2,3 in a group, and the inter-group spacing (S_g) as the distance between these groups. Both the intra-group spacing (S_c) and the inter-group spacing (S_g) has been optimized to minimize the spacing between the transmission paths (D) along the center line (C) as previously discussed. Thus, varying both the intra-group spacing (S_c) and the inter-group spacing (S_g) provides for a further increasing the resolution of the touch-sensitive apparatus 100.
The ratio of the inter-group spacing to the intra-group spacing may be 1.33. This may provide for a particularly effective minimization of the spacing between the transmission paths (D) along the center line (C).
The intra-group spacing in at least one group, in at least one of the first and second subsets, may be in the range 0.25-5 mm. This may also advantageously provide for reducing the size of any gaps in the grid of transmission paths (P) at the center line (C).
At least one emitter 2 and one detector 3, in at least one of the first and second subsets, may be arranged as a component pair 201 having an intra-group spacing (S_c) corresponding substantially to the sum of half the width of said one emitter 2 and half the width of said one detector 3. Thus, the emitter 2 and detector 3 in such component pair may be positioned as close as physically possible, while taking into account any manufacturing tolerances (d), as schematically illustrated in FIG. 8. The intra-group spacing (S_c), which effectively is the spacing between the active areas 2′, 3′, of the respective components 2, 3, may thus be minimized in order to further reduce the spacing between the transmission paths (D) along the center line (C).
At least one of the first and second subsets may comprise a plurality of the mentioned component pairs 201 arranged at defined intervals along the first and/or second end. The component pairs 201 may for example be arranged along the ends, i.e. sides of the touch-sensitive panel 4, with intervals as shown in FIG. 7 for providing an effective reduction of the spacing between the transmission paths (D) along the center line (C). As mentioned, the inter-group spacing (S_g) may be simultaneously varied.
The components within a group (G) may be separated with at least two different intra-group spacings (S_c). This is schematically illustrated in FIG. 6b , showing two different intra-group spacings S_cand S′_cfor group G. The configuration illustrated in FIG. 6b may be referred to as a double-interleaved configuration. I.e. two detectors may be connected to function as one detector unit (3″), and two emitters may be connected to function as one emitter unit (2″). The detector- and emitter unit may be part of a group (G) as illustrated. Arranging the components within this group to have at least two different intra-group spacings (S_c) provides for reducing the spacing between the transmission paths (D) along the center line (C) while benefiting from the double-interleaved configuration. The configuration in FIG. 6b is just one example, and it is conceivable that number and type of component varies within each group, while the intra-group spacings (S_c) may assume a plurality of different values amongst the components.
Each detector 3 within a group may be separated by different intra-group spacings (S_c) from at least two emitters 2 in the same group, i.e. as illustrated in the example of FIG. 6 b.
The groups may comprise interleaved pairs 2″, 3″, of detectors and emitters. For at least a first group, a detector 3 of at least one detector pair 3″ and an emitter 2 of at least one emitter pair 2″ may be arranged as a component pair 201 having an intra-group spacing (S_c) corresponding substantially to the sum of half the width of said one emitter 2 and half the width of said one detector 3. Hence, emitter and detector 2, 3, separated by spacing S′ c as illustrated in FIG. 6b , may be arranged as previously described in relation to FIG. 8. Each group (G) in such double-interleaved configuration may comprise at least one component pair 201 having a separation corresponding substantially to the sum of half the width of said one emitter 2 and half the width of said one detector 3. This provides for a further effective reduction of the spacing between the transmission paths (D) along the center line (C).
As used herein, “horizontal” and “vertical” merely refer to directions on the drawings and does not imply any particular positioning of the panel 1.
The inventive grouping may thus be applied in one or both dimensions (horizontal or vertical) of the panel. It is to be noted that the inventive grouping of components may be applied in combination with any type of conventional arrangement of components, be it based on fan beams or collimated beams, as explained in the Background section. It is also conceivable that the inventive grouping is applied within only a portion of the opposite rows, while the rest of the opposite rows has a conventional arrangement of emitters and/or detectors.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and the scope of the appended claims.
Based on the present teachings, it is merely a matter of routine experimentation and optimization for the skilled person to design a systematic arrangement of the electro-optical components into spatially separated groups so as to achieve a desired property of overall detection grid, with respect to the spacing of intersection points along the center line, the uniformity of the intersection points across the entire touch surface, the average number of detection lines per intersection point on the center line, etc.
For example, the groups may contain more than two electro-optical components. It is even possible to use more than one type of group on either side, e.g. with respect to the number of components or the order of emitters and detectors. Furthermore, it is conceivable to use different groupings on the opposite sides, with respect to inter-group spacing, intra-group spacing, number of components in each group, etc.
Furthermore, all the above embodiments, examples, variants and alternatives given with respect to an FTIR-based touch system are equally applicable to a touch-sensitive apparatus that operates by transmission of other energy than light. In one example, the touch surface may be implemented as an electrically conductive panel, the emitters and detectors may be electrodes that couple electric currents into and out of the panel, and the output signal may be indicative of the resistance/impedance of the panel on the individual detection lines. In another example, the touch surface may include a material acting as a dielectric, the emitters and detectors may be electrodes, and the output signal may be indicative of the capacitance of the panel on the individual detection lines. In yet another example, the touch surface may include a material acting as a vibration conducting medium, the emitters may be vibration generators (e.g. acoustic or piezoelectric transducers), and the detectors may be vibration sensors (e.g. acoustic or piezoelectric sensors).

Claims

1.-19. (canceled)

20. A touch-sensitive apparatus, comprising

a panel defining a touch surface, the panel comprising a first edge, a second edge opposite the first edge, a third edge perpendicular from the first edge, and a fourth edge opposite the third edge;

a first plurality of emitters arranged on the first edge;

a second plurality of emitters arranged on the third edge;

a first plurality of detectors arranged on the second edge, wherein the second edge does not include any emitters; and

a second plurality of detectors arranged on the fourth edge, wherein the fourth edge does not include any emitters.

21. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 20, wherein the first plurality of detectors are divided into a plurality of groups, wherein each group includes at least two detectors, wherein the plurality of groups are spaced apart according to an intra-group spacing and each of the detectors within a group are spaces apart according to an inter-group spacing.

22. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 21, wherein a ratio of the inter-group spacing to the intra-group spacing is 1.33.

23. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 21, wherein the intra-group spacing in at least one group is in the range 0.25-5 mm.

24. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 20, wherein the first plurality of emitters are divided into a plurality of groups, wherein each group includes at least two emitters, wherein the plurality of groups are spaced apart according to an intra-group spacing and each of the emitters within a group are spaces apart according to an inter-group spacing.

25. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 24, wherein a ratio of the inter-group spacing to the intra-group spacing is 1.33.

26. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 24, wherein the intra-group spacing in at least one group is in the range 0.25-5 mm.

27. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 20, wherein the panel is rectangular.

28. A touch-sensitive apparatus, comprising

a panel defining a touch surface, the panel comprising a first edge and a second edge opposite the first edge, a third edge perpendicular from the first edge, and a fourth edge opposite the third edge;

wherein the first edge is configured to include only a first plurality of emitters;

wherein the third edge is configured to include only a second plurality of emitters;

wherein the second edge is configured to include only a first plurality of detectors;

wherein the fourth edge is configured to include only a second plurality of detectors; and

wherein the panel is rectangular.

29. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 28, wherein the first plurality of emitters are divided into a plurality of groups, wherein each group includes at least two emitters, wherein the plurality of groups are spaced apart according to an intra-group spacing and each of the emitters within a group are spaces apart according to an inter-group spacing.

30. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 29, wherein a ratio of the inter-group spacing to the intra-group spacing is 1.33.

31. The touch-sensitive apparatus of claim 29, wherein the intra-group spacing in at least one group is in the range 0.25-5 mm.