US20180376132A1 - Multiscopic image capture system - Google Patents

Multiscopic image capture system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180376132A1
US20180376132A1 US16/019,236 US201816019236A US2018376132A1 US 20180376132 A1 US20180376132 A1 US 20180376132A1 US 201816019236 A US201816019236 A US 201816019236A US 2018376132 A1 US2018376132 A1 US 2018376132A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sensors
cluster
views
sensor
operable
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US16/019,236
Other versions
US11166007B2 (en
Inventor
Jonathan Sean Karafin
Miller H. Schuck
Douglas J. McKnight
Mrityunjay Kumar
Wilhelm Taylor
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Light Field Lab Inc
Original Assignee
Light Field Lab Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Light Field Lab Inc filed Critical Light Field Lab Inc
Priority to US16/019,236 priority Critical patent/US11166007B2/en
Publication of US20180376132A1 publication Critical patent/US20180376132A1/en
Assigned to REALD INC. reassignment REALD INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: TAYLOR, WILHELM, MCKNIGHT, Douglas J, KARAFIN, Jon, SCHUCK, MILLER, KUMAR, MRITYUNJAY
Assigned to LIGHT FIELD LAB, INC. reassignment LIGHT FIELD LAB, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: REALD INC.
Priority to US17/103,596 priority patent/US11558600B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11166007B2 publication Critical patent/US11166007B2/en
Priority to US18/081,171 priority patent/US20230188698A1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N13/00Stereoscopic video systems; Multi-view video systems; Details thereof
    • H04N13/10Processing, recording or transmission of stereoscopic or multi-view image signals
    • H04N13/106Processing image signals
    • H04N13/111Transformation of image signals corresponding to virtual viewpoints, e.g. spatial image interpolation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N13/00Stereoscopic video systems; Multi-view video systems; Details thereof
    • H04N13/20Image signal generators
    • H04N13/204Image signal generators using stereoscopic image cameras
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N13/00Stereoscopic video systems; Multi-view video systems; Details thereof
    • H04N13/20Image signal generators
    • H04N13/282Image signal generators for generating image signals corresponding to three or more geometrical viewpoints, e.g. multi-view systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N13/00Stereoscopic video systems; Multi-view video systems; Details thereof
    • H04N2013/0074Stereoscopic image analysis
    • H04N2013/0081Depth or disparity estimation from stereoscopic image signals
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N2213/00Details of stereoscopic systems
    • H04N2213/001Constructional or mechanical details

Definitions

  • the present disclosure generally relates to imaging capture systems, and more particularly to image capture systems configured to generate a plurality of captured views of the same scene or object.
  • Images capture system may be configured to provide a plurality of captured views of the same scene or object. Intermediate views may be interpolated from the plurality of captured views. The interpolated intermediate views may be used to generate multiscopic content, including stereoscopic, panoramic (e.g., 180-, 270-, 360-degree views), and holographic contents.
  • An exemplary embodiment of a capture system may be operable to generate captured views and a plurality of intermediate views within a pixel disparity range. Td, the plurality of intermediate views being extrapolated from the captured views.
  • the system may include S number of sensors operable to generate the captured views, S being an integer greater than one, wherein each sensor pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity Md. In an embodiment, S is greater than or equal to (Td/Md)+1 wherein the ratio Td/Md is greater than 1. At least two of the S number of sensors may be defined on different substrates.
  • the sensors have an effective sensor width, Sw and an effective pixel resolution. Px and the sensors have optical centers separated by a distance, DIA, which is (SW*DMax*MD)/(PX*FL), Dmax being the distance between the sensor imaging plane and the closest object in a scene, and Fl being the focal length.
  • Md is less than 25% of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view. In an embodiment, Md is less than 10% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view. In an embodiment, Md is less than 1% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
  • the sensors may be arranged in a variety of arrangement, including a vertical array, horizontal array, or a 2 dimensional array.
  • An exemplary embodiment of a capture system comprises: 1) a first cluster of sensors operable to generate first captured views, the first cluster comprising S 1 number of sensors, S 1 being an integer greater than one, wherein a first plurality of intermediate views within a first pixel disparity range, Td 1 , are operable to be extrapolated from the first captured views; and 2) a second cluster of sensors operable to generate the second captured views, the second cluster comprising S 2 number of sensors, S 2 being an integer greater than one, wherein a second plurality of intermediate views within a second pixel disparity range, Td 2 , are operable to be extrapolated from the second captured views.
  • Each sensor of the first cluster pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md 1 , of the first cluster.
  • Each sensor of the second cluster pair with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md 2 , of the second cluster.
  • At least one of the first cluster of sensors and at least one of the second cluster of sensors may be defined on different substrates.
  • the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on a same substrate. In an embodiment, the at least two sensors on the same substrate are operable to capture different views. In another embodiment, the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on different substrates.
  • At least one of the first or the second cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors having substantially the same pixel pitch.
  • An exemplary capture system is operable to generate captured views, and a plurality of intermediate views within a pixel disparity range, Td, are operable to be extrapolated from the captured views.
  • the capture system may include S number of sensors operable to generate the captured views, S being an integer greater than one, wherein each sensor pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity (matched to effective resolution), Md, and wherein S ⁇ (Td/Md)+1 and the ratio Td/Md is greater than 1.
  • the Md is less than 25% of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view; and at least two of the S number of sensors are defined on different substrates. In an embodiment, Md is less than 10% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view. In an embodiment, Md is less than 1% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating a first capture system operable to capture different views of an object
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a theoretical capture system operable to capture different views of an object
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system operable to capture different views of an object and interpolate from the capture views, in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary capture system operable to capture different views of an object, in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating another exemplary capture system operable to capture different views of an object, in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary configuration of a capture system having cluster of sensors, in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 are schematic diagrams illustrating a capture system with a sensor configuration for rotated images, in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system with a polarizing beam splitter, in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram illustrating exemplary elements of a capture system with a relay system, in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 12A is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system with split aperture configuration, in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 12B is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of a split polarizer.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating a capture system 100 configured to generate a plurality of captured views of an objection.
  • the capture system 100 may include a number, N, of optical modules 102 , 104 , 106 configured to capture a scene comprising a closest object 108 . While FIG. 1 , for illustrative purpose, shows only three optical modules 102 , 104 , 106 , it is to be appreciated that the capture system 100 may include other numbers of optical modules, such as, two, four, five or more.
  • the optical modules 102 , 104 , and 106 have optical axes 132 , 134 , and 136 , respectively, and the optical axes 132 , 134 , and 136 are spaced apart by an interaxial distance, D IA .
  • the closest object 108 may be spaced from an optical center 124 of the optical module 104 by a distance D max , which is parallel to the optical axis 134 of the optical module 104 .
  • the optical modules 102 , 104 , and 106 are configured to generate the captured views 142 , 144 , and 146 of the object 108 , respectively.
  • the captured views 142 , 144 may have a disparity 150
  • the captured view 144 , 146 may have a disparity 152
  • the disparity between the first and last captured views 142 and 146 define a total disparity range T D
  • the optical modules 102 , 104 , and 106 may have form factors that result in a large D IA , such as a lens diameter on the order of 10 cm, and the large D IA , in turn, may result in large disparities 150 and 152 . As illustrated in FIG.
  • the captured views 142 , 144 , and 146 do not provide enough information to interpolate intermediate views (e.g., 160 , 162 , 164 , 166 ) within the total disparity range without creating occlusions and substantial distortions.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a theoretical capture system 200 similar to that of capture system 100 except the form factor limitations (e.g., lens diameter) are ignored.
  • the capture system 200 may include theoretical optical modules 202 , 204 , 206 that are superimposed on each other to reduce the D IA and thereby reducing the disparities 250 and 252 of the captured views 242 , 244 , and 246 .
  • the disparities 250 and 252 may be less than a maximum effective disparity, M D , such that intermediate views 260 and 262 may be generated substantially seamlessly without creating occlusions and distortions.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a capture system 400 in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • the capture system 400 may be configured to generate captured views of a scene.
  • the scene information in the capture views generated by the capture system 400 allows for, generating, without substantial artifacts, at least one intermediate view within a pixel disparity range, T D , defined by the captured views.
  • T D may be user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined.
  • the capture system 400 may include at least S number of optical modules, such as optical modules 402 , 404 , and 406 . While only optical modules 402 , 404 , and 406 are shown in FIG. 4 for illustrative purpose, it is to be appreciated that the capture system 400 may include other numbers of optical modules, such as, two, four, five or more.
  • each of the optical modules 402 , 404 , 406 may include at least one imaging sensor 472 , 474 , 476 , respectively, and at least one lens 482 , 484 , 486 , respectively, configured to direct image light to the imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 to generate captured views, thereby defining an effective focal length, F L .
  • at least two of the imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 are defined on different substrates.
  • the capture system 400 may be configured so that the number S is greater than or equal to (T D /M D )+1, in which S may be a number rounded up to the nearest integer.
  • the ratio T D /M D may be greater than 1.
  • the imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 may pair with an adjacent imaging sensor to define a maximum effective disparity M D , which may be less than or equal to (D IA *P X *F L )/(S w *D MAX ), in which:
  • the image sensors 472 , 474 , 476 may have pixels that are not active for any reason, such as digital scaling, and the effective sensor width, S w and the effective pixel resolution, P x , of the image sensors 472 , 474 , 476 may be understood to be defined by the active pixels only.
  • M D allows for the determination of the S number of sensors in the capture system 400 to allow for the interpolation of intermediate views from the capture views within the T D substantially without artifacts. Additionally, various physical configurations of the capture system 400 may be adjusted to achieve a combination of D IA , P X , F L , and S w to achieve M D , thereby allowing for the interpolation of intermediate views from the capture views within the T D substantially without artifacts. In an embodiment, to allow for the interpolation of intermediate views from the capture views within the T D substantially without artifacts, M D maybe less than a percentage of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view. For an intermediate view having a pixel resolution of at least 1K in one dimension, the percentage may be about 25%, or preferably about 10%, or most preferably about 1%.
  • the first direction 490 along which the effective pixel resolution is defined may be referred to as the x-direction, and a second direction 492 orthogonal to the first direction 490 may be referred to as the y-direction.
  • the optical centers 422 , 424 , 426 may be fixed in both the x- and y-directions and define an array of the optical modules 402 , 404 , and 406 .
  • the modules 402 , 404 , and 406 may have optical axes 432 , 434 , 436 , respectively, extending along a third direction 494 referred to as the z-direction, which is orthogonal to the x- and y-directions and perpendicular to the surface of imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 , respectively.
  • the surfaces of the imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 may be configured to be parallel to each other.
  • the imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 may be configured to translate along the x-, y-, or z-direction.
  • the lens 482 , 484 , 486 may be rotatable about the x-, y-, or z-direction, resulting in 3 degrees of freedom plus focal adjustment.
  • the lens of capture system 400 may have a maximum optical distortion of ⁇ OMax %, in which the OMax may be a maximum distortion value to ensure rectilinear or near rectilinear image acquisition.
  • OMax may be user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined.
  • the lens may also have a maximum focal length differential of ⁇ TMax %, in which TMax may be a maximum differential value between the lenses' field of view as captured during image acquisition such that the optical characteristics between each individual module are corrected for optomechanically within the below established tolerances.
  • TMax may be user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined.
  • the resulting captured image may be individually calibrated (if necessary) through use of calibration targets (or similar) to include individual optical distortion correction displacement maps per module to ensure rectilinear image output. Images may be calibrated both optomechanically and/or through hardware and/or software image processing to ensure all capture perspective images contain the lowest possible distortion and variance.
  • the captured pixels may be aligned, before and/or after image processing calibration, within a tolerance of +/ ⁇ TMax % (represented as a percent of pixel width of frame) at the corners of each frame at a distance greater than D Inf about the X image axis.
  • D Inf may be the distance where less than 1 pixel of disparity is possible between any two adjacent optical modules and may be calculated as (F L *D IA *P X )/S W .
  • P Y may be the effective pixel resolution along Y axis produced by imaging sensor.
  • PMax may be a number of pixels
  • TC may be a threshold divisor
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 schematically illustrate the calibration of the capture system 400 for converged capturing, which allows interpolated intermediate views for panoramic (e.g., 180-, 270-, 360-degree views), and holographic contents.
  • the image sensors 472 , 474 , 476 of the capture system 400 may be translated by a distance DS in the x-direction to an offset position relative to the respective optical axes 432 , 434 , 436 , to converge the images captured by all perspectives at the image frustum height and width at a perpendicular distance, CD, from each of the imaging sensors 472 , 474 , 476 .
  • the disparity space may refer to the world positions that exist between the distances that are parallel to optical axis and perpendicular to imaging sensor's surface from optical center of any individual optical module of disparity space values 1 through MD.
  • the image sensors 472 , 474 , 476 of the capture system 400 may be translated by a distance DS in the y-direction or z-direction.
  • the translation of the image sensors 472 , 474 , 476 of the capture system 400 may be effected at DS 2 to converge the images captured by all perspectives at a subsection of the sensor's frustum height and width at a perpendicular distance from each image sensor, CD, while capturing using the full sensor's width and cropping to the resulting desired subsection of image frame, PX 2 .
  • PX 2 may be a user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined value in pixels that represents a subsection of pixel width as captured using the full imaging sensor, and it is less than PX.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system 700 having a first cluster of sensors 710 operable to generate first captured views, the first cluster comprising S 1 number of sensors, S 1 being an integer greater than one.
  • the first cluster of sensors 710 may be similarly configured as the sensors 472 , 474 , 476 of the capture system 400 .
  • a first plurality of intermediate views within a first pixel disparity range, Td 1 are operable to be extrapolated from the first captured views.
  • the capture system 700 may have a second cluster of sensors 720 operable to generate the second captured views, the second cluster comprising S 2 number of sensors, S 2 being an integer greater than one.
  • the second cluster of sensors 720 may be similarly configured as the sensors 472 , 474 , 476 of the capture system 400 .
  • a second plurality of intermediate views within a second pixel disparity range, Td 2 are operable to be extrapolated from the second captured views.
  • Each sensor of the first cluster pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md 1 , of the first cluster.
  • Each sensor of the second cluster pair with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md 2 , of the second cluster.
  • at least one of the first cluster of sensors and at least one of the second cluster of sensors may be defined on different substrates.
  • the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on a same substrate.
  • the at least two sensors on the same substrate are operable to capture different views.
  • the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on different substrates.
  • the limiting factors for configuring D IA , P X , F L , and S w to achieve M D may include sensor module and/or electronics board width, lens outer diameter, sensor offset (for convergence or alignment), and mechanical design and other hardware considerations.
  • SPW refers to the sensor package width including all components, cables, connectors, boards and/or electronics
  • DS refers to the distance of maximum travel required for viewpoint convergence
  • HW refers to the maximum required width of the mechanical design for each individual capture module
  • LD refers to the lens outer diameter and includes any other optical components necessary for practical use.
  • an optical rotation mechanism 830 may be introduced such that the image sensor's height 810 is now the limiting factor within the sensor board/module design 820 by optically rotating the image by +/ ⁇ 90 degrees.
  • the optical rotation mechanism 830 may include the use of mirrors, relays, or prisms, external behind or in front of lens 840 .
  • a beam splitter 1010 disposed between arrays 1020 and 1030 allows for an arrangement where some cameras can have an apparently closer inter-axial distance. More cameras can be added to one or both of the arrays with separations ⁇ Md. Depending on the desired capture inter-axial spacing, it may be possible to add cameras to only one of the arrays.
  • the inter-axial separation of cameras may be reduced below what may be conveniently achieved in the construction of the camera itself.
  • This may be achieved by using a double-telecentric relay lens system 1200 as shown in FIG. 12 to map the entrance pupils 1210 of the cameras to virtual entrance pupils 1220 with a preferred inter-axial separation. It may be convenient to focus and/or zoom the resulting compound system by making adjustments in the relay system rather than adjustments to each camera lens.
  • the virtual pupils are, in this example, a demagnified version of the cameras' entrance pupils.
  • the pupil diameter is demagnified by the ratio of f 1 /f 2 .
  • the field of view of the compound system is increased over the cameras' FOV by f 2 /f 1 .
  • the field stop 1230 may not be physically present, but is useful to aid in the description. It can be arranged such that the edge of the fields of all the cameras coincide with the edge of the field stop.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B illustrate an embodiment of a capture system 1300 comprising an aperture splitting configuration to allow sensors 1310 , 1312 , 1314 , and 1316 to image a scene.
  • the capture system 1300 may include at least one split polarizer 1320 and a PBS 1322 to cooperate to split incoming light from a camera 1330 into 4 paths to the sensors 1310 , 1312 , 1314 , and 1316 .
  • embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of optical systems and projection systems.
  • the embodiment may include or work with a variety of projectors, projection systems, optical components, computer systems, processors, self-contained projector systems, visual and/or audiovisual systems and electrical and/or optical devices.
  • aspects of the present disclosure may be used with practically any apparatus related to optical and electrical devices, optical systems, presentation systems or any apparatus that may contain any type of optical system. Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure may be employed in optical systems, devices used in visual and/or optical presentations, visual peripherals and so on and in a number of computing environments including the Internet, intranets, local area networks, wide area networks and so on.
  • the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provide an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from zero percent to ten percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, angles, et cetera. Such relativity between items ranges between approximately zero percent to ten percent.

Abstract

Systems, devices, and methods disclosed herein may generate captured views and a plurality of intermediate views within a pixel disparity range, Td, the plurality of intermediate views being extrapolated from the captured views.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present disclosure generally relates to imaging capture systems, and more particularly to image capture systems configured to generate a plurality of captured views of the same scene or object.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Images capture system may be configured to provide a plurality of captured views of the same scene or object. Intermediate views may be interpolated from the plurality of captured views. The interpolated intermediate views may be used to generate multiscopic content, including stereoscopic, panoramic (e.g., 180-, 270-, 360-degree views), and holographic contents.
  • SUMMARY
  • An exemplary embodiment of a capture system may be operable to generate captured views and a plurality of intermediate views within a pixel disparity range. Td, the plurality of intermediate views being extrapolated from the captured views. The system may include S number of sensors operable to generate the captured views, S being an integer greater than one, wherein each sensor pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity Md. In an embodiment, S is greater than or equal to (Td/Md)+1 wherein the ratio Td/Md is greater than 1. At least two of the S number of sensors may be defined on different substrates. The sensors have an effective sensor width, Sw and an effective pixel resolution. Px and the sensors have optical centers separated by a distance, DIA, which is (SW*DMax*MD)/(PX*FL), Dmax being the distance between the sensor imaging plane and the closest object in a scene, and Fl being the focal length.
  • In an embodiment, Md is less than 25% of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view. In an embodiment, Md is less than 10% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view. In an embodiment, Md is less than 1% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
  • In an embodiment, the image capture system may further include optical modules having lenses operable to direct image light towards the sensors, the lenses each define an effective focal length, Fl, wherein optical centers of adjacent optical modules are spaced apart by a maximum inter axial distance, Dia, or less, the Dia being defined by the equation: Dia=(Ws*DMax*MD)/(PX*FL), wherein DMax is a distance between a closest capture object and the optical center of a nearest optical module.
  • The sensors may be arranged in a variety of arrangement, including a vertical array, horizontal array, or a 2 dimensional array.
  • In an embodiment, the sensors each have a sensor width, Ws, defined along a first direction, have a pixel resolution, Px, along the first direction, and are disposed in optical modules and the capture system further include optical modules comprising lenses operable to direct image light towards the sensors, the lenses each define an effective focal length, Fl, and optical centers of adjacent optical modules are spaced apart by a maximum inter axial distance, Dia, or less, the Dia being defined by the equation: Dia=(Ws*DMax*MD)/(PX*FL), wherein DMax is a distance between a closest capture object and the optical center of a nearest optical module.
  • An exemplary embodiment of a capture system comprises: 1) a first cluster of sensors operable to generate first captured views, the first cluster comprising S1 number of sensors, S1 being an integer greater than one, wherein a first plurality of intermediate views within a first pixel disparity range, Td1, are operable to be extrapolated from the first captured views; and 2) a second cluster of sensors operable to generate the second captured views, the second cluster comprising S2 number of sensors, S2 being an integer greater than one, wherein a second plurality of intermediate views within a second pixel disparity range, Td2, are operable to be extrapolated from the second captured views. Each sensor of the first cluster pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md1, of the first cluster. Each sensor of the second cluster pair with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md2, of the second cluster. In an embodiment, S1≥(Td1/Md1)+1 and S2≥(Td2/Md2)+1, and the ratios Td1/Md1 and Td2/Md2 both greater than 1. At least one of the first cluster of sensors and at least one of the second cluster of sensors may be defined on different substrates.
  • In an embodiment, the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on a same substrate. In an embodiment, the at least two sensors on the same substrate are operable to capture different views. In another embodiment, the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on different substrates.
  • In an embodiment, at least one of the first or the second cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors having substantially the same pixel pitch.
  • An exemplary capture system is operable to generate captured views, and a plurality of intermediate views within a pixel disparity range, Td, are operable to be extrapolated from the captured views. The capture system may include S number of sensors operable to generate the captured views, S being an integer greater than one, wherein each sensor pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity (matched to effective resolution), Md, and wherein S≥(Td/Md)+1 and the ratio Td/Md is greater than 1.
  • In an embodiment, the Md is less than 25% of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view; and at least two of the S number of sensors are defined on different substrates. In an embodiment, Md is less than 10% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view. In an embodiment, Md is less than 1% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Embodiments are illustrated by way of example in the accompanying figures, in which like reference numbers indicate similar parts, and in which:
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating a first capture system operable to capture different views of an object;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a theoretical capture system operable to capture different views of an object;
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system operable to capture different views of an object and interpolate from the capture views, in accordance with the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary capture system operable to capture different views of an object, in accordance with the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating another exemplary capture system operable to capture different views of an object, in accordance with the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary configuration of a capture system having cluster of sensors, in accordance with the present disclosure;
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 are schematic diagrams illustrating a capture system with a sensor configuration for rotated images, in accordance with the present disclosure;
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system with a polarizing beam splitter, in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram illustrating exemplary elements of a capture system with a relay system, in accordance with the present disclosure; and
  • FIG. 12A is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system with split aperture configuration, in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 12B is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of a split polarizer.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating a capture system 100 configured to generate a plurality of captured views of an objection. The capture system 100 may include a number, N, of optical modules 102, 104, 106 configured to capture a scene comprising a closest object 108. While FIG. 1, for illustrative purpose, shows only three optical modules 102, 104, 106, it is to be appreciated that the capture system 100 may include other numbers of optical modules, such as, two, four, five or more. The optical modules 102, 104, and 106 have optical axes 132, 134, and 136, respectively, and the optical axes 132, 134, and 136 are spaced apart by an interaxial distance, DIA. The closest object 108 may be spaced from an optical center 124 of the optical module 104 by a distance Dmax, which is parallel to the optical axis 134 of the optical module 104. The optical modules 102, 104, and 106 are configured to generate the captured views 142, 144, and 146 of the object 108, respectively. The captured views 142, 144 may have a disparity 150, and the captured view 144, 146 may have a disparity 152. The disparity between the first and last captured views 142 and 146 define a total disparity range TD. In an embodiment, the optical modules 102, 104, and 106 may have form factors that result in a large DIA, such as a lens diameter on the order of 10 cm, and the large DIA, in turn, may result in large disparities 150 and 152. As illustrated in FIG. 2, with large disparities 150 and 152, the captured views 142, 144, and 146 do not provide enough information to interpolate intermediate views (e.g., 160, 162, 164, 166) within the total disparity range without creating occlusions and substantial distortions.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a theoretical capture system 200 similar to that of capture system 100 except the form factor limitations (e.g., lens diameter) are ignored. The capture system 200 may include theoretical optical modules 202, 204, 206 that are superimposed on each other to reduce the DIA and thereby reducing the disparities 250 and 252 of the captured views 242, 244, and 246. The disparities 250 and 252 may be less than a maximum effective disparity, MD, such that intermediate views 260 and 262 may be generated substantially seamlessly without creating occlusions and distortions.
  • While the MD in FIG. 3 was achieved by superimposing the optical modules 202, 204, 206, which is physically impossible, it is to be appreciated that, in accordance with the principles disclosed in the present disclosure, various hardware configurations of the capture systems of the present disclosure may be configured to allow for capture views with a MD such that intermediate views within a total disparity range. TD, may be generated substantially seamlessly without creating occlusions and distortions.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of a capture system 400 in accordance with the present disclosure. The capture system 400 may be configured to generate captured views of a scene. The scene information in the capture views generated by the capture system 400 allows for, generating, without substantial artifacts, at least one intermediate view within a pixel disparity range, TD, defined by the captured views. TD may be user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined.
  • In an embodiment, the capture system 400 may include at least S number of optical modules, such as optical modules 402, 404, and 406. While only optical modules 402, 404, and 406 are shown in FIG. 4 for illustrative purpose, it is to be appreciated that the capture system 400 may include other numbers of optical modules, such as, two, four, five or more. In an embodiment, each of the optical modules 402, 404, 406 may include at least one imaging sensor 472, 474, 476, respectively, and at least one lens 482, 484, 486, respectively, configured to direct image light to the imaging sensors 472, 474, 476 to generate captured views, thereby defining an effective focal length, FL. In an embodiment, at least two of the imaging sensors 472, 474, 476 are defined on different substrates.
  • The capture system 400 may be configured so that the number S is greater than or equal to (TD/MD)+1, in which S may be a number rounded up to the nearest integer. The ratio TD/MD may be greater than 1. The imaging sensors 472, 474, 476 may pair with an adjacent imaging sensor to define a maximum effective disparity MD, which may be less than or equal to (DIA*PX*FL)/(Sw*DMAX), in which:
      • Sw is an effective sensor width of the image sensors 472, 474, 476, the Sw being defined along a first direction 490;
      • PX is an effective pixel resolution of the image sensors 472, 474, 476 along the first direction 490;
      • DIA is an interaxial distance between optical centers 422, 424, 426 of adjacent optical modules 402, 404, 406; and
      • DMAX is a distance between the closest object 108 in the scene and the optical center 424 of the optical module 404 closest to the closest object 108.
  • In an embodiment, the image sensors 472, 474, 476 may have pixels that are not active for any reason, such as digital scaling, and the effective sensor width, Sw and the effective pixel resolution, Px, of the image sensors 472, 474, 476 may be understood to be defined by the active pixels only.
  • It is to be appreciated from that MD allows for the determination of the S number of sensors in the capture system 400 to allow for the interpolation of intermediate views from the capture views within the TD substantially without artifacts. Additionally, various physical configurations of the capture system 400 may be adjusted to achieve a combination of DIA, PX, FL, and Sw to achieve MD, thereby allowing for the interpolation of intermediate views from the capture views within the TD substantially without artifacts. In an embodiment, to allow for the interpolation of intermediate views from the capture views within the TD substantially without artifacts, MD maybe less than a percentage of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view. For an intermediate view having a pixel resolution of at least 1K in one dimension, the percentage may be about 25%, or preferably about 10%, or most preferably about 1%.
  • The first direction 490 along which the effective pixel resolution is defined may be referred to as the x-direction, and a second direction 492 orthogonal to the first direction 490 may be referred to as the y-direction. In this geometry, the optical centers 422, 424, 426 may be fixed in both the x- and y-directions and define an array of the optical modules 402, 404, and 406. In an embodiment, the modules 402, 404, and 406 may have optical axes 432, 434, 436, respectively, extending along a third direction 494 referred to as the z-direction, which is orthogonal to the x- and y-directions and perpendicular to the surface of imaging sensors 472, 474, 476, respectively.
  • In an embodiment, the surfaces of the imaging sensors 472, 474, 476 may be configured to be parallel to each other. For reasons to be discussed below in greater detail, in an embodiment, the imaging sensors 472, 474, 476 may be configured to translate along the x-, y-, or z-direction. In an embodiment, the lens 482, 484, 486 may be rotatable about the x-, y-, or z-direction, resulting in 3 degrees of freedom plus focal adjustment.
  • In an embodiment, the lens of capture system 400 may have a maximum optical distortion of <OMax %, in which the OMax may be a maximum distortion value to ensure rectilinear or near rectilinear image acquisition. OMax may be user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined. The lens may also have a maximum focal length differential of <TMax %, in which TMax may be a maximum differential value between the lenses' field of view as captured during image acquisition such that the optical characteristics between each individual module are corrected for optomechanically within the below established tolerances. TMax may be user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined. The resulting captured image, given the above tolerances, may be individually calibrated (if necessary) through use of calibration targets (or similar) to include individual optical distortion correction displacement maps per module to ensure rectilinear image output. Images may be calibrated both optomechanically and/or through hardware and/or software image processing to ensure all capture perspective images contain the lowest possible distortion and variance. In an embodiment, the captured pixels may be aligned, before and/or after image processing calibration, within a tolerance of +/−TMax % (represented as a percent of pixel width of frame) at the corners of each frame at a distance greater than DInf about the X image axis. DInf may be the distance where less than 1 pixel of disparity is possible between any two adjacent optical modules and may be calculated as (FL*DIA*PX)/SW.
  • The captured pixels may be aligned within a tolerance of +/−(TMax/TC) % (represented as a percent of pixel width of frame) at the center of each frame at a distance greater than DInf, before and/or after image processing calibration, within a tolerance of +/−TYMax % (represented as a percent of pixel width of frame) at the corners of each frame at a distance greater than DInf about the Y image axis, in which: TMax %=PMax/PX; TYMax %=TMax %*(PY/PX). PY may be the effective pixel resolution along Y axis produced by imaging sensor. PMax may be a number of pixels, and TC may be a threshold divisor
  • Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6, which schematically illustrate the calibration of the capture system 400 for converged capturing, which allows interpolated intermediate views for panoramic (e.g., 180-, 270-, 360-degree views), and holographic contents. The image sensors 472, 474, 476 of the capture system 400 may be translated by a distance DS in the x-direction to an offset position relative to the respective optical axes 432, 434, 436, to converge the images captured by all perspectives at the image frustum height and width at a perpendicular distance, CD, from each of the imaging sensors 472, 474, 476. CD may be determined by the equation CD=((DInf−DMax)*CA %)+DMax, in which CA % is a percent between 0 and 100% to determine a relative position between the nearest and furthest captured positions within a disparity space. The disparity space may refer to the world positions that exist between the distances that are parallel to optical axis and perpendicular to imaging sensor's surface from optical center of any individual optical module of disparity space values 1 through MD. In an embodiment, the image sensors 472, 474, 476 of the capture system 400 may be translated by a distance DS in the y-direction or z-direction. DS may be determined by the equation. DS=((SN#*DIA)/CD)*FL.
  • In an embodiment as illustrated in FIG. 6, the translation of the image sensors 472, 474, 476 of the capture system 400 may be effected at DS2 to converge the images captured by all perspectives at a subsection of the sensor's frustum height and width at a perpendicular distance from each image sensor, CD, while capturing using the full sensor's width and cropping to the resulting desired subsection of image frame, PX2. DS2 may be considered to be a maximum translation distance to overlap the two subsection frames within the full sensor resolution and may be determined by the equation, DS2=tan(DIA)*FL. PX2 may be a user defined, automatically calculated, or predefined value in pixels that represents a subsection of pixel width as captured using the full imaging sensor, and it is less than PX.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating a capture system 700 having a first cluster of sensors 710 operable to generate first captured views, the first cluster comprising S1 number of sensors, S1 being an integer greater than one. The first cluster of sensors 710 may be similarly configured as the sensors 472, 474, 476 of the capture system 400. A first plurality of intermediate views within a first pixel disparity range, Td1, are operable to be extrapolated from the first captured views. The capture system 700 may have a second cluster of sensors 720 operable to generate the second captured views, the second cluster comprising S2 number of sensors, S2 being an integer greater than one. The second cluster of sensors 720 may be similarly configured as the sensors 472, 474, 476 of the capture system 400. A second plurality of intermediate views within a second pixel disparity range, Td2, are operable to be extrapolated from the second captured views. Each sensor of the first cluster pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md1, of the first cluster. Each sensor of the second cluster pair with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md2, of the second cluster. In an embodiment, S1≥(Td1/Md1)+1 and S2≥(Td2/Md2)+1, and the ratios Td1/Md1 and Td2/Md2 both greater than 1. In an embodiment, at least one of the first cluster of sensors and at least one of the second cluster of sensors may be defined on different substrates. In an embodiment, the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on a same substrate. In an embodiment, the at least two sensors on the same substrate are operable to capture different views. In another embodiment, the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on different substrates. In an embodiment, at least one of the first or the second cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors having substantially the same pixel pitch. Referring to FIG. 7, one or more individual clusters 710 and 720 may be separated by a distance per segment, DSub, where DSub=((DIA*((SN−SN2)+(R−1)))/(R−1))+/−VS.
  • It is to be appreciated that the limiting factors for configuring DIA, PX, FL, and Sw to achieve MD may include sensor module and/or electronics board width, lens outer diameter, sensor offset (for convergence or alignment), and mechanical design and other hardware considerations. This limiting factor can be expressed as the minimum distance possible between each optical module, DMin, where DMin=max(SPW+DS (or DS2), HW, LD). SPW refers to the sensor package width including all components, cables, connectors, boards and/or electronics; DS refers to the distance of maximum travel required for viewpoint convergence; HW refers to the maximum required width of the mechanical design for each individual capture module; LD refers to the lens outer diameter and includes any other optical components necessary for practical use.
  • Referring to the exemplary capture system 800 as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, to further optimize the necessary spacing and captured pixel resolution based upon the available sensor width 805, an optical rotation mechanism 830 may be introduced such that the image sensor's height 810 is now the limiting factor within the sensor board/module design 820 by optically rotating the image by +/−90 degrees. The optical rotation mechanism 830 may include the use of mirrors, relays, or prisms, external behind or in front of lens 840.
  • In an embodiment as shown in the capture system 1000 in FIG. 10, a beam splitter 1010 disposed between arrays 1020 and 1030 allows for an arrangement where some cameras can have an apparently closer inter-axial distance. More cameras can be added to one or both of the arrays with separations≥Md. Depending on the desired capture inter-axial spacing, it may be possible to add cameras to only one of the arrays.
  • Referring to FIG. 11, in the field of 3D image capture it may be helpful, in some circumstances, for the inter-axial separation of cameras to be reduced below what may be conveniently achieved in the construction of the camera itself. This may be achieved by using a double-telecentric relay lens system 1200 as shown in FIG. 12 to map the entrance pupils 1210 of the cameras to virtual entrance pupils 1220 with a preferred inter-axial separation. It may be convenient to focus and/or zoom the resulting compound system by making adjustments in the relay system rather than adjustments to each camera lens. The virtual pupils are, in this example, a demagnified version of the cameras' entrance pupils. The pupil diameter is demagnified by the ratio of f1/f2. Correspondingly, the field of view of the compound system is increased over the cameras' FOV by f2/f1. The field stop 1230 may not be physically present, but is useful to aid in the description. It can be arranged such that the edge of the fields of all the cameras coincide with the edge of the field stop.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B illustrate an embodiment of a capture system 1300 comprising an aperture splitting configuration to allow sensors 1310, 1312, 1314, and 1316 to image a scene. The capture system 1300 may include at least one split polarizer 1320 and a PBS 1322 to cooperate to split incoming light from a camera 1330 into 4 paths to the sensors 1310, 1312, 1314, and 1316.
  • It should be noted that embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of optical systems and projection systems. The embodiment may include or work with a variety of projectors, projection systems, optical components, computer systems, processors, self-contained projector systems, visual and/or audiovisual systems and electrical and/or optical devices. Aspects of the present disclosure may be used with practically any apparatus related to optical and electrical devices, optical systems, presentation systems or any apparatus that may contain any type of optical system. Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure may be employed in optical systems, devices used in visual and/or optical presentations, visual peripherals and so on and in a number of computing environments including the Internet, intranets, local area networks, wide area networks and so on.
  • Additionally, it should be understood that the embodiment is not limited in its application or creation to the details of the particular arrangements shown, because the embodiment is capable of other variations. Moreover, aspects of the embodiments may be set forth in different combinations and arrangements to define embodiments unique in their own right. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
  • As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provide an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from zero percent to ten percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, angles, et cetera. Such relativity between items ranges between approximately zero percent to ten percent.
      • i. While various embodiments in accordance with the principles disclosed herein have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of this disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with any claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
        Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the embodiment(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically, and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that certain technology is prior art to any embodiment(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the embodiment(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple embodiments may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the embodiment(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A capture system operable to generate captured views of a scene, the captured views comprising information for generating at least one intermediate view within a pixel disparity range defined by the captured views, TD, the system comprising:
at least S number of optical modules, each of the optical module comprising:
at least one imaging sensor;
at least one lens configured to direct image light to the at least one imaging sensor to generate one of the captured views, thereby defining an effective focal length, FL;
wherein the S number of optical modules comprise at least S number of respective imaging sensors, S being an integer, and at last two of the at least S number of imaging sensors being defined on different substrates;
wherein each of the at least S number of imaging sensors pairs with an adjacent imaging sensor to define a maximum effective disparity MD;
wherein S is greater than or equal to (TD/MD)+1, the ratio TD/MD being greater than 1;
wherein MD is less than or equal to (DIA*PX*FL)/(Sw*DMAX), in which
Sw is an effective sensor width of the at least S number of image sensors, the Sw being defined along a first direction;
PX is an effective pixel resolution of the at least S number of image sensors along the first direction;
DIA is an interaxial distance between optical centers of adjacent optical modules; and
DMAX is a distance between a closest object in the scene and an optical center of an optical module closest to the closest object.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the MD is less than 25% of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view of the at least one intermediate view.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the MD is less than 10% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the MD is less than 1% of the pixel resolution of the rust intermediate view.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensors are arranged in a horizontal array.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensors are arranged in a vertical array.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensors are arranged in a two dimensional array.
8. A capture system operable to generate captured views of a scene, the captured views comprising information for generating at least one intermediate view within a pixel disparity range defined by the captured views, TD, the system comprising:
at least S number of optical modules comprising at least S number of respective imaging sensors, S being an integer;
wherein each of the at least S number of imaging sensors pairs with an adjacent imaging sensor to define a maximum effective disparity MD;
wherein S is greater than or equal to (TD/MD)+1, the ratio TD/MD being greater than 1;
wherein the at least S number of image sensors define substantially parallel imaging planes, and the at least S number of image sensors are configured to translate along a first direction in the parallel planes.
9. The capture system of claim 8, wherein the at least S number of image sensors are configured to translate along a second direction orthogonal to the first direction in the parallel planes.
10. The capture system of claim 8, wherein the at least S number of image sensors are configured to translate along a direction perpendicular to the parallel planes.
11. The system of claim 8, wherein the MD is less than 25% of a pixel resolution of a first intermediate view of the at least one intermediate view.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the MD is less than 10% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the MD is less than 1% of the pixel resolution of the first intermediate view.
14. A capture system comprising:
a first cluster of sensors operable to generate first captured views, the first cluster comprising S1 number of sensors, S1 being an integer greater than one, wherein a first plurality of intermediate views within a first pixel disparity range, Td1, are operable to be extrapolated from the first captured views;
a second cluster of sensors operable to generate the second captured views, the second cluster comprising S2 number of sensors, S2 being an integer greater than one, wherein a second plurality of intermediate views within a second pixel disparity range, Td2, are operable to be extrapolated from the second captured views;
wherein each sensor of the first cluster pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md1, of the first cluster;
wherein each sensor of the second cluster pair with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md2, of the second cluster;
wherein S1≥(Td1/Md1)+1;
wherein S2≥(Td2/Md2))+1;
wherein the ratios Td1/Md1 and Td2/Md2 both greater than 1; and
wherein at least one of the first cluster of sensors and at least one of the second cluster of sensors are defined on different substrates.
15. The system of claim 14, wherein the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on a same substrate.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the at least two sensors on the same substrate are operable to capture different views.
17. The system of claim 14, wherein the first cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors defined on different substrates.
18. A capture system comprising:
a first cluster of sensors operable to generate first captured views, the first cluster comprising S1 number of sensors, S1 being an integer greater than one, wherein a first plurality of intermediate views within a first pixel disparity range, Td1, we operable to be extrapolated from the first captured views;
a second cluster of sensors operable to generate the second captured views, the second cluster comprising S2 number of sensors, S2 being an integer greater than one, wherein a second plurality of intermediate views within a second pixel disparity range, Td2, are operable to be extrapolated from the second captured views;
wherein each sensor of the first cluster pairs with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md1, of the first cluster,
wherein each sensor of the second cluster pair with at least one other sensor to define a maximum effective disparity, Md2, of the second cluster;
wherein S1≥(Td1/Md1)+1;
wherein S2≥(Td2/Md2)+1;
wherein the ratios Td1/Md1 and Td2/Md2 are both greater than 1; and
wherein at least one of the first or the second cluster of sensors comprise at least two sensors having substantially the same pixel pitch.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the sensors are arranged in a one-dimensional array.
20. The system of claim 18, wherein the sensors are arranged in a two dimensional array.
US16/019,236 2014-09-26 2018-06-26 Multiscopic image capture system Active US11166007B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/019,236 US11166007B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2018-06-26 Multiscopic image capture system
US17/103,596 US11558600B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2020-11-24 Multiscopic image capture system
US18/081,171 US20230188698A1 (en) 2014-09-26 2022-12-14 Multiscopic image capture system

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201462056366P 2014-09-26 2014-09-26
PCT/US2015/000118 WO2016048402A2 (en) 2014-09-26 2015-09-29 Multiscopic image capture system
US15/418,637 US10009597B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2017-01-27 Multiscopic image capture system
US16/019,236 US11166007B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2018-06-26 Multiscopic image capture system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/418,637 Continuation US10009597B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2017-01-27 Multiscopic image capture system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/103,596 Continuation US11558600B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2020-11-24 Multiscopic image capture system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180376132A1 true US20180376132A1 (en) 2018-12-27
US11166007B2 US11166007B2 (en) 2021-11-02

Family

ID=55582226

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/418,637 Active US10009597B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2017-01-27 Multiscopic image capture system
US16/019,236 Active US11166007B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2018-06-26 Multiscopic image capture system
US17/103,596 Active 2035-10-22 US11558600B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2020-11-24 Multiscopic image capture system
US18/081,171 Pending US20230188698A1 (en) 2014-09-26 2022-12-14 Multiscopic image capture system

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/418,637 Active US10009597B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2017-01-27 Multiscopic image capture system

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/103,596 Active 2035-10-22 US11558600B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2020-11-24 Multiscopic image capture system
US18/081,171 Pending US20230188698A1 (en) 2014-09-26 2022-12-14 Multiscopic image capture system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (4) US10009597B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2016048402A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016048402A2 (en) * 2014-09-26 2016-03-31 Reald Multiscopic image capture system
AU2017296073B2 (en) 2016-07-15 2019-02-14 Light Field Lab, Inc. Energy propagation and transverse Anderson localization with two-dimensional, light field and holographic relays
WO2019140269A1 (en) 2018-01-14 2019-07-18 Light Field Lab, Inc. Systems and methods for transverse energy localization in energy relays using ordered structures
US11650354B2 (en) 2018-01-14 2023-05-16 Light Field Lab, Inc. Systems and methods for rendering data from a 3D environment
CN112074773B (en) 2018-01-14 2024-02-02 光场实验室公司 Four-dimensional energy field packaging assembly
US10951875B2 (en) 2018-07-03 2021-03-16 Raxium, Inc. Display processing circuitry
JP7163656B2 (en) * 2018-07-30 2022-11-01 株式会社リコー Delivery system, receiving client terminal, delivery method
EP4042364A4 (en) 2019-11-01 2023-11-22 Google LLC Light field displays incorporating eye trackers and methods for generating views for a light field display using eye tracking information
KR20220107831A (en) * 2021-01-26 2022-08-02 삼성전자주식회사 Display apparatus and control method thereof
CN115484377B (en) * 2021-06-15 2023-08-29 杭州海康威视数字技术股份有限公司 Camera for panoramic imaging of a scene

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020122113A1 (en) * 1999-08-09 2002-09-05 Foote Jonathan T. Method and system for compensating for parallax in multiple camera systems
US20080174670A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2008-07-24 Richard Ian Olsen Simultaneous multiple field of view digital cameras
US20110069189A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2011-03-24 Pelican Imaging Corporation Capturing and processing of images using monolithic camera array with heterogeneous imagers
US20120147205A1 (en) * 2010-12-14 2012-06-14 Pelican Imaging Corporation Systems and methods for synthesizing high resolution images using super-resolution processes
US20130250150A1 (en) * 2010-05-03 2013-09-26 Michael R. Malone Devices and methods for high-resolution image and video capture
US20140078333A1 (en) * 2012-09-19 2014-03-20 Google Inc. Imaging device with a plurality of pixel arrays
US20150146029A1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2015-05-28 Pelican Imaging Corporation Array Camera Configurations Incorporating Multiple Constituent Array Cameras
US20150294472A1 (en) * 2014-04-14 2015-10-15 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus and computer program product for disparity estimation of plenoptic images
US20160105660A1 (en) * 2013-06-05 2016-04-14 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus and image processing method
US10009597B2 (en) * 2014-09-26 2018-06-26 Light Field Lab, Inc. Multiscopic image capture system
US20190364263A1 (en) * 2013-02-15 2019-11-28 Red.Com, Llc Computational imaging device

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7286689B2 (en) * 2003-06-07 2007-10-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Motion estimation for compression of calibrated multi-view image sequences
US8736672B2 (en) * 2006-08-24 2014-05-27 Reald Inc. Algorithmic interaxial reduction
CA2714932A1 (en) * 2009-09-23 2011-03-23 Her Majesty The Queen In The Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Industry Image interpolation for motion/disparity compensation
US9117310B2 (en) * 2010-04-02 2015-08-25 Imec Virtual camera system
EP2765775A1 (en) * 2013-02-06 2014-08-13 Koninklijke Philips N.V. System for generating intermediate view images

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020122113A1 (en) * 1999-08-09 2002-09-05 Foote Jonathan T. Method and system for compensating for parallax in multiple camera systems
US20080174670A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2008-07-24 Richard Ian Olsen Simultaneous multiple field of view digital cameras
US20110069189A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2011-03-24 Pelican Imaging Corporation Capturing and processing of images using monolithic camera array with heterogeneous imagers
US20130250150A1 (en) * 2010-05-03 2013-09-26 Michael R. Malone Devices and methods for high-resolution image and video capture
US20120147205A1 (en) * 2010-12-14 2012-06-14 Pelican Imaging Corporation Systems and methods for synthesizing high resolution images using super-resolution processes
US20140078333A1 (en) * 2012-09-19 2014-03-20 Google Inc. Imaging device with a plurality of pixel arrays
US20190364263A1 (en) * 2013-02-15 2019-11-28 Red.Com, Llc Computational imaging device
US20160105660A1 (en) * 2013-06-05 2016-04-14 Sony Corporation Image processing apparatus and image processing method
US20150146029A1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2015-05-28 Pelican Imaging Corporation Array Camera Configurations Incorporating Multiple Constituent Array Cameras
US20150146030A1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2015-05-28 Pelican Imaging Corporation Array Camera Configurations Incorporating Constituent Array Cameras and Constituent Cameras
US20150294472A1 (en) * 2014-04-14 2015-10-15 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus and computer program product for disparity estimation of plenoptic images
US10009597B2 (en) * 2014-09-26 2018-06-26 Light Field Lab, Inc. Multiscopic image capture system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2016048402A2 (en) 2016-03-31
US20210314552A1 (en) 2021-10-07
US10009597B2 (en) 2018-06-26
US20170237970A1 (en) 2017-08-17
US11558600B2 (en) 2023-01-17
WO2016048402A9 (en) 2016-09-22
US20230188698A1 (en) 2023-06-15
US11166007B2 (en) 2021-11-02
WO2016048402A3 (en) 2016-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11558600B2 (en) Multiscopic image capture system
CN108886611B (en) Splicing method and device of panoramic stereo video system
CN101796548B (en) Stereoscopic image generation device, stereoscopic image generation method
WO2012050040A1 (en) Stereoscopic image conversion device and stereoscopic image display device
WO2006112536A1 (en) Panoramic three-dimensional adapter for an optical instrument and a combination of such an adapter and such an optical instrument
JP5450330B2 (en) Image processing apparatus and method, and stereoscopic image display apparatus
JP2003502925A (en) How to shoot 3D scenes with one portable camera
US10379332B2 (en) Stereoscopic viewing apparatus
WO2013001880A1 (en) Three-dimensional imaging device and electronic equipment provided with same
JP2010181826A (en) Three-dimensional image forming apparatus
US10602122B2 (en) Monocular stereoscopic camera
JP2012227679A (en) Twin-lens camera
TWI486052B (en) Three-dimensional image processing device and three-dimensional image processing method
Schreer et al. Geometrical design concept for panoramic 3D video acquisition
KR102031485B1 (en) Multi-view capturing apparatus and method using single 360-degree camera and planar mirrors
US11924395B2 (en) Device comprising a multi-aperture imaging device for generating a depth map
JP2011182003A (en) Panorama camera and 360-degree panorama stereoscopic video system
AU2017290388A1 (en) Stereoscopic image capture
JP5243359B2 (en) Stereoscopic image generation system and program
CN212163540U (en) Omnidirectional stereoscopic vision camera configuration system
JP2012129714A (en) Optical system and imaging apparatus comprising the same
TWI725620B (en) Omnidirectional stereo vision camera configuration system and camera configuration method
JP2022073568A (en) Lens for panoramic photographing and digital camera for panoramic photographing
Joblove Development of Tools and Workflow for “Run-and-Gun” Video Production in Stereoscopic 3D
JP2007194694A (en) Three-dimensional video photographing apparatus and program thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

AS Assignment

Owner name: REALD INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KARAFIN, JON;SCHUCK, MILLER;MCKNIGHT, DOUGLAS J;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20160906 TO 20161130;REEL/FRAME:049011/0132

Owner name: LIGHT FIELD LAB, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:REALD INC.;REEL/FRAME:049011/0152

Effective date: 20180310

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PTGR); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE