US20180331696A1 - Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder - Google Patents

Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180331696A1
US20180331696A1 US16/029,677 US201816029677A US2018331696A1 US 20180331696 A1 US20180331696 A1 US 20180331696A1 US 201816029677 A US201816029677 A US 201816029677A US 2018331696 A1 US2018331696 A1 US 2018331696A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
decoding
ldpc
iteration
clock frequency
throughput
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US16/029,677
Inventor
Chen-Yu Weng
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Silicon Motion Inc
Original Assignee
Silicon Motion Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Silicon Motion Inc filed Critical Silicon Motion Inc
Priority to US16/029,677 priority Critical patent/US20180331696A1/en
Publication of US20180331696A1 publication Critical patent/US20180331696A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/03Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
    • H03M13/05Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
    • H03M13/11Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits using multiple parity bits
    • H03M13/1102Codes on graphs and decoding on graphs, e.g. low-density parity check [LDPC] codes
    • H03M13/1105Decoding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/03Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
    • H03M13/05Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
    • H03M13/11Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits using multiple parity bits
    • H03M13/1102Codes on graphs and decoding on graphs, e.g. low-density parity check [LDPC] codes
    • H03M13/1105Decoding
    • H03M13/1108Hard decision decoding, e.g. bit flipping, modified or weighted bit flipping
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/03Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
    • H03M13/05Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
    • H03M13/11Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits using multiple parity bits
    • H03M13/1102Codes on graphs and decoding on graphs, e.g. low-density parity check [LDPC] codes
    • H03M13/1105Decoding
    • H03M13/1111Soft-decision decoding, e.g. by means of message passing or belief propagation algorithms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03MCODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
    • H03M13/00Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
    • H03M13/37Decoding methods or techniques, not specific to the particular type of coding provided for in groups H03M13/03 - H03M13/35
    • H03M13/3707Adaptive decoding and hybrid decoding, e.g. decoding methods or techniques providing more than one decoding algorithm for one code
    • H03M13/3715Adaptation to the number of estimated errors or to the channel state

Definitions

  • This invention relates to low-density parity check decoding, and more particularly, to a low-density parity check decoder and decoding method which can save power.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the parity check matrix H and a Tanner graph, which is another way of representing the codewords, and is used to explain the operation of the LDPC decoder for hard decision soft decoding when using a bit flipping algorithm.
  • the check nodes which are represented by the square boxes, are the number of parity bits; and the variable nodes, which are represented by the circular boxes, are the number of bits in a codeword. If a code symbol is involved in a particular equation, a line is drawn between the corresponding check node and variable node. ‘Messages’, which are estimates, are passed along the connecting lines, and combined in different ways at the nodes. Initially, the variable nodes will send an estimate to the check nodes on all connecting lines containing a bit believed to be correct. Each check node then takes all the other connected estimates, makes new estimates for each variable node based on this information, and passes the new estimate back to the variable nodes. The new estimate is based on the fact that the parity check equations force all variable nodes connected to a particular check node to sum to zero.
  • the parity check constraints are performed by doing a syndrome check.
  • a hard decision and a syndrome check are performed during each iteration, wherein a non-zero syndrome means there is odd parity and a new decoding iteration is required.
  • Decoders have a power issue, wherein the more complicated they are, the more power they use.
  • the above bit flipping algorithm can support both hard decision hard decoding and hard decision soft decoding modes.
  • Hard decision hard decoding is the lowest power mode as it only involves 1 bit. As the number of error bits increases, however, the power issue starts to become more important. Above about 25 error bits, the throughput of the bit flipping algorithm starts to drop. Above about 40 error bits, it is better to switch to hard decision soft decoding, but the speed of the algorithm will be very unstable when a different mode is entered.
  • a method for dynamically adapting a clock frequency used to perform low-density parity check (LDPC) decoding comprises: setting a first clock frequency for performing a first LDPC decoding iteration on a received codeword to generate a decoded codeword; performing a successive plurality of LDPC decoding iterations on the decoded codeword; at the end of each LDPC decoding iteration, determining a number of error bits of the decoded codeword and a throughput of the LDPC decoding iteration; and when a number of the error bits increases, increasing the clock frequency for performing a next LDPC decoding iteration so that a throughput of the next LDPC decoding iteration is the same as the throughput of the immediately preceding iteration.
  • the first clock frequency is set according to a number of error bits in an immediately previous decoding operation.
  • the LDPC decoding is hard decision decoding using a bit flipping algorithm.
  • a syndrome weight is determined.
  • the syndrome weights are monitored over the plurality of decoding iterations. When the syndrome weights begin to overlap, a final decoding iteration is performed using the bit flipping algorithm, the clock frequency is increased, and the decoding mode is switched to hard decision soft decoding mode.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of a parity check matrix Tanner graph for low-density parity check decoding.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of an LDPC decoder according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides a frequency auto-tuning scheme in order to control power consumption vs. throughput issues.
  • bit-flipping can support all modes, but is best used for hard decision hard decoding which is a low power mode. Even in hard decision hard decoding, throughput drops above about 25 error bits.
  • bit-flipping and an N2 decoding engine can be used. Above 40 error bits, however, N2 is much more reliable. Therefore, a method is proposed which can provide a power boost via increasing clock frequency for bit-flipping during hard decision hard decoding, and can provide a further power boost when the mode changes to hard decision soft decoding.
  • Syndrome weight is used to determine an appropriate time for providing these clock frequency boosts.
  • the syndrome weight is the number of non-zero components or unsatisfied check nodes in a trapping set (a sub graph of the Tanner graph of an LDPC code which causes decoder failure). As the syndrome weight will increase on average with the number of error bits, and the throughput of the BF engine also decreases as the errors increase, syndrome weight is a good indicator for when power boost is required.
  • the syndrome weight is first obtained, and a clock frequency is set accordingly. For a first iteration, a previous number of error bits can be obtained and used to set the initial clock frequency. During subsequent iterations, the syndrome weight is obtained each time, and used to maintain or increase the clock frequency. The aim is to maintain the throughput at approximately 400 MHz
  • the syndrome weight will begin to overlap during the bit flipping hard decision hard decoding mode. This is an indication that hard decision soft decoding mode needs to be entered. As detailed above, changing the mode requires a power boost, which means the clock frequency should be increased. In general, the bit flipping can go through one more iteration when it is detected that the syndrome weights begin to overlap before increasing the clock frequency and changing decoding modes.
  • the above method comprises two sub-methods.
  • the first sub-method always returns to the initial clock frequency at the end of decoding, and then uses previous error bits to set the initial clock frequency for a next stage of decoding.
  • the second sub-method maintains the latest clock frequency even when decoding is finished, and uses this clock frequency as the initial clock frequency for the next stage of decoding.
  • the first sub-method can be termed an individual mode, and is better for decoding performance as the initial clock frequency is a better match for random data.
  • the second sub-method can be termed a forward mode, and is better for power usage.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of an LDPC decoding engine according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • the LDPC decoding engine 200 comprises an order memory 230 which stores channel values.
  • the channel values and corresponding metrics are passed to a subtractor, and D values are sent to the compare circuit 210 for updating the channel values.
  • the D values are also sent to the Dapp_memory 250 , and are sent to a processer block 290 , which outputs modified metrics.
  • the modified channel values and metrics are combined at the adder to generate a new APP value, which is sent to the permutator 270 for activating a syndrome check via the Early Termination (ET) Check circuit 280 .
  • ET Early Termination
  • the ET Check circuit 280 also comprises a check syndrome weight circuit 260 , which is coupled to an oscillator 265 that generates a clock frequency for the LDPC decoding engine 200 .
  • the check syndrome weight circuit 260 is used for determining the syndrome weight and using the syndrome weight to update the clock frequency.
  • a signal is output from the check syndrome weight circuit 260 to the oscillator 265 , which generates an updated clock signal CLK with a frequency according to the syndrome weight.
  • the present invention therefore provides a method and apparatus for auto-tuning a clock frequency during both hard decision hard decoding and hard decision soft decoding to maintain throughput when a number of error bits increases.
  • the throughput vs. power consumption issue can be controlled, and a power boost can be provided when hard decision hard decoding mode switches to hard decision soft decoding in order to prevent unstable speed. In this way, power consumption can be controlled.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
  • Detection And Correction Of Errors (AREA)

Abstract

A method for dynamically adapting a clock frequency used to perform low-density parity check (LDPC) decoding includes: setting a first clock frequency for performing a first LDPC decoding iteration on a received codeword to generate a decoded codeword; performing a successive plurality of LDPC decoding iterations on the decoded codeword; at the end of each LDPC decoding iteration, determining a number of error bits of the decoded codeword and a throughput of the LDPC decoding iteration; and when a number of the error bits increases, increasing the clock frequency for performing a next LDPC decoding iteration so that a throughput of the next LDPC decoding iteration is the same as the throughput of the immediately preceding iteration. The first clock frequency is set according to a number of error bits in an immediately previous decoding operation.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/073,606, which was filed on Mar. 17, 2016, the contents of which are included herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to low-density parity check decoding, and more particularly, to a low-density parity check decoder and decoding method which can save power.
  • 2. Description of the Prior Art
  • Low-density parity check (LDPC) decoders use a linear error correcting code with parity bits. Parity bits provide a decoder with parity equations which can validate a received codeword. For example, a low-density parity check is a fixed length binary code wherein all the symbols added together will equal zero.
  • During encoding, all data bits are repeated and transmitted to encoders, wherein each encoder generates a parity symbol. Codewords are formed of k information digits and r check digits. If the length of the codeword is n then the information digits, k, will equal n−r. The codewords can be represented by a parity check matrix, which consists of r rows (representing equations) and n columns (representing digits), and is represented in FIG. 1. The codes are called low-density because the parity matrix will have very few ‘1’s in comparison to the number of ‘0’s. During decoding, each parity check is viewed as a single parity check code, and is then cross-checked with others. Decoding occurs at check nodes, and cross-checking occurs at variable nodes.
  • LDPC engines support three modes: hard decision hard decoding, soft decision hard decoding, and soft decision soft decoding. FIG. 1 illustrates the parity check matrix H and a Tanner graph, which is another way of representing the codewords, and is used to explain the operation of the LDPC decoder for hard decision soft decoding when using a bit flipping algorithm.
  • The check nodes, which are represented by the square boxes, are the number of parity bits; and the variable nodes, which are represented by the circular boxes, are the number of bits in a codeword. If a code symbol is involved in a particular equation, a line is drawn between the corresponding check node and variable node. ‘Messages’, which are estimates, are passed along the connecting lines, and combined in different ways at the nodes. Initially, the variable nodes will send an estimate to the check nodes on all connecting lines containing a bit believed to be correct. Each check node then takes all the other connected estimates, makes new estimates for each variable node based on this information, and passes the new estimate back to the variable nodes. The new estimate is based on the fact that the parity check equations force all variable nodes connected to a particular check node to sum to zero.
  • The variable nodes receive the new information and use a majority rule (a hard decision) to determine if the value of the original bit they sent was correct. If not, the original bit will be ‘flipped’. The bit is then sent back to the check nodes, and these steps are repeated for a predetermined number of iterations or until the parity check equations at the check nodes are satisfied. If these equations are satisfied (i.e. the value calculated by the check nodes matches the value received from the variable nodes) then Early Termination can be activated, which allows the system to exit the decoding process before the maximum number of iterations is reached.
  • The parity check constraints are performed by doing a syndrome check. A valid codeword will satisfy the equation H·CT=S=0, wherein H is the parity matrix, C is the hard decision codeword and S is the syndrome. When the syndrome equals zero, this means that no further information is required and the decoding process is complete. Typically, a hard decision and a syndrome check are performed during each iteration, wherein a non-zero syndrome means there is odd parity and a new decoding iteration is required.
  • Decoders have a power issue, wherein the more complicated they are, the more power they use. The above bit flipping algorithm can support both hard decision hard decoding and hard decision soft decoding modes. Hard decision hard decoding is the lowest power mode as it only involves 1 bit. As the number of error bits increases, however, the power issue starts to become more important. Above about 25 error bits, the throughput of the bit flipping algorithm starts to drop. Above about 40 error bits, it is better to switch to hard decision soft decoding, but the speed of the algorithm will be very unstable when a different mode is entered.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A method for dynamically adapting a clock frequency used to perform low-density parity check (LDPC) decoding is disclosed. The method comprises: setting a first clock frequency for performing a first LDPC decoding iteration on a received codeword to generate a decoded codeword; performing a successive plurality of LDPC decoding iterations on the decoded codeword; at the end of each LDPC decoding iteration, determining a number of error bits of the decoded codeword and a throughput of the LDPC decoding iteration; and when a number of the error bits increases, increasing the clock frequency for performing a next LDPC decoding iteration so that a throughput of the next LDPC decoding iteration is the same as the throughput of the immediately preceding iteration. The first clock frequency is set according to a number of error bits in an immediately previous decoding operation.
  • In the above method, the LDPC decoding is hard decision decoding using a bit flipping algorithm. At the end of each decoding iteration, a syndrome weight is determined. The syndrome weights are monitored over the plurality of decoding iterations. When the syndrome weights begin to overlap, a final decoding iteration is performed using the bit flipping algorithm, the clock frequency is increased, and the decoding mode is switched to hard decision soft decoding mode.
  • A low-density parity check (LDPC) decoder which dynamically adapts a clock frequency used to perform decoding is disclosed. The LDPC decoder comprises: an oscillator, for providing a clock to the LDPC decoder for a plurality of decoding iterations, wherein a first clock frequency of the oscillator is set for performing a first LDPC decoding iteration of the plurality of decoding iterations on a received codeword to generate a decoded codeword; a check syndrome weight circuit, for determining a number of error bits of the decoded codeword at the end of each decoding iteration; and a processor, coupled to the oscillator and the check syndrome weight circuit, for controlling operations of the LDPC decoder, wherein the processor determines a throughput of each LDPC decoding iteration, and when a number of the error bits increases, the processor increases the clock frequency for performing a next LDPC decoding iteration of the plurality of decoding iterations so that a throughput of the next LDPC decoding iteration is the same as the throughput of an immediately preceding iteration. The first clock frequency is set according to a number of error bits in an immediately previous decoding operation.
  • In the above apparatus, the check syndrome weight circuit further determines a syndrome weight at the end of each decoding iteration, the processor further monitors the syndrome weights over the plurality of decoding iterations, and when the syndrome weights begin to overlap, the processor controls the LDPC decoder to perform a final decoding iteration using the bit flipping algorithm, controls the oscillator to increase the clock frequency, and controls the LDPC decoder to switch the decoding mode to hard decision soft decoding mode.
  • These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of a parity check matrix Tanner graph for low-density parity check decoding.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of an LDPC decoder according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention provides a frequency auto-tuning scheme in order to control power consumption vs. throughput issues.
  • As detailed in the background, bit-flipping can support all modes, but is best used for hard decision hard decoding which is a low power mode. Even in hard decision hard decoding, throughput drops above about 25 error bits. When hard decision soft decoding is entered, both bit-flipping and an N2 decoding engine can be used. Above 40 error bits, however, N2 is much more reliable. Therefore, a method is proposed which can provide a power boost via increasing clock frequency for bit-flipping during hard decision hard decoding, and can provide a further power boost when the mode changes to hard decision soft decoding.
  • Syndrome weight is used to determine an appropriate time for providing these clock frequency boosts. The syndrome weight is the number of non-zero components or unsatisfied check nodes in a trapping set (a sub graph of the Tanner graph of an LDPC code which causes decoder failure). As the syndrome weight will increase on average with the number of error bits, and the throughput of the BF engine also decreases as the errors increase, syndrome weight is a good indicator for when power boost is required.
  • In each iteration, the syndrome weight is first obtained, and a clock frequency is set accordingly. For a first iteration, a previous number of error bits can be obtained and used to set the initial clock frequency. During subsequent iterations, the syndrome weight is obtained each time, and used to maintain or increase the clock frequency. The aim is to maintain the throughput at approximately 400 MHz
  • As the errors start to increase, the syndrome weight will begin to overlap during the bit flipping hard decision hard decoding mode. This is an indication that hard decision soft decoding mode needs to be entered. As detailed above, changing the mode requires a power boost, which means the clock frequency should be increased. In general, the bit flipping can go through one more iteration when it is detected that the syndrome weights begin to overlap before increasing the clock frequency and changing decoding modes.
  • The above method comprises two sub-methods. The first sub-method always returns to the initial clock frequency at the end of decoding, and then uses previous error bits to set the initial clock frequency for a next stage of decoding. The second sub-method maintains the latest clock frequency even when decoding is finished, and uses this clock frequency as the initial clock frequency for the next stage of decoding. The first sub-method can be termed an individual mode, and is better for decoding performance as the initial clock frequency is a better match for random data. The second sub-method can be termed a forward mode, and is better for power usage.
  • Please refer to FIG. 2, which is a diagram of an LDPC decoding engine according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The LDPC decoding engine 200 comprises an order memory 230 which stores channel values. The channel values and corresponding metrics are passed to a subtractor, and D values are sent to the compare circuit 210 for updating the channel values. The D values are also sent to the Dapp_memory 250, and are sent to a processer block 290, which outputs modified metrics. The modified channel values and metrics are combined at the adder to generate a new APP value, which is sent to the permutator 270 for activating a syndrome check via the Early Termination (ET) Check circuit 280. The ET Check circuit 280 also comprises a check syndrome weight circuit 260, which is coupled to an oscillator 265 that generates a clock frequency for the LDPC decoding engine 200. The check syndrome weight circuit 260 is used for determining the syndrome weight and using the syndrome weight to update the clock frequency. A signal is output from the check syndrome weight circuit 260 to the oscillator 265, which generates an updated clock signal CLK with a frequency according to the syndrome weight.
  • The present invention therefore provides a method and apparatus for auto-tuning a clock frequency during both hard decision hard decoding and hard decision soft decoding to maintain throughput when a number of error bits increases. By monitoring the syndrome weight, the throughput vs. power consumption issue can be controlled, and a power boost can be provided when hard decision hard decoding mode switches to hard decision soft decoding in order to prevent unstable speed. In this way, power consumption can be controlled.
  • Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.

Claims (6)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for dynamically adapting a clock frequency used to perform low-density parity check (LDPC) decoding, the method comprising:
setting a first clock frequency for performing a first LDPC decoding iteration on a received codeword to generate a decoded codeword;
performing a successive plurality of LDPC decoding iterations on the decoded codeword;
at the end of each LDPC decoding iteration, determining a number of error bits of the decoded codeword and a throughput of the LDPC decoding iteration; and
when a number of the error bits increases, increasing the clock frequency for performing a next LDPC decoding iteration so that a throughput of the next LDPC decoding iteration is the same as the throughput of the immediately preceding iteration.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the LDPC decoding is hard decision decoding using a bit flipping algorithm, and the method further comprises:
at the end of each decoding iteration, determining a syndrome weight;
monitoring the syndrome weights over the plurality of decoding iterations;
when the syndrome weights begin to overlap, performing a final decoding iteration using the bit flipping algorithm; and
increasing the clock frequency and switching the decoding mode to hard decision soft decoding mode.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first clock frequency is set according to a number of error bits in an immediately previous decoding operation.
4. A low-density parity check (LDPC) decoder which dynamically adapts a clock frequency used to perform decoding, the LDPC decoder comprising:
an oscillator, for providing a clock to the LDPC decoder for a plurality of decoding iterations, wherein a first clock frequency of the oscillator is set for performing a first LDPC decoding iteration of the plurality of decoding iterations on a received codeword to generate a decoded codeword;
a check syndrome weight circuit, for determining a number of error bits of the decoded codeword at the end of each decoding iteration; and
a processor, coupled to the oscillator and the check syndrome weight circuit, for controlling operations of the LDPC decoder, wherein the processor determines a throughput of each LDPC decoding iteration, and when a number of the error bits increases, the processor increases the clock frequency for performing a next LDPC decoding iteration of the plurality of decoding iterations so that a throughput of the next LDPC decoding iteration is the same as the throughput of an immediately preceding iteration.
5. The LDPC decoder of claim 4, wherein the LDPC decoding is hard decision decoding using a bit flipping algorithm, the check syndrome weight circuit further determines a syndrome weight at the end of each decoding iteration, the processor further monitors the syndrome weights over the plurality of decoding iterations, and when the syndrome weights begin to overlap, the processor controls the LDPC decoder to perform a final decoding iteration using the bit flipping algorithm, controls the oscillator to increase the clock frequency, and controls the LDPC decoder to switch the decoding mode to hard decision soft decoding mode.
6. The LDPC decoder of claim 4, wherein the first clock frequency is set according to a number of error bits in an immediately previous decoding operation.
US16/029,677 2016-03-17 2018-07-09 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder Abandoned US20180331696A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/029,677 US20180331696A1 (en) 2016-03-17 2018-07-09 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/073,606 US10050642B2 (en) 2016-03-17 2016-03-17 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder
US16/029,677 US20180331696A1 (en) 2016-03-17 2018-07-09 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/073,606 Continuation US10050642B2 (en) 2016-03-17 2016-03-17 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180331696A1 true US20180331696A1 (en) 2018-11-15

Family

ID=59856151

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/073,606 Active US10050642B2 (en) 2016-03-17 2016-03-17 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder
US16/029,677 Abandoned US20180331696A1 (en) 2016-03-17 2018-07-09 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/073,606 Active US10050642B2 (en) 2016-03-17 2016-03-17 Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US10050642B2 (en)
CN (2) CN107425856B (en)
TW (1) TWI626830B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110380803A (en) * 2019-07-18 2019-10-25 电子科技大学 A kind of adaptive tracking control method based on LDPC code transmission

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10565040B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2020-02-18 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. ECC decoder with selective component disabling based on decoding message resolution
US10530393B2 (en) * 2016-12-01 2020-01-07 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Configurable ECC decoder
US10218384B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2019-02-26 Sandisk Technologies Llc ECC decoder with multiple decoding modes
EP3340476A1 (en) * 2016-12-23 2018-06-27 Sequans Communications S.A. Error correction decoding with configurable parallelism
US10523236B2 (en) 2017-11-21 2019-12-31 Silicon Motion, Inc. Method employed in LDPC decoder and the decoder
US11115062B2 (en) * 2018-03-16 2021-09-07 SK Hynix Inc. Memory system with adaptive threshold decoding and method of operating such memory system
TWI646783B (en) * 2018-04-10 2019-01-01 大陸商深圳大心電子科技有限公司 Decoding method and storage controller
KR102523059B1 (en) * 2018-04-18 2023-04-19 에스케이하이닉스 주식회사 Error correction circuit and memory system including the same
US11043969B2 (en) * 2019-11-12 2021-06-22 SK Hynix Inc. Fast-converging soft bit-flipping decoder for low-density parity-check codes
US11146291B2 (en) * 2020-03-02 2021-10-12 Micron Technology, Inc. Configuring iterative error correction parameters using criteria from previous iterations
CN113890545A (en) * 2020-07-03 2022-01-04 华为技术有限公司 On-demand decoding method and device
TWI818490B (en) * 2022-03-29 2023-10-11 睿寬智能科技有限公司 Reassembly-type decoding method and apparatus for use in a low-density parity check code

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150016940A1 (en) * 2013-07-09 2015-01-15 Magna Van Development Company LLC Modular moving system and apparatus

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003021440A1 (en) * 2001-09-01 2003-03-13 Bermai, Inc. Decoding architecture for low density parity check codes
JP3633572B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2005-03-30 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Arithmetic unit power control apparatus, power-saving decoder, arithmetic unit power control program, and arithmetic unit power control method
WO2006001015A2 (en) * 2004-06-25 2006-01-05 Runcom Technologies Ltd. Multi-rate ldpc code system and method
KR20060016059A (en) * 2004-08-16 2006-02-21 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for coding/decoding block low density parity check code with variable block length
US8117515B2 (en) 2007-03-23 2012-02-14 Sizhen Yang Methodology and apparatus for soft-information detection and LDPC decoding on an ISI channel
JP4487213B2 (en) * 2007-10-19 2010-06-23 ソニー株式会社 Decoding apparatus and method, and program
JP4487212B2 (en) * 2007-10-19 2010-06-23 ソニー株式会社 Decoding device and method, transmission / reception system, receiving device and method, and program
CN101355366B (en) * 2008-06-13 2011-04-13 华为技术有限公司 Method and apparatus for decoding low density parity check code
JP5445828B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2014-03-19 ソニー株式会社 Receiving apparatus, receiving method, program, and receiving system
CN101604975A (en) * 2009-07-08 2009-12-16 复旦大学 A kind of low-power multimode QC-LDPC code decoder and method of work thereof
US8438461B2 (en) * 2009-10-12 2013-05-07 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Power consumption in LDPC decoder for low-power applications
TWI415396B (en) 2009-11-23 2013-11-11 Nat Univ Tsing Hua Decoder and decoding method for low-density parity check codes constructed based on reed-solomon codes
CN102098059A (en) * 2009-12-10 2011-06-15 上海华虹集成电路有限责任公司 Low-density parity check code-based decoding method and implementation device thereof
US8869000B2 (en) * 2011-01-31 2014-10-21 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Methods and systems for efficient decoding of concatenated error correction codes
KR101296773B1 (en) 2011-10-07 2013-08-14 한국전기연구원 Apparatus and method for decoding LDPC code
US9106265B2 (en) * 2011-11-04 2015-08-11 Silicon Laboratories Inc. Receive data flow path using a single FEC decoder
US8929009B2 (en) * 2012-12-19 2015-01-06 Lsi Corporation Irregular low density parity check decoder with low syndrome error handling

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150016940A1 (en) * 2013-07-09 2015-01-15 Magna Van Development Company LLC Modular moving system and apparatus

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110380803A (en) * 2019-07-18 2019-10-25 电子科技大学 A kind of adaptive tracking control method based on LDPC code transmission

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US10050642B2 (en) 2018-08-14
CN112087236A (en) 2020-12-15
US20170272097A1 (en) 2017-09-21
TWI626830B (en) 2018-06-11
CN107425856B (en) 2020-09-29
TW201735551A (en) 2017-10-01
CN107425856A (en) 2017-12-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20180331696A1 (en) Low power scheme for bit flipping low density parity check decoder
US10630316B2 (en) Bit flipping algorithm for providing soft information during hard decision hard decoding
US10411735B1 (en) Systems and methods for an iterative decoding scheme
US8347194B2 (en) Hierarchical decoding apparatus
US8132080B2 (en) Communication apparatus and decoding method
JP5464990B2 (en) Multistage decoder and method for decoding a block of symbols
TWI758748B (en) Method employed in ldpc decoder and the decoder
US8677225B1 (en) Low-density parity-check decoder
US20170288698A1 (en) Power saving for bit flipping decoding algorithm in ldpc decoder
US20070162821A1 (en) Parity check matrix, method of generating parity check matrix, encoding method and error correction apparatus
US11177834B2 (en) Communication method and apparatus using polar codes
US11522562B2 (en) Error correcting decoding device and error correcting decoding method
US20170222659A1 (en) Power improvement for ldpc
CN111277355B (en) Method and device for correcting deadlock in TPC (transmit power control) decoding
JP5523064B2 (en) Decoding apparatus and method
KR102045438B1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Decoding of Low-density parity-check
WO2019229846A1 (en) Transmitter, receiver, communication system, and coding rate revision method
JP7038910B2 (en) Decoding device, control circuit and storage medium
Toto-Zarasoa et al. Non-asymmetric Slepian-Wolf coding of non-uniform Bernoulli sources
KR20040080734A (en) Method of demodulating for efficient error-correction and apparatus thereof
JP2009088720A (en) Radio receiver
JP2005020501A (en) Communication system using correlation matrix, correlation matrix learning method, apparatus and program
KR20090094984A (en) Apparatus for calculating value of probability
KR20130037523A (en) Method and apparatus for encoing using state-check code

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION