US20180243406A1 - Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions - Google Patents

Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180243406A1
US20180243406A1 US15/967,058 US201815967058A US2018243406A1 US 20180243406 A1 US20180243406 A1 US 20180243406A1 US 201815967058 A US201815967058 A US 201815967058A US 2018243406 A1 US2018243406 A1 US 2018243406A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
virus
composition
months
bio
activity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/967,058
Inventor
Wayne L. Ryan
James A. Grunkemeyer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Streck Inc
Original Assignee
Streck Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Streck Inc filed Critical Streck Inc
Priority to US15/967,058 priority Critical patent/US20180243406A1/en
Publication of US20180243406A1 publication Critical patent/US20180243406A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/12Viral antigens
    • A61K39/275Poxviridae, e.g. avipoxvirus
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K39/12Viral antigens
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N7/00Viruses; Bacteriophages; Compositions thereof; Preparation or purification thereof
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K39/00Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
    • A61K2039/51Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies comprising whole cells, viruses or DNA/RNA
    • A61K2039/525Virus
    • A61K2039/5252Virus inactivated (killed)
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2760/00MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA ssRNA viruses negative-sense
    • C12N2760/00011Details
    • C12N2760/16011Orthomyxoviridae
    • C12N2760/16111Influenzavirus A, i.e. influenza A virus
    • C12N2760/16134Use of virus or viral component as vaccine, e.g. live-attenuated or inactivated virus, VLP, viral protein
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2760/00MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA ssRNA viruses negative-sense
    • C12N2760/00011Details
    • C12N2760/16011Orthomyxoviridae
    • C12N2760/16111Influenzavirus A, i.e. influenza A virus
    • C12N2760/16161Methods of inactivation or attenuation
    • C12N2760/16163Methods of inactivation or attenuation by chemical treatment

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to inactivated swine flu virus compositions, methods of preparing such compositions, and to such compositions useful as or in vaccines. Further the present invention relates to methods of preparation, storage and transportation of precursors to and vaccine compositions wherein the precursors and vaccines can be stored and transported at ambient temperatures.
  • Swine Flu Virus is a negative segmented myxovirus. It has infected a significant portion of the human population. Improved vaccines are desired. Due to its widespread affect the there is a need for widespread distribution of precursors to vaccines and vaccines for this virus. One challenge is that many precursors to vaccines and vaccines require storage and transport at low temperatures, sub ambient temperatures. Thus it presents a challenge to provide such vaccines to populations located in places that do not have infrastructure for storage and transport of such precursors at sub ambient temperatures. To prepare vaccines, viruses are inactivated so that they do not infect the host and the antigens are stabilized so that hosts inoculated with the inactivated viruses develop immunological responses.
  • the present invention is directed at a composition
  • a composition comprising a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens-on the virus in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.
  • the present invention provides a method for deactivating a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens, comprising the steps of: a) providing, a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; and b) contacting the virus swine flu with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating, the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated swine flu virus.
  • a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating, the infectious component with the formalde
  • the invention is a method of preparing a composition useful as a vaccine comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount, for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered, of the deactivated swine flu virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is useful in, or as, a vaccine composition.
  • the present invention provides a method for deactivating a live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; and b) contacting the virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus; and c) storing and/or transporting the contacted composition at ambient temperatures, that is without cold storage or transport.
  • a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating the infectious component
  • the invention is a method of preparing a composition useful as a vaccine comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of d) mixing a non-toxic effective amount, for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered, of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is useful in, or as, a vaccine composition.
  • the invention herein also contemplates vaccine compositions prepared according to the methods or using the virus of the foregoing aspects of the invention.
  • the aspects of the present invention offer a number of advantages as compared with existing compositions useful in or as vaccines including the possibility to obtain total protection of mortality without use of an adjuvant; the ability to withstand without damaging the vaccine and/or without aggregating vaccine components after one or more freeze-thaw cycles; a reduction of cross-linking surface antigens to a significant enough degree that would result in an auto-immune hypersensitivity reaction mediated by mast cells is avoided; the vaccine protects birds from a live virus challenge (e.g., birds are given two vaccinations two weeks apart, and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) data from samples drawn after the first vaccination indicate that a single vaccination is sufficient); a substantial reduction in the amount of antigen (e.g., a reduction by at least two logs in antigen, and more preferably at least three logs in antigen) necessary to manufacture the vaccine may be realized, a very important
  • compositions of the invention or prepared by the method of the invention facilitate storage and transportation of vaccine precursors and vaccines at ambient temperatures, that is without the need for storage and/or transportation with refrigeration.
  • the compositions of the invention can be manufactured in an efficient manner, contain components which enhance the disinfectant and antimicrobial properties of the vaccine precursors, exhibit hemagglutination equal to or better than industry standards, do not exhibit a loss in titer and are relatively non-toxic.
  • the invention is useful with flu antigens produced in singular or plural forms in any biological system. Such antigens may be produced in recombinant systems. In particular such antigens may be subjected to the stabilizing and efficacy treatments of the invention.
  • FIGS. 1 to 28 show graphs of Bio-Activity of IDU stabilized compositions over time as described in the Examples.
  • the present invention is directed at a composition
  • a composition comprising a deactivated swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol.
  • the present invention provides an improved method for deactivating a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; b) contacting the swine flu virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated swine flu virus.
  • the invention is a method of preparing a composition comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of c) storing or transporting the mixture at ambient temperatures.
  • the invention is a method of preparing a composition comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of d) mixing a non-toxic effective amount, for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered, of the deactivated swine flu virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is useful in, or as, a vaccine composition.
  • the invention is a method comprising the steps of: a) providing a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; b) contacting the swine flu, virus with a formaldehyde donor agent, having, a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving, at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus c) transporting or storing the contacted composition at ambient temperature.
  • the method for preparing a stabilized live virus composition may further comprise any one or more of the features described in this specification in any combination, including the preferences and examples listed in this specification, and includes the following features: the virus is grown in a tissue or in-vitro cell culture, such as a chicken egg; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof; the contacting step includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of less than about w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less; the contacting step (b) occurs for a period of about 24 to about 240 hours and more preferably about 24 to about 72 hours; the contacting step (b) occurs at a temperature of about 23° C.
  • the method is free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formatin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof;
  • the method includes a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus; further comprising a step of performing an assay of the deactivated virus to confirm that the infectious component has been de-activated; further comprising; c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for forming a vaccine composition;
  • the virus is an avian virus provided in a live titer amount of about 10 6 to about 10 12 EID50 per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition; further comprising a step of
  • compositions may further comprise any one or more of the features described in this specification in any combination, including the preferences and examples listed in this specification, and includes the following features: the virus manufactured by growing the virus in tissue or a chicken egg; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof; the formaldehyde donor agent is present in a concentration of less than about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less; further comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent; and the composition can be transported and stored at ambient temperatures.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or
  • the live virus useful in this invention is any live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens which is capable of being deactivated for use in vaccines.
  • Preferred live viruses are those which can be incubated in tissue or in vitro cell cultures, such as in chicken eggs.
  • preferred viruses are avian flu, swine flu, bovine respiratory systhial virus and the like.
  • avian flu is a swine flu or an avian virus.
  • the avian flu virus is Newcastle's disease.
  • the virus is a strain of Newcastle Disease Virus selected from a lentogenic strain, a mesogenic strain, a velogenic strain or any combination thereof.
  • the virus is a La Sota strain (e.g., Mass. type) of Newcastle Disease Virus.
  • the amount of time for the contacting step preferably is sufficient for de-activating the virus (whether by attenuating it, modifying it or killing it), while sufficiently preserving surface antigens so that when a subject is vaccinated with a vaccine composition including the deactivated virus, the deactivated virus will induce an immunity response (e.g., a response that is measurable by Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay, such that the response allows the vaccinated subjects to survive exposure to a lethal dosage of the live virus).
  • the contacting occurs for a period of time of about 12 hours or greater and more preferably about 24 hours or greater.
  • the contacting occurs for a period of time of about 240 hours or less, more preferably 120 hours or less; even more preferably about 72 hours or less, and most preferably about 48 hours or less.
  • the contacting step occurs at a temperature of about 20° C. or greater, more preferably about 23° C. or greater and most preferably about 25° C. or greater.
  • the contacting step occurs at a temperature of about 37° C. or less, more preferably about 30° C. or less; and most preferably about 25 C or less.
  • the viral infection that is useful in the teachings herein preferably is a swine flu virus. More specifically, the virus is a strain of Swine Flu Virus is selected from those designated H1N1, H1N2, H3N2 or the like.
  • the virus is used in a composition used as a vaccine it is provided in a sufficient amount for invoking an immunity response in a subject to which the vaccines herein are administered.
  • the swine fluid virus may be provided in a live titer amount of about 10 3 to about 10 12 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition and more preferably about 10 6 to about 10 11 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition.
  • the virus titer may range from about 10 6 to about 10 8 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition.
  • the avian virus may be provided in a live titer amount of about 10 6 to about 10 11 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking, chemical fixative that contains urea. More preferably, the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent may consist essentially of diazolidinyl urea (DU) imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
  • the contacting step generally includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of about 5 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and more preferably about 4 w/v or less.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent may be present in a concentration of about 0.5 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater and more preferably about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater.
  • the contacting step generally includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and more preferably about 0.5 w/v or less.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent may be present in a concentration of about 0.0625 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater and more preferably about 0.1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater.
  • the contacting step may be the only step during which the live virus is contacted with the formaldehyde donor agent.
  • the mixing step is a step that can be employed for preparing the resulting composition useful as a vaccine.
  • the mixing step may occur immediately following the contacting step (such that there is no intermediate washing, quenching step or other step by which the deactivated virus would be subjected to a fluid other than a carrier of the vaccine composition), or it may occur during the time period when the contacting step (b) is occurring.
  • the deactivated virus will remain in contact with solution that includes the formaldehyde donor agent.
  • the antigen-treated virus may be maintained at a temperature above about 15° C. (e.g., it may be about room temperature).
  • composition of the invention generally will thus include, a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent, which may be a liquid, a solid, a gel or otherwise.
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent which may be a liquid, a solid, a gel or otherwise.
  • the antigen-treated virus may be admixed in a suitable carrier (e.g., one based on a water or a saline solution) that optionally is buffered (e.g., phosphate buffered saline, such as Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline “D-PBS”) before administering into a subject animal.
  • a suitable carrier e.g., one based on a water or a saline solution
  • D-PBS Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline
  • the carrier is such that the antigen-treated virus is uniformly dispersed in the resulting composition at the time of the administration, and it will not degrade the antigen-treated virus throughout a storage life of at least 10 days, more preferably at least one month at a temperature, of about 0° C. to about 37° C.
  • An example of one suitable solution includes, a mixture of CaCl 2 (Calcium Chloride); MgC 2 (Magnesium Chloride); KCI (Potassium Chloride); KH 2 PO 4 (Potassium Phosphate, monobasic); NaCl (Sodium Chloride); Na 2 HPO 4 (Sodium Phosphate, dibasic), and DGlucose (dextrose). More specifically, one example of such a solution is set forth in the following Table 1, where mM refers to milli-molarity; millimoles/liter.
  • a carrier or diluent may include one or any combination of stabilizers, preservatives and buffers.
  • Suitable stabilizers may include, for example SPGA, carbohydrates (such as sorbitol, mannitol, starch, sucrose, peptone, arginine, dextran, glutamate or glucose), proteins (such as dried milk serum, albumin or casein) or degradation products thereof.
  • Suitable buffers may include for example alkali metal phosphates.
  • Suitable preservatives may include thimerosal, merthuilate and gentamicin.
  • Diluents include water, aqueous buffer (such as buffered saline) and polyols (such as glycerol). It will be appreciated that vaccine compositions herein, as well as any of its carrier or diluents is preferably free of any anti-biotic, and/or any mercury-containing ingredient.
  • the method may further comprise a step of contacting the virus with an adjuvant.
  • Any suitable adjuvant may be utilized in the compositions and methods of this invention.
  • Exemplary adjuvants include those selected from one or any combination of lecithin, a pharmaceutically acceptable polymer, saponin or a derivative thereof, cholesterol, aluminium hydroxide, -phosphate or -oxide, oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion based on, for example a mineral oil, a vegetable oil (such as vitamin E acetate), or some other suitable carboxylic acid. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,981, incorporated by reference. If an adjuvant is employed, it may be employed in a suitable amount for providing adjuvant activity.
  • the deactivated virus may diluted into D-PBS, which may include an adjuvant or be free of an adjuvant.
  • suitable adjuvants may include one or any combination of compounds or compositions for this purpose
  • the vaccine composition and the virus are free of any contact with any plant-cell—produced components: the virus includes or is free of an infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus; the method may optionally be free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formalin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof; or any combination of the foregoing. It is also possible that the vaccine composition may include or be free of any neutralizing antibodies bound to the surface antigens. It is also possible that the vaccine composition may otherwise include or be free of an antioxidant.
  • the method may include a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus.
  • the antigen-treated virus may include or be free of any temperature reduction to a temperature below about 10° C. (e.g., to below about 0° C.).
  • the method may include or be free of any step that removes the formaldehyde donor agent prior to the mixing step.
  • the various aspects of the invention contemplate that the administration of the vaccine composition is accomplished in the absence of any step of diluting the composition at the time of or at the site of administration of the vaccination.
  • the mixing step described previously could constitute the only diluting step that occurs in the methods herein.
  • the method may also include one or more steps of storing the resulting composition for a period of at least 30 days, at least 60 days, or even at least 90 days following the mixing step; storing the resulting composition at one or more temperatures of below about 1 St (e.g., about 0 to about 10° C.), with the composition retaining its stability under such conditions (e.g., the amount of useful deactivated virus remains within about 20% and more preferably within about 10% of the titer amount at the time of the mixing step).
  • the composition may be stored in suitable sealed containers, such as stopped vials (e.g., rubber stopped glass or plastic vials), sealed syringes, blister packaging, or otherwise.
  • the method includes storing or transporting any composition of the invention or prepared by the methods of the invention at ambient temperature, wherein ambient temperature is defined hereinbefore. When such compositions are stored or transported at ambient temperatures such compositions retain their efficacy as described hereinbefore.
  • the method may also include one or more steps of performing an assay of the deactivated virus to confirm that the infectious component has been de-activated.
  • the methods herein further contemplate immunizing a subject with a vaccine composition prepared according to the present teachings.
  • the methods herein may further comprise at least one step of administering a subject in need of immunization with the vaccine composition described in the present teachings.
  • Any step of administering a subject in need of immunization with the vaccine composition by performed by ingestion (e.g., from drinking water), intranasally (e.g., by aerosol), intraocularly (e.g., by aerosol), via intramuscular injection, by subcutaneous injection, by delivering into eggs prior to hatching (e.g., manually or by machine); or any combination thereof.
  • a plurality of steps of administering the vaccine to the subject may be performed at intervals (e.g., they may be administered to the same subject on multiple occasions, such as at intervals of at least 3 days).
  • at least two steps of administering the subject may performed at intervals of greater than one week (e.g., about 14 days apart). It is also possible that only a single dose is administered and is sufficient for achieving the desired satisfactory immune response.
  • another aspect of the present invention is directed at deactivated virus described herein that has been contacted with a formaldehyde donor agent according to the above teachings, as well as compositions useful as vaccines (including the and one or more of the other ingredients, e.g., one or more of a carrier, an adjuvant, or both) resulting from the methods herein.
  • Resulting viruses treated according to the teachings herein may be characterized as being free of cross-linking with other surface antigens of the virus.
  • the dosage of the vaccine preferably will be a sufficient amount for inducing immunity in the vaccinated subjects against challenge by a virulent form of the virus, wherein immunity can be described as the realization within a period of 4, days, more preferably 7 days, and still more preferably 14 days after challenge of a death rate due to the virulent form of the virus that is less than 50% of the population of subjects challenged, more preferably less than 25% of subjects challenged and still more preferably less than 5% of subjects challenged (e.g., approximately 100% of challenged subjects survive the challenge).
  • Challenges include the step of administering the virulent form of the virus to the subject in a 100% lethal dosage amount.
  • the present invention is not intended to be so limited. It may have application for immunization for prevention of other viruses, including but not limited to other avian paramyxoviruses, avian influenza (e.g., H5 or H7 influenza, such as H5N1 influenza), avian polyoma virus, Pacheco's disease, West Nile Virus, diminuvirus, chicken anemia virus, or Circo virus.
  • the vaccine compositions herein may also include a plurality of antigenic components suitable for immunizing against a plurality of viruses. For example, the invention contemplates that the resulting vaccine may immunize against Swine Flu Virus and one or more other viruses.
  • the methods and compositions herein may be employed in the immunization of mammal and avian subjects.
  • the method of the invention comprises the steps of: providing a live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; b) contacting the virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus.
  • the method of the invention may further comprise one or more of the following features in any combination.
  • the virus is grown in a chicken egg; the virus is Swine flu virus; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, or consists essentially of, a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, or consists essentially of, diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
  • the resulting solution consists essentially of de-activated virus and the formaldehyde donor agent; the contacting step includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of less than about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less, preferably about 0.5 w/v or less (grams per 100 ml total volume) and preferably about 0.625 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume or greater), and more preferably about of about 0.1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater.
  • the contacting step (b) occurs for a period of about 24 to about 72 hours.
  • the contacting step (b) occurs at a temperature of about 20° C.
  • the mixing step (c) occurs immediately following the contacting step (b). During the time period throughout the contacting step (b) the antigen-treated virus is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. or greater.
  • the contacting step (b) is the only step during which the live virus is contacted with the formaldehyde donor agent.
  • the resulting composition may be free of any contact with any plant-cell-produced components.
  • the virus includes an infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus.
  • the virus may be free of any infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus.
  • the method may be free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formalin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof.
  • the method may include a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus.
  • the method may further comprise a step of performing an assay of the deactivated virus to confirm that the infectious component has been de-activated.
  • the method may be free of any step of reducing the temperature of the virus to below about 20° C.
  • the surface antigens may be free of cross-linking with other surface antigens of the virus.
  • the method may further comprise; c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for forming a vaccine composition.
  • the virus is an avian-virus provided in a live titer amount of about 10 8 to about 10 11 Eid per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition.
  • the method may further comprise a step of contacting the virus with an adjuvant.
  • the mixing step (c) may occur immediately following the contacting step (b); during the time period throughout the contacting step (b) and the mixing step (c).
  • the antigen-treated virus is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C.
  • the antigen-treated virus may be free of any temperature reduction to a temperature below about 20° C.
  • the method may be free of any step that removes the formaldehyde donor agent prior to the mixing step (c).
  • the composition of the invention comprises a deactivated virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol.
  • the composition of the invention may further comprise one or more of the following features in any combination.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, consists essentially of, a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, consists essentially of, diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
  • the formaldehyde donor agent is present in a concentration of about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and more preferably about 0.5 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and about 0.625 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater and more preferably about 0.1 (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater.
  • the composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. The resulting composition may be free of any contact with any plant-cell-produced components.
  • the virus may include an infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus; the virus is free of any infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus.
  • the composition may be free of binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formalin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof.
  • the surface antigens may be free of cross-linking with other surface antigens of the virus.
  • a non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine of the deactivated virus of a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is administered.
  • the virus may be an avian virus provided in a live titer amount of about 10 6 to about 10 11 EID 50 per milliliter.
  • the composition retains its immunological efficacy after storage and transportation at ambient temperature, about 20° C. to about 37° C. and more preferably about 23° C. to about 30° C.
  • HA Hemagglutination Assay
  • inactivation treatment degrades virus surface epitopes necessary for hemagglutination. If so, the HA result should be negative. The desired, result is positive hemagglutination, thereby confirming that surface epitopes are preserved. More specifically, in this assay, a sample is incubated with a fresh preparation of chicken red blood cells (cRBC5). Hemagglutination (HA) is defined as the clumping of cRBCs. The virus can promote hemagglutination through the interaction of molecules on the virus surface with molecules on the surface of cRBC5. Damaged or degraded virus does not promote hemagglutination.
  • cRBC5 chicken red blood cells
  • the results may be interpreted differently. If the sample is treated/untreated virus (the inactivation sample), a positive HA result indicates that the virus is not degraded due to the treatment—it gives no information (in this case) about the viability of the virus (inactivation state). If the sample is the allantoic fluid from an inoculated egg, a positive HA result indicates that the virus is not inactivated by the treatment (the virus was active and able to replicate in the egg).
  • the virus is completely inactivated by the treatment (eg—incubation with DU/IDU/BEI/formaldehyde), the small amount of virus in the inoculum would be diluted out by the large volume of AF, and the HA result would be negative.
  • Embryonic Toxicity assay is run to determine if the virus is still viable after the inactivation treatment. If still viable the virus would replicate in allantoic fluid and kill an embryo to which it is contacted. The desired result is embryonic viability, thereby confirming the presence of no live virus. More specifically, embryonic toxicity is assessed by candling the eggs, such that an egg is placed on a source of bright light (e.g. a flashlight), and the embryo is directly observed. Viable embryos are identified by certain visual cues (pulsatile vasculature, for example).
  • embryonic death may be due to one of three things: (1) injury/infection resulting from the needle stick used in the injection; (2) chemical toxicity (by inactivating agent—DU/IDU); or (3) live virus replication (as a result of incomplete NDV inactivation).
  • Allantoic fluid (AF: from injected eggs) HA Assay is run to determine if the virus is not viable. If not viable, inactivated virus would not replicate and injected virus would be diluted out in AF. If, after ‘inactivation’ treatment, the virus is still viable, allantoic fluid would contain high enough titer of virus to promote hemagglutination. The desired result is negative hemagglutination, thereby confirming that the AF fluid contains no live virus.
  • Chicken Embryonic Fibroblast (CEF) Immunofluorescence (IF) Assay is run to determine whether successful inactivation occurs. It is recognized that chicken embryonic fibroblasts (CEF) grow well in culture and are highly susceptible to infection by liveSwine Flu.
  • allantoic fluid (AF) from inoculated eggs is applied to confluent CEF monolayers. After 5 days, cells are washed, fixed and stained with anti-viral antibodies. Positive staining indicates that there was live virus in AF, and therefore, ‘inactivation’ treatment is unsuccessful. The desired result is no staining (which indicates that the virus had been completely inactivated), and supports that the AF fluid contains no live virus.
  • Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay is run with serum samples obtained from vaccinated and/or control animals are incubated with live virus prior to use in the aforementioned HA assay. If the cRBCs do not agglutinate (negative result), the conclusion is that there were specific anti-viral antibodies in the serum (seroconversion) which blocked the viral antigens from interacting with the cRBCs.
  • a serum HAI titer of greater than 16 correlates with an animal successfully rejecting a subsequent live viral challenge.
  • An example of one such assay is found in Allan and Gough, “A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease. (2) Vaccination and Challenge”. Vet Rec., Vol. 95, Issue 7, 147-149, Aug. 17, 1974.
  • Swine influenza virus SIV H1N1.
  • the virus is characterized in red blood cells (RBC) a permissive cell type for assaying the hemagglutination (HA) activity and cytopathic effect (CPE) is identified.
  • Imidazolidinyl urea preparations are prepared in Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline at concentrations as described hereinafter. Equal volumes of virus are mixed with the imidazolidinyl urea. The resulting solutions are then serially diluted and added to cell monolayers. The plates are incubated at 37° C., in 5% carbon dioxide for 5 to 6 days. The monolayers are observed for morphological changes associated with cytotoxicity effect (CTE) or CPE caused by imidazolidinyl urea and Swine Influenza Virus.
  • CTE cytotoxicity effect
  • CPE cytotoxicity effect
  • the inactivation of SIV infectivity using imidazolidinyl urea, BEI and an untreated SIV control is studied.
  • the virus is prepared as described hereinbefore.
  • the virus is expanded to a total of 350 ml and the infectivity and HA bioactivity is determined as approximately 8.00 TCID 50 /ml and 1280 HA/ml.
  • Infectivity is determined using a MDCK cell line and microscopic observations for cytopathic effects as the 50 percent end point.
  • Complete inactivation is tested using fluorescent antibody to type A influenza.
  • the HA bioassay is performed using chicken red blood cells that are observed and scored for hemaglutination.
  • Three treatment groups are prepared, IDU treated, BEI treated and untreated.
  • Each preparation is incubated at room temperature for approximately 72 hours with continuous rocking. After incubation, infectivity and HA bioactivity are tested using MDCK and chicken red blood cells, respectively. Each preparation is aliquoted into four volumes and placed at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-38° C., and 40-42° C. Samples are collected at 0 days, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. the HA bioactivity is tested on the day of collection at each time point. A 3 percent BEI solution is prepared and 4.5 ml is mixed with 150 ml of virus lysate. A 10 percent stock of imidazolidinyl urea is prepared in sterile RO/DI water and filter stabilized.
  • a 0.5 percent imidazolidinyl urea concentration a 7.5 ml portion of the 10 percent stock is mixed with 150 ml of virus lysate. Infectious titers of the base samples are determined for the untreated version as 8.00 TCID 50 /ml and 8.50FAID 50 /ml. For BEI treated and IDU treated samples, the results are below the level of detection, where the level of detection is ⁇ 1.3 TCID 50 /ml and 1.3 FAID 50 /ml.
  • H1N1 virus was inactivated using 0.5% IDU or 3% v/v BEI at room temperature for 72 hours. Preparations of each sample were placed at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for the forced degradation assay. Samples were collected and tested for HA bio-activity every week for the first month, at three months, three and a half months, six months, twelve months, fifteen months, eighteen months and twenty-one months. After three and a half months the testing of all samples being stored at 40-42° C. was discontinued due to loss of detectable HA bio-activity. After twelve, months, the testing of all samples stored at 35-39° C. was discontinued due to loss of detectable HA bio-activity.
  • H1N1 isolates stored at 2-7° C. and 22-25° C. at fifteen months, eighteen months and twenty-one months. All samples collected to date have been tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC.
  • the positive control viruses H1N1 or H1N2 isolates, not-inactivated
  • the HA bio-activity was retained in all samples tested following inactivation.
  • the HA bio-activity of samples stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 7 and 8 during the twenty-one months of incubation. The only exception was month six in which all samples had a titer of 6. The results are graphed in FIG. 1 .
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated and IDU-inactivated viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6-8 through the fifteen months of incubation, then decreased to a titer of 4 after twenty-one months of incubation.
  • the HA bio-activity of the BEI-inactivated virus stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 7 and 8 through the first three and a half months of incubation, then was undetectable (titer of ⁇ 2) after twenty-one months of incubation.
  • the results are graphed in FIG. 2 .
  • In the first phase of testing there was no real difference in HA bio-activity between any of the H1N1 isolate treatments stored at 2-7° C.
  • the H1N1 isolate inactivated with IDU demonstrated at least a retention of 3 to 4-fold greater amount of HA bio-activity compared to the BEI inactivated virus from fifteen months through twenty-one months of incubation at 22-25° C.
  • the HA bio-activity of all Phase I samples collected during the first fifteen months of incubation were tested using one lot of cRBC.
  • the HA bio-activity titers for all samples were within 2 logs of the original titer obtained on the day of collection. The only exception is the untreated virus stored at 40-42° C. at three and three and a half months which had titers that were 3 and 4 logs higher, respectively, than those obtained on the original days of collection (see Table 4).
  • Phase II of this project was to extend the HA bio-activity testing of the H1N2 virus and H3N2 virus from three months to one year.
  • the H1N2 and H3N2 viruses were inactivated using IDU and BEI.
  • the H1N2 and H3N2 viruses were inactivated with 0.5% IDU and 3% v/v BEI at room temperature for 72 hours.
  • the untreated virus samples were retained at 2-7° C. until the initiation of the forced degradation assay. Preparations of each sample were placed at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for the forced degradation assay.
  • Samples were collected and tested for HA bio-activity on days three, seven, ten, fourteen, and twenty-one; one month, two months, three months, four months, six months, nine months and twelve months. After the four month testing date all samples being incubated at 40-42° C. were no longer tested due to a loss of detectable HA bio-activity.
  • H1N2 and H3N2 SIV isolates Treatment of the H1N2 and H3N2 SIV isolates with 0.5% IDU and 3% v/v BEI for 72 hours resulted in complete-SIV infection inactivation ( ⁇ 1.5 TCID 50 /ml). No cytopathic effect was observed in indicator cells. As expected, there was a minimal cytotoxic effect due to the IDU.
  • the H1N2 SIV virus yielded a titer of 5.8 TCID 50 /ml before inactivation and the H1N2 positive control virus yielded a titer of 6.8 TCID 50 /ml.
  • the H3N2 SIV virus yielded a titer of 4.8 TCID 50 /ml before inactivation and the H3N2 positive control virus yielded a titer of 6.0 TCID 50 /ml.
  • the HA bio-activity was tested on days three, seven, ten, fourteen, and twenty-one; one month, two months, three months, four months, six months, nine months and twelve months. All samples collected to date were tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC.
  • the H1N2 positive control has had an HA titer of 6-7 and the H3N2 positive control has had an HA titer of 5-7 during the twelve months.
  • the HA bio-activity was retained in all samples tested following inactivation.
  • the HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. retained a titer of 6 through the first twenty-one days of incubation, then decreased to a titer of 2 after twelve months see FIG. 4 .
  • the titer for the untreated virus increased to a titer of 1 after nine months, then below the level of detection to a titer of ⁇ 2 at twelve months.
  • the titer for the IDU-inactivated virus increased during the six to twelve month testing period see FIG. 5 .
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 40-42° C. retained a titer of 6 for the first three days of incubation.
  • the HA bio-activity of the BEI inactivated H1N2 virus decreased below the level of detection after fourteen days, then had a low level of activity at one month.
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated and IDU inactivated H1N2 viruses decreased below the level of detection after 1 month, see FIG. 6 .
  • the H1N2 virus inactivated with BEI maintained similar HA bio-activity as the untreated H1N2 virus at the 2-7° C., 22-25° C. and 35-39° C. storage temperatures.
  • the HA bio-activity of the BEI inactivated H1N2 virus decreased more rapidly than the untreated virus at 40-42° C.
  • the HA bio-activity of the H1N2 virus inactivated with IDU decreased at a greater rate at every storage temperature, than the untreated or BEI inactivated viruses.
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through twelve months of incubation.
  • the HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through the first two months of incubation then between titers of 5 and 6 through twelve months, see FIG. 7 .
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through twelve months of incubation.
  • the HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through the first two months of incubation, then between titers 5 and 7 through twelve months, see FIG. 8 .
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated H3N2 virus stored at 35-39° C. fluctuated between titers of 5 and 6 through the first four months of incubation, then decreased to a titer of 4 after twelve months.
  • the HA bio-activity of the BEI-inactivated and the IDU-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. fluctuated between titers of 5 and 7 for the first two months, then between titers of 3 and 6 through nine months of incubation. After twelve months of incubation the BEI-inactivated H3N2 virus retained a titer of 3, whereas the IDU-inactivated H3N2 virus IHA bio-activity was not detected (titer ⁇ 2), see FIG.
  • the HA bio-activity of the BEI-inactivated H3N2 virus stored at 40-42° C. was below the level of detection (titer of ⁇ 2) after seven days and fluctuated between a below the level of detection and 2 through four months.
  • the HA bio-activity of the untreated H3N2 virus fluctuated between a titer of 2 or 3 throughout one month, then was not detected two months.
  • the HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H3N2 virus started with a titer of 6 and retained a titer of 5 through the first month of incubation. After two months the IDU-inactivated H3N2 virus had a titer of 3, and then was undetectable after four months. Testing of all samples stored at 40-42° C. was ceased after four months, see FIG. 10 .
  • the H3N2 SIV isolate was inactivated using 0.5% IDU at room temperature, 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
  • the H1N2 SIV isolate was inactivated using 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% IDU at room temperature, 35-3.9° C. and 40-42° C. for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
  • Bulk preparations of each sample were placed at 2-7° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for the forced degradation assay. Samples were collected and tested for HA bio-activity on days 0, seven, fourteen, and twenty-one, and once monthly for six months.
  • the HA bio-activity was tested at time 0, day seven, day fourteen, day twenty-one, and once-monthly for six months. All samples collected to date have been tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC.
  • the positive control H3N2 not-inactivated
  • the initial HA bio-activity was retained in all samples tested regardless of the incubation temperature or time of incubation used to inactivate the samples.
  • the HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. retained an HA titer of 6 during the first month of incubation, then fluctuated between titers of 5 and 6 through six months, see FIG. 11 .
  • the HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. retained an HA titer of 6 during the first month of incubation, then fluctuated between titers of 4 and 5 through six months see FIG. 12 .
  • the HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses stored at 40-42° C. retained a titer of 6 for the first seven days then decreased to a titer of 3 after two months.
  • the HA bio-activity has been tested at time 0, days seven, fourteen twenty-one, and each month for six months. All samples collected to date have been tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC.
  • the HA titer for the positive control H1N2 not-inactivated
  • the incubation temperature, time of incubation, or concentration of IDU used to inactivate the samples did not affect the initial HA titer.
  • the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 2 or 3 see FIG. 16 .
  • the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 1.0% IDU and stored at 2-7° C. started at a titer of 7 or 8 and fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through five months of incubation.
  • the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 6, see FIG. 17 .
  • H1N2 viruses inactivated at room temperature (24, 48 or 72 hours) or at 37° C. for 24 hours decreased below the level of detection (titer of ⁇ 2); the H1N2 viruses inactivated at 37° C. for 48 or 72 hours decreased to a titer of 1; and the H1N2 viruses inactivated at 41° C. (24, 48 or 72 hours) decreased to a titer of 2, see FIG. 22 .
  • the H1N2 virus was inactivated using 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% IDU at various temperatures and incubation periods. Each inactivated preparation was placed at 2-7° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for storage for six months.
  • the initial HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 0.5% and 1.0% IDU was slightly higher than the initial HA bio-activity for the H1N2 viruses inactivated with 2.0% IDU, average of 7.3 and 6.7, respectively, There did not appear to be an overt difference between the inactivation conditions regarding the stability of the HA bio-activity during incubations at the lower temperatures. However, there was a slight increase in the retention of HA bio-activity in the groups when incubations were performed at higher temperature.
  • H1N1 isolate samples collected within the first fifteen months of storage were also tested using one lot of cRBCs. This testing was conducted to determine whether differences in HA titers were observed between each of the original testing dates (in which various lots of cRBCs were used) and using one lot of cells. Small differences were observed between the titers (within 2-fold) and are probably attributable to the natural variation of the assay. Samples of the untreated H1N1 virus collected at 3 and 3.5 months of storage at 40-42° C. had no detectable titer when originally tested (titer ⁇ 2), but had titers of 8 and 16, respectively, when tested using one lot of cRBCs (Appendix II).
  • H1N2 and H3N2 isolates were assayed through one year of storage at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. and the stability of the IDU-treated samples compared to BEI-treated or untreated samples. The isolates were inactivated using IDU or BEI at room temperature for 72 hours. IDU did not appear to provide much stability of HA bio-activity of the H1N2 preparation used in this phase of the study.
  • the IDU-treated H1N2 isolates had a lower amount of HA bio-activity at every-storage temperature throughout the 12 month period ( FIGS. 3-6 ). This was not true for the H3N2 isolate. Although there was no real difference in HA bio-activity between any of the H3N2 isolate treatments at the 2-7° C., 22-25° C. or 35-59° C. storage temperatures, the IDU-treated isolate maintained a 3 to 5-fold higher HA bio-activity titer than the BEI-treated isolate at the 40-42° C. storage temperature ( FIGS. 7-10 ). Therefore, it appears that the H3N2 isolate benefited from treatment with IDU if stored at 40-42° C.
  • the H1N2 and H3N2 isolates were also assayed through six months of storage at 2-7° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C.; however these samples were not compared to BEI or untreated isolates. Instead, various conditions of IDU-inactivation were compared. No real difference was observed between the HA bio-activity of the isolates inactivated using the various conditions; all conditions tested were within 2-fold of each other at each testing period ( FIGS. 11-22 ).
  • the H3N2 isolate behaved very similarly between this phase of the study ( FIGS. 11-13 ) and the phase in which the isolate was inactivated only at room temperature for 72 hours ( FIGS. 7-10 ).
  • the HA bio-activity of the H1N2 isolates inactivated using 0.5% IDU appeared to be slightly more stable than the isolates inactivated with 1.0% or 2.0% IDU at the elevated temperatures (35-39° C. and 40-42° C.). This supports previous studies that suggested a range of 0.25% to 0.5% IDU was useful to inactivate virus and stabilize HA bio-activity.
  • the H1N2 preparation used in this phase of the study appeared to be much more stable than the preparation used in the earlier studies where the isolate was inactivated at room temperature for 72 hours ( FIGS. 3-6 ); this was most evident especially at the higher temperatures.
  • Table 4 shows the titer data measured.
  • FIGS. 23 to 25 provide a comparison of the HA Bio-Activity for the H3N2 Virus Inactivated with 0.5% DU for 72 Hours at Room Temperature between Phase I and Phase H1.
  • FIGS. 26 to 28 provide a comparison of the HA Bio-Activity for the H1N2 Virus Inactivated with 0.5% IDU for 72 Hours at Room Temperature between Phase I and Phase II
  • Parts by weight as used herein refers to 100 parts by weight of the composition specifically referred to.
  • any numerical values recited in the above application include all values from the lower value to the upper value in increments of one unit provided that there is a separation of at least 2 units between any lower value and any higher value.
  • the amount of a component or a value of a process variable such as, for example, temperature, pressure, time and the like is, for example, from 1 to 90, preferably from 20 to 80, more preferably from 30 to 70, it is intended that values such as 15 to 85, 22 to 68, 43 to 51, 30 to 32 etc. are expressly enumerated in this specification.
  • one unit is considered to be 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01 or 0.1 as appropriate.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention is directed at a composition comprising a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol. Preferably, the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.

Description

    CLAIM OF PRIORITY
  • This application claims priority from provisional application Ser. No. 61/482,367 filed May 4, 201 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates generally to inactivated swine flu virus compositions, methods of preparing such compositions, and to such compositions useful as or in vaccines. Further the present invention relates to methods of preparation, storage and transportation of precursors to and vaccine compositions wherein the precursors and vaccines can be stored and transported at ambient temperatures.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • It is known that the preparation of vaccines commonly involves the steps of inactivating a live virus (whether it be attenuated, modified or killed), so that the virus thereafter can be introduced into a living being for inducing an active immune response (e.g., a protective response) in the being. The manufacture of such vaccines often encounters any of a number of practical constraints, which create a strain on health care systems. By way of example, in recent history, shortages of influenza vaccines have been experienced due to contamination problems in the manufacturing process. In the context of viral vaccines, one approach to the manufacture of such vaccines has been to grow the specific virus in advance of preparing the vaccine composition, such as by growing the virus in chicken eggs. The manufacture of viruses according to that approach can be expensive, and time consuming, especially considering that many times, one or two eggs may be necessary to yield each dose of vaccine. One classic approach to the manufacture of vaccines has been to inactivate a virus with formalin, binary ethylenimine, formaldehyde or combinations thereof. It is also typically necessary in the manufacture of vaccines to employ one or more preservatives to help prevent contamination by bacteria, fungus or both. Among the most widely employed preservatives have been phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, or thimerosal (which contains mercury). Concerns have been expressed as to the potential efficacy, toxicity or mutagenicity of one or more of the above agents or other ingredients of vaccines. There has been a recognized resurgence in vaccine research in recent years, which has placed an even more acute demand upon vaccine manufacturers to address the above issues.
  • Swine Flu Virus is a negative segmented myxovirus. It has infected a significant portion of the human population. Improved vaccines are desired. Due to its widespread affect the there is a need for widespread distribution of precursors to vaccines and vaccines for this virus. One challenge is that many precursors to vaccines and vaccines require storage and transport at low temperatures, sub ambient temperatures. Thus it presents a challenge to provide such vaccines to populations located in places that do not have infrastructure for storage and transport of such precursors at sub ambient temperatures. To prepare vaccines, viruses are inactivated so that they do not infect the host and the antigens are stabilized so that hosts inoculated with the inactivated viruses develop immunological responses. The United States Department of Agriculture has approved protocols for using binary ethylene-imine or formaldehyde to inactivate certain viruses for vaccine production. In U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,459,073; 5,811,099; and 5,849,517, there are disclosed preservative compositions that include a formaldehyde donor agent, and specifically, one or both of diazolidinyl urea or imidazolidinyl urea. That such compositions can be used in a vaccine is addressed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,811,099; and 5,849,517. Commonly owned and copending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/940,112 filed Nov. 5, 2010 titled “INACTIVATED VIRUS COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS”, now published as US 2011/0110975, discloses contacting a virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus and the resulting composition. This application is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Notwithstanding the foregoing, there remains a need in the art for safer and less toxic inactivated live virus compositions useful in vaccines, more specifically, veterinary vaccines, and still more specifically, inactivated-viral swine vaccines, which can be produced in high yield, with inconsequential toxicity or other potential undesired side effects. What is further needed are vaccine precursors and vaccines that can be stored and transported at ambient temperatures and processes for their production, transport and storage at ambient temperatures. What is needed are compositions that can be manufactured in an efficient manner, that contain components which enhance the disinfectant and antimicrobial properties of the vaccine precursors, that exhibit hemagglutination equal to or better than industry standards, compositions that do not exhibit a loss in titer and are relatively non-toxic.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed at a composition comprising a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens-on the virus in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol. Preferably, the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.
  • The present invention provides a method for deactivating a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens, comprising the steps of: a) providing, a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; and b) contacting the virus swine flu with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating, the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated swine flu virus. In another embodiment, the invention is a method of preparing a composition useful as a vaccine comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount, for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered, of the deactivated swine flu virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Preferably the composition containing a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is useful in, or as, a vaccine composition.
  • The present invention provides a method for deactivating a live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; and b) contacting the virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time (e.g., at least about 12 hours) sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus; and c) storing and/or transporting the contacted composition at ambient temperatures, that is without cold storage or transport. In another embodiment, the invention is a method of preparing a composition useful as a vaccine comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of d) mixing a non-toxic effective amount, for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered, of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Preferably the composition containing a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is useful in, or as, a vaccine composition.
  • The invention herein also contemplates vaccine compositions prepared according to the methods or using the virus of the foregoing aspects of the invention. The aspects of the present invention offer a number of advantages as compared with existing compositions useful in or as vaccines including the possibility to obtain total protection of mortality without use of an adjuvant; the ability to withstand without damaging the vaccine and/or without aggregating vaccine components after one or more freeze-thaw cycles; a reduction of cross-linking surface antigens to a significant enough degree that would result in an auto-immune hypersensitivity reaction mediated by mast cells is avoided; the vaccine protects birds from a live virus challenge (e.g., birds are given two vaccinations two weeks apart, and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) data from samples drawn after the first vaccination indicate that a single vaccination is sufficient); a substantial reduction in the amount of antigen (e.g., a reduction by at least two logs in antigen, and more preferably at least three logs in antigen) necessary to manufacture the vaccine may be realized, a very important economic consideration. The compositions of the invention or prepared by the method of the invention facilitate storage and transportation of vaccine precursors and vaccines at ambient temperatures, that is without the need for storage and/or transportation with refrigeration. The compositions of the invention can be manufactured in an efficient manner, contain components which enhance the disinfectant and antimicrobial properties of the vaccine precursors, exhibit hemagglutination equal to or better than industry standards, do not exhibit a loss in titer and are relatively non-toxic. The invention is useful with flu antigens produced in singular or plural forms in any biological system. Such antigens may be produced in recombinant systems. In particular such antigens may be subjected to the stabilizing and efficacy treatments of the invention.
  • DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES
  • FIGS. 1 to 28 show graphs of Bio-Activity of IDU stabilized compositions over time as described in the Examples.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The explanations and illustrations presented herein are intended to acquaint others skilled in the art with the invention, its principles, and its practical application. Those skilled in the art may adapt and apply the invention in its numerous forms, as may be best suited to the requirements of a particular use. Accordingly, the specific embodiments of the present invention as set forth are not intended as being exhaustive or limiting of the invention. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but should instead be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. The disclosures of all articles and references, including patent applications and publications, are incorporated by reference for all purposes. Other combinations are also possible as will be gleaned from the following claims, which are also hereby incorporated by reference into this written description.
  • The present invention is directed at a composition comprising a deactivated swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol. In addition the present invention provides an improved method for deactivating a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens, comprising the steps of: a) providing a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; b) contacting the swine flu virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated swine flu virus. In another embodiment the invention is a method of preparing a composition comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of c) storing or transporting the mixture at ambient temperatures. In another embodiment the invention is a method of preparing a composition comprising the abovementioned steps in combination with the step of d) mixing a non-toxic effective amount, for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered, of the deactivated swine flu virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Preferably the composition containing a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is useful in, or as, a vaccine composition.
  • In another embodiment, the invention is a method comprising the steps of: a) providing a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; b) contacting the swine flu, virus with a formaldehyde donor agent, having, a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving, at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus c) transporting or storing the contacted composition at ambient temperature.
  • The method for preparing a stabilized live virus composition may further comprise any one or more of the features described in this specification in any combination, including the preferences and examples listed in this specification, and includes the following features: the virus is grown in a tissue or in-vitro cell culture, such as a chicken egg; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof; the contacting step includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of less than about w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less; the contacting step (b) occurs for a period of about 24 to about 240 hours and more preferably about 24 to about 72 hours; the contacting step (b) occurs at a temperature of about 23° C. to about 37° C.; the method is free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formatin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof; the method includes a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus; further comprising a step of performing an assay of the deactivated virus to confirm that the infectious component has been de-activated; further comprising; c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for forming a vaccine composition; the virus is an avian virus provided in a live titer amount of about 106 to about 1012EID50 per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition; further comprising a step of contacting the virus with an adjuvant; the mixing step (c) occurs immediately following the contacting step (b); the contacted composition is transported or stored at ambient temperature; the contacted composition is transported at ambient temperature; and ambient temperature is from about 20° C. to about 37° C.
  • The compositions may further comprise any one or more of the features described in this specification in any combination, including the preferences and examples listed in this specification, and includes the following features: the virus manufactured by growing the virus in tissue or a chicken egg; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof; the formaldehyde donor agent is present in a concentration of less than about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less; further comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent; and the composition can be transported and stored at ambient temperatures.
  • The live virus useful in this invention is any live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens which is capable of being deactivated for use in vaccines. Preferred live viruses are those which can be incubated in tissue or in vitro cell cultures, such as in chicken eggs. Among preferred viruses are avian flu, swine flu, bovine respiratory systhial virus and the like. In one preferred embodiment wherein the composition is transported and/or stored at ambient temperatures a preferred virus is a swine flu or an avian virus. More preferably the avian flu virus is Newcastle's disease. Still more specifically, the virus is a strain of Newcastle Disease Virus selected from a lentogenic strain, a mesogenic strain, a velogenic strain or any combination thereof. For example, the virus is a La Sota strain (e.g., Mass. type) of Newcastle Disease Virus.
  • The amount of time for the contacting step preferably is sufficient for de-activating the virus (whether by attenuating it, modifying it or killing it), while sufficiently preserving surface antigens so that when a subject is vaccinated with a vaccine composition including the deactivated virus, the deactivated virus will induce an immunity response (e.g., a response that is measurable by Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay, such that the response allows the vaccinated subjects to survive exposure to a lethal dosage of the live virus). In a preferred embodiment, the contacting occurs for a period of time of about 12 hours or greater and more preferably about 24 hours or greater. In a preferred embodiment, the contacting occurs for a period of time of about 240 hours or less, more preferably 120 hours or less; even more preferably about 72 hours or less, and most preferably about 48 hours or less. In a preferred embodiment, the contacting step occurs at a temperature of about 20° C. or greater, more preferably about 23° C. or greater and most preferably about 25° C. or greater. In a preferred embodiment, the contacting step occurs at a temperature of about 37° C. or less, more preferably about 30° C. or less; and most preferably about 25 C or less.
  • The viral infection that is useful in the teachings herein preferably is a swine flu virus. More specifically, the virus is a strain of Swine Flu Virus is selected from those designated H1N1, H1N2, H3N2 or the like. When the virus is used in a composition used as a vaccine it is provided in a sufficient amount for invoking an immunity response in a subject to which the vaccines herein are administered. By way of example, the swine fluid virus may be provided in a live titer amount of about 103 to about 1012 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition and more preferably about 106 to about 1011 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition. More specifically, the virus titer may range from about 106 to about 108 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition. By way of example, the avian virus may be provided in a live titer amount of about 106 to about 1011 titer per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition. The formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking, chemical fixative that contains urea. More preferably, the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof. The formaldehyde donor agent may consist essentially of diazolidinyl urea (DU) imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
  • In the embodiment wherein the virus is an avian flu, the contacting step generally includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of about 5 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and more preferably about 4 w/v or less. Preferably, the formaldehyde donor agent may be present in a concentration of about 0.5 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater and more preferably about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater. In the embodiment wherein the virus is a swine flu virus, the contacting step generally includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and more preferably about 0.5 w/v or less. Preferably, the formaldehyde donor agent may be present in a concentration of about 0.0625 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater and more preferably about 0.1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater. The contacting step may be the only step during which the live virus is contacted with the formaldehyde donor agent.
  • The mixing step is a step that can be employed for preparing the resulting composition useful as a vaccine. The mixing step may occur immediately following the contacting step (such that there is no intermediate washing, quenching step or other step by which the deactivated virus would be subjected to a fluid other than a carrier of the vaccine composition), or it may occur during the time period when the contacting step (b) is occurring. Thus, it will be appreciated that during the mixing step the deactivated virus will remain in contact with solution that includes the formaldehyde donor agent. During the mixing step, the antigen-treated virus may be maintained at a temperature above about 15° C. (e.g., it may be about room temperature).
  • The composition of the invention generally will thus include, a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent, which may be a liquid, a solid, a gel or otherwise. By way of illustration, the antigen-treated virus may be admixed in a suitable carrier (e.g., one based on a water or a saline solution) that optionally is buffered (e.g., phosphate buffered saline, such as Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline “D-PBS”) before administering into a subject animal. Preferably, the carrier is such that the antigen-treated virus is uniformly dispersed in the resulting composition at the time of the administration, and it will not degrade the antigen-treated virus throughout a storage life of at least 10 days, more preferably at least one month at a temperature, of about 0° C. to about 37° C. An example of one suitable solution includes, a mixture of CaCl2 (Calcium Chloride); MgC2 (Magnesium Chloride); KCI (Potassium Chloride); KH2PO4 (Potassium Phosphate, monobasic); NaCl (Sodium Chloride); Na2HPO4 (Sodium Phosphate, dibasic), and DGlucose (dextrose). More specifically, one example of such a solution is set forth in the following Table 1, where mM refers to milli-molarity; millimoles/liter.
  • TABLE I
    CaCl2 0.901 mM 
    MgCI2 0.493 mM 
    KCl 2.67 mM
    KH2P04 1.47 mM
    NaCI 137.93 mM 
    Na2HPO4 8.06 mM
    D-Glucose 5.56 mM
  • As taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,252,984, a carrier or diluent may include one or any combination of stabilizers, preservatives and buffers. Suitable stabilizers may include, for example SPGA, carbohydrates (such as sorbitol, mannitol, starch, sucrose, peptone, arginine, dextran, glutamate or glucose), proteins (such as dried milk serum, albumin or casein) or degradation products thereof. Suitable buffers may include for example alkali metal phosphates. Suitable preservatives may include thimerosal, merthuilate and gentamicin. Diluents include water, aqueous buffer (such as buffered saline) and polyols (such as glycerol). It will be appreciated that vaccine compositions herein, as well as any of its carrier or diluents is preferably free of any anti-biotic, and/or any mercury-containing ingredient.
  • The method may further comprise a step of contacting the virus with an adjuvant. Any suitable adjuvant may be utilized in the compositions and methods of this invention. Exemplary adjuvants include those selected from one or any combination of lecithin, a pharmaceutically acceptable polymer, saponin or a derivative thereof, cholesterol, aluminium hydroxide, -phosphate or -oxide, oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion based on, for example a mineral oil, a vegetable oil (such as vitamin E acetate), or some other suitable carboxylic acid. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,981, incorporated by reference. If an adjuvant is employed, it may be employed in a suitable amount for providing adjuvant activity. Thus, by way of example, following treatment of the surface antigens of the virus, the deactivated virus may diluted into D-PBS, which may include an adjuvant or be free of an adjuvant. Other examples of suitable adjuvants may include one or any combination of compounds or compositions for this purpose
  • The composition and method for making it is a relatively simple and elegant to a technology that previously has seen various potentially complicating approaches. Though such approaches may be employed with the teachings herein, it is preferable that the vaccine composition and the virus are free of any contact with any plant-cell—produced components: the virus includes or is free of an infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus; the method may optionally be free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formalin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof; or any combination of the foregoing. It is also possible that the vaccine composition may include or be free of any neutralizing antibodies bound to the surface antigens. It is also possible that the vaccine composition may otherwise include or be free of an antioxidant.
  • Other variations of the invention are also possible. To illustrate, the method may include a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus. The antigen-treated virus may include or be free of any temperature reduction to a temperature below about 10° C. (e.g., to below about 0° C.). The method may include or be free of any step that removes the formaldehyde donor agent prior to the mixing step. Accordingly, the various aspects of the invention contemplate that the administration of the vaccine composition is accomplished in the absence of any step of diluting the composition at the time of or at the site of administration of the vaccination. The mixing step described previously could constitute the only diluting step that occurs in the methods herein. The method may also include one or more steps of storing the resulting composition for a period of at least 30 days, at least 60 days, or even at least 90 days following the mixing step; storing the resulting composition at one or more temperatures of below about 1 St (e.g., about 0 to about 10° C.), with the composition retaining its stability under such conditions (e.g., the amount of useful deactivated virus remains within about 20% and more preferably within about 10% of the titer amount at the time of the mixing step). The composition may be stored in suitable sealed containers, such as stopped vials (e.g., rubber stopped glass or plastic vials), sealed syringes, blister packaging, or otherwise. Preferably the method includes storing or transporting any composition of the invention or prepared by the methods of the invention at ambient temperature, wherein ambient temperature is defined hereinbefore. When such compositions are stored or transported at ambient temperatures such compositions retain their efficacy as described hereinbefore.
  • The method may also include one or more steps of performing an assay of the deactivated virus to confirm that the infectious component has been de-activated. The methods herein further contemplate immunizing a subject with a vaccine composition prepared according to the present teachings. Thus the methods herein may further comprise at least one step of administering a subject in need of immunization with the vaccine composition described in the present teachings. Any step of administering a subject in need of immunization with the vaccine composition by performed by ingestion (e.g., from drinking water), intranasally (e.g., by aerosol), intraocularly (e.g., by aerosol), via intramuscular injection, by subcutaneous injection, by delivering into eggs prior to hatching (e.g., manually or by machine); or any combination thereof. A plurality of steps of administering the vaccine to the subject may be performed at intervals (e.g., they may be administered to the same subject on multiple occasions, such as at intervals of at least 3 days). By way of further example, at least two steps of administering the subject may performed at intervals of greater than one week (e.g., about 14 days apart). It is also possible that only a single dose is administered and is sufficient for achieving the desired satisfactory immune response.
  • As gathered from the foregoing, another aspect of the present invention is directed at deactivated virus described herein that has been contacted with a formaldehyde donor agent according to the above teachings, as well as compositions useful as vaccines (including the and one or more of the other ingredients, e.g., one or more of a carrier, an adjuvant, or both) resulting from the methods herein. Resulting viruses treated according to the teachings herein may be characterized as being free of cross-linking with other surface antigens of the virus.
  • The dosage of the vaccine preferably will be a sufficient amount for inducing immunity in the vaccinated subjects against challenge by a virulent form of the virus, wherein immunity can be described as the realization within a period of 4, days, more preferably 7 days, and still more preferably 14 days after challenge of a death rate due to the virulent form of the virus that is less than 50% of the population of subjects challenged, more preferably less than 25% of subjects challenged and still more preferably less than 5% of subjects challenged (e.g., approximately 100% of challenged subjects survive the challenge). Challenges include the step of administering the virulent form of the virus to the subject in a 100% lethal dosage amount.
  • Though illustrated in connection with immunization for prevention of swine flu virus, the present invention is not intended to be so limited. It may have application for immunization for prevention of other viruses, including but not limited to other avian paramyxoviruses, avian influenza (e.g., H5 or H7 influenza, such as H5N1 influenza), avian polyoma virus, Pacheco's disease, West Nile Virus, diminuvirus, chicken anemia virus, or Circo virus. The vaccine compositions herein may also include a plurality of antigenic components suitable for immunizing against a plurality of viruses. For example, the invention contemplates that the resulting vaccine may immunize against Swine Flu Virus and one or more other viruses. The methods and compositions herein may be employed in the immunization of mammal and avian subjects.
  • The method of the invention comprises the steps of: providing a live virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens; b) contacting the virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus. The method of the invention may further comprise one or more of the following features in any combination. The virus is grown in a chicken egg; the virus is Swine flu virus; the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, or consists essentially of, a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea. The formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, or consists essentially of, diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof. The resulting solution consists essentially of de-activated virus and the formaldehyde donor agent; the contacting step includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of less than about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less, preferably about 0.5 w/v or less (grams per 100 ml total volume) and preferably about 0.625 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume or greater), and more preferably about of about 0.1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater. The contacting step (b) occurs for a period of about 24 to about 72 hours. The contacting step (b) occurs at a temperature of about 20° C. to about 37° C., preferably about 25° C. The mixing step (c) occurs immediately following the contacting step (b). During the time period throughout the contacting step (b) the antigen-treated virus is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. or greater. The contacting step (b) is the only step during which the live virus is contacted with the formaldehyde donor agent. The resulting composition may be free of any contact with any plant-cell-produced components. The virus includes an infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus. The virus may be free of any infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus. The method may be free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formalin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof. The method may include a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus. The method may further comprise a step of performing an assay of the deactivated virus to confirm that the infectious component has been de-activated. The method may be free of any step of reducing the temperature of the virus to below about 20° C. The surface antigens may be free of cross-linking with other surface antigens of the virus. The method may further comprise; c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for forming a vaccine composition. The virus is an avian-virus provided in a live titer amount of about 108 to about 1011 Eid per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition. The method may further comprise a step of contacting the virus with an adjuvant. The mixing step (c) may occur immediately following the contacting step (b); during the time period throughout the contacting step (b) and the mixing step (c). The antigen-treated virus is maintained at a temperature of about 20° C. During the time period throughout the contacting step (b) and the mixing step (c), the antigen-treated virus may be free of any temperature reduction to a temperature below about 20° C. The method may be free of any step that removes the formaldehyde donor agent prior to the mixing step (c). The composition of the invention comprises a deactivated virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol. The composition of the invention may further comprise one or more of the following features in any combination. The formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, consists essentially of, a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea. The formaldehyde donor agent is selected from, consists essentially of, diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof. The formaldehyde donor agent is present in a concentration of about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and more preferably about 0.5 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less and about 0.625 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater and more preferably about 0.1 (grams per 100 ml total volume) or greater. The composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. The resulting composition may be free of any contact with any plant-cell-produced components. The virus may include an infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus; the virus is free of any infectious genetically engineered, genetically modified or cloned virus. The composition may be free of binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formalin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof. The surface antigens may be free of cross-linking with other surface antigens of the virus. A non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine of the deactivated virus of a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier is administered. The virus may be an avian virus provided in a live titer amount of about 106 to about 1011 EID50 per milliliter. The composition retains its immunological efficacy after storage and transportation at ambient temperature, about 20° C. to about 37° C. and more preferably about 23° C. to about 30° C.
  • Illustrative Embodiments of the Invention
  • The following examples are provided to illustrate the invention, but are not intended to limit the scope thereof. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
  • Test Methods
  • Inactivation Sample Hemagglutination Assay (HA) is run to determine if inactivation treatment degrades virus surface epitopes necessary for hemagglutination. If so, the HA result should be negative. The desired, result is positive hemagglutination, thereby confirming that surface epitopes are preserved. More specifically, in this assay, a sample is incubated with a fresh preparation of chicken red blood cells (cRBC5). Hemagglutination (HA) is defined as the clumping of cRBCs. The virus can promote hemagglutination through the interaction of molecules on the virus surface with molecules on the surface of cRBC5. Damaged or degraded virus does not promote hemagglutination. Depending on the sample used (treated/untreated virus or allantoic fluid—AF—from inoculated eggs), the results may be interpreted differently. If the sample is treated/untreated virus (the inactivation sample), a positive HA result indicates that the virus is not degraded due to the treatment—it gives no information (in this case) about the viability of the virus (inactivation state). If the sample is the allantoic fluid from an inoculated egg, a positive HA result indicates that the virus is not inactivated by the treatment (the virus was active and able to replicate in the egg). If the virus is completely inactivated by the treatment (eg—incubation with DU/IDU/BEI/formaldehyde), the small amount of virus in the inoculum would be diluted out by the large volume of AF, and the HA result would be negative.
  • Embryonic Toxicity assay is run to determine if the virus is still viable after the inactivation treatment. If still viable the virus would replicate in allantoic fluid and kill an embryo to which it is contacted. The desired result is embryonic viability, thereby confirming the presence of no live virus. More specifically, embryonic toxicity is assessed by candling the eggs, such that an egg is placed on a source of bright light (e.g. a flashlight), and the embryo is directly observed. Viable embryos are identified by certain visual cues (pulsatile vasculature, for example). In these experiments, embryonic death may be due to one of three things: (1) injury/infection resulting from the needle stick used in the injection; (2) chemical toxicity (by inactivating agent—DU/IDU); or (3) live virus replication (as a result of incomplete NDV inactivation).
  • Allantoic fluid (AF: from injected eggs) HA Assay is run to determine if the virus is not viable. If not viable, inactivated virus would not replicate and injected virus would be diluted out in AF. If, after ‘inactivation’ treatment, the virus is still viable, allantoic fluid would contain high enough titer of virus to promote hemagglutination. The desired result is negative hemagglutination, thereby confirming that the AF fluid contains no live virus.
  • Chicken Embryonic Fibroblast (CEF) Immunofluorescence (IF) Assay is run to determine whether successful inactivation occurs. It is recognized that chicken embryonic fibroblasts (CEF) grow well in culture and are highly susceptible to infection by liveSwine Flu. In this assay, allantoic fluid (AF) from inoculated eggs is applied to confluent CEF monolayers. After 5 days, cells are washed, fixed and stained with anti-viral antibodies. Positive staining indicates that there was live virus in AF, and therefore, ‘inactivation’ treatment is unsuccessful. The desired result is no staining (which indicates that the virus had been completely inactivated), and supports that the AF fluid contains no live virus.
  • Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay is run with serum samples obtained from vaccinated and/or control animals are incubated with live virus prior to use in the aforementioned HA assay. If the cRBCs do not agglutinate (negative result), the conclusion is that there were specific anti-viral antibodies in the serum (seroconversion) which blocked the viral antigens from interacting with the cRBCs. A serum HAI titer of greater than 16 correlates with an animal successfully rejecting a subsequent live viral challenge. An example of one such assay is found in Allan and Gough, “A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease. (2) Vaccination and Challenge”. Vet Rec., Vol. 95, Issue 7, 147-149, Aug. 17, 1974.
  • Test Results
  • Testing is performed on Swine influenza virus (SIV) H1N1. The virus is characterized in red blood cells (RBC) a permissive cell type for assaying the hemagglutination (HA) activity and cytopathic effect (CPE) is identified. Imidazolidinyl urea preparations are prepared in Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline at concentrations as described hereinafter. Equal volumes of virus are mixed with the imidazolidinyl urea. The resulting solutions are then serially diluted and added to cell monolayers. The plates are incubated at 37° C., in 5% carbon dioxide for 5 to 6 days. The monolayers are observed for morphological changes associated with cytotoxicity effect (CTE) or CPE caused by imidazolidinyl urea and Swine Influenza Virus.
  • Concentrations of 0.0625, 0.1250, 0.250 and 0.500 of imidazolidinyl urea (IDU) are tested according to the protocol described. The results are compiled in Table 2.
  • TABLE 2
    CPE Titer
    CTE per ml
    HA Titer CTE Titer Titer above (above
    IDU per ml per ml per ml CTE titer)
    Example Conc % SIV Present SIV Present No SIV SIV Present
    1 0.5000 1920 1280 1280 40
    2 0.2500 1920 1280 1280 0
    3 0.1250 1920 640 640 0
    4 0.0625 1920 160 160 80
    5 0 1280 40960
  • The data demonstrates that imidazolidinyl urea levels of 0.0625, 01250, 0.2500 and 0.5000 levels significantly reduce SIV infectivity with incubations of 37° C. for 18 hours.
  • The inactivation of SIV infectivity using imidazolidinyl urea, BEI and an untreated SIV control is studied. The virus is prepared as described hereinbefore. The virus is expanded to a total of 350 ml and the infectivity and HA bioactivity is determined as approximately 8.00 TCID50/ml and 1280 HA/ml. Infectivity is determined using a MDCK cell line and microscopic observations for cytopathic effects as the 50 percent end point. Complete inactivation is tested using fluorescent antibody to type A influenza. The HA bioassay is performed using chicken red blood cells that are observed and scored for hemaglutination. Three treatment groups are prepared, IDU treated, BEI treated and untreated. Each preparation is incubated at room temperature for approximately 72 hours with continuous rocking. After incubation, infectivity and HA bioactivity are tested using MDCK and chicken red blood cells, respectively. Each preparation is aliquoted into four volumes and placed at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-38° C., and 40-42° C. Samples are collected at 0 days, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. the HA bioactivity is tested on the day of collection at each time point. A 3 percent BEI solution is prepared and 4.5 ml is mixed with 150 ml of virus lysate. A 10 percent stock of imidazolidinyl urea is prepared in sterile RO/DI water and filter stabilized. A 0.5 percent imidazolidinyl urea concentration a 7.5 ml portion of the 10 percent stock is mixed with 150 ml of virus lysate. Infectious titers of the base samples are determined for the untreated version as 8.00 TCID50/ml and 8.50FAID50/ml. For BEI treated and IDU treated samples, the results are below the level of detection, where the level of detection is ≥1.3 TCID50/ml and 1.3 FAID50/ml.
  • The results of the Hemagglutination bio-activity is compiled in Table 3.
  • TABLE 3
    Sample T Time Time Time Time Time Time Time Time Time
    type ° C. Days 0 Days 7 Days 14 Days 21 Months 1 Months 3 Months 3.5 Months 6 Months 12
    SIV 2-7 128 128 256 128 128 128 128 64 256
    SIV 22-25 128 256 128 128 128 128 64 128
    SIV 35-38 128 256 128 128 4 4 <2 16
    SIV 40-42 128 128 32 16 2 2 ND ND
    BEI 2-7 256 128 256 128 128 128 128 64 128
    BEI 22-25 128 256 128 128 128 128 16 32
    BEI 35-38 128 128 64 64 64 64  2 4
    BEI 40-42 128 64 4 <2 2 2 ND ND
    IDU 2-7 256 128 256 128 128 128 128 64 64
    IDU 22-25 128 256 128 128 128 128 64 4
    IDU 35-38 256 256 128 128 32 16 <2 ND
    IDU 40-42 128 256 128 32 2 2 ND 64
    SIV1 256 256 256 128 128 128 128 128  128
  • 1. No Incubation
  • Inactivation Studies
  • H1N1 virus was inactivated using 0.5% IDU or 3% v/v BEI at room temperature for 72 hours. Preparations of each sample were placed at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for the forced degradation assay. Samples were collected and tested for HA bio-activity every week for the first month, at three months, three and a half months, six months, twelve months, fifteen months, eighteen months and twenty-one months. After three and a half months the testing of all samples being stored at 40-42° C. was discontinued due to loss of detectable HA bio-activity. After twelve, months, the testing of all samples stored at 35-39° C. was discontinued due to loss of detectable HA bio-activity.
  • Additional HA bio-activity has been tested on the H1N1 isolate stored at 2-7° C. and 22-25° C. at fifteen months, eighteen months and twenty-one months. All samples collected to date have been tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC. The positive control viruses (H1N1 or H1N2 isolates, not-inactivated) had HA titers of 6-8 (log base 2) during the twenty-one months. The HA bio-activity was retained in all samples tested following inactivation. The HA bio-activity of samples stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 7 and 8 during the twenty-one months of incubation. The only exception was month six in which all samples had a titer of 6. The results are graphed in FIG. 1. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and IDU-inactivated viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6-8 through the fifteen months of incubation, then decreased to a titer of 4 after twenty-one months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the BEI-inactivated virus stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 7 and 8 through the first three and a half months of incubation, then was undetectable (titer of <2) after twenty-one months of incubation. The results are graphed in FIG. 2. In the first phase of testing, there was no real difference in HA bio-activity between any of the H1N1 isolate treatments stored at 2-7° C. for up to twenty-one months following inactivation. The H1N1 isolate inactivated with IDU demonstrated at least a retention of 3 to 4-fold greater amount of HA bio-activity compared to the BEI inactivated virus from fifteen months through twenty-one months of incubation at 22-25° C. The HA bio-activity of all Phase I samples collected during the first fifteen months of incubation were tested using one lot of cRBC. The HA bio-activity titers for all samples were within 2 logs of the original titer obtained on the day of collection. The only exception is the untreated virus stored at 40-42° C. at three and three and a half months which had titers that were 3 and 4 logs higher, respectively, than those obtained on the original days of collection (see Table 4).
  • Phase 2 Testing
  • The purpose of Phase II of this project was to extend the HA bio-activity testing of the H1N2 virus and H3N2 virus from three months to one year. The H1N2 and H3N2 viruses were inactivated using IDU and BEI. The H1N2 and H3N2 viruses were inactivated with 0.5% IDU and 3% v/v BEI at room temperature for 72 hours. The untreated virus samples were retained at 2-7° C. until the initiation of the forced degradation assay. Preparations of each sample were placed at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for the forced degradation assay. Samples were collected and tested for HA bio-activity on days three, seven, ten, fourteen, and twenty-one; one month, two months, three months, four months, six months, nine months and twelve months. After the four month testing date all samples being incubated at 40-42° C. were no longer tested due to a loss of detectable HA bio-activity.
  • Treatment of the H1N2 and H3N2 SIV isolates with 0.5% IDU and 3% v/v BEI for 72 hours resulted in complete-SIV infection inactivation (≤1.5 TCID50/ml). No cytopathic effect was observed in indicator cells. As expected, there was a minimal cytotoxic effect due to the IDU. The H1N2 SIV virus yielded a titer of 5.8 TCID50/ml before inactivation and the H1N2 positive control virus yielded a titer of 6.8 TCID50/ml. The H3N2 SIV virus yielded a titer of 4.8 TCID50/ml before inactivation and the H3N2 positive control virus yielded a titer of 6.0 TCID50/ml.
  • The HA bio-activity was tested on days three, seven, ten, fourteen, and twenty-one; one month, two months, three months, four months, six months, nine months and twelve months. All samples collected to date were tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC. The H1N2 positive control has had an HA titer of 6-7 and the H3N2 positive control has had an HA titer of 5-7 during the twelve months. The HA bio-activity was retained in all samples tested following inactivation. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through twelve months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through the first two months of incubation then decreased to a titer 4 after twelve months, see FIG. 3. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through twelve months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. retained a titer of 6 through the first twenty-one days of incubation, then decreased to a titer of 2 after twelve months see FIG. 4. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through the first month of incubation, then was undetected (titer of <2) after three months. The HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. retained a titer of 6 for the first three days, retained a titer of 4 through fourteen days and then gradually decreased below the level of detection to a titer of <2 after three months. The titer for the untreated virus increased to a titer of 1 after nine months, then below the level of detection to a titer of <2 at twelve months. The titer for the IDU-inactivated virus increased during the six to twelve month testing period see FIG. 5. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H1N2 viruses stored at 40-42° C. retained a titer of 6 for the first three days of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the BEI inactivated H1N2 virus decreased below the level of detection after fourteen days, then had a low level of activity at one month. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and IDU inactivated H1N2 viruses decreased below the level of detection after 1 month, see FIG. 6.
  • The H1N2 virus inactivated with BEI maintained similar HA bio-activity as the untreated H1N2 virus at the 2-7° C., 22-25° C. and 35-39° C. storage temperatures. The HA bio-activity of the BEI inactivated H1N2 virus decreased more rapidly than the untreated virus at 40-42° C. The HA bio-activity of the H1N2 virus inactivated with IDU decreased at a greater rate at every storage temperature, than the untreated or BEI inactivated viruses. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through twelve months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through the first two months of incubation then between titers of 5 and 6 through twelve months, see FIG. 7. The HA bio-activity of the untreated and BEI-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through twelve months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 22-25° C. fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through the first two months of incubation, then between titers 5 and 7 through twelve months, see FIG. 8. The HA bio-activity of the untreated H3N2 virus stored at 35-39° C. fluctuated between titers of 5 and 6 through the first four months of incubation, then decreased to a titer of 4 after twelve months. The HA bio-activity of the BEI-inactivated and the IDU-inactivated H3N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. fluctuated between titers of 5 and 7 for the first two months, then between titers of 3 and 6 through nine months of incubation. After twelve months of incubation the BEI-inactivated H3N2 virus retained a titer of 3, whereas the IDU-inactivated H3N2 virus IHA bio-activity was not detected (titer <2), see FIG. 9. The HA bio-activity of the BEI-inactivated H3N2 virus stored at 40-42° C. was below the level of detection (titer of <2) after seven days and fluctuated between a below the level of detection and 2 through four months. The HA bio-activity of the untreated H3N2 virus fluctuated between a titer of 2 or 3 throughout one month, then was not detected two months. The HA bio-activity of the IDU-inactivated H3N2 virus started with a titer of 6 and retained a titer of 5 through the first month of incubation. After two months the IDU-inactivated H3N2 virus had a titer of 3, and then was undetectable after four months. Testing of all samples stored at 40-42° C. was ceased after four months, see FIG. 10.
  • There was no real difference in the HA bio-activity for any of the H3N2 virus treatments through twelve months of storage at 2-7° C., 22-25° C. and 35-39° C.; the only exception being the loss of HA bio-activity to below the level of detection of the virus inactivated with IDU on the twelve month testing date. The HA bio-activity of the H3N2 virus inactivated with IDU appeared to be much more stable than the untreated or BEI inactivated H3N2 viruses through two months of storage at 40-42° C.
  • Testing was performed to determine whether the hemagglutinin protein from Swine Influenza Virus (SIV) isolates H1N2 and H3N2 is stabilized by the compound IDU using expanded inactivation conditions. Data from Phase I.B. demonstrated that 0.5% IDU was effective in the complete inactivation of SIV infectivity of both isolates (H1N2 and H3N2) after a 72 hour incubation at room temperature and did not affect the HA protein's ability to hemagglutinate red blood cells. However, the incubation of inactivated viruses at elevated temperatures resulted in different levels of HA bio-activity stability over time. The level of HA bio-activity stability was not the same for all the isolates tested.
  • Phase 3 Inactivation Studies Hemagglutination Bio-Activity Testing of the H3N2 Isolate Forced Degradation Samples Inactivated with 0.5% IDU
  • Treatment of all Phase 3 samples with 0.5%, 1.0%, or 2.0% IDU for 24, 48, and 72 hours resulted in complete SIV infection inactivation (≤1.5 TCID50/ml). No cytopathic effect was observed in indicator cells. As expected, there was a minimal cytotoxic effect due to the IDU. The SIV positive control (not inactivated) yielded a titer of 5.5 TCID50/ml on the indicator cells.
  • The H3N2 SIV isolate was inactivated using 0.5% IDU at room temperature, 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for 24, 48 and 72 hours. The H1N2 SIV isolate was inactivated using 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% IDU at room temperature, 35-3.9° C. and 40-42° C. for 24, 48 and 72 hours. Bulk preparations of each sample were placed at 2-7° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for the forced degradation assay. Samples were collected and tested for HA bio-activity on days 0, seven, fourteen, and twenty-one, and once monthly for six months.
  • The HA bio-activity was tested at time 0, day seven, day fourteen, day twenty-one, and once-monthly for six months. All samples collected to date have been tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC. The positive control (H3N2 not-inactivated) had an HA bio-activity titer of 6 or 7 during the six months. The initial HA bio-activity was retained in all samples tested regardless of the incubation temperature or time of incubation used to inactivate the samples. The HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C. retained an HA titer of 6 during the first month of incubation, then fluctuated between titers of 5 and 6 through six months, see FIG. 11. The HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. retained an HA titer of 6 during the first month of incubation, then fluctuated between titers of 4 and 5 through six months see FIG. 12. The HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses stored at 40-42° C. retained a titer of 6 for the first seven days then decreased to a titer of 3 after two months. The HA bio-activity of all H3N2 viruses fluctuated between titers of 2 and 4 through five months of incubation, then was not detected (titer <2) after six months, see FIG. 13.
  • There was no real loss of HA bio-activity for any of the H3N2 virus treatments stored at 2-7° C. through six months. All treatments of the H3N2 virus stored at 35-39° C. retained a HA bio-activity titer of 6 through one month, then dropped to a titer of 4 after six months. All treatments of the H3N2 virus stored at 40-42° C. retained HA bio-activity titers within 2-fold of each other throughout six months except at the four month testing date. After four months of storage at 40-42° C., there was a 3-fold difference in titer between the virus inactivated at 37° C. for 24 and 48 hours and the virus inactivated at 41° C. for 72 hours. However, all treatments stored at 40-42° C. returned to a titer of 3 after five months, then the HA bio-activity was not detected after six months.
  • Phase 4 Hemagglutination Bio-Activity Testing of the H1N2 Isolate Forced Degradation Samples Inactivated with 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% IDU
  • The HA bio-activity has been tested at time 0, days seven, fourteen twenty-one, and each month for six months. All samples collected to date have been tested for HA bio-activity using cRBC. The HA titer for the positive control (H1N2 not-inactivated) remained consistent at 7 or 8 during the six months. The incubation temperature, time of incubation, or concentration of IDU used to inactivate the samples did not affect the initial HA titer. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 0.5% IDU and stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 6-8 through six months of incubation, see FIG. 14. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 0.5% IDU and stored at 35-39° C. fluctuated between titers of 7 and 8 through the first seven days, then fluctuated between titers of 5 and 7 through four months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of the H1N2 viruses fluctuated between titers of 4 and 5 after five months of incubation and then decreased to a titer of 4 after six months, see FIG. 15. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 0.5% IDU and stored at 40-42° C. fluctuated between a titer of 7 and 8 for the first seven days, then fluctuated between a titer of 5 and 6 through three months of incubation. After six months of incubation the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 2 or 3 see FIG. 16. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 1.0% IDU and stored at 2-7° C. started at a titer of 7 or 8 and fluctuated between titers of 6 and 7 through five months of incubation. After six months of incubation the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 6, see FIG. 17. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 1.0% IDU and stored at 35-39° C. started at titers of 7 or 8, then fluctuated between a titer of 5 and 7 through three months of incubation. After six months of incubation the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 4, see FIG. 18. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 1.0% IDU and stored at 40-42° C. started at titers of 7 or 8, then fluctuated between titers of 4 and 6 through three months of incubation. After six months of incubation the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated at room temperature for 24 or 48 hours decreased to a titer of 1 and all remaining H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 2, see FIG. 19. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 2.0% IDU and stored at 2-7° C. fluctuated between titers of 5-7 through six months of incubation, see FIG. 20. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 2.0% IDU and stored at 35-39° C. started at a titer of 6 or 7, then fluctuated between titers of 4 or 6 through four months of incubation. After six months of incubation the HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses decreased to a titer of 3, see FIG. 21. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 2.0% IDU and stored at 40-42° C. decreased from a titer of 6 or 7 to titers of 3 and 4 after two months of incubation. The HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses returned to a titer of 5 after three months. After six months of incubation, the H1N2 viruses inactivated at room temperature (24, 48 or 72 hours) or at 37° C. for 24 hours decreased below the level of detection (titer of <2); the H1N2 viruses inactivated at 37° C. for 48 or 72 hours decreased to a titer of 1; and the H1N2 viruses inactivated at 41° C. (24, 48 or 72 hours) decreased to a titer of 2, see FIG. 22.
  • The H1N2 virus was inactivated using 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% IDU at various temperatures and incubation periods. Each inactivated preparation was placed at 2-7° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. for storage for six months. The initial HA bio-activity of all H1N2 viruses inactivated with 0.5% and 1.0% IDU was slightly higher than the initial HA bio-activity for the H1N2 viruses inactivated with 2.0% IDU, average of 7.3 and 6.7, respectively, There did not appear to be an overt difference between the inactivation conditions regarding the stability of the HA bio-activity during incubations at the lower temperatures. However, there was a slight increase in the retention of HA bio-activity in the groups when incubations were performed at higher temperature. There was no real loss of HA bio-activity for any of the H1N2 viruses stored at 2-7° C.; the titer for all viruses after six months was within 2-fold of the original titer. The pattern of HA bio-activity for all H1N2 viruses stored at 35-39° C. was similar; all viruses decreased 3 to 4-fold in titer after six months of storage. The pattern of HA bio-activity for all H N2 viruses stored at 40-42° C. was also similar, but the stability of the HA bio-activity appeared to decrease slightly as the concentration of IDU used for inactivation increased.
  • All H1N1 isolate samples collected within the first fifteen months of storage were also tested using one lot of cRBCs. This testing was conducted to determine whether differences in HA titers were observed between each of the original testing dates (in which various lots of cRBCs were used) and using one lot of cells. Small differences were observed between the titers (within 2-fold) and are probably attributable to the natural variation of the assay. Samples of the untreated H1N1 virus collected at 3 and 3.5 months of storage at 40-42° C. had no detectable titer when originally tested (titer <2), but had titers of 8 and 16, respectively, when tested using one lot of cRBCs (Appendix II). It is possible that there was some degradation of virions in these samples that may have caused the number of HA subunits per particle to increase if all HA subunits disassociated from the virion. The H1N2 and H3N2 isolates were assayed through one year of storage at 2-7° C., 22-25° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C. and the stability of the IDU-treated samples compared to BEI-treated or untreated samples. The isolates were inactivated using IDU or BEI at room temperature for 72 hours. IDU did not appear to provide much stability of HA bio-activity of the H1N2 preparation used in this phase of the study. The IDU-treated H1N2 isolates had a lower amount of HA bio-activity at every-storage temperature throughout the 12 month period (FIGS. 3-6). This was not true for the H3N2 isolate. Although there was no real difference in HA bio-activity between any of the H3N2 isolate treatments at the 2-7° C., 22-25° C. or 35-59° C. storage temperatures, the IDU-treated isolate maintained a 3 to 5-fold higher HA bio-activity titer than the BEI-treated isolate at the 40-42° C. storage temperature (FIGS. 7-10). Therefore, it appears that the H3N2 isolate benefited from treatment with IDU if stored at 40-42° C. The H1N2 and H3N2 isolates were also assayed through six months of storage at 2-7° C., 35-39° C. and 40-42° C.; however these samples were not compared to BEI or untreated isolates. Instead, various conditions of IDU-inactivation were compared. No real difference was observed between the HA bio-activity of the isolates inactivated using the various conditions; all conditions tested were within 2-fold of each other at each testing period (FIGS. 11-22). The H3N2 isolate behaved very similarly between this phase of the study (FIGS. 11-13) and the phase in which the isolate was inactivated only at room temperature for 72 hours (FIGS. 7-10). The HA bio-activity of the H1N2 isolates inactivated using 0.5% IDU appeared to be slightly more stable than the isolates inactivated with 1.0% or 2.0% IDU at the elevated temperatures (35-39° C. and 40-42° C.). This supports previous studies that suggested a range of 0.25% to 0.5% IDU was useful to inactivate virus and stabilize HA bio-activity. The H1N2 preparation used in this phase of the study (FIGS. 14-22) appeared to be much more stable than the preparation used in the earlier studies where the isolate was inactivated at room temperature for 72 hours (FIGS. 3-6); this was most evident especially at the higher temperatures. This may be because the H1N2 isolate used in this phase of the study was re-expanded and the new material had a 2-fold higher HA bio-activity titer than the previous material. The increased number of virions and the resulting change in the ratio of IDU to virus mass may have aided in its overall greater stability in this phase of the study. These results suggest that IDU is beneficial for stabilizing the HA bio-activity of the H1N1 and H3N2 isolates, compared to BEI-treatment, when stored at elevated temperatures. The H1N2 isolate also appeared to have benefited from treatment with IDU, but not this was not consistent between two preparations of the virus. There is a greater amount of HA stability observed with the H1N2 isolate if the initial HA bio-activity is higher (at least 7), but the stabilization of this isolate at the higher initial titer was not compared to BEI-treatment. These results also support previous data suggesting that a concentration of 0.5% IDU is optimal for use in inactivating virus and stabilizing HA bio-activity.
  • Table 4 shows the titer data measured.
  • Phase I.A.b: Comparison of Hemagglutination Bio-Activity of all Forced Degradation
    Samples of the H1N1 Virus using Multiple or One Chicken Red Blood Cell Lots
    HA Bio-Activity Titer/50 ul
    Sample T = 0 T = 7 d T = 14 d T = 21 d T = 1 mo
    Un-  2-7° C. 128 256 128 256 256 128 128 128 128 256
    treated 22-25° C. N/A N/A 128 256 256 256 128 128 128 256
    Control 35-39° C. N/A N/A 128 256 256 128 128 128 128 128
    Virus 40-42° C. N/A N/A 128 128 128 128  32  32  16  32
    BEI-  2-7° C. 256 256 128 256 256 128 128 128 128 256
    Treated 22-25° C. N/A N/A 128 128 256 128 128 128 128 256
    Virus 35-39° C. N/A N/A 128 128 128 128  64 128  64 128
    40-42° C. N/A N/A 128 128  64  64  4  4  <2  4
    IDU-  2-7° C. 256 256 128 128 256 256 128 128 128 256
    Treated 22-25° C. N/A N/A 128 256 256 128 128 128 128 128
    Virus 35-39° C. N/A N/A 256 256 256 128 128 128 128 128
    40-42° C. N/A N/A 128 128 256 128 128 128  32  64
    Phase  1  2  1  2  1  2  1  2  1  2
    Positive Control  2561  128*  2561  128*  2561  128*  1281  128*  1281  128*
    HA Bio-Activity Titer/50 ul
    Sample T = 3 mo T = 3.5 mo T = 6 mo T = 12 mo T = 12 mo T = 15 mo
    Un-  2-7° C. 128 256 128 256 64 256  256 128  256 128 256
    Treated 22-25° C. 128 256 128 256 64 128  256 128  256  64  64
    Control 35-39° C.  4  16  4  8 <2 16  4  8  4 NT NT
    Virus 40-42° C.  <2  8  <2  16 NT NT NT NT NT NT NT
    BEI-  2-7° C. 128 128 128 128 64 128  128 128  256 128 256
    treated 22-25° C. 128 128 128 256 16 32  16 64  64  8  16
    virus 35-39° C.  64 128  64  64 <2  4  2  4  4 NT NT
    40-42° C.  <2  4  <2  4 NT NT NT NT NT NT NT
    IDU-  2-7° C. 128 128 128 128 64 128  128 128  128 128 256
    treated 22-25° C. 128 128 128 256 64 64 128 64 128  64 128
    virus 35-39° C.  32  64  16  32 <2  4  <2  4  2 NT NT
    40-42° C.  <2  2  <2  2 NT NT NT NT NT NT NT
    Testing Dates  1  2  1  2  1  1  2  1  2  1  2
    Positive Control 1281  128* 1281  128* 1281  NT  128* NT  128* 1282  128*
    *Positive control virus tested once, 128 HA titer/50 ul
    1H1N1 Iowa-73 isolate, not inactivated, used as positive control
    2H1N2 SIV isolate, not inactivated, used as positive control
    N/A = Not Applicable;
    NT = Not Tested
  • FIGS. 23 to 25 provide a comparison of the HA Bio-Activity for the H3N2 Virus Inactivated with 0.5% DU for 72 Hours at Room Temperature between Phase I and Phase H1. FIGS. 26 to 28 provide a comparison of the HA Bio-Activity for the H1N2 Virus Inactivated with 0.5% IDU for 72 Hours at Room Temperature between Phase I and Phase II
  • Parts by weight as used herein refers to 100 parts by weight of the composition specifically referred to.
  • Any numerical values recited in the above application include all values from the lower value to the upper value in increments of one unit provided that there is a separation of at least 2 units between any lower value and any higher value. As an example, if it is stated that the amount of a component or a value of a process variable such as, for example, temperature, pressure, time and the like is, for example, from 1 to 90, preferably from 20 to 80, more preferably from 30 to 70, it is intended that values such as 15 to 85, 22 to 68, 43 to 51, 30 to 32 etc. are expressly enumerated in this specification. For values-which are less than one, one unit is considered to be 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01 or 0.1 as appropriate. These are only examples of what is specifically intended and all possible combinations of numerical values between the lowest value and the highest value enumerated are to be considered to be expressly stated in this application in a similar manner. Unless otherwise stated, all ranges include both endpoints and all numbers between the endpoints. The use of “about” or “approximately” in connection with a range applies to both ends of the range. Thus, “about 20 to 30” is intended to cover “about 20 to about 30”, inclusive of at least the specified endpoints. The term “consisting essentially of” to describe a combination shall include the elements, ingredients, components or steps identified, and such other elements ingredients, components or steps that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the combination. The use of the terms “comprising” or “including” to describe combinations of elements, ingredients, components or steps herein also contemplates embodiments that consist essentially of the elements, ingredients, components or steps. Plural elements, ingredients, components or steps can be provided by a single integrated element, ingredient, component or step. Alternatively, a single integrated element, ingredient, component or step might be divided into separate plural elements, ingredients, components or steps. The disclosure of “a” or “one” to describe an element, ingredient, component or step is not intended to foreclose additional elements, ingredients, components or steps.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens;
b) contacting the swine flu virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus.
2. A method of claim 1 wherein the virus is grown in a tissue or in vitro cell culture.
3. A method of claim 1 or 2 wherein the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.
4. A method of claim 3 wherein the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
5. A method of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the contacting step includes contacting the virus with the formaldehyde donor agent having a concentration of less than about w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less.
6. A method of any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the contacting step (b) occurs for a period of about 24 to about 72 hours.
7. A method of any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the contacting step (b) occurs at a temperature of about 23° C. to about 37° C.
8. A method of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the method is free of any step of contacting the virus with binary ethylene-imine, formaldehyde, formatin, phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, thimerosal, bromo-ethylene-imine, ethyl methane sulfonate, Nitrosoguanidine, fluorouracil, 5-azacytadine, or any combination thereof.
9. A method of any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the method includes a step of freeze-drying and re-hydrating the antigen-treated virus.
10. A method of preparing, a vaccine comprising the method of any one of claims 1 to 9 which further comprises; c) mixing a non-toxic effective amount for inducing an immune response in a subject to which the vaccine is administered of the deactivated virus with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for forming a vaccine composition.
11. A method of claim 10 wherein the virus is an avian virus provided in a live titer amount of about 106 to about 1012EID50 per milliliter of the resulting vaccine composition.
12. A method of claim 10 or 11 wherein the mixing step (c) occurs immediately following the contacting step (b).
13. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the contacted composition is transported or stored at ambient temperature.
14. A composition comprising a deactivated swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens in contact with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is less than about 400 g/mol.
15. A composition of claim 14 wherein the virus manufactured by growing the virus in a chicken egg.
16. A composition of claim 14 or 15 wherein the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from a non-crosslinking chemical fixative that contains urea.
17. A composition of any one of claims 14 to 16 wherein the formaldehyde donor agent is selected from diazolidinyl urea (DU), imidazolidinyl urea (IDU), or a mixture thereof.
18. A composition of any one of claims 14 to 17 wherein the formaldehyde donor agent is present in a concentration of less than about 1 w/v (grams per 100 ml total volume) or less.
19. A composition of any one of claims 14 to 18 wherein the composition can be transported and stored at ambient temperatures.
20. A method comprising the steps of:
a) providing a live swine flu virus having an infectious component and a plurality of surface antigens;
b) contacting the swine flu virus with a formaldehyde donor agent having a molecular weight that is greater than about 50 g/mol and less than about 400 g/mol for a period of time sufficient for de-activating the infectious component with the formaldehyde donor agent, and for preserving at least a portion of the surface antigens to form a deactivated virus
c) transporting or storing the contacted composition at ambient temperature.
US15/967,058 2011-05-04 2018-04-30 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions Abandoned US20180243406A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/967,058 US20180243406A1 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-04-30 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161482367P 2011-05-04 2011-05-04
PCT/US2012/036304 WO2012151391A2 (en) 2011-05-04 2012-05-03 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
US201314112263A 2013-10-17 2013-10-17
US15/967,058 US20180243406A1 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-04-30 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/112,263 Continuation US9956281B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2012-05-03 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
PCT/US2012/036304 Continuation WO2012151391A2 (en) 2011-05-04 2012-05-03 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180243406A1 true US20180243406A1 (en) 2018-08-30

Family

ID=46420502

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/112,263 Active 2032-10-01 US9956281B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2012-05-03 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
US15/966,986 Abandoned US20180243405A1 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-04-30 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
US15/967,058 Abandoned US20180243406A1 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-04-30 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/112,263 Active 2032-10-01 US9956281B2 (en) 2011-05-04 2012-05-03 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
US15/966,986 Abandoned US20180243405A1 (en) 2011-05-04 2018-04-30 Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (3) US9956281B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2704740B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012151391A2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11168351B2 (en) 2015-03-05 2021-11-09 Streck, Inc. Stabilization of nucleic acids in urine
US11299764B2 (en) 2015-11-20 2022-04-12 Streck, Inc. Single spin process for blood plasma separation and plasma composition including preservative
US11506655B2 (en) 2016-07-29 2022-11-22 Streck, Inc. Suspension composition for hematology analysis control

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2017207076B2 (en) * 2016-01-15 2021-04-29 Km Biologics Co., Ltd. Vaccine containing immobilized virus particles

Family Cites Families (144)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3867521A (en) 1970-08-26 1975-02-18 Scherer Corp R P Method for absorption of drugs
US3885011A (en) 1971-12-29 1975-05-20 Janssen Pharmaceutica Nv Vaccine adjuvants
US4053583A (en) 1976-03-01 1977-10-11 Smithkline Corporation Live newcastle disease virus vaccines
BE853923A (en) 1977-04-25 1977-10-25 Rit Rech Ind Therapeut NEW IMPROVED LIVE VACCINE AGAINST AVIAN PSEUDOPESTE AND ITS PREPARATION PROCESS
US4515890A (en) 1982-11-08 1985-05-07 Abbott Laboratories Immunoassay of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase
US4675159A (en) 1985-09-29 1987-06-23 Al Sioufi Habib Method and device for disinfecting biological fluids and container for same
GB8703696D0 (en) 1987-02-18 1987-03-25 Oxford J S Influenza vaccine
NZ224567A (en) 1987-05-19 1990-08-28 Yissum Res Dev Co Vaccine against newcastle disease virus comprising a live immunogenic lentogenic or mesogenic strain of newcastle disease virus in combination with a liquid containing a mineral or vegetable oil
US5153117A (en) 1990-03-27 1992-10-06 Genetype A.G. Fetal cell recovery method
JP2540649B2 (en) 1990-04-27 1996-10-09 テルモ株式会社 Blood collection tube
US5250438A (en) 1990-05-09 1993-10-05 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Method for differential determination of white blood cells using diazolidinyl urea to stabilize white blood cells
US5196182A (en) 1991-05-08 1993-03-23 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Tissue fixative
US5459073A (en) 1991-05-08 1995-10-17 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Method and composition for preserving antigens and process for utilizing cytological material produced by same
US5849517A (en) * 1991-05-08 1998-12-15 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Method and composition for preserving antigens and nucleic acids and process for utilizing cytological material produced by same
US5460797A (en) 1991-05-08 1995-10-24 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Method for fixing tissues and cells for analysis using oxazolidine compounds
US5260048A (en) 1991-05-08 1993-11-09 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Tissue fixative solution and method
US5459253A (en) 1991-07-19 1995-10-17 Pharmacia P-L Biochemicals Inc. M-RNA purification
US5998483A (en) 1991-09-20 1999-12-07 Camiener; Gerald W. Glyoxal-containing preservative compositions
AU669673B2 (en) 1991-09-20 1996-06-20 Gerald W. Camiener Methods and compositions with aldehyde stabilizing solution
US5257633A (en) 1992-06-23 1993-11-02 Becton, Dickinson And Company Surface modified blood collection tubes
EP0662152A1 (en) 1992-07-17 1995-07-12 Aprogenex, Inc. Enriching and identyfying fetal cells in maternal blood for in situ hybridization
US5629147A (en) 1992-07-17 1997-05-13 Aprogenex, Inc. Enriching and identifying fetal cells in maternal blood for in situ hybridization
US5427791A (en) 1992-08-05 1995-06-27 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Embryonal vaccine against Newcastle disease
GB9223035D0 (en) 1992-11-03 1992-12-16 Kiessling Cooper Ann A Preservation of peripheral blood & semen in fixatives that inactivate human pathogens
US5457024A (en) 1993-01-22 1995-10-10 Aprogenex, Inc. Isolation of fetal erythrocytes
AU6230594A (en) 1993-02-01 1994-08-29 University Of Iowa Research Foundation, The Quartenary amine surfactants and methods of using same in isolation of rna
CA2166729A1 (en) 1993-07-05 1995-01-19 Vivian Granger Preparation and stabilisation of cells
US6043032A (en) 1993-09-22 2000-03-28 Tosoh Corporation Method of extracting nucleic acids and method of detecting specified nucleic acid sequences
WO1995026417A1 (en) 1994-03-29 1995-10-05 Genzyme Corporation Culture and isolation of fetal cells from maternal peripheral blood
DK0754301T3 (en) 1994-04-05 1999-06-07 North Gen Hospital Nhs Trust Preparation and Stabilization of Cell Suspensions
US5501954A (en) 1994-06-13 1996-03-26 Genzyme Corporation Method of detecting cellular material
FR2722506B1 (en) 1994-07-13 1996-08-14 Rhone Poulenc Rorer Sa COMPOSITION CONTAINING NUCLEIC ACIDS, PREPARATION AND USES
US5824536A (en) 1994-08-23 1998-10-20 St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Influenza virus replicated in mammalian cell culture and vaccine production
US6527957B1 (en) 1995-08-09 2003-03-04 Baxter International Inc. Methods for separating, collecting and storing red blood cells
EP0770397B1 (en) 1995-10-18 2004-04-21 Akzo Nobel N.V. Newcastle disease virus combination vaccine
US5817519A (en) 1995-12-28 1998-10-06 Bayer Corporation Automated method and device for identifying and quantifying platelets and for determining platelet activation state using whole blood samples
US6630301B1 (en) 1997-03-14 2003-10-07 The Penn State Research Foundation Detection of extracellular tumor-associated nucleic acid in blood plasma or serum
US6156504A (en) 1996-03-15 2000-12-05 The Penn State Research Foundation Detection of extracellular tumor-associated nucleic acid in blood plasma or serum using nucleic acid amplification assays
WO1997035589A1 (en) 1996-03-26 1997-10-02 Kopreski Michael S Method enabling use of extracellular rna extracted from plasma or serum to detect, monitor or evaluate cancer
US6759217B2 (en) 1996-03-26 2004-07-06 Oncomedx, Inc. Method enabling use of extracellular RNA extracted from plasma or serum to detect, monitor or evaluate cancer
GB2313288B (en) 1996-05-24 2000-07-12 North Gen Hospital Nhs Trust Specimen collection fluid
IT1294964B1 (en) 1996-07-12 1999-04-23 Domenico Valerio INSULATION AND CULTURE OF FETAL CELLS FROM THE MATERNAL PERIPHERAL BLOOD
US5731156A (en) 1996-10-21 1998-03-24 Applied Imaging, Inc. Use of anti-embryonic hemoglobin antibodies to identify fetal cells
US6190609B1 (en) 1996-11-19 2001-02-20 Baxter International Inc. Methods and apparatus for inactivating contaminants in biological fluid
US5783093A (en) 1997-01-02 1998-07-21 Haemonetics Corporation Blood cell concentrates using a single solution for anticoagulation and preservation
AU740547B2 (en) 1997-01-21 2001-11-08 American National Red Cross, The Intracellular and extracellular decontamination of whole blood and blood components by amphiphilic phenothiazin-5-ium dyes plus light
AT405939B (en) 1997-02-24 1999-12-27 Immuno Ag METHOD FOR INACTIVATING LIPID-ENVIRONED VIRUSES
GB9704444D0 (en) 1997-03-04 1997-04-23 Isis Innovation Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
US20010051341A1 (en) 1997-03-04 2001-12-13 Isis Innovation Limited Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
EP0970365B1 (en) 1997-03-25 2003-10-01 Immunivest Corporation Apparatus and methods for capture and analysis of particulate entities
US5939259A (en) 1997-04-09 1999-08-17 Schleicher & Schuell, Inc. Methods and devices for collecting and storing clinical samples for genetic analysis
US5906744A (en) 1997-04-30 1999-05-25 Becton Dickinson And Company Tube for preparing a plasma specimen for diagnostic assays and method of making thereof
ES2260837T3 (en) 1997-05-30 2006-11-01 Xenomics PROCEDURE FOR DETECTING SEQUENCES OF NUCLEIC ACIDS IN THE URINE.
US6083731A (en) 1997-06-24 2000-07-04 Washington State University Research Foundation Recombinant materials and methods for the production of limonene hydroxylases
AU745185B2 (en) 1997-06-25 2002-03-14 Promega Corporation Method of isolating RNA
US5962234A (en) 1997-10-20 1999-10-05 Applied Imaging Corporation Use of anti-embryonic epsilon hemoglobin antibodies to identify fetal cells
US6210889B1 (en) 1998-01-28 2001-04-03 The Universite Laval Method for enrichment of fetal cells from maternal blood and use of same in determination of fetal sex and detection of chromosomal abnormalities
US20010018192A1 (en) 1998-02-12 2001-08-30 Terstappen Leon W.M.M. Labeled cells for use as an internal functional control in rare cell detection assays
KR100399475B1 (en) 1998-02-12 2003-09-29 보드 오브 리전츠, 더 유니버시티 오브 텍사스 시스템 Methods and reagents for the rapid and efficient isolation of circulating cancer cells
EP0974660A1 (en) 1998-06-19 2000-01-26 Stichting Instituut voor Dierhouderij en Diergezondheid (ID-DLO) Newcastle disease virus infectious clones, vaccines and diagnostic assays
US6204375B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2001-03-20 Ambion, Inc. Methods and reagents for preserving RNA in cell and tissue samples
US20090233276A1 (en) 1998-09-22 2009-09-17 Oncomedx, Inc. Method Enabling the Use of Extracellular Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Extracted from Plasma or Serum to Detect, Monitor or Evaluate Cancer or Premalignant Conditions
US6159472A (en) 1998-11-16 2000-12-12 Akzo Nobel N.V. Intradermal Avian immunization with inactivated vaccines
AT407958B (en) 1999-02-11 2001-07-25 Immuno Ag INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINE FOR NASAL OR ORAL APPLICATION
US7683035B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2010-03-23 Qiagen, Gmbh Method of stabilizing and/or isolating nucleic acids
US6077235A (en) 1999-02-23 2000-06-20 Becton, Dickinson And Company Blood collection assembly and method therefor
EP1203227A4 (en) 1999-06-04 2003-01-02 Bioseparations Inc System and method for prenatal diagnostic screening
AU5620600A (en) 1999-06-16 2001-01-02 University Of Cincinnati, The Agent and process for isolation of extra-chromosomal nucleic acids
DE19928820A1 (en) 1999-06-17 2000-12-21 Ulrich Groth Fixative for cells and tissues, useful in cytological or histological diagnosis, comprises mixture of alcohols, acetone, evaporation retardant and pH regulator
AU6498600A (en) 1999-07-29 2001-02-19 Baxter International Inc. Sampling tube holder for blood sampling system
US6592869B2 (en) 1999-08-24 2003-07-15 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. Vaccine composition and method of using the same
ATE481499T1 (en) 1999-09-24 2010-10-15 Ambion Inc COCKTAIL OF NUCLEASE INHIBITORS
US6337189B1 (en) 2000-02-08 2002-01-08 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Fixative system, method and composition for biological testing
DE10006662A1 (en) 2000-02-15 2001-08-23 Antigen Produktions Gmbh Sample vessel for stabilizing and isolating nucleic acid, contains a lytic solution that stabilizes nucleic acid and a solid phase that binds it, especially for sampling whole blood
GB0009179D0 (en) 2000-04-13 2000-05-31 Imp College Innovations Ltd Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
GB0009784D0 (en) 2000-04-20 2000-06-07 Simeg Limited Methods for clinical diagnosis
US20020045196A1 (en) 2000-05-12 2002-04-18 Walt Mahoney Methods of isolating trophoblast cells from maternal blood
AU2002215488B8 (en) 2000-06-21 2007-11-15 Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc. Universal collection medium
US6653062B1 (en) 2000-07-26 2003-11-25 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Preservation and storage medium for biological materials
US6664056B2 (en) 2000-10-17 2003-12-16 The Chinese University Of Hong Kong Non-invasive prenatal monitoring
US6551267B1 (en) 2000-10-18 2003-04-22 Becton, Dickinson And Company Medical article having blood-contacting surface
CA2428864C (en) 2000-11-08 2011-04-12 Becton, Dickinson And Company Method and device for collecting and stabilizing a biological sample
US6602718B1 (en) 2000-11-08 2003-08-05 Becton, Dickinson And Company Method and device for collecting and stabilizing a biological sample
AU2002243263A1 (en) 2000-11-15 2002-07-24 Roche Diagnostics Corporation Methods and reagents for identifying rare fetal cells in the material circulation
US6794152B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2004-09-21 Streck Laboratories Inc. Flow cytometry reagent and system
US6617180B1 (en) 2001-04-16 2003-09-09 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Test structure for detecting bridging of DRAM capacitors
FR2824144B1 (en) 2001-04-30 2004-09-17 Metagenex S A R L METHOD OF PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS ON FETAL CELLS ISOLATED FROM MATERNAL BLOOD
US7314715B2 (en) 2001-06-14 2008-01-01 Schering-Plough Animal Health Corporation Recombinant avian herpesvirus useful in vaccine production
DK1421215T3 (en) 2001-07-25 2011-06-27 Oncomedx Inc Methods for evaluating pathological conditions using extracellular RNA
US7863012B2 (en) 2004-02-17 2011-01-04 Veridex, Llc Analysis of circulating tumor cells, fragments, and debris
BR0212124A (en) 2001-08-23 2004-07-20 Immunivest Corp Compositions, methods and apparatus for preserving biological specimens and blood samples suspected of containing circulating tumor cells, and stabilized cellular composition.
US6884573B2 (en) 2001-08-31 2005-04-26 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Fixed dried red blood cells and method of use
ATE307606T1 (en) 2001-10-04 2005-11-15 Ct Voor Onderzoek In Diergenee ATTENUATED MUTANT STRAIN OF NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS FOR IN OVO VACCINATION AND USE THEREOF
WO2003063930A1 (en) 2002-02-01 2003-08-07 Gambro, Inc. Whole blood collection and processing method
GB0203280D0 (en) 2002-02-12 2002-03-27 Ic Innovations Ltd Anti-glycolytic composition
US6977162B2 (en) 2002-03-01 2005-12-20 Ravgen, Inc. Rapid analysis of variations in a genome
AU2003230270A1 (en) 2002-05-07 2003-11-11 Becton, Dickinson And Company Collection assembly
US7442506B2 (en) 2002-05-08 2008-10-28 Ravgen, Inc. Methods for detection of genetic disorders
US20070178478A1 (en) 2002-05-08 2007-08-02 Dhallan Ravinder S Methods for detection of genetic disorders
AU2003243475A1 (en) 2002-06-13 2003-12-31 New York University Early noninvasive prenatal test for aneuploidies and heritable conditions
US20060008807A1 (en) 2002-08-23 2006-01-12 O'hara Shawn M Multiparameter analysis of comprehensive nucleic acids and morphological features on the same sample
US6913932B2 (en) 2002-08-23 2005-07-05 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Formaldehyde-ammonium salt complexes for the stabilization of blood cells
EP1816461B1 (en) 2002-10-16 2020-01-08 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Method and device for collecting and preserving cells for analysis
CA2445204C (en) 2002-10-16 2014-08-12 Streck Laboratories, Inc. Method and device for collecting and preserving cells for analysis
KR100471183B1 (en) 2002-10-29 2005-03-10 삼성전자주식회사 Semiconductor memory device having offset transistor and method of fabricating the same
EP1599608A4 (en) 2003-03-05 2007-07-18 Genetic Technologies Ltd Identification of fetal dna and fetal cell markers in maternal plasma or serum
WO2005013920A2 (en) 2003-03-24 2005-02-17 Wellstat Biologics Corporation Newcastle disease virus administration
US7267980B1 (en) 2003-04-04 2007-09-11 Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc. Stabilizing solution for cells and tissues
US20050277204A1 (en) 2003-08-12 2005-12-15 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Sample preparation methods and devices
US20070111233A1 (en) 2003-10-30 2007-05-17 Bianchi Diana W Prenatal diagnosis using cell-free fetal DNA in amniotic fluid
US20050181353A1 (en) 2004-02-17 2005-08-18 Rao Galla C. Stabilization of cells and biological specimens for analysis
US20100216153A1 (en) 2004-02-27 2010-08-26 Helicos Biosciences Corporation Methods for detecting fetal nucleic acids and diagnosing fetal abnormalities
US20080119645A1 (en) 2004-05-05 2008-05-22 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amidites and Methods of Rna Synthesis
CN1993140A (en) 2004-06-01 2007-07-04 纽约大学西奈山医学院 Genetically engineered swine influenza virus and uses thereof
US8497134B2 (en) 2004-08-19 2013-07-30 Blood Cell Storage, Inc. Fluorescent detector systems for the detection of chemical perturbations in sterile storage devices
ES2251307B2 (en) 2004-10-05 2006-12-16 Universidad Complutense De Madrid SOLUTION FOR THE UNDEFINED MAINTENANCE OF NUCLEIC ACIDS IN ITS ORIGIN CELL.
AU2005305012C1 (en) 2004-11-05 2012-07-19 Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc. Compositions and methods for purifying nucleic acids from stabilization reagents
WO2006091918A2 (en) 2005-02-23 2006-08-31 Streck, Inc. Process, composition and kit for providing a stable whole blood calibrator/control
US7419832B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2008-09-02 Streck, Inc. Blood collection tube with surfactant
DE102005013261A1 (en) 2005-03-22 2006-09-28 Adnagen Ag Reagent and method for preventing time-dependent expression in biological cells
WO2007022151A2 (en) 2005-08-15 2007-02-22 Vaxin, Inc. Immunization of avians by administration of non-replicating vectored vaccines
EP1915447A4 (en) 2005-08-19 2008-07-30 Bioventures Inc Method and device for the collection and isolation of nucleic acid
NZ566490A (en) 2005-10-07 2011-06-30 Pfizer Prod Inc Live attenuated or killed H3N8 influenza vaccines and methods to treat canine influenza
WO2007053491A2 (en) 2005-10-28 2007-05-10 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Method and kit for evaluating rna quality
ES2429408T5 (en) 2006-02-02 2020-01-16 Univ Leland Stanford Junior Non-invasive fetal genetic test by digital analysis
SI2351858T1 (en) 2006-02-28 2015-06-30 University Of Louisville Research Foundation Med Center Three, Detecting fetal chromosomal abnormalities using tandem single nucleotide polymorphisms
WO2008006086A2 (en) 2006-07-07 2008-01-10 Atlantic City Coin & Slot Service Company, Inc. Gaming device and method of use
CN101528763B (en) 2006-08-30 2012-06-27 生物风险公司 Methods and substances for isolation and detection of small polynucleotides
US8080645B2 (en) 2007-10-01 2011-12-20 Longhorn Vaccines & Diagnostics Llc Biological specimen collection/transport compositions and methods
US20080108071A1 (en) 2006-10-10 2008-05-08 Katherine Thompson Methods and Systems to Determine Fetal Sex and Detect Fetal Abnormalities
GB0704488D0 (en) 2007-03-08 2007-04-18 Univ Nottingham Platelet viability kit
WO2008157203A2 (en) 2007-06-15 2008-12-24 Wyeth Methods of protecting animals from avian influenza infection
WO2009042457A1 (en) 2007-09-21 2009-04-02 Streck, Inc. Nucleic acid isolation in preserved whole blood
US20100167271A1 (en) 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Streck, Inc. Method for screening blood using a preservative that may be in a substantially solid state form
US11634747B2 (en) 2009-01-21 2023-04-25 Streck Llc Preservation of fetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma
EP2398912B1 (en) 2009-02-18 2017-09-13 Streck Inc. Preservation of cell-free nucleic acids
US9128082B2 (en) 2009-03-24 2015-09-08 Biocept, Inc. Devices and methods of cell capture and analysis
WO2011014741A1 (en) 2009-07-31 2011-02-03 Artemis Health, Inc. Methods and compositions for cell stabilization
US20110110975A1 (en) * 2009-11-06 2011-05-12 Streck, Inc. Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
CA2780536C (en) 2009-11-09 2018-01-02 Streck, Inc. Stabilization of rna in and extracting from intact cells within a blood sample
CN102803490B (en) 2010-01-04 2015-03-25 奇亚根盖瑟斯堡股份有限公司 Methods, compositions, and kits for recovery of nucleic acids or proteins from fixed tissue samples
WO2012040603A2 (en) 2010-09-23 2012-03-29 Biocept, Inc. Use of diazolidinyl urea for anti-clumping of biological samples
JP2015505966A (en) 2011-12-09 2015-02-26 ザ スクリップス リサーチ インスティテュート Apparatus, system and method for identifying circulating tumor cells
DE202013012535U1 (en) 2012-02-13 2017-08-28 Streck Inc. Blood collection device for improved nucleic acid regulation

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11168351B2 (en) 2015-03-05 2021-11-09 Streck, Inc. Stabilization of nucleic acids in urine
US11299764B2 (en) 2015-11-20 2022-04-12 Streck, Inc. Single spin process for blood plasma separation and plasma composition including preservative
US11506655B2 (en) 2016-07-29 2022-11-22 Streck, Inc. Suspension composition for hematology analysis control

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2704740A2 (en) 2014-03-12
WO2012151391A3 (en) 2013-01-03
US9956281B2 (en) 2018-05-01
US20180243405A1 (en) 2018-08-30
US20140044752A1 (en) 2014-02-13
EP2704740B1 (en) 2016-10-05
WO2012151391A2 (en) 2012-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20180243406A1 (en) Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
CN110478479B (en) Methods and compositions for live attenuated viruses
CN111511396B (en) Liquid vaccine for live enveloped viruses
CA2599697C (en) Chemically defined stabiliser composition
US20110110975A1 (en) Inactivated virus compositions and methods of preparing such compositions
WO2000023104A1 (en) Freeze-dried hepatitis a attenuated live vaccine and its stabilizer
JP2017505807A (en) Poultry virus vaccine that is liquid stable
JP7448475B2 (en) Improved diluents for cell-associated alphaherpesvirus vaccines
CA1122527A (en) Influenza vaccine production in liquid cell culture
US20120128716A1 (en) Vaccine Compositions
Tabynov et al. Immunogenic and protective properties of the first Kazakhstan vaccine against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 in ferrets
KR20080044258A (en) Stabilizers for veterinary vaccines
JP2013540825A (en) Viral vaccine and preparation method thereof
CN102352345B (en) Preparation method of newcastle disease HI antigen
HUT62200A (en) Cell-free virus vaccine for marek disease
US6403363B1 (en) Method of preservation of vaccines with polybiguanide
RU2774588C2 (en) Improved diluent for vaccine against cell-associated alpha-herpesvirus
WO2012104647A1 (en) Vaccine compositions
RU2304447C1 (en) Culture vaccine against poultry pox out of hen&#39;s virus (ospovac) (variants)
US11813322B2 (en) Stabilized liquid live vaccine
Kydyrbayev et al. Immunogenicity of the inactivated oil emulsion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in chickens
KR101360112B1 (en) A novel airborn transmissible low pathogenic avian Influenza virus (H9N2) K040110/2010 and vaccine for low pathogenic avian Influenza comprising the same
RU2279473C1 (en) Strain of bovine parainfluenza virus for production of vaccine and diagnostic preparations
RU2323741C2 (en) Anti- bird flue inactivated emulsion vaccine
BehrouziNasab Comparative Study of Vaccine-Induced Humoral Immune Response against Newcastle Disease Virus and Avian Influenza Virus (H9N2) in Different Bird Species of Mashhad Birds Garden

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: EXPRESSLY ABANDONED -- DURING EXAMINATION