US20180095186A1

US20180095186A1 - Noise models by selection of transform coefficients

Info

Publication number: US20180095186A1
Application number: US15/724,791
Authority: US
Inventors: Tilman Klüver
Original assignee: PGS Geophysical AS
Current assignee: PGS Geophysical AS
Priority date: 2013-05-15
Filing date: 2017-10-04
Publication date: 2018-04-05
Also published as: US9784869B2; US20140340987A1

Abstract

A data set representing features of a geologic formation is formed from two or more signal acquisition data set representing independent aspects of the same wavefield. A wavelet transform is performed on the two or more signal acquisition data sets, and the data sets are further transformed to equalize signal portions of the data sets. Remaining differences in the data sets are interpreted as excess noise and are removed by different methods to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of any resulting data set.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/823,884, filed May 15, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

In geophysical data acquisition, measurements may be taken of wavefields that have been initiated by geophysical energy sources, for example air guns, marine vibrators, electric bipole antennae, and magnetic coils. The geophysical energy sources may be positioned at known locations in a geographic area. In a marine setting, the sources may be towed behind one or more boats traveling a prescribed course, usually along a group of generally equidistant parallel lines. The geophysical sources are caused to emit energy. For example, when the geophysical source is a seismic source, sonic pulses are emitted, and sensors record reflected sonic waves as voltages from transducers. The data received may be compiled into a data set with time and distance along and across the sampling paths. Such data is commonly used to more effectively prospect for geologic resources such as oil and gas deposits.
The data set obtained typically contains information of interest indicating the geology of earth strata below the geophysical equipment. Unfortunately, however, the geophysical information is often obscured by substantial noise from a wide variety of sources. Coherent noise sources, such as hydrostatic pressure variations, cavitation of boat propellers, and seismic interference, are usually well-defined and easily removed. Incoherent noise sources, however, such as tugging noise caused by sudden movements of a vessel or sensor due to wave motion, strumming or vibration of cables, and swell noise, are more difficult to remove.
Conventional methods of removing incoherent noise from geophysical data typically employ various rigorous de-noising procedures. These procedures typically involve cascaded applications of various de-spiking and de-noising techniques. A user is often required to iteratively process the data, testing parameters and performing quality control. Such procedures are expensive, time-consuming, and imprecise. If the parameterization is too conservative, noise remains in the data. If the parameterization is too aggressive, geophysical information may be affected. Thus, there is a continuing need for new methods of removing noise from geophysical data.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the above-recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other effective embodiments.

FIG. 1 is an activity diagram showing a data acquisition scheme.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram summarizing a method according to one embodiment.

To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements disclosed in one embodiment may be beneficially utilized on other embodiments without specific recitation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To resolve signal from noise in a given wavefield, the wavefield may be measured using two or more different sensors to form a plurality of records or data sets representing the wavefield. The sensors may be the same kind of sensor or different kinds of sensors. The sensors may be co-located with respect to the wavefield, or the sensors may be displaced in time or space with respect to the wavefield.
FIG. 1 is an activity diagram showing a data acquisition scheme 100 in a marine context. A vessel 102 tows a first streamer 104 and a second streamer 106 in the water behind the vessel. The first streamer 104 has a first sensor 108, and the second streamer 106 has a second sensor 110. In a typical marine data acquisition situation, a vessel may have any suitable number of streamers, each with multiple sensors. An energy source 112, which may be attached to the vessel 102 or displaced from the vessel 102 by any suitable extension, or attached to or displaced from another vessel (not shown), emits energy. In the marine context, the energy may propagate through the water and may reflect and/or refract from the various surfaces of water and geologic features. The sensors 108/110 may detect the resultant wavefield.
The sensors 108/110 may have a fixed relationship with respect to each other that may be accounted for mathematically. The sensors 108/110 may also measure different aspects of the wavefield that may be related mathematically. For example, a geophone and a hydrophone typically measure particle velocity and pressure respectively, which may be related mathematically. Any number of streamers may be used, and multiple vessels may be used. Streamers may have any number of sensors, which may be the same or different types. Commonly used sensors in a marine gather include geophones, hydrophones, and accelerometers. Since each streamer may exhibit a different depth profile, the sensors on any particular streamer may be at a different or the same depths, and sensors on different streamers may likewise be at different or the same depths.
The physical data collected from the sensors 108/110, depicting real-world signals and vibrations from the physical environment, forms a primary record of the wavefield that may be represented and stored in a computer 114 or on a computer readable medium 116 that may be inserted into the computer 114 for storing the data. The computer readable medium 116, which is not a transitory signal medium, may contain the raw data collected from the sensors 108/110, or a data product made by processing the raw data according to methods described herein. More than one data product, each data product formed by performing a different process on the raw data, may be stored on the computer readable medium 116. The computer readable medium 116 may contain instructions for performing methods described herein, in addition to, or instead of, the raw data or the data product. The physical data may additionally be transformed by certain methods described below and implemented in the computer 114, which may also be stored on the computer readable medium 116 as instructions for performing any of the methods described below. Computer readable media that may store various embodiments include rotationally operated magnetoresistive memory devices such as floppy disks, hard disks, stationary magnetoresistive memory devices such as flash drives, and optical disks. Additionally, data products and instructions for computer execution of methods described herein may be transmitted by wire or wirelessly.
The primary record from each sensor has a signal part s and a noise part n, so that the wavefield w may be expressed as
w=s+n (1).
Two sensors measuring the same wavefield measure the same signal part s, with different levels of incoherent noise n. Once coherent noise has been removed, the signal part of the primary record from each sensor may be mathematically transformed, if necessary, to be equal by accounting for time and space displacements and differences in the aspects of the wavefield that are detected, such as pressure and particle velocity. Any residual difference in the primary record from two sensors that have been equalized is thought to be due to noise in the primary record. Such transformation may be performed on the physical data set derived directly from the physical environment (i.e., the primary record), or on a data set that has been transformed in any analytical way, such as by an integral transform.
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a method 200 for removing noise from a data set. Due to the substantial amounts of data processed in a typical geophysical application, the method 200 is implemented using a computer system programmed to perform the method 200. At 202, a first primary record and a second primary record are obtained recording or representing apects of the same wavefield. The first primary record and the second primary record may be obtained in a data acquisition similar to that described above in connection to FIG. 1. A primary record generally represents geophysical data obtained by projecting energy, which may be pressure energy, seismic energy, acoustic energy, electromagnetic energy, or any other suitable energy, into the earth and recording the effect of the water and geologic features on that energy. The recorded wavefield may indicate boundaries between different materials in the earth, and may be used to prospect for subterranean resources, such as oil, gas, and minerals, for recovery.
Each primary record is typically indexed according to one or more indices. Relating to geophysical data, the indices are typically one or more spatial directions and time. The spatial directions relate to distance along a sampling path and distance from the line of the sampling path, and time relates to the elapsed time at which each energy amplitude is detected. Each primary record represents energy waves resulting from designed energy perturbations produced by an energy emitter. An example of such an emitter, commonly used as an energy source in geophysical data gathers, is an air gun or a marine vibrator, or a signal generator.
At 204, the first primary record and the second primary record are transformed such that the first transformed record and the second transformed record have substantially equal signal parts. The first primary record and the second primary record may also be transformed to a frequency domain using an integral transform that employs a frequency parameter. The integral transform is an operation of the form:
X ^T =T(X)=ƒ_v Xƒ(v)dv (2)
where f(v) is the kernel of the integral transform, and boldface generally denotes a mathematical object that may have non-zero rank, such as a vector. As such, the integral transform may be a multi-dimensional transform. The domain v of the kernel f(v) typically includes the domain of the raw data set X and at least one transform index, each transform index corresponding to an index of the raw data set X. Thus, defining v=u∪α, we may express some integral transforms as
X ^T(α)=T(X(u))=ƒ_u X(u)ƒ(u,α)du (3)
The transform may be performed with respect only to a time parameter, such that the primary records are transformed to a frequency domain, or the transform may be performed to distance and time parameters, such that the primary records are transformed to a frequency-wavenumber domain.
One type of integral transform commonly used is the wavelet transform. The wavelet transform may be used to define an array of coefficients that may be used to represent a data set as a wavelet series. So, the wavefield data set may be represented as follows:
w(u)=w(x ₁ ,x ₂ ,x ₃ ,t)=Σ_jk c _jk(x ₁ ,x ₂ x ₃) ψ_jk(x ₁ ,x ₂ ,x ₃ ,t) (4)
where ψ may be a wavelet function such as the Haar function, the Meyer function, the Morlet function, the Daubechies function, the Coifman function, the Shannon function, the Lemarie function, and other wavelet functions. The coefficients may be derived from the wavelet transform as follows:
$\begin{matrix} c_{jk} (x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\langle 2 - j \rangle}} \int_{t}^{} ψ (2^{j} t - k) w (u) dt & (5) \end{matrix}$
Here, the domain u of the wavefield may be two or three spatial dimensions and time, and the domain x of the coefficient array c_jkis the domain u excluding time, the effect of time on the coefficients being integrated and parameterized in the coefficients by the subscripts j and k. The wavelet transform above applies to one variable of the data set (time), but the method may be extended to any or all variables of the data set, if desired. Thus, the wavelet coefficients with respect to variable x_iof the domain σ of the data set w(σ) are as follows:
$\begin{matrix} c_{jki} (σ_{- i}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\langle 2 - j \rangle}} \int_{σ_{i}}^{} ψ (2^{j} σ_{i} - k) w (σ) d σ_{i} & (6) \end{matrix}$
where σ_-idenotes the domain σ reduced by the variable σ_isuch that the variable σ_iis parameterized by the subscripts j and k.
It should be noted here that use of a wavelet transform is a way of obtaining time resolution in the frequency domain, and the methods described herein may be used with any other way of obtaining such resolution. Such processes include using the Gabor transform or using a windowed Fourier transform.
The transformation of 204 may account for sensor displacement in time and/or space and to account for measurement of different aspects of the wavefield. As noted above, the transformation generally results in a signal portion of each primary record being equalized. Where a hydrophone and a geophone are used in a marine context to record the same wavefield, the pressure wavefield from the hydrophone can be converted to an equivalence with the velocity wavefield using the following relation:
$\begin{matrix} v_{z} = - \frac{k_{z}}{ωρ} (\frac{1 + e^{- 2 {ik}_{z} z^{R}}}{1 - e^{- 2 {ik}_{z} z^{R}}}) p & (7) \end{matrix}$
where k_zis vertical wavenumber, ω is frequency, ρ is density, and z^Ris receiver depth. Applying the relation above results in a wavefield recorded by a hydrophone, or any other pressure sensor, and a wavefield recorded by a corresponding geophone, or any other particle velocity sensor, having the same signal part s.
The transformation of equation 7 may be performed in any convenient domain by transforming the above equation to the desired domain, along with the data to be equalized. If an integral transform applied at 204 is applied before an equalizing transform, for example to render the physical data in a wavelet domain, then the integral transform, for example the wavelet transform, may be applied to, or convolved with, the transform of equation 7, and then the data are filtered using the resulting relation. Conversely, the data may be equalized in the physical domain before applying an integral transform.
After applying the transformation 204, frequency notches in the data may be eliminated by applying data from the first sensor to the data from the second sensor, and vice versa, if the sensors are selected and positioned to create data sets with frequency notches at different frequencies, for example by locating the sensors at different depths. Any of the transformations described above in connection with 204 may be performed by a computer with a computer-readable medium having instructions to perform such transformations.
In general, two data sets A and B, representing a single wavefield may be gathered by measuring different aspects of the wavefield, such as pressure, particle velocity, and particle acceleration. For example, data set A may reflect pressure while data set B reflects particle velocity. The data sets A and B may also measure the same aspect of the wavefield, but from different locations in the coordinate space. Generally, A and B are gathered in a way that A and B may be related by a known transformation F_A, applicable to data set A, and F_B, applicable to data set B, such that if A and B each have a signal part and a noise part,
A=A _S +A _N (8)
B=B _S +B _N (9)
the signal parts are related as
F _A A _S =F _B B _S (10)
The transformation may be applied in the space-time domain or in the frequency or frequency-wavenumber domain to form equalized data sets. In general, an equalizing transformation may be applied in any convenient domain by transforming or convolving the equalizing transformation with the selected domain transformation, or with no other transformation if the equalizing transformation is applied in the native domain of the original data sets. Using such transformations, A and B can be regarded as representing the same signal interchangeably.
After transformation in this way, the following result is obtained:
F _A A−F _B B=F _A A _S −F _B B _S +F _A A _N −F _B B _N =F _A A _N −F _B B _N (11)
In other words, any remaining difference between the two data sets is attributable to noise in one of the two data sets. If F_AA<F_BB, then A may be used rather than B, or B may be replaced by
$\begin{matrix} C = L \min (A, \frac{F_{B} B}{F_{A}}) + M \min (B, \frac{F_{A} A}{F_{B}}) & (12) \end{matrix}$
to lower the overall noise of the two data sets. The converse may be applied if F_AA>F_BB. The data sets F_AA and F_BB may be equalized records formed by applying the transformations F_Aand F_Bas filters to the primary records from two sensors, or to the wavelet transforms of the primary records.
A selection process is performed to remove noise from the primary records representing the wavefield, resulting in a noise reduced data set. In the general case of the data sets A and B, for a first equalized record F_AA and a second equalized record F_BB having the same signal portion s, energy content of corresponding data points is compared at 206, and the data point that has the lowest energy content may be selected at 208.
In another aspect, a third data set may be formed by linear combination, as follows:
$\frac{F_{A} A}{F_{B}}$
where L and M are any convenient scaling or filtering factors. If an equal weighting of the two data sets is desired, L and M may be equal. L and M may also be determined by finding the values of L and M that minimize the residual energy in each data point. In this way, the signal to noise ratio of the resulting data set C is improved.
Each data value q from a first equalized record F_AA may be compared to a corresponding data value r from a second equalized record F_BB. Corresponding data values q and r from the equalized records F_AA and F_BB are data values from the same domain location x in each of the equalized records F_AA and F_BB. If the energy content of q is less than that of r, then r may be replaced with q in the second equalized record F_BB, and if the energy content of r is less than that of q, then q may be replaced with r in the first equalized record F_AA. Alternately, a third data set may be populated with the minimum energy combination of q and r at each location in the domain.
Wavelet coefficients may be used as input for the selection at 208. Performing a wavelet transformation of the data set A yields a set of wavelet coefficients c_A(x), and transformation of the data set B yields the wavelet coefficients c_B(x). A selection is made based on a determination of the energy content encoded in each wavelet coefficient c_A(x) and c_B(x). In one aspect, this may be done by computing the Hilbert transform of each data set A and B and then computing the wavelet transform of the Hilbert transforms to yield wavelet coefficient sets c_A ^H(x) and c_B ^H(x). An envelope of each wavelet coefficient c_A(x) and c_B(x) can then be computed, as follows:
E _A(x)=√{square root over (c _A(x)² +c _A ^H(x)²)} (13)
E _B(x)=√{square root over (c _B(x)² +c _B ^H(x)²)} (14)
Each envelope coefficient is interpreted as representing the energy content of the corresponding base data wavelet if that wavelet were transformed to the space-time domain, and differences in corresponding envelope wavelets indicate differences in noise levels associated with that wavelet in the two data sets A and B, once the data sets A and B are transformed to equalize their signal parts. Therefore, for each corresponding data point A(x,t) and B(x,t), if E_A(x)>E_B(x) then wavelet coefficient c_B(x) is retained as an output and if E_B(x)>E_A(x) then wavelet coefficient c_A(x) is retained as an output. When the output wavelet coefficients are transformed back to the domain of distance and time, the resulting data has reduced noise.
In one embodiment, a third set of wavelet coefficients may be formed by selecting the wavelet coefficient corresponding to the lowest energy representative of each corresponding pair of wavelet coefficients:
$\begin{matrix} c_{C} (x) = {\begin{matrix} c_{A} (x) if E_{A} (x) < E_{B} (x) \\ c_{B} (x) otherwise \end{matrix} . & (15) \end{matrix}$
The third set of wavelet coefficients may be transformed back to the domain of distance and time to form a data set with reduced noise.
In another embodiment, each wavelet coefficient in either data set may be replaced with a value calculated from the wavelet coefficient in the other data set, transformed to the appropriate basis:
$\begin{matrix} c_{A} (x) = \min [c_{A} (x), \frac{F_{B} c_{B} (x)}{F_{A}}] & (16) \\ c_{B} (x) = \min [c_{B} (x), \frac{F_{A} c_{A} (x)}{F_{B}}] . & (17) \end{matrix}$
If a linear combination of the coefficients from the two data sets is desired, a third data set may be constructed from the wavelet coefficients, as follows:
$\begin{matrix} c_{C} (x) = L \min [c_{A} (x), \frac{F_{B} c_{B} (x)}{F_{A}}] + M \min [c_{B} (x), \frac{F_{A} c_{A} (x)}{F_{B}}] & (18) \end{matrix}$
where, as before, L and M are any linear filters, scaling factors, or weighting factors.
If desired, the coefficients L and M may be determined according to an energy minimization criterion using the envelope of wavelet coefficients. For example, a least-squares routine may be performed using L and M as parameters to combine the data sets A and B into a combined data set C, which is Hilbert transformed and then wavelet transformed. An envelope calculated from c_C(x) and c_C ^H(x) as above may be used as the measure of energy to be minimized in the least-squares process.
Any of the operations described in connection with 206 and 208 above may be performed using a computer with a computer-readable medium bearing instructions for performing the operations described above, including comparing the energy content of corresponding data points in two data set and selecting from corresponding pairs of data points the data point having the lowest energy content to form a noise reduced data set.
At 210, the noise reduced data set produced by the selection at 208 is used to identify prospective geological resources, such as by depicting the noise reduced data set in a way that represents the physical environment, for example by graphical depiction on a computer screen. The depiction may then be used to identify prospects for subterranean exploration, such as drilling or excavation. If desired, an inverse wavelet transform may be performed on the noise reduced data set to forma noise-reduced version of the primary record.
Any number of data sets may be used in a selection process as described above. A binary selection process between two data sets is described above, but the method may be extended to a selection process using any number of data sets, provided the data sets are appropriately transformed to have equal signal parts. If N data sets are so employed, each corresponding data point in each data set is compared with every other corresponding data point according to the methods described above to determine the data point with the lowest noise component. As described above, every data point with a higher noise component may be replaced with a predicted value formed by applying transforming filters to the data point with the lowest noise component.
For example, if three data sets, A, B, and C, are used, with equalizing filters F_A, F_B, and F_c, such that F_AA_S=F_BB_S=F_CC_S, the wavelet transformation may be performed on each data set, and the equalizing filters applied, to form wavelet coefficient sets c_A, c_B, and c_C. For each corresponding wavelet coefficient c_A, c_B, and c_C, the corresponding wavelet coefficients may be set to the lowest value among all the corresponding transformed coefficients, as follows:
$\begin{matrix} c_{A} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) = \min (c_{A} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}), \frac{F_{B} c_{B} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})}{F_{A}}, \frac{F_{C} c_{C} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})}{F_{A}}) & (19) \\ c_{B} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) = \min (c_{B} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}), \frac{F_{A} c_{A} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})}{F_{B}}, \frac{F_{C} c_{C} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})}{F_{B}}) & (20) \\ c_{C} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}) = \min (c_{C} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}), \frac{F_{A} c_{A} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})}{F_{C}}, \frac{F_{B} c_{B} (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})}{F_{C}}) & (21) \end{matrix}$
An iterative binary selection process may also be performed between successive pairs of the coefficient sets to select an output set. Alternately, a resultant wavelet coefficient set c_Rmay be constructed from the three wavelet coefficient sets c_A, c_B, and c_C, as follows:
$\begin{matrix} c_{R} (x) = L \min [c_{A} (x), \frac{F_{B} c_{B} (x)}{F_{A}}, \frac{F_{C} c_{C} (x)}{F_{A}}] + M \min [c_{B} (x), \frac{F_{A} c_{A} (x)}{F_{B}}, \frac{F_{C} c_{C} (x)}{F_{B}}] + O \min [c_{C} (x), \frac{F_{A} c_{A} (x)}{F_{C}}, \frac{F_{B} c_{B} (x)}{F_{C}}] & (22) \end{matrix}$
In this way, the methods described above may be extended to any desired number of data sets by an iterative binary process or by a collective process.
The iterative binary selection process is generally performed by processing corresponding data points at each location of the domain. In the frequency domain, a first location of the frequency domain is identified, and a coefficient is accessed from each data set being subjected to the binary selection process. The coefficients are compared according to any of the methods described herein, and an output coefficient is retained in an output data set that has the same domain as the data sets from which the coefficients are accessed. A second location of the frequency domain is then identified and the process repeated. The binary selection process is complete when the comparison has been performed at all desired locations of the frequency domain.
The wavelet coefficient sets thus obtained may be used to decompose the resulting data according to frequency, wavenumber, or any other parameter associated with the particular wavelets employed for the transform. The wavelet coefficient sets may also be transformed to the physical, space-time domain for analysis.
If desired, a noise model can be constructed from the two, three, or N data sets by determining the difference between corresponding data points in the various data sets. If the data sets are transformed such that they have equal signal parts, then any differences between the data points are excess noise. In the instance of two data sets A and B, with the equalizing filters F_Aand F_B, the following quantities are noise:
$\begin{matrix} A_{N} ~ A - \frac{F_{B} B}{F_{A}} & (23) \\ B_{N} ~ B - \frac{F_{A} A}{F_{B}} & (24) \end{matrix}$
A noise model of the form
$C_{N} = L (A - \frac{F_{B} B}{F_{A}}) + M (B - \frac{F_{A} A}{F_{B}})$
may be used to reduce noise in the combined data C=LA +MB by any convenient method, for example by adaptive subtraction and/or least-squares error reduction.

EXAMPLE

What follows is an example set of equations that may be used with the methods described herein to reduce noise in a data set. In the following description, P denotes the recorded pressure wavefield, V_zdenotes the recorded vertical component of the particle velocity field, and P-UP denotes the up-going part of the recorded pressure wavefield.
P-UP generation from hydrophone and geophone recordings is demonstrated. The filters F_Aand F_Bused in cross-ghosting, i.e. equalizing pressure and particle velocity signals, are given by:
$F_{A} = - \frac{k_{z}}{ωρ} (1 + e^{- {ik}_{z} 2 z_{r}}) and$ $F_{B} = 1 - e^{- {ik}_{z} 2 z_{r}}$
The filters M and N for pressure de-ghosting are given by
M=1 and N=−ωρ/κ_z (26)
That results in either using P and Vz for wavefield separation or replacing Vz by P converted to Vz, and replacing P by Vz converted to P. At hydrophone and geophone notch frequencies, the corresponding complementary sensor may be used.
When this method is combined with a “signal preservation term” as used in the optimized LFC, it is a natural extension of the optimized LFC to account for temporally and spatially non-stationary noise. This aspect is related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,957,906, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a geophysical data product indicative of certain properties of the subsurface rock may be produced from the detected energy. The geophysical data product may include processed geophysical data and may be stored on a non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium. The geophysical data product may be produced offshore (i.e. by equipment on a vessel) or onshore (i.e. at a facility on land) either within the United States or in another country. If the geophysical data product is produced offshore or in another country, it may be imported onshore to a facility in the United States. Once onshore in the United States, geophysical analysis may be performed on the data product.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof.

Claims

1.-15. (canceled)

16. A method of reducing noise in a geophysical acquisition record, comprising:

identifying a first data set representing a first aspect of a wavefield;

identifying a second data set representing a second aspect of the physical wavefield;

transforming the first data set and the second data set to a frequency-wavenumber domain;

applying a first filter to the transformed first data set to form a first equalized data set and a second filter to the transformed second data set to form a second equalized data set, wherein a signal part of the first equalized data set is equal to a signal part of the second equalized data set;

forming a noise model from the first equalized data set and the second equalized data set by subtracting each data point of the first equalized data set from a corresponding data point of the second equalized data set and retaining the value of the result;

linearly combining the first equalized data set and the second equalized data set to form a combined data set; and

using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein at least the transforming the first data set and the second data set, the applying the first filter and the second filter, the forming the noise model, and the linearly combining are performed using a computer with a computer-readable medium containing instructions to perform the transforming the first data set and the second data set, the applying the first filter and the second filter, the forming the noise model, and the linearly combining.

18. The method of claim 16, wherein the first aspect and the second aspect are independent.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises transforming the combined data set and the noise model to a domain of distance and time to form a combined data set and a noise model, and adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

21. A method of reducing noise in a geophysical acquisition record, comprising:

obtaining a first data set representing a first aspect of a physical wavefield;

obtaining a second data set representing a second aspect of the physical wavefield;

transforming the first equalized data set and the second equalized data set to a wavelet domain to form a first wavelet coefficient set and a second wavelet coefficient set;

forming a noise model from the first wavelet coefficient set and the second wavelet coefficient set by subtracting each wavelet coefficient of the first wavelet coefficient set from a corresponding wavelet coefficient of the second wavelet coefficient set and retaining the value of the result;

using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set.

22.34. (canceled)

35. The method of claim 21, wherein the first aspect and the second aspect are independent.

36. The method of claim 21, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

37. The method of claim 21, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises transforming the combined data set and the noise model to a domain of distance and time to form a combined data set and a noise model, and adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

38. A computer-readable medium that stores instructions, wherein the instructions are executable to implement operations comprising:

identifying a first data set representing a first aspect of a wavefield;

using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set.

39. The computer-readable medium of claim 38, wherein the first aspect and the second aspect are independent.

40. The computer-readable medium of claim 38, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

41. The computer-readable medium of claim 38, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises transforming the combined data set and the noise model to a domain of distance and time to form a combined data set and a noise model, and adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

42. A computer-readable medium that stores instructions, wherein the instructions are executable to implement operations comprising:

obtaining a first data set representing a first aspect of a physical wavefield;

using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set.

43. The computer-readable medium of claim 42, wherein the first aspect and the second aspect are independent.

44. The computer-readable medium of claim 42, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.

45. The computer-readable medium of claim 42, wherein using the noise model to remove noise from the combined data set comprises transforming the combined data set and the noise model to a domain of distance and time to form a combined data set and a noise model, and adaptively subtracting the noise model from the combined data set.