US20170208922A1 - Method of selecting the colour of cosmetic products - Google Patents
Method of selecting the colour of cosmetic products Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20170208922A1 US20170208922A1 US15/326,758 US201515326758A US2017208922A1 US 20170208922 A1 US20170208922 A1 US 20170208922A1 US 201515326758 A US201515326758 A US 201515326758A US 2017208922 A1 US2017208922 A1 US 2017208922A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- units
- complexion
- user
- lightness
- colour
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A45—HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
- A45D—HAIRDRESSING OR SHAVING EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT FOR COSMETICS OR COSMETIC TREATMENTS, e.g. FOR MANICURING OR PEDICURING
- A45D44/00—Other cosmetic or toiletry articles, e.g. for hairdressers' rooms
- A45D44/005—Other cosmetic or toiletry articles, e.g. for hairdressers' rooms for selecting or displaying personal cosmetic colours or hairstyle
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A45—HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
- A45D—HAIRDRESSING OR SHAVING EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT FOR COSMETICS OR COSMETIC TREATMENTS, e.g. FOR MANICURING OR PEDICURING
- A45D44/00—Other cosmetic or toiletry articles, e.g. for hairdressers' rooms
- A45D2044/007—Devices for determining the condition of hair or skin or for selecting the appropriate cosmetic or hair treatment
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of selection of colour cosmetics that provides an objective assessment of colours that suit a given user.
- the user is required to subjectively decide which colour cosmetics may suit their complexion.
- the lighting in a shop will play an important role in the perception of colour, and in particular, whether a colour cosmetic will suit the user or not.
- the light output can be different from different light sources, for example daylight light is slightly bluish in colour compared to an incandescent light bulb, leading to a slightly different perceived colour.
- Users are often seen to ‘test’ a product on their hand, however the skin tone and texture of skin on a hand is not equivalent to complexion of the face, resulting in the user buying a product which may well have suited the skin tone of their hand, but not their face.
- the foundation may change the tone of the skin to the extent that the colour cosmetic is no longer suitable.
- a user may seek advice from an in-store colour cosmetic adviser.
- the offer of an adviser may also be subjective.
- the Applicants of the present invention have been primarily concerned with improving the objectivity of the colour cosmetic selection process.
- the Applicants have found that not all colour cosmetics, such as lip shades for example, will suit every skin tone. For example, for users with a golden tone to their complexion, lip shades that are tonally more blue, such as magenta/fuchsia in colour, are less flattering to the complexion than lipstick shades that are more yellow, such as ruby or auburn toned shades.
- a wide variety of lipstick shades will flatter skins that are darker in tone, such as for example, magenta, rose, raspberry, ruby, coral and auburn toned shades flatter these skin tones. However for those users whose skin is very pink in tone will find that yellow toned shades, such as auburn or coral lipstick shades, are less flattering. Alternatively, bluer-toned lipstick shades, for example rose, magenta, raspberry shades will be more flattering.
- CIELAB (L*a*b*) is a three-dimensional colour space that can be used to describe all colours visible to the human eye.
- a particular colour can be specified in CIELAB using three different parameters: L* denotes the lightness of the colour and runs from 0, representing black, and 100, representing white; a* denotes the red/green value of the colour; and b* denotes the yellow/blue value of the colour.
- CIELAB uses Cartesian co-ordinates to describe a colour. Polar co-ordinates can also be used. This method is called CIELCH (L*C*h°) and is derived from CIELAB.
- L* denotes lightness
- C* denotes chroma
- h° denotes hue angle.
- the objective of the present work was to identify which shades of colour cosmetic was flattering to a given complexion shade.
- the Applicant is able to measure shade of complexion using their marketed colour-measuring instrument, the ‘Match Made’ device, and will then be able to offer a client a pre-chosen range of colour cosmetics, for example lip shade, that will flatter either their complexion, or their complexion with foundation applied thereto. It has been possible to group complexion shades into 4 different areas of the colour space.
- the first group are defined by a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units and a hue angle h° of 54-60°. These complexions are darker in colour, an example of which may be an Afro-Caribbean origin and the like?.
- a complexion tone in this range, then the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-30°, lightness L* of 40-45 units and chroma C* of 30-50.
- the second group are defined by a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units and a hue angle h° of greater than 63°.
- These complexions have golden tones and examples of which may be people of Asian-origin
- a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 10-30°, lightness L* of 40-47 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- the third group have a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units and hue angle h° of less than 50°. These people have a complexion with a pinker undertone and examples of which are people of Caucasian origin with a ruddy complexion. When a user has a complexion tone in this range, the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-20°, lightness L* 40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- the fourth group have a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of 20-25 units and hue angle of 56-63. These people have a range of complexions and examples of which are people of darker toned Caucasian or Hispanic origin. When a user has a complexion tone in this range, then the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-25°, lightness L*40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- Suitable lip colour products include lipsticks, lip pencils, lip gloss, lip liners and mixtures thereof.
- Lip colour shades were developed by random choice based on a preference of the formulator. The present colour understanding has permitted the Applicant to be able to develop an organised, logical range of lip colour shades which permit a selection of shades which are suitable for each of the four complexion groups. The Applicant has produced a range of lip shades along fixed increments of L* C* h° within the area of CIELAB colour space where lipstick shades sit. By developing lip shades in this way the Applicant is able to ensure improved suitability of a lipshade for a given user, reducing the level of subjectivity in the lipshade choice.
- Suitable lipstick products may be creamy and matt or glossy and shiny.
- Preferably lipstick products are creamy and matt, as the Applicants have found that creamy shades enhance lipstick suitability.
- kits including a colour cosmetic foundation and one or more suiting lip products.
- the present invention is designed toward selecting lip colour cosmetics
- the invention can be manipulated to understand and provide a similar objective method of selecting other colour cosmetics, such as blushers, bronzers, eye shadows, pencils and mascaras.
Landscapes
- Cosmetics (AREA)
- Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)
Abstract
According to the present invention there is provided a method for selecting colour cosmetics which are most flattering for a given complexion shade.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method of selection of colour cosmetics that provides an objective assessment of colours that suit a given user.
- The use of colour cosmetics is not a new concept or habit. Today, a user will make their own choice of colour cosmetics from the array of products that are presented in a shop.
- In the former scenario, the user is required to subjectively decide which colour cosmetics may suit their complexion. The lighting in a shop will play an important role in the perception of colour, and in particular, whether a colour cosmetic will suit the user or not. Moreover, the light output can be different from different light sources, for example daylight light is slightly bluish in colour compared to an incandescent light bulb, leading to a slightly different perceived colour. Users are often seen to ‘test’ a product on their hand, however the skin tone and texture of skin on a hand is not equivalent to complexion of the face, resulting in the user buying a product which may well have suited the skin tone of their hand, but not their face. Furthermore, even if the user correctly selects a suitable colour cosmetic, if foundation is applied to the skin, the foundation may change the tone of the skin to the extent that the colour cosmetic is no longer suitable.
- Alternatively, a user may seek advice from an in-store colour cosmetic adviser. However, although more experienced in colour choice than some consumers, the offer of an adviser may also be subjective.
- Attempts have been made in the past to group people of similar complexion, such as the system used by ‘Colour Me Beautiful’, whereby a user will be grouped into a warmer or cooler shade or by ‘season’. The aim of such a system was then to offer the user a pre-selected palette of colours that were defined to suit. Whilst the theory behind such attempts may be good, the user would often get the grouping wrong, because of some of the lighting issues discussed above, or their own perception of their skin tone. However the system was too simplistic and users often made an incorrect initial choice of which warm/cooler shade or ‘season’ they fell into, as well as the pre-selected colour palette also sometimes incorrectly leading the user to an incorrect palette choice. In brief, it did not follow that if one found oneself to be of ‘cool’ skin tone, that one should wear ‘cool’ colours. The systems were subjective, and thus subject to human error.
- The above inadequacies of the colour cosmetic selection process results in a poor experience of the user, which the Applicant has sought to address.
- According to the present invention there is provided a method of selecting a suitable/coordinating lip product colour cosmetic in which
-
- 1) An assessment is made of the complete complexion shade of the user
- 2) A lip product colour cosmetic is selected according to one of the four complexion groups wherein, if
- a) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units and a hue angle h° of 54-60°, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-30°, lightness L* of 40-45 units and chroma C* of 30-50;
- b) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units and a hue angle h° of greater than 63°, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 10-30°, lightness L* of 40-47 units and chroma C* 30-50;
- c) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units and hue angle h° of less than 50°, then then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-20°, lightness L* 40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50;
- d) the user has a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of 20-25 units and hue angle h° of 56-63, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-25°, lightness L*40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- The Applicants of the present invention have been primarily concerned with improving the objectivity of the colour cosmetic selection process. The Applicants have found that not all colour cosmetics, such as lip shades for example, will suit every skin tone. For example, for users with a golden tone to their complexion, lip shades that are tonally more blue, such as magenta/fuchsia in colour, are less flattering to the complexion than lipstick shades that are more yellow, such as ruby or auburn toned shades.
- A wide variety of lipstick shades will flatter skins that are darker in tone, such as for example, magenta, rose, raspberry, ruby, coral and auburn toned shades flatter these skin tones. However for those users whose skin is very pink in tone will find that yellow toned shades, such as auburn or coral lipstick shades, are less flattering. Alternatively, bluer-toned lipstick shades, for example rose, magenta, raspberry shades will be more flattering.
- For all other skin tones a wide range of lipstick shades are flattering, but orange-toned shades, such as coral, orange, auburn will be less flattering.
- There is no accurate method for deciding whether a colour flatters a user or not, but instead this is a instinctive decision based on the perceived appearance of the user. When a shade of a colour cosmetic suits a user, their skin appears healthier, more radiant, lighter and energised. Contrarily, when a shade does not suit the user, the skin appears grey, drained and unwell, and tends to highlight negatively perceived areas, such as dark marks or bags under the eye, the appearance of blemishes, or uneven skin tone.
- Colour of the complexion, foundation and colour cosmetic are measured within the CIELAB(L*a*b*) method. CIELAB (L*a*b*) is a three-dimensional colour space that can be used to describe all colours visible to the human eye. A particular colour can be specified in CIELAB using three different parameters: L* denotes the lightness of the colour and runs from 0, representing black, and 100, representing white; a* denotes the red/green value of the colour; and b* denotes the yellow/blue value of the colour. CIELAB uses Cartesian co-ordinates to describe a colour. Polar co-ordinates can also be used. This method is called CIELCH (L*C*h°) and is derived from CIELAB. Here, L* denotes lightness, C* denotes chroma and h° denotes hue angle.
- The objective of the present work was to identify which shades of colour cosmetic was flattering to a given complexion shade. The Applicant is able to measure shade of complexion using their marketed colour-measuring instrument, the ‘Match Made’ device, and will then be able to offer a client a pre-chosen range of colour cosmetics, for example lip shade, that will flatter either their complexion, or their complexion with foundation applied thereto. It has been possible to group complexion shades into 4 different areas of the colour space.
- The first group are defined by a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units and a hue angle h° of 54-60°. These complexions are darker in colour, an example of which may be an Afro-Caribbean origin and the like?. When a user has a complexion tone in this range, then the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-30°, lightness L* of 40-45 units and chroma C* of 30-50.
- The second group are defined by a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units and a hue angle h° of greater than 63°. These complexions have golden tones and examples of which may be people of Asian-origin When a user has complexion tone in this range, then the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 10-30°, lightness L* of 40-47 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- The third group have a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units and hue angle h° of less than 50°. These people have a complexion with a pinker undertone and examples of which are people of Caucasian origin with a ruddy complexion. When a user has a complexion tone in this range, the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-20°, lightness L* 40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- The fourth group have a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of 20-25 units and hue angle of 56-63. These people have a range of complexions and examples of which are people of darker toned Caucasian or Hispanic origin. When a user has a complexion tone in this range, then the user is matched with a lip shade colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-25°, lightness L*40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50.
- Suitable lip colour products include lipsticks, lip pencils, lip gloss, lip liners and mixtures thereof. Historically Lip colour shades were developed by random choice based on a preference of the formulator. The present colour understanding has permitted the Applicant to be able to develop an organised, logical range of lip colour shades which permit a selection of shades which are suitable for each of the four complexion groups. The Applicant has produced a range of lip shades along fixed increments of L* C* h° within the area of CIELAB colour space where lipstick shades sit. By developing lip shades in this way the Applicant is able to ensure improved suitability of a lipshade for a given user, reducing the level of subjectivity in the lipshade choice.
- Suitable lipstick products may be creamy and matt or glossy and shiny. Preferably lipstick products are creamy and matt, as the Applicants have found that creamy shades enhance lipstick suitability.
- In a preferred embodiment a kit may be provided including a colour cosmetic foundation and one or more suiting lip products.
- Whilst the present invention is designed toward selecting lip colour cosmetics, the invention can be manipulated to understand and provide a similar objective method of selecting other colour cosmetics, such as blushers, bronzers, eye shadows, pencils and mascaras.
Claims (2)
1. A method of selecting a suitable/coordinating lip product shade in which
1) An assessment is made of the complete complexion shade of the user
2) A range of lip product colour cosmetics is selected according to one of the four complexion groups wherein, if
a) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units and a hue angle h° of 54-60°, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-30°, lightness L* of 40-45 units and chroma C* of 30-50;
b) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units and a hue angle h° of greater than 63°, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 10-30°, lightness L* of 40-47 units and chroma C* 30-50;
c) the user has a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units and hue angle h° of less than 50°, then then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-20°, lightness L* 40-49 units and chroma C* 30-50;
d) the user has a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of 20-25 units and hue angle h° of 56-63, then the user is matched with a lip product colour cosmetic with hue angle h° 5-25°, lightness L*40-4 units and chroma C* 30-50.
2. A kit of colour cosmetics comprising selecting a foundation shade selected from group consisting:
a) a complexion lightness L* of 41-52 units, C* of 18-24 units and a hue angle h° of 54-60°;
b) a complexion lightness L* of 58-70 units, C* of 20-25 units and a hue angle h° of greater than 63°;
c) a complexion lightness L* of 62-68 units, C* of 18-25 units and hue angle h° of less than 50; and
d) a complexion lightness L* of greater than 52 units, C* of 20-25 units and hue angle h° of 56-63, and combining it with the appropriate lip product colour cosmetic according to claim 1
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB1413047.0A GB201413047D0 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2014-07-23 | Method of selecting colour cosmetics |
GB1413047.0 | 2014-07-23 | ||
PCT/EP2015/025051 WO2016012104A1 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2015-07-17 | Method of selecting the colour of cosmetic products |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20170208922A1 true US20170208922A1 (en) | 2017-07-27 |
Family
ID=51494999
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/326,758 Abandoned US20170208922A1 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2015-07-17 | Method of selecting the colour of cosmetic products |
Country Status (12)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20170208922A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3179881B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2017522124A (en) |
KR (1) | KR101927684B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN106659286A (en) |
AU (2) | AU2015294657A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2954770A1 (en) |
CL (1) | CL2017000135A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2691925T3 (en) |
GB (1) | GB201413047D0 (en) |
MX (1) | MX362887B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016012104A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11064791B2 (en) * | 2016-10-12 | 2021-07-20 | La Bouche Rouge | System for creating and providing a product of a certain color or texture chosen by a subject and product produced by such a system |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109300164A (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2019-02-01 | 丽宝大数据股份有限公司 | Basal tone judgment method and electronic device |
KR102343251B1 (en) | 2018-04-13 | 2021-12-27 | 샤넬 파르퓜 보트 | A method for selecting a cosmetic product for an intended user |
CN108324595A (en) * | 2018-04-18 | 2018-07-27 | 上海中翊日化有限公司 | A kind of water-in-oil foundation liquid combining form having toning function and its use and preparation method |
WO2023245404A1 (en) * | 2022-06-21 | 2023-12-28 | L'oreal | Method for classifying a color of a makeup productand tool for assistance in the development of colors of makeup products |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3501852A (en) * | 1966-03-12 | 1970-03-24 | Merck Ag E | Color scales for analytical and diagnostic purposes |
US4048493A (en) * | 1976-08-03 | 1977-09-13 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Light-sensitive control for colored light projector |
US4523852A (en) * | 1983-06-09 | 1985-06-18 | Miles Laboratories, Inc. | Color comparison reference standard and method for using same |
US5313267A (en) * | 1983-07-18 | 1994-05-17 | Chromatics Color Sciences International Inc. | Method and instrument for selecting personal compatible colors |
US6603550B1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2003-08-05 | Fd Management, Inc. | Device, kit and method for selecting personalized color cosmetics |
US20090004126A1 (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2009-01-01 | Linda Jane Lowndes | Colour Compensating System |
US20120300050A1 (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2012-11-29 | Lvmh Recherche | Method for characterizing the tone of the skin and integuments |
US20120315232A1 (en) * | 2011-05-26 | 2012-12-13 | Lvmh Recherche | Make-up composition producing a change in colour on application |
US20130033590A1 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2013-02-07 | Sumera Yacoob | Real-Time Skin Color Visualization and Classification Tool |
US20130300761A1 (en) * | 2010-11-12 | 2013-11-14 | Colormodules Inc. | Method and system for color matching and color recommendation |
US20130343647A1 (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2013-12-26 | Omron Corporation | Image processing device, image processing method, and control program |
US8693768B1 (en) * | 2012-07-10 | 2014-04-08 | Lisa LaForgia | Cosmetic base matching system |
US9519927B1 (en) * | 2013-05-22 | 2016-12-13 | Sephora USA, Inc. | System for cosmetics matching based on skin tone |
US20180057212A1 (en) * | 2016-08-23 | 2018-03-01 | Noxell Corporation | Cosmetic Product With Indicia |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3390558B2 (en) * | 1995-01-27 | 2003-03-24 | ポーラ化成工業株式会社 | Lip color advice system and method |
JP2000002590A (en) * | 1998-06-16 | 2000-01-07 | Shiseido Co Ltd | Method for selecting color |
FR2861177A1 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2005-04-22 | Oreal | ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING THE CLARITY LEVEL OF THE SKIN AND THE RANGES OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS |
JP4519681B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2010-08-04 | 大日本印刷株式会社 | Method and apparatus for creating human lip area mask data |
JP4709643B2 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2011-06-22 | 花王株式会社 | Skin impression production method |
CN101668451B (en) * | 2007-03-08 | 2012-05-30 | 惠普开发有限公司 | Method and system for recommending a product based upon skin color estimated from an image |
JP2008286649A (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2008-11-27 | Shiseido Co Ltd | Method of evaluating whiteness of complexion of face, and program and complexion measuring apparatus using same |
JP5323431B2 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2013-10-23 | 株式会社 資生堂 | Lipstick selection method, lipstick selection device, and lipstick selection program |
-
2014
- 2014-07-23 GB GBGB1413047.0A patent/GB201413047D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2015
- 2015-07-17 CN CN201580040016.8A patent/CN106659286A/en active Pending
- 2015-07-17 AU AU2015294657A patent/AU2015294657A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2015-07-17 ES ES15747753.0T patent/ES2691925T3/en active Active
- 2015-07-17 US US15/326,758 patent/US20170208922A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2015-07-17 WO PCT/EP2015/025051 patent/WO2016012104A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-07-17 KR KR1020177004716A patent/KR101927684B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2015-07-17 JP JP2017503936A patent/JP2017522124A/en active Pending
- 2015-07-17 EP EP15747753.0A patent/EP3179881B1/en active Active
- 2015-07-17 CA CA2954770A patent/CA2954770A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2015-07-17 MX MX2017000879A patent/MX362887B/en active IP Right Grant
-
2017
- 2017-01-18 CL CL2017000135A patent/CL2017000135A1/en unknown
-
2018
- 2018-09-25 AU AU2018236734A patent/AU2018236734B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3501852A (en) * | 1966-03-12 | 1970-03-24 | Merck Ag E | Color scales for analytical and diagnostic purposes |
US4048493A (en) * | 1976-08-03 | 1977-09-13 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Light-sensitive control for colored light projector |
US4523852A (en) * | 1983-06-09 | 1985-06-18 | Miles Laboratories, Inc. | Color comparison reference standard and method for using same |
US5313267A (en) * | 1983-07-18 | 1994-05-17 | Chromatics Color Sciences International Inc. | Method and instrument for selecting personal compatible colors |
US6603550B1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2003-08-05 | Fd Management, Inc. | Device, kit and method for selecting personalized color cosmetics |
US20090004126A1 (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2009-01-01 | Linda Jane Lowndes | Colour Compensating System |
US20130300761A1 (en) * | 2010-11-12 | 2013-11-14 | Colormodules Inc. | Method and system for color matching and color recommendation |
US20130343647A1 (en) * | 2011-03-10 | 2013-12-26 | Omron Corporation | Image processing device, image processing method, and control program |
US20120315232A1 (en) * | 2011-05-26 | 2012-12-13 | Lvmh Recherche | Make-up composition producing a change in colour on application |
US20120300050A1 (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2012-11-29 | Lvmh Recherche | Method for characterizing the tone of the skin and integuments |
US20130033590A1 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2013-02-07 | Sumera Yacoob | Real-Time Skin Color Visualization and Classification Tool |
US8693768B1 (en) * | 2012-07-10 | 2014-04-08 | Lisa LaForgia | Cosmetic base matching system |
US9519927B1 (en) * | 2013-05-22 | 2016-12-13 | Sephora USA, Inc. | System for cosmetics matching based on skin tone |
US20180057212A1 (en) * | 2016-08-23 | 2018-03-01 | Noxell Corporation | Cosmetic Product With Indicia |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11064791B2 (en) * | 2016-10-12 | 2021-07-20 | La Bouche Rouge | System for creating and providing a product of a certain color or texture chosen by a subject and product produced by such a system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3179881A1 (en) | 2017-06-21 |
MX362887B (en) | 2019-02-22 |
AU2018236734B2 (en) | 2020-09-03 |
CL2017000135A1 (en) | 2017-07-28 |
AU2015294657A1 (en) | 2017-02-02 |
JP2017522124A (en) | 2017-08-10 |
CN106659286A (en) | 2017-05-10 |
KR20170032447A (en) | 2017-03-22 |
WO2016012104A1 (en) | 2016-01-28 |
MX2017000879A (en) | 2017-05-04 |
EP3179881B1 (en) | 2018-09-12 |
KR101927684B1 (en) | 2018-12-12 |
AU2018236734A1 (en) | 2018-10-18 |
ES2691925T3 (en) | 2018-11-29 |
GB201413047D0 (en) | 2014-09-03 |
CA2954770A1 (en) | 2016-01-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2018236734B2 (en) | Method of selecting the colour of cosmetic products | |
US6330341B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for hair color characterization and treatment | |
CN110728618B (en) | Virtual makeup testing method, device, equipment and image processing method | |
Ling et al. | A new model for color preference: Universality and individuality | |
JP2001292832A (en) | Method for classifying makeup color image and makeup color image map | |
KR20210006069A (en) | Apparatus and method for diagnosing personal color | |
Shamey et al. | Effect of field view size and lighting on unique-hue selection using natural color system object colors | |
CN108416813B (en) | Design method for color extraction optimization | |
JP6146754B1 (en) | Flag set for personal color diagnosis | |
JP5180441B2 (en) | Color analysis method, personal color diagnostic method, and personal color diagnostic tool | |
KR102299813B1 (en) | Method For Evaluating Application Uniformity of Makeup Cosmetics | |
CN107766896A (en) | A kind of spectrum dimension reduction method based on form and aspect cluster | |
JPH0850125A (en) | Point make-up cosmetic selecting method | |
JP2023511664A (en) | Systems and methods for bulk tone and application evaluation of lipsticks | |
Ebner | Derivation and modelling hue uniformity and development of the IPT color space | |
Fernandez-Maloigne et al. | Digital Color: Acquisition, Perception, Coding and Rendering | |
Wright et al. | The Color Affects System of Applied Color Psychology | |
JP2000002590A (en) | Method for selecting color | |
Yan et al. | Skin Balancing: Skin Color-Based Calibration for Portrait Images to Enhance the Affective Quality | |
Reddy et al. | Cultural differences in color preferences | |
Kurnia et al. | Skin and Clothes Matching Seeded by Color System Selection | |
US11481928B2 (en) | System and method of lipstick bulktone and application evaluation | |
Babilon et al. | A new metric for memory colour preference evaluation in lighting applications–Experiments, mathematical definition, and comparison with other colour rendering indices | |
Anku | Preferred Rendering of Memory Colors | |
KR20030007206A (en) | Cosmetic method based on color balance of skin color, hair color and make-up color |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE BOOTS COMPANY PLC, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WATSON, JOANNE;REEL/FRAME:048724/0485 Effective date: 20170123 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |