US20170086465A1

US20170086465A1 - Antinematodal methods and compositions

Info

Publication number: US20170086465A1
Application number: US15/295,390
Authority: US
Inventors: Benjamin Podbilewicz; Ori Avinoam; Judith M. White
Original assignee: Technion Research and Development Foundation Ltd; University of Virginia Patent Foundation
Current assignee: Technion Research and Development Foundation Ltd; UVA Licensing and Ventures Group
Priority date: 2011-02-01
Filing date: 2016-10-17
Publication date: 2017-03-30
Also published as: US20130336939A1; CN103502270A; WO2012104837A1; US9468660B2; CN103502270B; EP2670771B1; BR112013019707A2; EP2670771A1

Abstract

There are provided methods and compositions useful in cell-cell fusion using Fusion Family (FF) proteins of nematode origin. There are further provided antinematodal methods and compositions, utilizing fusogenic proteins of the nematode Fusion Family.

Description

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/982,996, filed Sep. 3, 2013 (published as US 20130336939), which is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IL2012/000054, filed Jan. 31, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/438,274, filed Feb. 1, 2011, the contents of each of which are herein expressly incorporated by reference for all purposes.

INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Incorporated by reference in its entirety herein is a computer-readable nucleotide/amino acid sequence listing submitted concurrently herewith and identified as follows: One 54,715 byte ACSII (text) file named “Seq_List” created on Jul. 31, 2013.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods and compositions useful in cell-cell fusion using Fusion Family proteins of nematodes. There are further provided antinematodal methods and compositions, utilizing fusogenic proteins of the nematode Fusion Family.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Virtually all membranes can fuse, ranging from small intracellular vesicles and organelles to entire cells. Consequently, membrane fusion is critical for many biological processes such as fertilization, embryonic and postembryonic development, intracellular trafficking and viral infection (1-6). Exoplasmic cell fusion process involves the merger of plasma membranes. This process can be either transient, as in the case of sperm-egg fusion, resulting in a diploid cell that continues to divide, or permanent, resulting in the formation of syncytia multinuclear cells. Such syncytia serve as essential components of several somatic tissues in metazoans, including the myotubes in muscle formation, osteoclasts in bone formation and syncytial trophoblasts in the formation of the mammalian placenta. Exoplasmic cell fusion also takes place during specific viral infections, as enveloped viruses (such as, for example, influenza, HIV and rabies) fuse their membrane with the host's plasma or endosomal membrane. Similar to exoplasmic cell-cell fusion, viral-cell fusion takes place between the external layers of the fusing membranes and, as such, differs in many aspects from endoplasmic fusion events that occur within a cell (for example, vesicular membrane transport between organelles).
Existing models of the molecular mechanisms of membrane fusion rely on experimental and biophysical analyses performed mainly on viral and intercellular fusion-mediating proteins (known as fusogens). However, how well these models correspond to the mechanisms of action of cell-cell fusogens is unknown (4, 5). For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,402,409 is directed to cell fusion method. Another cell fusion method is described, for example, by Gottesman et. al. (18).
AFF-1 (Anchor-cell Fusion Failure-1) and EFF-1 (Epithelial Fusion Failure-1) proteins from the nematode C. elegans are the first identified and therefore the founding members of a family of fusogens (that is, proteins mediating cell to cell fusion through fusion of the lipid bi-layers of the cells), conserved in nematodes (4). The C. elegans FF proteins (CeFF's) were shown to induce fusion in heterologous insect cells (for example, references 7-11). aff-1 and eff-1 mutants are viable, but have severe body deformities and reproductive defects associated with cell fusion failure (9, 10). EFF-1's function as a fusogen requires its expression in both fusion partners (8). The Fusion Family (FF) family of proteins is very well conserved among nematodes. FF members were identified in various nematode species, suggesting that the FF family is conserved in the phylum Nematoda (4). Only a few members of the FF family have been identified outside nematodes, none of them in plants or in vertebrates.
Nematodes are the most diverse phylum of pseudocoelomates, and one of the most diverse of all animals. Over 28,000 Nematode species have been described (12) and about 16,000 of the nematodes are parasitic. The nematodes have adapted to nearly every known ecosystem.
Infection by nematodes in general and parasitic nematodes in particular may affect various hosts, such as, for example, livestock, humans, marine habitats, plants, and the like (13), resulting in health-related and financial consequences. Thus, effective control of infection would contribute significantly to agriculture, farming and medicine with a resultant financial implication. For example, the World Health Organization estimates that at least two billion people are infected by parasitic nematodes, while damage by plant parasitic nematodes is estimated at ˜4-10 billion $ per year in losses in the U.S and over $80 billion per year in losses worldwide. Antinematodal agents (also known as antihelminthics, anhelmintics and vermicides), currently in use include mostly chemicals, pharmaceuticals or naturally occurring compounds that are designed to kill the parasite or expel it from its host. Nevertheless, most of these antinematodal agents are extremely toxic and if used in improper dosages are dangerous to humans. Furthermore, the continuous use of chemicals leads to the accumulation of resistant worms and inevitably to treatment failure. In addition, controlling pathogens such as parasitic nematodes can be extremely expensive.
Thus, there is an unmet need for new antihelminthic methods and compositions, that are specific, safe, non toxic, inexpensive and with minimal effect on the environment. The use of nematodal fusogens as exogenously expressed mediators for fusion of virus particles to cells or cell-cell fusion between cells of higher organisms of the plant and animal kingdom is neither taught nor suggested in the art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods and compositions for the fusion of cells including but not limited to mammalian cells, plant cells, avian cells, and the like, as well as fusion of cells with viral particles, using fusogenic proteins comprising at least the extracellular portion of a fusogen of nematode origin. The present invention further discloses antinematodal methods and compositions, methods for their preparation, and uses thereof.
The invention is based in part on the unexpected and surprising finding that conserved eukaryotic fusogens, such as, nematode fusogenic proteins of the Fusion Family proteins, can mediate fusion of viral envelopes to cells, by replacing the endogenous viral fusogenic protein(s). The invention is further based in part on the unexpected finding that the Fusion Family (FF) proteins are a family of membrane fusogens that may be interchangeable between species and even beyond the nematode phylum and hence homologs of the family can be used for fusion of non-insect cells, when expressed on the membranes of those cells. Such findings are surprising and unexpected since induced fusion in heterologous insect cells mediated by C. elegans FF proteins, does not indicate nor suggest that such fusion proteins are capable of: replacing an endogenous viral fusogenic protein(s) or that the FF proteins are interchangeable between species and can be used for fusion of cells of higher, non-insect organisms.
According to some embodiments, a method is provided for a specific, protein mediated cell to cell fusion. The protein which mediates the fusion is a fusion protein, for example, of nematode origin, that is expressed on the surface of the cells and thereby allows/induces/mediates fusion of the cells. In some embodiments, the same fusogenic protein is expressed on the surface of both a first and a second cell. In some embodiments, each of the cells expresses a different fusion protein, both fusogenic proteins belong to the same family of fusogenic proteins (homotypic). In some embodiments, the fusogenic proteins are endogenously expressed proteins. In some embodiments, for at least one of the cells to be fused, the fusogenic protein is an exogenous protein. In some embodiments, the cells are of similar origin. For example, both cells may be mammalian cells. In some embodiments, the cells are of different origin. In some exemplary embodiments, the first cell is a pseudotyped enveloped virus and the other (second) cell is of nematode origin. In other exemplary embodiments, the first cell is a pseudotyped enveloped virus and the other (second) cell is of mammalian or plant origin. In some embodiments, at least one of the cells to be fused is not an insect cell. In some embodiments, the cells are of the higher animal or plant kingdom. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a method for fusing a first cell and a second cell to produce a fused, hybrid cell, the method comprising mixing/incubating/placing a first cell comprising a first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein with a second cell comprising a second exogenous nematode fusogenic protein; thereby fusing the first and the second cell. In some embodiments, the first cell and the second cell are of the same origin. In some embodiments when the first cell and the second cell are of the same origin, the cells are not insect cells (i.e. non-insect cells). In some embodiments, the first cell and/or the second cell are non-insect cells. In some embodiments, the first cell and the second cell are of the different origin. In some embodiments, the cells are selected from: virus (virus particle), plant cell, avian cell, animal cells or human cell. Each possibility is a separate embodiment. In some embodiments, the cells are non-insect cells. In some embodiments, the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are identical. In other embodiments, the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are different. In further embodiments, the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 or homologs thereof. In some embodiments, the expression of the first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the first cell and/or the second cell is transient. In some embodiments, the expression of the first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the first cell and/or the second cell is stable. In some embodiments, when the first cell and the second cell are of the same origin, the cells are not of nematode origin.
According to further embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion may further be used for immunotherapy methods and vaccine production by fusing antigen-presenting cells to other cells, wherein both cells express a Fusion Family protein of a nematode origin.
According to further embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion may further be used for the production of monoclonal antibodies by fusing cells to generate hybridomas using a physiological and less toxic alternative than currently used methods.
According to further embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion may further be used for the study of the mechanism of cell-cell fusion in the field of cancer and stem cell research and therapy.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a composition comprising a non-insect cell or viral particle expressing an exogenous nematode fusogenic protein. In some embodiments, the non-insect cell is selected from mammalian, avian, and plant cells. In further embodiments, the fusogenic protein is capable of mediating fusion of the cell or viral particle to a second cell expressing a second nematode fusogenic protein. In other embodiments, the second cell is selected from a mammalian, an avian, and a plant cell exogenously expressing a second nematode fusogenic protein, or a nematode cell endogenously expressing a nematode fusogenic protein. According to yet further embodiments, the second nematode fusogenic protein is the same or different from the fusogen of the non-insect cell. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a method for fusing a first cell and a second cell, the method comprising: incubating a first cell comprising a first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein with a second cell comprising a second exogenous nematode fusogenic protein; thereby fusing the first cell and the second cell to form a fused cell, wherein at least one of the cells is not of insect origin. In some embodiments, the first cell and the second cell are of the same origin. In other embodiments, the first cell and the second cell are of different origin. In some embodiments, the cells are selected from, plant, avian, animal, human, and viral particle. In additional embodiments, the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are identical. In other embodiments, the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are different. In some embodiments, the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 or homologs thereof. In other embodiments, the expression of the first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the first cell and/or the second cell is transient. In some embodiments, the expression of the exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the first cell and/or the second cell is stable.
According to additional embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated cell to cell fusion, may be used to specifically target nematodes. The method includes fusing a nematode cell with a viral particle expressing a nematode fusogenic protein. The specific fusion of the viral particle and the nematode cell may lead to a desired effect on the nematode cell, wherein the effect may be achieved without the use of an additional antinematodal agent. A desired effect on the nematode cell, may include, for example, killing the cell, inhibiting growth of the cell, stunning the cell, and the like. In some embodiments, the mere fusion of cells may lead to the death of the cells. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to further embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion, may be used to specifically target antinematodal agents to nematodes. In such embodiments, fusion of the cells is dependant on the expression of a fusogenic protein of nematode origin in the membranes of both fusing cells, wherein the fusogenic proteins may be identical or different. In some exemplary embodiments, one (first) cell is of nematode origin (endogenously expressing the fusion protein) and the other (second) cell is of different origin (such as, of plant origin, mammalian origin, avian origin, insect, enveloped pseudovirus, or the like), wherein the other (second) cell exogenously expresses a fusogenic protein of nematode origin. The other (second) cell may comprise one or more antinematodal agents, such as, for example: a chemical compound (such as, for example, but not limited to: organophospates, carbamates, imidazole derivatives, such as, for example, benzimidazole, Levamisole, Fumigant nematicides, macrolides, avermectin, milbemycin, tetanus toxin, and the like); a nucleic acid (such as, for example, antisense DNA molecules directed against nematode genes; siRNA or other dsRNA molecules directed against nematode genes, and the like); proteins (such as, for example, but not limited to: an enzyme capable of cleaving a nematode protein, an antibody directed against a nematode protein, a toxin, and the like), or combinations thereof. Upon the specific fusion of the cells, the antinematodal agent may exert an effect on the nematode. The effect may be, for example, kill, stun, and/or inhibit growth of the nematode.
According to further embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion may thus be used for the treatment of parasitic nematode infections of plants, animals and humans.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a composition comprising a cell expressing an exogenous nematode fusogenic protein capable of mediating specific fusion of the cell to the nematode cell; wherein the cell comprises an antinematodal agent. The compositions may be used for killing a nematode cell. In some embodiments, the cell may be selected from a mammalian cell, (including any stem cell), avian cell, virus, and plant cell. The exogenous nematode fusogenic protein may be selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof.
In some embodiments, the antinematodal agent may be selected from a chemical substance, a protein, a nucleic acid, a toxin and combinations thereof. In further embodiments, the antinematodal agent may expressed by the cell.
According to additional embodiments, the exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the cell may be transient. In some embodiments, the expression of the exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the cell may stable.
According to yet further embodiments, the nematode may be selected from, but not limited to: Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Caenorhabditis japonica, Caenorhabditis ramanei, Caenorhabditis brenneri, Caenorhabditis sp5,7,9,11, Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella pseudospiralis, Trichinella papuae, Pristionchus entomophagus, Pristionchus maupasi, Pristionchus pacificus, Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne hapla, Globodera pallida, Ancylostoma caninum, Brugia Malayi, Haemonchus contortus, Ascaris suum, Oscheius tipulae, Dirofilaria immitis, Howardula aoronymphium, Litomosoides sigmodontis, Heterodera glycines, Romanomermis culicivorax, Trichuris muris, Strongyloids ratti, Onchocerca volvulus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Wuchereria bancrofti, and Loa loa.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a composition comprising a virus comprising/expressing a nematode fusion protein, wherein said fusogenic protein is capable of mediating fusion of the virus to a cell of the nematode; wherein said fusion induces killing of the nematode. In some embodiments, the nematode fusogenic protein is selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof. The nematode may be selected from, but not limited to: Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Caenorhabditis japonica, Caenorhabditis ramanei, Caenorhabditis brenneri, Caenorhabditis sp5,7,9,11, Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella pseudospiralis, Trichinella papuae, Pristionchus entomophagus, Pristionchus maupasi, Pristionchus pacificus, Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne hapla, Globodera pallida, Ancylostoma caninum, Brugia Malayi, Haemonchus contortus, Ascaris suum, Oscheius tipulae, Dirofilaria immitis, Howardula aoronymphium, Litomosoides sigmodontis, Heterodera glycines, Romanomermis culicivorax, Trichuris muris, Strongyloids ratti, Onchocerca volvulus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Wuchereria bancrofti, and Loa loa. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
In some embodiments, the virus may be selected from Retrovirus, Hepadnavirus, Poxyvirus, Rhabdoviridae viruses, Paramyxoviruses, Herpes viruses and Coronavirus. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to further embodiments, there is provide a method for the targeted killing of a nematode, the method comprising contacting the nematode with a cell comprising an antinematodal agent, wherein the cell further comprises an exogenous fusogenic protein capable of mediating fusion of the cell and a cell of the nematode; and wherein the fusion induces killing of the nematode. The cell may be selected from mammalian cell, stem cell, avian cell, virus, and plant cell. In some embodiments, the exogenous fusogenic protein is a nematode protein selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof.
According to additional embodiments, the antinematodal agent may be selected from a chemical substance, a protein, a nucleic acid, a toxin and combinations thereof. The antinematodal agent may be expressed by the cell. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a method for the targeted killing of a nematode, the method comprising contacting the nematode with a virus comprising an exogenous nematode fusion protein, capable of mediating fusion of the virus to a cell of the nematode; wherein the fusion induces killing of the nematode. In some embodiments, the exogenous fusogenic protein is a nematode fusogenic protein selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof. In some embodiments, the nematode may be selected from, but not limited to: Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Caenorhabditis japonica, Caenorhabditis ramanei, Caenorhabditis brenneri, Caenorhabditis sp5,7,9,11, Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella pseudospiralis, Trichinella papuae, Pristionchus entomophagus, Pristionchus maupasi, Pristionchus pacificus, Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne hapla, Globodera pallida, Ancylostoma caninum, Brugia Malayi, Haemonchus contortus, Ascaris suum, Oscheius tipulae, Dirofilaria immitis, Howardula aoronymphium, Litomosoides sigmodontis, Heterodera glycines, Romanomermis culicivorax, Trichuris muris, Strongyloids ratti, Onchocerca volvulus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Wuchereria bancrofti, and Loa loa. The virus may be selected from retrovirus, Hepadnavirus, Poxyvirus, Rhabdoviridae viruses, Paramyxoviruses Herpes viruses and Coronavirus.
According to yet further embodiments, there is provided a method for the treatment of a nematode infection in a subject, the method comprising administering to the subject a composition comprising a cell expressing an exogenous nematode fusion protein, wherein fusion of said cell and a nematode cell infecting the subject induces death or inhibition of growth of the nematode. In some embodiments, the subject is human. In some embodiments, the subject is an animal. In some embodiments, the administering is selected from oral administration, injection, suppository and topical application. In further embodiments, the cell may further include an antinematodal agent, selected from a chemical substance, a protein, a nucleic acid, a toxin and combinations thereof. In additional embodiments, the cell may be selected from a mammalian cell, stem cell, avian cell, virus, and plant cell.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a transgenic plant stably expressing a fusogenic protein of the nematode family.
According to yet further embodiments, there is provided a viral vector for the expression of a nematode fusogenic protein on the surface of a virus.
According to additional embodiments, there is provided a recombinant cell expressing a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 15% identical to the amino acid sequence of a nematode fusogenic protein. In some embodiments, the cell may be selected from mammalian cell, stem cell, avian cell, virus, and plant cell. In some exemplary embodiments, the nematode fusogenic protein is selected from Ce-AFF-1 (SEQ ID NO: 23), Ce-EFF-1 (SEQ IS NO:24), tsp-FF-1 (SEQ. ID. No. 25) and/or Bfl-FF-1 (SEQ ID No. 26). Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to yet additional embodiments, there is provided a composition for killing a nematode cell, the composition comprising: a recombinant cell expressing an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 15% identical to the amino acid sequence of a nematode fusion protein, wherein said recombinant cell further comprises an anti nematodal agent.
According to some embodiments, there is further provided a kit comprising a composition comprising a recombinant cell expressing a fusogenic protein of nematode origin and; instructions for using said composition for the treatment of nematode infection.
These and additional benefits and features of the invention could better be understood by those skilled in the art with reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the figures and non-limiting examples.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate certain embodiments of the present invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive. The figures are listed below.

FIG. 1A shows a schematic illustration of the generation of recombinant single round infective VSVΔG-AFF-1 in vitro. BHK cells were transfected with a plasmid encoding aff-1 (Table 2, below) and expressed the protein on the cell surface. Cells were then infected with the G-complemented VSVΔG recombinant virus (VSVΔG-G). The viral genome encodes GFP in place of the fusogenic glycoprotein G. Infection results in viral induced expression of GFP by target cells (gray cytoplasm). VSVΔG-AFF-1 pseudoviruses were harvested from the supernatant.

FIG. 1B shows a pictograph of Western Blot analysis of purified VSVΔG-AFF-1 pseudoviruses demonstrating incorporation of AFF-1 into pseudotypes. Left Panel (A) depicts Mouse anti-Flag antibody recognizing bands of an apparent molecular weight (MW) of 75 kDa. The apparent MW of AFF-1 in Sf9 insect cells is 75 kDa (3). The theoretical MW of AFF-1 is 67 kDa (8). The extra bands reflect oligomers, processing and differential glycosylation of AFF-1 in BHK cells. Right panel (B) depicts Mouse anti-VSV-M antibody, which identified a protein of an apparent molecular weight of 25 kDa corresponding to the predicted molecular weight of VSV-M (arrow head).

FIG. 1C shows a schematic illustration summarizing VSVΔG-AFF-1 infection of BHK cells. Cells were transfected with aff-1, eff-1 or vector plasmid and infected with VSVΔG-AFF-1. Cells transfected with empty vector and infected with bald particles served as negative controls.

FIG. 1D shows bar graphs representing titers of VSVΔG pseudoviruses. The type of protein on the viral membrane (Bald or AFF-1) and on the BHK cell membrane (Vector, AFF-1 or EFF-1) is indicated. Anti-VSVG antibody (uG) was used to neutralize any residual VSVΔG-G virus (shown in FIG. 1F, below). Titers are in infectious units (IU) representing the number of cells expressing GFP per microliter 24 hours after virus inoculation. Data are mean+/−SE (n=3 experiments). The inset shows background infection.

FIG. 1E shows images of infected BHK cells. Infection of BHK cells monitored as GFP expression; phase contrast (top panels) versus fluorescence (bottom panels). Scale bar is 50 μm.

FIG. 1F shows a bar graph showing VSVΔG-G infection of cells expressing CeFFs and in the presence of anti-VSVG. Cells expressing AFF-1, EFF-1 or transfected with empty vector were infected with VSVΔG-G pseudo typed virus (1.5×10⁷IU). Infection was preformed in the presence (+) or absence (−) of anti G antibodies (uG) (1:100). Cells were examined by FACS (total number of cells counted 20,000 cells) after 24 hours. Transfection/Expression of FF proteins did not affect infection efficiency of VSVΔG-G pseudo typed virus (The two-tailed P value equals 0.49-0.89). uG efficiently blocked infection of VSVΔG-G. Results are presented as mean of three independent experiments+/−standard error.

FIGS. 2A-P shows Electron Microscopy pictures of various Recombinant VSVΔGs or immunofluorescence of Sf9 cells expressing AFF-1. Negative stained vesicles were obtained from the following viruses: FIG. 2A bald virus preparations (VSVΔG); FIG. 2B VSVΔG-G virus preparation; FIG. 2C—VSVΔG-AFF-1 pseudotype virus preparations. Arrows point to surface particles.

Anti AFF-1 polyclonal antibodies followed by immunogold labeling and negative stain of: FIG. 2D—VSVΔG-G virus preparation, FIG. 2E—VSVΔG-AFF-1 pseudotype virus preparation.

Cryo TEM: FIG. 2F—VSVΔG virus; FIG. 2G—VSVΔG-G; FIG. 2H VSVΔG-AFF-1. FIGS. 2I-K—show Top (2I), Center (2J) and bottom (2K) slice from VSVΔG-AFF-1 tomogram, respectively.

FIGS. 2L-M show slices form cryoET of vesicles co-purified with VSVΔG-AFF-1 preparation displaying penta- or hexa-meric “flower” shaped complexes (Arrows).

Scale bars are 100 nm and 10 nm for insets; Arrows: surface spike assemblies; Arrowheads: gold particles; White square: indicating area shown magnified in inset.

FIG. 2N. Immunofluorescence in Sf9 cells expressing AFF-1-Flag (transfected with 3 μg/ml aff-1 plasmid (Table 2)) with either: Panel A—#8 mouse polyclonal antibodies against AFF-1, diluted 1:500 in TBST or Panel B—pre-immune serum. Secondary antibody—Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti mouse IgG (H+L, Invitrogen Cat#A11004) diluted 1:500 in TBST. Order of pictures in each panel, left to right: Panel A: AFF-1 (white, solid arrow (representing red)); Transfection marker nuclear/cytoplasmic (dashed arrow (representing green)); DAPI, DNA (Long dashed arrow (representing blue)); overly of staining. Panel B: pre-immune serum; Transfection marker nuclear/cytoplasmic (dashed arrow (representing green)); DAPI, DNA (long dashed arrow (representing blue)); overly of staining. Scale bar is 10 μm.

FIG. 2O (panels A-H) demonstrate quantification of immunogold labeling. Panel A—shows pictograms of immunogold labeled VSVΔG-AFF-1 (asterisk). Panel B shows pictograms of immunogold labeled vesicle isolated from VSVΔG-AFF-1 prep (asterisk) with some background staining (arrowheads). Panel C—shows pictograms of immunogold labeled VSVΔG-AFF-1 (center) with some background staining (arrowheads). Panel D—shows pictograms of immunogold labeled vesicles and VSVΔG-AFF-1 viruses. Panel E—shows pictograms of VSVΔG-G stained with anti AFF-1 (negative control) antibody showing some non specific immunogold labeling (arrowheads). Panel F—shows pictograms of VSVΔG-G (center) with some background staining (arrowheads). Panel G—shows pictograms of immunogold labeled vesicles isolated from VSVΔG-G prep (asterisk) with some background staining (arrowheads). Panel H—shows bar graphs representing number of gold particles (Y axis) recognizing viruses and vesicles versus background of VSVΔG-AFF-1 or VSVΔG-G samples stained with anti-AFF-1. Anti-AFF-1 show specific virus/vesicle recognition of VSVΔG-AFF-1 compared to control VSVΔG-G. The difference in background staining between VSVΔG-AFF-1 and VSVΔG-G grids is not statistically significant (P=0.4588; n=30 quantified images per virus);

FIG. 2P (panels A-C) shows slices from cryoET of vesicles that co-purified with VSVΔG-AFF-1. Panel A—Top; Panel B—center; Panel C—bottom of slice from cryoET of vesicle preparations displaying penta- or hexa-meric “flower” shaped assemblies, Scale bars are 100 nm and 10 nm for the inset; white box: magnified area shown in inset.

FIGS. 3A-O—Fusion of BHK-AFF-1 and BHK-EFF-1 cells. FIGS. 3A-C are schematic illustrations of experimental design of a color mixing assay. FIG. 3D is a pictogram showing Negative control. Mixed cells co-transfected with empty vector and a (red) cytoplasmic marker (RFPnes) or a (cyan) nuclear marker (CFPnls) showed no color mixing. Scale bar is 100 μm.

FIG. 3E is a pictogram showing BHK-AFF-1 expressing cells (solid arrow (representing Red)) and BHK-EFF-1 expressing cells (dashed arrow (representing Cyan)) that were mixed. Hybrids express cyan nuclei and red cytoplasm (as indicated by the solid, short arrow heads).

FIGS. 3F-H show pictograms of: FIG. 3F: AFF-1 expressing BHK cells with (red) cytoplasm (represented by solid arrow); FIG. 3G: EFF-1 expressing BHK cells with (cyan) nuclei (represented by dashed arrow); FIG. 3H: BHK cells with (red) cytoplasm (represented by solid arrow) surrounding two (cyan) nuclei (represented by dashed arrows) appeared following expression of AFF-1 in BHK cells, expression of EFF-1 expression in BHK cells and mixing of the cells. (Scale bar is 10 μm.)

FIGS. 3I-K show pictograms of: FIG. 3I: AFF-1 expressing BHK cell with (red) cytoplasm (solid arrow, representing red cytoplasm); FIG. 3J: AFF-1 expressing BHK cell with (cyan) nuclei (dashed arrow, representing cyan nuclei); FIG. 3K: BHK cell with red cytoplasm (solid arrow, representing red cytoplasm) surrounding cyan nuclei (dashed arrow, representing cyan nuclei), which appeared following mixing of the cells.

FIGS. 3 L-O show quantification of the content mixing experiments in pie graphs, which represent the fraction of multinucleated cells (2 nuclei or higher). Results are mean of four independent experiments (n≧1000 total cells): FIG. 3L is a pie graph of quantity of cells transfected with Empty vectors. All multinucleated cells are bi-nucleated (total dividing cells 4%); FIG. 3M is a pie graph of quantity of AFF-1 expressing cells (solid arrow (representing red)) mixed with empty vector transfected cells (dashed arrow (representing cyan)). Elevation in multinucleation was only observed for AFF-1 expressing cells (solid arrow, 11%; dashed arrow, 3%). One cell with a single nucleus expressing both markers (red and cyan) was observed; FIG. 3N is a pie graph of quantity of AFF-1 expressing cells (solid arrow (representing red)) mixed with AFF-1 expressing cells (dashed arrow (representing cyan) resulting in four cell populations—mononucleated white and multinucleated red (represented by solid arrow, 13%), cyan (represented by dashed arrow, 12%) and mixed (represented by long dashed arrow (purple); 11%); FIG. 3O is a pie graph of quantity of AFF-1 expressing cells (solid arrow (representing red), 9%) mixed with EFF-1 expressing cells (dashed arrow (representing cyan), 11%). AFF-1 and EFF-1 expressing cells fuse (long dashed arrow (representing purple) 18%).

FIGS. 4A-F The FF Family of Eukaryotic Cell-Cell Fusogens: FIG. 4A shows scheme of two trees produced using maximum parsimony analysis. Phylogenic relationships of 25 taxa (left) and 14 taxa (right) based on either the TGFβ-RI like domain or the full length extracellular domain respectively, show classification of FF proteins into three subgroups (EFF-1-like, AFF-1-like and FF). FIG. 4B-E shows pictograms of immunofluorescence with anti-Flag antibodies (solid arrow (representing green)), and nuclei DAPI staining (dashed arrow (representing blue)) on BHK cells transfected with: FIG. 4B—empty vector; FIG. 4C—aff-1; FIG. 4D—Tsp-ff-1; and FIG. 4E—Bfl-ff-1. Co-transfection marker (original color—red). The images are representative of hundreds of fields in at least eight independent experiments. Scale bars represent 20 μm. For cells not expressing the construct (no red fluorescence) only the nuclei are visible. FIG. 4F shows bar graphs illustrating fusion index for transfected BHK cells expressing FF proteins and negative control. Data are means±SE. Empty vector, n=14, aff-1, n=14, Tsp-ff-1, n=8; Bfl-ff-1, n=9; n represents number of experiments.

FIG. 5 shows time lapse images of AFF-1-mediated fusion of mammalian cells. BHK cells co-transfected with AFF-1 and pRFPnes (white). The cells fuse as indicated by the diffusion of the marker from the brighter cell (36 min, asterisk) to the larger cell. After 72 minutes the marker is homogenously distributed and excluded from the second nucleus (arrowhead). Scale bar 20 μm. n>3 experiments.

FIGS. 6A-C shows sequence analysis of FF proteins. FIG. 6A shows distribution of conserved sequence motifs in FF paralogs and orthologs. Sequence motifs are numbered (color coded): I (representing Green)—Signal peptide (SP); II (representing Pink)—Pro-domain; III (representing Brown)—TGFβ-RI-like domain; IV (representing Yellow)-“[LMF]-G-W-[YFL]-[RK] motif”; V (representing Cyan)—Putative protein-protein interaction domain; VI (representing Purple)—Membrane proximal stem domain, VII (representing Ocher)—Transmembrane domain (TM). C. elegans paralogs are listed by gene name AFF-1, EFF-1, EFF-2 (C26D10.7). EFF-1 Alternative splicing variants (EFF-1 A-D) are also shown. Overall sequence identity to AFF-1 is indicated under the gene name. Local sequence identity to AFF-1(%) is indicated within each domain. Sequence limits are indicated under the illustration unless it is identical to previously shown schematic as in the case for EFF-1 isoforms. Sequences retrieved from B. floridae v2.0 assembly are listed as Bf-FF-1 and FF-3 which correspond to protein model id's 104514 and 104513 respectively. T. spiralis (Tsp FF-1) and P. pacificus (Ppa FF-1) correspond to gi1162730680 and Contig235.2 of the PpaFreeze1.bases database. Sequences retrieved for N. gruberi (Ngr-FF-1) correspond to gi|284087402 (Table 4). Accession numbers/database identifier of the various sequences are listed in Table 4. Annotation was preformed as previously described (2). FIG. 6B shows schematic representation of the multiple sequence alignment of FF proteins. Sequence alignment of conserved sequence motifs is shown. Alignment (color) code was according to the Clustal X color scheme with 40% conservation color increment in Jalview software (16). FIG. 6C shows schematic representation of secondary structure prediction of AFF-1 based on the multiple sequence alignment of FF proteins. The consensus prediction is shown—alpha helices are marked as tubes (originally represented by red tubes), and beta sheets as arrows (originally represented by green arrows).

FIGS. 7A-D—FF-1 protein from P. pacificus can fuse C. elegans cells. The gene Ppa-ff-1 (Table 2) was PCR amplified from P. pacificus genomic DNA and cloned downstream to a heat shock promoter (hsp16.2) from C. elegans. Transgenic worms were generated using microinjection of wild type stain (N2) and crossed to eff-1(ok1021) (8). Ectopic cell fusion was visualized by following the disappearance of an apical junction marker from fusing membranes (AJM-1::GFP) using confocal Z series reconstruction (2, 8) (n=9 embryos). FIGS. 7 A-D shows pictograms of ectopic cell fusion of transgenic worms (FIGS. 7A-B are florescence images, FIG. 7C is bright field and FIG. 7D is a merger of images of FIGS. 7B and 7C). 1.5-fold stage embryos, anterior to the left and ventral down. The effect of ectopic cell fusion is lethal. Scale bars are 10 μm. FIG. 7A shows a wild type embryo, two dorsal hypodermal cells undergo normal fusion (represented by asterisk). Unfused junction is marked with an arrow. FIG. 7B-D—eff-1 mutant embryo expressing hsp::Ppa-ff-1 (SEQ ID NO:20) after heat shock. The disappearance of apical junctions between individual cells suggests that Ppa-FF-1 mediates fusion of the hypodermal cells in an eff-1 independent manner.

FIGS. 8A-B. shows a schematic model of predicted structural homology of AFF-1 to class II viral fusogens. FIG. 8A—Top: model of Dengue 2 envelope glycoprotein E (accession: GI: 34811077/8). The following domains are shown: (Domain II (representing pink), Domain I (representing gray), Domain III (representing yellow) of the resolved structure of Dengue 2 E protein (PDB:loke)). Bottom (boxed)—Model of AFF-1 putative fusion (“fusion loop”) and ij (“jl loop”) loops.

FIG. 8B—(B) Structural alignment of the Dengue 2 E protein and of the predicted secondary structure of AFF-1. Fusion loop and ij loop are indicated by lines above the text. Alignment color is according to the Clustal X coloring scheme. Beta sheets—boxes and black arrows below text; Alpha helixes—boxes and black lines below text. Background: Domain II ((representing Pink), indicated by “II”), Domain I ((representing Gray), indicated by “I”), Domain III ((representing Yellow), indicated by “III”).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Definitions

To facilitate an understanding of the present invention, a number of terms and phrases are defined below. It is to be understood that these terms and phrases are for the purpose of description and not of limitation, such that the terminology or phraseology of the present specification is to be interpreted by the skilled artisan in light of the teachings and guidance presented herein, in combination with the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art.
The term “construct”, as used herein, refers to an artificially assembled or isolated nucleic acid molecule which may include one or more nucleic acid sequences, wherein the nucleic acid sequences may include coding sequences (that is, sequence which encodes an end product), regulatory sequences, non-coding sequences, or any combination thereof. The term construct includes, for example, vector but should not be seen as being limited thereto.
“Expression vector” refers to constructs that have the ability to incorporate and express heterologous nucleic acid fragments (such as, for example, DNA), in a foreign cell. In other words, an expression vector comprises nucleic acid sequences/fragments (such as DNA, mRNA, tRNA, rRNA), capable of being transcribed. Many prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression vectors are known and/or commercially available. Selection of appropriate expression vectors is within the knowledge of those having skill in the art.
The term “expression”, as used herein, refers to the production of a desired end-product molecule in a target cell. The end-product molecule may include, for example an RNA molecule; a peptide or a protein; a virus; and the like; or combinations thereof.
As used herein, the terms “introducing” and “transfection” may interchangeably be used and refer to the transfer of molecules, such as, for example, nucleic acids, polynucleotide molecules, vectors, and the like into a target cell(s), and more specifically into the interior of a membrane-enclosed space of a target cell(s). The molecules can be “introduced” into the target cell(s) by any means known to those of skill in the art, for example as taught by Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York (2001), the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. Means of “introducing” molecules into a cell include, for example, but are not limited to: heat shock, calcium phosphate transfection, PEI transfection, electroporation, lipofection, transfection reagent(s), viral-mediated transfer, and the like, or combinations thereof. The transfection of the cell may be performed on any type of cell, of any origin, such as, for example, human cells, animal cells, plant cells, virus, nematode cell, stem cells, cancer cells, and the like. The cells may be selected from isolated cells, tissue cultured cells, cell lines, cells present within an organism body, and the like.
As referred to herein, the terms “nucleic acid”, “nucleic acid molecules” “oligonucleotide”, “polynucleotide”, and “nucleotide” may interchangeably be used herein. The terms are directed to polymers of deoxyribonucleotides (DNA), ribonucleotides (RNA), and modified forms thereof in the form of a separate fragment or as a component of a larger construct, linear or branched, single stranded, double stranded, triple stranded, or hybrids thereof. The term also encompasses RNA/DNA hybrids. The polynucleotides may include sense and antisense oligonucleotide or polynucleotide sequences of DNA or RNA. The DNA or RNA molecules may be, for example, but not limited to: complementary DNA (cDNA), genomic DNA, synthesized DNA, recombinant DNA, or a hybrid thereof or an RNA molecule such as, for example, mRNA, tRNA, shRNA, siRNA, miRNA, and the like. The terms further include oligonucleotides composed of naturally occurring bases, sugars, and covalent internucleoside linkages, as well as oligonucleotides having non-naturally occurring portions, which function similarly to respective naturally occurring portions.
The terms “polypeptide,” “peptide” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. The terms apply to amino acid polymers in which one or more amino acid residue is an artificial chemical analogue of a corresponding naturally occurring amino acid, as well as to naturally occurring amino acid polymers.
The term “homology”, “homologous” and “homologs” as used herein are directed to sequence similarity between different sequences of peptides or different sequences of nucleic acids. For example, if two or more proteins have highly similar amino acid sequences, it is likely that they are homologs. In some embodiments, homologs may include homologs within species, between species and/or between phyla. In some embodiments, the term homologs include orthologs and/or prologs.
As referred to herein, the term “exogenous gene” is directed to a gene (or any part thereof) which is introduced from the exterior into a cell. In some embodiments, the exogenous gene is inserted in the form of a polynucleotide (for example, DNA, RNA, and the like), for example, in the form of an expression vector. In some embodiments, the exogenous gene is capable of being expressed in the cell. In some embodiments, the exogenous gene is overexpressed within the cell.
As referred to herein, the term “Kill” with respect to a cell/cell population/organism is directed to include any type of manipulation that will lead to the death of that cell/cell population/organism.
The terms “treating” and “treatment” as used herein refer to reduction in severity and/or frequency of symptoms, elimination of symptoms and/or underlying cause, prevention of the occurrence of symptoms and/or their underlying cause, and improvement or remediation of damage. Thus, for example, “treating” a subject involves prevention of a particular disorder, or infection or adverse physiological event in a susceptible subject as well as treatment of a clinically symptomatic subject.
As referred to herein, the terms “anthelmintic(s)” or “antihelminthic(s)” or “anti-nematode” may interchangeably be used. The terms are directed to agents/compositions that are directed against helminths (parasitic round worms or nematodes). The agents/compositions may include various molecules, such as, for example, but not limited to: chemical compound, drug, nucleic acid molecule (such as, for example, DNA, RNA, siRNA, ribozyme, modified nucleic acids and the like), a protein or a peptide (such as, for example, an enzyme, an antibody, and the like), a toxin, or combinations thereof. In various embodiments, the antihelminthic may be used to stun, inhibit/suppress growth, and/or kill helminths cells. In some embodiments, the term “antinematodal” relates to antihelminthic which are directed against nematodes. In some embodiments, the terms antihelminthic and antinematodal may interchangeably be used. In some embodiments, the antinematodal is nematocidal (that is an agent that is able to kill the nematode/nematode cell). In some embodiments, the antinematodal is nematostatic (that is an agent that is able to stun/inhibit/suppress growth of the nematode/nematode cell).
As referred to herein, the terms “fusion protein”, “fusogen” and “fusogenic protein” may interchangeably be used. The terms are directed to a protein/peptide which is able to induce/mediate cell to cell fusion, for example, through fusion of the lipid bi-layers of the cells. In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein is an endogenous protein (that is, a protein encoded by the authentic genome of the cell and is usually expressed by an unmodified cell). In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein is an exogenous protein (that is, a protein which is encoded by a foreign gene introduced into the cell). In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein comprises a portion/domain of the full length fusogenic protein. The portion of the fusogenic protein may be any domain of the fusogenic portion or combinations of such domains, such as, for example, Signal peptide (SP) domain; Pro-domain; TGFβ-RI-like domain; “[LMF]-G-W-[YFL]-[RK] motif” domain; the Putative protein-protein interaction domain; Membrane proximal stem domain, Trans-membrane domain (TM), Fusion loop, and the like, or any desired peptide derived from the fusogenic protein sequence.
As referred to herein, the term “FF protein(s)” is directed to Fusion Family proteins. The term “CeFF proteins” is directed to FF proteins of C. elegans origin. Members of the FF proteins include, for example, AFF-1 and/or EFF-1 proteins and homologs thereof. Wherein said fusogenic protein of nematode origin it is meant to include members of the Fusion Family (FF) proteins as well as homologs thereof, wherein homologs may include homologs within species, between species and/or between phyla. In some embodiments, the term “homologs” include orthologs and/or paralogs. As referred to herein, homologs of the FF Family protein are proteins that share primary and/or secondary amino acid sequence signatures including a pattern of cysteins in the ectodomain of the type I membrane glycoprotein. To consider membership to the FF family the candidate protein is to share at least 15% identity or similarity with a known FF or protein of related secondary or tertiary structure (as further demonstrated in FIGS. 6A-C). In some embodiments, an FF protein may be selected from any of the FF proteins listed in Table 4 below herein. In some exemplary embodiments, FF proteins may be selected from, but no limited to: CeAFF-1 (SEQ ID NO: 23), CeEFF-1 (SEQ ID NO:24), tsp-FF-1 (SEQ. ID. NO: 25), Bfl-FF-1 (SEQ ID NO: 26), CeEFF-2, Cbr-aff-1, Cbr-eff-1, Cre-aff-1, Cre-eff-1, Cs5-AFF-1, Cs5-EFF-1, Cs7/9-AFF-1, Cs7/9-EFF-1, Cs11-FF, Ppa-FF-1, Ppa-FF-2, Ppa-FF-3, Pen-FF-1, Pma-FF-1, Tsp-ff-2, Tps-FF, Tpa-FF, Min-FF, Mar-FF, Mha-FF, Gpa-FF, Gpa-FFA, Gpa-FFB, Aca-FF, Bma-FF-1, Hco-FF, Asu-FF, Oti-FF, Oti-EFF-1, Dim-FF, Hao-FF, Lsi-FF-1, Lsi-FF-2, Hgl-FF, Tmu-FF-1, Tmu-FF-2, Sra-FF-1, Sra-FF-2, Sra-FF-3, Ovo-FF, Tci-FF, Wba-FF, Llo-FF, Bfl-FF-3, Ppi-FF, Cfi-FF, Lsa-FF, Ngr-FF-1, Ngr-FF-2, Ngr-FF-3, Ngr-FF-4, Bxy-FF-1, Bxy-FF-2, Can-FF, Hba-FF-1, Hba-FF-2, Rcu-FF, Hpo-FF, Ana-FF-1, Ana-FF-2, Mle-FF-1A, Mle-FF-1B, Mle-FF-2, Mel-FF-3, Mel-FF-4, Mel-FF-5, Mel-FF-6 or any combination thereof. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
As used herein, the term “pseudotyped virus” relates to a virus in which the endogenous viral envelope proteins have been replaced by envelope proteins from other sources, such as, for example, from other viruses, by exogenous proteins or peptides (for example, of nematode origin), and the like.
As referred to herein, the term “virus cell” is meant to include a virus, viral particle, viral envelope, viral vector and/or pseudotyped virus.
As used herein, the term “bald virus” relates to an enveloped viral particle or a pseudoviral particle lacking one or more viral envelope proteins.
As used herein, the term “homotypic” with respect to fusion is directed to fusion between cells that express the same fusion protein, or cells that express fusogenic protein of the same family.
As used herein, the term “non-insect cell” is directed to include cells which are not of insect origin. The term includes, for example, such cells as, mammalian cells, avian cells, plant cell, viral particle, human cells, animal cells, and the like.
As referred to herein, where a color is mentioned by name with respect to a figure (for example, “red”, “cyan”, “purple”, “green”, “pink”, “yellow”, etc.) it refers to the color as can be identified in the figure when reproduced in color scale. Where applicable, and as indicated in the brief description of the Figures, where a color is mentioned it is further indicated by an identifier, such as, arrow (solid, dash, long dash arrow head, and the like), asterisk, box, numerical or any other indication. The original figures reproduced in color can be found in publication by some of the inventors of the present application (Avinoam, et. al. (19), the contents of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
According to some embodiments, and as exemplified herein, nematode fusogenic proteins of the FF family and homologs thereof, such as for example, CeFF proteins, may be capable of mediating fusion of a virus to a cell (such as, for example, a mammalian cell), when the FF proteins are expressed and presented on the membranes of the virus and the cell. In some embodiments, the FF proteins expressed by the virus are replacing the endogenous fusogenic proteins of the virus. In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein expressed by the virus is the same fusogenic protein as that expressed by the cell. In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein expressed by the virus is not the same fusogenic protein as the fusogenic protein expressed by the cell, but rather a family member thereof. For example, the fusogenic protein expressed by both the virus and the cell is AFF-1 protein or homologs thereof. For example, as further shown below, the fusion protein expressed by the virus is AFF-1 whereas the fusion protein expressed by the cell is EFF-1, and vice versa. Accordingly, in some embodiments, a nematode fusogenic protein may replace the endogenous viral fusogen as the minimal fusogenic machinery. Moreover, the infection biology of the virus may be transformed from a mechanism in which the endogenous viral fusogen, (for example, VSVG), is required only in the virus, to a homotypic, fusion protein-dependent mode-of-action in which the fusogen(s) is expressed in the membranes of both the virus and the target cell.
According to some embodiments, the fusion family protein may be any member of the family of fusogenic proteins that may be of nematode origin, or even of other phylum, such as, for example, chordates. Sequence comparisons (ref. 4, and herein) identified putative FF members in thirty five nematode species, suggesting that the FF family is conserved in the phylum Nematoda (4). In addition, similar proteins were found in the arthropods Calanus finmarchicus and Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Crustacea), the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus, the chordate Branchiostoma floridae (order Amphioxi) and the protist Naegleria gruberi, (as shown in FIG. 4A and Table 4 below), suggesting that FF proteins are conserved in at least four animal phyla and one protist. Phylogenic analysis of full and partial FF sequences revealed that FF proteins may be classified into three subgroups (EFF-1-like, AFF-1-like and FF; FIG. 4A). To further characterize the molecular conservation of FF proteins, a multiple sequence alignment (FIG. 6A) was generated and determined that FF proteins share a common organization of putative conserved domains (FIG. 6B). For example, FF proteins share a pattern of cysteins in the TGFb-RI-like domain (Domain III in FIGS. 6A-C), suggesting they may be conserved at the level of protein structure. As shown in FIG. 6C, secondary structure predictions show that they may belong to the family of “mostly beta sheet super family”). Additionally, as further demonstrated hereinbelow, sequence structure analyses and comparisons of Hidden Markov models suggest that FF proteins may fold to resemble class II fusogens from alfa and flavi viruses.
According to some embodiments, and as further demonstrated below, FF proteins are a family of membrane fusogens in nematodes that may be interchangeable between species and even beyond the nematode phylum and hence homologs of the family can be used for fusion of cells, when expressed on the membranes of those cells. As exemplified hereinbelow (for example, in FIG. 4), various homologs of the CeFF proteins (such as, for example, Tsp-FF-1 of the Trichinella spiralis nematode species), EFF-1 homolog from the nematode Pristionchus pacificu and chordate B. floridae (Bfl-ff-1) of the chordates phylum) are able to fuse cells, when expressed by the cells.
According to some embodiments, Fusion Family proteins of nematode origin and homologs thereof can mediate homotypic or heterotypic fusion of a virus and a cell without additional membrane co-factors. The fusion of the virus and the cell results in infection of the cell by the virus.
According to other embodiments, the Fusion Family proteins of nematode origin and homologs thereof can mediate homotypic fusion of two cells (a first cell and a second cell), wherein the cells express the fusogenic protein of nematode origin. In some embodiments, the cells are not-insect cells. In some embodiments, at least one of the fused cells is not an insect cell. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to some embodiments, the nematode may be any type of nematode. For example, the nematode may be selected from, but not limited to: Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Caenorhabditis japonica, Caenorhabditis ramanei, Caenorhabditis brenneri, Caenorhabditis sp5,7,9,11, Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella pseudospiralis, Trichinella papuae, Pristionchus entomophagus, Pristionchus maupasi, Pristionchus pacificus, Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne hapla Globodera pallida, Ancylostoma caninum, Brugia Malayi, Haemonchus contortus, Ascaris suum, Oscheius tipulae, Dirofilaria immitis, Howardula aoronymphium, Litomosoides sigmodontis, Heterodera glycines, Romanomermis culicivorax, Trichuris muris, Strongyloids ratti, Onchocerca volvulus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Wuchereria bancrofti, Loa loa, and any other nematode known in the art. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
According to some embodiments, in order to express an exogenous fusogenic protein in a cell, the cell may be introduced with a construct, such as, for example, an appropriate expression vector, encoding the desired fusion protein. The construct that encode for the fusogenic protein may include a plasmid, vector, viral construct, or others known in the art, used for replication and expression in the appropriate target cell (which may include, for example, mammalian cells, avian cell, plant cells, viruses, and the like). The construct may be used for transient transfection and/or stable transfection of the cells. Expression of the fusogenic protein can be regulated by any promoter known in the art to act in the target cell. Such promoters can be inducible or constitutive. Such promoters include, for example, but are not limited to: the SV40 early promoter region, the promoter contained in the 3′ long terminal repeat of Rous sarcoma virus, the herpes thymidine kinase promoter, the regulatory sequences of the metallothionein gene, the viral CMV promoter, the human chorionic gonadotropin-beta promoter, and the like. Any type of plasmid, cosmid, YAC or viral vector can be used to prepare the construct which can be introduced directly into the cell, by any method known in the art. Alternatively, when the target cell is not a virus, viral vectors can be used which selectively infect the desired target cell. In some embodiments, expression of the fusogenic protein in the cell is transient. In other embodiments, expression of the fusogenic protein in the cell is chronic. In some embodiments, expression of the fusogenic protein in the cell may be inducible (that is, the fusogenic protein is expressed only under certain conditions).
According to some embodiments, there is thus provided a method for a specific, protein-mediated virus to cell fusion, wherein the virus and the cell express a fusogenic protein of the nematode family, or homologs thereof. The method includes placing/incubating/mixing the virus and the cell in close proximity, thereby allowing interaction of the fusogenic proteins which consequently may lead to fusion of the cells. According to some embodiments, the fusogenic protein is selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof. In some exemplary embodiments, the fusogenic protein is a CeFF protein. In some embodiments, the same fusogenic protein is expressed on the surface of both the virus and the cell. In some embodiments, each of the virus and the cell express a different fusogenic protein, both fusogenic proteins belong to the family of Fusion Family proteins. In some embodiments, for at least one of the cells, the fusogenic protein is an exogenous protein. The method may be performed in-vitro and/or in vivo. When performed in vitro, the virus and the cell may be placed in the same growth medium and incubated under favorable conditions which allow the growth of the cells.
According to some embodiments, there is further provided a method for a targeted and specific fusion of a nematode cell and a virus expressing an exogenous fusogenic protein of nematode origin, wherein the exogenous fusogenic protein expressed by the virus replaces an endogenous fusogenic protein that may be expressed by the virus.
In some embodiments, the virus expressing the exogenous fusogenic protein of nematode origin may be any type of virus capable of fusing with other cells. In some embodiments, the native (unmodified) virus may be capable of inducing fusion by virtue of endogenous fusogenic proteins expressed by the unmodified virus. For example, but without limitation, the virus may be of the retrovirus family (for example, HIV, MLV); Hepadnavirus, Poxyvirus, Rhabdoviridae viruses (for example, Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)); Paramyxoviruses; Herpes viruses; Coronavirus, and the like, or combination thereof.
According to further embodiments, there is thus provided a method for the targeted killing or inhibition of a nematode/nematode cell, the method comprises contacting the nematode with a virus expressing an exogenous fusogenic protein of nematode origin, thereby allowing fusion of the virus to a cell of the nematode. Consequent to the fusion between the virus and the nematode cell, the virus may induce lysis of the nematode/nematode cell and/or inhibit the growth of the nematode/nematode cell. The nematode may further become unviable if too many of its cells are killed.
According to further embodiments, there is provided a method for a specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion. The method includes having the cells express a fusogenic protein on their membranes and mixing/placing/incubating the cells in close proximity, thereby allowing interaction of the fusogenic proteins which may lead to fusion of the cells. The protein which mediates the fusion may be a fusogenic protein of nematode origin or homologs thereof, and is expressed on the surface of the cells and thereby allows fusion of the cells. According to some embodiments, the fusogenic protein is selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof. In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein is a CeFF protein. In some embodiments, the same fusogenic protein is expressed on the surface of both cells. In some embodiments, each cell expresses a different fusion protein, both fusogenic proteins belong to the family of Fusion Family proteins. In some embodiments, the fusogenic proteins are endogenously expressed proteins. In some embodiments, for at least one of the cells, the fusogenic protein is an exogenous protein. In some embodiments, the cells are of similar origin. In some embodiments, the cells are of different origin. For example, the cells may be of human origin, animal origin, plant origin, avian origin, and the like. In some exemplary embodiments, both cells (i.e. the first cell and the second cell) express an exogenous Ce-AFF-1 protein. In some exemplary embodiments, both cells (i.e. the first cell and the second cell) express an exogenous Ce-EFF-1 protein. In some embodiments, the first cell expresses an exogenous Ce-AFF-1 protein and the second cell expresses a Ce-EFF-1 protein. In some embodiments, upon fusion of the cells (i.e. the first cell and the seconds cell), and hybrid cell is formed. In some embodiments, the hybrid cell contains two nucleus.
According to additional embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion may be used to specifically target antinematodal agents to nematodes. In such embodiments, fusion of a nematode cell to a foreign cell is dependant on the expression of a fusogenic protein of nematode origin (or homologs thereof) in the membranes of both fusing cells, wherein the fusogenic proteins may be identical or different. In some exemplary embodiments, one cell is of nematode origin (endogenously expressing the fusion protein) and the second cell is of different/foreign origin (such as, for example, of viral origin, plant origin, mammalian origin, avian origin, insect origin), wherein the second cell exogenously expresses a fusogenic protein of nematode origin. The second cell may comprise one or more antinematodal agents that may include any antinematodal agent known in the art or to be developed/identified in the future. The antinematodal agent that is comprised in the cell may be further carried in a carrier within the cell, wherein the carrier is configured to protect the agent within the cell. The carrier may include, for example, such carriers as, liposomes, vacuoles, capsules, microspheres, micelles, and the like. In some embodiments, the antinematodal agent is encoded/produced by the cell. Upon specific fusion of the cells, the antinematodal agent may be released/expressed and exert an effect on the nematode. The effect may be, for example, kill, stun, and/or inhibit/suppress growth of the nematode.
According to some exemplary embodiments, the antinematodal agent may be selected from, but not limited to: a chemical compound (such as, for example, but not limited to: organophospates, carbamates, imidazole derivatives, such as, for example, benzimidazole, Levamisole, Fumigant nematicides, macrolides, avermectin, milbemycin and the like); a nucleic acid (such as, for example, antisense DNA molecules directed against nematode genes; siRNA molecules directed against nematode genes, and the like); proteins (such as, for example, but not limited to: an enzyme capable of cleaving a nematode protein, an antibody directed against a nematode protein); toxins, antibodies and combinations thereof.
According to further embodiments, the method for the specific, protein mediated, cell to cell fusion may thus be used for the treatment of parasitic nematode infection of various organisms (such as, for example, animals and humans) and plants. In some embodiments, the method may include inducing one or more cells of the organism/plant to be treated to express a fusogenic protein of a nematode origin and an antinematodal agent, whereby upon expression of the fusogenic protein by the cell, a nematode infecting the organism or plant is fused to said cell expressing the fusion protein, thereby exposing the nematode to the antinematodal agent.
In some embodiments, a transgenic plant is provided, in which at least some of the plant cells have been modified to express a fusogenic protein of the nematode family and optionally further express an antinematodal agent (such as, for example a protein or a peptide having antinematodal effect, nucleic acid sequence capable of exerting an antinematodal effect, and the like). Upon infection of the transgenic plant with a nematode, the nematode cells will fuse with the plant cells expressing the fusogenic proteins, and the antinematodal agent comprised/encoded by those cells may exert a deleterious effect on the nematode, such as, for example, kill the nematode and/or inhibit/suppress its growth. In some embodiments, the expression of the nematode fusogenic protein by plant cells is constitutive (that is, the cells constitutively express the nematode fusion protein). In some embodiments, the expression of the nematode fusogenic proteins by plant cells are induced under different conditions (such as, for example, different lighting conditions, different watering conditions, different temperatures, different humidity, and the like, or combinations thereof).
According to some embodiments, the stable or transient expression of a nematode fusogenic protein in plants may be achieved by stable or transient transfection of plant cells with a nucleic acid encoding a nematode fusogenic protein. In stable transformation, the nucleic acid molecule encoding a nematode fusogenic protein is integrated into the plant genome, and as such it represents a stable and inherited trait. In transient transformation, the nucleic acid molecule is expressed by the cell transformed but not integrated into the genome, and as such represents a transient trait.
There are various methods of introducing foreign genes into both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. The principal methods of the stable integration of exogenous DNA into plant genomic DNA include two main approaches: (i) Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer, which includes the use of plasmid vectors that contain defined DNA segments which integrate into the plant genomic DNA. Methods of inoculation of the plant tissue vary depending upon the plant species and the Agrobacterium delivery system. A widely used approach is the leaf-disc procedure, which can be performed with any tissue explant that provides a good source for initiation of whole-plant differentiation. A supplementary approach employs the Agrobacterium delivery system in combination with vacuum infiltration. The Agrobacterium system is especially useful for in the creation of transgenic dicotyledenous plants. (ii) Direct DNA uptake. There are various methods of direct DNA transfer into plant cells. In electroporation, the protoplasts are briefly exposed to a strong electric field, opening up mini-pores to allow DNA to enter. In microinjection, the DNA is mechanically injected directly into the cells using micropipettes. In microparticle bombardment, the DNA is adsorbed on microprojectiles such as magnesium sulfate crystals or tungsten particles, and the microprojectiles are physically accelerated into cells or plant tissues.
Following stable transformation, plant propagation then occurs. The most common method of plant propagation is by seed. Another method of regenerating a transformed plant is by micropropagation, which provides a rapid, consistent reproduction of the transformed plants.
Transient transformation of, for instance, leaf cells, meristematic cells, or the whole plant may also be used.
Transient transformation can be effected by any of the direct DNA transfer methods described above or by viral infection using modified plant viruses.
Viruses that useful for the transformation of plant hosts include, for example, cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), and baculovirus (BV). In some embodiments, pseudotyped BD virus expressing FF proteins can also be used to deliver toxins, nucleic acids and other molecules.
In addition, the nucleic acid molecule encoding a nematode fusogenic protein can also be introduced into a chloroplast genome.
According to additional embodiments, treatment of parasitic nematode infection of organisms such as mammals, avians, rodents, and the like, may include providing the infected organism with a composition (such as, for example, a pharmaceutical composition), which includes a virus particle/viral vector, which is genetically engineered to express an exogenous fusogenic protein of the nematode family. In some embodiments, the virus does not express an endogenous fusogenic protein. In exemplary embodiments, the viral endogenous protein is replaced by a fusogenic protein of the nematode origin. The virus cell/viral vector of the composition does not affect any of the cells of the organism, and upon specific fusion with a nematode cell, can induce killing or inhibition of growth of the nematode. The composition may be formulated by any method known in the art, such as disclosed, for example in the latest edition of “Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences,” Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., which is herein fully incorporated by reference. The composition may further include one or more excipients, as known in the art. The composition may be administered by any administration route, such as, for example, oral, rectal, transmucosal, especially trans-nasal, intestinal, or parenteral delivery, including intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intramedullary injections, as well as intrathecal, direct intraventricular, intravenous, inrtaperitoneal, intranasal, or intraocular injections. In some embodiments, the composition is formulated for veterinary use. In some embodiments, the composition is in form of a viral vector, wherein administration of viral vectors can be performed by, for example, intravenous or subcutaneous injection into the organism. Following injection, the viral vectors can circulate until they recognize nematode cells, whereby they viral vector fuses to the nematode cells and induce their killing or suppression of their growth.
In some embodiments, the virus cell/viral vector, which is genetically engineered to express an exogenous fusogenic protein of the nematode family may be integrated into the genome of the treated organism.
In some embodiments, a transgenic animal is provided, in which at least some of the cells have been modified to express a fusogenic protein of the nematode family and optionally further express an antinematodal agent (such as, for example a protein or a peptide having antinematodal effect, nucleic acid sequence capable of exerting an antinematodal effect, and the like).
According to some embodiments, there is provided a method for treating a nematode infection in a subject, comprising administering to the subject a composition comprising a cell expressing an exogenous fusogenic protein of the nematode family, wherein fusion of said cell of the composition and a nematode cell infecting the subject, may lead to the death and/or inhibition of growth of the nematode, thereby treating the nematode infection. In some embodiments, the subject is human. In some embodiments, the composition is a pharmaceutical composition that may be formulated by any method known in the art. In exemplary embodiments, the composition is formulated to be administered orally and to release the cell expressing the nematode fusogenic protein in the intestines.
In additional embodiments, there is provided a use of a composition comprising a cell expressing an exogenous nematode fusogenic protein and optionally an antinematodal agent, for the treatment of nematode infection in a subject in need.
According to some embodiments, there is provided a method for treating a nematode infection in an animal, comprising administering to the animal a composition comprising a cell expressing an exogenous fusogenic protein of the nematode family, wherein fusion of said cell of the composition and a nematode cell may lead to the death and or inhibition of growth of the nematode, thereby treating the nematode infection in the animal. In some embodiments, the animal is a rodent, a mammal, an avian, and the like. In some exemplary embodiments, the animal is cattle, chicken, horse, canine, and the like, or any other animal that may be infected by nematode.
According to some embodiments, there is further provided a viral vector for the expression of a nematode fusogenic protein on the surface of a virus. The fusogenic protein may be selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof.
According to further embodiments, there is provided a cell expressing an exogenous fusogenic protein of nematode origin, wherein said exogenous fusogenic protein is a Fusion Family protein member. The cell may be of any origin, such as, for example mammalian cell, avian cell, viral cell, plant cell, human cell, animal cell, and the like. In some embodiments, the cell is a non-insect cell. Each possibility is a separate embodiment.
In various embodiments, there are further provided kits for practicing antinematodal methods of various embodiments. The kits may include, for example, at least one or more of: a virus expressing an exogenous nematode fusogenic protein; a cell expressing an exogenous nematode fusion protein, wherein the cell may optionally express an antinematodal agent; a vector for expressing a nematode fusogenic protein on the surface of a cell; and a viral vector expressing a nematode fusogenic protein. The kits may further include additional components, such as, for example, suitable containers, suitable growth medium, buffers, reagents, and the like. Additionally, the kit may further include instructions for using the components of the kit for practicing various embodiments, such as, for example, for the treatment of nematode infection.
According to various embodiments, it is to be emphasized that wherein said fusogenic protein of nematode origin, it also encompasses homologs thereof. In some embodiments, the fusogenic protein comprises any protein having at list 15% identity or similarity with a known FF or protein of related structure (as demonstrated, for example, in FIG. 6).
The term comprising includes the term consisting of.
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced be interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
The following examples are presented in order to more fully illustrate certain embodiments of the invention. They should in no way, however, be construed as limiting the broad scope of the invention. One skilled in the art can readily devise many variations and modifications of the principles disclosed herein without departing from the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES

Materials and Methods

DNA Constructs

For transient expression of FF proteins, AFF-1::FLAG (SEQ ID NO:1), EFF-1::V5 (SEQ ID NO: 2), Tsp-FF-1::FLAG (SEQ ID NO: 3), and Bfl-FF-1::FLAG (SEQ ID NO: 4) were inserted into the pCAGGS mammalian expression vector (15) (Tables 2 and 4). Unless otherwise indicated, 5′ KpnI and 3′ NheI restrictions sites were used to clone into pCAGGS. To generate pOA20 (Table 2) the DNA encoded by pIZT-AFF-1 (10) was PCR amplified using primers OR55, OR56 (Table 3). To generate pOA19 (Table 2) the DNA encoded by pIZT-EFF-1A (9) was PCR amplified using primers OR54, OR55 (Table 3). To generate pOA35 (Table 2), DNA from a cDNA library (obtained from Nagano) was PCR amplified using nested primers OR100-OR103 (Table 3). The PCR product was ligated into pGEMT-easy as recommended by manufacturer (Promega) and then used as template for PCR amplification with primers OR111 and OR112 (Table 3). To generate pOA60 (Table 2), the cDNA sequence corresponding to accession gi12100900151 with Flanking 5′ KpnI 3′ NheI was optimized for expression and synthesized (GeneScript). To label cytoplasm, pRFPnes (16) was used. To label the nucleus, pCFPnls (SEQ ID NO. 21) encoding CFP with two tandem repeats of the nuclear localization signal (nls) from simian virus large T-antigen was used. To generate pCFPnls, primers OR147-148 (Table 3) were used with pCH44 (16) as template. The PCR product was cloned into the BamHI, EcoRI sites of pCDNA3.1 (+) (Invitrogen). To generate pOA6 P. pacificus genomic DNA (PS312) was used as template with primers OR-19 and OR-22 (Table 3). The PCR product was ligated into pPD49.78. To generate pRSETA-AFF1EC (SEQ. ID. NO: 27), primers AM66 and AM 67 (Table 3) were used with Ce-AFF-1 cDNA as template (10). The PCR product was cloned into the BglII, KpnI sites of pRSET-A (Invitrogen). All sequences were verified by sequencing.

TABLE 2

Plasmids used

Plasmid
Name	Description

pOA6	P. pacificus eff-1 genomic sequence (SEQ ID NO: 20)
	in pPD49.78 (hsp 16.2)
pOA19	C. elegans eff-1 fused to a C-terminal V5 tag (EFF-1::V5)
	(SEQ ID NO 2) in pCAGGS vector. (V5 tag nt. 1974-2049)
pOA20	C. elegans aff-1 fused to a C-terminal FLAG tag
	(AFF-1::FLAG) (SEQ ID NO: 1) in pCAGGS vector
pOA35	T. spiralis ff-1 with a kozak sequence fused to a C-terminal
	FLAG tag (Tsp-FF-1::FLAG) (SEQ ID NO: 3) in pCAGGS
	vector (FLAG-tag nt. 1779-1803 of SEQ ID NO: 3).
pOA60	B. floridae ff-1 with a kozak sequence fused to a C-terminal
	FLAG tag (Bfl-FF-1::FLAG) (SEQ ID NO: 4) in pCAGGS
	vector (FLAG tag: nt. 1740-1764 of SEQ ID NO: 4)
pCFPnls	CFP with two tandem nuclear localization signals
	(SEQ ID NO: 21)
pCAGGS	A chicken beta-actin/rabbit beta-globin hybrid promoter with a
	human cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV-IE)
	enhancer
pCAGGS-	VSV G Indiana strain (ref. 20)
Gind
pRFPnes	DsRed2 with a nuclear export signal (pCH19) (Ref. 16)
pRSETA-	The extracellular domain of Ce-AFF-1 including 6-His tag
AFF1EC	(SEQ ID NO. 27). (6XHis tags, nt. 1692-1710 of SEQ ID
including	NO: 27).
6His tags

TABLE 3

Primers used

Name	Sequence

OR-19	ATGATCTTCTCTTCTCTTCTACTGTATAC
(SEQ ID
NO: 5)

OR-22	TCATACATAATCTCCAGGTAGAACATC
(SEQ ID
NO: 6)

OR-54	TTAATTGGTACCACTATGGAACCGCCGTTTGAGTGG
(SEQ ID
NO: 7)

OR-55	AATTAAGCTAGCTCAACCGGTACGCGTAGAATCGAGACC
(SEQ ID
NO: 8)

OR-56	TTAATTGGTACCACTATGGTACTGTGGCAATGGTCAATA
(SEQ ID	GCC
NO: 9)

OR-100	ATGTTCTCACCACTTTTTTGTCTTCTTCTTCTGC
(SEQ ID
NO: 10)

OR-101	AACTGCCTCGCCCAAGAATATGCC
(SEQ ID
NO: 11)

OR-102	ATATTCTTGGGCGAGGCAGTTGACC
(SEQ ID
NO: 12)

OR-103	TCACAATTTGTTAGCATTCGTTCTGCC
(SEQ ID
NO: 13)

OR-111	TTAATTGGTACCATGTTCTCACCACTTTTTTGTCTTCTT
(SEQ ID	CTTCTGC
NO: 14)

OR-112	AATTAAGCTAGCTCATTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTC
(SEQ ID	CAATTTGTTAGCATTCGTTCTGCCATTTCC
NO: 15)

OR-147F	AATTAAGGATCCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTG
(SEQ ID
NO: 16)

OR-148R	AATTAAGAATTCTTATACCTTTCTCTTCTTTTTTGGATC
(SEQ ID	TACC
NO: 17)

AM-66	TATGTCTTAGATCTCCAAAGTCTCATCAGTACACAGTAC
(SEQ ID	T
NO: 18)

AM-67	TGTATCATGGTACCCTCTGTGAAATCCCCACCATGAGC
(SEQ ID
NO: 19)

Nematode Strains

Nematode strains were maintained according to standard protocols. In addition to the wild-type strain N2, the following strains were used: LGII: BP347 eff-1(ok1021) (9). LGIV: SU93 jcIs1[ajm-1::gfp, pRF4] (7), BP421 eff-1(ok1021)II, hyEx161[ajm-1::gfp, (21) pOA6 (Ce-hsp::Ppa-ff-1) (SEQ ID NO: 20). To drive Ppa-ff-1 ectopic expression in C. elegans, 10 ng/μl of pOA6 (Table 2) were co-injected with 10 ng/μl of the apical junction marker AJM-1::GFP (hyExl61).

Bioinformatics

Identification and Characterization of New Members of the FF Family

FF proteins in nematodes were identified as described in Reference 4. For the Chordate, Ctenophore and Arthropod sequences, the BLAST search provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was used. For annotation, the Augustus gene prediction software with the training set for C. elegans was used. In some cases, the gene model was manually corrected based on the multiple sequence alignment (for example, as shown in FIG. 6B). Accession numbers and databases are summarized in Table 4, hereinbelow.

Phylogeny of FF Proteins (FIG. 4A)

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA4. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Parsimony (MP) method. The MP tree was obtained using the Close-Neighbor-Interchange algorithm with search level 3 in which the initial trees were obtained with the random addition of sequences (10 replicates). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated from the dataset (Complete Deletion option). The signal sequence was removed from the final dataset. Evolutionary relationships of 14 (right) and 25 (left) taxa is shown (FIG. 4A). For 14 taxa, the full length sequence of the extracellular domain was used. Tree #1 out of 3 most parsimonious trees (length=1165) is shown. The consistency index is (0.926554), the retention index is (0.930667), and the composite index is 0.868356 (0.862313) for all sites and parsimony-informative sites (in parentheses). There were a total of 438 positions in the final dataset, out of which 344 were parsimony informative. For 25 taxa the amino acid sequences corresponding to the TGFβ-RI like domains (10) AFF-1(84-192) (Residues 84-192 of SEQ ID NO: 23 were used; the sequence of the N. gruberi served as an outgroup. Tree #1 out of 9 most parsimonious trees (length=469) is shown. The consistency index is (0.727876), the retention index is (0.717241), and the composite index is 0.529138 (0.522063) for all sites and parsimony-informative sites (in parentheses). There were a total of 75 positions in the final dataset, out of which 60 were parsimony informative.

Secondary Structure Prediction (FIG. 6C)

Predictions were performed using the JNET method available from the web services of the Jalview 2.5 software.

Structural Homology (FIGS. 8A-B)

The multiple sequence alignment was used as query to scan the protein data bank (PDB) for homologues by sequence-structure comparison either using FUGUE v2.s.07 or HHpred. Searches identified several putative distant homologues belonging to the Class II family of viral fusogens (14). The most probable homology was to Dengue2 envelope glycoprotein (loke, lok8, (accession: GI: 34811077/8)) (FUGUE confidence 95% and HHpred probability 61%). In addition, Tick-Born Encephalitis envelope glycoprotein (lsvb), Semliki Forest Virus (lala), and Dengue 1 and 3 were identified with lower probabilities (lp58, luzg).

Cells and Reagents

All Baby Hamster Kidney cells (BHK) are BHK-21(ATCC). BHK cells and their growth conditions were according to standard protocols. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), Penn/Strep, L-glutamine, and sodium pyruvate obtained from Gibco. Fetal Bovine Serum was obtained from Biological Industries, Kibbutz Belt Haemek, Israel. Experiments with Sf9 cells and their growth conditions were as described (9, 10).

Cell-Cell Fusion Assay

BHK cells at ˜70% confluence were transfected using Fugene6 (Roche) with 2 g of pCAGGS DNA (including an insert (FF coding sequence as detailed above) or an empty vector) and 0.5 μg of pRFPnes DNA in 35 mm tissue culture dishes (Corning) containing a glass cover slip on the bottom (Knittel). At 14-24 hours post transfection the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and processed for immunofluorescence. To assay multinucleated cells, cell nuclei was stained with Hoechst (1 μg/ml, H3570, Molecular Probes) or 1 μg/ml DAPI for 10 min at room temperature (9). The number of nuclei in expressing cells as marked by pRFPnes or antibody staining (see below), was counted using either a Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted or a Nikon Eclipse E800 upright fluorescence microscope. The fusion indexes (shown as percentage of fusion) were defined as the ratio between the number of nuclei in multinucleated cells and the total number of nuclei in fused cells and expressing cells that were in contact but did not fuse. The fusion indexes are presented as means±standard errors of at least eight independent experiments. Each experiment consisted of at least two replicates of the same transfection (2, 3). Transfection efficiency was evaluated as 40-60% based on pRFPnes and antibody staining.

Color Mixing Assay

Cytoplasmic content mixing assays were performed as described (16) with some modifications. The cytoplasm of cells that express AFF-1 was marked with a red fluorescent protein by expressing RFPnes. The nuclei of cells that express EFF-1 were marked with a CFPnls. Fused hybrid cells could be distinguished by their red cytoplasm surrounding multiple blue nuclei. The percentages of fused hybrid cells (red and cyan; purple) and multinucleated cells (red or cyan alone) were calculated by dividing the mean number of red, cyan and purple cells by the mean number of cells from four independent experiments. Experiments were repeated at least five times yielding similar results independent of whether the co-transfection fluorescent marker was RFPnes or CFPnls.

Pseudoviruses Preparation

Recombinant viruses were recovered as described (17) with some modifications. BHK cells were grown to 70% confluence on 10 cm plates and then transfected with plasmids encoding pCAGGS empty vector, pOA19 or pOA20 (Table 3). Following 24 hour incubation at 37° C. in 5% CO₂, cells were infected with VSVG-complemented VSVΔG recombinant virus (VSVΔG-G) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2-5 for 1 hour at 37° C. in a 5% CO₂incubator in serum free culture medium (DMEM). Virus infected cells were washed at least 3 times with serum-free DMEM or PBS to remove unabsorbed VSVΔG-G virus. Following a 24 hour incubation period at 37° C. the supernatant and cells containing the VSVΔG, VSVΔG-EFF-1, or VSVΔG-AFF-1 pseudoviruses were harvested and centrifuged at 600 μg for 10 min at 4° C. to clear cell debris. Virions were removed from the supernatant by pelleting at 100,000 g through a 20% sucrose cushion and resuspended in 10% sucrose in Hepes/NaCl buffer (25 mM Hepes, 130 mM NaCl pH 7.4).

Titering VSV Pseudotype Viruses on BHK Cells

To determine the titer of each pseudovirus preparation, 3×10⁴BHK cells were plated into each well of a 96 well tissue culture plate (NUNC). For titering of VSVΔG-AFF-1 or VSVΔG-EFF-1, BHK cells were initially transfected with 1 μg/ml aff-1 or eff-1, pOA20 or pOA19, respectively. Cells transfected with empty vector served as control. Six serial dilutions of the virus were performed and added to cells. After 18-24 hours of incubation, GFP expressing cells were counted in at least two dilutions using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M fluorescence microscope. Each experiment was repeated at least three times with duplicates. Inoculation was performed in the presence of anti-VSVG antibody mAb I1 diluted 1:100 to inhibit infection due to residual presence of VSVG. Results were also confirmed by FACS analysis. For FACS analysis BHK cells were grown to 70% confluence and transfected with 1 μg/ml of plasmid encoding aff-1 or eff-1 (plasmids pOA20 or pOA19, respectively). Following 24 hour incubation, cells were infected with VSVΔG-AFF-1 and incubated for 24 hours. To measure the titer cells were collected using EDTA and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Samples were maintained on ice and examined for GFP expression using BD FACS Calibur (N=20,000 cells, FIG. 5).

Immunoblotting

To detect proteins by Western blotting, samples were treated with SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 10% of β-mercaptoethanol or RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 5% Deoxycholate) for 20 min at 4° C. Samples were boiled in the presence of 20 mM DTT for 5 min and the protein profile was examined on an 8%, 10% or 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel. For AFF-1 expressing cells (BHK-AFF-1) and viruses (VSVΔG-AFF-1) bands were visualized using mouse anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma F3165) monoclonal antibody and mouse anti-M polyclonal antibody (FIG. 1B). For EFF-1 expressing cells (BHK-EFF-1) and viruses (VSVΔG-EFF-1) bands were visualized using mouse anti-V5 (Cat #46-0705 Invitrogen). In controls, rabbit anti-VSVG (Cat # V4888 Sigma-Aldrich) was used. As secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with HRP (Cat #115-035-003 Jackson), were used. Bands were detected by chemoluminescence (EZ-ECL kit, Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel) using a FUJI LAS 3000 with the Image Gauge V3.12 software package. Data shown are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Production of Mouse Anti-AFF-1 Polyclonal Antibodies

The extracellular domain of AFF-1 (AFF-1EC) was sub-cloned into pRSET-A that introduced 6× His at the N terminus (Table 2). The AFF-1EC::6× His (SEQ ID NO: 27) fusogenic protein was over-expressed in E. coli by adding 0.5 mM IPTG and incubating the culture overnight at 16° C. Rosetta and affinity purification with NiNTA beads (Qiagen Cat#30210) was according to the QIAexpressionist manual (June 2003, QIAGEN). The protein was eluted by adding four 0.5 ml aliquots of elution buffer A (8M urea, 100 mM NaH₂PO₄, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 5.9) followed by another four aliquots of elution buffer B (8M urea, 100 mM NaH₂PO₄, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 4.5). Mouse polyclonal antibodies were prepared using AFF-1EC as antigen (Adar Biotech Inc., Israel).

Immunofluorescence

BHK-21 cells were grown on tissue culture plates with glass cover slips on the bottom (Knittel). Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, incubated in 40 mM NH₄Cl to block free aldehydes, washed in PBS, permeabilized in 0.1% tritonX-100 in PBS and blocked in 1% FBS in PBS. The cover slips were incubated 1 hour at 23° C. with either anti-V5 1:500 (Invitrogen) or anti-FLAG 1:2000 (Sigma) mouse monoclonal antibodies. The secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit coupled to Alexa488, 633 or 643 (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen). Transfected cells expressed cytoplasmic RFP from the pRFPnes vector and nuclei were visualized with DAPI or Hoechst staining as described above.
Sera obtained from mice immunized with AFF-1EC were tested by immunofluorescence using Sf9 cells expressing AFF-1::Flag. Sera #8 diluted 1:500 showed membrane and intracellular vesicular staining (FIG. 2N, Panel A). Pre-immune sera (FIG. 2N, Panel B) or secondary antibodies alone (Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) 1:500) gave no staining.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Negative Staining-TEM

A 400-mesh carbon-coated grid was placed on a 20 μl sample drop for 2 min and blotted with a filter paper. The sample was chemically stained by placing the grid on a 20 μl drop of 2% uranyl acetate for 2 min followed by blotting with a filter paper and air-drying. Specimens were examined in a Tecnai T12 G²TEM (FEI) or in a Philips CM120 transmission electron microscopes operated at 120 kV. Images were recorded digitally on a Gatan UltraScan 1000 2k×2k camera or the Gatan 791 wide-angle camera using the DigitalMicrograph software (Gatan, U.K.)

Cryo Electron Microscopy

A 3-μl drop of the sample was placed on a glow-discharged holey carbon coated copper electron microscopy grid (C-flat, Protochips). The drop was blotted, and the sample was vitrified by plunging into liquid ethane (−183° C.). The specimen was then transferred to liquid nitrogen (−196° C.) for storage. Vitrified specimens were examined on a Tecnai F30 Polara TEM (FEI) operated at 300 kV and equipped with a GIF2002 postcolumn energy filter (Gatan) operated in zero loss mode. 2K×2K images were acquired at a calibrated magnification of 27,500×, resulting in a pixel size of 0.5 nm at the specimen level. Projection images were recorded at defocus settings between −4 m to −6 m using SerialEM. Alternatively, specimens were examined in a Tecnai T12 G²TEM (FEI) operated at 120 kV and images were recorded digitally on a Gatan UltraScan 1000 2K×2K camera using the DigitalMicrograph software (Gatan, U.K.).

Cryo Electron Tomography

A 4-μl aliquot of the pseudotyped virus preparations was pipetted onto a glow-discharged holey carbon coated copper electron microscopy grid (Cflat, Protochips). Colloidal 10 nm diameter gold particles coupled to bovine serum albumin (BSA) were added, excess liquid was absorbed using a filter paper and the grids were vitrified by plunge-freezing in liquid ethane. Vitrified grids were stored in liquid nitrogen until examined on a Tecnai Polara TEM (FEI) operated at 300 kV and equipped with a GIF2002 or Tridem postcolumn energy filter (Gatan) operated in zero loss mode. 2K×2K images were acquired at a calibrated magnification of 27,500×, resulting in a pixel size of 0.5 nm at the specimen level. Tilt series were collected at a defocus of either −6 μm for the viral tomogram or −8 μm for the vesicle tomogram in two-degree increments covering an angular range from −60° to 600 using SerialEM. The total electron dose was kept below 100 electrons/Å². Tilt series were aligned using gold beads as fiducials. Three dimensional reconstructions were calculated from the tilt series in IMOD using weighted back projection. Slices for figures were prepared using Amira 5.2 (Visage Imaging).

Measurements

The width and length of the particles on the surface of viruses and vesicles were measured from images of negatively stained samples using ImageJ Software 1.410. The G glycoprotein was measured as control and the obtained size was compared to published dimensions. Unpaired t tests were performed (P<0.0001).

Immunogold Labeling

Virus samples were pipetted onto carbon-coated grids and incubated for 5 min and then blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The grids were then placed on a 50 μl drop of anti-AFF-1 (#8 serum; see Immunofluorescence section above) diluted 1:100 in PBS containing 1% BSA and incubated overnight at 4° C. in a sealed humidified chamber. Excess antibody was removed by placing grids sequentially onto three 50 μl drops of 0.1% BSA in PBS for 2 min each time. The grids were then placed on a 20 μl drop of goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with 12-nm gold particles (Jackson lab, 1:20) for 1 hour at room temperature. Unbound gold conjugates were removed by three sequential 2-min washes with PBS. Samples were fixed by placing the grids on a 50 μl drop of 0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 5 min. The grids were washed twice in PBS for 2 min and were then negatively stained by incubating the grids for 2 min on a 20 μl drop of 2% phosphotungstic acid in water (pH 7). Excess stain was removed and the grids were air-dried. Images were recorded digitally as described above.

Example 1: CeFF Proteins are Capable of Mediating Virus-Cell Fusion

In order to test whether CeFF proteins are capable of mediating virus-cell fusion when presented on the membrane of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), AFF-1 complemented VSVΔG pseudoviruses, in which the gene encoding the fusogenic glycoprotein (VSVG) was replaced by GFP (VSVΔG-AFF-1; scheme of FIG. 1A) were generated. Infection of Baby Hamster Kidney cells (BHK) expressing AFF-1 (BHK-AFF-1) on their surface with VSVΔG-AFF-1 showed a 600-fold increase in infection compared to control BHK cells (FIG. 1C to 1E). These results demonstrate that AFF-1 can replace the endogenous viral fusogen as the minimal fusogenic machinery that can mediate virus-cell binding and fusion. To explore whether EFF-1 and AFF-1 can heterotypically interact with each other, VSVΔG-AFF-1 was added to BHK expressing EFF-1 (BHK-EFF-1, Scheme of FIG. 1C) and vice versa. It was found that VSVΔG-AFF-1 was able to infect BHK-EFF-1 cells and that the efficiency of AFF-1-AFF-1 and AFF-1-EFF-1 mediated virus-cell fusion was not significantly different (FIG. 1D). Although infection due to residual VSVG complemented VSVΔG (VSVΔG-G) was negligible (FIG. 1D), inoculations in the presence of neutralizing anti-G antibody mAb I1 were performed to assure that only AFF-1-mediated infection was measured (FIG. 1F). The results further demonstrate that AFF-1 and EFF-1 can mediate homotypic virus-cell fusion without additional membrane co-factors and AFF-1-EFF-1 mediated fusion also resulted in infection.

Example 2—Structure-Function of AFF-1

To study the relationship between structure and function of AFF-1, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used. Negatively stained samples of VSVΔG to VSVG and AFF-1 complemented VSVΔG preparations were compared. VSVΔG virions have the typical VSV ‘bullet’ shape with a smooth membrane, hence termed bald, while both VSVΔG-G and VSVΔG-AFF-1 virions displayed distinct spikes on their envelopes (FIG. 2A to C). In negative stain (pH 5), VSVG form elongated spikes on VSVΔG-G (FIG. 2B), while VSVΔG-AFF-1 show bulkier spikes (FIG. 2C). The estimated average spike length of VSVG and AFF-1 as measured from the negative stain images were 145 Å and 110 Å respectively (Table 1). To confirm that the observed spikes were indeed AFF-1, immunogold labeling using anti-AFF-1 polyclonal antibodies was performed. A specific immunoreactivity on the surface of VSVΔG-AFF-1 is observed (FIGS. 2D, 2E, 2N and 2O). To further characterize the pseudoviruses at higher resolution and in a more native state they were imaged embedded in vitreous ice by cryo electron microscopy (cryoEM, FIG. 2F to H) and cryo electron tomography (cryoET, FIG. 2I to K). CryoEM projection images show that AFF-1 proteins uniformly coat the pseudoviruses. Individual spikes could be observed at central sections of the tomograms (FIG. 2J, inset). Higher order assemblies of AFF-1 in the form of penta- or hexa-meric “flower” shaped complexes could be observed in computational slices through the tomogram oriented peripheral to the pseudotyped virus particles (FIG. 2I, inset). These assemblies were even better visible in slices through the tomograms of co-purified vesicles (FIGS. 2L, 2M and 2P). The order of these arrays may have a critical function in bending and deforming plasma membranes to mediate fusion.

TABLE 1

Measured size of AFF-1 and VSVG

VSVG

AFF-1

	Length (nm)	Width (nm)	Length (nm)	Width (nm)

Mean Size	14.5	8.7	10.9	6.0
SEM	0.5	0.4	0.5	0.3

N

20

32

Size (38)	12.5	6.0

*SEM—Standard Error, N—number of measurements

Example 3—FF Proteins can Interact

To show that FF proteins can interact, cytoplasmic mixing between cells using a color mixing-assay (FIG. 3 A to C) was performed. aff-1 was coexpressed with a fluorescent protein (red) that contained a nuclear export signal (RFPnes; FIG. 3A) and the cells were mixed with cells co-expressing eff-1 and a fluorescent protein (cyan) that contained a nuclear localization signal (CFPnls; FIG. 3B). The two cell populations were co-cultured and multinucleated cells were observed, mostly dikaryons, expressing both markers (FIGS. 3 C, E to H and O). In contrast, no cells expressing both markers following mixing of cells transfected with empty vector (FIGS. 3 D and L) were observed. AFF-1-mediated mixing (FIG. 3 I to K) occurred only when the protein was expressed in both cells (FIGS. 3 M and N); thus, cytoplasmic mixing during cell-cell fusion is dependent on the expression of AFF-1 in both fusing partners.

Example 4—Divergent FFs can Function as Fusogens

To determine whether divergent FFs can function as fusogens, Tsp-ff-1 was expressed in BHK cells and its activity was compared to AFF-1 (FIGS. 4 B and D). Using immunofluorescence 28±4% multinucleation was observed in cells transfected with Tsp-ff-1 compared to 26±2% and 4±3% multinucleation in cells that were transfected with aff-1 and empty vector, respectively (FIG. 4F). In addition, EFF-1 paralog from the nematode Pristionchus pacificus was expressed in C. elegans embryos to result in ectopic fusion of embryonic cells (FIG. 7). Additionally, expression of the FF ortholog identified in the chordate B. floridae (Bfl-ff-1), (FIGS. 6A and 6B and Table 4), in BHK cells resulted in 37±7% multinucleation (FIGS. 4 E and F).

Example 5—Identification and Characterization of New Members of the FF Family

FF proteins in nematodes were identified as described in (4). For the Chordate, Ctenophore and Arthropod sequences the BLAST search provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was used. For annotation, the Augustus gene prediction software with the training set for C. elegans was used. In some cases, the gene model was manually corrected based on the multiple sequence alignment (FIG. 6B). Accession numbers and databases are summarized in Table 4, hereinbelow.

TABLE 4

Sequence identifiers/Accession numbers

Species	Sequence Identifier/Accession number

Caenorhabditis elegans	CeAFF-1 (SEQ ID NO: 23) (WP: CE41369)
	CeEFF-1 (SEQ ID NO: 24) (WP: CE03028, WP: CE30881, WP: CE31159,
	WP: CE32594)
	C26D10.7 (CeEFF-2) (WP: CE36985)
Caenorhabditis briggsae	Cbr-aff-1 (CBP17138)
	Cbr-eff-1 (BP: CBP34546, BP: CBP37650)
Caenorhabditis japonica	CJA05978 (CJA05978/JA11265)
	CJA03218 (CJA03218/JA03456)
Caenorhabditis ramanei	Cre-aff-1 (RP: RP19336)
	Cre-eff-1 (RP: RP32670, RP: RP36929)
Caenorhabditis brenneri	Database: Caenorhabditis_ (CBN32067, CN35418, Database:
	Caenorhabditis_PB2801-4.0-contigs [Contig1645.2])
	CBN17896 (CBN17896, CN30500, CN18501)
Caenorhabditis sp5, 7, 9, 11	Cs5-AFF-1(Database: Caeno_sp5_DRD-2008_JU800_2.fna, contig2451)
	Cs5-EFF-1(Database: Caeno_sp5_DRD-2008_JU800_2.fna, contig6234)
	Database: Caeno_sp5_DRD-2008_JU800_1.fna [contig_262626]
	Database: Caeno_sp7_ju1286_454scaffolds_1.fna [scaffold00005]
	Database: Caeno_sp9_ju1422_454scaffolds_1.fna [scaffold00235,
	scaffold00002]
	Cs7/9-AFF-1 (Database: Caeno_sp7_ju1286_454scaffolds_1.fna
	scaffold00007; Database: Caeno_sp9_ju1422_454scaffolds_1.fna
	scaffold00001, scaffold00169)
	Cs7/9-EFF-1 (Database: Caeno_sp7_ju1286_454scaffolds_1.fna
	scaffold00005; Database: Caeno_sp9_ju1422_454scaffolds_1.fna
	scaffold00002)
	Cs7/9-EFF-1 (Database: Caeno_sp9_ju1422_454scaffolds_1.fna
	scaffold00235)
	Cs7/9-EFF-1 (Database: Caeno_sp9_ju1422_454scaffolds_1.fna
	scaffold00235)
	Cs11-FF (gi\|319532004\|gb\|AEKS01003493.1\|, Contig629.1546)
	Database: Caeno_sp11_JU1373_454scaffolds_1.fna [scaffold01488]
Pristionchus pacificus	Ppa-FF-1 (Database: PpaFreeze1.bases Contig235.2)
	Ppa-FF-2 (Database: PpaFreeze1.bases Contig162.2)
	Ppa- FF-3 (Database: PpaFreeze1.bases Contig735.1 + Contig735.2)
Pristionchus entomophagus	Pen-FF-1 (Database: Pristionchus_entomophagus-3.0.bases Contig1225.3)
Pristionchus maupasi	Pma-FF-1 (Database: p. maup genome Contig3990.1)
Trichinella spiralis	gi\|162730680 (Tsp-ff-1) (gi\|339236477\|ref\|XP_003379793.1)
	gi\|339234943\|ref\|XP_003379026.1\|
	gi\|339234945\|ref\|XP_003379027.1\|
Trichinella pseudospiralis	Tps-FF gi\|149208398\|gb\|EF601568.1\| (SEQ ID NO.
Trichinella papuae	Tpa-FF gi\|149208399\|gb\|EF601569.1\|
Meloidogyne incognita	Min-FF (gi\|198718377\|emb\|CABB01003673.1\| Meloidogyne incognita,
	whole genome shotgun sequence assembly, contig_3673,
	gi\|19265127\|gb\|BM881383.1\|BM881383 rb09d06.y1), gi\|19265127\|
Meloidogyne arenaria	Mar-FF (BI746953, rm34a12.y1) gi\|15768755\|
Meloidogyne hapla	Mha-FF (gi\|207096946\|gb\|ABLG01001006.1\| Meloidogyne hapla strain
	VW9 Mh10g200708_Contig1005, gi\|207095745\|gb\|ABLG01002207.1\|
	Meloidogyne hapla strain VW9 Mh10g200708_Contig2206)
Globodera pallida	Gpa-FF (gi\|54548408\|gb\|CV578685.1\|CV578685 kf14e11.y1)
	Gpa-FFA (Database: gpal.201011.contigs.fasta [Sanger] Contig 1004319)
	Gpa-FFB (Database: gpal.201011.contigs.fasta [Sanger] Contig 1004319)
Ancylostoma caninum	Aca-FF (gi\|157997724\|gb\|EX544342.1\|EX544342 AIAC-aaa88e02.g1)
	Aca-FF (gi\|158000776\|gb\|EX547394.1\|EX547394 AIAC-aaa14c06.g1)
	gi\|157990577\|
Brugia Malayi	Bma-FF-1 (gi\|170576008\|ref\|XP_001893468.1\| hypothetical protein
	Bm1_09975)
	gi\|170582744\|ref\|XP_001896266.1\| hypothetical protein Bm1_24045
	gi\|170576006\|ref\|XP_001893467.1\| hypothetical protein Bm1_09970
	gi\|154234139\|gb\|AAQA01001677.1\| Brugia malayi ctg_62087
	gi\|154209490\|gb\|AAQA01025369.1\| Brugia malayi ctg_35248
	gi\|154234539\|gb\|AAQA01001277.1\| Brugia malayi ctg_54442
	Bm1_09970 + Bm1_09975
	Bm1_24045
Haemonchus contortus	Hco-FF (gi\|27320801\|gb\|CA869252.1\|CA869252 px01a04.y1)
	Hco-FF (Database: HAEM.contigs.fasta [Sanger] Contig 006057)
Ascaris suum	Asu-FF (gi\|113050648\|gb\|ED245151.1\|ED245151 AUAC-aag39g05.g1,
	gi\|320312531\|gb\|AEUI01008540.1\| Ascaris suum ASU_contig008540)
	gi\|320301910\|gb\|AEUI01019161.1\| Ascaris suum ASU_contig019161
	gi\|320309474\|gb\|AEUI01011597.1\| Ascaris suum ASU_contig011597
	gi\|320297040\|gb\|AEUI01024031.1\| Ascaris suum ASU_contig024031
Oscheius tipulae	Oti-FF (Database: Oscheius_tipulae_clc3_1.fna, contig 5292)
	Oti-EFF-1 (Database: Oscheius_tipulae_clc3_1.fna, contig 4684)
	Database: Oscheius_tipulae_clc3_1.fna [Contig 4684, contig 5292]
Dirofilaria immitis	Dim-FF (Database: Dirofilaria_immitis_v1.3_Maker_Transcripts.fna,
	DimmContig4043_DIMM48125; Database:
	Dirofilaria_immitis_rnaseq_assembly_transabyss.v1.20110321.fna,
	k23_18675 1796 37333)
	Dim-FF (Database:
	Dirofilaria_immitis_rnaseq_assembly_transabyss.v1.20110321.fna,
	k27_51785 1538 23309, k31_119704 1392 19131)
	Database: Dirofilaria_immitis_clc_1.fna
Howardula aoronymphium	Hao-FF (Database: Howardula_aoronymphium_clc_1.fna, contig_147926)
	Hao-FF (Database: Howardula_aoronymphium_clc_1.fna, contig_103402)
	Database: Howardula_aoronymphium_clc_1.fna
Litomosoides sigmodontis	Lsi-FF-1 (Database: Litomosoides_sigmodontis_abyss_1.fna, 342875)
	Lsi-FF-2 (Database: Litomosoides_sigmodontis_abyss_1.fna, 344431,
	332390)
	Database: Litomosoides_sigmodontis_abyss_1.fna
Heterodera glycines	Hgl-FF (gi\|170569983\|gb\|ABLA01000927.1\|)
Romanomermis culicivorax	contig05859, contig06497 (Kindly provided by W. Kelley Thomas)
Trichuris muris	Tmu-FF-1 (Database: T_muris_contigs.fasta [Sanger];
	NODE_192365_length_12375_cov_11.496000)
	Tmu-FF-2 (Database: T_muris_contigs.fasta [Sanger];
	NODE_99371_length_23257_cov_11.624845)
Strongyloids ratti	Sra-FF-1 (Database: RATTI.contigs.fasta [Sanger] Contig 75311)
	Sra-FF-2 (Database: RATTI.contigs.fasta [Sanger] Contig 74980)
	Sra-FF-3 (Database: RATTI.contigs.fasta [Sanger] Contig 75430)
	Database: S.ratti.reads
Onchocerca volvulus	Ovo-FF (Database: O_volvulus_all454_contigs.fna [Sanger], contig25914)
Teladorsagia circumcincta	Tci-FF (Database: T_circumcincta_reads.fasta [Sanger]
	Supercontig_0000831)
Wuchereria bancrofti	Wba-FF (gi\|285840565\|gb\|ADBV01004176.1\| cont1.4176) GI:285822425,
	GI:285835743
Loa loa	Llo-FF (gi\|285859024\|gb\|ADBU01000052.1\| contig1.52)
	GI:285852521, GI:285851695
Branchiostoma floridae	Bfl-FF-1 (Database: fgenesh2_pg.scaffold_465000022; Protein ID:
	104514)jgi\|Brafl1\|104514\|fgenesh2_pg.scaffold_465000022 (SEQ ID NO.
	26)
	Bfl-FF-3 (Database: fgenesh2_pg.scaffold_46500002; Protein ID: 104513)
	jgi\|Brafl1\|104513\|fgenesh2_pg.scaffold_465000021
Pleurobrachia pileus	Ppi-FF (gi\|167791107\|gb\|CU417832.1\|CU417832)
Calanus finmarchicus	Cfi-FF (gi\|190134016\|gb\|FG632618.1)
Lepeophtheirus salmonis	Lsa-FF (gi\|293020530\|gb\|ADND01294772.1\|) gi\|293020530\|
Naegleria gruberi	Ngr-FF-1 (gi\|284087402\|gb\|EFC41072.1\|)
	Ngr-FF-2 (gi\|284087338\|gb\|EFC41008.1\|)
	Ngr-FF-3 (gi\|284083966\|gb\|EFC37664.1\| NAEGRDRAFT_81886)
	Ngr-FF-4 (gi\|284083965\|gb\|EFC37663.1\| NAEGRDRAFT_81885)
	est's GI:168534442; GI:168542950
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus	Bxy-FF-1 (gi\|351002770\|emb\|CADV01009240.1)
	Bxy-FF-2 (gi\|351002016\|emb\|CADV01009994.1\|
Caenorhabditis angaria	Can-FF (gi\|308940912\|gb\|AEHI01101512.1\|, contigRNAPATHr2484_10)
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora	Hba-FF-1 (gi\|343491313\|gb\|ACKM01000079.1\|, Contig56.1)
	Hba-FF-2 (gi\|343491313\|gb\|ACKM01000079.1\|, Contig56.1)
Romanomermis culicivorax	Rcu-FF
Heligmosomoides polygyrus	Hpo-FF (Database: Heligmosomoides_polygyrus_clc_1.fna,
	contig_126399)
	Hpo-FF (Database: Heligmosomoides_polygyrus_clc_1.fna,
	contig_3 72600)
	Hpo-FF (Database: Heligmosomoides_polygyrus_clc_1.fna,
	contig 376900)
Acrobeloides nanus	Ana-FF-1
	Ana-FF-2
Mnemiopsis leidyi	Mle-FF-1A (gi\|346671607\|gb\|AGCP01008927.1\| c605800073.Contig1)
	Mle-FF-1B (gi\|346671607\|gb\|AGCP01008927.1\| c605800073.Contig1)
	Mle-FF-2 (gi\|346671607\|gb\|AGCP01008927.1\| c605800073.Contig1)
	Mel-FF-3 (gi\|346680498\|gb\|AGCP01000036.1\| c600000000.Contig54)
	Mel-FF-4 (gi\|346673076\|gb\|AGCP01007458.1\| c605700043.Contig1)
	Mel-FF-5 (gi\|346661390\|gb\|AGCP01019144.1\| c601500011.Contig6)
	Mel-FF-6 (gi\|346674975\|gb\|AGCP01005559.1\| c606400022.Contig1)

REFERENCES

1. W. Wickner, R. Schekman, Nat Struct Mol Biol 15, 658 (July, 2008). REV.
2. S. Martens, H. T. McMahon, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9, 543 (July, 2008). REV.
3. J. M. White, S. E. Delos, M. Brecher, K. Schomberg, Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 43, 189 (May-June, 2008). REV
4. A. Sapir, O. Avinoam, B. Podbilewicz, L. V. Chemomordik, Dev Cell 14, 11 (January, 2008).
5. M. Oren-Suissa, B. Podbilewicz, Trends Cell Biol 17, 537 (November, 2007).
6. E. H. Chen, E. Grote, W. Mohler, A. Vignery, FEBS Lett, (Mar. 21, 2007).
7. W. A. Mohler et al., Dev Cell 2, 355 (March, 2002).
8. G. Shemer et al., Curr Biol 14, 1587 (Sep. 7, 2004).
9. B. Podbilewicz et al., Dev Cell 11, 471 (2006).
10. A. Sapir et al., Dev Cell 12 683 (2007).
11. M. Oren-Suissa, D. H. Hall, M. Treinin, G. Shemer, B. Podbilewicz, Science 328, 1285 (June 4).
12. Hugot, J. P.; Baujard, P. & Morand, S. (2001): Biodiversity in helminths and nematodes as a field of study: an overview. Nematology 3: 199-208
13. Parasitology textbook Chitwood, B. G., and Chitwood, M. B. H. (1974). Introduction to Nematology (Baltimore, University Park Press).
14. M. Kielian, F. A. Rey, Nature Rev. Microbiol. 4, 67 (2006).
15. H. Niwa, K. Yamamura, J. Miyazaki, Gene 108, 193 (1991).
16. C. Hu et al., Science 300, 1745 (2003).
17. K. Schomberg et al., J Virol 80, 4174 (2006).
18. Gottesman A., et. al., BioTechniques, Vol. 49, No. 4, 747-750 (2010)
19. Avinoam O. et. al., Science, 332, 589-92 (2011).
20. A. Takada et. al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol 94, pp. 14764-14769, (1997).
21. Koppen M, et. al., Nature Cell Biology Vol 3, pp. 983-991 (2001).

Claims

1-43. (canceled)

44. A composition comprising a non-insect cell or viral particle expressing an exogenous nematode fusogenic protein.

45. The composition of claim 44, wherein the non-insect cell is selected from mammalian, avian, and plant cells.

46. The composition according to claim 44, wherein the fusogenic protein is capable of mediating fusion of the cell or viral particle to a second cell expressing a second nematode fusogenic protein.

47. The composition of claim 46, wherein the second cell is selected from a mammalian, an avian, and a plant cell exogenously expressing a second nematode fusogenic protein, or a nematode cell endogenously expressing a nematode fusogenic protein.

48. The composition of claim 46, wherein the second nematode fusogenic protein is the same or different from the fusogen of the non-insect cell.

49. A method for fusing a first cell and a second cell, the method comprising:

incubating a first cell comprising a first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein with a second cell comprising a second exogenous nematode fusogenic protein;

thereby fusing the first cell and the second cell to form a fused cell, wherein at least one of the cells is not of insect origin.

50. The method of claim 49, wherein the first cell and the second cell are of the same origin, or wherein the first cell and the second cell are of different origin.

51. The method of claim 49, wherein the cells are selected from: virus, plant, avian, animal, human, or combinations thereof.

52. The method of claim 49, wherein the first fusogenic protein and the second fusogenic protein are selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 or homologs thereof.

53. The method of claim 49, wherein expression of the first exogenous nematode fusogenic protein in the first cell and/or the second cell is transient or stable.

54. An antinematodal composition comprising: a cell comprising an exogenous nematode fusion protein, capable of mediating fusion of the cell to a cell of the nematode;

wherein the composition induces killing or inhibition of growth of the nematode.

55. The antinematodal composition of claim 54, wherein the cell is selected from mammalian cell, avian cell, plant cell, and a virus.

56. The antinematodal compositing of claim 55, wherein the virus is selected from Retrovirus, Hepadnavirus, Poxyvirus, Rhabdoviridae, Paramyxoviruses, Herpes viruses and Coronavirus.

57. The antinematodal composition of claim 56, wherein said exogenous nematode fusogenic protein is selected from AFF-1, EFF-1 and homologs thereof.

58. The composition of claim 54, wherein said nematode is selected from: Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Caenorhabditis japonica, Caenorhabditis ramanei, Caenorhabditis brenneri, Caenorhabditis sp5,7,9,11, Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella pseudospiralis, Trichinella papuae, Pristionchus entomophagus, Pristionchus maupasi, Pristionchus pacificus, Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne hapla Globodera pallida, Ancylostoma caninum, Brugia Malayi, Haemonchus contortus, Ascaris suum, Oscheius tipulae, Dirofilaria immitis, Howardula aoronymphium, Litomosoides sigmodontis, Heterodera glycines, Romanomermis culicivorax, Trichuris muris, Strongyloids ratti, Onchocerca volvulus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Wuchereria bancrofti, and Loa loa.

59. The composition of claim 54, wherein the exogenous nematode fusogenic protein is transiently expressed in the cell or stably expressed in the cell.

60. The composition of claim 54, wherein the cell further comprises an antinematodal agent, selected from a chemical substance, a protein, a nucleic acid, a toxin and combinations thereof.

61. The composition of claim 60, wherein said antinematodal agent is expressed by the cell.

62. A method for targeted killing of a nematode, the method comprising: contacting the nematode with a the composition of claim 54, wherein said cell is a virus comprising an exogenous nematode fusogenic protein, capable of mediating fusion of the virus to a cell of the nematode;

whereby the fusion results in killing of the nematode.

63. A method for the targeted killing of a nematode, the method comprising: contacting the nematode with the composition of claim 60, whereby the fusion of the nematode and the cell induces killing of the nematode.

64. A method for the treatment of a nematode infection in a subject, the method comprising administering to the subject the composition of claim 54;

wherein fusion of the cell and a nematode cell infecting the subject induces death or inhibition of growth of the nematode.

65. The method of claim 64, wherein the subject is human or animal.

66. The method of claim 64, wherein said administering is selected from oral administration, injection, suppository and topical application.