US20170074931A1 - Semiconductor circuit and semiconductor system - Google Patents

Semiconductor circuit and semiconductor system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20170074931A1
US20170074931A1 US15/066,375 US201615066375A US2017074931A1 US 20170074931 A1 US20170074931 A1 US 20170074931A1 US 201615066375 A US201615066375 A US 201615066375A US 2017074931 A1 US2017074931 A1 US 2017074931A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
register
outputter
input signal
signal
diagnosis
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US15/066,375
Other versions
US9823302B2 (en
Inventor
Jun Hasegawa
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Assigned to KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA reassignment KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HASEGAWA, JUN
Publication of US20170074931A1 publication Critical patent/US20170074931A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9823302B2 publication Critical patent/US9823302B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/28Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
    • G01R31/317Testing of digital circuits
    • G01R31/31703Comparison aspects, e.g. signature analysis, comparators
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/28Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
    • G01R31/317Testing of digital circuits
    • G01R31/31727Clock circuits aspects, e.g. test clock circuit details, timing aspects for signal generation, circuits for testing clocks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/28Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
    • G01R31/317Testing of digital circuits
    • G01R31/3177Testing of logic operation, e.g. by logic analysers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/16Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the present invention relate to a semiconductor circuit and a semiconductor system.
  • the function is duplexed into an operation system and a safety system on a function-by-function basis, such as a module-by-module basis.
  • the operation is monitored by comparing the outputs of those with each other.
  • the combination circuit except the registers is also needed to be duplexed entirely, which causes the circuit scale to be twice as large or more.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram for explaining a configuration of a semiconductor system according to the present embodiment
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a semiconductor circuit
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram for explaining operation of the semiconductor circuit in normal use
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram for explaining operation of the semiconductor circuit in configuring a diagnosis value
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram for explaining operation of the semiconductor circuit in diagnosis
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram for explaining relation between the states of registers and a clock control signal
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 1 of the semiconductor circuit 100 ;
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 2 of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically illustrating Modification 3 of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • a semiconductor circuit which has circuit units in a plurality of stages, the circuit units being continuously connected, and each of the circuit units in the plurality of stages comprising: a first register; a second register; a first outputter; and a second outputter.
  • the first outputter is connected to the first register and the second register, and outputs at least one of a first input signal inputted from the first register and a second input signal inputted from the second register.
  • the second outputter configured to output at least one of the second input signal and a third input signal to a second register in a next stage, the third input signal being outputted from a logic circuit unit that performs logic operation on the basis of an input signal containing at least one of signals outputted from the first outputters.
  • the semiconductor circuit according to the present embodiment is to enhance the detection rate of failure more by inputting a diagnosis signal to the logic circuit unit as a diagnosis target and comparing a value of the result signal with an expectation value.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram for explaining a configuration of a semiconductor system 1 according to a first embodiment.
  • the semiconductor system 1 according to the present embodiment is configured to include a semiconductor circuit 100 , a diagnosis pattern outputter 102 , an expectation value outputter 104 , a diagnoser 106 and a controller 108 .
  • the semiconductor circuit 100 is a circuit having a diagnosis function. Namely, the semiconductor circuit 100 has a circuit structure with which a diagnosis signal can be inputted to a circuit unit as a diagnosis target, and whether or not the circuit unit is good can be diagnosed on the basis of a value of an output signal of the circuit unit and an expectation value thereof.
  • the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 outputs the diagnosis signal for diagnosing the presence or absence of failure.
  • the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 outputs, for example, a preset diagnosis pattern as the diagnosis signal to the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • the expectation value outputter 104 outputs the expectation value corresponding to the diagnosis pattern. Namely, the expectation value outputter 104 outputs the expectation value as a theoretical value that the circuit unit should output on the basis of the diagnosis pattern. For example, the expectation value is a value beforehand calculated based on the diagnosis signal.
  • the diagnoser 106 diagnoses whether or not the circuit failures by comparing the value of the output signal from the circuit unit as the diagnosis target with the expectation value from the expectation value outputter 104 . Namely, ii is detected whether or not the circuit failures on the basis of whether the output signal exactly as the expectation value is outputted.
  • the controller 108 controls the semiconductor circuit 100 , the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 , the expectation value outputter 104 and the diagnoser 106 .
  • the controller 108 includes not-shown clock outputter and control signal outputter.
  • the clock outputter outputs a clock control signal.
  • the control signal outputter outputs a control signal.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • the semiconductor circuit 100 is configured to have circuit units “C(n)” (0 ⁇ n ⁇ m) connected.
  • m is an integer not less than two and has, for example, figures of ten or tens of thousands.
  • the circuit unit “C(0)” in the first stage is connected via an outputter in the previous stage.
  • the circuit unit “C(m ⁇ 1)” in the final stage is connected to the outside.
  • the circuit units “C(n)” are equivalently configured except for the connection targets of the input of the circuit unit “C(0)” and the output of the circuit unit “C(m ⁇ 1)”.
  • a configuration of the circuit unit “C(n)” (1 ⁇ n ⁇ m ⁇ 1) is described.
  • the circuit unit “C(n)” is configured to include an operation system register “RM(n)” (first register), a safety system register “RS(n)” (second register), a first outputter “MUXI(n)”, a logic circuit unit “G”, a second outputter “MUXO(n)” and a first comparer “CMP(n)”.
  • the operation system register “RM(n)” holds and outputs an input signal in accordance with a control clock signal from the controller 108 .
  • the operation system register “RM(n)” is configured of a flip-flop or the like.
  • the safety system register “RS(n)” has the equivalent configuration to the operation system register “RM(n)” and is configured, for example, of a flip-flop or the like. When the safety system registers “RS” in a plurality of stages are connected, they function as a shift register.
  • the first outputter “MUXI(n)” is connected to the operation system register “RM(n)” and the safety system register “RS(n)”, and selects and outputs one of the input signal (first input signal) from the operation system register “RM(n)” and the input signal (second input signal) from the safety system register “RS(n)”.
  • the first outputter “MUXI(n)” is, for example, a multiplexer.
  • the logic circuit unit “G” is connected to the first outputter “MUXI(n)”, performs logic operation on the basis of a plurality of input signals containing the input signal from the first outputter “MUXI(n)”, and outputs one of a plurality of outputs to the operation system register “RM(n+1)” in the next stage.
  • the logic circuit unit “G” is a circuit unit with which the plurality of output signals are generated with respect to the plurality of input signals.
  • the logic circuit unit “G” is configured, for example, of a combination circuit and shared by the circuit units “C(n)”.
  • the second outputter “MUXO(n)” is connected to the logic circuit unit “G” and the safety system register “RS(n)”, and selects and outputs one of the input signal (third input signal) from the logic circuit unit “G” and the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)” in the next stage.
  • the second outputter “MUXO(n)” is, for example, a multiplexer.
  • the first comparer “CMP(n)” is connected to the operation system register “RM(n)” and the safety system register “RS(n)” and compares the first register value in the operation system register “RM(n)” with the second register value of the safety system register “RS(n)”. Namely, when the first register value does not coincide with the second register value, the first comparer “CMP(n)” outputs a non-coincidence signal. In this way, in the case of non-coincidence, the first comparer “CMP(n)” reports this as transition fault.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram for explaining the operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in normal use.
  • broken lines indicate flows of signals.
  • the same signal is inputted to the operation system register “RM(n+1)” and the safety system register “RS(n+1)”.
  • the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”.
  • the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the logic circuit unit “G” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)” in the next stage.
  • the first comparer “CMP(n+1)” When non-coincidence arises between the output signals of the operation system register “RM(n+1)” and the safety system register “RS(n+1)”, the first comparer “CMP(n+1)” outputs the non-coincidence signal. Namely, in the state where the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” is selected in the first outputter “MUXI(n)”, one (third input signal) of the output signals of the logic circuit unit “G” is inputted to the operation system register “RM(n+1)” and the safety system register “RS(n+1)”.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram for explaining the operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in configuring the diagnosis value.
  • broken lines indicate flows of signals.
  • the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”. Moreover; the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)”.
  • the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” is selected in the first outputter “MUXI(n)” and one of the output signals of the logic circuit unit “G” is inputted to the operation system register “RM(n)”.
  • the diagnosis signal is inputted to “RS(0)” in the first stage as the safety system register from the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 in a serial manner.
  • the safety system registers “RS(n)” are configured into a chain connection as a shift register.
  • the diagnosis signal is configured up to “RS(m ⁇ 1)” using time for “m” clock pulses.
  • An outputter “MUXO” which is equivalent to the second outputter “MUXO(n)” is connected to the previous stage of the safety system register “RS(0)”.
  • This “MUXO” switches and outputs the diagnosis signal from the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 and the output signal of the logic circuit “G” to the safety system register “RS(0)”. Namely, “MUXO” takes the safety system register “RS(0)” as the input start point of the diagnosis signal when the output of the diagnosis signal is selected. Meanwhile, “MUXO” selects and outputs the output signal of the logic circuit “G” to the safety system register “RS(0)” in normal use.
  • the operation system register “RM(n)” performs the same operation as in normal use. Due to this, also in configuring the diagnosis value, the semiconductor circuit 100 can continue the normal operation.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram for explaining the operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in diagnosis. Broken lines indicate flows of signals.
  • the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”.
  • the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the logic circuit unit “G” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)”. Namely, the result signal is outputted as one of a number of outputs outputted based on the diagnosis signal by the logic circuit unit “G” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)” in the next stage.
  • the controller 108 suspends the clock of the operation system register “RM(n)”. In this case, while the clock signal is being supplied to the safety system register “RS(n)”, supply of the clock signal to the operation system register “RM(n)” is suspended. Moreover, after the diagnosis signal is configured as the diagnosis pattern to the safety system register “RS(n)”, the controller 108 changes the selections of the output signals of the first outputter “MUXI(n)” and the second outputter “MUXO(n)”.
  • the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”.
  • the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)”. Namely, the safety system registers “RS(n)” are connected again into the chain connection as the shift register.
  • the controller 108 starts supply of the clock control signal to the operation system register “RM(n)”. By doing so, also in transmitting the result signal, the operation system register “RM(n)” can perform the same operation as in normal use. Due to this, also in transmitting the result signal, the semiconductor circuit 100 can continue the normal operation.
  • each of the second outputters “MUXO(n)” is set in the state where the input signal from the logic circuit unit “G” is selected. In this way, the semiconductor circuit 100 returns to the normal state.
  • the diagnoser 106 compares it with the expectation value acquired from the expectation value outputter 104 . When the value of the result signal is different from the expectation value, the diagnoser 106 determines that the logic circuit unit “G” failures. On the other hand, when the value of the result signal is the same as the expectation value, it determines that the logic circuit unit “G” is good.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram for explaining the relation between the states of the resisters and the clock control signal.
  • the middle row thereof illustrates the state of the operation system register “RM(n)”.
  • the bottom row thereof illustrates the state of the safety system register “RS(n)”.
  • the operation system register “RM(n)” is performing the normal operating work.
  • the supply of the clock to the operation system register “RM(n)” is suspended and its use is thus suspended.
  • the operation system register “RM(n)” is performing the normal operating work. Namely, the suspension of the normal operating work of the operation system register “RM(n)” is only during the period of the diagnosis.
  • the clock in diagnosis corresponds, for example, to one clock pulse. Notably, it may correspond to plural clock pulses such as two or three.
  • the diagnosis of failure due to a common cause can be performed with respect to the circuit itself that serves the use.
  • the failure due to a common cause can be detected.
  • the safety system registers “RS(n)” are used for the configuration of the diagnosis signal
  • the operation system registers “RM(n)” can continue the normal operating work. In this way, the semiconductor circuit 100 is only needed to suspend the normal use for a time corresponding to the clock pulses with which the diagnosis signal is transmitted to the circuit as the diagnosis target.
  • the portion of the registers is duplexed, the individual duplexed registers share the logic circuit unit. Due to this, as compared with duplication on a module-by-module basis, the circuit scale can be reduced more. Furthermore, even in the case of a circuit without a functional safety measure, the functional safety measure can be easily applied thereto, for example, by changing an existing register chain thereof which is installed for the purpose of scanning into the configuration of the present invention.
  • diagnosis signal when the diagnosis signal is outputted to the operation circuit as the diagnosis target, “MUXI(n)” may be caused to output a fixed value in place of inputting the diagnosis signal from the safety system register “RS(n)”.
  • diagnosis signal may be set as a fixed value to compare a preset expectation value with the result signal in the semiconductor circuit 100 , and only the result thereof may be reported to the outside of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • serial input and output are not performed in configuring the diagnosis value and in transmitting the result signal, the chain structure is not needed to be employed.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 1 of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • the detection of the transition failure is not performed in the semiconductor circuit 100 , and thereby, the circuit scale is to be reduced more. Therefore, it is different from the semiconductor circuit 100 of FIG. 2 in not having the first comparers “CMP(n)”. In this way, the circuit scale can be reduced more.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 2 of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • Modification 2 is different from the semiconductor circuit 100 of FIG. 2 in including comparison system registers “RC(n)” (0 ⁇ n ⁇ m) (third registers).
  • RC(n) comparison system registers
  • the second comparer “CMP2(n)” is connected to the operation system register “RM(n)” and the comparison system register “RC(n)” and compares the first register value in the operation system register “RM(n)” with the third register value of the comparison system register “RC(n)”. Namely, when the first register value does not coincide with the second register value, the second comparer “CMP2(n)” outputs the non-coincidence signal. In the case of non-coincidence, the second comparer “CMP2(n)” reports this as the transition failure.
  • the operation system register “RM(n)” can be compared with the comparison system register “RC(n)”. In this way, the transition failure of the operation system register “RM(n)” can be monitored at all times.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically illustrating Modification 3 of the semiconductor circuit 100 .
  • rectangles indicate the safety system registers “RS(n)”.
  • FIGS. ( 1 ) to ( 4 ) indicate positions at which the diagnosis signal is divided and inputted in a parallel manner and positions at which the result signals are taken out in a parallel manner with directions of arrows reversed.
  • the arrow ( 1 ) toward the safety system register “RS(n)” indicates the safety system register “RS(n)” to which the divided diagnosis signal is inputted.
  • the arrow ( 2 ) indicates the safety system register “RS(n+3)” to which the diagnosis signal is inputted.
  • the reversed arrows indicate the positions at which the result signal is divided and taken out.
  • the diagnosis signal is divided and is inputted and outputted in a parallel manner, and thereby, the diagnosis value can be configured at a higher speed. Moreover, the result signal can be taken out at a higher speed.
  • the diagnosis signal is outputted to the logic circuit unit “G” via the safety system register “RS(n)” and the result signal obtained from the logic circuit unit “G” is compared with the expectation value, and thereby, it is diagnosed whether or not the diagnoser 106 failures.
  • the suspension time of the operation system register “RM(n)” is reduced more, the operation state of the logic circuit unit “G” that is actually implemented can be diagnosed.
  • the detection rate of failure can be made higher.
  • the logic circuit unit “G” is not needed to be duplexed, which can reduce the circuit scale more.

Abstract

A semiconductor circuit has circuit units in a plurality of stages which units are continuously connected, each of the circuit units in the plurality of stages including: a first register; a second register; a first outputter; and a second outputter. The first outputter is connected to the first register and the second register, and selects and outputs one of a first input signal inputted from the first register and a second input signal inputted from the second register. The second outputter outputs at least one of the second input signal and a third input signal to a second register in a next stage, the third input signal being outputted from a logic circuit unit that performs logic operation on the basis of an input signal containing at least one of a signals outputted from the first outputters.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-181, 215, filed on Sep. 14, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD
  • Embodiments of the present invention relate to a semiconductor circuit and a semiconductor system.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • In the fields where high safety is required, it is required to monitor a function normally operating during its operation. Therefore, the function is duplexed into an operation system and a safety system on a function-by-function basis, such as a module-by-module basis. The operation is monitored by comparing the outputs of those with each other. In this method, the combination circuit except the registers is also needed to be duplexed entirely, which causes the circuit scale to be twice as large or more.
  • Moreover, there can be a case where common cause failure (for example, occurrence of delay due to temperature variation) arises in the operation system and in the safety system. In such a case, there can be a case where the outputs coincide with each other in the operation system and in the safety system, which causes a possibility that the failure cannot be detected.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram for explaining a configuration of a semiconductor system according to the present embodiment;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a semiconductor circuit;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram for explaining operation of the semiconductor circuit in normal use;
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram for explaining operation of the semiconductor circuit in configuring a diagnosis value;
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram for explaining operation of the semiconductor circuit in diagnosis;
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram for explaining relation between the states of registers and a clock control signal;
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 1 of the semiconductor circuit 100;
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 2 of the semiconductor circuit 100; and
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically illustrating Modification 3 of the semiconductor circuit 100.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Embodiments will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings. The present invention is not limited to the embodiments.
  • There is provided a semiconductor circuit according to the present embodiment which has circuit units in a plurality of stages, the circuit units being continuously connected, and each of the circuit units in the plurality of stages comprising: a first register; a second register; a first outputter; and a second outputter. The first outputter is connected to the first register and the second register, and outputs at least one of a first input signal inputted from the first register and a second input signal inputted from the second register. The second outputter configured to output at least one of the second input signal and a third input signal to a second register in a next stage, the third input signal being outputted from a logic circuit unit that performs logic operation on the basis of an input signal containing at least one of signals outputted from the first outputters.
  • The semiconductor circuit according to the present embodiment is to enhance the detection rate of failure more by inputting a diagnosis signal to the logic circuit unit as a diagnosis target and comparing a value of the result signal with an expectation value.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram for explaining a configuration of a semiconductor system 1 according to a first embodiment. The semiconductor system 1 according to the present embodiment is configured to include a semiconductor circuit 100, a diagnosis pattern outputter 102, an expectation value outputter 104, a diagnoser 106 and a controller 108.
  • The semiconductor circuit 100 is a circuit having a diagnosis function. Namely, the semiconductor circuit 100 has a circuit structure with which a diagnosis signal can be inputted to a circuit unit as a diagnosis target, and whether or not the circuit unit is good can be diagnosed on the basis of a value of an output signal of the circuit unit and an expectation value thereof.
  • The diagnosis pattern outputter 102 outputs the diagnosis signal for diagnosing the presence or absence of failure. The diagnosis pattern outputter 102 outputs, for example, a preset diagnosis pattern as the diagnosis signal to the semiconductor circuit 100.
  • The expectation value outputter 104 outputs the expectation value corresponding to the diagnosis pattern. Namely, the expectation value outputter 104 outputs the expectation value as a theoretical value that the circuit unit should output on the basis of the diagnosis pattern. For example, the expectation value is a value beforehand calculated based on the diagnosis signal.
  • The diagnoser 106 diagnoses whether or not the circuit failures by comparing the value of the output signal from the circuit unit as the diagnosis target with the expectation value from the expectation value outputter 104. Namely, ii is detected whether or not the circuit failures on the basis of whether the output signal exactly as the expectation value is outputted.
  • The controller 108 controls the semiconductor circuit 100, the diagnosis pattern outputter 102, the expectation value outputter 104 and the diagnoser 106. Namely, the controller 108 includes not-shown clock outputter and control signal outputter. The clock outputter outputs a clock control signal. Moreover; the control signal outputter outputs a control signal.
  • Moreover, the semiconductor circuit 100 and the clock outputter in the controller 108 may be configured in the same semiconductor chip. Furthermore, the diagnosis pattern outputter 102, the expectation value outputter 104, the diagnoser 106 and the control signal outputter in the controller 108 may be configured in the same semiconductor chip likewise. Otherwise, the diagnosis pattern outputter 102, the expectation value outputter 104, the diagnoser 106 and the control signal outputter in the controller 108 may be configured outside the semiconductor chip containing the semiconductor circuit 100. FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the semiconductor circuit 100. The semiconductor circuit 100 is configured to have circuit units “C(n)” (0≦n<m) connected. “m” is an integer not less than two and has, for example, figures of ten or tens of thousands. The circuit unit “C(0)” in the first stage is connected via an outputter in the previous stage. The circuit unit “C(m−1)” in the final stage is connected to the outside. The circuit units “C(n)” are equivalently configured except for the connection targets of the input of the circuit unit “C(0)” and the output of the circuit unit “C(m−1)”. Here, a configuration of the circuit unit “C(n)” (1≦n<m−1) is described.
  • The circuit unit “C(n)” is configured to include an operation system register “RM(n)” (first register), a safety system register “RS(n)” (second register), a first outputter “MUXI(n)”, a logic circuit unit “G”, a second outputter “MUXO(n)” and a first comparer “CMP(n)”.
  • The operation system register “RM(n)” holds and outputs an input signal in accordance with a control clock signal from the controller 108. Namely, the operation system register “RM(n)” is configured of a flip-flop or the like.
  • The safety system register “RS(n)” has the equivalent configuration to the operation system register “RM(n)” and is configured, for example, of a flip-flop or the like. When the safety system registers “RS” in a plurality of stages are connected, they function as a shift register.
  • The first outputter “MUXI(n)” is connected to the operation system register “RM(n)” and the safety system register “RS(n)”, and selects and outputs one of the input signal (first input signal) from the operation system register “RM(n)” and the input signal (second input signal) from the safety system register “RS(n)”. Namely, the first outputter “MUXI(n)” is, for example, a multiplexer.
  • The logic circuit unit “G” is connected to the first outputter “MUXI(n)”, performs logic operation on the basis of a plurality of input signals containing the input signal from the first outputter “MUXI(n)”, and outputs one of a plurality of outputs to the operation system register “RM(n+1)” in the next stage. Namely, the logic circuit unit “G” is a circuit unit with which the plurality of output signals are generated with respect to the plurality of input signals. The logic circuit unit “G” is configured, for example, of a combination circuit and shared by the circuit units “C(n)”. The second outputter “MUXO(n)” is connected to the logic circuit unit “G” and the safety system register “RS(n)”, and selects and outputs one of the input signal (third input signal) from the logic circuit unit “G” and the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)” in the next stage. Namely, the second outputter “MUXO(n)” is, for example, a multiplexer.
  • The first comparer “CMP(n)” is connected to the operation system register “RM(n)” and the safety system register “RS(n)” and compares the first register value in the operation system register “RM(n)” with the second register value of the safety system register “RS(n)”. Namely, when the first register value does not coincide with the second register value, the first comparer “CMP(n)” outputs a non-coincidence signal. In this way, in the case of non-coincidence, the first comparer “CMP(n)” reports this as transition fault.
  • Next, operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in normal use is described. FIG. 3 is a block diagram for explaining the operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in normal use. In FIG. 3, broken lines indicate flows of signals.
  • In normal use, the same signal is inputted to the operation system register “RM(n+1)” and the safety system register “RS(n+1)”. Namely, in normal use, the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”. Moreover, the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the logic circuit unit “G” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)” in the next stage.
  • When non-coincidence arises between the output signals of the operation system register “RM(n+1)” and the safety system register “RS(n+1)”, the first comparer “CMP(n+1)” outputs the non-coincidence signal. Namely, in the state where the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” is selected in the first outputter “MUXI(n)”, one (third input signal) of the output signals of the logic circuit unit “G” is inputted to the operation system register “RM(n+1)” and the safety system register “RS(n+1)”.
  • Next, operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in configuring a diagnosis value is described. FIG. 4 is a block diagram for explaining the operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in configuring the diagnosis value. In FIG. 4, broken lines indicate flows of signals.
  • In configuring the diagnosis value, the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”. Moreover; the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)”.
  • Namely, the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” is selected in the first outputter “MUXI(n)” and one of the output signals of the logic circuit unit “G” is inputted to the operation system register “RM(n)”.
  • Moreover, in the state where the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” is selected in the second outputter “MUXO(n)”, the diagnosis signal is inputted to “RS(0)” in the first stage as the safety system register from the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 in a serial manner. In this case, the safety system registers “RS(n)” are configured into a chain connection as a shift register. In other words, the diagnosis signal is configured up to “RS(m−1)” using time for “m” clock pulses. An outputter “MUXO” which is equivalent to the second outputter “MUXO(n)” is connected to the previous stage of the safety system register “RS(0)”. This “MUXO” switches and outputs the diagnosis signal from the diagnosis pattern outputter 102 and the output signal of the logic circuit “G” to the safety system register “RS(0)”. Namely, “MUXO” takes the safety system register “RS(0)” as the input start point of the diagnosis signal when the output of the diagnosis signal is selected. Meanwhile, “MUXO” selects and outputs the output signal of the logic circuit “G” to the safety system register “RS(0)” in normal use.
  • On the other hand, also in configuring the diagnosis value, the operation system register “RM(n)” performs the same operation as in normal use. Due to this, also in configuring the diagnosis value, the semiconductor circuit 100 can continue the normal operation.
  • Next, operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in diagnosis is described. FIG. 5 is a block diagram for explaining the operation of the semiconductor circuit 100 in diagnosis. Broken lines indicate flows of signals.
  • In diagnosis, the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”. Moreover, the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the logic circuit unit “G” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)”. Namely, the result signal is outputted as one of a number of outputs outputted based on the diagnosis signal by the logic circuit unit “G” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)” in the next stage.
  • In this stage, in timing when the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)”, the controller 108 suspends the clock of the operation system register “RM(n)”. In this case, while the clock signal is being supplied to the safety system register “RS(n)”, supply of the clock signal to the operation system register “RM(n)” is suspended. Moreover, after the diagnosis signal is configured as the diagnosis pattern to the safety system register “RS(n)”, the controller 108 changes the selections of the output signals of the first outputter “MUXI(n)” and the second outputter “MUXO(n)”.
  • Next, transmission of the result signal is described with reference to FIG. 4. In the case of transmitting the result signal, the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)” to the logic circuit unit “G”. Moreover, the second outputter “MUXO(n)” selects and outputs the input signal from the safety system register “RS(n)” to the safety system register “RS(n+1)”. Namely, the safety system registers “RS(n)” are connected again into the chain connection as the shift register.
  • Meanwhile, in timing when the first outputter “MUXI(n)” selects the input signal from the operation system register “RM(n)”, the controller 108 starts supply of the clock control signal to the operation system register “RM(n)”. By doing so, also in transmitting the result signal, the operation system register “RM(n)” can perform the same operation as in normal use. Due to this, also in transmitting the result signal, the semiconductor circuit 100 can continue the normal operation.
  • Next, in timing when the result signal is transmitted from each safety system register “RS(n)” and the result signal is outputted from the safety system register “RS(m−1)”, each of the second outputters “MUXO(n)” is set in the state where the input signal from the logic circuit unit “G” is selected. In this way, the semiconductor circuit 100 returns to the normal state.
  • Next, upon output of the result signal from “RS(m−1)” which is the safety system register in the final stage, the diagnoser 106 compares it with the expectation value acquired from the expectation value outputter 104. When the value of the result signal is different from the expectation value, the diagnoser 106 determines that the logic circuit unit “G” failures. On the other hand, when the value of the result signal is the same as the expectation value, it determines that the logic circuit unit “G” is good.
  • Next, the states of the operation system register “RM(n)” and the safety system register “RS(n)” are described based on relation between those and timing of the clock control signal. FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram for explaining the relation between the states of the resisters and the clock control signal. The middle row thereof illustrates the state of the operation system register “RM(n)”. The bottom row thereof illustrates the state of the safety system register “RS(n)”.
  • During the period when the safety system register “RS(n)” is performing the configuring work of the diagnosis value, the operation system register “RM(n)” is performing the normal operating work. During the period when the safety system register “RS(n)” is performing the diagnosis operation, the supply of the clock to the operation system register “RM(n)” is suspended and its use is thus suspended. Moreover, during the period when the safety system register “RS(n)” is performing the transmission of the result signal, the operation system register “RM(n)” is performing the normal operating work. Namely, the suspension of the normal operating work of the operation system register “RM(n)” is only during the period of the diagnosis. The clock in diagnosis corresponds, for example, to one clock pulse. Notably, it may correspond to plural clock pulses such as two or three.
  • As above, in the present embodiment, the diagnosis of failure due to a common cause can be performed with respect to the circuit itself that serves the use. The failure due to a common cause can be detected. Moreover, since the safety system registers “RS(n)” are used for the configuration of the diagnosis signal, the operation system registers “RM(n)” can continue the normal operating work. In this way, the semiconductor circuit 100 is only needed to suspend the normal use for a time corresponding to the clock pulses with which the diagnosis signal is transmitted to the circuit as the diagnosis target.
  • Moreover, although the portion of the registers is duplexed, the individual duplexed registers share the logic circuit unit. Due to this, as compared with duplication on a module-by-module basis, the circuit scale can be reduced more. Furthermore, even in the case of a circuit without a functional safety measure, the functional safety measure can be easily applied thereto, for example, by changing an existing register chain thereof which is installed for the purpose of scanning into the configuration of the present invention.
  • Notably, when the diagnosis signal is outputted to the operation circuit as the diagnosis target, “MUXI(n)” may be caused to output a fixed value in place of inputting the diagnosis signal from the safety system register “RS(n)”. Moreover, while the result signal is outputted to the outside in evaluating the result signal, the diagnosis signal may be set as a fixed value to compare a preset expectation value with the result signal in the semiconductor circuit 100, and only the result thereof may be reported to the outside of the semiconductor circuit 100. Moreover, when the serial input and output are not performed in configuring the diagnosis value and in transmitting the result signal, the chain structure is not needed to be employed.
  • Modification 1
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 1 of the semiconductor circuit 100. In Modification 1, the detection of the transition failure is not performed in the semiconductor circuit 100, and thereby, the circuit scale is to be reduced more. Therefore, it is different from the semiconductor circuit 100 of FIG. 2 in not having the first comparers “CMP(n)”. In this way, the circuit scale can be reduced more.
  • Modification 2
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating Modification 2 of the semiconductor circuit 100. Modification 2 is different from the semiconductor circuit 100 of FIG. 2 in including comparison system registers “RC(n)” (0≦n<m) (third registers). Hereafter, the different portions from the semiconductor circuit 100 in FIG. 2 are described.
  • The second comparer “CMP2(n)” is connected to the operation system register “RM(n)” and the comparison system register “RC(n)” and compares the first register value in the operation system register “RM(n)” with the third register value of the comparison system register “RC(n)”. Namely, when the first register value does not coincide with the second register value, the second comparer “CMP2(n)” outputs the non-coincidence signal. In the case of non-coincidence, the second comparer “CMP2(n)” reports this as the transition failure.
  • Namely, even when the semiconductor circuit 100 is in the operation state such as the configuring work of the diagnosis value, the operation system register “RM(n)” can be compared with the comparison system register “RC(n)”. In this way, the transition failure of the operation system register “RM(n)” can be monitored at all times.
  • Modification 3
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically illustrating Modification 3 of the semiconductor circuit 100. In FIG. 9, rectangles indicate the safety system registers “RS(n)”. Moreover, FIGS. (1) to (4) indicate positions at which the diagnosis signal is divided and inputted in a parallel manner and positions at which the result signals are taken out in a parallel manner with directions of arrows reversed.
  • For example, the arrow (1) toward the safety system register “RS(n)” indicates the safety system register “RS(n)” to which the divided diagnosis signal is inputted. Moreover, the arrow (2) indicates the safety system register “RS(n+3)” to which the diagnosis signal is inputted. Meanwhile, the reversed arrows indicate the positions at which the result signal is divided and taken out. The diagnosis signal is divided and is inputted and outputted in a parallel manner, and thereby, the diagnosis value can be configured at a higher speed. Moreover, the result signal can be taken out at a higher speed.
  • As mentioned above, according to the semiconductor circuit 100 according to the present embodiment, the diagnosis signal is outputted to the logic circuit unit “G” via the safety system register “RS(n)” and the result signal obtained from the logic circuit unit “G” is compared with the expectation value, and thereby, it is diagnosed whether or not the diagnoser 106 failures. By doing so, while the suspension time of the operation system register “RM(n)” is reduced more, the operation state of the logic circuit unit “G” that is actually implemented can be diagnosed. Hence, the detection rate of failure can be made higher. Moreover, since the operation system register “RM(n)” and the safety system register “RS(n)” are connected to the logic circuit unit “G”, the logic circuit unit “G” is not needed to be duplexed, which can reduce the circuit scale more.
  • While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventions. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the inventions.

Claims (15)

What is claimed is:
1. A semiconductor circuit has circuit units in a plurality of stages, the circuit units being continuously connected, and each of the circuit units in the plurality of stages comprising:
a first register;
a second register corresponding to the first register;
a first outputter that is connected to the first register and the second register, and outputs at least one of a first input signal from the first register and a second input signal from the second register; and
a second outputter configured to output at least one of the second input signal and a third input signal to a second register in a next stage, the third input signal being outputted from a logic circuit unit that performs logic operation on the basis of an input signal containing at least one of signals outputted from the first outputters.
2. The semiconductor circuit according to claim 1, wherein
when a diagnosis signal is inputted to the second register in a state where the first input signal is selected in the first outputter and the second input signal is selected in the second outputter,
after a diagnosis value based on the diagnosis signal is set in the second register, supply of a clock signal to the first register is suspended, the second input signal is selected in the first outputter, and the third input signal is selected in the second outputter to perform diagnosis of the logic circuit unit.
3. The semiconductor circuit according to claim 2, wherein after a result signal based on the diagnosis signal is inputted from the logic circuit unit to the second register in the next stage, the clock signal is supplied to the first register.
4. The semiconductor circuit according to claim 3, wherein before the clock signal is supplied, the first input signal is selected in the first outputter and the second input signal is selected in the second outputter.
5. The semiconductor circuit according to claim 1, wherein the first input signal is selected in the first outputter and the third input signal is inputted to the first register in the next stage in the second outputter.
6. A semiconductor system has circuit units in a plurality of stages, the circuit units being continuously connected, each of the circuit units in the plurality of stages including:
a first register;
a second register corresponding to the first register;
a first outputter that is connected to the first register and the second register, and outputs at least one of a first input signal from the first register and a second input signal from the second register; and
a second outputter configured to outputs at least one of the second input signal and a third input signal to a second register in a next stage, the third input signal being outputted from a logic circuit unit that performs logic operation on the basis of an input signal containing at least one of signals outputted from the first outputters.
7. The semiconductor system according to claim 6, further comprising
a diagnosis pattern outputter that outputs a diagnosis signal as a diagnosis pattern to a first stage of the second register in a serial manner, wherein
in a state where the first input signal is selected in the first outputter and the second input signal is selected in the second outputter,
the third input signal is inputted to the first register and the diagnosis signal is inputted from the diagnosis pattern outputter to the second register.
8. The semiconductor system containing a semiconductor device according to claim 7, further comprising:
a controller that performs control of signal selections with respect to the first outputters and the second outputters in the plurality of circuits;
an expectation value outputter that outputs an expectation value corresponding to the diagnosis signal; and
a diagnoser that diagnoses whether or not the logic circuit unit as a diagnosis target is normal based on a result signal outputted, based on the diagnosis signal, by the logic circuit unit as the diagnosis target and the expectation value.
9. The semiconductor system according to claim 8, wherein
when a diagnosis value based on the diagnosis signal is set in the second register, the controller performs control for causing the first outputter to select the first input signal and control with which the second input signal is selected in the second outputter, and
causes the first outputter to select the second input signal and the second outputter to select the third input signal, corresponding to the diagnosis value based on the diagnosis signal which value is configured to the second register.
10. The semiconductor system according to claim 8, wherein
the diagnosis pattern outputter divides and outputs the diagnosis signal to at least two second registers in the plurality of circuits in a parallel manner; and
the diagnoser acquires output signals respectively from a plurality of second registers corresponding to the at least two second registers in the parallel manner.
11. The semiconductor system according to claim 6, wherein the second register is a flip-flop circuit, and when a signal inputted from the second register is selected in the second outputter, the second register functions as a shift register.
12. The semiconductor system according to claim 6, further comprising
a first comparer that is connected to the first register and the second register and compares a first register value in the first register with a second register value in the second register, wherein
the first comparer outputs a signal indicating non-coincidence when the first register value does not coincide with the second register value.
13. The semiconductor system according to claim 6, wherein the first outputter and the second outputter are configured of multiplexers.
14. The semiconductor system according to claim 6, wherein
each of the circuit units further has
a third register that is connected to a logic circuit unit in a previous stage and to which a signal is inputted from the logic circuit unit, and
a second comparer that is connected to the first register and the third register and compares a first register value in the first register with a third register value in the third register, and
the second comparer outputs a signal indicating non-coincidence when the first register value does not coincide with the third register value.
15. The semiconductor system according to claim 6, wherein the controller outputs a clock control signal to the first register, the second register, the first outputter, the logic: circuit unit and the second outputter in each circuit unit.
US15/066,375 2015-09-14 2016-03-10 Semiconductor circuit and semiconductor system Active 2036-05-20 US9823302B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015-181215 2015-09-14
JP2015181215A JP6416065B2 (en) 2015-09-14 2015-09-14 Diagnostic circuit and semiconductor system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20170074931A1 true US20170074931A1 (en) 2017-03-16
US9823302B2 US9823302B2 (en) 2017-11-21

Family

ID=58237616

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/066,375 Active 2036-05-20 US9823302B2 (en) 2015-09-14 2016-03-10 Semiconductor circuit and semiconductor system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US9823302B2 (en)
JP (1) JP6416065B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210263099A1 (en) * 2020-02-21 2021-08-26 Infineon Technologies Ag Integrated circuit with self-test circuit, method for operating an integrated circuit with self-test circuit, multi-core processor device and method for operating a multi-core processor device

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6359818B2 (en) * 2000-07-14 2002-03-19 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus for analyzing failure for semiconductor memory device
US7653854B2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2010-01-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor integrated circuit having a (BIST) built-in self test circuit for fault diagnosing operation of a memory
US20140258797A1 (en) * 2013-03-06 2014-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation Built-in-self-test (bist) test time reduction

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU616213B2 (en) 1987-11-09 1991-10-24 Tandem Computers Incorporated Method and apparatus for synchronizing a plurality of processors
JP2000227456A (en) * 1999-02-05 2000-08-15 Kawasaki Steel Corp Scan flip-flop
JP2004340877A (en) 2003-05-19 2004-12-02 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Semiconductor device
JP2008026074A (en) 2006-07-19 2008-02-07 Hitachi Ltd Ic test method and ic
JP2009192461A (en) * 2008-02-18 2009-08-27 Renesas Technology Corp Semiconductor integrated circuit device
JP5347951B2 (en) * 2009-12-24 2013-11-20 富士通セミコンダクター株式会社 Integrated circuit and fault diagnosis circuit

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6359818B2 (en) * 2000-07-14 2002-03-19 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus for analyzing failure for semiconductor memory device
US7653854B2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2010-01-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Semiconductor integrated circuit having a (BIST) built-in self test circuit for fault diagnosing operation of a memory
US20140258797A1 (en) * 2013-03-06 2014-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation Built-in-self-test (bist) test time reduction

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210263099A1 (en) * 2020-02-21 2021-08-26 Infineon Technologies Ag Integrated circuit with self-test circuit, method for operating an integrated circuit with self-test circuit, multi-core processor device and method for operating a multi-core processor device
US11619668B2 (en) * 2020-02-21 2023-04-04 Infineon Technologies Ag Integrated circuit with self-test circuit, method for operating an integrated circuit with self-test circuit, multi-core processor device and method for operating a multi-core processor device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2017058795A (en) 2017-03-23
JP6416065B2 (en) 2018-10-31
US9823302B2 (en) 2017-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10684903B2 (en) Apparatus and operating method for monitoring micro controller unit having multi-core
US5144230A (en) Method and system for testing integrated circuits by cycle stealing
US20110307752A1 (en) Semiconductor device, and design method, design tool, and fault detection method of semiconductor device
JP6316646B2 (en) Multiple microcore monitoring apparatus and method
KR20070029528A (en) Fault diagnostic apparatus of system on chip and method thereof, soc capable of fault diagnostic
CN107300906B (en) Multi-channel fault detection with single diagnostic output
US20170288677A1 (en) Clock signal stop detection circuit
US11531048B2 (en) Voltage diagnostic circuit
US20150149842A1 (en) Test device and method using a separate control module for test
JP2016081340A (en) Multiplex control device
US9823302B2 (en) Semiconductor circuit and semiconductor system
US9442478B2 (en) Systems, circuits and a method for generating a configurable feedback
US20100095173A1 (en) Matrix system and method for debugging scan structure
US7093168B2 (en) Signal validation and arbitration system and method
JP2016134010A (en) Power supply monitoring circuit
KR101619741B1 (en) Apparatus for testing semiconductor chip having built-in test function
US20170169630A1 (en) Diagnosis circuit, semiconductor device, on-vehicle electronic control unit, and diagnosis method by diagnosis circuit
CN106776463B (en) Design method of dual-redundancy computer control system based on FPGA
JP2005055730A (en) Display unit, information display device, and its fault detection method
US8395409B2 (en) Testing for multiplexer logic associated with a multiplexed input/output pin
JP6660818B2 (en) Control device
CN107942894B (en) Main input/output submodule, diagnosis method thereof and editable logic controller
JP2015197729A (en) Microprocessor failure diagnostic method
JP2020035205A (en) Computation device, and mutual monitoring system
SU960826A1 (en) Digital unit checking device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HASEGAWA, JUN;REEL/FRAME:037946/0988

Effective date: 20160308

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4