US20150311671A1 - Non-linear filter for dml - Google Patents

Non-linear filter for dml Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150311671A1
US20150311671A1 US14/695,890 US201514695890A US2015311671A1 US 20150311671 A1 US20150311671 A1 US 20150311671A1 US 201514695890 A US201514695890 A US 201514695890A US 2015311671 A1 US2015311671 A1 US 2015311671A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
signal
tap
circuit
weight
receiving
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/695,890
Inventor
Gurpreet S. BHULLAR
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Semtech Canada Corp
Original Assignee
Semtech Canada Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Semtech Canada Corp filed Critical Semtech Canada Corp
Priority to US14/695,890 priority Critical patent/US20150311671A1/en
Assigned to SEMTECH CANADA CORPORATION reassignment SEMTECH CANADA CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BHULLAR, GURPREET S.
Assigned to HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION reassignment HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SEMTECH CORPORATION
Publication of US20150311671A1 publication Critical patent/US20150311671A1/en
Assigned to HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SEMTECH CORPORATION, SEMTECH EV, INC., SIERRA MONOLITHICS, INC., TRIUNE IP, LLC, TRIUNE SYSTEMS, L.L.C., SEMTECH NEW YORK CORPORATION
Priority to US17/080,692 priority patent/US11271366B2/en
Priority to US17/584,296 priority patent/US11664639B2/en
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR AGENT ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (040646/0799) Assignors: HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS RESIGNING AGENT
Priority to US18/304,273 priority patent/US20230261439A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/04Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping, e.g. by electron beams
    • H01S5/042Electrical excitation ; Circuits therefor
    • H01S5/0427Electrical excitation ; Circuits therefor for applying modulation to the laser
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/10Construction or shape of the optical resonator, e.g. extended or external cavity, coupled cavities, bent-guide, varying width, thickness or composition of the active region
    • H01S5/18Surface-emitting [SE] lasers, e.g. having both horizontal and vertical cavities
    • H01S5/183Surface-emitting [SE] lasers, e.g. having both horizontal and vertical cavities having only vertical cavities, e.g. vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers [VCSEL]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/02Transmitters
    • H04B1/04Circuits
    • H04B1/0475Circuits with means for limiting noise, interference or distortion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/503Laser transmitters
    • H04B10/504Laser transmitters using direct modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/58Compensation for non-linear transmitter output

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to communication and more particularly to optical communication.
  • Optical transmitters employing Directly Modulated Lasers such as Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers (VCSELs) are rated to operate up to a predetermined data rate.
  • DML Directly Modulated Lasers
  • VCSELs Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers
  • the DML transmits an optical signal that differs from the drive signal provided thereto such that signal reception is substantially affected beyond short transmission distances.
  • Added jitter and vertical eye closure from distortion introduced by VCSEL can cause significant reduction in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • Linear filters are used conventionally to partially compensate for the distortion due to the DML itself
  • linear filters fail to achieve optimal compensation for the distortion. It would be advantageous to overcome some of the shortcomings of the prior art.
  • a component having repeatable distortion characteristics and a drive circuit for providing a drive signal and comprising a non-linear filter for pre-compensating for distortion introduced by the component having repeatable distortion characteristics in response to the drive signal, the error having a non-linear response to the drive signal.
  • a method comprising: providing a drive current for driving a Directly Modulated Laser (DML); filtering the drive current with a non-linear filter to provide pre-compensated drive current pre-compensated for errors in a signal resulting from driving the DML with the drive current, wherein an output signal from the DML in response to the pre-compensated drive current better approximates the drive current to incur reduced errors.
  • DML Directly Modulated Laser
  • a circuit comprising: an input port for receiving a first signal; a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, and a biasing circuit for biasing an applied weighting between the first weight and the second weight to bias the tap signal, the biased tap signal for modifying the first signal.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a typical optical output signal amplitude of a DML (VCSEL) in response to a direct driving input signal.
  • VCSEL DML
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a linear finite impulse response (FIR) filter.
  • FIG. 3 is a logic diagram of non-linear FIR filter.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a non-linear FIR filter implementation.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram of another non-linear FIR filter implementation optimized for performance.
  • FIG. 6 is an eye diagram of an unfiltered drive signal alongside an eye diagram of an output signal corrected with a non-linear FIR filter such as that of FIG. 4 or FIG. 5 .
  • FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the transmit signal before and after filtering with a 4 tap non-linear FIR filter.
  • FIG. 8A shows a sample circuit for implementing a non-linear filter for pre-compensating a drive signal for driving a directly modulated laser (DML).
  • DML directly modulated laser
  • FIG. 8B shows another sample circuit for implementing a non-linear filter for pre-compensating a drive signal for driving a directly modulated laser (DML).
  • DML directly modulated laser
  • FIG. 8C shows another sample circuit for implementing a non-linear filter for pre-compensating a drive signal for driving a directly modulated laser (DML).
  • DML directly modulated laser
  • FIG. 1 shown is a typical optical output signal amplitude of a Directly Modulated Laser (DML) in the form of a Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL) in response to a direct driving input signal.
  • DML Directly Modulated Laser
  • VCSEL Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser
  • the optical signal generated (thin line) fails to follow accurately the signal provided (thick line).
  • the resulting overshoots and undershoots add distortion to the signal.
  • the distortion appears as both jitter affecting the width of the eye and amplitude variations affecting the opening of the eye.
  • the signals are distorted horizontally—i.e., increased jitter—and vertically—i.e., degraded SNR.
  • the inner eye opening is significantly smaller than it would be if the signal was undistorted. Correction of these distortion artifacts within the transmit signal are important to enable transmission of higher data rates over longer distances.
  • the distortion artifacts resulting from DML optical response are amplitude dependent and thus non-linear in nature.
  • the rising edge and falling edge responses are different and they each need to be compensated differently.
  • compensating one edge response may adversely affect the other edge or may fail to achieve significant improvement without compensating for the other edge as well.
  • conventional approaches using linear filters for compensating for the distortion from the DML response are not optimal.
  • a second problem is implementation efficiency. If the distortion is repeatable and calculable, it may be possible using a DSP to reduce the nonlinear distortion within the DML signal; that said, such an implementation would be costly and would not lend itself to inexpensive, low power and compact implementation. A more simple non-linear distortion reduction method would be preferred.
  • FIG. 2 shown is a simplified block diagram of a typical linear finite impulse response (FIR) filter.
  • a signal is provided to the filter and is then summed with a weighted delayed version of the signal, termed as a delayed tap, or a plurality of weighted sequentially delayed versions of the signal or delayed taps.
  • Linear FIR filters are well known and well studied.
  • a linear filter is not suitable to addressing the distortion concerns completely. In fact, such a linear filter, will fail to substantially correct the problems disclosed above, reducing distortion in one of the rising or falling edge response while compounding the distortion in the other.
  • FIG. 3 shown is a non-linear FIR filter design for providing pre-compensation for some of the non-linearities shown in FIG. 1 .
  • a signal is provided to the filter consisting of multiple delayed taps and each tap's contribution is weighted by two different factors dependent on input signal's instantaneous amplitude, resulting in an amplitude-dependent, non-linear filter response.
  • the filter generates a different response to each of the rising and falling edges and approximately compensates for the non-linear response of the DML in response to a driver signal.
  • the use of two weights per tap, combined with scaling the tap contributions with instantaneous input signal amplitude allows for non-linear filter response.
  • the non-linear FIR filter shown is implementable as an analogue circuit within a semiconductor, for example, without relying on complex processing circuitry such as a DSP.
  • FIG. 4 shown is a simplified diagram of a practical implementation of non-linear FIR filter for Non-Return to Zero (NRZ) signaling.
  • NRZ Non-Return to Zero
  • a signal provided is delayed and tapped, and each tap contribution is weighted differently, depending on input signal level of one or zero, to provide level dependent non-linear operation.
  • the tap contributions are added back into the signal to provide filtering thereof.
  • Signal scalars are reduced to gates in the filter shown, as suits an integrated hardware implementation.
  • FIG. 5 shown is a diagram of another non-linear FIR filter implementation optimized for performance in the present embodiment.
  • each tap signal is acted on by two different weights.
  • a multiplexer is used to select the weighting for multiplication.
  • the input signal level is used to select one of the multiplexer's input weights, and the multiplier scales the tap signal as per selected weight for each stage. Since the weights for each tap switch as per the input signal's level, the filter output need not follow a linear contour.
  • the resulting non-linear filtering pre-compensates for distortion in the DML.
  • FIG. 6 shown is an eye diagram of an uncorrected output signal (left-hand side) alongside an eye diagram of an output signal corrected with a non-linear FIR filter such as that of FIG. 4 or FIG. 5 (right-hand side), sand according to the present embodiment.
  • the eye has opened up considerably with reduced jitter and improved SNR.
  • An improved eye diagram is typically reflective of improved ability to transmit over greater distances and reduced error in signal reception.
  • FIG. 7 shows a graphical representation of the transmit signal before (left-hand side) and after filtering with a 4 tap non-linear FIR filter (right-hand side).
  • signal distortion is greatly reduced after a short time reducing distortion central to the eye. At the rising edge and falling edge, distortion remains, but it is significantly reduced. Thus, the eye opening in an eye diagram is improved. Further, other frequency components resulting from the distortion are reduced with reduced distortion.
  • FIGS. 8A-C shows three sample circuits for implementing a non-linear filter according to the embodiment.
  • Each circuit has different drawbacks and advantages, but effectively, the filter design allows not only for analogue hardware implementation, but for varied implementation to take advantage of different power sources, power levels, and other design criteria.
  • Architectures supporting implementation flexibility are typically desirable as they are useful in many different applications and well suited to implementation in many different devices.
  • w_ 0 and w_ 1 two currents proportional to weights are shown designated with “w” (w_ 0 and w_ 1 ) being multiplexed into the scaling circuit for each tap determined by level of the input signal (Dp, Dn).
  • the currents proportional to weights are applied to a scaling circuit such that they are first scaled by the input signal (Dp, Dn) followed by the tap signal (Tnp, Tnn).
  • currents proportional to the weights are applied to a scaling circuit where the signals being scaled are a logical combination of input signal (Dp, Dn) and the tap signal (Tnp, Tnn).
  • the logical combinations include input signal (Dp, Dn) logically OR'd with tap signal (Tnp, Tnn) designated as “Dp+Tnp”; and input signal (Dp, Dn) logically AND'd with tap signal (Tnp, Tnn) designated as “Dp.Tnp”.
  • the scaled version of these logically combined signals in current form is then summed through a wire OR to produce a single tap contribution that is dependent on the weights and the input signal amplitude. Multiple tap contributions are summed to generate a resulting signal that has an amplitude dependent non-linear characteristic.
  • FIGS. 8A-C show one tap for each architecture, it is understood by those of skill in the art that any number of taps is supported and selection of a number of taps is dependent upon the circuit design requirements. Further, though two weights are shown, the filter architecture described above may be implemented with additional weights to correct for more complex amplitude dependent non-linear effects requiring higher granularity or resolution in amplitude levels.
  • non-linear filter as shown in FIG. 3 can be used for a received signal.
  • the transmitter and receiver pairing is known and the weights within the receiver are tuned for use with a specific receiver or are adjusted based on a transmitter from which a signal is received.
  • a circuit In use, a circuit is designed and manufactured. Once manufactured, the circuit is tested with a representative DML component and based on the combined circuit and DML transmit signal characteristics, the non-linear FIR filter weights are adjusted to pre-compensate the drive current for the DML. Thus, each product is compensated individually, accounting for known DML response issues as well as circuit specific response issues for a given DML. Once compensated, the circuit operates in compensated mode. Optionally, the circuit's operating parameters are readjusted to re-compute the weights for the non-linear FIR filter at intervals.
  • the optical output signal is tapped and provided as feedback to the transmit circuit where the non-linear FIR filter is adjusted in response to changes in performance of the DML output signal.
  • the circuit is designed and manufactured with fixed weighting for the non-linear FIR filter.
  • the manufactured devices are tested, the non-linear FIR filter is tuned—weights are set—and the circuit is tested again. Based on its performance, the circuit is assigned a quality level.
  • some manufactured drive circuits support 25 GHz while others support only 15 GHz—determined after tuning in the manufacturing stage. This allows for a more coarse tuning process with the performance assignment then dividing between circuits with best tuning and those with less effective tuning results.

Abstract

A circuit is disclosed having a component having repeatable distortion characteristics; and a drive circuit for providing a drive signal and comprising a non-linear filter for pre-compensating for distortion introduced by the component having repeatable distortion characteristics in response to the drive signal, the distortion having a non-linear response to the drive signal.

Description

  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/984,621, filed on Apr. 25, 2014, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates generally to communication and more particularly to optical communication.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Optical transmitters employing Directly Modulated Lasers (DML) such as Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers (VCSELs) are rated to operate up to a predetermined data rate. Problematically, when operating at higher data rates, distortion from the DML itself limits performance of the device and thus the data link. The DML transmits an optical signal that differs from the drive signal provided thereto such that signal reception is substantially affected beyond short transmission distances. Added jitter and vertical eye closure from distortion introduced by VCSEL can cause significant reduction in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). These limitations on performance place a limit on the transmission distances for higher data rates.
  • Linear filters are used conventionally to partially compensate for the distortion due to the DML itself However, linear filters fail to achieve optimal compensation for the distortion. It would be advantageous to overcome some of the shortcomings of the prior art.
  • SUMMARY OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment there is provided a component having repeatable distortion characteristics; and a drive circuit for providing a drive signal and comprising a non-linear filter for pre-compensating for distortion introduced by the component having repeatable distortion characteristics in response to the drive signal, the error having a non-linear response to the drive signal.
  • In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment there is provided a method comprising: providing a drive current for driving a Directly Modulated Laser (DML); filtering the drive current with a non-linear filter to provide pre-compensated drive current pre-compensated for errors in a signal resulting from driving the DML with the drive current, wherein an output signal from the DML in response to the pre-compensated drive current better approximates the drive current to incur reduced errors.
  • In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment of the invention there is provided a circuit comprising: an input port for receiving a first signal; a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, and a biasing circuit for biasing an applied weighting between the first weight and the second weight to bias the tap signal, the biased tap signal for modifying the first signal.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a typical optical output signal amplitude of a DML (VCSEL) in response to a direct driving input signal.
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a linear finite impulse response (FIR) filter.
  • FIG. 3 is a logic diagram of non-linear FIR filter.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a non-linear FIR filter implementation.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram of another non-linear FIR filter implementation optimized for performance.
  • FIG. 6 is an eye diagram of an unfiltered drive signal alongside an eye diagram of an output signal corrected with a non-linear FIR filter such as that of FIG. 4 or FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 7 is a graphical representation of the transmit signal before and after filtering with a 4 tap non-linear FIR filter.
  • FIG. 8A shows a sample circuit for implementing a non-linear filter for pre-compensating a drive signal for driving a directly modulated laser (DML).
  • FIG. 8B shows another sample circuit for implementing a non-linear filter for pre-compensating a drive signal for driving a directly modulated laser (DML).
  • FIG. 8C shows another sample circuit for implementing a non-linear filter for pre-compensating a drive signal for driving a directly modulated laser (DML).
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
  • The following description is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, shown is a typical optical output signal amplitude of a Directly Modulated Laser (DML) in the form of a Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL) in response to a direct driving input signal. As is evident, the optical signal generated (thin line) fails to follow accurately the signal provided (thick line). The resulting overshoots and undershoots add distortion to the signal. The distortion appears as both jitter affecting the width of the eye and amplitude variations affecting the opening of the eye.
  • Referring now to the eye diagram that is shown on the left-hand side of FIG. 6, the signals are distorted horizontally—i.e., increased jitter—and vertically—i.e., degraded SNR. As is evident, the inner eye opening is significantly smaller than it would be if the signal was undistorted. Correction of these distortion artifacts within the transmit signal are important to enable transmission of higher data rates over longer distances.
  • The distortion artifacts resulting from DML optical response are amplitude dependent and thus non-linear in nature. The rising edge and falling edge responses are different and they each need to be compensated differently. Further, compensating one edge response may adversely affect the other edge or may fail to achieve significant improvement without compensating for the other edge as well. Thus, conventional approaches using linear filters for compensating for the distortion from the DML response are not optimal.
  • A second problem is implementation efficiency. If the distortion is repeatable and calculable, it may be possible using a DSP to reduce the nonlinear distortion within the DML signal; that said, such an implementation would be costly and would not lend itself to inexpensive, low power and compact implementation. A more simple non-linear distortion reduction method would be preferred.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, shown is a simplified block diagram of a typical linear finite impulse response (FIR) filter. A signal is provided to the filter and is then summed with a weighted delayed version of the signal, termed as a delayed tap, or a plurality of weighted sequentially delayed versions of the signal or delayed taps. Linear FIR filters are well known and well studied.
  • Because the distortion is non-linear in nature, a linear filter is not suitable to addressing the distortion concerns completely. In fact, such a linear filter, will fail to substantially correct the problems disclosed above, reducing distortion in one of the rising or falling edge response while compounding the distortion in the other.
  • Referring now to FIG. 3, shown is a non-linear FIR filter design for providing pre-compensation for some of the non-linearities shown in FIG. 1. Here, a signal is provided to the filter consisting of multiple delayed taps and each tap's contribution is weighted by two different factors dependent on input signal's instantaneous amplitude, resulting in an amplitude-dependent, non-linear filter response. The filter generates a different response to each of the rising and falling edges and approximately compensates for the non-linear response of the DML in response to a driver signal. The use of two weights per tap, combined with scaling the tap contributions with instantaneous input signal amplitude, allows for non-linear filter response. While the use of the FIR architecture supports compact and efficient implementation. For example, the non-linear FIR filter shown is implementable as an analogue circuit within a semiconductor, for example, without relying on complex processing circuitry such as a DSP.
  • Referring now to FIG. 4, shown is a simplified diagram of a practical implementation of non-linear FIR filter for Non-Return to Zero (NRZ) signaling. Again, a signal provided is delayed and tapped, and each tap contribution is weighted differently, depending on input signal level of one or zero, to provide level dependent non-linear operation. The tap contributions are added back into the signal to provide filtering thereof. Signal scalars are reduced to gates in the filter shown, as suits an integrated hardware implementation.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5, shown is a diagram of another non-linear FIR filter implementation optimized for performance in the present embodiment. Here again, each tap signal is acted on by two different weights. A multiplexer is used to select the weighting for multiplication. The input signal level is used to select one of the multiplexer's input weights, and the multiplier scales the tap signal as per selected weight for each stage. Since the weights for each tap switch as per the input signal's level, the filter output need not follow a linear contour. The resulting non-linear filtering pre-compensates for distortion in the DML.
  • Referring again to FIG. 6, shown is an eye diagram of an uncorrected output signal (left-hand side) alongside an eye diagram of an output signal corrected with a non-linear FIR filter such as that of FIG. 4 or FIG. 5 (right-hand side), sand according to the present embodiment. As is shown, the eye has opened up considerably with reduced jitter and improved SNR. An improved eye diagram is typically reflective of improved ability to transmit over greater distances and reduced error in signal reception.
  • FIG. 7 shows a graphical representation of the transmit signal before (left-hand side) and after filtering with a 4 tap non-linear FIR filter (right-hand side). Most noteworthy, signal distortion is greatly reduced after a short time reducing distortion central to the eye. At the rising edge and falling edge, distortion remains, but it is significantly reduced. Thus, the eye opening in an eye diagram is improved. Further, other frequency components resulting from the distortion are reduced with reduced distortion.
  • Just looking to the falling edge, it is seen that whereas without filtering, the signal bounces at the bottom down and up, with filtering the signal remains substantially in alignment with the desired signal contour. On the rising edge, two notable bounces are reduced to one smaller bounce, thereby limiting the effect of the bounce on the top of the eye.
  • FIGS. 8A-C shows three sample circuits for implementing a non-linear filter according to the embodiment. Each circuit has different drawbacks and advantages, but effectively, the filter design allows not only for analogue hardware implementation, but for varied implementation to take advantage of different power sources, power levels, and other design criteria. Architectures supporting implementation flexibility are typically desirable as they are useful in many different applications and well suited to implementation in many different devices.
  • As is seen in each of the circuit diagrams, two currents proportional to weights are shown designated with “w” (w_0 and w_1) being multiplexed into the scaling circuit for each tap determined by level of the input signal (Dp, Dn). Alternatively, the currents proportional to weights are applied to a scaling circuit such that they are first scaled by the input signal (Dp, Dn) followed by the tap signal (Tnp, Tnn). Further alternatively, currents proportional to the weights are applied to a scaling circuit where the signals being scaled are a logical combination of input signal (Dp, Dn) and the tap signal (Tnp, Tnn). The logical combinations include input signal (Dp, Dn) logically OR'd with tap signal (Tnp, Tnn) designated as “Dp+Tnp”; and input signal (Dp, Dn) logically AND'd with tap signal (Tnp, Tnn) designated as “Dp.Tnp”. The scaled version of these logically combined signals in current form is then summed through a wire OR to produce a single tap contribution that is dependent on the weights and the input signal amplitude. Multiple tap contributions are summed to generate a resulting signal that has an amplitude dependent non-linear characteristic.
  • Though FIGS. 8A-C show one tap for each architecture, it is understood by those of skill in the art that any number of taps is supported and selection of a number of taps is dependent upon the circuit design requirements. Further, though two weights are shown, the filter architecture described above may be implemented with additional weights to correct for more complex amplitude dependent non-linear effects requiring higher granularity or resolution in amplitude levels.
  • Though the above embodiments are directed to pre-compensating the drive current, filtering of received signals to improve data detection is also supported. The general architecture for non-linear filter as shown in FIG. 3 can be used for a received signal. In end-to-end fibre optic communications such as fibre optic cables for communicating, the transmitter and receiver pairing is known and the weights within the receiver are tuned for use with a specific receiver or are adjusted based on a transmitter from which a signal is received.
  • In use, a circuit is designed and manufactured. Once manufactured, the circuit is tested with a representative DML component and based on the combined circuit and DML transmit signal characteristics, the non-linear FIR filter weights are adjusted to pre-compensate the drive current for the DML. Thus, each product is compensated individually, accounting for known DML response issues as well as circuit specific response issues for a given DML. Once compensated, the circuit operates in compensated mode. Optionally, the circuit's operating parameters are readjusted to re-compute the weights for the non-linear FIR filter at intervals.
  • In another embodiment, the optical output signal is tapped and provided as feedback to the transmit circuit where the non-linear FIR filter is adjusted in response to changes in performance of the DML output signal. Further optionally, the circuit is designed and manufactured with fixed weighting for the non-linear FIR filter.
  • In another embodiment, the manufactured devices are tested, the non-linear FIR filter is tuned—weights are set—and the circuit is tested again. Based on its performance, the circuit is assigned a quality level. Thus, some manufactured drive circuits support 25 GHz while others support only 15 GHz—determined after tuning in the manufacturing stage. This allows for a more coarse tuning process with the performance assignment then dividing between circuits with best tuning and those with less effective tuning results.
  • Numerous other embodiments may be envisioned without departing from the scope of the invention.

Claims (39)

What is claimed is:
1. A circuit comprising:
a component having repeatable distortion characteristics; and
a drive circuit for providing a drive signal and comprising a non-linear filter having at least a tap for pre-compensating for distortion introduced by the component having repeatable distortion characteristics in response to the drive signal, the distortion having a non-linear response to the drive signal.
2. A circuit according to claim 1 wherein the component comprises a Directly Modulated Laser (DML).
3. A circuit according to claim 2 wherein the DML comprises a Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL).
4. A circuit according to claim 2 wherein the DML comprises a Distributed FeedBack (DFB) laser.
5. A circuit according to claim 3 wherein the DML is operated at at least 25 Gbps.
6. A circuit according to claim 4 wherein the non-linear filter comprises a non-linear Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter having at least 2 weights for application at each delayed tap and supporting at least one delayed tap.
7. A circuit according to claim 4 wherein the non-linear filter comprises a non-linear Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter having at least 2 weights for application at each delayed tap and supporting at least 3 delayed taps.
8. A circuit according to claim 1 wherein the non-linear filter comprises a non-linear Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter having at least 2 weights for application at each delayed tap and supporting filtering of both a rising edge, low to high signal level response and a falling edge, high to low signal level response.
9. A circuit according to claim 8 comprising:
for each tap a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, a switch for switching between the first weight and the second weight, and a weighting circuit for weighting of a signal within the tap to produce a tap output, tap output signals from different taps combined to form the drive signal.
10. A circuit according to claim 8 comprising:
for each tap a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, a scaling circuit for scaling the first weight and the second weight, and a weighting circuit for weighting of a signal within the tap to produce a tap output, tap output signals from different taps combined to form the drive signal.
11. A circuit according to claim 1 wherein the non-linear filter comprises a non-linear Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter having greater than 2 weights at each delayed tap supporting filtering of a complex amplitude dependent non-linear distortion for a signal with a modulation scheme having greater than 2 amplitude levels of consequence for a given data symbol, such as PAM4 or 4-Level Pulse Amplitude Modulation.
12. A circuit according to claim 11 consisting of an analogue filter circuit.
13. A circuit according to claim 12 wherein the circuit is implemented in an integrated semiconductor.
14. A circuit according to claim 11 comprising:
for each tap a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, a scaling circuit for scaling the first weight and the second weight, and a weighting circuit for weighting of a signal within the tap to produce a tap output, tap output signals from different taps combined to form the drive signal.
15. A method comprising:
providing a drive current for driving a component;
filtering the drive current with a non-linear filter to provide pre-compensated drive current pre-compensated for distortion in a signal resulting from driving the component with the drive current, wherein an output signal from the component in response to the pre-compensated drive current has reduced distortion and better approximates an ideal transmit signal for an intended modulation.
16. A method according to claim 15 wherein the component comprises a Directly Modulated Laser (DML).
17. A method according to claim 16 wherein the directly modulated laser comprises a Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL).
18. A method according to claim 16 wherein the directly modulated laser comprises a Distributed FeedBack (DFB) laser.
19. A method according to claim 18 wherein filtering is performed with an analogue filter.
20. A method according to claim 15 wherein the analogue filter is implemented in semiconductor.
21. A method according to claim 15 wherein the non-linear filter comprises a non-linear FIR filter.
22. A method according to claim 15 wherein filtering corrects for both a rising edge, low to high signal level response, and a falling edge, high to low signal level response.
23. A circuit comprising:
an input port for receiving a first signal;
a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, and a scaling circuit for scaling an applied weighting based on the first weight and the second weight to scale the tap signal, the scaled tap signal for modifying the first signal.
24. A circuit according to claim 23 wherein the scaling circuit comprises a switching circuit for switching between the different weights to select one weight for application at a first time and another weight for application at another time within a same signal to be filtered.
25. A circuit according to claim 23 wherein the scaling circuit comprises a switching circuit for switching between the different weights to select one weight for application at a first time and another weight for application at another time in dependence upon a content of the signal to be filtered.
26. A circuit according to claim 23 comprising a summer for summing an output of each of the plurality of taps.
27. A circuit comprising:
an input port for receiving a first signal;
a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, and a scaling circuit for scaling an applied weighting between the first weight and the second weight to scale the tap signal, the scaled tap signal for modifying the first signal.
28. A circuit comprising:
an input port for receiving a first signal;
a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a plurality of input ports each for receiving a weight, and a scaling circuit for scaling an applied weighting based on the received weights to scale the tap signal, the scaled tap signal for modifying the first signal.
29. A circuit according to claim 28 wherein the scaling circuit comprises a switching circuit for switching between the different weights to select one weight for application at a first time and another weight for application at another time within a same signal to be filtered.
30. A circuit according to claim 28 wherein the scaling circuit comprises a switching circuit for switching between the different weights to select one weight for application at a first time and another weight for application at another time in dependence upon a content of the signal to be filtered.
31. A circuit according to claim 28 comprising a summer for summing an output of each of the plurality of taps.
32. A circuit comprising:
an input port for receiving a first signal, the first signal received at a receiver via a communication interface and from a remote location;
a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a plurality of weight input ports each for receiving a weight, and a scaling circuit for scaling an applied weighting based on the received weights to scale the tap signal, the scaled tap signal for modifying the first signal.
33. A circuit according to claim 32 wherein the scaling circuit comprises a switching circuit for switching between the different weights to select one weight for application at a first time and another weight for application at another time within a same signal to be filtered.
34. A circuit according to claim 32 wherein the scaling circuit comprises a switching circuit for switching between the different weights to select one weight for application at a first time and another weight for application at another time in dependence upon a content of the signal to be filtered.
35. A circuit according to claim 32 comprising a summer for summing an output of each of the plurality of taps.
36. A method comprising
providing a receiver for receiving a signal transmitted across an optical fibre and for providing an electrical first signal;
using a filter, filtering the first signal with a non-linear filter to provide compensation to the first signal for distortion in the signal when transmitted resulting from driving a transmitter at a transmit end, wherein an output signal from the filter better approximates an ideal transmit signal for an intended modulation.
37. A method comprising:
manufacturing a circuit comprising:
an input port for receiving a first signal;
a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a plurality of input ports each for receiving a weight, and a scaling circuit for scaling an applied weighting based on the received weights to scale the tap signal, the scaled tap signal for modifying the first signal;
testing the circuit and determining each of the plurality of weights based on testing thereof; and
setting each of the plurality of weights based on a result of the testing thereof and fixing each of the plurality of weights.
38. A circuit comprising:
a non-linear FIR filter comprising a plurality of taps, each tap having multiple weights and a scaling circuit for scaling the multiple weights to affect a signal propagating within the tap for nonlinear filtering of a first signal.
39. A circuit according to claim 38 wherein the non-linear filter is implemented as an analogue component within an integrated circuit.
US14/695,890 2014-04-25 2015-04-24 Non-linear filter for dml Abandoned US20150311671A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/695,890 US20150311671A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2015-04-24 Non-linear filter for dml
US17/080,692 US11271366B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2020-10-26 Non-linear filter for DML
US17/584,296 US11664639B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2022-01-25 Device having non-linear filter
US18/304,273 US20230261439A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2023-04-20 Apparatus with non-linear filter

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201461984621P 2014-04-25 2014-04-25
US14/695,890 US20150311671A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2015-04-24 Non-linear filter for dml

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/080,692 Continuation US11271366B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2020-10-26 Non-linear filter for DML

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150311671A1 true US20150311671A1 (en) 2015-10-29

Family

ID=54139668

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/695,890 Abandoned US20150311671A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2015-04-24 Non-linear filter for dml
US17/080,692 Active US11271366B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2020-10-26 Non-linear filter for DML
US17/584,296 Active US11664639B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2022-01-25 Device having non-linear filter
US18/304,273 Pending US20230261439A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2023-04-20 Apparatus with non-linear filter

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/080,692 Active US11271366B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2020-10-26 Non-linear filter for DML
US17/584,296 Active US11664639B2 (en) 2014-04-25 2022-01-25 Device having non-linear filter
US18/304,273 Pending US20230261439A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2023-04-20 Apparatus with non-linear filter

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (4) US20150311671A1 (en)
CN (2) CN204669328U (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112104339A (en) * 2020-08-28 2020-12-18 电子科技大学 Smoothing filtering method suitable for signals with jumping edges
US11063669B2 (en) 2017-03-07 2021-07-13 Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd. Dual-rate DML device and module having built-in signal calibration circuit, and signal calibration method
US20220006446A1 (en) * 2018-09-27 2022-01-06 Universiteit Gent Cascadable filter architecture
US11483018B1 (en) * 2021-06-04 2022-10-25 Xilinx, Inc. Reconfigurable and scalable nonlinear filter for digital pre-distorters

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150311671A1 (en) * 2014-04-25 2015-10-29 Semtech Canada Corporation Non-linear filter for dml
CN112532324B (en) * 2020-11-23 2022-07-15 北京邮电大学 Nonlinear damage precompensation method in optical fiber communication system

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5424680A (en) * 1993-11-30 1995-06-13 Harmonic Lightwaves, Inc. Predistorter for high frequency optical communications devices
US20110069749A1 (en) * 2009-09-24 2011-03-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Nonlinear equalizer to correct for memory effects of a transmitter
US20150063828A1 (en) * 2013-08-27 2015-03-05 Broadcom Corporation Generalized Transmit Pre-Coding for Optical and Backplane Channels
US20150086216A1 (en) * 2013-09-20 2015-03-26 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Level Spacing For M-PAM Optical Systems With Coherent Detection

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6973138B1 (en) 2000-01-26 2005-12-06 Pmc-Sierra, Inc. Advanced adaptive pre-distortion in a radio frequency transmitter
US7826752B1 (en) 2005-06-02 2010-11-02 Level 3 Communications, Llc Optical transmission apparatuses, methods, and systems
US8083417B2 (en) 2006-04-10 2011-12-27 Finisar Corporation Active optical cable electrical adaptor
US8548404B2 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-10-01 Scintera Networks, Inc. Linearization of power amplifiers through digital in-band predistortion followed by analog predistortion
EP2634934B1 (en) 2012-01-10 2016-05-04 Alcatel Lucent Optical transmitter
US20150311671A1 (en) * 2014-04-25 2015-10-29 Semtech Canada Corporation Non-linear filter for dml

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5424680A (en) * 1993-11-30 1995-06-13 Harmonic Lightwaves, Inc. Predistorter for high frequency optical communications devices
US20110069749A1 (en) * 2009-09-24 2011-03-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Nonlinear equalizer to correct for memory effects of a transmitter
US20150063828A1 (en) * 2013-08-27 2015-03-05 Broadcom Corporation Generalized Transmit Pre-Coding for Optical and Backplane Channels
US20150086216A1 (en) * 2013-09-20 2015-03-26 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Level Spacing For M-PAM Optical Systems With Coherent Detection

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Stephan Warm, "ELECTRONIC PREDISTORTION STRATEGIES FOR DIRECTLY MODULATED LASER SYSTEM", pp 1-15, Berlin, 2009 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11063669B2 (en) 2017-03-07 2021-07-13 Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd. Dual-rate DML device and module having built-in signal calibration circuit, and signal calibration method
US20220006446A1 (en) * 2018-09-27 2022-01-06 Universiteit Gent Cascadable filter architecture
CN112104339A (en) * 2020-08-28 2020-12-18 电子科技大学 Smoothing filtering method suitable for signals with jumping edges
US11483018B1 (en) * 2021-06-04 2022-10-25 Xilinx, Inc. Reconfigurable and scalable nonlinear filter for digital pre-distorters

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20220149594A1 (en) 2022-05-12
CN204669328U (en) 2015-09-23
US11271366B2 (en) 2022-03-08
US20230261439A1 (en) 2023-08-17
US11664639B2 (en) 2023-05-30
US20210044086A1 (en) 2021-02-11
CN105048993A (en) 2015-11-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210044086A1 (en) Non-linear filter for dml
US10547387B2 (en) Transition based feedforward equalization method and apparatus implemented with lookup table circuits
CA3047882C (en) Optical transmission characteristic estimation method, optical transmission characteristic compensation method, optical transmission characteristic estimation system and optical transmission characteristic compensation system
US7224911B2 (en) Adaptive distortion compensation in optical fiber communication networks
US8054876B2 (en) Active delay line
US9735883B2 (en) Intensity modulated direct detection optical transceiver
US11283528B2 (en) Digital coherent receiver and digital coherent receiving method
TWI573403B (en) Method and system for compensating mode conversion over a communications channel
US20060008279A1 (en) Pattern-dependent error counts for use in correcting operational parameters in an optical receiver
US20120027418A1 (en) Equalizer for an Optical Transmission System
US8229303B1 (en) Reducing pulse narrowing in the transmitter signal that drives a limiting E/O converter for optical fiber channels
US9621276B2 (en) Optical transmitter for transmitting a multilevel amplitude-shift-keying modulated signal
US20050169638A1 (en) Chirp managed laser fiber optic system including an adaptive receiver
US20210194607A1 (en) Estimation of external noise in a communication channel
Bajaj et al. 54.5 Tb/s WDM transmission over field deployed fiber enabled by neural network-based digital pre-distortion
US10838282B2 (en) Optical ring circuit with electrical filter
US10938604B2 (en) Receiver supporting multiple data rates with fast equalization
US7313197B2 (en) Data transceiver and method for transceiving data performing equalization and pre-emphasis adaptive to transmission characteristics of receiving part
JP2009094777A (en) Signal waveform deterioration compensation circuit
US9344192B1 (en) Driver chip for minimizing transmission impairments and for boosting signal transmission rates
JP7367557B2 (en) Optical communication device and correction method
CN109495421B (en) In-phase component and quadrature component mismatch compensation device and method
Bilal et al. Interpolators for digital coherent receivers
KR102177925B1 (en) Method and appratus for electronic nonlinear equalization in intensity-modulation/direct-detection optical communication systems
EP3457594A1 (en) A method and system for determining a model representation for an optical transmitter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SEMTECH CANADA CORPORATION, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BHULLAR, GURPREET S.;REEL/FRAME:036117/0317

Effective date: 20150626

AS Assignment

Owner name: HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SEMTECH CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036146/0366

Effective date: 20150709

AS Assignment

Owner name: HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SEMTECH CORPORATION;SEMTECH NEW YORK CORPORATION;SIERRA MONOLITHICS, INC.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20151115 TO 20161115;REEL/FRAME:040646/0799

Owner name: HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SEMTECH CORPORATION;SEMTECH NEW YORK CORPORATION;SIERRA MONOLITHICS, INC.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20151115 TO 20161115;REEL/FRAME:040646/0799

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (040646/0799);ASSIGNOR:HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS RESIGNING AGENT;REEL/FRAME:062781/0544

Effective date: 20230210