US20150026162A1 - Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document - Google Patents

Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150026162A1
US20150026162A1 US14/506,142 US201414506142A US2015026162A1 US 20150026162 A1 US20150026162 A1 US 20150026162A1 US 201414506142 A US201414506142 A US 201414506142A US 2015026162 A1 US2015026162 A1 US 2015026162A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
document
user
text
numbers
characters
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/506,142
Inventor
Martin T. King
Clifford A. Kushler
James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Dale L. Grover
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Google LLC
Original Assignee
Google LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/004,637 external-priority patent/US7707039B2/en
Priority claimed from US11/097,961 external-priority patent/US20060041484A1/en
Priority claimed from US11/097,093 external-priority patent/US20060041605A1/en
Priority claimed from US11/098,043 external-priority patent/US20060053097A1/en
Application filed by Google LLC filed Critical Google LLC
Priority to US14/506,142 priority Critical patent/US20150026162A1/en
Assigned to GOOGLE INC. reassignment GOOGLE INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EXBIBLIO B.V.
Assigned to GOOGLE INC. reassignment GOOGLE INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KUSHLER, CLIFFORD A., STAFFORD-FRASER, JAMES Q., GROVER, DALE L., KING, MARTIN T.
Publication of US20150026162A1 publication Critical patent/US20150026162A1/en
Assigned to GOOGLE LLC reassignment GOOGLE LLC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GOOGLE INC.
Assigned to GOOGLE LLC reassignment GOOGLE LLC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE REMOVAL OF THE INCORRECTLY RECORDED APPLICATION NUMBERS 14/149802 AND 15/419313 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 44144 FRAME: 1. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Assignors: GOOGLE INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G06F17/30011—
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/93—Document management systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/38—Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually
    • G06F16/382—Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually using citations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903—Querying
    • G06F16/9032—Query formulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/955—Retrieval from the web using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL]
    • G06F16/9554—Retrieval from the web using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL] by using bar codes
    • G06F17/22—
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/10—Text processing
    • G06F40/12—Use of codes for handling textual entities
    • G06K9/723—
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06V—IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V30/00—Character recognition; Recognising digital ink; Document-oriented image-based pattern recognition
    • G06V30/10—Character recognition
    • G06V30/26—Techniques for post-processing, e.g. correcting the recognition result
    • G06V30/262—Techniques for post-processing, e.g. correcting the recognition result using context analysis, e.g. lexical, syntactic or semantic context
    • G06V30/268—Lexical context
    • G06K2209/01—

Definitions

  • the described technology is directed to the field of document processing.
  • Paper documents have an enduring appeal, as can be seen by the proliferation of paper documents in the computer age. It has never been easier to print and publish paper documents than it is today. Paper documents prevail even though electronic documents are easier to duplicate, transmit, search and edit.
  • FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram that illustrates the flow of information in one embodiment of the core system.
  • FIG. 2 is a component diagram of components included in a typical implementation of the system in the context of a typical operating environment.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a scanner.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the typical environment in which embodiments of the system operate.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to implement bookmarks.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a scanning device that has an integrated highlighter and pen.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to process text capture actions.
  • FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate how two characters of an alphabet often have approximately the same *relative* shape in multiple fonts.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the approach used by the facility in some embodiments to learn an entirely new set of symbols using self-recognition.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram that shows a subset of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 that self-define their vertical and horizontal extent.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram that shows relationships between some of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 .
  • a system for interpreting and interacting with rendered documents e.g., printed or displayed documents
  • rendered documents e.g., printed or displayed documents
  • digital “source,” “counterpart,” or “reference” versions of these documents (“the system”) is described.
  • the system is not directly concerned with recognizing and interpreting characters per se; it does not concern itself with recognizing and understanding printed characters, though it may in some cases perform this function. Rather, the system assumes that a version of the document is already known, that machine-readable (e.g., ASCII or some other machine-readable text) source or reference version document is at hand, or is machine accessible, or will be made available in the future.
  • the system uses various features (including text) in rendered documents for navigation (i.e., determining location within a document). The location is in turn used to enable a rich set of user functions and interactions, some of which will be described below.”
  • the system is based in part on the process of interpreting and deciphering the patterns of marks (e.g., the text and any rendered supplemental informational marks) in documents to determine location information.
  • this location information is with reference to the document itself—e.g., location within the document, often down to a single paragraph, sentence, word and even single character.
  • the location information can be converted to location on a display screen, a printed page, etc.
  • printed text is used in its generic sense to documents rendering in any form that is readable to a human (e.g., on paper, on a display screen, in Braille format, etc.). It should be understood that in many cases various of the features and applications of system apply quite well to non-alphanumeric rendered content—such as punctuation, graphics and images, special marks, etc. Embodiments of the system include these additional uses.
  • the system uses a sample of text captured from a paper document, for example using a handheld scanner, to identify and locate an electronic counterpart of the document.
  • the amount of text needed by the facility is very small in that a few words of text from a document can often function as an identifier for the paper document and as a link to its electronic counterpart.
  • the system may use those few words to identify not only the document, but also a location within the document.
  • the system implements these and many other examples of “paper/digital integration” without requiring changes to the current processes of writing, printing and publishing documents, giving such conventional rendered documents a whole new layer of digital functionality.
  • a rendered document is a printed document or a document shown on a display or monitor. It is a document that is perceptible to a human, whether in permanent form or on a transitory display.
  • Scanning or capturing is the process of systematic examination to obtain information from a rendered document.
  • the process may involve optical capture using a scanner or camera (for example a camera in a cellphone), or it may involve reading aloud from the document into an audio capture device or typing it on a keypad or keyboard.
  • a scanner or camera for example a camera in a cellphone
  • This section describes some of the devices, processes and systems that constitute a system for paper/digital integration.
  • the system builds a wide variety of services and applications on this underlying core that provides the basic functionality.
  • FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram that illustrates the flow of information in one embodiment of the core system. Other embodiments may not use all of the stages or elements illustrated here, while some will use many more.
  • Text from a rendered document is captured 100 , typically in optical form by an optical scanner or audio form by a voice recorder, and this image or sound data is then processed 102 , for example to remove artifacts of the capture process or to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.
  • a recognition process 104 such as OCR, speech recognition, or autocorrelation then converts the data into a signature, comprised in some embodiments of text, text offsets, or other symbols.
  • the system performs an alternate form of extracting document signature from the rendered document.
  • the signature represents a set of possible text transcriptions in some embodiments. This process may be influenced by feedback from other stages, for example, if the search process and context analysis 110 have identified some candidate documents from which the capture may originate, thus narrowing the possible interpretations of the original capture.
  • a post-processing 106 stage may take the output of the recognition process and filter it or perform such other operations upon it as may be useful. Depending upon the embodiment implemented, it may be possible at this stage to deduce some direct actions 107 to be taken immediately without reference to the later stages, such as where a phrase or symbol has been captured which contains sufficient information in itself to convey the user's intent. In these cases no digital counterpart document need be referenced, or even known to the system.
  • next stage will be to construct a query 108 or a set of queries for use in searching.
  • Some aspects of the query construction may depend on the search process used and so cannot be performed until the next stage, but there will typically be some operations, such as the removal of obviously misrecognized or irrelevant characters, which can be performed in advance.
  • the query or queries are then passed to the search and context analysis stage 110 .
  • the system optionally attempts to identify the document from which the original data was captured.
  • the system typically uses search indices and search engines 112 , knowledge about the user 114 and knowledge about the user's context or the context in which the capture occurred 116 .
  • Search engine 112 may employ and/or index information specifically about rendered documents, about their digital counterpart documents, and about documents that have a web (internet) presence). It may write to, as well as read from, many of these sources and, as has been mentioned, it may feed information into other stages of the process, for example by giving the recognition system 104 information about the language, font, rendering and likely next words based on its knowledge of the candidate documents.
  • the sources of the documents 124 may be directly accessible, for example from a local filing system or database or a web server, or—they may need to be contacted via some access service 122 which might enforce authentication, security or payment or may provide other services such as conversion of the document into a desired format.
  • markup The next stage of the process 130 , then, is to identify any markup relevant to the captured data. Such markup may be provided by the user, the originator, or publisher of the document, or some other party, and may be directly accessible from some source 132 or may be generated by some service 134 . In various embodiments, markup can be associated with, and apply to, a rendered document and/or the digital counterpart to a rendered document, or to groups of either or both of these documents.
  • actions may be taken 140 .
  • These may be default actions such as simply recording the information found, they may be dependent on the data or document, or they may be derived from the markup analysis. Sometimes the action will simply be to pass the data to another system.
  • the various possible actions appropriate to a capture at a specific point in a rendered document will be presented to the user as a menu on an associated display, for example on a local display 332 , on a computer display 212 or a mobile phone or PDA display 216 . If the user doesn't respond to the menu, the default actions can be taken.
  • FIG. 2 is a component diagram of components included in a typical implementation of the system in the context of a typical operating environment.
  • the operating environment includes one or more optical scanning capture devices 202 or voice capture devices 204 .
  • Each capture device is able to communicate with other parts of the system such as a computer 212 and a mobile station 216 (e.g., a mobile phone or PDA) using either a direct wired or wireless connection, or through the network 220 , with which it can communicate using a wired or wireless connection, the latter typically involving a wireless base station 214 .
  • the capture device is integrated in the mobile station, and optionally shares some of the audio and/or optical components used in the device for voice communications and picture-taking.
  • Computer 212 may include a memory containing computer executable instructions for processing an order from scanning devices 202 and 204 .
  • an order can include an identifier (such as a serial number of the scanning device 202 / 204 or an identifier that partially or uniquely identifies the user of the scanner), scanning context information (e.g., time of scan, location of scan, etc.) and/or scanned information (such as a text string) that is used to uniquely identify the document being scanned.
  • scanning context information e.g., time of scan, location of scan, etc.
  • scanned information such as a text string
  • the operating environment may include more or less components.
  • the network 220 may be a corporate intranet, the public Internet, a mobile phone network or some other network, or any interconnection of the above.
  • the devices may all be operable in accordance with well-known commercial transaction and communication protocols (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP)).
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • the functions and capabilities of scanning device 202 , computer 212 , and mobile station 216 may be wholly or partially integrated into one device.
  • scanning device, computer, and mobile station can refer to the same device depending upon whether the device incorporates functions or capabilities of the scanning device 202 , computer 212 and mobile station 216 .
  • some or all of the functions of the search engines 232 , document sources 234 , user account services 236 , markup services 238 and other network services 239 may be implemented on any of the devices and/or other devices not shown.
  • the capture device may capture text using an optical scanner that captures image data from the rendered document, or using an audio recording device that captures a user's spoken reading of the text, or other methods. Some embodiments of the capture device may also capture images, graphical symbols and icons, etc., including machine readable codes such as barcodes.
  • the device may be exceedingly simple, consisting of little more than the transducer, some storage, and a data interface, relying on other functionality residing elsewhere in the system, or it may be a more full-featured device. For illustration, this section describes a device based around an optical scanner and with a reasonable number of features.
  • Scanners are well known devices that capture and digitize images.
  • portable optical scanners have been introduced in convenient form factors, such as a pen-shaped handheld device.
  • the portable scanner is used to scan text, graphics, or symbols from rendered documents.
  • the portable scanner has a scanning element that captures text, symbols, graphics, etc., from rendered documents.
  • rendered documents include documents that have been displayed on a screen such as a CRT monitor or LCD display.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a scanner 302 .
  • the scanner 302 comprises an optical scanning head 308 to scan information from rendered documents and convert it to machine-compatible data, and an optical path 306 , typically a lens, an aperture or an image conduit to convey the image from the rendered document to the scanning head.
  • the scanning head 308 may incorporate a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD), a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) imaging device, or an optical sensor of another type.
  • CCD Charge-Coupled Device
  • CMOS Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor
  • a microphone 310 and associated circuitry convert the sound of the environment (including spoken words) into machine-compatible signals, and other input facilities exist in the form of buttons, scroll-wheels or other tactile sensors such as touchpads 314 .
  • Feedback to the user is possible through a visual display or indicator lights 332 , through a loudspeaker or other audio transducer 334 and through a vibrate module 336 .
  • the scanner 302 comprises logic 326 to interact with the various other components, possibly processing the received signals into different formats and/or interpretations.
  • Logic 326 may be operable to read and write data and program instructions stored in associated storage 330 such as RAM, ROM, flash, or other suitable memory. It may read a time signal from the clock unit 328 .
  • the scanner 302 also includes an interface 316 to communicate scanned information and other signals to a network and/or an associated computing device.
  • the scanner 302 may have an on-board power supply 332 .
  • the scanner 302 may be powered from a tethered connection to another device, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connection.
  • USB Universal Serial Bus
  • a reader may scan some text from a newspaper article with scanner 302 .
  • the text is scanned as a bit-mapped image via the scanning head 308 .
  • Logic 326 causes the bit-mapped image to be stored in memory 330 with an associated time-stamp read from the clock unit 328 .
  • Logic 326 may also perform optical character recognition (OCR) or other post-scan processing on the bit-mapped image to convert it to text.
  • Logic 326 may optionally extract a signature from the image, for example by performing a convolution-like process to locate repeating occurrences of characters, symbols or objects, and determine the distance or number of other characters, symbols, or objects between these repeated elements.
  • the reader may then upload the bit-mapped image (or text or other signature, if post-scan processing has been performed by logic 326 ) to an associated computer via interface 316 .
  • a reader may capture some text from an article as an audio file by using microphone 310 as an acoustic capture port.
  • Logic 326 causes audio file to be stored in memory 328 .
  • Logic 326 may also perform voice recognition or other post-scan processing on the audio file to convert it to text.
  • the reader may then upload the audio file (or text produced by post-scan processing performed by logic 326 ) to an associated computer via interface 316 .
  • End-to-end feedback can be applied by performing an approximation of the recognition or interpretation, identifying a set of one or more candidate matching documents, and then using information from the possible matches in the candidate documents to further refine or restrict the recognition or interpretation.
  • Candidate documents can be weighted according to their probable relevance (for example, based on then number of other users who have scanned in these documents, or their popularity on the Internet), and these weights can be applied in this iterative recognition process.
  • the selective power of a search query based on a few words is greatly enhanced when the relative positions of these words are known, only a small amount of text need be captured for the system to identify the text's location in a corpus.
  • the input text will be a contiguous sequence of words, such as a short phrase.
  • the system can identify the location in that document and can take action based on this knowledge.
  • the system may also employ other methods of discovering the document and location, such as by using watermarks or other special markings on the rendered document.
  • search query In addition to the captured text, other factors (i.e., information about user identity, profile, and context) may form part of the search query, such as the time of the capture, the identity and geographical location of the user, knowledge of the user's habits and recent activities, etc.
  • the document identity and other information related to previous captures, especially if they were quite recent, may form part of a search query.
  • the identity of the user may be determined from a unique identifier associated with a capturing device, and/or biometric or other supplemental information (speech patterns, fingerprints, etc.).
  • the search query can be constructed taking into account the types of errors likely to occur in the particular capture method used.
  • One example of this is an indication of suspected errors in the recognition of specific characters; in this instance a search engine may treat these characters as wildcards, or assign them a lower priority.
  • the capturing device may not be in communication with the search engine or corpus at the time of the data capture. For this reason, information helpful to the offline use of the device may be downloaded to the device in advance, or to some entity with which the device can communicate. In some cases, all or a substantial part of an index associated with a corpus may be downloaded. This topic is discussed further in Section 15.3.
  • this pre-loaded information can improve the performance of the local device, reduce communication costs, and provide helpful and timely user feedback.
  • the queries may be saved and transmitted to the rest of the system at such a time as communication is restored.
  • Section 13.1 discusses the importance of the time of capture in relation to earlier captures. It is important to note that the time of capture will not always be the same as the time that the query is executed.
  • multiple queries may be launched in response to a single capture, either in sequence or in parallel.
  • queries may be sent in response to a single capture, for example as new words are added to the capture, or to query multiple search engines in parallel.
  • the system sends queries to a special index for the current document, to a search engine on a local machine, to a search engine on the corporate network, and to remote search engines on the Internet.
  • the results of particular searches may be given higher priority than those from others.
  • the response to a given query may indicate that other pending queries are superfluous; these may be cancelled before completion.
  • search engines may be enhanced or modified in a number of ways to make them more suitable for use with the described system.
  • the search engine and/or other components of the system may create and maintain indices that have different or extra features.
  • the system may modify an incoming paper-originated query or change the way the query is handled in the resulting search, thus distinguishing these paper-originated queries from those coming from queries typed into web browsers and other sources.
  • the system may take different actions or offer different options when the results are returned by the searches originated from paper as compared to those from other sources.
  • the same index can be searched using either paper-originated or traditional queries, but the index may be enhanced for use in the current system in a variety of ways.
  • Extra fields can be added to such an index that will help in the case of a paper-based search.
  • the first example is a field indicating that the document is known to exist or be distributed in paper form.
  • the system may give such documents higher priority if the query comes from paper.
  • statistical data concerning the popularity of paper documents (and, optionally, concerning sub-regions within these documents)—for example the amount of scanning activity, circulation numbers provided by the publisher or other sources, etc.—is used to give such documents higher priority, to boost the priority of digital counterpart documents (for example, for browser-based queries or web searches), etc.
  • Another important example may be recording information about the layout of a specific rendering of a document.
  • the index may include information about where the line breaks and page breaks occur, which fonts were used, any unusual capitalization.
  • the index may also include information about the proximity of other items on the page, such as images, text boxes, tables and advertisements.
  • semantic information that can be deduced from the source markup but is not apparent in the paper document, such as the fact that a particular piece of text refers to an item offered for sale, or that a certain paragraph contains program code, may also be recorded in the index.
  • a second factor that may modify the nature of the index is the knowledge of the type of capture likely to be used.
  • a search initiated by an optical scan may benefit if the index takes into account characters that are easily confused in the OCR process, or includes some knowledge of the fonts used in the document.
  • the query is from speech recognition, an index based on similar-sounding phonemes may be much more efficiently searched.
  • An additional factor that may affect the use of the index in the described model is the importance of iterative feedback during the recognition process. If the search engine is able to provide feedback from the index as the text is being captured, it can greatly increase the accuracy of the capture.
  • the system stores the appropriate offset or signature information in an index.
  • Indices may be maintained on several machines on a corporate network. Partial indices may be downloaded to the capture device, or to a machine close to the capture device. Separate indices may be created for users or groups of users with particular interests, habits or permissions. An index may exist for each file system, each directory, even each file on a user's hard disk. Indexes are published and subscribed to by users and by systems. It will be important, then, to construct indices that can be distributed, updated, merged and separated efficiently.
  • a search engine may take different actions when it recognizes that a search query originated from a paper document.
  • the engine might handle the query in a way that is more tolerant to the types of errors likely to appear in certain capture methods, for example.
  • some indicator included in the query for example a flag indicating the nature of the capture
  • it may deduce this from the query itself for example, it may recognize errors or uncertainties typical of the OCR process.
  • queries from a capture device can reach the engine by a different channel or port or type of connection than those from other sources, and can be distinguished in that way.
  • some embodiments of the system will route queries to the search engine by way of a dedicated gateway.
  • the search engine knows that all queries passing through the dedicated gateway were originated from a paper document.
  • Section 13 describes a variety of different factors which are external to the captured text itself, yet which can be a significant aid in identifying a document. These include such things as the history of recent scans, the longer-term reading habits of a particular user, the geographic location of a user and the user's recent use of particular electronic documents. Such factors are referred to herein as “context.”
  • search engine may keep track of a user's scanning history, and may also cross-reference this scanning history to conventional keyboard-based queries. In such cases, the search engine maintains and uses more state information about each individual user than do most conventional search engines, and each interaction with a search engine may be considered to extend over several searches and a longer period of time than is typical today.
  • Some of the context may be transmitted to the search engine in the search query (Section 3.3), and may possibly be stored at the engine so as to play a part in future queries. Lastly, some of the context will best be handled elsewhere, and so becomes a filter or secondary search applied to the results from the search engine.
  • the described system can emit and use not only information about documents as a whole, but also information about sub-regions of documents, even down to individual words.
  • Many existing search engines concentrate simply on locating a document or file that is relevant to a particular query. Those that can work on a finer grain and identify a location within a document will provide a significant benefit for the described system.
  • the search engine may use some of the further information it now maintains to affect the results returned.
  • the system may also return certain documents to which the user has access only as a result of being in possession of the paper copy (Section 7.4).
  • the search engine may also offer new actions or options appropriate to the described system, beyond simple retrieval of the text.
  • the described system In addition to performing the capture-search-retrieve process, the described system also associates extra functionality with a document, and in particular with specific locations or segments of text within a document. This extra functionality is often, though not exclusively, associated with the rendered document by being associated with its electronic counterpart. As an example, hyperlinks in a web page could have the same functionality when a printout of that web page is scanned. In some cases, the functionality is not defined in the electronic document, but is stored or generated elsewhere.
  • markup This layer of added functionality is referred to herein as “markup.”
  • the markup may include human-readable content, but is often invisible to a user and/or intended for machine use. Examples include options to be displayed in a popup-menu on a nearby display when a user captures text from a particular area in a rendered document, or audio samples that illustrate the pronunciation of a particular phrase.
  • Any document may have multiple overlays simultaneously, and these may be sourced from a variety of locations.
  • Markup data may be created or supplied by the author of the document, or by the user, or by some other party.
  • Markup data may be attached to the electronic document or embedded in it. It may be found in a conventional location (for example, in the same place as the document but with a different filename suffix ⁇ . Markup data may be included in the search results of the query that located the original document, or may be found by a separate query to the same or another search engine. Markup data may be found using the original captured text and other capture information or contextual information, or it may be found using already-deduced information about the document and location of the capture. Markup data may be found in a location specified in the document, even if the markup itself is not included in the document.
  • markup may be largely static and specific to the document, similar to the way links on a traditional html web page are often embedded as static data within the html document, but markup may also be dynamically generated and/or applied to a large number of documents.
  • dynamic markup is information attached to a document that includes the up-to-date share price of companies mentioned in that document.
  • An example of broadly applied markup is translation information that is automatically available on multiple documents or sections of documents in a particular language.
  • Users may also install, or subscribe to particular sources of, markup data, thus personalizing the system's response to particular captures.
  • Some elements in documents may have particular “markup” or functionality associated with them based on their own characteristics rather than their location in a particular document. Examples include special marks that are printed in the document purely for the purpose of being scanned, as well as logos and trademarks that can link the user to further information about the organization concerned. The same applies to “keywords” or “key phrases” in the text. Organizations might register particular phrases with which they are associated, or with which they would like to be associated, and attach certain markup to them that would be available wherever that phrase was scanned.
  • any word, phrase, etc. may have associated markup.
  • the system may add certain items to a pop-up menu (e.g., a link to an online bookstore) whenever the user captures the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books.
  • digital counterpart documents or indices are consulted to determine whether a capture occurred near the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books—and the system behavior is modified in accordance with this proximity to keyword elements.
  • markup enables data captured from non-commercial text or documents to trigger a commercial transaction.
  • Annotations are another type of electronic information that may be associated with a document.
  • a user can attach an audio file of his/her thoughts about a particular document for later retrieval as voice annotations.
  • a multimedia annotation a user may attach photographs of places referred to in the document.
  • the user generally supplies annotations for the document but the system can associate annotations from other sources (for example, other users in a work group may share annotations).
  • markup data may often be supplied by third parties, such as by other readers of the document. Online discussions and reviews are a good example, as are community-managed information relating to particular works, volunteer contributed translations and explanations.
  • Another example of third-party markup is that provided by advertisers.
  • markup By analyzing the data captured from documents by several or all users of the system, markup can be generated based on the activities and interests of a community.
  • An example might be an online bookstore that creates markup or annotations that tell the user, in effect, “People who enjoyed this book also enjoyed . . . . ”
  • the markup may be less anonymous, and may tell the user which of the people in his/her contact list have also read this document recently.
  • Other examples of datastream analysis are included in Section 14.
  • Markup will often be based on external events and data sources, such as input from a corporate database, information from the public Internet, or statistics gathered by the local operating system.
  • Data sources may also be more local, and in particular may provide information about the user's context—his/her identity, location and activities.
  • the system might communicate with the user's mobile phone and offer a markup layer that gives the user the option to send a document to somebody that the user has recently spoken to on the phone.
  • the identity of the user will be known. Sometimes this will be an “anonymous identity,” where the user is identified only by the serial number of the capture device, for example. Typically, however, it is expected that the system will have a much more detailed knowledge of the user, which can be used for personalizing the system and to allow activities and transactions to be performed in the user's name.
  • One of the simplest and yet most useful functions that the system can perform is to keep a record for a user of the text that s/he has captured and any further information related to that capture, including the details of any documents found, the location within that document and any actions taken as a result.
  • This stored history is beneficial for both the user and the system.
  • the user can be presented with a “Life Library,” a record of everything s/he has read and captured. This may be simply for personal interest, but may be used, for example, in a library by an academic who is gathering material for the bibliography of his next paper.
  • the user may wish to make the library public, such as by publishing it on the web in a similar manner to a weblog, so that others may see what s/he is reading and finds of interest.
  • the capture can be stored in the library and can be processed later, either automatically or in response to a user request.
  • a user can also subscribe to new markup services and apply them to previously captured scans.
  • a record of a user's past captures is also useful for the system. Many aspects of the system operation can be enhanced by knowing the user's reading habits and history. The simplest example is that any scan made by a user is more likely to come from a document that the user has scanned in the recent past, and in particular if the previous scan was within the last few minutes it is very likely to be from the same document. Similarly, it is more likely that a document is being read in start-to-finish order. Thus, for English documents, it is also more likely that later scans will occur farther down in the document. Such factors can help the system establish the location of the capture in cases of ambiguity, and can also reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured.
  • this device may be used as a key that identifies the user and authorizes certain actions.
  • the device may be embedded in a mobile phone or in some other way associated with a mobile phone account.
  • a scanner may be associated with a mobile phone account by inserting a SIM card associated with the account into the scanner.
  • the device may be embedded in a credit card or other payment card, or have the facility for such a card to be connected to it. The device may therefore be used as a payment token, and financial transactions may be initiated by the capture from the rendered document.
  • the scanner may also be associated with a particular user or account through the process of scanning some token, symbol or text associated with that user or account.
  • scanner may be used for biometric identification, for example by scanning the fingerprint of the user.
  • the system may identify the user by matching the voice pattern of the user or by requiring the user to speak a certain password or phrase.
  • a user scans a quote from a book and is offered the option to buy the book from an online retailer
  • the user can select this option, and is then prompted to scan his/her fingerprint to confirm the transaction.
  • the capture device When the capture device is used to identify and authenticate the user, and to initiate transactions on behalf of the user, it is important that communications between the device and other parts of the system are secure. It is also important to guard against such situations as another device impersonating a scanner, and so-called “man in the middle” attacks where communications between the device and other components are intercepted.
  • An advantage of the described system is that there is no need to alter the traditional processes of creating, printing or publishing documents in order to gain many of the system's benefits. There are reasons, though, that the creators or publishers of a document—hereafter simply referred to as the “publishers”—may wish to create functionality to support the described system.
  • the system allows for printed documents to have an associated electronic presence.
  • Conventionally publishers often ship a CD-ROM with a book that contains further digital information, tutorial movies and other multimedia data, sample code or documents, or further reference materials.
  • some publishers maintain web sites associated with particular publications which provide such materials, as well as information which may be updated after the time of publishing, such as errata, further comments, updated reference materials, bibliographies and further sources of relevant data, and translations into other languages. Online forums allow readers to contribute their comments about the publication.
  • the described system allows such materials to be much more closely tied to the rendered document than ever before, and allows the discovery of and interaction with them to be much easier for the user.
  • the system can automatically connect the user to digital materials associated with the document, and more particularly associated with that specific part of the document.
  • the user can be connected to online communities that discuss that section of the text, or to annotations and commentaries by other readers. In the past, such information would typically need to be found by searching for a particular page number or chapter.
  • Some publishers may have mailing lists to which readers can subscribe if they wish to be notified of new relevant matter or when a new edition of the book is published.
  • the user can register an interest in particular documents or parts of documents more easily; in some cases even before the publisher has considered providing any such functionality.
  • the reader's interest can be fed to the publisher, possibly affecting their decision about when and where to provide updates, further information, new editions or even completely new publications on topics that have proved to be of interest in existing books.
  • Such symbols may be intended purely for the reader, or they may be recognized by the system when scanned and used to initiate some action. Sufficient data may be encoded in the symbol to identify more than just the symbol: it may also store information, for example about the document, edition, and location of the symbol, which could be recognized and read by the system.
  • the printed document is a gateway to extra materials and functionality, access to such features can also be time-limited. After the expiry date, a user may be required to pay a fee or obtain a newer version of the document to access the features again.
  • the paper document will, of course, still be usable, but will lose some of its enhanced electronic functionality. This may be desirable, for example, because there is profit for the publisher in receiving fees for access to electronic materials, or in requiring the user to purchase new editions from time to time, or because there are disadvantages associated with outdated versions of the printed document remaining in circulation. Coupons are an example of a type of commercial document that can have an expiration date.
  • Section 10.5 discusses the use of the system's statistics to influence compensation of authors and pricing of advertisements.
  • the system deduces the popularity of a publication from the activity in the electronic community associated with it as well as from the use of the paper document. These factors may help publishers to make decisions about what they will publish in future. If a chapter in an existing book, for example, turns out to be exceedingly popular, it may be worth expanding into a separate publication.
  • An important aspect of the described system is the ability to provide to a user who has access to a rendered copy of a document access to an electronic version of that document.
  • a document is freely available on a public network or a private network to which the user has access.
  • the system uses the captured text to identify, locate and retrieve the document, in some cases displaying it on the user's screen or depositing it in their email inbox.
  • a document will be available in electronic form, but for a variety of reasons may not be accessible to the user. There may not be sufficient connectivity to retrieve the document, the user may not be entitled to retrieve it, there may be a cost associated with gaining access to it, or the document may have been withdrawn and possibly replaced by a new version, to name just a few possibilities.
  • the system typically provides feedback to the user about these situations.
  • the degree or nature of the access granted to a particular user may be different if it is known that the user already has access to a printed copy of the document.
  • Access to the document may be restricted to specific users, or to those meeting particular criteria, or may only be available in certain circumstances, for example when the user is connected to a secure network.
  • Section 6 describes some of the ways in which the credentials of a user and scanner may be established.
  • Documents that are not freely available to the general public may still be accessible on payment of a fee, often as compensation to the publisher or copyright holder.
  • the system may implement payment facilities directly or may make use of other payment methods associated with the user, including those described in Section 6.2.
  • Electronic documents are often transient; the digital source version of a rendered document may be available now but inaccessible in future.
  • the system may retrieve and store the existing version on behalf of the user, even if the user has not requested it, thus guaranteeing its availability should the user request it in future. This also makes it available for the system's use, for example for searching as part of the process of identifying future captures.
  • a trusted “document escrow” service can retrieve the document on behalf of the user, such as upon payment of a modest fee, with the assurance that the copyright holder will be fully compensated in future if the user should ever request the document from the service.
  • Variations on this theme can be implemented if the document is not available in electronic form at the time of capture.
  • the user can authorize the service to submit a request for or make a payment for the document on his/her behalf if the electronic document should become available at a later date.
  • payment may be waived, reduced or satisfied based on the user's existing association with another account or subscription. Subscribers to the printed version of a newspaper might automatically be entitled to retrieve the electronic version, for example.
  • association may not be quite so direct: a user may be granted access based on an account established by their employer, or based on their scanning of a printed copy owned by a friend who is a subscriber.
  • the described system could be coupled to a database which records the location of an original document, for example in an archiving warehouse, making it easy for somebody with access to a copy to locate the archived original paper document.
  • OCR Optical Character Recognition
  • a scanning device for use with the described system will often be small, portable, and low power.
  • the scanning device may capture only a few words at a time, and in some implementations does not even capture a whole character at once, but rather a horizontal slice through the text, many such slices being stitched together to form a recognizable signal from which the text may be deduced.
  • the scanning device may also have very limited processing power or storage so, while in some embodiments it may perform all of the OCR process itself, many embodiments will depend on a connection to a more powerful device, possibly at a later time, to convert the captured signals into text. Lastly, it may have very limited facilities for user interaction, so may need to defer any requests for user input until later, or operate in a “best-guess” mode to a greater degree than is common now.
  • OCR optical character recognition
  • the OCR process can be informed by the contents of the document corpus as it progresses, potentially offering substantially greater recognition accuracy.
  • Such a connection will also allow the device to inform the user when sufficient text has been captured to identify the digital source.
  • the font may be downloaded to the device to help with the recognition.
  • While component characters of a text fragment may be the most recognized way to represent a fragment of text that may be used as a document signature, other representations of the text may work sufficiently well that the actual text of a text fragment need not be used when attempting to locate the text fragment in a digital document and/or database, or when disambiguating the representation of a text fragment into a readable form.
  • Other representations of text fragments may provide benefits that actual text representations lack. For example, optical character recognition of text fragments is often prone to errors, unlike other representations of captured text fragments that may be used to search for and/or recreate a text fragment without resorting to optical character recognition for the entire fragment. Such methods may be more appropriate for some devices used with the current system.
  • Such characterizations of text fragments may include, but are not limited to, word lengths, relative word lengths, character heights, character widths, character shapes, character frequencies, token frequencies, and the like.
  • the offsets between matching text tokens i.e., the number of intervening tokens plus one are used to characterize fragments of text.
  • Embodiments of the system are different; they employ a variety of methods that use the rendered text itself to assist in the recognition process. These embodiments use characters (or tokens) to “recognize each other.”
  • One way to refer to such self-recognition is “template matching,” and is similar to “convolution.” To perform such self-recognition, the system slides a copy of the text horizontally over itself and notes matching regions of the text images.
  • Prior template matching and convolution techniques encompass a variety of related techniques. These techniques to tokenize and/or recognize characters/tokens will be collectively referred to herein as “autocorrelation,” as the text is used to correlate with its own component parts when matching characters/tokens.
  • the offset number is the distance (number of tokens) to the next occurrence of the same token. If the token is unique within the text string, the offset is zero (0).
  • the sequence of token offsets thus generated is a signature that can be used to identify the scanned text.
  • the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are compared to an index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon the token offsets of their contents (Section 4.1.2). In other embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are converted to text, and compared to a more conventional index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon their contents
  • a similar token-correlation process may be applied to speech fragments when the capture process consists of audio samples of spoken words.
  • the shapes of characters in most commonly used fonts are related. For example, in most fonts, the letter “c” and the letter “e” are visually related—as are “t” and “f,” etc.
  • the OCR process is enhanced by use of this relationship to construct templates for letters that have not been scanned yet. For example, where a reader scans a short string of text from a paper document in a previously unencountered font such that the system does not have a set of image templates with which to compare the scanned images the system can leverage the probable relationship between certain characters to construct the font template library even though it has not yet encountered all of the letters in the alphabet. The system can then use the constructed font template library to recognize subsequent scanned text and to further refine the constructed font library.
  • images cannot be machine-transcribed into a form suitable for use in a search process, the images themselves can be saved for later use by the user, for possible manual transcription, or for processing at a later date when different resources may be available to the system.
  • the user may be offered that document for purchase either in paper or electronic form.
  • the user may also be offered related documents, such as those quoted or otherwise referred to in the paper document, or those on a similar subject, or those by the same author.
  • the capture of text may be linked to other commercial activities in a variety of ways.
  • the captured text may be in a catalog that is explicitly designed to sell items, in which case the text will be associated fairly directly with the purchase of an item (Section 18.2).
  • the text may also be part of an advertisement, in which case a sale of the item being advertised may ensue.
  • the user captures other text from which their potential interest in a commercial transaction may be deduced.
  • a reader of a novel set in a particular country might be interested in a holiday there. Someone reading a review of a new car might be considering purchasing it.
  • the user may capture a particular fragment of text knowing that some commercial opportunity will be presented to them as a result, or it may be a side-effect of their capture activities.
  • the system allows for a new kind of advertising which is not necessarily explicitly in the rendered document, but is nonetheless based on what people are reading.
  • advertisements In a traditional paper publication, advertisements generally consume a large amount of space relative to the text of a newspaper article, and a limited number of them can be placed around a particular article.
  • advertising can be associated with individual words or phrases, and can selected according to the particular interest the user has shown by capturing that text and possibly taking into account their history of past scans.
  • the system may gather a large amount of information about other aspects of a user's context for its own use (Section 13); estimates of the geographical location of the user are a good example. Such data can also be used to tailor the advertising presented to a user of the system.
  • the system enables some new models of compensation for advertisers and marketers.
  • the publisher of a printed document containing advertisements may receive some income from a purchase that originated from their document. This may be true whether or not the advertisement existed in the original printed form; it may have been added electronically either by the publisher, the advertiser or some third party, and the sources of such advertising may have been subscribed to by the user.
  • Analysis of the statistics generated by the system can reveal the popularity of certain parts of a publication (Section 14.2).
  • a newspaper for example, it might reveal the amount of time readers spend looking at a particular page or article, or the popularity of a particular columnist.
  • An author whose work becomes a frequently read authority on a subject might be considered differently in future contracts from one whose books have sold the same number of copies but are rarely opened. (See also Section 7.6)
  • Decisions about advertising in a document may also be based on statistics about the readership.
  • the advertising space around the most popular columnists may be sold at a premium rate. Advertisers might even be charged or compensated some time after the document is published based on knowledge about how it was received.
  • the “Life Library” or scan history described in Sections 6.1 and 16.1 can be an extremely valuable source of information about the interests and habits of a user. Subject to the appropriate consent and privacy issues, such data can inform offers of goods or services to the user. Even in an anonymous form, the statistics gathered can be exceedingly useful.
  • Advertising and other opportunities for commercial transactions may not be presented to the user immediately at the time of text capture. For example, the opportunity to purchase a sequel to a novel may not be available at the time the user is reading the novel, but the system may present them with that opportunity when the sequel is published.
  • a user may capture data that relates to a purchase or other commercial transaction, but may choose not to initiate and/or complete the transaction at the time the capture is made.
  • data related to captures is stored in a user's Life Library, and these Life Library entries can remain “active” (i.e., capable of subsequent interactions similar to those available at the time the capture was made).
  • a user may review a capture at some later time, and optionally complete a transaction based on that capture. Because the system can keep track of when and where the original capture occurred, all parties involved in the transaction can be properly compensated.
  • the author who wrote the story—and the publisher who published the story—that appeared next to the advertisement from which the user captured data can be compensated when, six months later, the user visits their Life Library, selects that particular capture from the history, and chooses “Purchase this item at Amazon” from the pop-up menu (which can be similar or identical to the menu optionally presented at the time of the capture).
  • OSs Modern Operating Systems
  • other software packages have many characteristics that can be advantageously exploited for use with the described system, and may also be modified in various ways to provide an even better platform for its use.
  • New and upcoming file systems and their associated databases often have the ability to store a variety of metadata associated with each file.
  • this metadata has included such things as the ID of the user who created the file, the dates of creation, last modification, and last use.
  • Newer file systems allow such extra information as keywords, image characteristics, document sources and user comments to be stored, and in some systems this metadata can be arbitrarily extended. File systems can therefore be used to store information that would be useful in implementing the current system. For example, the date when a given document was last printed can be stored by the file system, as can details about which text from it has been captured from paper using the described system, and when and by whom.
  • capture devices such as pen scanners
  • the same will be true for other aspects of the system's operation.
  • the entire described system, or the core of it is provided by the OS.
  • support for the system is provided by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that can be used by other software packages, including those directly implementing aspects of the system.
  • APIs Application Programming Interfaces
  • OSs include support for speech or handwriting recognition, though it is less common for OSs to include support for OCR, since in the past the use of OCR has typically been limited to a small range of applications.
  • recognition components As recognition components become part of the OS, they can take better advantage of other facilities provided by the OS. Many systems include spelling dictionaries, grammar analysis tools, internationalization and localization facilities, for example, all of which can be advantageously employed by the described system for its recognition process, especially since they may have been customized for the particular user to include words and phrases that he/she would commonly encounter.
  • the operating system includes full-text indexing facilities, then these can also be used to inform the recognition process, as described in Section 9.3.
  • an optical scan or other capture occurs and is presented to the OS, it may have a default action to be taken under those circumstances in the event that no other subsystem claims ownership of the capture.
  • An example of a default action is presenting the user with a choice of alternatives, or submitting the captured text to the OS's built-in search facilities.
  • OS has Default Action for Particular Documents or Document Types
  • the OS may have a standard action that it will take when that particular document, or a document of that class, is scanned.
  • Applications and other subsystems may register with the OS as potential handlers of particular types of capture, in a similar manner to the announcement by applications of their ability to handle certain file types.
  • Markup data associated with a rendered document, or with a capture from a document can include instructions to the operating system to launch specific applications, pass applications arguments, parameters, or data, etc.
  • certain items of text or other symbols may, when scanned, cause standard actions to occur, and the OS may provide a selection of these.
  • An example might be that scanning the text “[print]” in any document would cause the OS to retrieve and print a copy of that document.
  • the OS may also provide a way to register such actions and associate them with particular scans.
  • a typical use of the system may be for the user to scan an area of a paper document, and for the system to open the electronic counterpart in a software package that is able to display or edit it, and cause that package to scroll to and highlight the scanned text (Section 12.2.1).
  • the first part of this process, finding and opening the electronic document is typically provided by the OS and is standard across software packages.
  • the availability of a standard API for this functionality could greatly enhance the operation of this aspect of the system.
  • the system may wish to perform a variety of operations upon that text.
  • the system may request the surrounding text, so that the user's capture of a few words could result in the system accessing the entire sentence or paragraph containing them.
  • this functionality can be usefully provided by the OS rather than being implemented in every piece of software that handles text.
  • the system uses the application pop-up menus traditionally associated with clicking the right mouse button on some text. The system inserts extra options into such menus, and causes them to be displayed as a result of activities such as scanning a paper document.
  • the OS keeps a simple record of when any document was printed and by whom.
  • the OS takes one or more further actions that would make it better suited for use with the system. Examples include:
  • An OS often maintains certain categories of folders or files that have particular significance.
  • a user's documents may, by convention or design, be found in a “My Documents” folder, for example.
  • Standard file-opening dialogs may automatically include a list of recently opened documents.
  • Categories may be enhanced or augmented in ways that take into account a user's interaction with paper versions of the stored files. Categories such as “My Printed Documents” or “My Recently Read Documents” might usefully be identified and incorporated in its operations.
  • markup Since important aspects of the system are typically provided using the “markup” concepts discussed in Section 5, it would clearly be advantageous to have support for such markup provided by the OS in a way that was accessible to multiple applications as well as to the OS itself. In addition, layers of markup may be provided by the OS, based on its own knowledge of documents under its control and the facilities it is able to provide.
  • Digital Rights Management the ability to control the use of particular data according to the rights granted to a particular user, software entity or machine. It may inhibit unauthorized copying or distribution of a particular document, for example.
  • the user interface of the system may be entirely on a PC, if the capture device is relatively dumb and is connected to it by a cable, or entirely on the device, if it is sophisticated and with significant processing power of its own. In some cases, some functionality resides in each component. Part, or indeed all, of the system's functionality may also be implemented on other devices such as mobile phones or PDAs.
  • a handheld scanner may have a variety of ways of providing feedback to the user about particular conditions.
  • the most obvious types are direct visual, where the scanner incorporates indicator lights or even a full display, and auditory, where the scanner can make beeps, clicks or other sounds.
  • Important alternatives include tactile feedback, where the scanner can vibrate, buzz, or otherwise stimulate the user's sense of touch, and projected feedback, where it indicates a status by projecting onto the paper anything from a colored spot of light to a sophisticated display.
  • Important immediate feedback that may be provided on the device includes:
  • the device may provide a variety of ways for the user to provide input in addition to basic text capture. Even when the device is in close association with a host machine that has input options such as keyboards and mice, it can be disruptive for the user to switch back and forth between manipulating the scanner and using a mouse, for example.
  • the handheld scanner may have buttons, scroll/jog-wheels, touch-sensitive surfaces, and/or accelerometers for detecting the movement of the device. Some of these allow a richer set of interactions while still holding the scanner.
  • the system presents the user with a set of several possible matching documents.
  • the user uses a scroll-wheel on the side of the scanner is to select one from the list, and clicks a button to confirm the selection.
  • the user can indicate a large region of text by scanning the first few words in conventional left-to-right order, and the last few in reverse order, i.e. right to left.
  • the user can also indicate the vertical extent of the text of interest by moving the scanner down the page over several lines.
  • a backwards scan might indicate cancellation of the previous scan operation.
  • network connectivity may depend on network connectivity, either between components of the system such as a scanner and a host laptop, or with the outside world in the form of a connection to corporate databases and Internet search. This connectivity may not be present all the time, however, and so there will be occasions when part or all of the system may be considered to be “offline.” It is desirable to allow the system to continue to function usefully in those circumstances.
  • the device may be used to capture text when it is out of contact with other parts of the system.
  • a very simple device may simply be able to store the image or audio data associated with the capture, ideally with a timestamp indicating when it was captured.
  • the various captures may be uploaded to the rest of the system when the device is next in contact with it, and handled then.
  • the device may also upload other data associated with the captures, for example voice annotations associated with optical scans, or location information.
  • More sophisticated devices may be able to perform some or all of the system operations themselves despite being disconnected. Various techniques for improving their ability to do so are discussed in Section 15.3. Often it will be the case that some, but not all, of the desired actions can be performed while offline. For example, the text may be recognized, but identification of the source may depend on a connection to an Internet based search engine. In some embodiments, the device therefore stores sufficient information about how far each operation has progressed for the rest of the system to proceed efficiently when connectivity is restored.
  • the operation of the system will, in general, benefit from immediately available connectivity, but there are some situations in which performing several captures and then processing them as a batch can have advantages. For example, as discussed in Section 13 below, the identification of the source of a particular capture may be greatly enhanced by examining other captures made by the user at approximately the same time. In a fully connected system where live feedback is being provided to the user, the system is only able to use past captures when processing the current one. If the capture is one of a batch stored by the device when offline, however, the system will be able to take into account any data available from later captures as well as earlier ones when doing its analysis.
  • a scanner will often communicate with some other device, such as a PC, PDA, phone or digital camera to perform many of the functions of the system, including more detailed interactions with the user.
  • some other device such as a PC, PDA, phone or digital camera to perform many of the functions of the system, including more detailed interactions with the user.
  • the host device When the host device receives a capture, it may initiate a variety of activities. An incomplete list of possible activities performed by the system after locating and electronic counterpart document associated with the capture and a location within that document follows.
  • the operating system's metadata and other records associated with the document may be updated. (Section 11.1)
  • the scanner device projects a popup menu onto the paper document.
  • a user may select from such menus using traditional methods such as a keyboard and mouse, or by using controls on the capture device (Section 12.1.2), gestures (Section 12.1.3), or by interacting with the computer display using the scanner (Section 12.2.4).
  • the popup menus which can appear as a result of a capture include default items representing actions which occur if the user does not respond—for example, if the user ignores the menu and makes another capture.
  • the system provides a real-time display of the documents or the locations found, for example in list, thumbnail-image or text-segment form, and for the number of elements in that display to reduce in number as capture continues.
  • the system displays thumbnails of all candidate documents, where the size or position of the thumbnail is dependent on the probability of it being the correct match.
  • this fact may be emphasized to the user, for example using audio feedback.
  • the system may indicate this on the screen, for example by grouping documents containing a quoted reference around the original source document.
  • Some optical scanners may be able to capture text displayed on a screen as well as on paper. Accordingly, the term rendered document is used herein to indicate that printing onto paper is not the only form of rendering, and that the capture of text or symbols for use by the system may be equally valuable when that text is displayed on an electronic display.
  • the user of the described system may be required to interact with a computer screen for a variety of other reasons, such as to select from a list of options. It can be inconvenient for the user to put down the scanner and start using the mouse or keyboard.
  • Other sections have described physical controls on the scanner (Section 12.1.2) or gestures (Section 12.1.3) as methods of input which do not require this change of tool, but using the scanner on the screen itself to scan some text or symbol is an important alternative provided by the system.
  • the optics of the scanner allow it to be used in a similar manner to a light-pen, directly sensing its position on the screen without the need for actual scanning of text, possibly with the aid of special hardware or software on the computer.
  • Another example of useful context is the user's geographical location.
  • a user in Paris is much more likely to be reading Le Monde than the Seattle Times, for example.
  • the timing, size and geographical distribution of printed versions of the documents can therefore be important, and can to some degree be deduced from the operation of the system.
  • the time of day may also be relevant, for example in the case of a user who always reads one type of publication on the way to work, and a different one at lunchtime or on the train going home.
  • the user's recent use of electronic documents can also be a helpful indicator.
  • Section 14 covers the analysis of the data stream resulting from paper-based searches, but it should be noted here that statistics about the popularity of documents with other readers, about the timing of that popularity, and about the parts of documents most frequently scanned are all examples of further factors which can be beneficial in the search process.
  • the system brings the possibility of Google-type page-ranking to the world of paper.
  • This stream is a record of what users are reading and when, and is in many cases a record of what they find particularly valuable in the things they read. Such data has never really been available before for paper documents.
  • Section 6.1 Some ways in which this data can be useful for the system, and for the user of the system, are described in Section 6.1. This section concentrates on its use for others. There are, of course, substantial privacy issues to be considered with any distribution of data about what people are reading, but such issues as preserving the anonymity of data are well known to those of skill in the art.
  • the system can also deduce who is reading any given document. This allows the tracking of a document through an organization, to allow analysis, for example, of who is reading it and when, how widely it was distributed, how long that distribution took, and who has seen current versions while others are still working from out-of-date copies.
  • the system can deduce the popularity of certain documents and of particular sub-regions of those documents. This forms a valuable input to the system itself ⁇ Section 4.2.2) and an important source of information for authors, publishers and advertisers (Section 7.6, Section 10.5). This data is also useful when integrated in search engines and search indices—for example, to assist in ranking search results for queries coming from rendered documents, and/or to assist in ranking conventional queries typed into a web browser.
  • One example is connecting one user with others who have related interests. These may be people already known to the user.
  • the system may ask a university professor, “Did you know that your colleague at XYZ University has also just read this paper?”
  • the system may ask a user, “Do you want to be linked up with other people in your neighborhood who are also how reading Jane Eyre?”
  • Such links may be the basis for the automatic formation of book clubs and similar social structures, either in the physical world or online
  • Section 10.6 has already mentioned the idea of offering products and services to an individual user based on their interactions with the system.
  • Current online booksellers for example, often make recommendations to a user based on their previous interactions with the bookseller. Such recommendations become much more useful when they are based on interactions with the actual books.
  • the user will also not just be capturing some text, but will be causing some action to occur as a result. It might be emailing a reference to the document to an acquaintance, for example. Even in the absence of information about the identity of the user or the recipient of the email, the knowledge that somebody considered the document worth emailing is very useful.
  • the aggregated statistics of that group can be used to deduce the importance of a particular document to that group.
  • a capture device for use with the system needs little more than a way of capturing text from a rendered version of the document.
  • this capture may be achieved through a variety of methods including taking a photograph of part of the document or typing some words into a mobile phone keypad.
  • This capture may be achieved using a small hand-held optical scanner capable of recording a line or two of text at a time, or an audio capture device such as a voice recorder into which the user is reading text from the document.
  • the device used may be a combination of these—an optical scanner which could also record voice annotations, for example—and the capturing functionality may be built into some other device such as a mobile phone, PDA, digital camera or portable music player.
  • the device implements the majority of the system itself. In some embodiments, however, it often communicates with a PC or other computing device and with the wider world using communications facilities.
  • these communications facilities are in the form of a general-purpose data network such as Ethernet, 802.11 or UWB or a standard peripheral-connecting network such as USB, IEEE-1394 (Firewire), BluetoothTM or infra-red.
  • a wired connection such as Firewire or USB
  • the capture device may appear to a connected machine to be a conventional peripheral such as a USB storage device.
  • the device may in some circumstances “dock” with another device, either to be used in conjunction with that device or for convenient storage.
  • Sections 3.5 and 12.1.4 have raised the topic of disconnected operation.
  • the device can still be useful, though the functionality available will sometimes be reduced.
  • the device can record the raw image or audio data being captured and this can be processed later.
  • it can be important to give feedback where possible about whether the data captured is likely to be sufficient for the task in hand, whether it can be recognized or is likely to be recognizable, and whether the source of the data can be identified or is likely to be identifiable later.
  • the user will then know whether their capturing activity is worthwhile. Even when all of the above are unknown, the raw data can still be stored so that, at the very least, the user can refer to them later.
  • the user may be presented with the image of a scan, for example, when the scan cannot be recognized by the OCR process.
  • the SimpleScanner has a scanning head able to read pixels from the page as it is moved along the length of a line of text. It can detect its movement along the page and record the pixels with some information about the movement. It also has a clock, which allows each scan to be time-stamped. The clock is synchronized with a host device when the SimpleScanner has connectivity. The clock may not represent the actual time of day, but relative times may be determined from it so that the host can deduce the actual time of a scan, or at worst the elapsed time between scans.
  • the SimpleScanner does not have sufficient processing power to perform any OCR itself, but it does have some basic knowledge about typical word-lengths, word-spacings, and their relationship to font size. It has some basic indicator lights which tell the user whether the scan is likely to be readable, whether the head is being moved too fast, too slowly or too inaccurately across the paper, and when it determines that sufficient words of a given size are likely to have been scanned for the document to be identified.
  • the SimpleScanner has a USB connector and can be plugged into the USB port on a computer, where it will be recharged. To the computer it appears to be a USB storage device on which time-stamped data files have been recorded, and the rest of the system software takes over from this point.
  • the SuperScanner also depends on connectivity for its full operation, but it has a significant amount of on-board storage and processing which can help it make better judgments about the data captured while offline.
  • the captured pixels are stitched together and passed to an OCR engine that attempts to recognize the text.
  • a number of fonts including those from the user's most-read publications, have been downloaded to it to help perform this task, as has a dictionary that is synchronized with the user's spelling-checker dictionary on their PC and so contains many of the words they frequently encounter.
  • Also stored on the scanner is a list of words and phrases with the typical frequency of their use—this may be combined with the dictionary. The scanner can use the frequency statistics both to help with the recognition process and also to inform its judgment about when a sufficient quantity of text has been captured; more frequently used phrases are less likely to be useful as the basis for a search query.
  • the full index for the articles in the recent issues of the newspapers and periodicals most commonly read by the user are stored on the device, as are the indices for the books the user has recently purchased from an online bookseller, or from which the user has scanned anything within the last few months.
  • the titles of several thousand of the most popular publications which have data available for the system are stored so that, in the absence of other information the user can scan the title and have a good idea as to whether or not captures from a particular work are likely to be retrievable in electronic form later.
  • the system informs user that the captured data has been of sufficient quality and of a sufficient nature to make it probable that the electronic copy can be retrieved when connectivity is restored. Often the system indicates to the user that the scan is known to have been successful and that the context has been recognized in one of the on-board indices, or that the publication concerned is known to be making its data available to the system, so the later retrieval ought to be successful.
  • the SuperScanner docks in a cradle connected to a PC's Firewire or USB port, at which point, in addition to the upload of captured data, its various onboard indices and other databases are updated based on recent user activity and new publications. It also has the facility to connect to wireless public networks or to communicate via Bluetooth to a mobile phone and thence with the public network when such facilities are available.
  • Some embodiments of the system use a scanner that scans in contact with the paper, and which, instead of lenses, uses an image conduit a bundle of optical fibers to transmit the image from the page to the optical sensor device.
  • a scanner that scans in contact with the paper, and which, instead of lenses, uses an image conduit a bundle of optical fibers to transmit the image from the page to the optical sensor device.
  • Such a device can be shaped to allow it to be held in a natural position; for example, in some embodiments, the part in contact with the page is wedge-shaped, allowing the user's hand to move more naturally over the page in a movement similar to the use of a highlighter pen.
  • the conduit is either in direct contact with the paper or in close proximity to it, and may have a replaceable transparent tip that can protect the image conduit from possible damage.
  • the scanner may be used to scan from a screen as well as from paper, and the material of the tip can be chosen to reduce the likelihood of damage to such displays.
  • some embodiments of the device will provide feedback to the user during the scanning process which will indicate through the use of light, sound or tactile feedback when the user is scanning too fast, too slow, too unevenly or is drifting too high or low on the scanned line.
  • the capture device may form an important part of identification and authorization for secure transactions, purchases, and a variety of other operations. It may therefore incorporate, in addition to the circuitry and software required for such a role, various hardware features that can make it more secure, such as a smartcard reader, RFID, or a keypad on which to type a PIN.
  • the scanning head may also be able to read a fingerprint.
  • the voice pattern of the user may be used.
  • the device is able to form an association with other nearby devices to increase either its own or their functionality.
  • it uses the display of a nearby PC or phone to give more detailed feedback about its operation, or uses their network connectivity.
  • the device may, on the other hand, operate in its role as a security and identification device to authenticate operations performed by the other device. Or it may simply form an association in order to function as a peripheral to that device.
  • An interesting aspect of such associations is that they may be initiated and authenticated using the capture facilities of the device. For example, a user wishing to identify themselves securely to a public computer terminal may use the scanning facilities of the device to scan a code or symbol displayed on a particular area of the terminal's screen and so effect a key transfer. An analogous process may be performed using audio signals picked up by a voice-recording device.
  • the functionality of the capture device is integrated into some other device that is already in use.
  • the integrated devices may be able to share a power supply, data capture and storage capabilities, and network interfaces. Such integration may be done simply for convenience, to reduce cost, or to enable functionality that would not otherwise be available.
  • Some examples of devices into which the capture functionality can be integrated include:
  • the phone hardware is not modified to support the system, such as where the text capture can be adequately done through voice recognition, where they can either be processed by the phone itself, or handled by a system at the other end of a telephone call, or stored in the phone's memory for future processing.
  • voice recognition can either be processed by the phone itself, or handled by a system at the other end of a telephone call, or stored in the phone's memory for future processing.
  • Many modern phones have the ability to download software that could implement some parts of the system.
  • voice capture is likely to be suboptimal in many situations, however, for example when there is substantial background noise, and accurate voice recognition is a difficult task at the best of times.
  • the audio facilities may best be used to capture voice annotations.
  • the camera built into many mobile phones is used to capture an image of the text.
  • the phone display which would normally act as a viewfinder for the camera, may overlay on the live camera image information about the quality of the image and its suitability for OCR, which segments of text are being captured, and even a transcription of the text if the OCR can be performed on the phone.
  • the phone is modified to add dedicated capture facilities, or to provide such functionality in a clip-on adaptor or a separate Bluetooth connected peripheral in communication with the phone.
  • the phone has connectivity with the wider world, which means that queries can be submitted to remote search engines or other parts of the system, and copies of documents may be retrieved for immediate storage or viewing.
  • a phone typically has sufficient processing power for many of the functions of the system to be performed locally, and sufficient storage to capture a reasonable amount of data. The amount of storage can also often be expanded by the user. Phones have reasonably good displays and audio facilities to provide user feedback, and often a vibrate function for tactile feedback. They also have good power supplies.
  • the Life Library (see also Section 6.1.1) is a digital archive of any important documents that the subscriber wishes to save and is a set of embodiments of services of this system. Important books, magazine articles, newspaper clippings, etc., can all be saved in digital form in the Life Library. Additionally, the subscriber's annotations, comments, and notes can be saved with the documents.
  • the Life Library can be accessed via the Internet and World Wide Web.
  • the system creates and manages the Life Library document archive for subscribers.
  • the subscriber indicates which documents the subscriber wishes to have saved in his life library by scanning information from the document or by otherwise indicating to the system that the particular document is to be added to the subscriber's Life Library.
  • the scanned information is typically text from the document but can also be a barcode or other code identifying the document.
  • the system accepts the code and uses it to identify the source document. After the document is identified the system can store either a copy of the document in the user's Life Library or a link to a source where the document may be obtained.
  • One embodiment of the Life Library system can check whether the subscriber is authorized to obtain the electronic copy. For example, if a reader scans text or an identifier from a copy of an article in the New York Times (NYT) so that the article will be added to the reader's Life Library, the Life Library system will verify with the NYT whether the reader is subscribed to the online version of the NYT; if so, the reader gets a copy of the article stored in his Life Library account; if not, information identifying the document and how to order it is stored in his Life Library account.
  • NYT New York Times
  • the system maintains a subscriber profile for each subscriber that includes access privilege information.
  • Document access information can be compiled in several ways, two of which are: 1) the subscriber supplies the document access information to the Life Library system, along with his account names and passwords, etc., or 2) the Life Library service provider queries the publisher with the subscriber's information and the publisher responds by providing access to an electronic copy if the Life Library subscriber is authorized to access the material. If the Life Library subscriber is not authorized to have an electronic copy of the document, the publisher provides a price to the Life Library service provider, which then provides the customer with the option to purchase the electronic document.
  • the Life Library service provider either pays the publisher directly and bills the Life Library customer later or the Life Library service provider immediately bills the customer's credit card for the purchase.
  • the Life Library service provider would get a percentage of the purchase price or a small fixed fee for facilitating the transaction.
  • the system can archive the document in the subscriber's personal library and/or any other library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. For example, as a user scans text from a printed document, the Life Library system can identify the rendered document and its electronic counterpart. After the source document is identified, the Life Library system might record information about the source document in the user's personal library and in a group library to which the subscriber has archival privileges.
  • Group libraries are collaborative archives such as a document repository for: a group working together on a project, a group of academic researchers, a group web log, etc.
  • the life library can be organized in many ways: chronologically, by topic, by level of the subscriber's interest, by type of publication ⁇ newspaper, book, magazine, technical paper, etc.), where read, when read, by ISBN or by Dewey decimal, etc.
  • the system can learn classifications based on how other subscribers have classified the same document. The system can suggest classifications to the user or automatically classify the document for the user.
  • annotations may be inserted directly into the document or may be maintained in a separate file.
  • the article is archived in his Life Library with the scanned text highlighted.
  • the article is archived in his Life Library along with an associated annotation file (thus leaving the archived document unmodified).
  • Embodiments of the system can keep a copy of the source document in each subscriber's library, a copy in a master library that many subscribers can access, or link to a copy held by the publisher.
  • the Life Library stores only the user's modifications to the document (e.g., highlights, etc.) and a link to an online version of the document (stored elsewhere). The system or the subscriber merges the changes with the document when the subscriber subsequently retrieves the document.
  • the source document and the annotation file are provided to the subscriber and the subscriber combines them to create a modified document.
  • the system combines the two files prior to presenting them to the subscriber.
  • the annotation file is an overlay to the document file and can be overlaid on the document by software in the subscriber's computer.
  • Subscribers to the Life Library service pay a monthly fee to have the system maintain the subscriber's archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays a small amount (e.g., a micro-payment) for each document stored in the archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays to access the subscriber's archive on a per-access fee. Alternatively, subscribers can compile libraries and allow others to access the materials/annotations on a revenue share model with the Life Library service provider and copyright holders. Alternatively, the Life Library service provider receives a payment from the publisher when the Life Library subscriber orders a document (a revenue share model with the publisher, where the Life Library service provider gets a share of the publisher's revenue).
  • a small amount e.g., a micro-payment
  • subscribers can compile libraries and allow others to access the materials/annotations on a revenue share model with the Life Library service provider and copyright holders.
  • the Life Library service provider receives a payment from the publisher when the Life Library subscriber orders a document (a revenue share model with the publisher, where
  • the Life Library service provider acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the copyright holder (or copyright holder's agent, such as the Copyright Clearance Center, a.k.a. CCC) to facilitate billing and payment for copyrighted materials.
  • the Life Library service provider uses the subscriber's billing information and other user account information to provide this intermediation service. Essentially, the Life Library service provider leverages the pre-existing relationship with the subscriber to enable purchase of copyrighted materials on behalf of the subscriber.
  • the Life Library system can store excerpts from documents. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a paper document, the regions around the scanned text are excerpted and placed in the Life Library, rather than the entire document being archived in the life library. This is especially advantageous when the document is long because preserving the circumstances of the original scan prevents the subscriber from re-reading the document to find the interesting portions. Of course, a hyperlink to the entire electronic counterpart of the paper document can be included with the excerpt materials.
  • the system also stores information about the document in the Life Library, such as author, publication title, publication date, publisher, copyright holder (or copyright holder's licensing agent), ISBN, links to public annotations of the document, readrank, etc.
  • information about the document is a form of paper document metadata.
  • Third parties may create public annotation files for access by persons other than themselves, such the general public. Linking to a third party's commentary on a document is advantageous because reading annotation files of other users enhances the subscriber's understanding of the document.
  • the system archives materials by class. This feature allows a Life Library subscriber to quickly store electronic counterparts to an entire class of paper documents without access to each paper document. For example, when the subscriber scans some text from a copy of National Geographic magazine, the system provides the subscriber with the option to archive all back issues of the National Geographic. If the subscriber elects to archive all back issues, the Life Library service provider would then verify with the National Geographic Society whether the subscriber is authorized to do so. If not, the Life Library service provider can mediate the purchase of the right to archive the National Geographic magazine collection.
  • a variation on, or enhancement of, the Life Library concept is the “Life Saver,” where the system uses the text captured by a user to deduce more about their other activities.
  • the scanning of a menu from a particular restaurant, a program from a particular theater performance, a timetable at a particular railway station, or an article from a local newspaper allows the system to make deductions about the user's location and social activities, and could construct an automatic diary for them, for example as a website.
  • the user would be able to edit and modify the diary, add additional materials such as photographs and, of course, look again at the items scanned.
  • Portable scanners supported by the described system have many compelling uses in the academic setting. They can enhance student teacher interaction and augment the learning experience. Among other uses, students can annotate study materials to suit their unique needs; teachers can monitor classroom performance; and teachers can automatically verify source materials cited in student assignments.
  • a child's interaction with a paper document, such as a book, is monitored by a literacy acquisition system that employs a specific set of embodiments of this system.
  • the child uses a portable scanner that communicates with other elements of the literacy acquisition system.
  • the literacy acquisition system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer.
  • the scanner is coupled with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.).
  • the literacy acquisition system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the word.
  • the database includes a dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (e.g., sound, graphics, etc.).
  • the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the child.
  • the word and its definition are displayed by the literacy acquisition system on the computer's monitor.
  • Multimedia files about the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if a child reading “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” scanned the word “bear,” the system might pronounce the word “bear” and play a short video about bears on the computer's monitor. In this way, the child learns to pronounce the written word and is visually taught what the word means via the multimedia presentation.
  • the literacy acquisition system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the learning process.
  • the child uses this supplementary information to quickly acquire a deeper understanding of the written material.
  • the system can be used to teach beginning readers to read, to help children acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. This system provides the child with information about words with which the child is unfamiliar or about which the child wants more information.
  • the system compiles personal dictionaries. If the reader sees a word that is new, interesting, or particularly useful or troublesome, the reader saves it (along with its definition) to a computer file. This computer file becomes the reader's personalized dictionary. This dictionary is generally smaller in size than a general dictionary so can be downloaded to a mobile station or associated device and thus be available even when the system isn't immediately accessible.
  • the personal dictionary entries include audio files to assist with proper word pronunciation and information identifying the paper document from which the word was scanned.
  • the system creates customized spelling and vocabulary tests for students. For example, as a student reads an assignment, the student may scan unfamiliar words with the portable scanner. The system stores a list of all the words that the student has scanned. Later, the system administers a customized spelling/vocabulary test to the student on an associated monitor (or prints such a test on an associated printer).
  • the arrangement of notes on a musical staff is similar to the arrangement of letters in a line of text.
  • the same scanning device discussed for capturing text in this system can be used to capture music notation, and an analogous process of constructing a search against databases of known musical pieces would allow the piece from which the capture occurred to be identified which can then be retrieved, played, or be the basis for some further action.
  • Teachers can use the system to detect plagiarism or to verify sources by scanning text from student papers and submitting the scanned text to the system. For example, a teacher who wishes to verify that a quote in a student paper came from the source that the student cited can scan a portion of the quote and compare the title of the document identified by the system with the title of the document cited by the student. Likewise, the system can use scans of text from assignments submitted as the student's original work to reveal if the text was instead copied.
  • capturing text from an academic textbook links students or staff to more detailed explanations, further exercises, student and staff discussions about the material, related example past exam questions, further reading on the subject, recordings of the lectures on the subject, and so forth. (See also Section 7.1.)
  • the system is used to teach foreign languages. Scanning a Spanish word, for example, might cause the word to be read aloud in Spanish along with its definition in English.
  • the system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the new language acquisition process.
  • the reader uses this supplementary information to acquire quickly a deeper understanding of the material.
  • the system can be used to teach beginning students to read foreign languages, to help students acquire a larger vocabulary, etc.
  • the system provides information about foreign words with which the reader is unfamiliar or for which the reader wants more information.
  • Reader interaction with a paper document, such as a newspaper or book, is monitored by a language skills system.
  • the reader has a portable scanner that communicates with the language skills system.
  • the language skills system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer.
  • the scanner communicates with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.).
  • the database includes a foreign language dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (sound, graphics, etc.).
  • the system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the scanned word. After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the reader.
  • the word and its definition are both displayed on the computer's monitor.
  • Multimedia files about grammar tips related to the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if the words “to speak” are scanned, the system might pronounce the word “hablar,” play a short audio clip that demonstrates the proper Spanish pronunciation, and display a complete list of the various conjugations of “hablar.” In this way, the student learns to pronounce the written word, is visually taught the spelling of the word via the multimedia presentation, and learns how to conjugate the verb. The system can also present grammar tips about the proper usage of “hablar” along with common phrases.
  • the user scans a word or short phrase from a rendered document in a language other than the user's native language (or some other language that the user knows reasonably well).
  • the system maintains a prioritized list of the user's “preferred” languages. The system identifies the electronic counterpart of the rendered document, and determines the location of the scan within the document. The system also identifies a second electronic counterpart of the document that has been translated into one of the user's preferred languages, and determines the location in the translated document corresponding to the location of the scan in the original document. When the corresponding location is not known precisely, the system identifies a small region (e.g., a paragraph) that includes the corresponding location of the scanned location. The corresponding translated location is then presented to the user. This provides the user with a precise translation of the particular usage at the scanned location, including any slang or other idiomatic usage that is often difficult to accurately translate on a word-by-word basis.
  • a user researching a particular topic may encounter all sorts of material, both in print and on screen, which they might wish to record as relevant to the topic in some personal archive.
  • the system would enable this process to be automatic as a result of scanning a short phrase in any piece of material, and could also create a bibliography suitable for insertion into a publication on the subject.
  • Conventional Internet search engines typically provide free search of electronic documents, and also make no charge to the content providers for including their content in the index.
  • the system provides for charges to users and/or payments to search engines and/or content providers in connection with the operation and use of the system.
  • subscribers to the system's services pay a fee for searches originating from scans of paper documents.
  • a stockbroker may be reading a Wall Street Journal article about a new product offered by Company X.
  • the stockbroker uses the system to search special or proprietary databases to obtain premium information about the company, such as analyst's reports.
  • the system can also make arrangements to have priority indexing of the documents most likely to be read in paper form, for example by making sure all of the newspapers published on a particular day are indexed and available by the time they hit the streets.
  • Content providers may pay a fee to be associated with certain terms in search queries submitted from paper documents. For example, in one embodiment, the system chooses a most preferred content provider based on additional context about the provider (the context being, in this case, that the content provider has paid a fee to be moved up the results list). In essence, the search provider is adjusting paper document search results based on pre-existing financial arrangements with a content provider. See also the description of keywords and key phrases in Section 5.2.
  • Such content may be protected by a firewall and thus not generally indexable by third parties.
  • the content provider may nonetheless wish to provide an index to the protected content.
  • the content provider can pay a service provider to provide the content provider's index to system subscribers.
  • a law firm may index all of a client's documents. The documents are stored behind the law firm's firewall.
  • the law firm wants its employees and the client to have access to the documents through the portable scanner so it provides the index (or a pointer to the index) to the service provider, which in turn searches the law firm's index when employees or clients of the law firm submit paper-scanned search terms via their portable scanners.
  • the law firm can provide a list of employees and/or clients to the service provider's system to enable this function or the system can verify access rights by querying the law firm prior to searching the law firm's index.
  • the index provided by the law firm is only of that client's documents, not an index of all documents at the law firm.
  • the service provider can only grant the law firm's clients access to the documents that the law firm indexed for the client.
  • the search function revenue can be generated from paid subscriptions from the scanner users, but can also be generated on a per-search charge.
  • the content delivery revenue can be shared with the content provider or copyright holder (the service provider can take a percentage of the sale or a fixed fee, such as a micropayment, for each delivery), but also can be generated by a “referral” model in which the system gets a fee or percentage for every item that the subscriber orders from the online catalog and that the system has delivered or contributed to, regardless of whether the service provider intermediates the transaction.
  • the system service provider receives revenue for all purchases that the subscriber made from the content provider, either for some predetermined period of time or at any subsequent time when a purchase of an identified product is made.
  • the subscriber scans information from the catalog that identifies the catalog. This information is text from the catalog, a bar code, or another identifier of the catalog. The subscriber scans information identifying the products that s/he wishes to purchase.
  • the catalog mailing label may contain a customer identification number that identifies the customer to the catalog vendor. If so, the subscriber can also scan this customer identification number.
  • the system acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the vendor to facilitate the catalog purchase by providing the customer's selection and customer identification number to the vendor.
  • a consumer scans paper coupons and saves an electronic copy of the coupon in the scanner, or in a remote device such as a computer, for later retrieval and use.
  • An advantage of electronic storage is that the consumer is freed from the burden of carrying paper coupons.
  • a further advantage is that the electronic coupons may be retrieved from any location.
  • the system can track coupon expiration dates, alert the consumer about coupons that will expire soon, and/or delete expired coupons from storage.
  • An advantage for the issuer of the coupons is the possibility of receiving more feedback about who is using the coupons and when and where they are captured and used.
  • the system may be used to auto-populate an electronic document that corresponds to a paper form.
  • a user scans in some text or a barcode that uniquely identifies the paper form.
  • the scanner communicates the identity of the form and information identifying the user to a nearby computer.
  • the nearby computer has an Internet connection.
  • the nearby computer can access a first database of forms and a second database having information about the user of the scanner (such as a service provider's subscriber information database).
  • the nearby computer accesses an electronic version of the paper form from the first database and auto-populates the fields of the form from the user's information obtained from the second database.
  • the nearby computer then emails the completed form to the intended recipient. Alternatively, the computer could print the completed form on a nearby printer.
  • the system has a portable scanner that contains the user's information, such as in an identity module, SIM, or security card.
  • the scanner provides information identifying the form to the nearby PC.
  • the nearby PC accesses the electronic form and queries the scanner for any necessary information to fill out the form.
  • the system can be used to automatically populate electronic address books or other contact lists from paper documents. For example, upon receiving a new acquaintance's business card, a user can capture an image of the card with his/her cellular phone. The system will locate an electronic copy of the card, which can be used to update the cellular phone's onboard address book with the new acquaintance's contact information. The electronic copy may contain more information about the new acquaintance than can be squeezed onto a business card. Further, the onboard address book may also store a link to the electronic copy such that any changes to the electronic copy will be automatically updated in the cell phone's address book.
  • the business card optionally includes a symbol or text that indicates the existence of an electronic copy.
  • the cellular phone can use OCR and knowledge of standard business card formats to fill out an entry in the address book for the new acquaintance. Symbols may also aid in the process of extracting information directly from the image. For example, a phone icon next to the phone number on the business card can be recognized to determine the location of the phone number.
  • the system can enhance the proofreading and editing process.
  • One way the system can enhance the editing process is by linking the editor's interactions with a paper document to its electronic counterpart.
  • the system will make the appropriate annotations or edits to an electronic counterpart of the paper document. For example, if the editor scans a portion of text and makes the “new paragraph” control gesture with the scanner, a computer in communication with the scanner would insert a “new paragraph” break at the location of the scanned text in the electronic copy of the document.
  • a user can make voice annotations to a document by scanning a portion of text from the document and then making a voice recording that is associated with the scanned text.
  • the scanner has a microphone to record the user's verbal annotations. After the verbal annotations are recorded, the system identifies the document from which the text was scanned, locates the scanned text within the document, and attaches the voice annotation at that point. In some embodiments, the system converts the speech to text and attaches the annotation as a textual comment.
  • the system keeps annotations separate from the document, with only a reference to the annotation kept with the document.
  • the annotations then become an annotation markup layer to the document for a specific subscriber or group of users.
  • the system identifies the document, opens it using a software package, scrolls to the location of the scan and plays the voice annotation. The user can then interact with a document while referring to voice annotations, suggested changes or other comments recorded either by themselves or by somebody else.
  • a markup layer associated with a paper document contains help menu information for the document. For example, when a user scans text from a certain portion of the document, the system checks the markup associated with the document and presents a help menu to the user. The help menu is presented on a display on the scanner or on an associated nearby display.
  • the portable scanner is used to scan information from computer monitors and televisions.
  • the portable optical scanner has an illumination sensor that is optimized to work with traditional cathode ray tube (CRT ⁇ display techniques such as rasterizing, screen blanking, etc.
  • CRT ⁇ display techniques such as rasterizing, screen blanking, etc.
  • a voice capture device which operates by capturing audio of the user reading text from a document will typically work regardless of whether that document is on paper, on a display, or on some other medium.
  • a public kiosk displays a dynamic session ID on its monitor.
  • the kiosk is connected to a communication network such as the Internet or a corporate intranet.
  • the session ID changes periodically but at least every time that the kiosk is used so that a new session ID is displayed to every user.
  • the subscriber scans in the session ID displayed on the kiosk; by scanning the session ID, the user tells the system that he wishes to temporarily associate the kiosk with his scanner for the delivery of content resulting from scans of printed documents or from the kiosk screen itself.
  • the scanner may communicate the Session ID and other information authenticating the scanner (such as serial number, account number, or other identifying information) directly to the system.
  • the scanner can communicate directly (where “directly” means without passing the message through the kiosk) with the system by sending the session initiation message through the user's cell phone (which is paired with the user's scanner via BluetoothTM).
  • the scanner can establish a wireless link with the kiosk and use the kiosk's communication link by transferring the session initiation information to the kiosk (perhaps via short range RF such as BluetoothTM, etc.); in response, the kiosk sends the session initiation information to the system via its Internet connection.
  • the system can prevent others from using a device that is already associated with a scanner during the period (or session) in which the device is associated with the scanner. This feature is useful to prevent others from using a public kiosk before another person's session has ended.
  • the user scans a barcode on a monitor of a PC which s/he desires to use; in response, the system sends a session ID to the monitor that it displays; the user initiates the session by scanning the session ID from the monitor (or entering it via a keypad or touch screen or microphone on the portable scanner); and the system associates in its databases the session ID with the serial number (or other identifier that uniquely identifies the user's scanner) of his/her scanner so another scanner cannot scan the session ID and use the monitor during his/her session.
  • the scanner is in communication (through wireless link such as BluetoothTM, a hardwired link such as a docking station, etc.) with a PC associated with the monitor or is in direct (i.e., w/o going through the PC) communication with the system via another means such as a cellular phone, etc.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the typical environment in which embodiments of the system operate.
  • the system functions in a distributed computing environment 400 that includes a plurality of devices interconnected by a wireless network 401 , the Internet 402 or other networks (not shown ⁇ . All these communications and connections are interconnected via suitable network connections using suitable network communication protocols.
  • the servers and other devices communicate with each other in accordance with respective APIs, which form additional embodiment of the system.
  • the devices and servers may communicate in accordance with open/standard protocols.
  • the servers and other devices include an OCR device 411 or other text capture device that is used to capture text from a rendered document 412 ; a wireless device 421 and/or a user device 422 to which the text capture device uploads various representations of captured text and other user input, and via which the system can provide various types of feedback to the user; a user account server 431 and associated user account database 432 in which the system manages user account information for the user; a search engine server 441 and an associated search database 442 that the system uses to perform queries containing text captured from a rendered document to identify positions in electronic documents in which the captured text occurs; and a document server 451 and an associated document database 452 from which the system retrieves copies of documents determined to contain the captured text.
  • OCR device 411 or other text capture device that is used to capture text from a rendered document 412
  • a wireless device 421 and/or a user device 422 to which the text capture device uploads various representations of captured text and other user input, and via which the system can provide various types of feedback to
  • each server may actually comprise more than a single device in an actual system practicing embodiments of the system.
  • the servers include file servers, database servers or a mixture that includes file servers and database servers. It will further be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, that while the various servers may be discussed as separate devices, in other embodiments of the system the servers may reside on a single device.
  • the scanner incorporates a magnetic sensor
  • data can be coded in documents magnetically as well as optically, acoustically, tactually, etc.
  • the system achieves this by scanning the desired position within a document to identify a distinctive text “signature,” where this signature provides information that can be used to locate the corresponding location within the original digital source document.
  • the system sends this digital signature to a server that has access to database of electronic documents, which desirably includes an electronic version of the paper document in question (though, as explained below, useful outcomes can be obtained even when this is not the case).
  • the server identifies the corresponding location (or locations) in the electronic source document, connecting it with the original scan of the paper document. Establishing this relationship enables numerous useful innovations related to the use of printed documents in a variety of contexts. Various embodiment of the system are discussed below.
  • the system can be viewed as using auxiliary or augmenting information to transform document recognition into document navigation (e.g., finding a location and traversing portions of a document, and generating information for the traversal).
  • auxiliary or augmenting information to transform document recognition into document navigation (e.g., finding a location and traversing portions of a document, and generating information for the traversal).
  • the first marks a user makes in a document will be used to capture the typeface or font.
  • the meaning of these character objects can then be determined by a (offset-based) template-matching plus disambiguation approach mentioned elsewhere, or by more conventional approaches.
  • the device can capture and transmit actual text (e.g., ASCII), or it can use the (offset-based) template-matching representation mentioned elsewhere.
  • the system handles them in a special way. Because the system generally has a source or reference copy of the document available, the system can anticipate situations where capital letters (as well as punctuation) might or will occur.
  • a good example is the capital letter that usually begins an English sentence. Because these are rare, it will not in general be easy to use template matching and disambiguation to interpret these initial capitals.
  • One alternative solution is to essentially ignore capitals—by ignoring the first character of each new paragraph, sentence, etc.
  • a user may wish to indicate the following sentence, which occurs in a rendered document: “Take as an example this sentence.”
  • a conventional OCR system would seek to understand and interpret the letter “T”—in order to ascertain whether the first was “Take” or “Make” or “Fake” or “Rake”, etc.
  • the system is only looking for distinguishing reference features for navigation purposes.
  • the system can simply drop the “T” and search the source document for “ake as an example”—where this phrase might be represented as letters, offsets, or in another form. So long as the remainder of the phrase constitutes an identifying signature, the interpretation of the initial character is not essential.
  • bookmarks each indicating a location in the rendered document. Generally these can be used to find a location in a document at a later time.
  • One simple but interesting application is to mark where the user last was reading in the document—very much in keeping with the traditional meaning of “bookmark”. It can be useful for the user to have easy access to this information—where they left off in a book or other document. This data might appear on the user's PC or PDA or cellular telephone.
  • the device itself indicates the last read location, such as by using a small LCD display in the device itself.
  • the display is binary—for example, an LED which is either on or off. This LED might be on if the user scans text which they have already read, and off if they scan new text. In this way the user can “hunt” for where the user left off.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to implement bookmarks.
  • the system receives text scanned by a user.
  • the system preprocesses the text scanned in step 501 .
  • the system compares the scanned text to a document history maintained for the user.
  • the system if the scanned text was previously scanned by the user, then the system continues in step 505 to return an indication of the previous scan, else the system continues in step 506 to locate the scan in a document.
  • step 507 if the scan is located before the last bookmark, then the system continues in step 508 to return an indication of being previously read, else the facility continues in step 509 to return an indication of being previously unread.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a scanning device that has an integrated highlighter and pen. It can be seen that scan device 600 contains both a highlighter 601 and a pen 602 , which are optionally retractable.
  • This overlay can thus be thought of as an abstract, virtual layer.
  • This layer can then be merged with or “overlaid” on the source or reference version of the document. In one example, this would occur when the user views the reference document on their computer screen—where the overlaid data from the user's actions would appear on top of, or integrated into, the reference document. Note that the reference document does not need to be modified to be displayed in this way.
  • the overlay information is combined with the reference or source document when the user prints the document.
  • the system applies the overlay to—or merges it into the source document when it is delivered electronically to the user. For example, the source document and overlay might be combined into a PDF document and emailed to the user.
  • the source document does not need to be changed.
  • many users can all mark and interact with a single copy of a document.
  • the user's marks and notes are stored separately, so the original doesn't need to change.
  • Each user's data is typically small compared to the underlying document.
  • highlighting all that needs to be stored is the start and end location of the highlighted text in the document, and the highlight color.
  • One way of storing this data is as character offsets from the start of the document.
  • Another way is as an address like document:page:line.
  • the system stores the actual x-y coordinates of the user's actions in the rendered document.
  • Documents used with the system sometimes carry a special mark (e.g., barcode, etc.) that the user can scan to indicate which issue or copy of the document is being scanned. This additional identifying information enables the system to determine which document the user has, and thus how it is rendered.
  • a special mark e.g., barcode, etc.
  • the system may require the user to scan an identifying code or mark to enable the user to interact with the document using the system. This may be required before the user has used the device on other parts of the document.
  • the system may allow the user to interact with the document, but require that they perform an identifying scan at some future point.
  • the identifying scan may be optional; without it, the system may have additional ambiguity, i.e., less certainty about the specific document being used. With the extra scan, the system knows more about the specific document.
  • the capture device provides an error indicator or signal (e.g., an LED or audible tone) which tells the user that this document either isn't recognized or isn't enabled—i.e., that an identifying scan is desired or required.
  • an error indicator or signal e.g., an LED or audible tone
  • This identifying scan may be used to specifically indicate which document the user has—for example, their local morning newspaper—which then allows the system to refer to a cached copy of the document or related dictionary for determining disambiguation and location of scans.
  • the special marks that are scanned might be 1 or 2 dimensional barcodes, or a specific region of human-readable text, or otherwise coded data.
  • a region of text within the rendered document is specifically marked (for example, by a margin mark, or highlighting, or underlining, or special colored ink) to indicate to the user that this region should be scanned for document recognition.
  • these scans may be used to help the system know the user's context. In other cases they may enable or unlock features of the system which would not otherwise be available. For example, a purchase from a printed catalog might not be allowed unless the user scans the address label with their identifying code on it.
  • the user may be able to scan a region of text specifically to establish their context—which location in which document.
  • the terminal device may have a special switch or input to indicate this desired function (setting context).
  • the user can perform a special gesture with the device that may indicate a context-setting reference scan function, such as by scanning the text in reverse.
  • a motion or gesture with the device may indicate “erasing” or “undoing” a previous action.
  • the motions and actions of the device can be used to indicate user intent.
  • the long list of possible motions includes:
  • the device can record that a particular document was scanned at a particular time, place, etc.—including which portions were scanned.
  • the optics in the device may also be able of capturing and storing an image of a signature.
  • documents may be provided with special marks or codes at one or more locations (perhaps including a unique identifier code for the entire document). These marks might include specially marked or indicated human readable text (e.g., a section of a legal document which is printed in bold, or underlined, etc.).
  • a user can then scan various portions of a document to indicate that they have read it.
  • they might optionally sign the document and scan in their signature with the terminal device.
  • the device itself may incorporate writing means as shown in FIG. 6 —in which case the user can both scan and sign with one device.
  • a document navigation tool plus code scanner (plus, optionally, a tool which performs OCR)
  • code scanner plus, optionally, a tool which performs OCR
  • a terminal device which can also include hardware and/or software capable of reading coded (e.g. barcode) information.
  • coded e.g. barcode
  • the terminal device might simply capture an image of the barcode to be read and forward this for interpretation.
  • the device recognizes when the image it is scanning is 1-dimensional, as in a barcode. For example, it may check (in software or electronically in hardware, or some combination of these) whether there is one axis which carries no information.
  • a 1-d barcode has this property, being made up of parallel lines assumed to be parallel to the y-axis. In this case, only changes along the x-axis-that cross the lines, perpendicular to them, in the x direction-contain information.
  • the device may have local intelligence (hardware and/or software) to reduce this scanned data by collapsing/ignoring the y-axis—i.e., it may be able to partially or completely read or interpret the code (e.g., before communicating with a server).
  • local intelligence hardware and/or software
  • De-skewing is the process of removing any artificial angular components from scanned or imaged data.
  • a situation which often occurs with hand scanners is that the user holds them at an angle, rotated around the axis perpendicular to the page, so that data captured has an artificial angle or slant included. Note that the angle also may vary over time, for example as the user moves their hand across the page. It is helpful if this artificial skew is removed in one of the steps of processing the data or image.
  • one advantage is that, to first order, the artificial skew or angle doesn't matter. That is, letters or symbols which are each skewed at the same angle will match each other without removing this skew component.
  • the system de-skews text by performing a mathematical transform on the data from which the skew angle can be readily determined. This transform can be applied locally so that variations in skew (e.g., across a single line of text) can be detected and measured locally.
  • the template-matching (offset-based), convolution approach which can be used in the system has the ability to find matching objects, using earlier occurrences of these objects as templates.
  • One interesting result of this ability is that any repeating objects can carry easily readable information—and the tokens which represent this information do not need to be defined in advance or known to the system.
  • a document contains a string of 1's and 0's (e.g., a representation of binary data), such as: “100101001.”
  • the system needn't recognize and understand the meaning of a “1” or a “0”. Rather, it can interpret the sample string as, “an object of a first type, followed by two objects of a second type, followed by an object of the first type, etc.” This information in the sample string can just as well be represented by “abbababba” or by “011010110.”
  • Data can be encoded using any number of distinct objects or symbols—and that spaces can be treated as one of these objects (if spaces are used, measured distance may be used to count adjacent spaces, or each space object may be limited to always having a count of 1—e.g., such that “1 11 111 1” would be interpreted the same as “1 11 111 1”). From this perspective, a language written in the 26 character roman alphabet (assuming all lower case) is just a special instance of this encoding, where the number of symbols happens to be 26.
  • the system represents the data in a sequence such as the above “01101011 0” example as offsets—the number of character positions separating recurring instances of each symbol.
  • “011010110” is represented as 3,1,2,2,2,3,1,?,?—where each digit corresponds to a character i ⁇ the original string, and the value of the digit is the distance or offset to the next occurrence of this same character.
  • the last two entries are redundant—the characters at these positions are known by earlier offsets/references to them—so these two trailing positions carry little or no information.
  • a character has an offset of m—assuming we are moving right and measuring offsets to the right—the next character cannot have the offset m ⁇ 1, and the character after that cannot have the offset m ⁇ 2, etc. This is because these “forbidden” offsets conflict with and contradict the earlier given offsets.
  • the system exploits the forbidden codes in decoding and/or representing the data.
  • the facility exploits the forbidden codes by using them to store additional data, such as an exception code.
  • additional data such as an exception code.
  • the system interprets forbidden codes as “escape sequences” which invoke special actions or processes, or read subsequent embedded data from the stream—after which the system can re-synchronize to the input stream (since the escape sequence can carry information about the sequence length, or this can be known or inferred by the system) and continue processing.
  • forbidden codes are to reduce the amount of information in the encoding of the data.
  • One algorithm here might be, “if this is the first (smallest) forbidden code, treat it as the first allowed/valid code; if this is the second (next smallest) forbidden code, treat it as the second allowed/valid code”. In this way smaller (forbidden) numbers can represent larger (allowed) codes—so the number of bits used to store or transmit the data is reduced.
  • forbidden codes can be combined—for example, the first (smallest) forbidden code might be interpreted as an escape sequence, while higher codes are mapped to the next available valid codes. And other uses of these codes can be applied as well.
  • sequence “abcbcbcabcbcbcabcbcbcbcbcbc” is first coded as offsets: “72222337222233?2222??”, then reduced to “74(2)2(3)74(2)2(3)?4(2)2(?)”, then further reduced to
  • the system drafts repeat counts are altogether, and only the objects themselves are stored or transmitted.
  • “abcabcabcabcabc” can first be coded as offsets: “333333333333???” which in turn can be represented as count(object): 12(3)??? —which can be stored or transmitted as simply “+3???”—where here the “+” is an indicator that the object repeats.
  • the system just stores or transmits “3”, dropping any reference to a repeat count.
  • the system does not require that this be scanned in its entirety in order to be recognized.
  • the offsets from this sequence could be represented (counting spaces as objects) as: “31641153164115 . . . . ” This can be stored or transmitted as a count plus object, or as a “plurality indicator” (“+3164115”—see use of plus sign above), or without any indication of plurality Gust “3164115”).
  • the server which is indexing data might only store a single first instance of a repeating sequence (either of raw data or derived offsets), and a scanning terminal device might only store or transmit 1 instance of the repeating sequence.
  • a separate system e.g., running on a remote server, can then search for, or consult an index looking for, sequences which match this compressed representation. To do so it would treat each object in the sequence as potentially occurring “1 or more times”—an, as with regular expressions, would implement code and algorithms to find these matches.
  • a similar efficiency in storage and/or transmission can be obtained by noting that, when character offsets are employed, all scans of text end in unknown offsets (shown above as “???”). This is because, assuming the user is scanning left-to-right, and offsets are for the next matching character to the right, at some point the scan must terminate, so some of the last characters will not have known offsets—their next occurrence will not be included in the scan. In one data-encoding technique, these unknowns might be represented as zeros—but another embodiment is to drop these trailing unknowns from the data transmitted or stored.
  • Template matching and/or self-correlation use one instance of a token or object or character or symbol as a template to recognize subsequent occurrences of this same object.
  • a token or object or character or symbol as a template to recognize subsequent occurrences of this same object.
  • the system When the user scans a single horizontal line of text with a capture device, in some embodiments the system captures an image of the text and stores it in memory and/or transmits it. In some embodiments, the system performs the template matching on-the-fly, by immediately calculating the offsets of matching objects and storing only the individual templates—and these may be discarded when the offsets are known.
  • the system does not need to know much (if anything) about the shapes of the objects it is scanning. In the process of template matching, these shapes emerge as the various templates discovered.
  • the system in some embodiments, as (or after) the user scans a portion of a horizontal line of text, the system “convolves” the line, i.e., effectively slides a copy of the line horizontally past itself, looking for regions which match well. At the start of this process it may be helpful to determine the baseline of the text, and to de-skew it—both are well-known techniques in the field of document imaging. However, note that there are ways to search for matching regions without either of these steps.
  • This process may optionally choose to use connected-region analysis—wherein tokens/objects/characters/symbols are assumed to be comprised of “connected” (i.e., contiguous) pixels or ink. Thus we are in this instance looking for connected regions which match. Note this is related to our knowledge of whitespace, since by definition the region exterior to a connected region of ink is whitespace.
  • the system uses (as another of several approaches) simple horizontal extent. That is, the system pays attention to the horizontal width and position of matching regions of ink or pixels, with no or little attention to connected regions or whitespace—though these components can be introduced to assist the process.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to process text capture actions.
  • the system receives text captured by the user.
  • the system preprocesses the text scanned in step 701 .
  • the system identifies word and line boundaries in the scanned text.
  • the system convolves the text as described above.
  • the system uses delimiters to determine boundaries of unknown regions in the text.
  • the system processes the scan to produce a representation of the captured text.
  • the system searches for a matching text representation in the corpus of electronic documents.
  • step 708 if the search of step 707 is successful, then the system continues in step 709 to return a successful search notice, else the system continues in step 710 .
  • step 710 if the search can be refined, then the system continues in step 711 , else the system continues in step 712 to return a failed search notice.
  • step 711 the system indicates to the user that refinement is needed. After step 711 , the system continues in step 701 to receive additional text captured by the user in response to the indication of step 711 .
  • the system makes decisions as to how well one region matches another.
  • Several tools can be used to accomplish this, many already well known in the fields of OCR, document imaging, and machine vision.
  • One way to estimate fit or match used by the system in some embodiments is to first find the best alignment of the objects to be compared, then calculate a difference over the objects. For example, in the case of simple black and white pixels (no gray scale), the system simply finds the pixels which are on in one image/object, and off in the other image/object. The count of these “errors” is a rough estimate of fit.
  • This count estimate can be improved by “normalizing it” by (dividing it by) the total number of pixels included.
  • the system uses either:
  • fit_error #_bad_pixels/#_pixels_in — x — y _region_compared
  • the former considers the number of error pixels compared to the area being compared.
  • the latter considers the number of error pixels compared to the number or matching, non-error pixels.
  • the system adds various refinements to these techniques, or uses other matching techniques from OCR, etc.
  • the physical distribution (e.g., x-y coordinates) of the error and matching pixels is of potential importance.
  • the matching pixels are “concentrated” (i.e., contiguous, occurring close together), and the error pixels are “distributed” (i.e., non-contiguous, occurring far apart).
  • the system compares the image of an “r” to that of an “n”. Only a small part of the image contains error pixels—where the right hand side of the “n” descends to the base line, but the “r” does not. Note that there may not be a large number of error pixels, but they occur close together and contiguous.
  • the quality of the image is not good—e.g., it has been blurred or smeared, or is fuzzy. In this case, there may be very many error pixels—but note that they are likely to occur distributed at many places around the character. This demonstrates that widely distributed error pixels suggest less error than closely packed error pixels.
  • FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate how two characters of an alphabet often have approximately the same *relative* shape in multiple fonts.
  • FIG. 8A shows the letters “O”, “C”, and “L” in an Arial lower-case font
  • FIG. 8C shows these letters in a Times New Roman lower-case font. Even though the fonts are very different and distinct, the relationship between these characters *within* a particular font are approximately the same.
  • One way to implement this self-recognition system is as an m ⁇ m matrix of general relationships, where m is the number of characters in the alphabet.
  • Each entry in this table describes how character i relates to character j—possibly including general relative shape information and rules (“character i extends below the baseline, character j doesn't”)—and possibly including reference to additional characters in the alphabet (e.g., the entry for row “d” and column “c” might be “ ⁇ 1”—subtract an “1” to make a “c” from a “d”—and the entry for row “c” and column “d” might be “+1”—add an “1” to make a “d” from a “c”).
  • a special case of self-recognition occurs when a set of symbols or tokens (i.e., a new font) is constructed with explicit intent that they be self-recognizable as described above. That is, given a subset of these symbols, the others can be derived or inferred. These symbols can be used to error-check each other, since their graphic components/design are interrelated. This redundancy also provides also robustness against noise.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the approach used by the facility in some embodiments to learn an entirely new set of symbols using self-recognition.
  • the diagram shows a set 900 of symbols comprised of a 2 ⁇ 2 array of small “boxes”.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram that shows a subset of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 that self-define their vertical and horizontal extent. Each symbol of the subset 1000 is two boxes wide and two boxes high.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram that shows relationships between some of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 .
  • each of relationships 1101 and 1102 show a relationship by which one symbol of the set can be constructed out of two other symbols. Note that we can choose as a subset those symbols which have the best redundancy and/or error correction properties. Note that some symbols can be constructed at least two different ways from combinations of symbols in the set.
  • Another means for locating the source document is if the marked version carries a machine-readable code which identifies the document and/or provides directions for retrieving this source document (e.g., a URL).
  • This code might be a barcode, machine-readable font, or any machine-readable means for conveying this information.
  • machine-readable document ID and document locator An interesting extension of the machine-readable document ID and document locator is for this data to include access information. That is, included in the machine readable code is information which allows the system to access the document, e.g., when it is password protected, behind a corporate firewall, etc. Note that an additional input might be required by the user or another individual which confirms the request to access this document.
  • the system maintains the relationship between a user's notes and marks and the document content and features associated with these notes and marks. This can be important, for example, if the source document is re-rendered in a different style or format, and the system wants to re-display the user's mark at the correct location. As an example, if the user draws a line through a word of text, the system may want to show that line through the same text in subsequent renderings.
  • each user mark or group of marks with some recognizable feature in the document (e.g., a single word, punctuation mark, image, etc.).
  • the system does so by finding the nearest source document feature (e.g., by geometric distance) and associate the mark with this feature.
  • the system finds near-by features, and to weight or rank them, and then associate the user's marks with a high-rated feature.
  • the system might examine all near-by words, and associate the mark with the word which is most relevant (e.g., a keyword rather than a stop-word, perhaps related to the topic of the source document text, etc.).
  • This aspect of the system can employ some of the many techniques which are known for identifying important elements in a document.
  • Notes and marks which have associated anchor points can thus be related to digital documents—such that the relevant note or mark can be accessed when viewing or editing the document (e.g., with a word processor). For example, all such notes might appear as a special symbol embedded in the document (and optionally stored within the document). The user might then mouse-over or click on these symbols to reveal the embedded or associated note or mark. Similarly, the user's notes might be turned on or off via a menu command.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Library & Information Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

A facility for navigating an electronic document is described. The facility receives user input selecting a portion of the content of a rendered document that constitutes a sentence fragment. In response to receiving the user input, the facility identifies an electronic document contained in a corpus of electronic documents, the identified electronic document containing the selected document portion. In response to receiving the user input, the facility further identifies a position within the identified electronic document at which the selected document portion occurs.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/729,045, titled “Processing Techniques for Visual Capture Data from a Rendered Document,” filed on Mar. 22, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/729,045 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/110,353, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,702,624, titled “Processing Techniques for Visual Capture Data from a Rendered Document,” filed on Apr. 19, 2005, which is a continuation-in-part of the following, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,637 filed on Dec. 3, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,961, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INITIATING APPLICATION PROCESSES BY DATA CAPTURE FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,093, entitled DETERMINING ACTIONS INVOLVING CAPTURED INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC CONTENT ASSOCIATED WITH RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,038, entitled CONTENT ACCESS WITH HANDHELD DOCUMENT DATA CAPTURE DEVICES, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,014, entitled SEARCH ENGINES AND SYSTEMS WITH HANDHELD DOCUMENT DATA CAPTURE DEVICES, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,103, entitled TRIGGERING ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO OPTICALLY OR ACOUSTICALLY CAPTURING KEYWORDS FROM A RENDERED DOCUMENT, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,043, entitled SEARCHING AND ACCESSING DOCUMENTS ON PRIVATE NETWORKS FOR USE WITH CAPTURES FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,981, entitled INFORMATION GATHERING SYSTEM AND METHOD, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,089, entitled DOCUMENT ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,835, entitled PUBLISHING TECHNIQUES FOR ADDING VALUE TO A RENDERED DOCUMENT, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,016, entitled ARCHIVE OF TEXT CAPTURES FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,828, entitled ADDING INFORMATION OR FUNCTIONALITY TO A RENDERED DOCUMENT VIA ASSOCIATION WITH AN ELECTRONIC COUNTERPART, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,833, entitled AGGREGATE ANALYSIS OF TEXT CAPTURES PERFORMED BY MULTIPLE USERS FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,836, entitled ESTABLISHING AN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,042, entitled DATA CAPTURE FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS USING HANDHELD DEVICE, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,704, entitled CAPTURING TEXT FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS USING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.
  • This application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference in their entirety, the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: Application No. 60/563,520 filed on Apr. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/563,485 filed on Apr. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/564,688 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/564,846 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/556,667 filed on Apr. 30, 2004, Application No. 60/571,381 filed on May 14, 2004, Application No. 60/571,560 filed on May 14, 2004, Application No. 60/571,715 filed on May 17, 2004, Application No. 60/589,203 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/589,201 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/589,202 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/598,821 filed on Aug. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/602,956 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,925 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,947 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,897 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,896 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,930 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,898 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/603,466 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,082 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,081 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,498 filed on Aug. 20, 2004, Application No. 60/603,358 filed on Aug. 20, 2004, Application No. 60/604,103 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,098 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,100 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,102 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/605,229 filed on Aug. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/605,105 filed on Aug. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,243 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,628 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,632 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,589 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,242 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,602 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,340 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,634 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,461 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,455 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,460 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,400 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,456 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,341 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,361 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,454 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,339 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,633 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/615,378 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/615,112 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/615,538 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/617,122, filed on Oct. 7, 2004, Application No. 60/622,906 filed on Oct. 28, 2004, Application No. 60/633,452 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,678 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,486 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,453 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/634,627 filed on Dec. 9, 2004, Application No. 60/634,739 filed on Dec. 9, 2004, Application No. 60/647,684 filed on Jan. 26, 2005, Application No. 60/648,746 filed on Jan. 31, 2005, Application No. 60/653,372 filed on Feb. 15, 2005, Application No. 60/653,663 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,669 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,899 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,679 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,847 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/654,379 filed on Feb. 17, 2005, Application No. 60/654,368 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/654,326 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/654,196 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/655,279 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,280 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,987 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,697 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,281 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, and Application No. 60/657,309 filed on Feb. 28, 2005.
    • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The described technology is directed to the field of document processing.
    • BACKGROUND
  • Paper documents have an enduring appeal, as can be seen by the proliferation of paper documents in the computer age. It has never been easier to print and publish paper documents than it is today. Paper documents prevail even though electronic documents are easier to duplicate, transmit, search and edit.
  • Given the popularity of paper documents and the advantages of electronic documents, it would be useful to combine the benefits of both.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram that illustrates the flow of information in one embodiment of the core system.
  • FIG. 2 is a component diagram of components included in a typical implementation of the system in the context of a typical operating environment.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a scanner.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the typical environment in which embodiments of the system operate.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to implement bookmarks.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a scanning device that has an integrated highlighter and pen.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to process text capture actions.
  • FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate how two characters of an alphabet often have approximately the same *relative* shape in multiple fonts.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the approach used by the facility in some embodiments to learn an entirely new set of symbols using self-recognition.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram that shows a subset of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 that self-define their vertical and horizontal extent.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram that shows relationships between some of the symbols shown in FIG. 9.
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION Overview
  • A system for interpreting and interacting with rendered documents (e.g., printed or displayed documents), and related digital “source,” “counterpart,” or “reference” versions of these documents (“the system”) is described. In some embodiments, the system is not directly concerned with recognizing and interpreting characters per se; it does not concern itself with recognizing and understanding printed characters, though it may in some cases perform this function. Rather, the system assumes that a version of the document is already known, that machine-readable (e.g., ASCII or some other machine-readable text) source or reference version document is at hand, or is machine accessible, or will be made available in the future. The system uses various features (including text) in rendered documents for navigation (i.e., determining location within a document). The location is in turn used to enable a rich set of user functions and interactions, some of which will be described below.”
  • The system is based in part on the process of interpreting and deciphering the patterns of marks (e.g., the text and any rendered supplemental informational marks) in documents to determine location information. In various embodiments, this location information is with reference to the document itself—e.g., location within the document, often down to a single paragraph, sentence, word and even single character. However, in cases where the physical lay-out of a specific rendering of a document is also known, the location information can be converted to location on a display screen, a printed page, etc.
  • In discussing various embodiments of the system, the term “printed text” is employed. “Printed” is used in its generic sense to documents rendering in any form that is readable to a human (e.g., on paper, on a display screen, in Braille format, etc.). It should be understood that in many cases various of the features and applications of system apply quite well to non-alphanumeric rendered content—such as punctuation, graphics and images, special marks, etc. Embodiments of the system include these additional uses.
    • Part I—Introduction 1. Nature of the System
  • For every paper document that has an electronic counterpart, there exists a discrete amount of information in the paper document that can identify the electronic counterpart. In some embodiments, the system uses a sample of text captured from a paper document, for example using a handheld scanner, to identify and locate an electronic counterpart of the document. In most cases, the amount of text needed by the facility is very small in that a few words of text from a document can often function as an identifier for the paper document and as a link to its electronic counterpart. In addition, the system may use those few words to identify not only the document, but also a location within the document.
  • Thus, paper documents and their digital counterparts can be associated in many useful ways using the system discussed herein.
    • 1.1. A Quick Overview of the Future
  • Once the system has associated a piece of text in a paper document with a particular digital entity has been established, the system is able to build a huge amount of functionality on that association.
  • It is increasingly the case that most paper documents have an electronic counterpart that is accessible on the World Wide Web or from some other online database or document corpus, or can be made accessible, such as in response to the payment of a fee or subscription. At the simplest level, then, when a user scans a few words in a paper document, the system can retrieve that electronic document or some part of it, or display it, email it to somebody, purchase it, print it or post it to a web page. As additional examples, scanning a few words of a book that a person is reading over breakfast could cause the audio-book version in the person's car to begin reading from that point when s/he starts driving to work, or scanning the serial number on a printer cartridge could begin the process of ordering a replacement.
  • The system implements these and many other examples of “paper/digital integration” without requiring changes to the current processes of writing, printing and publishing documents, giving such conventional rendered documents a whole new layer of digital functionality.
    • 1.2. Terminology
  • A typical use of the system begins with using an optical scanner to scan text from a paper document, but it is important to note that other methods of capture from other types of document are equally applicable. The system is therefore sometimes described as scanning or capturing text from a rendered document, where those terms are defined as follows:
  • A rendered document is a printed document or a document shown on a display or monitor. It is a document that is perceptible to a human, whether in permanent form or on a transitory display.
  • Scanning or capturing is the process of systematic examination to obtain information from a rendered document. The process may involve optical capture using a scanner or camera (for example a camera in a cellphone), or it may involve reading aloud from the document into an audio capture device or typing it on a keypad or keyboard. For more examples, see Section 15.
    • 2. Introduction to the System
  • This section describes some of the devices, processes and systems that constitute a system for paper/digital integration. In various embodiments, the system builds a wide variety of services and applications on this underlying core that provides the basic functionality.
    • 2.1. The Processes
  • FIG. 1 is a data flow diagram that illustrates the flow of information in one embodiment of the core system. Other embodiments may not use all of the stages or elements illustrated here, while some will use many more.
  • Text from a rendered document is captured 100, typically in optical form by an optical scanner or audio form by a voice recorder, and this image or sound data is then processed 102, for example to remove artifacts of the capture process or to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. A recognition process 104 such as OCR, speech recognition, or autocorrelation then converts the data into a signature, comprised in some embodiments of text, text offsets, or other symbols. Alternatively, the system performs an alternate form of extracting document signature from the rendered document. The signature represents a set of possible text transcriptions in some embodiments. This process may be influenced by feedback from other stages, for example, if the search process and context analysis 110 have identified some candidate documents from which the capture may originate, thus narrowing the possible interpretations of the original capture.
  • A post-processing 106 stage may take the output of the recognition process and filter it or perform such other operations upon it as may be useful. Depending upon the embodiment implemented, it may be possible at this stage to deduce some direct actions 107 to be taken immediately without reference to the later stages, such as where a phrase or symbol has been captured which contains sufficient information in itself to convey the user's intent. In these cases no digital counterpart document need be referenced, or even known to the system.
  • Typically, however, the next stage will be to construct a query 108 or a set of queries for use in searching. Some aspects of the query construction may depend on the search process used and so cannot be performed until the next stage, but there will typically be some operations, such as the removal of obviously misrecognized or irrelevant characters, which can be performed in advance.
  • The query or queries are then passed to the search and context analysis stage 110. Here, the system optionally attempts to identify the document from which the original data was captured. To do so, the system typically uses search indices and search engines 112, knowledge about the user 114 and knowledge about the user's context or the context in which the capture occurred 116. Search engine 112 may employ and/or index information specifically about rendered documents, about their digital counterpart documents, and about documents that have a web (internet) presence). It may write to, as well as read from, many of these sources and, as has been mentioned, it may feed information into other stages of the process, for example by giving the recognition system 104 information about the language, font, rendering and likely next words based on its knowledge of the candidate documents.
  • In some circumstances the next stage will be to retrieve 120 a copy of the document or documents that have been identified. The sources of the documents 124 may be directly accessible, for example from a local filing system or database or a web server, or—they may need to be contacted via some access service 122 which might enforce authentication, security or payment or may provide other services such as conversion of the document into a desired format.
  • Applications of the system may take advantage of the association of extra functionality or data with part or all of a document. For example, advertising applications discussed in Section 10.4 may use an association of particular advertising messages or subjects with portions of a document. This extra associated functionality or data can be thought of as one or more overlays on the document, and is referred to herein as “markup.” The next stage of the process 130, then, is to identify any markup relevant to the captured data. Such markup may be provided by the user, the originator, or publisher of the document, or some other party, and may be directly accessible from some source 132 or may be generated by some service 134. In various embodiments, markup can be associated with, and apply to, a rendered document and/or the digital counterpart to a rendered document, or to groups of either or both of these documents.
  • Lastly, as a result of the earlier stages, some actions may be taken 140. These may be default actions such as simply recording the information found, they may be dependent on the data or document, or they may be derived from the markup analysis. Sometimes the action will simply be to pass the data to another system. In some cases the various possible actions appropriate to a capture at a specific point in a rendered document will be presented to the user as a menu on an associated display, for example on a local display 332, on a computer display 212 or a mobile phone or PDA display 216. If the user doesn't respond to the menu, the default actions can be taken.
    • 2.2. The Components
  • FIG. 2 is a component diagram of components included in a typical implementation of the system in the context of a typical operating environment. As illustrated, the operating environment includes one or more optical scanning capture devices 202 or voice capture devices 204. In some embodiments, the same device performs both functions. Each capture device is able to communicate with other parts of the system such as a computer 212 and a mobile station 216 (e.g., a mobile phone or PDA) using either a direct wired or wireless connection, or through the network 220, with which it can communicate using a wired or wireless connection, the latter typically involving a wireless base station 214. In some embodiments, the capture device is integrated in the mobile station, and optionally shares some of the audio and/or optical components used in the device for voice communications and picture-taking.
  • Computer 212 may include a memory containing computer executable instructions for processing an order from scanning devices 202 and 204. As an example, an order can include an identifier (such as a serial number of the scanning device 202/204 or an identifier that partially or uniquely identifies the user of the scanner), scanning context information (e.g., time of scan, location of scan, etc.) and/or scanned information (such as a text string) that is used to uniquely identify the document being scanned. In alternative embodiments, the operating environment may include more or less components.
  • Also available on the network 220 are search engines 232, document sources 234, user account services 236, markup services 238 and other network services 239. The network 220 may be a corporate intranet, the public Internet, a mobile phone network or some other network, or any interconnection of the above.
  • Regardless of the manner by which the devices are coupled to each other, they may all may be operable in accordance with well-known commercial transaction and communication protocols (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP)). In various embodiments, the functions and capabilities of scanning device 202, computer 212, and mobile station 216 may be wholly or partially integrated into one device. Thus, the terms scanning device, computer, and mobile station can refer to the same device depending upon whether the device incorporates functions or capabilities of the scanning device 202, computer 212 and mobile station 216. In addition, some or all of the functions of the search engines 232, document sources 234, user account services 236, markup services 238 and other network services 239 may be implemented on any of the devices and/or other devices not shown.
    • 2.3. The Capture Device
  • As described above, the capture device may capture text using an optical scanner that captures image data from the rendered document, or using an audio recording device that captures a user's spoken reading of the text, or other methods. Some embodiments of the capture device may also capture images, graphical symbols and icons, etc., including machine readable codes such as barcodes. The device may be exceedingly simple, consisting of little more than the transducer, some storage, and a data interface, relying on other functionality residing elsewhere in the system, or it may be a more full-featured device. For illustration, this section describes a device based around an optical scanner and with a reasonable number of features.
  • Scanners are well known devices that capture and digitize images. An offshoot of the photocopier industry, the first scanners were relatively large devices that captured an entire document page at once. Recently, portable optical scanners have been introduced in convenient form factors, such as a pen-shaped handheld device.
  • In some embodiments, the portable scanner is used to scan text, graphics, or symbols from rendered documents. The portable scanner has a scanning element that captures text, symbols, graphics, etc., from rendered documents. In addition to documents that have been printed on paper, in some embodiments, rendered documents include documents that have been displayed on a screen such as a CRT monitor or LCD display.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a scanner 302. The scanner 302 comprises an optical scanning head 308 to scan information from rendered documents and convert it to machine-compatible data, and an optical path 306, typically a lens, an aperture or an image conduit to convey the image from the rendered document to the scanning head. The scanning head 308 may incorporate a Charge-Coupled Device (CCD), a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) imaging device, or an optical sensor of another type.
  • A microphone 310 and associated circuitry convert the sound of the environment (including spoken words) into machine-compatible signals, and other input facilities exist in the form of buttons, scroll-wheels or other tactile sensors such as touchpads 314.
  • Feedback to the user is possible through a visual display or indicator lights 332, through a loudspeaker or other audio transducer 334 and through a vibrate module 336.
  • The scanner 302 comprises logic 326 to interact with the various other components, possibly processing the received signals into different formats and/or interpretations. Logic 326 may be operable to read and write data and program instructions stored in associated storage 330 such as RAM, ROM, flash, or other suitable memory. It may read a time signal from the clock unit 328. The scanner 302 also includes an interface 316 to communicate scanned information and other signals to a network and/or an associated computing device. In some embodiments, the scanner 302 may have an on-board power supply 332. In other embodiments, the scanner 302 may be powered from a tethered connection to another device, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connection.
  • As an example of one use of scanner 302, a reader may scan some text from a newspaper article with scanner 302. The text is scanned as a bit-mapped image via the scanning head 308. Logic 326 causes the bit-mapped image to be stored in memory 330 with an associated time-stamp read from the clock unit 328. Logic 326 may also perform optical character recognition (OCR) or other post-scan processing on the bit-mapped image to convert it to text. Logic 326 may optionally extract a signature from the image, for example by performing a convolution-like process to locate repeating occurrences of characters, symbols or objects, and determine the distance or number of other characters, symbols, or objects between these repeated elements. The reader may then upload the bit-mapped image (or text or other signature, if post-scan processing has been performed by logic 326) to an associated computer via interface 316.
  • As an example of another use of scanner 302, a reader may capture some text from an article as an audio file by using microphone 310 as an acoustic capture port. Logic 326 causes audio file to be stored in memory 328. Logic 326 may also perform voice recognition or other post-scan processing on the audio file to convert it to text. As above, the reader may then upload the audio file (or text produced by post-scan processing performed by logic 326) to an associated computer via interface 316.
    • Part II—Overview of the Areas of the Core System
  • As paper-digital integration becomes more common, there are many aspects of existing technologies that can be changed to take better advantage of this integration, or to enable it to be implemented more effectively. This section highlights some of those issues.
    • 3. Search
  • Searching a corpus of documents, even so large a corpus as the World Wide Web, has become commonplace for ordinary users, who use a keyboard to construct a search query which is sent to a search engine. This section and the next discuss the aspects of both the construction of a query originated by a capture from a rendered document, and the search engine that handles such a query.
    • 3.1. Scan/Speak/Type as Search Query
  • Use of the described system typically starts with a few words being captured from a rendered document using any of several methods, including those mentioned in Section 1.2 above. Where the input needs some interpretation to convert it to text, for example in the case of OCR or speech input, there may be end-to-end feedback in the system so that the document corpus can be used to enhance the recognition process. End-to-end feedback can be applied by performing an approximation of the recognition or interpretation, identifying a set of one or more candidate matching documents, and then using information from the possible matches in the candidate documents to further refine or restrict the recognition or interpretation. Candidate documents can be weighted according to their probable relevance (for example, based on then number of other users who have scanned in these documents, or their popularity on the Internet), and these weights can be applied in this iterative recognition process.
    • 3.2. Short Phrase Searching
  • Because the selective power of a search query based on a few words is greatly enhanced when the relative positions of these words are known, only a small amount of text need be captured for the system to identify the text's location in a corpus. Most commonly, the input text will be a contiguous sequence of words, such as a short phrase.
  • 3.2.1. Finding Document and Location in Document from Short Capture
  • In addition to locating the document from which a phrase originates, the system can identify the location in that document and can take action based on this knowledge.
    • 3.2.2. Other Methods of Finding Location
  • The system may also employ other methods of discovering the document and location, such as by using watermarks or other special markings on the rendered document.
    • 3.3. Incorporation of Other Factors in Search Query
  • In addition to the captured text, other factors (i.e., information about user identity, profile, and context) may form part of the search query, such as the time of the capture, the identity and geographical location of the user, knowledge of the user's habits and recent activities, etc.
  • The document identity and other information related to previous captures, especially if they were quite recent, may form part of a search query.
  • The identity of the user may be determined from a unique identifier associated with a capturing device, and/or biometric or other supplemental information (speech patterns, fingerprints, etc.).
    • 3.4. Knowledge of Nature of Unreliability in Search Query (OCR Errors, Etc.)
  • The search query can be constructed taking into account the types of errors likely to occur in the particular capture method used. One example of this is an indication of suspected errors in the recognition of specific characters; in this instance a search engine may treat these characters as wildcards, or assign them a lower priority.
    • 3.5. Local Caching of Index for Performance/Offline Use
  • Sometimes the capturing device may not be in communication with the search engine or corpus at the time of the data capture. For this reason, information helpful to the offline use of the device may be downloaded to the device in advance, or to some entity with which the device can communicate. In some cases, all or a substantial part of an index associated with a corpus may be downloaded. This topic is discussed further in Section 15.3.
    • 3.6. Queries, in Whatever Form, May be Recorded and Acted on Later
  • If there are likely to be delays or cost associated with communicating a query or receiving the results, this pre-loaded information can improve the performance of the local device, reduce communication costs, and provide helpful and timely user feedback.
  • In the situation where no communication is available (the local device is “offline”), the queries may be saved and transmitted to the rest of the system at such a time as communication is restored.
  • In these cases it may be important to transmit a timestamp with each query. The time of the capture can be a significant factor in the interpretation of the query. For example, Section 13.1 discusses the importance of the time of capture in relation to earlier captures. It is important to note that the time of capture will not always be the same as the time that the query is executed.
    • 3.7. Parallel Searching
  • For performance reasons, multiple queries may be launched in response to a single capture, either in sequence or in parallel. Several queries may be sent in response to a single capture, for example as new words are added to the capture, or to query multiple search engines in parallel.
  • For example, in some embodiments, the system sends queries to a special index for the current document, to a search engine on a local machine, to a search engine on the corporate network, and to remote search engines on the Internet.
  • The results of particular searches may be given higher priority than those from others.
  • The response to a given query may indicate that other pending queries are superfluous; these may be cancelled before completion.
    • 4. Paper and Search Engines
  • Often it is desirable for a search engine that handles traditional online queries also to handle those originating from rendered documents. Conventional search engines may be enhanced or modified in a number of ways to make them more suitable for use with the described system.
  • The search engine and/or other components of the system may create and maintain indices that have different or extra features. The system may modify an incoming paper-originated query or change the way the query is handled in the resulting search, thus distinguishing these paper-originated queries from those coming from queries typed into web browsers and other sources. And the system may take different actions or offer different options when the results are returned by the searches originated from paper as compared to those from other sources. Each of these approaches is discussed below.
    • 4.1. Indexing
  • Often, the same index can be searched using either paper-originated or traditional queries, but the index may be enhanced for use in the current system in a variety of ways.
  • 4.1.1. Knowledge about the Paper Form
  • Extra fields can be added to such an index that will help in the case of a paper-based search.
    • Index Entry Indicating Document Availability in Paper Form
  • The first example is a field indicating that the document is known to exist or be distributed in paper form. The system may give such documents higher priority if the query comes from paper.
    • Knowledge of Popularity Paper Form
  • In this example statistical data concerning the popularity of paper documents (and, optionally, concerning sub-regions within these documents)—for example the amount of scanning activity, circulation numbers provided by the publisher or other sources, etc.—is used to give such documents higher priority, to boost the priority of digital counterpart documents (for example, for browser-based queries or web searches), etc.
    • Knowledge of Rendered Format
  • Another important example may be recording information about the layout of a specific rendering of a document.
  • For a particular edition of a book, for example, the index may include information about where the line breaks and page breaks occur, which fonts were used, any unusual capitalization.
  • The index may also include information about the proximity of other items on the page, such as images, text boxes, tables and advertisements.
    • Use of Semantic Information in Original
  • Lastly, semantic information that can be deduced from the source markup but is not apparent in the paper document, such as the fact that a particular piece of text refers to an item offered for sale, or that a certain paragraph contains program code, may also be recorded in the index.
    • 4.1.2. Indexing in the Knowledge of the Capture Method
  • A second factor that may modify the nature of the index is the knowledge of the type of capture likely to be used. A search initiated by an optical scan may benefit if the index takes into account characters that are easily confused in the OCR process, or includes some knowledge of the fonts used in the document. Similarly, if the query is from speech recognition, an index based on similar-sounding phonemes may be much more efficiently searched. An additional factor that may affect the use of the index in the described model is the importance of iterative feedback during the recognition process. If the search engine is able to provide feedback from the index as the text is being captured, it can greatly increase the accuracy of the capture.
    • Indexing Using Offsets
  • If the index is likely to be searched using the offset-based/autocorrelation OCR methods described in Section 9, in some embodiments, the system stores the appropriate offset or signature information in an index.
    • 4.1.3. Multiple Indices
  • Lastly, in the described system, it may be common to conduct searches on many indices. Indices may be maintained on several machines on a corporate network. Partial indices may be downloaded to the capture device, or to a machine close to the capture device. Separate indices may be created for users or groups of users with particular interests, habits or permissions. An index may exist for each file system, each directory, even each file on a user's hard disk. Indexes are published and subscribed to by users and by systems. It will be important, then, to construct indices that can be distributed, updated, merged and separated efficiently.
    • 4.2. Handling the Queries
  • 4.2.1. Knowing the Capture is from Paper
  • A search engine may take different actions when it recognizes that a search query originated from a paper document. The engine might handle the query in a way that is more tolerant to the types of errors likely to appear in certain capture methods, for example.
  • It may be able to deduce this from some indicator included in the query (for example a flag indicating the nature of the capture), or it may deduce this from the query itself (for example, it may recognize errors or uncertainties typical of the OCR process).
  • Alternatively, queries from a capture device can reach the engine by a different channel or port or type of connection than those from other sources, and can be distinguished in that way. For example, some embodiments of the system will route queries to the search engine by way of a dedicated gateway. Thus, the search engine knows that all queries passing through the dedicated gateway were originated from a paper document.
    • 4.2.2. Use of Context
  • Section 13 below describes a variety of different factors which are external to the captured text itself, yet which can be a significant aid in identifying a document. These include such things as the history of recent scans, the longer-term reading habits of a particular user, the geographic location of a user and the user's recent use of particular electronic documents. Such factors are referred to herein as “context.”
  • Some of the context may be handled by the search engine itself, and be, reflected in the search results. For example, the search engine may keep track of a user's scanning history, and may also cross-reference this scanning history to conventional keyboard-based queries. In such cases, the search engine maintains and uses more state information about each individual user than do most conventional search engines, and each interaction with a search engine may be considered to extend over several searches and a longer period of time than is typical today.
  • Some of the context may be transmitted to the search engine in the search query (Section 3.3), and may possibly be stored at the engine so as to play a part in future queries. Lastly, some of the context will best be handled elsewhere, and so becomes a filter or secondary search applied to the results from the search engine.
    • Data-Stream Input to Search
  • An important input into the search process is the broader context of how the community of users is interacting with the rendered version of the document—for example, which documents are most widely read and by whom. There are analogies with a web search returning the pages that are most frequently linked to, or those that are most frequently selected from past search results. For further discussion of this topic, see Sections 13.4 and 14.2.
    • 4.2.3. Document Sub-Regions
  • The described system can emit and use not only information about documents as a whole, but also information about sub-regions of documents, even down to individual words. Many existing search engines concentrate simply on locating a document or file that is relevant to a particular query. Those that can work on a finer grain and identify a location within a document will provide a significant benefit for the described system.
    • 4.3. Returning the Results
  • The search engine may use some of the further information it now maintains to affect the results returned.
  • The system may also return certain documents to which the user has access only as a result of being in possession of the paper copy (Section 7.4).
  • The search engine may also offer new actions or options appropriate to the described system, beyond simple retrieval of the text.
    • 5. Markup, Annotations and Metadata
  • In addition to performing the capture-search-retrieve process, the described system also associates extra functionality with a document, and in particular with specific locations or segments of text within a document. This extra functionality is often, though not exclusively, associated with the rendered document by being associated with its electronic counterpart. As an example, hyperlinks in a web page could have the same functionality when a printout of that web page is scanned. In some cases, the functionality is not defined in the electronic document, but is stored or generated elsewhere.
  • This layer of added functionality is referred to herein as “markup.”
    • 5.1. Overlays, Static and Dynamic
  • One way to think of the markup is as an “overlay” on the document, which provides further information about—and may specify actions associated with—the document or some portion of it. The markup may include human-readable content, but is often invisible to a user and/or intended for machine use. Examples include options to be displayed in a popup-menu on a nearby display when a user captures text from a particular area in a rendered document, or audio samples that illustrate the pronunciation of a particular phrase.
  • 5.1.1. Several Layers, Possibly from Several Sources
  • Any document may have multiple overlays simultaneously, and these may be sourced from a variety of locations. Markup data may be created or supplied by the author of the document, or by the user, or by some other party.
  • Markup data may be attached to the electronic document or embedded in it. It may be found in a conventional location (for example, in the same place as the document but with a different filename suffix}. Markup data may be included in the search results of the query that located the original document, or may be found by a separate query to the same or another search engine. Markup data may be found using the original captured text and other capture information or contextual information, or it may be found using already-deduced information about the document and location of the capture. Markup data may be found in a location specified in the document, even if the markup itself is not included in the document.
  • The markup may be largely static and specific to the document, similar to the way links on a traditional html web page are often embedded as static data within the html document, but markup may also be dynamically generated and/or applied to a large number of documents. An example of dynamic markup is information attached to a document that includes the up-to-date share price of companies mentioned in that document. An example of broadly applied markup is translation information that is automatically available on multiple documents or sections of documents in a particular language.
    • 5.1.2. Personal “Plug-in” Layers
  • Users may also install, or subscribe to particular sources of, markup data, thus personalizing the system's response to particular captures.
    • 5.2. Keywords and Phrases, Trademarks and Logos
  • Some elements in documents may have particular “markup” or functionality associated with them based on their own characteristics rather than their location in a particular document. Examples include special marks that are printed in the document purely for the purpose of being scanned, as well as logos and trademarks that can link the user to further information about the organization concerned. The same applies to “keywords” or “key phrases” in the text. Organizations might register particular phrases with which they are associated, or with which they would like to be associated, and attach certain markup to them that would be available wherever that phrase was scanned.
  • Any word, phrase, etc. may have associated markup. For example, the system may add certain items to a pop-up menu (e.g., a link to an online bookstore) whenever the user captures the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books. In some embodiments, of the system, digital counterpart documents or indices are consulted to determine whether a capture occurred near the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books—and the system behavior is modified in accordance with this proximity to keyword elements. In the preceding example, note that markup enables data captured from non-commercial text or documents to trigger a commercial transaction.
    • 5.3. User-Supplied Content 5.3.1. User Comments and Annotations, Including Multimedia
  • Annotations are another type of electronic information that may be associated with a document. For example, a user can attach an audio file of his/her thoughts about a particular document for later retrieval as voice annotations. As another example of a multimedia annotation, a user may attach photographs of places referred to in the document. The user generally supplies annotations for the document but the system can associate annotations from other sources (for example, other users in a work group may share annotations).
  • 5.3.2. Notes from Proof-Reading
  • An important example of user-sourced markup is the annotation of paper documents as part of a proofreading, editing or reviewing process.
    • 5.4. Third-Party Content
  • As mentioned earlier, markup data may often be supplied by third parties, such as by other readers of the document. Online discussions and reviews are a good example, as are community-managed information relating to particular works, volunteer contributed translations and explanations.
  • Another example of third-party markup is that provided by advertisers.
    • 5.5. Dynamic Markup Based on Other Users' Data Streams
  • By analyzing the data captured from documents by several or all users of the system, markup can be generated based on the activities and interests of a community. An example might be an online bookstore that creates markup or annotations that tell the user, in effect, “People who enjoyed this book also enjoyed . . . . ” The markup may be less anonymous, and may tell the user which of the people in his/her contact list have also read this document recently. Other examples of datastream analysis are included in Section 14.
    • 5.6. Markup Based on External Events and Data Sources
  • Markup will often be based on external events and data sources, such as input from a corporate database, information from the public Internet, or statistics gathered by the local operating system.
  • Data sources may also be more local, and in particular may provide information about the user's context—his/her identity, location and activities. For example, the system might communicate with the user's mobile phone and offer a markup layer that gives the user the option to send a document to somebody that the user has recently spoken to on the phone.
    • 6. Authentication, Personalization and Security
  • In many situations, the identity of the user will be known. Sometimes this will be an “anonymous identity,” where the user is identified only by the serial number of the capture device, for example. Typically, however, it is expected that the system will have a much more detailed knowledge of the user, which can be used for personalizing the system and to allow activities and transactions to be performed in the user's name.
    • 6.1. User History and “Life Library”
  • One of the simplest and yet most useful functions that the system can perform is to keep a record for a user of the text that s/he has captured and any further information related to that capture, including the details of any documents found, the location within that document and any actions taken as a result.
  • This stored history is beneficial for both the user and the system.
    • 6.1.1. For the User
  • The user can be presented with a “Life Library,” a record of everything s/he has read and captured. This may be simply for personal interest, but may be used, for example, in a library by an academic who is gathering material for the bibliography of his next paper.
  • In some circumstances, the user may wish to make the library public, such as by publishing it on the web in a similar manner to a weblog, so that others may see what s/he is reading and finds of interest.
  • Lastly, in situations where the user captures some text and the system cannot immediately act upon the capture (for example, because an electronic version of the document is not yet available) the capture can be stored in the library and can be processed later, either automatically or in response to a user request. A user can also subscribe to new markup services and apply them to previously captured scans.
    • 6.1.2. For the System
  • A record of a user's past captures is also useful for the system. Many aspects of the system operation can be enhanced by knowing the user's reading habits and history. The simplest example is that any scan made by a user is more likely to come from a document that the user has scanned in the recent past, and in particular if the previous scan was within the last few minutes it is very likely to be from the same document. Similarly, it is more likely that a document is being read in start-to-finish order. Thus, for English documents, it is also more likely that later scans will occur farther down in the document. Such factors can help the system establish the location of the capture in cases of ambiguity, and can also reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured.
    • 6.2. Scanner as Payment, Identity and Authentication Device
  • Because the capture process generally begins with a device of some sort, typically an optical scanner or voice recorder, this device may be used as a key that identifies the user and authorizes certain actions.
  • 6.2.1. Associate Scanner with Phone or Other Account
  • The device may be embedded in a mobile phone or in some other way associated with a mobile phone account. For example, a scanner may be associated with a mobile phone account by inserting a SIM card associated with the account into the scanner. Similarly, the device may be embedded in a credit card or other payment card, or have the facility for such a card to be connected to it. The device may therefore be used as a payment token, and financial transactions may be initiated by the capture from the rendered document.
    • 6.2.2. Using Scanner Input for Authentication
  • The scanner may also be associated with a particular user or account through the process of scanning some token, symbol or text associated with that user or account. In addition, scanner may be used for biometric identification, for example by scanning the fingerprint of the user. In the case of an audio-based capture device, the system may identify the user by matching the voice pattern of the user or by requiring the user to speak a certain password or phrase.
  • For example, where a user scans a quote from a book and is offered the option to buy the book from an online retailer, the user can select this option, and is then prompted to scan his/her fingerprint to confirm the transaction.
  • See also Sections 15.5 and 15.6.
    • 6.2.3. Secure Scanning Device
  • When the capture device is used to identify and authenticate the user, and to initiate transactions on behalf of the user, it is important that communications between the device and other parts of the system are secure. It is also important to guard against such situations as another device impersonating a scanner, and so-called “man in the middle” attacks where communications between the device and other components are intercepted.
  • Techniques for providing such security are well understood in the art; in various embodiments, the hardware and software in the device and elsewhere in the system are configured to implement such techniques.
    • 7. Publishing Models and Elements
  • An advantage of the described system is that there is no need to alter the traditional processes of creating, printing or publishing documents in order to gain many of the system's benefits. There are reasons, though, that the creators or publishers of a document—hereafter simply referred to as the “publishers”—may wish to create functionality to support the described system.
  • This section is primarily concerned with the published documents themselves. For information about other related commercial transactions, such as advertising, see Section 10 entitled “P-Commerce.”
    • 7.1. Electronic Companions to Printed Documents
  • The system allows for printed documents to have an associated electronic presence. Conventionally publishers often ship a CD-ROM with a book that contains further digital information, tutorial movies and other multimedia data, sample code or documents, or further reference materials. In addition, some publishers maintain web sites associated with particular publications which provide such materials, as well as information which may be updated after the time of publishing, such as errata, further comments, updated reference materials, bibliographies and further sources of relevant data, and translations into other languages. Online forums allow readers to contribute their comments about the publication.
  • The described system allows such materials to be much more closely tied to the rendered document than ever before, and allows the discovery of and interaction with them to be much easier for the user. By capturing a portion of text from the document, the system can automatically connect the user to digital materials associated with the document, and more particularly associated with that specific part of the document. Similarly, the user can be connected to online communities that discuss that section of the text, or to annotations and commentaries by other readers. In the past, such information would typically need to be found by searching for a particular page number or chapter.
  • An example application of this is in the area of academic textbooks (Section 17.5).
    • 7.2. “Subscriptions” to Printed Documents
  • Some publishers may have mailing lists to which readers can subscribe if they wish to be notified of new relevant matter or when a new edition of the book is published. With the described system, the user can register an interest in particular documents or parts of documents more easily; in some cases even before the publisher has considered providing any such functionality. The reader's interest can be fed to the publisher, possibly affecting their decision about when and where to provide updates, further information, new editions or even completely new publications on topics that have proved to be of interest in existing books.
  • 7.3. Printed Marks with Special Meaning or Containing Special Data
  • Many aspects of the system are enabled simply through the use of the text already existing in a document. If the document is produced in the knowledge that it may be used in conjunction with the system, however, extra functionality can be added by printing extra information in the form of special marks, which may be used to identify the text or a required action more closely, or otherwise enhance the document's interaction with the system. The simplest and most important example is an indication to the reader that the document is definitely accessible through the system. A special icon might be used, for example, to indicate that this document has an online discussion forum associated with it.
  • Such symbols may be intended purely for the reader, or they may be recognized by the system when scanned and used to initiate some action. Sufficient data may be encoded in the symbol to identify more than just the symbol: it may also store information, for example about the document, edition, and location of the symbol, which could be recognized and read by the system.
    • 7.4. Authorization Through Possession of the Paper Document
  • There are some situations where possession of or access to the printed document would entitle the user to certain privileges, for example, the access to an electronic copy of the document or to additional materials. With the described system, such privileges could be granted simply as a result of the user capturing portions of text from the document, or scanning specially printed symbols. In cases where the system needed to ensure that the user was in possession of the entire document, it might prompt the user to scan particular items or phrases from particular pages, e.g. “the second line of page 46.”
  • 7.5. Documents which Expire
  • If the printed document is a gateway to extra materials and functionality, access to such features can also be time-limited. After the expiry date, a user may be required to pay a fee or obtain a newer version of the document to access the features again. The paper document will, of course, still be usable, but will lose some of its enhanced electronic functionality. This may be desirable, for example, because there is profit for the publisher in receiving fees for access to electronic materials, or in requiring the user to purchase new editions from time to time, or because there are disadvantages associated with outdated versions of the printed document remaining in circulation. Coupons are an example of a type of commercial document that can have an expiration date.
    • 7.6. Popularity Analysis and Publishing Decisions
  • Section 10.5 discusses the use of the system's statistics to influence compensation of authors and pricing of advertisements.
  • In some embodiments, the system deduces the popularity of a publication from the activity in the electronic community associated with it as well as from the use of the paper document. These factors may help publishers to make decisions about what they will publish in future. If a chapter in an existing book, for example, turns out to be exceedingly popular, it may be worth expanding into a separate publication.
    • 8. Document Access Services
  • An important aspect of the described system is the ability to provide to a user who has access to a rendered copy of a document access to an electronic version of that document. In some cases, a document is freely available on a public network or a private network to which the user has access. The system uses the captured text to identify, locate and retrieve the document, in some cases displaying it on the user's screen or depositing it in their email inbox.
  • In some cases, a document will be available in electronic form, but for a variety of reasons may not be accessible to the user. There may not be sufficient connectivity to retrieve the document, the user may not be entitled to retrieve it, there may be a cost associated with gaining access to it, or the document may have been withdrawn and possibly replaced by a new version, to name just a few possibilities. The system typically provides feedback to the user about these situations.
  • As mentioned in Section 7.4, the degree or nature of the access granted to a particular user may be different if it is known that the user already has access to a printed copy of the document.
    • 8.1. Authenticated Document Access
  • Access to the document may be restricted to specific users, or to those meeting particular criteria, or may only be available in certain circumstances, for example when the user is connected to a secure network. Section 6 describes some of the ways in which the credentials of a user and scanner may be established.
    • 8.2. Document Purchase—Copyright-Owner Compensation
  • Documents that are not freely available to the general public may still be accessible on payment of a fee, often as compensation to the publisher or copyright holder. The system may implement payment facilities directly or may make use of other payment methods associated with the user, including those described in Section 6.2.
    • 8.3. Document Escrow and Proactive Retrieval
  • Electronic documents are often transient; the digital source version of a rendered document may be available now but inaccessible in future. The system may retrieve and store the existing version on behalf of the user, even if the user has not requested it, thus guaranteeing its availability should the user request it in future. This also makes it available for the system's use, for example for searching as part of the process of identifying future captures.
  • In the event that payment is required for access to the document, a trusted “document escrow” service can retrieve the document on behalf of the user, such as upon payment of a modest fee, with the assurance that the copyright holder will be fully compensated in future if the user should ever request the document from the service.
  • Variations on this theme can be implemented if the document is not available in electronic form at the time of capture. The user can authorize the service to submit a request for or make a payment for the document on his/her behalf if the electronic document should become available at a later date.
  • 8.4. Association with Other Subscriptions and Accounts
  • Sometimes payment may be waived, reduced or satisfied based on the user's existing association with another account or subscription. Subscribers to the printed version of a newspaper might automatically be entitled to retrieve the electronic version, for example.
  • In other cases, the association may not be quite so direct: a user may be granted access based on an account established by their employer, or based on their scanning of a printed copy owned by a friend who is a subscriber.
  • 8.5. Replacing Photocopying with Scan-and-Print
  • The process of capturing text from a paper document, identifying an electronic original, and printing that original, or some portion of that original associated with the capture, forms an alternative to traditional photocopying with many advantages:
      • the paper document need not be in the same location as the final printout, and in any case need not be there at the same time
      • the wear and damage caused to documents by the photocopying process, especially to old, fragile and valuable documents, can be avoided
      • the quality of the copy is typically be much higher
      • records may be kept about which documents or portions of documents are the most frequently copied
      • payment may be made to the copyright owner as part of the process
      • unauthorized copying may be prohibited
        8.6. Locating Valuable Originals from Photocopies
  • When documents are particularly valuable, as in the case of legal instruments or documents that have historical or other particular significance, people may typically work from copies of those documents, often for many years, while the originals are kept in a safe location.
  • The described system could be coupled to a database which records the location of an original document, for example in an archiving warehouse, making it easy for somebody with access to a copy to locate the archived original paper document.
    • 9. Text Recognition Technologies
  • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technologies have traditionally focused on images that include a large amount of text, for example from a flat-bed scanner capturing a whole page. OCR technologies often need substantial training and correcting by the user to produce useful text. OCR technologies often require substantial processing power on the machine doing the OCR, and, while many systems use a dictionary, they are generally expected to operate on an effectively infinite vocabulary.
  • All of the above traditional characteristics may be improved upon in the described system.
  • While this section focuses on OCR, many of the issues discussed map directly onto other recognition technologies, in particular speech recognition. As mentioned in Section 3.1, the process of capturing from paper may be achieved by a user reading the text aloud into a device which captures audio. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that principles discussed here with respect to images, fonts, and text fragments often also apply to audio samples, user speech models and phonemes.
    • 9.1. Optimization for Appropriate Devices
  • A scanning device for use with the described system will often be small, portable, and low power. The scanning device may capture only a few words at a time, and in some implementations does not even capture a whole character at once, but rather a horizontal slice through the text, many such slices being stitched together to form a recognizable signal from which the text may be deduced. The scanning device may also have very limited processing power or storage so, while in some embodiments it may perform all of the OCR process itself, many embodiments will depend on a connection to a more powerful device, possibly at a later time, to convert the captured signals into text. Lastly, it may have very limited facilities for user interaction, so may need to defer any requests for user input until later, or operate in a “best-guess” mode to a greater degree than is common now.
    • 9.2. “Uncertain” OCR
  • The primary new characteristic of OCR within the described system is the fact that it will, in general, examine images of text which exists elsewhere and which may be retrieved in digital form. An exact transcription of the text is therefore not always required from the OCR engine. The OCR system may output a set or a matrix of possible matches, in some cases including probability weightings, which can still be used to search for the digital original.
    • 9.3. Iterative OCR—Guess, Disambiguate, Guess
  • If the device performing the recognition is able to contact the document index at the time of processing, then the OCR process can be informed by the contents of the document corpus as it progresses, potentially offering substantially greater recognition accuracy.
  • Such a connection will also allow the device to inform the user when sufficient text has been captured to identify the digital source.
    • 9.4. Using Knowledge of Likely Rendering
  • When the system has knowledge of aspects of the likely printed rendering of a document—such as the font typeface used in printing, or the layout of the page, or which sections are in italics—this too can help in the recognition process. (Section 4.1.1)
    • 9.5. Font Caching—Determine Font on Host, Download to Client
  • As candidate source texts in the document corpus are identified, the font, or a rendering of it, may be downloaded to the device to help with the recognition.
    • 9.6. Autocorrelation and Character Offsets
  • While component characters of a text fragment may be the most recognized way to represent a fragment of text that may be used as a document signature, other representations of the text may work sufficiently well that the actual text of a text fragment need not be used when attempting to locate the text fragment in a digital document and/or database, or when disambiguating the representation of a text fragment into a readable form. Other representations of text fragments may provide benefits that actual text representations lack. For example, optical character recognition of text fragments is often prone to errors, unlike other representations of captured text fragments that may be used to search for and/or recreate a text fragment without resorting to optical character recognition for the entire fragment. Such methods may be more appropriate for some devices used with the current system.
  • Those of ordinary skill in the art and others will appreciate that there are many ways of describing the appearance of text fragments. Such characterizations of text fragments may include, but are not limited to, word lengths, relative word lengths, character heights, character widths, character shapes, character frequencies, token frequencies, and the like. In some embodiments, the offsets between matching text tokens (i.e., the number of intervening tokens plus one) are used to characterize fragments of text.
  • Conventional OCR uses knowledge about fonts, letter structure and shape to attempt to determine characters in scanned text. Embodiments of the system are different; they employ a variety of methods that use the rendered text itself to assist in the recognition process. These embodiments use characters (or tokens) to “recognize each other.” One way to refer to such self-recognition is “template matching,” and is similar to “convolution.” To perform such self-recognition, the system slides a copy of the text horizontally over itself and notes matching regions of the text images. Prior template matching and convolution techniques encompass a variety of related techniques. These techniques to tokenize and/or recognize characters/tokens will be collectively referred to herein as “autocorrelation,” as the text is used to correlate with its own component parts when matching characters/tokens.
  • When auto correlating, complete connected regions that match are of interest. This occurs when characters (or groups of characters) overlay other instances of the same character (or group). Complete connected regions that match automatically provide tokenizing of the text into component tokens. As the two copies of the text are slid past each other, the regions where perfect matching occurs (i.e., all pixels in a vertical slice are matched) are noted. When a character/token matches itself, the horizontal extent of this matching (e.g., the connected matching portion of the text) also matches.
  • Note that at this stage there is no need to determine the actual identity of each token (i.e., the particular letter, digit or symbol, or group of these, that corresponds to the token image), only the offset to the next occurrence of the same token in the scanned text. The offset number is the distance (number of tokens) to the next occurrence of the same token. If the token is unique within the text string, the offset is zero (0). The sequence of token offsets thus generated is a signature that can be used to identify the scanned text.
  • In some embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are compared to an index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon the token offsets of their contents (Section 4.1.2). In other embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are converted to text, and compared to a more conventional index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon their contents
  • As has been noted earlier, a similar token-correlation process may be applied to speech fragments when the capture process consists of audio samples of spoken words.
    • 9.7. Font/Character “Self-Recognition”
  • Conventional template-matching OCR compares scanned images to a library of character images. In essence, the alphabet is stored for each font and newly scanned images are compared to the stored images to find matching characters. The process generally has an initial delay until the correct font has been identified. After that, the OCR process is relatively quick because most documents use the same font throughout. Subsequent images can therefore be converted to text by comparison with the most recently identified font library.
  • The shapes of characters in most commonly used fonts are related. For example, in most fonts, the letter “c” and the letter “e” are visually related—as are “t” and “f,” etc. The OCR process is enhanced by use of this relationship to construct templates for letters that have not been scanned yet. For example, where a reader scans a short string of text from a paper document in a previously unencountered font such that the system does not have a set of image templates with which to compare the scanned images the system can leverage the probable relationship between certain characters to construct the font template library even though it has not yet encountered all of the letters in the alphabet. The system can then use the constructed font template library to recognize subsequent scanned text and to further refine the constructed font library.
    • 9.8. Send Anything Unrecognized (Including Graphics) to Server
  • When images cannot be machine-transcribed into a form suitable for use in a search process, the images themselves can be saved for later use by the user, for possible manual transcription, or for processing at a later date when different resources may be available to the system.
    • 10. P-Commerce
  • Many of the actions made possible by the system result in some commercial transaction taking place. The phrase p-commerce is used herein to describe commercial activities initiated from paper via the system.
  • 10.1. Sales of Documents from their Physical Printed Copies.
  • When a user captures text from a document, the user may be offered that document for purchase either in paper or electronic form. The user may also be offered related documents, such as those quoted or otherwise referred to in the paper document, or those on a similar subject, or those by the same author.
    • 10.2. Sales of Anything Else Initiated or Aided by Paper
  • The capture of text may be linked to other commercial activities in a variety of ways. The captured text may be in a catalog that is explicitly designed to sell items, in which case the text will be associated fairly directly with the purchase of an item (Section 18.2). The text may also be part of an advertisement, in which case a sale of the item being advertised may ensue.
  • In other cases, the user captures other text from which their potential interest in a commercial transaction may be deduced. A reader of a novel set in a particular country, for example, might be interested in a holiday there. Someone reading a review of a new car might be considering purchasing it. The user may capture a particular fragment of text knowing that some commercial opportunity will be presented to them as a result, or it may be a side-effect of their capture activities.
    • 10.3. Capture of Labels, Icons, Serial Numbers, Barcodes on an Item Resulting in a Sale
  • Sometimes text, or symbols are actually printed on an item or its packaging. An example is the serial number or product id often found on a label on the back or underside of a piece of electronic equipment. The system can offer the user a convenient way to purchase one or more of the same items by capturing that text. They may also be offered manuals, support or repair services.
    • 10.4. Contextual Advertisements
  • In addition to the direct capture of text from an advertisement, the system allows for a new kind of advertising which is not necessarily explicitly in the rendered document, but is nonetheless based on what people are reading.
    • 10.4.1. Advertising Based on Scan Context and History
  • In a traditional paper publication, advertisements generally consume a large amount of space relative to the text of a newspaper article, and a limited number of them can be placed around a particular article. In the described system, advertising can be associated with individual words or phrases, and can selected according to the particular interest the user has shown by capturing that text and possibly taking into account their history of past scans.
  • With the described system, it is possible for a purchase to be tied to a particular printed document and for an advertiser to get significantly more feedback about the effectiveness of their advertising in particular print publications.
    • 10.4.2. Advertising Based on User Context and History
  • The system may gather a large amount of information about other aspects of a user's context for its own use (Section 13); estimates of the geographical location of the user are a good example. Such data can also be used to tailor the advertising presented to a user of the system.
    • 10.5. Models of Compensation
  • The system enables some new models of compensation for advertisers and marketers. The publisher of a printed document containing advertisements may receive some income from a purchase that originated from their document. This may be true whether or not the advertisement existed in the original printed form; it may have been added electronically either by the publisher, the advertiser or some third party, and the sources of such advertising may have been subscribed to by the user.
    • 10.5.1. Popularity-Based Compensation
  • Analysis of the statistics generated by the system can reveal the popularity of certain parts of a publication (Section 14.2). In a newspaper, for example, it might reveal the amount of time readers spend looking at a particular page or article, or the popularity of a particular columnist. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for an author or publisher to receive compensation based on the activities of the readers rather than on more traditional metrics such as words written or number of copies distributed. An author whose work becomes a frequently read authority on a subject might be considered differently in future contracts from one whose books have sold the same number of copies but are rarely opened. (See also Section 7.6)
    • 10.5.2. Popularity-Based Advertising
  • Decisions about advertising in a document may also be based on statistics about the readership. The advertising space around the most popular columnists may be sold at a premium rate. Advertisers might even be charged or compensated some time after the document is published based on knowledge about how it was received.
    • 10.6. Marketing Based on Life Library
  • The “Life Library” or scan history described in Sections 6.1 and 16.1 can be an extremely valuable source of information about the interests and habits of a user. Subject to the appropriate consent and privacy issues, such data can inform offers of goods or services to the user. Even in an anonymous form, the statistics gathered can be exceedingly useful.
  • 10.7. Sale/Information at Later Date (when Available)
  • Advertising and other opportunities for commercial transactions may not be presented to the user immediately at the time of text capture. For example, the opportunity to purchase a sequel to a novel may not be available at the time the user is reading the novel, but the system may present them with that opportunity when the sequel is published.
  • A user may capture data that relates to a purchase or other commercial transaction, but may choose not to initiate and/or complete the transaction at the time the capture is made. In some embodiments, data related to captures is stored in a user's Life Library, and these Life Library entries can remain “active” (i.e., capable of subsequent interactions similar to those available at the time the capture was made). Thus a user may review a capture at some later time, and optionally complete a transaction based on that capture. Because the system can keep track of when and where the original capture occurred, all parties involved in the transaction can be properly compensated. For example, the author who wrote the story—and the publisher who published the story—that appeared next to the advertisement from which the user captured data can be compensated when, six months later, the user visits their Life Library, selects that particular capture from the history, and chooses “Purchase this item at Amazon” from the pop-up menu (which can be similar or identical to the menu optionally presented at the time of the capture).
    • 11. Operating System and Application Integration
  • Modern Operating Systems (OSs) and other software packages have many characteristics that can be advantageously exploited for use with the described system, and may also be modified in various ways to provide an even better platform for its use.
    • 11.1. Incorporation of Scan and Print-Related Information in Metadata and Indexing
  • New and upcoming file systems and their associated databases often have the ability to store a variety of metadata associated with each file. Traditionally, this metadata has included such things as the ID of the user who created the file, the dates of creation, last modification, and last use. Newer file systems allow such extra information as keywords, image characteristics, document sources and user comments to be stored, and in some systems this metadata can be arbitrarily extended. File systems can therefore be used to store information that would be useful in implementing the current system. For example, the date when a given document was last printed can be stored by the file system, as can details about which text from it has been captured from paper using the described system, and when and by whom.
  • Operating systems are also starting to incorporate search engine facilities that allow users to find local files more easily. These facilities can be advantageously used by the system. It means that many of the search-related concepts discussed in Sections 3 and 4 apply not just to today's Internet-based and similar search engines, but also to every personal computer.
  • In some cases specific software applications will also include support for the system above and beyond the facilities provided by the OS.
    • 11.2. OS Support for Capture Devices
  • As the use of capture devices such as pen scanners becomes increasingly common, it will become desirable to build support for them into the operating system, in much the same way as support is provided for mice and printers, since the applicability of capture devices extends beyond a single software application. The same will be true for other aspects of the system's operation. Some examples are discussed below. In some embodiments, the entire described system, or the core of it, is provided by the OS. In some embodiments, support for the system is provided by Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that can be used by other software packages, including those directly implementing aspects of the system.
    • 11.2.1. Support for OCR and Other Recognition Technologies
  • Most of the methods of capturing text from a rendered document require some recognition software to interpret the source data, typically a scanned image or some spoken words, as text suitable for use in the system. Some OSs include support for speech or handwriting recognition, though it is less common for OSs to include support for OCR, since in the past the use of OCR has typically been limited to a small range of applications.
  • As recognition components become part of the OS, they can take better advantage of other facilities provided by the OS. Many systems include spelling dictionaries, grammar analysis tools, internationalization and localization facilities, for example, all of which can be advantageously employed by the described system for its recognition process, especially since they may have been customized for the particular user to include words and phrases that he/she would commonly encounter.
  • If the operating system includes full-text indexing facilities, then these can also be used to inform the recognition process, as described in Section 9.3.
    • 11.2.2. Action to be Taken on Scans
  • If an optical scan or other capture occurs and is presented to the OS, it may have a default action to be taken under those circumstances in the event that no other subsystem claims ownership of the capture. An example of a default action is presenting the user with a choice of alternatives, or submitting the captured text to the OS's built-in search facilities.
    • 11.2.3. OS has Default Action for Particular Documents or Document Types
  • If the digital source of the rendered document is found, the OS may have a standard action that it will take when that particular document, or a document of that class, is scanned. Applications and other subsystems may register with the OS as potential handlers of particular types of capture, in a similar manner to the announcement by applications of their ability to handle certain file types.
  • Markup data associated with a rendered document, or with a capture from a document, can include instructions to the operating system to launch specific applications, pass applications arguments, parameters, or data, etc.
  • 11.2.4. Interpretation of Gestures and Mapping into Standard Actions
  • In Section 12.1.3 the use of “gestures” is discussed, particularly in the case of optical scanning, where particular movements made with a handheld scanner might represent standard actions such as marking the start and end of a region of text.
  • This is analogous to actions such as pressing the shift key on a keyboard while using the cursor keys to select a region of text, or using the wheel on a mouse to scroll a document. Such actions by the user are sufficiently standard that they are interpreted in a system-wide way by the OS, thus ensuring consistent behavior. The same is desirable for scanner gestures and other scanner-related actions.
    • 11.2.5. Set Response to Standard (and Non-Standard) Iconic/Text Printed Menu Items
  • In a similar way, certain items of text or other symbols may, when scanned, cause standard actions to occur, and the OS may provide a selection of these. An example might be that scanning the text “[print]” in any document would cause the OS to retrieve and print a copy of that document. The OS may also provide a way to register such actions and associate them with particular scans.
    • 11.3. Support in System GUI Components for Typical Scan-Initiated Activities
  • Most software applications are based substantially on standard Graphical User Interface components provided by the OS.
  • Use of these components by developers helps to ensure consistent behavior across multiple packages, for example that pressing the left-cursor key in any text-editing context should move the cursor to the left, without every programmer having to implement the same functionality independently.
  • A similar consistency in these components is desirable when the activities are initiated by text-capture or other aspects of the described system. Some examples are given below.
    • 11.3.1. Interface to Find Particular Text Content
  • A typical use of the system may be for the user to scan an area of a paper document, and for the system to open the electronic counterpart in a software package that is able to display or edit it, and cause that package to scroll to and highlight the scanned text (Section 12.2.1). The first part of this process, finding and opening the electronic document, is typically provided by the OS and is standard across software packages. The second part, however—locating a particular piece of text within a document and causing the package to scroll to it and highlight it—is not yet standardized and is often implemented differently by each package. The availability of a standard API for this functionality could greatly enhance the operation of this aspect of the system.
    • 11.3.2. Text Interactions
  • Once a piece of text has been located within a document, the system may wish to perform a variety of operations upon that text. As an example, the system may request the surrounding text, so that the user's capture of a few words could result in the system accessing the entire sentence or paragraph containing them. Again, this functionality can be usefully provided by the OS rather than being implemented in every piece of software that handles text.
    • 11.3.3. Contextual (Popup) Menus
  • Some of the operations that are enabled by the system will require user feedback, and this may be optimally requested within the context of the application handling the data. In some embodiments, the system uses the application pop-up menus traditionally associated with clicking the right mouse button on some text. The system inserts extra options into such menus, and causes them to be displayed as a result of activities such as scanning a paper document.
    • 11.4. Web/Network Interfaces
  • In today's increasingly networked world, much of the functionality available on individual machines can also be accessed over a network, and the functionality associated with the described system is no exception. As an example, in an office environment, many paper documents received by a user may have been printed by other users' machines on the same corporate network. The system on one computer, in response to a capture, may be able to query those other machines for documents which may correspond to that capture, subject to the appropriate permission controls.
    • 11.5. Printing of Document Causes Saving
  • An important factor in the integration of paper and digital documents is maintaining as much information as possible about the transitions between the two. In some embodiments, the OS keeps a simple record of when any document was printed and by whom. In some embodiments, the OS takes one or more further actions that would make it better suited for use with the system. Examples include:
      • Saving the digital rendered version of every document printed along with information about the source from which it was printed
      • Saving a subset of useful information about the printed version—for example, the fonts used and where the line breaks occur—which might aid future scan interpretation
      • Saving the version of the source document associated with any printed copy
      • Indexing the document automatically at the time of printing and storing the results for future searching
    11.6. My (Printed/Scanned) Documents
  • An OS often maintains certain categories of folders or files that have particular significance. A user's documents may, by convention or design, be found in a “My Documents” folder, for example. Standard file-opening dialogs may automatically include a list of recently opened documents.
  • On an OS optimized for use with the described system, such categories may be enhanced or augmented in ways that take into account a user's interaction with paper versions of the stored files. Categories such as “My Printed Documents” or “My Recently Read Documents” might usefully be identified and incorporated in its operations.
    • 11.7. OS-Level Markup Hierarchies
  • Since important aspects of the system are typically provided using the “markup” concepts discussed in Section 5, it would clearly be advantageous to have support for such markup provided by the OS in a way that was accessible to multiple applications as well as to the OS itself. In addition, layers of markup may be provided by the OS, based on its own knowledge of documents under its control and the facilities it is able to provide.
    • 11.8. Use of OS ORM Facilities
  • An increasing number of operating systems support some form of “Digital Rights Management”: the ability to control the use of particular data according to the rights granted to a particular user, software entity or machine. It may inhibit unauthorized copying or distribution of a particular document, for example.
    • 12. User Interface
  • The user interface of the system may be entirely on a PC, if the capture device is relatively dumb and is connected to it by a cable, or entirely on the device, if it is sophisticated and with significant processing power of its own. In some cases, some functionality resides in each component. Part, or indeed all, of the system's functionality may also be implemented on other devices such as mobile phones or PDAs.
  • The descriptions in the following sections are therefore indications of what may be desirable in certain implementations, but they are not necessarily appropriate for all and may be modified in several ways.
    • 12.1. On the Capture Device
  • With all capture devices, but particularly in the case of an optical scanner, the user's attention will generally be on the device and the paper at the time of scanning. It is very desirable, then, that any input and feedback needed as part of the process of scanning do not require the user's attention to be elsewhere, for example on the screen of a computer, more than is necessary.
    • 12.1.1. Feedback on Scanner
  • A handheld scanner may have a variety of ways of providing feedback to the user about particular conditions. The most obvious types are direct visual, where the scanner incorporates indicator lights or even a full display, and auditory, where the scanner can make beeps, clicks or other sounds. Important alternatives include tactile feedback, where the scanner can vibrate, buzz, or otherwise stimulate the user's sense of touch, and projected feedback, where it indicates a status by projecting onto the paper anything from a colored spot of light to a sophisticated display.
  • Important immediate feedback that may be provided on the device includes:
      • feedback on the scanning process—user scanning too fast, at too great an angle, or drifting too high or low on a particular line
      • sufficient content—enough has been scanned to be pretty certain of finding a match if one exists—important for disconnected operation
      • context known—a source of the text has been located
      • unique context known—one unique source of the text has been located
      • availability of content—indication of whether the content is freely available to the user, or at a cost
  • Many of the user interactions normally associated with the later stages of the system may also take place on the capture device if it has sufficient abilities, for example, to display part or all of a document.
    • 12.1.2. Controls on Scanner
  • The device may provide a variety of ways for the user to provide input in addition to basic text capture. Even when the device is in close association with a host machine that has input options such as keyboards and mice, it can be disruptive for the user to switch back and forth between manipulating the scanner and using a mouse, for example.
  • The handheld scanner may have buttons, scroll/jog-wheels, touch-sensitive surfaces, and/or accelerometers for detecting the movement of the device. Some of these allow a richer set of interactions while still holding the scanner.
  • For example, in response to scanning some text, the system presents the user with a set of several possible matching documents. The user uses a scroll-wheel on the side of the scanner is to select one from the list, and clicks a button to confirm the selection.
    • 12.1.3. Gestures
  • The primary reason for moving a scanner across the paper is to capture text, but some movements may be detected by the device and used to indicate other user intentions. Such movements are referred to herein as “gestures.”
  • As an example, the user can indicate a large region of text by scanning the first few words in conventional left-to-right order, and the last few in reverse order, i.e. right to left. The user can also indicate the vertical extent of the text of interest by moving the scanner down the page over several lines. A backwards scan might indicate cancellation of the previous scan operation.
    • 12.1.4. Online/Offline Behavior
  • Many aspects of the system may depend on network connectivity, either between components of the system such as a scanner and a host laptop, or with the outside world in the form of a connection to corporate databases and Internet search. This connectivity may not be present all the time, however, and so there will be occasions when part or all of the system may be considered to be “offline.” It is desirable to allow the system to continue to function usefully in those circumstances.
  • The device may be used to capture text when it is out of contact with other parts of the system. A very simple device may simply be able to store the image or audio data associated with the capture, ideally with a timestamp indicating when it was captured. The various captures may be uploaded to the rest of the system when the device is next in contact with it, and handled then. The device may also upload other data associated with the captures, for example voice annotations associated with optical scans, or location information.
  • More sophisticated devices may be able to perform some or all of the system operations themselves despite being disconnected. Various techniques for improving their ability to do so are discussed in Section 15.3. Often it will be the case that some, but not all, of the desired actions can be performed while offline. For example, the text may be recognized, but identification of the source may depend on a connection to an Internet based search engine. In some embodiments, the device therefore stores sufficient information about how far each operation has progressed for the rest of the system to proceed efficiently when connectivity is restored.
  • The operation of the system will, in general, benefit from immediately available connectivity, but there are some situations in which performing several captures and then processing them as a batch can have advantages. For example, as discussed in Section 13 below, the identification of the source of a particular capture may be greatly enhanced by examining other captures made by the user at approximately the same time. In a fully connected system where live feedback is being provided to the user, the system is only able to use past captures when processing the current one. If the capture is one of a batch stored by the device when offline, however, the system will be able to take into account any data available from later captures as well as earlier ones when doing its analysis.
    • 12.2. On a Host Device
  • A scanner will often communicate with some other device, such as a PC, PDA, phone or digital camera to perform many of the functions of the system, including more detailed interactions with the user.
    • 12.2.1. Activities Performed in Response to a Capture
  • When the host device receives a capture, it may initiate a variety of activities. An incomplete list of possible activities performed by the system after locating and electronic counterpart document associated with the capture and a location within that document follows.
      • The details of the capture may be stored in the user's history. (Section 6.1)
      • The document may be retrieved from local storage or a remote location. (Section 8)
  • The operating system's metadata and other records associated with the document may be updated. (Section 11.1)
      • Markup associated with the document may be examined to determine the next relevant operations. (Section 5)
      • A software application may be started to edit, view or otherwise operate on the document. The choice of application may depend on the source document, or on the contents of the scan, or on some other aspect of the capture. (Section 11.2.2, 11.2.3)
      • The application may scroll to, highlight, move the insertion point to, or otherwise indicate the location of the capture. (Section 11.3)
      • The precise bounds of the captured text may be modified, for example to select whole words, sentences or paragraphs around the captured text. (Section 11.3.2)
      • The user may be given the option to copy the capture text to the clipboard or perform other standard operating system or application-specific operations upon it.
      • Annotations may be associated with the document or the captured text. These may come from immediate user input, or may have been captured earlier, for example in the case of voice annotations associated with an optical scan. (Section 19.4)
      • Markup may be examined to determine a set of further possible operations for the user to select.
    12.2.2. Contextual Popup Menus
  • Sometimes the appropriate action to be taken by the system will be obvious, but sometimes it will require a choice to be made by the user. One good way to do this is through the use of “popup menus” or, in cases where the content is also being displayed on a screen, with so-called “contextual menus” that appear close to the content. (See Section 11.3.3). In some embodiments, the scanner device projects a popup menu onto the paper document. A user may select from such menus using traditional methods such as a keyboard and mouse, or by using controls on the capture device (Section 12.1.2), gestures (Section 12.1.3), or by interacting with the computer display using the scanner (Section 12.2.4). In some embodiments, the popup menus which can appear as a result of a capture include default items representing actions which occur if the user does not respond—for example, if the user ignores the menu and makes another capture.
    • 12.2.3. Feedback on Disambiguation
  • When a user starts capturing text, there will initially be several documents or other text locations that it could match. As more text is captured, and other factors are taken into account (Section 13), the number of candidate locations will decrease until the actual location is identified, or further disambiguation is not possible without user input. In some embodiments, the system provides a real-time display of the documents or the locations found, for example in list, thumbnail-image or text-segment form, and for the number of elements in that display to reduce in number as capture continues. In some embodiments, the system displays thumbnails of all candidate documents, where the size or position of the thumbnail is dependent on the probability of it being the correct match.
  • When a capture is unambiguously identified, this fact may be emphasized to the user, for example using audio feedback.
  • Sometimes the text captured will occur in many documents and will be recognized to be a quotation. The system may indicate this on the screen, for example by grouping documents containing a quoted reference around the original source document.
  • 12.2.4. Scanning from Screen
  • Some optical scanners may be able to capture text displayed on a screen as well as on paper. Accordingly, the term rendered document is used herein to indicate that printing onto paper is not the only form of rendering, and that the capture of text or symbols for use by the system may be equally valuable when that text is displayed on an electronic display.
  • The user of the described system may be required to interact with a computer screen for a variety of other reasons, such as to select from a list of options. It can be inconvenient for the user to put down the scanner and start using the mouse or keyboard. Other sections have described physical controls on the scanner (Section 12.1.2) or gestures (Section 12.1.3) as methods of input which do not require this change of tool, but using the scanner on the screen itself to scan some text or symbol is an important alternative provided by the system.
  • In some embodiments, the optics of the scanner allow it to be used in a similar manner to a light-pen, directly sensing its position on the screen without the need for actual scanning of text, possibly with the aid of special hardware or software on the computer.
    • 13. Context Interpretation
  • An important aspect of the described system is the use of other factors, beyond the simple capture of a string of text, to help identify the document in use. A capture of a modest amount of text may often identify the document uniquely, but in many situations it will identify a few candidate documents. One solution is to prompt the user to confirm the document being scanned, but a preferable alternative is to make use of other factors to narrow down the possibilities automatically. Such supplemental information can dramatically reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured and/or increase the reliability and speed with which the location in the electronic counterpart can be identified. This extra material is referred to as “context,” and it was discussed briefly in Section 4.2.2. We now consider it in more depth.
    • 13.1. System and Capture Context
  • Perhaps the most important example of such information is the user's capture history.
  • It is highly probable that any given capture comes from the same document as the previous one, or from an associated document, especially if the previous capture took place in the last few minutes (Section 6.1.2). Conversely, if the system detects that the font has changed between two scans, it is more likely that they are from different documents.
  • Also useful are the user's longer-term capture history and reading habits. These can also be used to develop a model of the user's interests and associations.
    • 13.2. User's Real-World Context
  • Another example of useful context is the user's geographical location. A user in Paris is much more likely to be reading Le Monde than the Seattle Times, for example. The timing, size and geographical distribution of printed versions of the documents can therefore be important, and can to some degree be deduced from the operation of the system.
  • The time of day may also be relevant, for example in the case of a user who always reads one type of publication on the way to work, and a different one at lunchtime or on the train going home.
    • 13.3. Related Digital Context
  • The user's recent use of electronic documents, including those searched for or retrieved by more conventional means, can also be a helpful indicator.
  • In some cases, such as on a corporate network; other factors may be usefully considered:
      • Which documents have been printed recently?
      • Which documents have been modified recently on the corporate file server?
      • Which documents have been emailed recently?
  • All of these examples might suggest that a user was more likely to be reading a paper version of those documents. In contrast, if the repository in which a document resides can affirm that the document has never been printed or sent anywhere where it might have been printed, then it can be safely eliminated in any searches originating from paper.
    • 13.4. Other Statistics—the Global Context
  • Section 14 covers the analysis of the data stream resulting from paper-based searches, but it should be noted here that statistics about the popularity of documents with other readers, about the timing of that popularity, and about the parts of documents most frequently scanned are all examples of further factors which can be beneficial in the search process. The system brings the possibility of Google-type page-ranking to the world of paper.
  • See also Section 4.2.2 for some other implications of the use of context for search engines.
    • 14. Data-Stream Analysis
  • The use of the system generates an exceedingly valuable data-stream as a side effect. This stream is a record of what users are reading and when, and is in many cases a record of what they find particularly valuable in the things they read. Such data has never really been available before for paper documents.
  • Some ways in which this data can be useful for the system, and for the user of the system, are described in Section 6.1. This section concentrates on its use for others. There are, of course, substantial privacy issues to be considered with any distribution of data about what people are reading, but such issues as preserving the anonymity of data are well known to those of skill in the art.
    • 14.1. Document Tracking
  • When the system knows which documents any given user is reading, it can also deduce who is reading any given document. This allows the tracking of a document through an organization, to allow analysis, for example, of who is reading it and when, how widely it was distributed, how long that distribution took, and who has seen current versions while others are still working from out-of-date copies.
  • For published documents that have a wider distribution, the tracking of individual copies is more difficult, but the analysis of the distribution of readership is still possible.
    • 14.2. Read Ranking—Popularity of Documents and Sub-Regions
  • In situations where users are capturing text or other data that is of particular interest to them, the system can deduce the popularity of certain documents and of particular sub-regions of those documents. This forms a valuable input to the system itself {Section 4.2.2) and an important source of information for authors, publishers and advertisers (Section 7.6, Section 10.5). This data is also useful when integrated in search engines and search indices—for example, to assist in ranking search results for queries coming from rendered documents, and/or to assist in ranking conventional queries typed into a web browser.
    • 14.3. Analysis of Users—Building Profiles
  • Knowledge of what a user is reading enables the system to create a quite detailed model of the user's interests and activities. This can be useful on an abstract statistical basis—“35% of users who buy this newspaper also read the latest book by that author”—but it can also allow other interactions with the individual user, as discussed below.
    • 14.3.1. Social Networking
  • One example is connecting one user with others who have related interests. These may be people already known to the user. The system may ask a university professor, “Did you know that your colleague at XYZ University has also just read this paper?” The system may ask a user, “Do you want to be linked up with other people in your neighborhood who are also how reading Jane Eyre?” Such links may be the basis for the automatic formation of book clubs and similar social structures, either in the physical world or online
    • 14.3.2. Marketing
  • Section 10.6 has already mentioned the idea of offering products and services to an individual user based on their interactions with the system. Current online booksellers, for example, often make recommendations to a user based on their previous interactions with the bookseller. Such recommendations become much more useful when they are based on interactions with the actual books.
    • 14.4. Marketing Based on Other Aspects of the Data-Stream
  • We have discussed some of the ways in which the system may influence those publishing documents, those advertising through them, and other sales initiated from paper (Section 10). Some commercial activities may have no direct interaction with the paper documents at all and yet may be influenced by them. For example, the knowledge that people in one community spend more time reading the sports section of the newspaper -than they do the financial section might be of interest to somebody setting up a health club.
  • 14.5. Types of Data that May be Captured
  • In addition to the statistics discussed, such as who is reading which bits of which documents, and when and where, it can be of interest to examine the actual contents of the text captured, regardless of whether or not the document has been located.
  • In many situations, the user will also not just be capturing some text, but will be causing some action to occur as a result. It might be emailing a reference to the document to an acquaintance, for example. Even in the absence of information about the identity of the user or the recipient of the email, the knowledge that somebody considered the document worth emailing is very useful.
  • In addition to the various methods discussed for deducing the value of a particular document or piece of text, in some circumstances the user will explicitly indicate the value by assigning it a rating.
  • Lastly, when a particular set of users are known to form a group, for example when they are known to be employees of a particular company, the aggregated statistics of that group can be used to deduce the importance of a particular document to that group.
    • 15. Device Features and Functions
  • A capture device for use with the system needs little more than a way of capturing text from a rendered version of the document. As described earlier (Section 1.2), this capture may be achieved through a variety of methods including taking a photograph of part of the document or typing some words into a mobile phone keypad. This capture may be achieved using a small hand-held optical scanner capable of recording a line or two of text at a time, or an audio capture device such as a voice recorder into which the user is reading text from the document. The device used may be a combination of these—an optical scanner which could also record voice annotations, for example—and the capturing functionality may be built into some other device such as a mobile phone, PDA, digital camera or portable music player.
    • 15.1. Input and Output
  • Many of the possibly beneficial additional input and output facilities for such a device have been described in Section 12.1. They include buttons, scroll-wheels and touch-pads for input, and displays, indicator lights, audio and tactile transducers for output. Sometimes the device will incorporate many of these, sometimes very few. Sometimes the capture device will be able to communicate with another device that already has them (Section 15.6), for example using a wireless link, and sometimes the capture functionality will be incorporated into such other device (Section 15.7).
    • 15.2. Connectivity
  • In some embodiments, the device implements the majority of the system itself. In some embodiments, however, it often communicates with a PC or other computing device and with the wider world using communications facilities.
  • Often these communications facilities are in the form of a general-purpose data network such as Ethernet, 802.11 or UWB or a standard peripheral-connecting network such as USB, IEEE-1394 (Firewire), Bluetooth™ or infra-red. When a wired connection such as Firewire or USB is used, the device may receive electrical power though the same connection. In some circumstances, the capture device may appear to a connected machine to be a conventional peripheral such as a USB storage device.
  • Lastly, the device may in some circumstances “dock” with another device, either to be used in conjunction with that device or for convenient storage.
    • 15.3. Caching and Other Online/Offline Functionality
  • Sections 3.5 and 12.1.4 have raised the topic of disconnected operation. When a capture device has a limited subset of the total system's functionality, and is not in communication with the other parts of the system, the device can still be useful, though the functionality available will sometimes be reduced. At the simplest level, the device can record the raw image or audio data being captured and this can be processed later. For the user's benefit, however, it can be important to give feedback where possible about whether the data captured is likely to be sufficient for the task in hand, whether it can be recognized or is likely to be recognizable, and whether the source of the data can be identified or is likely to be identifiable later. The user will then know whether their capturing activity is worthwhile. Even when all of the above are unknown, the raw data can still be stored so that, at the very least, the user can refer to them later. The user may be presented with the image of a scan, for example, when the scan cannot be recognized by the OCR process.
  • To illustrate some of the range of options available, both a rather minimal optical scanning device and then a much more full-featured one are described below. Many devices occupy a middle ground between the two.
    • 15.3.1. The SimpleScanner—a Low-End Offline Example
  • The SimpleScanner has a scanning head able to read pixels from the page as it is moved along the length of a line of text. It can detect its movement along the page and record the pixels with some information about the movement. It also has a clock, which allows each scan to be time-stamped. The clock is synchronized with a host device when the SimpleScanner has connectivity. The clock may not represent the actual time of day, but relative times may be determined from it so that the host can deduce the actual time of a scan, or at worst the elapsed time between scans.
  • The SimpleScanner does not have sufficient processing power to perform any OCR itself, but it does have some basic knowledge about typical word-lengths, word-spacings, and their relationship to font size. It has some basic indicator lights which tell the user whether the scan is likely to be readable, whether the head is being moved too fast, too slowly or too inaccurately across the paper, and when it determines that sufficient words of a given size are likely to have been scanned for the document to be identified.
  • The SimpleScanner has a USB connector and can be plugged into the USB port on a computer, where it will be recharged. To the computer it appears to be a USB storage device on which time-stamped data files have been recorded, and the rest of the system software takes over from this point.
    • 15.3.2. The SuperScanner—a High-End Offline Example
  • The SuperScanner also depends on connectivity for its full operation, but it has a significant amount of on-board storage and processing which can help it make better judgments about the data captured while offline.
  • As it moves along the line of text, the captured pixels are stitched together and passed to an OCR engine that attempts to recognize the text. A number of fonts, including those from the user's most-read publications, have been downloaded to it to help perform this task, as has a dictionary that is synchronized with the user's spelling-checker dictionary on their PC and so contains many of the words they frequently encounter. Also stored on the scanner is a list of words and phrases with the typical frequency of their use—this may be combined with the dictionary. The scanner can use the frequency statistics both to help with the recognition process and also to inform its judgment about when a sufficient quantity of text has been captured; more frequently used phrases are less likely to be useful as the basis for a search query.
  • In addition, the full index for the articles in the recent issues of the newspapers and periodicals most commonly read by the user are stored on the device, as are the indices for the books the user has recently purchased from an online bookseller, or from which the user has scanned anything within the last few months. Lastly, the titles of several thousand of the most popular publications which have data available for the system are stored so that, in the absence of other information the user can scan the title and have a good idea as to whether or not captures from a particular work are likely to be retrievable in electronic form later.
  • During the scanning process, the system informs user that the captured data has been of sufficient quality and of a sufficient nature to make it probable that the electronic copy can be retrieved when connectivity is restored. Often the system indicates to the user that the scan is known to have been successful and that the context has been recognized in one of the on-board indices, or that the publication concerned is known to be making its data available to the system, so the later retrieval ought to be successful.
  • The SuperScanner docks in a cradle connected to a PC's Firewire or USB port, at which point, in addition to the upload of captured data, its various onboard indices and other databases are updated based on recent user activity and new publications. It also has the facility to connect to wireless public networks or to communicate via Bluetooth to a mobile phone and thence with the public network when such facilities are available.
    • 15.4. Features for Optical Scanning
  • We now consider some of the features that may be particularly desirable in an optical scanner device.
    • 15.4.1. Flexible Positioning and Convenient Optics
  • One of the reasons for the continuing popularity of paper is the ease of its use in a wide variety of situations where a computer, for example, would be impractical or inconvenient. A device intended to capture a substantial part of a user's interaction with paper should therefore be similarly convenient in use. This has not been the case for scanners in the past; even the smallest hand-held devices have been somewhat unwieldy. Those designed to be in contact with the page have to be held at a precise angle to the paper and moved very carefully along the length of the text to be scanned. This is acceptable when scanning a business report on an office desk, but may be impractical when scanning a phrase from a novel while waiting for a train. Scanners based on camera-type optics that operate at a distance from the paper may similarly be useful in some circumstances.
  • Some embodiments of the system use a scanner that scans in contact with the paper, and which, instead of lenses, uses an image conduit a bundle of optical fibers to transmit the image from the page to the optical sensor device. Such a device can be shaped to allow it to be held in a natural position; for example, in some embodiments, the part in contact with the page is wedge-shaped, allowing the user's hand to move more naturally over the page in a movement similar to the use of a highlighter pen. The conduit is either in direct contact with the paper or in close proximity to it, and may have a replaceable transparent tip that can protect the image conduit from possible damage. As has been mentioned in Section 12.2.4, the scanner may be used to scan from a screen as well as from paper, and the material of the tip can be chosen to reduce the likelihood of damage to such displays.
  • Lastly, some embodiments of the device will provide feedback to the user during the scanning process which will indicate through the use of light, sound or tactile feedback when the user is scanning too fast, too slow, too unevenly or is drifting too high or low on the scanned line.
    • 15.5. Security, Identity, Authentication, Personalization and Billing
  • As described in Section 6, the capture device may form an important part of identification and authorization for secure transactions, purchases, and a variety of other operations. It may therefore incorporate, in addition to the circuitry and software required for such a role, various hardware features that can make it more secure, such as a smartcard reader, RFID, or a keypad on which to type a PIN.
  • It may also include various biometric sensors to help identify the user. In the case of an optical scanner, for example, the scanning head may also be able to read a fingerprint. For a voice recorder, the voice pattern of the user may be used.
    • 15.6. Device Associations
  • In some embodiments, the device is able to form an association with other nearby devices to increase either its own or their functionality. In some embodiments, for example, it uses the display of a nearby PC or phone to give more detailed feedback about its operation, or uses their network connectivity. The device may, on the other hand, operate in its role as a security and identification device to authenticate operations performed by the other device. Or it may simply form an association in order to function as a peripheral to that device.
  • An interesting aspect of such associations is that they may be initiated and authenticated using the capture facilities of the device. For example, a user wishing to identify themselves securely to a public computer terminal may use the scanning facilities of the device to scan a code or symbol displayed on a particular area of the terminal's screen and so effect a key transfer. An analogous process may be performed using audio signals picked up by a voice-recording device.
  • 15.7. Integration with Other Devices
  • In some embodiments, the functionality of the capture device is integrated into some other device that is already in use. The integrated devices may be able to share a power supply, data capture and storage capabilities, and network interfaces. Such integration may be done simply for convenience, to reduce cost, or to enable functionality that would not otherwise be available.
  • Some examples of devices into which the capture functionality can be integrated include:
      • an existing peripheral such as a mouse, a stylus, a USB “webcam” camera, a Bluetooth™ headset or a remote control
      • another processing/storage device, such as a PDA, an MP3 player, a voice recorder, a digital camera or a mobile phone
      • other often-carried items, just for convenience—a watch, a piece of jewelry, a pen, a car key fob
    15.7.1. Mobile Phone Integration
  • As an example of the benefits of integration, we consider the use of a modified mobile phone as the capture device.
  • In some embodiments, the phone hardware is not modified to support the system, such as where the text capture can be adequately done through voice recognition, where they can either be processed by the phone itself, or handled by a system at the other end of a telephone call, or stored in the phone's memory for future processing. Many modern phones have the ability to download software that could implement some parts of the system. Such voice capture is likely to be suboptimal in many situations, however, for example when there is substantial background noise, and accurate voice recognition is a difficult task at the best of times. The audio facilities may best be used to capture voice annotations.
  • In some embodiments, the camera built into many mobile phones is used to capture an image of the text. The phone display, which would normally act as a viewfinder for the camera, may overlay on the live camera image information about the quality of the image and its suitability for OCR, which segments of text are being captured, and even a transcription of the text if the OCR can be performed on the phone.
  • In some embodiments, the phone is modified to add dedicated capture facilities, or to provide such functionality in a clip-on adaptor or a separate Bluetooth connected peripheral in communication with the phone. Whatever the nature of the capture mechanism, the integration with a modern cellphone has many other advantages. The phone has connectivity with the wider world, which means that queries can be submitted to remote search engines or other parts of the system, and copies of documents may be retrieved for immediate storage or viewing. A phone typically has sufficient processing power for many of the functions of the system to be performed locally, and sufficient storage to capture a reasonable amount of data. The amount of storage can also often be expanded by the user. Phones have reasonably good displays and audio facilities to provide user feedback, and often a vibrate function for tactile feedback. They also have good power supplies.
  • Most significantly of all, they are a device that most users are already carrying.
    • Part III—Example Applications of the System
  • This section lists example uses of the system and applications that may be built on it. This list is intended to be purely illustrative and in no sense exhaustive.
    • 16. Personal Applications 16.1. Life Library
  • The Life Library (see also Section 6.1.1) is a digital archive of any important documents that the subscriber wishes to save and is a set of embodiments of services of this system. Important books, magazine articles, newspaper clippings, etc., can all be saved in digital form in the Life Library. Additionally, the subscriber's annotations, comments, and notes can be saved with the documents. The Life Library can be accessed via the Internet and World Wide Web.
  • The system creates and manages the Life Library document archive for subscribers. The subscriber indicates which documents the subscriber wishes to have saved in his life library by scanning information from the document or by otherwise indicating to the system that the particular document is to be added to the subscriber's Life Library. The scanned information is typically text from the document but can also be a barcode or other code identifying the document. The system accepts the code and uses it to identify the source document. After the document is identified the system can store either a copy of the document in the user's Life Library or a link to a source where the document may be obtained.
  • One embodiment of the Life Library system can check whether the subscriber is authorized to obtain the electronic copy. For example, if a reader scans text or an identifier from a copy of an article in the New York Times (NYT) so that the article will be added to the reader's Life Library, the Life Library system will verify with the NYT whether the reader is subscribed to the online version of the NYT; if so, the reader gets a copy of the article stored in his Life Library account; if not, information identifying the document and how to order it is stored in his Life Library account.
  • In some embodiments, the system maintains a subscriber profile for each subscriber that includes access privilege information. Document access information can be compiled in several ways, two of which are: 1) the subscriber supplies the document access information to the Life Library system, along with his account names and passwords, etc., or 2) the Life Library service provider queries the publisher with the subscriber's information and the publisher responds by providing access to an electronic copy if the Life Library subscriber is authorized to access the material. If the Life Library subscriber is not authorized to have an electronic copy of the document, the publisher provides a price to the Life Library service provider, which then provides the customer with the option to purchase the electronic document. If so, the Life Library service provider either pays the publisher directly and bills the Life Library customer later or the Life Library service provider immediately bills the customer's credit card for the purchase. The Life Library service provider would get a percentage of the purchase price or a small fixed fee for facilitating the transaction.
  • The system can archive the document in the subscriber's personal library and/or any other library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. For example, as a user scans text from a printed document, the Life Library system can identify the rendered document and its electronic counterpart. After the source document is identified, the Life Library system might record information about the source document in the user's personal library and in a group library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. Group libraries are collaborative archives such as a document repository for: a group working together on a project, a group of academic researchers, a group web log, etc.
  • The life library can be organized in many ways: chronologically, by topic, by level of the subscriber's interest, by type of publication {newspaper, book, magazine, technical paper, etc.), where read, when read, by ISBN or by Dewey decimal, etc. In one alternative, the system can learn classifications based on how other subscribers have classified the same document. The system can suggest classifications to the user or automatically classify the document for the user.
  • In various embodiments, annotations may be inserted directly into the document or may be maintained in a separate file. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a newspaper article, the article is archived in his Life Library with the scanned text highlighted. Alternatively, the article is archived in his Life Library along with an associated annotation file (thus leaving the archived document unmodified). Embodiments of the system can keep a copy of the source document in each subscriber's library, a copy in a master library that many subscribers can access, or link to a copy held by the publisher.
  • In some embodiments, the Life Library stores only the user's modifications to the document (e.g., highlights, etc.) and a link to an online version of the document (stored elsewhere). The system or the subscriber merges the changes with the document when the subscriber subsequently retrieves the document.
  • If the annotations are kept in a separate file, the source document and the annotation file are provided to the subscriber and the subscriber combines them to create a modified document. Alternatively, the system combines the two files prior to presenting them to the subscriber. In another alternative, the annotation file is an overlay to the document file and can be overlaid on the document by software in the subscriber's computer.
  • Subscribers to the Life Library service pay a monthly fee to have the system maintain the subscriber's archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays a small amount (e.g., a micro-payment) for each document stored in the archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays to access the subscriber's archive on a per-access fee. Alternatively, subscribers can compile libraries and allow others to access the materials/annotations on a revenue share model with the Life Library service provider and copyright holders. Alternatively, the Life Library service provider receives a payment from the publisher when the Life Library subscriber orders a document (a revenue share model with the publisher, where the Life Library service provider gets a share of the publisher's revenue).
  • In some embodiments, the Life Library service provider acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the copyright holder (or copyright holder's agent, such as the Copyright Clearance Center, a.k.a. CCC) to facilitate billing and payment for copyrighted materials. The Life Library service provider uses the subscriber's billing information and other user account information to provide this intermediation service. Essentially, the Life Library service provider leverages the pre-existing relationship with the subscriber to enable purchase of copyrighted materials on behalf of the subscriber.
  • In some embodiments, the Life Library system can store excerpts from documents. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a paper document, the regions around the scanned text are excerpted and placed in the Life Library, rather than the entire document being archived in the life library. This is especially advantageous when the document is long because preserving the circumstances of the original scan prevents the subscriber from re-reading the document to find the interesting portions. Of course, a hyperlink to the entire electronic counterpart of the paper document can be included with the excerpt materials.
  • In some embodiments, the system also stores information about the document in the Life Library, such as author, publication title, publication date, publisher, copyright holder (or copyright holder's licensing agent), ISBN, links to public annotations of the document, readrank, etc. Some of this additional information about the document is a form of paper document metadata. Third parties may create public annotation files for access by persons other than themselves, such the general public. Linking to a third party's commentary on a document is advantageous because reading annotation files of other users enhances the subscriber's understanding of the document.
  • In some embodiments, the system archives materials by class. This feature allows a Life Library subscriber to quickly store electronic counterparts to an entire class of paper documents without access to each paper document. For example, when the subscriber scans some text from a copy of National Geographic magazine, the system provides the subscriber with the option to archive all back issues of the National Geographic. If the subscriber elects to archive all back issues, the Life Library service provider would then verify with the National Geographic Society whether the subscriber is authorized to do so. If not, the Life Library service provider can mediate the purchase of the right to archive the National Geographic magazine collection.
    • 16.2. Life Saver
  • A variation on, or enhancement of, the Life Library concept is the “Life Saver,” where the system uses the text captured by a user to deduce more about their other activities. The scanning of a menu from a particular restaurant, a program from a particular theater performance, a timetable at a particular railway station, or an article from a local newspaper allows the system to make deductions about the user's location and social activities, and could construct an automatic diary for them, for example as a website. The user would be able to edit and modify the diary, add additional materials such as photographs and, of course, look again at the items scanned.
    • 17. Academic Applications
  • Portable scanners supported by the described system have many compelling uses in the academic setting. They can enhance student teacher interaction and augment the learning experience. Among other uses, students can annotate study materials to suit their unique needs; teachers can monitor classroom performance; and teachers can automatically verify source materials cited in student assignments.
    • 17.1. Children's Books
  • A child's interaction with a paper document, such as a book, is monitored by a literacy acquisition system that employs a specific set of embodiments of this system. The child uses a portable scanner that communicates with other elements of the literacy acquisition system. In addition to the portable scanner, the literacy acquisition system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer. The scanner is coupled with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.). When the child sees an unknown word in the book, the child scans it with the scanner. In one embodiment, the literacy acquisition system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the word. The database includes a dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (e.g., sound, graphics, etc.). After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the child. In another embodiment, the word and its definition are displayed by the literacy acquisition system on the computer's monitor. Multimedia files about the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if a child reading “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” scanned the word “bear,” the system might pronounce the word “bear” and play a short video about bears on the computer's monitor. In this way, the child learns to pronounce the written word and is visually taught what the word means via the multimedia presentation.
  • The literacy acquisition system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the learning process. The child uses this supplementary information to quickly acquire a deeper understanding of the written material. The system can be used to teach beginning readers to read, to help children acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. This system provides the child with information about words with which the child is unfamiliar or about which the child wants more information.
    • 17.2. Literacy Acquisition
  • In some embodiments, the system compiles personal dictionaries. If the reader sees a word that is new, interesting, or particularly useful or troublesome, the reader saves it (along with its definition) to a computer file. This computer file becomes the reader's personalized dictionary. This dictionary is generally smaller in size than a general dictionary so can be downloaded to a mobile station or associated device and thus be available even when the system isn't immediately accessible. In some embodiments, the personal dictionary entries include audio files to assist with proper word pronunciation and information identifying the paper document from which the word was scanned.
  • In some embodiments, the system creates customized spelling and vocabulary tests for students. For example, as a student reads an assignment, the student may scan unfamiliar words with the portable scanner. The system stores a list of all the words that the student has scanned. Later, the system administers a customized spelling/vocabulary test to the student on an associated monitor (or prints such a test on an associated printer).
    • 17.3. Music Teaching
  • The arrangement of notes on a musical staff is similar to the arrangement of letters in a line of text. The same scanning device discussed for capturing text in this system can be used to capture music notation, and an analogous process of constructing a search against databases of known musical pieces would allow the piece from which the capture occurred to be identified which can then be retrieved, played, or be the basis for some further action.
    • 17.4. Detecting Plagiarism
  • Teachers can use the system to detect plagiarism or to verify sources by scanning text from student papers and submitting the scanned text to the system. For example, a teacher who wishes to verify that a quote in a student paper came from the source that the student cited can scan a portion of the quote and compare the title of the document identified by the system with the title of the document cited by the student. Likewise, the system can use scans of text from assignments submitted as the student's original work to reveal if the text was instead copied.
    • 17.5. Enhanced Textbook
  • In some embodiments, capturing text from an academic textbook links students or staff to more detailed explanations, further exercises, student and staff discussions about the material, related example past exam questions, further reading on the subject, recordings of the lectures on the subject, and so forth. (See also Section 7.1.)
    • 17.6. Language Learning
  • In some embodiments, the system is used to teach foreign languages. Scanning a Spanish word, for example, might cause the word to be read aloud in Spanish along with its definition in English.
  • The system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the new language acquisition process. The reader uses this supplementary information to acquire quickly a deeper understanding of the material. The system can be used to teach beginning students to read foreign languages, to help students acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. The system provides information about foreign words with which the reader is unfamiliar or for which the reader wants more information.
  • Reader interaction with a paper document, such as a newspaper or book, is monitored by a language skills system. The reader has a portable scanner that communicates with the language skills system. In some embodiments, the language skills system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer. The scanner communicates with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.). When the reader sees an unknown word in an article, the reader scans it with the scanner. The database includes a foreign language dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (sound, graphics, etc.). In one embodiment, the system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the scanned word. After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the reader. In some embodiments, the word and its definition are both displayed on the computer's monitor. Multimedia files about grammar tips related to the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if the words “to speak” are scanned, the system might pronounce the word “hablar,” play a short audio clip that demonstrates the proper Spanish pronunciation, and display a complete list of the various conjugations of “hablar.” In this way, the student learns to pronounce the written word, is visually taught the spelling of the word via the multimedia presentation, and learns how to conjugate the verb. The system can also present grammar tips about the proper usage of “hablar” along with common phrases.
  • In some embodiments, the user scans a word or short phrase from a rendered document in a language other than the user's native language (or some other language that the user knows reasonably well). In some embodiments, the system maintains a prioritized list of the user's “preferred” languages. The system identifies the electronic counterpart of the rendered document, and determines the location of the scan within the document. The system also identifies a second electronic counterpart of the document that has been translated into one of the user's preferred languages, and determines the location in the translated document corresponding to the location of the scan in the original document. When the corresponding location is not known precisely, the system identifies a small region (e.g., a paragraph) that includes the corresponding location of the scanned location. The corresponding translated location is then presented to the user. This provides the user with a precise translation of the particular usage at the scanned location, including any slang or other idiomatic usage that is often difficult to accurately translate on a word-by-word basis.
    • 17.7. Gathering Research Materials
  • A user researching a particular topic may encounter all sorts of material, both in print and on screen, which they might wish to record as relevant to the topic in some personal archive. The system would enable this process to be automatic as a result of scanning a short phrase in any piece of material, and could also create a bibliography suitable for insertion into a publication on the subject.
    • 18. Commercial Applications
  • Obviously, commercial activities could be made out of almost any process discussed in this document, but here we concentrate on a few obvious revenue streams.
    • 18.1. Fee-Based Searching and Indexing
  • Conventional Internet search engines typically provide free search of electronic documents, and also make no charge to the content providers for including their content in the index. In some embodiments, the system provides for charges to users and/or payments to search engines and/or content providers in connection with the operation and use of the system.
  • In some embodiments, subscribers to the system's services pay a fee for searches originating from scans of paper documents. For example, a stockbroker may be reading a Wall Street Journal article about a new product offered by Company X. By scanning the Company X name from the paper document and agreeing to pay the necessary fees, the stockbroker uses the system to search special or proprietary databases to obtain premium information about the company, such as analyst's reports. The system can also make arrangements to have priority indexing of the documents most likely to be read in paper form, for example by making sure all of the newspapers published on a particular day are indexed and available by the time they hit the streets.
  • Content providers may pay a fee to be associated with certain terms in search queries submitted from paper documents. For example, in one embodiment, the system chooses a most preferred content provider based on additional context about the provider (the context being, in this case, that the content provider has paid a fee to be moved up the results list). In essence, the search provider is adjusting paper document search results based on pre-existing financial arrangements with a content provider. See also the description of keywords and key phrases in Section 5.2.
  • Where access to particular content is to be restricted to certain groups of people (such as clients or employees), such content may be protected by a firewall and thus not generally indexable by third parties. The content provider may nonetheless wish to provide an index to the protected content. In such a case, the content provider can pay a service provider to provide the content provider's index to system subscribers. For example, a law firm may index all of a client's documents. The documents are stored behind the law firm's firewall. However, the law firm wants its employees and the client to have access to the documents through the portable scanner so it provides the index (or a pointer to the index) to the service provider, which in turn searches the law firm's index when employees or clients of the law firm submit paper-scanned search terms via their portable scanners. The law firm can provide a list of employees and/or clients to the service provider's system to enable this function or the system can verify access rights by querying the law firm prior to searching the law firm's index. Note that in the preceding example, the index provided by the law firm is only of that client's documents, not an index of all documents at the law firm. Thus, the service provider can only grant the law firm's clients access to the documents that the law firm indexed for the client.
  • There are at least two separate revenue streams that can result from searches originating from paper documents: one revenue stream from the search function, and another from the content delivery function. The search function revenue can be generated from paid subscriptions from the scanner users, but can also be generated on a per-search charge. The content delivery revenue can be shared with the content provider or copyright holder (the service provider can take a percentage of the sale or a fixed fee, such as a micropayment, for each delivery), but also can be generated by a “referral” model in which the system gets a fee or percentage for every item that the subscriber orders from the online catalog and that the system has delivered or contributed to, regardless of whether the service provider intermediates the transaction. In some embodiments, the system service provider receives revenue for all purchases that the subscriber made from the content provider, either for some predetermined period of time or at any subsequent time when a purchase of an identified product is made.
    • 18.2. Catalogs
  • Consumers may use the portable scanner to make purchases from paper catalogs. The subscriber scans information from the catalog that identifies the catalog. This information is text from the catalog, a bar code, or another identifier of the catalog. The subscriber scans information identifying the products that s/he wishes to purchase. The catalog mailing label may contain a customer identification number that identifies the customer to the catalog vendor. If so, the subscriber can also scan this customer identification number. The system acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the vendor to facilitate the catalog purchase by providing the customer's selection and customer identification number to the vendor.
    • 18.3. Coupons
  • A consumer scans paper coupons and saves an electronic copy of the coupon in the scanner, or in a remote device such as a computer, for later retrieval and use. An advantage of electronic storage is that the consumer is freed from the burden of carrying paper coupons. A further advantage is that the electronic coupons may be retrieved from any location. In some embodiments, the system can track coupon expiration dates, alert the consumer about coupons that will expire soon, and/or delete expired coupons from storage. An advantage for the issuer of the coupons is the possibility of receiving more feedback about who is using the coupons and when and where they are captured and used.
    • 19. General Applications 19.1. Forms
  • The system may be used to auto-populate an electronic document that corresponds to a paper form. A user scans in some text or a barcode that uniquely identifies the paper form. The scanner communicates the identity of the form and information identifying the user to a nearby computer. The nearby computer has an Internet connection. The nearby computer can access a first database of forms and a second database having information about the user of the scanner (such as a service provider's subscriber information database). The nearby computer accesses an electronic version of the paper form from the first database and auto-populates the fields of the form from the user's information obtained from the second database. The nearby computer then emails the completed form to the intended recipient. Alternatively, the computer could print the completed form on a nearby printer.
  • Rather than access an external database, in some embodiments, the system has a portable scanner that contains the user's information, such as in an identity module, SIM, or security card. The scanner provides information identifying the form to the nearby PC. The nearby PC accesses the electronic form and queries the scanner for any necessary information to fill out the form.
    • 19.2. Business Cards
  • The system can be used to automatically populate electronic address books or other contact lists from paper documents. For example, upon receiving a new acquaintance's business card, a user can capture an image of the card with his/her cellular phone. The system will locate an electronic copy of the card, which can be used to update the cellular phone's onboard address book with the new acquaintance's contact information. The electronic copy may contain more information about the new acquaintance than can be squeezed onto a business card. Further, the onboard address book may also store a link to the electronic copy such that any changes to the electronic copy will be automatically updated in the cell phone's address book. In this example, the business card optionally includes a symbol or text that indicates the existence of an electronic copy. If no electronic copy exists, the cellular phone can use OCR and knowledge of standard business card formats to fill out an entry in the address book for the new acquaintance. Symbols may also aid in the process of extracting information directly from the image. For example, a phone icon next to the phone number on the business card can be recognized to determine the location of the phone number.
    • 19.3. Proofreading/Editing
  • The system can enhance the proofreading and editing process. One way the system can enhance the editing process is by linking the editor's interactions with a paper document to its electronic counterpart. As an editor reads a paper document and scans various parts of the document, the system will make the appropriate annotations or edits to an electronic counterpart of the paper document. For example, if the editor scans a portion of text and makes the “new paragraph” control gesture with the scanner, a computer in communication with the scanner would insert a “new paragraph” break at the location of the scanned text in the electronic copy of the document.
    • 19.4. Voice Annotation
  • A user can make voice annotations to a document by scanning a portion of text from the document and then making a voice recording that is associated with the scanned text. In some embodiments, the scanner has a microphone to record the user's verbal annotations. After the verbal annotations are recorded, the system identifies the document from which the text was scanned, locates the scanned text within the document, and attaches the voice annotation at that point. In some embodiments, the system converts the speech to text and attaches the annotation as a textual comment.
  • In some embodiments, the system keeps annotations separate from the document, with only a reference to the annotation kept with the document. The annotations then become an annotation markup layer to the document for a specific subscriber or group of users.
  • In some embodiments, for each capture and associated annotation, the system identifies the document, opens it using a software package, scrolls to the location of the scan and plays the voice annotation. The user can then interact with a document while referring to voice annotations, suggested changes or other comments recorded either by themselves or by somebody else.
    • 19.5. Help in Text
  • The described system can be used to enhance paper documents with electronic help menus. In some embodiments, a markup layer associated with a paper document contains help menu information for the document. For example, when a user scans text from a certain portion of the document, the system checks the markup associated with the document and presents a help menu to the user. The help menu is presented on a display on the scanner or on an associated nearby display.
  • 19.6. Use with Displays
  • In some situations, it is advantageous to be able to scan information from a television, computer monitor, or other similar display. In some embodiments, the portable scanner is used to scan information from computer monitors and televisions. In some embodiments, the portable optical scanner has an illumination sensor that is optimized to work with traditional cathode ray tube (CRT} display techniques such as rasterizing, screen blanking, etc.
  • A voice capture device which operates by capturing audio of the user reading text from a document will typically work regardless of whether that document is on paper, on a display, or on some other medium.
    • 19.6.1. Public Kiosks and Dynamic Session IDs
  • One use of the direct scanning of displays is the association of devices as described in Section 15.6. For example, in some embodiments, a public kiosk displays a dynamic session ID on its monitor. The kiosk is connected to a communication network such as the Internet or a corporate intranet. The session ID changes periodically but at least every time that the kiosk is used so that a new session ID is displayed to every user. To use the kiosk, the subscriber scans in the session ID displayed on the kiosk; by scanning the session ID, the user tells the system that he wishes to temporarily associate the kiosk with his scanner for the delivery of content resulting from scans of printed documents or from the kiosk screen itself. The scanner may communicate the Session ID and other information authenticating the scanner (such as serial number, account number, or other identifying information) directly to the system. For example, the scanner can communicate directly (where “directly” means without passing the message through the kiosk) with the system by sending the session initiation message through the user's cell phone (which is paired with the user's scanner via Bluetooth™). Alternatively, the scanner can establish a wireless link with the kiosk and use the kiosk's communication link by transferring the session initiation information to the kiosk (perhaps via short range RF such as Bluetooth™, etc.); in response, the kiosk sends the session initiation information to the system via its Internet connection.
  • The system can prevent others from using a device that is already associated with a scanner during the period (or session) in which the device is associated with the scanner. This feature is useful to prevent others from using a public kiosk before another person's session has ended. As an example of this concept related to use of a computer at an Internet cafe, the user scans a barcode on a monitor of a PC which s/he desires to use; in response, the system sends a session ID to the monitor that it displays; the user initiates the session by scanning the session ID from the monitor (or entering it via a keypad or touch screen or microphone on the portable scanner); and the system associates in its databases the session ID with the serial number (or other identifier that uniquely identifies the user's scanner) of his/her scanner so another scanner cannot scan the session ID and use the monitor during his/her session. The scanner is in communication (through wireless link such as Bluetooth™, a hardwired link such as a docking station, etc.) with a PC associated with the monitor or is in direct (i.e., w/o going through the PC) communication with the system via another means such as a cellular phone, etc.
    • Part IV—System Details
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the typical environment in which embodiments of the system operate. The system functions in a distributed computing environment 400 that includes a plurality of devices interconnected by a wireless network 401, the Internet 402 or other networks (not shown}. All these communications and connections are interconnected via suitable network connections using suitable network communication protocols. In various embodiments, the servers and other devices communicate with each other in accordance with respective APIs, which form additional embodiment of the system. In alternate embodiments, the devices and servers may communicate in accordance with open/standard protocols.
  • The servers and other devices include an OCR device 411 or other text capture device that is used to capture text from a rendered document 412; a wireless device 421 and/or a user device 422 to which the text capture device uploads various representations of captured text and other user input, and via which the system can provide various types of feedback to the user; a user account server 431 and associated user account database 432 in which the system manages user account information for the user; a search engine server 441 and an associated search database 442 that the system uses to perform queries containing text captured from a rendered document to identify positions in electronic documents in which the captured text occurs; and a document server 451 and an associated document database 452 from which the system retrieves copies of documents determined to contain the captured text. It will also be appreciated that while these servers are illustrated as single devices, each server may actually comprise more than a single device in an actual system practicing embodiments of the system. It will also be appreciated that the servers include file servers, database servers or a mixture that includes file servers and database servers. It will further be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, that while the various servers may be discussed as separate devices, in other embodiments of the system the servers may reside on a single device.
  • If the scanner incorporates a magnetic sensor, data can be coded in documents magnetically as well as optically, acoustically, tactually, etc.
  • Although the process of turning electronic documents into printed form has existed almost from the outset of computing, what has been lacking is an efficient way to reference back to the original digital sources of printed documents. In some embodiments, the system achieves this by scanning the desired position within a document to identify a distinctive text “signature,” where this signature provides information that can be used to locate the corresponding location within the original digital source document. The system sends this digital signature to a server that has access to database of electronic documents, which desirably includes an electronic version of the paper document in question (though, as explained below, useful outcomes can be obtained even when this is not the case). The server then identifies the corresponding location (or locations) in the electronic source document, connecting it with the original scan of the paper document. Establishing this relationship enables numerous useful innovations related to the use of printed documents in a variety of contexts. Various embodiment of the system are discussed below.
  • In one perspective, the system can be viewed as using auxiliary or augmenting information to transform document recognition into document navigation (e.g., finding a location and traversing portions of a document, and generating information for the traversal). Some of the many “hints” which the system may employ/discover include:
      • How fast the user reads
      • which direction the user reads
      • What periodicals the user subscribes to
      • The user's daily and weekly behavior (such as reading the Sunday paper on Sunday morning)
      • Recent marks the user has made in this and other documents
      • The types of materials/subjects which the user has been interested in historically
      • An explicit user profile
      • Current user location (as might be given by wireless environment, proximity to and/or activity on the user's PC, etc.)
      • The nature of the text
      • etc.
  • In many cases, the first marks a user makes in a document will be used to capture the typeface or font. The meaning of these character objects can then be determined by a (offset-based) template-matching plus disambiguation approach mentioned elsewhere, or by more conventional approaches. Once the current typeface or font is known, the device can capture and transmit actual text (e.g., ASCII), or it can use the (offset-based) template-matching representation mentioned elsewhere.
  • Because capital letters occur infrequently, in some embodiments, the system handles them in a special way. Because the system generally has a source or reference copy of the document available, the system can anticipate situations where capital letters (as well as punctuation) might or will occur.
  • In many cases there is no guarantee that a particular instance of a document will be rendered exactly as it appears in the source or reference copy. Nonetheless, the system can often infer how the rendered copy will handle these marks (capitals).
  • A good example is the capital letter that usually begins an English sentence. Because these are rare, it will not in general be easy to use template matching and disambiguation to interpret these initial capitals. One alternative solution is to essentially ignore capitals—by ignoring the first character of each new paragraph, sentence, etc.
  • And in the disambiguation process, capital letters and other infrequent marks are handled correctly automatically—in that characters which only occur once (don't repeat) are given a special default offset (e.g., a code of 0).
  • Note that when a special index is constructed from an offset-based representation (or other ambiguous representation), the uncertainty about the leading character can be anticipated—that is, the system knows from the source document that a capital will occur at a certain location, and that it will not match
  • This issue of capitals is a good example of how the system is distinguished from prior OCR systems. Because the system assumes (and in some cases depends on) a source document being (now or in future) available, various uncertainties and problems are dealt with easily. And because our focus is primarily document navigation, rather than interpretation, issues which would trip up a conventional OCR system (like needing to have special knowledge about the shapes of all capital letters in all fonts, etc.) do not cause problems for the system.
  • As an example, a user may wish to indicate the following sentence, which occurs in a rendered document: “Take as an example this sentence.” A conventional OCR system would seek to understand and interpret the letter “T”—in order to ascertain whether the first was “Take” or “Make” or “Fake” or “Rake”, etc. However, the system is only looking for distinguishing reference features for navigation purposes. The system can simply drop the “T” and search the source document for “ake as an example”—where this phrase might be represented as letters, offsets, or in another form. So long as the remainder of the phrase constitutes an identifying signature, the interpretation of the initial character is not essential.
  • Another perspective on this issue and distinction comes by understanding that conventional OCR was employed to recognize (i.e., interpret) text characters. For example, a user of an OCR pen moves the pen over a line of text to capture and interpret that text; the user of the system has a different intent. They would move their wand or scanning device over a line of text to *indicate* or “point to” this location in the document—and thus to enable many features and functions associated with that location in the document.
  • Moreover, when the user is interested in the specific underlying text, their action is generally to act on the text rather than to capture and interpret it Thus the user might underline this text, change it to italics, excerpt it, place a bookmark at it, etc.
  • One useful function of the system is to place bookmarks, each indicating a location in the rendered document. Generally these can be used to find a location in a document at a later time. One simple but interesting application is to mark where the user last was reading in the document—very much in keeping with the traditional meaning of “bookmark”. It can be useful for the user to have easy access to this information—where they left off in a book or other document. This data might appear on the user's PC or PDA or cellular telephone. In some embodiments, the device itself indicates the last read location, such as by using a small LCD display in the device itself. In some embodiments, the display is binary—for example, an LED which is either on or off. This LED might be on if the user scans text which they have already read, and off if they scan new text. In this way the user can “hunt” for where the user left off.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to implement bookmarks. In step 501, the system receives text scanned by a user. In step 502, the system preprocesses the text scanned in step 501. In step 503, the system compares the scanned text to a document history maintained for the user. In step 504, if the scanned text was previously scanned by the user, then the system continues in step 505 to return an indication of the previous scan, else the system continues in step 506 to locate the scan in a document. In step 507, if the scan is located before the last bookmark, then the system continues in step 508 to return an indication of being previously read, else the facility continues in step 509 to return an indication of being previously unread.
  • A striking example of the new capabilities provided in the system in some embodiments can be seen in the historic uses of library books, school textbooks, etc. Writing in books—whether as margin notes, underlining and highlighting, or other forms, has always been a desire of readers. However, in the cases mentioned (and even in the user's own books) there is a huge barrier to making these marks—they interfere with other's (and sometimes the user's own) future enjoyment of the work. The system allows users to mark and annotate a book or document, yet at the same time choose to leave the original untouched.
  • One way to view the actions of the user in a particular document is as an overlay or transparency. Though the user is interacting with a physical rendering of a document, their marks are virtual—that is, they are captured and saved electronically, so no physical mark needs to appear in the rendered version. In some embodiments, however, the system employs text capture devices that have an integrated highlighter or pen. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a scanning device that has an integrated highlighter and pen. It can be seen that scan device 600 contains both a highlighter 601 and a pen 602, which are optionally retractable.
  • This overlay can thus be thought of as an abstract, virtual layer. This layer can then be merged with or “overlaid” on the source or reference version of the document. In one example, this would occur when the user views the reference document on their computer screen—where the overlaid data from the user's actions would appear on top of, or integrated into, the reference document. Note that the reference document does not need to be modified to be displayed in this way. In some embodiments, the overlay information is combined with the reference or source document when the user prints the document. In some embodiments, the system applies the overlay to—or merges it into the source document when it is delivered electronically to the user. For example, the source document and overlay might be combined into a PDF document and emailed to the user.
  • In either of these examples, because the user's overlaid information can be stored as a separate layer, the source document does not need to be changed. Thus many users can all mark and interact with a single copy of a document. The user's marks and notes are stored separately, so the original doesn't need to change.
  • Each user's data is typically small compared to the underlying document. Consider the case of highlighting: all that needs to be stored is the start and end location of the highlighted text in the document, and the highlight color. One way of storing this data is as character offsets from the start of the document. Another way is as an address like document:page:line. Alternatively, the system stores the actual x-y coordinates of the user's actions in the rendered document.
  • Documents used with the system sometimes carry a special mark (e.g., barcode, etc.) that the user can scan to indicate which issue or copy of the document is being scanned. This additional identifying information enables the system to determine which document the user has, and thus how it is rendered.
  • In some cases the system may require the user to scan an identifying code or mark to enable the user to interact with the document using the system. This may be required before the user has used the device on other parts of the document. Alternatively, the system may allow the user to interact with the document, but require that they perform an identifying scan at some future point. Or, in yet another alternative, the identifying scan may be optional; without it, the system may have additional ambiguity, i.e., less certainty about the specific document being used. With the extra scan, the system knows more about the specific document.
  • In some embodiments, the capture device provides an error indicator or signal (e.g., an LED or audible tone) which tells the user that this document either isn't recognized or isn't enabled—i.e., that an identifying scan is desired or required. This identifying scan may be used to specifically indicate which document the user has—for example, their local morning newspaper—which then allows the system to refer to a cached copy of the document or related dictionary for determining disambiguation and location of scans.
  • The special marks that are scanned might be 1 or 2 dimensional barcodes, or a specific region of human-readable text, or otherwise coded data. In some embodiments, a region of text within the rendered document is specifically marked (for example, by a margin mark, or highlighting, or underlining, or special colored ink) to indicate to the user that this region should be scanned for document recognition.
  • All of the above discussion can also be applied to multiple marks within a document. For example, different articles within a magazine or newspaper, individual ads in a magazine, individual pages, etc., might carry special marks, or the user might be asked to explicitly scan one or more items in sub-regions of a document. Thus individual parts of a document can be clearly identified by an explicit action of the user.
  • In some cases these scans may be used to help the system know the user's context. In other cases they may enable or unlock features of the system which would not otherwise be available. For example, a purchase from a printed catalog might not be allowed unless the user scans the address label with their identifying code on it.
  • In some embodiments, the user may be able to scan a region of text specifically to establish their context—which location in which document. For this purpose the terminal device may have a special switch or input to indicate this desired function (setting context). Alternatively, the user can perform a special gesture with the device that may indicate a context-setting reference scan function, such as by scanning the text in reverse. Alternatively, such a motion or gesture with the device may indicate “erasing” or “undoing” a previous action.
  • In general, the motions and actions of the device can be used to indicate user intent. The long list of possible motions includes:
      • Scanning in the direction of reading=generating a document signature.
      • Scanning in the reverse direction=setting a context.
      • Dragging vertically down or up the page (the system can both count horizontal lines traversed, and also capture data fragments from the swath it traverses)=setting a region.
      • Back and forth motions, or up and down motions=undoing a previous action.
      • Circling a region of text=selecting a region
      • Tapping or clicking—either via a switch or sensor in the end of the device which is in contact with the rendered document, or via a separate switch which the user can control=requesting a context relevant menu.
  • Note that this is only a partial list. Also note the rich possibilities which result from combining two or more of these motions, and from varying the order in which they are performed.
  • One interesting use of the system is in signing documents. Note that the device can record that a particular document was scanned at a particular time, place, etc.—including which portions were scanned. The optics in the device may also be able of capturing and storing an image of a signature. In the system, documents may be provided with special marks or codes at one or more locations (perhaps including a unique identifier code for the entire document). These marks might include specially marked or indicated human readable text (e.g., a section of a legal document which is printed in bold, or underlined, etc.). A user can then scan various portions of a document to indicate that they have read it. In addition, they might optionally sign the document and scan in their signature with the terminal device. The device itself may incorporate writing means as shown in FIG. 6—in which case the user can both scan and sign with one device.
  • There has been a long felt need to code documents and sub-parts of documents with special codes—for example barcodes. However, historically, efforts to solve this have not been completely successful. One reason for this may be that a simple barcode scanner in and of itself is not of sufficient utility to the end-user. This gives rise to the chicken-and-egg situation: Users don't carry scanners so publishers don't print codes. Publishers don't print codes, so users don't acquire and use code-scanning devices.
  • However, the unique combination of a document navigation tool, plus code scanner (plus, optionally, a tool which performs OCR), can overcome this barrier. Because of the utility and value of the text scanning abilities and/or OCR abilities, users will be motivated to acquire and carry or use a terminal device—which can also include hardware and/or software capable of reading coded (e.g. barcode) information. Note that all the additional components for handling barcodes might be located on a server, or elsewhere in the system. The terminal device might simply capture an image of the barcode to be read and forward this for interpretation.
  • In some embodiments, the device recognizes when the image it is scanning is 1-dimensional, as in a barcode. For example, it may check (in software or electronically in hardware, or some combination of these) whether there is one axis which carries no information. A 1-d barcode has this property, being made up of parallel lines assumed to be parallel to the y-axis. In this case, only changes along the x-axis-that cross the lines, perpendicular to them, in the x direction-contain information. In cases where the device sees data which has this 1-dimensional property, it may have local intelligence (hardware and/or software) to reduce this scanned data by collapsing/ignoring the y-axis—i.e., it may be able to partially or completely read or interpret the code (e.g., before communicating with a server).
  • This discussion about barcodes raises an interesting technical component of most OCR or systems—“de-skewing”. De-skewing is the process of removing any artificial angular components from scanned or imaged data. A situation which often occurs with hand scanners is that the user holds them at an angle, rotated around the axis perpendicular to the page, so that data captured has an artificial angle or slant included. Note that the angle also may vary over time, for example as the user moves their hand across the page. It is helpful if this artificial skew is removed in one of the steps of processing the data or image.
  • When the system employs the template-matching or convolution-based approach (described elsewhere), one advantage is that, to first order, the artificial skew or angle doesn't matter. That is, letters or symbols which are each skewed at the same angle will match each other without removing this skew component.
  • Many type fonts carry a number of strong vertical elements. These are often straight lines perpendicular to the base-line. In some embodiments, the system de-skews text by performing a mathematical transform on the data from which the skew angle can be readily determined. This transform can be applied locally so that variations in skew (e.g., across a single line of text) can be detected and measured locally.
  • The template-matching (offset-based), convolution approach which can be used in the system has the ability to find matching objects, using earlier occurrences of these objects as templates. One interesting result of this ability is that any repeating objects can carry easily readable information—and the tokens which represent this information do not need to be defined in advance or known to the system.
  • As an example, a document contains a string of 1's and 0's (e.g., a representation of binary data), such as: “100101001.”
  • In the template matching approach, the system needn't recognize and understand the meaning of a “1” or a “0”. Rather, it can interpret the sample string as, “an object of a first type, followed by two objects of a second type, followed by an object of the first type, etc.” This information in the sample string can just as well be represented by “abbababba” or by “011010110.”
  • Data can be encoded using any number of distinct objects or symbols—and that spaces can be treated as one of these objects (if spaces are used, measured distance may be used to count adjacent spaces, or each space object may be limited to always having a count of 1—e.g., such that “1 11 111 1” would be interpreted the same as “1 11 111 1”). From this perspective, a language written in the 26 character roman alphabet (assuming all lower case) is just a special instance of this encoding, where the number of symbols happens to be 26.
  • In some embodiments, the system represents the data in a sequence such as the above “01101011 0” example as offsets—the number of character positions separating recurring instances of each symbol. In this representation, “011010110” is represented as 3,1,2,2,2,3,1,?,?—where each digit corresponds to a character i˜ the original string, and the value of the digit is the distance or offset to the next occurrence of this same character.
  • In this representation, there are certain missing elements and/or forbidden codes. For example, after the first digit, “3”, the digit “2” could never naturally occur—because this would mean that this second character is the same as the first—in which case the “3” would have been a “1”—etc.
  • Also, the last two entries (noted as“?”) are redundant—the characters at these positions are known by earlier offsets/references to them—so these two trailing positions carry little or no information. In other words, where a character has an offset of m—assuming we are moving right and measuring offsets to the right—the next character cannot have the offset m−1, and the character after that cannot have the offset m−2, etc. This is because these “forbidden” offsets conflict with and contradict the earlier given offsets.
  • In some embodiments, the system exploits the forbidden codes in decoding and/or representing the data. For example, in some embodiments, the facility exploits the forbidden codes by using them to store additional data, such as an exception code. Thus, whenever a sequence of offsets contains the codes “m, m−1”, the system may enter a special mode or routine, perhaps treating following codes specially.
  • This effect can be cumulative—that is, each offset must satisfy the constraints of all offsets which have been previously seen. As an example, consider the input input data string “xyzyyxzzzyx,” which has offsets “5,2,4,1,5,5,1,1,?,?,?”. Each of these entries has constraints as follows:
  • 5—can be anything, no prior knowledge
  • 2—can't be a 4 (else preceding entry would have been 1, not 5)
  • 4—can't be a 3 or a 1 (as these would contradict the preceding 5 and 2)
  • 1—cant be a 2 (conflicts with 5) or a 3 (conflicts with 4)
  • 5—can't be a 2 (conflicts with 4)
  • 5—can't be a 4 or a 1 (conflicts with 4 and 5)
  • 1—can't be a 4 or a 3 (conflicts with 5 and 5)
  • 1—can't be a 3 or a 2 (conflicts with 5 and 5)
  • ?—can't be a 2 or a 1 (conflicts with 5 and 5)
  • ?—can't be a 1 (conflicts with 5)
  • ?—can be anything, since nothing beyond this position is referenced.
  • Said another way, any offset which extends beyond one character position imposes logical constraints on all intervening positions.
  • One use of this observation is to perform error detection. For example, if a forbidden code is received, the system can interpret this as an error and report or act on it.
  • Another use is to encode additional data. In some embodiments, the system interprets forbidden codes as “escape sequences” which invoke special actions or processes, or read subsequent embedded data from the stream—after which the system can re-synchronize to the input stream (since the escape sequence can carry information about the sequence length, or this can be known or inferred by the system) and continue processing.
  • Yet another use of these forbidden codes is to reduce the amount of information in the encoding of the data. One algorithm here might be, “if this is the first (smallest) forbidden code, treat it as the first allowed/valid code; if this is the second (next smallest) forbidden code, treat it as the second allowed/valid code”. In this way smaller (forbidden) numbers can represent larger (allowed) codes—so the number of bits used to store or transmit the data is reduced.
  • These several example uses of forbidden codes can be combined—for example, the first (smallest) forbidden code might be interpreted as an escape sequence, while higher codes are mapped to the next available valid codes. And other uses of these codes can be applied as well.
  • In general, little additional information is carried by sequences which are repeated. Thus, for example, the character sequence “abcabcabcabcabc” is more succinctly represented as “5(abc)”. The same is true for the offset representation of repeating sequences. “abcabcabcabcabc” is represented in offsets as “333333333333???”—which might be represented as “12(3)???”.
  • In another example, the sequence “abcbcbcabcbcbcabcbcbc” is first coded as offsets: “72222337222233?2222??”, then reduced to “74(2)2(3)74(2)2(3)?4(2)2(?)”, then further reduced to
  • “2(74(2)2(3))?4(2)2(?)”. {The convention shown here is “count(object)” where the parentheses delimit the object, but in a data system this could be represented many ways.)
  • In some embodiments, the system drafts repeat counts are altogether, and only the objects themselves are stored or transmitted. Applied to the repeating series of offsets in the earlier example, “abcabcabcabcabc” can first be coded as offsets: “333333333333???” which in turn can be represented as count(object): 12(3)??? —which can be stored or transmitted as simply “+3???”—where here the “+” is an indicator that the object repeats. Alternatively, the system just stores or transmits “3”, dropping any reference to a repeat count.
  • One reason this issue of repeating sequences is important is that the system may not know how far the user will scan. As an example the user may scan a series of dashes: “---------------”. If the system assumes that these dashes go on at some length, the user may not wish to scan to their end—so how many dashes are present may not be known. In this case, the system simply stores or transmits “a repeating sequence of length 1” in some embodiments.
  • This also works for more complex sequences. Perhaps the sections of a story which a user is reading includes the boundary marker:
  • “--***--***--***--***--***--***--***--***--***”
  • In some embodiments, the system does not require that this be scanned in its entirety in order to be recognized. The offsets from this sequence could be represented (counting spaces as objects) as: “31641153164115 . . . . ” This can be stored or transmitted as a count plus object, or as a “plurality indicator” (“+3164115”—see use of plus sign above), or without any indication of plurality Gust “3164115”).
  • These latter two examples are roughly akin to matching constructs in regular expressions. The “+3164115” example corresponding to “match greater than 1 occurrence” and the “3164115” example corresponding to “match 1 or more occurrences.” In this last case, the agreed convention, when searching for a sequence in an index or database, would be that any sequence is matched by 1 or more contiguous occurrences of itself.
  • Part of the utility of this construct arises when there is a source or reference copy of a document in the system, and the system is attempting to locate the user's position. If the terminal and/or local system components and the back-end components (e.g., archive, indices, etc., perhaps server-based) both understand and agree as to how repeating sequences will be handled, then redundant data can be dropped from storage and communications. In the “1 or more” example from the preceding paragraph, the server which is indexing data might only store a single first instance of a repeating sequence (either of raw data or derived offsets), and a scanning terminal device might only store or transmit 1 instance of the repeating sequence.
  • Another way to describe this process is that any repeating sequence is either represented by a count, or, in the simpler alternative model, ignored entirely. Thus the phrase: “*** buy cheap cheap tools here!!! ***” could be indexed or represented as: “* buy cheap tools here! *” or its offsets could be similarly compressed: “*** buy cheap cheap tools here!!! ***”
  • “11*4???6666666?**??6?1???8?2??11??11?” (where offsets greater than 9 are shown as “*”) which compresses to:
  • “2(1)*43(?)7(6)?**2(?)6?13(?)8?22(?)2(1)2(?)2(1)?” Or, removing all repeats (but leaving the “*” for offsets higher than 9:
  • “1*4?6?**?6?1?8?2?1?1?”
  • A separate system, e.g., running on a remote server, can then search for, or consult an index looking for, sequences which match this compressed representation. To do so it would treat each object in the sequence as potentially occurring “1 or more times”—an, as with regular expressions, would implement code and algorithms to find these matches.
  • A similar efficiency in storage and/or transmission can be obtained by noting that, when character offsets are employed, all scans of text end in unknown offsets (shown above as “???”). This is because, assuming the user is scanning left-to-right, and offsets are for the next matching character to the right, at some point the scan must terminate, so some of the last characters will not have known offsets—their next occurrence will not be included in the scan. In one data-encoding technique, these unknowns might be represented as zeros—but another embodiment is to drop these trailing unknowns from the data transmitted or stored.
  • Template matching and/or self-correlation use one instance of a token or object or character or symbol as a template to recognize subsequent occurrences of this same object. Here we provide a simplified overview.
  • Assume the user is scanning a single horizontal line of text with a terminal device.
  • When the user scans a single horizontal line of text with a capture device, in some embodiments the system captures an image of the text and stores it in memory and/or transmits it. In some embodiments, the system performs the template matching on-the-fly, by immediately calculating the offsets of matching objects and storing only the individual templates—and these may be discarded when the offsets are known.
  • Initially, the system does not need to know much (if anything) about the shapes of the objects it is scanning. In the process of template matching, these shapes emerge as the various templates discovered.
  • This also applies to horizontal extent of characters. While special knowledge about whitespace and the widths of characters can be helpful (e.g., that the ratio of width to height of most characters is about x, or that the average word length is about y, etc.), it isn't essential. Indeed, in some embodiments, the capture device ignores whitespace altogether.
  • In some embodiments, as (or after) the user scans a portion of a horizontal line of text, the system “convolves” the line, i.e., effectively slides a copy of the line horizontally past itself, looking for regions which match well. At the start of this process it may be helpful to determine the baseline of the text, and to de-skew it—both are well-known techniques in the field of document imaging. However, note that there are ways to search for matching regions without either of these steps.
  • As regions which match or nearly match, their horizontal extent is noted. In this example we are assuming the vertical extent of the match is the entire height of the character (we will later consider some matching techniques, which we call “self-recognition”).
  • This process may optionally choose to use connected-region analysis—wherein tokens/objects/characters/symbols are assumed to be comprised of “connected” (i.e., contiguous) pixels or ink. Thus we are in this instance looking for connected regions which match. Note this is related to our knowledge of whitespace, since by definition the region exterior to a connected region of ink is whitespace.
  • In some embodiments, the system uses (as another of several approaches) simple horizontal extent. That is, the system pays attention to the horizontal width and position of matching regions of ink or pixels, with no or little attention to connected regions or whitespace—though these components can be introduced to assist the process.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing steps typically performed by the system to process text capture actions. In step 701, the system receives text captured by the user. In step 702, the system preprocesses the text scanned in step 701. In step 703, the system identifies word and line boundaries in the scanned text. In step 706, the system convolves the text as described above. In step 705, the system uses delimiters to determine boundaries of unknown regions in the text. In step 706, the system processes the scan to produce a representation of the captured text. In step 707, the system searches for a matching text representation in the corpus of electronic documents. In step 708, if the search of step 707 is successful, then the system continues in step 709 to return a successful search notice, else the system continues in step 710. In step 710, if the search can be refined, then the system continues in step 711, else the system continues in step 712 to return a failed search notice. In step 711, the system indicates to the user that refinement is needed. After step 711, the system continues in step 701 to receive additional text captured by the user in response to the indication of step 711.
  • In matching two regions of text taken from rendered documents the system encounters the issue of “goodness of match.” Because all physical measurements include errors, the system's matching process will essentially never be exact. Therefore, in some embodiments, the system makes decisions as to how well one region matches another. Several tools can be used to accomplish this, many already well known in the fields of OCR, document imaging, and machine vision. One way to estimate fit or match used by the system in some embodiments is to first find the best alignment of the objects to be compared, then calculate a difference over the objects. For example, in the case of simple black and white pixels (no gray scale), the system simply finds the pixels which are on in one image/object, and off in the other image/object. The count of these “errors” is a rough estimate of fit.
  • This count estimate can be improved by “normalizing it” by (dividing it by) the total number of pixels included. Thus, in various embodiments, the system uses either:

  • fit_error=#_bad_pixels/#_pixels_in— x — y_region_compared

  • or:

  • fit_error=#_bad_pixels/#_pixels_in_object
  • The former considers the number of error pixels compared to the area being compared. The latter considers the number of error pixels compared to the number or matching, non-error pixels. In various embodiments, the system adds various refinements to these techniques, or uses other matching techniques from OCR, etc.
  • In the described matching process, the physical distribution (e.g., x-y coordinates) of the error and matching pixels is of potential importance. In abbreviated and approximate language, there may be a better fit when the matching pixels are “concentrated” (i.e., contiguous, occurring close together), and the error pixels are “distributed” (i.e., non-contiguous, occurring far apart).
  • As an example of this, consider two situations. In one case, the system compares the image of an “r” to that of an “n”. Only a small part of the image contains error pixels—where the right hand side of the “n” descends to the base line, but the “r” does not. Note that there may not be a large number of error pixels, but they occur close together and contiguous. Next, consider comparing two images of the letter “n”, where the quality of the image is not good—e.g., it has been blurred or smeared, or is fuzzy. In this case, there may be very many error pixels—but note that they are likely to occur distributed at many places around the character. This demonstrates that widely distributed error pixels suggest less error than closely packed error pixels.
  • This discussion about matching leads to another related innovation called “self-matching”. Historically, OCR has employed direct knowledge about absolute character shapes and fonts to recognize various characters. In some embodiments, the system uses indirect knowledge about *relative* character shape to recognize characters.
  • FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate how two characters of an alphabet often have approximately the same *relative* shape in multiple fonts. FIG. 8A shows the letters “O”, “C”, and “L” in an Arial lower-case font, while FIG. 8C shows these letters in a Times New Roman lower-case font. Even though the fonts are very different and distinct, the relationship between these characters *within* a particular font are approximately the same.
  • FIGS. 8B and 8D show that, in either font, a “d” can be constructed with some accuracy by adding together a “c” and an “1”. Or, in a pseudo-algebraic statement, “d=c+1”. There are many other similar relationships that are true for many fonts, such as “e=c+−”, “P=B−b+1”, “8=6+9. These relationships are not meant to be exact—but, rather, that the relative shapes of various letters in different fonts is *approximately* the same. Even though these relationships are approximate, they allow us to use one group of characters in a font to recognize (or, indeed, construct) additional characters.
  • One application of this technique is in OCR. Once the system determines a few of the characters in a font—perhaps one about which we have no knowledge—the system may then be able to predict and/or recognize the remaining, unknown characters.
  • It is often possible to establish the identity of some characters using simple techniques of cryptography, such as character frequency and n-gram analyses. Observations about how frequently a character appears, in which positions within words, in association with what other characters, can provide initial information about characters—even though they appear in a font about which we have no knowledge. The simplest example might be the single characters “a” and “1”—when we see one character words, we know immediately they are probably one of these two letters. Similarly, characters which are repeated (e.g., ee, oo) are not likely to be “hh” or “qq”.
  • Assume that the system has learned the characters “d” and “o”, and encounters the character “c”—but doesn't yet know what it is. By comparing the character “C”'s shape with the shapes of characters that have been learned, the system determines that it matches the “d” except for the vertical stem; and that it matches the “o” except for the right hand edge. Knowing that these are the relative characteristics of “d”, “o”, and “c” in most fonts, the system has now identified the new letter “c”. Having done so, the system adds it to its repertoire of known symbols, and uses it in deciphering additional characters. Thus, the system's knowledge about a font about which it has no specific knowledge can be grown incrementally and extended, based on its *general* knowledge of *relative* character shapes.
  • One way to implement this self-recognition system is as an m×m matrix of general relationships, where m is the number of characters in the alphabet. Each entry in this table describes how character i relates to character j—possibly including general relative shape information and rules (“character i extends below the baseline, character j doesn't”)—and possibly including reference to additional characters in the alphabet (e.g., the entry for row “d” and column “c” might be “−1”—subtract an “1” to make a “c” from a “d”—and the entry for row “c” and column “d” might be “+1”—add an “1” to make a “d” from a “c”).
  • A special case of self-recognition occurs when a set of symbols or tokens (i.e., a new font) is constructed with explicit intent that they be self-recognizable as described above. That is, given a subset of these symbols, the others can be derived or inferred. These symbols can be used to error-check each other, since their graphic components/design are interrelated. This redundancy also provides also robustness against noise.
  • To employ such an approach, there is no requirement that *any* of the symbols be known to the system in advance. By using one of the above-described approaches of template-matching or correlation, the system can determine the entire symbol set being used based upon the matching and non-matching symbols. The system then uses known relationship between symbols to confirm each of the symbols, or in some cases to generate any missing/unused symbols—even though the system has never seen this symbol set before.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates the approach used by the facility in some embodiments to learn an entirely new set of symbols using self-recognition. The diagram shows a set 900 of symbols comprised of a 2×2 array of small “boxes”. Using knowledge of whitespace and a baseline to establish vertical and horizontal spacing, there are 16 possible symbols: 4 single boxes in the four corners, 6 permutations involving 2 boxes, 4 permutations each having 3 boxes, and one symbol having all 4 boxes, and a whitespace symbol comprised of no boxes.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram that shows a subset of the symbols shown in FIG. 9 that self-define their vertical and horizontal extent. Each symbol of the subset 1000 is two boxes wide and two boxes high.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram that shows relationships between some of the symbols shown in FIG. 9. For example, each of relationships 1101 and 1102 show a relationship by which one symbol of the set can be constructed out of two other symbols. Note that we can choose as a subset those symbols which have the best redundancy and/or error correction properties. Note that some symbols can be constructed at least two different ways from combinations of symbols in the set.
  • Several dedicated bar code scanning devices aimed at the consumer market have achieved commercial failure, perhaps because barcode scanning alone does not offer enough value or function for broad consumer adoption. On the other hand, the combination of document marking/scanning and barcode scanning creates a combined function which will be of use and interest to a wide array of consumers. This combination of text and barcode imaging can be accomplished with many of the same components, hardware and software. However, one really interesting new ingredient is a scanning device which makes use of a reference or source copy of the rendered document being scanned, which enables the user's actions in the rendered document are interpreted with respect to, and mapped to, the source or reference document.
  • Another means for locating the source document is if the marked version carries a machine-readable code which identifies the document and/or provides directions for retrieving this source document (e.g., a URL). This code might be a barcode, machine-readable font, or any machine-readable means for conveying this information.
  • An interesting extension of the machine-readable document ID and document locator is for this data to include access information. That is, included in the machine readable code is information which allows the system to access the document, e.g., when it is password protected, behind a corporate firewall, etc. Note that an additional input might be required by the user or another individual which confirms the request to access this document.
  • In some embodiments, the system maintains the relationship between a user's notes and marks and the document content and features associated with these notes and marks. This can be important, for example, if the source document is re-rendered in a different style or format, and the system wants to re-display the user's mark at the correct location. As an example, if the user draws a line through a word of text, the system may want to show that line through the same text in subsequent renderings.
  • One means to accomplish this is to “anchor” each user mark or group of marks with some recognizable feature in the document (e.g., a single word, punctuation mark, image, etc.). In some embodiments, the system does so by finding the nearest source document feature (e.g., by geometric distance) and associate the mark with this feature.
  • In some embodiments, the system finds near-by features, and to weight or rank them, and then associate the user's marks with a high-rated feature. As an example, if the system encounters a margin note by the user, it might examine all near-by words, and associate the mark with the word which is most relevant (e.g., a keyword rather than a stop-word, perhaps related to the topic of the source document text, etc.). This aspect of the system can employ some of the many techniques which are known for identifying important elements in a document.
  • Notes and marks which have associated anchor points can thus be related to digital documents—such that the relevant note or mark can be accessed when viewing or editing the document (e.g., with a word processor). For example, all such notes might appear as a special symbol embedded in the document (and optionally stored within the document). The user might then mouse-over or click on these symbols to reveal the embedded or associated note or mark. Similarly, the user's notes might be turned on or off via a menu command.
    • CONCLUSION
  • It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above-described system may be straightforwardly adapted or extended in various ways. While the foregoing description makes reference to particular embodiments, the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims that following and the elements recited therein.

Claims (21)

1. (canceled)
2. A method performed by a data processing apparatus, the method comprising:
receiving data specifying a text input;
for a particular alphanumeric character that occurs in the text input, determining a quantity of other characters between an initial occurrence of the particular alphanumeric character in the text input and a successive occurrence of the particular alphanumeric character in the text input;
identifying, from a corpus of electronic documents, an electronic document that includes a text portion having successive occurrences of the particular alphanumeric character separated by the same quantity of other characters; and
providing, for presentation on a display device, at least a portion of the identified electronic document.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
for each of a plurality of additional alphanumeric characters that occur in the text input, determining a quantity of other characters between an initial occurrence of the additional alphanumeric character in the text input and a successive occurrence of the additional alphanumeric character in the text input; and
generating a sequence of numbers for the text input using the quantity of other characters for the particular alphanumeric character and the quantity of other characters for each additional alphanumeric character, the sequence of numbers being in a same order as the particular alphanumeric character and the additional alphanumeric characters occur in the text input.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
identifying a particular number in the sequence of numbers and a successive number that follows the particular number in the sequence of numbers;
determining a difference between the particular number and the successive number; and
identifying an action to perform based on the difference.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the action comprises identifying additional data encoded in the sequence of numbers.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein:
the successive number immediately follows the particular number in the sequence of numbers; and
the action comprises generating an error alert in response to determining that the difference between the particular number and the successive number has a particular value.
7. The method of claim 3, wherein identifying the electronic document comprises:
identifying, for each electronic document in the corpus of electronic documents, a sequence of numbers based on quantities of characters that occur in the electronic document between successive occurrences of particular characters in the electronic document; and
determining that the sequence of numbers for the identified electronic document includes the sequence of numbers for the text input.
8. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
identifying multiple occurrences of a subsequence of numbers in the sequence of numbers; and
compressing the sequence of numbers based on the multiple occurrences.
9. A system comprising:
a data processing apparatus; and
a memory apparatus in data communication with the data processing apparatus and storing instructions executable by the data processing apparatus and that upon such execution cause the data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising:
receiving data specifying a text input;
for a particular alphanumeric character that occurs in the text input, determining a quantity of other characters between an initial occurrence of the particular alphanumeric character in the text input and a successive occurrence of the particular alphanumeric character in the text input;
identifying, from a corpus of electronic documents, an electronic document that includes a text portion having successive occurrences of the particular alphanumeric character separated by the same quantity of other characters; and
providing, for presentation on a display device, at least a portion of the identified electronic document.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the operations further comprise:
for each of a plurality of additional alphanumeric characters that occur in the text input, determining a quantity of other characters between an initial occurrence of the additional alphanumeric character in the text input and a successive occurrence of the additional alphanumeric character in the text input; and
generating a sequence of numbers for the text input using the quantity of other characters for the particular alphanumeric character and the quantity of other characters for each additional alphanumeric character, the sequence of numbers being in a same order as the particular alphanumeric character and the additional alphanumeric characters occur in the text input.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise:
identifying a particular number in the sequence of numbers and a successive number that follows the particular number in the sequence of numbers;
determining a difference between the particular number and the successive number; and
identifying an action to perform based on the difference.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the action comprises identifying additional data encoded in the sequence of numbers.
13. The system of claim 11, wherein:
the successive number immediately follows the particular number in the sequence of numbers; and
the action comprises generating an error alert in response to determining that the difference between the particular number and the successive number has a particular value.
14. The system of claim 10, wherein identifying the electronic document comprises:
identifying, for each electronic document in the corpus of electronic documents, a sequence of numbers based on quantities of characters that occur in the electronic document between successive occurrences of particular characters in the electronic document; and
determining that the sequence of numbers for the identified electronic document includes the sequence of numbers for the text input.
15. The system of claim 10, wherein the operations further comprise:
identifying multiple occurrences of a subsequence of numbers in the sequence of numbers; and
compressing the sequence of numbers based on the multiple occurrences.
16. A computer storage medium encoded with a computer program, the program comprising instructions that when executed by data processing apparatus cause the data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising:
receiving data specifying a text input;
for a particular alphanumeric character that occurs in the text input, determining a quantity of other characters between an initial occurrence of the particular alphanumeric character in the text input and a successive occurrence of the particular alphanumeric character in the text input;
identifying, from a corpus of electronic documents, an electronic document that includes a text portion having successive occurrences of the particular alphanumeric character separated by the same quantity of other characters; and
providing, for presentation on a display device, at least a portion of the identified electronic document.
17. The computer storage medium of claim 16, wherein the operations further comprise:
for each of a plurality of additional alphanumeric characters that occur in the text input, determining a quantity of other characters between an initial occurrence of the additional alphanumeric character in the text input and a successive occurrence of the additional alphanumeric character in the text input; and
generating a sequence of numbers for the text input using the quantity of other characters for the particular alphanumeric character and the quantity of other characters for each additional alphanumeric character, the sequence of numbers being in a same order as the particular alphanumeric character and the additional alphanumeric characters occur in the text input.
18. The computer storage medium of claim 17, wherein the operations further comprise:
identifying a particular number in the sequence of numbers and a successive number that follows the particular number in the sequence of numbers;
determining a difference between the particular number and the successive number; and
identifying an action to perform based on the difference.
19. The computer storage medium of claim 18, wherein the action comprises identifying additional data encoded in the sequence of numbers.
20. The computer storage medium of claim 18, wherein:
the successive number immediately follows the particular number in the sequence of numbers; and
the action comprises generating an error alert in response to determining that the difference between the particular number and the successive number has a particular value.
21. The computer storage medium of claim 17, wherein identifying the electronic document comprises:
identifying, for each electronic document in the corpus of electronic documents, a sequence of numbers based on quantities of characters that occur in the electronic document between successive occurrences of particular characters in the electronic document; and
determining that the sequence of numbers for the identified electronic document includes the sequence of numbers for the text input.
US14/506,142 2004-04-19 2014-10-03 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document Abandoned US20150026162A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/506,142 US20150026162A1 (en) 2004-04-19 2014-10-03 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

Applications Claiming Priority (96)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US56348504P 2004-04-19 2004-04-19
US56352004P 2004-04-19 2004-04-19
US56484604P 2004-04-23 2004-04-23
US56468804P 2004-04-23 2004-04-23
US56666704P 2004-04-30 2004-04-30
US57156004P 2004-05-14 2004-05-14
US57138104P 2004-05-14 2004-05-14
US57171504P 2004-05-17 2004-05-17
US58920104P 2004-07-19 2004-07-19
US58920204P 2004-07-19 2004-07-19
US58920304P 2004-07-19 2004-07-19
US59882104P 2004-08-02 2004-08-02
US60293004P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60289704P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60289804P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60295604P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60289604P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60294704P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60292504P 2004-08-18 2004-08-18
US60308204P 2004-08-19 2004-08-19
US60308104P 2004-08-19 2004-08-19
US60346604P 2004-08-19 2004-08-19
US60335804P 2004-08-20 2004-08-20
US60349804P 2004-08-20 2004-08-20
US60409804P 2004-08-23 2004-08-23
US60410004P 2004-08-23 2004-08-23
US60410204P 2004-08-23 2004-08-23
US60410304P 2004-08-23 2004-08-23
US60510504P 2004-08-27 2004-08-27
US60522904P 2004-08-27 2004-08-27
US61363304P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61324204P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61334004P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61363204P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61346004P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61358904P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61362804P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61334104P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61360204P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61324304P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61340004P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61336104P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61345604P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61333904P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61363404P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61345504P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61345404P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61346104P 2004-09-27 2004-09-27
US61553804P 2004-10-01 2004-10-01
US61511204P 2004-10-01 2004-10-01
US61537804P 2004-10-01 2004-10-01
US61712204P 2004-10-07 2004-10-07
US62290604P 2004-10-28 2004-10-28
US11/004,637 US7707039B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2004-12-03 Automatic modification of web pages
US63348604P 2004-12-06 2004-12-06
US63345204P 2004-12-06 2004-12-06
US63345304P 2004-12-06 2004-12-06
US63367804P 2004-12-06 2004-12-06
US63473904P 2004-12-09 2004-12-09
US63462704P 2004-12-09 2004-12-09
US64768405P 2005-01-26 2005-01-26
US64874605P 2005-01-31 2005-01-31
US65337205P 2005-02-15 2005-02-15
US65389905P 2005-02-16 2005-02-16
US65366905P 2005-02-16 2005-02-16
US65384705P 2005-02-16 2005-02-16
US65367905P 2005-02-16 2005-02-16
US65366305P 2005-02-16 2005-02-16
US65437905P 2005-02-17 2005-02-17
US65419605P 2005-02-18 2005-02-18
US65436805P 2005-02-18 2005-02-18
US65432605P 2005-02-18 2005-02-18
US65527905P 2005-02-22 2005-02-22
US65598705P 2005-02-22 2005-02-22
US65569705P 2005-02-22 2005-02-22
US65528005P 2005-02-22 2005-02-22
US65528105P 2005-02-22 2005-02-22
US65730905P 2005-02-28 2005-02-28
US11/098,016 US7421155B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Archive of text captures from rendered documents
US11/097,961 US20060041484A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2005-04-01 Methods and systems for initiating application processes by data capture from rendered documents
US11/097,833 US8515816B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Aggregate analysis of text captures performed by multiple users from rendered documents
US11/098,038 US7599844B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Content access with handheld document data capture devices
US11/096,704 US7599580B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information
US11/098,042 US7593605B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Data capture from rendered documents using handheld device
US11/097,828 US7742953B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Adding information or functionality to a rendered document via association with an electronic counterpart
US11/098,014 US8019648B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Search engines and systems with handheld document data capture devices
US11/097,093 US20060041605A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2005-04-01 Determining actions involving captured information and electronic content associated with rendered documents
US11/097,835 US7831912B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Publishing techniques for adding value to a rendered document
US11/097,836 US20060041538A1 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Establishing an interactive environment for rendered documents
US11/097,981 US7606741B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Information gathering system and method
US11/097,089 US8214387B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Document enhancement system and method
US11/098,043 US20060053097A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2005-04-01 Searching and accessing documents on private networks for use with captures from rendered documents
US11/097,103 US7596269B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-01 Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document
US11/110,353 US7702624B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2005-04-19 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US12/729,045 US8874504B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2010-03-22 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US14/506,142 US20150026162A1 (en) 2004-04-19 2014-10-03 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/729,045 Continuation US8874504B2 (en) 2004-04-19 2010-03-22 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150026162A1 true US20150026162A1 (en) 2015-01-22

Family

ID=43498340

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/729,045 Active US8874504B2 (en) 2004-04-19 2010-03-22 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US14/506,142 Abandoned US20150026162A1 (en) 2004-04-19 2014-10-03 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/729,045 Active US8874504B2 (en) 2004-04-19 2010-03-22 Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8874504B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9253302B2 (en) * 2014-06-04 2016-02-02 Google Inc. Populating user contact entries
EP3133507A1 (en) 2015-03-31 2017-02-22 Secude AG Context-based data classification
WO2020247765A1 (en) * 2019-06-06 2020-12-10 G-71 Inc. Method for marking visuals of information for subsequent identification or authentication
US11606475B2 (en) 2019-06-06 2023-03-14 G-71 Inc. Method for marking visuals of information for subsequent identification or authentication

Families Citing this family (77)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8352400B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2013-01-08 Hoffberg Steven M Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US7904187B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2011-03-08 Hoffberg Steven M Internet appliance system and method
US7707039B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2010-04-27 Exbiblio B.V. Automatic modification of web pages
US8442331B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2013-05-14 Google Inc. Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information
US8799303B2 (en) * 2004-02-15 2014-08-05 Google Inc. Establishing an interactive environment for rendered documents
US7812860B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2010-10-12 Exbiblio B.V. Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device
US10635723B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2020-04-28 Google Llc Search engines and systems with handheld document data capture devices
US20060041484A1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2006-02-23 King Martin T Methods and systems for initiating application processes by data capture from rendered documents
US20080313172A1 (en) * 2004-12-03 2008-12-18 King Martin T Determining actions involving captured information and electronic content associated with rendered documents
US9116890B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2015-08-25 Google Inc. Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document
US20070300142A1 (en) * 2005-04-01 2007-12-27 King Martin T Contextual dynamic advertising based upon captured rendered text
US8793162B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2014-07-29 Google Inc. Adding information or functionality to a rendered document via association with an electronic counterpart
US8621349B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2013-12-31 Google Inc. Publishing techniques for adding value to a rendered document
US7894670B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2011-02-22 Exbiblio B.V. Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document
US8081849B2 (en) * 2004-12-03 2011-12-20 Google Inc. Portable scanning and memory device
US20060081714A1 (en) 2004-08-23 2006-04-20 King Martin T Portable scanning device
US8146156B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2012-03-27 Google Inc. Archive of text captures from rendered documents
US9008447B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2015-04-14 Google Inc. Method and system for character recognition
US20100185538A1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2010-07-22 Exbiblio B.V. Content access with handheld document data capture devices
US9143638B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2015-09-22 Google Inc. Data capture from rendered documents using handheld device
US7990556B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2011-08-02 Google Inc. Association of a portable scanner with input/output and storage devices
US20060098900A1 (en) 2004-09-27 2006-05-11 King Martin T Secure data gathering from rendered documents
US8713418B2 (en) * 2004-04-12 2014-04-29 Google Inc. Adding value to a rendered document
US8620083B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2013-12-31 Google Inc. Method and system for character recognition
US9460346B2 (en) 2004-04-19 2016-10-04 Google Inc. Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device
US8489624B2 (en) 2004-05-17 2013-07-16 Google, Inc. Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document
US8874504B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2014-10-28 Google Inc. Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US8346620B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2013-01-01 Google Inc. Automatic modification of web pages
US20100092095A1 (en) * 2008-10-14 2010-04-15 Exbiblio B.V. Data gathering in digital and rendered document environments
US20110075228A1 (en) * 2004-12-03 2011-03-31 King Martin T Scanner having connected and unconnected operational behaviors
US7783135B2 (en) 2005-05-09 2010-08-24 Like.Com System and method for providing objectified image renderings using recognition information from images
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
EP2067119A2 (en) 2006-09-08 2009-06-10 Exbiblio B.V. Optical scanners, such as hand-held optical scanners
US20080267504A1 (en) * 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Nokia Corporation Method, device and computer program product for integrating code-based and optical character recognition technologies into a mobile visual search
US20110145068A1 (en) * 2007-09-17 2011-06-16 King Martin T Associating rendered advertisements with digital content
US8434093B2 (en) 2008-08-07 2013-04-30 Code Systems Corporation Method and system for virtualization of software applications
EP2399385B1 (en) * 2009-02-18 2019-11-06 Google LLC Automatically capturing information, such as capturing information using a document-aware device
WO2010105246A2 (en) 2009-03-12 2010-09-16 Exbiblio B.V. Accessing resources based on capturing information from a rendered document
US8447066B2 (en) 2009-03-12 2013-05-21 Google Inc. Performing actions based on capturing information from rendered documents, such as documents under copyright
US9081799B2 (en) * 2009-12-04 2015-07-14 Google Inc. Using gestalt information to identify locations in printed information
US9323784B2 (en) * 2009-12-09 2016-04-26 Google Inc. Image search using text-based elements within the contents of images
US9104517B2 (en) 2010-01-27 2015-08-11 Code Systems Corporation System for downloading and executing a virtual application
US9229748B2 (en) 2010-01-29 2016-01-05 Code Systems Corporation Method and system for improving startup performance and interoperability of a virtual application
US8763009B2 (en) 2010-04-17 2014-06-24 Code Systems Corporation Method of hosting a first application in a second application
US9218359B2 (en) 2010-07-02 2015-12-22 Code Systems Corporation Method and system for profiling virtual application resource utilization patterns by executing virtualized application
JP5012981B2 (en) * 2010-09-09 2012-08-29 カシオ計算機株式会社 Electronic dictionary device and program
US9021015B2 (en) 2010-10-18 2015-04-28 Code Systems Corporation Method and system for publishing virtual applications to a web server
FR2984659B1 (en) * 2011-12-20 2016-01-29 Sagemcom Documents Sas METHOD OF PAIRING BETWEEN A SINGLE IDENTIFIER OF A DOCUMENT SCANNING DEVICE AND A USER ACCOUNT IDENTIFIER
US9159313B2 (en) * 2012-04-03 2015-10-13 Sony Corporation Playback control apparatus, playback control method, and medium for playing a program including segments generated using speech synthesis and segments not generated using speech synthesis
US9870713B1 (en) * 2012-09-17 2018-01-16 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Detection of unauthorized information exchange between users
US10176252B2 (en) * 2012-12-04 2019-01-08 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Information-processing device, server device, interaction system, and program
US10592506B1 (en) * 2013-02-13 2020-03-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Query hint specification
US9886950B2 (en) * 2013-09-08 2018-02-06 Intel Corporation Automatic generation of domain models for virtual personal assistants
US9942396B2 (en) * 2013-11-01 2018-04-10 Adobe Systems Incorporated Document distribution and interaction
US20150255057A1 (en) * 2013-11-21 2015-09-10 Chatfish Ltd. Mapping Audio Effects to Text
US9544149B2 (en) 2013-12-16 2017-01-10 Adobe Systems Incorporated Automatic E-signatures in response to conditions and/or events
US9681016B2 (en) 2014-02-26 2017-06-13 Xerox Corporation Methods and systems for capturing, sharing, and printing annotations
US9934212B2 (en) * 2014-02-26 2018-04-03 Xerox Corporation Methods and systems for capturing, sharing, and printing annotations
US9703982B2 (en) 2014-11-06 2017-07-11 Adobe Systems Incorporated Document distribution and interaction
US9531545B2 (en) 2014-11-24 2016-12-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Tracking and notification of fulfillment events
US10002256B2 (en) * 2014-12-05 2018-06-19 GeoLang Ltd. Symbol string matching mechanism
US9432368B1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-30 Adobe Systems Incorporated Document distribution and interaction
US9910566B2 (en) * 2015-04-22 2018-03-06 Xerox Corporation Copy and paste operation using OCR with integrated correction application
US9935777B2 (en) 2015-08-31 2018-04-03 Adobe Systems Incorporated Electronic signature framework with enhanced security
US9626653B2 (en) 2015-09-21 2017-04-18 Adobe Systems Incorporated Document distribution and interaction with delegation of signature authority
KR101694727B1 (en) * 2015-12-28 2017-01-10 주식회사 파수닷컴 Method and apparatus for providing note by using calculating degree of association based on artificial intelligence
KR101693658B1 (en) * 2016-04-05 2017-01-06 주식회사 티맥스 소프트 Method, business processing server and data processing server for storing and searching transaction history data
US10347215B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2019-07-09 Adobe Inc. Multi-device electronic signature framework
US10474750B1 (en) * 2017-03-08 2019-11-12 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Multiple information classes parsing and execution
US10503919B2 (en) 2017-04-10 2019-12-10 Adobe Inc. Electronic signature framework with keystroke biometric authentication
US10679101B2 (en) * 2017-10-25 2020-06-09 Hand Held Products, Inc. Optical character recognition systems and methods
CN108021954B (en) 2017-11-01 2020-06-05 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Method and device for starting business process
US11030395B2 (en) * 2018-05-30 2021-06-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Top-align comments: just-in-time highlights and automatic scrolling
US10936809B2 (en) * 2018-09-11 2021-03-02 Dell Products L.P. Method of optimized parsing unstructured and garbled texts lacking whitespaces
US11182542B2 (en) * 2018-10-29 2021-11-23 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Exposing annotations in a document
US10839181B1 (en) 2020-01-07 2020-11-17 Zebra Technologies Corporation Method to synchronize a barcode decode with a video camera to improve accuracy of retail POS loss prevention
US11487797B2 (en) 2020-09-22 2022-11-01 Dell Products L.P. Iterative application of a machine learning-based information extraction model to documents having unstructured text data

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5706365A (en) * 1995-04-10 1998-01-06 Rebus Technology, Inc. System and method for portable document indexing using n-gram word decomposition
US6047298A (en) * 1996-01-30 2000-04-04 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Text compression dictionary generation apparatus
US6349296B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2002-02-19 Altavista Company Method for clustering closely resembling data objects

Family Cites Families (1014)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3899687A (en) 1972-07-10 1975-08-12 Identicon Corp Optical label scanning
US3917317A (en) 1974-02-25 1975-11-04 Univ California Book indexing and processing system
US4135791A (en) 1974-12-02 1979-01-23 Varian Associates, Inc. Reduced glare scanner
US4052058A (en) 1976-04-08 1977-10-04 Hintz Ronald E Pistol draw target
US4065778A (en) 1976-06-17 1977-12-27 Eastman Kodak Company Automatic rangefinder and focusing apparatus
DE3175959D1 (en) * 1980-10-31 1987-04-09 Toshiba Kk Document information filing system with a single display device
US5262628A (en) 1982-01-25 1993-11-16 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Narrow-bodied, single- and twin-windowed portable laser scanning head for reading bar code symbols
DE3214621A1 (en) 1982-04-20 1983-10-20 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München COMBINED OPTICAL HAND READER FOR MECHANICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION WITH INTEGRATED OPTICAL SYSTEM
JPS5955574A (en) 1982-09-17 1984-03-30 インタ−ナショナル　ビジネス　マシ−ンズ　コ−ポレ−ション Mark sheet reader
US4716804A (en) * 1982-09-23 1988-01-05 Joel Chadabe Interactive music performance system
US4526078A (en) 1982-09-23 1985-07-02 Joel Chadabe Interactive music composition and performance system
US4553261A (en) 1983-05-31 1985-11-12 Horst Froessl Document and data handling and retrieval system
US4610025A (en) 1984-06-22 1986-09-02 Champollion Incorporated Cryptographic analysis system
US4941125A (en) 1984-08-01 1990-07-10 Smithsonian Institution Information storage and retrieval system
JPH0750483B2 (en) 1985-05-22 1995-05-31 株式会社日立製作所 How to store additional information about document images
US4776464A (en) 1985-06-17 1988-10-11 Bae Automated Systems, Inc. Automated article handling system and process
JPH0797373B2 (en) * 1985-08-23 1995-10-18 株式会社日立製作所 Document matching system
US4829453A (en) 1987-03-05 1989-05-09 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for cataloging and retrieving image data
US5576529A (en) 1986-08-08 1996-11-19 Norand Technology Corporation Hand-held optically readable information set reader focus with operation over a range of distances
US4713008A (en) 1986-09-09 1987-12-15 Stocker Elizabeth M Method and means for teaching a set of sound symbols through the unique device of phonetic phenomena
US5146404A (en) 1986-09-19 1992-09-08 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Electronic maintenance support work station
US4949391A (en) 1986-09-26 1990-08-14 Everex Ti Corporation Adaptive image acquisition system
US4901364A (en) * 1986-09-26 1990-02-13 Everex Ti Corporation Interactive optical scanner system
EP0285614A1 (en) 1986-10-06 1988-10-12 Stéfan Grigore DE FAY Method and portable device for acquiring, storing and optionally processing and reproducing graphic signs from any medium
US4890230A (en) 1986-12-19 1989-12-26 Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Electronic dictionary
US4903229A (en) * 1987-03-13 1990-02-20 Pitney Bowes Inc. Forms generating and information retrieval system
US4988981B1 (en) * 1987-03-17 1999-05-18 Vpl Newco Inc Computer data entry and manipulation apparatus and method
US4804949A (en) * 1987-03-20 1989-02-14 Everex Ti Corporation Hand-held optical scanner and computer mouse
US4805099A (en) * 1987-04-17 1989-02-14 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Retrieval of related records from a relational database
US4829872A (en) 1987-05-11 1989-05-16 Fairlight Instruments Pty. Limited Detection of musical gestures
CA1301912C (en) 1987-07-08 1992-05-26 Toshio Ishikawa Image input device
USD306162S (en) 1987-10-20 1990-02-20 Everex Ti Corporation Hand-held OCR scanner
US5107256A (en) 1987-11-02 1992-04-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for controlling terminals on communication network
JPH021057A (en) 1988-01-20 1990-01-05 Ricoh Co Ltd Document retrieving device
JP2745406B2 (en) 1988-03-11 1998-04-28 株式会社リコー Control method of image filing system
US7512254B2 (en) 2001-11-07 2009-03-31 Symbol Technologies, Inc. System and method for mobile biometric authentication
US5202985A (en) 1988-04-14 1993-04-13 Racal-Datacom, Inc. Apparatus and method for displaying data communication network configuration after searching the network
EP0374241B1 (en) 1988-05-27 1997-08-27 Kodak Limited Document annotation and manipulation in a data processing system
US5133052A (en) 1988-08-04 1992-07-21 Xerox Corporation Interactive graphical search and replace utility for computer-resident synthetic graphic image editors
US5131053A (en) 1988-08-10 1992-07-14 Caere Corporation Optical character recognition method and apparatus
US6688523B1 (en) 1988-08-31 2004-02-10 Intermec Ip Corp. System for reading optical indicia
US4968877A (en) 1988-09-14 1990-11-06 Sensor Frame Corporation VideoHarp
US5010500A (en) 1989-01-26 1991-04-23 Xerox Corporation Gesture-modified diagram for retrieval of image resembling diagram, with parts selectable for further interactive retrieval
US5083218A (en) * 1989-02-08 1992-01-21 Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Hand-held image reading apparatus
US5418684A (en) 1989-06-07 1995-05-23 Norand Corporation Hand-held data capture system with interchangeable modules
US5252951A (en) 1989-04-28 1993-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation Graphical user interface with gesture recognition in a multiapplication environment
US5157384A (en) 1989-04-28 1992-10-20 International Business Machines Corporation Advanced user interface
US5201010A (en) 1989-05-01 1993-04-06 Credit Verification Corporation Method and system for building a database and performing marketing based upon prior shopping history
US5159668A (en) 1989-05-08 1992-10-27 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for manipulating outlines in improving digital typeface on raster output devices
US4914709A (en) 1989-06-02 1990-04-03 Eastman Kodak Company Method for identifying unrecognizable characters in optical character recognition machines
US4955693A (en) 1989-06-09 1990-09-11 Spectra-Physics, Inc. Laser scanner having improved optical scanning window
US6053413A (en) 1989-06-16 2000-04-25 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Optical scanner with hand-held and hands-free modes of use
US5136687A (en) 1989-10-10 1992-08-04 Edelman Gerald M Categorization automata employing neuronal group selection with reentry
US5133024A (en) 1989-10-24 1992-07-21 Horst Froessl Image data bank system with selective conversion
EP0424803B1 (en) 1989-10-24 1997-07-16 FROESSL, Horst Method for at least partially transforming image data into text with provision for subsequent storage or further processing
US5179652A (en) * 1989-12-13 1993-01-12 Anthony I. Rozmanith Method and apparatus for storing, transmitting and retrieving graphical and tabular data
US5185857A (en) * 1989-12-13 1993-02-09 Rozmanith A Martin Method and apparatus for multi-optional processing, storing, transmitting and retrieving graphical and tabular data in a mobile transportation distributable and/or networkable communications and/or data processing system
JPH03202967A (en) 1989-12-28 1991-09-04 Toshiba Corp Electronic filing device
US6002491A (en) 1990-01-05 1999-12-14 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Apparatus for processing human-readable and machine-readable documents
GB9002244D0 (en) 1990-02-01 1990-03-28 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Separation method
US5048097A (en) 1990-02-02 1991-09-10 Eastman Kodak Company Optical character recognition neural network system for machine-printed characters
US5040229A (en) 1990-02-02 1991-08-13 Eastman Kodak Company Contour feature-based method for identification and segmentation of touching characters
US5062143A (en) 1990-02-23 1991-10-29 Harris Corporation Trigram-based method of language identification
US5146552A (en) 1990-02-28 1992-09-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method for associating annotation with electronically published material
US5355146A (en) 1990-03-05 1994-10-11 Bmc Micro-Industries Ltd. Multi-directional hand scanner and mouse
US5151951A (en) 1990-03-15 1992-09-29 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Character recognition device which divides a single character region into subregions to obtain a character code
US5271068A (en) 1990-03-15 1993-12-14 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Character recognition device which divides a single character region into subregions to obtain a character code
US5142161A (en) 1990-04-26 1992-08-25 Brackmann Rogers F Hand-held optical scanner and highlighter
USRE34476E (en) 1990-05-14 1993-12-14 Norwood Donald D Hybrid information management system for handwriting and text
US5109439A (en) 1990-06-12 1992-04-28 Horst Froessl Mass document storage and retrieval system
US5140644A (en) 1990-07-23 1992-08-18 Hitachi, Ltd. Character string retrieving system and method
US5168147A (en) 1990-07-31 1992-12-01 Xerox Corporation Binary image processing for decoding self-clocking glyph shape codes
US5272324A (en) 1990-08-10 1993-12-21 Interlink Technologies, Inc. Portable scanner system with transceiver for two-way radio frequency communication
US5418717A (en) 1990-08-27 1995-05-23 Su; Keh-Yih Multiple score language processing system
US5212739A (en) 1990-10-17 1993-05-18 Hewlett-Packard Company Noise tolerant optical character recognition system
US5347295A (en) 1990-10-31 1994-09-13 Go Corporation Control of a computer through a position-sensed stylus
US5288938A (en) * 1990-12-05 1994-02-22 Yamaha Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling electronic tone generation in accordance with a detected type of performance gesture
US5203704A (en) 1990-12-21 1993-04-20 Mccloud Seth R Method of communication using pointing vector gestures and mnemonic devices to assist in learning point vector gestures
US5301243A (en) 1990-12-21 1994-04-05 Francis Olschafskie Hand-held character-oriented scanner with external view area
US5574804A (en) 1990-12-21 1996-11-12 Olschafskie; Francis Hand-held scanner
US5231698A (en) 1991-03-20 1993-07-27 Forcier Mitchell D Script/binary-encoded-character processing method and system
US6434581B1 (en) 1991-03-20 2002-08-13 Microsoft Corporation Script character processing method for interactively adjusting space between writing element
US5229590A (en) 1991-06-10 1993-07-20 Spectra-Physics Scanning Systems, Inc. Dome-shaped handheld laser scanner
US5946406A (en) 1991-06-17 1999-08-31 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for data entry of handwritten symbols
US5550930A (en) 1991-06-17 1996-08-27 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for training a handwriting recognizer at the time of misrecognition
US5251316A (en) 1991-06-28 1993-10-05 Digital Equipment Corporation Method and apparatus for integrating a dynamic lexicon into a full-text information retrieval system
JPH0736142B2 (en) 1991-10-10 1995-04-19 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション Method and information processing apparatus for recognizing movement stop of movement instruction means
DE69232493T2 (en) 1991-10-21 2003-01-09 Canon K.K., Tokio/Tokyo Method and device for character recognition
US5568452A (en) 1991-11-01 1996-10-22 Kronenberg; Harry Alarm clock
US5848187A (en) 1991-11-18 1998-12-08 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for entering and manipulating spreadsheet cell data
CA2078423C (en) 1991-11-19 1997-01-14 Per-Kristian Halvorsen Method and apparatus for supplementing significant portions of a document selected without document image decoding with retrieved information
US6400996B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-06-04 Steven M. Hoffberg Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method
US7006881B1 (en) 1991-12-23 2006-02-28 Steven Hoffberg Media recording device with remote graphic user interface
US5903454A (en) 1991-12-23 1999-05-11 Hoffberg; Linda Irene Human-factored interface corporating adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus
US6850252B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2005-02-01 Steven M. Hoffberg Intelligent electronic appliance system and method
JP3103928B2 (en) 1991-12-27 2000-10-30 株式会社日立製作所 Portable pen input device and pen input computer system
US5347477A (en) 1992-01-28 1994-09-13 Jack Lee Pen-based form computer
US5351995A (en) 1992-01-29 1994-10-04 Apple Computer, Inc. Double-sided, reversible electronic paper
US5539427A (en) 1992-02-10 1996-07-23 Compaq Computer Corporation Graphic indexing system
US5838458A (en) 1992-02-25 1998-11-17 Tsai; Irving Method and apparatus for linking designated portions of a received document image with an electronic address
US5756981A (en) 1992-02-27 1998-05-26 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Optical scanner for reading and decoding one- and-two-dimensional symbologies at variable depths of field including memory efficient high speed image processing means and high accuracy image analysis means
US5247285A (en) 1992-03-06 1993-09-21 Everex Systems, Inc. Standup portable personal computer with detachable wireless keyboard and adjustable display
US5251106A (en) 1992-03-06 1993-10-05 Everex Systems, Inc. Stackable enclosure for electronic devices
US5699441A (en) 1992-03-10 1997-12-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Continuous sign-language recognition apparatus and input apparatus
US5360971A (en) 1992-03-31 1994-11-01 The Research Foundation State University Of New York Apparatus and method for eye tracking interface
US5243149A (en) 1992-04-10 1993-09-07 International Business Machines Corp. Method and apparatus for improving the paper interface to computing systems
US5563996A (en) 1992-04-13 1996-10-08 Apple Computer, Inc. Computer note pad including gesture based note division tools and method
US5398310A (en) 1992-04-13 1995-03-14 Apple Computer, Incorporated Pointing gesture based computer note pad paging and scrolling interface
CA2089784C (en) 1992-04-15 1996-12-24 William Joseph Anderson Apparatus and method for disambiguating an input stream generated by a stylus-based user interface
US5583542A (en) * 1992-05-26 1996-12-10 Apple Computer, Incorporated Method for deleting objects on a computer display
US5592566A (en) * 1992-05-27 1997-01-07 Apple Computer, Incorporated Method and apparatus for computerized recognition
US5536930A (en) 1992-06-03 1996-07-16 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for sensing positional orientations of a portable terminal
US5889236A (en) 1992-06-08 1999-03-30 Synaptics Incorporated Pressure sensitive scrollbar feature
US5543591A (en) 1992-06-08 1996-08-06 Synaptics, Incorporated Object position detector with edge motion feature and gesture recognition
US5880411A (en) 1992-06-08 1999-03-09 Synaptics, Incorporated Object position detector with edge motion feature and gesture recognition
US6028271A (en) 1992-06-08 2000-02-22 Synaptics, Inc. Object position detector with edge motion feature and gesture recognition
EP0576226B1 (en) 1992-06-22 1998-12-02 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for reading image of image scanner-reader
US5701424A (en) 1992-07-06 1997-12-23 Microsoft Corporation Palladian menus and methods relating thereto
US5499108C1 (en) 1992-07-29 2001-01-16 Primax Electronics Ltd Document-driven scanning input device communicating with a computer
JP3398981B2 (en) 1992-07-31 2003-04-21 ソニー株式会社 Handwriting input information processing device
IL106401A (en) 1992-08-07 1997-02-18 Donnelley & Sons Co Method and system for converting bitmap data into page definition language commands
GB9220404D0 (en) 1992-08-20 1992-11-11 Nat Security Agency Method of identifying,retrieving and sorting documents
JP3244798B2 (en) 1992-09-08 2002-01-07 株式会社東芝 Moving image processing device
US6097392A (en) 1992-09-10 2000-08-01 Microsoft Corporation Method and system of altering an attribute of a graphic object in a pen environment
FR2696258B1 (en) 1992-09-25 1994-10-28 Sextant Avionique Device for managing a human-machine interaction system.
US5430558A (en) 1992-09-29 1995-07-04 Sohaei; Frank Portable optical scanner with integral audio recorder
US5978784A (en) 1992-10-05 1999-11-02 Expert Systems Publishing Co. Computer-implemented decision management system with dynamically generated questions and answer choices
US5371348A (en) 1992-10-16 1994-12-06 Khyber Technologies Corporation Portable device for handsfree data entry with variably-positionable display/scanner module detachable for handheld use
JPH06131437A (en) * 1992-10-20 1994-05-13 Hitachi Ltd Method for instructing operation in composite form
US5481278A (en) * 1992-10-21 1996-01-02 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing apparatus
EP0596247A3 (en) 1992-11-02 1994-10-12 Motorola Inc A full-text index creation, search, retrieval and display method.
US5583543A (en) 1992-11-05 1996-12-10 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Pen input processing apparatus
US5465325A (en) 1992-11-16 1995-11-07 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for manipulating inked objects
US5404442A (en) 1992-11-30 1995-04-04 Apple Computer, Inc. Visible clipboard for graphical computer environments
US5612719A (en) 1992-12-03 1997-03-18 Apple Computer, Inc. Gesture sensitive buttons for graphical user interfaces
US6212299B1 (en) 1992-12-11 2001-04-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for recognizing a character
US5438630A (en) 1992-12-17 1995-08-01 Xerox Corporation Word spotting in bitmap images using word bounding boxes and hidden Markov models
JP3025121B2 (en) 1992-12-24 2000-03-27 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing method and apparatus
JP2682364B2 (en) 1993-01-06 1997-11-26 ヤマハ株式会社 Electronic musical instrument data setting device
US5502803A (en) 1993-01-18 1996-03-26 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing apparatus having a gesture editing function
US6002798A (en) 1993-01-19 1999-12-14 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for creating, indexing and viewing abstracted documents
JP2501771B2 (en) 1993-01-19 1996-05-29 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション Method and apparatus for obtaining multiple valid signatures of an unwanted software entity
US5399852A (en) 1993-02-19 1995-03-21 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for illumination and imaging of a surface employing cross polarization
US5467425A (en) 1993-02-26 1995-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Building scalable N-gram language models using maximum likelihood maximum entropy N-gram models
US5920694A (en) 1993-03-19 1999-07-06 Ncr Corporation Annotation of computer video displays
JPH06282375A (en) 1993-03-29 1994-10-07 Casio Comput Co Ltd Information processor and electronic pen
DE69425607T2 (en) 1993-05-07 2001-04-19 Canon K.K., Tokio/Tokyo Selective facility and method for document retrieval.
US5602376A (en) 1993-05-07 1997-02-11 Psc Inc. Hand-mounted optical scanner system
US5677710A (en) 1993-05-10 1997-10-14 Apple Computer, Inc. Recognition keypad
US5517578A (en) 1993-05-20 1996-05-14 Aha! Software Corporation Method and apparatus for grouping and manipulating electronic representations of handwriting, printing and drawings
US5377706A (en) * 1993-05-21 1995-01-03 Huang; Jih-Tung Garbage collecting device
US5581670A (en) 1993-07-21 1996-12-03 Xerox Corporation User interface having movable sheet with click-through tools
US5454043A (en) 1993-07-30 1995-09-26 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Dynamic and static hand gesture recognition through low-level image analysis
US5710831A (en) * 1993-07-30 1998-01-20 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for correcting handwriting on a pen-based computer
US5367453A (en) * 1993-08-02 1994-11-22 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for correcting words
US5485565A (en) * 1993-08-04 1996-01-16 Xerox Corporation Gestural indicators for selecting graphic objects
JP3282637B2 (en) 1993-08-11 2002-05-20 ソニー株式会社 Handwritten input display device and method
US6021218A (en) 1993-09-07 2000-02-01 Apple Computer, Inc. System and method for organizing recognized and unrecognized objects on a computer display
US5500937A (en) 1993-09-08 1996-03-19 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for editing an inked object while simultaneously displaying its recognized object
US5734923A (en) 1993-09-22 1998-03-31 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus for interactively editing and outputting sign language information using graphical user interface
DE69423838T2 (en) 1993-09-23 2000-08-03 Xerox Corp., Rochester Semantic match event filtering for speech recognition and signal translation applications
US5423554A (en) 1993-09-24 1995-06-13 Metamedia Ventures, Inc. Virtual reality game method and apparatus
US5596697A (en) * 1993-09-30 1997-01-21 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for routing items within a computer system
US5555363A (en) 1993-09-30 1996-09-10 Apple Computer, Inc. Resetting the case of text on a computer display
JP2804224B2 (en) * 1993-09-30 1998-09-24 日立ソフトウエアエンジニアリング株式会社 Network diagram drawing method and system
US5583946A (en) * 1993-09-30 1996-12-10 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for recognizing gestures on a computer system
GB2282906B (en) 1993-10-13 1996-11-06 Dataquill Ltd Data enty systems
JP2986345B2 (en) 1993-10-18 1999-12-06 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション Voice recording indexing apparatus and method
CA2129075C (en) 1993-10-18 1999-04-20 Joseph J. Daniele Electronic copyright royalty accounting system using glyphs
JPH07175813A (en) 1993-10-27 1995-07-14 Ricoh Co Ltd Composite communication processor
US5764794A (en) 1993-10-27 1998-06-09 Perlin; Kenneth Method and apparatus for electronically storing alphanumeric characters
GB2283591B (en) 1993-11-04 1998-04-15 Northern Telecom Ltd Database management
US6345104B1 (en) 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
US5862260A (en) * 1993-11-18 1999-01-19 Digimarc Corporation Methods for surveying dissemination of proprietary empirical data
US6339767B1 (en) 1997-06-02 2002-01-15 Aurigin Systems, Inc. Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing
US5623681A (en) 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US5905251A (en) 1993-11-24 1999-05-18 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Hand-held portable WWW access terminal with visual display panel and GUI-based WWW browser program integrated with bar code symbol reader in a hand-supportable housing
JPH07160827A (en) 1993-12-09 1995-06-23 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Handwritten stroke editing device and method therefor
JPH07200155A (en) 1993-12-10 1995-08-04 Microsoft Corp Detection of nonobjective result of pen-type computer system
US5347306A (en) 1993-12-17 1994-09-13 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Animated electronic meeting place
US5583980A (en) 1993-12-22 1996-12-10 Knowledge Media Inc. Time-synchronized annotation method
DE69426919T2 (en) 1993-12-30 2001-06-28 Xerox Corp Apparatus and method for performing many chaining command gestures in a gesture user interface system
DE69428675T2 (en) 1993-12-30 2002-05-08 Xerox Corp Apparatus and method for supporting an implicit structuring of free-form lists, overviews, texts, tables and diagrams in an input system and editing system based on hand signals
US5488196A (en) * 1994-01-19 1996-01-30 Zimmerman; Thomas G. Electronic musical re-performance and editing system
JP3630712B2 (en) * 1994-02-03 2005-03-23 キヤノン株式会社 Gesture input method and apparatus
US5889896A (en) 1994-02-09 1999-03-30 Meshinsky; John System for performing multiple processes on images of scanned documents
USH2098H1 (en) 1994-02-22 2004-03-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Multilingual communications device
US5577135A (en) 1994-03-01 1996-11-19 Apple Computer, Inc. Handwriting signal processing front-end for handwriting recognizers
US5732227A (en) 1994-07-05 1998-03-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Interactive information processing system responsive to user manipulation of physical objects and displayed images
US6947571B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2005-09-20 Digimarc Corporation Cell phones with optical capabilities, and related applications
US6522770B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2003-02-18 Digimarc Corporation Management of documents and other objects using optical devices
US5815577A (en) 1994-03-18 1998-09-29 Innovonics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for securely encrypting data in conjunction with a personal computer
US5541419A (en) 1994-03-21 1996-07-30 Intermec Corporation Symbology reader wth reduced specular reflection
NZ248751A (en) 1994-03-23 1997-11-24 Ryan John Kevin Text analysis and coding
US5465353A (en) 1994-04-01 1995-11-07 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Image matching and retrieval by multi-access redundant hashing
IL109268A (en) 1994-04-10 1999-01-26 Advanced Recognition Tech Pattern recognition method and system
US6625581B1 (en) 1994-04-22 2003-09-23 Ipf, Inc. Method of and system for enabling the access of consumer product related information and the purchase of consumer products at points of consumer presence on the world wide web (www) at which consumer product information request (cpir) enabling servlet tags are embedded within html-encoded documents
US6961712B1 (en) 1996-10-25 2005-11-01 Ipf, Inc. Consumer product information request (CPIR) enabling servlets and web-based consumer product information catalogs employing the same
WO1995032469A2 (en) 1994-05-13 1995-11-30 Apple Computer, Inc. Unified hierarchical and tear-off menus in a graphical, event-driven computer system
US6154758A (en) 1994-05-13 2000-11-28 Apple Computer, Inc. Text conversion method for computer systems
US5932863A (en) 1994-05-25 1999-08-03 Rathus; Spencer A. Method and apparatus for accessing electric data via a familiar printed medium
US6866196B1 (en) 1994-05-25 2005-03-15 Spencer A. Rathus Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium
US6164534A (en) 1996-04-04 2000-12-26 Rathus; Spencer A. Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium
US5687254A (en) 1994-06-06 1997-11-11 Xerox Corporation Searching and Matching unrecognized handwriting
JP3486459B2 (en) 1994-06-21 2004-01-13 キヤノン株式会社 Electronic information equipment and control method thereof
JP3423413B2 (en) 1994-06-21 2003-07-07 キヤノン株式会社 Handwritten information recognition apparatus and method
US5570113A (en) 1994-06-29 1996-10-29 International Business Machines Corporation Computer based pen system and method for automatically cancelling unwanted gestures and preventing anomalous signals as inputs to such system
US5624265A (en) 1994-07-01 1997-04-29 Tv Interactive Data Corporation Printed publication remote contol for accessing interactive media
US5462473A (en) 1994-07-01 1995-10-31 Sheller; Ken Toy with slow movement recovery
US5752051A (en) 1994-07-19 1998-05-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Nsa Language-independent method of generating index terms
US6115053A (en) 1994-08-02 2000-09-05 New York University Computer animation method and system for synthesizing human-like gestures and actions
US5949921A (en) 1994-08-09 1999-09-07 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Image processing apparatus for reading an image by hand scanning
US5640193A (en) 1994-08-15 1997-06-17 Lucent Technologies Inc. Multimedia service access by reading marks on an object
US5574840A (en) 1994-08-29 1996-11-12 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for selecting text utilizing a plurality of text using switchable minimum granularity of selection
US5625711A (en) 1994-08-31 1997-04-29 Adobe Systems Incorporated Method and apparatus for producing a hybrid data structure for displaying a raster image
US6052481A (en) 1994-09-02 2000-04-18 Apple Computers, Inc. Automatic method for scoring and clustering prototypes of handwritten stroke-based data
JPH0887378A (en) 1994-09-19 1996-04-02 Nec Corp Command execution system by mouse operation recognition
WO1996009579A1 (en) 1994-09-22 1996-03-28 Izak Van Cruyningen Popup menus with directional gestures
US5608778A (en) 1994-09-22 1997-03-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Cellular telephone as an authenticated transaction controller
GB9419126D0 (en) 1994-09-22 1994-11-09 At & T Global Inf Solution Method and apparatus for displaying translucent overlapping graphical objects on a computer monitor
US5768607A (en) 1994-09-30 1998-06-16 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for freehand annotation and drawings incorporating sound and for compressing and synchronizing sound
US5777614A (en) 1994-10-14 1998-07-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Editing support system including an interactive interface
US5522798A (en) 1994-10-17 1996-06-04 Abbott Laboratories Control of a multi-channel drug infusion pump using a pharmacokinetic model
US5724521A (en) 1994-11-03 1998-03-03 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for providing electronic advertisements to end users in a consumer best-fit pricing manner
US5758257A (en) 1994-11-29 1998-05-26 Herz; Frederick System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US6460036B1 (en) 1994-11-29 2002-10-01 Pinpoint Incorporated System and method for providing customized electronic newspapers and target advertisements
US6029195A (en) 1994-11-29 2000-02-22 Herz; Frederick S. M. System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US5818612A (en) 1994-11-29 1998-10-06 Nec Corporation Scanning method and apparatus for pre-scanning document to allow manual adjustment of its orientation
US5638092A (en) 1994-12-20 1997-06-10 Eng; Tommy K. Cursor control system
US5814803A (en) 1994-12-23 1998-09-29 Spectra-Physics Scanning Systems, Inc. Image reader with multi-focus lens
KR960028113A (en) 1994-12-27 1996-07-22 김광호 Facsimile Automatic Document Transmitter and Method
US5668891A (en) * 1995-01-06 1997-09-16 Xerox Corporation Methods for determining font attributes of characters
FI97508C (en) 1995-01-09 1996-12-27 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Quick selection in a personal mobile device
US5880743A (en) 1995-01-24 1999-03-09 Xerox Corporation Apparatus and method for implementing visual animation illustrating results of interactive editing operations
US6745937B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2004-06-08 E-Comm, Inc. Low-power hand-held transaction device
US7093759B2 (en) 1995-02-13 2006-08-22 E-Comm Incorporated Low-power hand-held transaction device
US5594469A (en) * 1995-02-21 1997-01-14 Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America Inc. Hand gesture machine control system
US5732214A (en) 1995-02-28 1998-03-24 Lucent Technologies, Inc. System for universal archival service where transfer is initiated by user or service and storing information at multiple locations for user selected degree of confidence
US5982853A (en) 1995-03-01 1999-11-09 Liebermann; Raanan Telephone for the deaf and method of using same
US5652849A (en) 1995-03-16 1997-07-29 Regents Of The University Of Michigan Apparatus and method for remote control using a visual information stream
US5852676A (en) 1995-04-11 1998-12-22 Teraform Inc. Method and apparatus for locating and identifying fields within a document
JPH08286831A (en) 1995-04-14 1996-11-01 Canon Inc Pen input type electronic device and its control method
JPH08286807A (en) 1995-04-18 1996-11-01 Canon Inc Data processing unit and method for recognizing gesture
US5893130A (en) 1995-04-28 1999-04-06 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Image output device
US5663514A (en) 1995-05-02 1997-09-02 Yamaha Corporation Apparatus and method for controlling performance dynamics and tempo in response to player's gesture
US5757360A (en) 1995-05-03 1998-05-26 Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. Hand held computer control device
JPH08315185A (en) 1995-05-18 1996-11-29 Hitachi Ltd Sign language editing device
JP3671259B2 (en) 1995-05-31 2005-07-13 カシオ計算機株式会社 Display device
US5991441A (en) 1995-06-07 1999-11-23 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Real time handwriting recognition system
US5798693A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-08-25 Engellenner; Thomas J. Electronic locating systems
US5978773A (en) 1995-06-20 1999-11-02 Neomedia Technologies, Inc. System and method for using an ordinary article of commerce to access a remote computer
IL114367A (en) 1995-06-27 1999-11-30 Wizcom Technologies Ltd Hand-holdable optical scanner particularly useful as electronic translator
US5754308A (en) 1995-06-27 1998-05-19 Panasonic Technologies, Inc. System and method for archiving digital versions of documents and for generating quality printed documents therefrom
US5713045A (en) * 1995-06-29 1998-01-27 Object Technology Licensing Corporation System for processing user events with input device entity associated with event producer which further links communication from event consumer to the event producer
JP3689455B2 (en) 1995-07-03 2005-08-31 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing method and apparatus
US6018342A (en) * 1995-07-03 2000-01-25 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Automatically generated content-based history mechanism
US5737507A (en) 1995-07-07 1998-04-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Representation of inter-relationships between graphical objects in a computer display device
US6788800B1 (en) 2000-07-25 2004-09-07 Digimarc Corporation Authenticating objects using embedded data
US20030040957A1 (en) 1995-07-27 2003-02-27 Willam Y. Conwell Advertising employing watermarking
US6650761B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2003-11-18 Digimarc Corporation Watermarked business cards and methods
US7562392B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2009-07-14 Digimarc Corporation Methods of interacting with audio and ambient music
US6505160B1 (en) 1995-07-27 2003-01-07 Digimarc Corporation Connected audio and other media objects
US5724985A (en) 1995-08-02 1998-03-10 Pacesetter, Inc. User interface for an implantable medical device using an integrated digitizer display screen
US5682439A (en) 1995-08-07 1997-10-28 Apple Computer, Inc. Boxed input correction system and method for pen based computer systems
US6026388A (en) 1995-08-16 2000-02-15 Textwise, Llc User interface and other enhancements for natural language information retrieval system and method
US6477239B1 (en) 1995-08-30 2002-11-05 Hitachi, Ltd. Sign language telephone device
EP0848552B1 (en) * 1995-08-30 2002-05-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Sign language telephone system for communication between persons with or without hearing impairment
US5867597A (en) * 1995-09-05 1999-02-02 Ricoh Corporation High-speed retrieval by example
JPH0981309A (en) 1995-09-13 1997-03-28 Toshiba Corp Input device
US6360949B1 (en) 1995-10-10 2002-03-26 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Retro-reflective scan module for electro-optical readers
US6081623A (en) 1995-10-11 2000-06-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method for lossless bandwidth compression of a series of glyphs
US6061050A (en) 1995-10-27 2000-05-09 Hewlett-Packard Company User interface device
US5963966A (en) 1995-11-08 1999-10-05 Cybernet Systems Corporation Automated capture of technical documents for electronic review and distribution
US5767457A (en) 1995-11-13 1998-06-16 Cirque Corporation Apparatus and method for audible feedback from input device
US6714969B1 (en) 1995-11-17 2004-03-30 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Mobile terminal with integrated host application software
US6184847B1 (en) 1998-09-22 2001-02-06 Vega Vista, Inc. Intuitive control of portable data displays
US5822539A (en) 1995-12-08 1998-10-13 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System for adding requested document cross references to a document by annotation proxy configured to merge and a directory generator and annotation server
US6078308A (en) 1995-12-13 2000-06-20 Immersion Corporation Graphical click surfaces for force feedback applications to provide user selection using cursor interaction with a trigger position within a boundary of a graphical object
US5880731A (en) 1995-12-14 1999-03-09 Microsoft Corporation Use of avatars with automatic gesturing and bounded interaction in on-line chat session
US5774591A (en) 1995-12-15 1998-06-30 Xerox Corporation Apparatus and method for recognizing facial expressions and facial gestures in a sequence of images
US5818965A (en) 1995-12-20 1998-10-06 Xerox Corporation Consolidation of equivalence classes of scanned symbols
US5595445A (en) * 1995-12-27 1997-01-21 Bobry; Howard H. Hand-held optical scanner
US6055333A (en) 1995-12-28 2000-04-25 Motorola, Inc. Handwriting recognition method and apparatus having multiple selectable dictionaries
USRE37654E1 (en) 1996-01-22 2002-04-16 Nicholas Longo Gesture synthesizer for electronic sound device
US6066794A (en) 1997-01-21 2000-05-23 Longo; Nicholas C. Gesture synthesizer for electronic sound device
US5821925A (en) 1996-01-26 1998-10-13 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Collaborative work environment supporting three-dimensional objects and multiple remote participants
WO1997027553A1 (en) * 1996-01-29 1997-07-31 Futuretense, Inc. Distributed electronic publishing system
US6115482A (en) 1996-02-13 2000-09-05 Ascent Technology, Inc. Voice-output reading system with gesture-based navigation
US5799219A (en) 1996-02-20 1998-08-25 Eastman Kodak Company System and method for remote image communication and processing using data recorded on photographic film
US5832474A (en) 1996-02-26 1998-11-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Document search and retrieval system with partial match searching of user-drawn annotations
US6069622A (en) 1996-03-08 2000-05-30 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for generating comic panels
US6549891B1 (en) 1996-03-26 2003-04-15 Recovery Management Corporation Method for managing inventory
US5893095A (en) 1996-03-29 1999-04-06 Virage, Inc. Similarity engine for content-based retrieval of images
US5809172A (en) 1996-04-17 1998-09-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Non-linear aggregation mapping compression of image data and method
US5692073A (en) 1996-05-03 1997-11-25 Xerox Corporation Formless forms and paper web using a reference-based mark extraction technique
JP4481370B2 (en) 1996-05-06 2010-06-16 アドビ システムズ， インコーポレイテッド Internet hyperlink drag and drop
US5884014A (en) * 1996-05-23 1999-03-16 Xerox Corporation Fontless structured document image representations for efficient rendering
JPH1049549A (en) 1996-05-29 1998-02-20 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Document retrieving device
US5781723A (en) 1996-06-03 1998-07-14 Microsoft Corporation System and method for self-identifying a portable information device to a computing unit
US5864635A (en) * 1996-06-14 1999-01-26 International Business Machines Corporation Distinguishing gestures from handwriting in a pen based computer by stroke analysis
US5862256A (en) * 1996-06-14 1999-01-19 International Business Machines Corporation Distinguishing gestures from handwriting in a pen based computer by size discrimination
US6314406B1 (en) 1996-06-26 2001-11-06 Telxon Corporation Customer information network
US5784061A (en) 1996-06-26 1998-07-21 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for collapsing and expanding selected regions on a work space of a computer controlled display system
US5861886A (en) * 1996-06-26 1999-01-19 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for grouping graphic objects on a computer based system having a graphical user interface
EP0816986B1 (en) 1996-07-03 2006-09-06 Hitachi, Ltd. System for recognizing motions
US6021403A (en) * 1996-07-19 2000-02-01 Microsoft Corporation Intelligent user assistance facility
AU3495097A (en) 1996-07-21 1998-02-10 Ernestine, Llc World wide web bar code access system
IL118914A0 (en) 1996-07-22 1996-10-31 Zohar Argamanit Ltd Hand-holdable optical scanner particularly useful as electronic translator
US6002808A (en) 1996-07-26 1999-12-14 Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. Hand gesture control system
US6476830B1 (en) 1996-08-02 2002-11-05 Fujitsu Software Corporation Virtual objects for building a community in a virtual world
US5913185A (en) * 1996-08-19 1999-06-15 International Business Machines Corporation Determining a natural language shift in a computer document
US5867795A (en) * 1996-08-23 1999-02-02 Motorola, Inc. Portable electronic device with transceiver and visual image display
US6837436B2 (en) * 1996-09-05 2005-01-04 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Consumer interactive shopping system
US5745116A (en) 1996-09-09 1998-04-28 Motorola, Inc. Intuitive gesture-based graphical user interface
JP3904637B2 (en) 1996-09-13 2007-04-11 株式会社東芝 Information input device and method
US6218964B1 (en) 1996-09-25 2001-04-17 Christ G. Ellis Mechanical and digital reading pen
US5838326A (en) 1996-09-26 1998-11-17 Xerox Corporation System for moving document objects in a 3-D workspace
US6081621A (en) 1996-10-01 2000-06-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Positioning templates in optical character recognition systems
US5995976A (en) 1996-10-11 1999-11-30 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for distributing supplemental information related to printed articles
US6085162A (en) 1996-10-18 2000-07-04 Gedanken Corporation Translation system and method in which words are translated by a specialized dictionary and then a general dictionary
EP0837418A3 (en) 1996-10-18 2006-03-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method and apparatus for generating information input using reflected light image of target object
JPH10133847A (en) 1996-10-28 1998-05-22 Casio Comput Co Ltd Mobile terminal system for voice recognition, database search, and resource access communications
US6088484A (en) 1996-11-08 2000-07-11 Hughes Electronics Corporation Downloading of personalization layers for symbolically compressed objects
EP1012694A4 (en) 1996-11-08 2005-04-06 Neomedia Tech Inc Automatic access of electronic information through machine-readable codes on printed documents
DE69738233T2 (en) 1996-11-15 2008-07-31 Toho Business Management Center BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
US8225089B2 (en) 1996-12-04 2012-07-17 Otomaku Properties Ltd., L.L.C. Electronic transaction systems utilizing a PEAD and a private key
US6175922B1 (en) 1996-12-04 2001-01-16 Esign, Inc. Electronic transaction systems and methods therefor
US6111588A (en) 1996-12-05 2000-08-29 Adobe Systems Incorporated Creating and modifying curves on a computer display
US6154723A (en) 1996-12-06 2000-11-28 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Virtual reality 3D interface system for data creation, viewing and editing
US6157935A (en) 1996-12-17 2000-12-05 Tran; Bao Q. Remote data access and management system
US5952599A (en) 1996-12-19 1999-09-14 Interval Research Corporation Interactive music generation system making use of global feature control by non-musicians
US5937110A (en) 1996-12-20 1999-08-10 Xerox Corporation Parallel propagating embedded binary sequences for characterizing objects in N-dimensional address space
ATE232621T1 (en) 1996-12-20 2003-02-15 Hitachi Europ Ltd METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOGNIZING HAND GESTURES
US5966126A (en) 1996-12-23 1999-10-12 Szabo; Andrew J. Graphic user interface for database system
JPH10240552A (en) 1996-12-26 1998-09-11 Canon Inc Information processor and its method
JPH10200804A (en) 1997-01-07 1998-07-31 Nikon Corp Camera type scanner
US7437351B2 (en) 1997-01-10 2008-10-14 Google Inc. Method for searching media
US5953541A (en) 1997-01-24 1999-09-14 Tegic Communications, Inc. Disambiguating system for disambiguating ambiguous input sequences by displaying objects associated with the generated input sequences in the order of decreasing frequency of use
JP4005165B2 (en) 1997-01-29 2007-11-07 株式会社東芝 Image input system and image input method
US5864848A (en) * 1997-01-31 1999-01-26 Microsoft Corporation Goal-driven information interpretation and extraction system
JP3634099B2 (en) 1997-02-17 2005-03-30 株式会社リコー Document information management system, media sheet information creation device, and document information management device
US5884267A (en) 1997-02-24 1999-03-16 Digital Equipment Corporation Automated speech alignment for image synthesis
US5960383A (en) 1997-02-25 1999-09-28 Digital Equipment Corporation Extraction of key sections from texts using automatic indexing techniques
US6118888A (en) 1997-02-28 2000-09-12 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Multi-modal interface apparatus and method
US6747632B2 (en) 1997-03-06 2004-06-08 Harmonic Research, Inc. Wireless control device
CA2199999A1 (en) 1997-03-14 1998-09-14 Peter Johann Kielland Parking regulation enforcement system
AUPO799197A0 (en) 1997-07-15 1997-08-07 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Image processing method and apparatus (ART01)
US5970455A (en) 1997-03-20 1999-10-19 Xerox Corporation System for capturing and retrieving audio data and corresponding hand-written notes
US6643696B2 (en) 1997-03-21 2003-11-04 Owen Davis Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database
US5796952A (en) 1997-03-21 1998-08-18 Dot Com Development, Inc. Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database
US6208435B1 (en) 1997-03-25 2001-03-27 Jan Scott Zwolinski Method and apparatus for providing a handheld scanner-dictionary apparatus
US6154222A (en) 1997-03-27 2000-11-28 At&T Corp Method for defining animation parameters for an animation definition interface
US6483513B1 (en) 1998-03-27 2002-11-19 At&T Corp. Method for defining MPEP 4 animation parameters for an animation definition interface
US6036086A (en) 1997-03-28 2000-03-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus and method for initiating a telephone transaction using a scanner
US5895470A (en) 1997-04-09 1999-04-20 Xerox Corporation System for categorizing documents in a linked collection of documents
JPH10289006A (en) * 1997-04-11 1998-10-27 Yamaha Motor Co Ltd Method for controlling object to be controlled using artificial emotion
US6378075B1 (en) 1997-04-11 2002-04-23 The Brodia Group Trusted agent for electronic commerce
US6049327A (en) 1997-04-23 2000-04-11 Modern Cartoons, Ltd System for data management based onhand gestures
US6546378B1 (en) 1997-04-24 2003-04-08 Bright Ideas, L.L.C. Signal interpretation engine
US6057844A (en) 1997-04-28 2000-05-02 Adobe Systems Incorporated Drag operation gesture controller
WO1998051036A1 (en) 1997-05-07 1998-11-12 Neomedia Technologies, Inc. Scanner enhanced remote control unit and system for automatically linking to on-line resources
EP0983661A1 (en) 1997-05-09 2000-03-08 Neomedia Technologies, Inc Method and system for accessing electronic resources via machine-readable data on intelligent documents
JP3904671B2 (en) 1997-05-28 2007-04-11 富士通株式会社 Virtual clay system and simulation method thereof
US6003775A (en) 1997-06-11 1999-12-21 Intermec Ip Corp. Generic handheld symbology scanner with a modular optical sensor
US6104401A (en) 1997-06-12 2000-08-15 Netscape Communications Corporation Link filters
US6025844A (en) * 1997-06-12 2000-02-15 Netscape Communications Corporation Method and system for creating dynamic link views
US6075895A (en) 1997-06-20 2000-06-13 Holoplex Methods and apparatus for gesture recognition based on templates
US6072502A (en) 1997-06-25 2000-06-06 Adobe Systems Incorporated Characterization of corners of curvilinear segment
US6029141A (en) 1997-06-27 2000-02-22 Amazon.Com, Inc. Internet-based customer referral system
US6252598B1 (en) 1997-07-03 2001-06-26 Lucent Technologies Inc. Video hand image computer interface
US5970483A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-10-19 Claritech Corporation Apparatus and methodology for submitting search queries
JPH11102414A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-04-13 Kuraritec Corp Method and device for correcting optical character recognition by using bitmap selection and computer-readable record medium record with series of instructions to correct ocr output error
JPH11110480A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-04-23 Kuraritec Corp Method and device for displaying text
US5987448A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-11-16 Claritech Corporation Methodology for displaying search results using character recognition
IL121457A (en) 1997-08-03 2004-06-01 Guru Internat Inc Computerized dictionary and thesaurus applications
US6092068A (en) 1997-08-05 2000-07-18 Netscape Communication Corporation Marked document tutor
US6178261B1 (en) * 1997-08-05 2001-01-23 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method and system for extracting features in a pattern recognition system
US5907328A (en) 1997-08-27 1999-05-25 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic and configurable viewpoint switching in a 3D scene
US5917491A (en) 1997-08-29 1999-06-29 Netscape Communications Corporation Page proxy
US7028899B2 (en) 1999-06-07 2006-04-18 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Method of speckle-noise pattern reduction and apparatus therefore based on reducing the temporal-coherence of the planar laser illumination beam before it illuminates the target object by applying temporal phase modulation techniques during the transmission of the plib towards the target
US6344906B1 (en) 1997-09-16 2002-02-05 Cyberscan Technology, Inc. Universal document scanner controller
US6081629A (en) 1997-09-17 2000-06-27 Browning; Denton R. Handheld scanner and accompanying remote access agent
US5899700A (en) 1997-09-22 1999-05-04 Didacticom Partners Embedded multimedia control code method and apparatus
EP0905644A3 (en) 1997-09-26 2004-02-25 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Hand gesture recognizing device
US6044378A (en) 1997-09-29 2000-03-28 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for a federated digital library by managing links
US6201903B1 (en) 1997-09-30 2001-03-13 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method and apparatus for pen-based faxing
US6518950B1 (en) 1997-10-07 2003-02-11 Interval Research Corporation Methods and systems for providing human/computer interfaces
US6072494A (en) 1997-10-15 2000-06-06 Electric Planet, Inc. Method and apparatus for real-time gesture recognition
US6546405B2 (en) 1997-10-23 2003-04-08 Microsoft Corporation Annotating temporally-dimensioned multimedia content
US5986655A (en) 1997-10-28 1999-11-16 Xerox Corporation Method and system for indexing and controlling the playback of multimedia documents
DE19748702C1 (en) 1997-11-04 1998-11-05 Siemens Ag Distributed transmission information pattern recognition method
US6057845A (en) 1997-11-14 2000-05-02 Sensiva, Inc. System, method, and apparatus for generation and recognizing universal commands
US6134532A (en) 1997-11-14 2000-10-17 Aptex Software, Inc. System and method for optimal adaptive matching of users to most relevant entity and information in real-time
US5999664A (en) * 1997-11-14 1999-12-07 Xerox Corporation System for searching a corpus of document images by user specified document layout components
US20030173405A1 (en) 2000-01-12 2003-09-18 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Bar code symbol driven systems for accessing information resources on the internet
US5889523A (en) 1997-11-25 1999-03-30 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for dynamically grouping a plurality of graphic objects
US5986200A (en) 1997-12-15 1999-11-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Solid state interactive music playback device
US6145003A (en) 1997-12-17 2000-11-07 Microsoft Corporation Method of web crawling utilizing address mapping
US6925182B1 (en) 1997-12-19 2005-08-02 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Administration and utilization of private keys in a networked environment
US6804659B1 (en) 2000-01-14 2004-10-12 Ricoh Company Ltd. Content based web advertising
JP4183311B2 (en) 1997-12-22 2008-11-19 株式会社リコー Document annotation method, annotation device, and recording medium
US7124093B1 (en) 1997-12-22 2006-10-17 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Method, system and computer code for content based web advertising
US6181343B1 (en) * 1997-12-23 2001-01-30 Philips Electronics North America Corp. System and method for permitting three-dimensional navigation through a virtual reality environment using camera-based gesture inputs
US6195104B1 (en) 1997-12-23 2001-02-27 Philips Electronics North America Corp. System and method for permitting three-dimensional navigation through a virtual reality environment using camera-based gesture inputs
GB9727322D0 (en) 1997-12-29 1998-02-25 Xerox Corp Multilingual information retrieval
US6192165B1 (en) 1997-12-30 2001-02-20 Imagetag, Inc. Apparatus and method for digital filing
US6427032B1 (en) 1997-12-30 2002-07-30 Imagetag, Inc. Apparatus and method for digital filing
US6744936B2 (en) 1997-12-30 2004-06-01 Imagetag, Inc. Apparatus and method for simultaneously managing paper-based documents and digital images of the same
US6514083B1 (en) 1998-01-07 2003-02-04 Electric Planet, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing interactive karaoke entertainment
US6018346A (en) * 1998-01-12 2000-01-25 Xerox Corporation Freeform graphics system having meeting objects for supporting meeting objectives
US6509912B1 (en) * 1998-01-12 2003-01-21 Xerox Corporation Domain objects for use in a freeform graphics system
JPH11212691A (en) 1998-01-21 1999-08-06 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Method and device for pen input
EP1717679B1 (en) 1998-01-26 2016-09-21 Apple Inc. Method for integrating manual input
US6092038A (en) 1998-02-05 2000-07-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for providing lossless compression of n-gram language models in a real-time decoder
US6985169B1 (en) * 1998-02-09 2006-01-10 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Image capture system for mobile communications
US6094689A (en) 1998-02-13 2000-07-25 Hewlett-Packard Company System for coupling a host computer to an image scanner in which high level functions are migrated to the attached host computer
US6249606B1 (en) 1998-02-19 2001-06-19 Mindmaker, Inc. Method and system for gesture category recognition and training using a feature vector
US6560281B1 (en) 1998-02-24 2003-05-06 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for generating a condensed version of a video sequence including desired affordances
KR100285265B1 (en) 1998-02-25 2001-04-02 윤덕용 Db management system and inverted index storage structure using sub-index and large-capacity object
US6433784B1 (en) 1998-02-26 2002-08-13 Learn2 Corporation System and method for automatic animation generation
US6192478B1 (en) 1998-03-02 2001-02-20 Micron Electronics, Inc. Securing restricted operations of a computer program using a visual key feature
US6055513A (en) 1998-03-11 2000-04-25 Telebuyer, Llc Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce
US20020055906A1 (en) 1998-03-11 2002-05-09 Katz Ronald A. Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce
US6269188B1 (en) 1998-03-12 2001-07-31 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Word grouping accuracy value generation
US6421675B1 (en) 1998-03-16 2002-07-16 S. L. I. Systems, Inc. Search engine
JP3597697B2 (en) 1998-03-20 2004-12-08 富士通株式会社 Document summarizing apparatus and method
GB9806085D0 (en) 1998-03-23 1998-05-20 Xerox Corp Text summarisation using light syntactic parsing
WO1999050783A1 (en) 1998-03-31 1999-10-07 Logic Controls, Inc. Integrated keyboard input device
US6330976B1 (en) 1998-04-01 2001-12-18 Xerox Corporation Marking medium area with encoded identifier for producing action through network
US6031525A (en) 1998-04-01 2000-02-29 New York University Method and apparatus for writing
US6208355B1 (en) 1998-04-07 2001-03-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Sketch-based editing of curves
US6064854A (en) 1998-04-13 2000-05-16 Intel Corporation Computer assisted interactive entertainment/educational character goods
US6313853B1 (en) 1998-04-16 2001-11-06 Nortel Networks Limited Multi-service user interface
US6285794B1 (en) 1998-04-17 2001-09-04 Adobe Systems Incorporated Compression and editing of movies by multi-image morphing
US6088731A (en) 1998-04-24 2000-07-11 Associative Computing, Inc. Intelligent assistant for use with a local computer and with the internet
US6033086A (en) 1998-04-30 2000-03-07 Hewlett-Packard Company Compact illumination system for image scanner
US6249292B1 (en) 1998-05-04 2001-06-19 Compaq Computer Corporation Technique for controlling a presentation of a computer generated object having a plurality of movable components
GB9809679D0 (en) 1998-05-06 1998-07-01 Xerox Corp Portable text capturing method and device therefor
US6421453B1 (en) 1998-05-15 2002-07-16 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and methods for user recognition employing behavioral passwords
US6571025B2 (en) 1998-05-18 2003-05-27 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Handheld code reader with optimal optical reading distance
US6438523B1 (en) 1998-05-20 2002-08-20 John A. Oberteuffer Processing handwritten and hand-drawn input and speech input
US6766494B1 (en) 1998-06-15 2004-07-20 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Method and system for creating ad-hoc links from free-form ink
US6573883B1 (en) 1998-06-24 2003-06-03 Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for controlling a computing device with gestures
US6151208A (en) 1998-06-24 2000-11-21 Digital Equipment Corporation Wearable computing device mounted on superior dorsal aspect of a hand
US6347290B1 (en) 1998-06-24 2002-02-12 Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. Apparatus and method for detecting and executing positional and gesture commands corresponding to movement of handheld computing device
US6638314B1 (en) 1998-06-26 2003-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Method of web crawling utilizing crawl numbers
US6430567B2 (en) 1998-06-30 2002-08-06 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for multi-user awareness and collaboration
US6265844B1 (en) 1998-07-02 2001-07-24 Ericsson Inc. Battery pack with photo means for enabling integral circuitry
US6229542B1 (en) 1998-07-10 2001-05-08 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for managing windows in three dimensions in a two dimensional windowing system
US6417797B1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-07-09 Cirrus Logic, Inc. System for A multi-purpose portable imaging device and methods for using same
JP3952599B2 (en) 1998-07-16 2007-08-01 松下電器産業株式会社 Video display device and video display method
US6304674B1 (en) 1998-08-03 2001-10-16 Xerox Corporation System and method for recognizing user-specified pen-based gestures using hidden markov models
US6169969B1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2001-01-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Director Of The National Security Agency Device and method for full-text large-dictionary string matching using n-gram hashing
US6681031B2 (en) * 1998-08-10 2004-01-20 Cybernet Systems Corporation Gesture-controlled interfaces for self-service machines and other applications
US6801637B2 (en) 1999-08-10 2004-10-05 Cybernet Systems Corporation Optical body tracker
US6356899B1 (en) 1998-08-29 2002-03-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method for interactively creating an information database including preferred information elements, such as preferred-authority, world wide web pages
US6369811B1 (en) 1998-09-09 2002-04-09 Ricoh Company Limited Automatic adaptive document help for paper documents
US6636892B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-10-21 Lv Partners, L.P. Method for conducting a contest using a network
US6792452B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-09-14 L.V. Partners, L.P. Method for configuring a piece of equipment with the use of an associated machine resolvable code
US6701369B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-03-02 L.V. Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by sensing a machine-resolvable code
US6697949B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-02-24 L.V. Partner, L.P. Method and apparatus for controlling a user's pc through an audio-visual broadcast to archive information in the users pc
US6636896B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-10-21 Lv Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet
US6758398B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-07-06 L.V. Partners, L.P. Optical reader with ultraviolet wavelength capability
US6826592B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-11-30 L.V. Partners, L.P. Digital ID for selecting web browser and use preferences of a user during use of a web application
US6526449B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-02-25 Digital Convergence Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling a computer from a remote location
US6836799B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-12-28 L.V. Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for tracking user profile and habits on a global network
US6688522B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-02-10 L. V. Partners, L.P. Unique bar code
US6384744B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2002-05-07 Digital:Convergence Corp. Method and system for data transmission from an optical reader
US6622165B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-09-16 Lv Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for allowing a remote site to interact with an intermediate database to facilitate access to the remote site
US6631404B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-10-07 Lv Partners, L.P. Method and system for conducting a contest using a network
US6754698B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-06-22 L. V. Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a dedicated memory system
US6745234B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-06-01 Digital:Convergence Corporation Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by scanning an optical code
US6725260B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-04-20 L.V. Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for configuring configurable equipment with configuration information received from a remote location
US6629133B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-09-30 Lv Partners, L.P. Interactive doll
US6643692B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-11-04 Lv Partners, L.P. Method for controlling a computer using an embedded unique code in the content of video tape media
US6701354B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-03-02 L. V. Partners, L.P. Method for interconnecting two locations over a network in response to using a tool
US6757715B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-06-29 L.V. Partners, L.P. Bar code scanner and software interface interlock for performing encrypted handshaking and for disabling the scanner in case of handshaking operation failure
US6829650B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-12-07 L. V. Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for opening and launching a web browser in response to an audible signal
US6098106A (en) 1998-09-11 2000-08-01 Digitalconvergence.Com Inc. Method for controlling a computer with an audio signal
US6708208B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-03-16 L.V. Partners, L.P. Unique bar code for indicating a link between a product and a remote location on a web network
US6594705B1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2003-07-15 Lv Partners, L.P. Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet
US6615268B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2003-09-02 Lv Partners, L.P. Method for controlling a computer using an embedded unique code in the content of dat media
US6823388B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-11-23 L.V. Parners, L.P. Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a programmable memory system
US6791588B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-09-14 L.V. Partners, L.P. Method for conducting a contest using a network
US6229137B1 (en) 1998-09-14 2001-05-08 Hewlett-Packard Company Scan line illumination system utilizing hollow reflector
WO2000016221A1 (en) 1998-09-15 2000-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Interactive playlist generation using annotations
US6195475B1 (en) 1998-09-15 2001-02-27 Hewlett-Packard Company Navigation system for handheld scanner
US6140140A (en) 1998-09-16 2000-10-31 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method for detecting process sensitivity to integrated circuit layout by compound processing
JP2000163196A (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-06-16 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Gesture recognizing device and instruction recognizing device having gesture recognizing function
DE69936620T2 (en) 1998-09-28 2008-05-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Kadoma Method and device for segmenting hand gestures
JP2000113220A (en) 1998-09-30 2000-04-21 Sony Corp Information processor, information processing method and provision medium
JP2000123114A (en) 1998-10-15 2000-04-28 Casio Comput Co Ltd Handwritten character input device and storage medium
US6244873B1 (en) 1998-10-16 2001-06-12 At&T Corp. Wireless myoelectric control apparatus and methods
US6459823B2 (en) 1998-10-28 2002-10-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Apparatus and method of increasing scanner resolution
US6341280B1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2002-01-22 Netscape Communications Corporation Inline tree filters
US6351222B1 (en) 1998-10-30 2002-02-26 Ati International Srl Method and apparatus for receiving an input by an entertainment device
US6978297B1 (en) 1998-11-12 2005-12-20 Ricoh, Co., Ltd. System and method of managing queues by maintaining metadata files having attributes corresponding to capture of electronic document and using the metadata files to selectively lock the electronic document
US6204852B1 (en) 1998-12-09 2001-03-20 Lucent Technologies Inc. Video hand image three-dimensional computer interface
US6222465B1 (en) 1998-12-09 2001-04-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Gesture-based computer interface
US6147678A (en) 1998-12-09 2000-11-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Video hand image-three-dimensional computer interface with multiple degrees of freedom
AU2174700A (en) 1998-12-10 2000-06-26 Christian R. Berg Brain-body actuated system
US6292274B1 (en) 1998-12-11 2001-09-18 Hewlett-Packard Company Portable scanner with tilting body design
US6307955B1 (en) 1998-12-18 2001-10-23 Topaz Systems, Inc. Electronic signature management system
US6675356B1 (en) 1998-12-22 2004-01-06 Xerox Corporation Distributed document-based calendaring system
US6342901B1 (en) 1998-12-22 2002-01-29 Xerox Corporation Interactive device for displaying information from multiple sources
US6167369A (en) 1998-12-23 2000-12-26 Xerox Company Automatic language identification using both N-gram and word information
US6243683B1 (en) 1998-12-29 2001-06-05 Intel Corporation Video control of speech recognition
US6256610B1 (en) * 1998-12-30 2001-07-03 Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. Header/footer avoidance for reading system
US6570555B1 (en) 1998-12-30 2003-05-27 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for embodied conversational characters with multimodal input/output in an interface device
US6851115B1 (en) 1999-01-05 2005-02-01 Sri International Software-based architecture for communication and cooperation among distributed electronic agents
IL132719A (en) 1999-01-07 2010-04-29 Topscan Ltd Optical scanner and software therefor
US6049034A (en) 1999-01-19 2000-04-11 Interval Research Corporation Music synthesis controller and method
US6363160B1 (en) 1999-01-22 2002-03-26 Intel Corporation Interface using pattern recognition and tracking
US6691914B2 (en) 1999-01-25 2004-02-17 Airclic, Inc. Method and system for directing end user to network location of provider based on user-provided codes
US6993580B2 (en) * 1999-01-25 2006-01-31 Airclic Inc. Method and system for sharing end user information on network
US6448979B1 (en) 1999-01-25 2002-09-10 Airclic, Inc. Printed medium activated interactive communication of multimedia information, including advertising
US6381602B1 (en) 1999-01-26 2002-04-30 Microsoft Corporation Enforcing access control on resources at a location other than the source location
US6418433B1 (en) 1999-01-28 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for focussed web crawling
US6377296B1 (en) 1999-01-28 2002-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Virtual map system and method for tracking objects
AU3215000A (en) 1999-02-01 2000-08-18 Barpoint.Com, Inc. Interactive system for investing products on a network
US6651053B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2003-11-18 Barpoint.Com, Inc. Interactive system for investigating products on a network
US20030004724A1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2003-01-02 Jonathan Kahn Speech recognition program mapping tool to align an audio file to verbatim text
US6845913B2 (en) * 1999-02-11 2005-01-25 Flir Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for barcode selection of themographic survey images
US6883000B1 (en) 1999-02-12 2005-04-19 Robert L. Gropper Business card and contact management system
US6577329B1 (en) 1999-02-25 2003-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for relevance feedback through gaze tracking and ticker interfaces
JP2000251012A (en) 1999-03-01 2000-09-14 Hitachi Ltd Method and system for document processing
US6307952B1 (en) 1999-03-03 2001-10-23 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Apparatus for detecting guest interactions and method therefore
US6687878B1 (en) 1999-03-15 2004-02-03 Real Time Image Ltd. Synchronizing/updating local client notes with annotations previously made by other clients in a notes database
US7353199B1 (en) 1999-03-22 2008-04-01 Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. Method of moderating external access to an electronic document authoring development and distribution system
US6545669B1 (en) 1999-03-26 2003-04-08 Husam Kinawi Object-drag continuity between discontinuous touch-screens
CA2368556C (en) 1999-04-05 2010-12-21 Neomedia Technologies, Inc. System and method of using machine-readable or human-readable linkage codes for accessing networked data resources
US6486892B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2002-11-26 Joseph L. Stern System and method for accessing, manipulating and viewing internet and non-internet related information and for controlling networked devices
US6658151B2 (en) 1999-04-08 2003-12-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Extracting information from symbolically compressed document images
CN1159661C (en) 1999-04-08 2004-07-28 肯特里奇数字实验公司 System for Chinese tokenization and named entity recognition
US6314457B1 (en) 1999-04-21 2001-11-06 Airclic, Inc. Method for managing printed medium activated revenue sharing domain name system schemas
AU4481600A (en) 1999-04-22 2000-11-10 Qode.Com, Inc. System and method for providing electronic information upon receipt of a scannedbar code
US6400845B1 (en) 1999-04-23 2002-06-04 Computer Services, Inc. System and method for data extraction from digital images
US6453237B1 (en) * 1999-04-23 2002-09-17 Global Locate, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating and providing services to mobile devices
US6678664B1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2004-01-13 Checkfree Corporation Cashless transactions without credit cards, debit cards or checks
KR100789222B1 (en) 1999-04-27 2007-12-31 아이쓰리이 홀딩스, 엘엘씨 Remote ordering system
EP1221160A2 (en) 1999-04-29 2002-07-10 Spintronics Ltd. Information retrieval system
JP2002544628A (en) 1999-05-12 2002-12-24 エアクリック，インコーポレイティド Interactive communication initiated by print media
US6880122B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2005-04-12 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Segmenting a document into regions associated with a data type, and assigning pipelines to process such regions
KR101145534B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2012-06-01 디지맥 코포레이션 Methods and systems for controlling computers or linking to internet resources from physical and electronic objects
US6789194B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2004-09-07 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Network publishing authorization protocol
US6816274B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2004-11-09 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Method and system for composition and delivery of electronic mail
AUPQ439299A0 (en) 1999-12-01 1999-12-23 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Interface system
US6832717B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2004-12-21 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Computer system interface surface
US6439706B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2002-08-27 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd. Printer cartridge with binder
US6341290B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2002-01-22 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for automating the communication of business information
US6476834B1 (en) 1999-05-28 2002-11-05 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic creation of selectable items on surfaces
JP2000353215A (en) 1999-06-11 2000-12-19 Nec Corp Character recognition device and recording medium where character recognizing program is recorded
US7339467B2 (en) 1999-06-11 2008-03-04 At&T Delaware Intellectual Property, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing weather and other alerts
US6886104B1 (en) 1999-06-25 2005-04-26 Cross Match Technologies Rechargeable mobile hand-held fingerprint scanner with a data and power communication interface
SG121851A1 (en) 1999-06-30 2006-05-26 Silverbrook Res Pty Ltd Method and system for conferencing using processing sensor
CN1248500C (en) 1999-06-30 2006-03-29 西尔弗布鲁克研究股份有限公司 Method and system for obtaining video-related document
JP2003504718A (en) 1999-06-30 2003-02-04 シルバーブルック リサーチ ピーティーワイ リミテッド Interactive Printer Permanent Storage Provider
CN1205529C (en) 1999-06-30 2005-06-08 西尔弗布鲁克研究股份有限公司 Method and system for collaborative document markup
US6543052B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2003-04-01 Fujitsu Limited Internet shopping system utilizing set top box and voice recognition
US6335725B1 (en) * 1999-07-14 2002-01-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Method of partitioning a touch screen for data input
US6813395B1 (en) 1999-07-14 2004-11-02 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image searching method and image processing method
US6396523B1 (en) 1999-07-29 2002-05-28 Interlink Electronics, Inc. Home entertainment device remote control
WO2001013317A2 (en) 1999-08-13 2001-02-22 Kocher Jean Pierre Method and apparatus for scanning of food and medicine to provide outputs relative to a user profile
US6546385B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2003-04-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for indexing and searching content in hardcopy documents
US6297491B1 (en) * 1999-08-30 2001-10-02 Gateway, Inc. Media scanner
US6466336B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2002-10-15 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for organizing scanned images
US6408257B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2002-06-18 Xerox Corporation Augmented-reality display method and system
US7424543B2 (en) 1999-09-08 2008-09-09 Rice Iii James L System and method of permissive data flow and application transfer
US6970583B2 (en) 2000-05-25 2005-11-29 Black Gerald R Identity authentication device
US7225979B2 (en) 1999-09-17 2007-06-05 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Methods and systems for object identification and interaction
GB9922214D0 (en) 1999-09-20 1999-11-17 Ncr Int Inc Creation transmission and retrieval of information
US6346933B1 (en) 1999-09-21 2002-02-12 Seiko Epson Corporation Interactive display presentation system
US6688525B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2004-02-10 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus and method for reading a coded pattern
US8429005B2 (en) 1999-09-23 2013-04-23 Activ8Now, Llc Method for determining effectiveness of display of objects in advertising images
WO2001024051A1 (en) 1999-09-24 2001-04-05 Ericsson, Inc. Systems, methods and computer program products for scanning uniform resource locators to access and display internet resources
US6316710B1 (en) 1999-09-27 2001-11-13 Eric Lindemann Musical synthesizer capable of expressive phrasing
US6879957B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2005-04-12 William H. Pechter Method for producing a speech rendition of text from diphone sounds
US6522333B1 (en) 1999-10-08 2003-02-18 Electronic Arts Inc. Remote communication through visual representations
EP1093836A1 (en) 1999-10-21 2001-04-25 ABB (Schweiz) AG Degassification system for a power station
US6970915B1 (en) 1999-11-01 2005-11-29 Tellme Networks, Inc. Streaming content over a telephone interface
US6772338B1 (en) 1999-10-26 2004-08-03 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Device for transfering data between an unconscious capture device and another device
US6589290B1 (en) 1999-10-29 2003-07-08 America Online, Inc. Method and apparatus for populating a form with data
EP1240228B1 (en) 1999-11-02 2003-08-13 Huntsman International Llc Process for making visco-elastic foams, polyols blend and reaction system useful therefor
JP2003513341A (en) 1999-11-04 2003-04-08 テレフオンアクチーボラゲット エル エム エリクソン（パブル） System and method for increasing recognition rate of voice input command in telecommunications terminal
US6466198B1 (en) 1999-11-05 2002-10-15 Innoventions, Inc. View navigation and magnification of a hand-held device with a display
US6489970B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2002-12-03 International Business Machines, Corporation Means for specifying direct manipulation relationships on hierarchically structured visuals
US6571235B1 (en) 1999-11-23 2003-05-27 Accenture Llp System for providing an interface for accessing data in a discussion database
US6384829B1 (en) 1999-11-24 2002-05-07 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Streamlined architecture for embodied conversational characters with reduced message traffic
WO2001039001A1 (en) 1999-11-29 2001-05-31 Neomedia Technologies, Inc. System and method for linking online resources to print media and authoring tool for same
WO2001041032A1 (en) 1999-11-30 2001-06-07 David Russell Methods, systems, and apparatuses for secure interactions
US7337389B1 (en) 1999-12-07 2008-02-26 Microsoft Corporation System and method for annotating an electronic document independently of its content
US7277925B2 (en) 1999-12-08 2007-10-02 Warnock Kevin L Internet document services
US6360951B1 (en) 1999-12-16 2002-03-26 Xerox Corporation Hand-held scanning system for heuristically organizing scanned information
US6714677B1 (en) 1999-12-17 2004-03-30 Xerox Corporation Use of correlation histograms for improved glyph decoding
US6865284B2 (en) * 1999-12-20 2005-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for processing an electronic version of a hardcopy of a document
US6404438B1 (en) 1999-12-21 2002-06-11 Electronic Arts, Inc. Behavioral learning for a visual representation in a communication environment
JP2001188555A (en) * 1999-12-28 2001-07-10 Sony Corp Device and method for information processing and recording medium
US6526395B1 (en) 1999-12-31 2003-02-25 Intel Corporation Application of personality models and interaction with synthetic characters in a computing system
US6507349B1 (en) * 2000-01-06 2003-01-14 Becomm Corporation Direct manipulation of displayed content
US6664991B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2003-12-16 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for providing context menus on a pen-based device
USD432539S (en) 2000-01-07 2000-10-24 Digitalconvergence.:Com Inc. Keystroke automator
US6496802B1 (en) 2000-01-07 2002-12-17 Mp3.Com, Inc. System and method for providing access to electronic works
AU2001229421A1 (en) * 2000-01-13 2001-07-24 Orbidex, Inc. System and method of searching and gathering information on-line and off-line
US20040193488A1 (en) 2000-01-19 2004-09-30 Denis Khoo Method and system for advertising over a data network
US6820237B1 (en) 2000-01-21 2004-11-16 Amikanow! Corporation Apparatus and method for context-based highlighting of an electronic document
US20010034237A1 (en) 2000-03-01 2001-10-25 Masood Garahi Interactive wagering system with control of unauthorized wagering
US6587835B1 (en) 2000-02-09 2003-07-01 G. Victor Treyz Shopping assistance with handheld computing device
US20020029350A1 (en) 2000-02-11 2002-03-07 Cooper Robin Ross Web based human services conferencing network
US6832116B1 (en) 2000-02-16 2004-12-14 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and system for controlling an electronic utility device using an electronic reading device
AU2001238354A1 (en) 2000-02-18 2001-08-27 The University Of Maryland Methods for the electronic annotation, retrieval, and use of electronic images
US6992655B2 (en) * 2000-02-18 2006-01-31 Anoto Ab Input unit arrangement
US6615209B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2003-09-02 Google, Inc. Detecting query-specific duplicate documents
US6718308B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2004-04-06 Daniel L. Nolting Media presentation system controlled by voice to text commands
US6630924B1 (en) 2000-02-22 2003-10-07 International Business Machines Corporation Gesture sensing split keyboard and approach for capturing keystrokes
GB2366033B (en) 2000-02-29 2004-08-04 Ibm Method and apparatus for processing acquired data and contextual information and associating the same with available multimedia resources
US6650442B1 (en) 2000-03-06 2003-11-18 Umax Data Systems, Inc. Multiple non-directional scanning
US6744938B1 (en) 2000-03-06 2004-06-01 Ncr Corporation Retail terminal utilizing an imaging scanner for product attribute identification and consumer interactive querying
US20020051262A1 (en) 2000-03-14 2002-05-02 Nuttall Gordon R. Image capture device with handwritten annotation
US6792112B1 (en) 2000-03-17 2004-09-14 Denso Corporation Encrypting communications between wireless mobile units
US6510417B1 (en) * 2000-03-21 2003-01-21 America Online, Inc. System and method for voice access to internet-based information
US7117374B2 (en) 2000-03-24 2006-10-03 Intermec Ip Corp Apparatus and method for gathering and utilizing data
US6409401B1 (en) 2000-03-30 2002-06-25 Zih Corp. Portable printer with RFID encoder
JP4261779B2 (en) 2000-03-31 2009-04-30 富士通株式会社 Data compression apparatus and method
EP1360604A2 (en) 2000-03-31 2003-11-12 Harlequin Ltd. Method and system for gathering, organizing, and displaying information from data searches
US6377712B1 (en) 2000-04-10 2002-04-23 Adobe Systems Incorporated Iteratively building displacement maps for image warping
US6618732B1 (en) 2000-04-11 2003-09-09 Revelink, Inc. Database query handler supporting querying of textual annotations of relations between data objects
US6624833B1 (en) 2000-04-17 2003-09-23 Lucent Technologies Inc. Gesture-based input interface system with shadow detection
US20010049636A1 (en) 2000-04-17 2001-12-06 Amir Hudda System and method for wireless purchases of goods and services
US6771283B2 (en) 2000-04-26 2004-08-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for accessing interactive multimedia information or services by touching highlighted items on physical documents
US6832263B2 (en) 2000-04-27 2004-12-14 Hyperion Solutions Corporation Method and apparatus for implementing a dynamically updated portal page in an enterprise-wide computer system
AU2001257311A1 (en) 2000-04-28 2001-11-12 James Grossman Method of distributing printed advertising
CN1439135A (en) 2000-05-01 2003-08-27 R.R.唐纳利父子公司 Methods and apparatus for serving a web page to a client device based on printed publications and publisher controlled links
US6697838B1 (en) 2000-05-03 2004-02-24 Software Leader, Llc Method and system for annotating information resources in connection with browsing, in both connected and disconnected states
US6938024B1 (en) 2000-05-04 2005-08-30 Microsoft Corporation Transmitting information given constrained resources
US20020073000A1 (en) 2000-05-05 2002-06-13 Mike Sage System and method for implementing a wireless network in a service center for generating a repair order
US20020002504A1 (en) * 2000-05-05 2002-01-03 Andrew Engel Mobile shopping assistant system and device
US6625335B1 (en) 2000-05-11 2003-09-23 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for assigning keywords to documents
US6812961B1 (en) 2000-05-11 2004-11-02 Eastman Kodak Company System and camera for automatically forwarding digital images to a service provider
WO2001088661A2 (en) 2000-05-16 2001-11-22 U.S. Army Medical Research And Material Command System and method for providing access to forms and maintaining the data used to complete the forms
US6785421B1 (en) 2000-05-22 2004-08-31 Eastman Kodak Company Analyzing images to determine if one or more sets of materials correspond to the analyzed images
US6931592B1 (en) 2000-05-22 2005-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Reviewing and merging electronic documents
US6968332B1 (en) 2000-05-25 2005-11-22 Microsoft Corporation Facility for highlighting documents accessed through search or browsing
KR100356105B1 (en) 2000-05-30 2002-10-19 주식회사 엔아이비소프트 Method and system for document classification and search using document auto-summary system
KR20000054339A (en) 2000-06-01 2000-09-05 한정룡 The mobile phone with character recognition capacity
US6678075B1 (en) * 2000-06-07 2004-01-13 Mustek Systems Inc. Slide securing device for flatbed scanning system
US6766956B1 (en) 2000-06-08 2004-07-27 United Video Properties, Inc. System and method for using portable device with bar-code scanner
KR20000071993A (en) * 2000-06-10 2000-12-05 최제형 Authentication method and device, and operation method for medium with specified period and anthorization for payment method of internet payinformation service
US6720984B1 (en) 2000-06-13 2004-04-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Characterization of bioelectric potentials
US20010053252A1 (en) 2000-06-13 2001-12-20 Stuart Creque Method of knowledge management and information retrieval utilizing natural characteristics of published documents as an index method to a digital content store
US6990548B1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2006-01-24 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Methods and arrangements for configuring a printer over a wireless communication link using a wireless communication device
US20020016750A1 (en) 2000-06-20 2002-02-07 Olivier Attia System and method for scan-based input, storage and retrieval of information over an interactive communication network
US20010056463A1 (en) 2000-06-20 2001-12-27 Grady James D. Method and system for linking real world objects to digital objects
US7487112B2 (en) 2000-06-29 2009-02-03 Barnes Jr Melvin L System, method, and computer program product for providing location based services and mobile e-commerce
US6554433B1 (en) 2000-06-30 2003-04-29 Intel Corporation Office workspace having a multi-surface projection and a multi-camera system
US6788809B1 (en) 2000-06-30 2004-09-07 Intel Corporation System and method for gesture recognition in three dimensions using stereo imaging and color vision
US6549751B1 (en) 2000-07-25 2003-04-15 Giuseppe Li Mandri Multimedia educational system
US6721921B1 (en) 2000-07-26 2004-04-13 Itm Associates Method and system for annotating documents using an independent annotation repository
EP1410637A2 (en) 2000-07-27 2004-04-21 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Transcript triggers for video enhancement
JP3527211B2 (en) 2000-08-01 2004-05-17 日立マクセル株式会社 Electronic coupon system
US7523067B1 (en) 2000-08-02 2009-04-21 Softbankbb Corporation Electronic settlement system, settlement apparatus, and terminal
US6704024B2 (en) 2000-08-07 2004-03-09 Zframe, Inc. Visual content browsing using rasterized representations
US20020023957A1 (en) 2000-08-21 2002-02-28 A. John Michaelis Method and apparatus for providing audio/visual feedback to scanning pen users
US20020052747A1 (en) 2000-08-21 2002-05-02 Sarukkai Ramesh R. Method and system of interpreting and presenting web content using a voice browser
DE10041800A1 (en) 2000-08-25 2002-03-21 Siemens Ag Method for operating a navigation device and arrangement for carrying out the method
US6671684B1 (en) * 2000-09-01 2003-12-30 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for simultaneous highlighting of a physical version of a document and an electronic version of a document
US6704699B2 (en) 2000-09-05 2004-03-09 Einat H. Nir Language acquisition aide
US7130885B2 (en) 2000-09-05 2006-10-31 Zaplet, Inc. Methods and apparatus providing electronic messages that are linked and aggregated
US6868193B1 (en) 2000-09-08 2005-03-15 Corel Inc. Method and apparatus for varying automated data processing
US7689832B2 (en) 2000-09-11 2010-03-30 Sentrycom Ltd. Biometric-based system and method for enabling authentication of electronic messages sent over a network
US7058223B2 (en) 2000-09-14 2006-06-06 Cox Ingemar J Identifying works for initiating a work-based action, such as an action on the internet
US6754632B1 (en) 2000-09-18 2004-06-22 East Carolina University Methods and devices for delivering exogenously generated speech signals to enhance fluency in persons who stutter
US20020038456A1 (en) 2000-09-22 2002-03-28 Hansen Michael W. Method and system for the automatic production and distribution of media content using the internet
US7089330B1 (en) 2000-09-28 2006-08-08 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. System and method for transforming custom content generation tags associated with web pages
GB0023938D0 (en) 2000-09-29 2000-11-15 British Telecomm Information access
US20040143501A1 (en) 2000-10-06 2004-07-22 Lopez Kermit D. Processing negotiable economic credits through electronic hand held devices
US6725203B1 (en) 2000-10-12 2004-04-20 E-Book Systems Pte Ltd. Method and system for advertisement using internet browser to insert advertisements
AUPR082400A0 (en) 2000-10-17 2000-11-09 Telstra R & D Management Pty Ltd An information retrieval system
US6904408B1 (en) 2000-10-19 2005-06-07 Mccarthy John Bionet method, system and personalized web content manager responsive to browser viewers' psychological preferences, behavioral responses and physiological stress indicators
US7136814B1 (en) 2000-11-03 2006-11-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Syntax-driven, operator assisted voice recognition system and methods
KR200218899Y1 (en) 2000-11-04 2001-04-02 주식회사자미나 A reactionary toy having communication means
US7016532B2 (en) * 2000-11-06 2006-03-21 Evryx Technologies Image capture and identification system and process
US6486874B1 (en) 2000-11-06 2002-11-26 Motorola, Inc. Method of pre-caching user interaction elements using input device position
US20020102966A1 (en) 2000-11-06 2002-08-01 Lev Tsvi H. Object identification method for portable devices
NO314059B1 (en) 2000-11-10 2003-01-20 Imp Technology As Procedure for structuring and searching information
US6791536B2 (en) 2000-11-10 2004-09-14 Microsoft Corporation Simulating gestures of a pointing device using a stylus and providing feedback thereto
US6788815B2 (en) 2000-11-10 2004-09-07 Microsoft Corporation System and method for accepting disparate types of user input
US20040036718A1 (en) 2002-08-26 2004-02-26 Peter Warren Dynamic data item viewer
US6833936B1 (en) 2000-11-21 2004-12-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for capturing information from a document
US20020091671A1 (en) 2000-11-23 2002-07-11 Andreas Prokoph Method and system for data retrieval in large collections of data
US20030098352A1 (en) 2000-11-24 2003-05-29 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Handheld imaging device employing planar light illumination and linear imaging with image-based velocity detection and aspect ratio compensation
JP4095243B2 (en) 2000-11-28 2008-06-04 キヤノン株式会社 A storage medium storing a URL acquisition and processing system and method and a program for executing the method.
US20050144074A1 (en) 2000-11-28 2005-06-30 Carlson Companies, Inc. Computer implemented method and system for on-line redemption of coupons
US6691194B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2004-02-10 Emc Corporation Selective association of lock override procedures with queued multimodal lock
US6690358B2 (en) 2000-11-30 2004-02-10 Alan Edward Kaplan Display control for hand-held devices
US7047491B2 (en) 2000-12-05 2006-05-16 Schubert Daniel M Electronic information management system for abstracting and reporting document information
US20020067308A1 (en) 2000-12-06 2002-06-06 Xerox Corporation Location/time-based reminder for personal electronic devices
US7203158B2 (en) 2000-12-06 2007-04-10 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. OFDM signal transmission system, portable terminal, and e-commerce system
US6904171B2 (en) 2000-12-15 2005-06-07 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Technique to identify interesting print articles for later retrieval and use of the electronic version of the articles
US6741745B2 (en) 2000-12-18 2004-05-25 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for formatting OCR text
US7613634B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2009-11-03 Sony Corporation Method and system for performing electronic retailing
US7197716B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2007-03-27 Merchant & Gould, P.C. Litigation management system and method
US6957384B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2005-10-18 Tractmanager, Llc Document management system
US6898592B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2005-05-24 Microsoft Corporation Scoping queries in a search engine
US6538187B2 (en) 2001-01-05 2003-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for writing common music notation (CMN) using a digital pen
US20080071775A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2008-03-20 Overture Services, Inc. System And Method For Ranking Items
US6600475B2 (en) 2001-01-22 2003-07-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Single camera system for gesture-based input and target indication
US20020135815A1 (en) 2001-01-22 2002-09-26 Time Domain Corporation Hand-held scanner with impulse radio wireless interface
US6628295B2 (en) 2001-01-31 2003-09-30 Adobe Systems Incorporated Modifying a stylistic property of a vector-based path
US6599130B2 (en) 2001-02-02 2003-07-29 Illinois Institute Of Technology Iterative video teaching aid with recordable commentary and indexing
JP2002236808A (en) 2001-02-07 2002-08-23 Sony Corp Information processing device and method, program storage medium and program
US7599855B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2009-10-06 Lester Sussman System and method for a complete and convenient shopping experience
US7062437B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2006-06-13 International Business Machines Corporation Audio renderings for expressing non-audio nuances
FR2821186B1 (en) 2001-02-20 2003-06-20 Thomson Csf KNOWLEDGE-BASED TEXT INFORMATION EXTRACTION DEVICE
JP4624577B2 (en) 2001-02-23 2011-02-02 富士通株式会社 Human interface system with multiple sensors
US7043489B1 (en) 2001-02-23 2006-05-09 Kelley Hubert C Litigation-related document repository
US20020125411A1 (en) 2001-03-08 2002-09-12 Christy Orrin D. Method and apparatus for reducing specular reflection from a scannable surface
US7424618B2 (en) 2001-03-14 2008-09-09 Paladin Electronic Services, Inc. Biometric access control and time and attendance network including configurable system-on-chip (CSOC) processors with embedded programmable logic
US7711547B2 (en) 2001-03-16 2010-05-04 Meaningful Machines, L.L.C. Word association method and apparatus
JP2002278984A (en) 2001-03-22 2002-09-27 Fujitsu Ltd Document managing device
US7392287B2 (en) 2001-03-27 2008-06-24 Hemisphere Ii Investment Lp Method and apparatus for sharing information using a handheld device
US6804396B2 (en) 2001-03-28 2004-10-12 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Gesture recognition system
US6798429B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2004-09-28 Intel Corporation Intuitive mobile device interface to virtual spaces
US6616047B2 (en) 2001-03-31 2003-09-09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Machine readable label reader system with robust context generation
US6491217B2 (en) 2001-03-31 2002-12-10 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Machine readable label reader system with versatile response selection
US6539931B2 (en) 2001-04-16 2003-04-01 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Ball throwing assistant
US6498970B2 (en) 2001-04-17 2002-12-24 Koninklijke Phillips Electronics N.V. Automatic access to an automobile via biometrics
JP4421134B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2010-02-24 富士通株式会社 Document image search device
US20020194143A1 (en) 2001-04-26 2002-12-19 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for usage-based pricing of E-content
US20030001018A1 (en) * 2001-05-02 2003-01-02 Hand Held Products, Inc. Optical reader comprising good read indicator
GB2378775A (en) 2001-05-03 2003-02-19 Connextra Ltd Provision of Secondary Information based on Context of Primary Information
TW560164B (en) 2001-05-11 2003-11-01 Veutron Corp Palmtop office machine with scanning function
US6752498B2 (en) 2001-05-14 2004-06-22 Eastman Kodak Company Adaptive autostereoscopic display system
US7111787B2 (en) 2001-05-15 2006-09-26 Hand Held Products, Inc. Multimode image capturing and decoding optical reader
GB2375866B (en) 2001-05-25 2005-02-09 At & T Lab Cambridge Ltd User interface systems
US7020663B2 (en) 2001-05-30 2006-03-28 George M. Hay System and method for the delivery of electronic books
KR100725500B1 (en) 2001-06-13 2007-06-08 삼성전자주식회사 Display and controlling method thereof
US6594616B2 (en) 2001-06-18 2003-07-15 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing a mobile input device
US6783071B2 (en) 2001-06-18 2004-08-31 Symbol Technologies, Inc Scanner pairing in a bluetooth POS network
US7945935B2 (en) 2001-06-20 2011-05-17 Dale Stonedahl System and method for selecting, capturing, and distributing customized event recordings
US6508706B2 (en) * 2001-06-21 2003-01-21 David Howard Sitrick Electronic interactive gaming apparatus, system and methodology
US6597443B2 (en) 2001-06-27 2003-07-22 Duane Boman Spatial tracking system
US6748306B2 (en) 2001-06-28 2004-06-08 Xerox Corporation Document communication systems for use in automobiles
US20030009495A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-09 Akli Adjaoute Systems and methods for filtering electronic content
US20030004991A1 (en) 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 Keskar Dhananjay V. Correlating handwritten annotations to a document
US7246118B2 (en) 2001-07-06 2007-07-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for automated collaboration using electronic book highlights and notations
US7331523B2 (en) 2001-07-13 2008-02-19 Hand Held Products, Inc. Adaptive optical image reader
JP2003036093A (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-02-07 Japan Science & Technology Corp Speech input retrieval system
US20030144865A1 (en) 2001-07-24 2003-07-31 Lin Kuang Shin E-commerce back-end hierarchical data management system and method
GB2378008A (en) * 2001-07-27 2003-01-29 Hewlett Packard Co Data acquisition and processing system and method
US7793326B2 (en) 2001-08-03 2010-09-07 Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc Video and digital multimedia aggregator
US7133862B2 (en) * 2001-08-13 2006-11-07 Xerox Corporation System with user directed enrichment and import/export control
US20050022114A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2005-01-27 Xerox Corporation Meta-document management system with personality identifiers
US6793129B2 (en) 2001-08-17 2004-09-21 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Study aid apparatus and method of using study aid apparatus
US20030043042A1 (en) 2001-08-21 2003-03-06 Tabula Rasa, Inc. Method and apparatus for facilitating personal attention via wireless networks
US7001681B2 (en) 2001-08-28 2006-02-21 Honeywell International Inc. Water vapor transport power generator
US7409434B2 (en) 2001-09-07 2008-08-05 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling document service requests using a mobile computing device
US6922725B2 (en) 2001-09-07 2005-07-26 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for processing document service requests originating from a mobile computing device
US7103848B2 (en) 2001-09-13 2006-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Handheld electronic book reader with annotation and usage tracking capabilities
US6773177B2 (en) 2001-09-14 2004-08-10 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Method and system for position-aware freeform printing within a position-sensed area
JP3997459B2 (en) 2001-10-02 2007-10-24 株式会社日立製作所 Voice input system, voice portal server, and voice input terminal
US6892264B2 (en) 2001-10-05 2005-05-10 International Business Machines Corporation Storage area network methods and apparatus for associating a logical identification with a physical identification
US6854642B2 (en) * 2001-10-19 2005-02-15 Chesterfield Holdings, L.L.C. System for vending products and services using an identification card and associated methods
US7426486B2 (en) 2001-10-31 2008-09-16 Call-Tell Llc Multi-party reporting system and method
JP3840091B2 (en) 2001-10-31 2006-11-01 キヤノン株式会社 IMAGING DEVICE, SYSTEM HAVING IMAGING DEVICE AND RECORDING DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
US20030126128A1 (en) 2001-10-31 2003-07-03 Mike Watson Systems and methods of generating interactive electronic reference materials
US6669088B2 (en) 2001-11-09 2003-12-30 William J. Veeneman Multi-merchant gift registry
US8429201B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2013-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Updating a database from a browser
KR100450080B1 (en) 2001-11-13 2004-10-06 (주)지에스텔레텍 Portable storage medium based on Universal Serial Bus standard and Control Method therefor
US20030093545A1 (en) 2001-11-14 2003-05-15 Inventec Tomorrow Work Studio Corporation, Taiwan Method and system for downloading data to portable electronic device
NO316480B1 (en) 2001-11-15 2004-01-26 Forinnova As Method and system for textual examination and discovery
US7415670B2 (en) 2001-11-19 2008-08-19 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Printer with audio/video localization
US7131061B2 (en) * 2001-11-30 2006-10-31 Xerox Corporation System for processing electronic documents using physical documents
GB2382879A (en) 2001-12-06 2003-06-11 Hewlett Packard Co Image capture device with capture field illumination
US6641037B2 (en) 2001-12-13 2003-11-04 Peter Williams Method and system for interactively providing product related information on demand and providing personalized transactional benefits at a point of purchase
US6688081B2 (en) 2001-12-18 2004-02-10 Schmalbach-Lubeca Ag Method for reducing headspace gas
US7680859B2 (en) 2001-12-21 2010-03-16 Location Inc. Group Corporation a Massachusetts corporation Method for analyzing demographic data
US6564144B1 (en) 2002-01-10 2003-05-13 Navigation Technologies Corporation Method and system using a hand-gesture responsive device for collecting data for a geographic database
US7096218B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2006-08-22 International Business Machines Corporation Search refinement graphical user interface
GB0200980D0 (en) 2002-01-15 2002-03-06 Ibm Method and apparatus for classification
WO2003063067A1 (en) 2002-01-24 2003-07-31 Chatterbox Systems, Inc. Method and system for locating positions in printed texts and delivering multimedia information
JP2003216631A (en) 2002-01-25 2003-07-31 Canon Inc Information processor, information delivery device, retrieval device, information acquisition system and method, computer readable recording media, and computer program
US7242492B2 (en) 2002-01-25 2007-07-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Proxied printing services
US6725125B2 (en) 2002-01-29 2004-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Smart filing system
US20030154071A1 (en) * 2002-02-11 2003-08-14 Shreve Gregory M. Process for the document management and computer-assisted translation of documents utilizing document corpora constructed by intelligent agents
US7152786B2 (en) 2002-02-12 2006-12-26 Digimarc Corporation Identification document including embedded data
US6615136B1 (en) 2002-02-19 2003-09-02 Motorola, Inc Method of increasing location accuracy in an inertial navigational device
US6577953B1 (en) 2002-02-19 2003-06-10 Motorola, Inc. Device for use with a portable inertial navigation system (PINS) and method for processing PINS signals
CA2375355A1 (en) 2002-03-11 2003-09-11 Neo Systems Inc. Character recognition system and method
US7126728B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2006-10-24 Jen-Shou Tseng Linear guiding mechanism
US20030214528A1 (en) 2002-03-15 2003-11-20 Pitney Bowes Incorporated Method for managing the annotation of documents
US20030182399A1 (en) 2002-03-21 2003-09-25 Silber Matthew A. Method and apparatus for monitoring web access
US20060069616A1 (en) 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 David Bau Determining advertisements using user behavior information such as past navigation information
WO2003088561A1 (en) 2002-04-11 2003-10-23 Ong Corp. System for managing distribution of digital audio content
CA2480625A1 (en) 2002-04-11 2003-10-23 Sensormatic Electronics Corporation Portable handheld electronic article surveillance and scanner device
US20030200152A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Wireless shopping system and method
US7542966B2 (en) 2002-04-25 2009-06-02 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Method and system for retrieving documents with spoken queries
US20050108195A1 (en) 2002-05-07 2005-05-19 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for processing information based on the discovery of semantically labeled strings
US7325194B2 (en) 2002-05-07 2008-01-29 Microsoft Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for converting numbers between measurement systems based upon semantically labeled strings
US6678579B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2004-01-13 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Publication-dispensing apparatus
US8611919B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2013-12-17 Wounder Gmbh., Llc System, method, and computer program product for providing location based services and mobile e-commerce
US7050630B2 (en) 2002-05-29 2006-05-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method of locating a non-textual region of an electronic document or image that matches a user-defined description of the region
US20030225547A1 (en) 2002-05-30 2003-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Wireless feeder verification system
US7174332B2 (en) 2002-06-11 2007-02-06 Ip. Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for safeguarding files
US20040001217A1 (en) * 2002-06-26 2004-01-01 Microsoft Corporation System and method for users of mobile computing devices to print documents
US7079713B2 (en) 2002-06-28 2006-07-18 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for displaying and linking ink objects with recognized text and objects
US7260534B2 (en) 2002-07-16 2007-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation Graphical user interface for determining speech recognition accuracy
US20040204953A1 (en) 2002-07-17 2004-10-14 Lincoln Muir Subscription based systems, methods and components for providing genomic and proteomic products and services
WO2004017624A1 (en) 2002-07-19 2004-02-26 Cognex Ltd. Image-recording device, method for recording an image that is visualized on a display unit, arrangement of an image-recording device and a display unit, use of said image-recording device, and use of said arrangement
JP2004050722A (en) 2002-07-23 2004-02-19 Canon Inc Printer
US7137077B2 (en) 2002-07-30 2006-11-14 Microsoft Corporation Freeform encounter selection tool
US7058902B2 (en) * 2002-07-30 2006-06-06 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced on-object context menus
US6915103B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2005-07-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System for enhancing books with special paper
AU2003266962A1 (en) 2002-08-06 2004-02-25 Brainshield Technologies Inc. Device for carrying out the copy-protected distribution of electronic documents
US7167604B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2007-01-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Portable document scan accessory for use with a wireless handheld communications device
US7433068B2 (en) 2002-08-15 2008-10-07 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Digital transmitter device
JP4401633B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2010-01-20 富士通株式会社 Advertisement effect measuring method for measuring the effect of advertisements posted on printed matter, and program for causing a computer to perform these methods
US7506250B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2009-03-17 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Techniques for determining electronic document information for paper documents
JP2004102707A (en) 2002-09-10 2004-04-02 Ntt Docomo Inc Information inquiry system, server, program and recording medium
JP4245883B2 (en) 2002-09-13 2009-04-02 株式会社日立製作所 Authenticity management method and system for electronic document and print medium thereof, program, and recording medium
US7151864B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2006-12-19 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Information research initiated from a scanned image media
JP4137566B2 (en) 2002-09-19 2008-08-20 大日本印刷株式会社 Electronic pen, form processing system, and unit data division processing program
FR2845233B1 (en) 2002-09-26 2005-08-26 Bouygues Telecom Sa MULTIMEDIA CONTENT DOWNLOAD SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD
US20040064453A1 (en) 2002-09-27 2004-04-01 Antonio Ruiz Large-scale hierarchical identification and verification for secured ingress and egress using biometrics
US7167586B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2007-01-23 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system for remote form completion
KR100505848B1 (en) 2002-10-02 2005-08-04 씨씨알 주식회사 Search System
US7574407B2 (en) 2002-10-10 2009-08-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selecting, ordering and accessing copyrighted information from physical documents
AU2003285891A1 (en) 2002-10-15 2004-05-04 Digimarc Corporation Identification document and related methods
US7844907B2 (en) 2002-10-16 2010-11-30 William Watler System and method for dynamic modification of web content
CN103714481A (en) 2002-10-21 2014-04-09 瑞菲尔·斯贝茹 System and method for capture, storage and processing of receipts and related data
US20040080795A1 (en) 2002-10-23 2004-04-29 Bean Heather N. Apparatus and method for image capture device assisted scanning
US20040139400A1 (en) 2002-10-23 2004-07-15 Allam Scott Gerald Method and apparatus for displaying and viewing information
US7085755B2 (en) 2002-11-07 2006-08-01 Thomson Global Resources Ag Electronic document repository management and access system
US7121469B2 (en) 2002-11-26 2006-10-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selective processing of digital images
ATE540373T1 (en) 2002-11-29 2012-01-15 Sap Ag METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR PROTECTING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS
US7263521B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2007-08-28 Caringo, Inc. Navigation of the content space of a document set
US7110576B2 (en) 2002-12-30 2006-09-19 Pitney Bowes Inc. System and method for authenticating a mailpiece sender
US7216121B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2007-05-08 International Business Machines Corporation Search engine facility with automated knowledge retrieval, generation and maintenance
US20040139107A1 (en) 2002-12-31 2004-07-15 International Business Machines Corp. Dynamically updating a search engine's knowledge and process database by tracking and saving user interactions
US6593723B1 (en) 2003-01-21 2003-07-15 Calvin G. Johnson Integrated wall apparatus for delivering uninterrupted electrical power
US7240843B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2007-07-10 Lobar Code Technologies, Inc. Universal club card and real-time coupon validation
WO2004074968A2 (en) 2003-02-21 2004-09-02 Caringo, Inc. Additional hash functions in content-based addressing
US7203384B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2007-04-10 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Implement for optically inferring information from a planar jotting surface
JP4823890B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2011-11-24 ディジマーク コーポレイション Document authentication method
US8255978B2 (en) * 2003-03-11 2012-08-28 Innovatrend, Inc. Verified personal information database
KR100447526B1 (en) 2003-03-18 2004-09-08 엔에이치엔(주) A method of determining an intention of internet user, and a method of advertising via internet by using the determining method and a system thereof
US20040186766A1 (en) 2003-03-19 2004-09-23 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for marketing to instant messaging service users
US20040186859A1 (en) 2003-03-20 2004-09-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. File access based on file digests
US6947930B2 (en) 2003-03-21 2005-09-20 Overture Services, Inc. Systems and methods for interactive search query refinement
US7152209B2 (en) 2003-03-28 2006-12-19 Microsoft Corporation User interface for adaptive video fast forward
US7664733B2 (en) 2003-04-11 2010-02-16 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Techniques for performing operations on a source symbolic document
US7266568B1 (en) 2003-04-11 2007-09-04 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Techniques for storing multimedia information with source documents
US7783617B2 (en) 2003-04-16 2010-08-24 Yahoo! Inc. Personals advertisement affinities in a networked computer system
JP4019063B2 (en) * 2003-04-18 2007-12-05 光雄 中山 Optical terminal device, image processing method and system
JP4366108B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2009-11-18 キヤノン株式会社 Document search apparatus, document search method, and computer program
US7149748B1 (en) 2003-05-06 2006-12-12 Sap Ag Expanded inverted index
US20040229194A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2004-11-18 Yang George L. Study aid system
JP2004348591A (en) 2003-05-23 2004-12-09 Canon Inc Document search method and device thereof
US7257769B2 (en) 2003-06-05 2007-08-14 Siemens Communications, Inc. System and method for indicating an annotation for a document
US20040260470A1 (en) 2003-06-14 2004-12-23 Rast Rodger H. Conveyance scheduling and logistics system
US20040260618A1 (en) 2003-06-19 2004-12-23 Damon Larson Home shopping system
US7739588B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2010-06-15 Microsoft Corporation Leveraging markup language data for semantically labeling text strings and data and for providing actions based on semantically labeled text strings and data
US7057607B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2006-06-06 Motorola, Inc. Application-independent text entry for touch-sensitive display
US7484213B2 (en) 2003-07-11 2009-01-27 Boban Mathew Agent architecture employed within an integrated message, document and communication system
US7174054B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2007-02-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Method and system for access to electronic images of text based on user ownership of corresponding physical text
US7870199B2 (en) * 2003-10-06 2011-01-11 Aol Inc. System and method for seamlessly bringing external services into instant messaging session
CN100555264C (en) 2003-10-21 2009-10-28 国际商业机器公司 The annotate method of electronic document, device and system
US20050091578A1 (en) 2003-10-24 2005-04-28 Microsoft Corporation Electronic sticky notes
US20050097335A1 (en) 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Secure document access method and apparatus
US7110100B2 (en) 2003-11-04 2006-09-19 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Apparatus and method for determining an inclination of an elongate object contacting a plane surface
US6786793B1 (en) 2003-11-13 2004-09-07 Sheng-Chien Wang Motion-generating illuminated inflatable decoration
US20050149538A1 (en) 2003-11-20 2005-07-07 Sadanand Singh Systems and methods for creating and publishing relational data bases
US7038846B2 (en) 2003-11-24 2006-05-02 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Solid catadioptric lens with a single viewpoint
US7268956B2 (en) 2003-11-24 2007-09-11 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Solid catadioptric lens with two viewpoints
US7689712B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2010-03-30 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Techniques for integrating note-taking and multimedia information
EP1536305A1 (en) 2003-11-27 2005-06-01 Océ-Technologies B.V. Secure transmission of electronic documents
US7088440B2 (en) 2003-12-22 2006-08-08 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining absolute position of a tip of an elongate object on a plane surface with invariant features
US20050154760A1 (en) 2004-01-12 2005-07-14 International Business Machines Corporation Capturing portions of an electronic document
JP2007519047A (en) 2004-01-20 2007-07-12 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ Method and system for determining topic of conversation and acquiring and presenting related content
US7872669B2 (en) * 2004-01-22 2011-01-18 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Photo-based mobile deixis system and related techniques
US8442331B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2013-05-14 Google Inc. Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information
US7707039B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2010-04-27 Exbiblio B.V. Automatic modification of web pages
US7826641B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2010-11-02 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Apparatus and method for determining an absolute pose of a manipulated object in a real three-dimensional environment with invariant features
US9229540B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2016-01-05 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Deriving input from six degrees of freedom interfaces
US8542219B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2013-09-24 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Processing pose data derived from the pose of an elongate object
US7961909B2 (en) 2006-03-08 2011-06-14 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Computer interface employing a manipulated object with absolute pose detection component and a display
US7729515B2 (en) 2006-03-08 2010-06-01 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Optical navigation apparatus using fixed beacons and a centroid sensing device
US7855812B2 (en) 2004-02-13 2010-12-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated Cellular phone with scanning capability
US20060041484A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2006-02-23 King Martin T Methods and systems for initiating application processes by data capture from rendered documents
US20060136629A1 (en) 2004-08-18 2006-06-22 King Martin T Scanner having connected and unconnected operational behaviors
US20060041605A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2006-02-23 King Martin T Determining actions involving captured information and electronic content associated with rendered documents
US7812860B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2010-10-12 Exbiblio B.V. Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device
US8799303B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2014-08-05 Google Inc. Establishing an interactive environment for rendered documents
US20060122983A1 (en) 2004-12-03 2006-06-08 King Martin T Locating electronic instances of documents based on rendered instances, document fragment digest generation, and digest based document fragment determination
US20060053097A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2006-03-09 King Martin T Searching and accessing documents on private networks for use with captures from rendered documents
US20060104515A1 (en) 2004-07-19 2006-05-18 King Martin T Automatic modification of WEB pages
US7023536B2 (en) 2004-03-08 2006-04-04 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Apparatus and method for determining orientation parameters of an elongate object
US7433893B2 (en) 2004-03-08 2008-10-07 Marpex Inc. Method and system for compression indexing and efficient proximity search of text data
WO2005091235A1 (en) * 2004-03-16 2005-09-29 Maximilian Munte Mobile paper record processing system
US20050214730A1 (en) 2004-03-24 2005-09-29 Rines Robert H Method of and apparatus for supplementing the reading of selected passages of printed material in a book or the like by electronically reading coded indicia provided in the book at such passages to access the playing of corresponding coded tracks of pre-recorded video/audio supplemental material respectively related to the selected passages
US7181761B2 (en) 2004-03-26 2007-02-20 Micosoft Corporation Rights management inter-entity message policies and enforcement
US7289806B2 (en) 2004-03-30 2007-10-30 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for context enabled search
US9008447B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2015-04-14 Google Inc. Method and system for character recognition
US20100185538A1 (en) 2004-04-01 2010-07-22 Exbiblio B.V. Content access with handheld document data capture devices
US20080313172A1 (en) 2004-12-03 2008-12-18 King Martin T Determining actions involving captured information and electronic content associated with rendered documents
US20070300142A1 (en) 2005-04-01 2007-12-27 King Martin T Contextual dynamic advertising based upon captured rendered text
US20060081714A1 (en) 2004-08-23 2006-04-20 King Martin T Portable scanning device
EP1743239A4 (en) 2004-04-01 2012-07-11 Google Inc A method and system for character recognition
US8081849B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2011-12-20 Google Inc. Portable scanning and memory device
US8146156B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2012-03-27 Google Inc. Archive of text captures from rendered documents
US7990556B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2011-08-02 Google Inc. Association of a portable scanner with input/output and storage devices
US8793162B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2014-07-29 Google Inc. Adding information or functionality to a rendered document via association with an electronic counterpart
US8621349B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2013-12-31 Google Inc. Publishing techniques for adding value to a rendered document
US7894670B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2011-02-22 Exbiblio B.V. Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document
US20060098900A1 (en) 2004-09-27 2006-05-11 King Martin T Secure data gathering from rendered documents
US20050222801A1 (en) 2004-04-06 2005-10-06 Thomas Wulff System and method for monitoring a mobile computing product/arrangement
WO2005101193A2 (en) 2004-04-06 2005-10-27 King Martin T Scanning apparatus and related techniques
US8713418B2 (en) 2004-04-12 2014-04-29 Google Inc. Adding value to a rendered document
WO2005106643A2 (en) 2004-04-12 2005-11-10 Exbiblio, B.V. Adding value to a rendered document
US7161664B2 (en) 2004-04-13 2007-01-09 Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. Apparatus and method for optical determination of intermediate distances
US20050228683A1 (en) 2004-04-13 2005-10-13 Stephen Saylor Integrated use of a portable image capture device into a workflow process
JP5102614B2 (en) 2004-04-19 2012-12-19 グーグル インコーポレイテッド Processing techniques for visually acquired data from rendered documents
US8489624B2 (en) 2004-05-17 2013-07-16 Google, Inc. Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document
US8874504B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2014-10-28 Google Inc. Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US7404520B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2008-07-29 Symbol Technologies, Inc. System and method for providing location information in transaction processing
TWM262937U (en) 2004-04-30 2005-04-21 Avision Inc A book scanner with a uniform light source structure
US20050262058A1 (en) 2004-05-24 2005-11-24 Microsoft Corporation Query to task mapping
US7362902B1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2008-04-22 Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. Resolving character data boundaries
US20050278314A1 (en) 2004-06-09 2005-12-15 Paul Buchheit Variable length snippet generation
US7818178B2 (en) 2004-06-09 2010-10-19 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method and apparatus for providing network support for voice-activated mobile web browsing for audio data streams
US7275049B2 (en) 2004-06-16 2007-09-25 The Boeing Company Method for speech-based data retrieval on portable devices
US7113270B2 (en) 2004-06-18 2006-09-26 Electronics Scripting Products, Inc. Determination of an orientation parameter of an elongate object with a scan beam apparatus
US7284192B2 (en) * 2004-06-24 2007-10-16 Avaya Technology Corp. Architecture for ink annotations on web documents
SE0401737D0 (en) 2004-07-03 2004-07-03 Tomas Hultgren Tools for skills acquisition and increased amount of solutions for development and production applications
US7309015B2 (en) 2004-07-14 2007-12-18 Scanbuy, Inc. Mobile device gateway providing access to instant information
WO2006014727A1 (en) 2004-07-19 2006-02-09 Exbiblio. B.V. Automatic modification of web pages
US8346620B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2013-01-01 Google Inc. Automatic modification of web pages
WO2006023718A2 (en) 2004-08-18 2006-03-02 Exbiblio B.V. Locating electronic instances of documents based on rendered instances, document fragment digest generation, and digest based document fragment determination
US20100092095A1 (en) 2008-10-14 2010-04-15 Exbiblio B.V. Data gathering in digital and rendered document environments
WO2006023937A2 (en) 2004-08-23 2006-03-02 Exbiblio B.V. A portable scanning device
US7710598B2 (en) 2004-08-23 2010-05-04 Harrison Jr Shelton E Polychromatic encoding system, method and device
US7299407B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2007-11-20 International Business Machines Corporation Marking and annotating electronic documents
KR20060050729A (en) 2004-08-31 2006-05-19 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for processing document image captured by camera
WO2006029259A2 (en) 2004-09-08 2006-03-16 Sharedbook Ltd Creating an annotated web page
WO2006036853A2 (en) 2004-09-27 2006-04-06 Exbiblio B.V. Handheld device for capturing
US20060075327A1 (en) 2004-09-29 2006-04-06 Joe Sriver User interface for presentation of a document
US7587412B2 (en) 2005-08-23 2009-09-08 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Mixed media reality brokerage network and methods of use
US8489583B2 (en) 2004-10-01 2013-07-16 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Techniques for retrieving documents using an image capture device
US7672543B2 (en) 2005-08-23 2010-03-02 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Triggering applications based on a captured text in a mixed media environment
US7917554B2 (en) 2005-08-23 2011-03-29 Ricoh Co. Ltd. Visibly-perceptible hot spots in documents
US8176054B2 (en) 2007-07-12 2012-05-08 Ricoh Co. Ltd Retrieving electronic documents by converting them to synthetic text
US8144921B2 (en) * 2007-07-11 2012-03-27 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Information retrieval using invisible junctions and geometric constraints
US7561312B1 (en) 2004-10-04 2009-07-14 Google Inc. Systems and methods for glare removal using polarized filtering in document scanning
US7493487B2 (en) 2004-10-15 2009-02-17 Microsoft Corporation Portable computing environment
US7512814B2 (en) 2004-11-09 2009-03-31 Fortiva Inc. Secure and searchable storage system and method
US20060103893A1 (en) 2004-11-15 2006-05-18 Kouros Azimi Cellular telephone based document scanner
US20110075228A1 (en) 2004-12-03 2011-03-31 King Martin T Scanner having connected and unconnected operational behaviors
US20110029504A1 (en) 2004-12-03 2011-02-03 King Martin T Searching and accessing documents on private networks for use with captures from rendered documents
US20060138219A1 (en) 2004-12-29 2006-06-29 John Brzezniak Handset shopping tool and method thereof
KR20060077988A (en) 2004-12-30 2006-07-05 삼성전자주식회사 System and method for information providing service through retrieving of context in multimedia communication system
US7796116B2 (en) 2005-01-12 2010-09-14 Thinkoptics, Inc. Electronic equipment for handheld vision based absolute pointing system
US20060195695A1 (en) 2005-02-25 2006-08-31 John Keys Techniques for verification of electronic device pairing
WO2006093971A2 (en) 2005-02-28 2006-09-08 Exbiblio B.V. Association of a portable scanner with input/output and storage devices
KR100741368B1 (en) 2005-03-21 2007-07-20 유니챌(주) Apparatus and method for automatic recognition of character
US20060224895A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Xerox Corporation System and methods for electronically notarizing scanned documents
US7634407B2 (en) 2005-05-20 2009-12-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for indexing speech
US7204424B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2007-04-17 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Retro-reflective scanner having exit window with positive optical power
US7770799B2 (en) 2005-06-03 2010-08-10 Hand Held Products, Inc. Optical reader having reduced specular reflection read failures
US7761451B2 (en) 2005-06-17 2010-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Efficient querying and paging in databases
US7672931B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2010-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Searching for content using voice search queries
US7623711B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2009-11-24 Ricoh Co., Ltd. White space graphs and trees for content-adaptive scaling of document images
US8073700B2 (en) 2005-09-12 2011-12-06 Nuance Communications, Inc. Retrieval and presentation of network service results for mobile device using a multimodal browser
JP4789567B2 (en) * 2005-10-04 2011-10-12 キヤノン株式会社 Liquid ejection device
US20070219940A1 (en) 2005-10-14 2007-09-20 Leviathan Entertainment, Llc Merchant Tool for Embedding Advertisement Hyperlinks to Words in a Database of Documents
US7477909B2 (en) * 2005-10-31 2009-01-13 Nuance Communications, Inc. System and method for conducting a search using a wireless mobile device
KR20070051217A (en) 2005-11-14 2007-05-17 주식회사 빛 일일사 A system for accessing the internet site placarded information about the ad printed on life information paper via camera-attached portable wireless device and a method thereof
US7941433B2 (en) 2006-01-20 2011-05-10 Glenbrook Associates, Inc. System and method for managing context-rich database
US20070208732A1 (en) 2006-02-07 2007-09-06 Future Vistas, Inc. Telephonic information retrieval systems and methods
US7571854B2 (en) 2006-02-22 2009-08-11 Symbol Technologies Inc. Imaging reader and method with internal window reflections directed away from imager
US20110096174A1 (en) 2006-02-28 2011-04-28 King Martin T Accessing resources based on capturing information from a rendered document
KR100735820B1 (en) 2006-03-02 2007-07-06 삼성전자주식회사 Speech recognition method and apparatus for multimedia data retrieval in mobile device
US8239762B2 (en) 2006-03-20 2012-08-07 Educational Testing Service Method and system for automatic generation of adapted content to facilitate reading skill development for language learners
US7705288B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2010-04-27 Hand Held Products, Inc. Optical reading device with light blocking gasket
KR100761912B1 (en) 2006-04-05 2007-09-28 (주)첫눈 Document information extraction method and system based on body text identification
US20070249406A1 (en) 2006-04-20 2007-10-25 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Method and system for retrieving information
JP2009540404A (en) 2006-06-06 2009-11-19 エクスビブリオ ベースローテン フェンノートシャップ Contextual dynamic ads based on captured rendering text
KR20080000203A (en) 2006-06-27 2008-01-02 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for searching music file using voice recognition
WO2008014255A2 (en) 2006-07-24 2008-01-31 Exbiblio B.V. Referral award system for portable devices
US20080023550A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2008-01-31 Ming Yu Curved window in electro-optical reader
US7697758B2 (en) 2006-09-11 2010-04-13 Google Inc. Shape clustering and cluster-level manual identification in post optical character recognition processing
EP2067119A2 (en) 2006-09-08 2009-06-10 Exbiblio B.V. Optical scanners, such as hand-held optical scanners
US7646921B2 (en) * 2006-09-11 2010-01-12 Google Inc. High resolution replication of document based on shape clustering
US8175394B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2012-05-08 Google Inc. Shape clustering in post optical character recognition processing
US7650035B2 (en) * 2006-09-11 2010-01-19 Google Inc. Optical character recognition based on shape clustering and multiple optical character recognition processes
KR101443404B1 (en) 2006-09-15 2014-10-02 구글 인코포레이티드 Capture and display of annotations in paper and electronic documents
US20080072134A1 (en) 2006-09-19 2008-03-20 Sreeram Viswanath Balakrishnan Annotating token sequences within documents
US10452756B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2019-10-22 Oath Inc. Platform for rendering content for a remote device
US7986843B2 (en) 2006-11-29 2011-07-26 Google Inc. Digital image archiving and retrieval in a mobile device system
KR100916717B1 (en) 2006-12-11 2009-09-09 강민수 Advertisement Providing Method and System for Moving Picture Oriented Contents Which Is Playing
CA2672735A1 (en) 2006-12-13 2008-06-19 Quickplay Media Inc. Mobile media platform
US7680067B2 (en) 2007-03-09 2010-03-16 Palm, Inc. Peer-to-peer data synchronization architecture
US20080235093A1 (en) 2007-03-22 2008-09-25 W.S. Packaging Group, Inc. Mobile phone image processing for promotional enterprise
US7949191B1 (en) 2007-04-04 2011-05-24 A9.Com, Inc. Method and system for searching for information on a network in response to an image query sent by a user from a mobile communications device
US20090012806A1 (en) * 2007-06-10 2009-01-08 Camillo Ricordi System, method and apparatus for data capture and management
US20110145068A1 (en) 2007-09-17 2011-06-16 King Martin T Associating rendered advertisements with digital content
US20090247219A1 (en) 2008-03-25 2009-10-01 Jian-Liang Lin Method of generating a function output from a photographed image and related mobile computing device
US9129004B2 (en) 2008-11-12 2015-09-08 Oracle America, Inc. Multi-interval quicksort algorithm for complex objects
US8082258B2 (en) 2009-02-10 2011-12-20 Microsoft Corporation Updating an inverted index in a real time fashion
EP2399385B1 (en) 2009-02-18 2019-11-06 Google LLC Automatically capturing information, such as capturing information using a document-aware device
US8447066B2 (en) 2009-03-12 2013-05-21 Google Inc. Performing actions based on capturing information from rendered documents, such as documents under copyright
WO2010105246A2 (en) 2009-03-12 2010-09-16 Exbiblio B.V. Accessing resources based on capturing information from a rendered document
DE202010018557U1 (en) 2009-03-20 2017-08-24 Google Inc. Linking rendered ads to digital content
US8171049B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2012-05-01 Xerox Corporation System and method for information seeking in a multimedia collection
US9081799B2 (en) 2009-12-04 2015-07-14 Google Inc. Using gestalt information to identify locations in printed information
US9323784B2 (en) 2009-12-09 2016-04-26 Google Inc. Image search using text-based elements within the contents of images

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5706365A (en) * 1995-04-10 1998-01-06 Rebus Technology, Inc. System and method for portable document indexing using n-gram word decomposition
US6047298A (en) * 1996-01-30 2000-04-04 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Text compression dictionary generation apparatus
US6349296B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2002-02-19 Altavista Company Method for clustering closely resembling data objects

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9253302B2 (en) * 2014-06-04 2016-02-02 Google Inc. Populating user contact entries
US9678958B2 (en) 2014-06-04 2017-06-13 Google Inc. Populating user contact entries
US10162823B2 (en) 2014-06-04 2018-12-25 Google Llc Populating user contact entries
EP3133507A1 (en) 2015-03-31 2017-02-22 Secude AG Context-based data classification
WO2020247765A1 (en) * 2019-06-06 2020-12-10 G-71 Inc. Method for marking visuals of information for subsequent identification or authentication
US11120520B2 (en) 2019-06-06 2021-09-14 G-71 Inc. Method for marking visuals of information for subsequent identification or authentication
US11606475B2 (en) 2019-06-06 2023-03-14 G-71 Inc. Method for marking visuals of information for subsequent identification or authentication

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110022940A1 (en) 2011-01-27
US8874504B2 (en) 2014-10-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8874504B2 (en) Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US7702624B2 (en) Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US9684902B2 (en) Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document
US8505090B2 (en) Archive of text captures from rendered documents
US8621349B2 (en) Publishing techniques for adding value to a rendered document
US10115041B2 (en) Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information
US9919209B2 (en) Document enhancement system and method
US20110075228A1 (en) Scanner having connected and unconnected operational behaviors
US20060136629A1 (en) Scanner having connected and unconnected operational behaviors
US20060122983A1 (en) Locating electronic instances of documents based on rendered instances, document fragment digest generation, and digest based document fragment determination
US20110295842A1 (en) Applying Scanned Information to Identify Content
WO2005101192A2 (en) Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document
US20140236978A1 (en) Publishing techniques for adding value to a rendered document
US10504162B2 (en) Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document
US10423862B2 (en) Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information
WO2006023717A2 (en) Scanner having connected and unconnected operational behaviors

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GOOGLE INC., UNITED STATES

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KING, MARTIN T.;KUSHLER, CLIFFORD A.;STAFFORD-FRASER, JAMES Q.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050909 TO 20050916;REEL/FRAME:034396/0036

Owner name: GOOGLE INC., UNITED STATES

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EXBIBLIO B.V.;REEL/FRAME:034397/0571

Effective date: 20110105

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: GOOGLE LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GOOGLE INC.;REEL/FRAME:044144/0001

Effective date: 20170929

AS Assignment

Owner name: GOOGLE LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE REMOVAL OF THE INCORRECTLY RECORDED APPLICATION NUMBERS 14/149802 AND 15/419313 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 44144 FRAME: 1. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GOOGLE INC.;REEL/FRAME:068092/0502

Effective date: 20170929