US20140170755A1 - Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity - Google Patents

Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140170755A1
US20140170755A1 US14/036,178 US201314036178A US2014170755A1 US 20140170755 A1 US20140170755 A1 US 20140170755A1 US 201314036178 A US201314036178 A US 201314036178A US 2014170755 A1 US2014170755 A1 US 2014170755A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
milk
fatty acids
total
produced
methane
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/036,178
Inventor
Pierre Weill
Guillaume Chesneau
Yves Chilliard
Michel Doreau
Cécile Martin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Valorex SAS
Original Assignee
Valorex SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=40158605&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20140170755(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Valorex SAS filed Critical Valorex SAS
Priority to US14/036,178 priority Critical patent/US20140170755A1/en
Assigned to VALOREX reassignment VALOREX ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MARTIN, CECILE, DOREAU, MICHEL, CHILLIARD, YVES, CHESNEAU, GUILLAUME, WEILL, PIERRE
Publication of US20140170755A1 publication Critical patent/US20140170755A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/02—Food
    • G01N33/04—Dairy products
    • G01N33/06—Determining fat content, e.g. by butyrometer
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K20/00—Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10—Organic substances
    • A23K20/158—Fatty acids; Fats; Products containing oils or fats
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/10—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/483—Physical analysis of biological material
    • G01N33/497—Physical analysis of biological material of gaseous biological material, e.g. breath
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P60/00—Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
    • Y02P60/20—Reduction of greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions in agriculture, e.g. CO2
    • Y02P60/22—Methane [CH4], e.g. from rice paddies

Definitions

  • the present invention lies in the area of animal feed, and more precisely in the area of feed for milk-producing animals.
  • the digestion of organic matter by ruminants comprises a microbial fermentation phase in the rumen.
  • plant polysaccharides such as cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and starch
  • cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and starch are broken down by the anaerobic bacteria living in the rumen.
  • VFAs volatile fatty acids
  • Hydrogen inhibits the activity of most bacteria via different mechanisms. The hydrogen produced must therefore be eliminated by the rumen to promote good microbial digestion.
  • Methanogenesis leading to the formation of methane (CH 4 ), is the main route allowing this elimination. It can be symbolized by the following reaction:
  • GGs main greenhouse gases
  • the European Council has set itself the target of reducing GGs by 20% between now and 2020.
  • livestock farming generated 47.7 MMTCDE (million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent) of which 28.3 MMTCDE in the form of methane derived from the digestive fermentation of ruminants (Leseur, 2006; Martin et al., 2006).
  • the first consists of limiting the consumption of products derived from ruminants and in particular dairy products, the effect of which would be to reduce the number of these dairy ruminants and hence logically the emissions of methane.
  • dairy products have been present in the food of human beings since time began. Man is known to be the only animal species to eat dairy products after weaning. Also, at nutritional level, these dairy products contain calcium, proteins, and lipids with very special nutritional properties which cannot be dissociated from a balanced diet at all stages of life.
  • Another solution consists of changing the feed of dairy ruminants (cows, sheep, goats, etc.) by directing the mechanisms of rumination towards decreased methane production.
  • the first consists of increasing the quantity of milk produced per cow (intensified livestock farming).
  • the second provides for additives in the feed that are toxic for protozoa and/or methanogenic bacteria so that milk can be produced with a reduction in the emitted quantities of methane.
  • a third technique consists of adding sources of plant lipids high in unsaturated fatty acids to the feed of dairy ruminants, preferably from the Omega-3 family, or in the form of other unsaturated fatty acids although their effects on methanogenesis are less powerful (than those of Omega-3 fatty acids).
  • These fatty acids are toxic for methanogenic bacteria, either directly or via the toxic effects on protozoa which live in association with these methanogenic bacteria.
  • the present invention sets out to overcome this shortcoming.
  • the present invention concerns a method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, characterized by the fact that it comprises determination of the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less, called FA ⁇ C16, and the sum of the total fatty acids in the milk, said fatty acids being those present in the milk produced by said ruminant, said quantity of methane being defined by the following equation:
  • FIG. 1 is a graph which shows the prediction of production of CH 4 based on the production of Volatile Fatty Acids (VFAs).
  • the present invention concerns a method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, characterized by the fact that it comprises determination of the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less, called FA ⁇ C16, and the sum of the total fatty acids in the milk, said fatty acids being those present in the milk produced by said ruminant, said quantity of methane being defined by the following equation:
  • a and b are respectively 11.368 and ⁇ 0.4274.
  • Another aspect of the invention relates to a method to reduce and control the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant.
  • omega-3 alpha-linolenic acid ALA
  • ALA omega-3 alpha-linolenic acid
  • this lipid source is in the form of grazed fodder or conserved forage (wilted grass, silage, wrapped round bale, dehydrated, etc.) or oil seeds (in the natural state, raw, or cooked) high in ALA and oil-cakes of these same oil seeds.
  • said source includes flax (linseed).
  • Omega-3-alpha-linolenic acid or C18: 3 n ⁇ 3 or “ALA” is one of the mass constituents of growing plants.
  • ALA is a basic constituent of chlorophyll membranes.
  • ALA is also found in some oilseeds such as flax seed (45% to 70%), hemp (around 15%), rapeseed or soy (around 10%).
  • the ALA content in the ration of dairy ruminants modifies the microbial population present in the rumen.
  • ALA directly and indirectly, effectively inhibits methanogenic bacteria and significantly modifies the proportions of VFAs produced, in particular by lowering the quantities of acetate and butyrate produced.
  • ALA sources can have different effects depending on the site of ALA digestion.
  • raw flax seeds only bring a scarce reduction in the ratio [(C2+C4)/C3)], whereas extruded flax seeds and flax seed oils bring a strong increase.
  • VFAs (C2, C3, or C4) produced by the rumen are diffused through its walls, or move on further through the intestinal barrier to enter circulating fluids.
  • Propionic acid (C3) is used as “glucogenic” source and contributes towards milk production as lactose precursor.
  • acetic (C2) and butyric (C4) acids are used by the de novo synthesis mechanisms to produce the saturated fatty acids of milk with 2 to 16 carbon atoms.
  • This synthesis which takes place in the mammary epithelial cells, uses acetyl coA, a compound derived from C2 and/or C4 for these syntheses of C14: 0 and C16: 0.
  • These 2 fatty acids are then “shortened” (peroxisomal beta-oxidation) to produce short and medium-chain fatty acids of milk. These fatty acids can then optionally be desaturated into mono-unsaturated fatty acids under mammary desaturase activity.
  • This VFA ratio is to be read as having a strong biological causal link with milk composition, in the form of the ratio between:
  • the quantity of CH 4 produced per dairy female can therefore be calculated in relation to milk production (kg milk, per year, per animal) and to the FA composition of the milk from this animal.
  • This indirect, but accurate, measurement of methane production can be used as a guide for the rationing systems of dairy ruminant animals, so as to reduce their contribution towards the greenhouse effect and to allow rapid measurement of the effects of these changes.
  • the sum of saturated FAs with 16 carbon atoms or less is particularly representative of this de novo synthesis from C2. Additionally, reading of the C16 fatty acids or of the sums of FAs with 12, 14, 16 carbon atoms, even the ratio between C16 and the sum of saturated FAs would also be relevant criteria.
  • the table below compares the measured values with the values “predicted” from the above-mentioned tables.
  • parameters a and b are 11.368 and ⁇ 0.4274 respectively.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates in particular to a method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant. The method comprises determination of the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less and the sum of the total fatty acids of the milk, said quantity of methane being defined by the following equation:

Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/Total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
in which:
  • quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
  • FA<C16=quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
  • Total FAs =total quantity of fatty acids;
  • expression of the ratio (FA<C16)/(Total FAs) as a % of total FAs;
  • milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg of milk/animal and per year;
  • a and b are numerical parameters in which a lies between 10 and 13, and b lies between −0.40 and −0.45.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/452,243, filed Dec. 18, 2009, which is a national phase entry under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/057919, filed Jun. 24, 2009, which claims benefit of French Application No. 08 54230 filed Jun. 25, 2008. The disclosures of all of said applications are incorporated by reference herein.
    • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention lies in the area of animal feed, and more precisely in the area of feed for milk-producing animals.
  • It more particularly concerns a method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, and a method to control the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant.
  • The digestion of organic matter by ruminants comprises a microbial fermentation phase in the rumen. During this phase, plant polysaccharides (such as cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and starch) are broken down by the anaerobic bacteria living in the rumen.
  • This gives rise to the production of various volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (acetate, propionate, and butyrate [in increasing order of importance], carbon dioxide [CO2] and hydrogen [H2]).
  • Since the rumen is an anaerobic medium, the production of energy (ATP) occurs by “hydrogen transfer”.
  • Hydrogen inhibits the activity of most bacteria via different mechanisms. The hydrogen produced must therefore be eliminated by the rumen to promote good microbial digestion.
  • Methanogenesis, leading to the formation of methane (CH4), is the main route allowing this elimination. It can be symbolized by the following reaction:

  • [CO2+4H2]=CH4+2H2O
  • This conversion is ensured by methanogenic bacteria which live in association with protozoa (which form the rumen's microfauna).
  • Methane (CH4), together with carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and the three halogen carbons (Chlorofluorocarbons CFCs, hydrofluorocarbons HFCs, and perfluorocarbons PFCs), is one of the main greenhouse gases (GGs).
  • Its contribution to the greenhouse effect is very considerable. One molecule of CH4 is effectively equivalent to 21 molecules of CO2, according to official equivalence tables.
  • These GGs are believed to have an effect on climate change and in particular on global warming. Since the World Earth Summit in Rio in 1992, the fight against these changes has become an international commitment which, in 1997, translated as quantitative commitments taken under the Kyoto protocol.
  • The European Council has set itself the target of reducing GGs by 20% between now and 2020. In 2003, livestock farming generated 47.7 MMTCDE (million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent) of which 28.3 MMTCDE in the form of methane derived from the digestive fermentation of ruminants (Leseur, 2006; Martin et al., 2006).
  • These methane emissions represent 26% of emissions by the farming sector and 5% of French GG emissions (Leseur, 2006).
  • It therefore appears necessary to reduce the methane emissions of ruminants.
  • Different solutions have been put forward to reach this objective.
  • The first consists of limiting the consumption of products derived from ruminants and in particular dairy products, the effect of which would be to reduce the number of these dairy ruminants and hence logically the emissions of methane.
  • However, dairy products have been present in the food of human beings since time began. Man is known to be the only animal species to eat dairy products after weaning. Also, at nutritional level, these dairy products contain calcium, proteins, and lipids with very special nutritional properties which cannot be dissociated from a balanced diet at all stages of life.
  • Additionally, the increase in the planet's population appears scarcely compatible with a reduction in numbers of livestock intended to feed this increasing population.
  • Another solution consists of changing the feed of dairy ruminants (cows, sheep, goats, etc.) by directing the mechanisms of rumination towards decreased methane production.
  • Different techniques have been suggested to reach this objective.
  • The first consists of increasing the quantity of milk produced per cow (intensified livestock farming).
  • The second provides for additives in the feed that are toxic for protozoa and/or methanogenic bacteria so that milk can be produced with a reduction in the emitted quantities of methane.
  • Finally, a third technique consists of adding sources of plant lipids high in unsaturated fatty acids to the feed of dairy ruminants, preferably from the Omega-3 family, or in the form of other unsaturated fatty acids although their effects on methanogenesis are less powerful (than those of Omega-3 fatty acids). These fatty acids are toxic for methanogenic bacteria, either directly or via the toxic effects on protozoa which live in association with these methanogenic bacteria.
  • However, these different techniques can only be of real interest if there is a practical method, that is easy to implement, to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by ruminants.
  • Yet, measurement of methane emissions at the present time is only possible at experimental stations, but in cumbersome costly manner.
  • The present invention sets out to overcome this shortcoming.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Therefore, according to a first aspect, the present invention concerns a method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, characterized by the fact that it comprises determination of the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less, called FA<C16, and the sum of the total fatty acids in the milk, said fatty acids being those present in the milk produced by said ruminant, said quantity of methane being defined by the following equation:

  • Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
  • in which:
    • quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
    • FA<C16=quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
    • Total FAs=total quantity of fatty acids;
    • expression of the ratio (FA<C16)/(Total FAs) as a % of Total FAs;
    • milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg milk/per animal/per year;
    • a and b are numerical parameters, with a lying between 10 and 13 and b lying between −0.40 and −0.45.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a graph which shows the prediction of production of CH4 based on the production of Volatile Fatty Acids (VFAs).
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Therefore, according to a first aspect, the present invention concerns a method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, characterized by the fact that it comprises determination of the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less, called FA<C16, and the sum of the total fatty acids in the milk, said fatty acids being those present in the milk produced by said ruminant, said quantity of methane being defined by the following equation:

  • Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
  • in which:
    • quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
    • FA<C16=quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
    • Total FAs=total quantity of fatty acids;
    • expression of the ratio (FA<C16)/(Total FAs) as a % of Total FAs;
    • milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg milk/per animal/per year;
    • a and b are numerical parameters, with a lying between 10 and 13 and b lying between −0.40 and −0.45.
  • This method is easy to implement since the present applicant has evidenced that the quantity of methane produced is directly related to the quantity of fatty acids in the milk. Also, the assay of fatty acids in milk is an operation that is currently given very wide application and does not require any sophisticated or costly means.
  • In one preferred embodiment, a and b are respectively 11.368 and −0.4274.
  • Another aspect of the invention relates to a method to reduce and control the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant.
  • This method is noteworthy in that it consists of:
      • giving the ruminant a food ration which meets at least one of the following criteria:
  • a) it excludes all fat of animal origin;
  • b) it limits the exogenous intake of vegetable oil containing more than 30% Total FA in the form of saturated FAs, in the natural state, hydrogenated, or saponified, to no more than 15 grams/animal and per 100 kg live weight;
  • c) it contains at least one lipid source high in omega-3 alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), i.e. of which more than 30% of the Total FAs are in the form of omega-3 FAs;
  • and of controlling said quantity of methane by applying the method according to one of the preceding characteristics.
  • Preferably, this lipid source is in the form of grazed fodder or conserved forage (wilted grass, silage, wrapped round bale, dehydrated, etc.) or oil seeds (in the natural state, raw, or cooked) high in ALA and oil-cakes of these same oil seeds.
  • Advantageously, said source includes flax (linseed).
  • Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description.
    • 1—Production of Volatile Fatty Acids (VFAs) And Production of Methane (CH4)
  • The link between the production of VFAs in the rumen and the production of methane has been known and researched for many years.
  • It has been shown for example that the production of acetate and butyrate releases hydrogen, and therefore promotes the production of methane, whereas the production of propionate allows the hydrogen to be used and hence limits methane production (Gworgwor et al., 2006).
  • This can be illustrated by the following equations:
  • 1 Glucose (C6) gives 2 Pyruvates (C3) [+4H]
  • 1 Pyruvate (C3)+H2O=1 Acetate+CO2 [+2H] and:
  • 1 Pyruvate=1 propionate (C3) [−4H]
  • A predictive equation has therefore been developed to predict the production of CH4 from the production of VFAs, using the graph given in appended FIG. 1 (Moss et al., 2000). Therefore, the greater the production of C2 and C4 by fermentations in the rumen, the greater the production of CH4.
  • Conversely, the greater the production of C3 by fermentations in the rumen, the more the production of CH4 is reduced.
  • The synthesis equation following therefrom is defined as follows: [CH4]=0.45 [acetate]+0.40 [Butyrate]−0.275 [Propionate]
  • where [x]=quantity of x, as a % of Total VFAs.
    • 2—Influence of the Intake of A Source (Digestible In the Rumen) of Omega-3 Alpha-Linolenic Acid (ALA) On the Production of VFAs And CH4
  • Omega-3-alpha-linolenic acid or C18: 3 n−3 or “ALA” is one of the mass constituents of growing plants.
  • It is found in abundance for example in young grass and in algae in which it accounts for the vast majority (50 to 75%) of the fatty acids in these plants. ALA is a basic constituent of chlorophyll membranes.
  • ALA is also found in some oilseeds such as flax seed (45% to 70%), hemp (around 15%), rapeseed or soy (around 10%).
  • The ALA content in the ration of dairy ruminants modifies the microbial population present in the rumen. ALA, directly and indirectly, effectively inhibits methanogenic bacteria and significantly modifies the proportions of VFAs produced, in particular by lowering the quantities of acetate and butyrate produced.
  • According to numerous sources in the scientific literature, when an ALA source is added to the ration of a ruminant, the production of propionic acid (C3) increases, and the proportions of acetic acid (C2) and butyric acid (C4) are reduced.
  • It therefore appears that:
      • the ratio [(C2+C4) to C3] is a very good index for the production of methane in the rumen;
      • the intake of ALA in the diets of dairy ruminants has a linear effect on the ratio (C2+C4)/C3 which is regularly decreased when, all other things being equivalent, the quantity of ALA ingested by the ruminant is increased.
  • It is to be noted, however that ALA sources can have different effects depending on the site of ALA digestion.
  • For example, raw flax seeds only bring a scarce reduction in the ratio [(C2+C4)/C3)], whereas extruded flax seeds and flax seed oils bring a strong increase.
  • The ability to modify this ratio [(C2+C4)/C3)] is therefore related to the quantity of ALA in animal diet but also to the availability of ALA in the rumen.
    • 3—Influence of the Ratio [(C2+C4)/C3)] On Milk Composition
  • VFAs (C2, C3, or C4) produced by the rumen are diffused through its walls, or move on further through the intestinal barrier to enter circulating fluids.
  • Propionic acid (C3) is used as “glucogenic” source and contributes towards milk production as lactose precursor.
  • On the contrary, acetic (C2) and butyric (C4) acids are used by the de novo synthesis mechanisms to produce the saturated fatty acids of milk with 2 to 16 carbon atoms.
  • This synthesis, which takes place in the mammary epithelial cells, uses acetyl coA, a compound derived from C2 and/or C4 for these syntheses of C14: 0 and C16: 0.
  • These 2 fatty acids are then “shortened” (peroxisomal beta-oxidation) to produce short and medium-chain fatty acids of milk. These fatty acids can then optionally be desaturated into mono-unsaturated fatty acids under mammary desaturase activity.
    • 4—Theoretical Model
  • The quantity of CH4 produced per litre of milk therefore takes into account:
  • a) the animal's yearly milk production.
  • The more a dairy cow (for example) produces milk, the more the production of methane per litre of milk is decreased. Therefore, some authors propose the following equation:

  • Quantity of methane produced (kg per cow per year)=55.7+0.0098*(milk production, in kg per year and per animal).
  • b) ration composition, and in particular the quantity of available ALA in the rumen.
  • c) the ratio (C2+C4)/C3 in the rumen of these animals.
  • This VFA ratio is to be read as having a strong biological causal link with milk composition, in the form of the ratio between:
  • i) the sum of milk FAs with 16 or less than 16 carbon atoms,
  • and
  • ii) the sum of all the milk FAs.
  • The quantity of CH4 produced per dairy female can therefore be calculated in relation to milk production (kg milk, per year, per animal) and to the FA composition of the milk from this animal.
  • It therefore appears that the person skilled in the art may have at hand a precious tool to evaluate the production of methane by dairy animals, in relation to their production level (easy to measure) and to the composition of the milk (easy to measure).
  • This indirect, but accurate, measurement of methane production can be used as a guide for the rationing systems of dairy ruminant animals, so as to reduce their contribution towards the greenhouse effect and to allow rapid measurement of the effects of these changes.
    • 5—Test And Interpretation of Results
  • Numerous tests are available in the general bibliography which describe the effects of an intake of a food ALA source (most often in the form of flax) on the production of methane by cows, goats, and other female dairy ruminants.
  • Other tests are available which describe the effects of these same ALA sources, in the form of flax, on the fatty acid (FA) composition of milk.
  • Matching and synthesis of these results have been carried out to validate the theoretical model. These results are given in Table 1 below.
  • The focus here was to measure the production of CH4 per litre of milk as a function of:
      • milk production (kg/animal/year);
      • the ratio between milk FAs having 16 carbon atoms or less as a % of total FAs.
  • Evidently, we could have chosen other FAs or other sums or ratios of FAs to illustrate the effects of de novo synthesis of saturated FAs in the udder, using the C2 produced in the rumen with CH4 emission.
  • However, the sum of saturated FAs with 16 carbon atoms or less is particularly representative of this de novo synthesis from C2. Additionally, reading of the C16 fatty acids or of the sums of FAs with 12, 14, 16 carbon atoms, even the ratio between C16 and the sum of saturated FAs would also be relevant criteria.
  • This compiling of results was notably made from tests which firstly gave the FA profiles of milk and secondly gave measurements of methane produced per litre of milk, in tests using extruded flax seeds as ALA source and on cows having different production levels.
  • TABLE 1
    Production of methane per litre of milk in relation to milk production
    per animal and to milk FA profile, over a given range of milk FA profile
    MP
    FA 4 000 5 000 6 000 7 000 8 000 9 000 10 000 11 000 12 000 13 000 14 000
    70 23.7 20.9 19.1 17.8 16.8 16.0 15.4 14.9 14.4 14.1 13.8
    68 23.0 20.3 18.5 17.2 16.3 15.5 14.9 14.4 14.0 13.7 13.4
    66 22.4 19.7 18.0 16.7 15.8 15.1 14.5 14.0 13.6 13.3 13.0
    64 21.7 19.1 17.4 16.2 15.3 14.6 14.1 13.6 13.2 12.9 12.6
    62 21.0 18.5 16.9 15.7 14.8 14.2 13.6 13.2 12.8 12.5 12.2
    60 20.3 17.9 16.4 15.2 14.4 13.7 13.2 12.7 12.4 12.1 11.8
    58 19.7 17.4 15.8 14.7 13.9 13.2 12.7 12.3 12.0 11.7 11.4
    56 19.0 16.8 15.3 14.2 13.4 12.8 12.3 11.9 11.6 11.3 11.0
    54 18.3 16.2 14.7 13.7 12.9 12.3 11.9 11.5 11.1 10.9 10.6
    52 17.6 15.6 14.2 13.2 12.5 11.9 11.4 11.0 10.7 10.5 10.2
    50 16.9 15.0 13.6 12.7 12.0 11.4 11.0 10.6 10.3 10.1 9.8
    48 16.3 14.4 13.1 12.2 11.5 11.0 10.5 10.2 9.9 9.7 9.4
    46 15.6 13.8 12.5 11.7 11.0 10.5 10.1 9.8 9.5 9.3 9.1
    44 14.9 13.2 12.0 11.2 10.5 10.1 9.7 9.3 9.1 8.9 8.7
    42 14.2 12.6 11.5 10.7 10.1 9.6 9.2 8.9 8.7 8.5 8.3
    NB:
    This range of milk FA profile was deliberately limited to the range in which FAs with 16 carbon atoms or less account for 70 to 42% of the milk FAs. Not because the ensuing biological model or equation is limited to this range, but because beyond the limits of this range the composition of the milks produced can be considered firstly to be nutritionally doubtful and secondly ncompatible with the above-defined means used to obtain these milks.
  • In this table: MP (horizontally)=milk production (kg/animal/year) and FA=[FA<C16/Total FAs], as a %.
  • We have therefore drawn up a predictive table for emitted CH4 values on the basis of milk production data and the FA profiles of these milks so produced:
  • TABLE 2
    MP
    FA
    4 000 5 000 6 000 7 000 8 000 9 000 10 000 11 000 12 000 13 000 14 000
    70 23.0 20.9 19.3 18.1 17.1 16.2 15.5 14.9 14.4 13.9 13.5
    68 22.3 20.3 18.8 17.6 16.6 15.8 15.1 14.5 14.0 13.5 13.1
    66 21.7 19.7 18.2 17.1 16.1 15.3 14.6 14.1 13.5 13.1 12.7
    64 21.0 19.1 17.7 16.5 15.6 14.9 14.2 13.6 13.1 12.7 12.3
    62 20.3 18.5 17.1 16.0 15.1 14.4 13.8 13.2 12.7 12.3 11.9
    60 19.7 17.9 16.6 15.5 14.6 13.9 13.3 12.8 12.3 11.9 11.5
    58 19.0 17.3 16.0 15.0 14.2 13.5 12.9 12.4 11.9 11.5 11.1
    56 18.4 16.7 15.5 14.5 13.7 13.0 12.4 11.9 11.5 11.1 10.8
    54 17.7 16.1 14.9 14.0 13.2 12.5 12.0 11.5 11.1 10.7 10.4
    52 17.1 15.5 14.4 13.4 12.7 12.1 11.5 11.1 10.7 10.3 10.0
    50 16.4 14.9 13.8 12.9 12.2 11.6 11.1 10.7 10.3 9.9 9.6
    48 15.8 14.3 13.2 12.4 11.7 11.1 10.6 10.2 9.9 9.5 9.2
    46 15.1 13.7 12.7 11.9 11.2 10.7 10.2 9.8 9.4 9.1 8.8
    44 14.4 13.1 12.1 11.4 10.7 10.2 9.8 9.4 9.0 8.7 8.5
    42 13.8 12.5 11.6 10.9 10.3 9.7 9.3 8.9 8.6 8.3 8.1
    • 6—Validation of This Model
  • We have the results of several tests which accurately measured:
      • the quantity of ALA (available in the rumen) in the rations of dairy cows;
      • the effects of this ALA on the ratio (C2+C4)/C3;
      • the effects of these rations on the milk FA profile;
      • and finally tests which compared the production of CH4 per litre of milk with different ALA contents in the rations.
  • The table below compares the measured values with the values “predicted” from the above-mentioned tables.
  • TABLE 3
    Tests
    1 2 3 4 5 6
    Milk 6 000 6 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 6 000
    production
    FA >=C16   61   42   66   64   56   42
    CH4 in g/l   16.8   11.8   17.2   16.2   13.8   10.9
    milk
    “Prediction”
    in g/l
    As per Table 1   16.4   11.5   17.2   16.2   14.2   11.5
    As per Table 2   16.4   11.5   17.2   15.7   14.2   11.5
  • The present applicant has inferred from these tests that the quantity of methane can be defined by the following equation:

  • Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/Total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
  • in which:
      • quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
      • FA<C16=quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
      • Total FAs=total quantity of fatty acids;
      • milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg per animal per year
      • a and b=numerical parameters in which a lies between 10 and 13, and b lies between −0.40 and −0.45.
  • Preferably, parameters a and b are 11.368 and −0.4274 respectively.

Claims (7)

1. A method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, comprising:
determining the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less, called FA<C16 and the sum of the total fatty acids in the milk, said fatty acids being those found in the milk produced by said ruminant, said quantity of methane being defined by the following equation:

Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/Total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
in which:
quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
FA<C16=quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
Total FAs=total quantity of fatty acids;
expression of the ratio (FA<C16)/(Total FAs) as a % of total FAs;
milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg of milk/animal and per year;
a and b are numerical parameters, with a lying between 10 and 13, and b lying between −0.40 and −0.45.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein a and b are respectively 11.368 and −0.4274.
3.-6. (canceled)
7. A method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant, comprising:
(a) assaying fatty acids of milk produced by a dairy ruminant;
(b) determining the ratio between the quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less, called FA<C16, and the sum of the total fatty acids in the milk, said fatty acids being those found in the milk produced by said ruminant;
(c) calculating said quantity of methane which is defined by the following equation:

Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/Total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
in which:
quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
FA<C16=quantity of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
Total FAs=total quantity of fatty acids;
expression of the ratio (FA<C16)/(Total FAs) as a % of total FAs;
milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg of milk/animal and per year;
a and b are numerical parameters, with a lying between 10 and 13, and b lying between −0.40 and −0.45.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein a and b are respectively 11.368 and −0.4274.
9. A method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant for use in reducing or controlling the quantity of methane produced by the ruminant, comprising:
(a) assaying fatty acids of milk produced by a dairy ruminant by:
(i) determining the total content of fatty acids in the milk; and
(ii) determining the content of fatty acids with 16 carbons or less in the milk;
(b) determining the ratio between the content of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less and the total content of fatty acids in the milk;
(c) determining the milk production of said ruminant, wherein said milk production is the quantity of milk produced in kg of milk per animal per year; and
(d) calculating said quantity of methane which is defined by the following equation:

Quantity CH4=(FA<C16/Total FAs)*a*(milk production)b
in which:
quantity CH4 (in g/litre of milk)=quantity of methane produced;
FA<C16=content of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms or less;
Total FAs=total content of fatty acids;
expression of the ratio (FA<C16)/(Total FAs) as a % of total FAs;
milk production=quantity of milk produced in kg of milk/animal and per year;
a and b are numerical parameters, with a lying between 10 and 13, and b lying between −0.40 and −0.45.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein a and b are respectively 11.368 and −0.4274.
US14/036,178 2008-06-25 2013-09-25 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity Abandoned US20140170755A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/036,178 US20140170755A1 (en) 2008-06-25 2013-09-25 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0854230A FR2933191B1 (en) 2008-06-25 2008-06-25 METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUANTITY OF METHANE PRODUCED BY A DAIRY RUMINANT AND METHOD FOR DECREASING AND CONTROLLING SUCH QUANTITY
FR0854230 2008-06-25
PCT/EP2009/057919 WO2009156453A1 (en) 2008-06-25 2009-06-24 Method for evaluating the amount of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method for decreasing and controlling this amount
US12/452,243 US8642100B2 (en) 2008-06-25 2009-06-24 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity
US14/036,178 US20140170755A1 (en) 2008-06-25 2013-09-25 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2009/057919 Continuation WO2009156453A1 (en) 2008-06-25 2009-06-24 Method for evaluating the amount of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method for decreasing and controlling this amount
US12/452,243 Continuation US8642100B2 (en) 2008-06-25 2009-06-24 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140170755A1 true US20140170755A1 (en) 2014-06-19

Family

ID=40158605

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/452,243 Active 2031-05-09 US8642100B2 (en) 2008-06-25 2009-06-24 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity
US14/036,178 Abandoned US20140170755A1 (en) 2008-06-25 2013-09-25 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/452,243 Active 2031-05-09 US8642100B2 (en) 2008-06-25 2009-06-24 Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity

Country Status (18)

Country Link
US (2) US8642100B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2158484B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5363568B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101617373B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102077089B (en)
AT (1) ATE532062T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2009264211B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0914321B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2728307C (en)
DK (1) DK2158484T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2376622T3 (en)
FR (1) FR2933191B1 (en)
IL (1) IL210250A (en)
MX (1) MX2010013827A (en)
NZ (1) NZ590284A (en)
PL (1) PL2158484T3 (en)
PT (1) PT2158484E (en)
WO (1) WO2009156453A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8784871B2 (en) 2009-12-11 2014-07-22 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Nitrooxy alkanoic acids and derivatives thereof in feed for reducing methane emission in ruminants, and/or to improve ruminant performance
FR2961907B1 (en) * 2010-06-29 2012-07-27 Valorex Sa METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUANTITY OF METHANE PRODUCED BY A RUMINANT SAID "A MEAT"
NL2005543C2 (en) 2010-10-18 2012-04-19 Friesland Brands Bv Method to produce milk with increased unsaturated fatty acids content.
FR2966603B1 (en) 2010-10-21 2012-11-16 Valorex Sa METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE QUANTITY OF METHANE PRODUCED BY A DAIRY RUMINANT
EP2654455B1 (en) 2010-12-20 2018-10-24 DSM IP Assets B.V. Use of nitrooxy organic molecules in feed for reducing methane emission in ruminants
EP2644038A1 (en) 2012-03-26 2013-10-02 DSM IP Assets B.V. Use of para nitro amino derivatives in feed for reducing meth-ane emission in ruminants
FI124101B (en) 2012-05-14 2014-03-14 Hankkija Maatalous Oy Modified tall oil fatty acid
CN102652541B (en) * 2012-05-24 2013-06-12 山东新希望六和集团有限公司 Compound goat feed containing linolenic acid and preparation method thereof
FI124918B (en) 2013-05-14 2015-03-31 Hankkija Maatalous Oy tall oil fatty acids
FI125051B (en) 2013-10-24 2015-05-15 Hankkija Oy Tall oil fatty acid
WO2015071534A1 (en) 2013-11-13 2015-05-21 Hankkija Oy A feed supplement and a feed composition comprising resin acid based composition
CA2839027A1 (en) * 2014-01-02 2015-07-02 Alltech, Inc. Systems and methods for estimating feed efficiency and carbon footprint for milk producing animal
WO2016193309A1 (en) 2015-06-01 2016-12-08 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. New bis esters of ivy sapogenins for ruminants
FR3059103B1 (en) * 2016-11-18 2018-11-09 Valorex METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE QUANTITY OF A CONTENT CONTAINED IN A FOOD RATIONUM CONSUMED BY A RUMINANT, PROGRAM, MEMORY AND CORRESPONDING DEVICE.
KR101911465B1 (en) 2016-11-25 2018-10-24 전북대학교 산학협력단 Nitrate coating composition for reducing the methane gas produced by the rumen of ruminant Animals and method for producing the same
WO2018153702A1 (en) 2017-02-21 2018-08-30 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Use of a feed composition for reducing methane emission in rumi-nants, and/or to improve ruminant performance
EP3628169A1 (en) 2018-09-25 2020-04-01 DSM IP Assets B.V. 3h-1,2-dithiol-derivatives for reducing methane emission in ruminants
WO2020106929A1 (en) * 2018-11-21 2020-05-28 Stucker Dennis R Method for increasing rate and extent of fiber digestion in ruminants
WO2021131486A1 (en) * 2019-12-23 2021-07-01 国立研究開発法人農業・食品産業技術総合研究機構 Evaluation system and evaluation method
CN112420161A (en) * 2020-10-28 2021-02-26 西北农林科技大学 Rumen volatile fatty acid prediction method, system, equipment and medium
EP4037666B1 (en) 2020-12-08 2024-05-01 Ruminant Biotech Corp Limited Improvements to devices and methods for delivery of substances to animals
CN117119897A (en) 2021-04-15 2023-11-24 帝斯曼知识产权资产管理有限公司 Use of gossypol and methane inhibitors for reducing the formation of methane resulting from digestive activities of ruminants
BR112023021280A2 (en) 2021-04-15 2023-12-19 Dsm Ip Assets Bv NEW USE
EP4322927A1 (en) 2021-04-15 2024-02-21 DSM IP Assets B.V. Novel use
US20240207203A1 (en) 2021-04-15 2024-06-27 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Novel use
WO2023031166A1 (en) 2021-08-31 2023-03-09 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. System and method for classifying animal food products

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1059542C (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-12-20 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所 Preparation of microbial fermented stalk feed for reducing methane discharge of ruminant
WO2006040537A1 (en) * 2004-10-12 2006-04-20 Rowett Research Institute Improved ruminant feeding
CN100556560C (en) * 2004-11-09 2009-11-04 中国科学技术大学 Utilize the method for rumen microbe in degrading waste plant matter effectively
EP2032966B1 (en) * 2006-06-07 2012-12-19 Valorex Method for determining the nutritional quality of milk lipids

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102077089A (en) 2011-05-25
JP5363568B2 (en) 2013-12-11
NZ590284A (en) 2012-05-25
WO2009156453A1 (en) 2009-12-30
IL210250A0 (en) 2011-03-31
CA2728307C (en) 2017-11-07
PT2158484E (en) 2012-02-03
AU2009264211B2 (en) 2014-05-29
IL210250A (en) 2015-08-31
US20110081442A1 (en) 2011-04-07
MX2010013827A (en) 2011-04-27
FR2933191A1 (en) 2010-01-01
EP2158484A1 (en) 2010-03-03
ES2376622T3 (en) 2012-03-15
CN102077089B (en) 2013-10-23
DK2158484T3 (en) 2012-01-30
KR20110039540A (en) 2011-04-19
FR2933191B1 (en) 2010-06-25
JP2011525974A (en) 2011-09-29
US8642100B2 (en) 2014-02-04
BRPI0914321A2 (en) 2015-10-13
KR101617373B1 (en) 2016-05-02
EP2158484B1 (en) 2011-11-02
CA2728307A1 (en) 2009-12-30
PL2158484T3 (en) 2012-03-30
BRPI0914321B1 (en) 2018-02-06
ATE532062T1 (en) 2011-11-15
AU2009264211A1 (en) 2009-12-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8642100B2 (en) Method to evaluate the quantity of methane produced by a dairy ruminant and method to reduce and control this quantity
Fievez et al. Milk odd-and branched-chain fatty acids as biomarkers of rumen function—An update
Arco-Pérez et al. Nutritive evaluation and milk quality of including of tomato or olive by-products silages with sunflower oil in the diet of dairy goats
Guyader et al. Additive methane-mitigating effect between linseed oil and nitrate fed to cattle
Jentsch et al. Methane production in cattle calculated by the nutrient composition of the diet
Van Zijderveld et al. Effects of a combination of feed additives on methane production, diet digestibility, and animal performance in lactating dairy cows
Bhatt et al. Change in body condition and carcass characteristics of cull ewes fed diets supplemented with rumen bypass fat
Rahman et al. Estimation of total volatile fatty acid (VFA) from total organic carbons (TOCs) assessment through in vitro fermentation of livestock feeds
Gutiérrez-Peña et al. Fatty acid profile and vitamins A and E contents of milk in goat farms under Mediterranean wood pastures as affected by grazing conditions and seasons
Elghandour et al. Biogas production from prickly pear cactus containing diets supplemented with Moringa oleifera leaf extract for a cleaner environmental livestock production
Zhao et al. Enteric methane emissions and nitrogen utilisation efficiency for two genotype of hill hoggets offered fresh, ensiled and pelleted ryegrass
Dijkstra et al. Relationships between milk fatty acid profiles and enteric methane production in dairy cattle fed grass-or grass silage-based diets
Martin et al. Diets supplemented with corn oil and wheat starch, marine algae, or hydrogenated palm oil modulate methane emissions similarly in dairy goats and cows, but not feeding behavior
De Souza et al. Between-cow variation in milk fatty acids associated with methane production
Van Gastelen et al. The relationship between milk metabolome and methane emission of Holstein Friesian dairy cows: Metabolic interpretation and prediction potential
US20130167617A1 (en) Method for evaluating the quantity of methane produced by a ruminant used for meat production
Patel Effects of increasing the proportion of high-quality grass silage in the diet of dairy cows
Dereje et al. Effect of concentrate supplementation to free ranging dromedary camels on yield, physicochemical quality and fatty acid profile of milk
Rugoho et al. Analysis of major fatty acids in milk produced from high-quality grazed pasture
Wattiaux et al. Milk urea nitrogen as a tool to assess efficiency of nitrogen utilization in dairy cows
Phuoc Thanh et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and rumen undegradable protein alter ruminal fermentation and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cows
Renes et al. Effect of feeding regimen on the fatty acid profile of sheep bulk tank milk
McKay et al. Impact of a total mixed ration or pasture/pasture silage-based feeding strategy in the initial stages of lactation of spring-calving dairy cows on milk production, composition and selected milk processability parameters
Li et al. Paths for improvements of smallholder dairies: case-study on local food security in arid regions of China
Guinguina et al. Postpartum responses of dairy cows supplemented with cereal grain or fibrous by-product concentrate

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: VALOREX, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WEILL, PIERRE;CHESNEAU, GUILLAUME;CHILLIARD, YVES;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20101220 TO 20110110;REEL/FRAME:031611/0246

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION