US20140102943A1 - Relating to coal to liquid processes - Google Patents

Relating to coal to liquid processes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140102943A1
US20140102943A1 US14/108,583 US201314108583A US2014102943A1 US 20140102943 A1 US20140102943 A1 US 20140102943A1 US 201314108583 A US201314108583 A US 201314108583A US 2014102943 A1 US2014102943 A1 US 2014102943A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
stream
sub
hydrogen
syngas
fuel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/108,583
Inventor
Joachim Ansorge
Scott A. BILTON
Henrik Jan Van Der Ploeg
Arold Marcel Albert Routier
Cornelis Jacobus Smit
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shell USA Inc
Original Assignee
Shell Oil Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shell Oil Co filed Critical Shell Oil Co
Priority to US14/108,583 priority Critical patent/US20140102943A1/en
Publication of US20140102943A1 publication Critical patent/US20140102943A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G1/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from oil-shale, oil-sand, or non-melting solid carbonaceous or similar materials, e.g. wood, coal
    • C10G1/002Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from oil-shale, oil-sand, or non-melting solid carbonaceous or similar materials, e.g. wood, coal in combination with oil conversion- or refining processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B3/00Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
    • C01B3/02Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen
    • C01B3/06Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of inorganic compounds containing electro-positively bound hydrogen, e.g. water, acids, bases, ammonia, with inorganic reducing agents
    • C01B3/12Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of inorganic compounds containing electro-positively bound hydrogen, e.g. water, acids, bases, ammonia, with inorganic reducing agents by reaction of water vapour with carbon monoxide
    • C01B3/16Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of inorganic compounds containing electro-positively bound hydrogen, e.g. water, acids, bases, ammonia, with inorganic reducing agents by reaction of water vapour with carbon monoxide using catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B3/00Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
    • C01B3/02Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen
    • C01B3/22Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by decomposition of gaseous or liquid organic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B3/00Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
    • C01B3/50Separation of hydrogen or hydrogen containing gases from gaseous mixtures, e.g. purification
    • C01B3/52Separation of hydrogen or hydrogen containing gases from gaseous mixtures, e.g. purification by contacting with liquids; Regeneration of used liquids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • C10G2/32Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J3/00Production of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide from solid carbonaceous fuels
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K3/00Modifying the chemical composition of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide to produce an improved fuel, e.g. one of different calorific value, which may be free from carbon monoxide
    • C10K3/02Modifying the chemical composition of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide to produce an improved fuel, e.g. one of different calorific value, which may be free from carbon monoxide by catalytic treatment
    • C10K3/04Modifying the chemical composition of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide to produce an improved fuel, e.g. one of different calorific value, which may be free from carbon monoxide by catalytic treatment reducing the carbon monoxide content, e.g. water-gas shift [WGS]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K3/00Modifying the chemical composition of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide to produce an improved fuel, e.g. one of different calorific value, which may be free from carbon monoxide
    • C10K3/06Modifying the chemical composition of combustible gases containing carbon monoxide to produce an improved fuel, e.g. one of different calorific value, which may be free from carbon monoxide by mixing with gases
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B2203/00Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/04Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/0415Purification by absorption in liquids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B2203/00Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/04Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/0465Composition of the impurity
    • C01B2203/0475Composition of the impurity the impurity being carbon dioxide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B2203/00Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/04Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/0465Composition of the impurity
    • C01B2203/0485Composition of the impurity the impurity being a sulfur compound
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B2203/00Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
    • C01B2203/06Integration with other chemical processes
    • C01B2203/062Hydrocarbon production, e.g. Fischer-Tropsch process
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/09Details of the feed, e.g. feeding of spent catalyst, inert gas or halogens
    • C10J2300/0913Carbonaceous raw material
    • C10J2300/093Coal
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/16Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant
    • C10J2300/1603Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant with gas treatment
    • C10J2300/1618Modification of synthesis gas composition, e.g. to meet some criteria
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/16Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant
    • C10J2300/164Integration of gasification processes with another plant or parts within the plant with conversion of synthesis gas
    • C10J2300/1656Conversion of synthesis gas to chemicals
    • C10J2300/1659Conversion of synthesis gas to chemicals to liquid hydrocarbons
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10JPRODUCTION OF PRODUCER GAS, WATER-GAS, SYNTHESIS GAS FROM SOLID CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL, OR MIXTURES CONTAINING THESE GASES; CARBURETTING AIR OR OTHER GASES
    • C10J2300/00Details of gasification processes
    • C10J2300/18Details of the gasification process, e.g. loops, autothermal operation
    • C10J2300/1807Recycle loops, e.g. gas, solids, heating medium, water
    • C10J2300/1823Recycle loops, e.g. gas, solids, heating medium, water for synthesis gas

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to improvements relating to coal and other heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks to liquid processes, particularly but not exclusively Fischer-Tropsch processes.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch process can be used for the conversion of hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks into liquid and/or solid hydrocarbons.
  • the feedstock e.g. natural gas, associated gas, coal-bed methane, heavy oil residues, coal
  • the feedstock e.g. natural gas, associated gas, coal-bed methane, heavy oil residues, coal
  • synthesis gas this mixture is often referred to as synthesis gas or syngas.
  • the synthesis gas is then fed into a reactor where it is converted over a suitable catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure into paraffinic compounds ranging from methane to high molecular weight molecules comprising up to 200 carbon atoms, or, under particular circumstances, even more.
  • Examples of the Fischer-Tropsch process are described in e.g. WO 02/02489, WO 01/76736, WO 02/07882, EP 510771 and EP 450861.
  • Fischer-Tropsch reactor systems include fixed bed reactors, especially multi-tubular fixed bed reactors, fluidised bed reactors, such as entrained fluidised bed reactors and fixed fluidised bed reactors, and slurry bed reactors such as three-phase slurry bubble columns and ebulated bed reactors.
  • feedstocks for the Fischer-Tropsch process are examples of feedstocks for the Fischer-Tropsch process.
  • solid fuels such as anthracite, brown coal, bitumous coal, sub-bitumous coal, lignite, petroleum coke, peat and the like
  • heavy residues e.g. hydrocarbons extracted from tar sands, residues from refineries such as residual oil fractions boiling above 360° C., especially above 550° C., more especially above 750° C., directly derived from crude oil, or from oil conversion processes such as thermal cracking, catalytic cracking, hydrocracking etc.
  • All such types of fuels have different levels of ‘quality’, that is the proportions of carbon and hydrogen, as well as substances regarded as ‘impurities’, generally sulphur and sulphur-based compounds, nitrogen containing compounds, heavy metals etc.
  • Gasification of solid carbonaceous fuels such as coal is well known, and generally involves milling or otherwise grinding the fuel to a preferred size or size range, followed by heating the fuel with oxygen in a gasifier. This creates the mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide referred to as syngas.
  • the proportion of carbon and hydrogen in solid carbonaceous fuels is generally such that the hydrogen/carbon monoxide (H 2 /CO) ratio in the syngas formed is generally less than 1, whereas Fischer-Tropsch processes based on cobalt-catalysts generally desire a H 2 /CO ratio in the syngas to the synthesis reactor from 1.5 to 2.0, frequently 1.6-1.8.
  • Fischer-Tropsch plant may desire a substantially pure hydrogen stream, that is, a very high H 2 /CO ratio. Further in the case that the Fischer-Tropsch process comprises two or more stages, additional hydrogen is needed between these stages.
  • the additional hydrogen may be pure hydrogen, but, preferably, is syngas having a high H 2 /CO ratio.
  • the present invention provides a method of increasing the hydrogen/carbon monoxide (H 2 /CO) ratio in a syngas stream derived from a solid carbonaceous fuel, wherein the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into at least two sub-streams, one of which undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction, and the so-obtained converted sub-stream is combined with a non-converted sub-stream(s) to form a syngas stream having an increased H 2 /CO ratio of between 1.1 and 1.95.
  • H 2 /CO hydrogen/carbon monoxide
  • the present invention also provides a process for the preparation of a hydrogen-enriched syngas derived from a carbonaceous fuel as herein defined, wherein a portion of the syngas undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction.
  • a portion of the syngas undergoing this shift conversion reaction is in the range 30-70% by volume of the syngas.
  • the present invention also provides syngas whenever prepared by a method or process as herein described.
  • the present invention also provides a hydrocarbonaceous product whenever produced by the use of syngas as herein described, including any products made by hydroconversion of the hydrocarbonaceous products.
  • the present invention provides a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel, comprising the steps of:
  • the syngas either in its combined form, or each substream, or both, undergoes a CO 2 /H 2 S removal or treatment step prior to the hydrocarbon synthesis section.
  • the carbonaceous fuel may include coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions, preferably coal.
  • FIG. 2 is of a flow diagram of a second arrangement of the method of the present.
  • carbonaceous fuel includes coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions, preferably coal.
  • the H 2 /CO ratio in syngas formed by gasification of most types of carbonaceous fuels defined herein is generally about or less than 1, and is commonly about 0.3-0.6 for coal-derived syngas, and 0.5-0.9 for heavy residue-derived syngas. It is possible to use such a H 2 /CO ratio in a Fischer-Tropsch process, but more satisfactory results can be achieved by increasing the H 2 /CO ratio.
  • the present invention allows for the increase of the H 2 /CO ratio in the syngas to a ratio, which is known to provide more satisfactory results during the synthesis step, especially higher quality and higher selectivity of the hydroconversion synthesis.
  • the H 2 /CO ratio in the second syngas stream formed by the combination of the sub-streams is greater than 1.5, preferably in the range 1.6-1.9, and more preferably in the range 1.6-1.8. It is observed that for the establishment of the combined H 2 /CO ratio any premixing of the two streams should be disregarded. Thus, in the case of recycling any gas streams comprising unconverted syngas, e.g. from the Fischer-Tropsch process, the influence of the H 2 and CO in the recycle stream should not be taken into account.
  • the present invention allows for the division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into any number of streams, more than one of which could undergo a catalytic water shift conversion reaction.
  • the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into two sub-streams, one of which undergoes the conversion reaction.
  • some of the non-converted sub-stream(s)could be used for other parts of the hydrocarbon conversion process rather than being combined with the converted sub-stream(s), e.g. for a second, third etc. stage in the Fischer-Tropsch process, for steam or power generation, or for the manufacture of hydrogen.
  • the division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into sub-streams can be such so as to create any desired H 2 /CO ratio following their recombination. Any degree or amount of division of the fuel-derived syngas stream is possible. Where the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into two sub-streams, the division into the sub-streams could be in the range 80:20 to 20:80 by volume, preferably 70:30 to 30:70 by volume, depending upon the desired final H 2 /CO ratio. Simple analysis of the H 2 /CO ratios in the fuel-derived syngas stream and knowledge of the desired ratio in the combined syngas stream allows easy calculation of the division. In the case that one stream is to be used as feed for e.g.
  • this stream will usually be between 10 and 50%, preferably between 20 and 35% of the stream which is catalytically shifted. In that case there are three stream, the two main streams in the range 80:20 to 20:80 by volume and one stream 10 to 50% of one of the earlier two streams.
  • the simple ability to change the degree of division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into the sub-streams also provides a simple but effective means of accommodating variation in the H 2 /CO ratio in the fuel-derived syngas stream, primarily due to variation in feedstock quality, i.e. the hydrogen and carbon content of the original fuel, for example, the ‘grade’ of coal.
  • feedstock quality i.e. the hydrogen and carbon content of the original fuel, for example, the ‘grade’ of coal.
  • Certain grades of coal generally having a higher carbon content, but a high carbon content, will, after gasification of the coal, provide a greater production of carbon monoxide, and thus a lower H 2 /CO ratio.
  • using other grades of coal means removing more contaminants or unwanted parts of the coal, such as ash and sulphur and sulphur-based compounds.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from coal. This starts with the gasification of coal with oxygen to form a syngas stream, followed by removal of solids such as slag and the like.
  • the fuel-derived syngas stream is then divided into two streams. One forms a ‘by-pass’ stream, which passes through a CO 2 /H 2 S removal system labelled ‘AGR 2 ’ followed by one or more guard beds and/or scrubbing units, either as backup or support to the CO 2 /H 2 S removal system, or to assist in the reduction and/or removal of other contaminants such as HCN, NH 3 , COS and H 2 S, etc.
  • AGR 2 CO 2 /H 2 S removal system
  • the other stream of syngas passes into a sour shift unit to undergo a catalytic water shift conversion reaction wherein the H 2 /CO ratio is significantly increased, optionally in a manner known in the art.
  • the gas stream from the sour shift unit then undergoes the same or similar CO 2 /H 2 S removal using unit ‘AGR 1 ’, followed by the same or similar guard beds as the other syngas stream.
  • the shifted syngas stream is then re-combined with the non-converted syngas stream prior to their entry into a heavy paraffin synthesis process, which may involve one or more reactors or units in one or more stages.
  • the products provided by the HPS can then be worked up in a manner known in the art to provide distillates, such as middle distillates.
  • FIG. 1 shows the possible use of a part of the shifted syngas stream into a pressure swing adsorption unit, wherein the shifted syngas is converted to provide a hydrogen enhanced stream, which stream can then be used in the hydrocracking in the product workup.
  • FIG. 2 shows a similar process to FIG. 1 .
  • the AGR 1 unit provides the CO 2 /H 2 S cleaning of the syngas stream prior to division.
  • the syngas stream is then divided, such that part of the stream by-passes directly towards the HPS stage.
  • the other divided syngas stream undergoes a sweet shift conversion, followed by subsequent CO 2 /H 2 S cleaning in unit ‘AGR 3 ’, which should not need to treat for H 2 S.
  • the converted sweet shift stream can then be wholly or substantially combined with the non-converted by-pass stream to provide a syngas stream entering the HPS stage with an enhanced the H 2 /CO ratio as desired.
  • a part of the shifted stream could be supplied to a PSA unit for the provision of an enchanced hydrogen stream.
  • the gasification of coal is well known in the art. Generally, the coal is milled to a desired particle size or particle size range, before being transported to a gasifier.
  • the gasifier requires the input of an oxygen stream.
  • One source of oxygen could be an air separation unit, which divides air into its nitrogen and oxygen components.
  • the nitrogen component from an air separation unit is admixed with the carbonaceous fuel feedstock, either prior to, during and/or after milling.
  • carbon dioxide gas such as that derived from some part of the processed described herein, could be admixed with the fuel feedstock, either prior to, during and/or after milling.
  • the nitrogen or carbon dioxide assists in transport of such a feedstock to the gasifier by ‘fluidising’ the feedstock bed.
  • the method of the present invention especially concerns a Fischer-Tropsch process which comprises two or more stages to convert the synthesis gas into hydrocarbonaceous products.
  • a Fischer-Tropsch process which comprises two or more stages to convert the synthesis gas into hydrocarbonaceous products.
  • it is possible to convert the syngas in one stage into hydrocarbons however, it is more efficient to use two or more stages, preferably two or three stages, more preferably two stages.
  • two stages in each of which the CO-conversion is 80% results in a total CO-conversion of 96%.
  • the H 2 /CO ratio to the first stage is below the consumption ratio (in general 2.05), e.g. when the H 2 /CO ratio to the first stage is below 1.95, e.g.
  • the H 2 /CO ratio of the feedstream to the second feedstream i.e. the H 2 /CO ratio of the product stream has been decreased considerably. It is especially suitably to send at least a part, preferably between 5 and 50% vol, more preferably between 10 and 40% vol, even more preferably between 15 and 35% vol of the shifted stream to the further stages in the Fischer-Tropsch process, especially to the second and third stage, more especially to the second stage.
  • part of the unconverted syngas in the product stream is recirculated to the feedstream.
  • 30-95 vol % is recirculated, more preferably 50-80 vol %.
  • the CO conversion per pass is suitably between 30 and 65%.
  • the total CO conversion per stage is suitably between 60 and 95%, preferably between 70 and 90%.
  • the weight ratio recirculation gas: fresh synthesis gas is suitably between 0.2:1.0 till 4.0:1.0, preferably between 0.5:1.0 till 3.0:1.0, more preferably between 1.0:1.0 till 2.0:1.0. In this way an optimum C 5+ selectivity is obtained in an optimum sized reactor.
  • there are 1 to 10 reactors in the previous stage preferably 2 to 8, more preferably 3 to 6.
  • a three stage Fischer-Tropsch process could comprise 12 reactors in the first stage, 4 in the second stage and 1 in the third stage.
  • the syngas still passes through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide (CO 2 /H 2 S) removal system, as the fuel-derived stream, the combined stream, and/or one or more, possibly all, of the sub-streams.
  • the removal system may involve one or more removal units.
  • at least one such unit is located downstream from the conversion reaction, as carbon dioxide is a product thereof.
  • a CO 2 /H 2 S removal unit is located in the path of each sub-stream.
  • the CO 2 /H 2 S removal system preferably uses a physical solvent process, especially methanol or sulfolan, preferably methanol.
  • This process is based on carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide being highly soluble under pressure in the solvent, and then being readily releasable from solution when the pressure is reduced as further discussed below.
  • This high pressure system is preferred due to its efficiency, although other removal systems such as using amines are known.
  • Chemical solvents which have proved to be industrially useful are primary, secondary and/or tertiary amines derived alkanolamines.
  • the most frequently used amines are derived from ethanolamine, especially monoethanol amine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), triethanolamine (TEA), diisopropanolamine (DIPA) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA).
  • Physical solvents which have proved to be industrially suitable are cyclo-tetramethylenesulfone and its derivatives, aliphatic acid amides, N-methylpyrrolidone, N-alkylated pyrrolidones and the corresponding piperidones, methanol, ethanol and mixtures of dialkylethers of polyethylene glycols.
  • a well-known commercial process uses an aqueous mixture of a chemical solvent, especially DIPA and/or MDEA, and a physical solvent, especially cyclotetramethylene-sulfone.
  • a chemical solvent especially DIPA and/or MDEA
  • a physical solvent especially cyclotetramethylene-sulfone.
  • the physical adsorption process useable in the present invention is well known to the man skilled in the art. Reference can be made to e.g. Perry, Chemical Engineerings' Handbook, Chapter 14, Gas Absorption.
  • the absorption process useable in the present process is a physical process. Suitable solvents are well known to the man skilled in the art and are described in the literature.
  • the liquid absorbent in the physical absorption process is suitably methanol, ethanol, acetone, dimethyl ether, methyl i-propyl ether, polyethylene glycol or xylene, preferably methanol.
  • the physical absorption process is suitably carried out at low temperatures, preferably between ⁇ 60° C. and 0° C., preferably between ⁇ 30 and ⁇ 10° C.
  • the physical absorption process is carried out by contacting the light products stream in a counter-current upward flow with the liquid absorbent.
  • the absorption process is preferably carried out in a continuous mode, in which the liquid absorbent is regenerated.
  • This regeneration process is well known to the man skilled in the art.
  • the loaded liquid absorbent is suitably regenerated by pressure release (e.g. a flashing operation) and/or temperature increase (e.g. a distillation process).
  • the regeneration is suitably carried out in two or more steps, preferably 3-10 steps, especially a combination of one or more flashing steps and a distillation step.
  • the regeneration of solvent from the process is also known in the art.
  • the present invention involves one integrated solvent regeneration tower.
  • the present invention may also involve one or more further removal systems, guards or scrubbing units, either as back-up or support to the CO 2 /H 2 S removal system, or to assist in the reduction and/or removal of other contaminants such as HCN, NH 3 , COS and H 2 S, metals, carbonyls, hydrides or other trace contaminants.
  • further removal systems guards or scrubbing units, either as back-up or support to the CO 2 /H 2 S removal system, or to assist in the reduction and/or removal of other contaminants such as HCN, NH 3 , COS and H 2 S, metals, carbonyls, hydrides or other trace contaminants.
  • the catalytic water shift conversion reaction provides a hydrogen enriched, often highly enriched, syngas, possibly having a H 2 /CO ratio above 3, more suitably above 5, preferably above 7, more preferably above 15, possibly 20 or even above.
  • the water shift conversion reaction is well known in the art. Generally, water, usually in the form of steam, is mixed with the syngas to form carbon dioxide and hydrogen.
  • the catalyst used can be any of the known catalysts for such a reaction, including iron, chromium, copper and zinc. Copper on zinc oxide is a known shift catalyst.
  • a very suitable source for the water required in the shift reaction is the product water produced in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. Preferably this is the main source, e.g. at least 80% is derived from the Fischer-Tropsch process, preferably at least 90%, more preferably 100%. Thus the need of an external water source is minimised.
  • a portion of the water shift converted sub-stream is used for hydrogen manufacture, such as in a Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA).
  • PSA Pressure Swing Adsorption
  • the proportion of the converted sub-stream used for such will generally be less than 10% by volume, preferably approximately 1-7% by volume.
  • the hydrogen manufactured in this way can then be used as the hydrogen source in the hydrocracking of the products provided by the hydrocarbon synthesis section. This arrangement reduces or even eliminates the need for a separate source of hydrogen, e.g. from an external supply, which is otherwise commonly used where available.
  • the carbonaceous fuel feedstock is able to provide a further reactant required in the overall process of coal to liquid products conversion, increasing the self-sufficiency of the overall process.
  • Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is well known to those skilled in the art and involves synthesis of hydrocarbons from a gaseous mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, by contacting that mixture at reaction conditions with a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst.
  • Products of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis may range from methane to heavy paraffinic waxes.
  • the production of methane is minimised and a substantial portion of the hydrocarbons produced have a carbon chain length of a least 5 carbon atoms.
  • the amount of C 5+ hydrocarbons is at least 60% by weight of the total product, more preferably, at least 70% by weight, even more preferably, at least 80% by weight, most preferably at least 85% by weight.
  • Reaction products which are liquid phase under reaction conditions may be physically separated Gas phase products such as light hydrocarbons and water may be removed using suitable means known to the person skilled in the art.
  • Fischer-Tropsch catalysts are known in the art, and typically include a Group VIII metal component, preferably cobalt, iron and/or ruthenium, more preferably cobalt.
  • the catalysts comprise a catalyst carrier.
  • the catalyst carrier is preferably porous, such as a porous inorganic refractory oxide, more preferably alumina, silica, titania, zirconia or mixtures thereof.
  • the optimum amount of catalytically active metal present on the carrier depends inter alia on the specific catalytically active metal.
  • the amount of cobalt present in the catalyst may range from 1 to 100 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of carrier material, preferably from 10 to 50 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of carrier material.
  • the catalytically active metal may be present in the catalyst together with one or more metal promoters or co-catalysts.
  • the promoters may be present as metals or as the metal oxide, depending upon the particular promoter concerned. Suitable promoters include oxides of metals from Groups IIA, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB and/or VIIB of the Periodic Table, oxides of the lanthanides and/or the actinides.
  • the catalyst comprises at least one of an element in Group IVB, VB and/or VIIB of the Periodic Table, in particular titanium, zirconium, maganese and/or vanadium.
  • the catalyst may comprise a metal promoter selected from Groups VIIB and/or VIII of the Periodic Table. Preferred metal promoters include rhenium, platinum and palladium.
  • a most suitable catalyst comprises cobalt as the catalytically active metal and zirconium as a promoter.
  • Another most suitable catalyst comprises cobalt as the catalytically active metal and manganese and/or vanadium as a promoter.
  • the promoter if present in the catalyst, is typically present in an amount of from 0.1 to 60 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of carrier material. It will however be appreciated that the optimum amount of promoter may vary for the respective elements which act as promoter. If the catalyst comprises cobalt as the catalytically active metal and manganese and/or vanadium as promoter, the cobalt:(manganese+vanadium) atomic ratio is advantageously at least 12:1.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is preferably carried out at a temperature in the range from 125 to 350° C., more preferably 175 to 275° C., most preferably 200 to 260° C.
  • the pressure preferably ranges from 5 to 150 bar abs., more preferably from 5 to 80 bar abs.
  • the gaseous hourly space velocity may vary within wide ranges and is typically in the range from 800 to 10000 Nl/l/h, preferably in the range from 2500 to 7500 Nl/l/h.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis may be carried out in a slurry phase regime or an ebullating bed regime, wherein the catalyst particles are kept in suspension by an upward superficial gas and/or liquid velocity.
  • a fixed bed Fischer-Tropsch process is used, especially a multi-tubular fixed bed.
  • a multi-tubular fixed bed reactor usually comprises a normally substantially vertically extending vessel, a plurality of open-ended reactor tubes arranged in the vessel parallel to its central longitudinal axis of which the upper ends are fixed to an upper tube plate and in fluid communication with a fluid inlet chamber above the upper tube plate and of which the lower ends are fixed to a lower tube plate and in fluid communication with an effluent collecting chamber below the lower tube plate, optionally liquid supply means for supplying liquid to the fluid inlet chamber, gas supply means for supplying gas to the fluid inlet chamber, and an effluent outlet arranged in the effluent collecting chamber.
  • the upper ends of the reactor tubes are provided with tubes extending through the upper tube plate and/or through the bottom of a horizontal tray arranged above the upper tube plate.
  • the reactor tubes are filled with catalyst particles.
  • synthesis gas is supplied through the fluid inlet chamber into the upper ends of the reactor tubes and passed through the reactor tubes. Effluents leaving the lower ends of the reactor tubes are collected in the effluent collecting chamber and removed from the effluent collecting chamber through the effluent outlet.
  • liquid may be recycled over the reactor tubes. Liquid leaving the lower ends of the reactor tubes is collected in the effluent collecting chamber and removed from the effluent collecting chamber through the effluent outlet.
  • the heat of reaction is removed by a heat transfer fluid which is passed along the outer surfaces of the reactor tubes.
  • Such a multi-tube reactor can also be used for the catalytic conversion of a liquid in the presence of a gas.
  • a commercial multi-tube reactor for such processes suitably will have a diameter of about 5 or 7 m and between about 5000 reactor tubes with a diameter of about 45 mm to 15 000 reactor tubes with a diameter of about 25 mm.
  • the length of a reactor tube will be about 10 to 15 m.
  • the hydrocarbon synthesis section may be a single stage or multi-stage process, each stage having one or more reactors.
  • the hydrogen enriched conversion sub-stream could be combined with syngas prior to one or more of the stages, either directly or indirectly.
  • the method of the present invention can provide a syngas with a H 2 /CO ratio more suitable for efficient hydrocarbon synthesis carried out on a given catalyst, such as in one or more Fischer-Tropsch reactors, as well as being able to accommodate variation in the H 2 /CO ratio of syngas formed from different qualities of feedstock fuels.
  • a given catalyst such as in one or more Fischer-Tropsch reactors
  • one ore more sub-streams may be used for the production of high H 2 /CO ratio syngas, e.g. for use as additional feed for a second, third etc. stage in the Fischer-Tropsch process, or for the manufacture of hydrogen.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A method of increasing the hydrogen/carbon monoxide (H2/CO) ratio in a syngas stream derived from a carbonaceous fuel including coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions, preferably coal. The fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into at least two sub-streams, one of which undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction. The so-obtained converted sub-stream is combined with the non-converted sub-stream(s) to form a second syngas stream with an increased H2/CO ratio. The method of the present invention can provide a syngas with a H2/CO ratio more suitable for efficient hydrocarbon synthesis carried out on a given catalyst, such as in one or more Fischer-Tropsch reactors, as well as being able to accommodate variation in the H2/CO ratio of syngas formed from different qualities of feedstock fuels.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO EARLIER APPLICATION
  • The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/794,515 filed Jun. 28, 2007, which is a 35 U.S.C. §371 national stage filing of PCT/EP2005/057217, filed Dec. 29, 2005, which claims priority of European application no. 04107067.3, filed Dec. 30, 2004.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to improvements relating to coal and other heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks to liquid processes, particularly but not exclusively Fischer-Tropsch processes.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The Fischer-Tropsch process can be used for the conversion of hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks into liquid and/or solid hydrocarbons. The feedstock (e.g. natural gas, associated gas, coal-bed methane, heavy oil residues, coal) is converted in a first step into a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide (this mixture is often referred to as synthesis gas or syngas). The synthesis gas is then fed into a reactor where it is converted over a suitable catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure into paraffinic compounds ranging from methane to high molecular weight molecules comprising up to 200 carbon atoms, or, under particular circumstances, even more. Examples of the Fischer-Tropsch process are described in e.g. WO 02/02489, WO 01/76736, WO 02/07882, EP 510771 and EP 450861.
  • Numerous types of reactor systems have been developed for carrying out the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. For example, Fischer-Tropsch reactor systems include fixed bed reactors, especially multi-tubular fixed bed reactors, fluidised bed reactors, such as entrained fluidised bed reactors and fixed fluidised bed reactors, and slurry bed reactors such as three-phase slurry bubble columns and ebulated bed reactors.
  • As mentioned above, “coal” and heavy oil residues are examples of feedstocks for the Fischer-Tropsch process. However, there are many solid or very heavy (viscous) fossil fuels which may be used as feedstock for the process, including solid fuels such as anthracite, brown coal, bitumous coal, sub-bitumous coal, lignite, petroleum coke, peat and the like, and heavy residues, e.g. hydrocarbons extracted from tar sands, residues from refineries such as residual oil fractions boiling above 360° C., especially above 550° C., more especially above 750° C., directly derived from crude oil, or from oil conversion processes such as thermal cracking, catalytic cracking, hydrocracking etc. All such types of fuels have different levels of ‘quality’, that is the proportions of carbon and hydrogen, as well as substances regarded as ‘impurities’, generally sulphur and sulphur-based compounds, nitrogen containing compounds, heavy metals etc.
  • Gasification of solid carbonaceous fuels such as coal is well known, and generally involves milling or otherwise grinding the fuel to a preferred size or size range, followed by heating the fuel with oxygen in a gasifier. This creates the mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide referred to as syngas. However, the proportion of carbon and hydrogen in solid carbonaceous fuels is generally such that the hydrogen/carbon monoxide (H2/CO) ratio in the syngas formed is generally less than 1, whereas Fischer-Tropsch processes based on cobalt-catalysts generally desire a H2/CO ratio in the syngas to the synthesis reactor from 1.5 to 2.0, frequently 1.6-1.8. Higher ratio syngases are also desired for other parts or sections of a Fischer-Tropsch plant: some parts may desire a substantially pure hydrogen stream, that is, a very high H2/CO ratio. Further in the case that the Fischer-Tropsch process comprises two or more stages, additional hydrogen is needed between these stages. The additional hydrogen may be pure hydrogen, but, preferably, is syngas having a high H2/CO ratio.
  • It is an object of the present invention to increase the H2/CO ratio in the syngas derived from a range of carbonaceous fuels ready for hydrocarbon synthesis processes such as the Fischer-Tropsch reaction.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a method of increasing the hydrogen/carbon monoxide (H2/CO) ratio in a syngas stream derived from a solid carbonaceous fuel, wherein the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into at least two sub-streams, one of which undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction, and the so-obtained converted sub-stream is combined with a non-converted sub-stream(s) to form a syngas stream having an increased H2/CO ratio of between 1.1 and 1.95.
  • The present invention also provides a process for the preparation of a hydrogen-enriched syngas derived from a carbonaceous fuel as herein defined, wherein a portion of the syngas undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction. Preferably the portion of syngas undergoing this shift conversion reaction is in the range 30-70% by volume of the syngas.
  • The present invention also provides syngas whenever prepared by a method or process as herein described.
  • The present invention also provides a hydrocarbonaceous product whenever produced by the use of syngas as herein described, including any products made by hydroconversion of the hydrocarbonaceous products.
  • According to one embodiment of the present invention, the present invention provides a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel, comprising the steps of:
    • gasifying the carbonaceous fuel with a supply of oxygen to provide syngas; removing solids from the syngas;
    • dividing the syngas into at least two sub-streams, one of which undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction;
    • combining said sub-streams to provide a syngas having an increased H2/CO ratio; feeding said combined syngas to a hydrocarbon synthesis section to produce the hydrocarbons.
  • Preferably, the syngas, either in its combined form, or each substream, or both, undergoes a CO2/H2S removal or treatment step prior to the hydrocarbon synthesis section.
  • The invention further provides a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel, comprising the steps of:
    • gasifying the carbonaceous fuel with a supply of oxygen to provide syngas;
    • removing solids from the syngas;
    • dividing the syngas into at least three sub-streams, two of which undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction;
    • combining two sub-streams to provide a syngas having an increased H2/CO ratio; feeding said combined syngas into a hydrocarbon synthesis section to produce the hydrocarbons, in which the hydrocarbon synthesis process comprises at least 2 or 3 stages, wherein the third, shifted gas-stream is used as additional feed for the further stages. In the above process the two sub-streams for the catalytic water shift conversion may also be shifted together, followed by a separation step.
  • In any of the above, the carbonaceous fuel may include coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions, preferably coal.
  • Without wishing to be restricted to a particular embodiment, the invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a first arrangement for the method of the present invention, and
  • FIG. 2 is of a flow diagram of a second arrangement of the method of the present.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • For the purpose of the present specification, the term carbonaceous fuel includes coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions, preferably coal.
  • The H2/CO ratio in syngas formed by gasification of most types of carbonaceous fuels defined herein is generally about or less than 1, and is commonly about 0.3-0.6 for coal-derived syngas, and 0.5-0.9 for heavy residue-derived syngas. It is possible to use such a H2/CO ratio in a Fischer-Tropsch process, but more satisfactory results can be achieved by increasing the H2/CO ratio.
  • The present invention allows for the increase of the H2/CO ratio in the syngas to a ratio, which is known to provide more satisfactory results during the synthesis step, especially higher quality and higher selectivity of the hydroconversion synthesis. Preferably the H2/CO ratio in the second syngas stream formed by the combination of the sub-streams is greater than 1.5, preferably in the range 1.6-1.9, and more preferably in the range 1.6-1.8. It is observed that for the establishment of the combined H2/CO ratio any premixing of the two streams should be disregarded. Thus, in the case of recycling any gas streams comprising unconverted syngas, e.g. from the Fischer-Tropsch process, the influence of the H2 and CO in the recycle stream should not be taken into account.
  • The present invention allows for the division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into any number of streams, more than one of which could undergo a catalytic water shift conversion reaction. In the simplest arrangement, the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into two sub-streams, one of which undergoes the conversion reaction.
  • If desired or necessary, some of the non-converted sub-stream(s)could be used for other parts of the hydrocarbon conversion process rather than being combined with the converted sub-stream(s), e.g. for a second, third etc. stage in the Fischer-Tropsch process, for steam or power generation, or for the manufacture of hydrogen.
  • The division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into sub-streams can be such so as to create any desired H2/CO ratio following their recombination. Any degree or amount of division of the fuel-derived syngas stream is possible. Where the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into two sub-streams, the division into the sub-streams could be in the range 80:20 to 20:80 by volume, preferably 70:30 to 30:70 by volume, depending upon the desired final H2/CO ratio. Simple analysis of the H2/CO ratios in the fuel-derived syngas stream and knowledge of the desired ratio in the combined syngas stream allows easy calculation of the division. In the case that one stream is to be used as feed for e.g. the second stage of a Fischer-Tropsch process, this stream will usually be between 10 and 50%, preferably between 20 and 35% of the stream which is catalytically shifted. In that case there are three stream, the two main streams in the range 80:20 to 20:80 by volume and one stream 10 to 50% of one of the earlier two streams.
  • The simple ability to change the degree of division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into the sub-streams also provides a simple but effective means of accommodating variation in the H2/CO ratio in the fuel-derived syngas stream, primarily due to variation in feedstock quality, i.e. the hydrogen and carbon content of the original fuel, for example, the ‘grade’ of coal. Certain grades of coal generally having a higher carbon content, but a high carbon content, will, after gasification of the coal, provide a greater production of carbon monoxide, and thus a lower H2/CO ratio. However, using other grades of coal means removing more contaminants or unwanted parts of the coal, such as ash and sulphur and sulphur-based compounds. It is observed that it also possible to divide the original syngas stream into two streams, followed by a catalytic shift of one of the streams, followed by further division of the shifted stream, e.g. one for combining with the other stream, one for use as additional feed in the second stage and one for the preparation of hydrogen.
  • The ability to change the degree of division of the fuel-derived syngas stream into the sub-streams allows the present invention to be used with a variety of fuel feedstocks, generally ‘raw’ coal, without any significant re-engineering of the process or equipment to accommodate expected or unexpected variation in such coals.
  • Turning to FIG. 1, there is shown a process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from coal. This starts with the gasification of coal with oxygen to form a syngas stream, followed by removal of solids such as slag and the like. The fuel-derived syngas stream is then divided into two streams. One forms a ‘by-pass’ stream, which passes through a CO2/H2S removal system labelled ‘AGR 2’ followed by one or more guard beds and/or scrubbing units, either as backup or support to the CO2/H2S removal system, or to assist in the reduction and/or removal of other contaminants such as HCN, NH3, COS and H2S, etc.
  • The other stream of syngas passes into a sour shift unit to undergo a catalytic water shift conversion reaction wherein the H2/CO ratio is significantly increased, optionally in a manner known in the art. The gas stream from the sour shift unit then undergoes the same or similar CO2/H2S removal using unit ‘AGR 1’, followed by the same or similar guard beds as the other syngas stream.
  • The shifted syngas stream is then re-combined with the non-converted syngas stream prior to their entry into a heavy paraffin synthesis process, which may involve one or more reactors or units in one or more stages. The products provided by the HPS can then be worked up in a manner known in the art to provide distillates, such as middle distillates.
  • FIG. 1 shows the possible use of a part of the shifted syngas stream into a pressure swing adsorption unit, wherein the shifted syngas is converted to provide a hydrogen enhanced stream, which stream can then be used in the hydrocracking in the product workup.
  • FIG. 2 shows a similar process to FIG. 1. However, in the process shown in FIG. 2, the AGR 1 unit provides the CO2/H2S cleaning of the syngas stream prior to division. After the AGR and guard beds, the syngas stream is then divided, such that part of the stream by-passes directly towards the HPS stage. Meanwhile, the other divided syngas stream undergoes a sweet shift conversion, followed by subsequent CO2/H2S cleaning in unit ‘AGR 3’, which should not need to treat for H2S. The converted sweet shift stream can then be wholly or substantially combined with the non-converted by-pass stream to provide a syngas stream entering the HPS stage with an enhanced the H2/CO ratio as desired.
  • Like FIG. 1, a part of the shifted stream could be supplied to a PSA unit for the provision of an enchanced hydrogen stream.
  • The gasification of coal is well known in the art. Generally, the coal is milled to a desired particle size or particle size range, before being transported to a gasifier. The gasifier requires the input of an oxygen stream. One source of oxygen could be an air separation unit, which divides air into its nitrogen and oxygen components.
  • According to one embodiment of the present invention, the nitrogen component from an air separation unit is admixed with the carbonaceous fuel feedstock, either prior to, during and/or after milling. Alternatively, or additionally, carbon dioxide gas, such as that derived from some part of the processed described herein, could be admixed with the fuel feedstock, either prior to, during and/or after milling.
  • In this way, the nitrogen or carbon dioxide assists in transport of such a feedstock to the gasifier by ‘fluidising’ the feedstock bed.
  • The method of the present invention especially concerns a Fischer-Tropsch process which comprises two or more stages to convert the synthesis gas into hydrocarbonaceous products. In principle it is possible to convert the syngas in one stage into hydrocarbons, however, it is more efficient to use two or more stages, preferably two or three stages, more preferably two stages. For instance, two stages in each of which the CO-conversion is 80%, results in a total CO-conversion of 96%. In the case that the H2/CO ratio to the first stage is below the consumption ratio (in general 2.05), e.g. when the H2/CO ratio to the first stage is below 1.95, e.g. between 1.3-1.9, especially between 1.6-1.8, the H2/CO ratio of the feedstream to the second feedstream, i.e. the H2/CO ratio of the product stream has been decreased considerably. It is especially suitably to send at least a part, preferably between 5 and 50% vol, more preferably between 10 and 40% vol, even more preferably between 15 and 35% vol of the shifted stream to the further stages in the Fischer-Tropsch process, especially to the second and third stage, more especially to the second stage. In a further preferred embodiment part of the unconverted syngas in the product stream is recirculated to the feedstream. Preferably 30-95 vol % is recirculated, more preferably 50-80 vol %. The CO conversion per pass is suitably between 30 and 65%. The total CO conversion per stage is suitably between 60 and 95%, preferably between 70 and 90%. The weight ratio recirculation gas: fresh synthesis gas is suitably between 0.2:1.0 till 4.0:1.0, preferably between 0.5:1.0 till 3.0:1.0, more preferably between 1.0:1.0 till 2.0:1.0. In this way an optimum C5+ selectivity is obtained in an optimum sized reactor. In general, for each reactor in a further stage there are 1 to 10 reactors in the previous stage, preferably 2 to 8, more preferably 3 to 6. Thus, a three stage Fischer-Tropsch process could comprise 12 reactors in the first stage, 4 in the second stage and 1 in the third stage.
  • Preferably, the syngas still passes through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide (CO2/H2S) removal system, as the fuel-derived stream, the combined stream, and/or one or more, possibly all, of the sub-streams. The removal system may involve one or more removal units. Preferably, at least one such unit is located downstream from the conversion reaction, as carbon dioxide is a product thereof.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, a CO2/H2S removal unit is located in the path of each sub-stream.
  • The CO2/H2S removal system preferably uses a physical solvent process, especially methanol or sulfolan, preferably methanol. This process is based on carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide being highly soluble under pressure in the solvent, and then being readily releasable from solution when the pressure is reduced as further discussed below. This high pressure system is preferred due to its efficiency, although other removal systems such as using amines are known.
  • It is preferred to remove at least 80 vol %, preferably at least 90 vol %, more preferably at least 95 vol % and at most 99.5 vol %, of the carbon dioxide present in the catalytically shifted syngas stream. This avoids the build-up of inerts in the Fischer-Tropsch process.
  • On an industrial scale there are chiefly two categories of absorbent solvents, depending on the mechanism to absorb the acidic components: chemical solvents and physical solvents. Each solvent has its own advantages and disadvantages as to features as loading capacity, kinetics, regenerability, selectivity, stability, corrosivity, heat/cooling requirements etc.
  • Chemical solvents which have proved to be industrially useful are primary, secondary and/or tertiary amines derived alkanolamines. The most frequently used amines are derived from ethanolamine, especially monoethanol amine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), triethanolamine (TEA), diisopropanolamine (DIPA) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA).
  • Physical solvents which have proved to be industrially suitable are cyclo-tetramethylenesulfone and its derivatives, aliphatic acid amides, N-methylpyrrolidone, N-alkylated pyrrolidones and the corresponding piperidones, methanol, ethanol and mixtures of dialkylethers of polyethylene glycols.
  • A well-known commercial process uses an aqueous mixture of a chemical solvent, especially DIPA and/or MDEA, and a physical solvent, especially cyclotetramethylene-sulfone. Such systems show good absorption capacity and good selectivity against moderate investment costs and operational costs. They perform very well at high pressures, especially between 20 and 90 bara.
  • The physical adsorption process useable in the present invention is well known to the man skilled in the art. Reference can be made to e.g. Perry, Chemical Engineerings' Handbook, Chapter 14, Gas Absorption. The absorption process useable in the present process is a physical process. Suitable solvents are well known to the man skilled in the art and are described in the literature. In the present process the liquid absorbent in the physical absorption process is suitably methanol, ethanol, acetone, dimethyl ether, methyl i-propyl ether, polyethylene glycol or xylene, preferably methanol. The physical absorption process is suitably carried out at low temperatures, preferably between −60° C. and 0° C., preferably between −30 and −10° C.
  • The physical absorption process is carried out by contacting the light products stream in a counter-current upward flow with the liquid absorbent. The absorption process is preferably carried out in a continuous mode, in which the liquid absorbent is regenerated. This regeneration process is well known to the man skilled in the art. The loaded liquid absorbent is suitably regenerated by pressure release (e.g. a flashing operation) and/or temperature increase (e.g. a distillation process). The regeneration is suitably carried out in two or more steps, preferably 3-10 steps, especially a combination of one or more flashing steps and a distillation step.
  • The regeneration of solvent from the process is also known in the art. Preferably, the present invention involves one integrated solvent regeneration tower.
  • The present invention may also involve one or more further removal systems, guards or scrubbing units, either as back-up or support to the CO2/H2S removal system, or to assist in the reduction and/or removal of other contaminants such as HCN, NH3, COS and H2S, metals, carbonyls, hydrides or other trace contaminants.
  • The catalytic water shift conversion reaction provides a hydrogen enriched, often highly enriched, syngas, possibly having a H2/CO ratio above 3, more suitably above 5, preferably above 7, more preferably above 15, possibly 20 or even above.
  • The water shift conversion reaction is well known in the art. Generally, water, usually in the form of steam, is mixed with the syngas to form carbon dioxide and hydrogen. The catalyst used can be any of the known catalysts for such a reaction, including iron, chromium, copper and zinc. Copper on zinc oxide is a known shift catalyst. A very suitable source for the water required in the shift reaction is the product water produced in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. Preferably this is the main source, e.g. at least 80% is derived from the Fischer-Tropsch process, preferably at least 90%, more preferably 100%. Thus the need of an external water source is minimised.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, a portion of the water shift converted sub-stream is used for hydrogen manufacture, such as in a Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA). The proportion of the converted sub-stream used for such will generally be less than 10% by volume, preferably approximately 1-7% by volume. The hydrogen manufactured in this way can then be used as the hydrogen source in the hydrocracking of the products provided by the hydrocarbon synthesis section. This arrangement reduces or even eliminates the need for a separate source of hydrogen, e.g. from an external supply, which is otherwise commonly used where available. Thus, the carbonaceous fuel feedstock is able to provide a further reactant required in the overall process of coal to liquid products conversion, increasing the self-sufficiency of the overall process.
  • One hydrocarbon synthesis process is the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is well known to those skilled in the art and involves synthesis of hydrocarbons from a gaseous mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, by contacting that mixture at reaction conditions with a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst.
  • Products of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis may range from methane to heavy paraffinic waxes. Preferably, the production of methane is minimised and a substantial portion of the hydrocarbons produced have a carbon chain length of a least 5 carbon atoms. Preferably, the amount of C5+ hydrocarbons is at least 60% by weight of the total product, more preferably, at least 70% by weight, even more preferably, at least 80% by weight, most preferably at least 85% by weight. Reaction products which are liquid phase under reaction conditions may be physically separated Gas phase products such as light hydrocarbons and water may be removed using suitable means known to the person skilled in the art.
  • Fischer-Tropsch catalysts are known in the art, and typically include a Group VIII metal component, preferably cobalt, iron and/or ruthenium, more preferably cobalt. Typically, the catalysts comprise a catalyst carrier. The catalyst carrier is preferably porous, such as a porous inorganic refractory oxide, more preferably alumina, silica, titania, zirconia or mixtures thereof.
  • The optimum amount of catalytically active metal present on the carrier depends inter alia on the specific catalytically active metal. Typically, the amount of cobalt present in the catalyst may range from 1 to 100 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of carrier material, preferably from 10 to 50 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of carrier material.
  • The catalytically active metal may be present in the catalyst together with one or more metal promoters or co-catalysts. The promoters may be present as metals or as the metal oxide, depending upon the particular promoter concerned. Suitable promoters include oxides of metals from Groups IIA, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIB and/or VIIB of the Periodic Table, oxides of the lanthanides and/or the actinides. Preferably, the catalyst comprises at least one of an element in Group IVB, VB and/or VIIB of the Periodic Table, in particular titanium, zirconium, maganese and/or vanadium. As an alternative or in addition to the metal oxide promoter, the catalyst may comprise a metal promoter selected from Groups VIIB and/or VIII of the Periodic Table. Preferred metal promoters include rhenium, platinum and palladium.
  • Reference to “Groups” and the “Periodic Table” as used herein relate to the “previous IUPAC form” of the Periodic Table such as that described in the 68th edition of the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CPC Press).
  • A most suitable catalyst comprises cobalt as the catalytically active metal and zirconium as a promoter. Another most suitable catalyst comprises cobalt as the catalytically active metal and manganese and/or vanadium as a promoter.
  • The promoter, if present in the catalyst, is typically present in an amount of from 0.1 to 60 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of carrier material. It will however be appreciated that the optimum amount of promoter may vary for the respective elements which act as promoter. If the catalyst comprises cobalt as the catalytically active metal and manganese and/or vanadium as promoter, the cobalt:(manganese+vanadium) atomic ratio is advantageously at least 12:1.
  • The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis is preferably carried out at a temperature in the range from 125 to 350° C., more preferably 175 to 275° C., most preferably 200 to 260° C. The pressure preferably ranges from 5 to 150 bar abs., more preferably from 5 to 80 bar abs.
  • Hydrogen and carbon monoxide (synthesis gas) is typically fed to the three-phase slurry reactor at a molar ratio in the range from 0.4 to 2.5. Preferably, the hydrogen to carbon monoxide molar ratio is in the range from 1.0 to 1.9 using either directly the syngas or using a recycle.
  • The gaseous hourly space velocity may vary within wide ranges and is typically in the range from 800 to 10000 Nl/l/h, preferably in the range from 2500 to 7500 Nl/l/h.
  • The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis may be carried out in a slurry phase regime or an ebullating bed regime, wherein the catalyst particles are kept in suspension by an upward superficial gas and/or liquid velocity.
  • It will be understood that the skilled person is capable to select the most appropriate conditions for a specific reactor configuration and reaction regime.
  • In a more preferred embodiment a fixed bed Fischer-Tropsch process is used, especially a multi-tubular fixed bed. Such a multi-tubular fixed bed reactor usually comprises a normally substantially vertically extending vessel, a plurality of open-ended reactor tubes arranged in the vessel parallel to its central longitudinal axis of which the upper ends are fixed to an upper tube plate and in fluid communication with a fluid inlet chamber above the upper tube plate and of which the lower ends are fixed to a lower tube plate and in fluid communication with an effluent collecting chamber below the lower tube plate, optionally liquid supply means for supplying liquid to the fluid inlet chamber, gas supply means for supplying gas to the fluid inlet chamber, and an effluent outlet arranged in the effluent collecting chamber.
  • The upper ends of the reactor tubes are provided with tubes extending through the upper tube plate and/or through the bottom of a horizontal tray arranged above the upper tube plate.
  • During normal operation the reactor tubes are filled with catalyst particles. To convert for example synthesis gas into hydrocarbons, synthesis gas is supplied through the fluid inlet chamber into the upper ends of the reactor tubes and passed through the reactor tubes. Effluents leaving the lower ends of the reactor tubes are collected in the effluent collecting chamber and removed from the effluent collecting chamber through the effluent outlet.
  • To distribute the heat of reaction generated during the conversion uniformly over the reactor tubes, and to improve heat transfer from the interiors of said tubes to the inner walls of the reactor tubes, liquid may be recycled over the reactor tubes. Liquid leaving the lower ends of the reactor tubes is collected in the effluent collecting chamber and removed from the effluent collecting chamber through the effluent outlet.
  • The heat of reaction is removed by a heat transfer fluid which is passed along the outer surfaces of the reactor tubes.
  • Such a multi-tube reactor can also be used for the catalytic conversion of a liquid in the presence of a gas.
  • A commercial multi-tube reactor for such processes suitably will have a diameter of about 5 or 7 m and between about 5000 reactor tubes with a diameter of about 45 mm to 15 000 reactor tubes with a diameter of about 25 mm. The length of a reactor tube will be about 10 to 15 m.
  • The hydrocarbon synthesis section may be a single stage or multi-stage process, each stage having one or more reactors. In a multi-stage process, the hydrogen enriched conversion sub-stream could be combined with syngas prior to one or more of the stages, either directly or indirectly.
  • The method of the present invention can provide a syngas with a H2/CO ratio more suitable for efficient hydrocarbon synthesis carried out on a given catalyst, such as in one or more Fischer-Tropsch reactors, as well as being able to accommodate variation in the H2/CO ratio of syngas formed from different qualities of feedstock fuels. In addition, one ore more sub-streams may be used for the production of high H2/CO ratio syngas, e.g. for use as additional feed for a second, third etc. stage in the Fischer-Tropsch process, or for the manufacture of hydrogen.

Claims (27)

What is claimed is:
1. A process for the preparation of hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas derived from a carbonaceous fuel, comprising:
providing a fuel-derived syngas stream;
dividing the fuel-derived syngas stream into at least two sub-streams;
letting one of the at least two sub-streams undergo a catalytic water shift conversion reaction followed by passing the converted stream through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system to obtain a converted and cleaned sub-stream;
passing the other stream(s) through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system to obtain a cleaned non-converted sub-stream(s);
combining the obtained converted and cleaned sub-stream with the cleaned non-converted sub-stream(s) to form a hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas stream having an increased H2/CO ratio of between 1.4 and 1.95.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the H2/CO ratio in the fuel-derived syngas stream is less than 1.
3. The process of claim 1, wherein the H2/CO ratio in the hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas stream is greater than 1.5.
4. The process of claim 1, wherein the H2/CO ratio in the hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas stream is in the range 1.6-1.9.
5. The process of claim 1, wherein the H2/CO ratio in the hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas stream is in the range 1.6-1.8.
6. The process of claim 1, wherein the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into two sub-streams.
7. The process of claim 6, wherein the ratio of fuel-derived syngas stream divided into the shift conversion sub-stream and other sub-stream is in the range 70:30 to 30:70 by volume.
8. The process of claim 1, wherein a portion of the converted sub-stream is used for manufacture of hydrogen.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein the portion of the converted sub-stream used for the manufacture of hydrogen is less than 10% by volume.
10. The process of claim 8, wherein the portion of the converted sub-stream used for the manufacture of hydrogen is approximately 1-7% by volume.
11. The process of claim 1, wherein the carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system uses a physical solvent process.
12. The process of claim 11, wherein the physical solvent process comprises a rectisol process.
13. The process of claim 1, wherein the carbonaceous fuel includes one or more of coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions.
14. The process of claim 1, wherein the carbonaceous fuel includes coal.
15. Syngas whenever prepared by the process of claim 1.
16. A Fischer-Tropsch process using the syngas of claim 15.
17. The Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 16, wherein the Fischer-Tropsch process is a multi-stage Fischer-Tropsch process.
18. The Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 17, wherein the catalytically shifted syngas sub-stream is used as feed for a first of the multi-stage Fischer-Tropsch process and as an additional feed for a further stage in the Fischer-Tropsch process.
19. The Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 12, wherein the Fischer-Tropsch process is a two-stage process.
20. A hydrocarbonaceous product, whenever produced by the Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 12.
21. A hydrocarbonaceous product including any product made by hydroconversion of the hydrocarbonaceous product of claim 20.
22. A process for hydrocracking of a hydrocarboneceous product, comprising
(a) providing a hydrocarbonaceous product obtained by performing a Fischer-Tropsch process on a hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas derived from a carbonaceous fuel, obtained from a process wherein:
a fuel-derived syngas stream is provided;
the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into at least two sub-streams;
one of the at least two sub-streams undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction followed by passing the converted stream through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system to obtain a converted and cleaned sub-stream;
the other stream(s) is (are) passed through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system to obtain a cleaned non-converted sub-stream(s);
the obtained converted and cleaned sub-stream is combined with the cleaned non-converted sub-stream(s) to form a hydrogen-enriched fuel-derived syngas stream having an increased H2/CO ratio of between 1.4 and 1.95;
(b) using a portion of the converted sub-stream from (a) to produce hydrogen;
(c) hydrocracking the hydrocarbonaceous product as provided in (a) using the hydrogen as provided in (b) for the cracking stream.
23. The process of claim 22, wherein the carbonaceous fuel includes one or more of coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions.
24. The process of claim 22, wherein the carbonaceous fuel includes coal.
25. A syngas derived from a carbonaceous fuel, wherein the hydrogen/carbon monoxide (H2/CO) ratio has been increased according to a method wherein
the fuel-derived syngas stream is divided into at least two sub-streams;
one of which undergoes a catalytic water shift conversion reaction where after the converted stream passes through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system;
the other stream(s) is (are) passed through a carbon dioxide/hydrogen sulphide removal system; and
the obtained converted and cleaned sub-stream is combined with the cleaned, non-converted sub-stream(s) to form a syngas stream having an increased H2/CO ratio of between 1.4 and 1.95.
26. The process of claim 25, wherein the carbonaceous fuel includes one or more of coal, brown coal, peat, and heavy residual oil fractions.
27. The process of claim 25, wherein the carbonaceous fuel includes coal.
US14/108,583 2004-12-30 2013-12-17 Relating to coal to liquid processes Abandoned US20140102943A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/108,583 US20140102943A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2013-12-17 Relating to coal to liquid processes

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04107067 2004-12-30
EP04107067.3 2004-12-30
PCT/EP2005/057217 WO2006070018A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2005-12-29 Improvements relating to coal to liquid processes
US79451507A 2007-06-28 2007-06-28
US14/108,583 US20140102943A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2013-12-17 Relating to coal to liquid processes

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/794,515 Division US8641790B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2005-12-29 Process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel
PCT/EP2005/057217 Division WO2006070018A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2005-12-29 Improvements relating to coal to liquid processes

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140102943A1 true US20140102943A1 (en) 2014-04-17

Family

ID=34930195

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/794,515 Active 2030-04-15 US8641790B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2005-12-29 Process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel
US14/108,583 Abandoned US20140102943A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2013-12-17 Relating to coal to liquid processes

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/794,515 Active 2030-04-15 US8641790B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2005-12-29 Process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US8641790B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1836283B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101094910A (en)
AU (1) AU2005321253B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2592599A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006070018A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200704702B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10118824B2 (en) 2013-12-17 2018-11-06 Avril Process for purifying synthesis gas by washing with aqueous solutions of amines

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2007231719B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2012-02-02 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Solid carbonaceous feed to liquid process
EP1939138A1 (en) * 2006-12-08 2008-07-02 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. A process of increasing the hydrogen/carbon monoxide molar ratio in a synthesis gas
CN101220288A (en) * 2006-12-30 2008-07-16 亚申科技研发中心(上海)有限公司 Liquefaction method for integrating moulded coal
CN101270294A (en) * 2006-12-30 2008-09-24 亚申科技研发中心(上海)有限公司 Liquefaction method for integrating moulded coal
ATE515477T1 (en) 2007-11-20 2011-07-15 Shell Int Research METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PURIFIED SYNTHESIS GAS STREAM
GB0805020D0 (en) 2008-03-18 2008-04-16 Al Chalabi Rifat Active reformer
US20090239960A1 (en) * 2008-03-24 2009-09-24 Paul Steven Wallace Methods and systems for fischer tropsch reactor low product variation
CN101659879B (en) * 2008-08-25 2013-10-02 杭州林达化工技术工程有限公司 Chemical-electric poly-generation method and equipment
WO2010057222A2 (en) * 2008-11-17 2010-05-20 William Rollins High efficiency power generation integrated with chemical processes
CN102264679B (en) 2008-12-22 2014-07-23 国际壳牌研究有限公司 Process to prepare methanol and/or dimethylether
JP2012522089A (en) * 2009-03-30 2012-09-20 シエル・インターナシヨナル・リサーチ・マートスハツペイ・ベー・ヴエー Method for generating a purified syngas stream
EP2236457A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-06 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for producing a purified synthesis gas
CA2756139A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-28 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for producing purified synthesis gas
AU2010230279B2 (en) * 2009-03-30 2013-10-10 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for producing purified synthesis gas
KR101752510B1 (en) 2009-06-30 2017-06-29 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. Process to prepare a hydrogen rich gas mixture
CN101781576A (en) * 2010-03-03 2010-07-21 北京国力源高分子科技研发中心 Method for preparing liquid fuel by carbon dioxide
US8268266B2 (en) * 2010-08-10 2012-09-18 General Electric Company System for heat integration within a gas processing section
US9193926B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2015-11-24 Uop Llc Fuel compositions and methods based on biomass pyrolysis
US9039790B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2015-05-26 Uop Llc Hydroprocessing of fats, oils, and waxes to produce low carbon footprint distillate fuels
CN102616737A (en) * 2011-01-30 2012-08-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Preparation method of synthetic gas required by glycol synthesis
US9677005B1 (en) 2011-06-21 2017-06-13 Emerging Fuels Technology, Inc. Integrated fuel processing with biomass oil
US9676678B1 (en) 2011-06-21 2017-06-13 Emerging Fuels Technology, Inc. Renewable fuels co-processing
CN103030111A (en) * 2011-10-09 2013-04-10 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Preparation method of synthetic gas needed by methanol production
US9163180B2 (en) * 2011-12-07 2015-10-20 IFP Energies Nouvelles Process for the conversion of carbon-based material by a hybrid route combining direct liquefaction and indirect liquefaction in the presence of hydrogen resulting from non-fossil resources
WO2014039095A1 (en) * 2012-09-07 2014-03-13 Afognak Native Corporation Systems and processes for producing liquid transportation fuels
CN104593037B (en) * 2014-12-19 2016-06-08 中美新能源技术研发(山西)有限公司 A kind of method of combined type coal hydrogenation oil refining reactor and oil refining
DE102015014683A1 (en) * 2015-11-12 2017-05-18 Linde Aktiengesellschaft Process and apparatus for the selective desulfurization of synthesis gas

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3904389A (en) * 1974-08-13 1975-09-09 David L Banquy Process for the production of high BTU methane-containing gas
US6033456A (en) * 1998-02-06 2000-03-07 Texaco Inc. Integration of partial oxidation process and direct reduction reaction process
US6521143B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2003-02-18 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Co-production of carbon monoxide-rich syngas wth high purity hydrogen
US20040055217A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2004-03-25 Pierre-Robert Gauthier Integrated process and installation for the production of synthesis gas
US20040181313A1 (en) * 2003-03-15 2004-09-16 Conocophillips Company Managing hydrogen in a gas to liquid plant
US20060236697A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2006-10-26 Ashok Rao Configuration and process for shift conversion

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL8103397A (en) 1981-07-17 1983-02-16 Shell Int Research METHOD FOR PREPARING ORGANIC COMPOUNDS.
CA2038773C (en) 1990-04-04 1999-06-08 Kym B. Arcuri Slurry fischer-tropsch process with co/ti02 catalyst
GB9108663D0 (en) 1991-04-23 1991-06-12 Shell Int Research Process for the preparation of a catalyst or catalyst precursor
EP0550242B1 (en) 1991-12-30 1996-11-20 Texaco Development Corporation Processing of synthesis gas
CA2370994A1 (en) 1999-06-07 2000-12-14 Rineco Chemical Industries, Inc. Process for recycling heterogeneous waste
MY136454A (en) 2000-04-07 2008-10-31 Shell Int Research A process for producing hydrocarbons, and a catalyst suitable for use in the process
MXPA02012731A (en) 2000-07-03 2003-05-14 Shell Int Research Catalyst and process for the preparation of hydrocarbons.
CA2416477A1 (en) 2000-07-24 2002-01-31 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. A shell metal catalyst and a precursor thereof, a process for their preparation and the use of the catalyst
US6583186B2 (en) 2001-04-04 2003-06-24 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method for upgrading Fischer-Tropsch wax using split-feed hydrocracking/hydrotreating
US6797252B2 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-09-28 Conocophillips Company Hydrocarbon gas to liquid conversion process
FR2856048B1 (en) 2003-06-11 2005-08-05 Air Liquide PURIFICATION OF A H2 / CO MIXTURE BY CATALYSIS OF NOx

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3904389A (en) * 1974-08-13 1975-09-09 David L Banquy Process for the production of high BTU methane-containing gas
US6033456A (en) * 1998-02-06 2000-03-07 Texaco Inc. Integration of partial oxidation process and direct reduction reaction process
US6521143B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2003-02-18 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Co-production of carbon monoxide-rich syngas wth high purity hydrogen
US20040055217A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2004-03-25 Pierre-Robert Gauthier Integrated process and installation for the production of synthesis gas
US20060236697A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2006-10-26 Ashok Rao Configuration and process for shift conversion
US20040181313A1 (en) * 2003-03-15 2004-09-16 Conocophillips Company Managing hydrogen in a gas to liquid plant

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10118824B2 (en) 2013-12-17 2018-11-06 Avril Process for purifying synthesis gas by washing with aqueous solutions of amines

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1836283A1 (en) 2007-09-26
ZA200704702B (en) 2008-09-25
CA2592599A1 (en) 2006-07-06
US8641790B2 (en) 2014-02-04
US20100031572A1 (en) 2010-02-11
EP1836283B1 (en) 2019-03-27
WO2006070018A1 (en) 2006-07-06
CN101094910A (en) 2007-12-26
AU2005321253A1 (en) 2006-07-06
AU2005321253B2 (en) 2009-09-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8641790B2 (en) Process for the synthesis of hydrocarbons from a carbonaceous fuel
US9624445B2 (en) Improvements relating to coal to liquid processes
US7951355B2 (en) Process for producing a purified synthesis gas stream
US7741377B2 (en) Solid carbonaceous feed to liquid process
EP1918352B1 (en) Solid carbonaceous feed to liquid process
CA2615576A1 (en) Preparation of syngas
US9096479B2 (en) Process for preparing a paraffin product
US9528049B2 (en) Process for preparing a paraffin product

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION