US20140045510A1 - Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP) - Google Patents

Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP) Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140045510A1
US20140045510A1 US13/948,388 US201313948388A US2014045510A1 US 20140045510 A1 US20140045510 A1 US 20140045510A1 US 201313948388 A US201313948388 A US 201313948388A US 2014045510 A1 US2014045510 A1 US 2014045510A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
csi
comp
feedback
crs
tps
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/948,388
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Guosen Yue
Narayan Prasad
Meilong Jiang
Sampath Rangarajan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Laboratories America Inc
Original Assignee
NEC Laboratories America Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NEC Laboratories America Inc filed Critical NEC Laboratories America Inc
Priority to US13/948,388 priority Critical patent/US20140045510A1/en
Publication of US20140045510A1 publication Critical patent/US20140045510A1/en
Assigned to NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. reassignment NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RANGARAJAN, SAMPATH, YUE, GUOSEN, JIANG, MEILONG, PRASAD, NARAYAN
Priority to US14/499,414 priority patent/US20150043499A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J11/00—Orthogonal multiplex systems, e.g. using WALSH codes
    • H04J11/0023—Interference mitigation or co-ordination
    • H04J11/005—Interference mitigation or co-ordination of intercell interference
    • H04J11/0053—Interference mitigation or co-ordination of intercell interference using co-ordinated multipoint transmission/reception
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/022—Site diversity; Macro-diversity
    • H04B7/024—Co-operative use of antennas of several sites, e.g. in co-ordinated multipoint or co-operative multiple-input multiple-output [MIMO] systems
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
    • H04B7/0456—Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0621—Feedback content
    • H04B7/0626—Channel coefficients, e.g. channel state information [CSI]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0621—Feedback content
    • H04B7/063—Parameters other than those covered in groups H04B7/0623 - H04B7/0634, e.g. channel matrix rank or transmit mode selection
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0621—Feedback content
    • H04B7/0632—Channel quality parameters, e.g. channel quality indicator [CQI]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0636—Feedback format
    • H04B7/0639—Using selective indices, e.g. of a codebook, e.g. pre-distortion matrix index [PMI] or for beam selection
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0026—Transmission of channel quality indication
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0076—Distributed coding, e.g. network coding, involving channel coding
    • H04L1/0077—Cooperative coding
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0032—Distributed allocation, i.e. involving a plurality of allocating devices, each making partial allocation
    • H04L5/0035—Resource allocation in a cooperative multipoint environment
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0048—Allocation of pilot signals, i.e. of signals known to the receiver
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0048—Allocation of pilot signals, i.e. of signals known to the receiver
    • H04L5/005—Allocation of pilot signals, i.e. of signals known to the receiver of common pilots, i.e. pilots destined for multiple users or terminals
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053—Allocation of signalling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • H04L5/0057—Physical resource allocation for CQI
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/10—Scheduling measurement reports ; Arrangements for measurement reports
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00—Local resource management
    • H04W72/04—Wireless resource allocation
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00—Local resource management
    • H04W72/12—Wireless traffic scheduling
    • H04W72/1263—Mapping of traffic onto schedule, e.g. scheduled allocation or multiplexing of flows
    • H04W72/1273—Mapping of traffic onto schedule, e.g. scheduled allocation or multiplexing of flows of downlink data flows
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00—Local resource management
    • H04W72/20—Control channels or signalling for resource management
    • H04W72/23—Control channels or signalling for resource management in the downlink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards a terminal
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0056—Systems characterized by the type of code used
    • H04L1/0067—Rate matching
    • H04L1/0068—Rate matching by puncturing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0044—Allocation of payload; Allocation of data channels, e.g. PDSCH or PUSCH
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053—Allocation of signalling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0058—Allocation criteria
    • H04L5/0073—Allocation arrangements that take into account other cell interferences
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0091—Signalling for the administration of the divided path, e.g. signalling of configuration information

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to coordinated multiple point transmission and reception (CoMP) and more particularly to channel state information (CSI) feedback, physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) mapping, resource allocation, and some other features for CoMP.
  • CoMP coordinated multiple point transmission and reception
  • CSI channel state information
  • PDSCH physical downlink shared channel
  • An objective of the present invention is to provide efficient CSI feedback, PDSCH RE mapping, and resource allocation for CoMP.
  • An aspect of the present invention includes a communications method implemented in a transmission point (TP) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the communications method includes transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), an indication of a channel state information (CSI) process in a CSI pattern comprising a set of CSI processes, wherein the UE is configured with the CSI process for at least one of the other CSI processes in the CSI pattern, and wherein a reported rank indication (RI) for the CSI process is the same as an RI for said at least one of the other CSI processes.
  • CSI channel state information
  • Another aspect of the present invention includes a communications method implemented in a user equipment (UE) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the communications method includes receiving, from a transmission point (TP), an indication of a channel state information (CSI) process in a CSI pattern comprising a set of CSI processes, wherein the UE is configured with the CSI process for at least one of the other CSI processes in the CSI pattern, and wherein a reported rank indication (RI) for the CSI process is the same as an RI for said at least one of the other CSI processes.
  • TP transmission point
  • CSI channel state information
  • RI reported rank indication
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a communications method implemented in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the communications method includes indicating, to a user equipment (UE), a channel state information (CSI) process in a CSI pattern comprising a set of CSI processes, configuring the UE with the CSI process for at least one of the other CSI processes in the CSI pattern, and reporting, from the UE, a rank indication (RI) for the CSI process that is the same as an RI for said at least one of the other CSI processes.
  • UE user equipment
  • CSI channel state information
  • RI rank indication
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a transmission point (TP) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the TP includes transmitter to transmit, to a user equipment (UE), an indication of a channel state information (CSI) process in a CSI pattern comprising a set of CSI processes, wherein the UE is configured with the CSI process for at least one of the other CSI processes in the CSI pattern, and wherein a reported rank indication (RI) for the CSI process is the same as an RI for said at least one of the other CSI processes.
  • CSI channel state information
  • RI reported rank indication
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a user equipment (UE) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the user equipment includes a receiver to receive, from a transmission point (TP), an indication of a channel state information (CSI) process in a CSI pattern comprising a set of CSI processes, wherein the UE is configured with the CSI process for at least one of the other CSI processes in the CSI pattern, and wherein a reported rank indication (RI) for the CSI process is the same as an RI for said at least one of the other CSI processes.
  • TP transmission point
  • CSI channel state information
  • RI reported rank indication
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system including a user equipment (UE), and a transmission point (TP) to transmit, to the UE, an indication of a channel state information (CSI) process in a CSI pattern comprising a set of CSI processes, wherein the UE is configured with the CSI process for at least one of the other CSI processes in the CSI pattern, and wherein a reported rank indication (RI) for the CSI process is the same as an RI for said at least one of the other CSI processes.
  • CoMP coordinated multipoint transmission and reception
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a communications method implemented in a transmission point (TP) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the communications method comprises transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), attributers for up to four indicators indicating at least physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) resource element (RE) mapping, and transmitting, to the UE, one of the four indicators, each of which is conveyed in 2 bits, wherein the four indicators comprises ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘10’, and ‘11’ corresponding to a first set, a second set, a third set, and a fourth set of parameters, respectively.
  • PDSCH physical downlink shared channel
  • RE resource element
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a communications method implemented in a user equipment (UE) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the communications method comprises receiving, from a transmission point (TP), attributers for up to four indicators indicating at least physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) resource element (RE) mapping, and receiving, from the TP, one of the four indicators, each of which is conveyed in 2 bits, wherein the four indicators comprises ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘10’, and ‘11’ corresponding to a first set, a second set, a third set, and a fourth set of parameters, respectively.
  • TP transmission point
  • PDSCH physical downlink shared channel
  • RE resource element
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a communications method implemented in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the communications method comprises transmitting, from a transmission point (TP) to a user equipment (UE), attributers for up to four indicators indicating at least physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) resource element (RE) mapping, and transmitting, from the TP to the UE, one of the four indicators, each of which is conveyed in 2 bits, wherein the four indicators comprises ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘10’, and ‘11’ corresponding to a first set, a second set, a third set, and a fourth set of parameters, respectively.
  • PDSCH physical downlink shared channel
  • RE resource element
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a transmission point (TP) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the transmission point comprises a first transmitter to transmit, to a user equipment (UE), attributers for up to four indicators indicating at least physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) resource element (RE) mapping, and a second transmitter to transmit, to the UE, one of the four indicators, each of which is conveyed in 2 bits, wherein the four indicators comprises ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘10’, and ‘11’ corresponding to a first set, a second set, a third set, and a fourth set of parameters, respectively.
  • PDSCH physical downlink shared channel
  • RE resource element
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a user equipment (UE) used in a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system.
  • the user equipment comprises a first receiver to receive, from a transmission point (TP), attributers for up to four indicators indicating at least physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) resource element (RE) mapping, and a second receiver to receive, from the TP, one of the four indicators, each of which is conveyed in 2 bits, wherein the four indicators comprises ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘10’, and ‘11’ corresponding to a first set, a second set, a third set, and a fourth set of parameters, respectively.
  • TP transmission point
  • PDSCH physical downlink shared channel
  • RE resource element
  • Still another aspect of the present invention includes a coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP) system comprising a user equipment (UE), and a transmission point (TP) to transmit, to a user equipment (UE), attributers for up to four indicators indicating at least physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) resource element (RE) mapping, wherein the UE receives, from the TP, one of the four indicators, each of which is conveyed in 2 bits, and wherein the four indicators comprises ‘00’, ‘01’, ‘10’, and ‘11’ corresponding to a first set, a second set, a third set, and a fourth set of parameters, respectively.
  • CoMP coordinated multipoint transmission and reception
  • FIG. 3 depicts an example of CRS/PDSCH collisions for two TPs with different cell IDs. Both TPs have two CRS antenna ports.
  • FIG. 4 depicts an example of CRS/PDSCH collisions for the TPs with the same cell IDs but different number of CRS antenna ports.
  • One TP left has two CRS antenna ports and the other (right) has four antenna ports.
  • FIG. 5 depicts an example of PDSCH starting point mismatch for the TPs with different cell IDs.
  • FIG. 6 depicts resource mapping for CRS/PDSCH collision avoidance. Left: the resource mapping for the example in FIG. 3 . Right: the resource mapping for the example in FIG. 4 .
  • FIG. 7 depicts data symbol allocations for CRS/PDSCH collision avoidance. Left: Original data symbol allocation assuming the serving TP single cell transmissions. Right: Data symbol allocations for CoMP transmissions (JT or DPS) with CRS/PDSCH collision avoidance, method 1.
  • JT or DPS CoMP transmissions
  • FIG. 8 depicts data symbol allocations for CRS/PDSCH collision avoidance. Left: Original data symbol allocation assuming the serving TP single cell transmissions. Right: Data symbol allocations for CoMP transmissions (JT or DPS) with CRS/PDSCH collision avoidance, method 2.
  • JT or DPS CoMP transmissions
  • FIG. 9 depicts BLER performance of a rate-1/2 LTE turbo code with puncturing (muting) and/or dirty received bits.
  • FIG. 10 depicts BLER performance of a rate-1/2 LTE turbo code with puncturing (muting) and partial data with stronger noise.
  • the CoMP network could be a homogeneous network consisting of all macro-cell BSs, i.e., homogeneous network, as shown in FIG. 1 or a heterogeneous network (HetNet) which is mixture of macro-cell BSs and lower power RRHs as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • HetNet heterogeneous network
  • ⁇ i is the transmission power or energy per resource element (EPRE) used by the ith transmission point;
  • W i and i are the precoding matrix (with r i columns) and the data symbol vector transmitted by the ith transmission point;
  • ⁇ tilde over (H) ⁇ , ⁇ tilde over (W) ⁇ are the composite channel matrix, precoding matrix, and data symbol vector transmitted by all the other transmission points outside the UE's CoMP set. Then, if the UE receives a data stream sent only along the jth layer of the mth transmission point, received SINR corresponding to that stream at the UE is
  • ⁇ mj ⁇ m r m ⁇ F mj ⁇ ⁇ H m ⁇ W mj ⁇ W mj ⁇ ⁇ H m ⁇ ⁇ F mj F mj ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ m r m ⁇ ⁇ j ′ , j ′ ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ H m ⁇ W mj ′ ⁇ W mj ′ ⁇ ⁇ H m ⁇ + ⁇ i ⁇ m ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ i r i ⁇ H i ⁇ W i ⁇ W i ⁇ ⁇ H i ⁇ ) ⁇ F mj + F mj ⁇ ⁇ RF mj , ( 2 )
  • all CSI can be passed to the network controller in a CoMP network which then does the scheduling.
  • the data is still transmitted from the serving cell (or equivalently the anchor cell where the control signalling is received from).
  • the network controller selects the transmission points for each UE so that the weighted sum rate of the system is maximized. Assume that m* is the transmission point selected by the network controller for the UE. The SINR corresponding to the j th layer is then ⁇ m*j and the transmission rate is then ⁇ m*j .
  • ⁇ i is the coherent phase adjustment to improve the SINR for coherent JT.
  • the serving cell BS with index 1 is always present in ⁇ for the JT.
  • ⁇ 1 0.
  • a common transmission rank r is employed for all W i i ⁇ .
  • H v ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ i ⁇ v ⁇ ⁇ i r i ⁇ H i ⁇ W i ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ i .
  • ⁇ v , j F v , j ⁇ ⁇ H v , j ⁇ H v , j ⁇ ⁇ F v , j F v , j ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ j ′ , j ′ ⁇ j ⁇ ⁇ H v , j ′ ⁇ H v , j ′ ⁇ + ⁇ i ⁇ v _ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ i r i ⁇ H i ⁇ W i ⁇ W i ⁇ ⁇ H i ) ⁇ F v , j + F v , j ⁇ ⁇ RF v , j , ( 5 )
  • F ⁇ denotes the receiver filter on the signal in (4) for CoMP JT transmissions.
  • RS reference signal
  • H i the channel matrix estimated by the UE, corresponding to all such ports of the ith TP.
  • a CSI feedback for a set of contiguous resource blocks (RBs) (which map to a time-frequency resource comprising of a set of consecutive sub-carriers and OFDM symbols) consists of a wideband preferred precoding matrix index (PMI) that indicates a preferred precoder matrix ⁇ , a wideband rank index (RI) ⁇ circumflex over (r) ⁇ , along with up-to two channel quality indices (CQIs), which are essentially quantized SINRs estimated by the UE.
  • PMI wideband preferred precoding matrix index
  • RI wideband rank index
  • CQIs channel quality indices
  • per-CSI-RS-feedback Since per-CSI-RS-feedback has been agreed to be mandatory for all CoMP transmission schemes, it raises an issue on the rank feedback for each transmission point. Whether or not to enforce a common rank feedback for all the transmission points in the CoMP set is yet to be decided. We first discuss the pros/cons on the per-CSI-RS-feedback based feedback scheme for CoMP, without the common rank restriction and provide our solutions.
  • each UE sends the CSI feedback for each transmission point in its CoMP set, which is computed assuming single-point transmission hypothesis. Therefore, it is possible that preferred rank varies in the CSI feedback computed for different transmission points. In this option, the UE is allowed to send the best rank for each transmission point along with corresponding PMI/CQIs to the BS.
  • the transmission to the UE is performed from one transmission point in its CoMP set (on each of its assigned RBs) which corresponds to one CSI-RS resource.
  • DPS-w wideband DPS
  • DPS-w subband DPS
  • DPS-w subband DPS
  • the controller can estimate the post-scheduling SINR for the selected TP reasonably well.
  • per-CSI-RS-resource feedback without common rank seems suitable for DPS-w.
  • CS/CB where each UE is served data only by its pre-determined anchor or serving cell TP, there is no significant performance degradation since each UE reports more accurate CSI for other transmission points using the respective preferred ranks. This option also facilitates the fallback from CoMP to non-CoMP single-cell transmissions.
  • the CSI feedbacks including preferred precoding matrices, quantized SINRs (fedback using CQIs), and rank indices are ( ⁇ 1 , ⁇ circumflex over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ 1 , ⁇ circumflex over (r) ⁇ 1 ) and ( ⁇ 2 , ⁇ circumflex over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ 2 , ⁇ circumflex over (r) ⁇ 2 ) for the transmission point 1 (TP1) and TP2, respectively.
  • V JT ( V 1 ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ 1 V 2 ⁇ ⁇ j ⁇ 2 ) .
  • each CSI-RS resource feedback consists of one RI (to indicate a rank say r), and one PMI, and N min ⁇ 2,r ⁇ CQIs, where N is number of subbands that the UE is configured to report.
  • n CQI , n RI , and n PMI are number of bits for each feedback of CQI, RI and PMI, respectively.
  • the system in a semi-static manner can further restrict the common rank to be 1 for solution 3 in case JT and/or CS-CB is preferred.
  • the rationale is as follows.
  • JT the CoMP performance gain via coherent phase combining is achieved mostly for rank-1 transmissions.
  • common rank-1 feedback the UE only needs to feedback one aggregate CQI (per subband).
  • CB/CS with rank-1 channel feedback, it is easier for the coordinated BSs to control the precoding beams for different TPs to reduce the intra CoMP set interference.
  • UE can choose the preferred CSI feedback scheme.
  • UE can choose between JT CoMP CSI feedback with a lower rank, e.g., rank-1 feedback with aggregated CQI feedback, or the CSI feedback for the single serving TP with higher rank, e.g., rank 2, (which has less overhead) by comparing the effective rates it deems it can get under these two, i.e., ⁇ 1 and ⁇ ⁇ , where ⁇ is the set of TPs being considered by the UE for JT.
  • the one corresponding to the higher rate is the type of transmission scheme (CoMP or fall-back to single serving TP) that the UE prefers and sends the CSI feedback accordingly.
  • the BS pre-allocates certain uplink (UL) resources for a UE to send its CSI feedback. Since per-CSI-RS resource feedback is agreed in order to support all CoMP schemes, a large number of UL feedback resources have to be pre-allocated to be able to accommodate the worst case, i.e., the highest transmission ranks for each TP along with N CQIs for each stream (maximum 2 data stream for rank 2 or higher). Even with UE centric CSI feedback, in which the actually feedback bits can be much less, it still could not reduce the signaling overhead since the UL feedback resources are pre-allocated.
  • M best- ⁇ hacek over
  • One variation of above alternative-2 scheme is that the restriction of ⁇ hacek over (M) ⁇ sets of CQI feedback includes the aggregated CQI.
  • the UE may be able to choose if aggregate CQI is needed and occupy the feedback resources so that less per-CSI-RS resource CSI feedbacks are reported.
  • each UE sends the CSI feedback for each transmission point in its CoMP set, and this per CSI-RS resource feedback is computed assuming single-point transmission hypothesis (i.e., transmission only from the TP corresponding to that CSI-RS resource). Therefore, it is possible that preferred rank varies in the CSI feedback computed for different transmission points. In this option, the UE is allowed to send the best rank for each transmission point along with corresponding PMI/CQIs to its serving TP.
  • a simple way in which the network controller can control a UE's per CSI-RS resource feedback is to employ a separate codebook subset restriction for each TP in a UE's CoMP set (a.k.a. CoMP measurement set).
  • the controller can inform each UE in a semi-static manner about the codebook subset it should employ for each TP in its CoMP set, so that the UE then searches for and reports a precoder only in the respective subset corresponding to each TP in its CoMP set.
  • the controller can tune the per CSI-RS resource feedback it receives, for instance in case it decides that CS/CB is a more preferable scheme it can configure the subsets corresponding to all non-serving TPs in a UE's CoMP set to include only rank-1 precoding vectors. This allows for better quantization of dominant interfering directions and better beam coordination which is particularly helpful for CS/CB.
  • the controller can also configure a separate maximum rank limit on the rank that can be reported by the UE for each TP in its CoMP set and convey these maximum rank limits to the UE in a semi-static manner. While this can be accomplished also via codebook subset restriction, setting a separate maximum rank limit can decrease the feedback load. For example, if a TP has four transmit antennas, with codebook subset restriction the feedback overhead need not be decreased since it has to be designed to accommodate the maximal subset size, which in this case translates to six bits, two bits for rank (up-to rank 4) and four bits for the PMI per rank. On the other hand, by imposing a maximum rank limit of 2, the overhead is 5 bits, one bit for rank (up-to rank 2) and four bits for the PMI per rank. Note that codebook subset restriction can be used in conjunction with maximum rank limit.
  • the network can also have the ability to semi-statically configure a separate feedback mode for each per CSI-RS resource feedback reported by a UE.
  • the network may configure a UE to use a feedback mode for its serving-TP that allows reporting per-subband PMI and CQI(s) and a mode that allows reporting a wideband PMI with per-subband CQI(s) for some or all of the other TPs in its CoMP set. This allows the controller to reduce the overall CoMP feedback load without a significant degradation in performance.
  • CoMP CSI feedback from a UE for a particular choice of: per CSI-RS resource feedback modes, possible accompanying restrictions such as common rank report for all TPs in the CoMP set and additional aggregate CQI(s) or inter-point phase resource(s): as a CoMP feedback format.
  • a key bottleneck in designing CoMP CSI feedback schemes is that the size of the UL resource used for reporting a particular CoMP feedback format must be pre-allocated and must be designed to accommodate the worst-case load. This is because the TP which receives the feedback should know the physical layer resources and attributes used for the UE feedback in order to decode it.
  • the TP which receives its feedback will have to employ blind decoding in order to jointly determine the format used by the UE and the content within it.
  • blind decoding increases the complexity and thus it is better to allow only a small cardinality for the set of permissible CoMP feedback formats, say 2.
  • Another even simpler solution is for the controller to semi-statically configure a feedback format for a UE which then employs that format for its CSI feedback until it is re-configured by the network.
  • each CSI-RS can be mapped to (or corresponds to) a TP.
  • These principles can be extended in a straightforward manner to the case where a CSI-RS corresponds to a virtual TP formed by antenna ports from multiple TPs. Let us first consider measurement set size 2. We will list the various alternatives in the following.
  • NZP-CSI-RS0 NZP-CSI-RS1
  • NZP-CSI-RS2 NZP-CSI-RS2
  • CSI0, CSI1 and CSI2 are CSI processes in which “channel parts” are determined from NZP-CSI-RS0, NZP-CSI-RS1 and NZP-CSI-RS2, respectively, and the interference parts are denoted by I0, I1 and I2, respectively, where I0 is computed by first measuring/estimating interference directly on IMR012 and then emulating the interferences from TPs 1 and 2 and adding them.
  • the emulation of interference from TP 1 (TP2) is done using the channel estimated from NZP-CSI-RS1 (NZP-CSI-RS2) and a scaled identity precoder (or an average over a configured precoder codebook subset).
  • I1 and I2 are similarly computed by directly estimating interference in IMR012 and emulating and adding interference using (NZP-CSI-RS0 and NZP-CSI-RS-2) and (NZP-CSI-RS0 and NZP-CSI-RS-1), respectively.
  • CSIij where i and j lie in ⁇ 0, 1, 2 ⁇ , in which the channel part is determined using NZP-CSI-RSi and the interference is computed by measuring/estimating interference directly on IMR012 and then emulating and adding the interference from TP in the set ⁇ 0, 1, 2 ⁇ i, j ⁇ using corresponding NZP-CSI-RS resource.
  • a codebook can be defined as the one including a pattern containing (CSI0, CSI1, CSI01, CSI10) and another pattern comprising of (CSI0, CSI2, CSI02, CSI20).
  • the controller can signal an index corresponding to any one of these two patterns to the UE.
  • CSI01 and CSI10 can be marked CQI-only and where the CQIs must be computed using the PMIs determined for CSI0 and CSI1, respectively.
  • CSI02 and CSI20 can be marked CQI-only and where the CQIs must be computed using the PMIs determined for CSI0 and CSI2, respectively.
  • the 3GPP LTE cellular system supports CRS for up to 4 antenna ports.
  • the CRS is positioned on the REs with a cell-specific frequency shift.
  • the cell-specific frequency shift and the number of CRS ports specify all the CRS RE positions on this subframe. Therefore, for the cells or the TPs with different cell IDs, the CRS RE positions are different. This will cause the collision with data symbols transmitted on the PDSCH for the CoMP transmissions
  • An example of 2 CoMP TPs is shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the data have to be transmitted through both TPs.
  • Such collision problem is also arise for the CoMP TPs with the same cell ID.
  • the number of antenna ports is the same among all the TPs with the same cell ID, there is no issue since the CRS positions are exactly the same for all the TPs.
  • the number of antenna ports may be different among the coordinated TPs.
  • the low power nodes might be equipped with less antennas than the macro base station.
  • the CRS for the TP with more antenna ports will collide with the PDSCH for the TP with less antenna ports. An example is shown in FIG.
  • the TP on the right has 4 antenna ports and the left has 2 antenna ports.
  • the TP with 4 antenna ports has 4 CRS REs collided with the TP with 2 antenna ports on the data REs.
  • the asymmetric antenna setting also exists for the CoMP TPs with different cell IDs. Since the coded QAM modulated symbol sequence is sequentially mapped to the PDSCH RE resources, if the number of CRS REs are different, the UE will not be able to decode the sequence at all due to the shifting of QAM symbol sequence. This is more severe than the CRS interference.
  • the number of CRS ports is fixed to be the same for different TPs in the cluster with the same cell ID even when the number of physical antennas for those TPs is different, then there is no collision issue. However, the CRS based channel estimation will have some performance degradation.
  • MBSFN subframes 2 there are some subframes which are configured as MBSFN subframes 2 .
  • the CRS is not transmitted on those MBSFN subframes.
  • CRS-PDSCH collision will also occur when the CoMP TPs do not have the same MBSFN subframe configurations. For example, at a time instance, one TP is on the non-MBSFN subframe with CRS transmitted on some REs, while at the same time, another TP in the measurement set is on the MBSFN subframe.
  • the PDSCH mapping is then different for these two TPs on this subframe. Then if CoMP JT or DPS is realized among these two TPs, CRS-PDSCH collision occurs.
  • 2 MBSFN stands for Multicast/Broadcast over a Single Frequency Network
  • the first several OFDM symbols are allocated for sending control signaling, i.e., PDCCH, in LTE and LTE-A systems.
  • the data channel PDSCH starts from the next OFDM symbol after PDCCH.
  • the numbers of OFDM symbols for PDCCH transmission can be different. Consequently, the starting points for PDSCH may be different.
  • the coded QAM sequence is sequentially mapped to the PDSCH RE resources, the mismatch of PDSCH starting points among TPs in the CoMP set will cause the issue for both joint transmission and DPS in CoMP transmissions if UE does not know the start point of PDSCH.
  • An example is shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the selected TP for transmission is the serving cell TP
  • the PDCCH region of the selected TP is larger than that of the serving cell
  • the PDSCH mapping is still configured as that of the serving cell, but with the QAM symbols in the PDCCH mismatching region being punctured. Since the selected transmit TP is transparent to the UE and the UE does not have the knowledge of the QAM symbol being punctured in the PDCCH mismatching region, UE receives totally irrelevant PDCCH signals on these RE positions to decode.
  • the UE assumes that the PDSCH mapping is aligned with that of the serving cell, the OFDM symbol or symbols after PDCCH of the selected TP that collides with the PDCCH region of the serving cell will not be used for data transmission.
  • the network will configure the PDSCH starting point of the selected transmit TP same as that of the serving TP.
  • the network will puncture (not to transmit) the symbols on the CRS positions of the selected transmit TP and skip the REs that are the CRS RE positions of the serving cell for the data symbols.
  • single cell ID CoMP does not solve the collision problem for the CoMP TPs with different number of antenna ports.
  • all these approaches are not efficient.
  • There are also some other non-transparent approaches e.g., signaling the UE the CoMP transmission TP or TPs (for DPS or JT) so that the UE knows the active TP set and the data can be allocated to the REs without collision.
  • Another non-transparent approach is dynamic or semi-static CRS mapping pattern signalling. Also since the CoMP transmission is dynamic scheduled and UE specific, the signaling of the active CoMP TP set or CRS mapping patterns will significantly increase the DL signaling overhead.
  • the network configures and signals the UE the TP set for which UE measures the channels.
  • Such TP set is called measurement set.
  • the CoMP transmission TP or TPs will be selected from the measurement set.
  • the UE knows the number of CRS antenna ports for each TP in the measurement set and provide the following resource mapping approach.
  • a variation of the proposed scheme is that the network broadcasts the CRS pattern information, which may include the cell ID or the frequency shift of the CRS RE position, and the number of CRS antenna ports, of all TPs in the CoMP cluster, the largest TP set for CoMP network based on the network deployment.
  • the CRS pattern information which may include the cell ID or the frequency shift of the CRS RE position, and the number of CRS antenna ports, of all TPs in the CoMP cluster, the largest TP set for CoMP network based on the network deployment.
  • This approach is not UE specific, thus does not introduce additional complexity on the resource mapping on the network side.
  • this approach may be only suitable for the scenario of the same cell ID CoMP as the excluded RE positions are at most the ones corresponding to the largest possible number, which is 4, of CRS antenna ports.
  • this approach is not efficient since the size of the CoMP cluster is usually much larger than the size of the UE specific CoMP measurement set. With a large size of CoMP cluster, this approach might eventually exclude the any OFDM symbol which contains a CRS RE for some TP.
  • 3 CoMP measurement set is a UE specific subset of TPs in the CoMP cluster.
  • CRS is mainly used for LTE (release 8) UEs for channel estimation and data symbol detection.
  • LTE Advanced (release 10 or later) systems a UE uses CSI-RS to estimate the channel.
  • the UE may not monitor or detect the CRS.
  • the UE may not be able to know the frequency shift of CRS position or the number of CRS antenna ports, consequently the CRS RE mapping pattern, for the TPs in its measurement set. For this case, we then propose the following alternatives.
  • the set m RE ( ⁇ m , p m ) as the set of CRS RE positions of the mth TP in the measurement set.
  • the union of all CRS REs in the measurement set is then given by ⁇ m m RE ( ⁇ m , p m ).
  • the set of CRS REs for TP-m assumed at the UE is then m RE ( ⁇ m , p*). Note that we have m RE ( ⁇ m , p m ) ⁇ m RE ( ⁇ m , p*).
  • all CRS REs in the ⁇ m m RE ( ⁇ m , p*) are excluded from the PDSCH mapping.
  • Alt-CRS-1.3 if the cell-ID of the TPs in the CoMP set is signalled to the UE, the UE is then able to deduce the CRS frequency shift ⁇ m . With the number of CRS ports or maximum number of CRS ports informed to the UE, the PDSCH mapping in Alt-CRS-1.3 is again to avoid the union of the CRS REs, i.e., ⁇ m m RE ( ⁇ m , p m ) or ⁇ m m RE ( ⁇ m , p*), as in Alt-CRS-1.2 or Alt-CRS-1.1.
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication with only the semi-statical signalling (1-bit).
  • CoMP PDSCH mapping indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 0 according to that of the serving cell 1 PDSCH RE mapping on a subframe excluding the union of the CRS REs of the TPs in the measurement set on that subframe t, ⁇ m
  • I m (t) 0 m RE ( ⁇ m , p m ) or ⁇ m
  • I m (t) 0 m RE ( ⁇ m , p*), are excluded from the PDSCH RE mapping on the tth subframe in Alt-CRS-1.1, Alt-CRS-1.2, or Alt-CRS-1.3.
  • eNB configures PDSCH RE mapping for any transmitting TP as that for the serving cell.
  • DPS when a TP other than the serving TP in the measurement set is transmitting, the PDSCH on the CRS positions for this TP will not be used for data transmission. If the UE assumes the serving cell PDSCH mapping, it would still try to decode the data on these CRS positions which actually do not carry any data information, resulting in receiving some noise signals, so called dirty data/bits.
  • a simple simulation is then performed to evaluate the performance of these scenarios.
  • a length-576 information bits are encoded using the LTE turbo code of rate-1/2.
  • Puncturing or muting 5% coded bits represents the above approaches that avoid the transmission on the collided REs.
  • the case of 2.5% punctured bits plus 2.5% dirty data represents the DPS with default PDSCH mapping.
  • the case of 5% dirty data represents the DPS scenario in which the TP other than the serving TP is transmitting on a non-MBSFN subframe, while the serving TP is on its MBSFN subframe.
  • the TBS assignment still follows the same TBS table in [5] and obtain the same data symbol sequence, e.g. 0 , 1 , . . . .
  • the network or CoMP active TP or TPs simply puncture and do not transmit the originally allocated data symbols that collides with the CRS RE positions on other TPs in the CoMP measurement set of this UE. Since the proposed resource mapping for CRS/PDSCH collision avoidance does not exclude many REs for data transmission, the slight increase of the final effective information rate will have nearly no impact on the receiver performance.
  • the PDSCH starting point might also need to be signalled to the UE in a semi-static manner.
  • the following schemes thus take care of the PDSCH starting point, if this is necessary.
  • CoMP PDSCH mapping indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH RE mapping according that of TP-1 in the measurement set (assuming it is serving cell without loss of generality) 01 PDSCH RE mapping according that of the TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH RE mapping according that of the TP-3 in the measurement set 11 PDSCH RE mapping on a subframe excluding the union of CRS RE positions of the TPs in the measurement set on that subframe
  • the network can semi-statically inform the UE the PDSCH start point, however for DPS, if there is a mismatch between the PDSCH start points for the TPs in the CoMP measurement set, it will cause spectral efficiency loss and reduce the performance gain of CoMP.
  • the PDSCH mapping information including the starting point and CRS pattern can be dynamically conveyed to the UE. We then list the following alternatives to achieve this goal and support all CoMP transmission schemes with a small signal overhead.
  • CoMP PDSCH mapping indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH RE mapping according that of the serving cell (assume TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH RE mapping according that of the TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH RE mapping according that of the TP-3 in the measurement set 11 PDSCH RE mapping by (1) excluding the intersection of all CRS RE set of the TPs in the measurement on that subframe or (2) simply occupying all of the CRS REs of the TPs in the measurement on that subframe
  • the approach Alt-CRS-2.3A certainly provides better performance than the PDSCH RE mapping around the CRS RE positions. Or the UE can at least cancel the interference of the CRS from the serving cell. If the interfering CRS is too strong, it is then up to UE to decide where to demodulate the CRS collided data symbol or not.
  • the PDSCH mapping indicator is set to be 11, the PDSCH starting point can be set with assuming the minimum or maximum size of PDCCH regions (or PDCCH OFDM symbols) of the TPs in the measurement set, which are semi-statically informed to the UE.
  • Explosive growth in data traffic is a reality that network operators must provision for.
  • the most potent approach to cater to this explosive growth is considered to be cell splitting in which multiple transmission points are placed in a cell traditionally covered by a single macro base station.
  • Each such transmission point can be a high power macro enhanced base-station (a.k.a. eNB) but is more likely to be a low-power remote radio head or a pico base-station of more modest capabilities.
  • the networks formed by such disparate transmission points are referred to as heterogeneous networks (a.k.a. HetNets) and are rightly regarded as the future of all next generation wireless networks.
  • TPs transmission points
  • the basic coordination unit is referred to as a cluster which consists of multiple TPs and can include more than one eNB.
  • Coordinated resource allocation within a cluster must be accomplished at a very fine time scale, typically once every millisecond. This in turn implies that all TPs within each cluster must have fibre connectivity and hence impacts the formation of clusters (a.k.a. clustering) which is dictated by the available fibre connectivity among transmission points.
  • next generation wireless networks will be based on the LTE standard which is periodically updated (with each update referred to as a release) to support more advanced schemes.
  • Coordinated transmission and reception (CoMP) among multiple TPs in a cluster will be supported starting from Release 11 and feedback and feedforward signalling procedures to support such scheduling as well as detailed channel models and network topologies have been finalized.
  • the simplest “baseline” approach then to manage dynamic coordination within a cluster is to associate each user with one TP within the cluster from which it receives the strongest average signal power (referred to as its “anchor” TP), and then perform separate single-point scheduling for each TP with full reuse. While this approach might appear simplistic and deficient with respect to degree of freedom metrics which assume a fully connected network, over realistic networks it captures almost all of the average spectral efficiency gains promised by cell splitting.
  • TPs downlink heterogenous network with universal frequency reuse
  • RBs orthogonal resource blocks
  • Each TP can be a high power macro base station or a low power radio remote head and can be equipped with multiple transmit antennas.
  • Each RB is a bandwidth slice and represents the minimum allocation unit.
  • these B TPs serve a pool of K active users.
  • a typical HetNet scenario (as defined in the 3GPP LTE Rel. 11) wherein these B TPs are synchronized and can exchange messages over a fibre backhaul.
  • the signal received by a user k on RB n can be written as
  • H k,j (n) models the MIMO channel between TP j and user k on RB n (which includes small-scale fading, large-scale fading and path attenuation), while z k (n) is the additive circularly-symmetric Gaussian noise vector and x J (n) denotes the signal vector transmitted by TP j on the n th RB.
  • OFDMA orthogonal frequency-division-multiple access
  • b q,u (n) is the complex symbol vector transmitted by TP q on RB n intended for some user u using the precoding matrix W q,u (n) which satisfies a norm (power) constraint.
  • This factor significantly complicates the scheduling problem since it is no longer meaningful to define a per-user utility that depends on the resources allocated to that user alone. 2
  • This restriction is referred to as SU-MIMO per TP and provides robustness against imperfect and coarse channel feedback from the users.
  • e (u, f, b) represents a transmission hypothesis, i.e., the transmission from TP b using format f intended for user u.
  • r 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ IR + denote the weighted sum rate utility function.
  • r( , n) yields the weighted sum rate obtained upon transmission using the hypotheses in on RB n.
  • the weight associated with each element e (or equivalently user u e ) is an input to the scheduler and is in turn updated using the resulting scheduling decision.
  • r ⁇ ( ⁇ _ , n ) ⁇ e _ ⁇ ⁇ _ ⁇ ⁇ r e _ ⁇ ( ⁇ _ , n ) , ( 4 )
  • Implicit in this formulation is the assumption that given the choice of transmission hypotheses on an RB, the aforementioned parameters (such as the precoders, constellations etc.) are also determined, using which we can compute the weighted sum rate over the corresponding Gaussian interference channel.
  • the first constraint ensures that at-most one transmission hypotheses is selected on each RB.
  • the second constraint ensures that each scheduled user is assigned only one format.
  • the third constraint which is imposed only in the case of CDPS is that a scheduled user is served by only one TP over all its assigned RBs.
  • Each format can for instance be defined as the number of symbol streams assigned, in which case the constraint of at-most one format per scheduled user captures the main constraint in the LTE standard which is that each scheduled user be assigned the same number of streams on all its assigned RBs.
  • the rate utility can be evaluated assuming point-to-point Gaussian codes for each link and any suitable transmit precoding such as SLNR based, interference alignment based, etc.
  • each format can also include up-to two QAM constellations in which case we incorporate another LTE constraint that each scheduled user can be assigned at-most two distinct QAM constellations.
  • Our first result is that (6) is unlikely to be optimally solved by a low (polynomial) complexity algorithm.
  • the mapping of each constellation to one or more streams can be done using the codeword-to-stream mapping defined in LTE.
  • Theorem 1 The optimization problem in (6) is NP hard. Specifically, for any fixed N ⁇ 1 & J ⁇ 2, the optimization problem in (6) is strongly NP hard. For any fixed B ⁇ 1 & J ⁇ 2, the optimization problem in (6) is NP hard.
  • Algorithm I referred to as the format balancing algorithm
  • This format balancing algorithm is conceptually simple in that the best transmission hypotheses is determined separately for each RB. Then, a balancing step is performed on a per-user basis to ensure that each scheduled user is assigned one format each.
  • the balancing is done in a “polite” manner in that a user is assigned a format and then scheduled only on RBs where it was originally assigned a higher format.
  • the notion adopted here is that a lower format represents a less aggressive choice with respect to the other co-scheduled users.
  • Algorithm I offers a constant approximation under the following additional assumption on the utility function that is satisfied by some physically meaningful utilities.
  • Algorithm I is conceptually simple and can offer a constant-factor approximation, its implementation complexity can be quite high. Indeed, its complexity is O(N(KJ) B ) and is not feasible in many scenarios.
  • MWIS strongly NP hard maximum weight independent set
  • an exponential complexity with respect to B is the likely price we have to pay in order to obtain a approximation factor independent of B. Consequently, henceforth we will adopt an iterative framework to design approximation algorithms which will make the complexity polynomial in even B but will introduce a penalty of
  • the family defined above possesses the following property which follows from the basic definitions. Proposition 2.
  • the family of sets defined in (27) or (28) is an independence family. Consequently ( ⁇ , ) is a matroid.
  • New assignments of RBs, serving TPs and formats to users are made by solving the “per-step” scheduling problem of (26) and the obtained result ensures an improvement in system utility while maintaining feasibility.
  • the main difference between the two algorithms is in the method used to approximately solve the per-step scheduling problem.
  • the balancing in each iteration of Algorithm III is with respect to the format of a user. While such a balancing can also be done with respect to the serving TP of a user, in general no provable guarantees can then be derived since the channels seen by a user from any two different TPs in the cluster can be arbitrarily different.
  • the pruning step in either algorithm, given a selected subset is done as follows.
  • G i,j ⁇ i,j , where ⁇ i,j ⁇ [0,1], ⁇ 1 ⁇ i,j ⁇ J. (32)
  • G i , j min ⁇ ⁇ i , j ⁇ max ⁇ ⁇ i , j ⁇ , 1 ⁇ i , j ⁇ J . ( 35 )
  • h ⁇ ( u , ⁇ ) ⁇ min ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ u ⁇ Q u , max f ⁇ F ⁇ ⁇ n ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r ⁇ ( ( u , f , b ) , n ) ⁇ , CS / CB ⁇ ⁇ b : u ⁇ ⁇ b min ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ u ⁇ Q u , max f ⁇ F , b ⁇ ⁇ 1 , ... ⁇ , B ⁇ ⁇ n ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r ⁇ ( ( u , f , b ) , n ) ⁇ , CDPS ( 40 )
  • h ⁇ ( u , ⁇ ) min ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ u ⁇ Q u , ⁇ n ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ r ⁇ ( e _ , n ) ⁇ . ( 43 )
  • any fractionally sub-additive set function can be expressed as a maximum over linear set functions.
  • T linear functions g (j) ⁇ 1, . . . , K ⁇ ⁇ IR + , 1 ⁇ j ⁇ T
  • h ⁇ ( u , ⁇ ) max j ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ n ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ g ( j ) ⁇ ( u , n ) ⁇ , ⁇ ⁇ u ⁇ ⁇ 1 , ... ⁇ , K ⁇ & ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ . ( 47 )
  • h ⁇ ⁇ ( ⁇ ) ⁇ n ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ max ( u , j ) ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ g ( j ) ⁇ ( u , n ) ⁇ , ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ . ( 48 )
  • a solution feasible for (41) can be obtained such that its corresponding value is no less than a factor (1 ⁇ 1/e) times the one corresponding to the solution feasible for the LP (51).
  • Proposition 6 There exists an approximate separation oracle that for arbitrarily chosen constants ⁇ , ⁇ (0, 1), any user u and any given set of prices p n ⁇ IR + , ⁇ n ⁇ returns a set such that
  • the problem in (54) is the classical knapsack problem for which there exists an FPTAS so that a solution 1 with an approximation factor 1 ⁇ can be recovered.
  • (55) is equivalent to a min-knapsack problem.
  • each r( e , n) is bounded above by a constant. This allows us to use the demand-based dynamic program for the knapsack problem and recover in polynomial time a solution for which min ⁇ u Q u , r( e , n) ⁇ p( ) is no less than max ⁇ : r( e ,n)> u Q u ⁇ u Q u ⁇ P( ) ⁇ .
  • the LP (51) can be approximately solved in polynomial time to obtain a solution whose value is no less than (1 ⁇ ) ⁇ circumflex over (V) ⁇ LP ⁇ , where ⁇ circumflex over (V) ⁇ LP denotes the optimal value for the LP (51). Proof. Notice that the LP (51) has an exponential number of variables. A key result that was discovered earlier in prior art was that such an LP can be optimally solved in polynomial time given a separation oracle.
  • the dual of this LP can be solved in polynomial time via the ellipsoid method given a separation oracle. Then retaining only the constraints encountered while solving the dual (which are polynomially many) we can get its primal LP counterpart which now has polynomially many variables and hence can be solved in polynomial time.
  • This reduced variable LP (which essentially is the same as (51) but where all but a small subset of variables are fixed to zero) yields an optimal solution to (51).
  • This argument with some minor changes was also shown to work recently for an ⁇ -approximate separation oracle, where ⁇ is the approximation factor. Indeed, it is verified next that the same approach also works for an approximate oracle of the form in (52).
  • the LP-rounding based approximation algorithm consists of the following steps.
  • V ⁇ LP ⁇ V ⁇ opt B V ⁇ LP ⁇ V ⁇ opt B .
  • ⁇ ′ ⁇ 1 - 1 / e ⁇ ⁇ then
  • CoMP scenario 4b which is particularly conducive to coordinated scheduling.
  • 57 cells are emulated (with wraparound) and in each cell one Macro base station and four remote radio heads are deployed.
  • 30 users on an average are dropped in each cluster (cell) using a specific distribution.
  • the central scheduler In FDD systems the central scheduler must rely on the feedback from the users in order to obtain estimates or approximations of their respective downlink channels. Since the uplink resources available for such feedback are limited the following low overhead feedback signalling scheme is supported.
  • the approximations of all channels seen by user k from TPs in its measurement set are obtained as before.
  • the channel approximation corresponding to the TP involved in serving data to user k is scaled by a factor c k which represents the correction factor associated with user k.
  • This scaling factor is continually updated based on the sequence of ACK/NACKs received from that user. While the update procedure is proprietary, it follows the principle that every ACK increases the factor whereas every NACK decreases it.
  • the worst scenario would be the one where the network CSI at the scheduler is poor but the users have powerful receivers in which case CoMP schemes would be detrimental.
  • the scenario emulated in Tables 8 and 9 is more closer to the latter case since compared to the one in Tables 5 and 6, the total feedback overhead is identical but the receivers are more robust.
  • TPs transmission points
  • TPs transmission points
  • the networks formed by such disparate transmission points are referred to as heterogeneous networks (a.k.a. HetNets) and are rightly regarded as the future of all next generation wireless networks.
  • HetNets the basic coordination unit is referred to as a cluster which consists of multiple TPs. Coordinated resource allocation within a cluster must be accomplished at a very fine time scale, typically once every millisecond.
  • the simplest “baseline” approach then to manage dynamic coordination within a cluster is to associate each user with one TP within the cluster from which it receives the strongest average signal power (referred to as its “anchor” TP), and then perform separate single-point scheduling for each TP with full reuse. While this approach might appear simplistic and deficient with respect to degree of freedom metrics, over realistic networks it captures almost all of the average spectral efficiency gains promised by cell splitting. Indeed, the expectation from more sophisticated joint scheduling schemes in a cluster is mainly to achieve significant gains in the 5 percentile spectral efficiency while retaining the average spectral efficiency gains of the baseline.
  • H k,j (n) models the MIMO channel between TP j and user k on RB n (which includes small-scale fading, large-scale fading and path attenuation), while z k (n) is the additive circularly-symmetric Gaussian noise vector and x j (n) denotes the signal vector transmitted by TP j on the n th RB.
  • x j (n) denotes the signal vector transmitted by TP j on the n th RB.
  • b q,u (n) is the complex symbol vector transmitted by TP q on RB n intended for some user u using the precoding matrix W q,u (n) which satisfies a norm (power) constraint.
  • W q,u (n) which satisfies a norm (power) constraint.
  • e (u, f, b) represents a transmission hypothesis, i.e., the transmission from TP b using format f intended for user u.
  • the weight associated with each element e (or equivalently user u e ) is an input to the scheduler and is in turn updated using the resulting scheduling decision.
  • any pre-determined rule to compute the weighted sum rate can be used.
  • the weighted sum rate utility function satisfies a natural sub-additivity assumption which says that the rates of elements in a set will not decrease if some elements are expurgated from that set.
  • defining ⁇ e we assume that for each n ⁇
  • Coordinated Silencing/Coordinated Beamforming A user associated with this scheme can be served data only by its pre-determined “anchor” TP so that no real-time sharing of that user's data among TPs is needed.
  • anchor TP
  • DPS Dynamic Point Selection
  • DPS allows for an increase in received signal strength by exploiting short-term fading via per-RB serving TP selection, where serving TP means the TP that serves data to the user.
  • serving TP means the TP that serves data to the user.
  • (6) the objective function incorporates the finite buffer limits, whereas the first constraint ensures that at-most one transmission hypotheses is selected on each RB.
  • the second constraint ensures that each scheduled user is assigned only one format.
  • a format can for instance be defined as the number of symbol streams assigned, in which case on any RB and for a given transmission hypotheses, we have an interference channel where the number of streams for each transceiver link is now given.
  • the rule to evaluate the weighted sum rate can then be the one which assumes a Gaussian input alphabet for each transceiver link and a transmit precoding method such as the one based on interference alignment. Notice that the constraint of at-most one format per scheduled user then captures the main constraint in the LTE standard which is that each scheduled user be assigned the same number of streams on all its assigned RBs. Our first result is that (6) is unlikely to be optimally solved by a low (polynomial) complexity algorithm.
  • Theorem 1 implies that not only is the existence of an efficient optimal algorithm for (6) highly improbable, an exponential complexity with respect to B is the likely price we have to pay in order to obtain a approximation factor independent of B.
  • the relation between the weighted sum rates obtained using the optimal solutions to (6) and (7) is given by the following result.
  • Proposition 1 The optimal solution to (7) is feasible for (6) and yields a value that is no less than a factor
  • ⁇ tilde over (g) ⁇ ( e , , n, ⁇ ) min ⁇ , r e ( ⁇ e ,n ) ⁇ ( r e ′ ( , n ) ⁇ r e ′ ( ⁇ e ,n )) ⁇ u e ′
  • ⁇ tilde over (g) ⁇ ( e , n, ⁇ ) represents the overall incremental weighted rate gain (or loss) that is obtained by scheduling element e on RB n given that elements in are already scheduled on that RB.
  • ⁇ as a weighted rate margin, i.e., the weighted rate gain obtained for user u e cannot exceed ⁇ .
  • the purpose of this margin is to enforce the buffer constraint on user u e with the understanding that user u e has already obtained a weighted rate of u Q u ⁇ as a result of being scheduled on other RBs.
  • the scalars ⁇ u ⁇ [0, 1] ⁇ u are discount factors which again are used to incorporate buffer constraints.
  • the term r e ′ ( , n)r e ′ ( ⁇ e , n) represents the loss in weighted rate of user u e ′ due to the increased interference arising from scheduling an additional element e .
  • this loss is the maximum possible loss which occurs only when the buffer constraint for u e ′ is inactive. If the buffer constraint for that user is active (as a result of all RBs that have been assigned to u e ′ ) we discount the loss by a factor ⁇ u e ′.
  • Algorithm I we now proceed to offer Algorithm I to approximately solve (6).
  • G i , j min ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ , j ⁇ max ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ , j ⁇ , ⁇ ⁇ , j .
  • Algorithm II offers a solution to (6) that has a worst-case guarantee of at-least
  • the weighted sum rate value obtained using the solution yielded by it is no less than
  • the problem in (12) is a combinatorial auction problem (a.k.a. welfare maximization problem) with monotonic submodular per-user utilities or valuations. Notice that since the per-user format constraint is dropped in (12), its optimal value is an upper bound on ⁇ opt . More importantly, any combinatorial auction problem with monotonic submodular valuations can be approximately solved (with 1 ⁇ 2 approximation) via a greedy algorithm. Indeed, the inner While-Do loop implements such a greedy routine as a consequence of which after Step 14 we have that u ⁇ u′ ⁇ u ⁇ u′ and
  • Tables I and II we provide evaluation results for Algorithm I, where the evaluations were done on a fully calibrated system simulator which emulates a HetNet (scenario 4b).
  • a HetNet with 19 cell-sites (with wraparound) and 3 sectors per cell-site is emulated, where each sector represents a cluster comprising of 5 TPs—one Macro base-station and 4 low power radio heads—each with 4 transmit antennas.
  • Each sector serves an average of 10 users (each with 2 receive antennas) and a full buffer model is assumed.
  • Table I we assume that each user employs a simple receiver without inter-cell interference (ICI) rejection capabilities, whereas in Table II a more robust MMSE-IRC receiver is employed.
  • ICI inter-cell interference
  • CoMP CS/CB joint transmission
  • CS/CB coordinated scheduling and beamforming
  • DPS dynamic point selection
  • the UE does not have the knowledge of the exact PDSCH RE mapping unless a certain assumption or additional DL control signal is specified.
  • the PDSCH mapping for CoMP JT and DPS has the following issues.
  • the default PDSCH mapping approach for CoMP JT and DPS is that the PDSCH mapping always aligns with the mapping of the serving cell including the PDSCH start point and the assumption on the CRS RE positions.
  • This default approach does not need to introduce additional DL signalling, and thus has minimum standard impact.
  • due to mismatched PDCCH regions and CRS/PDSCH collisions some RE resources can be wasted or experience strong interference from CRS signals of other cells.
  • Thus such default approach can incur large CoMP performance degradation on the spectral efficiency.
  • the first approach to address the CRS/PDSCH collision issue is based on PDSCH muting, i.e., not transmitting the data symbol on the REs that are collided with the CRS REs from other TPs.
  • the PDSCH mapping information with PDSCH RE muting may then be signalled to the CoMP UE. If we send exact PDSCH mapping to the CoMP UE dynamically, the PDSCH RE muting may not be needed for the CoMP DPS. However, dynamically transmitting the exact PDSCH mapping requires a large signalling overhead. Therefore, the PDSCH muting based on the CoMP measurement set seems a promising alternative solution if the dynamic signalling cannot be accommodated.
  • the PDSCH REs that collide with the CRS REs from any other TP with the corresponding CSI-RS resource in the CoMP measurement set are muted for data transmission. Since the measurement set is semi-statically configured, the PDSCH mapping with muting can be signalled to the UE semi-statically. Also it has been agreed that the maximum size of CoMP measurement size is 3. Thus, PDSCH muting based on the measurement set will not degrade the spectral efficiency performance much.
  • the network semi-statically informs the CoMP UE the union of the CRS RE patterns for the TPs or CSI-RS resources in the CoMP measurement set of the UE, which are excluded from the data transmissions in PDSCH to that UE.
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication for alternative 1.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 0 Align to the serving cell (TP-1) 1 RE mapping on a subframe excluding the union of CRS REs of TPs in the measurement set on that subframe.
  • eNB configures PDSCH RE mapping for any transmitting TP as that for the serving cell.
  • DPS when a TP other than the serving TP in the measurement set is transmitting, the PDSCH on the CRS positions for this TP will not be used for data transmission. Since the UE assumes the serving cell PDSCH mapping, it would still try to decode the data on these CRS positions which actually do not carry any data information, which are called dirty data/bits.
  • a simple simulation is performed to evaluate the performance of these scenarios.
  • a length-576 information bits is encoded using the LTE turbo code with rate-1/2. We assume there are total 5% coded bits affected by CRS/PDSCH collisions.
  • the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information for each TP in the CoMP measurement set of that UE, and the PDSCH mapping that the network will follow to serve that UE.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH mapping align to the serving cell (TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH mapping align to TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH mapping align to TP-3 in the measurement set 11 RE mapping excluding the union of CRS REs in the measurement set in a subframe.
  • the UE may signal the UE the list of cell IDs of the TP in the measurement set and the associated number of CRS ports. If the cell IDs in the measurement set are signalled to the CoMP UE, the interference cancellation can be implemented since the UE is able to decode all the CRS signals in its CoMP measurement set. Also note that with the discussions for FeICIC, it has been agreed that the list of the strong CRS interference will be signalled to the UE so that UE may perform the interference cancellation. Since most probably, the TPs other than the serving TP in the measurement set are included in this list, it is then possible to reuse this list for the CoMP PDSCH mapping to reduce the signal overhead.
  • the network can also semi-statically inform the UE the PDSCH start point.
  • DPS Downlink Packet Control Protocol
  • the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information and PDSCH start point for each TP in the CoMP measurement set of that UE in some order.
  • the network then informs the UE dynamically the PDSCH start point and CRS pattern that the PDSCH mapping will follow by conveying the indices corresponding to them.
  • the network first semi-statically signals the UE the CRS information for each TP in the measurement set as in Alternative 1 or Alternative 2, as well as the PDSCH starting point for each TP if PDCCH region changes semi-statically. Then the network dynamically signal the index of the TP that the PDSCH mapping follows including the starting point.
  • Such dynamic signal can be specified in DCI with introducing an additional signal field. The signal is similar to that in Table 2 except that the index for the muting on the union of CRS REs is not necessary. If the PDSCH start points are configured dynamically on each TP in the measurement set. It may be better also dynamically signal the PDSCH start point.
  • the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information for each TP in the CoMP measurement set of that UE in some order.
  • the network then informs the UE dynamically the CRS pattern that the PDSCH mapping will follow by conveying the indices corresponding to them or indicating the UE the PDSCH mapping occupying all the CRS RE positions (assuming no CRS).
  • the dynamic signal for mapping indicator is then given in Table 3.
  • the PDSCH mapping indicator is set to be 11
  • the PDSCH starting point can be set with assuming the minimum or maximum size of PDCCH regions (or PDCCH OFDM symbols) of the TPs in the measurement set, which are semi-statically informed to the UE.
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication for alternative 3, 4.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH mapping align to the serving cell (TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH mapping align to TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH mapping align to TP-3 in the measurement set 11 (Alt-4) PDSCH RE mapping by occupying all CRS REs in the measurement set (assuming no CRS).
  • the first three cases (00, 01, 10) in Table 3 can also be applied to the JT with the corresponding indicated TP in non-MBSFN subframe and other TPs in their MBSFN subframe, which can also be indicated with 11.
  • No CRS JT is done in MBSFN case or it might be possible to realize sometimes using eNB compensation for partial JT.
  • JT can be done in MBSFN case.
  • eNB compensation for partial JT i.e., transmission over single TP or the subset of TPs (for 3TP JT).
  • the PDSCH RE mapping assuming no CRS can be included in as a pattern with number of CRS port being 0.
  • the UE may estimate the channel with the precoded demodulation reference signal (DMRS), then use such estimated channel to demodulate/detect the data symbol for all data symbols in the resource block or the resource group. If we transmit the data symbol on a subset of TPs, with the same precodings as that for the normal JT using all configured JT TPs, there would be channel mismatch which may degrad demodulation performance.
  • DMRS demodulation reference signal
  • the precoding for the transmission on the single TP on the collided RE can be obtained as follows. Assume U 1 and U 2 are two precoding matrices employed on 2 TPs in the JT. The received signal seen at the UE can be written as
  • H 2 ⁇ 1 H 2 H (H 2 H 2 H ) ⁇ 1 .
  • D i 1 2 diag ⁇ ( ⁇ i ⁇ ⁇ 1 , ... ⁇ , ⁇ ir )
  • y ij as the SINR feedback (e.g. in a quantized form CQI) for the i-th TP(CSI-RS resource) and the j-th layer, accompanied with the preferred precoding G i of rank r.
  • y ij as the SINR feedback (e.g. in a quantized form CQI) for the i-th TP(CSI-RS resource) and the j-th layer, accompanied with the preferred precoding G i of rank r.
  • the network can approximate the channel as
  • the above precoding scheme can be easily extended to the general case, i.e., the partial JT using a subset of TPs, say m TPs for the normal JT with M JT TPs, m ⁇ M JT .
  • the normalized U can then be employed as the precoding matrix for TP-2. Since U is normalized/scaled, the eNB can decide if this scaling result in an acceptable performance or not.
  • the 4-bit indices for CRS patterns are summarized in Table 4.
  • CRS pattern index (b 3 b 2 b 1 b 0 ) Number of CRS ports Frequency shift of CRS 0000 1 0 0001 1 1 0010 1 2 0011 1 3 0100 1 4 0101 1 5 0110 Reserved Reserved 0111 Reserved Reserved 1000 2 0 1001 2 1 1010 2 2 1011 Reserved Reserved 1100 4 0 1101 4 1 1110 4 2 1111 Reserved Reserved
  • Proposal 1 For PDSCH mapping in CoMP, the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information of each TP in its CoMP measurement set, and either an indicator of the PDSCH mapping of the TP from the CoMP measurement set that the network will follow to serve that UE or the PDSCH mapping which excludes the union of the CRS REs of all the TPs in the CoMP measurement set.
  • Proposal 2 For PDSCH mapping in CoMP, the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information of each TP in its CoMP measurement set. The network then informs the UE dynamically the CRS pattern that the PDSCH mapping will follow by conveying an index identifying it or by indicating to the UE that the PDSCH mapping will occupy all the CRS RE positions.
  • the presented precoding scheme in (1) can be an efficient implementation for partial JT if we transmit some data symbols from a subset of JT TPs on some REs in a JT CoMP transmission.
  • Proposal 1 For PDSCH mapping in CoMP, the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information of each TP in its CoMP measurement set, and either an indicator of the PDSCH mapping of the TP from the CoMP measurement set that the network will follow to serve that UE or the PDSCH mapping which excludes the union of the CRS REs of all the TPs in the CoMP measurement set.
  • Proposal 2 For PDSCH mapping in CoMP, the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information of each TP in its CoMP measurement set. The network then informs the UE dynamically the CRS pattern that the PDSCH mapping will follow by conveying an index identifying it or by indicating to the UE that the PDSCH mapping will occupy all the CRS RE positions.
  • the presented precoding scheme in (1) can be an efficient implementation for partial JT if we transmit some data symbols from a subset of JT TPs on some REs in a JT CoMP transmission.
  • the proposed the CRS pattern indexing in Table 4 has an advantage that have several bits in the index (3 bits for 1 CRS port, 2 bits for 2 or 4 CRS ports) explicitly mapped to the frequency shift of CRS.
  • CoMP CS/CB joint transmission
  • CS/CB coordinated scheduling and beamforming
  • DPS dynamic point selection
  • the UE does not have the knowledge of the exact PDSCH RE mapping unless a certain assumption or additional DL control signal is specified.
  • the PDSCH mapping for CoMP JT and DPS has the following issues.
  • the semi-static approaches can be a tradeoff solution.
  • semi-static approach we consider the PDSCH muting over the CRS collided REs, i.e., all the PDSCH REs that collide with the CRS REs from any other TP with the corresponding CSI-RS resource in the CoMP measurement set are muted for data transmission. Since the measurement set is semi-statically configured, the PDSCH mapping with muting can be signalled to the UE semi-statically. Also it has been agreed that the maximum size of CoMP measurement size is 3. Thus, PDSCH muting based on the measurement set will not degrade the spectral efficiency performance much.
  • the network semi-statically informs the CoMP UE the union of the CRS RE patterns for the TPs or CSI-RS resources in the CoMP measurement set of the UE, which are excluded from the data transmissions in PDSCH to that UE.
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication for alternative 1.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 0 Align to the serving cell (TP-1) 1 RE mapping on a subframe excluding the union of CRS REs of TPs in the measurement set on that subframe.
  • the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information for each TP in the CoMP measurement set of that UE, and the PDSCH mapping that the network will follow to serve that UE.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH mapping align to the serving cell (TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH mapping align to TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH mapping align to TP-3 in the measurement set 11 RE mapping excluding the union of CRS REs in the measurement set in a subframe.
  • the UE may signal the UE the list of cell IDs of the TP in the measurement set and the associated number of CRS ports. If the cell IDs in the measurement set are signalled to the CoMP UE, the interference cancellation can be implemented since the UE is able to decode all the CRS signals in its CoMP measurement set. Also note that with the discussions for FeICIC, it has been agreed that the list of the strong CRS interference will be signalled to the UE so that UE may perform the interference cancellation. Since most probably, the TPs other than the serving TP in the measurement set are included in this list, it is then possible to reuse this list for the CoMP PDSCH mapping to reduce the signal overhead.
  • the network can also semi-statically inform the UE the PDSCH start point.
  • DPS Downlink Packet Control Protocol
  • the data is not transmitted on the union of CRS REs in the measurement set.
  • more indication bits can be assigned, we can include more combinations in term of union of CRS REs in the CoMP measurement set.
  • the 3-bit indication i.e., 8 states
  • the union of CRS REs for any combination of TPs in the measurement set (with maximum size 3) can be accommodated.
  • the PDSCH RE mapping is then followed by excluding the union of CRS RE pattern which is conveyed to the UE by the 3-bit indicator.
  • This semi-static approach can be further extended to the general case when the information of strong interfering CRS outside the CoMP cluster is available to UE as a feature of FeICIC.
  • the strong interference to those UEs may come from some TPs outside CoMP cluster, while the TPs in a UE's CoMP measurement set may not have comparable interference strength.
  • the UE can perform interference cancellation to remove the CRS interference to improve the decoding performance, additional complexity is incurred to the UE for including such feature.
  • one solution is not to transmit the data over the RE that is interfered by the TP even outside the CoMPs.
  • the PDSCH mapping can avoid the union of CRS REs include TPs outside CoMPs.
  • the union of CRS REs can be any combination of CRS RE patterns on the list including both TPs in the CoMP measurement set or outside the CoMP measurement set and/or CoMP cluster.
  • the Alt-2 as aforementioned uses a 1-bit to indicate 2 states of PDSCH mapping information which can only accommodate two CRS patterns.
  • the maximum size of the CoMP measurement set for a UE is 3, 1-bit is not enough to convey the CRS pattern and MBSFN subframe information.
  • the size of CoMP measurement set is 3, the cases of CoMP measurement set size being one cannot be neglected. Therefore, we prefer the 2-bit dynamic signalling.
  • the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the CRS information and PDSCH start point for each TP in the CoMP measurement set of that UE in some order.
  • the network then informs the UE dynamically the PDSCH start point and CRS pattern that the PDSCH mapping will follow by conveying the indices corresponding to them.
  • the network first semi-statically signals the UE the CRS information for each TP in the measurement set as in Alternative 1 or Alternative 2, as well as the PDSCH starting point for each TP if PDCCH region changes semi-statically. Then the network dynamically signal the index of the TP that the PDSCH mapping follows possibly including the starting point. Such dynamic signal can be specified in DCI with an additional signal field.
  • the 2-bit dynamic signal is similar to that in Table 2 except that the state for the muting on the union of CRS REs is not necessary. If the PDSCH start points are configured dynamically on each TP in the measurement set.
  • the MBSFN subframe configurations are also semi-statically informed to the UE and associated to one TP or one CSI-RS resources.
  • the 2-bit DCI can also indicate the quasi co-location assumption which is along the indicated TP or CSI-RS resource.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH mapping align to the serving cell (TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH mapping align to TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH mapping align to TP-3 in the measurement set 11 Reserved.
  • the three states (00, 01, 10) in Table 3 can also be applied to the JT with the corresponding indicated TP in non-MBSFN subframe and other TPs in their MBSFN subframe.
  • the semi-static signalling of MBSFN subframe configuration may not be necessary because for any transmission on MBSFN, we can use state-11 for such indication.
  • state-11 one issue for using state-11 to signal the PDSCH mapping on MBSFN subframe without semi-static information of MBSFN configuration is that it does not support quasi-co-location indication with the 2-bit DCI.
  • the network semi-statically informs a CoMP UE the attributes including CRS information and possibly quasi-co-location information of each TP in its CoMP measurement set.
  • the network then informs the UE dynamically the CRS pattern and other attributes by conveying an index identifying them or it indicates to the UE that the PDSCH mapping will occupy all the CRS RE positions (assuming no CRS, e.g. MBSFN subframe) and that no quasi-co-location assumption must be made.
  • the dynamic signal for mapping indicator is then given in Table 4.
  • the PDSCH starting point and other attributes such as CRS information and quasi-co-location, etc., can be semi-statically associated to the entries of the table.
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication for alternative 4.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH mapping align to the serving cell (TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH mapping align to TP-2 in the measurement set 10 PDSCH mapping align to TP-3 in the measurement set 11 PDSCH RE mapping assuming no CRS (e.g. MBSFN) and no quasi-co-location assumption.
  • CRS e.g. MBSFN
  • the 4-bit indices for CRS patterns are summarized in Table 4.
  • CRS pattern index (b 3 b 2 b 1 b 0 ) Number of CRS ports Frequency shift of CRS 0000 1 0 0001 1 1 0010 1 2 0011 1 3 0100 1 4 0101 1 5 0110 Reserved Reserved 0111 Reserved Reserved 1000 2 0 1001 2 1 1010 2 2 1011 Reserved Reserved 1100 4 0 1101 4 1 1110 4 2 1111 Reserved Reserved
  • one alternative is to design a different table using 1 bit which covers all users with a CoMP measurement set size of 2. Since the CoMP measurement set of a user only changes semi-statically, the choice of the table being used needs to be configured along with the CoMP measurement set only semi-statically.
  • the other alternative is to have a common size of 2 bits but to make the interpretation of the mapping indication (i.e., the entries in the table) to be dependent on the CoMP measurement set size. This way more information can be conveyed for a user with CoMP measurement set size 2 than what is possible with Table 4.
  • the entry 10 conveys to the user (with CoMP measurement set size 2) that PDSCH mapping for it is done assuming no CRS and also that the user should assume quasi co-location of TP-1. This is beneficial if MBSFN information of TP-1 has not been semi-statically configured for the user. Then, when the user is scheduled to be served data by TP-1 in its MBSFN subframe, the user can be informed using entry 10 so that the user knows that PDSCH mapping for it is done assuming no CRS and it can use the parameters estimated during CSI-RS estimation for TP-1 to initialize its DMRS based estimator and hence achieve improved performance. A similar fact holds for entry 11 with respect to TP-2
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator
  • CoMP PDSCH RE mapping indication CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping indication CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator
  • entry 11 we use entry 11 to cover the case where the CRS positions of both the TPs are identical (as in the scenario with same cell ID and with identical number of ports for both TPs) and the user is served by both TPs having disparate quasi co-location related parameters and it is not suitable to indicate the partial quasi-co location information to the user.
  • a user with CoMP set size 1 can be served using the legacy format. Alternatively, it can be served using the DCI with 2 or 1 bit dynamic indication field but where the entries in the corresponding tables are re-interpreted according to rules for CoMP measurement set size 1.
  • the entries could be used to indicate PDSCH mapping assuming exclusion of the union of the CRS of the serving TP and the CRS of a strong interferer.
  • the assumption is that a list of interferers and some of their attributes (such as CRS positions etc) are known via some semi-static configuration mechanism between the network and the user.
  • CoMP PDSCH Mapping Indicator CoMP PDSCH RE Mapping 00 PDSCH mapping align to the serving cell (TP-1 in the measurement set) 01 PDSCH mapping assuming excluding union of TP-1 and 1 st strongest interferer 10 PDSCH mapping assuming excluding union of TP-1 and 1 st and 2 nd strongest interferers 11 PDSCH mapping assuming excluding union of TP-1 and 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd strongest interferers
  • the entry 01 for example conveys to the user to assume PDSCH mapping excluding the RE positions covered by the union of CRS positions of TP-1 and the 1 st strongest interferer. This way the user which cannot perform CRS interference cancellation due to complexity or due to inability to accurately estimate parameters needed for such cancellation, might be benefited since it will not try to decode data in positions with strong interference.
  • a codebook of tables can be defined. Then, the choice of table from that codebook of tables that the network will use can be configured in a semi-static and user specific manner.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
US13/948,388 2012-07-25 2013-07-23 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP) Abandoned US20140045510A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/948,388 US20140045510A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2013-07-23 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)
US14/499,414 US20150043499A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2014-09-29 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261675541P 2012-07-25 2012-07-25
US201261678882P 2012-08-02 2012-08-02
US201261683263P 2012-08-15 2012-08-15
US201261706301P 2012-09-27 2012-09-27
US201261706752P 2012-09-27 2012-09-27
US13/948,388 US20140045510A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2013-07-23 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/499,414 Division US20150043499A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2014-09-29 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140045510A1 true US20140045510A1 (en) 2014-02-13

Family

ID=49997837

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/948,388 Abandoned US20140045510A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2013-07-23 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)
US13/948,409 Active 2033-08-14 US9094145B2 (en) 2012-07-25 2013-07-23 Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP)
US14/499,414 Abandoned US20150043499A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2014-09-29 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/948,409 Active 2033-08-14 US9094145B2 (en) 2012-07-25 2013-07-23 Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP)
US14/499,414 Abandoned US20150043499A1 (en) 2012-07-25 2014-09-29 Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US20140045510A1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
EP (2) EP2809025B1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
JP (5) JP5846521B2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
KR (2) KR101516666B1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
CA (4) CA2987989C (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
ES (1) ES2588537T3 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
IN (1) IN2014CN03552A (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
WO (1) WO2014018756A1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140112248A1 (en) * 2012-10-09 2014-04-24 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Load-Invariant Configuration of Interference Measurement Resources
US20150057010A1 (en) * 2013-08-22 2015-02-26 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. System and Method for Boundaryless Service in Wireless Networks with Cooperative Transmission Points
US20150098415A1 (en) * 2013-10-04 2015-04-09 Cellos Software Ltd Method and Apparatus for Coordinating One or More Downlink Transmissions In A Wireless Communication System
US20150319710A1 (en) * 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method And Apparatus For Reducing Interference In A Heterogeneous Network
US20160192382A1 (en) * 2013-09-06 2016-06-30 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for scheduling and/or muting of radio resources in a wireless communication system
WO2016127047A1 (en) * 2015-02-06 2016-08-11 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Standards compliant coordinated multi-point scheduling over lte heterogeneous wireless networks
US9467216B2 (en) 2012-06-14 2016-10-11 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Computing system with joint-transmission mechanism and method of operation thereof
US20160381697A1 (en) * 2014-03-12 2016-12-29 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for feeding back channel quality indicator, and method and apparatus for sending resource scheduling information
CN107294574A (zh) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-24 华为技术有限公司 多传输点数据传输的方法及装置
CN107735973A (zh) * 2015-06-30 2018-02-23 高通股份有限公司 协调多点调度
CN109120313A (zh) * 2017-06-26 2019-01-01 华为技术有限公司 一种秩指示上报方法和装置、指示方法和装置
US10243775B2 (en) * 2014-08-29 2019-03-26 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data transmission method and device
US20210068134A1 (en) * 2018-05-11 2021-03-04 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Communications method and apparatus
WO2021102478A1 (en) * 2020-06-15 2021-05-27 Zeku, Inc. Approaches to self-clustering resource blocks for improved noise estimation through imbalance detection
US11044065B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2021-06-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving feedback information in mobile communication system using multiple antennas
US20210226682A1 (en) * 2018-06-28 2021-07-22 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for reporting channel state information in wireless communication system, and device therefor
US20210266130A1 (en) * 2016-11-04 2021-08-26 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data Transmission Method and Apparatus
US11343052B2 (en) * 2017-03-24 2022-05-24 Apple Inc. Cell specific reference signal (CRS) muting for even further enhanced machine type communication (EFEMTC)
US20230087335A1 (en) * 2020-04-03 2023-03-23 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Pim downlink subspace acquisition method
US11690101B1 (en) * 2017-08-08 2023-06-27 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Systems and methods for coordinated multi point operation in the unlicensed band
US20230388173A1 (en) * 2020-10-13 2023-11-30 Zte Corporation Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method
US20240015725A1 (en) * 2020-06-15 2024-01-11 Cohere Technologies, Inc. Spectral sharing wireless systems

Families Citing this family (110)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0544884A (ja) * 1991-08-12 1993-02-23 Osaka Gas Co Ltd 被保護管の内面補修装置
ES2694076T3 (es) 2009-10-01 2018-12-17 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Transmisión de datos de control del enlace ascendente
EP2738953A1 (en) 2011-01-07 2014-06-04 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Communicating channel state information (CSI) of multiple transmission points
US11575478B2 (en) * 2011-01-17 2023-02-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Rate matching for coordinated multipoint transmission schemes
JP5437310B2 (ja) * 2011-05-02 2014-03-12 株式会社Ｎｔｔドコモ 無線基地局装置、移動端末装置、無線通信方法及び無線通信システム
KR101741059B1 (ko) * 2011-06-27 2017-06-15 삼성전자 주식회사 ＣｏＭＰ 단말의 스케줄링 방법 및 장치
KR20200000473A (ko) 2011-08-12 2020-01-02 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 무선 네트워크들에서의 간섭 측정
US8797966B2 (en) 2011-09-23 2014-08-05 Ofinno Technologies, Llc Channel state information transmission
US8879496B2 (en) 2011-12-19 2014-11-04 Ofinno Technologies, Llc Beamforming codeword exchange between base stations
WO2013107219A1 (en) * 2012-01-21 2013-07-25 Zte Corporation Cooperative Multi-Point Modulation (CoMP-M): Method and Apparatus using Base Station Modulation with Cooperative Multi-point Transmitting and Receiving in a Cellular System
GB2499674B (en) * 2012-02-27 2014-03-26 Broadcom Corp Method and apparatus for coordinated multi-point operations
KR20130130593A (ko) * 2012-05-22 2013-12-02 삼성전자주식회사 분산 안테나를 사용하는 복수 개의 기지국을 포함하는 무선통신 시스템에서 기준 신호 측정 방법 및 장치
KR101647007B1 (ko) 2012-06-04 2016-08-10 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 다중 전송 포인트의 통신 채널 상태 정보(csi)
US20140045510A1 (en) * 2012-07-25 2014-02-13 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)
CN104509191B (zh) * 2012-07-27 2019-06-11 华为技术有限公司 用于多点通信的系统和方法
US9407343B2 (en) * 2012-08-31 2016-08-02 Google Technology Holdings LLC Method and apparatus for mitigating downlink interference
JP6171015B2 (ja) 2012-09-16 2017-07-26 エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド 協調的送信を支援する無線通信システムにおいてデータを受信する方法及び装置
US9603139B2 (en) * 2012-09-21 2017-03-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and device for transmitting and receiving downlink signal in wireless communication system
JP5962764B2 (ja) * 2012-09-26 2016-08-03 富士通株式会社 基地局装置、通信システム及び通信方法
US20140092879A1 (en) * 2012-10-02 2014-04-03 Zte Wistron Telecom Ab Downlink transmission point selection in a wireless heterogeneous network
JP6345677B2 (ja) * 2012-10-04 2018-06-20 エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド 無線通信システムにおいてアンテナポート関係を考慮した下りリンク信号送受信方法及び装置
US9307521B2 (en) * 2012-11-01 2016-04-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Transmission scheme and quasi co-location assumption of antenna ports for PDSCH of transmission mode 10 for LTE advanced
WO2014089842A1 (zh) * 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 华为技术有限公司 一种上行CoMP集合的选择方法、设备及系统
CN114095140B (zh) 2012-12-27 2023-10-10 华为技术有限公司 信号处理方法和设备
US9954640B2 (en) * 2013-01-16 2018-04-24 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for calculating channel state information in wireless communications system based on multiple cells and apparatus therefor
GB2509958B (en) * 2013-01-18 2016-02-03 Broadcom Corp Methods, apparatus and computer programs for controlling feedbck about channel conditions
CN103973394B (zh) * 2013-01-25 2018-07-17 索尼公司 公共参考信号的图样通知方法和装置、及确定方法和装置
US10511504B2 (en) * 2013-01-25 2019-12-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Cell-specific reference signal interference averaging
EP2949064A1 (en) * 2013-01-28 2015-12-02 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) Configuration of interference averaging for channel measurements
WO2014157940A1 (ko) 2013-03-27 2014-10-02 엘지전자 주식회사 다증 샐 기반 무선 통신 시스템에서 참조 신호를 설정하는 방법 및 이를 위한 장치
TW202005313A (zh) * 2013-05-08 2020-01-16 美商內數位專利控股公司 在腸期進化(lte)系統中網路輔助干擾取消及/或抑制(naics)方法、系統及裝置
EP2996272A4 (en) * 2013-05-10 2017-04-05 Fujitsu Limited Information feedback method, user equipment, and base station
KR102083352B1 (ko) * 2013-07-03 2020-03-03 삼성전자주식회사 가상 셀 네트워크 시스템에서 가상 셀 형성장치 및 방법
WO2015005438A1 (ja) * 2013-07-11 2015-01-15 シャープ株式会社 端末装置、基地局装置、集積回路、および、通信方法
WO2015005428A1 (ja) * 2013-07-11 2015-01-15 シャープ株式会社 端末装置、基地局装置、集積回路、および、通信方法
US9231740B2 (en) * 2013-07-12 2016-01-05 Intel Corporation Transmitter noise in system budget
KR20150010560A (ko) * 2013-07-19 2015-01-28 삼성전자주식회사 무선 통신 시스템의 협력 통신 방법 및 장치
US10057002B2 (en) * 2013-12-29 2018-08-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for removing interference and receiving signal in wireless communication system
US9680563B2 (en) * 2014-01-17 2017-06-13 Apple Inc. System and method for partial bandwidth communication
US9872242B2 (en) * 2014-01-31 2018-01-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Joint transmission of CSI-RS for channel state feedback and transmission point selection
US9537557B2 (en) * 2014-02-07 2017-01-03 Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad Method and apparatus for a cluster specific CSI feedback
US9526016B2 (en) 2014-02-14 2016-12-20 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Computing system with feedback mechanism and method of operation thereof
KR20150107490A (ko) 2014-03-14 2015-09-23 삼성전자주식회사 무선통신 시스템에서 간섭 신호 제거 및 억제를 위한 제어정보 전송 방법 및 장치
CN104936184A (zh) * 2014-03-21 2015-09-23 上海贝尔股份有限公司 基于协作多点在多个小区间进行资源分配的方法与设备
US10103855B2 (en) * 2014-03-28 2018-10-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Flexible channel state information feedback management
US9351307B2 (en) * 2014-03-31 2016-05-24 Qualcomm Incorporated CSI report with different receiver capabilities
WO2015167280A1 (ko) * 2014-05-02 2015-11-05 엘지전자 주식회사 채널 상태 보고를 위한 방법 및 이를 위한 장치
KR101600955B1 (ko) * 2014-07-16 2016-03-08 에스케이텔레콤 주식회사 기지국장치 및 기지국장치의 동작 방법
CN106537809B (zh) * 2014-07-23 2020-01-10 Lg 电子株式会社 在无线接入系统中发送信道状态信息的方法和设备
US9578653B2 (en) * 2014-09-26 2017-02-21 Intel IP Corporation Network assisted parameter estimation in the presence of inter-cell interference
US9681324B2 (en) * 2014-10-30 2017-06-13 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method and controller for low-overhead user equipment measurements
CN105680999B (zh) 2014-11-17 2019-05-21 电信科学技术研究院 一种信道状态信息测量方法、终端和网络设备
US9807779B2 (en) * 2015-01-12 2017-10-31 Qualcomm Incorporated Techniques for managing wireless communications over multiple carriers
US9750056B2 (en) 2015-01-27 2017-08-29 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. System and method for transmission in a grant-free uplink transmission scheme
US9936519B2 (en) 2015-03-15 2018-04-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Self-contained time division duplex (TDD) subframe structure for wireless communications
US10342012B2 (en) 2015-03-15 2019-07-02 Qualcomm Incorporated Self-contained time division duplex (TDD) subframe structure
US10075970B2 (en) * 2015-03-15 2018-09-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Mission critical data support in self-contained time division duplex (TDD) subframe structure
CN106160825B (zh) * 2015-04-20 2021-07-30 中兴通讯股份有限公司 信道信息的配置方法及装置、反馈方法及装置
CN107567694B (zh) * 2015-05-13 2021-04-20 苹果公司 用于确定物理下行链路共享信道的功率偏移的方法和装置
US9814058B2 (en) 2015-05-15 2017-11-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Scaled symbols for a self-contained time division duplex (TDD) subframe structure
EP3319365B1 (en) * 2015-07-03 2020-09-02 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Terminal device, base station device, communication method and integrated circuit
US10080134B2 (en) 2015-07-03 2018-09-18 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Terminal device, base station apparatus, communication method, and integrated circuit
WO2017006873A1 (ja) * 2015-07-03 2017-01-12 シャープ株式会社 端末装置、基地局装置、通信方法、および、集積回路
US9992790B2 (en) 2015-07-20 2018-06-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Time division duplex (TDD) subframe structure supporting single and multiple interlace modes
CN108432313B (zh) * 2015-08-05 2022-07-05 夏普株式会社 终端装置、基站装置以及通信方法
US10608725B2 (en) 2015-09-09 2020-03-31 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for reporting channel state and apparatus therefor
CN106559182B (zh) * 2015-09-25 2020-06-16 中兴通讯股份有限公司 信道参数的配置获取方法、装置及系统
ES2690248T3 (es) * 2015-10-27 2018-11-20 Telefonica, S.A. Método para realizar programación conjunta en el enlace descendente o en el enlace ascendente de una red de acceso de radio OFDM centralizada para una pluralidad de usuarios teniendo en cuenta dominios de tiempo, frecuencia y espacio, dispositivo programador de los mismos y productos de programas de ordenador
WO2017136749A1 (en) * 2016-02-03 2017-08-10 Docomo Innovations, Inc. User equipment and method for wireless communication
US10575319B2 (en) * 2016-04-15 2020-02-25 Nec Corporation Two-stage algorithm for uplink CoMP
CN107306146B (zh) * 2016-04-19 2021-07-30 中兴通讯股份有限公司 端口与波束的配置方法及装置
US10574331B2 (en) * 2016-05-10 2020-02-25 Nokia Technologies Oy Antenna co-location and receiver assumptions
US11025319B2 (en) * 2016-05-10 2021-06-01 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for transmitting/receiving data signal between base station and terminal in wireless communication system and apparatus supporting same
US10742468B2 (en) * 2016-07-07 2020-08-11 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for transceiving a signal in a wireless communication system supporting zone-based communication
CN107733540B (zh) * 2016-08-12 2021-06-15 华为技术有限公司 测量的方法和装置
US10367566B2 (en) * 2016-08-12 2019-07-30 Qualcomm Incorporated Techniques for non-coherent joint transmissions in wireless communications
CN107733559B (zh) * 2016-08-12 2021-06-22 北京华为数字技术有限公司 一种数据传输方法、发送设备及接收设备
KR102534044B1 (ko) * 2016-08-12 2023-05-19 삼성전자 주식회사 이동 통신 시스템에서 데이터 디코딩 방법 및 장치
US10158555B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2018-12-18 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitation of route optimization for a 5G network or other next generation network
US10171214B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2019-01-01 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Channel state information framework design for 5G multiple input multiple output transmissions
US10206232B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2019-02-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Initial access and radio resource management for integrated access and backhaul (IAB) wireless networks
US10644924B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2020-05-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitating a two-stage downlink control channel in a wireless communication system
US10602507B2 (en) 2016-09-29 2020-03-24 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitating uplink communication waveform selection
US10505697B2 (en) 2016-11-03 2019-12-10 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitating a mobile device specific physical downlink shared channel resource element mapping indicator
US10440693B2 (en) 2016-11-04 2019-10-08 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Asynchronous multi-point transmission schemes
US10396959B2 (en) 2016-11-10 2019-08-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Signaling beamforming relationships between control and data channels
US10574308B2 (en) * 2017-01-24 2020-02-25 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Managing of channel state information in a multiple-antenna communication system
US10355813B2 (en) 2017-02-14 2019-07-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Link adaptation on downlink control channel in a wireless communications system
GB2562707B (en) 2017-03-24 2021-02-17 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Improvements in and relating to non-coherent joint detection in telecommunication systems
US10091777B1 (en) 2017-03-31 2018-10-02 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitating physical downlink shared channel resource element mapping indicator
US10187131B2 (en) 2017-06-09 2019-01-22 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitation of rank and precoding matrix indication determinations for multiple antenna systems with aperiodic channel state information reporting in 5G or other next generation networks
JP7242161B2 (ja) * 2017-06-14 2023-03-20 ソニーグループ株式会社 通信装置、通信制御方法及びコンピュータプログラム
CN109152017B (zh) * 2017-06-16 2021-02-05 华为技术有限公司 一种传输块大小的确定方法和装置
US10389411B2 (en) * 2017-09-18 2019-08-20 Bar-Ilan University Hierarchic beam-forming in a cloud radio access network
US10659996B2 (en) * 2017-09-29 2020-05-19 Northwestern University Radio resource management in metropolitan area networks
US10856300B2 (en) * 2017-10-17 2020-12-01 Qualcomm Incorporated Per-TTI rank control within transmission opportunity for downlink comp
US10645608B2 (en) 2017-10-24 2020-05-05 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Systems and methods for on demand intelligent analytics dynamic access network slice switching and carrier aggregation
CN109803351B (zh) * 2017-11-17 2021-03-16 维沃移动通信有限公司 一种资源分配的方法及设备
US10291378B1 (en) * 2018-04-05 2019-05-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Signaling of alternative modulation coding schemes
US11552687B2 (en) 2018-06-15 2023-01-10 Nec Corporation CSI reporting for multiple TRP transmission/panel
CN111818629B (zh) * 2019-04-10 2022-04-29 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 数据传输方法和设备
KR102202587B1 (ko) 2019-06-13 2021-01-13 금호타이어 주식회사 공기입타이어
US11510182B2 (en) 2019-11-18 2022-11-22 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Resource management method and apparatus in user-centric wireless network
US12016028B2 (en) 2020-03-19 2024-06-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Supporting allocation modification during transition instance in integrated access and backhaul network
CN111786706B (zh) * 2020-07-02 2022-03-08 电子科技大学 一种联合信道信息获取和波束赋形方法
EP4009564B1 (en) 2020-12-03 2023-12-06 Hon Lin Technology Co., Ltd. Method for allocating wireless resources based on sensitivity to inter-cell interference and apparatus thereof
EP4200998A4 (en) * 2020-12-07 2024-02-21 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INTERCELL INTERFERENCE CONTROL FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
CN112439201B (zh) * 2020-12-07 2022-05-27 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 一种基于次模最大化的动态场景生成方法、终端以及存储介质
US11582765B2 (en) * 2021-01-15 2023-02-14 T-Mobile Innovations Llc Determining radio signal metrics for specified resource blocks
WO2024150375A1 (ja) * 2023-01-12 2024-07-18 株式会社Ｎｔｔドコモ 端末、無線通信方法及び基地局

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120113816A1 (en) * 2010-11-05 2012-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Reference signal reception and channel state information determination for multiple nodes in a wireless communication network
US8761086B2 (en) * 2009-11-02 2014-06-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for hierarchical codebook design in wireless communication
US8913674B2 (en) * 2010-10-04 2014-12-16 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving codebook subset restriction bitmap

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8917707B2 (en) * 2009-04-24 2014-12-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Techniques for channel state information feedback in wireless communication system
KR101745414B1 (ko) * 2009-06-09 2017-06-13 엘지전자 주식회사 무선 통신 시스템에서 채널 정보 전송 방법 및 장치
KR20110040672A (ko) 2009-10-12 2011-04-20 주식회사 팬택 무선통신 시스템에서 제어정보 송수신방법 및 장치
KR101754970B1 (ko) 2010-01-12 2017-07-06 삼성전자주식회사 무선 통신 시스템의 채널 상태 측정 기준신호 처리 장치 및 방법
JP5735541B2 (ja) 2010-01-18 2015-06-17 エルジー エレクトロニクス インコーポレイティド 無線通信システムにおいてチャネル品質情報を提供する方法及び装置
US8995465B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2015-03-31 Qualcomm Incorporated Reference signal patterns
KR102069071B1 (ko) 2010-12-21 2020-02-11 엘지전자 주식회사 무선 통신 시스템에서 신호를 송수신하는 방법 및 이를 위한 장치
JP5265657B2 (ja) * 2010-12-27 2013-08-14 シャープ株式会社 基地局装置、端末装置、通信システムおよび通信方法
US9252930B2 (en) 2011-01-07 2016-02-02 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Reference signal transmission and reception method and equipment
EP2738953A1 (en) 2011-01-07 2014-06-04 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Communicating channel state information (CSI) of multiple transmission points
US8842622B2 (en) 2011-01-07 2014-09-23 Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Method, system and apparatus for downlink shared channel reception in cooperative multipoint transmissions
JP6110366B2 (ja) * 2011-04-29 2017-04-05 インターデイジタル パテント ホールディングス インコーポレイテッド 開ループ空間処理
US9516632B2 (en) 2012-01-11 2016-12-06 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for transmitting/receiving downlink data channel signal transmission information in cellular radio communication system using cooperative multi-point scheme
US9014109B2 (en) * 2012-06-05 2015-04-21 Hitachi, Ltd. Method and apparatus for bit-level PDSCH muting and/or receiver puncturing in LTE-advanced heterogeneous networks
US20140045510A1 (en) * 2012-07-25 2014-02-13 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Coordinated Multipoint Transmission and Reception (CoMP)
US20140064135A1 (en) * 2012-08-28 2014-03-06 Texas Instruments Incorporated Reception of Downlink Data for Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission in the Event of Fall-Back

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8761086B2 (en) * 2009-11-02 2014-06-24 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for hierarchical codebook design in wireless communication
US8913674B2 (en) * 2010-10-04 2014-12-16 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving codebook subset restriction bitmap
US20120113816A1 (en) * 2010-11-05 2012-05-10 Qualcomm Incorporated Reference signal reception and channel state information determination for multiple nodes in a wireless communication network

Cited By (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9467216B2 (en) 2012-06-14 2016-10-11 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Computing system with joint-transmission mechanism and method of operation thereof
US9143987B2 (en) * 2012-10-09 2015-09-22 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Load-invariant configuration of interference measurement resources
US20140112248A1 (en) * 2012-10-09 2014-04-24 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Load-Invariant Configuration of Interference Measurement Resources
US11044065B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2021-06-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving feedback information in mobile communication system using multiple antennas
US20150057010A1 (en) * 2013-08-22 2015-02-26 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. System and Method for Boundaryless Service in Wireless Networks with Cooperative Transmission Points
US10455590B2 (en) * 2013-08-22 2019-10-22 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. System and method for boundaryless service in wireless networks with cooperative transmission points
US20160192382A1 (en) * 2013-09-06 2016-06-30 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for scheduling and/or muting of radio resources in a wireless communication system
US10485011B2 (en) * 2013-09-06 2019-11-19 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for scheduling and/or muting of radio resources in a wireless communication system
US9419757B2 (en) * 2013-10-04 2016-08-16 Cellos Software Ltd Method and apparatus for coordinating one or more downlink transmissions in a wireless communication system
US20150098415A1 (en) * 2013-10-04 2015-04-09 Cellos Software Ltd Method and Apparatus for Coordinating One or More Downlink Transmissions In A Wireless Communication System
US9655099B2 (en) 2013-10-04 2017-05-16 Cellos Software Ltd Method and apparatus for coordinating one or more downlink transmissions in a wireless communication system
US20160381697A1 (en) * 2014-03-12 2016-12-29 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for feeding back channel quality indicator, and method and apparatus for sending resource scheduling information
US10194455B2 (en) * 2014-03-12 2019-01-29 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for feeding back channel quality indicator, and method and apparatus for sending resource scheduling information
US9769768B2 (en) * 2014-04-30 2017-09-19 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method and apparatus for reducing interference in a heterogeneous network
US20150319710A1 (en) * 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Method And Apparatus For Reducing Interference In A Heterogeneous Network
US10243775B2 (en) * 2014-08-29 2019-03-26 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data transmission method and device
US9906340B2 (en) * 2015-02-06 2018-02-27 Nec Corporation Standards compliant coordinated multi-point scheduling over LTE heterogeneous wireless networks
US20160233994A1 (en) * 2015-02-06 2016-08-11 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Standards compliant coordinated multi-point scheduling over lte heterogeneous wireless networks
WO2016127047A1 (en) * 2015-02-06 2016-08-11 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Standards compliant coordinated multi-point scheduling over lte heterogeneous wireless networks
CN107735973A (zh) * 2015-06-30 2018-02-23 高通股份有限公司 协调多点调度
CN107294574A (zh) * 2016-04-08 2017-10-24 华为技术有限公司 多传输点数据传输的方法及装置
US11784773B2 (en) * 2016-11-04 2023-10-10 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data transmission method and apparatus
US20210266130A1 (en) * 2016-11-04 2021-08-26 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data Transmission Method and Apparatus
US11997040B2 (en) 2017-03-24 2024-05-28 Apple Inc. Cell specific reference signal (CRS) muting for even further enhanced machine type communication (EFEMTC)
US11343052B2 (en) * 2017-03-24 2022-05-24 Apple Inc. Cell specific reference signal (CRS) muting for even further enhanced machine type communication (EFEMTC)
CN109120313A (zh) * 2017-06-26 2019-01-01 华为技术有限公司 一种秩指示上报方法和装置、指示方法和装置
US11690101B1 (en) * 2017-08-08 2023-06-27 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Systems and methods for coordinated multi point operation in the unlicensed band
US20210068134A1 (en) * 2018-05-11 2021-03-04 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Communications method and apparatus
US12137450B2 (en) * 2018-05-11 2024-11-05 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Communications method and apparatus
US20210226682A1 (en) * 2018-06-28 2021-07-22 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for reporting channel state information in wireless communication system, and device therefor
US20230087335A1 (en) * 2020-04-03 2023-03-23 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Pim downlink subspace acquisition method
US12034504B2 (en) * 2020-04-03 2024-07-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) PIM downlink subspace acquisition method
US20240015725A1 (en) * 2020-06-15 2024-01-11 Cohere Technologies, Inc. Spectral sharing wireless systems
WO2021102478A1 (en) * 2020-06-15 2021-05-27 Zeku, Inc. Approaches to self-clustering resource blocks for improved noise estimation through imbalance detection
US20230388173A1 (en) * 2020-10-13 2023-11-30 Zte Corporation Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method
US12126482B2 (en) * 2020-10-13 2024-10-22 Xi'an Zhongxing New Software Co., Ltd. Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2987989C (en) 2020-02-25
US20140044061A1 (en) 2014-02-13
CA2871263A1 (en) 2014-01-30
US9094145B2 (en) 2015-07-28
JP2015519019A (ja) 2015-07-06
JP2015092673A (ja) 2015-05-14
US20150043499A1 (en) 2015-02-12
KR20140089612A (ko) 2014-07-15
KR101516666B1 (ko) 2015-06-05
ES2588537T3 (es) 2016-11-03
JP6763451B2 (ja) 2020-09-30
JP6512275B2 (ja) 2019-05-15
IN2014CN03552A (enrdf_load_stackoverflow) 2015-09-25
JP5846521B2 (ja) 2016-01-20
KR101516667B1 (ko) 2015-05-04
EP2809025B1 (en) 2016-05-25
WO2014018756A1 (en) 2014-01-30
EP2809025A1 (en) 2014-12-03
KR20140093735A (ko) 2014-07-28
JP5846513B2 (ja) 2016-01-20
CA2987989A1 (en) 2014-01-30
JP2016054520A (ja) 2016-04-14
CA2942951A1 (en) 2014-01-30
JP2018067956A (ja) 2018-04-26
CA2857481C (en) 2015-10-13
CA2857481A1 (en) 2014-01-30
JP2019110607A (ja) 2019-07-04
CA2871263C (en) 2016-11-29
EP2774279A1 (en) 2014-09-10
EP2774279A4 (en) 2015-08-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9094145B2 (en) Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception (CoMP)
US9148818B2 (en) Coordinated multiple point transmission and reception
US8615052B2 (en) Enhanced channel feedback for multi-user MIMO
EP2891260B1 (en) Method and wireless terminal for mitigating downlink interference
US9337906B2 (en) Feedback and scheduling for coordinated multi-point (CoMP) joint transmission (JT) in orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA)
Määttänen et al. System-level performance of LTE-Advanced with joint transmission and dynamic point selection schemes
CN105308889A (zh) 在无线通信系统中干扰消除的方法及其设备
Benjebbour et al. Downlink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) combined with single user MIMO (SU-MIMO)
Liu et al. New leakage-based iterative coordinated beam-forming for multi-user MIMO in LTE-Advanced
US8923224B2 (en) Quantizing relative phase and relative amplitude for coordinated multipoint (CoMP) transmissions
Xi et al. Novel CQI update methods in CoMP transmission
Aluko Frameworks to enhance performance in precoded multi-user MIMO systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YUE, GUOSEN;PRASAD, NARAYAN;JIANG, MEILONG;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20140917 TO 20140925;REEL/FRAME:033816/0155

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION