US20130328702A1 - Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method - Google Patents

Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130328702A1
US20130328702A1 US13/892,252 US201313892252A US2013328702A1 US 20130328702 A1 US20130328702 A1 US 20130328702A1 US 201313892252 A US201313892252 A US 201313892252A US 2013328702 A1 US2013328702 A1 US 2013328702A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
configuration
attitude
child symbol
piloted craft
craft
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/892,252
Inventor
Russell Alan Vanhoozer
Bradley G. Wilburn
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/892,252 priority Critical patent/US20130328702A1/en
Publication of US20130328702A1 publication Critical patent/US20130328702A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D45/00Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C23/00Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
    • G01C23/005Flight directors

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to electronic instrument display systems and specifically to the display of configuration settings of a piloted craft within an attitude indicator; the piloted craft, including but not limited to, fixed wing aircraft, rotor-wing aircraft, spacecraft, lighter than air aircraft, and watercraft such as ships, barges, boats, semi-submersibles and fully submersible craft.
  • flight display systems include a primary flight display (PFD) installed in front of the left seat pilot position and a multi-function display (MFD) positioned centrally relative to the instrument panel. While the layout of the PFD may vary considerably depending on the manufacturer and the default or preferred settings which alter the arrangement of the various instruments displayed, the PFD typically includes a centrally positioned attitude indicator, airspeed indicator, altitude indicators, a vertical speed indicator next to the altitude indicator, and a heading display showing the magnetic heading of the aircraft.
  • PFD primary flight display
  • MFD multi-function display
  • attitude indicator is the most relied on by the pilot especially in low visibility conditions, or instrument flying and reflects the pitch (fore and aft tilt) and the roll (side to side tilt) of the aircraft. While modern attitude indicators typically have a chevron symbol representing the aircraft in relationship to an artificial horizon line in which the upward point of the chevron represents the nose of the aircraft, other various shapes representing the aircraft are also used.
  • the configuration elements of a modern aircraft can include the flaps which are hinged surfaces on the trailing edge of the fixed wings that are deployed to reduce the stalling speed, the slats which are positioned at the leading edge of the fixed wings and when deployed allow the wing to operate at a higher angle of attack, the landing gear, the spoilers which are plates on the top surface of the wings which are extended upward into the airflow to reduce lift, and the reverse thrusters which temporarily redirect a jet engine's exhaust forward to decelerate the aircraft on landing.
  • failure to deactivate the spoilers when accelerating has caused accidents. For example, failure to deactivate the spoilers while climbing to avoid a mountain contributed to the crash of American Airlines Flight 965 on Dec. 20, 1995.
  • the present invention is most generally, an Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method as part of an Electronic Instrument Display that includes graphical symbol groups representative of the piloted craft's configuration, i.e., including but not limited to the instant positional status of the lift inducing and drag inducing elements.
  • the elements typically comprising the configuration are considered the flaps, the slats, the landing gear, and the spoilers. Configuration should be understood to embody information regarding the deployment, non-deployment, and functioning of these elements either singly or collectively.
  • dedicated sensors associated with each configuration element provide the information via a computerized control system in which the symbol groups representative of the configuration elements are integrally displayed within, or proximate to an aircraft reference symbol, which for exemplary purposes only is depicted herein as a chevron symbol occupying the central position within an attitude indicator display.
  • the configuration elements are represented as symbol groups and are differentiated from one another by at least position, shape, behavior, and furthermore, move in concert with the aircraft reference symbol.
  • the present invention makes it possible for the pilot(s) to view and readily apprehend the aircraft's configuration at a single glance directed to the attitude indicator.
  • One object of the present invention is to provide a means to quickly apprehend the configuration status of a piloted craft.
  • Another object of the present invention is to help prevent accidents caused by the misapprehension of a piloted craft's configuration during all phases of flight including take-off and landing.
  • Yet another object of the present invention is to reduce the number of displays required to apprehend the configuration settings of an aircraft.
  • a further object of the present invention is to help reduce mental fatigue due to the concentration required to monitor multiple flight indicators especially in stressful situations.
  • While examples discussed herein are directed generally to a fixed wing aircraft, as would be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, configuration elements; i.e., drag inducing and lift inducing elements, are present in a variety of piloted craft as for example, the bow planes of a submarine, and thus the description that follows is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, combinations and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the detailed description.
  • FIG. 1 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft is in clean configuration;
  • FIG. 2 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft has flaps down at 45 degree position;
  • FIG. 3 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft has landing gear down;
  • FIG. 4 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft has spoilers deployed;
  • FIG. 5 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft is in full configuration
  • FIG. 6 is a detail view of a configuration 12 a representative of a piloted craft in clean configuration
  • FIG. 7 is a detail view of a configuration 12 b representative of a piloted craft showing the flaps deployed in 45 degree position;
  • FIG. 8 is a detail view of a configuration 12 c representative of a piloted craft showing the only the landing gear in down position;
  • FIG. 9 is a detail view of a configuration 12 d representative of a piloted craft showing the only the spoilers in deployed position;
  • FIG. 10 is a detail view of a landing configuration 12 e representative of a piloted craft showing the landing gear deployed, the flaps in the 45 degree position and an indicator representing a malfunctioning slat 22 on the leading edge of the left wing;
  • FIG. 11 is a detail view of a configuration 12 f representative of a piloted craft in full configuration with flaps 14 down at 45 degrees as indicated by showing sub-indicators 14 a, 14 b and 14 c, and spoilers 18 deployed, landing gear 16 down, reverse thrusters 20 deployed, and like FIG. 10 , depicts a malfunctioning slat 22 on the leading edge of the left wing;
  • FIG. 12 is a detail view of a configuration 12 g representative of a piloted craft transitioning to landing configuration; the flap indicators 14 are shown proximate to the borders of the parent icon, the flaps being positioned at 9 degrees as indicated by showing sub-indicators 14 a only;
  • FIG. 13 is a detail view of an alternate embodiment according to the present invention in which the configuration 12 h is representative of a piloted craft partitioning to landing configuration shown with the flaps positioned at 22 degrees as indicated by showing sub-indicators 14 a with sub-indicators 14 c;
  • FIG. 14 is a detail view of the embodiment shown in F 1 G. 12 according to the present invention shown in landing configuration 12 i with the flaps are fully deployed at 45 degrees, the landing gear is down, and, depicted with the left wing slat malfunctioning,
  • FIG. 15 is a detail view of the embodiment shown in FIG. 12 according to the present invention shown in full configuration 12 j with the spoilers in deployed position, flaps down, landing gear down and, further, depicted with the left wing slat 22 malfunctioning and a malfunction of the left reverse thruster as indicated by the force lines within (left) symbol 20 .
  • an embodiment according to the present invention includes an attitude indicator 10 ′, and a parent icon 12 shown here typically as a chevron which represents a piloted craft.
  • the particular shape of the parent icon presented herein is merely exemplary and should be considered non-limiting. It should also be understood that while there are many variants of attitude indicators of different design possessing an icon different from the chevron shape depicted and having shapes, colors, borders and proportions that vary, all possess a central icon that at a minimum depicts the wings and nose of the aircraft in relationship to an artificial horizon, if only the wings are represented by two lines and the nose by a point.
  • Reference numbers 12 a, 12 b, 12 c, 12 d, 12 e, 12 f, 12 g, 12 h, 12 i and 12 j represent various configurations of a piloted craft in which the parent icon and the child symbol groups 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 and 22 graphically represent the instant configuration status of a piloted craft.
  • the display status of the flaps 14 , slats 22 , landing gear 16 , spoilers 18 and reverse thrusters 20 taken together represent the overall configuration of a piloted craft at any given time.
  • the flaps, landing gear, reverse thrusters and spoiler groups belong to parent 12 .
  • the flap group, landing gear group, slats group, thrusters group and spoilers group each include a collection of sub-indicators that belong to their respective groups.
  • FIG. 1 shows a piloted craft in “clean” configuration in which the landing gear group 16 , flaps group 14 , spoiler group 18 and reverse thrusters group 20 are not displayed because they are not deployed in a clean configuration.
  • FIG. 2 only the flaps 14 are displayed indicating that only the flaps are deployed.
  • there are two flap symbol groups 14 one group each for the port and starboard wings; with each flap group having three sub-indicators that show the positional status of the flaps for the particular wing.
  • FIG. 1 shows a piloted craft in “clean” configuration in which the landing gear group 16 , flaps group 14 , spoiler group 18 and reverse thrusters group 20 are not displayed because they are not deployed in a clean configuration.
  • FIG. 2 only the flaps 14 are displayed indicating that only the flaps are deployed.
  • there are two flap symbol groups 14 one group
  • FIG. 3 only the symbol group for the landing gear 16 is displayed indicating that only the landing gear is deployed.
  • FIG. 4 only the spoilers 18 are shown deployed and in FIG. 5 the piloted craft is shown in what is generally understood as full configuration status with gear 16 down, flaps 14 down, reverse thrusters 20 deployed and spoilers 18 deployed.
  • FIGS. 6-15 are specific detail views of the parent icon possessing the child groups.
  • each child grouping is a subgroup of individual indicators or sub-indicators representing a single element associated with a piloted craft's configuration such as the nose landing gear, or a particular starboard wing spoiler.
  • the flap symbol groups 14 which each contain three separate sub-indicators that indicate the instant position of the flaps. It should be appreciated that the number of flaps per wing and degree setting may vary by manufacturer, and therefore, the particular embodiment shown is again merely exemplary, and is considered to be non-limiting.
  • the flaps 14 are shown inside the borders of the parent icon, while in another aspect according to the present invention shown in FIGS.
  • the flaps are proximate to and outside the borders of parent icon 12 .
  • a slat malfunction is shown by indicator 22 which is positioned on the leading edge of each wing.
  • indicator 22 typically, indicator 22 only displays if there is a malfunction of the leading edge slats, and then only on that portion of the parent icon's borders associated with the leading edge of the piloted craft's wings.
  • the child groupings are differentiated from one another by at least size, shape and position relative to the parent icon 12 and each other. Preferentially, the child groupings do not overlap and may be displayed singly, in multiple groups or collectively as in a full configuration. Moreover, within a single group any number of individual members or sub-indicators may display at any given time depending on the configuration settings as when a spoiler is deployed on only one wing to aid in roll control. In all cases, the child groups move in concert with the parent icon and the sub-indicators move in concert with the respective child group, and all child groups are positioned either immediately proximate to, or within the boundaries of the parent icon.
  • the sub-indicators as members of the child group may behave differently from each other by pulsing at different rates, and can be distinguished by color or intensity depending on operational status.
  • the behavior of the child groupings and individual indicators thereof are mediated by the flight control system which includes the electronics and computer systems to aid in flight and accesses real time metrics from flight sensors associated with each of the configuration elements; e.g., a sensor detecting the position of a particular flap or spoiler.
  • a dysfunctional element may flash, change colors or both.
  • the indication of malfunction indicated by a flashing child group or sub-indicator may be accompanied by audio alerts.
  • one or more of the sub-indicators within the reverse thruster (engine) group may blink or display force lines within the symbol to indicate a malfunction.
  • the display settings can be set to only display particular groups in the case of malfunction, or simply display each sub-indicator when deployed, preferably the display settings would be reduced to a standard and codified.
  • Child groupings and the sub-indicators thereof can be distinguished individually by color or intensity or pulse rate.
  • the present invention may be a part of a Heads Up Display (HUD).
  • HUD Heads Up Display

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Toys (AREA)
  • Mechanical Control Devices (AREA)

Abstract

Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method within the context of an Electronic Instrument System in which the configuration status of a piloted craft; typically the instant positions of lift inducing elements and drag inducing elements, are represented by symbol groupings integrated with an a parent icon, typically a chevron-type symbol representative of the piloted craft. The symbol groupings receive data from associated on-board sensors and are displayed singly or in combination with each other anytime the piloted craft is not in a clean configuration to instantly alert the pilot(s) of the configuration status with a single glance directed to the attitude indicator.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This Application is a Continuation Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/661,784 filed Mar. 24, 2010.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates generally to electronic instrument display systems and specifically to the display of configuration settings of a piloted craft within an attitude indicator; the piloted craft, including but not limited to, fixed wing aircraft, rotor-wing aircraft, spacecraft, lighter than air aircraft, and watercraft such as ships, barges, boats, semi-submersibles and fully submersible craft.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Various advances electronic instrument display systems and in particular Electronic Flight Information Systems (EFIS), have been implemented to make the difficult task of interpreting the operational status of commercial aircraft easier for pilots. Generally flight display systems include a primary flight display (PFD) installed in front of the left seat pilot position and a multi-function display (MFD) positioned centrally relative to the instrument panel. While the layout of the PFD may vary considerably depending on the manufacturer and the default or preferred settings which alter the arrangement of the various instruments displayed, the PFD typically includes a centrally positioned attitude indicator, airspeed indicator, altitude indicators, a vertical speed indicator next to the altitude indicator, and a heading display showing the magnetic heading of the aircraft. The attitude indicator is the most relied on by the pilot especially in low visibility conditions, or instrument flying and reflects the pitch (fore and aft tilt) and the roll (side to side tilt) of the aircraft. While modern attitude indicators typically have a chevron symbol representing the aircraft in relationship to an artificial horizon line in which the upward point of the chevron represents the nose of the aircraft, other various shapes representing the aircraft are also used.
  • According to the NTSB, between 1997 and 2006, 22.6% of all aircraft accidents occurred during takeoff and 35.4% while landing; both situations in which the aircraft is substantially more exposed to engine problems or weather problems such as wind shear, than at most other times in the flight. As recognized by those skilled in the art, lift induced drag and ground effects appear to be contributing factors in many of these accidents.
  • Specific lift inducing and drag inducing elements are employed during takeoff and landing which together comprise what is known to those skilled in the art as the configuration. The configuration elements of a modern aircraft can include the flaps which are hinged surfaces on the trailing edge of the fixed wings that are deployed to reduce the stalling speed, the slats which are positioned at the leading edge of the fixed wings and when deployed allow the wing to operate at a higher angle of attack, the landing gear, the spoilers which are plates on the top surface of the wings which are extended upward into the airflow to reduce lift, and the reverse thrusters which temporarily redirect a jet engine's exhaust forward to decelerate the aircraft on landing.
  • The misapprehension of the configuration status, and in particular the position of the spoilers figures in a number of recent accidents. While on most modern transport craft ground spoilers extend automatically upon touchdown, any failure to deploy spoilers in a timely fashion may result in accidents.
  • On Jun. 1, 1999 American Airlines Flight 1420 overran the runway at Little Rock National Airport. The NTSB investigation found that the pilots failed to arm the automatic ground spoiler system.
  • On Jul. 17, 2007 TAM Airlines Flight 3054 crashed upon landing at the Congonhas-São Paulo International Airport, São Paulo, Brazil. It was revealed that the spoilers had not deployed and that only one engine had deployed its thrust reverser causing the aircraft to careen off the runway.
  • In some cases, failure to deactivate the spoilers when accelerating has caused accidents. For example, failure to deactivate the spoilers while climbing to avoid a mountain contributed to the crash of American Airlines Flight 965 on Dec. 20, 1995.
  • Due to the criticality of understanding a piloted craft's instant configuration, what is needed is a display system that integrates symbols representative of the piloted craft's configuration elements immediately within the bounds of an attitude indicator, and specifically within the borders of—or proximate to—the symbol for a piloted craft which is centrally displayed within the attitude indicator so a pilot may obtain the current configuration of the piloted craft from the single most relied on indicator.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is most generally, an Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method as part of an Electronic Instrument Display that includes graphical symbol groups representative of the piloted craft's configuration, i.e., including but not limited to the instant positional status of the lift inducing and drag inducing elements. In commercial aircraft, the elements typically comprising the configuration are considered the flaps, the slats, the landing gear, and the spoilers. Configuration should be understood to embody information regarding the deployment, non-deployment, and functioning of these elements either singly or collectively. More specifically, dedicated sensors associated with each configuration element provide the information via a computerized control system in which the symbol groups representative of the configuration elements are integrally displayed within, or proximate to an aircraft reference symbol, which for exemplary purposes only is depicted herein as a chevron symbol occupying the central position within an attitude indicator display. Even more specifically, the configuration elements are represented as symbol groups and are differentiated from one another by at least position, shape, behavior, and furthermore, move in concert with the aircraft reference symbol. The present invention makes it possible for the pilot(s) to view and readily apprehend the aircraft's configuration at a single glance directed to the attitude indicator.
  • One object of the present invention is to provide a means to quickly apprehend the configuration status of a piloted craft.
  • Another object of the present invention is to help prevent accidents caused by the misapprehension of a piloted craft's configuration during all phases of flight including take-off and landing.
  • Yet another object of the present invention is to reduce the number of displays required to apprehend the configuration settings of an aircraft.
  • A further object of the present invention is to help reduce mental fatigue due to the concentration required to monitor multiple flight indicators especially in stressful situations.
  • While examples discussed herein are directed generally to a fixed wing aircraft, as would be appreciated by those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, configuration elements; i.e., drag inducing and lift inducing elements, are present in a variety of piloted craft as for example, the bow planes of a submarine, and thus the description that follows is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, combinations and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the detailed description.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft is in clean configuration;
  • FIG. 2 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft has flaps down at 45 degree position;
  • FIG. 3 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft has landing gear down;
  • FIG. 4 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft has spoilers deployed;
  • FIG. 5 is a plan view of an enhanced attitude indicator according to the present invention in which the piloted craft is in full configuration;
  • FIG. 6 is a detail view of a configuration 12 a representative of a piloted craft in clean configuration;
  • FIG. 7 is a detail view of a configuration 12 b representative of a piloted craft showing the flaps deployed in 45 degree position;
  • FIG. 8 is a detail view of a configuration 12 c representative of a piloted craft showing the only the landing gear in down position;
  • FIG. 9 is a detail view of a configuration 12 d representative of a piloted craft showing the only the spoilers in deployed position;
  • FIG. 10 is a detail view of a landing configuration 12 e representative of a piloted craft showing the landing gear deployed, the flaps in the 45 degree position and an indicator representing a malfunctioning slat 22 on the leading edge of the left wing;
  • FIG. 11 is a detail view of a configuration 12 f representative of a piloted craft in full configuration with flaps 14 down at 45 degrees as indicated by showing sub-indicators 14 a, 14 b and 14 c, and spoilers 18 deployed, landing gear 16 down, reverse thrusters 20 deployed, and like FIG. 10, depicts a malfunctioning slat 22 on the leading edge of the left wing;
  • FIG. 12 is a detail view of a configuration 12 g representative of a piloted craft transitioning to landing configuration; the flap indicators 14 are shown proximate to the borders of the parent icon, the flaps being positioned at 9 degrees as indicated by showing sub-indicators 14 a only;
  • FIG. 13 is a detail view of an alternate embodiment according to the present invention in which the configuration 12 h is representative of a piloted craft partitioning to landing configuration shown with the flaps positioned at 22 degrees as indicated by showing sub-indicators 14 a with sub-indicators 14 c;
  • FIG. 14 is a detail view of the embodiment shown in F1G. 12 according to the present invention shown in landing configuration 12 i with the flaps are fully deployed at 45 degrees, the landing gear is down, and, depicted with the left wing slat malfunctioning,
  • FIG. 15 is a detail view of the embodiment shown in FIG. 12 according to the present invention shown in full configuration 12 j with the spoilers in deployed position, flaps down, landing gear down and, further, depicted with the left wing slat 22 malfunctioning and a malfunction of the left reverse thruster as indicated by the force lines within (left) symbol 20.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Reference Listing
    • 10′ enhanced attitude indicator
    • 12 aircraft reference symbol
    • 14 flap symbols
    • 14 a flap position indicator
    • 14 b flap position indicator
    • 14 c flap position indicator
    • 16 landing gear symbols
    • 18 spoiler symbols
    • 20 reverse thruster symbol
    • 22 slat symbols
  • Referring generally to FIGS. 1-15, an embodiment according to the present invention includes an attitude indicator 10′, and a parent icon 12 shown here typically as a chevron which represents a piloted craft. The particular shape of the parent icon presented herein is merely exemplary and should be considered non-limiting. It should also be understood that while there are many variants of attitude indicators of different design possessing an icon different from the chevron shape depicted and having shapes, colors, borders and proportions that vary, all possess a central icon that at a minimum depicts the wings and nose of the aircraft in relationship to an artificial horizon, if only the wings are represented by two lines and the nose by a point. Reference numbers 12 a, 12 b, 12 c, 12 d, 12 e, 12 f, 12 g, 12 h, 12 i and 12 j represent various configurations of a piloted craft in which the parent icon and the child symbol groups 14, 16, 18, 20 and 22 graphically represent the instant configuration status of a piloted craft. The display status of the flaps 14, slats 22, landing gear 16, spoilers 18 and reverse thrusters 20 taken together represent the overall configuration of a piloted craft at any given time. The flaps, landing gear, reverse thrusters and spoiler groups belong to parent 12. The flap group, landing gear group, slats group, thrusters group and spoilers group each include a collection of sub-indicators that belong to their respective groups. FIG. 1 shows a piloted craft in “clean” configuration in which the landing gear group 16, flaps group 14, spoiler group 18 and reverse thrusters group 20 are not displayed because they are not deployed in a clean configuration. In FIG. 2 only the flaps 14 are displayed indicating that only the flaps are deployed. In the examples depicted, there are two flap symbol groups 14, one group each for the port and starboard wings; with each flap group having three sub-indicators that show the positional status of the flaps for the particular wing. In FIG. 3 only the symbol group for the landing gear 16 is displayed indicating that only the landing gear is deployed. In FIG. 4 only the spoilers 18 are shown deployed and in FIG. 5 the piloted craft is shown in what is generally understood as full configuration status with gear 16 down, flaps 14 down, reverse thrusters 20 deployed and spoilers 18 deployed.
  • Unless otherwise specified, it should be understood that the groupings displayed are merely for purposes of illustration and do not necessarily indicate of the specific groupings one would encounter in practice. For example, it is unlikely that there would be a case of landing gear deployment exclusive of other elements associated with the aircraft's configuration.
  • FIGS. 6-15 are specific detail views of the parent icon possessing the child groups. Within each child grouping is a subgroup of individual indicators or sub-indicators representing a single element associated with a piloted craft's configuration such as the nose landing gear, or a particular starboard wing spoiler. See for example, the flap symbol groups 14 which each contain three separate sub-indicators that indicate the instant position of the flaps. It should be appreciated that the number of flaps per wing and degree setting may vary by manufacturer, and therefore, the particular embodiment shown is again merely exemplary, and is considered to be non-limiting. In FIG. 7 the flaps 14 are shown inside the borders of the parent icon, while in another aspect according to the present invention shown in FIGS. 12-15, the flaps are proximate to and outside the borders of parent icon 12. Specifically referring to FIG. 10 and FIG. 11, a slat malfunction is shown by indicator 22 which is positioned on the leading edge of each wing. Typically, indicator 22 only displays if there is a malfunction of the leading edge slats, and then only on that portion of the parent icon's borders associated with the leading edge of the piloted craft's wings.
  • The child groupings are differentiated from one another by at least size, shape and position relative to the parent icon 12 and each other. Preferentially, the child groupings do not overlap and may be displayed singly, in multiple groups or collectively as in a full configuration. Moreover, within a single group any number of individual members or sub-indicators may display at any given time depending on the configuration settings as when a spoiler is deployed on only one wing to aid in roll control. In all cases, the child groups move in concert with the parent icon and the sub-indicators move in concert with the respective child group, and all child groups are positioned either immediately proximate to, or within the boundaries of the parent icon.
  • The sub-indicators as members of the child group may behave differently from each other by pulsing at different rates, and can be distinguished by color or intensity depending on operational status.
  • Where aircraft is the piloted craft, the behavior of the child groupings and individual indicators thereof are mediated by the flight control system which includes the electronics and computer systems to aid in flight and accesses real time metrics from flight sensors associated with each of the configuration elements; e.g., a sensor detecting the position of a particular flap or spoiler. A dysfunctional element may flash, change colors or both. The indication of malfunction indicated by a flashing child group or sub-indicator may be accompanied by audio alerts. In the case of total engine failure, or failure of the engines to reverse thrust, one or more of the sub-indicators within the reverse thruster (engine) group may blink or display force lines within the symbol to indicate a malfunction. While the display settings can be set to only display particular groups in the case of malfunction, or simply display each sub-indicator when deployed, preferably the display settings would be reduced to a standard and codified.
  • Child groupings and the sub-indicators thereof can be distinguished individually by color or intensity or pulse rate.
  • The present invention may be a part of a Heads Up Display (HUD).
  • The foregoing description is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular embodiments set forth, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the description in view of the appended drawings and claims.

Claims (13)

What is claimed is:
1. An electronic Attitude and Configuration Indicator display system comprising:
(1) an attitude indicator display,
(2) a two-dimensional parent icon with a border residing within bounds of the attitude indicator display in which the parent icon represents a piloted craft, and wherein position of the parent icon indicates at least the pitch and the roll of the piloted craft, and,
(3) a plurality of child symbol groups adjacent to or on the border of the parent icon wherein each group represents a category of elements associated with the configuration of the piloted craft and moves in concert with the parent icon and remains fully visible within the same plane as any other child symbol group when displayed, regardless of the indicated pitch and roll.
2. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 1 in which each child symbol group is displayed or hidden in response to real time data from sensors on the piloted craft.
3. The attitude and Configuration Indicator display system according to claim 1 wherein each child symbol group is distinguishable from any other child symbol group by at least its characteristics of position and shape relative to the parent icon.
4. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 1 in which the plurality of child symbol groups have at least two sub-indicators as members that indicate an operational aspect of a configuration element of the piloted craft.
5. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 1 in which at least one child symbol group is within the borders of the parent icon.
6. A method of displaying configuration and attitude data within an electronic instrument display system comprising the steps of:
(1) displaying a flat parent icon representing a piloted craft wherein position of the parent icon indicates at least the pitch and the roll of the piloted craft, and,
(2) selectively displaying or hiding child symbol groups on or adjacent to the parent icon in which each child symbol group represents the instant status of a particular element type associated with the piloted craft's configuration wherein each displayed child symbol group moves in concert with the parent icon and remains fully visible within the same plane as any other displayed child symbol group regardless of the indicated pitch and roll of the parent icon.
7. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 6 in which the child symbol groups are displayed or hidden in response to the status of configuration elements.
8. The method according to claim 6 in which the element types represented include at least the lift inducing elements and drag inducing elements of the piloted craft.
9. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 6 in the child symbol groups are displayed or hidden in response to real time data via sensors associated with the configuration elements.
9. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 6 in which at least one child symbol groups has sub-indicators which represent a particular configuration element associated with the piloted craft.
10. In combination with an electronic instrument display system, an attitude indicator display comprising:
a symbolic flattened icon representative of a piloted craft in which the flattened icon's position within the display indicates at least the pitch and the roll of the piloted craft, and,
a plurality of child symbol groups proximate to or within said flattened icon wherein each group represents a particular category of element associated with the configuration status of the piloted craft and each child symbol group is distinguishable from the other groups by at least its attributes of position and shape and wherein the plurality of child symbol groups are integrated with the flattened icon and move in concert therewith, and,
at least one sub-indicator as part of a child symbol group that indicates an operational aspect of a configuration element of the piloted craft, and wherein any one child symbol group is viewable on a same plane as any other child symbol group regardless of the indicated pitch and roll.
10. The Attitude and Configuration Indicator display according to claim 10 in which the child symbol groups are displayed or hidden in response to real time data from sensors on the piloted craft.
11. The attitude indicator according to claim 10 in which the categories of elements represented by the child symbol groups include at least the lift inducing elements and drag inducing elements of the piloted craft.
US13/892,252 2010-03-24 2013-05-11 Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method Abandoned US20130328702A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/892,252 US20130328702A1 (en) 2010-03-24 2013-05-11 Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/661,784 US8462020B1 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Attitude and configuration indicator display system and method
US13/892,252 US20130328702A1 (en) 2010-03-24 2013-05-11 Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/661,784 Continuation US8462020B1 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Attitude and configuration indicator display system and method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130328702A1 true US20130328702A1 (en) 2013-12-12

Family

ID=48538392

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/661,784 Active 2031-01-18 US8462020B1 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Attitude and configuration indicator display system and method
US13/892,252 Abandoned US20130328702A1 (en) 2010-03-24 2013-05-11 Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/661,784 Active 2031-01-18 US8462020B1 (en) 2010-03-24 2010-03-24 Attitude and configuration indicator display system and method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8462020B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160245654A1 (en) * 2013-07-05 2016-08-25 Thales Method for managing and representing a rate of turn indicator for an aircraft
RU2653414C1 (en) * 2017-02-02 2018-05-08 Сергей Николаевич Низов Stalling warning system

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10690555B2 (en) 2017-10-17 2020-06-23 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Composite airspeed indicator display for compound aircrafts
USD881206S1 (en) 2018-02-08 2020-04-14 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Flight display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface including a composite indicator
USD888069S1 (en) * 2018-02-08 2020-06-23 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Flight display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface including a composite indicator
US11790789B2 (en) * 2020-06-05 2023-10-17 Honeywell International Inc. Gliding vertical margin guidance methods and systems

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5357263A (en) * 1991-03-20 1994-10-18 Dornier Luftfahrt Gmbh Display instrument for aircraft for showing the aircraft orientation, particularly the rolling and pitching position or the flight path angle
US20050012642A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2005-01-20 Sacle Jerome Attitude indicator for an aircraft

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19955664C2 (en) * 1999-11-19 2003-07-17 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Flight guidance display for use in aircraft cockpit and aircraft simulation systems
US7216069B2 (en) * 2001-01-19 2007-05-08 Honeywell International, Inc. Simulated visual glideslope indicator on aircraft display
US7961115B2 (en) * 2008-06-19 2011-06-14 Honeywell International Inc. System for displaying required navigation performance on a horizontal situation indicator
US7961116B2 (en) * 2008-09-15 2011-06-14 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus and method of displaying an aircraft's position
US8421649B2 (en) * 2010-02-22 2013-04-16 Jerry Lee Marstall Aircraft attitude systems

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5357263A (en) * 1991-03-20 1994-10-18 Dornier Luftfahrt Gmbh Display instrument for aircraft for showing the aircraft orientation, particularly the rolling and pitching position or the flight path angle
US20050012642A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2005-01-20 Sacle Jerome Attitude indicator for an aircraft

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160245654A1 (en) * 2013-07-05 2016-08-25 Thales Method for managing and representing a rate of turn indicator for an aircraft
US9766073B2 (en) * 2013-07-05 2017-09-19 Thales Method for managing and representing a rate of turn indicator for an aircraft
RU2653414C1 (en) * 2017-02-02 2018-05-08 Сергей Николаевич Низов Stalling warning system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8462020B1 (en) 2013-06-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20130328702A1 (en) Attitude and Configuration Indicator Display System and Method
US10318057B2 (en) Touch screen instrument panel
CN103847971B (en) The auxiliary of the aircraft of stall conditions drives
US20180232097A1 (en) Touch Screen Instrument Panel
CN103562682A (en) Primary flight display pitch- and power-based unreliable airspeed symbology
US9555896B2 (en) Aircraft flight control
JP5123964B2 (en) Aircraft control system, aircraft control method, and aircraft
EP3332220B1 (en) Aircraft display management system for flight envelope protection
BR112012017154A2 (en) calculation and display of warning speed to control impulse asymmetry
CN109313042B (en) Displaying performance limits in aircraft displays
JP3201100U (en) Multi-rotor variable pitch helicopter
JPH06312700A (en) Control display system
US9969503B2 (en) Head-up display (HUD) stall recovery symbology
US20110029165A1 (en) Method for determining the speed at which an aircraft breaks free of the ground effect
US10315780B2 (en) Touchdown control system
EP3663998A1 (en) Crew alerting systems and methods for mobile platforms
US10676210B2 (en) Lock-detecting system
US20220341754A1 (en) Aircraft flight attitude display device
CN112027098B (en) Aircraft flight attitude display device
US20150292901A1 (en) Screen symbology
US20230161536A1 (en) Multifunction display system for an aircraft, associated aircraft and display method
Bohn How flying got smarter
Stoop et al. an innovative approach to stall prevention?
US20230415911A1 (en) Maximum performance aviation instrument for engine failure operation of aircraft
Horlings Control and performance during asymmetrical powered flight

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION