US20130259693A1 - Ship propeller - Google Patents

Ship propeller Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130259693A1
US20130259693A1 US13/437,948 US201213437948A US2013259693A1 US 20130259693 A1 US20130259693 A1 US 20130259693A1 US 201213437948 A US201213437948 A US 201213437948A US 2013259693 A1 US2013259693 A1 US 2013259693A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
blades
blade
ship propeller
skewed
propeller according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/437,948
Inventor
Yih-Wei Tzeng
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/437,948 priority Critical patent/US20130259693A1/en
Publication of US20130259693A1 publication Critical patent/US20130259693A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63HMARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
    • B63H1/00Propulsive elements directly acting on water
    • B63H1/02Propulsive elements directly acting on water of rotary type
    • B63H1/12Propulsive elements directly acting on water of rotary type with rotation axis substantially in propulsive direction
    • B63H1/14Propellers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a ship propeller and, in particular, to a ship propeller for further improving propulsion efficiency of the ship.
  • FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B show a conventional ship propeller 1 , which includes a central hub 10 and a plurality of blades 13 around the hub.
  • the ship propeller 1 usually has a large expanded area ratio. Because the ship propeller 1 usually works in a limited space, the span length of each blade 13 is therefore limited. Under this limitation, to meet the demand of large expanded area ratio in a single plane of rotation, each blade 13 thus has a small span-chord ratio, wherein the span-chord ratio is defined as:
  • R is the blade radius
  • r h is the hub radius
  • C m is the mean chord length, wherein the mean chord length is defined as:
  • a b is the blade area
  • contra-rotating propeller One of the attempts is the contra-rotating propeller.
  • one drawback of contra-rotating propeller is that it has more complicated structure causing difficulties in fabrication and control. Therefore, there is a need to improve propulsion efficiency of a ship propeller in order to reduce energy consumption and running cost in a prerequisite of not increasing the fabrication complexity.
  • An object of this invention is to provide an energy-saving ship propeller for further improving propulsion efficiency so as to reduce energy consumption to reach the goal of saving energy and reducing the running cost in a prerequisite of not increasing the fabrication complexity.
  • the ship propeller of the present invention includes: a hub having an outer periphery; a first blade set including a plurality of first blades, wherein each first blade has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub; and a second blade set including a plurality of second blades, wherein each second blade has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub.
  • the first blade set and the second blade set are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed; and the distance between the first blade set and the second blade set is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius.
  • the ship propeller has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7, and the cross-section of each first blade and the cross-section of each second blade are streamlined foil shape respectively.
  • the plurality of second blades can be disposed without overlapping the plurality of first blades or alternatively disposed at least partially overlapping the plurality of first blades from the rotation axis view angle.
  • the plurality of first blades and the plurality of second blades are evenly distributed around the outer periphery of the hub respectively.
  • FIG. 1A is a front view of a conventional ship propeller.
  • FIG. 1B is a perspective view of the conventional ship propeller shown in FIG. 1A .
  • FIG. 2A is a perspective view of the ship propeller according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2B is a side view of the ship propeller shown in FIG. 2A .
  • FIG. 2C is a front view of the ship propeller shown in FIG. 2A .
  • FIG. 3A is a front view of the ship propeller according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3B is a front view of the ship propeller according to yet another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing the cross-section of each of the blades of the ship propeller according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5A illustrates a blade with a straight planform.
  • FIG. 5B illustrates a blade which is forwardly skewed.
  • FIG. 5C illustrates a blade which is backwardly skewed.
  • FIG. 5D illustrates a blade which is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
  • FIG. 5E illustrates a blade which is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating experimental data of a ship propeller according to the present invention and a conventional ship propeller.
  • the present invention discloses a ship propeller having a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7, in which the total expanded area ratio is the ratio of total blade area of the ship propeller divided by the propeller disc area.
  • the ship propeller includes a hub having an outer periphery and a plurality of blade sets.
  • Each of the plurality of blade sets includes a plurality of blades each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projecting outward from the outer periphery of the hub.
  • the blade radius of each blade set can be identical or varied from one to another.
  • the plurality of blade sets are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed, and the distance between two adjacent blade sets is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius.
  • the mean blade radius for a number of blade sets is defined as:
  • n is the number of blade sets and R 1 to Rn are the blade radii of the blade sets respectively.
  • the ship propeller 2 includes a hub 20 having an outer periphery 201 and two blade sets which are the first blade set and the second blade set.
  • the first blade set includes a plurality of first blades 231 each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projecting outward from the outer periphery 201 of the hub 20 .
  • the second blade set includes a plurality of second blades 233 each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projecting outward from the outer periphery 201 of the hub 20 .
  • each first blade 231 has a first blade radius R 1 and each second blade 233 has a second blade radius R 2 .
  • R 1 is equal to R 2 .
  • R 1 can be greater or less than R 2 in other embodiments and then the mean blade radius is equal to (R 1 +R 2 )/2.
  • the blade area of each first blade 231 is equal to the blade area of each second blade 233 .
  • the blade area of each first blade 231 can be greater or less than the blade area of each second blade 233 in other embodiments.
  • the first blade set and the second blade set are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed, and the distance between the first blade set and the second blade set is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius.
  • the ship propeller 2 has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7, wherein the total expanded area ratio is the ratio of total blade area of the ship propeller divided by the propeller disc area, which is defined as:
  • a d is the propeller disc area, it is circumference ratio and R g is the greater one of R 1 and R 2 .
  • the total expanded area ratio of the ship propeller 2 is usually less than 1.
  • the plurality of second blades 233 are disposed without overlapping the plurality of first blades 231 from rotation axis view angle, and the plurality of first blades 231 and the plurality of second blades 233 are evenly distributed around the outer periphery 201 of the hub 20 respectively.
  • the plurality of second blades can also be disposed at least partially overlapping the plurality of first blades from rotation axis view angle in other embodiments.
  • the plurality of second blades (not shown) are disposed overlapping the plurality of first blades 231 a ; as shown in FIG. 3B , the plurality of second blades 233 b are disposed partially overlapping the plurality of first blades 231 b.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing the cross-section of each of the blades of the ship propeller 2 .
  • the cross-section of each of the blades, the first blades 231 or the second blades 233 is made streamlined foil shape, so that the thrust can be generated with the least resistance when the ship propeller 2 is in working condition.
  • FIGS. 5A-5E illustrate several blade designs according to different aspects of the present invention.
  • the blade design of the first blades 231 can be the same as or different from that of the second blades 233 .
  • the first blades 231 are “unskewed”: each first blade 231 has a straight planform in which a radial center line of the first blade 231 is straight and the blade chords perpendicular to the radial center line are uniformly distributed about the line.
  • FIG. 5B each first blade 231 is forwardly skewed: the blade center line curves in the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2 .
  • each first blade 231 is backwardly skewed: the blade center line curves away from the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2 .
  • each first blade 231 is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2311 and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2313 .
  • each first blade 231 is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2311 and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2313 .
  • each second blade 233 is “unskewed”: each second blade 233 has a straight planform in which a radial center line of the second blade 233 is straight and the blade chords perpendicular to the radial center line are uniformly distributed about the line.
  • each second blade 233 is forwardly skewed: the blade center line curves in the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2 .
  • each second blade 233 is backwardly skewed: the blade center line curves away from the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2 .
  • FIG. 5A the second blades 233 is “unskewed”: each second blade 233 has a straight planform in which a radial center line of the second blade 233 is straight and the blade chords perpendicular to the radial center line are uniformly distributed about the line.
  • each second blade 233 is forwardly skewed: the blade center line curves in the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2 .
  • each second blade 233 is backwardly s
  • each second blade 233 is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2331 and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2333 .
  • each second blade 233 is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2331 and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2333 .
  • the present invention attains higher propulsion efficiency. Especially, at high advance coefficient J, propulsion efficiency is significantly improved. Accordingly, the ship propeller according to the present invention achieves the object of reducing energy consumption to reach the goal of saving energy and reduce the running cost in a prerequisite of not increasing the fabrication complexity.

Abstract

A ship propeller includes a hub having an outer periphery, a first blade set including a plurality of first blades each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and a second blade set including a plurality of second blades each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8. The first blade set and the second blade set are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed. Furthermore, the distance between the first blade set and the second blade set is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius. Specifically, the ship propeller has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a ship propeller and, in particular, to a ship propeller for further improving propulsion efficiency of the ship.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B show a conventional ship propeller 1, which includes a central hub 10 and a plurality of blades 13 around the hub. Traditionally, in order to achieve reasonable propulsion efficiency, the ship propeller 1 usually has a large expanded area ratio. Because the ship propeller 1 usually works in a limited space, the span length of each blade 13 is therefore limited. Under this limitation, to meet the demand of large expanded area ratio in a single plane of rotation, each blade 13 thus has a small span-chord ratio, wherein the span-chord ratio is defined as:
  • ( R - r h ) C m
  • where R is the blade radius, rh is the hub radius and Cm is the mean chord length, wherein the mean chord length is defined as:
  • C m = A b ( R - r h )
  • where Ab is the blade area.
  • As natural resources become rarer and rarer, how to save energy is gradually becoming a very important issue. Accordingly, how to make a propulsion device work with higher efficiency is always pursued.
  • One of the attempts is the contra-rotating propeller. However, one drawback of contra-rotating propeller is that it has more complicated structure causing difficulties in fabrication and control. Therefore, there is a need to improve propulsion efficiency of a ship propeller in order to reduce energy consumption and running cost in a prerequisite of not increasing the fabrication complexity.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An object of this invention is to provide an energy-saving ship propeller for further improving propulsion efficiency so as to reduce energy consumption to reach the goal of saving energy and reducing the running cost in a prerequisite of not increasing the fabrication complexity.
  • To solve the foregoing problem, the ship propeller of the present invention includes: a hub having an outer periphery; a first blade set including a plurality of first blades, wherein each first blade has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub; and a second blade set including a plurality of second blades, wherein each second blade has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub. The first blade set and the second blade set are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed; and the distance between the first blade set and the second blade set is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius. Specifically, the ship propeller has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7, and the cross-section of each first blade and the cross-section of each second blade are streamlined foil shape respectively. The plurality of second blades can be disposed without overlapping the plurality of first blades or alternatively disposed at least partially overlapping the plurality of first blades from the rotation axis view angle. The plurality of first blades and the plurality of second blades are evenly distributed around the outer periphery of the hub respectively.
  • The detailed technology and above preferred embodiments implemented for the present invention are described in the following paragraphs accompanying the appended drawings for people skilled in this field to well appreciate the features of the claimed invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The foregoing aspects and many of the accompanying advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • FIG. 1A is a front view of a conventional ship propeller.
  • FIG. 1B is a perspective view of the conventional ship propeller shown in FIG. 1A.
  • FIG. 2A is a perspective view of the ship propeller according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2B is a side view of the ship propeller shown in FIG. 2A.
  • FIG. 2C is a front view of the ship propeller shown in FIG. 2A.
  • FIG. 3A is a front view of the ship propeller according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3B is a front view of the ship propeller according to yet another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing the cross-section of each of the blades of the ship propeller according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5A illustrates a blade with a straight planform.
  • FIG. 5B illustrates a blade which is forwardly skewed.
  • FIG. 5C illustrates a blade which is backwardly skewed.
  • FIG. 5D illustrates a blade which is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
  • FIG. 5E illustrates a blade which is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating experimental data of a ship propeller according to the present invention and a conventional ship propeller.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The detailed explanation of the present invention is described as following. The described preferred embodiments are presented for purposes of illustrations and descriptions, and they are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
  • The present invention discloses a ship propeller having a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7, in which the total expanded area ratio is the ratio of total blade area of the ship propeller divided by the propeller disc area. The ship propeller includes a hub having an outer periphery and a plurality of blade sets. Each of the plurality of blade sets includes a plurality of blades each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projecting outward from the outer periphery of the hub. Moreover, the blade radius of each blade set can be identical or varied from one to another. In addition, the plurality of blade sets are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed, and the distance between two adjacent blade sets is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius. The mean blade radius for a number of blade sets is defined as:
  • ( R 1 + R 2 + + Rn ) n
  • where n is the number of blade sets and R1 to Rn are the blade radii of the blade sets respectively.
  • In one preferred embodiment as shown in FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B and FIG. 2C, the ship propeller 2 includes a hub 20 having an outer periphery 201 and two blade sets which are the first blade set and the second blade set. The first blade set includes a plurality of first blades 231 each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projecting outward from the outer periphery 201 of the hub 20. The second blade set includes a plurality of second blades 233 each having a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projecting outward from the outer periphery 201 of the hub 20. Moreover, as shown in FIG. 2C, each first blade 231 has a first blade radius R1 and each second blade 233 has a second blade radius R2. In this embodiment, R1 is equal to R2. However, R1 can be greater or less than R2 in other embodiments and then the mean blade radius is equal to (R1+R2)/2. Furthermore, in this embodiment, the blade area of each first blade 231 is equal to the blade area of each second blade 233. However, the blade area of each first blade 231 can be greater or less than the blade area of each second blade 233 in other embodiments. In addition, the first blade set and the second blade set are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed, and the distance between the first blade set and the second blade set is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius. Specifically, the ship propeller 2 has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7, wherein the total expanded area ratio is the ratio of total blade area of the ship propeller divided by the propeller disc area, which is defined as:

  • A d=π·(R g)2
  • where Ad is the propeller disc area, it is circumference ratio and Rg is the greater one of R1 and R2.
  • In general, the total expanded area ratio of the ship propeller 2 is usually less than 1.
  • In this preferred embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2C, the plurality of second blades 233 are disposed without overlapping the plurality of first blades 231 from rotation axis view angle, and the plurality of first blades 231 and the plurality of second blades 233 are evenly distributed around the outer periphery 201 of the hub 20 respectively.
  • However, the plurality of second blades can also be disposed at least partially overlapping the plurality of first blades from rotation axis view angle in other embodiments. For example, as shown in FIG. 3A, the plurality of second blades (not shown) are disposed overlapping the plurality of first blades 231 a; as shown in FIG. 3B, the plurality of second blades 233 b are disposed partially overlapping the plurality of first blades 231 b.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing the cross-section of each of the blades of the ship propeller 2. As shown in FIG. 4, the cross-section of each of the blades, the first blades 231 or the second blades 233, is made streamlined foil shape, so that the thrust can be generated with the least resistance when the ship propeller 2 is in working condition.
  • FIGS. 5A-5E illustrate several blade designs according to different aspects of the present invention. The blade design of the first blades 231 can be the same as or different from that of the second blades 233. In FIG. 5A, the first blades 231 are “unskewed”: each first blade 231 has a straight planform in which a radial center line of the first blade 231 is straight and the blade chords perpendicular to the radial center line are uniformly distributed about the line. In FIG. 5B, each first blade 231 is forwardly skewed: the blade center line curves in the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2. In FIG. 5C, each first blade 231 is backwardly skewed: the blade center line curves away from the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2. In FIG. 5D, each first blade 231 is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2311 and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2313. In FIG. 5E, each first blade 231 is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2311 and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2313.
  • Similarly, in FIG. 5A, the second blades 233 are “unskewed”: each second blade 233 has a straight planform in which a radial center line of the second blade 233 is straight and the blade chords perpendicular to the radial center line are uniformly distributed about the line. In FIG. 5B, each second blade 233 is forwardly skewed: the blade center line curves in the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2. In FIG. 5C, each second blade 233 is backwardly skewed: the blade center line curves away from the rotation direction D of the ship propeller 2. In FIG. 5D, each second blade 233 is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2331 and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2333. In FIG. 5E, each second blade 233 is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion 2331 and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion 2333.
  • The effect of the present invention has been verified in experiments and numerical analysis, and the results of which are shown in FIG. 6, in which the present invention is compared with a conventional design therein. As shown in FIG. 6, the present invention attains higher propulsion efficiency. Especially, at high advance coefficient J, propulsion efficiency is significantly improved. Accordingly, the ship propeller according to the present invention achieves the object of reducing energy consumption to reach the goal of saving energy and reduce the running cost in a prerequisite of not increasing the fabrication complexity.
  • Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.

Claims (16)

What is claimed is:
1. A ship propeller, comprising:
a hub having an outer periphery; and
a plurality of blade sets, wherein each of the plurality of blade sets comprises a plurality of blades, wherein each blade has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub, wherein the plurality of blade sets are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed, wherein the ship propeller has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7.
2. A ship propeller according to claim 1, wherein the distance between two adjacent blade sets is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius.
3. A ship propeller, comprising:
a hub having an outer periphery;
a first blade set comprising a first plurality of blades, wherein each of the first plurality of blades has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub; and
a second blade set comprising a second plurality of blades, wherein each of the second plurality of blades has a span-chord ratio substantially in a range of 3 to 8 and projects outward from the outer periphery of the hub, wherein the first blade set and the second blade set are situated in different planes of rotation and working at the same rotation direction and the same rotation speed, wherein the ship propeller has a total expanded area ratio substantially no less than 0.7.
4. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein the distance between the first blade set and the second blade set is 30 percent less than the mean blade radius.
5. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein the cross-section of each of the first plurality of blades and the cross-section of each of the second plurality of blades are streamlined foil shape respectively.
6. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein the second plurality of blades are disposed without overlapping the first plurality of blades from rotation axis view angle.
7. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein the second plurality of blades are disposed at least partially overlapping the first plurality of blades from rotation axis view angle.
8. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein the first plurality of blades and the second plurality of blades are evenly distributed around the outer periphery of the hub respectively.
9. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the first plurality of blades is forwardly skewed.
10. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the first plurality of blades is backwardly skewed.
11. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the first plurality of blades is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
12. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the first plurality of blades is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
13. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the second plurality of blades is forwardly skewed.
14. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the second plurality of blades is backwardly skewed.
15. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the second plurality of blades is backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
16. A ship propeller according to claim 3, wherein each of the second plurality of blades is forwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the root portion and backwardly skewed in the region adjacent to the tip portion.
US13/437,948 2012-04-03 2012-04-03 Ship propeller Abandoned US20130259693A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/437,948 US20130259693A1 (en) 2012-04-03 2012-04-03 Ship propeller

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/437,948 US20130259693A1 (en) 2012-04-03 2012-04-03 Ship propeller

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130259693A1 true US20130259693A1 (en) 2013-10-03

Family

ID=49235288

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/437,948 Abandoned US20130259693A1 (en) 2012-04-03 2012-04-03 Ship propeller

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20130259693A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105083508A (en) * 2015-08-14 2015-11-25 苏州金业船用机械厂 Anti-compression type propeller

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1012441A (en) * 1910-07-22 1911-12-19 William Reid Propeller.
US3606579A (en) * 1969-01-22 1971-09-20 Henry Mehus Propeller
GB1509996A (en) * 1974-04-12 1978-05-10 Bolt Beranek & Newman Propeller blade structure
JPS5996091A (en) * 1982-11-22 1984-06-02 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Skewed propeller
JPH0872794A (en) * 1994-09-06 1996-03-19 Miura Kaiun Kk Propeller for high speed ship

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1012441A (en) * 1910-07-22 1911-12-19 William Reid Propeller.
US3606579A (en) * 1969-01-22 1971-09-20 Henry Mehus Propeller
GB1509996A (en) * 1974-04-12 1978-05-10 Bolt Beranek & Newman Propeller blade structure
JPS5996091A (en) * 1982-11-22 1984-06-02 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Skewed propeller
JPH0872794A (en) * 1994-09-06 1996-03-19 Miura Kaiun Kk Propeller for high speed ship

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JP 08-072794 A Machine Translation. Accessed JPO website January 14, 2016. 5 pages. *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105083508A (en) * 2015-08-14 2015-11-25 苏州金业船用机械厂 Anti-compression type propeller

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7854593B2 (en) Airfoil for a helicopter rotor blade
US9085359B2 (en) Rotor blade tip planform
JP5969651B1 (en) Windmill wing
KR101506911B1 (en) Ship propulsion device and ship with same
US20130323098A1 (en) Axial flow blower
US20180127086A1 (en) Aerial Vehicle and Propeller Thereof
EP3009669B1 (en) Trailing edge side panel
IES86162B2 (en) Aerofoil blades
WO2018198477A1 (en) Main rotor blade and helicopter
US20130259693A1 (en) Ship propeller
TWI491536B (en) Ship propulsion system and ship
US20130202443A1 (en) Axial flow device
US20190248472A1 (en) Propeller assembly
CN112977816B (en) Rotor craft's paddle and rotor craft
CN105787217B (en) A kind of optimum design method of aircraft ripple aerofoil profile
US20210285329A1 (en) Hybrid airfoil
CN202670081U (en) Energy-saving propeller cap with fins
JPH0443192A (en) Rudder
CN112173077A (en) Big front-back sweeping combined helicopter rotor blade
CN211737557U (en) Cluster fan blade structure with reinforcing frame and axial flow fan
CN212563787U (en) Cluster fan blade structure with reinforcing frame and axial flow fan
CN212563780U (en) Cluster fan blade structure with reinforcing frame and axial flow fan
CN212563784U (en) Cluster fan blade structure with reinforcing frame and axial flow fan
CN206885312U (en) A kind of high-performance airscrew
JP5923179B2 (en) Ship propulsion device and ship equipped with the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION